WEBVTT

NOTE Libertarianism

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.000
Okay, kitties, can I have your attention, please?

2
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:13.000
How do you shut them up, Al?

3
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:17.000
We'll give out the nerve.

4
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:19.000
Okay.

5
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:23.000
I'd like to talk to you today about libertarianism.

6
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:29.000
And libertarianism is a very provocative sort of crazy, wigged-out philosophy.

7
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:35.000
And I'm going to be speaking about a half hour, so there'll be a questioning period maybe 15 or 20 minutes.

8
00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:42.000
But if you, this audience is like most audiences I speak to about libertarianism, you'll all sort of want to come up at the end and lynch me or something.

9
00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:47.000
Because I'm going to be saying things that are very different than what you've been hearing.

10
00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:51.000
Except, of course, if you've had my classes, then it'll be the same old crap.

11
00:00:51.000 --> 00:01:02.000
Anyway, so I'll be here after the period and we can discuss questions further and I also have some literature to blow your minds with if you're interested in it.

12
00:01:02.000 --> 00:01:15.000
Okay, what is libertarianism? Libertarianism is the philosophical view that it is immoral to commit aggression against non-aggressives.

13
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:44.000
Am I speaking too softly? Is this better? What do I do? Just speak louder? Libertarianism is the view that it is immoral for anyone to commit a crime.

14
00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:59.000
In the way of childhood playgrounds, you can't start up, but you can hit back.

15
00:01:59.000 --> 00:02:07.000
Libertarians are not pacifists. You don't have to turn the other cheek or what have you.

16
00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:17.300
But you cannot start off, you cannot violate anyone's property rights, you cannot beat anyone up, non-aggression against non-aggressives.

17
00:02:17.300 --> 00:02:27.600
Now, this is sort of the moral view of libertarianism, and I'll be going over a few of the other aspects of it after I give some examples of the moral view.

18
00:02:27.600 --> 00:02:33.400
Now, I don't think that this is very different than what most people...

19
00:02:33.400 --> 00:02:42.400
I don't think that this is very different than what most people believe.

20
00:02:42.400 --> 00:02:48.400
Many passages in the Bible or wherever can be called on to support this.

21
00:02:48.400 --> 00:02:57.400
I think that the difference between libertarianism and most other philosophies is the maniacal consistency with which we hold this view.

22
00:02:57.400 --> 00:03:06.400
Now, the first thing that we start off as private property rights is that you have private property rights in your own person.

23
00:03:06.400 --> 00:03:16.400
There's something in the newspapers today about abortion, where the women's liberation groups are saying that women own their own bodies.

24
00:03:16.400 --> 00:03:19.400
Well, this sentiment is very much a libertarian sentiment.

25
00:03:19.400 --> 00:03:24.400
I'm not saying that the women's liberation movement is libertarian, maybe by knowledge,

26
00:03:24.400 --> 00:03:51.400
The idea is that if the belly is part of the body, and I don't think too many people would want to argue that, and if the woman owns her body, she therefore owns her belly, and she and she alone has the right to say what grows in it, then we have an example of private property at its best, I would say.

27
00:03:51.400 --> 00:04:04.400
So the most important piece of private property that anyone can ever own, woman, man, or whatever, would be your own body, belly, the lungs, everything, the whole bit.

28
00:04:04.400 --> 00:04:17.400
The draft therefore would be a clear violation of the Libertarian Moral Code because it is someone coming over to an innocent person and saying, you know, we've got to ship your ass over to Vietnam or somewhere else.

29
00:04:17.400 --> 00:04:38.400
This would just be called slavery or kidnapping, except for the fact that the government does it and we come up with a new term, the draft. I just as well call it slavery or kidnapping.

30
00:04:38.400 --> 00:04:50.400
The other parts of private property that you can get to own legitimately are the parts of nature that you mix your labor with.

31
00:04:50.400 --> 00:04:58.400
For instance, the homesteading theory. You farm a piece of land for a few years and you get crops in and then you own it.

32
00:04:58.400 --> 00:05:07.400
And you can trade the fruits of it with the fruits of other people's farms or other people's bodies, namely their labor.

33
00:05:07.400 --> 00:05:18.400
So pretty much here we have the libertarian moral code, in a nutshell, but it's really sort of uninteresting, as I said before, because almost everyone would agree with this.

34
00:05:18.400 --> 00:05:26.400
You'd hardly find anyone disagreeing with it at this level, except for politicians or people like that, but we don't count them.

35
00:05:26.400 --> 00:05:42.400
Where I say that we will find differences is when we come to applications of this principle because in applications libertarians are really maniacal in being consistent with this and very few other people are consistent with this principle.

36
00:05:42.400 --> 00:05:51.400
For instance, one of the keystones of libertarian political philosophy is a deep and abiding suspicion of all things governmental.

37
00:05:51.400 --> 00:05:57.400
Now why would the libertarian feel that the government is antithetical to libertarian theory?

38
00:05:57.400 --> 00:06:04.400
Well, the reason for this is that the government, all governments, always are based on taxation.

39
00:06:04.400 --> 00:06:14.400
Now, taxation, you might not realize, is a perfect example of aggression against non-aggressives.

40
00:06:14.400 --> 00:06:22.400
For instance, I say that there's no real way to define taxation in a way that does not include robbery.

41
00:06:22.400 --> 00:06:29.400
And I also say that there's no way to define robbery in a way that does not include taxation.

