WEBVTT

NOTE An Interview with Walter Block

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.000
Walter Block is with us for the Mises University this week, and I thought we'd take the chance to get an interview with him.

2
00:00:07.000 --> 00:00:19.000
His lecture's going to be broadcast on by podcast all week, but this is a chance for us to discuss some more personal elements of the scholarly work that he's been doing.

3
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:20.000
So welcome, Walter.

4
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:22.000
My pleasure to be here, Jeff. Thanks.

5
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:24.000
I can call you Walter, right? Not this time?

6
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:25.000
Absolutely.

7
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:28.000
Everybody calls you Professor Block, and well, anyway.

8
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:34.000
I really want Emperor of the Universe, but I'll settle for Walter.

9
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:44.000
Well, there's so many things we could discuss, but maybe we should just revisit this issue that came up yesterday about this new book on Rhodes that you have out.

10
00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:45.000
Oh, yeah, sure.

11
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:46.000
Can you mention to me about that?

12
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:47.000
Sure, yes, we could talk about that.

13
00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:49.000
Yeah, go ahead.

14
00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:55.800
Well, you know, it's sort of strange because for a while I was hot after tenure for many

15
00:00:55.800 --> 00:00:56.800
years.

16
00:00:56.800 --> 00:01:01.480
In my career, I never had it until I got to Loyola, which was in 2001.

17
00:01:01.480 --> 00:01:05.880
So for many, many years, I didn't do any books because books don't count for tenure.

18
00:01:05.880 --> 00:01:13.600
Instead, what I would do is I would do articles in referee journals.

19
00:01:13.600 --> 00:01:18.960
And I had dozens of them because I'm productive and I've got a lot of stuff in me to say,

20
00:01:18.960 --> 00:01:25.260
So what I did about a year or two ago is I said, well, you know, maybe I'll make some

21
00:01:25.260 --> 00:01:27.600
books out of all these articles.

22
00:01:27.600 --> 00:01:29.380
And the Rhodes one was the first one.

23
00:01:29.380 --> 00:01:34.400
What I did is I took about 15 or 18 articles, I forget how many, something like that, and

24
00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:40.560
I put them in some sort of order that would be more reasonable or pleasing or what have

25
00:01:40.560 --> 00:01:45.320
you, and I offered it around as a book, and Mellon Press was kind enough to publish it,

26
00:01:45.320 --> 00:01:52.960
and now there's a book on privatizing roads, it came out in May of this year.

27
00:01:52.960 --> 00:01:55.200
And the prices?

28
00:01:55.200 --> 00:01:58.840
Well my understanding of the price is that there's a high price for libraries of about

29
00:01:58.840 --> 00:02:05.760
$135 or something like that, and then there's a lower price for individuals of about $35.

30
00:02:05.760 --> 00:02:06.760
Right.

31
00:02:06.760 --> 00:02:10.720
Well, you know, I hope that somehow we can manage to get it and make it available because

32
00:02:10.720 --> 00:02:19.560
And we were talking about the outrageous prices of these books and how it's driven in part

33
00:02:19.560 --> 00:02:26.480
by the state libraries that buy anything at any price.

34
00:02:26.480 --> 00:02:28.080
Yeah, it's very elastic.

35
00:02:28.080 --> 00:02:30.960
If a library wants it, they'll take it at whatever the price.

36
00:02:30.960 --> 00:02:35.720
So a lot of publishers jack up the price for them, but happily they have a lower price

37
00:02:35.720 --> 00:02:38.120
for individuals of $35.

38
00:03:08.120 --> 00:03:16.120
I think you have a lot of provocative arguments in it, which it does, but what you don't expect is that it actually teaches microeconomics.

39
00:03:16.120 --> 00:03:18.120
Well, you're very kind to say that.

40
00:03:18.120 --> 00:03:20.120
I just loved that book for that reason.

41
00:03:20.120 --> 00:03:23.120
It's sort of my thank you to Henry Hazlitt.

42
00:03:23.120 --> 00:03:29.120
I don't know if people see this, but Economics in One Lesson is one of my favorite books,

43
00:03:29.120 --> 00:03:37.120
and what Hazlitt did in that book was he had a thesis or a theory or one lesson about alternative costs and stuff,

44
00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:42.440
And then he applied it to 30 different chapters. Well, I too had a thesis of libertarianism,

45
00:03:42.440 --> 00:03:47.440
non-aggression against non-aggressors, and then I applied it to 30 cases or so, all of

46
00:03:47.440 --> 00:03:53.040
whom were not guilty of violating the libertarian code and yet were reviled or hated or prohibited

47
00:03:53.040 --> 00:03:57.400
and I said, well, you know, they shouldn't really be that way and actually they're heroic

48
00:03:57.400 --> 00:04:01.600
for persisting and, you know, paying low wages or whatever it was that they were doing.

49
00:04:01.600 --> 00:04:05.000
But you know what's striking about the book is, I guess that's what I was trying to say,

50
00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:08.800
You pick it up, you expect it to be just a pure libertarian argument based on the non-aggression

51
00:04:08.800 --> 00:04:09.800
axiom.

52
00:04:09.800 --> 00:04:16.520
What you don't expect is that you employ economic methods of analytics throughout the book.

53
00:04:16.520 --> 00:04:20.340
That's probably because you were just in graduate school and that was the tool that was most

54
00:04:20.340 --> 00:04:21.600
on the forefront of your mind.

55
00:04:21.600 --> 00:04:22.600
Yeah.

56
00:04:22.600 --> 00:04:29.800
Well, I mean, if you're going to defend someone like the person who charges high rents, you

57
00:04:29.800 --> 00:04:35.920
You naturally get into the function of high rents and markets and scarcity and equating

58
00:04:35.920 --> 00:04:37.960
supply and demand and stuff like that.

59
00:04:37.960 --> 00:04:39.720
Otherwise, what are you going to say?

60
00:04:39.720 --> 00:04:43.920
Well, you can sort of say in one sentence, well, he's not violating one's rights, period.

61
00:04:43.920 --> 00:04:46.320
End of chapter, next chapter.

62
00:04:46.320 --> 00:04:47.880
Three sentences for that one too.

