WEBVTT

NOTE An Interview with Friedrich Hayek: Part I

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:14.000
so that we younger men and also the people listening with the pamphlet will understand the character of the figures involved in the Austrian School.

2
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:20.000
And my first question that I had was on Menger.

3
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:22.000
What was his...

4
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:29.000
As you say, he did not want to publish and yet he had enormous impact of the ideas.

5
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:37.000
What was the character of Menger as a teacher or a personality, which may be his carry forth even though he wrote so little?

6
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:46.000
Well, that's a question I've often asked myself. See, I have a new man. I've seen him a single time.

7
00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:58.000
When he was about 80, long retired, marching in an academic profession, and the comic part of his story is

8
00:00:59.000 --> 00:01:16.000
When later I wrote a biographical essay on him, editing his works, there's one single sentence which is based on my own experience, and that is the only one which is wrong,

9
00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:26.500
Because he made a very impressive figure, so I described him as a tall man, and after whatever was told to me, you are alone, it's quite medium-sized.

10
00:01:26.500 --> 00:01:34.500
He was such an impressive figure, having seen him, I described him as a tall man.

11
00:01:34.500 --> 00:02:04.480
Now that his seminar, which ceased as early as 1903, when he retired the small group of very intelligent people and as was again a tradition associated with regular meetings with his former teacher,

12
00:02:04.500 --> 00:02:23.500
The former students, who were already occupying important positions in a coffee house, created a Menger circle that built in the century, which had largely vanished.

13
00:02:23.500 --> 00:02:39.500
that was dominated the first third of last century, and since Menger retired in 1903, very little was left beginning of this century.

14
00:02:39.500 --> 00:02:53.500
Then during World War I, the most powerful personal figure among his students, Boehm-Bawerk, also died.

15
00:02:53.500 --> 00:02:59.500
And so died the great textbook expositor, Filipowicz.

16
00:02:59.500 --> 00:03:21.500
And indeed, even the third man, who ultimately became my teacher, Friedrich von Mises, headed one of the last governments of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, being Minister of Trade, who had tempered the university.

17
00:03:21.500 --> 00:03:31.500
So when I came back from the war in 1918 was not a single one of the great features teaching.

18
00:03:31.500 --> 00:03:45.500
In fact, economics was in charge, temporarily and other comically, of an economic historian who was a socialist

19
00:03:45.500 --> 00:03:57.500
and became later the founder of the famous Marxist-Freudian Frank Institute of Social Research.

20
00:03:57.500 --> 00:04:06.500
But, Rieser came back. Who was that? I don't know. Grünberg is his name. Carl Grünberg.

21
00:04:06.500 --> 00:04:19.500
Later, the later people of the Frankfurt Institute were representative figures of Marx-Freud tradition in the 19th century.

22
00:04:19.500 --> 00:04:26.500
But he himself was an economic historian inclined in that direction.

23
00:04:26.500 --> 00:04:36.500
Scholarly Head was something which became a very political institution, but wholly uninteresting to us.

24
00:04:36.500 --> 00:04:43.500
And there was Mises who came back and became still my teacher.

25
00:04:43.500 --> 00:04:52.500
And Mises, who was what's called a present, an unfaithful man,

26
00:04:52.500 --> 00:05:04.500
Man who had the license to teach at the university, that to earn his living as a secretary of the Chamber of Commerce.

27
00:05:04.500 --> 00:05:13.500
Now, please be discreet about this point, because it raises very touchy problems.

28
00:05:13.500 --> 00:05:26.500
But it is commonly believed, and Mises himself asserted it, that he was never given a professorship because of anti-Semitism.

29
00:05:26.500 --> 00:05:34.500
It's not as simple as this, because half the law of faculty consisted of Jews.

30
00:05:34.500 --> 00:05:57.500
Well, the problem why Mises didn't get a professorship is a very peculiar one, and my answer to this, which I don't think has ever been stated, but which I will tell you is, all of our Jews who get a professorship, we had to have the support of these Jewish fellows.

31
00:05:57.500 --> 00:06:07.500
Any other Jews who were sufficiently eminent to be supported, because all the appointed Jews could get a professorship.

32
00:06:07.500 --> 00:06:18.500
But the Jews who were teaching were all socialists, and Mises was an anti-socialist, so he could not get the support of his own fellows.

33
00:06:18.500 --> 00:06:27.500
So the reason why I did not get a professorship was not really anti-Semitism, but he wasn't liked by his Jewish colleagues.

34
00:06:27.500 --> 00:06:37.500
It's a very comic story, and which I tell you is hesitation, because it's something you cannot prove.

35
00:06:37.500 --> 00:06:42.820
I'm quite certain it's correct, for my knowledge of the position,

36
00:06:42.820 --> 00:06:50.220
but the Vienna of the 1920s and 1930s

37
00:06:50.220 --> 00:06:56.220
is not intelligent without the Jewish problem,

38
00:06:56.220 --> 00:07:01.500
which was not a problem simply of Christians and Jews,

39
00:07:01.500 --> 00:07:05.900
but a very large middle group in between the two,

40
00:07:05.900 --> 00:07:12.900
Partly of baptized Jews, partly of Christians who have made friends with the Jews,

41
00:07:12.900 --> 00:07:19.900
and there was close contact with the purely Christian group, the mixed group,

42
00:07:19.900 --> 00:07:25.900
the game between the mixed group and the Jewish group, but not between the two things.

43
00:07:25.900 --> 00:07:30.900
I became very much aware of this quite a recent time ago,

44
00:07:30.900 --> 00:07:36.900
And I was asked whom of the great figures of Yemen I had known at the time.

45
00:07:36.900 --> 00:07:47.900
Have you known, for instance, Schrödinger? Yes, of course. Wittgenstein? Yes, of course. And so on.

46
00:07:47.900 --> 00:07:53.900
Then he came to Freud. No, no, I couldn't possibly have known Freud. Why?

47
00:07:53.900 --> 00:07:58.900
Because he belonged to the Holy Jewish School, and that was beyond my reach.

48
00:07:58.900 --> 00:08:28.580
Was not Freud a private docent for many years himself and was Freud also a private docent?

49
00:08:28.580 --> 00:08:32.580
When did he ever take a university position?

50
00:08:32.580 --> 00:08:36.580
Never, you know, both Mises and Fried.

51
00:08:36.580 --> 00:08:40.580
It's a title, Professor, but it was purely a title.

52
00:08:40.580 --> 00:08:44.580
The Werth Privatus Center had the license to teach

53
00:08:44.580 --> 00:08:48.580
what the Privatus Center means, and they finally

54
00:08:48.580 --> 00:08:52.580
decorated for being called professor, but never

55
00:08:52.580 --> 00:08:55.580
received a penny from the university.

56
00:08:55.580 --> 00:09:01.580
It's remarkable that two of the most important minds of Vienna were unable to do it.

57
00:09:01.580 --> 00:09:10.580
A very large number. And not only people, in the majority of instances, they were Jewish, but not only Jews.

58
00:09:10.580 --> 00:09:21.580
People who had highly unpopular views, but were recognized in a way, would get a license to teach, but not the regular professorship.

59
00:09:21.580 --> 00:09:29.580
Now, I have a question on this mixed group. Is this another religious group or what do you mean a mixed group?

60
00:09:29.580 --> 00:09:37.580
Mostly Christian Jews and Christians who were not anti-Semites.

61
00:09:37.580 --> 00:09:38.580
Oh, I see.

62
00:09:38.580 --> 00:09:52.580
who readily mixed with each other, and it was on the margin of the two pure groups, there was an intermediate group of people who very readily mixed and knew each other,

63
00:09:52.580 --> 00:09:59.580
which the extreme Jew and the extreme Christian would hardly communicate with the other side.

64
00:09:59.580 --> 00:10:03.580
You were a relative of Wittgenstein, are you not?

65
00:10:03.580 --> 00:10:25.580
The first time I heard of Wittgenstein was when I was a very small boy, and one of my aunts of my stern country answers once remarked,

66
00:10:25.580 --> 00:10:35.580
My grandfather has sold his daughter to a Jewish banker in Vienna, it was also a relation to the Wittgensteins ever came about.

67
00:10:35.580 --> 00:10:37.580
I see, all right.

68
00:10:37.580 --> 00:10:52.580
But they were completely established in Vienna society, as in general, the Jewish problem in Vienna became acute

69
00:10:52.580 --> 00:10:57.780
only as a result of the recent emigration from Poland.

70
00:10:57.780 --> 00:11:02.300
There was an old established Jewish population in Vienna,

71
00:11:02.300 --> 00:11:08.660
partly of local origin, partly of Hungarian or Bohemian origin,

72
00:11:08.660 --> 00:11:11.820
who were fully accepted to recognize

73
00:11:11.820 --> 00:11:15.060
the violent anti-Semitism occurred

74
00:11:15.060 --> 00:11:21.340
when very primitive, poor, Polish Jews immigrated

75
00:11:21.340 --> 00:11:27.980
already before the war and partly in flight from the Russians during the war.

76
00:11:27.980 --> 00:11:35.580
Then I became thrilled with the type of Jew which hadn't been known before in this caftan,

77
00:11:35.580 --> 00:11:41.740
a long beard, all that which we hadn't even seen before, and it was against them that the valiant

78
00:11:41.740 --> 00:11:50.540
anti-Semitism arose. And was that in the 20s, 1920s or 30s? What period? What period? During

79
00:11:50.540 --> 00:11:57.540
Do you think, was Menger equally respected by all scholars in the United States?

80
00:12:20.540 --> 00:12:25.540
In terms of the period, was he seen as a profound, a penetrating mind?

81
00:12:25.540 --> 00:12:35.540
Menger would be, and as I said, during the 1970s, the 1870s, the end of the century,

82
00:12:35.540 --> 00:12:44.540
the division was not yet so sharp. Menger himself made himself, before he became a professor,

83
00:12:44.540 --> 00:12:59.540
The reputation of the Germanist, which was in general a larger Jewish profession, so he was very much respected in the Jewish intellectual circle.

