WEBVTT

NOTE An Interview with Friedrich Hayek: Part II

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
Now, let's go back to Austria, the Austrian School and Vienna.

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:15.000
I know only a little about Vienna from the turn of the century through the 20s,

3
00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:23.000
as illiterate Americans pick up bits. Gorski's book is about all I really know about, at best.

4
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:43.000
Now, Vienna was almost a capital of intellectual ferment from what I can see from, say, 1880 or 1980, probably through the 30s. Is that how you perceive it in retrospect?

5
00:00:43.000 --> 00:00:53.000
All right. I mean, you can date it exactly. It was a great reform in 1867.

6
00:00:53.000 --> 00:01:00.000
Until then, the University of Vienna was nothing. Now, in 1867, it begins to grow.

7
00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:08.000
At the end of the century, it reached a high point. It had its highest level in the 1890s and up to 1914.

8
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:20.000
It revived once more after the war, through the twenties, and almost was the beginning of a furtive diet, not only in economics, but also now.

9
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:28.000
Do you just, you don't have to, maybe you don't have an immediate answer, but as a feeling in retrospect, perspective,

10
00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:42.000
Do you think that the Austrian perspective could have or would have been likely to have flourished and to have come into existence anywhere else except Vienna?

11
00:01:42.000 --> 00:02:11.000
I wouldn't have excluded England, which happens to be the only other country which I know as intimately as I know Vienna, although there are very specific obstacles, but in general I found more understanding among English people as almost anywhere else.

12
00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:23.000
So, there's a large number of books which have appeared about Vienna, not one of them is any good, I have feeling.

13
00:02:23.000 --> 00:02:32.000
And when I'm not a historian, I will never write a historical book.

14
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:46.000
for your information, the Stanford philosopher William Barclay, who is all the material for my intellectual work,

15
00:02:46.000 --> 00:02:50.000
who will now even be helping me on my current work.

16
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:51.000
He's at Stanford.

17
00:02:51.000 --> 00:03:04.960
And in addition, since he is there, Barclay, William Barclay III, Stanford order gets all

18
00:03:04.960 --> 00:03:12.320
my papers, so it will all be there, and they're making efforts to get, they have now got some

19
00:03:12.320 --> 00:03:15.960
and Mahmoud papers will not be particularly interesting.

20
00:03:15.960 --> 00:03:18.960
They will get other Austrian papers.

21
00:03:18.960 --> 00:03:24.080
So, after my death, Stanford will be the center,

22
00:03:24.080 --> 00:03:29.360
where the material should be to study this development.

23
00:03:29.360 --> 00:03:34.240
That's, of course, closely connected with the

24
00:03:34.240 --> 00:03:38.840
cultural atmosphere of one aspect of which

25
00:03:38.840 --> 00:03:41.840
I spoke before in connection with the Jewish problem,

26
00:03:41.840 --> 00:03:45.080
which is one aspect on it.

27
00:03:45.080 --> 00:03:48.520
Well, of course, the extent to which you could grow up

28
00:03:48.520 --> 00:03:52.440
in a purely academic atmosphere.

29
00:03:52.440 --> 00:03:55.160
My grandfather was a zoologist.

30
00:03:55.160 --> 00:03:57.400
My father, a botanist.

31
00:03:57.400 --> 00:04:01.800
My two brothers, professors of anatomy and biology

32
00:04:01.800 --> 00:04:04.600
and biological chemistry.

33
00:04:04.600 --> 00:04:07.440
My children who grew up in separation

34
00:04:07.440 --> 00:04:11.160
from the family's result of the war.

35
00:04:11.160 --> 00:04:19.660
My elder is an insect specialist, and my younger boy a bacteriologist, so the bacteriologist...

36
00:04:19.660 --> 00:04:27.960
And I am really in my training, my biology, my training, in my own education, a biologist,

37
00:04:27.960 --> 00:04:36.960
it was a gay political former, it's at the end of World War I, which drew me into political problems.

38
00:04:36.960 --> 00:04:45.960
But even then, while I was studying officially economics, or I should say, no, officially law,

39
00:04:45.960 --> 00:04:54.460
I divided that time equally between economics and physiological psychology,

40
00:04:54.460 --> 00:04:58.460
and it was practical problems to make me decide for economics,

41
00:04:58.460 --> 00:05:02.960
rather than these problems on physiological psychology,

42
00:05:02.960 --> 00:05:10.960
which I ultimately published a book, The Sensory Order, which is much more important for my thinking

43
00:05:12.960 --> 00:05:22.960
than the economists generally understood, because in connection with the formation of the human

44
00:05:22.960 --> 00:05:32.720
perception that my conception not only of order in general but the relation of orders

45
00:05:32.720 --> 00:05:38.220
of different degrees of magnitude became fully looked.

46
00:05:38.220 --> 00:05:45.220
I believe I understand economics because I understand not what's commonly called psychology,

47
00:05:45.220 --> 00:05:48.820
the sort of psychology which Freud and so on did.

48
00:05:48.820 --> 00:05:51.120
I have nothing to do at all.

49
00:05:51.120 --> 00:06:02.320
And to see how a man is capable to interpret an extremely complex order in which he lives.

50
00:06:02.320 --> 00:06:08.320
by forming within himself a sort of replica of this order.

51
00:06:08.320 --> 00:06:16.320
The one economist that I can think of, and not a very good one, who recognizes this is a man named Ben Seligman.

52
00:06:16.320 --> 00:06:22.320
Ben Seligman, S-E-L-I-G-M-A-N.

53
00:06:22.320 --> 00:06:31.320
He wrote an extended critique of you 20 years ago, almost all of it devoted to the sensory order.

54
00:06:31.320 --> 00:06:43.320
I'll send you a note on that, and it was curious to me at the time, but in later years I've understood that I don't like his critique, but he lived at the right place.

55
00:06:43.320 --> 00:06:48.320
I'd still like to see it. The name is familiar to me, but I certainly haven't seen it.

56
00:06:48.320 --> 00:07:00.320
I'll remember to send it to you. But what I'm trying to get at, you lived in this unique period of time in this remarkable seat, and it was not just you.

57
00:07:00.320 --> 00:07:11.320
I mean, it was Freud, it was Wittgenstein, it was the underground, the occult underground as well, Hitler really flourished out of it.

58
00:07:11.320 --> 00:07:23.320
Intellectually, the dominating figure, either by reaction or by adaptation, was Ernst Mach, the physicist.

59
00:07:23.320 --> 00:07:32.320
That was the principle for thinking in which we all go, and at first all adopt with it.

60
00:07:32.320 --> 00:07:38.320
But somehow, in my psychological thinking, it begins directly with Ernst Mach.

61
00:07:38.320 --> 00:08:01.320
Ernst Mach, in his famous book, The Analysis of Sensations, explains or assumes that while all our individual sensations have an original pure quality,

62
00:08:01.320 --> 00:08:05.320
They are constantly modified by experience.

63
00:08:05.320 --> 00:08:11.320
There is only an original order and then the experimental change.

64
00:08:11.320 --> 00:08:19.320
If you can show that experience can change the thing, why need there be an original quality?

65
00:08:19.320 --> 00:08:24.320
The original quality may have arisen in the same fashion.

66
00:08:24.320 --> 00:08:29.320
But there is only a step beyond math, which turns against human results.

67
00:08:29.320 --> 00:08:44.320
and so on, that my own psychology developed. In this sense, I began from the same thing in which the whole logical positivism, Schlick, Neurath, Carnap and so on, developed from Vienna.

68
00:08:44.320 --> 00:09:04.320
But on a split, it's a base, it's a path, very much, but these two apparently absolutely contrary trends come from a common initial viewpoint in Mark.