63
00:04:47.880 --> 00:04:52.520
So you have to bring in some sort of analytics.

64
00:04:52.520 --> 00:04:54.320
Sometimes they say it's not the words, it's the music.

65
00:04:54.320 --> 00:04:58.760
You have to tell a story, give the music as well, and the music is the economic efficiency

66
00:04:58.760 --> 00:05:04.080
and the University of it. Because people sometimes are convinced, sometimes rarely are convinced,

67
00:05:04.080 --> 00:05:10.280
well since it doesn't violate the libertarian code, it's kosher. But most people, they

68
00:05:10.280 --> 00:05:16.720
want to hear a story about how does it help, how does following Adam Smith's idea of maximizing

69
00:05:16.720 --> 00:05:22.320
profits lead to the public good, well how does it work in this case? So that was a lot

70
00:05:22.320 --> 00:05:23.640
of the gist of the book.

71
00:05:23.640 --> 00:05:28.640
So you get an integration there between economics and moral theory.

72
00:05:28.640 --> 00:05:35.640
Yeah, I think that's true. The two are never too far apart. The two wings of the libertarian plane, if you want to put it that way.

73
00:05:35.640 --> 00:05:47.640
I think really that a person could, if not knowing anything else about economic theory, could pick up that book and read it from the beginning and come away with all sorts of new knowledge that you can employ in other ways.

74
00:05:47.640 --> 00:05:52.640
Well, you're very, very kind to say that. There are reviewers who didn't say that.

75
00:05:52.640 --> 00:05:56.640
There were reviewers who said the only good thing about the book were the cartoons.

76
00:05:56.640 --> 00:06:02.640
Needless to say, I didn't do the cartoons, but I was smart enough to get a good cartoonist to illustrate it,

77
00:06:02.640 --> 00:06:04.640
because the way I see it, you know, economics should be fun.

78
00:06:04.640 --> 00:06:09.640
And we should look at the lighter side of these things as well as the more serious.

79
00:06:09.640 --> 00:06:14.640
So that was graduate school, and then your second book now suddenly comes out now.

80
00:06:14.640 --> 00:06:17.640
As you're a mature scholar, you've got a full professorship request.

81
00:06:17.640 --> 00:06:21.640
I think I've done about eight or nine other books between that book and Rhodes.

82
00:06:51.640 --> 00:07:06.640
Can I ask you, why is it so oddly central to your thought over time?

83
00:07:06.640 --> 00:07:08.640
You've stuck with this topic for a very long time.

84
00:07:08.640 --> 00:07:09.640
That's right.

85
00:07:09.640 --> 00:07:13.640
Why over 20 years have I written 30 articles on roads?

86
00:07:13.640 --> 00:07:14.640
What's with roads?

87
00:07:14.640 --> 00:07:16.640
Nobody else is talking about roads.

88
00:07:16.640 --> 00:07:18.640
Well, there are two things.

89
00:07:18.640 --> 00:07:24.960
The big, big, big thing is the fact that 40,000 people a year die on the roads.

90
00:07:24.960 --> 00:07:27.680
And you know, 40,000 people is a lot of people.

91
00:07:27.680 --> 00:07:31.640
Every time some little girl gets lost in a well and you get 300 people trying to rescue

92
00:07:31.640 --> 00:07:36.280
her, and that's all good, you know, I'm in favor of rescuing little girls from wells.

93
00:07:36.280 --> 00:07:38.400
But that's one little girl.

94
00:07:38.400 --> 00:07:42.440
I don't know how many little girls die out of the 40,000, you know, two, three thousand

95
00:07:42.440 --> 00:07:47.000
little girls in that group, and somehow it's sort of like death in taxes.

96
00:07:47.000 --> 00:08:17.000
In this case, you sort of have to bring attention to the fact that a lot of people are dying, and that it's not necessary, and that the reason for it is because the bloody government is running it, and if private enterprise ran it, my estimate is many, many fewer people would die. I think I have some estimate concocted in there, about 6,000 or 8,000 people would die from cancer.

97
00:08:17.000 --> 00:08:25.000
The government is responsible for, I don't know, 30, 35,000 needless deaths.

98
00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:31.000
You mentioned the word responsible and this is what always strikes me.

99
00:08:31.000 --> 00:08:33.000
Well, let me just tell a story.

100
00:08:33.000 --> 00:08:38.000
The other day I was at an airport going through the security thing

101
00:08:38.000 --> 00:08:43.000
and the employer of the federal government dropped my laptop on the ground.

102
00:08:43.000 --> 00:08:44.000
Oh, lovely.

103
00:08:44.000 --> 00:08:51.600
And I picked it up and a piece had flown off of it or something and I said, what happens

104
00:08:51.600 --> 00:08:52.600
if this doesn't work?

105
00:08:52.600 --> 00:08:54.280
And he just looked at me and shrugged.

106
00:08:54.280 --> 00:08:59.400
And you suddenly have this sudden realization that really there is no, the government doesn't

107
00:08:59.400 --> 00:09:03.760
accept liability for the damages of the causes, right?

108
00:09:03.760 --> 00:09:07.640
And so is that, there are many issues with having to do with private roads, having to

109
00:09:07.640 --> 00:09:10.240
do with management and rationality and all that.

110
00:09:10.240 --> 00:09:17.960
But how does just burying the liabilities for the desk, just the absence of responsibility,

111
00:09:17.960 --> 00:09:19.760
how does that figure into the argument?

