WEBVTT

NOTE An Interview with Joseph Salerno

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.000
I'm sitting here with Joseph Salerno, Professor of Economics at Pace University.

2
00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:08.000
How many years have you been coming to Mises? How many years have you been teaching here?

3
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:13.000
I've been teaching here, I believe, since 1989. That was my first Mises University.

4
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:16.000
How has it changed over the years, you think?

5
00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:22.000
Well, people know a lot more now, obviously because of the Mises.org

6
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:27.000
and the number of books that are being sold by the Mises Institute.

7
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:31.800
So the students are much better prepared than they were previously.

8
00:00:31.800 --> 00:00:37.400
Yeah, I do get the sense that everybody is doing their reading ahead of time.

9
00:00:38.280 --> 00:00:44.600
Yeah, and I think not only for this university, but they're doing reading on their own.

10
00:00:45.400 --> 00:00:48.120
And the website, I think, is the reason for that.

11
00:00:48.120 --> 00:00:51.960
I've had a number of people say that the conference is surprisingly rigorous

12
00:00:51.960 --> 00:01:03.960
and that if it hadn't been for the readings in advance that there would have been no chance of keeping that going, I mean to keep up with the lectures.

13
00:01:03.960 --> 00:01:09.960
And students haven't always said that. Do you think that the level of the conference is increasing in some way?

14
00:01:09.960 --> 00:01:17.960
Yeah, actually I think that many of the students have heard lectures again on the website.

15
00:01:17.960 --> 00:01:24.960
I think in general they've become much more attentive in the last few years. I don't see as many people that seem lost when I'm lecturing.

16
00:01:47.960 --> 00:01:52.960
Now, the topics you're covering are some of the more technical stuff, right? I mean, you've got...

17
00:01:52.960 --> 00:01:56.960
Yeah, today I just did entrepreneurship, I did a socialist calculation.

18
00:01:56.960 --> 00:02:04.960
There was someone who told me yesterday, a young student, and actually he's, I think, a chemical engineer, a graduate student of chemical engineering,

19
00:02:04.960 --> 00:02:13.960
that he had heard my socialism lecture nine times, he had listened to it, and this is before he'd even met me.

20
00:02:13.960 --> 00:02:20.960
One of your ambitions for this conference, and it's been a constant emphasis over the years,

21
00:02:20.960 --> 00:02:25.960
is that the purpose of the conference isn't just to introduce Austrian themes.

22
00:02:25.960 --> 00:02:31.960
Maybe you want to explain, what is the difference between an Austrian theme and Austrian economics?

23
00:02:31.960 --> 00:02:39.960
When there were fewer Austrian economists back in the 1970s and into the 1980s,

24
00:02:39.960 --> 00:02:53.960
The approach was to talk about the various aspects of Austrian economics, to talk about economics, to talk about methodological individualism in a disjointed fashion.

25
00:02:53.960 --> 00:03:03.960
And I think now the emphasis has become more, at least by myself and by many other senior faculty, to drill the students in actual technical theory.

26
00:03:03.960 --> 00:03:09.720
The Theory, not at a very high level initially, but to show them that it's really a systematic

27
00:03:09.720 --> 00:03:15.560
theory that can be learned and then used to understand the real world.

28
00:03:15.560 --> 00:03:21.600
So we're not just talking about Austrian economics, we are teaching Austrian economic theory.

29
00:03:21.600 --> 00:03:22.600
So you're teaching economics.

30
00:03:22.600 --> 00:03:28.600
We're teaching economics rather than talking about how Austrian economics differs for example

31
00:03:28.600 --> 00:03:34.040
from mainstream economics or from monetarism, which is what we tended to do in the past.

32
00:03:34.040 --> 00:03:39.520
Yeah, and there was also this tendency to just sort of emphasize Austrian, unique Austrian

33
00:03:39.520 --> 00:03:44.800
contributions that could be plugged into a kind of mainstream apparatus, you know, in

34
00:03:44.800 --> 00:03:49.200
the past. Well, not so much at Mises University, but this has been a tendency. So what does

35
00:03:49.200 --> 00:03:53.780
the Austrian School add? Well, it adds an insight about entrepreneurship, it adds process

36
00:03:53.780 --> 00:03:55.760
analysis, you know, that sort of thing.

37
00:03:55.760 --> 00:04:11.760
In other words, we never really, well, it wasn't really here at the Mises University, but other Austrians tended to approach Austrian economics in a way that showed, or in a way that embellished, showed as an embellishment of mainstream economics.

38
00:04:11.760 --> 00:04:25.260
More and more here at Mises University, what we do is begin with the fact that Austrian economics is a unique tradition.

39
00:04:25.260 --> 00:04:31.260
There are some points of contact with the mainstream and we don't ignore those points of contact.

40
00:04:31.260 --> 00:04:37.760
But what we do do is that we give sort of an integrated explanation of what Austrian economics is.

41
00:04:37.760 --> 00:04:40.760
And I think that's very important for the younger students to learn.

