WEBVTT

NOTE Rhett Butler, Ron Paul, and the Election of 2012

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:10.160
The published title of the talk was Ron Paul in the election of 2012, and I want you all

2
00:00:10.160 --> 00:00:20.440
to know that this is a completely objective, non-partisan sort of event.

3
00:00:20.440 --> 00:00:25.940
But even the published title wasn't exactly correct.

4
00:00:25.940 --> 00:00:34.140
My actual talk is going to be on Rhett Butler, Ron Paul and the election of 2012.

5
00:00:34.140 --> 00:00:39.140
And basically what I'm going to be talking about very briefly is my research that I've

6
00:00:39.140 --> 00:00:45.460
done over the last several years about the Civil War and specifically about blockade

7
00:00:45.460 --> 00:00:50.240
running and the union blockade.

8
00:00:50.240 --> 00:00:58.140
And my theory or my hypothesis is that the outcome of the American Civil War was not

9
00:00:58.140 --> 00:01:06.600
determined as it's traditionally stated as the battlegrounds, the land armies, Lee versus

10
00:01:06.600 --> 00:01:10.660
Grant, Gettysburg, you know, all of that kind of thing.

11
00:01:10.660 --> 00:01:17.640
But instead it was determined at sea by the blockade fleet and by the blockade runners.

12
00:01:17.640 --> 00:01:23.440
And of course, Rhett Butler, the prominent character in Gone with the Wind, both in the

13
00:01:23.440 --> 00:01:32.560
book and obviously the movie, is the prototype of the blockade runner, a smart, cunning,

14
00:01:32.560 --> 00:01:42.660
businessman, entrepreneur, cool and calculating, dark and mysterious, but really the only personification

15
00:01:42.660 --> 00:01:51.580
that we have with respect to that crucial entrepreneur during the American Civil War.

16
00:01:51.580 --> 00:01:57.740
Now how this is all going to impact the 2012 election will be developed as I go through

17
00:01:57.740 --> 00:02:00.740
this talk.

18
00:02:00.740 --> 00:02:04.580
First of all, I'd like to say about Ron Paul in the 2000 election.

19
00:02:04.580 --> 00:02:08.100
I get asked this question quite a bit.

20
00:02:08.100 --> 00:02:11.380
You know, it doesn't seem like Ron Paul really has a chance.

21
00:02:11.380 --> 00:02:13.620
The media is ignoring him.

22
00:02:13.620 --> 00:02:19.460
The other candidates have these massive super PACs and the odds seem all stacked against

23
00:02:19.460 --> 00:02:20.460
them.

24
00:02:20.460 --> 00:02:21.540
You know, why is he doing this?

25
00:02:21.540 --> 00:02:22.620
Why is he carrying on?

26
00:02:22.620 --> 00:02:28.780
Why is he bothering when he sort of remains in fourth place when, prior to this, if you

27
00:02:28.780 --> 00:02:30.900
were in last place, you'd drop out?

28
00:02:30.900 --> 00:02:38.180
Well, the first answer that I give is that, in my own mind, Ron Paul's already won.

29
00:02:38.180 --> 00:02:47.300
Basically, he's attracted and convinced all of the future leaders of our society that

30
00:02:47.300 --> 00:02:52.220
his politics and his economics is really the way to go.

31
00:02:52.220 --> 00:02:58.740
And so when I look at the crowds and I see the events, what I see are the leaders of

32
00:02:58.740 --> 00:03:06.620
tomorrow embracing a particular version of the future of tomorrow, and that's Ron Paul's

33
00:03:06.620 --> 00:03:14.620
Paul's vision of what American society is all about, what it truly means, what's truly

34
00:03:14.620 --> 00:03:20.900
unique about America and what has made us so great in the past.

35
00:03:20.900 --> 00:03:28.940
And so, in my own mind, Ron Paul's already won because he's captured this vast majority

36
00:03:28.940 --> 00:03:34.220
of the future leaders, the smart people, the entrepreneurial people, the people with organizational

37
00:03:34.220 --> 00:03:40.300
skills, the people who are attracted to moral and ethical as well as economical and practical

38
00:03:40.300 --> 00:03:43.380
issues.

