WEBVTT

NOTE The Evils of Intellectual Property

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.680
The topic that Briggs wanted me to talk about tonight is a topic that is my own personal

2
00:00:05.680 --> 00:00:06.680
obsession.

3
00:00:06.680 --> 00:00:11.040
It's always a good idea, if you're ever scheduling any events, when you ask the speaker to talk,

4
00:00:11.040 --> 00:00:14.580
to ask what he's obsessed with, because then he'll give a pretty good talk.

5
00:00:14.580 --> 00:00:18.160
So I hope that this will be a pretty good talk, we'll see.

6
00:00:18.160 --> 00:00:23.920
The topic is intellectual property, which sounds dreadfully boring.

7
00:00:23.920 --> 00:00:30.120
I wonder how many of you have heard of the concept of intellectual property? Could you

8
00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:36.540
just raise your hand? Okay, so there are some, yeah, okay. So maybe not everybody knows about

9
00:00:36.540 --> 00:00:41.760
intellectual property and its meaning. And it's a very interesting idea because, you

10
00:00:41.760 --> 00:00:46.600
know, it's one of these things you sort of take for granted. As a matter of fact, belief

11
00:00:46.600 --> 00:00:52.300
in intellectual property spans all political divisions. I mean, you'll find people on the

12
00:00:52.300 --> 00:00:56.700
the left accept it and people on the right accept it and everywhere in between and every

13
00:00:56.700 --> 00:01:03.340
regular person just believes this, you know. And by believes this, by the this, what I

14
00:01:03.340 --> 00:01:12.340
mean is that there's such a thing as property rights and ideas. So for example, if I believe

15
00:01:12.340 --> 00:01:16.620
in intellectual property and you believe in intellectual property, then anything I'm saying

16
00:01:16.620 --> 00:01:26.100
to you tonight is really mine. It's my personal property. And if you go outside of this room

17
00:01:26.100 --> 00:01:34.720
and you report it, any part of what I say, then you're taking my property. So you really

18
00:01:34.720 --> 00:01:42.260
should ask me. This is the idea. Because I possess some kind of ownership over the expression

19
00:01:42.260 --> 00:01:43.260
of my ideas.

20
00:01:43.260 --> 00:01:50.260
People who advocate copyright, for example, say that, look, it's not the ideas of such that are being owned, but only the expression of these ideas.

21
00:01:50.260 --> 00:01:56.260
To me, this is an irrelevant distinction. Would you agree with this, Dr. Long, that it's an irrelevant distinction?

22
00:01:56.260 --> 00:02:01.260
Lawyers are always saying, look, you've got the whole idea wrong. It's not that you own the ideas, it's you own the expression of the ideas.

23
00:02:01.260 --> 00:02:10.260
Okay, then the expression of the ideas, whether I express them in a paper, if I write them down, or if I'm saying them out loud, you know,

24
00:02:10.260 --> 00:02:16.020
This recording belongs to me, it doesn't belong to you. If we put it on the internet, you

25
00:02:16.020 --> 00:02:20.900
can listen to it with my permission, but if you share it with somebody else, you're violating

26
00:02:20.900 --> 00:02:29.620
my rights. And I think it's important that we distinguish here between what the law allows

27
00:02:29.620 --> 00:02:38.540
and what you might say, what is actually a violation of rights. Do you see what I mean?

28
00:02:38.540 --> 00:02:47.940
For example, if somebody is 17 years old and drinks a beer, we would distinguish between

29
00:02:47.940 --> 00:02:53.320
what's legal and what's immoral, right?

30
00:02:53.320 --> 00:02:57.860
You might say, but that's illegal to drink a beer when you're 17 because the law doesn't

31
00:02:57.860 --> 00:03:00.020
allow it, and we can all agree with that.

32
00:03:00.020 --> 00:03:04.020
Somebody else might say, well, it's not just illegal, it's just downright wrong, okay?

33
00:03:04.020 --> 00:03:06.100
So there's a difference between those two things, right?

34
00:03:06.100 --> 00:03:11.020
and what's legal and what we might evaluate in terms of morality.

35
00:03:11.020 --> 00:03:14.940
So it is with intellectual property, so I would like to talk about the rights and wrongs

36
00:03:14.940 --> 00:03:19.700
of intellectual property, not so much what the law permits or doesn't permit, I find

37
00:03:19.700 --> 00:03:23.060
the law personally preposterous.

38
00:03:23.060 --> 00:03:29.100
But more so than that, I would like to speak to the issue of the morality of intellectual

39
00:03:29.100 --> 00:03:30.100
property.

40
00:03:30.100 --> 00:03:38.300
My thesis is quite simply that the idea of intellectual property is completely made up.

41
00:03:38.300 --> 00:03:44.460
And it's a totally modern notion that dates roughly from the age of mercantilism and in

42
00:03:44.460 --> 00:03:49.860
particular the early 17th century in England.

43
00:03:49.860 --> 00:03:50.860
And that's it.

44
00:03:50.860 --> 00:03:57.100
And it's continued to be with us and gets more preposterous every day.

45
00:03:57.100 --> 00:04:02.540
Slowly very recently, for example, in 1995, I believe it was, with the Sonny Bono Copyright

46
00:04:02.540 --> 00:04:10.300
Act, Congress did the most massive land grab in the history of the world and retroactively

47
00:04:10.300 --> 00:04:14.560
copyrighted all sorts of manuscripts that had been already put into public domain dating

48
00:04:14.560 --> 00:04:21.800
back to 1962, for example. And why did they do this? Slowly to protect the property rights

49
00:04:21.800 --> 00:04:28.800
that Disney had to, that mouse character, Mickey Mouse, because he was about to go into the public domain.

50
00:04:28.800 --> 00:04:31.800
So that's what Congress did. That's very recently.

51
00:04:31.800 --> 00:04:36.800
But the notion of intellectual property itself has been growing since the 17th century

52
00:04:36.800 --> 00:04:39.800
and has gotten worse and worse and worse.

53
00:04:39.800 --> 00:04:44.800
There are several things we can include within the category of intellectual property.

54
00:04:44.800 --> 00:04:48.800
Copyrights, I've already mentioned. The other one is patents.

55
00:04:48.800 --> 00:05:18.800
Patents are a different form of intellectual property, maybe you know what it is, you come up with a unique invention of some sort, you raise to the patent office, you hire a lawyer to draw a picture for you and lays out all the documentation, you file it with the U.S. Patent Office, the Patent Office gives it to you as a reward for your innovation and then from that day forward until at some arbitrary stopping point, you're the only one who can benefit from the production distribution.

56
00:05:18.800 --> 00:05:28.800
and Profiting of this invention. That's a patent. It's related to copyright in the sense that both rely on this notion of intellectual property.

57
00:05:28.800 --> 00:05:36.800
So, here's the problem with intellectual property, ultimately, and why it becomes a problem in our times.

58
00:05:36.800 --> 00:05:57.800
And it is this. Ideas, unlike real property, are infinitely reproducible. Real property cannot be infinitely reproduced outside a situation in which there's a miracle.

59
00:05:57.800 --> 00:06:25.800
An example of such a miracle in history or at least in literature is a scene from the Bible when Jesus is speaking to the multitudes and his speech runs a little long and it starts to run through lunch and the multitudes are getting very annoyed because they're very hungry and they begin to grumble,

60
00:06:25.800 --> 00:06:28.200
Are we going to get lunch around here or what?

61
00:06:28.200 --> 00:06:32.200
Are we just going to have to listen to the Messiah all day long without anything to eat?

62
00:06:32.200 --> 00:06:38.900
And one of the followers of Jesus says, well, look, there's no food anywhere.

63
00:06:38.900 --> 00:06:41.400
I don't know why the people didn't think to bring a sack of lunch.

64
00:06:41.400 --> 00:06:44.400
They didn't expect him to go on so long, probably.

65
00:06:44.400 --> 00:06:50.800
But one of the apostles says, well, look, I have some loaves and some fishes in this little basket.

66
00:06:50.800 --> 00:07:03.300
and Jesus, very impressive, does something to cause these loaves and fishes to multiply infinitely and feed the whole crowd.

67
00:07:03.300 --> 00:07:07.300
Does anybody know this story? Have you all heard this story? Okay.

68
00:07:07.300 --> 00:07:10.300
All right. That would be an example of the infinite reproducible.

69
00:07:10.300 --> 00:07:13.300
And by the way, the Bible says there is some leftover in the end.

70
00:07:13.300 --> 00:07:16.300
How do you account for it? I don't know. But it's recorded. It was so notable.

71
00:07:16.300 --> 00:07:20.300
It was recorded in the Bible as a miracle.

72
00:07:20.300 --> 00:07:24.700
Okay, we can expect this kind of, so when this happens to physical property like loaves

73
00:07:24.700 --> 00:07:28.860
and fishes, it's a miracle. In normal life, we don't expect that to happen. For example,

74
00:07:28.860 --> 00:07:34.580
if I have a biscuit and you say, I admire that biscuit, may I have a copy? Well, I can't

75
00:07:34.580 --> 00:07:39.660
do anything about it. I can't give that to you. I can break it in half, then you have

76
00:07:39.660 --> 00:07:45.940
half my biscuit and I have half the biscuit, but now I have less biscuit than I had before

77
00:07:45.940 --> 00:07:55.540
and whatever, I'm less, you now have subsidized in terms of your biscuit quantity that you possess and I have less.

78
00:07:55.540 --> 00:07:58.440
And so it is, or I can give you the whole biscuit, but then I don't have a biscuit.

79
00:07:58.440 --> 00:08:04.740
With ideas on the other hand, if I give you all these wonderful ideas I'm saying right now, you can take them with you,

80
00:08:04.740 --> 00:08:09.940
but does that deny me anymore, my ownership over what I'm saying?

81
00:08:09.940 --> 00:08:14.340
I mean, have you robbed me? For example, I mean, everything I've said up to now,

82
00:08:14.340 --> 00:08:20.840
If you take it with you and repeat it, do I wake up tomorrow morning unable to say these same thoughts again?

83
00:08:20.840 --> 00:08:25.840
I mean, you know, I wake up thinking, you know, I read a book about something last night and I have no idea what it was,

84
00:08:25.840 --> 00:08:29.240
because you took my idea, right? You took it out of my head.

