WEBVTT

NOTE The Income Tax is Un-American

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:16.240
My talk tonight is The Income Tax is Un-American, and that's kind of a bold statement given that the income tax is in our Constitution, that it is almost 100 years old,

2
00:00:16.240 --> 00:00:23.840
and that Americans have been paying the income tax by the millions for those many years.

3
00:00:23.840 --> 00:00:31.840
Now, I'm an economist, but I'm going to first start out by telling you what libertarians think of the income tax.

4
00:00:31.840 --> 00:00:39.840
Libertarians view the income tax very negatively in an ethical, moral context.

5
00:00:39.840 --> 00:00:51.840
Most importantly, libertarians view the income tax as theft, that income taxation represents the government taking your money from you.

6
00:00:51.840 --> 00:01:04.840
It's not a voluntary mutually beneficial exchange. It's an exchange where one party uses power to dominate the other.

7
00:01:04.840 --> 00:01:18.840
It's an exchange where one party uses the threat of guns, of imprisonment, of confiscation of assets in order to coax you into paying your income taxes.

8
00:01:18.840 --> 00:01:24.840
So, it's not a regular voluntary exchange that you and I do on a regular basis.

9
00:01:24.840 --> 00:01:32.840
It's a coerced exchange where the government takes money from you, an arrangement which none of us have agreed to.

10
00:01:32.840 --> 00:01:40.840
Okay, so that if I were to give you $100, that would be a mutually beneficial exchange.

11
00:01:40.840 --> 00:01:45.840
If you were to give me $100, that would also be a mutually beneficial exchange.

12
00:01:45.840 --> 00:01:52.840
But if I was to say I'm going to take $100 from you or that I have a friend who's right

13
00:01:52.840 --> 00:02:00.580
now in your apartment stealing all your stuff, okay, he's going to take $1,000 out of your

14
00:02:00.580 --> 00:02:04.560
wallet or your checking account or something, that's not a mutually beneficial exchange,

15
00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:07.180
that's theft.

16
00:02:07.180 --> 00:02:14.220
And the idea that we all agree to it, even if that were true, that doesn't make it any

17
00:02:14.220 --> 00:02:18.300
Less or More Ethical or Moral

18
00:02:18.300 --> 00:02:22.100
Just because the people on this side of the room

19
00:02:22.100 --> 00:02:26.260
dominate the people over in this corner

20
00:02:26.260 --> 00:02:30.160
doesn't mean that they can decide, well, yeah, let's take some of their money

21
00:02:30.160 --> 00:02:33.300
and then divide it evenly amongst the group

22
00:02:33.300 --> 00:02:36.340
or divide it evenly amongst themselves.

23
00:02:36.340 --> 00:02:38.480
Just because it's a larger act

24
00:02:38.480 --> 00:02:40.160
of more people

25
00:02:40.160 --> 00:02:42.980
agreeing and then taking money

26
00:02:42.980 --> 00:02:52.580
away from people at large doesn't make it any more moral or ethical. Because your taxes

27
00:02:52.580 --> 00:03:00.140
are withheld from your paycheck, in addition to being theft, it represents confiscation.

28
00:03:00.140 --> 00:03:06.180
The government confiscates your money until April 15th rolls around when you actually

29
00:03:06.180 --> 00:03:31.900
Libertarians also see the income tax as a mechanism of social control, where the government

30
00:03:31.900 --> 00:03:41.200
is controlling your lives very directly and very forcefully in numerous different ways.

31
00:03:41.200 --> 00:03:49.400
And even if that control was beneficial, libertarians wouldn't like it. We believe that people are

32
00:03:49.400 --> 00:03:55.360
free individuals. They should get to do and choose what they themselves want to and take

33
00:03:55.360 --> 00:04:25.360
Let's look at the tax code. Well, in innumerable ways does it distort our decisions in everyday life, although we very often don't see the income taxes doing the distortions, but certainly we all realize that because of the tax benefits of owning a home exists, and were actually increased in the past few years,

34
00:04:25.360 --> 00:04:32.360
The economy is telling us exactly the opposite. In the old days, when people were born and lived and died in the same hometown, buying a home was obviously the logical thing to do.

35
00:04:55.360 --> 00:05:02.120
choice, especially with the tax break in place. But nowadays, people go away to college, they

36
00:05:02.120 --> 00:05:07.960
go get a new job, very often that job may mean transferring from one city to another.

37
00:05:07.960 --> 00:05:14.960
So the idea of home ownership is somehow some kind of predestined ideal is simply wrong

38
00:05:14.960 --> 00:05:18.160
and libertarians say we need to let people choose.

39
00:05:18.160 --> 00:05:33.160
Let's look at health care. Health insurance, when it's paid by your employer, means it comes to you as a tax benefit.

40
00:05:33.160 --> 00:05:44.160
Because the employer is paying for it, you're not getting the money and then buying the insurance with after-tax dollars.

41
00:05:44.160 --> 00:05:50.960
So the tax code has artificially shifted us into employer-provided health care rather

42
00:05:50.960 --> 00:05:53.840
than individual-purchased health care.

43
00:05:53.840 --> 00:05:54.840
Guess what?

44
00:05:54.840 --> 00:05:57.160
That means the individual doesn't get to decide.

45
00:05:57.160 --> 00:06:04.320
Some large firm, some large corporation decides the package that's going to be offered.

46
00:06:04.320 --> 00:06:10.760
In fact, it's such a tax dodge that insurance itself has changed.

47
00:06:10.760 --> 00:06:20.220
When I was born, so many centuries ago, individuals bought catastrophic health insurance, which

48
00:06:20.220 --> 00:06:26.220
meant if you had a baby or you had a heart attack or you had cancer or you had your appendix

49
00:06:26.220 --> 00:06:33.640
out or something and you went to the hospital, the insurance would pay the bills.

50
00:06:33.640 --> 00:06:50.640
Because of the tax benefit, health insurance has evolved into comprehensive health care so that every doctor's visit, every prescription, every little piece of medical equipment goes through the insurance industry.

51
00:06:50.640 --> 00:07:00.640
So all our medical decisions, all of our health decisions have been changed because of that.