84
00:12:59.540 --> 00:13:12.540
Well, Menger's story, I ought not to anticipate too much, because I have now a great deal of information, what is still a confidential document.

85
00:13:12.540 --> 00:13:25.540
Menger's son, the mathematician, is producing a biography, which I have read in manuscript, which is not yet published, so I mustn't give away too much.

86
00:13:25.540 --> 00:13:41.540
Well can you tell us, can you show us on this map any highlights of Menger's life that we should note, like you were saying, now he was, wasn't he the finance minister?

87
00:13:41.540 --> 00:13:53.540
No, no. He was only for many years tutor of the Archduke Rudolf, the son of Francis Joseph who committed suicide in the end.

88
00:13:53.540 --> 00:14:03.540
and through that he had intimate contacts, but apart from this he refused every official position.

89
00:14:03.540 --> 00:14:10.540
In contrast to his successors, the Boehm-Bawerk was for many years Minister of Finance

90
00:14:10.540 --> 00:14:19.540
and Mises in the end had to come in more as a figurehead at the very end of the old empire.

91
00:14:19.540 --> 00:14:27.540
Mises believes that a suicide, he says in his notes and recollections,

92
00:14:27.540 --> 00:14:32.540
he believes it was the pessimism about the future,

93
00:14:32.540 --> 00:14:37.540
which had been imparted to him from Menger, which led to the suicide,

94
00:14:37.540 --> 00:14:41.540
that it wasn't the relationship with the girl, but he despaired about the liberal future.

95
00:14:41.540 --> 00:14:44.540
Do you think that Mises is exaggerating that?

96
00:14:44.540 --> 00:14:53.540
Yes, it certainly contributed greatly. I wouldn't dare to make a simple statement of any one cause.

97
00:14:53.540 --> 00:15:08.540
This was a very strong contributory factor. Rudolf, the Crown Prince, had been made by Menger at a 19th century level.

98
00:15:08.540 --> 00:15:20.540
Very much in conflict with the Austrian then ruling tradition, his attempts to reform them proved unsuccessful.

99
00:15:23.540 --> 00:15:34.540
The chance of his father living on forever, as it turned out to be true, that he had no prospects in the foreseeable future to do anything about it,

100
00:15:34.540 --> 00:15:40.540
was quite enough to put him in a state of very deep depression.

101
00:15:40.540 --> 00:15:46.540
I believe the immediate cause was something quite different,

102
00:15:46.540 --> 00:15:52.540
but that his basic depressive view of the world,

103
00:15:52.540 --> 00:15:55.540
which made him ready for a suicide,

104
00:15:55.540 --> 00:16:01.540
was due to his seeing the world in the light of an essential liberal,

105
00:16:01.540 --> 00:16:16.540
which Menger had made to him. Menger's influence on him was evidently, by cover now from the period of his son, very much greater than I had imagined.

106
00:16:16.540 --> 00:16:23.540
Mises, who couldn't have known this except by stories, is evidently right.

107
00:16:23.540 --> 00:16:34.540
The influence of the seminar was very great, Menger's, Boehm-Bawerk's and the meetings that Mises had in the 20s.

108
00:16:34.540 --> 00:16:35.540
Well, it's different.

109
00:16:35.540 --> 00:16:37.540
What were the differences?

110
00:16:37.540 --> 00:16:43.540
The Menger seminar did not produce many academics.

111
00:16:43.540 --> 00:16:48.540
From the Menger seminar emerged quite a number.

112
00:16:48.540 --> 00:16:59.540
Menger started too late to have his immediate successors, Boehm-Bawerk and Mises as his students.

113
00:16:59.540 --> 00:17:10.540
Mises and Boehm-Bawerk had just completed their studies and were already out of the university

114
00:17:10.540 --> 00:17:13.960
by the time he started teaching.

115
00:17:13.960 --> 00:17:18.380
Now stop, I'm confused on the chronology, I'm confused here.

116
00:17:18.380 --> 00:17:19.880
Which book are we speaking of?

117
00:17:19.880 --> 00:17:21.360
The Gunsensei.

118
00:17:21.360 --> 00:17:23.100
And that was published in the...

119
00:17:23.100 --> 00:17:24.100
71.

120
00:17:24.100 --> 00:17:34.220
All right, now that was the beginning of his published, now I'm getting it, of the published

121
00:17:34.220 --> 00:17:35.220
career.

122
00:17:35.220 --> 00:17:48.100
Mises was, didn't he get his degree about 1906, or thereabouts, Mises was only post-Mengalian, Mises was never a direct pupil of Menger,

123
00:17:48.100 --> 00:17:59.180
and Weiser and von Boehm-Bawerk came on the faculty, or were they both students in that seminar with Menger, they were not?

124
00:17:59.180 --> 00:18:08.180
They had already graduated and gone as graduate students to Germany before Menger was appointed.

125
00:18:08.180 --> 00:18:16.180
Menger assisted them because he found in them the first people who believed in his book.

126
00:18:16.180 --> 00:18:20.180
But they were no longer students at that time.

127
00:18:20.180 --> 00:18:43.180
And from the mid-seventies, when Menger began to teach, to 1903, when he retired, his seminar produced a substantial number of distinguished high civil servants and statesmen.

128
00:18:43.180 --> 00:18:57.180
as a seminar and through this coffee house around, a considerable influence on the upper intellectual level of Vienna.

129
00:18:57.180 --> 00:19:02.180
And you say that coffee house is gone now? Do we know where it was?

130
00:19:02.180 --> 00:19:03.180
Do we have a look?

131
00:19:03.180 --> 00:19:12.180
No, I'm not sure. I believe I know. Do we all know Vienna at all? Not yet.

132
00:19:12.180 --> 00:19:17.180
Not really, I brought this map of the central part of Munich. Will that help?

133
00:19:17.180 --> 00:19:18.180
Well, the main...

134
00:19:18.180 --> 00:19:22.180
Because here's a university, I think.

135
00:19:22.180 --> 00:19:30.180
This is the university, which block of houses has at both ends coffee houses.

136
00:19:30.180 --> 00:19:36.180
This is a more popular one. This is the one especially favored by the economists.

137
00:19:36.180 --> 00:19:50.180
But it was quite regular that professors would meet their students after the lecture in the coffee house.

138
00:19:50.180 --> 00:19:55.180
I'm not sure which coffee house Menger frequented.

139
00:19:55.180 --> 00:20:00.180
In this century, it was this one which no longer exists.

140
00:20:00.180 --> 00:20:11.180
Which one is it? Try to get the two names. It's called Lundman, and it was called the Kuzler Cafe, the Athens Cafe.

141
00:20:11.180 --> 00:20:19.180
The Lund exists, and so all the history used to be the general sort.

142
00:20:19.180 --> 00:20:25.180
The Kuzler Cafe on the other side became specialized to the economists,

143
00:20:25.180 --> 00:20:32.180
In particular to some of them, what they have as a factor is spending their life as they're close to their house.

144
00:20:32.180 --> 00:20:34.180
Do we need to get the spelling of those?

145
00:20:34.180 --> 00:20:37.180
Yes, perhaps we should get the spelling so that we...

146
00:20:39.180 --> 00:20:41.180
Sure, write it down. Take that.

147
00:20:41.180 --> 00:20:44.180
Let's get the spelling of both of those.

148
00:20:47.180 --> 00:20:53.180
Did students meet with the senior professor over coffee?

149
00:20:53.180 --> 00:21:01.180
The professors would live, one typical instance I knew very well, in the early morning lecture,

150
00:21:01.180 --> 00:21:06.180
would take coffee there and the students would come, if they wanted to come sit with us.

151
00:21:06.180 --> 00:21:18.180
For the students, the coffee was very modern, to look sure it was the place to go to.

152
00:21:18.180 --> 00:21:26.680
While the Vienna Coffee House, of course, where in fact you could spend a day paying for a cup of coffee,

153
00:21:26.680 --> 00:21:35.780
was very attractive for intellectuals of a slightly higher level than the actual student.

154
00:21:35.780 --> 00:21:40.580
The student coffee thing even seemed cheaper in the university.

155
00:21:40.580 --> 00:21:48.340
But the professor who after his lecture retired to a couple of coffees would receive from us.

156
00:21:48.340 --> 00:21:56.900
I suspect, but I do not know, that like when he lay slightly older, a younger man, I knew,

157
00:21:56.900 --> 00:22:02.740
Menger also would have met his people at the Cafe Lundmann.

158
00:22:02.740 --> 00:22:19.740
But in Menger's case, the main important was that not students, but ex-students met regularly in a kind of circuit discussing current politics.

159
00:22:19.740 --> 00:22:42.740
While Menger never became active in current also-anthologies as an influence of the scheme and the intellectual heart of 19th century liberalism became very, very important.

160
00:22:42.740 --> 00:22:52.740
And even the highest civil servants, who would have been his students in the 1870s,

161
00:22:52.740 --> 00:22:56.740
would sit in 19th or the beginning of the century,

162
00:22:56.740 --> 00:23:01.740
to regularly come once a week for a conversation with men.

163
00:23:01.740 --> 00:23:09.740
That became the heart of what is so difficult today.

164
00:23:09.740 --> 00:23:15.740
You can't talk to Americans about liberalism without the understanding what it means.

165
00:23:15.740 --> 00:23:20.740
Well, we'll footnote your article to it where you explain it and that will be enough.

166
00:23:20.740 --> 00:23:23.740
We know what we mean, so you go ahead.

167
00:23:23.740 --> 00:23:33.740
In fact, if you have to explain it, you might almost say that in 19th century continental Europe,

168
00:23:33.740 --> 00:23:37.740
liberalism meant that American conservatism means today.