42
00:06:29.400 --> 00:06:36.400
Robbery and taxation are the same thing, just as kidnapping, the draft, and slavery are the same thing.

43
00:06:36.400 --> 00:06:43.400
And we just get fooled by the fact that in one case the government is doing it, and in another case other people are doing it.

44
00:06:43.400 --> 00:06:58.840
There are two arguments offered by the tax collector to try to prove to us that he is

45
00:06:58.840 --> 00:07:08.480
not a mother, that he is different than a mother, and I think both arguments fail.

46
00:07:08.480 --> 00:07:16.480
The first one is that the tax collector would say to us, if we would have asked him, he wouldn't put us in jail first,

47
00:07:16.480 --> 00:07:22.480
is that he comes to us based on a majority vote.

48
00:07:22.480 --> 00:07:27.480
The majority of the people got together, we decided to have a government, so goes the theory,

49
00:07:27.480 --> 00:07:33.480
and here he is, our representative, somehow coming to tax us.

50
00:07:33.480 --> 00:07:40.040
Now I don't think that this is a valid exception to the libertarian principle of non-aggression

51
00:07:40.040 --> 00:07:41.040
against non-aggressors.

52
00:07:41.040 --> 00:07:47.280
I don't think that there are any acceptable deviations from this principle.

53
00:07:47.280 --> 00:07:52.200
I think that if you violate this principle, you go against libertarianism.

54
00:07:52.200 --> 00:07:58.760
For instance, I don't know the exact situation in Hitler or Nazi Germany, but it is recuted

55
00:07:58.760 --> 00:08:03.000
that he came to office based on majority vote.

56
00:08:03.000 --> 00:08:15.000
Now according to this argument of the tax collector, anything that he did could be based on this argument as well.

57
00:08:15.000 --> 00:08:21.000
Hitler could also say that whatever he does is based on majority vote.

58
00:08:21.000 --> 00:08:27.000
So therefore a majority vote doesn't mean very much.

59
00:08:27.000 --> 00:08:30.000
So I think this argument is pretty invalid.

60
00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:37.000
Also, suppose the mother that we met in Central Park told us that he was elected by a majority.

61
00:08:37.000 --> 00:08:48.000
Would this matter as he pulls his knife on us and demands our wallets or the use of our bodies, depending upon his sexual preferences?

62
00:08:48.000 --> 00:08:51.000
No, it wouldn't.

63
00:08:51.000 --> 00:08:59.000
The second argument that some people might think justifies tax collection

64
00:08:59.000 --> 00:09:02.360
is that the government provides services for us.

65
00:09:02.360 --> 00:09:10.320
You know, police protection, and fire protection, and sanitation, and roads, and schools, and the whole bit.

66
00:09:10.320 --> 00:09:21.360
Now this, I think, is only somewhat true because most of these services are just sort of a waste in taxpayers' money, as I'll cover in a few minutes.

67
00:09:21.360 --> 00:09:24.440
But let's suppose that they were real, valid services.

68
00:09:24.440 --> 00:09:29.340
Now, for the libertarian, it's not important that there are real valid services or not.

69
00:09:29.340 --> 00:09:34.640
The only thing that's important is whether they are voluntarily agreed upon services.

70
00:09:34.640 --> 00:09:41.240
Because, look, the mother that we meet if we go to Central Park tonight can say the same thing.

71
00:09:41.240 --> 00:09:43.340
He can also give us services.

72
00:09:43.340 --> 00:09:49.840
He can give us used tissue paper or bottle caps or any damn full thing he wants to give us,

73
00:09:49.840 --> 00:09:52.140
and he can tell that's services.

74
00:09:52.140 --> 00:09:57.500
Therefore, he has a legitimate claim to the stuff in our laws.

75
00:09:57.500 --> 00:10:01.940
He could do this, and he wouldn't insult our intelligence by doing it,

76
00:10:01.940 --> 00:10:07.500
as some other people do. He would just take our money in sort of an honest way,

77
00:10:07.500 --> 00:10:14.500
without the bullshit that he's providing services for us.

78
00:10:14.500 --> 00:10:18.540
Now, I'd like to discuss the provision of services,

79
00:10:18.540 --> 00:10:35.540
Because most people maybe at this point could be convinced that taxes are immoral because they're based on, well, because the democratic vote doesn't mean anything and because the services don't mean anything, namely as a moral justification.

80
00:10:35.540 --> 00:10:42.540
But most people would say, but if we didn't have the government to provide services for us, we wouldn't have these services.

81
00:10:42.540 --> 00:10:55.540
Services. And people look around and they think that we have murders in the streets and rapes and robberies and wars and stuff, you know, not like we have now, of course, without the government.

82
00:10:55.540 --> 00:11:10.540
And I'd like to discuss why I think that the government provision of a service will necessarily be less efficient than if the service is provided privately, either through cooperative groups,

83
00:11:10.540 --> 00:11:22.820
There's one difference, there's one reason that I think that the market will always provide

84
00:11:22.820 --> 00:11:29.620
a given service more efficiently, and the reason for that is the profit and loss system.

85
00:11:29.620 --> 00:11:36.740
The idea is that when a government bureaucrat or a government hiring or whatever you want

86
00:11:36.740 --> 00:11:42.740
When a businessman does a bad job, it's very hard to get rid of him.

87
00:11:42.740 --> 00:11:47.740
Whereas when a businessman does a bad job, we have what's called the dollar vote.

