WEBVTT

NOTE Free Markets: An Interview with David Gordon

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.000
My guest today is Dr. David Gordon.

2
00:00:03.000 --> 00:00:07.060
David is the leading expert on the work of Murray Rothbard.

3
00:00:07.060 --> 00:00:10.000
David is the author of The Essential Rothbard,

4
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:14.800
which is an excellent book, published in 2007.

5
00:00:14.800 --> 00:00:17.160
My listeners who read The Freeman Magazine

6
00:00:17.160 --> 00:00:22.160
probably remember David's November 2007 article,

7
00:00:22.320 --> 00:00:25.280
Murray Rothbard's Philosophy of Freedom.

8
00:00:26.120 --> 00:00:28.200
Dr. Gordon is a senior fellow

9
00:00:28.200 --> 00:00:32.640
at the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama.

10
00:00:32.640 --> 00:00:34.360
David, welcome to the show.

11
00:00:34.360 --> 00:00:35.280
Thank you, Mike.

12
00:00:35.280 --> 00:00:37.400
It's nice to be with you.

13
00:00:37.400 --> 00:00:39.160
Well, it's a pleasure for you to take time

14
00:00:39.160 --> 00:00:40.400
out of your schedule to do this.

15
00:00:40.400 --> 00:00:41.760
I'm excited about this.

16
00:00:42.920 --> 00:00:44.120
Let's do this, David.

17
00:00:44.120 --> 00:00:46.880
Would you tell us a little bit about yourself first?

18
00:00:46.880 --> 00:00:48.840
Because I think you have an interesting background

19
00:00:48.840 --> 00:00:52.240
as far as your academic training and experience.

20
00:00:52.240 --> 00:01:01.280
Well, I first became interested in Murray Rothbard's ideas when I was in junior high.

21
00:01:01.280 --> 00:01:06.440
I remember when Man Economy and State came out in 1962.

22
00:01:06.440 --> 00:01:07.920
I read it right away.

23
00:01:07.920 --> 00:01:16.000
I read Mises' Human Action around that time also, but I didn't meet Murray Rothbard until

24
00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:17.000
1979.

25
00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:27.000
in 1979. Meanwhile, I'd gone to UCLA and I got all my degrees in history. I got a Ph.D. in history.

26
00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:38.000
And then after I met Rothbard in 1979, I got a job for a short time with the Cato Institute where he was working.

27
00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:46.560
And then after he shifted to the Mises Institute, I started working for them and I've been with

28
00:01:46.560 --> 00:01:48.360
them ever since.

29
00:01:48.360 --> 00:01:54.880
I was also, for a brief time, I was on a grant from the Social Philosophy and Policy Center

30
00:01:54.880 --> 00:02:03.040
of Bowling Green State University in Ohio and I did a book called Resurrecting Marx,

31
00:02:03.040 --> 00:02:08.040
which was on a particular kind of Marxism called analytical Marxism.

32
00:02:08.040 --> 00:02:15.040
Oh, interesting. Because I remember David when we were chatting together over the phone the other day,

33
00:02:15.040 --> 00:02:21.040
your doctorate is in history but you've also done a lot of writing in philosophy as well.

34
00:02:21.040 --> 00:02:28.040
Oh yes, I found actually it was easier to do philosophy articles because all you have to do is come up with arguments.

35
00:02:28.040 --> 00:02:29.040
Management.

36
00:02:29.040 --> 00:02:36.160
I used to send in articles to different philosophy journals like Analysis, that was a magazine

37
00:02:36.160 --> 00:02:39.720
published in England, it had 11 articles in that one.

38
00:02:39.720 --> 00:02:46.440
I wrote for, I'd had one article in Mind, which was a leading English philosophy journal.

39
00:02:46.440 --> 00:02:53.440
I'd had various other articles, but when I worked at the Mises Institute, you see I do

40
00:02:53.440 --> 00:03:18.440
I do a book review magazine. It's an online magazine called Mises Review and I do two reviews a month. I've been doing that since 1995 and a number of those books are on, I do political philosophy, economics, history, law, whatever seems suitable, I'll just do a book review.

41
00:03:18.440 --> 00:03:23.440
I'm afraid I'm infamous for rather negative reviews sometimes.

42
00:03:23.920 --> 00:03:27.560
I like to say, if you can't say anything bad

43
00:03:27.560 --> 00:03:29.800
about a book, why say it at all?

44
00:03:29.800 --> 00:03:34.800
But I must say, I do sometimes have favorable reviews.

45
00:03:36.680 --> 00:03:40.840
I mean, there are some very good writers out there.

46
00:03:40.840 --> 00:03:43.040
Yes, I've read a few of your favorable reviews.

47
00:03:43.040 --> 00:03:44.440
That's true.

48
00:03:44.440 --> 00:03:46.320
I was going to ask you, David,

49
00:03:46.320 --> 00:03:55.120
So tell us a little bit about how you met Murray Rothbard and was that back around the

50
00:03:55.120 --> 00:03:58.000
beginning of the Mises Institute?