169
00:23:37.740 --> 00:24:06.740
That is roughly the right definition. In this sense, in opposition against the advanced interventionism and in socialism of the government, the Menger group remained a Gladstonean liberal group in Europe.

170
00:24:06.740 --> 00:24:28.740
and he remained the inspirer of all sorts of, there was no point that he couldn't from memory, to mention the people in high public positions to men of the theoretical, the wise men available.

171
00:24:28.740 --> 00:24:38.240
did those men at a later date achieve important positions or influence to

172
00:24:38.240 --> 00:24:45.520
either turn the thinking of the public or at least of the other ministers away

173
00:24:45.520 --> 00:24:50.700
from the interventionism or did they I mean if they did when did their influence

174
00:24:50.700 --> 00:24:56.580
end was it during the war? When they died. Well all right all right and when was

175
00:24:56.580 --> 00:25:00.580
What was that, in the 30s, the 20s?

176
00:25:00.580 --> 00:25:04.580
In the second and third century of the century.

177
00:25:04.580 --> 00:25:08.580
That's a decade of this century.

178
00:25:08.580 --> 00:25:12.580
I will say the first and the second, and then to the left,

179
00:25:12.580 --> 00:25:16.580
when all of that collapsed.

180
00:25:16.580 --> 00:25:20.580
People were silly about it, but they were very tired of the 12th century.

181
00:25:20.580 --> 00:25:24.580
What about von Boehm-Bawerk's seminars?

182
00:25:24.580 --> 00:25:26.580
Well, let's talk about those.

183
00:25:26.580 --> 00:25:28.580
Well, that is quite different here.

184
00:25:28.580 --> 00:25:32.580
This was the center of the academic development.

185
00:25:32.580 --> 00:25:39.580
That was the place where the great, the Boehm-Bawerk and Mises, as you will read,

186
00:25:39.580 --> 00:25:42.580
were wholly different characters.

187
00:25:42.580 --> 00:25:44.580
It's very curious.

188
00:25:44.580 --> 00:25:51.580
There were exact school fellows, university colleagues, fellows in law,

189
00:25:51.580 --> 00:25:56.580
Working on the same subject, going together to German University,

190
00:25:56.580 --> 00:26:01.580
but of the wholly different scientific attitude.

191
00:26:01.580 --> 00:26:05.580
I once read, written an essay on the title,

192
00:26:05.580 --> 00:26:11.580
Two Types of Mind, which is partly modeled on this,

193
00:26:11.580 --> 00:26:16.580
Boehm-Bawerk, the absolute master of his subject.

194
00:26:16.580 --> 00:26:19.580
He used the answer to everything at once.

195
00:26:19.580 --> 00:26:25.460
Anything which had been said before, he knew, a clear conception of it all.

196
00:26:25.460 --> 00:26:27.620
And Mises was the puzzler.

197
00:26:27.620 --> 00:26:34.460
Mises had a tendency to simplify, but to avoid the ill difficulties.

198
00:26:34.460 --> 00:26:43.740
Mises, a slow, thoughtful person, to whom nothing was simple, was all frightfully difficult,

199
00:26:43.740 --> 00:26:49.740
We hated discussing it, discussing anything, because you had to give a quick answer.

200
00:26:49.740 --> 00:26:52.740
You want to think about everything else.

201
00:26:52.740 --> 00:26:57.740
So Marshall took an episode, which is rather amusing.

202
00:26:57.740 --> 00:27:05.740
Sometime before World War I, for a while,

203
00:27:05.740 --> 00:27:12.740
the English economist Alfred Marshall and Wieser happened to go for summer holidays

204
00:27:12.740 --> 00:27:27.740
to the same place in the South German, the Wolomites, and nodded to each other, year after year, polite, but neither at any wish to discuss economics.

205
00:27:27.740 --> 00:27:34.740
Then Boehm-Bawerk came on a visit, brought them together, insisted that they discuss economics.

206
00:27:34.740 --> 00:27:42.740
They all reported that a very exciting day, but neither Wieser nor Marshall ever went to the same place again.

207
00:27:42.740 --> 00:27:43.740
Where was this?

208
00:27:43.740 --> 00:27:48.740
In St. Goldner Valley, in the Dolomites.

209
00:27:48.740 --> 00:27:54.740
Was Wieser more like Frank Knight in the way he went about things?

210
00:27:54.740 --> 00:28:01.740
Oh, yes. I have, in fact, in that essay which I mentioned about two types of life.

211
00:28:01.740 --> 00:28:06.740
In a footnote, give wine and saying, no, it's a similar pair.

212
00:28:06.740 --> 00:28:08.740
Yes, to me.

213
00:28:08.740 --> 00:28:14.740
His, these are, we hear very little of his students.

214
00:28:14.740 --> 00:28:18.740
We hear more of Boehm-Bawerk's students.

215
00:28:18.740 --> 00:28:21.740
Is there a reason for that?

216
00:28:21.740 --> 00:28:23.740
Oh yes.

217
00:28:23.740 --> 00:28:30.740
In the seminar, there are a whole lot of different pairs.

218
00:28:30.740 --> 00:28:33.740
Boehm-Bawerk's, you know, were highly exciting.

219
00:28:34.740 --> 00:28:39.740
He had, apart from the main original thinkers of his own school,

220
00:28:40.740 --> 00:28:47.740
a good many of the socialists of the time, people like Otto Bauer and, forget all the names,

221
00:28:48.740 --> 00:28:51.740
with violent discussions going on.

222
00:28:52.740 --> 00:28:56.740
What was discussed in Boehm-Bawerk's seminar was discussed all over the university.

223
00:28:56.740 --> 00:29:12.740
The Wiesel seminar would be quietly on one knee, carefully prepared paper, which then picked to pieces, was very far away from any topical issue when he cried.

224
00:29:12.740 --> 00:29:24.740
The Boehm-Bawerk seminar ended before World War I. It died in 1914 or 15. I have only known the Wiesel seminar.

225
00:29:24.740 --> 00:29:29.740
It was interesting for a theoretical point of view, but Ludwig would be really excited about it.

226
00:29:29.740 --> 00:29:32.740
Were you in both? Did you have...

227
00:29:32.740 --> 00:29:37.740
Of course. When Boehm-Bawerk died, I was 16.

228
00:29:37.740 --> 00:29:39.740
That's right. All right.

229
00:29:39.740 --> 00:29:46.540
I knew Boehm-Bawerk only by chance, because he happened to be a friend of my grandfather,

230
00:29:46.540 --> 00:29:55.500
my maternal grandfather, and he was at the same time professors at Innsbruck in the 1980s.

231
00:29:55.500 --> 00:30:05.500
And, actually, it may also amuse you, used to climb mountains together here in the Pyramids,

232
00:30:05.500 --> 00:30:17.500
And he did, which was still possible in the 1880s, do some first ascents together to some of the big summons with the big stars.

233
00:30:17.500 --> 00:30:32.500
And before my grandfather died, maternal grandfather, I repeat, in 1910, I used to meet Boehm-Bawerk in his house,

234
00:30:32.500 --> 00:30:39.780
Before I knew what the word economics meant, it was just a close friend of my parents and

235
00:30:39.780 --> 00:30:48.060
grandparents, but he died in 1915, so even when he died I was 16.

236
00:30:48.060 --> 00:30:56.700
I used later to meet his widow still, who had been a maternal friend of my mother.

237
00:30:56.700 --> 00:31:02.700
My mother called his widow aunt, because in the years she was together in Salzburg.

238
00:31:02.700 --> 00:31:09.700
Who do you regard as the most important of the graduates of Boehm-Bawerk's seminar?

239
00:31:09.700 --> 00:31:13.700
Mises, of course, would be one famous graduate. Schumpeter was one.

240
00:31:13.700 --> 00:31:16.700
I believe Karl Pribram was one.

241
00:31:16.700 --> 00:31:17.700
Yes.

242
00:31:17.700 --> 00:31:19.700
Were there any other?

243
00:31:19.700 --> 00:31:23.700
I think that Karl Pribram was not really a traditional person.

244
00:31:23.700 --> 00:31:25.700
I understand that, but he was an important...

245
00:31:25.700 --> 00:31:34.700
from Boehm-Bawerk, but I'm not sure whether Mises' main successor, Hans Mises, may or may not have been.

246
00:31:34.700 --> 00:31:42.700
And then there were a few other quite influential economists who were not strictly Austrians,

247
00:31:42.700 --> 00:31:50.700
particularly called Alfred Ammann, but then as I said these various later socialist leaders

248
00:31:50.700 --> 00:31:56.020
Otto Bauer, who became one of the leaders of the Austrian Marxists.

249
00:31:56.020 --> 00:32:03.020
Ilfer Bling, who later played a great role in Germany.

250
00:32:03.020 --> 00:32:14.020
Emil Lederer, who went to Germany since the 1920s,

251
00:32:14.020 --> 00:32:18.020
had to appoint a new professor in Berlin.

252
00:32:18.020 --> 00:32:29.020
The one who took a socialist, had to take it from the Austrian school and so took this rather insignificant leader, which was accrossed by Schumpr-Emerick.

253
00:32:29.020 --> 00:32:36.020
He had counted on the chair in Berlin and didn't get it. Many didn't get it. He went off to Harvard.

254
00:32:36.020 --> 00:32:41.020
And that is roughly the count.

255
00:32:41.020 --> 00:32:59.020
On this point, the exact content of Boehm-Bawerk's seminar, my former assistant, Neube, who is now in Stanford, seems to have got some information.

256
00:32:59.020 --> 00:33:03.020
It's the only point on which I have no problem.

257
00:33:03.020 --> 00:33:33.020
It's very curious, see, among the generation just above me, the experience of the Boehm-Bawerk seminar was the great experience of the youth, who all the time talked about, but there were no details, the atmosphere, as if it were familiar to me, but as you now ask me, give me some information, I know no facts, I know what names were occasionally mentioned

258
00:33:33.020 --> 00:33:42.620
And, it certainly, in the Vienna of the 1920s, the reference,

259
00:33:42.620 --> 00:33:49.420
oh we discussed this in the Boehm-Bawerk seminar before the war, was a constant event.

