WEBVTT

NOTE Current Market Conditions: 6 Oct. 2008

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:16.600
Robert Higgs, author of Crisis and Leviathan, many other books, a great scholar of what

2
00:00:16.600 --> 00:00:23.400
government does in times of calamity and also the editor of the Independent Review and we

3
00:00:23.400 --> 00:00:26.560
are living in interesting times as they say.

4
00:00:26.560 --> 00:00:32.520
I suppose for many people this is a shock. For you, having studied this your whole life,

5
00:00:32.520 --> 00:00:33.520
how does it make you feel?

6
00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:42.320
Well, both good and bad, Jeff. I think a lot of extremely unfortunate things are being

7
00:00:42.320 --> 00:00:48.440
done by the government right now, so I feel bad about that. But at the same time, there's

8
00:00:48.440 --> 00:00:56.440
a kind of exhilaration for the scholar who studied the history of such episodes to be

9
00:00:56.440 --> 00:01:03.320
to be living in the midst of one and to see so many of the common patterns showing up

10
00:01:03.320 --> 00:01:07.840
again this time.

11
00:01:07.840 --> 00:01:15.640
What's the most closest historical parallel I suppose you would point us to the New Deal?

12
00:01:15.640 --> 00:01:23.400
Well in some ways there are parallels to the New Deal, certainly one important aspect of

13
00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:33.000
The Great Depression was a financial collapse. Of course, the banking catastrophe of the

14
00:01:33.000 --> 00:01:42.440
early 1930s was many, many times worse than what's happening right now. Between 1930

15
00:01:42.440 --> 00:01:54.060
In 1934, inclusive, more than 10,000 commercial banks failed, so we're certainly not witnessing

16
00:01:54.060 --> 00:01:59.120
anything like that right now, but there have been some bank failures, including some large

17
00:01:59.120 --> 00:02:10.800
bank failures, and especially in the housing sector, we see some parallels because many,

18
00:02:10.800 --> 00:02:18.000
Too many people found themselves in the early 1930s unable to make their mortgage payments

19
00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:25.240
or in some cases unable to pay the taxes on their property and as a result lenders foreclosed

20
00:02:25.240 --> 00:02:30.320
on them, they lost their homes or tax authorities.

21
00:02:30.320 --> 00:02:39.040
And so we're seeing certainly a rerun of some of those housing sector difficulties

22
00:02:39.040 --> 00:02:40.040
Right Now.

23
00:02:40.040 --> 00:02:48.160
Although, again, I would emphasize that what has occurred thus far is not nearly as extreme

24
00:02:48.160 --> 00:02:54.120
as what happened in the early thirties, and of course nowadays people are much, much richer

25
00:02:54.120 --> 00:03:03.040
than they were at that time, and so losing a home or losing employment does not leave

26
00:03:03.040 --> 00:03:08.600
people in the same situation that they were left in the early 1930s.

27
00:03:08.600 --> 00:03:18.760
But there are these parallels and now as then the government purported to come in and rescue

28
00:03:18.760 --> 00:03:25.320
people from these unfortunate circumstances by a variety of measures.

29
00:03:25.320 --> 00:03:35.320
A number of states put moratoria on foreclosures of mortgages, as I recall about 30 states

30
00:03:35.320 --> 00:03:38.240
that did that.

31
00:03:38.240 --> 00:04:07.240
The federal government, after Roosevelt's election especially, created a number of programs to adjust mortgages, to refinance mortgages, to steer public money to lenders to help people pay or to have taxpayers pay in their stead so that they could retain possession of their homes.

32
00:04:08.240 --> 00:04:38.240
So some of what we see in this bailout has parallels in the early 30s and also of course even before Roosevelt's election we had measures especially including the Reconstruction Finance Corporation which was created in 1932 to bail out big failing firms including banks and insurance companies so there are all sorts of parallels between now and the early 1930s

33
00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:44.240
with regard to what's going on in housing and banking and what the government is doing about it.

34
00:04:45.760 --> 00:04:50.720
What you're describing is, well let me ask it this way, are you surprised at what sounds like a

35
00:04:52.160 --> 00:04:59.280
disproportionate response by Washington relative to the crisis as it's developed so far?

36
00:05:00.080 --> 00:05:06.480
I am a little surprised, Jeff, because as I've been writing in the recent weeks,

37
00:05:06.480 --> 00:05:13.280
It seems to me that this so-called crisis is in large part bogus, which is to say not

38
00:05:13.280 --> 00:05:16.760
that nobody is in a bind.