39
00:03:43.380 --> 00:03:49.340
My talk tonight is going to be more along the lines, ultimately, what if he actually

40
00:03:49.340 --> 00:03:50.340
won?

41
00:03:50.340 --> 00:03:56.140
What would be the outcome if Ron Paul won this election in 2012?

42
00:03:56.140 --> 00:04:01.220
There's a lot of people who say, for example, that if Ron Paul did win, he'd throw the

43
00:04:01.220 --> 00:04:11.220
Would there be economy into chaos? Or what would happen with foreign wars and our possessions and our friends and our empire overseas?

44
00:04:11.220 --> 00:04:21.220
Wouldn't there be chaos everywhere in the economy, in politics, and in foreign affairs?

45
00:04:21.220 --> 00:04:30.860
So first I'm going to talk about my research about the Civil War and my theory which is

46
00:04:30.860 --> 00:04:37.840
that the war was won by the Union at sea rather than on land.

47
00:04:37.840 --> 00:04:45.700
And basically the idea here is that economics ultimately determines the outcome of wars.

48
00:04:45.700 --> 00:04:53.580
The better economy and the better use of military resources always seems to dominate poor economies,

49
00:04:53.580 --> 00:05:01.780
poor functioning economies and military operations which are inefficient and ineffective and

50
00:05:01.780 --> 00:05:06.060
usually gobble up a lot of resources in the process.

51
00:05:06.060 --> 00:05:13.400
So when we first looked at the blockade, one of the things we found was that the blockade

52
00:05:13.400 --> 00:05:21.840
not only suppressed the southern economy, but it actually demoralized the southern economy.

53
00:05:21.840 --> 00:05:28.800
And so what we looked at was the prices and the imports through the blockade.

54
00:05:28.800 --> 00:05:34.920
And what we found was that the blockade created what we call the Rhett-Butler effect, which

55
00:05:34.920 --> 00:05:39.860
was that there were a lot of luxury goods coming through the blockade rather than a

56
00:05:39.860 --> 00:05:46.860
and a lot of necessities in the minds of the southern people.

57
00:05:46.860 --> 00:05:54.380
And we were able to explain this importation of high-valued goods rather than low-value

58
00:05:54.380 --> 00:05:59.340
relative to weight and relative to volume goods by the blockade itself.

59
00:05:59.340 --> 00:06:06.060
The blockade imposed a cost on the blockade runners and this cost led them to try to import

60
00:06:06.060 --> 00:06:17.860
more valuable smaller products and in that mix of goods was indeed luxuries and the reason

61
00:06:17.860 --> 00:06:23.080
we looked at that is I did my dissertation on the economics of prohibition and one of

62
00:06:23.080 --> 00:06:28.620
the things that I noticed about prohibition is that there was a lot of similarities to

63
00:06:28.620 --> 00:06:45.900
Blockade Running. With prohibition, and in fact the U.S. spends most of its resources trying to suppress the drug war, trying to battle the drug war and fight the importation of illegal drugs, is at the border.

64
00:06:45.900 --> 00:06:57.300
And so as the cost to drug dealers rises trying to get across that border, the potency of the drugs that they import increases.

65
00:06:57.300 --> 00:07:07.300
So the more money we spend at the border trying to fight the war, the products that actually get through are much more potent and much more, in fact, dangerous.

66
00:07:07.300 --> 00:07:13.300
And of course we see this all the time at Auburn football games, right?

67
00:07:13.300 --> 00:07:24.300
If you go out around the stadium and you look at the tailgaters, almost everybody is drinking beer, right?

68
00:07:24.300 --> 00:07:28.620
There's not drinks being served, there's not wine being served.

69
00:07:28.620 --> 00:07:34.620
It's like 95% of people who are consuming alcoholic beverages are consuming beer.

70
00:07:34.620 --> 00:07:43.020
And then once you get into the stadium, there's less alcohol consumption, but 95% of it is whiskey.