260
00:33:49.420 --> 00:33:57.020
This was a great experience of the generation just before me, who constantly remember,

261
00:33:57.020 --> 00:34:01.020
oh how interesting when we are all discussing this together.

262
00:34:01.020 --> 00:34:04.020
Now, were these seminars always held at the university?

263
00:34:04.020 --> 00:34:09.020
These were all held at the university and bring back to this.

264
00:34:09.020 --> 00:34:15.020
In the first floor of the west wing, the left wing, let's call it.

265
00:34:15.020 --> 00:34:26.020
If you look at it from the English outside, the first floor of this was the center of law and economics.

266
00:34:26.020 --> 00:34:28.020
And is that still where?

267
00:34:28.020 --> 00:34:30.020
That's still where it is, yes.

268
00:34:30.020 --> 00:34:46.020
The only other center which for the later period is the offices of Mises and accidentally myself and Albert, which is in the Chamber of Commerce of Vienna.

269
00:34:46.020 --> 00:34:59.020
Still, he left in 1934 to all his living from being one of the secretaries of the Chamber of Comics.

270
00:34:59.020 --> 00:35:15.020
He became there the source of two appointments in the same building, not in the same office.

271
00:35:15.020 --> 00:35:24.020
Well, in the same office in a certain case, yes, we got Harbour Libbers as Librarian of the Chamber of Commerce.

272
00:35:24.020 --> 00:35:30.020
Although Harbour Libbers remained in Vienna, he worked in the same building.

273
00:35:30.020 --> 00:35:34.020
My story is a little more complicated.

274
00:35:34.020 --> 00:35:57.100
When I graduated in 1921, I wrote in Vienna a new temporary office to carry out certain

275
00:35:57.100 --> 00:36:14.100
Conditions of the Peace Treaty of 1918, The Settlement of pre-war private debts between the nations.

276
00:36:16.100 --> 00:36:23.100
Mises, on behalf of the Chamber of Commons, was one of the directors of this new office.

277
00:36:23.100 --> 00:36:32.420
It was very attractive to new people, because if a young man who had studied law and spoke

278
00:36:32.420 --> 00:36:39.780
two foreign languages could get a much better position in the other circumstances.

279
00:36:39.780 --> 00:36:46.580
I was one of the fortunate men and came, not at the game pieces, off the record, but for

280
00:36:46.580 --> 00:36:54.580
I came to Mises with a letter of introduction from Mises, recommending me for this position.

281
00:36:54.580 --> 00:37:02.580
And Mises, I still can't see him before me, reading Mises' lecture, letter of introduction.

282
00:37:02.580 --> 00:37:10.580
Look at me. Mises says, you are promising me, young economist, I've never seen you at my lectures.

283
00:37:10.580 --> 00:37:22.820
He gave me the job, and so for the next five years, interrupted by a visit to America,

284
00:37:22.820 --> 00:37:37.460
was working under him, and then when I brought back from America the new idea of great predictions,

285
00:37:37.460 --> 00:37:43.460
and the short thing which the Harvard Economic Barrow made when it developed in the early 20s.

286
00:37:43.460 --> 00:37:51.460
Mises helped me to create, in the same building, an institute for business cycle research.

287
00:37:51.460 --> 00:37:53.460
About what year?

288
00:37:53.460 --> 00:37:56.460
That was the second part of the 20s.

289
00:37:56.460 --> 00:38:00.460
The first part of the 20s I worked with him in the office.

290
00:38:00.460 --> 00:38:24.460
And from 27 to 31 exactly, till I went to London, I was actually an organizer of this institute, beginning as myself and the secretary, and gradually expanding it, getting in Morgenstern as my collaborator, who afterwards took over from me.

291
00:38:24.460 --> 00:38:27.460
Now, can you locate the Chamber of Commerce?

292
00:38:27.460 --> 00:38:43.460
The Chamber of Commerce building then became so important, because during the 1920s until he left in January 1940, when I had already been gone,

293
00:38:43.460 --> 00:38:58.460
Mises office was a place of a sort of private seminar that took place at the Chamber of Commerce during the academic year twice a month.

294
00:38:58.460 --> 00:39:13.700
Now, Indiana which answers, while the coffee houses, both of them, may use a one which

295
00:39:13.700 --> 00:39:20.820
has survived as a representative for the other which has not.

296
00:39:20.820 --> 00:39:38.820
Now what, this is significant though, now you are saying that Mises' teaching outside of the university for advanced teaching, students did not get credit for this.

297
00:39:38.820 --> 00:39:42.820
Nothing at all, it was purely discussion club.

298
00:39:42.820 --> 00:39:50.820
What are some of the people who came that you remember or ever heard of that would be important for you?

299
00:39:50.820 --> 00:40:04.820
Well, first of an intermediate generation between Mises and Mayer, people who were still in the Boehm-Bawerk seminar,

300
00:40:04.820 --> 00:40:16.820
A man called Striegel, whom we all expected to succeed to the professorship, but who died young.

301
00:40:17.820 --> 00:40:27.820
And another man, whose essays will appear shortly, called Schams, S-E-H-A-M-S.

302
00:40:27.820 --> 00:40:39.820
When comes my nation, in which I am slightly the oldest, although I have one contemporary

303
00:40:39.820 --> 00:40:50.820
and one who might be able to interview a lady called Steffi Brown, who lives in New York.

304
00:40:50.820 --> 00:40:53.820
How would that be spelled?

305
00:40:53.820 --> 00:41:05.820
She now speaks in English, P-R-O-W-N. She used to be P-R-A-U-N when I knew her in Austria.

306
00:41:06.820 --> 00:41:15.820
I have got an address book upstairs. I might give you one of those addresses later.

307
00:41:15.820 --> 00:41:23.820
She, I believe, is the only surviving member of my own age.

308
00:41:23.820 --> 00:41:28.820
There used to be another woman of the same age.

309
00:41:28.820 --> 00:41:42.820
was secretary of the Bank Association, the name of Lieser, L-I-E-S-E-R, the name of Lieser,

310
00:41:42.820 --> 00:41:46.820
who had been dead for many years.

311
00:41:46.820 --> 00:41:52.820
Then comes Haberloh, only a year my junior.

312
00:41:52.820 --> 00:41:56.820
Then, to take first the better known figures,

313
00:41:56.820 --> 00:42:01.820
Bachluck, who was now two years younger,

314
00:42:01.820 --> 00:42:06.820
Bornstern, who was at Princeton.

315
00:42:11.820 --> 00:42:14.820
Well, you might say it was a group of some,

316
00:42:17.820 --> 00:42:21.820
a total of up to 20 people from about 12,

317
00:42:21.820 --> 00:42:33.820
Chapter 12 would regularly meet twice a month in the Mises Actual Chamber of Commerce office

318
00:42:33.820 --> 00:42:43.820
without any formal connection with the university, all ex-university students.

319
00:42:43.820 --> 00:42:58.820
Discussing, I believe predominantly, questions of scientific methodology rather than particular problems.

320
00:42:58.820 --> 00:43:05.820
Even if we start out with a very practical, concrete problem of the time,

321
00:43:05.820 --> 00:43:12.820
would very soon be off with the conflict between the different schools of economics.

322
00:43:12.820 --> 00:43:24.820
Later, in the early 1930s, in the last four years, when it still met,

323
00:43:24.820 --> 00:43:30.820
it became a considerable point of attraction for foreign students.

324
00:43:30.820 --> 00:43:47.820
That was the last I had left. I don't remember. I know that during the later years French, English, American students used to come in for a term, take part in these discussions.

325
00:43:47.820 --> 00:44:05.820
and during the final years of the Austrian School in Austria, it was the center, not only for the Austrian School itself, which attracted students from all over the world to join into the discussion.

326
00:44:05.820 --> 00:44:33.820
That I knew mainly by hearsay, because I was at first to leave Vienna before ambition in any sense had yet started, because I never imagined that I was emigrating, but if at the age of 32 you're offered a professorship at the University of London, you take it.

327
00:44:33.820 --> 00:44:59.220
Now let me ask you a question that may embarrass you, but it must be asked. If Mises was attracting

328
00:44:59.220 --> 00:45:09.580
English-speaking students in the early 30s, or perhaps even some in the late 20s. Yet,

329
00:45:09.580 --> 00:45:17.660
Mises is known in the English-speaking world in the 30s only because of you, really. This

330
00:45:17.660 --> 00:45:18.660
isn't production.

331
00:45:18.660 --> 00:45:19.660
Not as simple as this.

332
00:45:19.660 --> 00:45:23.420
Well, for those of us who remember it, that's how, so maybe you can clarify.

333
00:45:23.420 --> 00:45:32.420
The decisive person was Lionel Robbins, later Lord Robbins, who said, I'm the School of Economics, who just...

334
00:45:34.420 --> 00:45:44.420
The question is simply, we know of Robbins' early work today, in retrospect, because of the Nature and Significance, which I think was 32.

335
00:45:44.420 --> 00:45:46.420
No, I believe it was 30 already.

336
00:45:46.420 --> 00:45:54.420
Perhaps you're right, but that is, we don't think of that as being a book promoting Mises or the Austrians.

337
00:45:54.420 --> 00:46:01.420
So there must be some other influence you have in mind there that was more important than your, because prices and production...

338
00:46:01.420 --> 00:46:16.420
You know, by that time, 1931, Mises was still a relatively minor figure, confined to a particular field.

339
00:46:16.420 --> 00:46:24.420
But the man had done two things, a theory of money and the racism of socialism.

340
00:46:24.420 --> 00:46:36.420
His great book, his philosophical essay, came out even in German only in 38 and the American version only in the 40s.

341
00:46:36.420 --> 00:46:41.420
That established him as a great social philosopher.