88
00:11:47.740 --> 00:11:50.740
Mainly, people refuse to patronize him.

89
00:11:50.740 --> 00:11:55.740
He loses money or he makes less money than his successful competitors,

90
00:11:55.740 --> 00:12:02.740
and his successful competitors can get him out of the market, take his business away.

91
00:12:02.740 --> 00:12:07.740
This, I think, does not exist in the government sphere.

92
00:12:07.740 --> 00:12:16.740
I'd like to read something to you from today's post to just give you an idea of one of the government services.

93
00:12:16.740 --> 00:12:24.740
By the way, I drive a motorcycle and I'm very aware of this particular problem I'm going to be talking about, mainly these potholes.

94
00:12:24.740 --> 00:12:30.740
You know, some of them you fall into and you'd be lost for weeks. They can never find you again.

95
00:12:30.740 --> 00:12:35.740
Okay, I'm reading from today's post, page three.

96
00:12:35.740 --> 00:12:47.640
At 10 a.m. one day recently, a reporter came upon a Highways department road resurfacing project on Lennox Avenue on 136th Street in front of the Harlem Hospital Center.

97
00:12:47.640 --> 00:12:57.140
By the way, that's also important because when the government does provide services, it usually provides services on places like Park Avenue and not Harlem.

98
00:12:57.140 --> 00:13:02.140
There was a very interesting case a few months ago about a bunch of rats that went under

99
00:13:02.140 --> 00:13:07.140
Park Avenue. There's some sort of railroad terminal under Park Avenue. And, you know,

100
00:13:07.140 --> 00:13:12.140
these goddamn rats surfaced at 61st Street and Park Avenue. And you've never seen such

101
00:13:12.140 --> 00:13:16.140
an amazement. You know, people are coming, well, these rats don't belong around here.

102
00:13:16.140 --> 00:13:20.140
What are they doing? Let's get them back up to Harlem, where they belong. So you got

103
00:13:20.140 --> 00:13:24.140
fire trucks and you got police and you get everybody, you know, chasing these poor little

104
00:13:24.140 --> 00:13:42.380
No Asphalt was being laid, nor was there an asphalt truck in sight.

105
00:13:42.380 --> 00:13:47.140
Two men in work jackets in the middle of the intersection surrounded by yellow cone markers

106
00:13:47.140 --> 00:13:48.140
were talking anonymously.

107
00:13:48.140 --> 00:13:57.140
Two more men were standing by a taut cattle, it's fire burning low. A yellow steamroller was parked nearby.

108
00:13:57.140 --> 00:14:06.140
As the reporter watched, the two men in the middle, one in a brown jacket and one in a white jacket, moved the marker out of the cars when anyone was talking with gestures.

109
00:14:06.140 --> 00:14:15.140
Brown jackets back, the two men by the cattle drifted off. At ten twenty, the two in the middle separated, brown jacket walked south and into the hospital.

110
00:14:15.140 --> 00:14:35.140
At 1022, a man in a green cap puked at the fire in the kettle. At 1030, he took something off the kettle and started tinkering with it. At 1040, he looked at his tools inside.

111
00:14:35.140 --> 00:14:42.140
It was a typical street scene in the city where hollows, department men are working as little as two hours a day.

112
00:14:42.140 --> 00:14:46.140
Department officials confronted with figures admitted it.

113
00:14:46.140 --> 00:14:50.140
Men report to the job sites in the streets late and leave hours early.

114
00:14:50.140 --> 00:15:00.140
Equipment leaves the yard to leisurely trickle between seven and nine-thirty in the morning, sometimes later, and starts returning with a roar well before two p.m.

115
00:15:00.140 --> 00:15:21.140
The work time left is during the morning and early afternoon hours of heavy traffic. Coffee and lunch breaks are frequent and long. Logistical delays in delivering the asphalt to resurfacing sites so that work can proceed add up to a lot of idling around.

116
00:15:21.140 --> 00:15:26.140
Choice of which streets repairs have hazard in the work that is done is often a slip shot.

117
00:15:26.140 --> 00:15:33.140
Record-keeping and sloppy in salaries appear to bear no relation to what a man does or how money works.

118
00:15:33.140 --> 00:15:39.140
Now the article goes on and sort of shows about all the waste that goes on in the highway department.

119
00:15:39.140 --> 00:15:44.140
Now you might say that waste also occurs in the market situation, and obviously it does.

120
00:15:44.140 --> 00:15:52.140
But imagine if any private restaurant ran its business the way this government bureaucracy is running its business.

121
00:15:52.140 --> 00:15:57.140
Pretty soon it would lose all its customers and automatically it would go broke.

122
00:15:57.140 --> 00:16:00.140
There would be this tendency in any case.

123
00:16:05.140 --> 00:16:11.140
I'm kind of scared. These highway department people, they're tough.

124
00:16:14.140 --> 00:16:23.140
You see, the thing is that there is no automatic firing of people, there is no automatic loss of jobs whenever anything bad happens.

125
00:16:23.140 --> 00:16:32.140
When you get mugged or when there's a traffic accident or a traffic tie-up, nobody loses his job, nobody loses any profits, nobody loses anything.

126
00:16:32.140 --> 00:16:40.140
In the private sphere, if there's a mugging or something, people do lose their jobs, or there's a direct, immediate effect.

127
00:16:40.140 --> 00:16:47.640
For instance, if you go to Mises and you get mugged in Mises and it can happen, what will happen in your response?