51
00:03:58.000 --> 00:04:03.960
No, that was a little before then, you see what had happened is I had mentioned I had

52
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:10.240
read Man Economy and State in 1962 and then Murray's Great Depression which came out

53
00:04:10.240 --> 00:04:17.240
The Theory of Money and Credit

54
00:04:40.240 --> 00:04:47.680
The invitation to go to a conference put on by the Cato Institute, which was in June 1979.

55
00:04:47.680 --> 00:04:49.720
I had further talks with Rothbard.

56
00:04:49.720 --> 00:04:57.680
I met Ralph Reiko and Ronald Hamoway, who were two of Murray's greatest friends, who

57
00:04:57.680 --> 00:04:59.880
were also teaching at that conference.

58
00:04:59.880 --> 00:05:05.480
And then shortly after that, they offered me a job with the Cato Institute, and I was

59
00:05:05.480 --> 00:05:13.560
Working, particularly with Ronald Hamoway, and Ralph Reiko was the book review editor

60
00:05:13.560 --> 00:05:19.800
of Inquiry, which I wrote book reviews for, but he wasn't in San Francisco where I was

61
00:05:19.800 --> 00:05:20.800
working.

62
00:05:20.800 --> 00:05:29.040
And then I became very good friends with Rothbard after that, and that continued until Rothbard's

63
00:05:29.040 --> 00:05:32.040
death in January 1995.

64
00:05:32.040 --> 00:05:34.040
I see.

65
00:05:34.040 --> 00:05:35.040
Okay.

66
00:05:35.040 --> 00:05:40.400
Well, I thought what was interesting too when we chatted the other day is you told me when

67
00:05:40.400 --> 00:05:46.680
you were writing the book, The Essential Rothbard, that you had full access to all of Murray's

68
00:05:46.680 --> 00:05:49.120
private correspondence and so forth.

69
00:05:49.120 --> 00:05:57.400
Oh yeah, you see, what happened after Murray died, all his papers went to the Mises Institute,

70
00:05:57.400 --> 00:06:05.600
which is in Auburn, Alabama, the group I work for, so I actually was one of the first to

71
00:06:05.600 --> 00:06:11.560
go through those papers, I was doing some preliminary sorting, so one of the most important

72
00:06:11.560 --> 00:06:18.040
things in the paper is that he worked for a number of years as a consultant to this group

73
00:06:18.040 --> 00:06:25.920
called the Volcker Foundation, which was one of the, in the late 1950s, early 60s, was

74
00:06:25.920 --> 00:06:35.920
Rothbard was one of the most important foundations that was sponsoring individualist and liberty-loving thought.

75
00:06:35.920 --> 00:06:47.920
They sponsored a lot of the main intellectuals that we study today, like Milton Friedman was one, Friedrich Hayek, these people all got Volcker grants.

76
00:06:47.920 --> 00:06:55.920
Rothbard wrote all sorts of book reviews and reports on various figures. He went to conferences for them.

77
00:06:55.920 --> 00:07:03.920
So you have his evaluations of all sorts of different thinkers and movements that are, many of them are unpublished.

78
00:07:03.920 --> 00:07:14.920
There's actually, the Mises Institute is going to be bringing out some volumes of some of these unpublished papers in the near future.

79
00:07:14.920 --> 00:07:25.920
Yeah, that's great. Actually, I'm going to come back toward, maybe toward the end of the show, David, and talk a little bit about the Mises Institute as a resource, because I think all my listeners ought to know about that.

80
00:07:25.920 --> 00:07:42.920
What I'm going to have to do, David, is jump in then and talk a little bit. Well, actually, what I was trying to do there is give my listeners a sense that you, like Rothbard, have this really wide and deep knowledge of, you know, half a dozen different areas,

81
00:07:42.920 --> 00:07:49.920
of the World, The Theory of Money and Credit, The Theory of Money and Credit, The Theory

82
00:09:12.920 --> 00:09:14.480
to the government.

83
00:09:14.480 --> 00:09:21.920
So what Rothbard said is if we consider seriously implications of being opposed to slavery then

84
00:09:21.920 --> 00:09:26.640
we'll be opposed to taxation as well.

85
00:09:26.640 --> 00:09:33.840
The government will not be able to take money from us by force.

86
00:09:33.840 --> 00:09:40.000
Another friend of mine, philosopher Robert Nozick, makes this point also in his book

87
00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:49.000
In 1974 at NIT State, you told me that taxation is akin to forced labor, so it's really a form of slavery.

88
00:09:49.000 --> 00:09:56.000
Herbert Spencer was one in the 19th century, the great 19th century philosophers that made the same point.

89
00:09:56.000 --> 00:10:02.000
Yeah, it's a powerful argument. It's hard to get around that one.

90
00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:14.000
Well, so let's talk a little bit more about, because I know Rothbard also took the slavery as wrong to, you know, also address issues like the military draft.

91
00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:27.000
Oh, yes. Now, you see, this is certainly, I mean, you're being forced to, this is perhaps even more of a direct example of slavery than taxation,

92
00:10:27.000 --> 00:10:33.480
In the draft, you're not only required to give your money to the government, you're

93
00:10:33.480 --> 00:10:38.920
not only required to labor for the government, but you could even be required to risk your

94
00:10:38.920 --> 00:10:39.920
life.