85
00:08:29.240 --> 00:08:38.240
No, of course not, because the ideas have this strange, and I would say almost miraculous capacity for infinite reproducibility,

86
00:08:38.240 --> 00:08:44.040
and that makes them uniquely different from all forms of physical property.

87
00:08:44.040 --> 00:08:49.280
So, in this sense, they have to be thought of in a different way.

88
00:08:49.280 --> 00:08:54.320
I think we can neatly divide the world, actually, between two kinds of goods.

89
00:08:54.320 --> 00:09:07.300
Those goods which are scarce, like biscuits and steamships and back scratchers and Velcro

90
00:09:07.300 --> 00:09:13.960
laced shoes and every physical thing you can possibly think of, money, unless, of course,

91
00:09:13.960 --> 00:09:19.960
for Central Banks Involved, and everything that's not scarce.

92
00:09:19.960 --> 00:09:23.960
And we can sit around and think about those things that are not scarce.

93
00:09:23.960 --> 00:09:29.960
One of the first things that comes to mind is air.

94
00:09:29.960 --> 00:09:33.960
Is air not scarce? I think probably it is scarce.

95
00:09:33.960 --> 00:09:39.960
Because, for example, we have an air conditioner in here, designed to give us a special kind of air.

96
00:09:39.960 --> 00:09:42.960
and it's scarce and it's only contained within this room.

97
00:09:42.960 --> 00:09:48.960
Even the air outside this building is unique to Auburn.

98
00:09:48.960 --> 00:09:51.960
I mean, if you go to Birmingham, you're going to experience a different kind of air.

99
00:09:51.960 --> 00:09:54.960
I don't think you can say that air is infinitely reproducible in that sense.

100
00:09:54.960 --> 00:09:57.960
I think it's probably a scarce good.

101
00:09:57.960 --> 00:10:00.960
Water, same thing, same thing.

102
00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:07.960
So, does anybody have another thought about what might be a non-scarce good that you can think of?

103
00:10:07.960 --> 00:10:09.960
Any suggestions?

104
00:10:11.960 --> 00:10:14.960
It's tricky, isn't it? Think about non-scarce goods.

105
00:10:15.960 --> 00:10:20.960
I would suggest to you, I can actually think of one apart from ideas, and that would be fire.

106
00:10:22.960 --> 00:10:26.960
So, for example, if I light a match, you know, I can set the building on fire,

107
00:10:26.960 --> 00:10:30.960
and yeah, still holding the match and it's still burning, right?

108
00:10:30.960 --> 00:10:34.960
So you can create a roaring bonfire or just contain it very small. Yes?

109
00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:39.960
The fire depends on oxygen, air, resources, water.

110
00:10:53.960 --> 00:10:57.960
There's a different sense of scarce.

111
00:10:57.960 --> 00:11:00.960
You get a different sense of scarce.

112
00:11:04.960 --> 00:11:34.960
The first thing I can think of is ideas because they are truly infinitely reproducible and an illustration of this is that if you receive, for example, a recording of my lecture on your email on an mp3 file and you forward it to 100 of your friends, that doesn't take it off your hard drive or the server on which the original email is stored, it continues to be multiplied and it can be multiplied to infinity.

113
00:11:34.960 --> 00:11:39.460
So digital media, in a way, has the same capacity as ideas themselves.

114
00:11:39.460 --> 00:11:43.460
I'm saying an idea to you, you take it out of this building, you say it to somebody else,

115
00:11:43.460 --> 00:11:47.460
and they say it to somebody else, and so on and so on until the end of the world.

116
00:11:47.460 --> 00:11:53.960
So digital media has the same capacity for infinite reproducibility.

117
00:11:53.960 --> 00:12:02.460
So it's not a surprise that the issue of intellectual property has become such a source of controversy in the digital age,

118
00:12:02.460 --> 00:12:10.100
because for the first time we're seeing the way in which ideas can be transported and

119
00:12:10.100 --> 00:12:15.060
sent and delivered in infinite ways and it's alarming lots of people.

120
00:12:15.060 --> 00:12:19.760
For example, if you use Auburn University internet connection to download movies or

121
00:12:19.760 --> 00:12:24.780
download songs, you have people all overview because they claim that you're violating the

122
00:12:24.780 --> 00:12:25.780
rights.

123
00:12:25.780 --> 00:12:28.340
I would suggest to you that you're not violating anybody's rights, you may be violating somebody's

124
00:12:28.340 --> 00:12:34.260
policies, but it's not actually a violation of rights, because ideas and the expressions

125
00:12:34.260 --> 00:12:41.300
of ideas and music and all those things that are associated with sound and even visuals,

126
00:12:41.300 --> 00:12:46.280
things I look at, I can have an image in my head and I can take it with me and I can close

127
00:12:46.280 --> 00:12:51.180
my eyes and imagine it. I'm not violating anybody's rights when I do that. I can look

128
00:12:51.180 --> 00:12:58.180
at somebody's face in here, remember it tomorrow, I haven't stolen your face. It's not robbery.

129
00:12:58.340 --> 00:13:02.340
because there's no property rights to the visual images I see.

130
00:13:02.340 --> 00:13:07.340
Whereas in the physical world of goods exchange and scarcity,

131
00:13:07.340 --> 00:13:12.340
there is ultimately what I have you can't have.

132
00:13:12.340 --> 00:13:14.340
So that's the difference.

133
00:13:14.340 --> 00:13:16.340
So how did this idea of intellectual property come about?

134
00:13:16.340 --> 00:13:19.340
And let me just kind of review for you the history.

135
00:13:19.340 --> 00:13:21.340
But actually before I review for you the history,

136
00:13:21.340 --> 00:13:25.340
I want to tell you that it strikes me there's two ways.

137
00:13:25.340 --> 00:13:41.780
The idea of intellectual property coincided with the advent of movable type publishing

138
00:13:41.780 --> 00:13:47.220
in 1450.

139
00:13:47.220 --> 00:13:55.020
Before that time, books could only be reproduced, copies could only be produced by scribes,

140
00:13:55.020 --> 00:14:00.140
and they would sit and scribe books. The main job of people up until that time was just

141
00:14:00.140 --> 00:14:06.620
keeping books alive. You had to be kind of a big shot in order to get an original work

142
00:14:06.620 --> 00:14:10.540
published. It's not like today where you can just go and get a print-on-demand publisher

143
00:14:10.540 --> 00:14:14.540
to publish it for you. You had to be like a bishop or a St. Thomas Aquinas or something

144
00:14:14.540 --> 00:14:18.340
like that in order to get a book published before 1450. It was a lot of work. Most of

145
00:14:18.340 --> 00:14:33.340
and all the time was spent scribing. So mostly people in religious orders that were highly exalted and very talented would scribe out works and it would take up to a year of full teams of people to produce anything remotely resembling a single book.

146
00:14:33.340 --> 00:14:46.340
Now I should say too that before the Gutenberg Bible or the Gutenberg Psalter actually, which was first in 1450, there was one thing the monks would do.

147
00:14:46.340 --> 00:14:53.380
So they would make like wood carvings and press them on the paper, rather than having

148
00:14:53.380 --> 00:14:56.540
to draw everything freehand, they would press them down and then like hammer them on, and

149
00:14:56.540 --> 00:15:04.580
they would do this out of stone too and hammer the stones into the vellum, the parchment,

150
00:15:04.580 --> 00:15:07.620
and be able to make copies of images, but they wouldn't last very long, you could get

151
00:15:07.620 --> 00:15:11.700
like seven or eight, you know, pressings out of those before it would wear down. That was

152
00:15:11.700 --> 00:15:14.700
the best thing anybody could come up with before the age of movable type. But then this great

153
00:15:14.700 --> 00:15:20.180
Goldsmith, Hans Gutenberg, came up with the system of moving letters around.

154
00:15:20.180 --> 00:15:25.340
Actually, the original system was invented in China, but it turned out that the Chinese

155
00:15:25.340 --> 00:15:30.160
language didn't lend itself to movable type too well because there were too many characters,

156
00:15:30.160 --> 00:15:34.220
so it waited for a Western style alphabet before it was really usable.

157
00:15:34.220 --> 00:15:40.460
Anyway, after that, then we saw for the first time the capacity to make a copy of a book,

158
00:15:40.460 --> 00:15:44.180
like an identical copy without involvement of the human hand.

159
00:15:44.180 --> 00:15:49.380
You just have a machine, press it, here's one, press it again, here's two, wow, they're practically identical.

160
00:15:49.380 --> 00:15:53.860
Amazing. It's like, again, it's like the loaves and the fishes or something.

161
00:15:53.860 --> 00:15:58.780
Infinite numbers of books are possible now for the first time, and they've made a bundle of money off these Bibles.

162
00:15:58.780 --> 00:16:02.980
Let me tell you, it was a big commercial success, and understandably so.

163
00:16:02.980 --> 00:16:08.580
But a couple hundred years goes by, and there arose, especially within England, on the continent,

164
00:16:08.580 --> 00:16:13.060
two but primarily in England, an establishment of publishers.

165
00:16:13.060 --> 00:16:43.060
It's very interesting, you know, the debates about piracy, they go way back. Back in the 1600s in England, you had the large firms, the large publishers complaining about pirate publishers that were taking old books and reprinting them all the time and ruining the market for new books, and the publishers complained, well look, this is a disaster, we've got these pirate publishers out there publishing these books that have already been published.

166
00:16:43.060 --> 00:16:47.060
And this is ruining the market for our new books and we're not able to pay authors right now.

167
00:16:47.060 --> 00:16:49.060
So it's exactly the same thing you hear all the time.

168
00:16:49.060 --> 00:16:53.060
If you continue to download books, you know, how are we going to be able to make any profits to pay authors?

169
00:16:53.060 --> 00:16:56.060
Creativity would die, you know, this is always the claim.

170
00:16:56.060 --> 00:17:05.060
So the early English publishers latched on to the predominant movement at the time in economic circles called mercantilism.