342
00:46:41.420 --> 00:46:51.420
But by the early 30s, Mises was internationally sufficed, he was known at all, which is limited.

343
00:46:51.420 --> 00:47:08.420
But known to people like Robbins as a man by time of distinctive competition, the fear of money developing men and developing most effectively its criticism of socialism.

344
00:47:08.420 --> 00:47:20.420
But for those of us who are young or starting out and we look at a man's career, who in his thirties, I gather, wrote The Theory of Money and Credit,

345
00:47:20.420 --> 00:47:26.740
which in retrospect seems to be a masterpiece and a path breaking book and then the theory

346
00:47:26.740 --> 00:47:33.420
of socialism which influenced you and Robbins and Ropke and I don't know how many others

347
00:47:33.420 --> 00:47:39.300
but a lot of very bright young men of his era and turned them from socialism. How is

348
00:47:39.300 --> 00:47:46.300
it in 1931, which is 19 years after Money and Credit and 9 years after socialism, why

349
00:47:50.420 --> 00:47:53.620
Why is it that he was still unknown in the profession?

350
00:47:53.620 --> 00:47:59.220
None of his books was set up.

351
00:47:59.220 --> 00:48:00.220
That's a good reason.

352
00:48:00.220 --> 00:48:05.860
See, it was Robbins and I who arranged it, and none of his books was set up.

353
00:48:05.860 --> 00:48:12.860
What I want to know is, wait, now you were invited to be a professor at the London School,

354
00:48:12.860 --> 00:48:17.140
or was it the London School of Economics?

355
00:48:17.140 --> 00:48:20.140
But why wasn't Mises invited?

356
00:48:20.140 --> 00:48:41.140
Well you see, I had done a thing which none of us had done. I had before the beginning of Rockefeller fellowships, in 1923, on my own risk, gone to America, spent 15 months in America, was in consequence speaking fluent English.

357
00:48:41.140 --> 00:48:47.140
That's number one. It's not the whole story. That was a precondition.

358
00:48:47.140 --> 00:48:52.140
Mises could hardly have done this at the time.

359
00:48:52.140 --> 00:49:00.140
But two, I had, while in America, there was a lot of time

360
00:49:00.140 --> 00:49:10.140
to the criticism of a peculiar kind of American underconsumption analysis

361
00:49:10.140 --> 00:49:20.140
which was very similar to what Keynes later produced as a foster and catching, so I don't know if you still remember these names.

362
00:49:20.140 --> 00:49:30.140
I explained it correctly and was absolutely ready to criticize any other consumption theory which then Keynes produced.

363
00:49:30.140 --> 00:49:35.140
And I found superman completely equipped to deal with this.

364
00:49:35.140 --> 00:49:37.140
This would have been about what year?

365
00:49:37.140 --> 00:49:42.140
What year that you began to interact with Cain?

366
00:49:42.140 --> 00:49:52.140
Well, I'd begun still in the States in 1924, but I was working all the time on this sort of problems.

367
00:49:52.140 --> 00:50:02.140
I was preparing, and that's a search of four elements, which I have to mention.

368
00:50:02.140 --> 00:50:21.140
I had started writing a great treatise on money, which I never completed, but for which I had proposed to start is ten chapters on the history of monetary theory and policy,

369
00:50:21.140 --> 00:50:32.140
of which, by the end of the 20s, had opened the first four chapters healing with the development in England between 1690 and 1900.

370
00:50:32.140 --> 00:50:48.140
So when I came to London, and I will explain this in a moment, I proved to know much more about the history of English monetary theory than any of the English professors, which caused a great impression.

371
00:50:48.140 --> 00:51:00.140
And the fourth and the luckiest subject is that when I gave in Vienna my initial lecture as a Privatutsend,

372
00:51:01.140 --> 00:51:11.140
I chose for my subject this kind of consumption theory which had just come acute in England and Robbins could read German.

373
00:51:11.140 --> 00:51:22.140
It's a very almost unique factor, an English professor who could read German literature, and I had the good luck that he pounced on my subject.

374
00:51:22.140 --> 00:51:28.140
This is the thing we need at the moment, to fight Keynes, so I was brought in for the purpose,

375
00:51:28.140 --> 00:51:38.140
produced a course of lectures which was original, which suggested more knowledge of the history of English theory than anybody else.

376
00:51:38.140 --> 00:51:44.140
was sympathetic by Robbins, who had been influenced by the Austrian School.

377
00:51:44.140 --> 00:51:47.140
We at once understood each other.

378
00:51:47.140 --> 00:51:53.140
It was a combination of accidents to my appointment in London.

379
00:51:53.140 --> 00:51:57.140
I mean, it was luck from beginning to end.

380
00:51:57.140 --> 00:52:06.140
But it was prices and production which brought the Austrian trade cycle theory to the attention of our world.

381
00:52:06.140 --> 00:52:27.140
I want to say a fifth point, equally accidental, the invitation reached me when I had for the first time a clear picture of this theory but had not yet gone into all the complicated details.

382
00:52:27.140 --> 00:52:34.140
Since I have started working it out in an elaborate treatise, I would have encountered any number of complications.

383
00:52:34.140 --> 00:52:38.140
I would have produced a very difficult treatise.

384
00:52:38.140 --> 00:52:47.140
The invitation met me at the moment, and I could just quickly tell the story as a general survey, as I then saw it,

385
00:52:47.140 --> 00:52:49.140
without yet being up here.

386
00:52:49.140 --> 00:52:55.140
Then I give you the main illustration, which later held up the development.

387
00:52:55.140 --> 00:53:09.140
For my simple exposition, I could operate with a grave simplification in Boehm-Bawerk, operating with an average period of production.

388
00:53:09.140 --> 00:53:15.140
Now the average period of production is a beautiful simplification, but doesn't help you at all.

389
00:53:15.140 --> 00:53:23.140
A gentle exposition I could give as soon as I became aware, it's not a question of a single average period of production,

390
00:53:23.140 --> 00:53:25.780
for the needy complex structure.

391
00:53:25.780 --> 00:53:27.180
I would have got all...

392
00:53:27.180 --> 00:53:31.100
If I had been aware of this in 1931,

393
00:53:31.100 --> 00:53:34.540
I could not have given a beautiful, simple exposition.

394
00:53:34.540 --> 00:53:36.900
But it would have confused everybody.

395
00:53:36.900 --> 00:53:41.580
But I was myself yet aware of the difficulty.

396
00:53:41.580 --> 00:53:46.220
So I gave these incredibly successful lectures.

397
00:53:46.220 --> 00:53:47.900
But it was not really the marriage.

398
00:53:47.900 --> 00:53:53.020
It was a situation in which this particular set of lectures

399
00:53:53.020 --> 00:54:04.020
It's in London, and I expected nothing less than that four lectures I give in London would reach an invitation.

400
00:54:04.020 --> 00:54:12.020
And of course, in the first instance, it would do so much on the invitation for a visiting professorship for one year.

401
00:54:12.020 --> 00:54:18.020
But I fitted in so well, and now Robin and I became very close friends.

402
00:54:18.020 --> 00:54:43.900
Well, that happened to a number of your contemporaries, but let me ask you this. The London School

403
00:54:43.900 --> 00:54:47.700
was originally a Fabian institution.

404
00:54:47.700 --> 00:54:51.340
How was it that by 1931, you and Robbins

405
00:54:51.340 --> 00:54:53.220
were both on the faculty?

406
00:54:53.220 --> 00:54:58.100
As a person, I hold it due to the person of Eddie and Canon.

407
00:54:58.100 --> 00:55:03.420
The webs, in a sense, were very decent.

408
00:55:03.420 --> 00:55:09.460
They wanted a good politician who was an independent mind,

409
00:55:09.460 --> 00:55:18.460
and we are so convinced that unprejudiced study of economics must lead to socialism.

410
00:55:18.460 --> 00:55:23.460
That's a mistake of someone who wouldn't at all.

411
00:55:23.460 --> 00:55:32.460
And he who was the main professor and Foxwell who was a professor of money banking

412
00:55:32.460 --> 00:55:37.460
were completely separated from the Fabian part.

413
00:55:37.460 --> 00:55:52.460
All through my years, although in a way Lasky and I had something in common. We were both great book collectors, but apart from this, we had nothing in common at all.

414
00:55:52.460 --> 00:55:57.460
We hardly spoke the same language.

415
00:55:57.460 --> 00:56:10.460
Don't ask me to begin to tell you stories about LSE, because of its comic place, and the extraordinary person of Harold Varsky was the most peculiar place.

416
00:56:10.460 --> 00:56:20.460
Give us a couple of stories. We need at least one or two. Harold Varsky was a pathological problem.

417
00:56:20.460 --> 00:56:29.460
means even one of his friends today recognized that he was a pathological liar who just couldn't.

418
00:56:29.460 --> 00:56:41.460
If you have time, we'll tell you one or two stories, which everybody will first from our book collecting experience.

419
00:56:41.460 --> 00:56:48.460
You know, book collectors are like fishermen. They always have found something unique.

420
00:56:48.460 --> 00:57:00.460
But Harold Lasky took the following course, would come one midday when we always met up for lunch in the senior common room.

421
00:57:00.460 --> 00:57:14.460
Enthusiastic, just been to a chair in Carthage and in one of those boxes there were some beautiful French duodecimal volumes of the 18th century

422
00:57:14.460 --> 00:57:22.460
I turned him over, all the religious stuff, suddenly found that the back of one was thicker than the other.

423
00:57:22.460 --> 00:57:26.460
So I asked the man, how much is it? Six pence each.

424
00:57:26.460 --> 00:57:35.460
He put down the shilling, took the two-volume, slid it open, and out fell four letters exchanged, which it also on white paper.

425
00:57:35.460 --> 00:57:41.460
They were never published, but it did exist. It was typical for the man.