39
00:05:16.760 --> 00:05:26.400
Certainly some of these big lending institutions, Fannie and Freddie for certain, and some of

40
00:05:26.400 --> 00:05:34.880
the big banks are in a lot of trouble, that is to say they're actually bankrupt.

41
00:05:34.880 --> 00:05:41.120
I think what has happened is that because these people have a lot of political clout, they've,

42
00:05:41.120 --> 00:05:51.040
as it were, joined forces to represent their difficulties as systemic or as portending

43
00:05:51.040 --> 00:05:57.800
some generalized economic collapse in order to frighten people and frighten members of

44
00:05:57.800 --> 00:06:27.800
and then to propose or to have proposed on their behalf rescue measures like this bailout law passed on Friday that the government claims will prevent or ameliorate recession or even worse developments but which in effect simply amounts to

45
00:06:27.800 --> 00:06:38.680
to taking money from taxpayers and using it to give to lending institutions that hold more

46
00:06:38.680 --> 00:06:40.760
or less worthless assets.

47
00:06:40.760 --> 00:06:50.160
So it's rewarding the very people who acted most imprudently in the past five or six years

48
00:06:50.160 --> 00:07:01.160
of the Real Estate Run-Up and the Credit Bubble and penalizing the massive people, including

49
00:07:01.160 --> 00:07:06.460
all those people who were prudent, who did not get themselves into situations they couldn't

50
00:07:06.460 --> 00:07:15.760
deal with, and it is the worst imaginable kind of incentive situation and if you wanted

51
00:07:15.760 --> 00:07:25.520
to create a program to maximally encourage moral hazard, you couldn't beat this current

52
00:07:25.520 --> 00:07:26.520
bailout program.

53
00:07:26.520 --> 00:07:37.000
It's tailor-made to reward the unwise and the imprudent, people who entered into undertakings

54
00:07:37.000 --> 00:07:45.600
that they, in many cases, didn't even understand in mortgage-backed securities and derivatives

55
00:07:45.600 --> 00:07:52.280
and what have you, and to reward them for their foolishness by penalizing taxpayers.

56
00:07:52.280 --> 00:08:00.680
And, of course, the fact that taxes may not be increased, but the government simply borrow

57
00:08:00.680 --> 00:08:10.760
The money to pay for these goals to lending institutions doesn't mean taxpayers aren't

58
00:08:10.760 --> 00:08:12.720
being put on the hook, of course.

59
00:08:12.720 --> 00:08:18.960
They're going to have to be responsible for servicing this increased debt and ultimately

60
00:08:18.960 --> 00:08:22.400
for paying it off in one way or another.

61
00:08:22.400 --> 00:08:29.920
I noticed, by the way, just this morning reading that between now and the end of December,

62
00:08:29.920 --> 00:08:36.400
People are saying the Treasury is going to have to, in that period, that's just three

63
00:08:36.400 --> 00:08:37.400
months.

64
00:08:37.400 --> 00:08:47.920
The Treasury is going to have to sell an additional $500 billion worth of debt.

65
00:08:47.920 --> 00:08:52.400
That's just extraordinary amount of additional debt.

66
00:08:52.400 --> 00:09:00.120
And that's on top of all the debt they were having to sell already because of the large

67
00:09:00.120 --> 00:09:01.920
government deficit.

68
00:09:01.920 --> 00:09:10.320
So amazing things are being done right now and every episode is a little different from

69
00:09:10.320 --> 00:09:16.200
every other one, but there are many parallels, particularly in the way that the government

70
00:09:16.200 --> 00:09:24.200
is exploiting frightened people and actually cultivating that fright in order to justify

71
00:09:24.200 --> 00:09:32.640
extreme measures which purport to be aimed at helping everybody but which on the face

72
00:09:32.640 --> 00:09:41.160
of them amount mainly to robbery, to taking from taxpayers and giving to privileged recipients.

73
00:09:41.160 --> 00:09:46.460
It does seem like the bailout and all the hysterical rhetoric coming from Washington

74
00:09:46.460 --> 00:09:56.080
and Wall Street has actually panicked people to the point that they're taking the inherently

75
00:09:56.080 --> 00:10:01.440
unstable system of banking and the highly leveraged corporate sector and actually exacerbating

76
00:10:01.440 --> 00:10:02.440
all the problems.

77
00:10:02.440 --> 00:10:04.440
Doesn't it seem that way to you?

