WEBVTT

NOTE Free Markets: An Interview with Joseph T. Salerno

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.560
Welcome to Free Markets, I'm Mike Beitler, your host.

2
00:00:03.560 --> 00:00:06.120
I believe big government is the problem

3
00:00:06.120 --> 00:00:08.880
and a free market is the solution.

4
00:00:08.880 --> 00:00:10.400
I'm gonna jump right in here

5
00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:14.080
and introduce my special guest today.

6
00:00:14.080 --> 00:00:18.000
My guest today is Professor Joseph Salerno.

7
00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:20.000
Joe is a professor of economics

8
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:22.720
at Pace University in New York,

9
00:00:22.720 --> 00:00:26.260
where he also serves as graduate program chair

10
00:00:26.260 --> 00:00:29.240
in the Department of Finance and Economics.

11
00:00:29.240 --> 00:00:36.240
Professor Salerno holds an M.A. and a Ph.D. from Rutgers University. Joe is a senior faculty

12
00:00:36.680 --> 00:00:43.680
member at the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama. Joe serves as editor of the Quarterly Journal

13
00:00:44.400 --> 00:00:50.840
of Austrian Economics. And like me, Joe is a fan of Ayn Rand. He discovered her book

14
00:00:50.840 --> 00:00:55.280
Atlas Shrugged while still in high school. Joe, welcome to the show.

15
00:00:55.280 --> 00:01:12.280
Thanks Mike, it's great to be here. It's a real pleasure to have you. Joe, I wanted to start off by asking you, as you know I missed the Austrian Scholars Conference this year, I'm going to make sure I get there next year, but how did the conference go this year?

16
00:01:12.280 --> 00:01:20.680
Oh, it went very well. We had over 250 attendees. We had between 30 and 35 panels and sessions

17
00:01:20.680 --> 00:01:27.280
in which people presented papers and talked about current issues. And we had many, maybe

18
00:01:27.280 --> 00:01:33.280
70 students or so that came and viewed the event.

19
00:01:33.280 --> 00:01:37.280
That's exciting. So it's growing. The interest is growing.

20
00:01:37.280 --> 00:01:41.280
Absolutely. It's very good to see the young people becoming more interested in this.

21
00:01:41.280 --> 00:01:48.400
Oh, it really is, because we as the baby boomers are burdening them with all kinds of things

22
00:01:48.400 --> 00:01:51.400
they're going to have to deal with, and hopefully from an Austrian perspective.

23
00:01:51.400 --> 00:01:59.240
I was going to ask you, Joe, I should probably tell my listeners too, a lot of your work,

24
00:01:59.240 --> 00:02:05.720
Joe, as far as audios and videos are on Mises.org, and that's where I'm going to pull several

25
00:02:05.720 --> 00:02:07.720
of these questions from today.

26
00:02:07.720 --> 00:02:08.720
Okay.

27
00:02:08.720 --> 00:02:15.720
Joe, you said on there, and you've actually written about this too, and I think this is a fascinating point that you make.

28
00:02:15.720 --> 00:02:22.720
You make the point that socialism is impossible. Not just difficult, but you're saying it's impossible.

29
00:02:22.720 --> 00:02:23.720
Will you talk a little bit about that?

30
00:02:23.720 --> 00:02:30.720
I sure can. When I say socialism is impossible, I don't mean attempts at setting up a socialist system.

31
00:02:30.720 --> 00:02:37.720
What I mean is that it's really impossible if you have government owning all of the capital goods and land and other resources.

32
00:02:37.720 --> 00:02:45.720
It's impossible for them to really figure out what goods and services to produce and what is the lowest cost way to producing those things.

33
00:02:45.720 --> 00:02:54.720
Now, it's often said, well, that position was refuted because in history we saw the Soviet Union lasted from 1917 until the 1990s.

34
00:02:54.720 --> 00:03:06.720
But that wasn't the point. The whole point that was made was that in a perfect socialist system where the government did own all resources, there would be no way to figure out any cost of anything.