69
00:09:04.320 --> 00:09:30.320
Well, now, to what extent was there a feeling of free thought in Vienna? Freedom, now, if, could you make a comparison to the freedom and the flourishing of the music through Vienna, Mozart, Beethoven, and Wagner, and all of these people, and then the freedom, is there any comparison?

70
00:09:30.320 --> 00:09:36.320
I have such a feeling of freedom at the university.

71
00:09:36.320 --> 00:09:45.320
I think the decisive point was simply that you were not expected to confine yourself to your own subject.

72
00:09:45.320 --> 00:09:54.320
I mean, I must have spent as much time in lectures and other fields with other people as I did with economics.

73
00:09:54.320 --> 00:10:15.320
Despite the jokers that nominally were studying law, it still, I can say it left me time, I took time, I spent my day at the university from morning to evening, but shifting from subject to subject.

74
00:10:15.320 --> 00:10:30.320
I would as readily hear lectures about art history or ancient Greek plays as I would hear lectures.

75
00:10:30.320 --> 00:10:43.320
Curiously enough, there are mere gaps in fact. It so happened that psychology had died out by natural death during the wartime.

76
00:10:43.320 --> 00:10:53.320
There had been, during the war, still two eminent psychologists who had died.

77
00:10:53.320 --> 00:11:00.320
There was still one dying, painfully, still giving daily lectures.

78
00:11:00.320 --> 00:11:05.320
But you could see this has been a brilliant man, for whom now the effort to get through.

79
00:11:05.320 --> 00:11:10.320
But he was sufficiently interesting for me to attract here.

80
00:11:10.320 --> 00:11:28.320
And it was to us, even make also a very small elite of the students, that it all happened at a time when the university was over flooded by veterans who were coming from the war.

81
00:11:28.320 --> 00:11:40.320
The number of students was probably three times the normal of whom nine-tenths wanted to get the degree as rapidly as possible.

82
00:11:41.320 --> 00:11:56.320
Yet, some of us managed, in an equally short period, not only to get, and I got a first class degree in law, but to study half a dozen other subjects.

83
00:11:56.320 --> 00:12:10.320
The University was welcomed, yes. There was never any test, either was you attended the lectures that you ought to attend, or was you attended any number of lectures where you had no right at all.

84
00:12:10.320 --> 00:12:21.320
I was going around all through the University, testing out people. I would try people like the famous camera, I probably remember the name of it.

85
00:12:21.320 --> 00:12:41.320
Kirzner wrote a book about this, he is the one man who believed he could prove the inheritance of a trial characteristics and became temporarily famous.

86
00:12:41.320 --> 00:12:53.320
But there were some very original figures. All of them at the universities, they were outside what you could call the professional staff.

87
00:12:53.320 --> 00:13:06.320
All these pivotal centers, who were just licensed to lecture, who had their own ideas of the center, who didn't take an organized scheme at all,

88
00:13:06.320 --> 00:13:27.680
It sounds very much like the University of Berlin in Marx's day.

89
00:13:27.680 --> 00:13:35.320
The same coffee house atmosphere, the brilliant young men coming in of all persuasion and of

90
00:13:35.320 --> 00:13:41.320
Of course, in their case, I guess Hegel being the overriding influence, the name Mach was in your day.

91
00:13:41.320 --> 00:14:00.320
It probably was, but in a contrast between the University of Vienna as I knew it in the present, is such that I avoid going to Vienna.

92
00:14:00.320 --> 00:14:08.320
In every other respect, Vienna is beautifully revived. It's nice, the better built, economically prosperous.

93
00:14:08.320 --> 00:14:14.320
When, what I remember, they were desperately poor, but there was this great intellectual excitement about it.

94
00:14:14.320 --> 00:14:20.320
And the main people who taught were absolutely first-class people.

95
00:14:20.320 --> 00:14:26.320
Every lecture, nearly everyone was intelligent and perhaps was contributive.

96
00:14:26.320 --> 00:14:39.640
I have never heard of a university since medieval time where that was true.

97
00:14:39.640 --> 00:14:44.840
You mean to say that the lectures actually counted for something?

98
00:14:44.840 --> 00:14:48.800
That students really went to lectures because they were good lecturers?

99
00:14:48.800 --> 00:14:56.240
No, no, but I'm thinking of people like you who went here and there and everywhere.

100
00:14:56.240 --> 00:15:11.160
Well, there was a small group of us who did it, a very small group, but I was by no means

101
00:15:11.160 --> 00:15:12.160
alone.

102
00:15:12.160 --> 00:15:17.120
I had friends with whom I could talk, who would have tried something else, and would

103
00:15:17.120 --> 00:15:22.720
tell me it's worth going to this man and worth going to this man, because they experimented

104
00:15:22.720 --> 00:15:24.720
in the same manner in which I did.

105
00:15:24.720 --> 00:15:48.720
Let me get back to Mark's original question though. Is there a relationship between what was going on in Vienna, the city of Vienna, and the openness, if it was openness, I gather that it must have been, and what was going on in the university, which sounds like another equally important experiment in the sharing of ideas?

106
00:15:48.720 --> 00:15:54.720
You know, the University was a world for itself.

107
00:15:54.720 --> 00:16:03.720
Now, where it's a university, at least in the law faculty,

108
00:16:03.720 --> 00:16:07.720
was a very violent political discussion,

109
00:16:07.720 --> 00:16:11.720
between organized socialists and communists.

110
00:16:11.720 --> 00:16:17.720
In fact, even I, although I've never since belonged to a political party,

111
00:16:17.720 --> 00:16:33.720
was one of my friends organizing a German Democratic Association in order to have a middle group between the Catholics on the one side and the socialists and communists on the other side.

112
00:16:33.720 --> 00:16:35.720
And when was this? What year was this?

113
00:16:35.720 --> 00:16:39.720
I was a student from 1918 to 1921.

114
00:16:39.720 --> 00:16:42.720
I would like to ask a question.

115
00:16:42.720 --> 00:16:44.720
I didn't finish for her.

116
00:16:44.720 --> 00:16:51.720
In spite of this, I did my law studies in a year short of the official time,

117
00:16:51.720 --> 00:16:55.720
because I had veterans' credits.

118
00:16:55.720 --> 00:16:59.720
So for that, I was allowed to do it in a short period.

119
00:16:59.720 --> 00:17:07.960
appeared and I managed to do it in spite of some complication. I came back from war

120
00:17:07.960 --> 00:17:15.240
with a fairly severe attack of malaria, was not in the best possible health, but

121
00:17:15.240 --> 00:17:20.400
having to spend every other evening at home with a high temperature didn't much

122
00:17:20.400 --> 00:17:25.040
interfere with the asthma. Now when were you in the war? What was the time period?

123
00:17:25.040 --> 00:17:42.040
When I joined up in the beginning of 1917, went out to Italy in October 1970 and spent exactly a year, just a few days over, a year on the Italian phones.

124
00:17:42.040 --> 00:17:57.040
I want to ask a couple of things. One is you triggered my memory saying Mises did not respond to your 1937 article as though it was a critique of him.

125
00:17:57.040 --> 00:18:07.040
Now I heard him say a very curious thing once and I can't remember where it was but I think it was probably over 20 years ago.

126
00:18:07.040 --> 00:18:15.040
years ago, he said Hayek's greatest book is the Counter-Revolution of Science.

127
00:18:15.040 --> 00:18:19.040
He may have said it to you, but it was public, he did say it.

128
00:18:19.040 --> 00:18:25.040
And yet the Counter-Revolution of Science is simply a development of the 37...

129
00:18:25.040 --> 00:18:27.040
The other way around.

130
00:18:27.040 --> 00:18:28.040
Well...

131
00:18:28.040 --> 00:18:30.040
That doesn't say Counter-Revolution of Science.

132
00:18:30.040 --> 00:18:31.040
It's a book form.

133
00:18:31.040 --> 00:18:32.040
Yes.

