WEBVTT

NOTE Current Market Conditions

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:30.000
This is Jeffrey Tucker, the Mises Institute. I'm sitting here with Mark Thornton, a resident economist, economist in residence, and he's going to take us through the Mises Institute's market page, which is on the site. And I invite you to join us. If you go to the cover of Mises.org and go about to the middle of the front page, you'll see quick links, a second link,

2
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:45.000
Markets and data label the stocks, commodities, money aggregates, and macroeconomic trends and I'm clicking on it now so that Professor Thornton can take us through this thing chart by chart. We begin with the stock market which is down 65 points today.

3
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:58.000
Yes, so we start with the Dow Jones Industrial Average just for the day and it shows in the color graph at the top that the Dow Jones was down 65 points today.

4
00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:28.000
The next graph below that is the Dow Jones Industrial Average over a six-month period. The Dow Jones is in blue, the 50-day moving average is in red, and it shows that the Dow over the last six months is down about 30 percent and it's getting close to its 50-day moving average, which that's just basically an indicator that if your market moves past the 50-day moving average that things may be changing, the trend may be changing.

5
00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:35.000
be changing. Why is that? Well, it's just a short period of time versus a long period

6
00:01:35.000 --> 00:01:40.320
of time, and it's something that technicians have looked at, and they look at the 50-day

7
00:01:40.320 --> 00:01:46.680
moving average that if you go decisively through it, that means there's a change in the short-term

8
00:01:46.680 --> 00:01:53.560
trend. If you go decisively through a 200-day moving average, that's an indicator that the

9
00:01:53.560 --> 00:02:07.560
You pay attention to these technical indicators because... Why? I mean, they obviously don't determine human action. It's because traders themselves pay attention to them, right?

10
00:02:07.560 --> 00:02:19.560
Well, traders themselves pay attention to them, but they give you an idea of where you are in relationship to where you were, which gives you some feedback in terms of your fundamental model,

11
00:02:19.560 --> 00:02:46.560
Theoretical model of what you think the world should look like. Technical apparatus that is used in the marketplace simply gives you some sort of picture of where you are in relationship to where you went, where you've been, so that you can put your own fundamental analysis and your theoretical analysis in perspective of time.

12
00:02:46.560 --> 00:03:11.560
I'm not a technical analyst, but I follow technical analysts and I know some of the basic tools, some of the major things that have been, are just good guides of thinking.

13
00:03:11.560 --> 00:03:23.560
The next market is the Nasdaq, again over six months, and this shows the Nasdaq now in about 40% over the last six months.

14
00:03:23.560 --> 00:03:27.560
That represents some serious value losses, doesn't it?

15
00:03:27.560 --> 00:03:36.500
40% of your money in six months is a serious loss and that doesn't even represent the loss

16
00:03:36.500 --> 00:03:37.500
from the top.

17
00:03:37.500 --> 00:03:42.560
We're not talking about the top, we're just talking about the last six months on these

18
00:03:42.560 --> 00:03:43.560
charts.

19
00:03:43.560 --> 00:03:49.880
Tell me something, you know, you get the sense that when you're at dinner parties, you're

20
00:03:49.880 --> 00:03:53.240
in private conversations with people that report their stock market losses to you.

21
00:03:53.240 --> 00:03:54.640
They're pervasive, aren't they?

22
00:03:54.640 --> 00:03:59.320
Throughout the whole of society, everybody's looking at their portfolios. Devastation.

23
00:03:59.320 --> 00:04:05.880
Right. During the late 1990s, at cocktail parties, everybody was trying to come up with

24
00:04:05.880 --> 00:04:11.360
the highest percentage gain possible. Like, I made 400% on this stock trade, or my portfolio

25
00:04:11.360 --> 00:04:17.400
is up 60%. And then there's this quagmire of time when people really didn't talk as

26
00:04:17.400 --> 00:04:22.280
much about their investments, and it may be up, it may be down, but nobody was really

27
00:04:22.280 --> 00:04:51.800
The dollar index represents the value of the dollar against a basket of foreign currencies.

28
00:04:51.800 --> 00:05:00.720
This actually shows that the value of the US dollar has been up 13% over the last 6 months.