95
00:10:39.920 --> 00:10:48.200
I mean, supposing you're drafted and the government can send you into combat in a situation where

96
00:10:48.200 --> 00:10:54.760
you're likely or even certain to lose your life, and it may be for a war that you don't

97
00:10:54.760 --> 00:10:56.280
even think is justified.

98
00:10:56.280 --> 00:11:17.280
Now, I think it's interesting if you look at what used to be at any rate the leading textbook in economics that was studied in college, which was by Paul Samuelson. It's a famous book. I remember studying that myself when I took economics.

99
00:11:17.280 --> 00:11:24.720
Samuelson, in the early editions of the book, said, well, you know, there are some government

100
00:11:24.720 --> 00:11:31.440
programs that no one really opposes, and he mentioned Social Security is one of them, but

101
00:11:31.440 --> 00:11:34.120
he also mentioned the draft was one of them.

102
00:11:34.120 --> 00:11:39.520
David, let me jump in there, we're not to come up on a break, but I think this is a

103
00:11:39.520 --> 00:11:41.680
great way to keep the listeners engaged.

104
00:11:41.680 --> 00:11:45.400
We're talking here about a couple of things that should shake your assumptions, even if

105
00:11:45.400 --> 00:11:47.880
if you are a Libertarian.

106
00:11:47.880 --> 00:11:51.960
Before the break, we were talking about the military draft

107
00:11:51.960 --> 00:11:55.440
and the morality behind that.

108
00:11:55.440 --> 00:12:00.440
And David was talking about Paul Samuelson's text,

109
00:12:00.520 --> 00:12:03.960
and I'm sure just about everybody who's ever taken

110
00:12:03.960 --> 00:12:07.640
an economics course is familiar with that.

111
00:12:07.640 --> 00:12:10.040
Can we go back to that and pick that up again, David?

112
00:12:10.040 --> 00:12:10.880
Oh, yes.

113
00:12:10.880 --> 00:12:14.080
Well, Mike, what I was saying was that Samuelson

114
00:12:14.080 --> 00:12:20.120
in this introductory textbook was giving examples of government programs he thought that were

115
00:12:20.120 --> 00:12:24.560
non-controversial but no one would challenge at the time he was writing it.

116
00:12:24.560 --> 00:12:35.560
His book originally came out in, I think, in 1948 or so, but he kept producing new editions

117
00:12:35.560 --> 00:12:40.840
in the 50s and 60s, so he said no one would really challenge the draft.

118
00:12:40.840 --> 00:12:49.240
This is really, we consider it as an odd thing to say because the draft really is one example

119
00:12:49.240 --> 00:12:56.600
where the government has total control of your life and it can send you into a situation

120
00:12:56.600 --> 00:13:01.640
where you're almost certain to lose your life, but Samuelson not only favored that, he said

121
00:13:01.640 --> 00:13:07.400
no one would find it controversial, I suppose he was saying that because he was writing

122
00:13:07.400 --> 00:13:14.300
just after World War II where, of course, we did have a draft and we had one in the

123
00:13:14.300 --> 00:13:20.040
Korean War as well, so I remember when I was in college, people were very concerned

124
00:13:20.040 --> 00:13:30.160
about being drafted for the Vietnam War, so this is, and it was really, many free market

125
00:13:30.160 --> 00:13:36.000
economists like Milton Friedman were strongly opposed to this, so we don't have the draft

126
00:13:36.000 --> 00:13:44.720
Now, but for a long time in the 20th century, it was very much a part of life that the people

127
00:13:44.720 --> 00:13:47.360
of military age had to cope with.

128
00:13:47.360 --> 00:13:53.720
Well, it's an interesting topic, David, because you still hear people in Congress bringing

129
00:13:53.720 --> 00:13:54.720
it up.

130
00:13:54.720 --> 00:13:58.880
It's going to become necessary if we start another war somewhere else in the world.

131
00:13:58.880 --> 00:13:59.880
We wouldn't have enough people.

132
00:13:59.880 --> 00:14:04.880
We'd have to start drafting again, and I guess what you're bringing up is important

133
00:14:04.880 --> 00:14:10.880
I guess we don't really consider the philosophical issues behind what we're doing there.

134
00:14:10.880 --> 00:14:23.880
I guess it's practical for me now because I have two sons and I'm not too concerned or too interested in them fighting a war that neither they or I would have any support for.

135
00:14:23.880 --> 00:14:26.880
But like you said, it's being done by force.

136
00:14:26.880 --> 00:14:45.880
Yes, well, I think one thing that's very important when you mention the argument that some congressmen have is that, well, we might not have enough people to fight in the war if we relied on voluntary measures.

137
00:14:45.880 --> 00:14:52.880
Of course, you could raise the point there. Well, maybe that would just show the pay and conditions they're offering for service aren't high enough.

138
00:14:52.880 --> 00:14:58.080
But I think there's perhaps a deeper point is, and again we could also question whether

139
00:14:58.080 --> 00:15:04.280
the particular war is justifiable or not, but I mean supposing that it is, which I think

140
00:15:04.280 --> 00:15:10.200
is very unlikely in the current administration, they would come up with a justifiable war,

141
00:15:10.200 --> 00:15:15.560
but I'm supposing they did, then we would have, I think, a basic question, Flossie.