42
00:04:40.760 --> 00:04:54.760
And the reason why they're learning it is because they are doing reading. Once again, there are books that are up now on Mises.org and so on. So they're actually reading some of these works of the masters like Mises and Hayek and Rothbard.

43
00:04:54.760 --> 00:05:24.760
Right, and you know, it's actually difficult for us to entirely explain to people who support these programs just how unique this Mises University is, because it's not a conference where you hear a bunch of talks on individual topics, you know, so you can gain insight on this point and insight on that point, but it really is, and you've made a huge contribution in organizing the way the thing runs from beginning to end, but you really sought to make it

44
00:05:24.760 --> 00:05:29.760
Systematics, so that it's really a teaching conference.

45
00:05:29.760 --> 00:05:32.760
That's right. It's an instructional conference.

46
00:05:32.760 --> 00:05:39.760
The first two days we have plenary lectures in which everyone gets the basic foundations of Austrian economics,

47
00:05:39.760 --> 00:05:42.760
after which they can pick and choose among concurrent courses,

48
00:05:42.760 --> 00:05:45.760
which allows them to branch out into areas of their own interests.

49
00:05:45.760 --> 00:05:51.760
But everyone has a common core, and to the extent that it's interactive,

50
00:05:51.760 --> 00:06:00.760
and I think that they're paying attention and picking up what we're giving them, I think they're getting a nice integrated view of what Austrian economics is in a week's time.

51
00:06:00.760 --> 00:06:01.760
I think that's great.

52
00:06:01.760 --> 00:06:10.760
And it's different from the Scholars Conference too in the sense that each professor is not necessarily giving his own research, but is trying to fit his own teaching into an overall program.

53
00:06:10.760 --> 00:06:12.760
Right, that's a good way of putting it.

54
00:06:12.760 --> 00:06:27.760
We emphasize that it is a teaching conference and that what we're trying to do is, while we have our own ideas about certain things, we're trying to give an overall and systematic view of Austrian economics.

55
00:06:27.760 --> 00:06:35.760
That's not to say that we don't, especially in the concurrent lectures, give some of our cutting-edge research, but we make sure that it fits into what the students have learned.

56
00:06:35.760 --> 00:06:54.760
Does it surprise you just how many, for example, I don't know how many applications we got but just only some of the people who applied were able to get in this year and every year we get more. Does it surprise you that there's so many people interested in it or does that not surprise you?

57
00:06:54.760 --> 00:07:01.760
It surprises and gratifies me that this year we have 125 people and we were turning people away.

58
00:07:01.760 --> 00:07:09.760
And as I mentioned before, these people are well prepared and it makes teaching them much, much easier and much more fun.

59
00:07:09.760 --> 00:07:15.760
How does free market policy fit in to the conference overall?

60
00:07:15.760 --> 00:07:22.760
I think what we do is we use the theory that we're teaching them and apply it.

61
00:07:22.760 --> 00:07:33.120
So as I went along in my lecture on entrepreneurship, I showed how entrepreneurship is inherently anti-monopolistic.

62
00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:43.720
That is to say that if you have free entry, entrepreneurs will operate in a way that will ensure that the market tends to serve consumers so they really don't need antitrust.

63
00:07:43.720 --> 00:07:49.880
So in other words, what we're doing is we're drawing out the implications of the theory for policy as we go along.

64
00:07:49.880 --> 00:07:53.960
and then later lectures are specifically on policy topics.

65
00:07:53.960 --> 00:07:57.880
So you don't feel the need to constantly say, now let me emphasize that Austrian school is

66
00:07:57.880 --> 00:08:01.240
value-free science and you don't have to draw these conclusions?

67
00:08:01.240 --> 00:08:08.040
No, I think they understand that early on that Austrian theory is value-free and that

68
00:08:08.040 --> 00:08:14.320
any conclusions that we might draw, if it's a normative conclusion, that this is applying

69
00:08:14.320 --> 00:08:18.560
the theory in conjunction with value judgments.

70
00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:21.560
So a dedicated socialist could come here and learn a lot.

71
00:08:21.560 --> 00:08:22.560
Yeah, absolutely.

72
00:08:22.560 --> 00:08:28.440
The devil himself who wanted to destroy mankind could come here and just do the opposite of

73
00:08:28.440 --> 00:08:30.440
what we're teaching.

74
00:08:30.440 --> 00:08:31.440
Crush entrepreneurship.

75
00:08:31.440 --> 00:08:32.440
Yeah, absolutely.

76
00:08:32.440 --> 00:08:33.440
Put on price control.

77
00:08:33.440 --> 00:08:34.440
So on.

78
00:08:34.440 --> 00:08:39.880
Yeah, have an antitrust policy, protections and whatever.

79
00:08:39.880 --> 00:08:46.760
Do you, it used to be said a lot concerning entrepreneurship that this is one of the unique

80
00:08:46.760 --> 00:08:58.760
Contributions of the Austrian School, and that the mainstream doesn't seem to have a role for entrepreneurship. Do you think that's still true, and if so, in what respect?