29
00:05:00.720 --> 00:05:05.300
But at the end, you can see that the value of the dollar has fallen, and it's fallen

30
00:05:05.300 --> 00:05:07.480
through that 50-day moving average.

31
00:05:07.480 --> 00:05:13.800
Okay, so this chart, the dollar index, shows that the value of the dollar has actually

32
00:05:13.800 --> 00:05:18.120
increased by about 13% over the last 6 months.

33
00:05:18.120 --> 00:05:23.760
Notice how it's been riding up that 50-day moving average, and now it's broken decisively

34
00:05:23.760 --> 00:05:27.960
through that 50-day moving average, which is a good indicator that the trend in the

35
00:05:27.960 --> 00:05:33.580
dollar, that upward trend in the dollar, is now over, and that the new short-term trend

36
00:05:33.580 --> 00:05:38.920
in the value of the dollar is going to be lower over the next few weeks or months.

37
00:05:38.920 --> 00:05:47.920
And that means less purchasing power abroad, what's that going to mean for the U.S. trade

38
00:05:47.920 --> 00:05:49.520
for the U.S. economy generally.

39
00:06:17.920 --> 00:06:47.920
The impact on foreign trade only takes place over a longer period of time, and very much related to this, and you'll see there is an ordering here where you look at one market and it naturally follows into the other, and that's why a lot of members of the Mises Institute and people who are on Mises.org use this as a way to study the market after the close of the deadline,

40
00:07:17.920 --> 00:07:47.920
The commodity index shows over the last six months the index falling from 450 down to almost 200 or actually it's a 50% loss in the value of the commodities the price of commodities over the last six months so there's been a huge deflation of commodity prices over the last six months so there's been a huge deflation of commodity prices over the last six months

41
00:08:17.920 --> 00:08:25.920
Top. It's fallen down to as low as $1.25. So in the summer, euros were very expensive.

42
00:08:27.280 --> 00:08:35.760
In the fall, euros have decreased quite a bit, down the value of the euro versus the dollar,

43
00:08:35.760 --> 00:08:41.760
down over 20% from peak to trough. This is just more or less an inverse of the dollar chart above.

44
00:08:42.800 --> 00:08:47.280
Well, the dollar chart above is versus all currencies, and this is specifically on the

45
00:08:47.280 --> 00:08:54.680
and the Euro, which is one of the major ones in the basket, but there is a difference between

46
00:08:54.680 --> 00:09:00.560
the Euro-dollar exchange rate and the index, the dollar index, which is a reflection of

47
00:09:00.560 --> 00:09:02.160
all the world's major currencies.

48
00:09:02.160 --> 00:09:03.160
Right.

49
00:09:03.160 --> 00:09:07.040
Next we come to the astonishing oil price market.

50
00:09:07.040 --> 00:09:09.840
Yes, yes.

51
00:09:09.840 --> 00:09:13.960
Not many people follow this series over time.

52
00:09:43.960 --> 00:09:51.760
The barrel per oil price was actually below $50, and today it's back above $50.

53
00:09:51.760 --> 00:09:53.640
It's very volatile.

54
00:09:53.640 --> 00:09:55.400
Why do oil prices spike up?

55
00:09:55.400 --> 00:09:58.320
Well, it has a lot to do with the business cycle, and if you look at the chart you'll

56
00:09:58.320 --> 00:10:04.920
notice that oil prices per barrel spike up at the end of the boom phase in the economy

57
00:10:04.920 --> 00:10:07.840
right before we turn into a recession.

58
00:10:07.840 --> 00:10:12.640
As we've sort of stretched ourselves out so thin, as we've pumped all the money and credit

59
00:10:12.640 --> 00:10:17.240
where all the producers are trying to complete their projects and they're consuming raw materials

60
00:10:17.240 --> 00:10:23.440
and they're consuming vast amounts of energy, both building and using all these new facilities

61
00:10:23.440 --> 00:10:28.800
that have been created in the boom, the price of oil spikes up higher.

62
00:10:28.800 --> 00:10:32.480
But then three things go into effect.

63
00:10:32.480 --> 00:10:35.160
First of all, there's conservation at higher prices.