35
00:03:06.720 --> 00:03:13.720
The government being the sole owner, the sole monopolist, loans everything. There's no trading of steel. There's no trading of electricity and so on.

36
00:03:13.720 --> 00:03:21.720
So the cost of production could never be figured out by the managers of these socialist firms. It would just be shot in the dark.

37
00:03:21.720 --> 00:03:28.720
So why the Soviet Union did last as long as it did, by the way, was because it was set within a capitalist world economy.

38
00:03:28.720 --> 00:03:37.320
So the Soviets, in fact, used world prices, they used the price of steel and electricity here in the West to approximate their own prices.

39
00:03:37.320 --> 00:03:41.720
Of course, these were wrong. So they were extremely inefficient.

40
00:03:41.720 --> 00:03:50.720
And also, by the way, the Soviet Union, especially in its latter days, was run to a great extent by black markets.

41
00:03:50.720 --> 00:03:55.720
In other words, at the end, much of the food was being grown outside the social system,

42
00:03:55.720 --> 00:04:11.720
Where prices were being paid for underground purchases. American denim jeans were being sold there, rock records and so on. So there's a thriving market in prices that the planners themselves are actually trying to approximate.

43
00:04:11.720 --> 00:04:34.720
Interesting, Joe. I think I heard you talking, too, about in the Soviet Union before it collapsed you were talking about fields of wheat. You just went on all the way to the horizon, but there were tractors and equipment sitting there that didn't have the necessary things to run, so the wheat was just basically rotting in the field.

44
00:04:34.720 --> 00:04:41.720
Right, right. There's a massive, or what the economists sometimes call, misallocation of resources. That just simply means a massive misuse of resources.

45
00:04:41.720 --> 00:04:53.720
You saw, like you said, the fields of wheat and other sorts of grains there, but they weren't being harvested because the tractors were sitting in the fields rusting because there wasn't enough gasoline, nor were there enough individuals to run them.

46
00:04:53.720 --> 00:05:02.720
Because they were building steel in other factories that was, at the end, just being piled up. So it was a mindless machine that was just running.

47
00:05:02.720 --> 00:05:23.720
I mean, the steel wasn't being used for anything. So they were producing capital goods and heavy goods that never became the ultimate goal, which was the consumer goods that satisfied human wants. So in a very deep sense, socialism was anti-human. It wasn't producing things for human consumption.

48
00:05:23.720 --> 00:05:31.720
Interesting. And I think you told a story too, Joseph, that I thought was just fascinating and illustrated this point so well.

49
00:05:31.720 --> 00:05:38.720
I think you were talking about there were houses that weren't finished. They couldn't put the roof on the house because they didn't have roofing nails.

50
00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:49.720
And weren't you saying, I think this was the example you gave, was they were, instead of using prices, they were trying to figure out production of nails by weight.

51
00:06:19.720 --> 00:06:26.720
The Theory of Money and Credit

52
00:06:49.720 --> 00:06:54.720
that just accumulated under socialism and resulted ultimately in its collapse.

53
00:06:54.720 --> 00:07:00.720
I mean, at the end, of course, no one believed in Marxism except the academics in Western universities.

54
00:07:00.720 --> 00:07:05.720
Even the commissars themselves were cynical about the whole thing.

55
00:07:05.720 --> 00:07:06.720
Interesting.

56
00:07:06.720 --> 00:07:10.720
You know, I think something related to that too, Joe.

57
00:07:10.720 --> 00:07:16.720
In an interview I saw you doing with Jeffrey Tucker, you were talking about the function of profits.

58
00:07:16.720 --> 00:07:20.920
So we're not just talking about cost, but you're saying that it's essential that we

59
00:07:20.920 --> 00:07:23.880
have profits as well, right?

60
00:07:23.880 --> 00:07:24.880
That's right, Mike.

61
00:07:24.880 --> 00:07:31.360
The reason why you need to calculate your cost, and we do do that in the U.S., is because

62
00:07:31.360 --> 00:07:36.640
it's important to see whether or not what you're using, that is the cost of the inputs

63
00:07:36.640 --> 00:07:40.280
that you're using, are more valuable than the good that you're producing.