52
00:07:00.640 --> 00:07:11.640
And this is a case where the government is supposedly presenting us or providing with us, encouraging us through the tax code that's supposed to benefit us.

53
00:07:11.640 --> 00:07:15.640
But guess what? It's just the opposite.

54
00:07:15.640 --> 00:07:21.640
So now I'm going to put my economist hat on and show you why that's the case.

55
00:07:21.640 --> 00:07:23.640
Let's think about it.

56
00:07:23.640 --> 00:07:24.640
Health insurance.

57
00:07:24.640 --> 00:07:34.640
You've got a little card that you may have purchased from the university, or your parents gave it to you, or your employer gave it to you.

58
00:07:34.640 --> 00:07:43.640
And anything you want in terms of health care, they say you give them the card, right?

59
00:07:43.640 --> 00:07:50.640
And it doesn't really matter after that too much. You may have to pay deductibles, you may have to make some co-payments.

60
00:07:50.640 --> 00:07:59.360
But the co-payment is $20 or $25. If you've got strep throat, you pay $25. If you have

61
00:07:59.360 --> 00:08:07.320
a heart attack, you're basically going to be paying $25. So the economic decision between

62
00:08:07.320 --> 00:08:13.800
you and your doctor and your hospital and your other healthcare professionals has removed

63
00:08:13.800 --> 00:08:22.560
Bargaining has removed the price system from health care. It's taken you completely out

64
00:08:22.560 --> 00:08:29.900
of it. You don't decide what treatments you get anymore. The health insurance company

65
00:08:29.900 --> 00:08:41.460
decides what treatments you get. The doctor may seem like he's offering his own ideas

66
00:08:41.460 --> 00:08:43.820
and his own diagnosis and treatment.

67
00:08:43.820 --> 00:08:48.300
Those are being ruled by the insurance business

68
00:08:48.300 --> 00:08:50.980
and, of course, the government agencies as well.

69
00:08:53.180 --> 00:08:54.020
So guess what?

70
00:08:54.020 --> 00:08:57.580
If you're just paying $25 or you've got this card,

71
00:08:57.580 --> 00:09:02.060
are you more or less likely to seek healthcare assistance?

72
00:09:04.980 --> 00:09:06.260
Yeah, it's gotta be more.

73
00:09:07.300 --> 00:09:10.740
I mean, if it was, you pull a card out

74
00:09:10.740 --> 00:09:15.660
to get something, or you pull your wallet out and take out real money, well then all

75
00:09:15.660 --> 00:09:22.400
of a sudden, the first thing people do is ask, how much is it? How much is this going

76
00:09:22.400 --> 00:09:35.940
to cost me? Is this prescription $4 or is it $256? With insurance, you don't care.

77
00:09:35.940 --> 00:09:41.980
Another thing that this health care, government health care created system of insurance and

78
00:09:41.980 --> 00:09:49.780
Medicaid and Medicare has done is it's created a social safety net for people.

79
00:09:49.780 --> 00:09:51.220
That sounds like a good thing too, right?

80
00:09:51.220 --> 00:09:56.900
I'm trying to pick some of the best good things and then make them sound as they really are,

81
00:09:56.900 --> 00:09:59.860
bad things for people, bad things for America.

82
00:09:59.860 --> 00:10:08.640
Well, when you put a social safety net of health care underneath people, I'm not saying

83
00:10:08.640 --> 00:10:15.840
that you would do this necessarily, but what would a lot of people do if they knew they,

84
00:10:15.840 --> 00:10:21.860
no matter what, you've got Medicaid, Medicare, you've got maybe private insurance, but everybody

85
00:10:21.860 --> 00:10:29.860
Everybody knows basically that you can go to the hospital, to the emergency room and get treated, right?

86
00:10:29.860 --> 00:10:47.860
You're in a car accident, you overdose on alcohol or drugs, you name it, get in a fight, get stabbed.

87
00:10:47.860 --> 00:10:56.860
That social safety net means that we can act irresponsibly and probably get away with it.

88
00:10:56.860 --> 00:11:03.860
We can probably drive drunk, get into a car accident, and get away with it in many cases.

89
00:11:03.860 --> 00:11:07.860
Because you know the government's got that ambulance.

90
00:11:07.860 --> 00:11:13.860
You know that government's going to pay for that emergency room.

91
00:11:13.860 --> 00:11:20.860
So we all act irresponsible towards our health because of that social safety net.

92
00:11:20.860 --> 00:11:24.860
I shouldn't say everybody, but many people do.

93
00:11:24.860 --> 00:11:27.860
And it shows.

94
00:11:27.860 --> 00:11:34.860
The American population is overweight.

95
00:11:34.860 --> 00:11:40.860
Ten percent of the adult population is considered alcoholic.

96
00:11:40.860 --> 00:11:48.860
Another good percentage of them use illegal drugs and drive.

97
00:11:48.860 --> 00:11:57.860
So there's a lot of irresponsibility and a lot of that is because of the tax system and what it does.

98
00:11:57.860 --> 00:12:04.860
Of course, the government also controls us socially through the tax code by the fact that they spend money

99
00:12:04.860 --> 00:12:09.860
in a very large number of different ways.

100
00:12:11.860 --> 00:12:14.860
So libertarians don't like the income tax.

101
00:12:14.860 --> 00:12:18.860
And when we go back to the founding of this country,

102
00:12:18.860 --> 00:12:21.860
we see that the founders of the United States

103
00:12:21.860 --> 00:12:23.860
also did not like the income tax,

104
00:12:23.860 --> 00:12:28.860
that it was morally unacceptable.

105
00:12:28.860 --> 00:12:32.860
Okay, this was certainly true in the American Revolution.

106
00:12:32.860 --> 00:12:44.820
fought the world's most powerful empire without an army really, without a navy, because of

107
00:12:44.820 --> 00:12:55.060
their power to tax. And the taxes themselves were really, really small. It was just that

108
00:12:55.060 --> 00:13:01.540
they had taken the initiative, the British had taken the initiative to establish their

109
00:13:01.540 --> 00:13:11.020
The American people understood this because the people who moved to America and formed

110
00:13:11.020 --> 00:13:20.100
the colonies were leaving European nations that were oppressive.