81
00:08:58.760 --> 00:09:13.760
I think it's still true, the mainstream, certainly mainstream textbooks either downplay it severely or ignore it altogether. But I don't think that's the only contribution, or the only way in which we differ from the mainstream.

82
00:09:13.760 --> 00:09:22.760
I think also Austrian Capital Theory, it's extremely important to teach Capital Theory as it's been developed from Boehm-Bawerk and especially through Hayek and Rothbard.

83
00:09:22.760 --> 00:09:32.760
So we have a number of theoretical courses on Capital Theory and I think that's very important and it's a very distinguishing feature of Austrian Economics.

84
00:09:32.760 --> 00:09:35.760
So do students read Boehm-Bawerk? I don't think Boehm-Bawerk is on the reading list, does he?

85
00:09:35.760 --> 00:09:51.760
I don't recall if we have anything by von Boehm-Bawerk, but whatever is in von Boehm-Bawerk that's of value, that doesn't mean they should not go back and read them if they become more advanced, is certainly in the readings that we give them in Rothbard and in Hayek.

86
00:09:51.760 --> 00:10:03.760
Yeah, I remember it was Mises when he reviewed von Boehm-Bawerk's three volume book on capital interest, he said that this is a book that every voter should read.

87
00:10:03.760 --> 00:10:21.800
There's been a lot of controversy about your contributions concerning the calculation debate

88
00:10:21.800 --> 00:10:25.920
and the knowledge debate.

89
00:10:25.920 --> 00:10:28.920
Do you find that students are particularly interested in that?

90
00:10:28.920 --> 00:10:34.600
Students are very interested and still interested in socialism and why the Soviet Union and

91
00:10:34.600 --> 00:10:38.000
other centrally planned economies collapsed.

92
00:10:38.000 --> 00:10:45.160
So yes, I get very good response to that lecture on socialism and calculation.

93
00:10:45.160 --> 00:10:50.060
And really, every Austrian theme, if I can use that word here, every Austrian theme is

94
00:10:50.060 --> 00:10:53.120
really embodied in that lecture and in that topic.

95
00:10:53.120 --> 00:10:54.120
Yeah.

96
00:10:54.120 --> 00:10:57.760
So if there were one lecture you'd encourage everybody to listen to online, it would be

97
00:10:57.760 --> 00:10:58.760
probably that one.

98
00:10:58.760 --> 00:11:05.760
Yeah, my lecture is certainly that one, I think, is the one that's most interesting, and again, it's the most fun to give.

99
00:11:05.760 --> 00:11:11.760
You know, I remember several years ago, you said we were having to talk about the kinds of things the Mises Institute does,

100
00:11:11.760 --> 00:11:19.760
and you've always emphasized the importance of training Austrians in the technical aspects of the Austrian tradition,

101
00:11:19.760 --> 00:11:24.760
in the same way that neoclassicals are trained in their methods.

102
00:11:24.760 --> 00:11:30.760
Do you think a week is really a long enough time to do it? I mean, how is it possible to do all of this in a week?

103
00:11:30.760 --> 00:11:36.760
Well, I think a week is long enough to whet their appetite, to get them interested in reading further in Austrian economics.

104
00:11:36.760 --> 00:11:42.760
I don't think you can completely drill them in Austrian economics. I think that takes actually a number of courses to do that.

105
00:11:42.760 --> 00:11:53.760
But I think a week is long enough to give them the overall view of a systematic theoretical edifice

106
00:11:53.760 --> 00:12:08.760
Do you get the sense that, well, what is your observation about the demographics here of the student population? What percentage of them, it's about half graduate students, half undergraduates, right?

107
00:12:08.760 --> 00:12:18.760
Yes, yes, and there's even a few high school students here. But I get the sense that the undergraduates, more than before, are very well prepared for the lectures.

108
00:12:18.760 --> 00:12:29.760
The lectures are aimed at probably, I would say, advanced undergraduates, and they certainly are something that graduate students benefit from.

109
00:12:29.760 --> 00:12:57.760
It's kind of difficult to talk about who is a beginner and who is an advanced person in this because you can have a person who is very, very well educated in economics and yet know nothing about the Austrian tradition in the case of that person. He or she would be considered a beginner, right?

110
00:12:57.760 --> 00:13:03.480
That's correct. In fact, Austrians are such good writers, Rothbard, Haslett and so on,

111
00:13:03.480 --> 00:13:08.280
that people who just pick these books up on their own are pretty well prepared, depending

112
00:13:08.280 --> 00:13:13.640
on what they read when they come here. And even if they've had no economics, they benefit

113
00:13:13.640 --> 00:13:18.520
from this. And on the other hand, people who may have had only mainstream economics but

114
00:13:18.520 --> 00:13:22.800
are interested in Austrian economics, they actually might be behind these other people

115
00:13:22.800 --> 00:13:26.720
in their level and in their understanding.

116
00:13:26.720 --> 00:13:37.000
And in the journal, what is your overall view of the journal's place in the research program

117
00:13:37.000 --> 00:13:38.640
of the Austrian School right now?