171
00:17:05.060 --> 00:17:09.060
And the theory was that the king had to give special privileges to certain producers,

172
00:17:09.060 --> 00:17:15.140
to producers, whether it was salt or copper or whatever kind of thing happened to be distributed

173
00:17:15.140 --> 00:17:20.540
in his realm. He had to give special privileges to certain producers in order to assure that

174
00:17:20.540 --> 00:17:24.820
the people would continue to get the product. And the producer would threaten, look, if

175
00:17:24.820 --> 00:17:29.340
you don't give me exclusive rights to produce something, I may not show up tomorrow. Still,

176
00:17:29.340 --> 00:17:33.740
whatever it may be, I may not show up tomorrow and then your people will be denied the products.

177
00:17:33.740 --> 00:17:38.140
Look, you'll benefit, too, because I'll give you a cut.

178
00:17:38.140 --> 00:17:40.980
So the king always went along with this,

179
00:17:40.980 --> 00:17:44.980
and the publishers got into the mercantilist business, too,

180
00:17:44.980 --> 00:17:47.900
by promoting their own, what they called copyright cases.

181
00:17:47.900 --> 00:17:51.220
We have intellectual property associated with this work.

182
00:17:51.220 --> 00:17:52.700
Nobody else may produce it.

183
00:17:53.780 --> 00:17:57.440
In England, in particular, this was particularly appealing

184
00:17:57.440 --> 00:17:59.700
to the ground because what was going on at the time,

185
00:17:59.700 --> 00:18:01.500
the massive religious wars.

186
00:18:01.500 --> 00:18:12.500
The Catholics were in charge one minute, the Protestants were in charge the next, the Catholics again, and then the Protestants and the Crown always found it, and it's very much in its interest to be able to control what was published.

187
00:18:12.500 --> 00:18:23.500
So this is the origin of copyright. It didn't actually catch on in the continent until the 19th century. It was the beginning of copyright laws in the continent.

188
00:18:23.500 --> 00:18:29.500
So we went a long spell of just total freedom. Before this time, though, you have to understand there was no such thing as copyright.

189
00:18:29.500 --> 00:18:36.340
Copyright. It was inconceivable because the technology didn't impress upon people the

190
00:18:36.340 --> 00:18:40.140
problem of what do you do with copies because there wasn't a capacity to make copies except

191
00:18:40.140 --> 00:18:45.420
by hand. You see, that's why copyright became a big deal. In terms of patents, it began

192
00:18:45.420 --> 00:18:49.620
at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and you know there's a huge in England and

193
00:18:49.620 --> 00:18:56.380
there's a huge debate in Parliament over the patent to the steam engine and the classical

194
00:18:56.380 --> 00:19:00.880
The liberals, the libertarians of the time were completely against it on grounds that

195
00:19:00.880 --> 00:19:07.380
they saw patents as a grant of industrial privilege to one producer at the expense of

196
00:19:07.380 --> 00:19:14.380
all other possible producers. The right to make one good and for one company to make

197
00:19:14.500 --> 00:19:19.700
a single product and the government would coerce everybody else against making that

198
00:19:19.700 --> 00:19:25.980
product. So that was the origin of patents. It's remarkable to think that most all kinds

199
00:19:25.980 --> 00:19:33.520
Patents of mercantilism disappeared over history, but this one kind persists to this day. Patents

200
00:19:33.520 --> 00:19:39.080
and copyrights persist to this day as a unique form of mercantilism applied to the realm

201
00:19:39.080 --> 00:19:48.340
of ideas. They're completely unjustified. I actually had planned to begin the lecture

202
00:19:48.340 --> 00:19:53.360
by talking to you a little bit about one of my favorite industries, namely the fashion

203
00:19:53.360 --> 00:19:57.360
Industry, which has absolutely no IP connected to it at all.

204
00:19:57.360 --> 00:20:01.960
And maybe as you're listening to me talk you're thinking, look, in a world with IP there would

205
00:20:01.960 --> 00:20:07.200
not be innovation, there would not be profitability, people would just be copying everybody and

206
00:20:07.200 --> 00:20:08.600
everything would completely collapse.

207
00:20:08.600 --> 00:20:13.520
Well, what I'm telling you, if you, sometimes it's hard to imagine what freedom looks like,

208
00:20:13.520 --> 00:20:17.280
well, just look at the world of fashion, okay, there you have total freedom.

209
00:20:17.280 --> 00:20:47.280
Designers, Calvin Klein, Ralph Lauren, all the rest of them, whatever, cannot copyright their designs, they cannot patent their designs, nothing is subject to any kind of intellectual property in the world of fashion, and let's look at the way the world works in fashion, you know, it's a very fast moving industry, highly profitable, but incredibly competitive, because of the absence of IP, it is enormously competitive, in other words, without a state grant of monopoly privilege

210
00:20:47.280 --> 00:20:53.520
to ideas, the industry is extremely vibrant and constantly fast changing. In fact, everybody

211
00:20:53.520 --> 00:20:58.480
complains about this all the time because it's actually too fast changing for most people.

212
00:20:58.480 --> 00:21:04.080
But what happens is that in the fashion industry, a designer is probably two years in advance

213
00:21:04.080 --> 00:21:10.600
of the release of his newest clothes, his or her newest clothes, is drawing out in secret

214
00:21:10.600 --> 00:21:17.600
and all of his plans and then the things are made and they appear at the market on the

215
00:21:17.600 --> 00:21:25.400
runway and as they're appearing the reviews are taking place and the producers of the

216
00:21:25.400 --> 00:21:30.960
clothing have already taken some of those designs and put them out into the vendors,

217
00:21:30.960 --> 00:21:35.880
the wholesalers who are selling things right downstairs to all the retailers.

218
00:21:35.880 --> 00:21:39.320
The retailers go in and buy up everything for the next season.

219
00:21:39.320 --> 00:21:45.120
And you're having to buy, you know, your fall merchandise in like November so that it arrives

220
00:21:45.120 --> 00:21:47.040
sometime in the summer.

221
00:21:47.040 --> 00:21:49.880
It's a tremendously risky thing, but get this.

222
00:21:49.880 --> 00:21:53.820
You know, these things arrive on the shelf in the fall.

223
00:21:53.820 --> 00:22:03.280
So you can go over to Talbot's and find a blouse for $130 that looks a certain way,

224
00:22:03.280 --> 00:22:04.720
and it's very impressive.

225
00:22:04.720 --> 00:22:07.000
And you put down the money because you've got to have it.

226
00:22:07.000 --> 00:22:11.080
And then a year later, you walk into Walmart and you find almost the exact same thing for

227
00:22:11.080 --> 00:22:16.840
fifteen dollars. Almost an exact copy, as close as possible. Maybe the materials aren't

228
00:22:16.840 --> 00:22:20.840
as good, but it looks pretty much the same. That's the way the industry works. Everybody

229
00:22:20.840 --> 00:22:26.320
is robbing everybody else, which is another way of saying that they're learning from everybody

230
00:22:26.320 --> 00:22:35.320
else, emulating the profitable producers to get some of those profits for themselves.

231
00:22:35.320 --> 00:22:39.320
If you think about it, this is the way the free market is supposed to work.

232
00:22:39.320 --> 00:22:45.600
You can review your economic knowledge and understand something about profitability as

233
00:22:45.600 --> 00:22:50.280
a signal to producers.

234
00:22:50.280 --> 00:22:56.640
Every entrepreneur is looking out over the economic landscape and seeing a scale of profitability,

235
00:22:56.640 --> 00:23:00.320
sees one producer over here making a tremendous amount of profits doing certain kinds of things

236
00:23:00.320 --> 00:23:05.160
and goes, you know, that worked for him, I think I'll follow it and do the same thing.

237
00:23:05.160 --> 00:23:10.640
So a new enterprise pops up to do the same thing, becomes in competition, his profits

238
00:23:10.640 --> 00:23:15.080
begin to go down, his profits begin to go up a little bit, eventually level, other producers

239
00:23:15.080 --> 00:23:20.360
jump into the market, eventually profits for everybody gets lower and lower and the margins

240
00:23:20.360 --> 00:23:24.080
fall and fall and fall until they approach the point of zero.

241
00:23:24.080 --> 00:23:25.400
This is the way markets work.

242
00:23:25.400 --> 00:23:29.360
If you want to think about the free market this way, you can look at it as a gigantic

243
00:23:29.360 --> 00:23:32.600
conspiracy to reduce all profits to zero.

244
00:23:32.600 --> 00:23:36.200
I mean, that's pretty much what the free market is and a competitive free market.

245
00:23:36.200 --> 00:23:39.600
What IP does is stops this process and says,

246
00:23:39.600 --> 00:23:43.800
oh, this producer over here is making all these profits.

247
00:23:43.800 --> 00:23:47.200
Here's your grant of Monopoly privilege. Here's your little badge of honor.

248
00:23:47.200 --> 00:23:51.600
You are the only one allowed to do this, produce this book, make this machine,

249
00:23:51.600 --> 00:23:55.600
make this dress design, and you can continue to do this for seven years,

250
00:23:55.600 --> 00:23:58.400
for 30 years, for 100 years in the case of copyright.

251
00:23:58.400 --> 00:24:00.200
You know, unbelievable.

252
00:24:00.200 --> 00:24:05.920
So, if you did this, for example, in the world of fashion, if you applied intellectual property in the world of fashion,

253
00:24:05.920 --> 00:24:09.860
Walmart would not be able to come out with Talbot's knockoffs the next year.

254
00:24:09.860 --> 00:24:17.860
Only Talbot's would be able to do that, and you would continue to have to pay $115 for that blouse instead of $15.

255
00:24:17.860 --> 00:24:21.760
Now, let me address the question of the ethics of copying.

256
00:24:21.760 --> 00:24:29.200
It strikes me, as we look back over the history of economic development,

257
00:24:29.200 --> 00:24:38.360
Copying and emulation is an essential economic institution, just as it is an essential social institution.

258
00:24:38.360 --> 00:24:42.460
And it all depends on the way you think of it, okay?

259
00:24:42.460 --> 00:24:49.380
My little girl, not this one, an even littler one, goes to school and she came home to me

260
00:24:49.380 --> 00:24:53.480
one day, she said, Dad, I wore a scarf on Tuesday.

261
00:24:53.480 --> 00:24:58.300
And Wednesday, Sarah was wearing a scarf too.