71
00:07:43.020 --> 00:07:53.900
It's double-proof brandies, double-proof rums, things of that nature that are getting across the border of the stadium

72
00:07:53.900 --> 00:08:02.780
and Inside the Stadium. So just as Auburn fans switched from beer to whiskey, just as drug

73
00:08:02.780 --> 00:08:09.580
dealers switched from marijuana to cocaine, blockade runners switched from bringing in

74
00:08:10.620 --> 00:08:19.340
necessities like food and they only would bring in things like medicine, weapons and luxury goods.

75
00:08:19.340 --> 00:08:27.940
But what we did find was that the blockade was unusually effective.

76
00:08:27.940 --> 00:08:31.380
Blockade running is usually fairly easy to do.

77
00:08:31.380 --> 00:08:37.300
Every blockade that's come about, there's always people successfully running the blockade

78
00:08:37.300 --> 00:08:39.660
because it's very profitable to do so.

79
00:08:39.660 --> 00:08:45.300
They buy better ships, they buy faster ships, they buy in modern times bigger, or excuse

80
00:08:45.300 --> 00:08:59.540
And so, blockade runners would buy faster camouflage ships in order to get across the blockade.

81
00:08:59.540 --> 00:09:03.940
So we weren't sure why the blockade was so successful, so that was the second question

82
00:09:03.940 --> 00:09:09.880
we looked at is, why was the union blockade so successful?

83
00:09:09.880 --> 00:09:14.720
And what we found was that the Confederate government was passing all sorts of laws that

84
00:09:14.720 --> 00:09:18.260
got in the way of blockade runners.

85
00:09:18.260 --> 00:09:25.800
They passed an excess profit tax on blockade runners, okay, which was, you know, it wasn't,

86
00:09:25.800 --> 00:09:31.740
it was a discouragement to blockade running and it didn't collect much revenues.

87
00:09:31.740 --> 00:09:38.960
They put tariffs on imports through the blockade and they put tariffs on exports through the

88
00:09:38.960 --> 00:09:40.380
blockade.

89
00:09:40.380 --> 00:09:47.180
So basically, on all margins, the Confederate government was passing laws from the very

90
00:09:47.180 --> 00:09:48.180
beginning of the war.

91
00:09:48.180 --> 00:09:53.740
As a matter of fact, at the very beginning of the war, they had a tacit embargo on the

92
00:09:53.740 --> 00:09:55.880
exportation of cotton.

93
00:09:55.880 --> 00:10:01.760
So their number one moneymaker, the thing that could have gotten them more income, income

94
00:10:01.760 --> 00:10:07.020
that they could have used to buy food, they could have bought cannons, they could have

95
00:10:37.020 --> 00:10:40.660
called a Confederate Blockade of the South.

96
00:10:40.660 --> 00:10:43.180
In other words, it wasn't really the Union

97
00:10:43.180 --> 00:10:47.460
that was that successful at blockading in the South.

98
00:10:47.460 --> 00:10:49.220
It was the Confederate policy which

99
00:10:49.220 --> 00:10:54.700
discouraged the export of cotton and the import of goods.

100
00:10:54.700 --> 00:10:59.660
And of course, the income in the South fell precipitously.

101
00:10:59.660 --> 00:11:02.300
In the third paper, we looked at a specific piece

102
00:11:02.300 --> 00:11:04.800
of legislation that was passed late in the war

103
00:11:04.800 --> 00:11:11.820
in February of 1864, Confederate Trade Legislation of 1864.

104
00:11:11.820 --> 00:11:15.440
This legislation did several things.

105
00:11:15.440 --> 00:11:24.800
It put price controls on imports, it created a prohibition on luxury imports, and it required

106
00:11:24.800 --> 00:11:30.240
all blockade runners coming in and going out to give half of their cargo space to the Confederate

107
00:11:30.240 --> 00:11:32.320
government.

108
00:11:32.320 --> 00:11:37.640
So half of your cargo space is gone, that means half of your profits are gone.

109
00:11:37.640 --> 00:11:45.640
The idea here was that the Confederate government needed that space to bring in its own supplies.