118
00:13:38.640 --> 00:13:43.040
I think it's very important to have the journal, it's important to have a resource whereby

119
00:13:43.040 --> 00:13:52.280
people can publish their cutting edge research, that is research strictly on Austrian economics

120
00:13:52.280 --> 00:13:57.600
and they don't have to tailor it to any particular view of the mainstream.

121
00:13:57.600 --> 00:14:03.960
So what I see it as is really something that is in the vanguard of the movement.

122
00:14:03.960 --> 00:14:04.880
Right.

123
00:14:04.880 --> 00:14:07.920
That it's driving Austrian economics forward.

124
00:14:07.920 --> 00:14:15.680
We've also had a number of important debates in there that have advanced the Austrian theory.

125
00:14:15.680 --> 00:14:27.680
And we're not shy about having people who are not necessarily sympathetic to the Austrian view, but who understand it and are willing to engage it in a scholarly fashion.

126
00:14:27.680 --> 00:14:37.680
So I think more than any other journal in economics, we're extremely open and there's a lot of interchange.

127
00:14:37.680 --> 00:14:50.680
One of the things that people get confused about, something like a niche journal, is this idea that somehow you have to do it because these writers can't get into mainstream journals.

128
00:14:50.680 --> 00:14:57.680
But anybody who's submitted to mainstream journals, one of the most frustrating things is that the referees don't know what the heck you're talking about.

129
00:14:57.680 --> 00:15:13.680
That's right. Because Austrian Economics is not in the mainstream, it's very difficult to write an Austrian article and to get good feedback from the referees, to get comprehending feedback from the referees.

130
00:15:13.680 --> 00:15:24.680
So one advantage of the quarterly journal of Austrian Economics is that the referees know what you're talking about and they can make sensible comments on how to improve.

131
00:15:24.680 --> 00:15:28.680
So the school can advance, otherwise they seem to be always starting from the ground.

132
00:15:28.680 --> 00:15:40.680
Right, you're always trying to rewrite the basic Austrian tenets and you're trying to make the referees in the mainstream journals understand what you're talking about.

133
00:15:40.680 --> 00:15:43.680
And that conveys the impression that the Austrians keep saying the same thing over and over again.

134
00:15:43.680 --> 00:15:47.680
Right, exactly, that we're repeating ourselves endlessly and not advancing.

135
00:15:47.680 --> 00:15:51.680
That's why it's important to read our journal, because that's where the advances are occurring.

136
00:15:51.680 --> 00:15:57.800
Yeah, right, and in many ways it's advancing on a separate path from the mainstream journals,

137
00:15:57.800 --> 00:15:58.800
and so that's...

138
00:15:58.800 --> 00:15:59.800
Yes, I mean...

139
00:15:59.800 --> 00:16:01.720
That's what's important, that's why I think.

140
00:16:01.720 --> 00:16:05.040
And there are other schools that pursue the similar strategy, right?

141
00:16:05.040 --> 00:16:09.120
Right, the post-Keynesian schools have done this, the behavioral economists have their

142
00:16:09.120 --> 00:16:14.360
own journals, and they've been successful, yeah, law and economics and of course public

143
00:16:14.360 --> 00:16:15.360
choice.

144
00:16:15.360 --> 00:16:19.360
In some ways it does seem like the only way a revolutionary paradigm can really succeed

145
00:16:19.360 --> 00:16:24.640
is just my forging ahead. I mean, because you can't expect to take the mainstream along

146
00:16:24.640 --> 00:16:28.160
with you step by step. Right, you can't do that. I mean, what's going to happen is that

147
00:16:28.160 --> 00:16:37.020
the mainstream is a degenerative or degenerating research program now, and we have to see what's

148
00:16:37.020 --> 00:16:40.800
going on in the mainstream, but we have to advance forward on our own, neither looking

149
00:16:40.800 --> 00:16:47.600
to the right or the left, but going straight ahead. And those people that find us, that's

150
00:17:17.600 --> 00:17:23.600
This is fascinating. I don't really understand all of this stuff, but there really is something here, so it attracts you.

151
00:17:23.600 --> 00:17:38.600
Right. I mean, the research in the quarterly journal is new research, and it's attempted to extend the masters, Mises, Rothbard, and so on, without repeating them.

152
00:17:38.600 --> 00:17:42.600
Starting from them, standing on their shoulders, and going forward.

153
00:17:42.600 --> 00:17:43.600
Do you have enough copy?

154
00:17:43.600 --> 00:18:00.600
Yeah, more than enough. If you measure these types of things, as the mainstream does, we have a fairly low acceptance rate, around 30%. But that's not something that I think is a mark of a good journal, necessarily.

155
00:18:00.600 --> 00:18:08.600
Yeah, I've never really understood that whole idea that you have to reject a lot of stuff. It seems like a strange, very strange.

156
00:18:08.600 --> 00:18:32.600
Now, quite often I get comments from people asking who or when is the, who's going to do it, who's going to complete Rothbard's history of economic thought and take his history into the 20th century, because of course he died before he was able to do that, even though he left us some wonderful recordings, MP3,

157
00:18:32.600 --> 00:18:40.600
And your name has often come up over the years as being the person to do this. What are your thoughts about that?