64
00:07:40.280 --> 00:07:47.840
So for example, the U.S. auto industry knows that it's producing automobiles that just

65
00:07:47.840 --> 00:07:51.040
use more valuable resources than they are worth to consumers.

66
00:07:51.040 --> 00:07:55.280
In other words, that steel and so on, the manpower, can be better used to produce small

67
00:07:55.280 --> 00:07:58.440
automobiles or produce bicycles or whatever else.

68
00:07:58.440 --> 00:08:03.620
So under capitalism, though mistakes are made by entrepreneurs, there is this profit and

69
00:08:03.620 --> 00:08:10.240
by the way, loss mechanism, which pushes entrepreneurs away from making products that are less valuable

70
00:08:10.240 --> 00:08:14.720
and more wasting resources and towards making those products where there's a

71
00:08:14.720 --> 00:08:18.560
great scarcity of them and consumers put a high value on them. So you have a

72
00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:23.880
continual movement. It's a dynamic process. Whereas in the Soviet Union and

73
00:08:23.880 --> 00:08:28.680
other sort of centrally planned economies, it's basically someone who's

74
00:08:28.680 --> 00:08:31.920
lost in a desert with no compass. They're doing things but they don't know what

75
00:08:31.920 --> 00:08:34.640
they're doing and what they're doing right and what they're doing wrong. At

76
00:08:34.640 --> 00:08:38.920
least there's an important feedback mechanism under capitalism in which you

77
00:08:38.920 --> 00:08:45.920
That is a great point, Joe. I guess I'm sitting here thinking, too. A similar thing happens with interest rates, right? If the government is artificially setting interest rates too low, which I would think would be the case now, they're too low, that's also sending false signals to the economy.

78
00:09:08.920 --> 00:09:14.920
Yeah, the interest rate is the one price in the economy that pervades the entire economy.

79
00:09:14.920 --> 00:09:29.920
So, for example, if interest rates are too low, we know that consumers are induced to borrow and to buy appliances and houses that they really cannot afford when those interest rates return to levels that are consistent with the amount of savings that people want to do.

80
00:09:29.920 --> 00:09:36.800
The Federal Reserve System, the Fed, is able to manipulate those interest rates.

81
00:09:36.800 --> 00:09:38.760
Now, they don't directly control interest rates.

82
00:09:38.760 --> 00:09:43.240
What they control is the power to create money, and they create money through the banks.

83
00:09:43.240 --> 00:09:47.440
So when they create additional funds for the banks to loan out, the only way the banks

84
00:09:47.440 --> 00:09:53.360
can loan those funds out, induce people to take those funds, is to lower interest rates.

85
00:09:53.360 --> 00:09:56.880
And when they do that, that's when people begin to miscalculate.

86
00:09:56.880 --> 00:09:58.640
the price of houses go up

87
00:09:58.640 --> 00:10:01.600
people believe that they're much more wealthy than they really are

88
00:10:01.600 --> 00:10:04.720
so what we saw happening by the way was that people

89
00:10:04.720 --> 00:10:07.800
looking at the growing wealth in their houses

90
00:10:07.800 --> 00:10:09.080
began to

91
00:10:09.080 --> 00:10:11.760
consume more out of their current income

92
00:10:11.760 --> 00:10:13.720
and even to use their houses

93
00:10:13.720 --> 00:10:15.380
as ATM machines

94
00:10:15.380 --> 00:10:17.120
that could take the equity out

95
00:10:17.120 --> 00:10:20.680
so thinking that they had enough stored up for the future and for their

96
00:10:20.680 --> 00:10:23.240
children's tuition and so on

97
00:10:23.240 --> 00:10:25.000
they began to over consume

98
00:10:25.000 --> 00:10:26.300
so we had a vast

99
00:10:26.300 --> 00:10:31.200
overconsumption boom here in the United States and we're a lot poorer for it