110
00:11:45.640 --> 00:11:51.720
And the prohibition on luxury goods, which seems like it's not a big deal, turns out

111
00:11:51.720 --> 00:11:57.900
that the luxury goods were imported by the sailors on the blockade-running ships.

112
00:11:57.900 --> 00:12:04.060
And those luxury goods that they brought in in their own bag was the basis of their pay.

113
00:12:04.060 --> 00:12:11.000
So this legislation wiped out the pay of the sailors and wiped out the profits for the

114
00:12:11.000 --> 00:12:13.060
blockade runners.

115
00:12:13.060 --> 00:12:22.220
So this was truly a crazy type legislation and was a significant deterrent to blockade

116
00:12:22.220 --> 00:12:24.600
running.

117
00:12:24.600 --> 00:12:31.200
As a matter of fact, the number of blockade running ships, the number of runs through

118
00:12:31.200 --> 00:12:39.700
the blockade actually declined in 1864 and 1865 from the previous year, despite the fact

119
00:12:39.700 --> 00:12:44.240
that there were a lot more ships available to run the blockade.

120
00:12:44.240 --> 00:12:52.540
And these new ships were faster, more camouflaged, better technology, they would have been very

121
00:12:52.540 --> 00:13:08.540
and very effective blockade runners, so you've got more ships, you've got more need for imports and exports, and yet after this legislation passes, there is a drop in overall runs through the blockade.

122
00:13:08.540 --> 00:13:32.540
Another piece of legislation we looked at showed that the effect of this legislation instead of increasing the prices, excuse me, instead of decreasing the prices of necessities, food, clothing, things of that nature, which the legislation was designed to do, actually led to an increase in the price of those same goods.

123
00:13:32.540 --> 00:13:40.300
So the intention of the legislation basically backfired as an unintended consequence of that legislation.

124
00:13:41.500 --> 00:13:46.380
Captain Roberts, one of the most successful blockade runners, ceased all blockade running activity.

125
00:13:47.180 --> 00:13:53.980
And I'll quote him, quote, the game indeed was fast drawing to a close. Its decline was caused

126
00:13:53.980 --> 00:13:59.980
in the first instant by the orders from the Confederate government at Richmond, pressing

127
00:13:59.980 --> 00:14:04.100
addressing the blockade runners into their service to carry out cotton on government

128
00:14:04.100 --> 00:14:09.700
account in such an arbitrary manner that the profit to their owners who had been put to

129
00:14:09.700 --> 00:14:16.900
an enormous expense and risk in sending vessels in was so much reduced that the ventures hardly

130
00:14:16.900 --> 00:14:19.860
paid at all.

131
00:14:19.860 --> 00:14:27.820
Captain Roberts is thought to have been the model for Margaret Mitchell's Rhett Butler,

132
00:14:27.820 --> 00:14:32.980
who also, by the way, chose to stop running the blockade towards the end of the war, if

133
00:14:32.980 --> 00:14:35.900
you remember the movie or the book.

134
00:14:35.900 --> 00:14:43.340
Another famous and successful blockade runner was Thompson Taylor, who made 28 successful

135
00:14:43.340 --> 00:14:46.600
trips through the blockade.

136
00:14:46.600 --> 00:14:51.380
As he put it, blockade running should have been encouraged rather than discouraged by

137
00:14:51.380 --> 00:14:53.820
having obstacles thrown in its way.

138
00:14:53.820 --> 00:15:09.820
I am convinced that the conditions of affairs would have been altered very materially and perhaps would have led to the South obtaining what it had shed so much blood to gain, its independence.

139
00:15:09.820 --> 00:15:22.820
As Captain Roberts explains, the enterprise had lost much of its charm, for unromantic as it may seem, much of that charm consisted in money-making.

140
00:15:22.820 --> 00:15:30.820
So, basically, what we looked at was a situation where the Confederacy should have not been

141
00:15:30.820 --> 00:15:33.820
defeated in the American Civil War.

142
00:15:33.820 --> 00:15:41.700
It had the same military organization, it had a very successful economy, it should have

143
00:15:41.700 --> 00:15:48.600
been able to export its cotton at very high prices and been able to obtain all of the

144
00:15:48.600 --> 00:15:58.280
Necessities of Going to War, and it had done that and taken on a defensive strategy of

145
00:15:58.280 --> 00:16:02.480
having fortified cities and guerrilla armies.