128
00:16:47.640 --> 00:16:57.140
Well, people are going to stop going to Mises, or Mises will fire their burns guards and maybe hire whack-and-hut guards or some other kind of guards.

129
00:16:57.140 --> 00:17:05.140
So we have an automatic, day-by-day, minute-by-minute, profit incentive to improve services.

130
00:17:05.140 --> 00:17:15.140
But many people are very much slavish to their past, they think that somehow the government has always done these things, and somehow the government will always have to do these things.

131
00:17:15.140 --> 00:17:30.140
When I mention that there are alternatives in the private market for businessmen to run sanitation or fire protection or defense or police or roads or schools or anything like this, people are really amazed.

132
00:17:30.140 --> 00:17:35.140
They can't conceive of the market doing something that the government has always been doing.

133
00:17:35.140 --> 00:17:39.140
I sometimes think that if the government were in the habit of making shoes,

134
00:17:39.140 --> 00:17:42.140
and I would suggest that somehow the government need not make shoes,

135
00:17:42.140 --> 00:17:44.140
you know, people say, but where do they get the leather?

136
00:17:44.140 --> 00:17:46.140
You know, how do they tie their shoes together?

137
00:17:46.140 --> 00:17:47.140
You know, how do they sell them?

138
00:17:47.140 --> 00:17:49.140
I mean, they just couldn't conceive of this.

139
00:17:49.140 --> 00:17:53.140
Actually, there are fire departments working in Arizona.

140
00:17:53.140 --> 00:17:58.140
There are many sanitation departments running at one-third the expense

141
00:17:58.140 --> 00:18:16.140
There are private fire departments, most of the police protection that we really benefit from is not public police but private police, although we don't somehow appreciate it because they're sort of in the background.

142
00:18:16.140 --> 00:18:25.140
I mean, how many people even look to see the police in Mises or in a place like that, or in Madison Square Garden? They do a good job and you don't see them too much.

143
00:18:25.140 --> 00:18:42.140
Actually, with regard to the post office, we once did have private post offices. You've seen them in western movies, you know, the Wells Fargo and the Pony Express, you know, the bandits are always ripping them off and stuff, you know, right on the stage perch.

144
00:18:42.140 --> 00:19:01.140
So what happens in the libertarian theory is that the government likes to take over what are called the command posts of the economy, you know, the education, the communications, the money supply, the armaments and things like that, and from here it can sort of rule most of the people.

145
00:19:01.140 --> 00:19:21.140
What happened was in the Constitution it said something like that the Federal Government shall have the right to make post offices and the way the Supreme Court interpreted this finally was that they shall have the only right, namely monopoly right, to run post offices.

146
00:19:21.140 --> 00:19:26.140
What happened was that before the government took over and they were just competing with the private post offices,

147
00:19:26.140 --> 00:19:30.140
they found that when they charged the same prices, the quality was very much lower,

148
00:19:30.140 --> 00:19:34.140
and when the quality was the same, the prices were very much higher.

149
00:19:34.140 --> 00:19:39.140
So consequently, they weren't able to out-compute the private post offices.

150
00:19:39.140 --> 00:19:42.140
So they finally had to get rid of them through law.

151
00:19:42.140 --> 00:19:45.140
But today, people think that you have to have a public post office,

152
00:19:45.140 --> 00:19:48.140
so they just can't conceive of private post offices.

153
00:19:48.140 --> 00:19:53.140
I think that the free market would be able to provide all the services that government provides,

154
00:19:53.140 --> 00:19:59.140
namely all the legitimate ones. I'm not talking about bombing people back to the stone ages.

155
00:19:59.140 --> 00:20:07.140
So we've said so far that the libertarian moral view is that it is illegitimate to have a government based on taxation,

156
00:20:07.140 --> 00:20:10.140
and also it is unnecessary.

157
00:20:10.140 --> 00:20:16.140
The second hypothesis about this would be that the rich and the poor come out exactly equal.

158
00:20:16.140 --> 00:20:26.140
This is sort of silly. What this would mean is that the rich give in, the poor give in, the poor get back, the rich get back, exactly what they put in.

159
00:20:26.140 --> 00:20:32.140
Therefore the whole process is sort of non-void except for the cost of doing all this stuff.

160
00:20:32.140 --> 00:20:38.140
We can pretty much reject the second hypothesis. I don't think anyone would hold that one.

161
00:20:38.140 --> 00:20:52.140
Now the third hypothesis is that the poor subsidize the rich on net benefit, and this is the hypothesis that I think is correct, although this is the hypothesis that most of you have probably brought up on.

162
00:20:52.140 --> 00:21:08.140
The things in support of this are the progressive income tax, that would support this view, the idea that the richer you get, the more money you have to pay.

163
00:21:08.140 --> 00:21:20.140
But of course, you're now very sophisticated and you know all about loopholes and stuff, where you get all these Ronnie Reagan type people that make over $100,000 a year and pay less than $100 in taxes.

164
00:21:20.140 --> 00:21:26.940
You're all familiar with a whole bunch of loopholes where the very, very rich do not have to pay very much taxes.

165
00:21:26.940 --> 00:21:31.840
But income tax is only one of the taxes, and that might be the most progressive of all the taxes.

166
00:21:31.840 --> 00:21:38.340
The other taxes are very much more regressive, where the poor pay a much higher percentage of their income than do the rich.