111
00:13:20.100 --> 00:13:21.500
They wanted to get away from that.

112
00:13:21.500 --> 00:13:26.620
That's why they took the chance of coming here, is to get away from exactly that type

113
00:13:26.620 --> 00:13:31.320
of oppressive, intrusive government.

114
00:13:31.320 --> 00:13:36.320
The Articles of Confederation, the first form of government in the United States, did not

115
00:13:36.320 --> 00:13:41.600
allow the federal government to have any power to tax.

116
00:13:41.600 --> 00:13:45.040
It had no power to tax.

117
00:13:45.040 --> 00:13:55.320
It simply said that the federal government, the national government can request contributions

118
00:13:55.320 --> 00:13:57.520
from the state governments.

119
00:13:57.520 --> 00:14:01.960
and so they would say small states we need this amount, large states we need this amount,

120
00:14:01.960 --> 00:14:07.640
and then the states themselves would comply voluntarily to those demands.

121
00:14:07.640 --> 00:14:15.000
The U.S. Constitution provides no authority for the federal government to tax our incomes

122
00:14:15.000 --> 00:14:19.080
initially.

123
00:14:19.080 --> 00:14:24.760
There was no authority in the U.S. Constitution as written by the founding fathers to provide

124
00:14:24.760 --> 00:14:26.400
for an income tax.

125
00:14:26.400 --> 00:14:30.600
It was written specifically against the idea of an income tax.

126
00:14:30.600 --> 00:14:38.320
The federal government could tax imports, it could raise fees on federal roads, and

127
00:14:38.320 --> 00:14:45.280
it could charge people for postage, and it could impose certain excise taxes, like on

128
00:14:45.280 --> 00:14:46.280
alcohol.

129
00:14:46.280 --> 00:14:52.560
And as a matter of fact, the Supreme Court regularly backed that up for more than a hundred

130
00:14:52.560 --> 00:14:59.160
of Years of denying the federal government the right to impose a federal income tax so

131
00:14:59.160 --> 00:15:04.520
that even if the House and even if the Senate concurred and even if the President signed

132
00:15:04.520 --> 00:15:15.520
a bill that imposed an income tax, the Supreme Court always called it null and void as unconstitutional.

133
00:15:15.520 --> 00:15:21.340
President Lincoln got away with it during the American Civil War as an emergency war

134
00:15:21.340 --> 00:15:43.340
Now, across the political spectrum to the other side, that's the American side, now we're going to go back a little bit more towards Europe, and the Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels,

135
00:15:43.340 --> 00:15:54.340
Now we're going to go back a little bit more towards Europe and the Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Frederic Engels.

136
00:15:54.340 --> 00:16:03.340
And if you look at the Communist Manifesto written in 1848 by those two gentlemen, the forefathers of communism,

137
00:16:03.340 --> 00:16:15.340
In their 10-point program to bring about the socialist revolution, they call for a progressive income tax.

138
00:16:15.340 --> 00:16:23.340
A progressive income tax in the sense that the more money you make, the higher the rate, which is basically the type of system we have today.

139
00:16:23.340 --> 00:16:29.340
It's not a flat tax. It's a progressively higher rates for higher incomes.

140
00:16:29.340 --> 00:16:52.340
And I encourage each and every one of you, it's got to be on the web some place, to look for the Communist Manifesto, it's very short, and then to look at the ten-point program of the Communist Manifesto and see what you see in there, in your country, the United States.

141
00:16:52.340 --> 00:17:01.940
They called for all sorts of things that we did not have at the time, but that we do now.

142
00:17:01.940 --> 00:17:09.780
Things like a central bank we did not have, we do now. Things like public education. There

143
00:17:09.780 --> 00:17:17.740
was no public education in 1848 to speak of. Of course there is today. The communists were

144
00:17:17.740 --> 00:17:24.820
are joined by the socialist, the fascist, and socialist of every sort, basically, in calling

145
00:17:24.820 --> 00:17:29.940
for a progressive income tax.

146
00:17:29.940 --> 00:17:36.040
Here in the United States, a group known as the progressives, which came to be fairly

147
00:17:36.040 --> 00:17:43.840
prominent in the first part of the 20th century, also supported a progressive income tax.

148
00:17:43.840 --> 00:17:51.840
The Progressive Era lasts from the first through the second decade in the United States, where

149
00:17:51.840 --> 00:18:00.280
the Constitution was changed in a variety of ways, including the 16th Amendment.

150
00:18:00.280 --> 00:18:06.600
The 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution authorized an income tax in the United States

151
00:18:06.600 --> 00:18:13.440
for the first time, and it certainly was progressive.

152
00:18:13.440 --> 00:18:21.800
The more you make, the higher the tax, the higher the tax rate, it actually applied initially

153
00:18:21.800 --> 00:18:29.160
to very few people, only the super wealthy actually came under the umbrella of the progressive

154
00:18:29.160 --> 00:18:36.120
income tax as it was intended.

155
00:18:36.120 --> 00:18:43.760
There is some question as to whether or not the 16th Amendment was actually officially

156
00:18:43.760 --> 00:18:50.160
correctly passed, but I will pass on that issue here tonight.

157
00:18:50.160 --> 00:18:57.160
One interesting part of the whole debate, however, was that opponents of the income

158
00:18:57.160 --> 00:19:05.920
Income Tax wanted there to be included in the amendment a statement to the effect that

159
00:19:05.920 --> 00:19:13.680
the income tax rate could never rise above 10%. So the income tax could never rise above

160
00:19:13.680 --> 00:19:19.200
that level. And the proponents of the legislation said, oh, don't be ridiculous. It would never,

161
00:19:19.200 --> 00:19:26.120
ever get that high. We would never allow the income tax rate to ever approach 10%. And

162
00:19:26.120 --> 00:19:32.400
started out as only a couple of percent and only on those who would be making today several

163
00:19:32.400 --> 00:19:40.520
hundreds of thousands of dollars. So that 10% limit was never included. And it's too

164
00:19:40.520 --> 00:19:46.600
bad for taxpayers because within a couple of years, the income tax rates had passed

165
00:19:46.600 --> 00:19:55.220
10% and of course would go far beyond that level. Today, the upper brackets are in the

166
00:19:55.220 --> 00:20:06.380
and Low 40%, but we've seen marginal tax rates higher than 70%.