158
00:18:40.600 --> 00:18:47.600
Well, I've been, you know, many of the articles I've written in the last few years have been filling in the gaps in the 20th century.

159
00:18:47.600 --> 00:18:53.600
That is showing that, in fact, actually starting before the 20th century, but right after the Martialist Revolution,

160
00:18:53.600 --> 00:18:58.600
showing in fact that there are two traditions in Austrian economics, that Wieser was the head of one

161
00:18:58.600 --> 00:19:16.600
One in Boehm-Bawerk was the leading member or founding member of the other tradition and then going forward from there and showing the place of human action in economics in general and in Austrian economics in particular and then talking about Rothbard's contributions.

162
00:19:16.600 --> 00:19:34.600
So what I have been doing in a way with my articles is following a plan of going from Menger up through Rothbard and beyond in outlining sort of a third volume, though it would of course not be near the quality of something that Rothbard could have written.

163
00:19:34.600 --> 00:19:41.920
Yeah. Well, and it's a different thing. I mean, it's kind of a, I would think, it's a strange thing that you should say.

164
00:19:41.920 --> 00:19:47.080
I mean, you know, I mean, Mozart died before his rec room was finished and it had to be finished by somebody else.

165
00:19:47.080 --> 00:19:49.320
I mean, nobody really wants to be put in that position.

166
00:19:49.320 --> 00:19:51.400
That's correct. Right.

167
00:19:51.400 --> 00:19:58.840
One thing about being in that position that a student here pointed out last night was that Rothbard, had he written the third edition,

168
00:19:58.840 --> 00:20:04.720
He himself was a major contributor. It would be very difficult for him to write about his own contributions.

169
00:20:04.720 --> 00:20:10.120
So someone else doing that has actually better perspective. He once even told me that

170
00:20:10.120 --> 00:20:13.240
when I mentioned that he was more a Boehm-Bawerkian

171
00:20:13.240 --> 00:20:18.040
on capital theory than Mises was, he said that he needed me to point that out.

172
00:20:18.040 --> 00:20:21.480
He hadn't realized that.

173
00:20:21.480 --> 00:20:26.160
He was always so generous that way, wasn't he? Yeah, absolutely.

174
00:20:26.160 --> 00:20:30.400
He was always so anxious to tell everybody how smart they were, you know.

175
00:20:30.400 --> 00:20:35.040
Right, I remember when we attended at least the first

176
00:20:35.040 --> 00:20:39.520
Austrian, Mises University that I attended in 1989.

177
00:20:39.520 --> 00:20:41.080
He said something like,

178
00:20:41.080 --> 00:20:45.960
this is the greatest gathering of Austrian brain power since old Vienna.

179
00:20:45.960 --> 00:20:50.960
Well, ninety percent of that of course was him just being there.

180
00:20:50.960 --> 00:20:53.840
And in so many ways we miss him.

181
00:20:53.840 --> 00:20:58.720
But, you know, to me, one of the, you know, I'll never forget the day that, that, that

182
00:20:58.720 --> 00:21:02.600
we got the news that he died, and it did seem like, you know, where's, where's the future?

183
00:21:02.600 --> 00:21:09.280
And yet, here we are, 12 years later, more students than ever, more books than ever,

184
00:21:09.280 --> 00:21:14.400
it's a, it's a, in many ways, his death kind of, it was strange, I mean, it's really set

185
00:21:14.400 --> 00:21:21.280
off a kind of, an explosion in Austrian research all over the world, and Rothbard's a bigger

186
00:21:21.280 --> 00:21:22.280
deal now than he ever was.

187
00:21:22.280 --> 00:21:38.840
The Austrian Movement has become stronger, not because of it, but as a result of everyone

188
00:21:38.840 --> 00:21:43.080
closing ranks and pushing forward and following his ideal.

189
00:21:43.080 --> 00:21:44.080
Appeal.

190
00:21:44.080 --> 00:21:45.080
Yeah.

191
00:21:45.080 --> 00:21:46.080
And there'll never be another Murray.

192
00:21:46.080 --> 00:21:47.080
No.

193
00:21:47.080 --> 00:21:48.080
Absolutely not.

194
00:21:48.080 --> 00:21:49.080
Yeah.

195
00:21:49.080 --> 00:21:50.080
But there's so many people.

196
00:21:50.080 --> 00:21:51.080
What do you make of the International Appeal?

197
00:21:51.080 --> 00:21:52.720
I mean, there's so many international things.

198
00:21:52.720 --> 00:22:00.720
There's an incredible number of international students from many different countries.

199
00:22:00.720 --> 00:22:09.080
The International Appeal has filtered through Hernando de Soto and ...

200
00:22:09.080 --> 00:22:11.080
A history script.

201
00:22:11.080 --> 00:22:26.080
and Pascal Sala. All of that though, they tend to be free market economists, but it was Murray's writings that had made them more hardcore.