112
00:09:19.760 --> 00:09:23.340
Well let me just say one thing, let me correct myself, I said they were only responsible

113
00:09:23.340 --> 00:09:27.600
for 35,000, let's say 5,000 would still die, I think they were still really responsible

114
00:09:27.600 --> 00:09:33.960
for all 40,000, because suppose I'm a mass murderer and I kill 25 people, and it's later

115
00:09:33.960 --> 00:09:40.040
proven that had I not killed those 25 people, five of them would have died anyway on cancer

116
00:09:40.040 --> 00:09:42.040
The Theory of Money and Credit

117
00:10:10.040 --> 00:10:14.080
And fewer people died. I would have ads saying, you know, don't go to the Jeff Road, come

118
00:10:14.080 --> 00:10:19.000
to the Walter Road. And then you would go broke or you would have to learn to emulate

119
00:10:19.000 --> 00:10:25.060
my policies which reduce deaths. And we would lower deaths in that way. I mean, this system

120
00:10:25.060 --> 00:10:29.880
of competition, it works well with toothpaste and wristwatches and computers and bow ties

121
00:10:29.880 --> 00:10:36.500
and why shouldn't it work well with roads? The other minor thing about roads that gets

122
00:10:36.500 --> 00:10:43.860
my crank going is traffic congestion. It's probably not too bad here in Auburn, but I

123
00:10:43.860 --> 00:10:51.220
tell you in any big city, you can go faster on a roller skates than in a car. The traffic

124
00:10:51.220 --> 00:10:55.980
congestion is so horrible. When I used to live in New York City, they would call the

125
00:10:55.980 --> 00:10:59.900
Long Island Expressway the longest parking lot in the world. It was 100 miles of bumper

126
00:10:59.900 --> 00:11:06.340
to bumper cars. LA is horrendous. In most big cities, you just can't go anywhere. They

127
00:11:06.340 --> 00:11:36.340
I remember when I was in California, what would happen is the people in the other lanes would get so ticked off that they would bunch up so close that you couldn't get off the HOV, so you had to stop when you wanted to get off the HOV, so it's just, that's, you know, getting back to your point about airline safety, only government would prevent paperclips, not paperclips, nail clippers. Nail clippers, give me a break. Well, the same thing.

128
00:11:36.340 --> 00:11:40.820
The thing with HOV, that's silly. You don't do HOV. What you do is you charge a higher

129
00:11:40.820 --> 00:11:45.020
price for more accessibility to road use.

130
00:11:45.020 --> 00:11:49.620
Have you noticed too that the HOV lands are increasingly used for political purposes?

131
00:11:49.620 --> 00:11:55.340
I read somewhere the other day that if you have a hybrid car in some large urban areas

132
00:11:55.340 --> 00:11:57.540
that you're permitted on HOV.

133
00:11:57.540 --> 00:12:03.420
And probably if you're a congress critter, you know, it's just a perversion.

134
00:12:03.420 --> 00:12:09.100
But if I can return to this point about liability though, if you're in the Mises Institute

135
00:12:09.100 --> 00:12:13.300
this week, if you trip down the stairs and you break a leg, we're presumably going to

136
00:12:13.300 --> 00:12:17.340
bear some responsibility for that, unless you've previously signed some agreement that

137
00:12:17.340 --> 00:12:20.460
says the Mises Institute is not liable for anything that happens to me.

138
00:12:20.460 --> 00:12:23.820
We take out insurance to deal with this.

139
00:12:23.820 --> 00:12:31.260
These people who die in the highways, their families can't sue the government.

140
00:12:31.260 --> 00:12:32.260
Can they?

141
00:12:32.260 --> 00:12:37.260
Oh, no, no, no. You can't sue the government.

142
00:12:37.260 --> 00:12:43.260
No, you can't sue the government. Look, I'm not a lawyer. I mean, you need a lawyer to be definitive on this.

143
00:12:43.260 --> 00:12:48.260
But my understanding is that if they break your computer by dropping it at the search point,

144
00:12:48.260 --> 00:12:53.260
or if a cop breaks into your house looking for drugs and it was the neighbor's house that he was supposed to be looking at

145
00:12:53.260 --> 00:12:58.260
and he shoots you in the leg, they're not as liable as they should be.

146
00:12:58.260 --> 00:13:08.260
This is just a fact of nature that they don't take liability. They're supposed to be protecting us, but if they turn around and shoot us, you know, there are problems.

147
00:13:08.260 --> 00:13:19.260
So if you can manage to assign blame to some other driver, then they can be responsible for that. But the blame somehow never rests with the owner, supposed owner, of the system.

148
00:13:19.260 --> 00:13:25.420
Well, you see, I would say that the way the private roads would function is that probably

149
00:13:25.420 --> 00:13:29.340
no road owner would let you on there unless you sign some sort of release saying that you're

150
00:13:29.340 --> 00:13:35.060
not holding the road owner responsible. But on the other hand, getting back to this competition

151
00:13:35.060 --> 00:13:41.380
between the Jeff Road and the Walter Road, let's say, take the problem of speeding. Let's

152
00:13:41.380 --> 00:13:46.620
suppose for the moment that speeding causes accidents. And we each try to reduce speeding.

153
00:13:46.620 --> 00:13:50.100
Now, one of us will do it more successfully than the other because of different techniques

154
00:13:50.100 --> 00:13:55.380
or what have you, and that might be the way to reduce the death rate.

155
00:13:55.380 --> 00:14:00.300
But it need not be speeding, and maybe it's not speeding, maybe it's the variance in speed.

156
00:14:00.300 --> 00:14:06.380
For instance, right now, the minimum speed is 40 miles an hour on the highways.

157
00:14:06.380 --> 00:14:08.780
You have to go at least 40.

158
00:14:08.780 --> 00:14:11.440
The maximum speed is usually 70.

159
00:14:11.440 --> 00:14:18.920
But everyone does 80, and some people go 42, you know, some little old lady type going,

160
00:14:18.920 --> 00:14:24.240
tootling along at 42 miles an hour and usually parked in the left lane and screws up all

161
00:14:24.240 --> 00:14:26.100
sorts of traffic.

162
00:14:26.100 --> 00:14:27.640
Maybe it's the variation in speed.

163
00:14:27.640 --> 00:14:32.120
Maybe what you ought to do is have different speed limits for the three different lanes.

164
00:14:32.120 --> 00:14:38.000
Maybe you should have 55, 70 and 85 for the three right, middle and left lanes.

165
00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:39.240
I don't know.

166
00:14:39.240 --> 00:14:40.240
You don't know.