262
00:24:58.300 --> 00:25:04.640
And isn't that terrible? She just copied me. I mean, this is just so awful because she

263
00:25:04.640 --> 00:25:09.420
said that to me. And I said, well, why do you think it's so awful? Well, because she

264
00:25:09.420 --> 00:25:16.180
just ripped me off. So I'm thinking, she's got this IP mentality. She doesn't understand

265
00:25:16.180 --> 00:25:21.940
that her fashions that she's wearing are infinitely reproducible. The idea of wearing a scarf

266
00:25:21.940 --> 00:25:26.460
can extend all over the whole world and never diminish her rights at all. So she doesn't

267
00:25:26.460 --> 00:25:41.460
So, I just rephrased it twice as well. But, isn't it lovely? You think about it. On Monday, nobody is wearing scarves. On Tuesday, you wear a scarf. And on Wednesday, another person is wearing a scarf, so now there are two of you.

268
00:25:41.460 --> 00:25:50.460
I mean, by the end of the week, the whole school may be wearing scarves. And look at the effect that your one action had on your social circle. You have changed the world.

269
00:25:50.460 --> 00:25:56.460
Your idea has been copied by everybody and you have made a dent in the universe.

270
00:25:56.460 --> 00:25:58.460
That makes you enormously important.

271
00:25:58.460 --> 00:26:03.460
And what a ratification of the success of your idea of wearing a scarf.

272
00:26:03.460 --> 00:26:05.460
Congratulations to you.

273
00:26:05.460 --> 00:26:09.460
If you continue to do this throughout your life, you are going to make a huge difference.

274
00:26:09.460 --> 00:26:13.460
The world could be a different place completely from the one that you came into.

275
00:26:13.460 --> 00:26:15.460
And all because of you.

276
00:26:15.460 --> 00:26:18.460
And she looked up and said, oh yeah, that's right.

277
00:26:18.460 --> 00:26:23.660
Oh, how wonderful. You're right. That's great. So she suddenly had a different attitude.

278
00:26:23.660 --> 00:26:27.960
You see, it all depends on how you look at things, right?

279
00:26:27.960 --> 00:26:33.060
Well, unfortunately, in the history of economics, there are lots of capitalist producers

280
00:26:33.060 --> 00:26:37.460
who have not looked at it that way, because they thought that if other people copied their ideas,

281
00:26:37.460 --> 00:26:40.960
it would ruin their profitability, and they might have been right about that.

282
00:26:40.960 --> 00:26:46.160
But you know what? You know what the consequence is? Society is poor. That's the problem.

283
00:26:46.160 --> 00:26:50.160
That's the problem with copyright and patents. It makes everybody poor.

284
00:26:50.160 --> 00:26:53.680
Because there's no competition. If we could extend the model of fashion

285
00:26:53.680 --> 00:26:57.280
to the whole world, the whole world would be like the fashion industry.

286
00:26:57.280 --> 00:27:00.560
Highly profitable, very competitive, constantly changing,

287
00:27:00.560 --> 00:27:04.760
you know, slavishly devoted to the consumer desires.

288
00:27:04.760 --> 00:27:10.360
Instead of the way it's becoming in industry after industry after industry

289
00:27:10.360 --> 00:27:13.800
stagnant, you know, a handful of producers

290
00:27:13.800 --> 00:27:18.640
uh... producing things racing each other to the patent office to to get the to

291
00:27:18.640 --> 00:27:22.440
get the goods and to get the privilege to get the monopoly and then jacking up

292
00:27:22.440 --> 00:27:25.920
prices for all the consumers it makes everybody worse off and this is not

293
00:27:25.920 --> 00:27:30.840
anything new this has been going on now ever since the origin of the patent

294
00:27:30.840 --> 00:27:35.240
and if you look back at the history of innovation and at the history of

295
00:27:35.240 --> 00:27:38.440
enterprise uh... you will see

296
00:27:38.440 --> 00:27:42.080
that the history of the patent has produced one

297
00:27:42.080 --> 00:27:50.240
racketeer after another. And let me just name three of them. One is named Eli Whitney, the

298
00:27:50.240 --> 00:27:55.680
so-called inventor of the cotton gin. You know this guy? Have you heard about Eli Whitney?

299
00:27:55.680 --> 00:28:00.400
This is a museum, Eli Whitney Museum, the inventor of the cotton gin. Yeah, okay, the guy did

300
00:28:00.400 --> 00:28:06.720
not invent the cotton gin. There has been cotton gins since about the fifth century.

301
00:28:06.720 --> 00:28:11.120
Huge innovations took place between the twelfth and the fourteenth century. In the early nineteenth

302
00:28:11.120 --> 00:28:17.120
in 19th century America and the deep south here, everybody was using cotton gins, mostly with rollers.

303
00:28:17.120 --> 00:28:19.120
There were cotton gins all over the place.

304
00:28:19.120 --> 00:28:22.120
I mean, before I read this history, I had imagined that before Eli Whitney,

305
00:28:22.120 --> 00:28:27.120
people were just sitting around going, oh, God, why did we get this crazy seed inside this cotton?

306
00:28:27.120 --> 00:28:29.120
You know how you do?

307
00:28:29.120 --> 00:28:33.120
And then this one genius comes along and says, no, not at all, here's my machine.

308
00:28:33.120 --> 00:28:35.120
That's not the way it happened.

309
00:28:35.120 --> 00:28:40.120
It was a series of slow steps, evolution from the 5th century up until the late 19th century.

310
00:28:40.120 --> 00:28:43.920
19th Century and in fact all the way up to our day. So who's this Eli Whitney guy?

311
00:28:43.920 --> 00:28:48.480
Okay well so he was talking to this aristocratic you know woman I forget now

312
00:28:48.480 --> 00:28:53.160
her name it's terrible I don't remember her name. She suggested to him that that

313
00:28:53.160 --> 00:28:56.560
the cotton gin as it presently exists it could be improved with a little brush

314
00:28:56.560 --> 00:29:04.040
technique. Yeah how'd you know? You know everything. Nobody should lecture nobody

315
00:29:04.040 --> 00:29:09.040
nobody should lecture except this guy right Katherine Green. So he goes races

316
00:29:09.040 --> 00:29:12.960
to the Patent Office and patents this one little thing and then claims to then own the

317
00:29:12.960 --> 00:29:18.240
cotton gin and spent the rest of his life until, well, spent the next couple of decades

318
00:29:18.240 --> 00:29:23.800
running around trying to shut down everybody's cotton gins all over the country, everywhere

319
00:29:23.800 --> 00:29:27.720
there's a cotton gin. He went and claimed that they owed him, I don't know what it was,

320
00:29:27.720 --> 00:29:32.640
30, 40 percent of the profits or something just because this was allegedly his idea.

321
00:29:32.640 --> 00:29:36.640
This is the great Eli Whitney. Later on he, and he bankrupted himself by the way with

322
00:29:36.640 --> 00:29:41.360
Lawsuit, as most of these people who pursue this kind of IP enforcement end up doing.

323
00:29:41.360 --> 00:29:45.720
So later on he went into interchangeable parts for guns and he wised up and decided not to

324
00:29:45.720 --> 00:29:49.840
try to patent his ideas and he actually did much better in the gun market than he ever

325
00:29:49.840 --> 00:29:54.040
did in the market for the cotton gin.

326
00:29:54.040 --> 00:30:00.160
Another case in point, the Wright brothers, I mean I've developed this intense hatred

327
00:30:00.160 --> 00:30:05.640
of the Wright brothers over the last week or so, as Julia can tell you, I just never

328
00:30:05.640 --> 00:30:09.400
or shut up about the evil of the Wright Brothers.

329
00:30:09.400 --> 00:30:15.280
So they invented one little small, the legend has it that they were in a bicycle shop and

330
00:30:15.280 --> 00:30:16.280
they invented flying.

331
00:30:16.280 --> 00:30:20.960
Well, it turns out you can look it up and see that there are about 20 competitors for

332
00:30:20.960 --> 00:30:23.040
the title of first in flight.

333
00:30:23.040 --> 00:30:29.640
Most of them shared ideas with each other in the name of advancing humanity.

334
00:30:29.640 --> 00:30:33.400
The Wright Brothers were unique in the sense that before they ever got to work on their

335
00:30:33.400 --> 00:30:43.400
Airplane Model, they hired a lawyer and a team of lawyers that were seized on getting the patent first, that was their number one thing, that's why they cared way more about the patent than they cared about the airplane.

336
00:30:43.400 --> 00:30:55.400
So consumed with this obsession, you know, they actually, most people at the time were trying to fly longer distances and higher through by using larger and larger engines.

337
00:30:55.400 --> 00:31:00.760
The Wright brothers had an insight, as is most of the case, the same thing with Eli Whitney and the Brushes,

338
00:31:00.760 --> 00:31:04.760
you know, the Wright brothers had an insight that they could put a moving part on the wing

339
00:31:04.760 --> 00:31:10.560
to equilirate the airplane in a better way, rather than building ever larger engines.

340
00:31:10.560 --> 00:31:18.560
And it worked, but they went immediately, and other people had simultaneous inventions, by the way.

341
00:31:18.560 --> 00:31:25.560
They went immediately to the patent office and patented their crazy contraption

342
00:31:25.560 --> 00:31:32.560
and went around suing everybody afterwards and they caused such havoc, the Wright brothers, in the United States

343
00:31:32.560 --> 00:31:37.560
that by the time of World War I, the U.S. industry in airplanes was so behind

344
00:31:37.560 --> 00:31:47.560
that in order to even get off the ground with anything like a flight crew to fight the war

345
00:31:47.560 --> 00:31:52.200
The U.S. had to buy all of its airplanes from France, you know, because they were so much

346
00:31:52.200 --> 00:31:53.200
far advanced.

347
00:31:53.200 --> 00:31:57.980
So you see the way the Wright Brothers patent actually retarded progress.

348
00:31:57.980 --> 00:32:02.880
You know, the patent comes along and says, okay, that's a neat innovation, stop.

349
00:32:02.880 --> 00:32:03.960
You're the kings.

350
00:32:03.960 --> 00:32:09.480
You get all the profits from now until whenever we say, and then nobody else can innovate.

351
00:32:09.480 --> 00:32:11.280
So it retards progress.

352
00:32:11.280 --> 00:32:12.920
We see this actually every day.

353
00:32:12.920 --> 00:32:18.920
Another case is Alexander Graham Bale, another absurd figure in patent history.