142
00:15:15.560 --> 00:15:21.680
Even if you have a goal that's justifiable, it doesn't follow that you can use any means

143
00:15:21.680 --> 00:15:26.680
The Theory of Money and Credit

144
00:15:51.680 --> 00:16:04.240
Supposing there was some medicine that your children really needed and you couldn't afford

145
00:16:04.240 --> 00:16:11.240
to buy it for them, it wouldn't follow, at least there's a lot more argument to say,

146
00:16:11.240 --> 00:16:16.880
well, then it's all right for you to go into the pharmacy and rob the place in order to

147
00:16:16.880 --> 00:16:17.880
get the medicine.

148
00:16:17.880 --> 00:16:43.880
Right, right. There was an argument I heard too, David, and I can't remember, I wish I could tell you who said this, but basically what his argument was, he said, you know, if the country was ever invaded, he's absolutely convinced that you'd have more volunteers than you knew what to do with, so that certainly wouldn't be a problem.

149
00:16:43.880 --> 00:16:51.320
He came back to basically what you were saying about if the war somehow has merit, people

150
00:16:51.320 --> 00:16:53.200
will volunteer to go.

151
00:16:53.200 --> 00:16:55.120
You shouldn't have to do it at gunpoint.

152
00:16:55.120 --> 00:17:00.720
Yes, I think this is certainly a very good point.

153
00:17:00.720 --> 00:17:06.800
If someone is going to be attacking your house, you're going to do something about it.

154
00:17:06.800 --> 00:17:16.160
I mean supposing there's some situation, I would say is the case with the Iraq war, where

155
00:17:16.160 --> 00:17:21.200
the matter really, at least in the opinion of many people, doesn't have much to do with

156
00:17:21.200 --> 00:17:28.000
us, so it's not clear why we're supposed to be in danger from various regimes in that

157
00:17:28.000 --> 00:17:35.280
area of the world, then people might, we might have trouble getting volunteers, of course

158
00:17:35.280 --> 00:17:40.280
We don't have a draft now, but people don't really want to go over there.

159
00:17:40.280 --> 00:17:45.280
It's a very unpopular war, and they're having a lot of trouble getting enough troops.

160
00:17:45.280 --> 00:17:51.280
That's why people are talking about a draft now, because we have a very unpopular war.

161
00:17:51.280 --> 00:17:55.280
I think that was the case in Vietnam.

162
00:17:55.280 --> 00:18:04.280
People got very upset over the draft because it was unpopular, and that was one of the reasons it was abolished after that.

163
00:18:04.280 --> 00:18:12.280
That's right, yeah. And David, I'm probably about your age. I remember the Vietnam War, too. I don't want to see us go back to something like that.

164
00:18:12.280 --> 00:18:15.280
No, that was a very unfortunate situation.

165
00:18:15.280 --> 00:18:19.280
It was a very unpleasant time, to say the least.

166
00:18:19.280 --> 00:18:29.280
The next thing I was going to ask you about here, David, Rothbard talked about, and again, this sounds very straightforward, but there are a lot of implications to this.

167
00:18:29.280 --> 00:18:33.720
He said a person owns his own labor.

168
00:18:33.720 --> 00:18:36.680
What are the implications according to Rothbard there?

169
00:18:36.680 --> 00:18:43.160
Well, that would be one that would be quite similar to the point about slavery.

170
00:18:43.160 --> 00:18:49.800
You can't, no one can take your labor away from you and it would follow if you own your

171
00:18:49.800 --> 00:18:56.960
own labor that you're free to enter into any arrangements you want to with other people

172
00:18:56.960 --> 00:18:58.960
The Theory of Money and Credit

173
00:19:26.960 --> 00:19:51.960
You don't have to give workers a living wage. It isn't fair to say that people earn only a few dollars an hour, but what this kind of legislation does is to prevent those people who are only employable for fairly low salaries from getting the job. This is harming them, not helping them.

174
00:19:51.960 --> 00:20:05.960
Right. Yeah, that's an interesting argument because I think, David, you told me that you know Robert Murphy, and Robert Murphy was on your show.

175
00:20:05.960 --> 00:20:12.960
Yeah, yeah, and Bob made that same argument about the minimum wage laws are actually hurting the people they're supposedly helping.

176
00:20:12.960 --> 00:20:23.440
This is actually one of the greatest of all the free market economists, Ludwig von Mises,

177
00:20:23.440 --> 00:20:29.680
said that this is a fundamental argument against all kinds of interference with the free market.

178
00:20:29.680 --> 00:20:36.480
I should say Mises was one of Rothbard's teachers and Rothbard went to Mises' seminar at New

179
00:20:36.480 --> 00:20:43.480
The Theory of Money and Credit

180
00:21:06.480 --> 00:21:23.480
Without making any controversial assumptions about values, you could show that these measures are wrong because they wouldn't work from the point of view of the people who supported them themselves.

181
00:21:23.480 --> 00:21:29.480
Rothbard thought you could go a long way with that argument, but he thought there were problems with applying it universally.