167
00:21:38.340 --> 00:21:43.040
All the so-called luxury taxes on beer, whiskey, cigarettes, things like that,

168
00:21:43.040 --> 00:21:47.340
the poor spend a higher proportion of their money than do the rich on these things,

169
00:21:47.340 --> 00:21:51.340
Therefore, they end up paying a higher proportion of their taxes.

170
00:21:51.340 --> 00:21:56.340
But even if somehow you could prove to me, which I don't think you can, that the tax system is progressive,

171
00:21:56.340 --> 00:22:02.340
the point is that the subsidy system is really, really progressive.

172
00:22:02.340 --> 00:22:07.340
Namely, it's true that the poor people in welfare do get a few crumbs off the table,

173
00:22:07.340 --> 00:22:15.340
but when it comes down to giving billions of dollars or hundreds of thousands of dollars, then you're giving it to the rich.

174
00:22:15.340 --> 00:22:22.140
So I say that Hypothesis 3 is correct, that the poor end up subsidizing the rich.

175
00:22:22.140 --> 00:22:25.140
Now look, let's look at this from another point of view.

176
00:22:25.140 --> 00:22:31.940
Make believe that you were, you know, King Nixon, or King ruling class, or whatever it is,

177
00:22:31.940 --> 00:22:35.540
and you were trying to run the economy.

178
00:22:35.540 --> 00:22:40.840
It's very strange to think that you would run it after all this expenditure to get a ruling class going,

179
00:22:40.840 --> 00:22:45.140
and then you would work it such that the poor benefited from it.

180
00:22:45.140 --> 00:22:47.220
and you lost from it.

181
00:22:47.220 --> 00:22:50.060
This would be the most altruistic, crazy thing ever.

182
00:22:50.060 --> 00:22:51.740
And yet, this is what people believe.

183
00:22:51.740 --> 00:22:57.260
People believe in hypothesis one, where the rich help the poor on net benefit,

184
00:22:57.260 --> 00:22:59.860
on net balance, excuse me.

185
00:22:59.860 --> 00:23:03.460
So I think we have to accept this hypothesis that on net balance,

186
00:23:03.460 --> 00:23:08.980
the rich get subsidized by the poor, the poor subsidize the rich.

187
00:23:08.980 --> 00:23:12.420
Therefore, all the arguments about the poor people not having

188
00:23:12.420 --> 00:23:18.180
enough money to buy the services for themselves, etc., go by the board.

189
00:23:18.180 --> 00:23:25.760
The best authority I could put on this sort of a thing would be one of my greatest heroes, Malcolm X.

190
00:23:25.760 --> 00:23:31.260
Now, Malcolm X was always talking about, you know, these phony white liberals and these blue-eyed devils.

191
00:23:31.260 --> 00:23:35.360
And his point was, we don't like the liberals to come in and help us.

192
00:23:35.360 --> 00:23:41.760
That's the last thing we want, because when they come in and help us, they usually end up scurrying us, or they usually start off by scurrying us.

193
00:23:41.760 --> 00:23:49.760
All we want is then to stay off our backs, not steal from us, not take our money in the ways that I've been outlining pretty much.

194
00:23:49.760 --> 00:23:57.760
Now, I'm not saying Malcolm X was a libertarian, I'm just saying that there were some ideas of his that I've seen as libertarian.

195
00:23:57.760 --> 00:24:04.760
Okay, let me consider one or two more instances of libertarianism, and then I'll call for some questions.

196
00:24:04.760 --> 00:24:15.760
Now, the usual view about the free market is that if we had the free market, we would have rampant monopoly. You have monopolies all over the place.

197
00:24:15.760 --> 00:24:23.760
And the usual case in point is something of the order of John D. Rockefeller running around and getting a monopoly.

198
00:24:23.760 --> 00:24:30.760
Now, let me draw you a beautiful picture of your country. That's the U.S.

199
00:24:30.760 --> 00:24:35.760
Isn't that pretty? That's the U.S. There's Texas and Florida and all that stuff.

200
00:24:39.760 --> 00:24:40.760
That's a lot of stuff.

201
00:24:41.760 --> 00:24:43.760
That was great in geography.

202
00:24:44.760 --> 00:24:46.760
I don't know what this is, but what the hell.

203
00:24:47.760 --> 00:24:53.760
Now, the usual view is that you have these little oil companies spread out all over the land.

204
00:24:53.760 --> 00:25:03.760
And what John D. Rockefeller does is he decides to attack one, one at a time.

205
00:25:03.760 --> 00:25:11.760
And what he does is he lowers his prices right here and he keeps his prices up or higher elsewhere.

206
00:25:11.760 --> 00:25:18.760
And he tries to force this poor little guy out of business right here, who's a local guy and has no ties with the other people.

207
00:25:48.760 --> 00:25:55.760
The Great Antitrust Division, etc., and this will stop it and keep the free market competitive, so to speak.

208
00:25:55.760 --> 00:26:07.760
I've already given a libertarian view on this type of thing, namely that the antitrust thing would probably turn out to be an invention of the ruling class interests.

209
00:26:07.760 --> 00:26:15.760
There's very little in this country that gets done that the ruling class interests do not want, and far from serving as a way of keeping the big people small,

210
00:26:15.760 --> 00:26:22.260
They serve as a way of keeping the small people, the potential competitors, small.

211
00:26:22.260 --> 00:26:36.700
Now, the actual historical proof of this, that this is really nonsense, would be an article in the Journal of Law and Economics by a guy named John McGee.