78
00:10:04.440 --> 00:10:08.820
Can you say that the bailout in a way is actually getting worse even in the short run?

79
00:10:08.820 --> 00:10:14.420
I think that's true, Jeff, and you look at things like the sort of runs on these money

80
00:10:14.420 --> 00:10:20.740
market funds, that looks to me like evidence for what you're saying, that the measures

81
00:10:20.740 --> 00:10:27.240
the government is taking are spooking people and making them think the sky is falling.

82
00:10:27.240 --> 00:10:33.340
What I've been saying for months is that when you step back from the financial sector and

83
00:10:33.340 --> 00:10:38.060
perhaps also from the housing sector and look at the rest of the economy, the sky is not

84
00:10:38.060 --> 00:10:47.060
It doesn't mean all is well out there, but this is a big productive economy that's clicking along pretty well.

85
00:10:47.060 --> 00:11:01.060
It doesn't mean it can't be dragged down, but the idea that somehow we stand on the brink of a collapse akin to the early 1930s is, in my mind, a preposterous idea.

86
00:11:01.060 --> 00:11:07.060
But is it possible that this kind of behavior and these sort of assumptions will actually cause the sky to fall after all?

87
00:11:07.060 --> 00:11:15.060
It can move us in that direction. It just depends on what the government continues to do in reaction.

88
00:11:15.060 --> 00:11:24.060
What happened in the 1930s that turned that situation into a Great Depression was that rather than doing nothing,

89
00:11:24.060 --> 00:11:33.060
rather than actually acting as a laissez-faire government, which later people accused it of being,

90
00:11:33.060 --> 00:11:41.180
I mean, the government under Hoover did all sorts of things that in almost every instance

91
00:11:41.180 --> 00:11:45.180
made the situation worse than it otherwise would have been.

92
00:11:45.180 --> 00:11:50.540
And then when you put all of those things together, their aggregate effect and their

93
00:11:50.540 --> 00:11:58.180
cumulative effect was to turn a recession that probably would have been over in a year

94
00:11:58.180 --> 00:12:04.380
into this enormous economic collapse that was not only generalized in our economy

95
00:12:04.380 --> 00:12:08.180
but dragged practically the whole world down with it.

96
00:12:08.180 --> 00:12:16.180
Well, it seems like all the stuff is going on fast forward if you read the headlines from Europe over the weekend.

97
00:12:16.180 --> 00:12:20.180
Yeah, the Europeans seem to be following along with a lag.

98
00:12:20.180 --> 00:12:27.180
I don't pretend to be expert on conditions in Europe, but from what I've read it looks to me as if

99
00:12:27.180 --> 00:12:35.340
They've made a lot of the same mistakes, but not to the same extent that these mistakes

100
00:12:35.340 --> 00:12:38.500
have been made in the United States.

101
00:12:38.500 --> 00:12:46.540
Right now, of course, the Fed is conspiring constantly with the European Central Bank and

102
00:12:46.540 --> 00:12:58.460
with other central banks in the world to try to throw new money at this problem, as if

103
00:12:58.460 --> 00:13:06.460
you can take problems of specific localized insolvency, which is what we have here, and

104
00:13:06.460 --> 00:13:15.180
solve those problems by creating a lot of liquidity, and I think it's an idiotic approach

105
00:13:15.180 --> 00:13:22.940
to these problems. The fact that you've got millions of people who've taken out mortgages

106
00:13:22.940 --> 00:13:30.100
and can't make the payments, it really isn't going to be changed significantly by flooding

107
00:13:30.100 --> 00:13:36.500
the world with money. You've got a lot of bad securities. You've got all these derivatives

108
00:13:36.500 --> 00:13:46.880
that were in effect represented on the basis of theoretical arguments to be sort of secure

109
00:13:46.880 --> 00:13:52.540
within limits that turn out to be even unpricable, unsaleable.

110
00:13:52.540 --> 00:13:56.260
Nobody knows what to offer for these things.

111
00:13:56.260 --> 00:14:02.380
And so that's created a certain amount of uncertainty in turmoil in financial markets,

112
00:14:02.380 --> 00:14:05.300
at least in part of those markets.

113
00:14:05.300 --> 00:14:10.940
But that problem won't be resolved by flooding the world with new money.

114
00:14:10.940 --> 00:14:17.100
That problem will only be resolved by letting markets find ways of pricing those securities.