167
00:20:06.380 --> 00:20:14.440
And then during World War II, the withholding aspect of the income tax was put into place.

168
00:20:14.440 --> 00:20:20.420
This meant that as you got a paycheck that your employer would remove part of your pay

169
00:20:20.420 --> 00:20:21.780
and give it to the government.

170
00:20:21.780 --> 00:20:30.180
This is where the confiscation of income enters into the system.

171
00:20:30.180 --> 00:20:35.340
And of course, you think about today, prior to World War II, the income tax was pretty

172
00:20:35.340 --> 00:20:40.260
small still, and applied to a small number of people.

173
00:20:40.260 --> 00:20:45.900
Then they put this withholding aspect into the income tax, and during World War II, the

174
00:20:45.900 --> 00:20:50.160
marginal tax rates increased significantly, and the number of people who were actually

175
00:20:50.160 --> 00:21:06.740
The average family of a couple making the average median income in the United States,

176
00:21:06.740 --> 00:21:15.900
if there was no withholding tax on that average family, they would be writing a check tomorrow

177
00:21:15.900 --> 00:21:21.100
for more than $6,000.

178
00:21:21.100 --> 00:21:25.700
Now when you think about it, that would make a lot of people mad.

179
00:21:25.700 --> 00:21:34.500
A lot of people that I know who are normal, level-headed people, when they all of a sudden

180
00:21:34.500 --> 00:21:42.100
realize, like tonight, how much they've actually paid in total taxes, they're up in arms about

181
00:21:42.100 --> 00:21:43.100
it.

182
00:21:43.100 --> 00:21:49.100
They want to talk to me about it, and what can I do to not pay $6,000?

183
00:21:49.100 --> 00:21:57.100
Unfortunately, they've been kind of lulled into submission because of this withholding tax.

184
00:21:57.100 --> 00:22:05.100
One thing I think is very important to understand is tax reform.

185
00:22:05.100 --> 00:22:17.100
It's a big issue in the presidential campaign. Mike Huckabee wanted to impose the fair tax,

186
00:22:17.100 --> 00:22:23.900
which is a flat tax, on consumption. And then the battle between the current Democrats and

187
00:22:23.900 --> 00:22:32.880
Republican is that the current Democrats want to raise the marginal tax rates by withdrawing

188
00:22:32.880 --> 00:22:41.880
The Bush Tax Cuts, John McCain was against the Bush Tax Cuts but now supports them.

189
00:22:41.880 --> 00:22:47.320
Well basically what I want to tell you here tonight is that tax reform is a scam.

190
00:22:47.320 --> 00:22:57.360
You can't improve the system with marginal tax reform measures.

191
00:22:57.360 --> 00:23:04.360
When people in Washington DC talk about tax reform, it's a scam. They're scamming the

192
00:23:04.360 --> 00:23:11.720
voters into thinking they're going to get something out of this. But what it's really

193
00:23:11.720 --> 00:23:18.240
a scam about is the people in Congress who are talking about these measures. You know

194
00:23:18.240 --> 00:23:24.840
what happens when they start talking about the tax code? Just try to think. What would

195
00:23:24.840 --> 00:23:29.340
What would happen if senators and congressmen were gathering together to rewrite the tax

196
00:23:29.340 --> 00:23:32.340
code?

197
00:23:32.340 --> 00:23:38.360
Yeah, and their friends.

198
00:23:38.360 --> 00:23:45.440
And so money starts to flow into Washington D.C. at warp speed.

199
00:23:45.440 --> 00:23:52.380
People who would benefit from the changes are given money, and people who are being

200
00:23:52.380 --> 00:24:20.380
The people who are on the tax writing committees, the money starts flowing in like crazy. It's a giant campaign contribution mechanism and they've basically been, quote-unquote, reforming the tax code about every three or four years, ever since it went into being.

201
00:24:20.380 --> 00:24:28.380
They've come along and they've adjusted the marginal rates and they have adjusted the deductions in a significant way.

202
00:24:28.380 --> 00:24:37.380
They actually play around with a lot more, but the reforms are about every three to four years, just enough to refill those campaign coffers.

203
00:24:37.380 --> 00:24:46.380
But the system never gets any better. The rates and the amount of money that it's taken out of our pockets almost never goes down.

204
00:24:46.380 --> 00:24:58.380
Collectively, it's never gone down. And it only gets more and more complicated as they write in special provisions for this group or that group.

205
00:25:03.380 --> 00:25:13.380
I've got a PhD in economics. I was a business major as an undergraduate. I've taken intermediate accounting courses, level accounting courses.

206
00:25:13.380 --> 00:25:43.380
I can no longer do my taxes. I mean, I could go into TurboTax and fill in some numbers. But I've already tested myself out. And I didn't pass. And I've asked people who've worked for the IRS questions. I've called the IRS with questions. In about a third of the cases, I never got an answer.

207
00:25:43.380 --> 00:25:52.460
And about another third, they gave me the wrong answer.

208
00:25:52.460 --> 00:26:01.460
And the final third, they were able to either answer simple questions or they gave ambiguous

209
00:26:01.460 --> 00:26:02.460
answers.

210
00:26:02.460 --> 00:26:07.980
And of course, if you ask a question and they give you an answer and you get it wrong on

211
00:26:07.980 --> 00:26:16.180
in your taxes because they gave you the wrong information, you're still liable. So it's

212
00:26:16.180 --> 00:26:28.000
getting worse. It's not getting better. And that has been the trend trajectory from the

213
00:26:28.000 --> 00:26:33.820
beginning of the income tax to the present. If you wanted to go back and study the history

214
00:26:33.820 --> 00:26:39.940
Give the tax code, which I really don't suggest you do, but if you did, or just go back to

215
00:26:39.940 --> 00:26:47.340
the very beginning and look at it, amazingly simple, we would all kill to have that kind

216
00:26:47.340 --> 00:26:50.620
of an income tax.

217
00:26:50.620 --> 00:26:52.980
It's so different.

