WEBVTT

NOTE An Interview with Ralph Raico

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.840
I have with me here Dr. Ralph Reiko, a famed Misesian historian, student of F. A. Hayek,

2
00:00:07.840 --> 00:00:13.120
and he's been at the Mises University some years. How many years has it been?

3
00:00:13.120 --> 00:00:19.040
Well, I think pretty much since the beginning. Oh, since the beginning of the Mises University.

4
00:00:19.040 --> 00:00:25.200
Oh, sure. Okay, that's great. And the topics you pick are mainly historical, of course.

5
00:00:25.200 --> 00:00:35.200
Yes, and why do you find this? Of course you have some historians that are studying here, right? It's not just economists.

6
00:00:35.200 --> 00:00:44.200
Yes, and people interested mainly in philosophy also and in political philosophy and social theory.

7
00:00:44.200 --> 00:01:12.200
I think that the Mises Institute's conception is the same as Murray's conception, which is that there are a number of intertwining disciplines and economics is the best developed, most likely, as far as the philosophy of liberty goes, but there are important connections with other scholarly disciplines.

8
00:01:12.200 --> 00:01:21.200
And historians are particularly, Tom Woods mentioned in his lecture the other night, that historians are particularly bad in their understanding of economics.

9
00:01:21.200 --> 00:01:34.200
Oh yes, and bad in general. You know, one of the best things, I think it must have been in the, correct me, but it must have been in the free market, the essay by Robert Higgs, No More Great Presidents, right?

10
00:01:34.200 --> 00:01:43.880
Right? And you'll know the exact reference of that, but Bob Hicks talks about the fact

11
00:01:43.880 --> 00:01:50.240
that whenever American historians are polled as to who the great presidents were, they

12
00:01:50.240 --> 00:01:56.200
all turn out to be the most statist presidents and usually war presidents, the great presidents

13
00:01:56.200 --> 00:02:00.000
in the near great. And Bob says, well, first of all, of course, it's a general leftist

14
00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:40.880
The War gives the president much greater scope to exercise his power, to posture, to stand

15
00:02:40.880 --> 00:02:48.040
as a beacon of America, freedom, blah, blah, blah.

16
00:02:48.040 --> 00:02:54.360
We see it even now that the fact that Bush has declared himself a war president and this

17
00:02:54.360 --> 00:03:02.240
This guy who dodged the draft during the Vietnam War, got into a cushy position with the Texas

18
00:03:02.240 --> 00:03:05.440
Air National Guard, is now a warrior.

19
00:03:05.440 --> 00:03:10.480
I mean, we see it, in other words, all around us, but it's historically been the case.

20
00:03:10.480 --> 00:03:15.760
Don't you think, too, that if somebody like Bush or anybody else becomes president, I

21
00:03:15.760 --> 00:03:18.280
think, well, you know, I want to make a mark on history.

22
00:03:18.280 --> 00:03:19.880
I want to be a big deal.

23
00:03:19.880 --> 00:03:21.920
And the historians contribute to this problem, right?

24
00:03:21.920 --> 00:03:22.920
Well, of course, of course.

25
00:03:22.920 --> 00:03:23.920
They reward these guys.

26
00:03:23.920 --> 00:03:27.920
Who are the figures who have made a mark on history?

27
00:03:27.920 --> 00:03:34.320
Well, in a sense, the figures who have made a mark on history most importantly and most

28
00:03:34.320 --> 00:03:41.520
memorably are people like Jesus Christ and other great religious leaders and people with

29
00:03:41.520 --> 00:03:50.520
humane values, but the ones that historians tend to idolize are Alexander the Great, Julius

30
00:03:50.520 --> 00:04:01.600
Caesar, Napoleon, and so on. Who is called the great in history? Frederick the Great

31
00:04:01.600 --> 00:04:10.480
of Prussia who plunged Europe into war again and again and again, or Catherine the Great

