WEBVTT

NOTE As the Bubble Bursts

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:14.000
Mark Thornton from the Ludwig von Mises Institute. I think it's pretty much neck and neck. Was it you or Robert Blumen that called the housing bubble first? He beat you by a nose, right?

2
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:28.000
I think so. There were actually four or five Austrians very early on. Frank Shostak, Chris Meyer, Robert Blumen, myself. We were all talking about and writing about the housing bubble.

3
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:42.000
And everybody else thought we were crazy. Everybody else was talking about how you couldn't lose money in real estate, how housing prices never go down, and, you know, of course, people were flipping houses and all that stuff. And you know, Scott, some of that's coming back.

4
00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:51.000
I know. Well, I saw on TV the other day, they said in Las Vegas, in Phoenix, and one other city.

5
00:00:51.000 --> 00:00:53.000
Orlando.

6
00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:58.000
That wasn't the one I saw, but anyway, and on TV is CNBC, they were talking about it and saying,

7
00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:01.000
well look, the economy is recovering, it's great.

8
00:01:03.000 --> 00:01:15.000
Not exactly, Scott. What we have is a very tight housing market because so many houses are locked up in a legal process of foreclosure and bankruptcy,

9
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:19.000
so they're not really on the market, the banks haven't put them on the market yet.

10
00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:23.640
and of course we also have rock-bottom interest rates in the economy and one of

11
00:01:23.640 --> 00:01:25.640
the things that's going on

12
00:01:25.640 --> 00:01:28.720
is that large corporations and hedge funds

13
00:01:28.720 --> 00:01:31.920
are borrowing a lot of this money from

14
00:01:31.920 --> 00:01:35.320
the Federal Reserve through the banking system and they're going around and

15
00:01:35.320 --> 00:01:36.480
buying up

16
00:01:36.480 --> 00:01:38.720
you know hundreds and thousands of

17
00:01:38.720 --> 00:01:42.600
of houses and apartment complexes

18
00:01:42.600 --> 00:01:45.640
because it represents a

19
00:01:45.640 --> 00:01:48.640
cash flow

20
00:01:48.640 --> 00:01:54.520
issue, so that these companies can generate some cash flow, which is so much needed nowadays

21
00:01:54.520 --> 00:02:00.700
because again of the low interest rates, the result of central banking, Federal Reserve

22
00:02:00.700 --> 00:02:05.520
policy, where nobody can make any money on their retirement accounts.

23
00:02:05.520 --> 00:02:10.520
And so, you know, as a consequence, the housing bubble has been reignited.

24
00:02:10.520 --> 00:02:15.440
Yeah, well, so it's a good time to get into housing.

25
00:02:15.440 --> 00:02:22.280
I knew a guy who owned a skate park construction business and all through the Greenspan years,

26
00:02:22.280 --> 00:02:28.300
this is really the greatest legacy, unintended, wonderful consequence to me of the Greenspan

27
00:02:28.300 --> 00:02:32.640
years to a lot of people, giant concrete skate parks all across the country, especially in

28
00:02:32.640 --> 00:02:38.440
the West from all the excess property tax revenue coming in during the housing bubble.

29
00:02:38.440 --> 00:02:43.600
I knew a guy who he was owning a skate park construction business, totally hip to Ludwig

30
00:02:43.600 --> 00:02:46.840
by Ludwig von Mises, and told me the story about how he would just read the Wall Street

31
00:02:46.840 --> 00:02:50.540
Journal every morning, and as soon as he saw that they raised the federal funds rate a

32
00:02:50.540 --> 00:02:54.040
quarter of a point, he knew his Rothbard, he said, oh, they're going to try to let the

33
00:02:54.040 --> 00:02:58.800
air out slowly, but that never works, it's going to pop. He sold his business, sold all

34
00:02:58.800 --> 00:03:02.280
his heavy equipment and everything, took his giant profits and went home and watched the

35
00:03:02.280 --> 00:03:03.280
whole thing crash.