218
00:26:52.980 --> 00:26:59.660
Now speaking of apples and oranges, one of the things I wanted to talk about tonight,

219
00:26:59.660 --> 00:27:05.740
Because I think it is important is the fair tax.

220
00:27:05.740 --> 00:27:13.020
You could substitute in the flat tax, but any tax reform that's basically designed

221
00:27:13.020 --> 00:27:20.220
to simplify the system, to make everybody pay roughly the same amount or in percentage

222
00:27:20.220 --> 00:27:27.780
terms, but to not change the amount of revenue essentially coming into the government.

223
00:27:27.780 --> 00:27:39.980
This is more of an apples to apples type analysis. First of all, I have a hard time imagining

224
00:27:39.980 --> 00:27:48.980
a simple tax reform ever passing. The current people who write our tax legislation simply

225
00:27:48.980 --> 00:27:54.780
have too many friends, have too many favors. It's the idea where they would take away deductions

226
00:27:54.780 --> 00:28:03.740
from some group and give the money away to other groups. I just don't see that happening.

227
00:28:03.740 --> 00:28:11.980
Second of all, I don't really see even the theoretical possibility of a simple tax reform.

228
00:28:11.980 --> 00:28:21.820
If you had a sales tax instead of an income tax, and that sales tax was 23% and you add

229
00:28:21.820 --> 00:28:29.340
Add that on to the local tax, a sales tax of 8%, and so you're talking about a sales

230
00:28:29.340 --> 00:28:34.380
tax of 31%.

231
00:28:34.380 --> 00:28:38.380
And the proponents of this are saying, we can get rid of the IRS.

232
00:28:38.380 --> 00:28:44.820
Well, you may be able to get rid of some of the IRS, but the guys with the guns are still

233
00:28:44.820 --> 00:28:54.820
We're also going to have to be there, because believe me, people will be cheating on that system in a major league way.

234
00:28:54.820 --> 00:29:04.820
I mean, if you can cut the price of something by 30% just by paying cash, people are going to do that.

235
00:29:04.820 --> 00:29:22.820
I mean, right now as it is, 40% of Americans admit in opinion polls that they either have cheated or regularly cheat on their income taxes.

236
00:29:22.820 --> 00:29:26.820
It just goes to show you how stupid we are.

237
00:29:26.820 --> 00:29:33.820
Why would you admit to a perfect stranger that you regularly break the law?

238
00:29:33.820 --> 00:29:39.420
I mean, I would personally feel like I might be talking to an IRS agent.

239
00:29:39.420 --> 00:29:47.820
That's why I always pay my fair share of taxes.

240
00:29:47.820 --> 00:29:54.140
I have an analogy here about the fair tax and the flat tax.

241
00:29:54.140 --> 00:30:03.820
And basically, imagine a world where we grow apples.

242
00:30:03.820 --> 00:30:09.820
And one group of people argue that the way

243
00:30:09.820 --> 00:30:16.260
to properly pick an apple is to start at the bottom of the tree

244
00:30:16.260 --> 00:30:19.940
and then work your way up.

245
00:30:19.940 --> 00:30:21.940
And then get back down off the ladder,

246
00:30:21.940 --> 00:30:26.180
Move it over, start at the bottom, and work your way up.

247
00:30:26.180 --> 00:30:31.300
And then get down, move the ladder, start at the bottom and work your way up.

248
00:30:31.300 --> 00:30:40.420
But the other group says, no, what you should do is start at the bottom and work your way

249
00:30:40.420 --> 00:30:43.700
around the whole tree.

250
00:30:43.700 --> 00:30:47.040
And then once you get all the way around, then go up to a higher level and come back

251
00:30:47.040 --> 00:30:49.500
and get all of these apples.

252
00:30:49.500 --> 00:30:55.500
and then aggressively move yourself around an up tree going sideways rather than up and down.

253
00:30:58.500 --> 00:31:07.500
And that's basically the same type of debate between the current system of the income tax or the fair tax or the flat tax.

254
00:31:12.500 --> 00:31:17.500
We do know something that one of those methods has to be more efficient.

255
00:31:17.500 --> 00:31:30.940
We might not be sure about which one is more efficient, but we probably can presume that

256
00:31:30.940 --> 00:31:39.700
one's going to be better than the other. But the problem with the income tax is not how

257
00:31:39.700 --> 00:31:46.760
How to Most Efficiently Collect the Tax

258
00:31:46.760 --> 00:31:55.060
The problem with this world of apple growers is that the income tax means that we collect

259
00:31:55.060 --> 00:32:03.940
and go out and pick 100% of the apples and then we destroy 50% of them.

260
00:32:03.940 --> 00:32:10.980
And as a matter of fact, we have to pay about five to ten percent of our remaining apples

261
00:32:10.980 --> 00:32:15.180
to the people who destroy our apples for us.

262
00:32:15.180 --> 00:32:20.980
That's what the income tax does, or that's what the fair tax and the flat tax does.

263
00:32:20.980 --> 00:32:25.300
It says we're going to take half of all of our production and we're just going to bury

264
00:32:25.300 --> 00:32:26.300
it.

265
00:32:26.300 --> 00:32:27.880
We're going to burn it.

266
00:32:27.880 --> 00:32:36.320
We're going to roll it over instead of eating it.

267
00:32:36.320 --> 00:32:42.640
I would rather have even used a less efficient method of doing something as long as we get

268
00:32:42.640 --> 00:32:49.200
the whole 100% of the apples.

269
00:32:49.200 --> 00:32:54.760
So what libertarians argue is that we're not going to argue over what's the best way to

270
00:32:54.760 --> 00:33:07.760
What libertarians argue is that this theft process is immoral from the get-go, and that

271
00:33:07.760 --> 00:33:16.120
it has terrible consequences in our economy and in our lives.

272
00:33:16.120 --> 00:33:19.080
It makes us less free.

273
00:33:19.080 --> 00:33:23.720
It takes away our labor from us.

274
00:33:23.720 --> 00:33:29.200
It then tells us what to do, how to spend our lives, how to live, how to take care of

275
00:33:29.200 --> 00:33:36.680
our health, and thousands of other things that you can't imagine until you actually

276
00:33:36.680 --> 00:33:47.000
are faced with the income tax in your lives, in your businesses.