64
00:11:05.160 --> 00:11:11.160
The Shaded Areas on the graphs represent recessions.

65
00:11:11.160 --> 00:11:19.160
There's a lead-up, a peak in the price, and then the economy moves into recession.

66
00:11:19.160 --> 00:11:23.160
You heard some people talking about Dominic Comitano and some others.

67
00:11:23.160 --> 00:11:31.160
I think you were talking about an oil price bubble, and really what this represents is the tail end of the boom, a sort of frantic rush to finish projects.

68
00:11:31.160 --> 00:11:50.160
That's right. I think it's down put it the economy runs out of gas. It has been a marvelous thing to see and it's just a pure coincidence that the last time gas was this low was when the Democrats were in charge, right?

69
00:11:50.160 --> 00:11:57.680
and you know while everybody else was completely puzzled over this run-up in oil prices and

70
00:11:57.680 --> 00:12:01.680
then completely surprised that the price started crashing, you know the people who come to

71
00:12:01.680 --> 00:12:07.760
our financial markets page every day and have been looking at the same graph and saw that

72
00:12:07.760 --> 00:12:13.000
run-up in the price of oil were expecting the onset of the recession because it's just

73
00:12:13.000 --> 00:12:17.280
too obvious, especially if you look at it over and over again.

74
00:12:17.280 --> 00:12:34.280
The next page is our very own True Money Supply. This is a product that we're not borrowing

75
00:12:34.280 --> 00:12:38.800
from some other site, but that we actually construct ourselves. It's based on Murray

76
00:12:38.800 --> 00:12:46.680
Murray Rothbard's definition of money and then Joseph Salerno has helped us put this

77
00:12:46.680 --> 00:12:52.160
together and it's we collect data from the Fed where we're looking at cash, we're looking

78
00:12:52.160 --> 00:12:56.160
at checking accounts and we're looking at savings account money, any money that's available

79
00:12:56.160 --> 00:13:05.920
immediately upon demand is in the true money supply and it's been moving rather slowly

80
00:13:05.920 --> 00:13:12.120
or not at all most of this spring and summer but the last couple reports have shown significant

81
00:13:12.120 --> 00:13:19.560
increases in the true money supply as we'll see happens in most of the money supply measures.

82
00:13:19.560 --> 00:13:27.600
The next one is MZM or money of zero maturity. This chart takes a similar shape to the true

83
00:13:27.600 --> 00:13:33.440
money supply but at a different level. So Austrians in the past used MZM because it

84
00:13:33.440 --> 00:14:03.440
The True Money Supply is available on the True Money Supply website.

85
00:14:03.440 --> 00:14:06.880
the impact that money has on economic activity.

86
00:14:06.880 --> 00:14:11.440
An absence of that, an absence of the TMS too, like MZM.

87
00:14:11.440 --> 00:14:17.040
That's a general consensus about the Austrian economist, yes.

88
00:14:17.040 --> 00:14:20.640
Then there's M2 included in the

89
00:14:20.640 --> 00:14:24.160
in the site, which is sort of the mainstream view

90
00:14:24.160 --> 00:14:29.360
of the money supply, and below that we have the St. Louis adjusted monetary base.

91
00:14:29.360 --> 00:14:35.120
and the monetary base is kind of the raw material of monetary inflation.

92
00:14:35.120 --> 00:14:45.760
If you have a monetary base which is cash and money deposited in banks on reserve, that's

93
00:14:45.760 --> 00:14:51.880
sort of the raw material to use in terms of inflating the money supply and then causing

94
00:15:21.880 --> 00:15:27.480
and jump up in the monetary base. Basically, if you, what has occurred in the last three

95
00:15:27.480 --> 00:15:35.200
weeks took, the last three months, excuse me, took an accumulative three years prior to

96
00:15:35.200 --> 00:15:40.880
that to increase the monetary base by the same amount. So that's incredible. That's

97
00:15:40.880 --> 00:15:46.600
the wild card, you know, what's going to happen to that monetary base going forward. It could

98
00:15:46.600 --> 00:16:01.100
Next, we have the effective federal funds rate over the history from the 1950s to the present.

99
00:16:01.100 --> 00:16:09.760
You see there's a gradual buildup, an erratic pattern that peaks out in the early 1980s.