426
00:57:41.460 --> 00:57:57.460
He just made the story up? Completely. Amazing. All this, later, but there are two memorable locations in the same room.

427
00:57:57.460 --> 00:58:06.460
Even before we moved to Cambridge in 1939, in preparation of a total outbreak of war,

428
00:58:06.460 --> 00:58:28.460
So, as in 1940, before we had all moved by bombing in London and started, Ruth Lasky and I were spending evenings of the days we were teaching, we were still coming up from London for two days a week, in the house of one colleague, Lancelot Billings.

429
00:58:28.460 --> 00:58:45.460
On the first occasion, it was very remarkable because Harold Lasky was entertaining us about the beauties of the Russian system

430
00:58:45.460 --> 00:58:55.460
and was interrupted by the announcement of the news. We were all listening to the BBC, I believe, at half past seven.

431
00:58:55.460 --> 00:59:08.460
The news came through of the Stalin-Ribbenthal Pact, and after what's hard, Lasky behaved as he had never in his life said a good word.

432
00:59:08.460 --> 00:59:23.460
Waschewitz, the most abominable creature of all, and a change in the man, he didn't seem to ever remember what he had been doing for the preceding 20 years of his life.

433
00:59:23.460 --> 00:59:43.460
But a year later, in exactly the same position, again sitting together after dinner, listening to the news, Harold had just been to his home Manchester, and had his bombing attack.

434
00:59:43.460 --> 00:59:54.460
And on that occasion, it had been very shaking, because one bomb that had fallen close to his hotel had badly shaken him.

435
00:59:54.460 --> 01:00:07.460
Within three weeks, I've heard every stage of this story, it had become a story that his hotel had been hit, and he had suspended four floors into the center.

436
01:00:07.460 --> 01:00:20.460
The London School, was it mostly people, students, in terms of students, were they Fabians? Were they just students trying to get a degree? What was the motivation to come to the London School?

437
01:00:20.460 --> 01:00:35.460
Well, you have to distinguish between faculty and students. Faculty was this enormous difference in economics on the one hand and political scientists and sociologists on the other.

438
01:00:35.460 --> 01:01:01.460
In between, there were the lawyers, the geographers, the economic historians, who were either neutral, or the usual type would be a very mild Fabian, people of the Bloomsbury group, people like Eileen Power, who stuck in the Bloomsbury group, very nice and decent people, and there were no pox in there.

439
01:01:01.460 --> 01:01:04.760
I had no idea she was in any way connected with Bloomsbury.

440
01:01:04.760 --> 01:01:08.260
Eileen Power was connected with Bloomsbury?

441
01:01:08.260 --> 01:01:11.460
Oh yes. I didn't know that. She happened to live there.

442
01:01:11.460 --> 01:01:14.560
The Bloomsbury people were her neighbors. She knew them all.

443
01:01:14.560 --> 01:01:19.260
Alright, okay. In this sense, I don't think she was any active,

444
01:01:19.260 --> 01:01:22.260
but they were all very familiar to her. Alright, go ahead.

445
01:01:22.260 --> 01:01:25.960
Paul May was, of course, also a Fabian.

446
01:01:25.960 --> 01:01:28.960
But the man with whom you could talk, Murky Doctrine,

447
01:01:28.960 --> 01:01:37.960
A very interesting man. Personally, I like Torme. Harold Barsky was always a jerk, and I could never take Harold Barsky.

448
01:01:37.960 --> 01:01:49.960
But at that time, people took him seriously. Now, even his party fellows, even before his death, take him seriously as a thinker.

449
01:01:49.960 --> 01:01:57.960
He must have been a very young man, very brilliant. But by the time I knew him, he was not.

450
01:01:57.960 --> 01:02:05.960
I want to bring up something you have mentioned in a couple of places in your writing.

451
01:02:05.960 --> 01:02:09.960
It is significant, but I want to ask a further question.

452
01:02:09.960 --> 01:02:19.960
You write of the time that you spent preparing a review of Keynes's treatise on money.

453
01:02:19.960 --> 01:02:27.960
And then once it was published, Keynes had said to you, oh well, I've changed my view.

454
01:02:27.960 --> 01:02:41.960
So then when the general theory came out, you decided at that time that it would be unwise to spend the same amount of time to critique the book only to have him do the same thing over.

455
01:02:41.960 --> 01:02:55.960
Now, those of us who live on the far side of general theory suspect that had you published, it might have been different.

456
01:02:55.960 --> 01:03:02.960
I am of the opinion that it would not have been different, that the times were just moving in the direction of King.

457
01:03:02.960 --> 01:03:04.960
In retrospect, what do you think?

458
01:03:04.960 --> 01:03:11.960
You know, it's a much more complicated story. I've myself put it in a way in which you were now approached.

459
01:03:11.960 --> 01:03:21.960
But by being disillusioned by Keynes so easily to take, oh no, it doesn't matter.

460
01:03:21.960 --> 01:03:26.960
I've had a later experience with him of the same sort, which we'll tell you later.

461
01:03:26.960 --> 01:03:30.960
But a much more complicated procession.

462
01:03:30.960 --> 01:03:45.960
I by then had become very much aware that in that simplified form, based on the Boehm-Bawerk's, as I mentioned before, average field of production, my theory could not really be carried through.

463
01:03:45.960 --> 01:03:55.960
So I had come to the conclusion that I must first build up an adequate theory of capital for a return to industrial fluctuations.

464
01:03:55.960 --> 01:04:08.960
That took me seven years to do so, but even then I only published the first static volume, assuming I would go over to the dynamic part.

465
01:04:08.960 --> 01:04:24.960
But then the very curious position arose. But then war had broken out, and Keynes was almost the only sensible man who was willing and able to protect us against inflation.

466
01:04:24.960 --> 01:04:37.960
So during the war years, I was supporting Keynes against his supporters as the one man who actually did succeed in getting through the war without inflation.

467
01:04:37.960 --> 01:04:45.960
So during the war on practical politics, I was on Keynes' side and didn't want to discredit him.

468
01:04:45.960 --> 01:04:52.960
An attack on Keynes during the war years would have been negligible if I was right.

469
01:04:52.960 --> 01:05:15.960
I was grateful for his existence, and said I was in a great measure right, and it proves my last experience which came, a story I have talked many times, but I do not mind repeating, a few weeks before his death.

470
01:05:15.960 --> 01:05:28.960
That means it must have been in the, about January 1946, I was still treated as an honorary fellow of King's College.

471
01:05:28.960 --> 01:05:39.960
She had lived through the war in Cambridge. King's had given me rooms in his college and after I had returned to Cambridge,

472
01:05:39.960 --> 01:06:01.960
which I see came occasionally to Keynes, to Keynes the Dime there, you know, the very large occasion when two things occurred which I usually tell as illustration of the respect to which Keynes was a genius,

473
01:06:01.960 --> 01:06:11.960
But in the end, we tend to sit together in the smoking room of the college, reading the daily newspapers.

474
01:06:11.960 --> 01:06:21.960
At a stage, I ask him, tell me, aren't you getting alarmed by what Joan Robinson and Richard Kramer are making of your theories?

475
01:06:21.960 --> 01:06:26.960
Danger to our clearly inflation. And he bursts out, oh, they are just fools!

476
01:06:26.960 --> 01:06:52.920
That's a significant story. But in retrospect, after the Pure Theory of Capital, you never

477
01:06:52.920 --> 01:06:58.920
I never went back. I mean, the Road to Serfdom came out. It was an extraordinary success.

478
01:06:58.920 --> 01:07:07.920
Political, philosophical book. And it seemed that that turned your interest to a wholly new field.

479
01:07:07.920 --> 01:07:21.920
Perfectly true. I became much more interested. In fact, in a way, as Mises had been, but not following Mises,

480
01:07:21.920 --> 01:07:30.920
The differences of the philosophical approach of the social sciences, which led to different conclusions.

481
01:07:30.920 --> 01:07:42.920
It became particularly acute because Keynes, against his intentions, had stimulated the development of Magnomics.

482
01:07:42.920 --> 01:07:51.920
Mayer was convinced that not only his particular conclusions, but the whole foundation of microeconomics was wrong.

483
01:07:51.920 --> 01:08:01.920
So I wanted to demonstrate that we had to return to microeconomics, that this whole prejudice,

484
01:08:01.920 --> 01:08:05.920
The facilities, supported by the natural scientists,

485
01:08:05.920 --> 01:08:09.920
they could deduce anything from measurable magnitudes,

486
01:08:09.920 --> 01:08:13.920
the effects of aggregates and averages,

487
01:08:13.920 --> 01:08:16.920
became to fascinate me much more.

488
01:08:16.920 --> 01:08:22.920
I felt in a way that the thing which I am now prepared to do,

489
01:08:22.920 --> 01:08:28.920
I don't know of anybody else who can do this particular task.

490
01:08:28.920 --> 01:08:36.920
The other group that was at the capital of the area that was quickly continued by others.

491
01:08:36.920 --> 01:08:41.920
This was an opening, which was much more fascinating.

492
01:08:41.920 --> 01:08:50.920
The others have meant working for a result which I already knew, but I had to prove it, which was very dull.

493
01:08:50.920 --> 01:08:53.920
The other thing was an open problem.

494
01:08:53.920 --> 01:09:18.920
What does economics really look like when you recognize it as a prototype of a new kind of science of complex phenomena which could not employ a simple model of mechanics or physics?

495
01:09:18.920 --> 01:09:28.920
But that to deal with what then I described as mere pattern predictions, certain limited predictions.

496
01:09:28.920 --> 01:09:34.920
That was so much more fascinating as an intellectual problem.

497
01:09:34.920 --> 01:09:44.920
And yet capital theory in the Austrian sense ended with pure theory of capital, wouldn't you say, in retrospect?

498
01:09:44.920 --> 01:09:49.920
I read very largely, nobody has done what I hope to look to done by others.