277
00:33:47.000 --> 00:33:57.560
It does all of that, so libertarians want to scrap the income tax entirely because it's

278
00:33:57.560 --> 00:34:03.120
not American, it doesn't represent the American way of life.

279
00:34:03.120 --> 00:34:09.440
Now of course the question is, can it be done?

280
00:34:09.440 --> 00:34:14.200
Well constitutional amendments are hard things to overturn, but the 18th amendment to the

281
00:34:14.200 --> 00:34:24.160
Constitution was overturned, alcohol prohibition was seen by the majority of people as being

282
00:34:24.160 --> 00:34:30.640
wrong and wrong-headed. And it wasn't the drinkers. The drinkers were against it from

283
00:34:30.640 --> 00:34:38.320
the get-go. It was business people who saw what it was doing to their business, what

284
00:34:38.320 --> 00:34:57.800
It was mothers. Mothers united into an organization. I can't remember what the name of it is. Mothers

285
00:34:57.800 --> 00:35:03.560
against alcohol prohibition or something like that. Because they saw what it was doing to

286
00:35:33.560 --> 00:35:46.560
and so prohibition was passed and then repealed once people figured out that it was wrong and wrong headed.

287
00:35:46.560 --> 00:35:55.560
And I think that there are a lot of people, in fact the majority of people now see that income tax is at least wrong headed.

288
00:35:55.560 --> 00:36:25.560
I think that is perfectly clear. What a lot of people don't understand is just, it's wrong. And that it's not American. And it can be done. If we got rid of the income tax today, we would have to cut the federal budget back to the year 2000. Eight years ago, if we had those spending levels, we could take every dollar of the income tax that is collected and not collected.

289
00:36:25.560 --> 00:36:41.560
That's how much spending has increased from 1.9 trillion dollars in the year 2000 to 3.1 trillion dollars in the current budget year.

290
00:36:41.560 --> 00:36:54.560
That difference between 1.9 and 3.1 is actually slightly larger than the amount of revenues currently collected by the income tax.

291
00:36:54.560 --> 00:37:02.560
So the income tax makes up a little bit between about 35% of federal expenditures.

292
00:37:02.560 --> 00:37:07.560
So it's not eliminating federal government, but it's a good start.

293
00:37:07.560 --> 00:37:11.560
And that's what libertarians hope to achieve in the future.

294
00:37:11.560 --> 00:37:20.560
And to that end, we hold an annual April 15th tax day protest

295
00:37:20.560 --> 00:37:25.560
in front of the post office on the Olopoleika Highway.

296
00:37:25.560 --> 00:37:32.560
And initially I was kind of timid about going to these tax protests.

297
00:37:32.560 --> 00:37:39.560
I mean, the students, okay, yeah, but faculty shouldn't really be out there, right?

298
00:37:39.560 --> 00:37:47.560
But over the last several years I've just had a great time going to these tax day protests.

299
00:37:47.560 --> 00:37:59.560
We've been on TV, we've been in the newspaper, and we hold signs that say a number of different things, but the most popular one is, honk if you hate taxes.

300
00:37:59.560 --> 00:38:14.560
And the noise level out there can get pretty high, especially at the lunch hour, and then between five and six o'clock when everybody's going home, almost everybody honks in favor of us.

301
00:39:14.560 --> 00:39:21.240
in the Income Tax because they don't pay taxes themselves and their job is paid for by the

302
00:39:21.240 --> 00:39:22.240
income tax.

303
00:39:22.240 --> 00:39:29.320
So obviously there is a lot of opposition within government employees especially and

304
00:39:29.320 --> 00:39:33.360
people who have more or less a direct benefit from the income tax.

305
00:39:33.360 --> 00:39:43.520
But I want you to know today that the founding of this country and the founders of this country

306
00:39:43.520 --> 00:39:49.720
dramatically opposed any idea about the income tax and that's why I think it's

307
00:39:49.720 --> 00:39:54.320
un-American and I think you should and one day I think we can do something

308
00:39:54.320 --> 00:39:57.360
about it. Thank you very much.

309
00:40:00.440 --> 00:40:06.640
Sure, I'd be happy to. I'd be happy to if you have any. I can't offer any tax advice,

310
00:40:06.640 --> 00:40:13.640
11 a.m.

311
00:41:06.640 --> 00:41:34.640
No, that's a very valid point. We do implicitly accept it. You know, I pay my taxes even though I think it's an immoral, unethical system, and we don't see the real true nature of it unless you have run afoul of the system.

312
00:41:34.640 --> 00:41:47.640
Unless you have tried to oppose this system, unless you have said, you know, I didn't agree to this, nobody here agreed to it, and yet we still have it.

313
00:41:47.640 --> 00:41:52.640
And then you see the guns come out, and you see your assets confiscated.

314
00:41:52.640 --> 00:42:00.640
Without trial, even, I mean, all this stuff takes place prior to any type of normal adjudication system.

315
00:42:00.640 --> 00:42:07.640
You know, if they think you have run against their rules and regulations,

316
00:42:07.640 --> 00:42:12.640
they not only use force, but they use punitive force.

317
00:42:12.640 --> 00:42:19.640
I mean, they take you down in terms of your assets and your access to your debit card,

318
00:42:19.640 --> 00:42:27.200
just like that without a trial and so that's where the that's why we see it as

319
00:42:27.200 --> 00:42:30.360
sort of implicit agreement because normally well we just go along with it

320
00:42:30.360 --> 00:42:36.840
but if we didn't then we would see the the type of force that's involved that it

321
00:42:36.840 --> 00:42:42.400
is force it is coercive and it is a vindictive type of force it's not you

322
00:42:42.400 --> 00:42:47.680
know gee can't we all get along here it's we're coming down on you and we're

323
00:42:47.680 --> 00:42:54.440
putting you out before anything has actually been adjudicated. So it has a

324
00:42:54.440 --> 00:43:02.680
kinder face but it also has one that's very menacing.