32
00:04:10.480 --> 00:04:36.800
of Russia, the slow material advance of the bourgeoisie, the men who created American

33
00:05:36.800 --> 00:05:42.880
German liberals, I mean people like us, that is with authentic laissez-faire attitude towards

34
00:05:42.880 --> 00:05:49.320
things, anti-imperialist, anti-militarist, who fought against the early anti-Semitic

35
00:05:49.320 --> 00:06:00.920
movement for another thing, I used to lecture at the University of Cologne, and German professors

36
00:06:00.920 --> 00:06:06.520
had never heard of any of these men, although in their own time they were very well known.

37
00:06:06.520 --> 00:06:14.020
There's another example and that's Henri Lepage. I think you know him. He's spoken here at the Mises Institute.

38
00:06:14.020 --> 00:06:23.520
Well, he's a very well-educated man. In all of his education he had never been told about Frederic Bastiat.

39
00:06:23.520 --> 00:06:31.020
He had to come to America and became, of course, a copy of the book, The Law.

40
00:06:31.020 --> 00:06:35.320
You know what I'm saying? And first time he'd ever heard of Bastiat.

41
00:06:35.320 --> 00:06:47.520
Although educated throughout the French... So, in other words, the history of authentic liberalism, of laissez-faire thinkers, has been largely suppressed.

42
00:06:47.520 --> 00:06:58.820
I mean, all that they have to talk about is David Ricardo and, God help us, John Stuart Mill, who was the beginning of English liberal decadence.

43
00:06:58.820 --> 00:07:03.540
and this whole tradition of liberalism forgotten.

44
00:07:03.540 --> 00:07:08.540
And in a way, a priori, we have to assume,

45
00:07:08.580 --> 00:07:10.400
and it turns out that it's correct,

46
00:07:10.400 --> 00:07:12.060
that throughout the 19th century,

47
00:07:12.060 --> 00:07:14.140
there were important liberal thinkers

48
00:07:14.140 --> 00:07:16.580
in all Western countries.

49
00:07:16.580 --> 00:07:17.840
I mean, that's how they became,

50
00:07:17.840 --> 00:07:20.380
that's one of the ways they became liberalized.

51
00:07:20.380 --> 00:07:22.460
Their economies became liberalized

52
00:07:22.460 --> 00:07:24.960
and the old mercantilist system was thrown off

53
00:07:24.960 --> 00:07:26.460
in one country after another.

54
00:07:26.460 --> 00:07:53.460
Germany would be an example, but also the Netherlands, Scandinavia, Spain even to an extent, Italy to an extent, and these people are totally unknown, and it's the status and the movement of gradually accumulating the statism in the late 19th century that is of interest to historians.

55
00:07:53.460 --> 00:07:57.700
Here's what I don't understand about the case of Germany. Now, there's been an intellectual

56
00:07:58.980 --> 00:08:04.980
effort taken for many decades to try to find the roots of the National Socialist Movement.

57
00:08:05.620 --> 00:08:12.180
And you think then to find the roots of the opponents of what led to National Socialism.

58
00:08:12.180 --> 00:08:17.220
So why wouldn't you be naturally, through these studies, be led to the German liberal tradition?

59
00:08:17.220 --> 00:08:21.940
Because from the beginning, the history of German, of authentic German liberalism,

60
00:08:21.940 --> 00:08:51.940
and you know, I have an article, what was it, in the Review of Austrian Economics, I think, some years back, available on the archives of the Mises Institute, on Eugen Richter, who in his own time was, according to contemporaries, as well known as Bismarck, and he was Bismarck's great opponent, but the history of authentic German liberalism was written either by, or in the history of Germany in general, either by social democrats, or on the other hand by nationalist conservatives.