134
00:18:32.040 --> 00:18:33.040
Well...

135
00:18:33.040 --> 00:18:40.040
It's a development of the original perception that you had, yet he must have looked at that book. He said so.

136
00:18:40.040 --> 00:18:46.040
Do you think he never really saw it as a threat to his own epistemology?

137
00:18:46.040 --> 00:18:55.040
But I've worked in Auschwitz, I just don't know.

138
00:18:55.040 --> 00:18:58.040
Alright, fair enough.

139
00:18:58.040 --> 00:19:04.040
Now, I have a question regarding after the war.

140
00:19:04.040 --> 00:19:09.040
You saw, at least, the great German inflation.

141
00:19:09.040 --> 00:19:10.040
Oh yes.

142
00:19:10.040 --> 00:19:12.040
And did Austria participate in that?

143
00:19:12.040 --> 00:19:15.040
We had it before.

144
00:19:15.040 --> 00:19:21.040
The Austrian inflation began almost immediately before the war.

145
00:19:21.040 --> 00:19:37.040
My first job under Mises in October 1921, I got a monthly salary of 3,000 old kernel a month.

146
00:19:37.040 --> 00:19:43.040
In the next month, I had to be paid the 3,000 free time in order to be able to live on it.

147
00:19:43.040 --> 00:20:03.040
And by next June they reached one million in a month. So my first ten months of professional life were in what then was still regarded as an enormous inflection that the Germans, two or three years later, got much higher.

148
00:20:03.040 --> 00:20:13.040
That time that the currency should depreciate to finally one million per unit of their noise.

149
00:20:15.040 --> 00:20:20.040
Ten thousand became the new unit after the reform.

150
00:20:21.040 --> 00:20:28.040
But then a very major inflation. And by the time the German inflation came, we knew all about it.

151
00:20:28.040 --> 00:20:38.040
And Mises was the only one who taught us the mechanism of it. Mises was the great monetary expert.

152
00:20:38.040 --> 00:20:48.040
At that time, he was almost exclusively a monetary expert. His book on socialism was going to come.

153
00:20:48.040 --> 00:20:54.040
Only the first essay on the calculation had already appeared.

154
00:20:54.040 --> 00:21:07.040
And at one point, well I happen to know privately, but again please, off the record, but for your information,

155
00:21:07.040 --> 00:21:18.040
I knew that Mises had in his drawer all the papers which would have enabled him from moment to moment to take over the finance ministry,

156
00:21:18.040 --> 00:21:23.040
which he hoped he would be called for to stabilize the currency.

157
00:21:23.040 --> 00:21:28.040
He was never called for it, one of the great disappointments of his life.

158
00:21:28.040 --> 00:21:33.040
But he finally, seeing that it was politically impossible,

159
00:21:33.040 --> 00:21:40.040
had a considerable hand in the arrangement that the League of Nations Commissioner

160
00:21:40.040 --> 00:21:44.040
was sent to Vienna in charge of finance.

161
00:21:44.040 --> 00:21:51.040
And how far he has not been advising this League of Nations Commissioner, I don't know.

162
00:21:51.040 --> 00:22:00.040
I suspect that also officially, he had no hand with it, the ultimate stabilization was done on his advice.

163
00:22:00.040 --> 00:22:02.040
On Mises' advice?

164
00:22:02.040 --> 00:22:06.040
He was the only person in Vienna capable of doing it.

165
00:22:06.040 --> 00:22:08.040
Mark, ask him about the story.

166
00:22:08.040 --> 00:22:19.040
Well, there is a story, perhaps apocryphal, that Mises was asked by the government during this inflation, how to stop it.

167
00:22:19.040 --> 00:22:36.040
He said, meet me at 12 o'clock at this building, and it turned out at 12 midnight they met him at the printing, where they were printing the money, and then they said, well how can we stop this inflation?

168
00:22:36.040 --> 00:22:41.040
He said, hear that noise, turn it off.

169
00:22:41.040 --> 00:22:49.040
Sounds like a story told by Mises himself. Totally plausible.

170
00:22:49.040 --> 00:23:00.040
What was the relationship of the credit installed? Were they the inflation machine, the central bank?

171
00:23:00.040 --> 00:23:05.040
No, you're the central bank. Both the central bank finance the government.

172
00:23:05.040 --> 00:23:22.040
The government, the government from the beginning was short of revenue and from the end of the war financed the expenditure by printing money and the essential point was to stop this gap in the budget.

173
00:23:22.040 --> 00:23:29.040
That was done by the League of Nations, but to make sure that the government started inflating again,

174
00:23:29.040 --> 00:23:39.040
the League of Nations was given one condition, that after that the finances should, for a number of years, be in the hands of the League of Nations Commission.

175
00:23:39.040 --> 00:23:50.040
And I must say, I only suspect, I do not positively know that Jean-Baptiste Say had been regarded as a highly anti-papriotic measure.

176
00:23:50.040 --> 00:24:03.040
It was Mises who, behind the scene, said that the Austrian government money only in conditions that the administration was put in the hands of the League of Nations Commissioners.

177
00:24:03.040 --> 00:24:12.040
And he would have been right that unless it was given to him, it was not in Austria, half of it in Germany.

178
00:24:12.040 --> 00:24:35.040
An expert would really accept himself, would really understand it, who could have done it, but as it probably happened, the League of Nations had been committed on his advice, which I write down, but on his advice is my interpretation.

179
00:24:35.040 --> 00:24:52.040
Now, not financial, I mean, as the situation was, he had to keep it confidential, and would not be free even to tell me what, at that time I saw him every day as my official head in a different job.

180
00:24:52.040 --> 00:25:02.040
The only episode I can remember is that he once threw it off his door and said, there are all the papers, which never meet tomorrow to start a Minister of Finance.

181
00:25:02.040 --> 00:25:03.040
But they never asked him.

182
00:25:03.040 --> 00:25:18.040
Well, one of the reasons, if Mises in the end was a very embittered man, that was one of the episodes which made him so embittered.

183
00:25:18.040 --> 00:25:26.040
I don't think at the end that he was. Perhaps in the course of years, he had met him when he arrived.

184
00:25:26.040 --> 00:25:32.400
Oh yes, oh yes, then, but at the end I saw him just, well within a year before he died,

185
00:25:32.400 --> 00:25:39.320
and the American Economics Association had finally given him that award in 1969, and

186
00:25:39.320 --> 00:25:45.640
he was beginning to get younger followers, in fact he'd had them for quite some time.

187
00:25:45.640 --> 00:25:52.200
He began to get his respect about the time he was your age, really, and I didn't notice

188
00:25:52.200 --> 00:26:11.920
Well, I needed to know, as far as the map is concerned, is it worth pointing out, is

189
00:26:11.920 --> 00:26:20.200
credit home stalled still in the same building, or do you recall where they're located, or

190
00:26:20.200 --> 00:26:38.200
can we find that in Vienna? Yes. It had built a new building, adjoining, almost adjoining its original building in 1914 and the main building is since 1918 in the same place.

191
00:26:38.200 --> 00:26:46.200
Of course, it was then one of the four great banks. Now it has become the one great bank.

192
00:26:46.200 --> 00:26:52.200
Wasn't that the bank that precipitated its failure, precipitated the depression in the era?

193
00:26:52.200 --> 00:27:00.200
There was another one before, the Boehm-Credit Einstein failed first, but they were so close lit up

194
00:27:00.200 --> 00:27:06.200
that when I was already in London, when the Boehm-Credit Einstein failed,

195
00:27:06.200 --> 00:27:12.200
and I was just expecting the Credit Einstein company to come next by that stage.

196
00:27:12.200 --> 00:27:13.200
And did it?