167
00:15:10.240 --> 00:15:15.520
of Roads. Well, from an Austrian point of view, even apart from roads, just in

168
00:15:15.520 --> 00:15:18.840
general, the Austrian view is free entry. That's what competition is. As long as

169
00:15:18.840 --> 00:15:24.280
anyone is free to set up another road, that's competition. Whether the road

170
00:15:24.280 --> 00:15:27.280
exists or not. Whether the road exists or not, but you see that that is a real

171
00:15:27.280 --> 00:15:31.160
competition because let's say there's only the Jeff Road and you're screwing

172
00:15:31.160 --> 00:15:36.280
it up and you know you're not running it well. Well, the Walter Road might come

173
00:15:36.280 --> 00:15:39.880
into effect and if the Walter Road comes into effect then the present discounted

174
00:15:39.880 --> 00:15:57.880
The last thing you want is my road to start up parallel to yours, so you're going to do everything humanly possible to prevent this entry and under a free market, the only way you can prevent entry is by satisfying consumers, not getting a law passed saying I can't open my road.

175
00:15:57.880 --> 00:16:04.880
So, if there's one railroad going up and down California, that's competition if another railroad is allowed to get in there.

176
00:16:04.880 --> 00:16:14.880
Now, if the law is passed by the first railroad, paying off the Congress of California, saying, well, no other railroad can compete with us, then you don't have competition.

177
00:16:14.880 --> 00:16:22.880
So, Austrians don't look at numbers of competitors. We look at, is their rivalry possible, legal?

178
00:16:22.880 --> 00:16:29.520
And if it is, then it has very great salutory value toward the competitive process.

179
00:16:29.520 --> 00:16:34.080
Well, most people would look at a road as big concrete structure and say, well, you know,

180
00:16:34.080 --> 00:16:39.000
the barriers to entry are not just legal, but they're financial, they're economic.

181
00:16:39.000 --> 00:16:42.320
It's just too expensive to set up another road.

182
00:16:42.320 --> 00:16:45.920
I'm just thinking through this from the point of view of somebody who would object and say,

183
00:16:45.920 --> 00:16:50.760
look, somebody is considering the Walter Road and you put all these enormous capital outlays

184
00:16:50.760 --> 00:17:00.760
The way that I would compete with you is just simply by lowering my price and then you would never get off the ground at all.

185
00:17:00.760 --> 00:17:09.760
I mean, how do these practical issues affect the likelihood of really existing competition?

186
00:17:09.760 --> 00:17:13.760
Well, what you're really getting at, I think, is the holdout problem.

187
00:17:13.760 --> 00:17:18.760
The reason putting up another road is so expensive is not so much because of the concrete.

188
00:17:18.760 --> 00:17:23.240
The concrete. It's more because you get some guy in the middle of where you want to put

189
00:17:23.240 --> 00:17:27.680
your second road, who's going to say, ha-ha, you want to put a road right through my house?

190
00:17:27.680 --> 00:17:33.720
Well, that's going to cost you one trillion dollars. And therefore, it's virtually impossible.

191
00:17:33.720 --> 00:17:38.200
Again, the concrete costs a lot of money, but that's not the key. It's the holdout

192
00:17:38.200 --> 00:17:46.760
problem. And that's the argument showing that why it's unfeasible to privatize roads,

193
00:17:46.760 --> 00:18:16.760
I go into that, I think I have a whole chapter on that in the book. I forget where I put that, but there's a whole series of objections like that. Another objection is, well, you come out of your house and you want to get on the road, and the guy says, well, that'll be a million dollars each time you come out, and you've got to either get a helicopter or become a pole vaulter or something. So there's a whole series of objections to this that are in the book.

194
00:18:16.760 --> 00:18:24.760
This is really good that we're having this interview now because we'll be discussing it during the week when I talk about privatization.

195
00:18:24.760 --> 00:18:32.760
The answer to the holdout problem, and I just had a debate with your friend in mind, Richard Epstein, on this very question.

196
00:18:32.760 --> 00:18:38.760
That debate will come out in the NYU Law Journal or something. I forget the full title of it.

197
00:18:38.760 --> 00:18:45.760
There are two answers to that. First, if you want to build a road from Auburn to New Orleans,

198
00:18:45.760 --> 00:18:50.200
there are several routes you can take one is the as the crow flies right but

199
00:18:50.200 --> 00:18:54.800
then you can go a mile on either side and make sort of an arc and then you go

200
00:18:54.800 --> 00:18:57.800
two miles on either side you go three miles on either side it would be still

201
00:18:57.800 --> 00:19:03.640
feasible to have a road from Auburn to New Orleans where you and I live you

202
00:19:03.640 --> 00:19:07.620
could have any number of arcs maybe even 20 miles this way or 20 miles that way

203
00:19:07.620 --> 00:19:12.640
so you can have a lot and then what you do is instead of trying to buy property

204
00:19:12.640 --> 00:19:17.200
What you do is you buy options to buy property. So you go to a farmer and you say,

205
00:19:17.200 --> 00:19:22.640
OK, Farmer Jones, I'd like to buy your land and I'm offering $50,000, but I'm not sure that I want to buy it.

206
00:19:22.640 --> 00:19:29.640
But I want to buy the right to buy it within a year and I'll give you $100 just for the right to buy it if I choose to exercise it.

207
00:19:29.640 --> 00:19:39.640
And then I try to buy options all around these roots. And if you get ahold of that, well, then you just don't exercise those options which can be bought at a relatively cheap price.

208
00:19:39.640 --> 00:19:49.640
That's one way. The super-duper argument is, well suppose for some reason there's a chasm, or there are mountains, or God knows what, there's only one way to go.

209
00:19:49.640 --> 00:19:57.640
And that's from A to B in the direct line. And now Farmer Jones says, you know, screw you, or a million, zillion dollars for my land.

210
00:19:57.640 --> 00:20:06.640
Well, my son and I co-authored an article on this, which is now a chapter in the book, and we start talking, well how about tunneling under or bridging over?