499
01:09:49.920 --> 01:09:53.920
I mean, that's almost 50 years. It's 45 years ago.

500
01:09:53.920 --> 01:09:56.920
And there's been nothing, in fact, I'll be quite honest,

501
01:09:56.920 --> 01:10:00.920
that's the one book of yours that gives me the most trouble.

502
01:10:00.920 --> 01:10:07.920
How much this is true, I became very much aware about

503
01:10:07.920 --> 01:10:25.920
For only four years ago, I asked for permission to give a lecture on the same day, January 1981,

504
01:10:25.920 --> 01:10:33.920
exactly 50 years after my prices and production actions, under the chairmanship of Lyon Robbins,

505
01:10:33.920 --> 01:10:47.920
Under the title Team of Goods and Services, this whole question of the variation of the time stream leading up to a problem was published only in a German translation.

506
01:10:47.920 --> 01:10:53.920
It was supposed to be a chapter of the English I am working on, but I became very much aware of what you say.

507
01:10:53.920 --> 01:11:17.920
In effect, we are still well over 50 years ago. The crucial point has not yet come, well it would be unfair to say, sufficiently accepted. It has not yet been presented in a form that is fully satisfactory, even to me.

508
01:11:17.920 --> 01:11:24.920
I have a question. There is a Ph.D. thesis that was done at New York University looking

509
01:11:25.120 --> 01:11:32.120
at the series, the historical evidence, in the United States to support the Hayekian theory

510
01:11:32.480 --> 01:11:36.580
of the business cycle. Have you seen that?

511
01:11:36.580 --> 01:11:39.580
Which one, Mrs. I've seen it, but not most of the kind of thing.

512
01:11:39.580 --> 01:11:42.580
Well, I just, Robertson or something.

513
01:11:42.580 --> 01:11:43.580
Not this school.

514
01:11:43.580 --> 01:11:46.080
No, no, no. This is much more recent.

515
01:11:46.080 --> 01:11:49.360
This was, like, 1982, and I'm...

516
01:11:49.360 --> 01:11:53.280
Well, I probably know who you live with, the seniors from the outside.

517
01:11:53.280 --> 01:11:55.560
Well, it is now such a flood.

518
01:11:55.560 --> 01:11:58.960
A hook by Hayekians, a canola in the mouth.

519
01:11:58.960 --> 01:12:01.520
To what do you attribute the late reaction?

520
01:12:01.520 --> 01:12:08.360
Now, you're the dean of the school by dent of biology, you know, you've survived.

521
01:12:08.360 --> 01:12:11.120
There is this wave of interest now.

522
01:12:11.120 --> 01:12:13.600
Well, he got the Nobel Prize in 1974.

523
01:12:13.600 --> 01:12:21.600
The Nobel Prize had very little effect, from 1974 till about 1980.

524
01:12:21.600 --> 01:12:31.600
Oh yes, there are external effects and so on, but I could not yet feel that it stirred the interest of the younger generation.

525
01:12:31.600 --> 01:12:36.600
And for the past five years, in such a flood, I can no longer follow it.

526
01:12:36.600 --> 01:12:48.600
I don't think I'm exaggerating. I get every month a new book dealing with my problems and I'm concerned with my own tasks. I can't even read them.

527
01:12:48.600 --> 01:12:56.600
Do you have any explanation? Here is my guess, but it is only a guess.

528
01:12:56.600 --> 01:13:08.600
that at last the question of the Keynesian aggregates is now being taken seriously and you wound up as the man who 50 years ago first challenged it.

529
01:13:08.600 --> 01:13:18.600
Yes, in a way, even simple. It is a disappointment with Keynes, which has turned into respect to me.

530
01:13:18.600 --> 01:13:30.600
In the mere fact of unemployment combined with inflation at the same time, it's certainly disillusioning people.

531
01:13:30.600 --> 01:13:39.520
And that's 79 and 80, that late 70s period. Now let me ask a personal question. Ten years

532
01:13:39.520 --> 01:13:45.040
ago, and I'm going again by a ten year memory but I think I've got it close, ten years ago

533
01:13:45.040 --> 01:13:55.400
and I think it was in February, Reason Magazine published an interview with you and you made

534
01:13:55.400 --> 01:14:04.800
approximately the following statement. Fortunately, the worst prediction of your life. You talked

535
01:14:04.800 --> 01:14:14.200
about what you thought would come, which was unemployment, inflationary crisis, price controls,

536
01:14:14.200 --> 01:14:22.960
the command economy. And you said, we will see it within 10 years, but I will not see

537
01:14:22.960 --> 01:14:35.960
and I am thankful that I won't. Now, one, you're still here and second, at least with respect to price controls and the command economy, we did not see it.

538
01:14:35.960 --> 01:14:37.960
No, it's never become as fair as that.

539
01:14:37.960 --> 01:14:43.960
Why do you?

540
01:14:43.960 --> 01:14:54.960
Well, I believe the answer is in the United States, that there was then already underway a stream of the animatic nerve,

541
01:14:54.960 --> 01:14:58.960
which I began to discover very soon after that.

542
01:14:58.960 --> 01:15:19.960
The second thing is, I must also admit, that once in a dumb inner period, I was either still in or only recovering from a period which in a sense might be called depression,

543
01:15:19.960 --> 01:15:43.960
Although the medical diagnosis that I was suffering from depression was pure nonsense, it's now being cleared up that I had about 69, a little earlier, two heart attacks which knocked me out, one for one year and one for five years.

544
01:15:43.960 --> 01:15:56.960
I was unable to work from 69 to early 74 and not being able to work made me frightfully depressed and pessimistic.

545
01:15:56.960 --> 01:16:03.960
I have not been cured as some of my friends maliciously suggest by the Nobel Prize.

546
01:16:03.960 --> 01:16:11.960
I had already started publishing again early in the summer of 74 before I had any idea

547
01:16:11.960 --> 01:16:22.960
But that before 74, I was for almost five years out of action intellectually,

548
01:16:22.960 --> 01:16:28.960
at least unable to do any original work.

549
01:16:28.960 --> 01:16:35.960
I did such things as, for instance, that survey of the history of liberalism

550
01:16:35.960 --> 01:16:44.960
for an Italian encyclopedia, which has since been published in English translation,

551
01:16:44.960 --> 01:16:56.960
which not only just reproduces my old knowledge, but even makes some awful blunders of pure memory.

552
01:16:56.960 --> 01:17:03.960
If you know my writing, you will see how absurd it is to write an intellectual history of liberalism

553
01:17:03.960 --> 01:17:20.960
and to forget to even mention Lord Acton was one of my great figures, but that thing could happen to me at a time when I was merely reviving things I knew that the Act were thinking of.

554
01:17:20.960 --> 01:17:26.960
Sometimes I feel these five years have been a period of rest.

555
01:17:26.960 --> 01:17:36.960
You, I want to go back now to some questions about the students of Mises.

556
01:17:36.960 --> 01:17:44.960
You maintained your commitment to the Austrian perspective generally.

557
01:17:44.960 --> 01:17:50.960
However, you may have disagreed on some points with Mises, but you're still an Austrian economist.

558
01:17:50.960 --> 01:17:54.960
Schumpeter, no.

559
01:17:54.960 --> 01:18:01.960
Schoenpader, of course, was a friend of me, or if not a friend, at least a colleague, an intellectual peer.

560
01:18:01.960 --> 01:18:06.960
Haberler abandoned his open...

561
01:18:06.960 --> 01:18:11.960
Otherwise, never been greatly interested in the philosophical basis of it.

562
01:18:11.960 --> 01:18:18.960
What about Machlöff? We don't think of him as an Austrian today, though he was.

563
01:18:18.960 --> 01:18:20.960
How about Alvin Hayes?

564
01:18:20.960 --> 01:18:32.960
He was and he was not. He knew it all, but he was not basically a philosophical thinker.

565
01:18:32.960 --> 01:18:41.960
Was it Keynes's work or was it the reaction regarding the length of the Depression?

566
01:18:41.960 --> 01:18:48.960
Rubens is a case in point. You cannot get him to discuss the Great Depression.

567
01:18:48.960 --> 01:18:53.960
That book has fallen into Robin's memory hole. It's not there anymore.

568
01:18:55.960 --> 01:19:03.960
Was it a disillusionment about the theory as a result of either Keynes or the Depression that you think may have...

569
01:19:03.960 --> 01:19:05.960
Well, Alvin Hanson is another.

570
01:19:05.960 --> 01:19:07.960
Alvin Hanson?

571
01:19:07.960 --> 01:19:10.960
Alvin Hanson became the teacher of Samuelson of all things.

572
01:19:10.960 --> 01:19:13.960
And he was one of your students, right?

573
01:19:13.960 --> 01:19:17.960
No, he was back in contemporary in age.

574
01:19:17.960 --> 01:19:19.960
But he was influenced by your thinking.

575
01:19:19.960 --> 01:19:26.960
He was at one stage influenced me, but Hanson, I'm afraid I don't take him seriously.

576
01:19:26.960 --> 01:19:32.960
He was a man quick to learn it. He was not a real theoretical chemist.

577
01:19:32.960 --> 01:19:39.960
But let me get to the crucial point.

578
01:19:39.960 --> 01:20:00.960
Now, what I see only now, clearly, is a problem of my relation to Mises, which began with my 1937 article on economics and knowledge,

579
01:20:00.960 --> 01:20:15.960
It was an attempt to persuade Mises himself that when he asserted that the market theory was a priori, he was wrong.

580
01:20:15.960 --> 01:20:21.960
That what was a priori was only the logic of individual action.

581
01:20:21.960 --> 01:20:31.960
But the moment you passed from this to the interaction of many people, you entered into the empirical field.

582
01:20:31.960 --> 01:20:44.960
Curiously enough, while Mises was very resentful of any criticism by his pupils, and temporarily broke,

583
01:20:44.960 --> 01:20:46.960
Go ahead.