197
00:27:13.200 --> 00:27:27.200
Again, you know, on the basis of Mises' prediction, Mises had no doubt that the banks were all in a state of quasi-bankruptcy.

198
00:27:27.200 --> 00:27:42.200
Let me tell you another episode, 30 years later, about a month, must have been in the middle 60s.

199
00:27:42.200 --> 00:28:00.200
I was asked by the then right-hand side, Chancellor of Austria, after it vainly asked Lachner that I would be willing to take over the presidency of the national bank,

200
00:28:00.200 --> 00:28:07.200
which I ascended on one condition, one of the great international accounting firms,

201
00:28:07.200 --> 00:28:13.200
check all the nationalized industries, that was the end of the conversation.

202
00:28:13.200 --> 00:28:18.200
I can well imagine that would have been an unpolar decision.

203
00:28:18.200 --> 00:28:27.200
When you studied as a young man,

204
00:28:27.200 --> 00:28:33.200
I gathered you were at some point influenced by Rickert and the South Baden School.

205
00:28:33.200 --> 00:28:34.200
I was not.

206
00:28:34.200 --> 00:28:36.200
Heinrich Rickert and Wendell Bond.

207
00:28:36.200 --> 00:28:37.200
You didn't?

208
00:28:37.200 --> 00:28:40.200
No, I personally, he had great influence in all of us.

209
00:28:40.200 --> 00:28:42.200
He was one of the familiar figures.

210
00:28:42.200 --> 00:28:47.200
Now, and you wrote the introduction to that book by Rickert.

211
00:28:47.200 --> 00:28:48.200
When it finally was translated.

212
00:28:48.200 --> 00:28:49.200
Years later.

213
00:28:49.200 --> 00:28:53.200
His very bad conscience had forgotten nearly all about it by the time.

214
00:28:53.200 --> 00:29:06.760
I'm curious about that because I see you as a man in the intellectual tradition of Kant

215
00:29:06.760 --> 00:29:12.920
and the Kantian movement, especially through the Vindelband approach. It sounds the same

216
00:29:12.920 --> 00:29:21.240
to me. The whole concept of understanding and historical understanding. Mises also said

217
00:29:21.240 --> 00:29:31.640
that he was, the language indicates that he was, and yet the two of you disagreed on epistemology.

218
00:29:31.640 --> 00:29:37.680
That's the thing that has baffled me. You're both conscience in perspective, yet you call

219
00:29:37.680 --> 00:29:41.320
him a utilitarian. How would you distinguish the two traditions?

220
00:29:41.320 --> 00:29:47.280
Well, it's again a complex story. You know the book by John Gray about me?

221
00:29:47.280 --> 00:29:48.280
I read it a month ago.

222
00:29:48.280 --> 00:29:58.280
Of course, he interprets me as a Kantian, and I first was inclined to say you exaggerate the influence.

223
00:29:58.280 --> 00:30:08.280
I've never studied carefully, but the fact is, at the crucial age of, say, 20 or 21,

224
00:30:08.280 --> 00:30:19.280
got very frequently fascinated by the works of a Kantian contemporary, named Alois Reel,

225
00:30:19.280 --> 00:30:26.280
who wrote a great work on criticism and two semi-popular introductions.

226
00:30:26.280 --> 00:30:33.280
And I suppose what I know about technical philosophy comes largely from a Kantian.

227
00:30:33.280 --> 00:30:46.280
So I'd afterwards to, first I told K. No, I knew far too little of kind directly to justify this, and then I had to admit indirectly I got a good deal.

228
00:30:46.280 --> 00:30:49.280
But you are clearly not a utilitarian.

229
00:30:49.280 --> 00:30:50.280
What?

230
00:30:50.280 --> 00:30:52.280
You are not a utilitarian in your perspective.

231
00:30:52.280 --> 00:30:53.280
in your perspective.

232
00:30:53.280 --> 00:30:54.280
Tell me not now.

233
00:30:54.280 --> 00:31:05.920
To begin with, well, I think it was Mises who made me familiar with the ______.

234
00:31:05.920 --> 00:31:19.760
And in my early stages, I'd studied very much, in fact so much so, I discovered in studying

235
00:31:19.760 --> 00:31:32.760
The papers of Jeremy Bentham at the University College, that Bentham had been a very good economist who had done very noticeable work on monetary theory.

236
00:31:32.760 --> 00:31:34.760
Short of currency, that's right.

237
00:31:34.760 --> 00:31:44.760
And I had started already the highly urgent work of organizing the Bentham papers, which were an awful mess.

238
00:31:44.760 --> 00:32:03.760
That broke down, and the first Bentham committee at the University College, which I had started, broke up during the war, and the definite start on an edition was only done after me, and after I'd been left random.

239
00:32:03.760 --> 00:32:11.760
If I had still been in London, there was no doubt the University College would ask me to come in again and to resume the thing.

240
00:32:11.760 --> 00:32:16.760
But I had by then gone to America, so a whole different group.

241
00:32:16.760 --> 00:32:24.760
I had nothing to do with the Great Bentham Edition, and I had then become fairly sceptical,

242
00:32:24.760 --> 00:32:40.760
Because I had become so very much aware that Bentham had been influenced much more by the French 18th century tradition than by the English, or I should say Scottish.

243
00:32:40.760 --> 00:32:51.760
I had discovered the sculpts and found that the early roots of my ideas lie with Smithson, Ferguson and these people.

244
00:32:51.760 --> 00:32:58.760
And there was a very distinct conflict between that tradition and the Benjaminite tradition.

245
00:32:58.760 --> 00:33:05.760
And then, of course, I did these many years of work on John Stuart Mill.

246
00:33:05.760 --> 00:33:15.760
It shook my admiration for what I thought a great figure very much indeed,

247
00:33:15.760 --> 00:33:27.760
Because my present opinion of Jean Stuart Mill is a very critical one indeed.

248
00:33:27.760 --> 00:33:39.760
The influence of Mises' socialism thesis, the economic calculation thesis, it moved you, did it not?

249
00:33:39.760 --> 00:33:52.760
Ruppke was moved. I gather Robbins was moved. There may have been others. That essay, or at least the book, was really a turning point.

250
00:33:52.760 --> 00:34:02.760
It was actually a turning point. Although I now see it as much less original as I then thought. It struck me as something completely new.

251
00:34:02.760 --> 00:34:11.760
The then dominating opinion, and I don't think Mises knew his predecessors, it was even on his terms completely original.

252
00:34:11.760 --> 00:34:24.760
I've since discovered, for instance, that the forgotten predecessor of marginal utility, the German H. H. Gossen, hands it up.

253
00:34:24.760 --> 00:34:31.760
This proves that without private property and calculation in prices, a market economy is impossible.

254
00:34:31.760 --> 00:34:35.760
It's all there, but none of us knew it.

255
00:34:35.760 --> 00:34:41.760
Coulson's book had been pulled out of circulation by him, had it not, by his public.

256
00:34:41.760 --> 00:34:43.760
He died a few years.

257
00:34:43.760 --> 00:35:12.760
That's a little suspected story. It did issue a new edition, but when I was asked to bring out the reprint of this, I discovered the so-called new edition was the original, was a new title page, page stuck on it.

258
00:35:12.760 --> 00:35:21.760
So there really was never a second printing, there was only a second issuing of the old edition with a new title page.

259
00:35:21.760 --> 00:35:34.760
When that article hit you as a young man and your contemporaries, it really turned everything, your whole way of thinking.

260
00:35:34.760 --> 00:35:46.760
Why do you think it is that even today, even today, textbooks generally, if it even was a footnote to the article, it is only indirectly when they quote Lange.

261
00:35:46.760 --> 00:36:00.760
Now this is 65 years later. It impressed you tremendously. It changed the lives of some of the great minds of our time, and yet it still does not seem to have registered in the minds of men.