182
00:21:29.480 --> 00:21:42.480
I think it is, as far as it goes, a very valuable point. You don't have to assume any controversial ethical point of view. Supposing you say, well, I'm in favor of freedom.

183
00:21:42.480 --> 00:21:49.480
Somebody, sort of a left-wing person, says, well, I believe more in equality. I don't accept your assumption.

184
00:21:49.480 --> 00:22:01.480
You could still argue that these various measures of intervention won't work even from their point of view because they just won't achieve what they're supposed to achieve.

185
00:22:01.480 --> 00:22:10.480
That's really interesting. This might have to be something we can pick up after the break.

186
00:22:10.480 --> 00:22:33.480
As I understood the argument between Mises and Rothbard, Mises being, I guess, more the mentor, I think it was Rothbard that was saying a value-free defense of the market cannot stand by itself. Is that right?

187
00:22:33.480 --> 00:22:45.720
Well, he thought that you couldn't really show that in all cases that these measures

188
00:22:45.720 --> 00:22:48.960
would fail from the point of view of the ones who advocated them.

189
00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:57.960
For example, he said one of the arguments that Mises used is he said minimum wages cause

190
00:22:57.960 --> 00:23:04.280
unemployment in the way I just mentioned, that those workers who aren't valuable enough

191
00:23:04.280 --> 00:23:10.160
to the employers to earn more than the minimum wage won't be employed by them.

192
00:23:10.160 --> 00:23:15.520
So Rothbard said, well, what if the people who favor the minimum wage don't really care

193
00:23:15.520 --> 00:23:20.800
about the unemployment, they're just trying to benefit a certain group of workers, like

194
00:23:20.800 --> 00:23:23.360
certain labor unions are just interested?

195
00:23:23.360 --> 00:23:33.800
Are we talking in terms of a practical, pragmatic justification for free markets versus a value-based

196
00:23:33.800 --> 00:23:34.800
or moral...

197
00:23:34.800 --> 00:23:42.960
Well, I think to some extent, I think Mises and Rothbard had different views of the nature

198
00:23:42.960 --> 00:23:43.960
of morality.

199
00:23:43.960 --> 00:23:50.760
They would, to a large extent, concur in the particular judgments they made, but Mises

200
00:23:50.760 --> 00:24:00.120
Mises thought that values are really subjective, just as in economic theory we talk about whatever

201
00:24:00.120 --> 00:24:05.840
values the person has and we try to explain their conduct on that basis.

202
00:24:05.840 --> 00:24:10.000
Mises thought that was all there was to it.

203
00:24:10.000 --> 00:24:16.720
We can't say they're values that are objective in the sense we can say that if you have certain

204
00:24:16.720 --> 00:24:19.680
values, these are the wrong ones.

205
00:24:19.680 --> 00:24:24.680
So according to Mises, people's values are subjective.

206
00:24:24.680 --> 00:24:32.480
Now he thought there was really a way of getting around this point that he thought that even

207
00:24:32.480 --> 00:24:39.480
though values are subjective, almost everyone will agree on certain values, say we all want

208
00:24:39.480 --> 00:24:44.080
to live in a free and prosperous society.

209
00:24:44.080 --> 00:24:50.120
So it isn't that it's objectively correct that we should live in a free and prosperous

210
00:24:50.120 --> 00:24:51.120
society.

211
00:24:51.120 --> 00:24:54.400
It's just that everyone will want to do that.

212
00:24:54.400 --> 00:25:01.160
So given that that's the case, we can ask, what are the best means by which we can achieve

213
00:25:01.160 --> 00:25:02.160
that goal?

214
00:25:02.160 --> 00:25:05.440
And that was something he thought did have an objective answer.

215
00:25:05.440 --> 00:25:09.200
Now, Rothbard disagreed with that.

216
00:25:09.200 --> 00:25:15.360
He of course agreed that people want to live in a free and prosperous society but he thought

217
00:25:15.360 --> 00:25:23.400
that we could show that certain values are not just ones people have but ones that they

218
00:25:23.400 --> 00:25:26.040
ought to have that are right or wrong.

219
00:25:26.040 --> 00:25:33.720
His ethics was really kind of Aristotelian style ethics and he thought that based on

220
00:25:33.720 --> 00:25:51.880
I think that's fascinating, David, because, as you know, in my book, Rational Individualism,

221
00:25:51.880 --> 00:25:58.240
the subtitle was actually a moral argument for limited government and capitalism.

222
00:25:58.240 --> 00:26:02.720
And you know, I've had people, you know, send me emails and people I've known for years

223
00:26:02.720 --> 00:26:15.720
Well, Mike, you've been in the business world all your life, and you've been a business professor, and we would have expected a practical argument instead of a philosophical kind of argument.

224
00:26:15.720 --> 00:26:29.720
And I think it's just fascinating that I think my listeners should be thinking in terms of how do we argue for our libertarian or free market views?

225
00:26:29.720 --> 00:26:33.360
What kind of a foundation do we have for that?

226
00:26:33.360 --> 00:26:39.320
I think that this is really an interesting thing to challenge my listeners on.

227
00:26:39.320 --> 00:26:42.240
We have to really, in the future, bring that up.

228
00:26:42.240 --> 00:26:46.640
Yes, I think one theory and practice go together.