146
00:16:02.480 --> 00:16:09.240
The Union could have never really successfully invaded and defeated the Confederacy, but

147
00:16:09.240 --> 00:16:16.360
for these policies regarding blockade running, which basically shut off the source of income

148
00:16:16.360 --> 00:16:22.760
and the source of raw materials that it needed to fight the war because the south, the southern

149
00:16:22.760 --> 00:16:28.700
economy was based on comparative advantage and basically it produced cotton, it produced

150
00:16:28.700 --> 00:16:35.120
a few other goods for exports and it produced some of its own necessities and essentials

151
00:16:35.120 --> 00:16:44.720
like food and clothing and so it needed international trade for its income and hence its war materials

152
00:16:44.720 --> 00:16:50.000
and things of that nature, and as a result of all this legislation, which choked all that off,

153
00:16:50.000 --> 00:16:56.160
slowly the South, the Southern population and the Southern economy began to crumble,

154
00:16:56.160 --> 00:17:04.480
and then in desperation it invaded the North against that defensive strategy

155
00:17:04.480 --> 00:17:13.360
and was militarily humiliated in both cases. So it got to the point where desperation

156
00:17:13.360 --> 00:17:19.640
led them to the invasion strategy which failed miserably.

157
00:17:19.640 --> 00:17:28.880
And speaking of that, the last thing we wanted to look at is why would the Confederate Congress

158
00:17:28.880 --> 00:17:32.240
vote for such stupid legislation?

159
00:17:32.240 --> 00:17:39.120
Because it was pretty obvious to everybody what was involved in that legislation.

160
00:17:39.120 --> 00:17:45.960
And what we found was we looked at the congressmen in the Confederate Congress and we looked

161
00:17:45.960 --> 00:17:51.280
at their personal history, what profession were they in, were they slave owners, were

162
00:17:51.280 --> 00:17:57.400
they landowners, and then we looked at their congressional districts, was it an urban or

163
00:17:57.400 --> 00:18:05.260
a rural district, was it a financial center or not, how many slaves per capita, how many

164
00:18:05.260 --> 00:18:13.260
and Money Slaves per Acre, all of these kind of variables regarding both the congressmen

165
00:18:13.260 --> 00:18:14.460
and the congressional district.

166
00:18:14.460 --> 00:18:22.020
And what we found was that the only variable that was really relevant was whether or not

167
00:18:22.020 --> 00:18:28.940
the congressional district was in union hands or in confederate hands.

168
00:18:28.940 --> 00:18:34.700
If a district was in confederate hands or was not controlled by the union, then the

169
00:18:34.700 --> 00:18:42.020
Congressman from Confederate controlled districts would vote against the legislation.

170
00:18:42.020 --> 00:18:46.860
If the congressman was from a district where the union was in control, they would vote

171
00:18:46.860 --> 00:18:48.300
for it.

172
00:18:48.300 --> 00:18:56.940
So rather than being voting stupidly for stupid legislation, they were basically voting for

173
00:18:56.940 --> 00:18:59.180
the private interest of their district.

174
00:18:59.180 --> 00:19:04.660
In other words, if you were still in the Confederacy and you would feel the pain of this legislation,

175
00:19:04.660 --> 00:19:07.020
Union, they voted against it.

176
00:19:07.020 --> 00:19:13.860
But if you were in the union behind the lines and would be unaffected by Confederate policy,

177
00:19:13.860 --> 00:19:19.020
then you voted for it because your constituents would not be affected.

178
00:19:19.020 --> 00:19:25.200
So basically what we have here is a series of policies that basically have an effect

179
00:19:25.200 --> 00:19:33.740
on entrepreneurs, a negative effect on entrepreneurs, and that negative effect translates over into

180
00:19:33.740 --> 00:19:35.580
to the Economy.