100
00:10:31.200 --> 00:10:35.400
and let me just say that businessmen also make mistakes when interest rates are too low

101
00:10:35.400 --> 00:10:40.420
things that would not look profitable at seven or eight percent

102
00:10:40.420 --> 00:10:45.100
various project expanding their factories, finding new sources of supply

103
00:10:45.100 --> 00:10:46.940
that may now look profitable if

104
00:10:46.940 --> 00:10:49.740
the interest rate pushed down to three percent or four percent

105
00:10:49.740 --> 00:10:51.900
but once again

106
00:10:51.900 --> 00:10:56.100
you have some sort of a a rise in prices and in stocks and houses and the Fed

107
00:10:56.100 --> 00:11:00.340
becomes worried about it and stops printing as much money, the interest rates shoot up

108
00:11:00.340 --> 00:11:04.940
again, and the businesses find that they have to lay off the workers they've hired to undertake

109
00:11:04.940 --> 00:11:05.940
those projects.

110
00:11:05.940 --> 00:11:08.900
So we have what we have now, a recession.

111
00:11:08.900 --> 00:11:10.220
And they're giving us more of the same.

112
00:11:10.220 --> 00:11:13.340
They're trying to push these interest rates down to zero.

113
00:11:13.340 --> 00:11:16.540
On overnight funds, they're around zero.

114
00:11:16.540 --> 00:11:18.900
And other interest rates are much lower than they should be.

115
00:11:18.900 --> 00:11:24.500
So we are not getting the correction that higher interest rates would allow the economy

116
00:11:24.500 --> 00:11:54.500
Interesting. I think what we'll do here, Joe, is we only have about a minute to the first break, but maybe we ought to come back after the break and we'll talk a little bit about the Fed's role in this. I had Bob Murphy on my show a couple weeks ago, and Bob and I agreed we ought to abolish the Fed. We'll find out if you're as radical in that as we are. And then we probably ought to talk a little bit about the gold standard as well.

117
00:11:54.500 --> 00:11:59.380
Welcome back to the second segment of Free Markets. I'm Mike Vitler, your host. My guest

118
00:11:59.380 --> 00:12:06.620
today is Professor Joe Salerno. And just before the break, we were talking about interest

119
00:12:06.620 --> 00:12:13.540
rates being held artificially low, and I made a comment to Joe about some of my listeners

120
00:12:13.540 --> 00:12:19.040
probably remember Bob Murphy was on my show a few weeks ago, and we talked about abolishing

121
00:12:19.040 --> 00:12:23.540
the Fed. Joe, what do you think? Are we being too radical there, or does the Fed need to

122
00:12:23.540 --> 00:12:34.540
Now, the Fed absolutely needs to go. I agree with Bob on that point. If you look at the current crisis, you can see the fingerprints of the Fed all over it.

123
00:12:34.540 --> 00:12:44.540
From 2001 to 2005, believe it or not, the Fed created $2 trillion of additional money out of thin air.

124
00:12:44.540 --> 00:12:50.300
Now, that's a rate of about $8 billion new dollars being pumped into the economy every

125
00:12:50.300 --> 00:12:55.620
week for those five years from the beginning of 2001 to the end of 2005.

126
00:12:55.620 --> 00:13:00.040
That people do not see this, that establishment economists think that there's some failure

127
00:13:00.040 --> 00:13:07.580
in the market and ignore this massive increase in the money supply is mind-boggling.

128
00:13:07.580 --> 00:13:14.500
So the Fed, in doing this, forced interest rates down to artificially low levels to low

129
00:13:14.500 --> 00:13:18.500
The levels that could not be sustained without causing a bubble in real estate, a bubble

130
00:13:18.500 --> 00:13:20.100
in the stock market.

131
00:13:20.100 --> 00:13:25.740
And when they finally began to allow interest rates to rise after 2005, we began to get

132
00:13:25.740 --> 00:13:27.280
the crisis and so on.