212
00:26:36.700 --> 00:26:43.620
It's in the library. It's in 1958. I forget the exact title. It's something about standard oil and monopoly.

213
00:26:43.620 --> 00:27:13.620
Where he shows that from the court records of the 1911 antitrust case of standard law that what John B. was doing was buying up all of these places and the reason he was able to buy them up is there were certain economies of scale and the bigger he got the more efficient he got and the more efficient he got the more he bought up other people and he kept the prices pretty low this is the historical record but it's a little hard to deal with historical records because people can always say well what if it were different you know need

214
00:27:13.620 --> 00:27:30.620
Now, the logical argument I would use to oppose this theory or this attempt at explanation of what happened is that it assumes that everybody except John Dee is a real idiot.

215
00:27:30.620 --> 00:27:37.620
For instance, suppose that you were a pig capitalist in another area, in an area that used oil as an input.

216
00:27:37.620 --> 00:27:46.620
Say, the chemical industry, you know, for sulfuric acid or something, or a whole bunch of industries use oil, pretty much oil is used in every industry.

217
00:27:46.620 --> 00:27:56.620
Now, suppose you had a firm around here somewhere in California and you were watching what was happening to this poor little oil dealer as he was being driven out by John Dee.

218
00:27:56.620 --> 00:28:05.620
Well, what would you do, knowing that if John Dee succeeded here and elsewhere, you'd be out because he could raise his prices and you'd be at his mercy?

219
00:28:05.620 --> 00:28:11.620
So obviously you do one of several things. Maybe you get your own oil well and not use it.

220
00:28:11.620 --> 00:28:20.620
Namely, while Jean-Baptiste is in the act of taking over this guy, you buy up all this oil at a very cheap price in the store.

221
00:28:20.620 --> 00:28:25.620
And then when Jean-Baptiste knocks it out and starts raising this price, you just use all this oil that you stockpile.

222
00:28:25.620 --> 00:28:33.620
Or you can get your own oil well, or you can subsidize this guy, or you can offer a partnership to this guy.

223
00:28:33.620 --> 00:28:38.420
The second thing, how about all the world oil suppliers?

224
00:28:38.420 --> 00:28:42.420
In other words, if John Dee ever succeeded in doing a thing like this to the United States,

225
00:28:42.420 --> 00:28:44.820
which I don't think is possible,

226
00:28:44.820 --> 00:28:49.320
oil from the rest of the world would come floating into the United States.

227
00:28:49.320 --> 00:28:51.420
Of course, it wouldn't, as a matter of fact,

228
00:28:51.420 --> 00:28:54.820
because we have all sorts of oil quotas not allowing oil in,

229
00:28:54.820 --> 00:28:57.220
but this is hardly a part of the free market,

230
00:28:57.220 --> 00:29:02.920
and the allegation is that it's the free market that allows monopoly to be caused.

231
00:29:02.920 --> 00:29:06.820
Thirdly, how about all these other guys? You know, they're not complete idiots either.

232
00:29:06.820 --> 00:29:11.320
They could see what's happening in the one place and they tend to band together to some degree

233
00:29:11.320 --> 00:29:15.720
to oppose these machinations of John Dick.

234
00:29:15.720 --> 00:29:20.620
Okay, one last case of libertarianism, and this is the old bugaboo of depressions.

235
00:29:20.620 --> 00:29:25.220
You know, if we didn't have a free market, or rather, if we had a free market, you know,

236
00:29:25.220 --> 00:29:30.120
we'd have all these depressions, you know, we'd have business cycles, we'd go up and down and up and down,

237
00:29:30.120 --> 00:29:36.880
And I guess we'd end up going far down and we'd all end up dead or something in the logical extension.

238
00:29:36.880 --> 00:29:44.120
The idea being that, you know, if there's one Miser who puts some money in his goddamn mattress, this screws everything up.

239
00:29:44.120 --> 00:29:48.920
Because what happens? You know, he buys less stuff, right?

240
00:29:48.920 --> 00:29:58.020
And then the people that he bought less stuff from buy less stuff in turn, and then they buy less stuff, and everybody starts buying less stuff, and nobody can sell anything,

241
00:29:58.020 --> 00:30:28.020
and then the whole thing goes kaput or take the case of just today in the paper our president Nixon, our boy, just negotiated a big agreement with Japanese and German steel producers whereby they would have quote voluntary unquote quotas on their export of steel to the United States you have the same thinking here you know if the Germans or the Japanese

242
00:30:28.020 --> 00:30:41.020
If you sell us any steel, that means that some steelworkers will lose their jobs, and if some steelworkers lose their jobs, they won't buy stuff, and they'll have this thing on and on around the economy.

243
00:30:41.020 --> 00:30:57.020
Now the thing is, I think, very clear, that if we buy Japanese steel, and we lose workers here, well, what's going to happen is that we're going to be saving some money, because the Japanese steel is cheaper.

244
00:30:57.020 --> 00:31:12.020
And with this extra money, people will spend in other areas, and these other areas will take up the slack, or the market process will tend in this way, so that we'll have full employment even if we have international division of labor.

245
00:31:12.020 --> 00:31:26.020
And if all of a sudden a bunch of Mises decide to sock some money in a mattress, this isn't so bad, because for every Miser that socks it away in a mattress, there's another Miser who's dying and his grandchildren are digging it out of the mattress.