100
00:16:09.760 --> 00:16:15.760
Then we get the Monetary De-Control Act and the Monetary Freedom Act and the relaxation

101
00:16:15.760 --> 00:16:23.760
of the Old Rules, and there's been a gradual, although erratic, decrease in the effective

102
00:16:23.760 --> 00:16:29.080
funds rate over time, and you'll notice again that there's a peeking out of the federal

103
00:16:29.080 --> 00:16:35.040
funds rate that occurs right before a recession period.

104
00:16:35.040 --> 00:16:40.920
And before the recession is recognized and in the boom phase, basically what you have

105
00:16:40.920 --> 00:16:54.920
The first thing we have going on in the economy is that the demand for loanable funds is exceeding the supply of loanable funds and as a consequence the federal funds rate is being pushed up both by the market and by the Fed as well.

106
00:16:54.920 --> 00:17:02.720
and then there's the realization that the correction is going to take place and at

107
00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:12.920
this point the supply of money in this market is exceeding the demand for it

108
00:17:12.920 --> 00:17:17.280
there's not as much demand because people realize there's a correction

109
00:17:17.280 --> 00:17:23.440
going on and there's more supply and as a result the Federal Reserve and the

110
00:17:53.440 --> 00:18:06.440
Interest Rates and Sound Money. What would you expect, effective federal funds rate, if there would be such a thing, what would it do in a recessionary period?

111
00:18:06.440 --> 00:18:18.440
That's a good question. If there was no intervention, I would expect the federal funds rate to usually be low, except during times of uncertainty,

112
00:18:18.440 --> 00:18:23.520
for that rate to change on a day-to-day basis rather than on a you know on the

113
00:18:23.520 --> 00:18:30.160
Fed schedule so there would be a lot of differences we certainly wouldn't have

114
00:18:30.160 --> 00:18:37.120
any kind of the chart wouldn't look like this and of course this is also related

115
00:18:37.120 --> 00:18:43.940
to the business cycle so the volatility in the series is being generated in large

116
00:18:43.940 --> 00:19:03.940
Now this next one, the mortgage rates are a little bit of a puzzle. Why wouldn't we, given the housing crash and the bad loans and everything out there, why wouldn't we see 30-year mortgage rates soaring?

117
00:19:03.940 --> 00:19:08.820
Well, we're not seeing the rates change that much because the Fed is keeping their rates

118
00:19:08.820 --> 00:19:16.900
low. But this is a little bit misleading because lending standards have changed dramatically

119
00:19:16.900 --> 00:19:22.420
since the beginning of this correction. Prior to this, I mean, they were giving money to

120
00:19:22.420 --> 00:19:30.500
anybody they could get their hands on. You had no credit, you had no down payment. Now

121
00:19:30.500 --> 00:19:34.760
you need good credit, well we've just gone basically back to the old standards

122
00:19:34.760 --> 00:19:35.940
and uh...

123
00:19:35.940 --> 00:19:37.540
twenty percent down

124
00:19:37.540 --> 00:19:42.540
income history, residency history, all the rest

125
00:19:42.540 --> 00:19:45.620
so the interest rate itself does not necessarily

126
00:19:45.620 --> 00:19:48.560
reflect completely the availability

127
00:19:48.560 --> 00:19:49.740
of uh...

128
00:19:49.740 --> 00:19:52.900
of funds in this marketplace

129
00:19:52.900 --> 00:19:54.820
uh... can you trust the next uh...

130
00:19:54.820 --> 00:19:59.020
chart personal savings rate? I've heard a lot of people debunking this

131
00:19:59.020 --> 00:20:05.380
Well, there are things that you want to consider, but our personal savings rate has declined

132
00:20:05.380 --> 00:20:11.780
to zero. A couple of the things that people bring up is that money put into retirement

133
00:20:11.780 --> 00:20:18.780
accounts doesn't necessarily go into personal savings, as calculated by this, and also corporate

134
00:20:18.780 --> 00:20:25.780
savings, which is another form of savings, is also not including this. This is how much

135
00:20:25.780 --> 00:20:55.780
of Money, Money, Money, Money, Money, Money,

136
00:21:25.780 --> 00:21:54.780
and so we haven't needed to save more money. But the key to the correction is to get personal savings back up into the normal range for an extended period of time, the direction is actually going. We now show personal savings rate as positive over the last couple of reports. So that's a good sign and it's predictable too. The savings rates always spike up as you go into an economic correction.