354
00:32:18.920 --> 00:32:21.920
As a matter of fact, if you look through the history of invention,

355
00:32:21.920 --> 00:32:28.920
lots of people name the great innovators according to who got the patent.

356
00:32:28.920 --> 00:32:30.920
This is just the wrong way to look at it.

357
00:32:30.920 --> 00:32:36.920
The right way to look at it is capitalistic innovation usually occurs at the margin.

358
00:32:36.920 --> 00:32:39.920
Small improvements, people copying those small improvements

359
00:32:39.920 --> 00:32:43.920
and making a little better improvement and so on and so on.

360
00:32:43.920 --> 00:32:46.420
It all works like software. You know how software works, right?

361
00:32:46.420 --> 00:32:49.420
Everybody's contributing a little bit of something, a little bit of something,

362
00:32:49.420 --> 00:32:53.920
here's a new version, here's a new version, try it out, get out the bugs, thanks for that idea.

363
00:32:53.920 --> 00:32:57.420
Now let's improve it a little bit. Here's something I can add.

364
00:32:57.420 --> 00:32:59.920
This is the way innovation works in the real world.

365
00:32:59.920 --> 00:33:03.420
It's not usually one great genius coming up with a completed project

366
00:33:03.420 --> 00:33:06.420
that the government then ratifies and says,

367
00:33:06.420 --> 00:33:36.420
Here's your Just Desserts for your innovation. It usually occurs in the margin, and it would work that way more so in the software industry if, in the 1990s, the federal government didn't decide that software should also be subject to patents and copyrights, and that has seriously injured the industry, we would be much further along, not only in the area of software, but in every other area of life, if it hadn't been for this one fact.

368
00:33:36.420 --> 00:33:41.960
Address some typical objections here particularly in the area of copyright because this is an industry that

369
00:33:43.140 --> 00:33:45.580
that we work in at the Mises Institute and

370
00:33:46.500 --> 00:33:51.960
What we've decided to do as a way of fighting copyright is to put all of our books into creative commons

371
00:33:52.080 --> 00:33:54.380
Creative commons is a special license that

372
00:33:55.220 --> 00:34:00.100
Now if we are up to us, we can just completely abolish copyright and not worry about it again. Unfortunately it exists

373
00:34:00.100 --> 00:34:02.100
so what this means is that

374
00:34:02.100 --> 00:34:09.100
You must copyright your ideas or else somebody else can take them and then prevent you from using them.

375
00:34:09.100 --> 00:34:14.100
So if I leave a manuscript out here that doesn't have my name on it or a copyright seal on it,

376
00:34:14.100 --> 00:34:19.100
you could pick it up, publish it, copyright it, and prevent me, if it belongs to me, from ever publishing it again.

377
00:34:19.100 --> 00:34:23.100
So this is why you have to use copyright to some extent, if only as a defensive measure.

378
00:34:23.100 --> 00:34:31.100
But you can put it into Creative Commons and permit then an infinite sharing of these ideas under a series of terms.

379
00:34:31.100 --> 00:34:34.100
I mean, you can say, you know, as long as you don't profit from them.

380
00:34:34.100 --> 00:34:40.100
The one we use is attribution. All we ask is that people, you know, attribute Mises Institute as the publisher.

381
00:34:40.100 --> 00:34:44.100
But actually, in my own view, that wouldn't even be necessary, you know.

382
00:34:44.100 --> 00:34:46.100
So, now, people say to me, this is preposterous.

383
00:34:46.100 --> 00:34:55.100
You mean to tell me that if you publish a book, anybody else could take and photocopy that book, put it between two covers, and sell it?

384
00:34:55.100 --> 00:34:59.100
I mean, why would you be in the publishing business if you're going to allow something like that?

385
00:34:59.100 --> 00:35:02.100
That's ridiculous. Nobody would be in publishing if this was permitted.

386
00:35:02.100 --> 00:35:06.100
You know what? We permitted, and we're still in the publishing business.

387
00:35:06.100 --> 00:35:10.100
And why? It turns out it's something of a pain in the neck to get into publishing.

388
00:35:10.100 --> 00:35:16.100
I mean, it takes a big investment. You've got to have more than just a book between two covers.

389
00:35:16.100 --> 00:35:20.100
You've got to have a distribution method. You've got to have a warehouse.

390
00:35:20.100 --> 00:35:26.100
You've got to have consumer service. You've got to have a lot of things besides just a text.

391
00:35:26.100 --> 00:35:34.240
So, for the most part, we have the monopoly, the market monopoly, because we're the first

392
00:35:34.240 --> 00:35:38.500
to print. We're the first to go to print with it. And it's the same way in a whole

393
00:35:38.500 --> 00:35:42.720
series of industries in the real world. For example, you know that company that came out

394
00:35:42.720 --> 00:35:48.460
with that bag that rolls? I mean, you're probably all too young to remember the days when all

395
00:35:48.460 --> 00:35:51.700
suitcases you had to like carry, because they had a handle on it, you know, no wheels at

396
00:35:51.700 --> 00:35:56.020
all, you couldn't drag them along. One company came out with this idea of the suitcases

397
00:35:56.020 --> 00:36:03.020
and so it is with us. Now, I would suggest to you that if we eliminate copyright, it would make the market for books more competitive and it would also help publishers, and let me just quickly tell you a story of how it helped me, and maybe you can get a better idea of how it helped me.

398
00:36:26.020 --> 00:36:29.020
A Glimpse of the Way the World Would Work Without Copyright

399
00:36:29.020 --> 00:36:31.020
We published a book called America's Great Depression.

400
00:36:31.020 --> 00:36:33.020
It was by Murray and Rothbard.

401
00:36:33.020 --> 00:36:37.020
We published it in hardback because we are very proud of this book.

402
00:36:37.020 --> 00:36:40.020
And we published a beautiful hardback book, and we said,

403
00:36:40.020 --> 00:36:42.020
look, this is a nice book.

404
00:36:42.020 --> 00:36:45.020
It's got a wonderful introduction by a famous author,

405
00:36:45.020 --> 00:36:47.020
and the text itself is invaluable,

406
00:36:47.020 --> 00:36:50.020
so we're going to charge $30 for a great hardback book.

407
00:36:50.020 --> 00:36:53.020
And so it was for a very long time.

408
00:36:53.020 --> 00:36:59.420
And it never occurred to me that maybe, and we published 300 books, so how would I know?

409
00:36:59.420 --> 00:37:04.140
And I love this book, so why shouldn't people be willing to pay $30 for it? And it sold.

410
00:37:04.140 --> 00:37:09.900
Everything was going great for us. And then one day, about eight months ago, I woke up

411
00:37:09.900 --> 00:37:14.780
and sales of the book had fallen flat. Nobody was buying our book anymore. And this was

412
00:37:14.780 --> 00:37:19.460
at the time when everybody should be curious about what caused the Great Depression. Nobody

413
00:37:19.460 --> 00:37:32.460
So we did some research and found that some smart ELEC publisher in New York had put out a paperback edition of our book that we had put into Creative Commons.

414
00:37:32.460 --> 00:37:42.460
And of course, I mean, what's your response to this? Outrage, right? I was outraged. He took our book, put it in paperback and he's selling it for 15 bucks on Amazon?

415
00:37:42.460 --> 00:37:47.020
No wonder we're not selling any more books. Who does this guy think he is? Of course at

416
00:37:47.020 --> 00:37:52.300
once it's outrageous, but it's also kind of exciting. So suddenly we had a competitor.

417
00:37:52.300 --> 00:37:56.980
So then, so that's exciting. I mean people like competition. So everybody likes competition.

418
00:37:56.980 --> 00:38:00.820
So we thought, okay, what can we do? So the obvious thing to do is to come out with a

419
00:38:00.820 --> 00:38:06.820
paperback edition. So we rushed, we poured it on, contacted every kind of, every kind

420
00:38:06.820 --> 00:38:10.900
of dealer you could possibly find. You know, we drove the price down as low as we could.

421
00:38:10.900 --> 00:38:40.900
you know if we could have waited longer and gotten a lower price to buy the books but no we wanted it out fast because we wanted to kill these people so so we got it printed fast and I had to pay a lot of money for the print it and I priced it just we priced this book just right barely above what it cost us I mean we were just stopped short of paying people to buy it I mean that's how that's how thin our margins were right so within two weeks we had a paperback edition of this book out on Amazon

422
00:38:40.900 --> 00:38:47.580
for $12, guess what happened? We sold hundreds of these things. And even to this day, I'm

423
00:38:47.580 --> 00:38:57.580
just thrilled to think at how much we made our competitors suffer. So that, and they

424
00:38:57.580 --> 00:39:02.420
probably have a warehouse full of, that'll teach them, you know, to copy us, right? So,

425
00:39:02.420 --> 00:39:07.060
so this is fun. This is a great way to do business. And look, you know, it's true that

426
00:39:07.060 --> 00:39:20.060
We paid a very high price for this, you know, but who benefits? I mean, you've got this preposterous fight going on between these two editions of a book, but who benefits from it? It's the consumer.

427
00:39:20.060 --> 00:39:30.060
I like this system. I think it's fun to compete. I mean, monopolies are boring. I mean, who needs it? It's terrible. It's a terrible life to live off government privilege.

428
00:39:30.060 --> 00:39:34.380
Oh, you know, send me my money, you know, and if anybody tries to compete with you,

429
00:39:34.380 --> 00:39:37.420
compete with me, I'll sue them. You know, that's a terrible way to live.

430
00:39:37.420 --> 00:39:42.700
It's much more exciting to enter into a realm of freedom and to beat your

431
00:39:42.700 --> 00:39:45.740
competitors fair and square by offering the consumers a better deal.

432
00:39:45.740 --> 00:39:48.540
And if we got rid of copyright, that's precisely what would happen.

433
00:39:48.540 --> 00:39:52.300
As a matter of fact, copyright is going away, as you all well know.