181
00:19:35.580 --> 00:19:40.700
And that's the sort of the core issue that I want to take into the discussion about Ron

182
00:19:40.700 --> 00:19:49.180
Paul and the election of 2012 and what would happen if Ron Paul was elected.

183
00:19:49.180 --> 00:19:57.300
Well, let's look at this in terms of how would a Ron Paul election affect entrepreneurs,

184
00:19:57.300 --> 00:20:02.100
which would in turn affect things like employment in the economy.

185
00:20:02.100 --> 00:20:07.820
Well, if you've studied Ron Paul's position, if you know his past, he's someone who's

186
00:20:07.820 --> 00:20:09.860
very consistent.

187
00:20:09.860 --> 00:20:16.700
In other words, what he believes and how he votes on a particular issue today is exactly

188
00:20:16.700 --> 00:20:23.420
the same as he would have voted in the mid-1970s when he first went to Congress.

189
00:20:23.420 --> 00:20:31.560
So there's the ultimate inconsistency in his positions.

190
00:20:31.560 --> 00:20:38.920
It's also the case that his particular views on just about any particular issue are extremely

191
00:20:38.920 --> 00:20:45.300
well known and it's also extremely well known that basically no one is going to change his

192
00:20:45.300 --> 00:20:50.080
mind on 99.9% of the issues.

193
00:20:50.080 --> 00:20:55.460
That's true so much so that lobbyists never bother going to visit him.

194
00:20:55.460 --> 00:21:01.660
They never try to go there and bribe him with dinners or campaign donations or to give him

195
00:21:01.660 --> 00:21:07.180
reports about, you know, how the FDA is hurting this industry or whatever because they know

196
00:21:07.180 --> 00:21:11.380
how he's going to vote on issues that affect them.

197
00:21:11.380 --> 00:21:14.060
He knows that they're going to vote against him and there's nothing you're going to be

198
00:21:14.060 --> 00:21:17.900
able to do to change his mind, to vote yes.

199
00:21:17.900 --> 00:21:24.300
And if he supports your private interests as a business, you don't have to spend money

200
00:21:24.300 --> 00:21:29.660
buying him out. You don't have to take him out to dinner. You don't have to send a campaign donation

201
00:21:29.660 --> 00:21:36.620
to him because that's the way he's going to vote anyways. Okay, so he's rather unique

202
00:21:37.900 --> 00:21:46.620
in American politics. Of course, this consistency is going to be true for a lot of politicians

203
00:21:46.620 --> 00:21:55.220
with respect to certain issues, a far-right social conservative republicans are always

204
00:21:55.220 --> 00:21:59.900
going to vote a certain way on abortion issues.

205
00:21:59.900 --> 00:22:05.980
And there's nothing in the world that's going to change them on those narrow issues.

206
00:22:05.980 --> 00:22:09.380
And the same is true for far-left politicians.

207
00:22:09.380 --> 00:22:13.900
If it's a liberal issue, it's not like you're going to be able to buy them out, change their

208
00:22:13.900 --> 00:22:25.900
The difference is that Ron Paul is consistent on all issues rather than just on his pet projects.

209
00:22:25.900 --> 00:22:37.900
So what's that going to mean? Well, it means that businesses, entrepreneurs, people who hire people, people who make investments in productive capacity,

210
00:22:37.900 --> 00:22:45.400
I have a lot of serious foresight for a Ron Paul presidency.

211
00:22:45.400 --> 00:22:53.160
For four years, things are going to turn out pretty much along the lines of a Ron Paul

212
00:22:53.160 --> 00:22:56.480
presidency that is very predictable.

213
00:22:56.480 --> 00:23:05.220
So if a new tax was passed by Congress, it's obvious that Ron Paul is going to vote against

214
00:23:05.220 --> 00:23:06.640
it.

215
00:23:06.640 --> 00:23:17.600
If Congress passes a deficit budget or at least one that's not sufficient in terms of cutting

216
00:23:17.600 --> 00:23:21.660
the deficit, Ron Paul is going to vote against it.

217
00:23:21.660 --> 00:23:30.560
If a new regulation is proposed with a few minor exceptions, Ron Paul is going to vote

218
00:23:30.560 --> 00:23:33.960
against that.