211
00:20:06.640 --> 00:20:12.760
Remember, would this violate property rights? Well, it would violate property rights if

212
00:20:12.760 --> 00:20:18.200
you adopt the ad colon doctrine. What's the ad colon doctrine? The ad colon doctrine is

213
00:20:18.200 --> 00:20:23.240
that if you own 20 acres of land, then you own a decreasing cone to the center of the

214
00:20:23.240 --> 00:20:30.520
earth and an increasing cone up into the heavens. But that is nonsense on stilts. That's not

215
00:20:30.520 --> 00:20:36.440
at all the Rothbardian, Hoppean, Lockean view of private property, which is based on

216
00:20:36.440 --> 00:20:52.440
and Homesteading. Now this farmer didn't do diddly-squat to land say 500 feet below his farm. So if I dig a tunnel under his land, 500 feet deep, and I don't disturb his property in any way, he has no right to say you can't do it.

217
00:20:52.440 --> 00:20:59.440
Well, what if the farmer likes to live there because he likes to look at the beautiful stars, and the next thing you know there's a highway.

218
00:20:59.440 --> 00:21:05.440
We're getting heavily... That's a very good objection. We're getting into...

219
00:21:05.440 --> 00:21:08.440
Is there no other way? I mean...

220
00:21:08.440 --> 00:21:15.440
Well, one way is the tunnel, one way is the bridge. And then you come into the question, well, can you own a view?

221
00:21:15.440 --> 00:21:16.440
Yeah.

222
00:21:16.440 --> 00:21:21.440
Suppose you own a property over here and there's a big mountain, beautiful mountain that you look at.

223
00:21:21.440 --> 00:21:27.440
And now I buy the house or I own the land between you and the mountain and I build a skyscraper.

224
00:21:27.440 --> 00:21:28.440
Right.

225
00:21:28.440 --> 00:21:33.160
and you can't see the mountain as clearly or you can't see the mountain at all. Do you own the view?

226
00:21:33.160 --> 00:21:38.280
And according to my understanding of libertarian property rights theory you cannot own views.

227
00:21:38.280 --> 00:21:43.320
Because if I own views I don't like the way you part your hair. It disturbs my aesthetic sensibility

228
00:21:43.320 --> 00:21:47.640
and if I own the view of you then I have a right to tell you how to part your hair, which is

229
00:21:47.640 --> 00:21:53.640
crazy because then we have conflicting views. The hair is on your head, you know, so if I own the

230
00:21:53.640 --> 00:21:57.000
view and you own the hair on your head we have a conflict in rights. You've got to buy the mountain,

231
00:21:57.000 --> 00:22:10.000
Well, you can't have a conflict. The whole libertarian theory is that there can never be conflicts in rights. If there are seeming conflicts in rights, you have to dig deeper. And the digging deeper here shows that you can't own views.

232
00:22:10.000 --> 00:22:14.000
Well, let's say that I demonstrated to you that you can own a view.

233
00:22:14.000 --> 00:22:22.760
Ah, well, then I'm in trouble. At least as far as the bridge is current, but a more different

234
00:22:22.760 --> 00:22:29.200
argument is the farmer doesn't own the view, but he owns the rain, and he owns the sunlight

235
00:22:29.200 --> 00:22:33.680
because it hits his crops and all. And here's where this article of my son and I came in.

236
00:22:33.680 --> 00:22:40.040
What we concocted was this drawbridge in case the road wants to have a building transported,

237
00:22:40.040 --> 00:22:45.880
You have to have a drawbridge and the drawbridge has to be mesh so that the rain can come through

238
00:22:45.880 --> 00:22:49.880
and it has to be clear plastic so that the sun can come through.

239
00:22:49.880 --> 00:22:54.480
So in that way, Farmer Jones can still grow his crops, which he has a right to because

240
00:22:54.480 --> 00:22:58.480
he's homesteaded the rights to grow crops and to grow crops you need sun and rain and

241
00:22:58.480 --> 00:23:01.560
this bridge will not interfere with it.

242
00:23:01.560 --> 00:23:07.120
So you're really getting into very fine detail here.

243
00:23:07.120 --> 00:23:13.920
It's silly how much these roads discussions turn on these kind of details, especially

244
00:23:13.920 --> 00:23:20.440
when you consider that most of the time the market finds workarounds to these problems.

245
00:23:20.440 --> 00:23:23.080
Don't businesses want roads to come by them?

246
00:23:23.080 --> 00:23:25.440
This is the overlooked fact.

247
00:23:25.440 --> 00:23:29.320
That's the point of why they wouldn't charge you a million dollars to get out on the road.

248
00:23:29.320 --> 00:23:32.480
What they want to do is encourage you to build there and if they're going to do this sort

249
00:23:32.480 --> 00:23:36.080
of nonsense then you're not going to build there.

250
00:23:36.080 --> 00:23:38.880
I don't know what the politics were behind the interstate highway system, but I gather

251
00:23:38.880 --> 00:23:41.240
there was a lot of rent-seeking going on, whatever.

252
00:23:41.240 --> 00:23:46.040
But I think how much cheaper the whole thing would have been been for a private...

253
00:23:46.040 --> 00:23:47.040
Absolutely.

254
00:23:47.040 --> 00:23:50.680
The latest thing is this bridge to nowhere in Alaska.

255
00:23:50.680 --> 00:23:55.840
There are always roads in places where the congressman or the senator is on the roads

256
00:23:55.840 --> 00:23:59.720
commission, crisscross roads in the middle of West Virginia or something.

257
00:23:59.720 --> 00:24:05.480
I don't know which state it is, but right now we have roads built for political purposes.

258
00:24:05.480 --> 00:24:08.480
In a market system, you'd have them built for economic purposes.

259
00:24:08.480 --> 00:24:10.480
Did you see the movie Cars?

260
00:24:10.480 --> 00:24:12.480
Cars? No, I can't say I did.

261
00:24:12.480 --> 00:24:15.480
There's all this victimology about some town that was overlooked by the highway system.

262
00:24:15.480 --> 00:24:20.480
They were going like gangbusters when Route 66 went through them and they were having a happy life and everything.

263
00:24:20.480 --> 00:24:23.480
And then the interstate highway system redirected traffic and they were crying.

264
00:24:23.480 --> 00:24:31.480
But of course, if this had been a private system, then the business owners of that town would have had every incentive to make sure that the road comes through there.