202
00:22:26.080 --> 00:22:37.080
And because it's a universal paradigm, it does have this kind of universal appeal to the truth that is taught.

203
00:22:37.080 --> 00:22:44.080
Virtually every day we get requests for translation rights from somewhere.

204
00:22:44.080 --> 00:22:48.080
You can't possibly keep up with that.

205
00:22:48.080 --> 00:23:04.080
Right, I just had an article of mine on the role of human action in economic thought being translated into Czech as an epilogue to the human action, the Czech edition of the human action.

206
00:23:04.080 --> 00:23:09.080
So every day these things are coming in and I think it shows a universal appeal.

207
00:23:09.080 --> 00:23:18.080
I think the whole idea of praxeology as a theory of action is something that is universal in its attraction to other minds.

208
00:23:18.080 --> 00:23:26.080
Yeah. Well, it is especially appealing once you realize, I mean, just for listeners,

209
00:23:26.080 --> 00:23:30.080
praxeology isn't something that occurs to you or you wouldn't be taught otherwise.

210
00:23:30.080 --> 00:23:38.080
You're either taught that there's the natural sciences that use the scientific method and there's everything else.

211
00:23:38.080 --> 00:23:51.080
Social sciences aren't taught in a way that presumes that there's an immutable logic at the core of the formation of society.

212
00:23:51.080 --> 00:24:03.080
Right, that there are immutable and universal laws that govern society that are not different from the universal laws of nature or physical sciences.

213
00:24:03.080 --> 00:24:07.800
and I forget who it was that was saying that yeah I guess it was Jeffrey

214
00:24:07.800 --> 00:24:12.240
Herbiner he said he said he said you know Murray was really right that this

215
00:24:12.240 --> 00:24:16.220
is the very core of Austrian economics and and this eternal debate about who

216
00:24:16.220 --> 00:24:20.680
is and who isn't an Austrian can really turns on this question are you do you

217
00:24:20.680 --> 00:24:26.800
embrace this logic of action yeah that was always Murray always emphasized

218
00:24:26.800 --> 00:24:33.700
as opposed to the the laundry list view of Austrian economics in which you

219
00:24:33.700 --> 00:24:38.080
list a number of characteristics of Austrian economics which goes back to

220
00:24:38.080 --> 00:24:43.420
what you were saying before about about just teaching themes and teaching about

221
00:24:43.420 --> 00:24:47.160
Austrian economics rather than teaching them the as you've called it the the

222
00:24:47.160 --> 00:24:53.240
immutable logic that that is with which you deduce these laws from from Human

223
00:24:53.240 --> 00:25:00.680
You've been fascinated and done a lot of work over the years on the question of predecessors

224
00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:07.080
of the Austrian School, particularly within the French tradition, and part of what draws

225
00:25:07.080 --> 00:25:15.560
you is precisely that they were curious about this phenomenon too, this logic that is at

226
00:25:15.560 --> 00:25:18.240
the root of the development of society.

227
00:25:18.240 --> 00:25:34.240
Yes, in fact, there was a very early French economist, de Tracy, who talked about a universal logic of society, and he was an early praxeologist.

228
00:25:34.240 --> 00:25:42.240
It's just remarkable, because once you realize that, so much else falls into place, and so much can be ruled out.

229
00:25:42.240 --> 00:25:56.240
And, you know, I've wondered why is it, well, first of all, it's difficult to explain to people, but there's also the problem that praxeology places such limits on the intellectual imagination in some way, don't you think?

230
00:25:56.240 --> 00:26:10.240
Well, it focuses the imagination of praxeology. In other words, it forces you to think through to its conclusion all of the consequences of action.

231
00:26:10.240 --> 00:26:20.240
So it rules out a lot of quack approaches to economics and I think that's one of its important functions.

232
00:26:20.240 --> 00:26:26.240
90% of political books you read out there today are speculating about things that just can't happen.

233
00:26:26.240 --> 00:26:38.240
Yeah, absolutely. Someone who is schooled in praxeology, these books are easily critically read and dismissed.

234
00:26:38.240 --> 00:26:43.480
Whereas if you haven't had this, if you don't know Austrian economics, I think it's difficult

235
00:26:43.480 --> 00:26:48.160
when you're reading books on history and politics to realize that many of these books, what

236
00:26:48.160 --> 00:26:49.840
they're saying is simply nonsense.

237
00:26:49.840 --> 00:26:50.840
Yeah.

238
00:26:50.840 --> 00:26:52.400
They're just dreaming.

239
00:26:52.400 --> 00:26:58.800
And I mean, this defines, well actually, most political books throughout all of history,

240
00:26:58.800 --> 00:27:00.760
just imagining things that just can't be.

241
00:27:00.760 --> 00:27:06.360
Well, I think Mises said that any historian or someone writing on history of politics

242
00:27:06.360 --> 00:27:12.400
must know a number of sciences, including statistics and logic, but also praxeology.

243
00:27:12.400 --> 00:27:18.480
You can't be a good historian without knowing praxeological economics.