115
00:14:17.100 --> 00:14:22.100
If it turns out the market price is zero, well, that's the market price and we're

116
00:14:22.100 --> 00:14:23.740
going to have to adjust to that.

117
00:14:23.740 --> 00:14:30.260
But if it's not zero, if they actually have values, the only way we know to converge on

118
00:14:30.260 --> 00:14:35.180
those values is through the operation of free markets.

119
00:14:35.180 --> 00:14:44.580
Right now we've got this situation where the Treasury is going to hire a bunch of financial

120
00:14:44.580 --> 00:14:52.980
management contractors, and you can just imagine who these guys are going to be, you know,

121
00:14:52.980 --> 00:14:56.260
relative to Hank Paulson.

122
00:14:56.260 --> 00:15:02.260
They're going to hire these guys and they're going to set them loose to go out and, as it

123
00:15:02.260 --> 00:15:07.860
for creating their own algorithms for how much they pay for what and this to me looks like

124
00:15:07.860 --> 00:15:14.940
a recipe for just creating a massive amount of noise in the financial markets, this is

125
00:15:14.940 --> 00:15:22.540
not a true market process and of course when you're dealing in funds that have been extorted

126
00:15:22.540 --> 00:15:27.700
from taxpayers in the first place, you can never have a true market process.

127
00:15:27.700 --> 00:15:38.820
So I think the upshot of this bailout procedure is potentially very, very, very harmful because

128
00:15:38.820 --> 00:15:44.740
it's an attempt to centrally plan the pricing of financial instruments and we know that

129
00:15:44.740 --> 00:15:45.740
can't be done.

130
00:15:45.740 --> 00:15:46.740
Isn't it remarkable?

131
00:15:46.740 --> 00:15:50.380
Through my whole life I've heard these campaigns for cheap housing.

132
00:15:50.380 --> 00:15:52.540
This has been a top part of Washington.

133
00:15:52.540 --> 00:15:56.540
We need to make sure the houses are available to the poor and to the lower middle class.

134
00:15:56.540 --> 00:16:03.940
Here we have a chance to actually make that reality happen through all of these foreclosures

135
00:16:03.940 --> 00:16:09.940
and what are they doing? They're blowing it. Now we can't have cheap houses.

136
00:16:09.940 --> 00:16:16.940
Well, as you know, Jeff, we live in a world where letting any asset price fall is viewed

137
00:16:16.940 --> 00:16:25.180
as catastrophic. No matter how high it's run up in a bubble or a boom, somehow the

138
00:16:25.180 --> 00:16:30.220
The idea that it starts coming down portends generalized disaster.

139
00:16:30.220 --> 00:16:39.460
And I think this is just a cock and bull story that the owners of these assets circulate.

140
00:16:39.460 --> 00:16:42.740
But it's remarkable how well it works.

141
00:16:42.740 --> 00:16:50.780
In fact, I mean, the past month has just astonished me at how the press in particular has fallen

142
00:16:50.780 --> 00:17:00.700
And for every anecdote some Wall Street trader has been willing to spout and there's been

143
00:17:00.700 --> 00:17:09.060
really no effort at all to look at broader measures or more substantial data and they've

144
00:17:09.060 --> 00:17:18.900
just repeated these sky is falling stories they've got from Wall Street and then the

145
00:17:18.900 --> 00:17:26.820
The media repeat what the media say and it's very incestuous, you've probably noticed

146
00:17:26.820 --> 00:17:37.700
how often different sources of news have identical verbiage, so they're obviously cannibalizing

147
00:17:37.700 --> 00:17:44.300
one another, but very often if you go back to the source of these stories they have extremely

148
00:17:44.300 --> 00:17:45.300
flimsy foundations.

149
00:17:45.300 --> 00:17:51.060
I was reading this morning in the New York Times about the collapse in consumer spending

150
00:17:51.060 --> 00:18:00.060
that are being reported by specific sectors, among which the airline industry, which made

151
00:18:00.060 --> 00:18:07.380
me wonder how long the airlines are going to be able to last under a situation in which

152
00:18:07.380 --> 00:18:10.580
consumers are unwilling to spend money on flights.

153
00:18:10.580 --> 00:18:15.780
We can see there are already very precarious positions as a result of all the regulation

154
00:18:15.780 --> 00:18:18.460
that's gone on since 9-11.

155
00:18:18.460 --> 00:18:23.860
There are also historically chronic feeders at the public trough.