133
00:13:27.280 --> 00:13:31.740
And let me just add, by the way, that the crisis is really the adjustment period, and

134
00:13:31.740 --> 00:13:39.180
it can be hastened along if you allowed interest rates to stay at their natural levels without

135
00:13:39.180 --> 00:13:43.060
tampering with them again and trying to force them down as they're doing now.

136
00:13:43.060 --> 00:13:50.500
What you just said too is interesting, Joe, because you said basically the Fed started

137
00:13:50.500 --> 00:13:58.820
going insane back under Alan Greenspan and I remember a few weeks ago Walter Block was

138
00:13:58.820 --> 00:14:04.980
on my show and Walter and I were talking about Alan Greenspan and Greenspan was part of Ayn

139
00:14:04.980 --> 00:14:07.420
Rand's inner circle.

140
00:14:07.420 --> 00:14:12.480
Do you feel the same way that Walter and I do that it's almost unimaginable that somebody

141
00:14:12.480 --> 00:14:20.480
Part of Ayn Rand's inner circle would go on to become a central planner and inflate the currency.

142
00:14:20.480 --> 00:14:23.480
Is that as disturbing to you as it is to me?

143
00:14:23.480 --> 00:14:31.480
Yeah, it's very disturbing. I've read a number of biographies on Alan Greenspan.

144
00:14:31.480 --> 00:14:38.480
The only thing that comes to mind is that somehow he separated in his own mind Ayn Rand's philosophy

145
00:14:38.480 --> 00:14:45.200
sort of an ideal that was really not applicable in the everyday world, when in fact if you

146
00:14:45.200 --> 00:14:53.180
read Rand's books, she set all her stories and so on in the real world, and her comments

147
00:14:53.180 --> 00:14:56.120
and so on were always about real world events.

148
00:14:56.120 --> 00:15:02.480
So for Alan Greenspan to depart from the Randian vision in that way, and still I think even

149
00:15:02.480 --> 00:15:14.480
I don't know, it just doesn't compute with me. I don't see how he can justify it in his own mind.

150
00:15:14.480 --> 00:15:26.480
It's really bizarre, Joe, because I look at Alan Greenspan and I'm thinking, which character in that Le Shrug would he be? It must be a combination of a few of them.

151
00:15:26.480 --> 00:15:45.480
There's no... Once again, you know, the insight into his character is he seems to want power. I mean, he was so happy when he was seated between, if you recall, Hillary Clinton and, I forget who else it was, it was at the Clinton inauguration.

152
00:15:45.480 --> 00:15:47.480
Yeah, I remember that.

153
00:15:47.480 --> 00:16:04.480
I don't recall, but to suck up that power. Now, you may think that he's using the power to do good, and he did pay lip service to markets, so even that has gone by the board in the last month.

154
00:16:04.480 --> 00:16:09.560
You know, he's come out and said, well, he's overestimated the power of markets to adjust

155
00:16:09.560 --> 00:16:13.280
and so on, and that maybe they shouldn't have been deregulated.

156
00:16:13.280 --> 00:16:19.200
So instead of realizing that he himself had made a mistake in playing this power game,

157
00:16:19.200 --> 00:16:21.080
he's turned on markets now.

158
00:16:21.080 --> 00:16:25.160
So, yeah, I'm extremely disappointed and shocked.

159
00:16:25.160 --> 00:16:29.880
Yeah, it's very disturbing to say the least.

160
00:16:29.880 --> 00:16:32.840
I want to change the topic here just a little bit, Joe.

161
00:16:32.840 --> 00:16:41.220
I want to go back to something on Mises.org. You may be able to give me the title of this

162
00:16:41.220 --> 00:16:48.820
audio that you did, but I heard you say you were speaking about a one-world currency and

163
00:16:48.820 --> 00:16:55.620
my first thought was, oh my God, not Joe Salerno of all people, but then I was glad to find

164
00:16:55.620 --> 00:17:01.800
out that you were not advocating a one-world fiat paper currency, but gold. Can you tell

165
00:17:01.800 --> 00:17:05.800
Can you tell us a little bit about your thoughts about going back to a gold standard?