325
00:43:17.680 --> 00:43:47.600
Well, you know, in surveys of Americans, where they're asked to list the programs, the government,

326
00:43:47.600 --> 00:43:52.600
and the environmental services that they deem most necessary, most essential.

327
00:43:52.600 --> 00:43:58.600
Ninety percent of those respondents indicated that most, in fact all,

328
00:43:58.600 --> 00:44:03.600
almost all of the ones that they listed were local government services.

329
00:44:03.600 --> 00:44:10.600
Police, fire, trash collection, you know, things, you know, courts, jails.

330
00:44:10.600 --> 00:44:12.600
None of that is paid for with the income tax.

331
00:44:12.600 --> 00:44:23.400
is paid for by local taxes and while all taxes are coercive libertarians are

332
00:44:23.400 --> 00:44:28.680
reasonable in the sense that well the more local they are the better the lower

333
00:44:28.680 --> 00:44:34.000
the rates the better the more chance that citizens have to actually impact

334
00:44:34.000 --> 00:44:39.800
the determination of taxes the better you know I get to I've gotten to vote on

335
00:44:39.800 --> 00:44:50.800
A lot of property taxes here in Auburn, sales tax increases, property taxes, they have to send me a notice that they're raising my property values.

336
00:44:50.800 --> 00:44:54.800
I get to go to court and present evidence that they're wrong and I'm right.

337
00:44:54.800 --> 00:45:03.800
And so people think of, you know, the income tax is government, and if it went away, government will go away.

338
00:45:03.800 --> 00:45:14.800
but none of the government that they really like and see as important would go away to any great extent.

339
00:45:14.800 --> 00:45:25.800
Everything that the government does has been done by the private sector for a long time and in a variety of different ways.

340
00:45:25.800 --> 00:45:32.800
In the United States in the colonial period and beyond, most roads were done by private companies

341
00:45:32.800 --> 00:45:38.000
and not just easy roads but really hard roads were done by private companies.

342
00:45:38.000 --> 00:45:47.240
Until the 1930s, almost all of welfare or assistance for the poor was done by the

343
00:45:47.240 --> 00:45:53.560
private sector and that has gotten increasingly sort of pushed out of the

344
00:45:53.560 --> 00:45:59.080
way. So everything that the government does now do, the private sector has

345
00:45:59.080 --> 00:46:10.080
It's already done prior to this and could easily come back in and fill in any gaps that were missing once the federal income tax was removed.

346
00:46:10.080 --> 00:46:21.080
Obviously, a lot of policy decisions would have to be different. Stationing 150,000 American soldiers in South Korea would have to be rethought.

347
00:46:21.080 --> 00:46:36.080
for 50 years, basing 150,000 American soldiers in South Korea, which could wipe out North Korea with both hands tied behind its back.

348
00:46:36.080 --> 00:46:45.080
A lot of those more sensible decisions would have to be met, would have to be made if you took the income tax away.

349
00:46:45.080 --> 00:46:49.080
Things would have to go, and things would have to be prioritized.

350
00:46:49.080 --> 00:47:01.080
In today's world, we increase taxes, we increase the national debt, we print up money to pay for whatever is left over, and we never make any hard decisions.

351
00:47:01.080 --> 00:47:11.080
We never make any decisions saying, what's more important? It's just more, more, more, and things tend to get worse, worse, and worse from my perspective.

352
00:47:19.080 --> 00:47:36.900
The federal government is funded a lot by the federal government itself.

353
00:47:36.900 --> 00:47:42.860
The state governments are like franchise restaurants for the federal government.

354
00:47:42.860 --> 00:47:48.360
They're just the local operator.

355
00:47:48.360 --> 00:47:59.200
I think a lot of decisions would have to be looked at and agencies, departments would

356
00:47:59.200 --> 00:48:06.520
have to be considered for termination and the Department of Education is one where I

357
00:48:06.520 --> 00:48:13.500
think what it does is does not only not help private schools, it actually makes it more

358
00:48:13.500 --> 00:48:19.100
more difficult for them to achieve their goals.

359
00:48:19.100 --> 00:48:25.500
People have suggested, and I think rightly so, eliminating the Department of Energy and

360
00:48:25.500 --> 00:48:28.380
the Department of Homeland Security.

361
00:48:28.380 --> 00:48:34.780
People have suggested that bringing troops home, we have American troops stationed abroad

362
00:48:34.780 --> 00:48:37.940
in 151 countries around the world.

363
00:48:37.940 --> 00:48:44.500
I didn't even know there were 151 countries around the world until I read that article.

364
00:48:44.500 --> 00:48:50.660
And you know, I think that's probably the most stupid form of spending, is to take American

365
00:48:50.660 --> 00:48:59.660
money and spend it on soldiers in a different country, because that makes the local leaders

366
00:48:59.660 --> 00:49:07.220
look kind of like puppets to their population, plus we're spending our dollars in their country.

367
00:49:07.220 --> 00:49:12.740
It seems like if you're going to spend it on soldiers, spend it here.

368
00:49:12.740 --> 00:49:19.020
And then if you did need to send them someplace, well, you can just pick your choice.

369
00:49:19.020 --> 00:49:25.580
But keeping soldiers in every country permanently doesn't make a lot of sense to me, so I think

370
00:49:25.580 --> 00:49:36.140
a lot of that would have to come undone as well.

371
00:49:36.140 --> 00:49:49.100
Well, Congress would have to make those determinations, but I think the candidates for cutting are

372
00:49:49.100 --> 00:49:54.100
extremely large, both in terms of whole programs, whole agencies, but also in terms of just

373
00:49:54.100 --> 00:50:01.660
cutting back on certain things and making other things run on their own, like the post

374
00:50:01.660 --> 00:50:02.660
office.

375
00:50:02.660 --> 00:50:07.660
You know, they made the post office run on its own. There was no more federal subsidies for that.

376
00:50:07.660 --> 00:50:15.660
They could certainly do that for Amtrak and they can do it for a hundred other agencies that could live off of their own revenues.

377
00:50:15.660 --> 00:50:24.660
So they could be completely cut off. I worked in the governor's office in Alabama for the state banking agency.