434
00:39:52.300 --> 00:39:56.300
Almost anything is available for instant download right now, and I'm sure you're

435
00:39:56.300 --> 00:39:59.900
all very sophisticated about how to go about this, and you would never share

436
00:39:59.900 --> 00:40:05.820
Here are your tips in public, especially not on a recording here, but you can get just

437
00:40:05.820 --> 00:40:11.620
about anything digitally with a quick download and that goes not only for books but also

438
00:40:11.620 --> 00:40:16.660
for movies and for everything else. There is no chance that the world of copyright can

439
00:40:16.660 --> 00:40:21.900
stand up to this technological advance. To me, it's very exciting. If you look at one

440
00:40:21.900 --> 00:40:28.100
theme in the whole history of the world, it is that anybody who resists innovation and

441
00:40:28.100 --> 00:40:36.700
and technology dies. They cannot live and they never live. So the copyright mavens and

442
00:40:36.700 --> 00:40:42.860
these people who are living off their government monopolies, they are being run over by technology

443
00:40:42.860 --> 00:40:47.940
and they will not live. They will die. So it's just a matter of time. And I congratulate

444
00:40:47.940 --> 00:40:53.740
anybody who fights the system, within the law, of course. I'm just teasing about that

445
00:40:53.740 --> 00:41:13.740
Okay, now it's also true, now let me just say this about patents. It's not as easy to subvert the patent system. The patent system is currently catastrophic. It's tying up the software industry, it's tying up the industry for cell phones right now.

446
00:41:13.740 --> 00:41:20.740
You know, if I come up with a good innovation, I can patent it. And why do I patent it? What if I just decline to patent it? This is the problem. What happens to me?

447
00:41:20.740 --> 00:41:28.740
What happens to me? Somebody else can take my innovation, go to the patent office, patent the thing, prevent me from using it.

448
00:41:28.740 --> 00:41:34.740
This is a catastrophic situation. Because most patents are what's called defensive patents.

449
00:41:34.740 --> 00:41:42.740
Most everybody takes out a patent in order to prevent themselves from being robbed or prevent themselves from being sued at a later date.

450
00:41:42.740 --> 00:41:51.340
So we've got a terrible situation where actually, in fact, most people, most industries would be really happy to get rid of all patents immediately,

451
00:41:51.340 --> 00:41:55.940
if they could be gotten rid of across the board, so they wouldn't get access to anybody.

452
00:41:55.940 --> 00:42:07.640
But because they are available, everybody has to accumulate these war chests of patents in order to protect themselves from being attacked and from being looted.

453
00:42:07.640 --> 00:42:12.120
I don't entirely know what the solution, I think I know the solution to copyright, I

454
00:42:12.120 --> 00:42:16.680
think it's going to destroy itself on its own. I don't see that there's any future

455
00:42:16.680 --> 00:42:20.920
with this institution. Patents are a different problem. We desperately, desperately need

456
00:42:20.920 --> 00:42:27.640
patent reform. If anybody voted for Obama in the hopes that the federal government's

457
00:42:27.640 --> 00:42:34.640
attack on real rights in the name of intellectual property rights would diminish, you'd have

458
00:42:34.640 --> 00:42:45.640
I've been sorely disappointed because Obama's own appointees in this area have been fanatic IP people, just like Bush's people before him and on and on back in time.

459
00:42:45.640 --> 00:42:52.640
And it's not a left-wing issue, it's not a right-wing issue. They're both terrible on the subject.

460
00:42:52.640 --> 00:42:58.640
But what I'm telling you is that if we continue down the road that we're on with patents right now,

461
00:42:58.640 --> 00:43:05.440
We can destroy the capacity of society to produce any kind of innovation.

462
00:43:05.440 --> 00:43:06.320
You see how it happens.

463
00:43:06.320 --> 00:43:11.920
Imagine if every new product, every new idea, every innovation we experience,

464
00:43:11.920 --> 00:43:15.360
and we are subject to innovations every day.

465
00:43:15.360 --> 00:43:19.520
I mean, every day when you open up your Gmail and there's a new theme, you know,

466
00:43:19.520 --> 00:43:22.480
that you can download, that's an innovation.

467
00:43:22.480 --> 00:43:26.560
And if every one of these things, and you can multiply that example

468
00:43:26.560 --> 00:43:33.600
by billions and trillions of every new idea were locked into place and given a government

469
00:43:33.600 --> 00:43:38.740
monopoly so that nobody could learn, nobody could emulate, nobody could copy, you could

470
00:43:38.740 --> 00:43:43.440
shut down society just practically overnight and everything would collapse because you

471
00:43:43.440 --> 00:43:48.800
shut down the market economy, you shut down competition and you shut down the capacity

472
00:43:48.800 --> 00:43:54.000
for us all to learn from each other. A consistent application of intellectual property would

473
00:43:54.000 --> 00:43:57.840
would be something like a Stalinist style society.

474
00:43:57.840 --> 00:44:00.480
It's utterly and completely incompatible with freedom

475
00:44:00.480 --> 00:44:03.280
and incompatible with the market economy.

476
00:44:03.280 --> 00:44:05.800
Okay, I've said everything I think I want to say about that.

477
00:44:05.800 --> 00:44:07.000
I'm really glad to...

478
00:44:09.160 --> 00:44:10.240
Yeah, the two ways.

479
00:44:11.480 --> 00:44:13.360
I covered it with the scarf example.

480
00:44:13.360 --> 00:44:15.440
Yeah, so I think I'm done.

481
00:44:15.440 --> 00:44:17.120
I'm glad to open it up to questions.

482
00:44:17.120 --> 00:44:18.480
I know I've said something

483
00:44:18.480 --> 00:44:20.480
that must have alarmed somebody here.

484
00:44:20.480 --> 00:44:21.480
Yes, go ahead.

485
00:44:24.000 --> 00:44:28.200
Question asked by audience

486
00:44:28.200 --> 00:44:32.200
Question asked by audience

487
00:44:32.200 --> 00:44:34.340
Yeah, well there are always suits, you know, the thing about

488
00:44:34.340 --> 00:44:37.480
America, you know, it's free countries so you can sue for anything

489
00:44:37.480 --> 00:44:42.060
But the suits aren't gonna go very far. In fact, there have been lawsuits over

490
00:44:42.060 --> 00:44:46.340
advertisements, your advertisement looks too much like mine

491
00:44:46.340 --> 00:44:51.400
And so you can sue in America for anything, but the hope is that of course

492
00:44:51.400 --> 00:44:57.400
Of course, courts could decide whatever they want to decide, but at least in a formal sense, fashion is not subject to IP.

493
00:44:57.400 --> 00:45:03.400
Another industry that's not subject to any kind of intellectual property protection is the font industry.

494
00:45:03.400 --> 00:45:08.400
A very interesting case to me, because I find myself having to buy fonts all the time.

495
00:45:08.400 --> 00:45:13.400
Now, I can send my package of fonts to somebody else, and they can send them to somebody else and somebody else and somebody else,

496
00:45:13.400 --> 00:45:19.400
and you're not violating any laws here. It's just that the font industry has become very sophisticated about downloads.

497
00:45:19.400 --> 00:45:27.400
and I mean probably you could download every font imaginable if you had the right, you know, the right website or something, you know.

498
00:45:27.400 --> 00:45:35.400
Okay, okay, okay. But for the most part, I guess I'm the idiot. I'm always pying my fonts, you know, and getting the license thing and installing things, I don't know.

499
00:45:35.400 --> 00:45:39.400
But font industry still makes money despite the absence of IP protection.

500
00:45:39.400 --> 00:45:57.400
Another industry that has been spectacularly unsuccessful in getting IP protection for itself, even though it's technically entitled to it, is what you might call the red light district of the image industry, if you know what I mean.

501
00:45:57.400 --> 00:46:17.400
So in this particular industry, it turns out the courts are not very favorable to the idea of granting anybody any judgments in their favor for having been robbed of their titillating imagery.

502
00:46:17.400 --> 00:46:39.400
So IP has not worked in this industry at all and in fact images that entice people in their reproductive capacities have been extended infinitely all over the world and in many places in many ways and the industry somehow continues to be profitable.

503
00:46:39.400 --> 00:46:45.400
So you see what I mean. IP would technically apply to the red light district but it doesn't in fact.

504
00:46:45.400 --> 00:46:49.440
and Fact. But nonetheless, the industry is enormously profitable.

505
00:46:49.440 --> 00:46:53.880
Another example, and this is my final example of what I consider the libertarian utopia.

506
00:46:53.880 --> 00:46:59.400
Here's the libertarian utopia. Recipes. You can't copyright a recipe in the United States.

507
00:46:59.400 --> 00:47:03.360
If I tell you how to make a wonderful beef stroganoff and I publish it or whatever, you

508
00:47:03.360 --> 00:47:10.960
can take my recipe and publish your own book with the beef stroganoff and you won't be

509
00:47:10.960 --> 00:47:15.960
I'm not going to be violating anybody's intellectual property rights because copyright cannot apply to recipes.

510
00:47:15.960 --> 00:47:20.960
Very interesting because you can go over to Barnes and Noble and see that it still remains an enormously profitable industry.

511
00:47:20.960 --> 00:47:27.960
Nobody's being hurt. How do you package a recipe book? You put an amazing picture on it and you have some dazzling chef on the front

512
00:47:27.960 --> 00:47:32.960
showing you how to make easy recipes. It's the compilation. It's the marketing.

513
00:47:32.960 --> 00:47:39.960
What makes a recipe book valuable? Maybe it's the arrangement of recipes and the pitch.

514
00:47:39.960 --> 00:47:53.960
and the obscurity of them. Maybe they're the first one to ever publish this recipe of black squid from Salamanca, you know, and nobody else seems to have the recipe, then they make a profit.

515
00:47:53.960 --> 00:48:05.960
So you can't apply copyright to recipes. And the industry, again, it works just fine. You see how freedom actually does work, and you can imagine it by looking at these little sectors that remain free of intellectual property. It works just fine.

516
00:48:05.960 --> 00:48:06.960
Yes.

517
00:48:36.960 --> 00:48:45.960
I wish I understood more about the subject. I do know that whatever industry IP touches, it leads to total stagnation and disaster.

518
00:48:45.960 --> 00:48:47.960
And this has happened again and again and again throughout history.

519
00:48:47.960 --> 00:49:00.960
And this, taking out copyrights on genetic codes and things, and certain strands of DNA and all these things, apparently very scientifically could be disastrous.

520
00:49:00.960 --> 00:49:06.060
That's a whole chapter on the subject and this book I'd recommend to all of you called

521
00:49:06.060 --> 00:49:15.060
Against Intellectual Monopoly by Michele Boldrine and David Levine, two economists.