584
01:20:46.960 --> 01:20:50.960
Temporarily broke posts with Machlub and Haberler,

585
01:20:50.960 --> 01:20:53.960
because they criticized the thing.

586
01:20:53.960 --> 01:20:56.960
He took my critique silently,

587
01:20:56.960 --> 01:20:59.960
and even approved the article,

588
01:20:59.960 --> 01:21:04.960
as if he had not been aware that it was a criticism of his own news.

589
01:21:04.960 --> 01:21:07.960
I cannot explain this.

590
01:21:07.960 --> 01:21:11.960
But my view has come very much further.

591
01:21:11.960 --> 01:21:36.960
I believe I can now even explain why what I admit is a masterly Christianity has not been really effective because Mises remained in the end, himself a rationalist utilitarian.

592
01:21:36.960 --> 01:21:46.960
And with a rationalist utilitarianism, the rejection of socialism is irreconcilable.

593
01:21:46.960 --> 01:22:04.960
Socialist capitalism presumes that apart from our rational insight, we possess a traditional endowment of morals

594
01:22:04.960 --> 01:22:11.960
which has been tested by evolution, but not designed by our intelligence.

595
01:22:11.960 --> 01:22:16.960
We have never invented private property because we understood its consequences,

596
01:22:16.960 --> 01:22:20.960
nor have we ever invented the family.

597
01:22:20.960 --> 01:22:26.960
It so happened that those traditions, essentially religious traditions,

598
01:22:26.960 --> 01:22:30.960
and I am as much an argument as Mises was,

599
01:22:30.960 --> 01:22:59.960
But I must admit that the too decisive tradition which made it possible for us to build up an order which extends our vision cannot be the result of our intellectual insight, but must be the result of a moral tradition which, as I now put it, is the result of group selection and not of individual selection.

600
01:22:59.960 --> 01:23:26.960
Something which we can express, interpret, but Mises postulates, if we are strictly rational, we decide also, we can see that socialism is wrong, if we remain strict rationalists, eucliditarians, that implies we can arrange everything according to our pleasure.

601
01:23:26.960 --> 01:23:41.960
So Mises never could free himself from that fundamental philosophy in which we have all grown up, all of our mission, that reason can do everything better than we have it.

602
01:23:41.960 --> 01:23:44.960
From this he could never lose himself.

603
01:23:44.960 --> 01:23:51.960
And this respect, although I accept nearly everything of his criticism of socialism,

604
01:23:51.960 --> 01:23:56.960
I now understand why it has not been fully effective.

605
01:23:56.960 --> 01:24:05.960
Because in this case it's still based on the fundamental mistake of rationalism and socialism,

606
01:24:05.960 --> 01:24:10.960
that we have the intellectual power to arrange everything rationally,

607
01:24:10.960 --> 01:24:20.960
This is not a conflict, this is a search, in one place he says we can't do it, in another place he argues, being rational people, we must try to do it.

608
01:24:20.960 --> 01:24:23.960
That's a significant difference.

609
01:24:23.960 --> 01:24:38.960
Let me ask you, what was the basis? I mean, at seminars, was there a discussion of moral philosophy, of religion? What was the basis for the agnosticism in, I think, among...

610
01:24:38.960 --> 01:24:57.960
In a way, Yemen is the origin of so many schools of its own, which were dominant in the 1920s,

611
01:24:57.960 --> 01:25:06.960
and one of them was the influential, which we all were partly caught with logical positivism.

612
01:25:06.960 --> 01:25:25.960
In fact, Mises drove, of course, Richard von Mises, one of the leading figures, but he and I all grew up in this Ernst-Marc philosophy that ultimately everything must be rationally justified.

613
01:25:25.960 --> 01:25:41.960
Till we both discovered that apart from our capacity of rationally organizing things, we rely also on something which we have never rationally invented, certain moral traditions.

614
01:25:41.960 --> 01:25:48.960
Let me tell you an amusing episode.

615
01:25:48.960 --> 01:26:12.960
takes a little introduction, even the catholic church has become very sensible with some members in it and a very great man, the present Cardinal of Vienna, acts for the Vatican as a liaison between church and islands and in this effort,

616
01:26:12.960 --> 01:26:38.960
And yet about two years ago, organized a very remarkable event, reorganized by Cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church, a meeting on evolution on the 100th anniversary of the death of Charles Darwin, imagine, organized by the Cardinal of the Catholic Church.

617
01:26:38.960 --> 01:26:43.460
On this occasion, I was out to give the lecture on cultural evolution,

618
01:26:43.460 --> 01:26:46.460
existing from biological evolution.

619
01:26:46.460 --> 01:26:50.460
Mr. Cardinal, the chair before me,

620
01:26:50.460 --> 01:26:55.460
I made the rather rude remark as conclusion.

621
01:26:55.460 --> 01:26:59.460
I'm afraid even we agnostics must admit

622
01:26:59.460 --> 01:27:05.460
that we owe our civilization to superstitions of the gardener.

623
01:27:05.460 --> 01:27:14.460
made first a bitter face, and I apologize, I know it's too hard a word, let's call it un-symbolic truth,

624
01:27:14.460 --> 01:27:22.460
which has suddenly embraced me, and on the term symbolic truth, which are not rationally justifiable,

625
01:27:22.460 --> 01:27:32.460
which have prevailed, proved themselves in tradition, we are suddenly in complete agreement.

626
01:27:32.460 --> 01:27:38.460
Here, of course, the truths of the religions are different from the truths of science.

627
01:27:38.460 --> 01:27:47.460
If you admit that civilization depends on symbolic truths, as you might call it,

628
01:27:47.460 --> 01:27:54.460
which are essential for the preservation of human civilization, there's no conflict between us.

629
01:27:54.460 --> 01:28:00.460
Now, in the 20s, that was not perceived.

630
01:28:00.460 --> 01:28:07.460
This is a later Hayek speaking than the Hayek of the 1920s.

631
01:28:07.460 --> 01:28:10.460
This is the fatal conceit on which I am working.

632
01:28:10.460 --> 01:28:28.460
The whole idea, which is basic, that part of our order of cooperation is based not on deliberate designs which we understand,

633
01:28:28.460 --> 01:28:52.460
But on traditions which have prevailed, because they have enabled more people to live than other traditions, a sort of quasi-Darwinian solution, which however differs from biological Darwinism and not being based on selection of individuals, because individuals can never perceive these effects.

634
01:28:52.460 --> 01:29:00.460
They are beyond their range of vision when they show themselves in the actual success of the group.

635
01:29:00.460 --> 01:29:08.460
Choosing for this purpose now the conception of an extended order of operation.

636
01:29:08.460 --> 01:29:14.460
By extended I mean an order which transcends our vision.

637
01:29:14.460 --> 01:29:19.460
Just a simple fact that we are all working for people whom we do not know

638
01:29:19.460 --> 01:29:22.960
and being supplied by people whom we do not know.

639
01:29:22.960 --> 01:29:30.160
We live in an order which is, in this sense, not perceivable to us.

640
01:29:30.160 --> 01:29:36.560
We produce through habits whose significance we do not understand.

641
01:29:36.560 --> 01:29:42.360
An order which has become essential for our survival in present numbers.

642
01:29:42.360 --> 01:29:46.760
This is the main theme of the book I'm preparing

643
01:29:46.760 --> 01:29:54.760
and which because it leads in so many philosophical problems is taking me much longer than a problem.

644
01:29:54.760 --> 01:30:04.760
The book has been in draft for these four years, but the first, we call it the Fatal Conceit.

645
01:30:04.760 --> 01:30:11.760
The Fatal Conceit meaning that the whole civilization is a creation of the human race,

646
01:30:11.760 --> 01:30:17.760
that we have created knowing what we are doing, that I am denying.

647
01:30:17.760 --> 01:30:25.760
And the crucial part is the three volumes of the Federal Compete of Morals, Economics and Politics.

648
01:30:25.760 --> 01:30:34.760
And the moral part, which has led me into the problems I've just been explaining, which have delayed the book so much.

649
01:30:34.760 --> 01:30:40.760
I'm still ad-hoc to send the first volume to the printers before this summer.

650
01:30:40.760 --> 01:30:46.760
I am still hanging with a very amusing chapter.

651
01:30:46.760 --> 01:30:51.760
The one chapter I have to rewrite now begins with a problem.

652
01:30:51.760 --> 01:30:55.760
Why has it been true for the last hundred years?

653
01:30:55.760 --> 01:30:58.760
The intelligent a person was,

654
01:30:58.760 --> 01:31:01.760
the more likely it was that he would be a socialist.

655
01:31:01.760 --> 01:31:03.760
Which is roughly true.

656
01:31:03.760 --> 01:31:05.760
I don't think you can deny it.

657
01:31:05.760 --> 01:31:14.760
among the natural. But not now. It's improved. Among the physicists, it's almost been through.

658
01:31:14.760 --> 01:31:21.760
The biologists saw, Einstein was an out-and-out. Einstein was one of my principal novelists.

659
01:31:21.760 --> 01:31:27.760
I understand, but I believe in the last years it has begun to shift, and you're partially responsible.

660
01:31:27.760 --> 01:31:41.760
But I still start with a paradigm, which is a Nobel Prize lecture by Jacques Monod, the French biologist, which explicitly said,

661
01:31:41.760 --> 01:31:51.760
Science has now definitely proved to us that it's nonsense to believe anything except what is empirically demonstrable.

662
01:31:51.760 --> 01:32:02.760
Going out of the balance, said all traditional morals have done something. We must build society on the morals which we invent.

663
01:32:02.760 --> 01:32:04.760
This I take to my head.

664
01:32:04.760 --> 01:32:06.760
That's destructive.

665
01:32:06.760 --> 01:32:11.760
But that's bad biology. It's not even good epistemology anymore.

666
01:32:11.760 --> 01:32:20.760
In biology it's already bad, but there are very few physicists even at present.