246
00:31:26.020 --> 00:31:29.020
So you don't really have too much of a shift.

247
00:31:29.020 --> 00:31:37.020
But in the 1929 Depression, as Milton Friedman would tell us in his book on the 1929 Depression and the monetary history of the United States,

248
00:31:37.020 --> 00:31:43.020
what happened is that the Federal Reserve system, the safeguard of depressions,

249
00:31:43.020 --> 00:31:49.020
what they did is they lowered the money supply by about a third in two or three years and this pretty much caused the Depression.

250
00:31:49.020 --> 00:31:55.020
The free market took the blame for it, but it was not the free market's fault, it was the government's fault.

251
00:31:55.020 --> 00:32:03.020
Okay, this time I'd like to call for some questions and comments and speeches or what have you.

252
00:32:03.020 --> 00:32:12.020
Don't all rise up at once.

253
00:32:12.020 --> 00:32:14.020
Yeah.

254
00:32:14.020 --> 00:32:31.020
Question from the audience.

255
00:32:31.020 --> 00:32:34.020
Well, I would say it's her belly.

256
00:32:34.020 --> 00:32:39.020
I mean, you know, if she could tell her kid to go somewhere else, that's okay.

257
00:32:39.020 --> 00:32:42.020
Otherwise, I would consider it trespassing.

258
00:32:42.020 --> 00:32:50.020
Oh, I'm sorry. Let me repeat the question and see if I can repeat it to your satisfaction.

259
00:32:50.020 --> 00:32:57.020
The statement was, it's all well and good to say that the woman has the control of her own body in the case of abortion,

260
00:32:57.020 --> 00:33:03.020
but how about the fact that it's the kid's life that we're talking about, not the woman's life?

261
00:33:03.020 --> 00:33:05.020
Is that your question, Ms. substance?

262
00:33:05.020 --> 00:33:14.020
Well, my answer to that would be that it is the woman's body and she and she alone can decide who lives in that belly.

263
00:33:14.020 --> 00:33:20.020
Now, if you could have some sort of abortion where the kid lived in a test tube or something else,

264
00:33:20.020 --> 00:33:29.020
then the mother would have no right to kill the kid because murder is obviously a prime violation of non-aggression against non-aggressives.

265
00:33:29.020 --> 00:33:34.020
But as long as the kid is in her belly, it's sort of too bad on the kid. That would be the answer.

266
00:33:34.020 --> 00:33:49.020
Every Man Being Able to Own a Rifle to Protect His Own Property

267
00:34:04.020 --> 00:34:20.020
was that Castro was allowing his citizens to go on. I think the first sign that something is coming up where the dictators are trying to take over is that they're first trying to take all the rifles away, to pretty much get everyone to lay down their arms.

268
00:34:20.020 --> 00:34:29.020
I think everyone should have the right to bear arms, and if anyone should disarm, and I'm for disarming too, I think that the biggest killers in the world should disarm first.

269
00:34:29.020 --> 00:34:35.020
And the biggest killers are not people with rifles and guns and knives. They're people in B-52s.

270
00:34:35.020 --> 00:34:36.020
Please.

271
00:34:36.020 --> 00:34:37.020
Yeah?

272
00:34:37.020 --> 00:35:01.660
Oh, let's take all of them, say, police, finance, sanitation, what would be the mechanics,

273
00:35:01.660 --> 00:35:04.940
how would the people pay for it, what would be the ongoing system?

274
00:35:04.940 --> 00:35:11.940
Well, it's a little hard to forecast what's going to happen when and if we ever have freedom or a free market.

275
00:35:11.940 --> 00:35:18.940
Just as it would be a little hard to forecast, say, in 1900, how the TV industry would look like, or what the TV industry would look like.

276
00:35:18.940 --> 00:35:20.940
But we can make some speculations.

277
00:35:20.940 --> 00:35:29.940
One way might be sort of a pay-as-you-go system, or you might have a contract, a yearly contract with a company, say, a yearly retainer.

278
00:35:29.940 --> 00:35:33.940
You know, people somehow think that if we had private fire departments,

279
00:35:33.940 --> 00:35:36.940
you know, your house would be on fire and all of a sudden you'd have to start

280
00:35:36.940 --> 00:35:39.940
dippering with a fire company while your house burned down.

281
00:35:39.940 --> 00:35:43.940
And they say, well, this shows that we can never have private fire departments.

282
00:35:43.940 --> 00:35:46.940
The answer to this would be that you might have a yearly retainer.

283
00:35:46.940 --> 00:35:50.940
You know, you hire a company and the usual way that it's working in

284
00:35:50.940 --> 00:35:54.940
Scottsboro, Arizona is the one place I know of where they have private fire departments

285
00:35:54.940 --> 00:35:58.940
is that the insurance companies get their own fire trucks.

286
00:35:58.940 --> 00:36:06.940
Because if you insure your house and it burns down, the insurance company has to pay for it, therefore the insurance company protects your house.

287
00:36:06.940 --> 00:36:12.940
So it's a package deal between insurance and fire. But it need not be this way. You could have insurance with one company,

288
00:36:12.940 --> 00:36:21.940
and you could have another private fire department protecting your house, say, on an annual retainer, and all sorts of combinations of permutations are possible.

289
00:36:21.940 --> 00:36:27.940
You might have a low yearly rate of pay, and if there's a fire, they get paid a bonus.