36
00:03:03.280 --> 00:03:09.040
Oh, I know it. You know, there's some smart cookies out there. I got a call in 2006 from

37
00:03:09.040 --> 00:03:15.240
from a home construction guy and he wanted to come over and meet me at the Mises Institute.

38
00:03:15.240 --> 00:03:21.160
He was from around the area and he told me that he had sold off all of his homes, sold

39
00:03:21.160 --> 00:03:26.060
his company at a great price and all of his equipment and he was taking all that money

40
00:03:26.060 --> 00:03:31.360
and he invested it in gold and he was heading to Florida and he was going to build him and

41
00:03:31.360 --> 00:03:38.440
his family this big complex of houses and so forth and a farm.

42
00:03:38.440 --> 00:03:41.240
And I thought to myself, jeez, can I go with you?

43
00:03:41.240 --> 00:03:42.240
Right.

44
00:03:42.240 --> 00:03:46.480
Because this guy was really in tune with where markets were going.

45
00:03:46.480 --> 00:03:54.640
He had read my article and he was a regular reader of Mises.org, M-I-S-E-S dot O-R-G,

46
00:03:54.640 --> 00:03:59.720
in our daily articles and audio and videos and all that kind of stuff.

47
00:03:59.720 --> 00:04:05.440
So he was well read in Austrian economics and he made a lot of money in housing, he

48
00:04:05.440 --> 00:04:35.440
Well now, here's the thing, you know me as an economist, I'm a great anti-war guy, I don't know nothing about all this stuff, Human Action and this and that, that's you guys' expertise, but here's the thing, I've been good on the housing bubble since the year 2000, and that's just because I listened to Ron Paul. And Ron Paul, and I don't even remember which speech it was, how I knew this or whatever, but I remember telling my friends in the year 2000, and I was right, but too far ahead of my time.

49
00:04:35.440 --> 00:04:47.440
I told them, no, it's a housing bubble. Don't buy a house now. You wait till the prices crash, but before they raise the interest rates and get a cheap house and lock in a low rate, you know?

50
00:04:47.440 --> 00:04:52.440
But if you buy a house now, then eventually it's going to owe more on it than it's worth and whatever.

51
00:04:52.440 --> 00:04:58.440
But of course, they had years and years and years before it fell and I don't know whether they broke even or not.

52
00:04:58.440 --> 00:04:59.440
or not.

53
00:04:59.440 --> 00:05:02.660
But anyway, I knew that it was a big fake housing market just like a big fake dot com

54
00:05:02.660 --> 00:05:06.880
market because I was paying attention to Dr. Paul's speeches on the house floor.

55
00:05:06.880 --> 00:05:09.440
Yeah, everybody should pay attention to Dr. Ron Paul.

56
00:05:09.440 --> 00:05:12.980
He's an Austrian economist though, of course, as well as a medical doctor.

57
00:05:12.980 --> 00:05:14.980
But you're absolutely right.

58
00:05:14.980 --> 00:05:21.280
2000 was the only recessionary year, as far as I can see back through history, where the

59
00:05:21.280 --> 00:05:27.760
housing sector did not take a hit, where there was no decline in the number of housing starts.

60
00:05:27.760 --> 00:05:31.480
The number of housing starts just continued on.

61
00:05:31.480 --> 00:05:36.720
And so that was the first signal, really, that we were in some kind of bubble trouble.

62
00:05:36.720 --> 00:05:41.760
And of course, it continued to build over the next six years.

63
00:05:41.760 --> 00:05:46.640
And so you might have been able to get in and get out, but you're taking your chances.

64
00:05:46.640 --> 00:05:53.520
Basically, if you're really not going to be a homeowner, then there's no need to take

65
00:05:53.520 --> 00:06:23.520
Well, but they are, I mean, hey, when I tell my story, I'm, I may be way over simplifying it, but is it not as easy as just read the Wall Street Journal and make sure that they're not raising the funds, right? That when they raise the funds, right, that's when they're officially, they've changed their mind, and they're going to stop shoveling new money into this or that market, right? They're going to try to raise the funds, right?