219
00:23:33.960 --> 00:23:42.360
He's going to be different in terms of enforcing regulations on all of the regulatory agencies

220
00:23:42.360 --> 00:23:45.440
that the executive branch controls.

221
00:23:45.440 --> 00:23:50.560
He's going to limit or eliminate all spending that's under his direct control.

222
00:23:50.560 --> 00:23:56.120
And most assuredly, he's going to replace Mr. Bernanke.

223
00:23:56.120 --> 00:24:03.600
And he's going to set forth a monetary policy that is much more market-driven.

224
00:24:03.600 --> 00:24:18.600
And of course he's also going to put forth and make a very strong effort to restore constitutional money in the form of a gold standard or at least make moves in that direction.

225
00:24:18.600 --> 00:24:27.600
And I just read in Barron's before I came over here, Tom Dolan's column which is really one of the best things that you should all be reading.

226
00:24:27.600 --> 00:24:31.600
It's in the last page of Barron's magazine.

227
00:24:31.600 --> 00:24:39.680
And he goes through these estimates that groups have done about President Barack Obama's budgets

228
00:24:39.680 --> 00:24:48.200
for the next 10 years, Senator Santorum's, Speaker Gingrich, and Ron Paul.

229
00:24:48.200 --> 00:24:56.640
And basically all of those proposed budgets are going to make things worse over the next

230
00:24:56.640 --> 00:24:58.320
10 years.

231
00:24:58.320 --> 00:25:08.320
The National Deficit Relative to GDP is going to get worse under Obama's, Gingrich's, Santorum's, and Romney.

232
00:25:08.320 --> 00:25:18.320
I left out Romney. Can you imagine that? Just forgot him entirely. I guess that happens to him a lot.

233
00:25:18.320 --> 00:25:27.320
With the exception of Ron Paul. With Ron Paul budget, and of course these are all subject to reality,

234
00:25:27.320 --> 00:25:35.000
But only with a round Paul budget does the national debt relative to GDP decline over 10 years.

235
00:25:35.000 --> 00:25:48.600
And actually, they indicated that it would basically be the only one that was balanced or in surplus over that, at least at the end of that 10-year period.

236
00:25:48.600 --> 00:25:59.840
So with respect to taxes, with respect to the national debt, with respect to regulations,

237
00:25:59.840 --> 00:26:06.520
a Ron Paul presidency would create a large amount of certainty for businesses and it's

238
00:26:06.520 --> 00:26:09.680
all the type of certainty that is positive.

239
00:26:09.680 --> 00:26:14.680
Right now, what are businesses and employers worried about?

240
00:26:14.680 --> 00:26:16.480
They're worried about taxes.

241
00:26:16.480 --> 00:26:20.520
They're worried about taxes in terms of tax rates and they're worried about taxes in terms

242
00:26:20.520 --> 00:26:26.420
of the national deficit because, you know, that's a real resource tax on the economy

243
00:26:26.420 --> 00:26:32.520
in the present and it means that some form of revenue is going to have to be raised higher

244
00:26:32.520 --> 00:26:33.520
in the future.

245
00:26:33.520 --> 00:26:34.520
Okay?

246
00:26:34.520 --> 00:26:41.360
Ron Paul says no new taxes and we're going to try to eliminate as many taxes as possible.

247
00:26:41.360 --> 00:26:46.040
Regulations are a tremendous burden on the economy and the Democrats and Republicans

248
00:26:46.040 --> 00:26:55.240
Regulations have put, have expanded the regulatory state by a significant amount in many, many

249
00:26:55.240 --> 00:27:05.640
areas including financial services, regulations over medical issues, environmental regulations,

250
00:27:05.640 --> 00:27:12.620
business practice regulations, accounting regulations, all of which are burdens on the

251
00:27:12.620 --> 00:27:14.260
in the American Economy.

252
00:27:14.260 --> 00:27:20.340
A recent study done in Birmingham by a former Auburn graduate, I might add, found that eliminating

253
00:27:20.340 --> 00:27:27.380
one regulatory job in Washington DC would result in adding the addition of 100 new private

254
00:27:27.380 --> 00:27:34.420
sector jobs and a $6.2 million increase in GDP.