290
00:36:27.940 --> 00:36:34.940
The same thing would be done by sanitation, sort of the way milk gets delivered or newspapers get delivered, only this would be the opposite.

291
00:36:34.940 --> 00:36:40.940
Garbage gets un-delivered or taken away. And I don't think that this presents much of a problem.

292
00:36:40.940 --> 00:36:50.940
But I would advise you to go look at Harlem or Bedford-Stuyvesant if you think that the people in the ghetto are getting a fair share from the garbage system.

293
00:36:50.940 --> 00:37:03.940
It's a very strange and horrible system. If you do a bad job, you don't lose any customers, because these customers have to pay or they go to jail.

294
00:37:03.940 --> 00:37:13.940
It would be the same thing in the police system. Many people think that if we had private police, you'd have to go everywhere with an armed bodyguard.

295
00:37:13.940 --> 00:37:20.940
If you had a bodyguard, you'd always be in danger and there'd be rapes and killing, as I said before, not as it is today.

296
00:37:20.940 --> 00:37:24.940
But you wouldn't have to have that. You might have people who own the streets.

297
00:37:24.940 --> 00:37:28.940
Obviously, all things would be owned privately in a full-free market.

298
00:37:28.940 --> 00:37:33.940
The guy who owned the street would have a great incentive to make sure that street was safe,

299
00:37:33.940 --> 00:37:37.940
because if his street got a reputation for being unsafe, people wouldn't come there.

300
00:37:37.940 --> 00:37:44.940
or the Merchants Associations could hire a police department to make the place safe.

301
00:37:44.940 --> 00:37:47.940
In other words, many types of contracts are possible.

302
00:37:47.940 --> 00:37:50.940
It might work like the way Mises works.

303
00:37:50.940 --> 00:37:54.940
They hire a police department for them to protect you.

304
00:38:01.940 --> 00:38:04.940
Come on, you deadheads.

305
00:38:04.940 --> 00:38:18.460
The question is what function should the government have, if anyone at all?

306
00:38:18.460 --> 00:38:22.500
I would say if the government is to have a function, and I'm not against the government

307
00:38:22.500 --> 00:38:26.980
or anyone else having a function, I'm only against the coercive aspects of the government.

308
00:38:26.980 --> 00:38:33.100
If the government would not have tax revenues, if it would not force people to pay for it,

309
00:38:33.100 --> 00:38:40.100
If it would fully depend on voluntary subscriptions, like say a lottery or an off-track betting or whatever,

310
00:38:40.100 --> 00:38:44.600
and by the way, if it had a lottery and an off-track betting, it couldn't be like the way they now have it,

311
00:38:44.600 --> 00:38:48.600
because the way they now have it is it's illegal for anyone else to have one.

312
00:38:48.600 --> 00:38:55.100
There's a beautiful case in, I think, the Harlem OTB where a bunch of people just busted it in,

313
00:38:55.100 --> 00:38:57.600
you know, busted the windows and ripped it all off.

314
00:38:57.600 --> 00:39:02.100
They said, you know, here you say that we can't have numbers running in Harlem,

315
00:39:02.100 --> 00:39:18.100
The answer to the question would be that it's not so much against government that libertarianism is, as it is against the initiation of violence against non-courses or non-aggressives.

316
00:39:18.100 --> 00:39:30.100
If the government would just exist based on voluntary subscriptions and would not either force people to pay money or disallow competition with it, then it would be perfectly justified.

317
00:39:30.100 --> 00:39:43.100
Why didn't you change one large power structure for a smaller one?

318
00:39:43.100 --> 00:40:11.100
In the free market, we still have large power blocks taking over and ruling us.

319
00:40:11.100 --> 00:40:21.100
Well, the point I would answer to that is that libertarianism is not a utopian thing.

320
00:40:21.100 --> 00:40:27.100
We're not saying that we're going to have the millennium and that everyone will be equal and will all live happily ever after.

321
00:40:27.100 --> 00:40:35.100
I think libertarianism can best be interpreted as a realistic attempt to diminish power.

322
00:40:35.100 --> 00:40:39.100
You see, I don't see anything wrong with some people having more money than others,

323
00:40:39.100 --> 00:40:52.100
I don't see anything wrong with Joan Baez having a lot of money, or with the Beatles having a lot of money, or with Elvis Presley having a lot of money, or with Will Chamberlain having a lot of money, or with Muhammad Ali.

324
00:40:52.100 --> 00:40:55.100
Now these people earned it honestly as far as I can see.

325
00:40:55.100 --> 00:41:06.100
And every time they earn some money honestly, let's say they invented something and gave a lot of people a lot of pleasure, what they did is for every dollar they earn they must have given ten or twenty dollars to everyone else.

326
00:41:36.100 --> 00:41:43.700
In other words, according to the libertarian view, the state is nothing but a front group

327
00:41:43.700 --> 00:41:48.300
for the ruling class, the businessmen, and the surest way to get rid of their power is

328
00:41:48.300 --> 00:41:55.100
to smash this status system of coercion that they use to sort of gain all their power.

329
00:41:55.100 --> 00:41:59.100
Al, do you want to ask the last question?

330
00:41:59.100 --> 00:42:00.100
No?

331
00:42:00.100 --> 00:42:04.100
Okay, thank you for your indulgence.

332
00:42:04.100 --> 00:42:10.100
Thank you for your indulgence. If you want to come up and ask questions, I'd be glad to talk to you. Thank you, Professor Block.