66
00:06:23.520 --> 00:06:26.560
Why to let the air out slowly, which never works?

67
00:06:26.560 --> 00:06:32.440
Well, it's a good indicator, but it's not a guaranteed indicator because, for example,

68
00:06:32.440 --> 00:06:38.760
if the Fed raised its interest rate, the federal funds rate, from a quarter of a percent to

69
00:06:38.760 --> 00:06:46.320
a half a percent, well, that wouldn't really do much to interest rates because...

70
00:06:46.320 --> 00:06:51.040
It would just be an indicator though, or wouldn't it be an indicator of they're going that way,

71
00:06:51.040 --> 00:06:52.680
or maybe you shouldn't assume that?

72
00:06:52.680 --> 00:06:58.600
Right, they're probably going that way and Scott, right now long-term interest rates

73
00:06:58.600 --> 00:07:04.440
on government bonds and on corporate bonds and a lot of other financial securities, those

74
00:07:04.440 --> 00:07:09.440
long-term interest rates are rising right now and they're rising at a fairly fast clip.

75
00:07:09.440 --> 00:07:15.840
So that's something that all your listeners need to be attuned to, is that rise in long-term

76
00:07:15.840 --> 00:07:33.480
In other words, you're saying the Fed is not raising the interest rates, the private bankers

77
00:07:33.480 --> 00:07:36.560
are raising the rates because otherwise they're losing money on inflation.

78
00:07:36.560 --> 00:07:38.680
They're doing it on their end.

79
00:07:38.680 --> 00:07:39.680
That's right.

80
00:07:39.680 --> 00:07:45.160
And of course, it's also foreign central banks, they're big holders of U.S. government debt.

81
00:07:45.160 --> 00:07:50.720
And if they decide, hey, we don't want as many U.S. government long-term bonds, which

82
00:07:50.720 --> 00:07:58.400
they don't, and we're more interested in adding to our gold holdings, which they are, then

83
00:07:58.400 --> 00:08:04.720
that's a big indicator that people are losing confidence in the U.S. dollar, the U.S. government

84
00:08:04.720 --> 00:08:10.980
bonds and the U.S. government, and it's runaway spending and borrowing and printing that we're

85
00:08:10.980 --> 00:08:11.980
going through.

86
00:08:41.980 --> 00:08:48.060
small correction in the stock market to an all-out route. If all that margin money has

87
00:08:48.060 --> 00:08:55.980
to be brought in and stocks have to be redeemed to meet those margin calls, it could be a

88
00:08:55.980 --> 00:08:59.900
runaway stock market to the downward side.

89
00:08:59.900 --> 00:09:08.100
Man, well, yeah, I guess as artificially high as it is, that's how low it's got to really

90
00:09:08.100 --> 00:09:09.100
go, right?

91
00:09:09.100 --> 00:09:20.100
Well, there's no bottom in this market. I mean, you look at the Japanese market and how it's been, it's gone from like less than 9,000 to, you know, over 16,000 in less than a year.

92
00:09:20.100 --> 00:09:37.100
I mean, that's just not right. That's just totally artificial. They're using paper money inflation to try to rig their markets and try to generate so much optimism and so much of a wealth effect that the real economy gets started.

93
00:09:37.100 --> 00:09:43.800
you know they believe in this Keynesian stimulus approach to the economy and to

94
00:09:43.800 --> 00:09:47.580
stock markets and so forth and the Austrians have shown that that just

95
00:09:47.580 --> 00:09:51.920
doesn't work and the only thing that does work is when government reduces

96
00:09:51.920 --> 00:09:56.480
spending it reduces the amount of resources taken out of the economy it

97
00:09:56.480 --> 00:10:01.440
balances its budget it gets on a sound monetary foundations with market

98
00:10:01.440 --> 00:10:06.520
determined interest rates and starts cutting regulation of the economy and

99
00:10:06.520 --> 00:10:12.520
and cutting interventions into the economy. That's what really jump-starts an economy.