522
00:49:15.060 --> 00:49:22.060
Yeah, actually, this is a wonderful book. You have to go to their own website. You can download it for free.

523
00:49:22.060 --> 00:49:26.060
That's an interesting case because that, yeah, and they've got a whole chapter on the subject.

524
00:49:26.060 --> 00:49:30.900
It's an interesting case of two authors who wrote this radical book against all intellectual

525
00:49:30.900 --> 00:49:37.060
property regulation at all, and they're academics, and so they needed it to be published by conventional

526
00:49:37.060 --> 00:49:42.140
publishers. They chose Cambridge University Press, I can't remember, which has a conventional

527
00:49:42.140 --> 00:49:45.180
copyright system, right, but they wanted to get it out there. I told them, next time you

528
00:49:45.180 --> 00:49:51.420
need to publish a book, come to us. So they maintained copyright to that text. The authors

529
00:49:51.420 --> 00:49:56.940
Publishers did persuade them to let them put it online for free, but nonetheless, the publisher

530
00:49:56.940 --> 00:50:01.900
has a monopoly to produce that book and they're charging outrageous prices, exactly as you

531
00:50:01.900 --> 00:50:05.500
expect with any kind of monopoly provision, everything is more expensive than it should

532
00:50:05.500 --> 00:50:06.500
be.

533
00:50:06.500 --> 00:50:10.460
Look at your textbooks you have to buy, blame IP for that.

534
00:50:10.460 --> 00:50:14.180
So this book is like 35 bucks and I've been harassing the publisher all the time, let

535
00:50:14.180 --> 00:50:17.260
us publish this book, let us publish this book, the authors want us to publish the book,

536
00:50:17.260 --> 00:50:22.260
We sell it for ten bucks, you know, but they have the intellectual property to it.

537
00:50:47.260 --> 00:50:51.900
Yeah, but it's a funny thing and people get browbeat by these claims.

538
00:50:51.900 --> 00:50:54.980
The claim is that you get a prescription from the doctor.

539
00:50:54.980 --> 00:50:58.940
I was somewhere, I went to the doctor and I was having like a sinus infection, he gave

540
00:50:58.940 --> 00:51:06.180
me some nasal spray and I went to the CVS and I said, well, that's like $160 or something.

541
00:51:06.180 --> 00:51:08.980
You know, so I declined to use it, you know, I declined to buy it.

542
00:51:08.980 --> 00:51:11.780
I mean, I get annoyed at this stuff because it's absurd.

543
00:51:11.780 --> 00:51:15.980
But what they say is, well, you know, I'm sorry, but these things are very expensive

544
00:51:15.980 --> 00:51:24.740
Well, you know, so are, so is Calvin Klein's latest three-piece suit. You know, I mean,

545
00:51:24.740 --> 00:51:30.260
lots of things are expensive. What you do is you have to allocate your expenses relative

546
00:51:30.260 --> 00:51:35.820
to your expected profits. You can't just spend all you want and then charge a bazillion dollars

547
00:51:35.820 --> 00:51:42.140
for the final result and expect everybody just to comply. I mean, I imagine if we went

548
00:51:42.140 --> 00:52:12.060
the way to make money is to be the first one to market. You keep it all secret and then

549
00:52:12.060 --> 00:52:17.180
When you explode, here's our great thing. Everybody goes, ah, that's great, and they

550
00:52:17.180 --> 00:52:25.580
love you. I mean, an example of that would be Adobe's PDF, Adobe Acrobat. So they still

551
00:52:25.580 --> 00:52:32.460
are able to charge $700 for their program, even though there are as good or better programs

552
00:52:32.460 --> 00:52:37.020
out there for like 90 bucks, or free if you know the right download type. But they're

553
00:52:37.020 --> 00:52:41.980
able to do it because they're the first market. So you get to be the first. So it is in pharmaceutical

554
00:52:41.980 --> 00:52:45.480
They should come out with their products and say, look, here's our amazing nasal spray.

555
00:52:45.480 --> 00:52:48.480
And everybody goes, buys it, and they experience profitability for a long time.

556
00:52:48.480 --> 00:52:51.480
And they have a brand name attached to it, like you can go to CVS right now

557
00:52:51.480 --> 00:52:53.480
and buy Bayer aspirin or CVS aspirin.

558
00:52:53.480 --> 00:52:56.480
And you're standing at the two, one's $4 and one's $2.

559
00:52:56.480 --> 00:52:59.480
And you think, well, I think I'll get Bayer.

560
00:52:59.480 --> 00:53:01.480
Why do we do that? I don't know. We do it.

561
00:53:01.480 --> 00:53:03.980
People do it all the time because they're the name brand.

562
00:53:03.980 --> 00:53:05.480
So it would be the pharmaceuticals.

563
00:53:05.480 --> 00:53:11.480
But there's a problem, because in the FDA approval process for getting drugs to market,

564
00:53:11.480 --> 00:53:17.480
They have to cough up their entire system for making the drugs, right?

565
00:53:17.480 --> 00:53:28.480
They have to make everything completely public, which means that other people have the ability to copy everything that they're doing, even before they've sold a single pill or a single spray bottle.

566
00:53:28.480 --> 00:53:37.480
So this is a problem. You see what I mean? It's a problem for these companies because they are required by law to give up, you know, everything before they go to market.

567
00:53:37.480 --> 00:53:52.480
So if we're going to get rid of pharmaceutical patents, we have to do something about allowing these companies to operate as normal companies would, which is to surprise people with their amazing product, like it is everywhere else in the market.

568
00:53:52.480 --> 00:53:56.480
That way they can be profitable and establish a name brand for themselves.

569
00:53:56.480 --> 00:53:58.480
So I would just add that one provisional.

570
00:53:58.480 --> 00:54:08.480
If we got rid of patents on pharmaceuticals today without getting rid of the FDA and its intrusive control over some pharmaceutical companies, we'd never see another drug.

571
00:54:28.480 --> 00:54:52.900
______________________________

572
00:54:52.900 --> 00:54:57.920
You can never know in advance what the market is going to render, I could go out in my backyard

573
00:54:57.920 --> 00:55:09.920
with the expectation that somebody in this room is going to pay me $235,000 for it.

574
00:55:09.920 --> 00:55:14.920
Is it just for me to expect? It's a speculation.

575
00:55:14.920 --> 00:55:20.920
Nobody knows the future. We have to calibrate what we do today relative to the return tomorrow.

576
00:55:20.920 --> 00:55:23.920
It's that way in all aspects of life.

577
00:55:23.920 --> 00:55:32.480
I mean, no matter how much time you've put into something, the value of an idea or a

578
00:55:32.480 --> 00:55:38.480
physical thing is determined solely by what people are willing to pay for it at the moment

579
00:55:38.480 --> 00:55:39.480
of exchange.

580
00:55:39.480 --> 00:55:40.480
And that's it.

581
00:55:40.480 --> 00:55:46.120
I have a friend of mine who was outraged at my talk about IP because he says, look, it

582
00:55:46.120 --> 00:55:50.120
takes me like five years to come up with a new idea.

583
00:55:50.120 --> 00:55:51.120
You know?

584
00:55:51.120 --> 00:55:52.120
I mean, it takes me a very long time.

585
00:55:52.120 --> 00:56:22.120
So once I come up with it I should get paid for that idea. Well, why? I mean, who's going to say? Who's going to say for sure? It's the markets that have to determine this, and if you think that the market is going to pay a lot for your product, then you're willing to put a lot of time into developing it like a winery is willing to exist for 15 years because it's pretty sure that people are willing to buy this wine. But I'm sorry, if somebody spends 15 years developing a winery and at the end their wine tastes no good, then there's

586
00:56:22.120 --> 00:56:30.120
Nobody is not wrong somehow, it's not an injustice against the winery that nobody was willing to pay for their item.

587
00:56:30.120 --> 00:56:37.120
So in other words, uncertainty creates difficulties, there's nothing that can be sure.

588
00:56:37.120 --> 00:56:46.120
The trick of entrepreneurship and capitalism is that you want to somehow calibrate your investments with your expected rewards and it's always a speculation.

589
00:57:16.120 --> 00:57:35.200
It's tough because we live in a culture now in which IP is so prevalent. I'm not really

590
00:57:35.200 --> 00:57:40.540
kidding when I was talking about my daughter and her crazy scarf. This is part of the way

591
00:57:40.540 --> 00:57:46.540
The way people think now, they think that every new thing that's copied, they've been robbed of it.

592
00:57:46.540 --> 00:57:52.540
I recently read, and really all I'm saying to you is that it doesn't have to be this way.

593
00:57:52.540 --> 00:57:57.540
In other words, if you don't want your ideas robbed, there's a sure solution for that.

594
00:57:57.540 --> 00:58:02.540
Never tell them to anybody. Just keep them to yourself.

595
00:58:02.540 --> 00:58:07.540
And then you'll just be rich with your own ideas.

596
00:58:07.540 --> 00:58:21.540
and just have them and love them forever. But if you ever tell anybody, tell those ideas to anybody, you run the risk that if it's very valuable, it's now going to be public knowledge, especially in the digital age, everything flies around globally and instantly.

597
00:58:21.540 --> 00:58:30.540
Let me tell you something. I read this wonderful new biography of Ayn Rand by Jennifer Burns. Do you know Ayn Rand? She wrote this...

598
00:58:30.540 --> 00:58:36.720
So, a wonderful new biography, and Ayn Rand had a kind of problem. She was a brilliant

599
00:58:36.720 --> 00:58:41.420
thinker, but she was confused on the issue of intellectual property. I mean, so confused

600
00:58:41.420 --> 00:58:46.900
in fact that she thought it was more foundational to the idea of liberty than even physical

601
00:58:46.900 --> 00:58:51.560
property. Like, she thought that only ideas exist and like everything else was sort of

602
00:58:51.560 --> 00:58:57.220
irrelevant in a way. And nobody really corrected her on this. She used to welcome challenges

603
00:58:57.220 --> 00:58:58.220
to your ideas.

604
00:58:58.220 --> 00:59:01.460
But there wasn't anybody really around to explain to her what was wrong, and the fountain

605
00:59:01.460 --> 00:59:09.780
can be regarded as kind of a big story about IP, you know, the architect's IP was violated,

606
00:59:09.780 --> 00:59:12.300
you know, when they changed the design so therefore he can blow up the building.