244
00:27:18.480 --> 00:27:23.680
We have an example of an historian here who knows Austrian economics, has been schooled

245
00:27:23.680 --> 00:27:29.400
in it, Tom Woods, and who is an excellent historian as a result.

246
00:27:29.400 --> 00:27:30.920
Yeah, what about other disciplines?

247
00:27:30.920 --> 00:27:32.440
Not everybody here is an economist, right?

248
00:27:32.440 --> 00:27:40.080
I talked to a fellow last night, he was studying literature, and there's a developing branch

249
00:27:40.080 --> 00:27:43.440
of the Austrian School that's focused on literary studies.

250
00:27:43.440 --> 00:27:52.320
Yes, with Paul Cantor. In fact, the fellows here, many of whom were in economics, attended

251
00:27:52.320 --> 00:27:57.520
the Paul Cantor seminar and were very, very interested in it. So because Paul Cantor sort

252
00:27:57.520 --> 00:28:04.520
The French Liberal School in particular, not all of them have been very successful.

253
00:28:27.520 --> 00:28:57.520
Translated to English, but certainly Bastiat is an extremely important figure and we're finding out that he's now with further research that in fact he isn't just an economic journalist but that he had some pretty deep theoretical insights and the character of Bastiat as someone who is not a theorist at all as Schumpeter said but just a good journalist is falling by the wayside I think with further research. So I do recommend Bastiat as a very important predecessor of the Austrian School.

254
00:28:57.520 --> 00:29:02.520
You know what's great about reading Bastiat, too, is he has almost this frenzy about his writing.

255
00:29:02.520 --> 00:29:05.520
He has some sense that he has a limited amount of time and he's just...

256
00:29:05.520 --> 00:29:12.520
Well, I mean, he had a terminal illness when he was writing many of his works in the late 1840s.

257
00:29:12.520 --> 00:29:19.520
He died in 1849, so that explains part of it, but also there's an extreme passion in his writing

258
00:29:19.520 --> 00:29:23.520
that is just... it's considered to be unscholarly today to write that way.

259
00:29:23.520 --> 00:29:26.520
Murray Rothbard, by the way, wrote that way also.

260
00:29:26.520 --> 00:29:52.520
Well, in the French school. There are a number of books in English by Paul-Lewis Bouillieu, one on collectivism, one on the modern state, which is an extremely good book. It was published in the 1890s, and it's very Spencerian, that is, it's like Herbert Spencer.

261
00:29:52.520 --> 00:30:14.520
I recommend him. He was a late French liberal. And of course, J.B. Say. J.B. Say's treatise is something that every informed person should read. It's much better organized and systematic than Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations. I would read that before I read The Wealth of Nations.

262
00:30:14.520 --> 00:30:20.520
I'm really fired up about our new J.B. Sage shirt. I told you what a friend of mine said about it, right?

263
00:30:20.520 --> 00:30:21.520
No.

264
00:30:21.520 --> 00:30:23.520
Because, you know, the shirt says, market's clear, right?

265
00:30:23.520 --> 00:30:24.520
Yeah.

266
00:30:24.520 --> 00:30:27.520
And he said, you wouldn't want to wear that into a rough Keynesian bar.

267
00:30:27.520 --> 00:30:31.520
If there are any Keynesians left.

268
00:30:31.520 --> 00:30:39.520
Right. Yeah, a fund of controversy, right? What class do you teach?

269
00:30:39.520 --> 00:30:43.520
Here at the Mises University?

270
00:30:43.520 --> 00:30:49.760
I teach in the MBA program, so I teach a class on macroeconomics for the MBAs. I also teach

271
00:30:49.760 --> 00:30:55.160
managerial economics, which is sort of an applied micro course. And I teach a money

272
00:30:55.160 --> 00:31:00.960
banking and capital markets course, in which I'm able to use quite a bit of Rothbard's

273
00:31:00.960 --> 00:31:03.440
writings on money.

274
00:31:03.440 --> 00:31:05.400
What's your choice of textbook for the macro class?

275
00:31:05.400 --> 00:31:12.160
For the macro class, I use Gregory Mankiew's textbook. The reason I do that is because

276
00:31:12.160 --> 00:31:25.160
The short-run Keynesian model is pushed to the end of the book and treats it as a special case that exists when markets don't clear.

277
00:31:25.160 --> 00:31:39.160
The first part of the book is good in that it shows that markets clear and that the interest rate doesn't get stuck and that the markets generally serve consumers and so on.

278
00:31:39.160 --> 00:31:46.160
Yeah, so Manki was a complete mainstreamer in every way, I mean this is probably the best-selling, biggest textbook.

279
00:31:46.160 --> 00:31:52.160
Yeah, absolutely, right. By the way, he has two, one is on the intermediate level and another one is for principles.

280
00:31:52.160 --> 00:31:55.160
But you use them because he's a good writer and...