100
00:10:12.520 --> 00:10:18.120
And, you know, that's true in the Austrian theory, but it's also true in fact. It's true

101
00:10:18.120 --> 00:10:24.200
in history. I mean, it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure this all out, and they're

102
00:10:24.200 --> 00:10:29.540
just going in the wrong direction. We've got all this, you know, tax changes and Obamacare

103
00:10:29.540 --> 00:10:36.340
changes and environmental changes, labor market changes, financial market regulation with

104
00:10:36.340 --> 00:10:42.040
Dodd-Frank, they're just ladling more and more of this stuff on top of the burden that

105
00:10:42.040 --> 00:10:44.220
already existed on our economy.

106
00:10:44.220 --> 00:10:52.460
So until they wake up, until they realize that they're doing the wrong thing, our economy

107
00:10:52.460 --> 00:10:58.980
is going to stay in a very stagnant and a very risky environment, basically.

108
00:10:58.980 --> 00:10:59.980
All right.

109
00:10:59.980 --> 00:11:04.340
Now, real quick, and I know you have to go soon, but you've got this latest piece at

110
00:11:04.340 --> 00:11:09.500
mises.org mark is called the rise and fall of the dollar and you're reviewing this book

111
00:11:09.500 --> 00:11:17.660
by a man named Ike Green, exorbitant privilege and the point I wanted to focus on here was

112
00:11:17.660 --> 00:11:23.980
I think you were seemingly agreeing with his sentiment that you won't really probably have

113
00:11:23.980 --> 00:11:30.980
a total crack-up boom and destruction of the dollar so much as people are going to retreat,

114
00:11:30.980 --> 00:11:35.540
The dollars are going to retreat into other currencies enough that they just sort of balance

115
00:11:35.540 --> 00:11:41.700
out where the dollar will still be a reserve currency, but it won't be the reserve currency.

116
00:11:41.700 --> 00:11:48.300
And at that point, I think the way you paraphrase him putting it, sanity will have to prevail.

117
00:11:48.300 --> 00:11:53.940
The central bank in America would have to actually act in a completely insane fashion

118
00:11:53.940 --> 00:11:59.180
to really destroy the dollar outright, which he doesn't believe is in the cards.

119
00:11:59.180 --> 00:12:02.180
And you seem to think that maybe he was right about that. Am I right about that?

120
00:12:02.180 --> 00:12:09.180
Well, you know, central banks around the world have been using the US dollar as their reserve currency.

121
00:12:09.180 --> 00:12:14.180
And so we've been able to print up money, send it abroad in exchange for their goods.

122
00:12:14.180 --> 00:12:19.180
So we've been living beyond our means for half of a century here in the United States,

123
00:12:19.180 --> 00:12:22.180
or at least 40 years since we went off the gold standard.

124
00:12:22.180 --> 00:12:31.700
and you know now people are less and less inclined to think of the dollar as the most stable currency

125
00:12:31.700 --> 00:12:39.940
to back up their central bank and their own money and so money has been moving to the euro,

126
00:12:39.940 --> 00:12:47.540
to the Chinese renminbi, the Indian rupee, the Japanese yen, the Swiss franc and at a slow pace

127
00:12:47.540 --> 00:12:56.420
It's also been moving into gold, and so we're certainly destined to lose our monopoly status

128
00:12:56.420 --> 00:13:03.900
as a world reserve currency, but Eikenberg, Eiken Green says that he doesn't see a route

129
00:13:03.900 --> 00:13:10.820
of the dollar unless the US continues to have outrageous economic policies, but all I see

130
00:13:10.820 --> 00:13:17.420
is that we're continuing with these outrageous monetary and economic policies with our debt,

131
00:13:17.420 --> 00:13:24.420
and Monetizing the Debt

132
00:13:47.420 --> 00:13:54.900
in 2014, 2015 or 2016 when credit rating agencies re-evaluates the credit worthiness

133
00:13:54.900 --> 00:14:02.080
of the U.S. government and he says if we get our ratings cut, then that's going to cause

134
00:14:02.080 --> 00:14:08.540
a significant slippage in the dollar and rising prices throughout the economy.