265
00:24:31.480 --> 00:24:37.320
And the owner would have had to assess the relative benefits of the higher revenue that

266
00:24:37.320 --> 00:24:42.600
would be gained by saving commuters 10 minutes by not going through that town, versus the

267
00:24:42.600 --> 00:24:52.040
revenue obtained by in effect redirecting the road through their town as a way of providing

268
00:24:52.040 --> 00:24:53.520
profits for the road system.

269
00:24:53.520 --> 00:24:54.520
Right.

270
00:24:54.520 --> 00:24:56.440
Whenever a thing is done through the market, it's mutually beneficial.

271
00:24:56.440 --> 00:24:58.960
It's a positive sum game.

272
00:24:58.960 --> 00:25:03.400
is when it's done through the government and they have eminent domain. Then you take someone's

273
00:25:03.400 --> 00:25:08.200
land at the price that you think is justified. Well, that's a horse of a very different color.

274
00:25:08.200 --> 00:25:13.040
You've probably heard every argument imaginable against private roads over the course of the

275
00:25:13.040 --> 00:25:18.760
200 years you've been writing about this subject. But I remember one telling a guy about it,

276
00:25:18.760 --> 00:25:22.920
look, we need to privatize the roads, and he blew up and he said, look, libertarians

277
00:25:22.920 --> 00:25:27.040
are essentially un-American. You know what it means to be an American? It means that

278
00:25:27.040 --> 00:25:32.240
I have the right to get in my car and drive on a road and drive and drive across the country

279
00:25:32.240 --> 00:25:35.840
as far as I want to go and go where I want to go and that's only made possible through

280
00:25:35.840 --> 00:25:36.840
public roads.

281
00:25:36.840 --> 00:25:41.240
Well I still think you'd have that right, I mean, or that ability rather.

282
00:25:41.240 --> 00:25:43.320
Most private road owners would welcome customers.

283
00:25:43.320 --> 00:25:47.480
I mean you have a right to go to any grocery in any state and they're happy to have your

284
00:25:47.480 --> 00:25:48.480
money.

285
00:25:48.480 --> 00:25:52.080
You can go to a McDonald's in any city and they're happy to have your money.

286
00:25:52.080 --> 00:25:53.720
Why wouldn't it work the same way with roads?

287
00:25:53.720 --> 00:25:54.720
They would welcome you.

288
00:25:54.720 --> 00:25:55.720
You'd have to pay for it.

289
00:25:55.720 --> 00:25:59.560
You have to pay for your burger. You have to pay for your toothpaste. Why shouldn't

290
00:25:59.560 --> 00:26:00.560
you pay for your road?

291
00:26:00.560 --> 00:26:04.480
It's not un-American to suggest you have to pay for toothpaste, right?

292
00:26:04.480 --> 00:26:08.920
That's right. It's commie to say that you don't have to pay for toothpaste. What we

293
00:26:08.920 --> 00:26:14.200
really have is the socialization of our roads. That's why they're death traps. That's why

294
00:26:14.200 --> 00:26:15.840
they have these congestion problems.

295
00:26:15.840 --> 00:26:20.360
This is a real problem too that affects so many growing communities because they have

296
00:26:20.360 --> 00:26:25.200
roads and other public infrastructure that's very expensive to put up. And then you get

297
00:26:25.200 --> 00:26:30.520
into all the debates of should we have limits on growth and, you know. Oh, yes. What, what

298
00:26:30.520 --> 00:26:36.040
are, what do you, have you ever thought about this, the feasibility of one town somewhere,

299
00:26:36.040 --> 00:26:43.040
just privatizing, make it Auburn, just privatize its main street and all the roads. Why wasn't,

300
00:26:43.040 --> 00:26:46.640
if, if, why doesn't that happen if this is such a good idea? Well, you know, it sort

301
00:26:46.640 --> 00:26:52.780
of does happen, only the government comes out against it. Like, you take a big shopping

302
00:26:52.780 --> 00:26:54.780
The Leoflitz Mall is a shopping mall, a gigantic shopping mall.

303
00:26:54.780 --> 00:26:58.780
It's got roads, and it's got parking lots, and it's got all sorts of things.

304
00:26:58.780 --> 00:27:06.780
In a sense it's totally private, except if I want a leaflet there, the owner of the mall has no right to stop me.

305
00:27:06.780 --> 00:27:11.780
Because somehow the government has declared this a public road, even though it's a private road.

306
00:27:11.780 --> 00:27:13.780
I mean, I can't leaflet in your living room.

307
00:27:13.780 --> 00:27:18.780
If I come into your living room and I start giving leaflets to your kids, you tell me to get the hell out of there.

308
00:27:18.780 --> 00:27:21.780
But if I come into your mall with leaflets, I can do that.

309
00:27:21.780 --> 00:27:36.780
So they've got all sorts of rules, you have to have handicapped, you have parking zones, you have to do this. So even on purely private areas, like the Mises Institute has a little parking lot in the front of the building and in the back of the building.

310
00:27:36.780 --> 00:27:44.780
I notice you have two or three spots for handicapped people. You'd think it's private property, you could do whatever you damn well please, but you can't.

311
00:27:44.780 --> 00:28:14.780
It's like they've nationalized a certain fraction. It's very strange, and when we had to draw those things, of course we're all in favor of disabled people coming here, and we want them to be able to park, and the very idea that anybody here would be interested in keeping them in, but it's very strange when you've got the state coming in and you've got to paint this official sign on this place, and if I see you parking there, and you're walking around looking totally normal, you're going to be in big trouble. Isn't that odd?

312
00:28:14.780 --> 00:28:27.780
The evidence of this is that private companies with parking lots are now starting new spots, totally unrelated to the government, where it says, pregnant moms, and the government hasn't done anything.

313
00:28:27.780 --> 00:28:35.780
In other words, this supports your point of view that had the government not required this, you would have done it anyway because you want handicapped people to come here.

314
00:28:35.780 --> 00:28:44.780
Yeah, and you know, those pregnant moms' signs are charming. They have a little stork on them. They're painted in blue. They're lovely. And you're so glad not to take that place.