229
00:26:46.640 --> 00:26:52.680
I mean, if we have a theory that doesn't work, then we've got the wrong theory.

230
00:26:52.680 --> 00:26:59.680
I mean, some people say, well, this is all right in theory, but it wouldn't work in

231
00:26:59.680 --> 00:27:10.680
In practice, sometimes people say that about libertarians and they'll say, well, it's a very appealing sounding idea, but we couldn't really put it into effect in the real world.

232
00:27:10.680 --> 00:27:21.680
Well, if that were true, then that would show there's something wrong with the theory. If the arguments are right, then it will work.

233
00:27:21.680 --> 00:27:23.680
That would be very interesting.

234
00:27:23.680 --> 00:27:49.680
Immanuel Kant wrote a short pamphlet on this particular point, something I've called, on the old, saw that this is true in theory but not in practice, and he said, no, this is just, if you think about it, it's just nonsense. If something doesn't work, then there must be something wrong with the theory.

235
00:27:49.680 --> 00:28:13.680
Right. Well let me ask you this because I think one thing I wrestle with David as a libertarian and I'm sure many of my listeners wrestle with as well is with Rothbard and a number of other people who are considered libertarians, they talk in terms of anarcho-capitalism.

236
00:28:13.680 --> 00:28:21.480
Can you talk a little bit about that and how would they justify or argue for that from

237
00:28:21.480 --> 00:28:23.840
a practice point of view?

238
00:28:23.840 --> 00:28:32.440
The way Rothbard arrived at that was he had been going to Mises' seminar when Human Action

239
00:28:32.440 --> 00:28:40.160
came out in 1949 and he had become convinced both from that and earlier about the benefits

240
00:28:40.160 --> 00:28:47.440
to the Free Market, and then when he was visiting the Foundation for Economic Education, Fee

241
00:28:47.440 --> 00:28:54.040
and Earlington, he had a conversation with someone where someone said, well, how could

242
00:28:54.040 --> 00:29:00.760
if all these free market arguments show that the various activities shouldn't be, government

243
00:29:00.760 --> 00:29:04.800
shouldn't engage in these various activities, how can you justify government at all?

244
00:29:04.800 --> 00:29:06.800
The Theory of Money and Credit

245
00:29:34.800 --> 00:29:44.200
is correct, is not that we don't need defense or police protection or justice, but that

246
00:29:44.200 --> 00:29:48.200
these can be supplied by the free market.

247
00:29:48.200 --> 00:29:59.200
We don't need to use coercion and compel people to just to have one government, one monopoly

248
00:29:59.200 --> 00:30:04.240
agency providing these various services.

249
00:30:04.240 --> 00:30:10.440
I think this is a fascinating argument, as I was saying at the beginning of the show,

250
00:30:10.440 --> 00:30:17.200
I still am comfortable, at least at this point in my life, with the government providing

251
00:30:17.200 --> 00:30:23.440
military, police and the court system, but in a discussion, and again this was with Bob

252
00:30:23.440 --> 00:30:31.640
Murphy a few weeks ago, I talked about abolishing the Federal Reserve, and I was glad that Bob

253
00:30:31.640 --> 00:30:36.040
Bob agreed with me on that item, and Bob made an interesting comment.

254
00:30:36.040 --> 00:30:41.360
He said, well, it's interesting, Mike, that a lot of free market advocates talk about

255
00:30:41.360 --> 00:30:47.840
free markets and this and free markets for that, but when then they're asked about what

256
00:30:47.840 --> 00:30:51.720
should the Federal Reserve do with interest rates so quickly to respond, well, they should

257
00:30:51.720 --> 00:30:57.800
lower it at a half a point, so their argument somehow breaks down when it came to the Federal

258
00:30:57.800 --> 00:30:58.800
Reserve.

259
00:30:58.800 --> 00:31:04.660
So I think what you're bringing up is a challenging point, David, because we do have to be thinking

260
00:31:04.660 --> 00:31:10.400
in terms of we want limited government and how should it be limited?

261
00:31:10.400 --> 00:31:14.400
Are we limited somehow philosophically or pragmatically or how are we thinking about

262
00:31:14.400 --> 00:31:15.400
that?

263
00:31:15.400 --> 00:31:20.320
Well, you see, I think one thing to bear in mind there, remember we were talking earlier

264
00:31:20.320 --> 00:31:27.280
about taxation and being forced labor, now if you have even a limited government, it's

265
00:31:27.280 --> 00:31:33.800
It would be very difficult for the government to operate without taxation, so even a limited

266
00:31:33.800 --> 00:31:39.040
government would be relying on taxation or forced labor.