607
00:59:12.300 --> 00:59:17.060
Now, of course, I don't mind that the building, there was a contract that it would not, okay.

608
00:59:17.060 --> 00:59:23.060
Okay, well there's a contract, also it was a public housing unit, so why do we care?

609
00:59:23.060 --> 00:59:30.300
But anyway, there was this underlying thing about IP in that book. But Rand had a problem

610
00:59:30.300 --> 00:59:35.220
because she wanted to convince other people of her ideas, but she believed she owned them.

611
00:59:35.220 --> 00:59:42.140
So it became very intense for her once she began to get followers. Okay, like how do

612
00:59:42.140 --> 00:59:50.660
you be a follower of Randian ideas? Really? How do you become a follower of Randian ideas?

613
00:59:50.660 --> 00:59:53.700
You know how it is in the music industry, if you take somebody's song and remix it,

614
00:59:53.700 --> 00:59:55.760
they get really annoyed, you know?

615
00:59:55.760 --> 01:00:00.180
So Rand really got annoyed when people would take her ideas and mix them with other ideas.

616
01:00:00.180 --> 01:00:03.940
She would only tolerate, you know, you could take her ideas as long as you took them in

617
01:00:03.940 --> 01:00:09.840
total and complete and didn't destroy the integrity of them.

618
01:00:09.840 --> 01:00:16.420
So you had to kind of like be a clone of her, exactly.

619
01:00:16.420 --> 01:00:21.980
And also, you had to constantly cite her, like, well, as Ayn Rand says, as Ayn Rand

620
01:00:21.980 --> 01:00:25.660
says, as Ayn Rand says, with every sentence. Now, if you've been around Randy in circles,

621
01:00:25.660 --> 01:00:32.460
you notice this propensity, you know? And I'm not saying that to criticize her followers.

622
01:00:32.460 --> 01:00:37.980
I think it follows from this fundamental mistake concerning IP. If you really believe in IP,

623
01:00:37.980 --> 01:00:42.980
the only way you can possibly have followers for your ideas is to insist that with every

624
01:00:42.980 --> 01:00:47.660
Every sentence another person utters, that they repeat what you said exactly and that

625
01:00:47.660 --> 01:00:53.540
they cite you precisely. It's the only real consistent way to believe in IP and also spread

626
01:00:53.540 --> 01:00:58.100
your ideas. The irony in Rand's case, of course, is that it was all being done in the name

627
01:00:58.100 --> 01:01:09.580
of individualism and creativity and living life as you saw it. The paradox is overwhelming

628
01:01:09.580 --> 01:01:14.960
in her case, you know, once believe in individualism and individual rights, on the other hand believe

629
01:01:14.960 --> 01:01:18.360
in her own intellectual property, and then also believe in that she wanted to influence

630
01:01:18.360 --> 01:01:22.900
the world. How do you reconcile these things? Well, I think she died somewhat despairing,

631
01:01:22.900 --> 01:01:27.360
you know, over this, over this problem, you know, of how do you, how do you deal with

632
01:01:27.360 --> 01:01:31.180
this, you know. But she did have this gatekeeper for a while, this Nathaniel Branden guy, you

633
01:01:31.180 --> 01:01:35.440
know, who'd actually like enforce this stuff. And if you called yourself an objectivist,

634
01:01:35.440 --> 01:01:38.960
you would get a letter from the lawyer, you know, telling yourself to stop him, and this

635
01:01:38.960 --> 01:01:43.840
This sort of thing. But again, I don't think this is malice on her part. I think it was

636
01:01:43.840 --> 01:01:50.040
just a mistake. The problem of IP, of intellectual property, is a persistent one. I think it's

637
01:01:50.040 --> 01:01:54.200
really prevalent today. If you look before the 16th century, throughout all of human

638
01:01:54.200 --> 01:01:59.240
history, I don't think you'll find a single other case in history where there was any

639
01:01:59.240 --> 01:02:07.360
kind of great conflicts over intellectual property. For example, music was not subject to copyright

640
01:02:07.360 --> 01:02:14.360
at all on the continent before the late 19th century. So it was very common for composers

641
01:02:14.360 --> 01:02:19.200
to borrow each other's melodies and you know they weren't mad about it. They were thrilled.

642
01:02:19.200 --> 01:02:25.560
Variations on a theme by Thomas Tallis, Bach writing themes on Vivaldi's themes that he

643
01:02:25.560 --> 01:02:30.220
heard just the day before, or taking books to Huda's compositions writing a dazzling

644
01:02:30.220 --> 01:02:35.840
new thing. They were flattered by this. To be copied is a compliment. That's the way

645
01:02:35.840 --> 01:02:48.840
In a way it was always regarded, same with literature. It was always true until this weird mercantilist idea of intellectual property came along in the 18th century, or really in the 17th century in England.

646
01:02:48.840 --> 01:02:59.840
The first country to copyright music was England, and it became very intense after about 1740.

647
01:02:59.840 --> 01:03:09.840
If you look back at music history, I don't know how much you know about classical music history, but there were very few composers in England after 1740 of any note whatsoever.

648
01:03:09.840 --> 01:03:15.840
Because if you can't learn from others, then you can't innovate yourself or make any useful innovations.

649
01:03:15.840 --> 01:03:21.840
Innovation requires learning. Development requires emulation.

650
01:03:21.840 --> 01:03:28.840
And if you make emulation illegal, you shut it all down. So that's the theme of my talk. Any other questions?

651
01:03:28.840 --> 01:03:33.840
Oh, come on. One more. We've got a few more minutes. No, we don't. Go ahead.

652
01:03:33.840 --> 01:03:41.840
I was going to say that, like, you said when patents are introduced, it kind of like stagnates the growth of innovation and stuff like that.

653
01:03:41.840 --> 01:03:52.840
Microsoft, for instance, has a ton of patents, yet every year they come out with more and more innovations in their software, in their operating system, in some of their hardware and stuff like that.

654
01:03:52.840 --> 01:04:03.840
Yeah, well you would get a lot of argument from people about whether or not they're really innovations, but it's certainly right that they're dedicated to consumer service and dedicated to improving their product.

655
01:04:03.840 --> 01:04:10.840
The industry is somewhat competitive because you've got the Mac OS out there that's making inroads.

656
01:04:10.840 --> 01:04:19.840
You've also got Linux operating systems, which everybody says you just download the Linux and you can do anything you can do on Microsoft.

657
01:04:19.840 --> 01:04:25.120
You face competition, and they also face competition with alternative pursuits other than being

658
01:04:25.120 --> 01:04:28.360
on the computer. So they have every incentive to make the computer ever better and better

659
01:04:28.360 --> 01:04:35.360
and better to keep people attached to the machines and using them. So I would say that

660
01:04:35.360 --> 01:04:41.280
the area of hardware and software is competitive, but it's not as competitive as it might be

661
01:04:41.280 --> 01:04:45.120
in the absence of patents. So that's how I would say that. And it used to be much more

662
01:04:45.120 --> 01:04:49.200
competitive back before the Federal Government decided that intellectual property applies

663
01:04:49.200 --> 01:04:51.040
as to computer code.

664
01:04:51.040 --> 01:04:52.780
And if you're a software developer,

665
01:04:52.780 --> 01:04:54.240
I don't know how many of you are looking forward

666
01:04:54.240 --> 01:04:56.040
to being a software developer,

667
01:04:56.040 --> 01:04:58.520
it's a very difficult industry now

668
01:04:58.520 --> 01:05:01.520
because you spend a vast amount of your time

669
01:05:01.520 --> 01:05:03.840
worrying about infringing on other people's

670
01:05:03.840 --> 01:05:05.060
intellectual property rights

671
01:05:05.060 --> 01:05:09.080
instead of doing things like learning and innovating.

672
01:05:09.080 --> 01:05:10.920
No, it's not allowed anymore.

673
01:05:10.920 --> 01:05:14.760
Now you have to navigate this minefield,

674
01:05:14.760 --> 01:05:18.040
you know, kind of walk through this ticket.

675
01:05:18.040 --> 01:05:21.540
and it's boring and it's tedious and it's bad for society.

676
01:05:21.540 --> 01:05:24.340
I think it's bad ultimately for the entrepreneurs themselves.

677
01:05:25.480 --> 01:05:28.320
Well, thank you very much for being such an attentive audience

678
01:05:28.320 --> 01:05:30.440
and please come by the Mises Institute.

679
01:05:30.440 --> 01:05:35.320
I would like to offer you two,

680
01:05:35.320 --> 01:05:36.820
not only for free download on the site,

681
01:05:36.820 --> 01:05:38.840
but we also have physical copies of a monograph

682
01:05:38.840 --> 01:05:40.040
that influenced me very much,

683
01:05:40.040 --> 01:05:42.760
Stefan Kinsella's Against Intellectual Property.

684
01:05:42.760 --> 01:05:45.360
He, for me, as the guy who opened my eyes,

685
01:05:45.360 --> 01:05:47.200
I tell you when he first wrote that essay,

686
01:05:47.200 --> 01:05:51.200
I read it six years ago and I thought, this is the most embarrassing thing I've ever read.

687
01:05:51.200 --> 01:05:53.200
It's absolutely wrong.

688
01:05:53.200 --> 01:05:57.360
And I was horrified that anybody could call for the repeal of intellectual property, repeal

689
01:05:57.360 --> 01:05:58.360
of copyright patents.

690
01:05:58.360 --> 01:05:59.360
I thought, this is crazy.

691
01:05:59.360 --> 01:06:01.840
Well, it took me six years to come around.

692
01:06:01.840 --> 01:06:03.340
It's an intellectual problem.

693
01:06:03.340 --> 01:06:08.240
And if you find anything I'm saying implausible, I would just suggest to you to give it time

694
01:06:08.240 --> 01:06:09.760
and think about it a little bit more.

695
01:06:09.760 --> 01:06:14.680
Look around the world, see if you can find examples of where absence of IP works and

696
01:06:14.680 --> 01:06:16.520
where presence of IP stagnates.

697
01:06:16.520 --> 01:06:20.520
and I think you'll see more and more examples and eventually come around to this position.

698
01:06:20.520 --> 01:06:22.520
Okay, thank you very much.