137
00:21:54.780 --> 00:22:00.940
Well, actually, you see here that it seems to shoot up to 5% and then it crashes again.

138
00:22:00.940 --> 00:22:05.940
Do we see this as a reflection of sort of counter-cyclical policy that initially...

139
00:22:05.940 --> 00:22:12.060
Yeah, the 5% I think is the tax rebate period.

140
00:22:12.060 --> 00:22:13.700
Ah, okay.

141
00:22:13.700 --> 00:22:18.940
Which that actually kept us out of a recession because without that money, GDP would have

142
00:22:18.940 --> 00:22:20.900
been negative during that period.

143
00:22:50.900 --> 00:23:20.900
Macroeconomic Trends, Real Gross Private Domestic Investment,

144
00:23:20.900 --> 00:23:50.900
on our page. And that's why you'll probably never hear it mentioned on CNBC or you know business channels and business newspapers and so forth. But we think it's very important. One thing about this is that the reporting on this is delayed significantly. So we're looking at a chart that ends in 2007. It peaks in 2006 and then comes down a little bit in 2007 and we don't show what's happened so far in

145
00:24:20.900 --> 00:24:29.600
18% when we're in a boom economy. The next category is real private fixed

146
00:24:29.600 --> 00:24:35.140
investment and this is just business investment what we saw in the previous

147
00:24:35.140 --> 00:24:41.180
graph except that we don't include inventory business inventory in that

148
00:24:41.180 --> 00:24:46.460
market so that's a little redundant but if you want to look at the numbers

149
00:24:46.460 --> 00:24:55.460
And most carefully, changes in inventory are important indicators when we look at changes in the overall business cycle.

150
00:24:55.460 --> 00:24:57.460
Now we move on to prices.

151
00:24:57.460 --> 00:24:59.460
Yeah, the consumer price index.

152
00:24:59.460 --> 00:25:09.460
This is a little bit puzzling. Is the data dated here because it shows CPI for all urban consumers going up and yet there's all this deflationary pressure?

153
00:25:09.460 --> 00:25:11.460
Well, there's a lot of prices that are going up.

154
00:25:11.460 --> 00:25:22.020
Commodities are going down, but consumer goods are going up, and it's interesting, this chart

155
00:25:22.020 --> 00:25:25.660
takes us all the way back to the founding of the Fed, the blue line goes all the way

156
00:25:25.660 --> 00:25:30.360
back to the founding of the Fed, and when you look at the gold standard period under

157
00:25:30.360 --> 00:25:41.240
the Fed from 1913 to 1971, the line is fairly flat, fairly stable, there's a lot of dips

158
00:25:41.240 --> 00:25:54.000
In the early 1970s, we go off the gold standard completely, and then the line takes off in

159
00:25:54.000 --> 00:26:00.960
an upward inflationary spiral.

160
00:26:00.960 --> 00:26:07.560
You can notice either within the graph or you can actually go to the data itself, and

161
00:26:07.560 --> 00:26:13.080
with respect to consumer prices, since we went off the gold standard, we have higher

162
00:26:13.080 --> 00:26:20.000
prices during the recessions, so you get price inflation during recessions.

163
00:26:20.000 --> 00:26:26.120
Prior to when we were still on the gold standard and you went into a recession, consumers got

164
00:26:26.120 --> 00:26:31.600
lower prices, so there was price deflation for consumers during recessions which helped

165
00:26:31.600 --> 00:26:32.600
them out.

166
00:26:32.600 --> 00:26:44.600
Now when we go into recession, consumer prices rise very quickly, which makes it even more difficult for the average person out there to deal with the consequences of a recession.

167
00:26:44.600 --> 00:26:59.600
And then we go to the producer price index, showing producer prices, again they tend to spike going into the correction as the boom period has sort of a blow off phase.