315
00:28:44.780 --> 00:28:54.780
Of course. But in five years, the government is going to compel it. I mean, either it's prohibited or it's compelled. There's no middle ground where people have a chance to do whatever they want.

316
00:28:54.780 --> 00:29:00.780
Isn't that the very definition of a total state that if it's not prohibited, it's required?

317
00:29:00.780 --> 00:29:04.780
Right. That's it. Either it's required or prohibited. There's no middle ground for freedom.

318
00:29:04.780 --> 00:29:12.780
You wouldn't think you've been writing on this subject for so long because you're so animated and excited about it, which is one of the reasons you make such a wonderful, you're such a wonderful teacher.

319
00:29:12.780 --> 00:29:15.780
How many of the students here are from your school?

320
00:29:15.780 --> 00:29:23.780
Well, you know, in past years I've had as many as 17 or 18 and usually the kids from Washington University beat us out by a kid or two.

321
00:29:23.780 --> 00:29:28.780
But this year, I don't know, we're having a lot of trouble with Katrina and all.

322
00:29:28.780 --> 00:29:32.780
I've only got three kids, but all three were in the summer fellowship program.

323
00:29:32.780 --> 00:29:41.780
And, but we've been beat out by, what's that school, Harry Fry's school? Walsh. Walsh has got nine or ten students.

324
00:29:41.780 --> 00:29:48.780
And I think my hat in this regard is mainly off to the Washington University students because there, there are no faculty members supporting it.

325
00:29:48.780 --> 00:29:56.780
The kids do it all on their own. Whereas when I come, I come with five or six professors to an Austrian Scholars Conference and fifteen or twenty students.

326
00:29:56.780 --> 00:29:58.780
Those kids do it all by themselves.

327
00:29:58.780 --> 00:30:05.780
Okay, so this is a good time for you to just go ahead and tell everybody your secret. What

328
00:30:05.780 --> 00:30:10.780
is the key that you've learned over the years to enticing students to Austro-libertarianism?

329
00:30:10.780 --> 00:30:13.780
What's the secret? How come you're so successful at it?

330
00:30:13.780 --> 00:30:18.780
I really don't know. I think luck is a big part of it. I mean, there are other professors

331
00:30:18.780 --> 00:30:25.780
who are more gifted than I, who have not had as many students come through the Mises doors.

332
00:30:25.780 --> 00:30:29.540
of the Wars. I was very lucky last year at the Austrian Scholars Conference. I had a

333
00:30:29.540 --> 00:30:35.100
whole panel of ex-students of mine who now have PhDs on our professors of economics,

334
00:30:35.100 --> 00:30:37.060
which just blows me away.

335
00:30:37.060 --> 00:30:39.220
You spend a lot of time with students, though, don't you?

336
00:30:39.220 --> 00:30:40.220
Oh, yeah.

337
00:30:40.220 --> 00:30:42.620
You hold long office hours, don't you?

338
00:30:42.620 --> 00:30:48.980
Well, they come by and I take them to lunch and I have seminars. They inspire me.

339
00:30:48.980 --> 00:30:52.020
They do. So when a student comes in, you're sitting there, you're working, you're writing

340
00:30:52.020 --> 00:31:08.020
I'm delighted to. I enjoy it. Right now, we're talking and I'm enthusiastic. I guess I'm naturally enthusiastic and maybe the enthusiasm is catching or something like that. That might be it.

341
00:31:08.020 --> 00:31:12.020
You don't ever feel like, gosh, here I am another semester. It's like starting all over again.

342
00:31:12.020 --> 00:31:21.020
Well, I've been in many different schools because I didn't get tenure in many different places and there were some schools where I got no students whatsoever.

343
00:31:21.020 --> 00:31:29.580
I had one or two students come here but none of them really were that interested, whereas

344
00:31:29.580 --> 00:31:33.340
when I was at Holy Cross I got a lot there and now at Loyola even more because now I

345
00:31:33.340 --> 00:31:36.100
have colleagues who are Austro-Libaterians.

346
00:31:36.100 --> 00:31:41.140
I was having a little contest with Jeff Herbiner to see who had a higher percentage of their

347
00:31:41.140 --> 00:31:47.020
economics department that was Austro-Libaterian and we came out with a tie, 100 percent.

348
00:31:47.020 --> 00:31:50.860
Only we beat them because we have five, they only have two.

349
00:31:50.860 --> 00:31:55.820
I think our two schools have the highest percentage of Austro-Libertarians. Now maybe George Mason's

350
00:31:55.820 --> 00:32:02.500
got more absolute numbers, but certainly not in relative numbers. So when everybody is

351
00:32:02.500 --> 00:32:08.340
on point and I get a student and then he goes to your class and then you send him back to

352
00:32:08.340 --> 00:32:15.900
me and the third guy, I've got four other colleagues at Loyola that are Austro-Libertarians.

353
00:32:15.900 --> 00:32:20.300
Reading Human Action, Private Property Rights Theory

354
00:32:20.300 --> 00:32:23.900
So the students are very encouraged by this.

355
00:32:23.900 --> 00:32:28.940
Let me mention one student in particular, Vedran Vuk, who is, I don't know, he must

356
00:32:28.940 --> 00:32:34.980
be up to about 10 or 11 articles now in lewrockwell.com, and he just started writing a couple of weeks

357
00:32:34.980 --> 00:32:40.180
ago or a month or two ago, he sort of churns out an article a week or two a week or something

358
00:32:40.180 --> 00:32:41.180
like that.

359
00:32:41.180 --> 00:32:42.180
He's like a machine.

360
00:32:42.180 --> 00:32:47.180
I'm inspired by kids like that, and the other kids are very productive too.

361
00:32:47.180 --> 00:32:54.180
Nick Snow and Chuck Long are here also, and they've written for the Mises thing.

362
00:32:54.180 --> 00:32:57.180
Yeah, and you also co-author articles for students, which is great.

363
00:32:57.180 --> 00:33:07.180
Yes, yes. I get term papers, and I make them write term papers because I think that if you just fill out a multiple choice, you don't really know it that well, and if you do an essay, it's better.

364
00:33:07.180 --> 00:33:15.180
But if you write a seven-page essay on something, it shows a deeper understanding of it, and some of those essays are gems.