262
00:36:00.760 --> 00:36:07.760
I've alluded before it was partially the utilitarian aspect, but I don't think it was just that.

263
00:36:07.760 --> 00:36:10.760
I figure Lange answered.

264
00:36:10.760 --> 00:36:13.760
Yeah, but that's because they didn't read Lange.

265
00:36:13.760 --> 00:36:20.760
In the framework of Mises' utilitarian approach, it doesn't quite fit in.

266
00:36:20.760 --> 00:36:27.760
But that doesn't apply to your three essays in later.

267
00:36:27.760 --> 00:36:46.760
I was completely convinced, have you by the way seen my latest effort about two years ago in the Journal of the London Institute, about three pages of fiction, where I make fun of Lange? I just analyzed Lange and showed that every single paragraph is nonsense.

268
00:36:46.760 --> 00:36:56.760
But every single paragraph is still taken seriously in the academic institutions, at least by the older tenured men.

269
00:36:56.760 --> 00:37:02.760
I suppose so, yes. I also have published this in a more vibrant, circulated order.

270
00:37:02.760 --> 00:37:09.760
I gave that moment to Ralph Harris, the London Institute, to publish in his journal,

271
00:37:09.760 --> 00:37:12.760
something which I incidentally did.

272
00:37:12.760 --> 00:37:21.760
But I don't think that even the believers in Lange can resist that Lange was a fraud.

273
00:37:21.760 --> 00:37:29.760
The Volcker Foundation, what was your relationship to the Volcker Foundation?

274
00:37:29.760 --> 00:37:39.760
Because it was a very quiet, very important organization that got no publicity deliberately, but was influential.

275
00:37:39.760 --> 00:37:41.760
That's the name Luno.

276
00:37:41.760 --> 00:37:43.760
Luno? Harold Luno.

277
00:37:43.760 --> 00:37:44.760
Yes.

278
00:37:44.760 --> 00:37:45.760
Who ran it?

279
00:37:45.760 --> 00:37:46.760
Yes.

280
00:37:46.760 --> 00:37:47.760
Who stopped it?

281
00:37:47.760 --> 00:37:48.760
Yes.

282
00:37:48.760 --> 00:37:49.760
Did he stop it?

283
00:37:49.760 --> 00:37:54.760
Well, yeah, but that was because Volcker had put in a self-destruct clause in the organization.

284
00:37:54.760 --> 00:37:55.760
Yeah.

285
00:37:55.760 --> 00:37:58.760
So there was legal, legality for that, for having it.

286
00:37:58.760 --> 00:38:01.760
Mune was the head of the firm called Mune.

287
00:38:01.760 --> 00:38:04.760
It was, well, I think it was the son-in-law.

288
00:38:04.760 --> 00:38:06.760
Yes, or Mune, I think nephew.

289
00:38:06.760 --> 00:38:07.760
Something like that.

290
00:38:07.760 --> 00:38:13.760
Now did they finance your coming to Chicago, or was there some connection?

291
00:38:13.760 --> 00:38:16.760
I believe, I wasn't killed at the time.

292
00:38:16.760 --> 00:38:31.760
I think John Neff who organized it, knew that Luna was favorably inclined, and to far as I know, got help from there, and went off to the University of Chicago, from the beginning.

293
00:38:31.760 --> 00:38:36.760
Again, it's a very long story if I start with it.

294
00:38:36.760 --> 00:38:57.760
When in 1945, six months after the autosurfing had been published, I was asked by the University of Chicago Press to come to the States for a lecture tour.

295
00:38:57.760 --> 00:39:12.760
I then was told, to four universities, four series of academic lectures, that tell the United States to start with this.

296
00:39:12.760 --> 00:39:20.760
Carefully written up four lectures to read to four universities, I had no idea what I was in for.

297
00:39:20.760 --> 00:39:49.760
When I arrived in the United States, while I had been in convoy on the high seas, the situation had completely changed by the leader's digest condensing, public opinion condensation of my book, which only incidentally, the University of Chicago Press had given the leader's digest as an advertisement. I never got a penny from this, but that's only incidentally.

298
00:39:49.760 --> 00:40:01.760
Anyhow, I have arrived in New York, the original plan is off, you have suddenly become famous, you go on a lecture tour of the United States.

299
00:40:01.760 --> 00:40:05.760
I can't do that, I have never gone on a public lecturing.

300
00:40:05.760 --> 00:40:09.760
Well, that's all arranged, you must try and do it.

301
00:40:09.760 --> 00:40:11.760
When do we begin?

302
00:40:11.760 --> 00:40:13.760
Oh, you are late already!

303
00:40:13.760 --> 00:40:15.760
Oh my!

304
00:40:15.760 --> 00:40:21.760
It was a Saturday afternoon. You start the morning at Town Hall, New York.

305
00:40:21.760 --> 00:40:24.760
It meant nothing to me.

306
00:40:24.760 --> 00:40:34.760
Mentioning this, revived in my picture this beautiful cartoon of some women of women's clubs.

307
00:40:34.760 --> 00:40:36.760
Forget what her name was.

308
00:40:36.760 --> 00:40:42.760
I thought Saturday, Sunday morning can only be such a women's club.

309
00:40:42.760 --> 00:40:59.760
It's only when I was picked up at the Regency Hotel and taken downtown, I began to inquire from my chairman who picked me up for the audience the whole whole three thousands, but there's no of them.

310
00:40:59.760 --> 00:41:13.760
I've never done such a thing. What am I supposed to lecture on? All we have taught is the rule of law in international affairs.

311
00:41:13.760 --> 00:41:20.760
I've never thought about it. I can't do this. But things are known. They're waiting for me.

312
00:41:20.760 --> 00:41:27.760
So I was ushered in this enormous fall, with all kinds of apparatus which were strange to me.

313
00:41:27.760 --> 00:41:36.760
At that time there were dictating machines, there were batteries of dictating machines, microphones, completely new to me, all of them.

314
00:41:36.760 --> 00:41:47.760
And my last recollection is, they asked the chairman, three quarters of an hour, oh no, it must be exactly an hour, you are on the radio.

315
00:41:47.760 --> 00:41:57.760
And so I got up on a subject which I had no idea and I still know that it began with a sentence,

316
00:41:57.760 --> 00:42:03.760
Ladies and Gentlemen, I suppose you will all agree when I say.

317
00:42:03.760 --> 00:42:07.760
I didn't know yet what I was going to say.

318
00:42:07.760 --> 00:42:13.760
And then I discovered that American audiences are grateful audiences.

319
00:42:13.760 --> 00:42:20.760
You can watch in their faces with interest, completely different from, say, an English audience.

320
00:42:20.760 --> 00:42:28.760
And gradually I worked them up into great excitement, and I got through this lecture with great success.

321
00:42:28.760 --> 00:42:34.760
I would never literally give a popular lecture, never lecture with a manuscript.

322
00:42:34.760 --> 00:42:40.760
Suddenly Farton was capable of popular lecturing of this kind.

323
00:42:40.760 --> 00:42:56.760
And all these things went all over the United States, as far as the mountains, back to the south, for five weeks, and gradually thought they'd become graduate lectures.

324
00:42:56.760 --> 00:43:00.760
On one of these, and the whole reason why I tell you this story,

325
00:43:00.760 --> 00:43:06.760
one of these and probably the most significant of these lectures,

326
00:43:06.760 --> 00:43:11.760
was to the economic club in Detroit.

327
00:43:11.760 --> 00:43:17.760
I had my head club with me at the Quadrarchy Club of the University of Chicago,

328
00:43:17.760 --> 00:43:22.760
since it was still the University of Chicago person who was behind it,

329
00:43:22.760 --> 00:43:30.760
The whole thing, incidentally, was in the hands of the National Concerts and Artists Organization.