61
00:08:51.940 --> 00:08:58.600
and both of those groups, even more than they hated each other, hated the

62
00:08:58.600 --> 00:09:06.040
authentic liberals and someone like Richter and the others

63
00:09:06.040 --> 00:09:12.220
dismissed as dogmatic, doctrinaire. Well, one reason they're held in

64
00:09:12.220 --> 00:09:16.080
contempt is that they were the first welfare state, of course, was introduced

65
00:09:16.080 --> 00:09:21.840
by Bismarck in Germany in the 1880s and they were the fiercest and truly

66
00:09:21.840 --> 00:09:43.840
The Welfare State means welfare not for impoverished people, pauper and so on, but for the working class through health insurance, old age insurance, disability insurance, forced contributions and so on.

67
00:09:43.840 --> 00:10:13.840
and so on. And the reason that they were attacked on the conservative side for their opposition to the welfare state was that they understood what was happening and that is that the Bismarck and the other conservatives and typically other people who support, other right-centered people who supported the welfare state were very worried about the fact that working people now were becoming independent, standing on their own two feet, buying their own insurance and so on.

68
00:10:13.840 --> 00:10:24.840
They wanted to reestablish state paternalism over the lower classes, and the welfare state was a way to do it.

69
00:10:24.840 --> 00:10:28.840
They were also against German nationalism and militarism, right?

70
00:10:28.840 --> 00:10:29.840
What's that?

71
00:10:29.840 --> 00:10:30.840
They were against nationalism.

72
00:10:30.840 --> 00:10:33.840
Well, no, I mean, they were German patriots.

73
00:10:33.840 --> 00:10:40.840
None of the German liberals really opposed the German unification in 1871,

74
00:10:40.840 --> 00:10:44.840
The Unification of the German States under Prussia

75
00:10:44.840 --> 00:10:49.840
The British and the English and French and Spaniards even

76
00:10:49.840 --> 00:10:51.840
had had a national state for centuries

77
00:10:51.840 --> 00:10:56.840
and they figured, you know, why should we Germans not have one?

78
00:10:56.840 --> 00:11:02.840
They understood it, though, as a way of creating a defensive situation in Central Europe.

79
00:11:02.840 --> 00:11:05.840
When the German states had been divided up,

80
00:11:05.840 --> 00:11:22.840
Then France and Russia especially could play their game of using one against Napoleon as the best example, pitting one against the other and in this way encroaching on the different German states, expanding their own territory and their own power.

81
00:11:22.840 --> 00:11:31.840
So the unification of Germany then would create a situation where none of the continental powers could do that to Germany again.

82
00:11:31.840 --> 00:11:43.600
but of course then got out of hand and Bismarck was reasonable enough and compromising in diplomacy

83
00:11:43.600 --> 00:11:50.640
but the creation of this big strong militarily economically strong Germany was too much of a

84
00:11:50.640 --> 00:11:55.120
temptation for the people who came after him and they threw their weight around and scared everybody

85
00:11:55.120 --> 00:12:15.120
German Liberalism is one of my interests. I've been interested in the history of liberalism in general, and of course given lectures here on that subject, and in particular in the history of French liberalism.

86
00:12:15.120 --> 00:12:25.120
My doctoral dissertation was on two French thinkers, Benjamin Constant and Alexis de Tocqueville, and also on Lord Acton.

87
00:12:25.120 --> 00:12:34.120
As you know, I did it under Hayek, and those were some of Hayek's absolutely favorite authors, and he got me onto them.

88
00:12:34.120 --> 00:12:42.120
And I've written a number of things, given a number of talks in France and elsewhere, on French liberalism, which is very underrated.

89
00:12:42.120 --> 00:13:12.120
People think that America and England turned out to be the most liberal societies in the world, true enough, but the fact that France was so early threatened by bureaucratic centralization under the kings, under Napoleon, under all the 19th century governments, created the circumstance, the context, wherein French liberals could critique expanding bureaucratic centralization,

90
00:13:12.120 --> 00:13:42.120
Centralization of the use by the state of democracy and democratic majorities to legitimize itself was among the French thinkers, and the French thinkers, it's not an accident that we still use the term laissez-faire, which is a French term, they were the, I don't know how to say it, the French thinkers, the French thinkers, the French thinkers,

91
00:13:42.120 --> 00:13:58.120
The last real liberal school in a school, I'm not saying particular thinkers, of course, are the Austrians, but the last major true liberal school in Europe.