365
00:33:15.180 --> 00:33:35.180
And what I do is I just can't keep my mitts off of them, and I start adding to them, and editing, and writing another paragraph or two, and all of a sudden it's twice as long, and it's a publishable thing, and I've had a lot of luck getting student essays published in referee journals, which is a magnificent thing, if I say so myself.

366
00:33:35.180 --> 00:33:42.180
There's so many other things we wanted to talk about, but you have a couple more books, right?

367
00:33:42.180 --> 00:33:43.180
You have a discrimination book coming out?

368
00:33:43.180 --> 00:33:50.180
Yes, I have a book on discrimination, one on labor, economics, another book with you.

369
00:33:50.180 --> 00:33:56.180
Well, I don't know if I enticed you to be a co-author, a co-editor with me on that, but that's the one on...

370
00:33:56.180 --> 00:33:58.180
Oh, no, no, I'm not going to be a co-editor.

371
00:33:58.180 --> 00:34:01.180
Well, I've offered it. You've been very helpful to me on that.

372
00:34:01.180 --> 00:34:05.180
Yeah, that's an exciting project. There's something like a hundred biographies.

373
00:34:05.180 --> 00:34:06.180
Yeah, autobiographies.

374
00:34:06.180 --> 00:34:11.180
Autobiographies of currently living liberal libertarian thinkers.

375
00:34:11.180 --> 00:34:17.180
Right. My idea is that people like Murray can do an autobiography, Murray Rothbard,

376
00:34:17.180 --> 00:34:25.180
but not all of us are that high up in prestige and accomplishment that we can write an autobiography

377
00:34:25.180 --> 00:34:30.180
or expect other people to write a biography about us. And yet our lives are interesting.

378
00:34:30.180 --> 00:34:37.180
and I think could inspire younger people to take up the banner of freedom and liberty.

379
00:34:37.180 --> 00:34:43.180
So instead of writing an autobiography of 300 pages, you write an autobiography of four or five pages

380
00:34:43.180 --> 00:34:46.180
and we get 100 or 150 people like that and we have a book.

381
00:34:46.180 --> 00:34:48.180
Some of the big names that have contributed?

382
00:34:48.180 --> 00:34:53.180
Well, Ron Paul, he's a big name.

383
00:34:53.180 --> 00:34:58.180
I'd hate to mention names because I'll forget other names and there are about 100 people.

384
00:34:58.180 --> 00:35:04.180
New Rockwell has contributed, and Jeff, if you don't contribute, I'm going to smack you.

385
00:35:04.180 --> 00:35:10.180
Other threats on air? I perhaps shouldn't do that. Your lawyer will now visit me.

386
00:35:10.180 --> 00:35:13.180
I keep changing the story, that's the problem.

387
00:35:13.180 --> 00:35:20.180
Oh, listen, I wanted to tell you. I'm not sure if you know this, but there's a publishing company.

388
00:35:20.180 --> 00:35:24.180
Where is it now? Is it in Poland?

389
00:35:24.180 --> 00:35:25.180
Well, anyway.

390
00:35:25.180 --> 00:35:27.180
Romania.

391
00:35:27.180 --> 00:35:28.660
Romania is doing a book also.

392
00:35:28.660 --> 00:35:29.660
Right, okay.

393
00:35:29.660 --> 00:35:32.900
So a Romanian publisher contacted us and said, we want to publish this book.

394
00:35:32.900 --> 00:35:35.900
And of course, I'm looking at this thinking, great, we don't have to do the typesetting.

395
00:35:35.900 --> 00:35:36.900
You do the editing.

396
00:35:36.900 --> 00:35:37.900
You do the typesetting.

397
00:35:37.900 --> 00:35:38.900
You do the index.

398
00:35:38.900 --> 00:35:39.900
You print it and publish it.

399
00:35:39.900 --> 00:35:41.460
And how can we do to help?

400
00:35:41.460 --> 00:35:44.020
So we bought lots of advanced copies, lots.

401
00:35:44.020 --> 00:35:45.780
Bless you, bless you.

402
00:35:45.780 --> 00:35:47.140
And I forget even the name of it.

403
00:35:47.140 --> 00:35:48.140
You don't remember doing it?

404
00:35:48.140 --> 00:35:49.140
I don't remember that.

405
00:35:49.140 --> 00:35:51.380
I think Building Blocks for Liberty or something like that.

406
00:35:51.380 --> 00:35:52.380
Yeah, something like that.

407
00:35:52.380 --> 00:35:53.380
It's a wonderful collection.

408
00:35:53.380 --> 00:35:59.380
I did not want to be in the position of choosing essays from Walter Block to put into 350 pages.

409
00:35:59.380 --> 00:36:03.380
What are the essays that you need to read by Walter? That's an impossible job.

410
00:36:03.380 --> 00:36:07.380
Well, these guys took on this impossible job and came up with a very nice collection.

411
00:36:07.380 --> 00:36:10.380
Very nice collection. I'm very excited about it.

412
00:36:10.380 --> 00:36:15.380
So the great thing is that I think it's maybe a couple of months away.

413
00:36:15.380 --> 00:36:19.380
And they're going to ship all the books here. We're paying for the freight and everything.

414
00:36:19.380 --> 00:36:22.380
So we're going to offer it for sale.

415
00:36:22.380 --> 00:36:31.380
This is great. This is another book. And the price is going to be right. It's going to be a nice paperback. A good price. I forget now what it is. It's going to be very low.

416
00:36:31.380 --> 00:36:41.380
So this is exciting. So we'll have something else to offer people besides the existing collection. And this is going to be a nice introduction to your thought.

417
00:36:41.380 --> 00:36:43.380
Well, you're very kind to say that. Thank you.

418
00:36:43.380 --> 00:36:45.380
So we can create more block-ins in the world.

419
00:36:45.380 --> 00:36:47.380
Block-headians.

420
00:36:47.380 --> 00:36:51.380
You're tireless. You're an inspiration to all of us, Walter. Thank you so much.

421
00:36:51.380 --> 00:36:53.380
You're very kind to have me, thanks.