168
00:26:59.600 --> 00:27:06.740
prices for producers rise very rapidly and of course that's one of the reason you go into correction because business costs

169
00:27:07.200 --> 00:27:09.200
have risen.

170
00:27:10.040 --> 00:27:17.600
The next one is the implicit price deflator for gross national product and this is just a more

171
00:27:19.040 --> 00:27:20.440
encompassing

172
00:27:20.440 --> 00:27:28.160
measure of price inflation and in effect you're taking CPI and PPI into account and looking at overall

173
00:27:29.600 --> 00:27:36.600
GDP and Price Increases. Now this is very important, the civilian unemployment rate.

174
00:27:38.360 --> 00:27:45.160
And this is something that gives away a nice story too, because we see the unemployment

175
00:27:45.160 --> 00:27:50.960
rate takes off at the beginning of the recession or the correction.

176
00:27:50.960 --> 00:27:51.960
Like clockwork.

177
00:27:51.960 --> 00:27:56.520
Like clockwork, that's right. And we've kept this up here for years, because we think it's

178
00:27:56.520 --> 00:28:02.520
is a good indicator when you start seeing the unemployment rate bottoming or stabilizing

179
00:28:02.520 --> 00:28:11.800
and then start to move upward you are pretty well informed that the correction is beginning

180
00:28:11.800 --> 00:28:17.960
and of course the NBER people who are supposed to call recessions and the people on CNBC

181
00:28:17.960 --> 00:28:24.800
who are telling you to buy stocks unless the recession is officially called they can go

182
00:28:24.800 --> 00:28:34.800
and so on with their rosy stories, but if you're looking at the unemployment rate and you're looking at this graph, you can just put those stories in the circular file.

183
00:28:34.800 --> 00:28:44.800
And so what we have here is a reallocation of labor resources in the same way that capital is being reallocated to adjust to the new economic realities.

184
00:28:44.800 --> 00:28:55.920
Right, that's right. The change in unemployment, it's given in percentage terms here, 1% unemployment

185
00:28:55.920 --> 00:29:02.280
rate represents about a million people. So you can see that the increase in the unemployment

186
00:29:02.280 --> 00:29:08.600
rate basically is freeing up a million and a half people who are out there currently

187
00:29:08.600 --> 00:29:12.040
looking for a new line of work.

188
00:29:12.040 --> 00:29:17.640
So we have a shifting of lines of production, people move from one type of industry into

189
00:29:17.640 --> 00:29:23.560
another type of industry, and you also have downward pressure on wages to some extent.

190
00:29:23.560 --> 00:29:30.360
That's true, and that's under the gold standard, that downward pressure on wages made this

191
00:29:30.360 --> 00:29:38.520
adjustment process rather quick, and that's been diminished by a number of factors to

192
00:29:38.520 --> 00:29:41.280
to slow down that adjustment phase.

193
00:29:41.280 --> 00:29:49.320
But even then, you can see from the chart that the adjustment takes place very rapidly.

194
00:29:49.320 --> 00:29:51.920
Unions can subvert this to some extent.

195
00:29:51.920 --> 00:29:52.920
To some extent.

196
00:29:52.920 --> 00:29:56.800
They slow the whole thing down.

197
00:29:56.800 --> 00:30:00.160
And we come to imports of goods and services.

198
00:30:00.160 --> 00:30:07.440
The general tendency here is for it to increase as world trade is increased.

199
00:30:07.440 --> 00:30:15.000
And you'll notice it becomes clear after we go off the gold standard that imports decline

200
00:30:15.000 --> 00:30:17.960
during recessions or corrections.

201
00:30:17.960 --> 00:30:23.800
This is most noticeable in the recession of 2001.

202
00:30:23.800 --> 00:30:32.640
So far we don't show an indication of imports declining, but you can bet with pretty good

203
00:30:32.640 --> 00:30:49.640
And this will, to some extent, boost domestic production and create an illusion of recovery?

204
00:30:49.640 --> 00:30:51.640
Recovery in certain industries.

205
00:30:51.640 --> 00:30:56.640
Like, oh, look, the great steel industry is making a big comeback.

206
00:30:56.640 --> 00:30:59.640
The beef industry is doing as well or whatever.