166
00:17:05.800 --> 00:17:11.800
Yes, let me talk about the gold standard. The most important virtue of the gold standard

167
00:17:11.800 --> 00:17:17.720
is that it serves as what used to be called golden handcuffs. That is, it handcuffs the

168
00:17:17.720 --> 00:17:24.400
government in the following sense, that when you're on a gold standard, it is very difficult

169
00:17:24.400 --> 00:17:29.840
for a government to run big deficits because the only way they can finance those deficits

170
00:17:29.840 --> 00:17:34.300
is by borrowing money today which will be paid back by higher taxes tomorrow.

171
00:17:34.300 --> 00:17:37.660
There is no way around that. They have to raise taxes because they can't print money

172
00:17:37.660 --> 00:17:44.660
under gold. So you tend to not have deficits under a gold standard. When we did have deficits

173
00:17:44.660 --> 00:17:48.620
by the way during the gold standard period, it occurred during wars when all governments

174
00:17:48.620 --> 00:17:53.480
went off the gold standard. So in tying the government's hands and not allowing it to

175
00:17:53.480 --> 00:17:58.480
print money without having gold backing, and by the way the gold is expensive, the gold

176
00:17:58.480 --> 00:18:15.480
the gold out of the ground, and gold is scarce, and that's its virtue. In doing that, having those qualities, you get much less, even no deficit spending, and of course, you get a break on inflation.

177
00:18:15.480 --> 00:18:27.480
So that is the primary virtue of gold. The second virtue, of course, of gold is that it is a market money. The value of gold is determined by supply and demand on the market.

178
00:18:27.480 --> 00:18:47.480
And the supply of gold increases very slowly over time, whereas the demand for gold, which is really the amount of goods and services that people produce and want to exchange for money, so they can in turn use that money to exchange for good that they themselves want, the demand for gold increases rapidly under a capitalist system.

179
00:18:47.480 --> 00:18:53.480
Right? We have a tremendous increase, for example, just take the high-tech industries, in personal computers.

180
00:18:53.480 --> 00:19:00.480
So what tends to happen under a gold standard is that the price of all goods, not just personal computers, would fall over time.

181
00:19:00.480 --> 00:19:08.480
Now there was no problem, none of us had a problem with the price of computers coming down from something like $20,000 for a personal computer in 1980

182
00:19:08.480 --> 00:19:12.480
to a less than $500 today for a higher quality computer.

183
00:19:12.480 --> 00:19:18.400
But under a gold standard, you would actually get prices of all goods falling, which is

184
00:19:18.400 --> 00:19:23.120
what we got when we went back to the gold standard for the Civil War in 1880.

185
00:19:23.120 --> 00:19:30.120
Prices fell 2 or 3 percent every year, overall prices, through 1896 when there were more

186
00:19:30.120 --> 00:19:33.920
gold discoveries and then prices started to rise slightly.

187
00:19:33.920 --> 00:19:40.920
But I guess the point I want to make is that deflation under a gold standard is very slow

188
00:19:42.480 --> 00:20:01.480
is beneficial to everyone because it raises their real incomes. All of us can buy more computers today, all of us can buy more hand calculators today, and more high-deficit televisions, with our same salaries and wages, because their prices are lower than they were, let's say, five years ago.

189
00:20:01.480 --> 00:20:06.200
I think what you just said, if I can go back to something there, Joe, you were talking

190
00:20:06.200 --> 00:20:13.680
about the gold standard would handcuff the government so they couldn't create currency

191
00:20:13.680 --> 00:20:14.680
out of thin air.

192
00:20:14.680 --> 00:20:19.080
I think what's interesting about that too, Joe, I came out of banking, I was a CFO in

193
00:20:19.080 --> 00:20:25.360
banking and I can remember borrowing money from the Fed and I think you've indicated

194
00:20:25.360 --> 00:20:40.360
The government is not even limited now to printing the currency. They can just put an electronic credit on a bank's account somewhere. They can go completely wild just creating currency.