92
00:13:58.120 --> 00:14:09.120
And then it came to America, which is another whole interesting episode and aspect of it.

93
00:14:09.120 --> 00:14:18.120
I was just talking to Dr. Long about how well libertarianism thrives in the United States today.

94
00:14:18.120 --> 00:14:26.120
And I was asking him to speculate on historical reasons for that. What's your opinion on that?

95
00:14:26.120 --> 00:14:32.120
Well, you know, it was well and correctly said at one time that the whole libertarian movement

96
00:14:32.120 --> 00:14:38.120
could fit into Murray Rothbard's apartment on West 88th Street and often did.

97
00:14:38.120 --> 00:14:52.120
I can look back, not literally, there were people in California, but pretty much. I can look back on that and it's amazing. What do we have here at the Mises University?

98
00:14:52.120 --> 00:15:02.120
125 people. From how many different countries? At least 25, really. Well, it's very remarkable.

99
00:15:02.120 --> 00:15:09.120
I just heard an excellent talk by Professor Joseph Salerno on the fall and renaissance

100
00:15:09.120 --> 00:15:24.120
of the Austrian School. He concluded that by saying that the essential institutional

101
00:15:24.120 --> 00:15:29.120
basis of the continuance of the Austrian School and the flourishing of the Austrian School

102
00:15:29.120 --> 00:15:43.120
and elaboration of Austrian theory also has been the Mises Institute and Lew Rockwell's work and we see it, of course, in the Mises University and everything else that happens here.

103
00:15:43.120 --> 00:15:48.120
Yeah, it probably wouldn't have been possible without this infrastructure.

104
00:15:48.120 --> 00:16:03.120
And of course not. Murray would still have been a pretty much isolated figure. I mean, he had younger disciples, of course, as we know, and younger followers and a certain amount of influence, but nothing like what's been happening in recent years.

105
00:16:03.120 --> 00:16:12.120
Do you find yourself inspired, just a number of people have mentioned how inspiring it is to be around all these young thinkers who are...

106
00:16:12.120 --> 00:16:19.120
The Theory of Money and Credit

107
00:16:42.120 --> 00:17:02.120
www.lewrockwell.com

108
00:17:12.120 --> 00:17:21.120
It goes around the world. Some of my talks I think have been distributed and I get letters.

109
00:17:21.120 --> 00:17:26.040
I got a letter from somebody in the Netherlands who said that he heard it, happened to hear

110
00:17:26.040 --> 00:17:33.560
it on the internet and could I give him more since I talk about the rise of the Dutch Republic

111
00:17:33.560 --> 00:17:38.480
as an important stage in European liberalism, give him more details about that and other

112
00:17:38.480 --> 00:18:01.440
One of the things that makes me very happy when I think about, and it's not just the

113
00:18:01.440 --> 00:18:05.080
Internet, it's also the fact that the Mises Institute has the resources to bring into

114
00:18:05.080 --> 00:18:09.720
to print things like the Libertarian Forum, which Murray worked on for years, and then

115
00:18:09.720 --> 00:18:13.360
it just died and you figure, well, it wasn't exactly mimeographs, but it was something

116
00:18:13.360 --> 00:18:20.360
close to it, the way it originally came out.

117
00:18:20.360 --> 00:18:27.240
How much would you estimate is in the archives of the Mises website, roughly speaking?

118
00:18:27.240 --> 00:18:32.080
Is it possible to ... a hundred million words, something like that?

119
00:18:32.080 --> 00:18:34.880
Well, easily, because you have whole books, don't you?