330
00:43:30.760 --> 00:43:42.760
But that lecture was quite successful, and the next morning, or the day after, back in Chicago,

331
00:43:42.760 --> 00:43:46.760
a certain gentleman turned up at my club and said,

332
00:43:46.760 --> 00:43:52.760
Professor, I'm not going to take long of your time, but a book like The Old Reserve

333
00:43:52.760 --> 00:43:56.760
ought to be written for the United States. Can you do it?

334
00:43:56.760 --> 00:44:01.760
No. No, no, no. Can it be done?

335
00:44:01.760 --> 00:44:08.760
Well, if you choose a suitable man, it could be done.

336
00:44:08.760 --> 00:44:12.760
How much will it cost?

337
00:44:12.760 --> 00:44:24.760
Well, I am not familiar with American prices now, but suppose for $10,000 a year, for $3,000 a year, you could be done. Money's yours!

338
00:44:24.760 --> 00:44:41.760
But that was Mr. Luno. And I didn't take him frightfully seriously, because I had some long discussions about this with Henry Simons, who had become my great friend in Chicago.

339
00:44:41.760 --> 00:45:03.760
and there are some complications, but I finally had to return to England, I had to report Bluner in the course of his journey, I couldn't have done anything about it, cable deck, will you come back for my term to do it?

340
00:45:03.760 --> 00:45:15.760
not in your pay. If you arrange for a university to invite me to come with a visiting professor, I might incidentally look after this.

341
00:45:15.760 --> 00:45:20.760
Which universities would you prefer? How about Cable University?

342
00:45:20.760 --> 00:45:31.760
Oh, I said Chicago where I started talking with Henry Simons, and then I mentioned from no other grounds and I've never been to the West Coast yet.

343
00:45:31.760 --> 00:45:35.760
I mentioned Stanford with certain possibilities.

344
00:45:35.760 --> 00:45:41.760
Within three weeks, I had the invitations from the Chancellor of the three universities

345
00:45:41.760 --> 00:45:44.760
to go and divide...

346
00:45:51.760 --> 00:45:58.760
I really persuaded Henry Simon to take the post on condition

347
00:45:58.760 --> 00:46:05.760
that Aaron Director was then working in Washington, came to join him and work with him.

348
00:46:05.760 --> 00:46:08.760
Now, where would this have been, at Stanford or at Chicago?

349
00:46:08.760 --> 00:46:10.760
That was Chicago.

350
00:46:10.760 --> 00:46:21.760
The director was the brother-in-law of Mr. Friedman, but he was new in Chicago and taking a wartime job in Washington.

351
00:46:21.760 --> 00:46:30.760
and was in Washington at the time, while Henry Simons was the one whom I negotiated.

352
00:46:30.760 --> 00:46:42.760
Now, the thing broke off with first Aaron refusing to take this job, helping Henry Simons,

353
00:46:42.760 --> 00:46:48.760
and to my wife want some information to exclude me.

354
00:46:48.760 --> 00:47:02.760
But then the Kirz event happened, and Etta had moved on to Stanford to make further efforts there. Henry Simons died, or I believe killed himself.

355
00:47:02.760 --> 00:47:20.760
In fact, he died quite suddenly. The official story and possibly true story is that he was sleepless with the habit of taking sleeping pills and one night he woke up too frequent, took his oath and didn't wake up.

356
00:47:20.760 --> 00:47:37.760
Anyhow, as a result of this, Aaron Director felt, now I feel the obligation to continue what I wasn't willing to do in my assignments with a friend.

357
00:47:37.760 --> 00:47:54.760
So Aaron Director went from this fulcrum to Chicago with the official mission to write a road to serfdom for the United States, which he never did.

358
00:47:54.760 --> 00:48:12.760
This is merely the story of my beginning with Luna. I had after this no further direct contact with him except attending some of the discussion meetings which he called.

359
00:48:12.760 --> 00:48:28.760
But I have reason to suspect that when a little later, John Neff began to make an attempt to persuade, what was the name of the president of?

360
00:48:28.760 --> 00:48:40.420
of Chicago, Hutchins, first waited Hutchins to call me to Chicago, where it was incidentally

361
00:48:40.420 --> 00:48:48.520
an episode, somebody proposed me first to the faculty of economics and they turned me down.

362
00:48:48.520 --> 00:48:49.520
Is that true?

363
00:48:49.520 --> 00:48:50.520
That's astounding.

364
00:48:50.520 --> 00:48:51.520
Actually it turned me down.

365
00:48:51.520 --> 00:48:58.520
Friedman, when he opens the full story, he only naturally assures me that he was in faith

366
00:48:58.520 --> 00:49:28.520
in favor and indicates that the opposition was among others, but whoever was behind it was insistent and shifted his efforts from the faculty of economics to the committee on social thought, which to me was much more attractive because after teaching 20 years economic theory I was a little tired and the invitation from the committee on social thought

367
00:49:28.520 --> 00:49:37.520
was most attractive in the form you can lecture on any borderline subject in the social sciences.

368
00:49:37.520 --> 00:49:41.520
If at any time you don't want to teach, you need neither.

369
00:49:41.520 --> 00:49:51.520
This was a correspondingly higher salary, was irresistible, so I did go to Chicago.

370
00:49:51.520 --> 00:50:03.520
And I may well, as you suggest, on the whole time be paid out of money which came from LUNO, but I knew nothing about it. To me it came from Hutchins.

371
00:50:03.520 --> 00:50:13.520
Hutchins probably had an offer from LUNO, and I did later attend many of these focus seminars.

372
00:50:13.520 --> 00:50:25.520
And finally, all the extraordinary meeting in somewhere south of San Francisco, between San Francisco and San Francisco.

373
00:50:25.520 --> 00:50:37.520
The final meeting, when we probably said, after spending three days on the future of the Fulker Commission, I'm going to wind it all up.

374
00:50:37.520 --> 00:50:48.520
That's how it ended. And I'm told that he was then already in some of the unbalanced mental state.

375
00:50:48.520 --> 00:50:56.520
It was our understanding, and I was later hired by them two years later. I was there in 63.

376
00:50:56.520 --> 00:50:58.520
With Harper?

377
00:50:58.520 --> 00:51:01.520
No, after Harper. Harper left in 62.

378
00:51:01.520 --> 00:51:07.520
or yes, but it's a long pill to feed a whole op-ed to run it on quite a long pill.

379
00:51:07.520 --> 00:51:10.520
That's correct, the Volcker Fund.

380
00:51:10.520 --> 00:51:18.520
But what we were told was simply that Volcker's original instructions were that he was afraid

381
00:51:18.520 --> 00:51:27.520
if it went longer than one generation it would be taken over by people of an opposing ideological perspective.

382
00:51:27.520 --> 00:51:29.520
He had seen it happen...

383
00:51:29.520 --> 00:51:30.520
Rockefeller Foundation.

384
00:51:30.520 --> 00:51:35.720
years and years before and he was afraid that the opponents would get the money

385
00:51:35.720 --> 00:51:38.200
and I think it all finally went to Hoover

386
00:51:38.200 --> 00:51:39.040
or most of it

387
00:51:39.040 --> 00:51:40.440
Hoover Institution

388
00:51:40.440 --> 00:51:43.380
Did you know the Cronwells still?

389
00:51:43.380 --> 00:51:45.780
I'm sorry, the question? Cronwell

390
00:51:45.780 --> 00:51:48.560
No, I didn't. There were two in succession.

391
00:51:48.560 --> 00:51:53.280
Yes. The one went up to Hawaii and became Big Sugar Industries

392
00:51:53.280 --> 00:51:55.520
and the other is still about

393
00:51:55.520 --> 00:51:57.040
He's just done a book

394
00:51:57.040 --> 00:51:59.600
Yes, quite good books

395
00:51:59.600 --> 00:52:22.000
My final question. You've seen momentous changes in economic theory and practice. You've seen

396
00:52:22.000 --> 00:52:29.360
the rise of the welfare state and the strangulation and near bankruptcy of the welfare state. You've

397
00:52:29.360 --> 00:52:42.520
We've seen, in wartime conditions, the command economy and all of its inefficiency and tyranny.