207
00:30:59.640 --> 00:31:06.960
2007, 2008, our exports, for example, were very strong in certain industries in response

208
00:31:06.960 --> 00:31:16.260
to the falling dollar, and so the international aspects are going to be influenced by the

209
00:31:16.260 --> 00:31:23.120
value of the dollar and the overall level of economic activity around the world.

210
00:31:23.120 --> 00:31:29.120
Although we could see an increase in the number of imports of cars that I would expect, right?

211
00:31:29.120 --> 00:31:43.920
This next is a puzzle. I always like to show this to people when they complain about Clinton's

212
00:31:43.920 --> 00:31:45.720
big spending habits.

213
00:31:45.720 --> 00:31:52.640
Right. It's really the only substantial budget surplus on the books throughout going back

214
00:31:52.640 --> 00:31:59.040
in our history, at least through the 20th century. And again, this chart, you're looking

215
00:31:59.040 --> 00:32:04.480
it's a basically a flat line then we have World War two it becomes a little bit

216
00:32:04.480 --> 00:32:09.360
wavy but still sticks to that zero level and then we go off the gold standard in

217
00:32:09.360 --> 00:32:15.720
1971 and the thing goes completely unhinged completely erratic with a

218
00:32:15.720 --> 00:32:21.760
general tendency towards budget deficits and of course an increasing national debt

219
00:32:21.760 --> 00:32:28.080
and one can only imagine where the line is going to end up in the next reporting

220
00:32:28.080 --> 00:32:32.000
Period. I guess this is clearly an indication that it's going to go off the

221
00:32:32.000 --> 00:32:37.720
charts because it's going to be greater than that level and they're going to have

222
00:32:37.720 --> 00:32:43.120
to readjust the size of that chart box. And what a picture the Bush years have

223
00:32:43.120 --> 00:32:51.720
left. Oh yeah. What a picture. Yeah, well there's some definite signs so you

224
00:32:51.720 --> 00:32:55.120
can analyze this over the eight years of the Bush administration and pick out

225
00:32:55.120 --> 00:33:02.720
about various pieces of data, a gentleman I was talking to yesterday said that, well,

226
00:33:02.720 --> 00:33:06.360
I guess FDR is no longer the worst president in U.S. history.

227
00:33:06.360 --> 00:33:12.240
I said, well, if you go to Mises.org financial page, you'll find statistical evidence to

228
00:33:12.240 --> 00:33:13.240
that effect.

229
00:33:13.240 --> 00:33:14.240
Yeah, it's a real shock.

230
00:33:14.240 --> 00:33:19.880
It's, what, you know, eight years reduced to one plummeting line, you know, and then

231
00:33:19.880 --> 00:33:30.480
And I guess the slight uptick there from $400 billion deficit to $200 billion deficit is

232
00:33:30.480 --> 00:33:36.320
a response to some extent a forecaster of the coming recession because you had an increase

233
00:33:36.320 --> 00:33:37.320
in tax revenue basically.

234
00:33:37.320 --> 00:33:40.080
It wasn't, it certainly wasn't spending cuts.

235
00:33:40.080 --> 00:33:41.080
Right.

236
00:33:41.080 --> 00:33:42.080
Yeah.

237
00:33:42.080 --> 00:33:43.080
No, it's true.

238
00:33:43.080 --> 00:33:44.080
Yeah.

239
00:33:44.080 --> 00:33:51.400
Big Data here, gross federal debt, again we have down by the zero line until we go off

240
00:33:51.400 --> 00:33:57.200
the gold standard and then a very rapid increase and then you get to 2000, this is where Clinton

241
00:33:57.200 --> 00:34:02.560
sort of leveling off getting a budget surplus and then George Bush takes over and it goes

242
00:34:02.560 --> 00:34:11.520
up like a skyrocket and basically he increased the national debt by over 30 percent.

243
00:34:11.520 --> 00:34:16.800
So we go over 200 years and within eight years he increased the national debt by more than

244
00:34:16.800 --> 00:34:17.800
30%.

245
00:34:17.800 --> 00:34:22.520
It's really hard to tell how much it's been increased because we don't really know the

246
00:34:22.520 --> 00:34:26.760
implications of what's happened here at the end of this term.