267
00:31:39.040 --> 00:31:45.800
Now, Ayn Rand tried to get around that by coming up with some measure where people would

268
00:31:45.800 --> 00:31:52.540
pay for the various services that they wanted, say if you were going to trial, you would

269
00:31:52.540 --> 00:31:59.540
pay for having a court, but it seems to me doubtful whether they could raise enough money

270
00:31:59.840 --> 00:32:06.840
on that basis to operate. Right, I'm a big Ayn Rand fan myself and I have to admit that

271
00:32:10.060 --> 00:32:15.020
that's one of the weaker arguments that's true because raising the amount of money to

272
00:32:15.020 --> 00:32:21.020
support the function is doubtful. Oh yes, you know one point that is interesting about

273
00:32:21.020 --> 00:32:32.180
Rothbard, he had a rather odd relationship with Ayn Rand. He had first been rather critical

274
00:32:32.180 --> 00:32:39.660
of her, but then when Atlas Shrug came out, he was really tremendously impressed by the

275
00:32:39.660 --> 00:32:46.220
novel and he wrote to her. They met earlier, but he wrote a big fan letter to her and for

276
00:32:46.220 --> 00:32:53.820
For a while Rothbard, his small group, which is called the Circle Bastiat group of people

277
00:32:53.820 --> 00:33:02.060
including Ralph Raekel, Hamoway, Leonard Ligio, George Reisman, they came over and

278
00:33:02.060 --> 00:33:06.180
had long discussions with Ayn Rand and her group.

279
00:33:06.180 --> 00:33:11.220
For a while they were getting along very well but then there were some various incidents

280
00:33:11.220 --> 00:33:23.220
came up and they had a very bitter quarrel and after that Rothbard was very critical of her, but for a while they were friendly.

281
00:33:23.220 --> 00:33:28.220
That's fascinating. I wasn't aware of that at all. That's very interesting.

282
00:33:28.220 --> 00:33:40.220
What we want to do this last segment is take a look at the Ludwig von Mises Institute, which is located in Auburn, Alabama.

283
00:33:40.220 --> 00:33:49.220
David's very active involved there. David, could you tell us a little bit about your work at the Mises Institute?

284
00:33:49.220 --> 00:33:57.220
The Mises Institute is an educational group devoted to promoting Austrian economics.

285
00:33:57.220 --> 00:34:03.220
Austrian economics is the kind of economics that Mises and Rothbard taught.

286
00:34:03.220 --> 00:34:14.220
and they have both publications and educational programs and I write as a book review magazine

287
00:34:14.220 --> 00:34:20.460
as I mentioned before called the Mises Review, it's an online journal and they have other

288
00:34:20.460 --> 00:34:25.740
magazines and journals like the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics which is most

289
00:34:25.740 --> 00:34:31.900
This is the most important journal for free market Austrian economists. It is edited by

290
00:34:31.900 --> 00:34:44.900
Joseph Salerno. He is an excellent economist. If you go to the website www.meses.org, you

291
00:34:44.900 --> 00:34:54.780
can have all sorts of lectures and books by Rothbard, Mises, Henry Hazlitt, all sorts

292
00:34:54.780 --> 00:34:58.460
of Free Market Thinkers are available on the website.

293
00:34:58.460 --> 00:35:04.560
You can download all the books and listen to Mises and Rothbard lecture.

294
00:35:04.560 --> 00:35:12.080
They also have programs such as we have, the probably most important one is the Mises University

295
00:35:12.080 --> 00:35:18.620
which is a week long program usually held in August and we get about over 100 students

296
00:35:18.620 --> 00:35:24.540
applied that can come to that, mostly college students, both undergraduate and graduate.

297
00:35:24.540 --> 00:35:26.940
David, you're very involved in that, right?

298
00:35:26.940 --> 00:35:32.220
Yes, yes. I lecture for that. I've been lecturing for that since 1987.

299
00:35:32.220 --> 00:35:39.580
We get the various economists such as Tom DeLorenzo was on your show and Bob Mercy

300
00:35:41.100 --> 00:35:47.500
both in that one. We get Joseph Salerno, other outstanding economists and we have a

301
00:35:47.500 --> 00:35:54.380
week-long program and then we also have other programs like we had, we're having this year,

302
00:35:54.380 --> 00:36:00.100
The Rothbard Graduate Seminar, which is a more advanced program, a week long program,

303
00:36:00.100 --> 00:36:07.020
where we go through Rothbard's main theoretical work on economics called Man Economy and State.

304
00:36:07.020 --> 00:36:14.780
And then we also have, usually in March, there's an Austrian Scholars Conference where we get

305
00:36:14.780 --> 00:36:21.660
scholars from all over the world who give papers on various aspects of Austrian economics.

306
00:36:21.660 --> 00:36:35.660
The Mises Institute is, in my opinion, the most important free market organization.

307
00:36:35.660 --> 00:36:48.660
Of course, I'm a little bit prejudiced since I work for them, but this is really, if you want to get the Mises economics and Rothbard's theories, this is the place to go.

308
00:36:48.660 --> 00:37:10.420
Oh, you're right David. Mises.org is just a wonderful resource. I wanted to quickly mention

309
00:37:10.420 --> 00:37:17.540
too one of the resources I know at the Mises Institute is a booklet by Rothbard called What

310
00:37:17.540 --> 00:37:20.040
What has government done to our money?

311
00:37:20.040 --> 00:37:26.580
And I think I would encourage all libertarian, free market advocates to read that, even if

312
00:37:26.580 --> 00:37:33.280
you're not interested in anarcho-capitalism or one of the other Rothbard issues.