398
00:52:42.520 --> 00:52:48.680
Come the final decades of the 20th century, economic and turmoil, the profession seems

399
00:52:48.680 --> 00:52:54.320
to be in intellectual turmoil.

400
00:52:54.320 --> 00:52:55.320
Where are we?

401
00:52:55.320 --> 00:53:04.320
As an elder statesman in the economic profession, where do you think we are and where do you think the profession is headed?

402
00:53:04.320 --> 00:53:10.320
Well, it's too big a question, but there is a sort of standard answer.

403
00:53:10.320 --> 00:53:23.320
I've been given to this question for quite a long time, which five years ago run about in these terms.

404
00:53:23.320 --> 00:53:28.320
You can now deduct five years from my time.

405
00:53:28.320 --> 00:53:34.320
What I used to say is, if the politicians don't destroy the world in the next 20 years,

406
00:53:34.320 --> 00:53:39.320
there's good hope because a new young generation coming up.

407
00:53:39.320 --> 00:53:41.320
How much one can hope from this.

408
00:53:41.320 --> 00:53:46.320
But that is so much more favorable than ever hoped.

409
00:53:46.320 --> 00:53:55.640
that I would live to know such a large number of young people actively working on these problems.

410
00:53:55.640 --> 00:54:03.560
See, I thought the maximum I could achieve, what I'd achieve within my own Montelloran society,

411
00:54:03.560 --> 00:54:09.280
which was already a great achievement, really against the stream,

412
00:54:09.280 --> 00:54:26.280
but have this large number of young people, actively, and such brilliant people, one of them, as my memory for proper names is going probably wrong,

413
00:54:26.280 --> 00:54:35.280
but the greatest, most pleasant surprise, and one of the most intelligent of them all, is that Negro, who is now in...

414
00:54:35.280 --> 00:54:42.280
Yes, I agree. In my generation, he's the greatest living economist of my generation. No question about it.

415
00:54:42.280 --> 00:54:48.280
But there's a certain Niko Williams who's the same length, not of that level.

416
00:54:48.280 --> 00:54:57.280
And all the young people, well what really sprung ultimately from the Harper Institute,

417
00:54:57.280 --> 00:55:04.280
the Institute of the Human Affairs, which is now moving to George Mason University,

418
00:55:04.280 --> 00:55:13.280
There's a whole group of really good young people. I mean, it's very much more than I ever dared to look.

419
00:55:13.280 --> 00:55:18.280
I wish Mises could have lived to see it.

420
00:55:18.280 --> 00:55:21.280
Mark, did you have a question?

421
00:55:21.280 --> 00:55:30.280
Just a couple of things. First of all, why don't you think Friedman and Stiegler and...

422
00:55:30.280 --> 00:55:49.280
The Chicago School, were they influenced by your being in Chicago, and did they ever look at the implications of your Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle on monetary...

423
00:55:49.280 --> 00:55:55.280
The same ones I should have agreed with, because that's what a catastrophe is.

424
00:55:55.280 --> 00:56:01.280
The others are in a methodological lane.

425
00:56:01.280 --> 00:56:07.280
They are in effect macroeconomists and not macroeconomists.

426
00:56:07.280 --> 00:56:16.280
The least of all, Friedman very much, and this is a continuous problem.

427
00:56:16.280 --> 00:56:36.280
Wilton and I agree on almost everything except monetary policy, but it creates an awful problem in the Mont Pelerin society with the constant dangers of society splitting up in the Friedmanite and the Hayek-Kartik group.

428
00:56:36.280 --> 00:56:44.280
And to avoid this, I tried to avoid discussions of monetary theory and this kind of thing,

429
00:56:44.280 --> 00:56:47.280
which bound to come out.

430
00:56:47.280 --> 00:57:00.280
Now, in this sense, the whole group, who saw this as derived from Wesley Clare Mitchell's

431
00:57:00.280 --> 00:57:21.280
Creation of the Institute of National Economic Research, led by Arthur Burns, another personal friend of mine, who might do not agree on economics, and they are in effect logical positivists, methodological.

432
00:57:21.280 --> 00:57:36.280
They believe economic phenomena can explain as magnum that you can assort thin causal effects from aggregates and averages of further things.

433
00:57:38.280 --> 00:57:44.280
What in a sense in observation is true, you may never necessarily connection.

434
00:57:44.280 --> 00:57:54.280
It is quite likely, in fact I should be preferred to demonstrate historically, that every period of inflation ends with a crash.

435
00:57:54.280 --> 00:58:00.280
But the historical demonstration is no proof that this must be so.

436
00:58:00.280 --> 00:58:10.280
The reason why it happens can now be accounted for by microeconomic analysis and not by a macroeconomic analysis.

437
00:58:10.280 --> 00:58:36.280
Now that, Milton Friedman does poo-poos. Steger, yes you can discuss it with him, he will see the problem. The other, probably the most gifted man in the Chicago School, is Becker, and he is theoretically also a more sophisticated thinker.

438
00:58:36.280 --> 00:58:59.280
But Friedman had this magnificent expository power, he is on most things general market problem sound, I want him on my side, I want nothing less than that the whole Friedman group, the majority of Americans would leave the more prevalent society.

439
00:58:59.280 --> 00:59:16.280
But, you know, I ought to add, I have often publicly said that one of the things I mostly get is not having to return to a criticism of Keynes' treatise,

440
00:59:16.280 --> 00:59:27.280
but it's as much true of not having criticized Milton's Positive Economics, which in a way is quite as dangerous a book.

441
00:59:27.280 --> 00:59:38.280
The difference would be Milton, unlike Keynes, would never change his mind and would fight you forever had you ever done it.

442
00:59:38.280 --> 00:59:41.280
Keynes might have changed his mind.

443
00:59:41.280 --> 00:59:44.280
You're perfectly right.

444
00:59:44.280 --> 00:59:51.280
Look, I've written a few essays on Keynes and we've seen some of them.

445
00:59:51.280 --> 01:00:04.280
It was sometimes comic how far he would allow himself to lead into considering things which had so far not existed in his thinking.

446
01:00:04.280 --> 01:00:17.280
For instance, that as a result of an over-accumulation of capital, there should be a fall of the rate of interest and a fall in the demand for capital.

447
01:00:17.280 --> 01:00:24.280
The old conception of overinvestment was strange to him, but it was interesting with him.

448
01:00:24.280 --> 01:00:30.280
But then you suddenly suggest that there's no direct connection between the final demand and investment.

449
01:00:30.280 --> 01:00:34.280
That's just stupidity. It would not work.

450
01:00:34.280 --> 01:00:50.280
Well, there have been some parts that Keynes's general theory was written purposely to confuse and to be complex. Do you think that's true?

451
01:00:50.280 --> 01:01:09.280
I believe I quoted the sentence already in my last conversation for him, when he actually said to me this theory was frightfully important during the Depression.

452
01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:15.280
If it ever should be wrong, trust me, I'm going to change the theory.

453
01:01:15.280 --> 01:01:30.280
For him, he was so convinced that he was cleverer than all the other people that he thought his instinct told him what ought to be done and he would invent a theory to convince people to do it.

454
01:01:30.280 --> 01:01:32.280
That was really his approach.

455
01:01:32.280 --> 01:01:44.880
He was very untrained as an economist in economic history, knowing he had a passion to live a bit near for the 16th century.

456
01:01:44.880 --> 01:01:49.480
He was a great expert on the economic history of the 19th century.