255
00:27:34.420 --> 00:27:44.000
A 5% cut in the regulatory budget in Washington DC, 5% would result in 1 million new jobs

256
00:27:44.000 --> 00:27:48.280
and an expansion of GDP of over $75 billion.

257
00:27:48.280 --> 00:27:49.280
So that's a real thing.

258
00:27:49.280 --> 00:27:51.080
It's not just an annoyance.

259
00:27:51.080 --> 00:27:55.480
It's a real job killing factor.

260
00:27:55.480 --> 00:28:00.520
And also I think there'd be a lot of certainty with respect to foreign policy and foreign

261
00:28:00.520 --> 00:28:01.520
affairs.

262
00:28:01.520 --> 00:28:09.800
Again, Ron Paul's views are widely known, obviously with all of these things there would

263
00:28:09.800 --> 00:28:15.620
be a disequilibrium in the short run, but in the long run I think there would be much

264
00:28:15.620 --> 00:28:24.200
more tendency towards equilibrium and harmony, not only in our economy, but in worldwide

265
00:28:24.200 --> 00:28:27.440
foreign affairs.

266
00:28:27.440 --> 00:28:32.920
So you'd see things like, for example, instead of Bernanke throwing money into the economy

267
00:28:32.920 --> 00:28:39.800
like a madman, along with all the other central bankers in the world, causing the price of

268
00:28:39.800 --> 00:28:47.840
oil to be up over $100 a barrel, I think with the Ron Paul presidency, you'd very likely

269
00:28:47.840 --> 00:28:55.480
see the price of oil come back down into a normal range, $30 or $40 a barrel, the price

270
00:28:55.480 --> 00:29:25.480
and the price of gasoline would fall, you know, I know Newt Gingrich makes this claim and it seems absurd because it is, because he has no idea about anything economics, but I think, you know, a Ron Paul presidency would actually show this in the sense that monetary policy, which flames oil prices, would bring the worldwide price of oil down to a more reasonable range of less than $50 a barrel,

271
00:29:25.480 --> 00:29:36.480
would bust the national government budgets of a number of oil exporting regimes, such as Venezuela,

272
00:29:36.480 --> 00:29:49.480
such as Russia, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, and a few others would have been busted the budget of Libya.

273
00:29:49.480 --> 00:29:59.480
So a lot of the rogue regimes around the world depend on 80, 90 dollar barrel oil for their government budgets.

274
00:29:59.480 --> 00:30:05.480
At 40 or 50 dollars a barrel, they don't have any money to spend on things like terrorism.

275
00:30:05.480 --> 00:30:17.480
So there's a lot of indirect things like that that would, I think, bring the world into a much cooler, much more comfortable, much more harmonious place to live.

276
00:30:17.480 --> 00:30:25.860
And so, what my conclusion was, that what if Ron Paul really won, is not that we would

277
00:30:25.860 --> 00:30:31.800
be developing chaos in the economy, chaos in financial markets and worldwide politics,

278
00:30:31.800 --> 00:30:39.560
but quite the opposite, that the fact that his consistency would replace the uncertainty

279
00:30:39.560 --> 00:30:46.900
that currently exists in the economy for entrepreneurs and foreign policy and that that consistency

280
00:30:46.900 --> 00:30:56.940
would actually lead to a very quickly rebounding economy and a very quickly reduction in all

281
00:30:56.940 --> 00:31:05.260
the hot spots around the world that we see today and they're coming so fast these days

282
00:31:05.260 --> 00:31:07.920
that it's hard to keep up with them all.

283
00:31:07.920 --> 00:31:13.380
First it's North Korea and then it's Iran and then it's Syria and it's just the new

284
00:31:13.380 --> 00:31:20.300
New Hotspot of the Week, I think that would also be addressed either indirectly or directly

285
00:31:20.300 --> 00:31:25.460
by the consistency of Ron Paul's positions on issues.

286
00:31:25.460 --> 00:31:26.460
Okay.