195
00:20:40.360 --> 00:20:49.360
You're absolutely right. It's just a keystroke on a computer keyboard. It can create hundreds of millions of dollars.

196
00:20:49.360 --> 00:20:53.840
In fact, three blocks from where I work in New York City at Pace University is the New

197
00:20:53.840 --> 00:20:59.720
York Federal Reserve Bank, and it's at that bank that the money creation actually does

198
00:20:59.720 --> 00:21:00.720
occur.

199
00:21:00.720 --> 00:21:05.000
And it can run to hundreds of millions of dollars each morning.

200
00:21:05.000 --> 00:21:13.080
So between 9 and 12 o'clock, there's an auction in which the Fed will bid for various, or

201
00:21:13.080 --> 00:21:19.120
let's turn it around a little bit, various banks and owners of government bonds, bond

202
00:21:19.120 --> 00:21:22.720
Bank dealers will offer prices to the Fed to buy their bonds.

203
00:21:22.720 --> 00:21:25.720
Where does the Fed get the money to buy those bonds?

204
00:21:25.720 --> 00:21:27.880
It's simply printing a check on themselves.

205
00:21:27.880 --> 00:21:31.520
That is, you pointed out they don't write newspaper checks anymore.

206
00:21:31.520 --> 00:21:35.440
They simply enter a credit into the bank's account.

207
00:21:35.440 --> 00:21:44.200
And so within a few seconds, when they buy, say, a $10 million bundle of bonds, $10 million

208
00:21:44.200 --> 00:21:48.760
new dollars is created for that bank to loan out beginning on that day.

209
00:21:48.760 --> 00:21:54.760
And because it's a fractional reserve bank, that can be multiplied up to ten times over the next few weeks.

210
00:21:54.760 --> 00:22:00.760
So the Fed can create just oodles of money in a single morning.

211
00:22:00.760 --> 00:22:07.760
And by the way, now they're permitted to buy almost anything. They're not limited to buying just government securities.

212
00:22:07.760 --> 00:22:16.760
They can buy foreign government securities. They can buy private equity now, it seems, equity in private firms and so on.

213
00:22:16.760 --> 00:22:44.760
That's true, Joe. I said on my show last week, I was reading in some, you know, back of the newspaper, you know, announcement that the Fed was basically increasing their balance sheet to $4 trillion. And like you said, they're buying up all kinds of stuff and creating money out of thin air to buy it. Very disturbing.

214
00:22:44.760 --> 00:23:06.760
Yeah, they're buying bad assets, too, now. I mean, that's what the bailout means. It means buying loans that have gone bad, that are not performing, in which people are not paying back, or have defaulted, and putting that on their books, taking them off the bank's books, and giving them money in exchange, so that they can continue to make loans.

215
00:23:06.760 --> 00:23:12.760
Right. As we're coming up on this next break here, we've got about a minute and a half, Joe.

216
00:23:12.760 --> 00:23:16.760
I think you said something that really helped to sum this whole thing up pretty well.

217
00:23:16.760 --> 00:23:24.760
When you were talking about the gold standard, you said, we really don't need a stable money, we need a sound money.

218
00:23:24.760 --> 00:23:29.760
Just talk a little bit about that, because I think that is a very insightful point.

219
00:23:29.760 --> 00:23:37.040
Yeah, what we mean by stability is a money that doesn't change in value, but that's

220
00:23:37.040 --> 00:23:42.000
not a money in the real world. Money is a commodity like any other commodity. Its value

221
00:23:42.000 --> 00:23:47.660
changes as people's demands for a change, as the supply of it changes. A sound money

222
00:23:47.660 --> 00:23:56.260
is a money like gold in which the value does fluctuate, but it doesn't do so in a way

223
00:23:56.260 --> 00:24:26.260
and the way that is volatile. You don't have one government, a monopoly, creating it and printing it and causing wild swings. It fluctuates, and since gold is such a stable commodity, it fluctuates very mildly over time, and entrepreneurs, the people who calculate profit and losses, can easily use gold money and have used gold money over the centuries to calculate their profit and losses and to allocate resources according to what consumers want the most. That's a sound money.