313
00:37:33.280 --> 00:37:38.960
That particular booklet, and I think David, you and I chatted about that the other day,

314
00:37:38.960 --> 00:37:44.380
that is the best booklet on money I have ever read, it's an incredible work.

315
00:37:44.380 --> 00:37:52.880
Oh yes, I remember when it came out. It was originally a pamphlet for the Freedom School run by Bob LaFave. I think it came out around 1963.

316
00:37:52.880 --> 00:38:05.880
And the basic point Rothbard makes there, it's a very short, easy to understand essay, is that money is a commodity like any other commodity.

317
00:38:05.880 --> 00:38:12.380
It has, of course, there are differences. Money does have some differences from other commodities.

318
00:38:12.380 --> 00:38:20.380
Basically, we should consider money not something that's created by the government, but something that is a commodity.

319
00:38:20.380 --> 00:38:28.380
If the government tries to change that and create fiat money, this will have all sorts of very bad results.

320
00:38:28.380 --> 00:38:37.380
Money must emerge from the free market as a commodity. It isn't an arbitrary creation of a government.

321
00:38:37.380 --> 00:38:42.660
I think that is so powerful because the argument I've made and some of my other guests have

322
00:38:42.660 --> 00:38:49.140
made is inflation is nothing more than the government just overflating the currency that's

323
00:38:49.140 --> 00:38:50.140
printing too much money.

324
00:38:50.140 --> 00:38:55.380
Yes, this is one of the basic points Rothbard makes in that essay.

325
00:38:55.380 --> 00:39:01.860
If you want to understand the current economic crisis, this is, I think, really essential

326
00:39:01.860 --> 00:39:02.860
reading.

327
00:39:02.860 --> 00:39:12.860
One more time, it's called, What Has Government Done to Your Money? by Murray Rothbard, just an absolutely wonderful document.

328
00:39:12.860 --> 00:39:24.860
Let me ask you too quickly, David. Some of my listeners, I'm sure, are going to want to read some of your works, and I know you've published quite a few things for lewrockwell.com.

329
00:39:24.860 --> 00:39:28.860
Can you just give us an idea of some of the things you've published there?

330
00:39:28.860 --> 00:39:40.140
I should say, Lew Rockwell was probably Murray Rothbard's closest friend and follower.

331
00:39:40.140 --> 00:39:45.380
When he established the Mises, he's the head of the Mises Institute, the founder and president

332
00:39:45.380 --> 00:39:46.380
of the Mises Institute.

333
00:39:46.380 --> 00:39:50.580
He set up the institute to promote Mises and Rothbard's work.

334
00:39:50.580 --> 00:39:58.220
Now, on lewrockwell.com, it promotes Austrian economics, but it also comments on current

335
00:39:58.220 --> 00:40:05.300
and Affairs and whatever topics that Lew Rockwell thinks are interesting.

336
00:40:05.300 --> 00:40:11.820
He has to come up with new articles every day, but I publish, sometimes he'll reprint

337
00:40:11.820 --> 00:40:17.780
some of my book reviews on the site, but I've done articles on other topics and many of

338
00:40:17.780 --> 00:40:19.580
them are on foreign policy.

339
00:40:19.580 --> 00:40:27.260
I had one, he put up this extremely long article, it was about a hundred pages, and it criticized

340
00:40:27.260 --> 00:40:35.180
In my road of Harry Jaffa, who was a political philosopher, he was written on Abraham Lincoln.

341
00:40:35.180 --> 00:40:41.100
So I had a 100-page essay on him that's available on the site.

342
00:40:41.100 --> 00:40:48.020
I have various articles on foreign policy topics.

343
00:40:48.020 --> 00:40:55.420
He really gets a broader range of people than just strictly libertarian people.

344
00:40:55.420 --> 00:41:06.420
has various writers on foreign policy and if you go to that you'll get a very good perspective on current events from a libertarian point of view.

345
00:41:06.420 --> 00:41:18.420
Yeah, I printed out a copy. They have an archive set up for each of the authors and I think your archive here is about six pages long, David,

346
00:41:18.420 --> 00:41:22.420
but there's some really fascinating articles in here for people to read.

347
00:41:22.420 --> 00:41:37.420
This is great stuff, David. I also want to go back and just remind all my listeners that David's book is called The Essential Rothbard.

348
00:41:37.420 --> 00:41:41.420
As I recall, that was also published by the Mises Institute, wasn't it?

349
00:41:41.420 --> 00:41:43.420
Yes.

350
00:41:43.420 --> 00:41:49.420
That came out in 2007. That's another excellent publication.

351
00:41:49.420 --> 00:41:55.460
So I guess I would suggest for my readers, read the essential Rothbard or go back and

352
00:41:55.460 --> 00:42:04.460
read that November 2007 article in the Freeman called Murray Rothbard's Philosophy of Freedom.

353
00:42:04.460 --> 00:42:12.900
That's about a four-page article that David did on Rothbard's work.

354
00:42:12.900 --> 00:42:19.980
I want to thank my guest today, Dr. David Gordon, obviously an expert on Murray Rothbard's

355
00:42:19.980 --> 00:42:26.220
work. His book is The Essential Rothbard. I want to thank David very much for being

356
00:42:26.220 --> 00:42:27.060
with me today.