281
00:31:55.160 --> 00:32:04.160
Very clear writer, the book is short so that it's easily supplemented with Austrian text and it's easy to show the transition

282
00:32:04.160 --> 00:32:34.160
or it's easy to show where Austrian business cycle theory fits in tobacco in that you simply point out that look prices don't get stuck in the short run and are not stuck in the long run okay that's sort of schizophrenic view in fact prices are always flexible and but yet even with flexible prices you could have business cycles and you have them because the Fed has the power to manipulate

283
00:32:34.160 --> 00:32:45.480
Another book that is often used is the old Paul Hain book, I guess that's more for micro

284
00:32:45.480 --> 00:32:46.480
though isn't it?

285
00:32:46.480 --> 00:32:49.940
That's a micro book, there's a few chapters on macro at the end, but it's mainly a micro

286
00:32:49.940 --> 00:32:50.940
book.

287
00:32:50.940 --> 00:32:51.940
Do you prefer Mankiw?

288
00:32:51.940 --> 00:32:55.880
Yeah, I prefer Mankiw to the Hain book.

289
00:32:55.880 --> 00:32:59.080
Do Austrians need to get busy writing textbooks or do you think it's just really not much

290
00:32:59.080 --> 00:33:00.080
point in that?

291
00:33:00.080 --> 00:33:28.080
Well, I think there has to be, maybe not something that is written as a textbook that's going to be adopted, you know, with an eye to being adopted, because then you'd have to trim your sails and you'd have to take a different tack, but there needs to be a systematic book setting out Austrian theory for advanced undergraduates and maybe even graduate students.

292
00:33:28.080 --> 00:33:45.080
and Peter Klein and I are in the process of working an outline up for a book on sort of modern Austrian economic analysis in which we focus on the actual analytics of Austrian economics and on the heuristic devices and models, if you want to use that term.

293
00:33:45.080 --> 00:33:48.080
How much of a high priority is that for you? Where does that come from?

294
00:33:48.080 --> 00:34:17.080
That's a very high priority. I gave two weeks of lectures here at the Mises Institute earlier this summer in order to really set out an outline that a book could follow and then Peter Klein, who's more in micro and I'm in macro, we're going to combine and do the same type of thing next year and hopefully get together and have a book come out of that.

295
00:34:17.080 --> 00:34:29.080
And you've also got your continuing studies in the history of economic thought in the 20th century. What's the next installment in that? You've done the Rothbard Man Economy and State, right?

296
00:34:29.080 --> 00:34:36.640
Right, right. I've talked about that. Are you talking about what the articles I've been reading?

297
00:34:36.640 --> 00:34:44.920
Yeah. Well, I think something has to be written and I'm actually working on something for the

298
00:34:44.920 --> 00:34:50.860
Austrian Scholars Conference and also for the Southern Economic Association meetings in which

299
00:34:50.860 --> 00:35:04.140
There's sort of a summarizing of what has happened with the debate over socialist calculation,

300
00:35:04.140 --> 00:35:10.220
how it has advanced Austrian economics from 1989 when it started to this point.

301
00:35:10.220 --> 00:35:13.900
It turns out that many people that were on the other side of the debate that supported

302
00:35:13.900 --> 00:35:20.140
sort of the knowledge view versus the calculation view, that they began to now pick up many

303
00:35:20.140 --> 00:35:35.140
I'm not sure we've even talked about that debate, but just by way of review, I mean, you single-handedly brought that whole question back again. I mean, after it had been settled once, settled again, and then suddenly went back.

304
00:35:35.140 --> 00:36:05.140
Right, right, right. I just happened to notice that Mises and Hayek, in going through Mises and writing something about how Mises thought about the spontaneous order, which is Hayek's term, I found that really Mises didn't have a notion of the spontaneous order, in fact that Mises had a very different view of the price system than Hayek, and then that led me to look again at their contributions to the calculation debate, and that then led to going back even further and finding that in fact there's two

305
00:36:05.140 --> 00:36:07.140
in Austrian economics.

306
00:36:07.140 --> 00:36:10.140
So I think that's a very fruitful avenue of research

307
00:36:10.140 --> 00:36:12.140
and there's much more to be done.

308
00:36:12.140 --> 00:36:15.140
And some of the younger scholars that have heard some of these lectures

309
00:36:15.140 --> 00:36:18.140
in the early 90s are now writing in this area.

310
00:36:18.140 --> 00:36:23.140
So I think this area in particular has pushed Austrian economics forward.

311
00:36:23.140 --> 00:36:26.140
Oh, say, let me ask you this because one of those writers in particular

312
00:36:26.140 --> 00:36:29.140
is the favorite candidate, so the Whispering Campaign

313
00:36:29.140 --> 00:36:33.140
would suggest for winning the $2500 prize at the end of this week.

314
00:36:33.140 --> 00:36:44.140
So, what's your sense? Is that prize, of course, follows oral exams. Have you heard talk about this prize this week?

315
00:36:44.140 --> 00:36:57.140
Well, I mean, I know about the prize. It's given for the person that gets the highest honors in the oral exams, but I haven't heard of any frontrunners yet.

316
00:36:57.140 --> 00:37:12.020
Thank you Dr. Salerno for spending time with us today.

317
00:37:13.020 --> 00:37:13.040
My pleasure.