457
01:01:49.480 --> 01:01:56.480
He goes to England, because it is like John S. Tatteries. The 19th century is ugly.

458
01:01:56.480 --> 01:02:04.480
Why? Why did he hate it so much? Why did he hate the 19th century so much?

459
01:02:04.480 --> 01:02:18.480
Well, because he believed Tony and company on their history of labor. The impoverishment of the working class. It's all the dicks.

460
01:02:18.480 --> 01:02:24.480
Now, I have two other questions to just kind of pick up on everything we've covered.

461
01:02:24.480 --> 01:02:38.480
It appears that everyone, you, Mises, Schumpeter and so forth, left Vienna. You said you were the first one to leave, others left a few years later.

462
01:02:38.480 --> 01:02:55.480
So in terms of personal places, houses you lived in, so forth, are there any that stand out as a place where we could stop by and look?

463
01:02:55.480 --> 01:02:58.480
This was Hayek's house when he lived in Vienna?

464
01:02:58.480 --> 01:03:03.480
I think I can point out at least approximately where Mises lived.

465
01:03:03.480 --> 01:03:06.480
That's the only long period.

466
01:03:06.480 --> 01:03:11.480
You see, while I lived in Vienna for 30 years, I was first...

467
01:03:11.480 --> 01:03:13.480
You were born in Vienna?

468
01:03:13.480 --> 01:03:23.480
I was born in Vienna, but my father earned his living as a medical officer of health, doctor.

469
01:03:23.480 --> 01:03:28.480
All his interest was in botany, and finally he ended up as professor of botany.

470
01:03:28.480 --> 01:03:34.480
But it meant that he was an officer in Ghana and was shifted around.

471
01:03:34.480 --> 01:03:43.480
So I grew up in four different apartments, and then for the past five years I was still there married,

472
01:03:43.480 --> 01:03:47.480
so again another place, so I have no locality.

473
01:03:47.480 --> 01:03:53.480
Most of the other people in Vienna lived in apartments, not in houses.

474
01:03:53.480 --> 01:04:04.480
And in that period, I believe I can show you where Menger lived for a very long time, and where Mises lived.

475
01:04:04.480 --> 01:04:11.480
I knew very well the place where Mises lived, but that was the most delightful place.

476
01:04:11.480 --> 01:04:18.480
on the outskirts, up on the hills, but not a place that could then become a social center.

477
01:04:18.480 --> 01:04:26.480
While the Mises apartment and Menger apartment were in a sense social centers up to a point.

478
01:04:26.480 --> 01:04:30.480
If I can point out to you what the other question was.

479
01:04:30.480 --> 01:04:39.480
Apart from the university, chamber of commerce, the coffee houses, and these two apartments,

480
01:04:39.480 --> 01:04:45.480
I don't believe there are any locations worth mentioning, let me just point out these two.

481
01:04:45.480 --> 01:04:55.480
His son was still a boy of 16, so the widow applied to the professors for advice,

482
01:04:55.480 --> 01:05:06.480
what best to do with the library, which then, in the middle of the inflation, was very much a problem of raising money.

483
01:05:06.480 --> 01:05:32.480
and I was invited to inspect this marvelous library. Menger's library was one of the five or six greatest personal libraries in economics and they had an offer from Japan and the only task I really had was to answer the question,

484
01:05:32.480 --> 01:05:40.480
Was this price adequate? And was there a chance of getting an equal price in Europe?

485
01:05:40.480 --> 01:05:47.480
And they had to tell her the price was fully adequate and there was no chance of getting an equal price in Europe.

486
01:05:47.480 --> 01:06:00.480
It was the result of my information as the library went to Japan, which I very much regret, but it wasn't all fault at that time.

487
01:06:00.480 --> 01:06:09.480
The only other question I had was the use of the word von, as in von Mises, von Hayek, and so forth.

488
01:06:09.480 --> 01:06:23.480
Sure, so you should ask the question, but I can refer you to the note which I wrote for this.

489
01:06:23.480 --> 01:06:31.480
This is particularly difficult to read, but I hope you can read it to get the full answer here for the Theory of Politics.

490
01:06:53.480 --> 01:07:22.480
First the general and then the Mises story. The general story is, imagine that in England all the higher civil service men, professional men and commercial people will get this for a special merit, the title Sir, can inherit it to all their children and unmarried females.

491
01:07:22.480 --> 01:07:33.480
Then you have exactly the same position. Instead of being called sir, you are called son, usually derived from several generations.

492
01:07:33.480 --> 01:07:46.480
The complication arises only that this title was formerly abolished and even prohibited at the revolution of 1918.

493
01:07:46.480 --> 01:07:57.480
This is so that in Austria, slightly comically, nobody can legally use himself, whatever he uses on that person.

494
01:07:57.480 --> 01:08:04.480
And that is not illegal. You are only prohibited to call yourself from.

495
01:08:04.480 --> 01:08:16.480
and in Austria, but as a proletariat, you still address anybody who is historically entitled.

496
01:08:16.480 --> 01:08:21.480
The complication becomes even greater in my own personal case.

497
01:08:21.480 --> 01:08:28.480
I was a law-abiding citizen and stopped completely using the Title Fund,

498
01:08:28.480 --> 01:08:33.480
but it was of course inevitably on my birth certificate.

499
01:08:33.480 --> 01:08:39.480
and naturalized in England and for the purpose submitted the birth certificate.

500
01:08:39.480 --> 01:08:46.480
When I received the certificate of naturalization, my English came suddenly from Hayek.

501
01:08:46.480 --> 01:08:54.480
Now, it was at the moment when I was very anxious to go on an English passport on a holiday to Europe.

502
01:08:54.480 --> 01:09:00.480
So instead of invoking bureaucracy to change this, I put up with it.

503
01:09:00.480 --> 01:09:13.480
Ever since I live officially in Austria, I am legally Mr. Hayek, but in England I am officially Mr. von Hayek.

504
01:09:13.480 --> 01:09:16.480
And what about Mises and his father?

505
01:09:16.480 --> 01:09:34.480
Mises's father, the generally known story, I mean the documented story, he said it was one of Mises's ancestors and that it was for the merits of his father.

506
01:09:34.480 --> 01:09:45.480
He was an engineer and builder of railways and many of the great railways in North Western Europe were designed by Mises's father.

507
01:09:45.480 --> 01:09:54.480
The story which I believe is true is that this engineer, Mises' father, was the son of a rabbi.

508
01:09:54.480 --> 01:10:02.480
And when he was offered the title, he out of modesty suggested,

509
01:10:02.480 --> 01:10:06.480
No, I'm not worthy. Please give it to my father.

510
01:10:06.480 --> 01:10:18.480
So, it was really Mises, for the merits of Mises' father, that Mises' grandfather is approved to have been given the title.

511
01:10:18.480 --> 01:10:22.480
And is it an inherited title? Does it go father to son?

512
01:10:22.480 --> 01:10:32.480
Yes, yes. From it's always an inheritable title, and unlike the English helmet, the serb, which is all over-inheritable,

513
01:10:32.480 --> 01:10:45.480
Inheritance to all descendants, which is true of all the mental titles, except the very highest.

514
01:10:45.480 --> 01:10:53.480
If you are a duke, only the senior son becomes a duke, the others are merely princes.

515
01:10:53.480 --> 01:11:01.480
But apart from these highest, mean baron and so on, they're all inherited by all descendants.

516
01:11:01.480 --> 01:11:08.480
Is there anything that you would like to mention, or say, or comment on, now that we're coming to the end?

517
01:11:08.480 --> 01:11:13.480
Is there anything that, now that we're coming to the end of the tape, is there anything else you'd like to mention?

518
01:11:13.480 --> 01:11:15.480
No, I think I've said everything that's worth saying.

519
01:11:15.480 --> 01:11:17.480
We do thank you for the time you've spent.