156
00:18:23.860 --> 00:18:33.380
You may remember they went and got an infusion of $5 billion in grants and $10 billion in

157
00:18:33.380 --> 00:18:38.780
loan guarantees right after 9-11.

158
00:18:38.780 --> 00:18:46.140
We can certainly expect the airlines, whenever they get in serious trouble, to be appealing

159
00:18:46.140 --> 00:18:50.980
for taxpayer money in some fashion.

160
00:18:50.980 --> 00:18:56.580
And I wouldn't be surprised, because their fortunes are highly cyclical, so that during

161
00:18:56.580 --> 00:19:04.780
the boom, airlines tend to do pretty well, and then during every recession, a bunch of

162
00:19:04.780 --> 00:19:07.780
them go bankrupt.

163
00:19:07.780 --> 00:19:15.380
You've written several books that try to link economic calamity with bad foreign policy and war.

164
00:19:15.380 --> 00:19:19.060
Do you see a linkage here?

165
00:19:19.060 --> 00:19:26.900
Well, in some ways I do.

166
00:19:26.900 --> 00:19:38.820
One of the most basic aspects of the artificial boom of the past seven, eight years is very

167
00:19:38.820 --> 00:19:44.820
easy credit, particularly between 2001 and 2005.

168
00:19:44.820 --> 00:19:52.260
And of course, those are the years when the Bush administration launched its wars in Afghanistan

169
00:19:52.260 --> 00:20:01.440
and Iraq, which turned out to be much more expensive than expected, certainly much more

170
00:20:01.440 --> 00:20:10.740
expensive than anyone in the administration ever indicated they expected.

171
00:20:10.740 --> 00:20:18.300
Maybe they're just very good at keeping their expectations to themselves, but it does look

172
00:20:18.300 --> 00:20:25.500
as if they, too, were shocked because the cakewalk didn't occur, of course, and when

173
00:20:25.500 --> 00:20:34.540
the wars got extended and they required more troops, more equipment, lost equipment, damaged

174
00:20:34.540 --> 00:20:41.500
equipment had to be replaced and so forth, these wars became extremely expensive.

175
00:20:41.500 --> 00:20:46.940
And so the government's deficit got very big.

176
00:20:46.940 --> 00:20:55.180
Now, it's generally the case that when the federal government is running a big deficit,

177
00:20:55.180 --> 00:21:03.260
the Fed is working hand-in-glove to ease credit conditions, to make the government's borrowing

178
00:21:03.260 --> 00:21:04.260
easier.

179
00:21:04.260 --> 00:21:13.100
And so, I think that was part of the reason why the Fed was so extraordinarily careless,

180
00:21:13.100 --> 00:21:19.260
Reckless between 2001 and 2005 or so.

181
00:21:19.260 --> 00:21:24.100
But that recklessness, of course, had effects other than making government borrowing easier.

182
00:21:24.100 --> 00:21:33.460
It had all these effects in promoting terrible investments and the purchase of subprime and

183
00:21:33.460 --> 00:21:41.140
and all-day mortgages and derivatives based on those, and a great deal of over-building

184
00:21:41.140 --> 00:21:48.460
in housing and even to some extent in commercial real estate and real estate development.

185
00:21:48.460 --> 00:21:57.020
All the things that Austrian economists expect to be the form that malinvestment takes when

186
00:21:57.020 --> 00:22:04.600
Interest rates are artificially shoved below market levels, so I think we can track some

187
00:22:04.600 --> 00:22:14.820
of this ease in Fed policy to the Fed's desire to facilitate the government's big deficits

188
00:22:14.820 --> 00:22:19.420
that arose from the expenses of those wars.

189
00:22:19.420 --> 00:22:23.380
So there's that connection, and there are many other connections, of course.

190
00:22:23.380 --> 00:22:30.740
The U.S. government and the Fed are part of an international establishment, if you want

191
00:22:30.740 --> 00:22:34.820
to call it that.

192
00:22:34.820 --> 00:22:42.740
What that means is that considerations having to do with foreign economies and foreign governments

193
00:22:42.740 --> 00:22:48.300
always enter to some extent into U.S. government policy making, and it certainly was the case

194
00:22:48.300 --> 00:22:52.820
in the past few years.

195
00:22:52.820 --> 00:22:59.460
The way the war, the way the depression finally came to a sort of culminating moment was in

196
00:22:59.460 --> 00:23:03.620
catastrophic World War II.