378
00:50:24.660 --> 00:50:36.380
Agency. And I was the assistant superintendent of banking. And we ran off the charges that

379
00:50:36.380 --> 00:50:41.860
we made to the banks. We didn't, we never had one penny of tax dollars, which makes

380
00:50:41.860 --> 00:50:47.940
me feel, you know, me sort of a hardcore libertarian and working for the state government was,

381
00:50:47.940 --> 00:50:54.620
I was little upset about, not upset, after all I was just getting some of my money back

382
00:50:54.620 --> 00:51:01.520
but we never took a penny from the taxpayers we charged the banks to

383
00:51:01.520 --> 00:51:07.700
inspect them so we set regulations they they had a chance to comment on the

384
00:51:07.700 --> 00:51:16.940
regulations and then that would be put forth to for approval and in order to be

385
00:51:16.940 --> 00:51:20.660
chartered at the state level instead of the federal level they would have to be

386
00:51:20.660 --> 00:51:27.460
We regulated, someone would have to go into the bank and count the money and oversee their

387
00:51:27.460 --> 00:51:35.980
loan portfolio and all that kind of stuff and we would get paid a fee as a result of

388
00:51:35.980 --> 00:51:37.220
that.

389
00:51:37.220 --> 00:51:42.820
So we ran completely independently, we had a very good working relationship with our

390
00:51:42.820 --> 00:51:49.140
banks because our banks could come to us or they could come to the federal regulators

391
00:51:49.140 --> 00:51:54.860
were their charter. And so if we were good to them and we had a good working relationship

392
00:51:54.860 --> 00:52:01.060
with them, they would come to us. If we tried to impose some stupid regulation, they would

393
00:52:01.060 --> 00:52:05.980
switch over to the feds. And that's how libertarians would like, if we're going to have any kind

394
00:52:05.980 --> 00:52:12.700
of government intrusion, those are kind of some of the ways in which we can make life

395
00:52:12.700 --> 00:52:23.540
more cooperative and more harmonious rather than having one of coercion and monopoly dictating

396
00:52:23.540 --> 00:52:24.540
to everybody.

397
00:52:24.540 --> 00:52:32.540
That's what we want to see, at a minimum, achieved here in the United States.

398
00:52:32.540 --> 00:53:02.540
Yes. Let's see. Okay, in the year, in the year 2000, 1.8 trillion

399
00:53:02.540 --> 00:53:30.340
dollars of spending, well I do know that they took in 1.2 trillion in 2008 and I

400
00:53:30.340 --> 00:53:37.340
I think, what was the year you were asking for?

401
00:54:00.340 --> 00:54:25.340
I would just be guessing. I would just be guessing. You can go to the United States Federal Budget on Wikipedia or the Treasury Department, though, and get all those numbers.

402
00:54:25.340 --> 00:54:52.700
Numbers. Although you have to be careful. There's a lot of numbers and there's a lot of different ways in which they present them. So you have to be very, very careful about what numbers you're talking about. I did spend a little bit of time today making sure I had a few correct numbers. And it's pretty amazing. Pretty amazing amounts of money involved in all that.

403
00:54:55.340 --> 00:55:03.340
Are there ways to eliminate the national debt and keep up with the state's aeronautics and that factor?

404
00:55:25.340 --> 00:55:32.140
The last one I heard but did not read, so I can't tell you what the source was or if

405
00:55:32.140 --> 00:55:35.660
it's valid, was 60 trillion dollars.

406
00:55:35.660 --> 00:55:41.100
And that's really a hole that we probably aren't going to get out of.

407
00:55:41.100 --> 00:55:46.860
I would like to think that if we started today, you know, and cut all sorts of government

408
00:55:46.860 --> 00:55:52.980
spending and cut taxes and made everything more efficient that somehow we could grow

409
00:55:52.980 --> 00:55:58.980
I don't know our way out of it, but I'm pretty skeptical about that.

410
00:55:58.980 --> 00:56:10.980
The estimates from economists at MIT, as well as the general accounting office of the federal government,

411
00:56:10.980 --> 00:56:31.980
Come up with numbers like we would have to cut spending in half and increase tax rates by 50% starting today in order to somehow erase out $60 trillion in these future liabilities.

412
00:56:31.980 --> 00:56:34.980
Of course, we could also just renege on them.

413
00:56:34.980 --> 00:56:41.980
We can just say, you know, all you old people, we just can't take care of you anymore. You're on your own.

414
00:56:41.980 --> 00:56:50.980
And we're probably going to do a lot of that. We're probably going to do a lot of inflation at the Fed, because you can inflate away debt.

415
00:56:50.980 --> 00:56:55.980
You can inflate away liabilities just by making the dollars less valuable.

416
00:56:55.980 --> 00:57:24.980
Yeah, yeah, there's no easy way out of this, there's no good way out of it, and I don't really see, you know, logically I could sit down and draw out a plan that might work, but they don't listen to me.

417
00:57:24.980 --> 00:57:35.580
to me. They don't listen to us over there. We started calling the housing bubble in 2003,

418
00:57:35.580 --> 00:57:42.780
you know, when long before anybody else had noticed it, we actually said that the housing

419
00:57:42.780 --> 00:57:50.300
bubble in the home building stocks was over in 2000, mid 2005, and anybody who talked

420
00:57:50.300 --> 00:57:54.860
about the housing bubble on TV or whatever would be shouted down as saying, oh, that's

421
00:57:54.860 --> 00:57:58.280
of Business, that there would be a housing bubble and home prices. Home prices never

422
00:57:58.280 --> 00:58:05.400
go down. Real estate is a great investment. We were calling the end of that bubble aspect

423
00:58:05.400 --> 00:58:17.440
in the stock market at that point. So no one listens to, to a great extent, to economists

424
00:58:17.440 --> 00:58:26.760
of the Austrian School. They prefer mainstream, main street marketing type economists to tell

425
00:58:26.760 --> 00:58:34.880
a story. And so this message about the income tax or that message about the housing bubble

426
00:58:34.880 --> 00:58:41.220
doesn't really get out that effectively. The main street media doesn't ever put it out

427
00:58:41.220 --> 00:58:54.220
I've been out there until very recently and people just haven't been listening to us, which is why I'm so appreciative that you came here to listen to me tonight. Thank you very much.