120
00:19:34.880 --> 00:19:41.840
The idea of somebody standing in front of students and lecturing to them, and they're

121
00:19:41.840 --> 00:19:46.920
thinking about lunch or they're thinking about what happened last night, and so on, it's

122
00:19:46.920 --> 00:19:49.360
not going to last forever.

123
00:19:49.360 --> 00:19:56.160
These students, if it's not the case now, in a few years, or let's say their children,

124
00:19:56.160 --> 00:20:05.600
will have available almost limitless resources. I mean, film, the Library of Congress is

125
00:20:05.600 --> 00:20:13.440
going to be on a few disks and so on. And also they can interact with people all around

126
00:20:13.440 --> 00:20:21.200
the world in their own, whatever their common interests might be. And I can't imagine that

127
00:20:21.200 --> 00:20:24.960
College Education, and anything like the form it has now, as you know.

128
00:20:24.960 --> 00:20:29.200
These are all sort of people dragged into, dragged to be there, that are just there to

129
00:20:29.200 --> 00:20:32.920
get their degree for the most part, and very different from the students we have here who

130
00:20:32.920 --> 00:20:33.920
come a very long way.

131
00:20:33.920 --> 00:20:34.920
Oh, no.

132
00:20:34.920 --> 00:20:35.920
Oh, yeah.

133
00:20:35.920 --> 00:20:36.920
Wow.

134
00:20:36.920 --> 00:20:42.040
To think that there are students who, during lunchtime, that are not discussing, well,

135
00:20:42.040 --> 00:20:46.680
in Buffalo, they're discussing the Buffalo Bills or the Sabres or something, or, you

136
00:20:46.680 --> 00:20:50.680
know, what did she say, what did he say, and so on.

137
00:20:50.680 --> 00:21:00.680
This year they discuss the different lectures. They discuss methodology. They discuss public policy and they get very excited about it.

138
00:21:00.680 --> 00:21:05.680
Yeah, it's like Murray's living room writ large, isn't it?

139
00:21:05.680 --> 00:21:09.680
Yeah, yeah. Not as funny though.

140
00:21:09.680 --> 00:21:17.680
Well, my other interest besides the history of liberalism has always been revisionist history, as we say.

141
00:21:17.680 --> 00:21:47.680
and my project is to finish my collection of essays on classical liberalism which is like the project has lasted a long time because there's always new stuff coming out and I have not managed to master the art of drawing the line enough is enough so I keep consulting the new works but after that my project would probably be to collect my writings on revisionist history

142
00:21:47.680 --> 00:22:03.680
You know, in our great anthology, The Costs of War, I have a couple of essays there on World War I, longish essays on World War I and on Churchill, in Reassessing the Presidency, are these things online, by the way?

143
00:22:03.680 --> 00:22:15.680
I'm doing my best, one essay at a time. The problem is that the files that were used to create those books are not accessible with today's software, so we're having to pretty much reshoot them.

144
00:22:15.680 --> 00:22:45.680
A Long Essay on Harry Truman and other revisionist essays.

145
00:23:15.680 --> 00:23:18.680
and the aftermath of the war.

146
00:23:18.680 --> 00:23:21.680
And these have to be corrected.

147
00:23:21.680 --> 00:23:28.680
If there were no revisionism, we'd still think that the Spaniards had blown up the USS Maine,

148
00:23:28.680 --> 00:23:35.680
that the Lusitania just had innocent civilians and no munitions of war,

149
00:23:35.680 --> 00:23:42.680
and that Pearl Harbor, the Japanese, for no good reason,

150
00:24:42.680 --> 00:24:55.680
And it's not that we have to totally agree in our conclusions or the structure that we're appealing to, but there's a very great deal to learn.

151
00:24:55.680 --> 00:25:00.680
I mean, I would take, for instance, Noam Chomsky, whom you wrote about a number of years ago, did you not?