197
00:23:03.620 --> 00:23:09.700
Looking way down the line, if the U.S. government manages to make this crisis much worse through

198
00:23:09.700 --> 00:23:15.300
its interventions and it doesn't seem to be any other way out, can we expect to see

199
00:23:15.300 --> 00:23:20.540
more foreign policy belligerence from the state?

200
00:23:20.540 --> 00:23:24.700
I don't know, Jeff, they're going to have to work pretty hard to be more belligerent

201
00:23:24.700 --> 00:23:29.500
than they have been in recent years.

202
00:23:29.500 --> 00:23:42.620
They haven't attacked Iran yet, they still may, but if they should, and I personally

203
00:23:42.620 --> 00:23:57.020
If the U.S. or its proxy, Israel, attacks Iran, I think the consequences are going to

204
00:23:57.020 --> 00:24:06.660
be just horrendous worldwide, both economic and political.

205
00:24:06.660 --> 00:24:15.060
Certainly, if we think we cultivated a lot of new terrorists by occupying Iraq, I don't

206
00:24:15.060 --> 00:24:23.180
think we've seen anything compared with what will happen if there's an attack on Iran,

207
00:24:23.180 --> 00:24:26.580
especially if nuclear weapons are used.

208
00:24:26.580 --> 00:24:35.740
So I think the reaction will be great and terrible, and I don't know what would unravel

209
00:24:35.740 --> 00:25:05.740
from all of that. But right now, we're in a little different situation from the United States circa 1939 because one of the things that almost everybody thought was a silver cloud of hearing up for war at that time was that the U.S. had massive unemployment and right now the country does not have massive unemployment and if the government

210
00:25:05.740 --> 00:25:21.740
grows even more than it has in the military buildup under the Bush administration to fight some Iran-related massive war in various parts of the world.

211
00:25:21.740 --> 00:25:30.740
It's not going to have the same effect. It's going to have more of an effect of probably creating very, very high rates of inflation.

212
00:25:30.740 --> 00:25:40.580
and that of course will be the trigger for price and wage controls and with

213
00:25:40.580 --> 00:25:46.100
those have to come all kinds of other controls so we we may be looking at at

214
00:25:46.100 --> 00:25:53.420
something if if we get into a much wider war that leads to a kind of controlled

215
00:25:53.420 --> 00:25:59.060
economy something like we saw in the early 1970s. I never would have imagined

216
00:25:59.060 --> 00:26:04.740
and that five years ago, now it seems eminently plausible.

217
00:26:04.740 --> 00:26:16.940
Yeah, I think both parties have shown that they have no regard for free markets, economic

218
00:26:16.940 --> 00:26:24.580
liberty at all, and almost none, except for a few people in the Democratic Party for personal

219
00:26:24.580 --> 00:26:25.580
liberty.

220
00:26:25.580 --> 00:26:44.060
So the idea of a full-fledged kind of fascism being fastened on this country, I don't think is cookie stuff anymore, I think it's within the realm of imagination, without imagining a whole lot of things that don't have a basis.

221
00:26:44.060 --> 00:26:48.220
Cheered by left, cheered by right, cheered by the business class, everybody.

222
00:26:48.220 --> 00:26:55.180
Yeah, everybody wins except the masses who get screwed by everything this government does.

223
00:26:55.180 --> 00:26:58.180
I must tell you, I spent the weekend reading Crisis of Leviathan.

224
00:26:58.180 --> 00:27:01.180
That's old news.

225
00:27:01.180 --> 00:27:07.180
I've read it several times before, but somehow it all took on a special vibrancy that it hadn't had before.

226
00:27:07.180 --> 00:27:15.180
Every paragraph was magnificent and oddly provides something like, I don't know, I don't want to describe it as hope,

227
00:27:15.180 --> 00:27:22.180
but there was some solace associated with knowing that we've been down this road before and more or less come out of it.

228
00:27:22.180 --> 00:27:29.620
Well, one of the things about knowing some history is that one knows that terrible times

229
00:27:29.620 --> 00:27:37.100
have occurred before, very, very terrible times have occurred before, and mankind survived.

230
00:27:37.100 --> 00:27:42.860
So, you know, we can hope that things don't get as terrible as they were at their darkest

231
00:27:42.860 --> 00:27:48.180
moments in the past, but if they should, we may still survive.

232
00:27:48.180 --> 00:27:58.180
Well Dr. Higgs, all lovers of liberty are grateful to you for all of your great work in the past and also for this interview today. Thank you so much.

233
00:27:58.180 --> 00:27:59.180
Thank you, Jeff.