135
00:14:08.540 --> 00:14:12.680
So it's something we all need to be concerned with and something that Washington doesn't

136
00:14:12.680 --> 00:14:17.400
Washington seemed to be all that concerned with. They're more interested in scandals

137
00:14:17.400 --> 00:14:23.200
and inter-party fighting and who's going to be the next presidential candidate, what's

138
00:14:23.200 --> 00:14:29.480
going on in North Korea, all of these things when the most important thing in our economy

139
00:14:29.480 --> 00:14:36.480
and any economy is the having stable money. That's the key economic ingredient and that's

140
00:14:36.480 --> 00:14:40.440
what we all have to hope that Washington realizes.

141
00:14:40.440 --> 00:14:44.520
And then also I just wanted to point at this one thing because I think it's really important

142
00:14:44.520 --> 00:14:49.280
especially for a liberal leaning audience which I sort of kind of have due to all the

143
00:14:49.280 --> 00:14:55.080
anti-war stuff you know and it's this piece by Thomas D Lorenzo at Mises.org today that

144
00:14:55.080 --> 00:14:56.640
you tweeted.

145
00:14:56.640 --> 00:15:01.600
By the way follow Mark Thornton on Twitter at Dr. Mark Thornton.

146
00:15:01.600 --> 00:15:06.040
It's called the Freedmanite Corruption of Capitalism and I think it's really important that people

147
00:15:06.040 --> 00:15:16.040
And you'll see that real libertarians are 100%, 100 million percent opposed to crony capitalism, to conservatism.

148
00:15:16.040 --> 00:15:19.040
That is not what real capitalism is about.

149
00:15:19.040 --> 00:15:28.040
And if you read Di Lorenzo, who I think you would identify him as kind of a right-leaning guy in a personal sort of a cultural sort of a way,

150
00:15:28.040 --> 00:15:32.040
boy, you can see the contempt that he has for conservative economics,

151
00:15:32.040 --> 00:15:36.480
which is just welfare for rich people at the expense of everyone else basically, he really

152
00:15:36.480 --> 00:15:42.240
cuts right to the core of it here, attacking Milton Friedman and Chicago School.

153
00:15:42.240 --> 00:15:48.000
Right on the money Scott, he's been attacking these phony free marketers for years and I

154
00:15:48.000 --> 00:15:56.040
think your audience would be well served to go to mises.org and take a look at that article

155
00:15:56.040 --> 00:16:01.920
and how he skewers Milton Friedman as being responsible for creating a vast network of

156
00:16:01.920 --> 00:16:04.200
croty capitalism here in the United States.

157
00:16:04.200 --> 00:16:05.200
Yep.

158
00:16:05.200 --> 00:16:06.200
All right.

159
00:16:06.200 --> 00:16:07.200
With that, I know you've got to go.

160
00:16:07.200 --> 00:16:08.200
Thank you so much for your time, Mark.

161
00:16:08.200 --> 00:16:09.200
I really appreciate it.

162
00:16:09.200 --> 00:16:10.200
Thank you, Scott.

163
00:16:10.200 --> 00:16:11.200
Thanks again for doing the show.

164
00:16:11.200 --> 00:16:12.200
All right, everybody.

165
00:16:12.200 --> 00:16:15.800
That is Mark Thornton from the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

166
00:16:15.800 --> 00:16:17.400
He's the master of the business cycle.