152
00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:03.680
In some magazines.

153
00:25:03.680 --> 00:25:09.680
Again, one doesn't agree with Chomsky on a lot of issues, especially on basic social philosophy.

154
00:25:09.680 --> 00:25:17.040
and Political Philosophy, but the detailed, the man has such energy, the detailed ongoing

155
00:25:17.040 --> 00:25:22.120
critique of American policy and American policymakers is very valuable.

156
00:25:22.120 --> 00:25:25.240
What's great about Chomsky, it's just the same thing that's great about Rothbard, is

157
00:25:25.240 --> 00:25:32.320
that it has a radicalizing effect on you when you read it, it kind of gets you fired up.

158
00:25:32.320 --> 00:25:38.920
What has also a radicalizing effect are the events of what's actually happening.

159
00:25:38.920 --> 00:25:48.320
You know, our good friend Robert Higgs, who has been at the Mises University in the past,

160
00:25:48.320 --> 00:25:50.520
has given talks here.

161
00:25:50.520 --> 00:25:58.320
You can see he's becoming more radical every week with every new column he comes out with.

162
00:25:58.320 --> 00:26:01.320
So you tend to get more radical as you get older?

163
00:26:01.320 --> 00:26:05.320
Well, you know, I started pretty radical. Well, I wouldn't say I started radical.

164
00:26:05.320 --> 00:26:11.320
Do people actually listening to this because I'm about to make a confession?

165
00:26:11.320 --> 00:26:15.320
Well, we can leave the tape running and if it's too shocking...

166
00:26:15.320 --> 00:26:20.320
You can edit it out if it's too shocking, yes. Well, I started as a Republican.

167
00:26:20.320 --> 00:26:23.320
Well, we'll try to edit that out, yeah.

168
00:26:23.320 --> 00:26:27.320
I really did. But a taft Republican, okay.

169
00:26:27.320 --> 00:26:31.480
uh... and then uh... uh... through friends and especially through Murray

170
00:26:31.480 --> 00:26:36.200
I became pretty radical pretty early on

171
00:26:36.200 --> 00:26:42.840
yeah and uh... uh... Mises too according to Murray got more radicals he got older

172
00:26:42.840 --> 00:26:43.640
um...

173
00:26:43.640 --> 00:26:47.920
well okay uh... it's possible uh...

174
00:26:47.920 --> 00:26:51.520
he was always at his core radical

175
00:26:51.520 --> 00:26:54.560
you know in a book that's uh...

176
00:27:24.560 --> 00:27:32.280
of the Central Government of Provinces, Cities, Communities, Neighborhoods, and he says if

177
00:27:32.280 --> 00:27:36.040
it were possible down to a particular household.

178
00:27:36.040 --> 00:27:38.600
So that is a pretty radical point of view.

179
00:27:38.600 --> 00:27:39.600
1919, yeah.

180
00:27:39.600 --> 00:27:45.360
Right, and as Hans Hoppe talks about and other of our friends talk about, I think that's

181
00:27:45.360 --> 00:27:47.680
a road to follow.

182
00:27:47.680 --> 00:27:53.780
We cannot live with this centralized, a great centralized state.

183
00:27:53.780 --> 00:28:03.780
How Much Empirical Evidence Do We Need To See That Government Cannot Be Limited?

184
00:28:53.780 --> 00:29:23.780
The first step is intellectual change.

185
00:29:23.780 --> 00:29:31.780
The lies that were fed. You use your critical intelligence. You educate yourself. You read more and more.

186
00:29:31.780 --> 00:29:37.780
And, of course, with everything the Mises Institute makes available, that's not very difficult.

187
00:29:37.780 --> 00:29:47.780
And then get together with people who you're intellectually compatible with, you agree with, and start change, start actual social change.

188
00:29:47.780 --> 00:29:49.780
Thank you very much, Dr. Reiko.