247
00:34:26.760 --> 00:34:31.040
Some historian, some economic historian is going to have to go back and say, what was

248
00:34:31.040 --> 00:34:38.520
the real national debt increase under George Bush if we include all of the subsequent money

249
00:34:38.520 --> 00:34:45.480
is going to be wasted on account of the policies of his treasury and his Federal Reserve, his

250
00:34:45.480 --> 00:34:49.520
FDIC and the whole rest. It's going to be very interesting.

251
00:34:49.520 --> 00:34:53.440
Yeah, so in other words, come January, just because we got a new president doesn't mean

252
00:34:53.440 --> 00:34:56.720
we're going to be done with Bush. We won't be done with Bush for a few years.

253
00:34:56.720 --> 00:34:57.720
No.

254
00:34:57.720 --> 00:34:58.720
Or maybe ever.

255
00:34:58.720 --> 00:35:06.720
We've got Iraq. We've got the budget in tatters, the economy in tatters. He's destroyed our

256
00:35:06.720 --> 00:35:16.720
The Federal Reserve, fiat money, fractional reserve banking, Human Action, Man Economy and State, The Theory of Money and Credit

257
00:35:36.720 --> 00:35:41.560
Reflection of how much is in private hands.

258
00:35:41.560 --> 00:35:49.400
And then there's the government expenditures showing us to be at about the $3 trillion level

259
00:35:49.400 --> 00:35:55.800
of federal government expenditures, seems like a lot.

260
00:35:55.800 --> 00:36:02.640
And then there's government revenues, government revenues fall in recessions in response to

261
00:36:02.640 --> 00:36:22.640
The Deficit Feeds the Debt

262
00:36:32.640 --> 00:36:39.040
to monetize that debt away, and of course the end game in all this is hyperinflation.

263
00:36:39.040 --> 00:36:49.040
Yeah, bye Mark. So now we come to a very strong culprit of the spending over the last 10 years.

264
00:36:49.040 --> 00:37:01.840
National defense, yeah. This shows low defense spending from World War II to the Reagan administration.

265
00:37:01.840 --> 00:37:07.040
and there's a big run-up during the Reagan administration and then a curtailment during

266
00:37:07.040 --> 00:37:12.960
the Clinton administration and then it skyrockets during the Bush administration, basically

267
00:37:12.960 --> 00:37:19.260
George Bush doubled defense spending in eight years and of course the commitments are still

268
00:37:19.260 --> 00:37:26.580
out there for all of that spending to be at those high levels and of course we're destroying

269
00:37:26.580 --> 00:37:33.060
so much capital, so much equipment that there's no, it's not like we've invested in a lot

270
00:37:33.060 --> 00:37:38.300
of equipment that we can now cut back on. We've been out there destroying our own equipment,

271
00:37:38.300 --> 00:37:45.300
so you know, essentially if we wanted to maintain our defense, it means only higher levels of

272
00:37:45.300 --> 00:37:48.180
spending to put all that.

273
00:37:48.180 --> 00:37:53.780
Sort of makes a mockery of the whole limited government rhetoric of the Republicans, doesn't

274
00:37:53.780 --> 00:37:54.780
it?

275
00:37:54.780 --> 00:38:06.780
It's almost as if everything is opposite of what it seems. You look at the data, you compare it with the rhetoric. It's two different worlds.

276
00:38:06.780 --> 00:38:15.780
That's right, and that's why I always encourage our members to go to the financial page of Mises.org to get the facts.

277
00:38:15.780 --> 00:38:45.780
I mean, we're not opposed to facts here, we're big on theory but the best thing to confront these bad ideologies and these bad images that are presented in the media is to go look at the facts and I think, you know, looking at this maybe once a week or even once a month gives you a perspective of actually where we are and what we've done and it doesn't take a high-powered computer to make calculations

278
00:38:45.780 --> 00:38:49.780
You can draw lines and things like that on these graphs to see exactly where we are.

279
00:38:49.780 --> 00:38:52.780
Well, you've given us a fantastic tour, Dr. Salerno. Thank you so much.

280
00:38:52.780 --> 00:38:53.780
Thank you, Jeff.