224
00:24:26.260 --> 00:24:31.260
The government is not in the picture manipulating the quantity of money.

225
00:24:31.260 --> 00:24:35.260
That is a great point. Sound money, not a stable money.

226
00:24:35.260 --> 00:24:39.260
My guest today is Professor Joe Salerno.

227
00:24:39.260 --> 00:24:44.260
We were talking about the gold standard before the break.

228
00:24:44.260 --> 00:24:51.260
Joe, I want to revisit that for just one more question, just to get your insights on this.

229
00:24:51.260 --> 00:25:01.260
There's not a lot of talk from China and Russia about returning to the gold standard, maybe even Russia more than China.

230
00:25:01.260 --> 00:25:10.260
Where do you think that's going to go? Is there any possibility that a country like Russia would go back to the gold standard and we'd be sitting here with fiat money?

231
00:25:10.260 --> 00:25:20.260
Yeah, that's a very good point, Mike. What's happened is that, to give you a little bit of background, the U.S. has been printing so much money and has been running such big deficits.

232
00:25:20.260 --> 00:25:29.260
Deficits, that our debt is held in huge quantities, especially by China, Japan, Russia to some

233
00:25:29.260 --> 00:25:31.460
extent, and many other countries.

234
00:25:31.460 --> 00:25:38.180
For example, just to give you, China holds over $700 billion of U.S. Treasury debt.

235
00:25:38.180 --> 00:25:40.580
And some people say it's near a trillion now.

236
00:25:40.580 --> 00:25:45.020
In any case, what they're worried about is a continual increase in the money supply in

237
00:25:45.020 --> 00:25:50.700
in the U.S. will eventually result in a drop in its value on foreign exchange markets in

238
00:25:50.700 --> 00:25:51.940
relation to their own currencies.

239
00:25:51.940 --> 00:25:55.820
So they don't want to be stuck holding all these dollar securities.

240
00:25:55.820 --> 00:26:01.260
So what they want to do, as China suggested, is to go back to some sort of kind of crazy

241
00:26:01.260 --> 00:26:05.860
paper gold standard that we had or tried to have in the 1960s.

242
00:26:05.860 --> 00:26:08.820
They're called SDRs and they were called paper gold.

243
00:26:08.820 --> 00:26:14.380
Russia has said, well, you know, we not only want to have a basket of currencies,

244
00:26:14.380 --> 00:26:19.340
that, you know, besides the dollar, but we also want to add gold to it. So what Russia

245
00:26:19.340 --> 00:26:23.260
is advocating is sort of a return to sort of partial gold standard,

246
00:26:23.260 --> 00:26:26.060
in which sort of the world currency

247
00:26:26.060 --> 00:26:28.820
unit would be based on a number of currencies,

248
00:26:28.820 --> 00:26:32.240
but also include gold as a commodity.

249
00:26:32.240 --> 00:26:35.460
I don't see this happening, but I think

250
00:26:35.460 --> 00:26:37.120
it's a good development.

251
00:26:37.120 --> 00:26:41.320
It's a good development in that a major country is talking about gold.

252
00:26:41.320 --> 00:26:45.640
And when that happens, no matter how much the establishment media tries to suppress

253
00:26:45.640 --> 00:26:49.240
those references to gold, people begin to think about it.

254
00:26:49.240 --> 00:26:54.560
And people still have this sort of collective memory that we did have a gold standard.

255
00:26:54.560 --> 00:26:59.120
By the way, my MBA students, when I asked them what backed US money, many of them still

256
00:26:59.120 --> 00:27:01.800
say, oh, well, the gold stock in Fort Knox.

257
00:27:01.800 --> 00:27:05.040
I say no, and it's not in Fort Knox, it's in the New York Fed, and we don't know how

258
00:27:05.040 --> 00:27:06.040
much there is.

259
00:27:06.040 --> 00:27:36.040
There is no backing of the U.S. currency, but in any case, what we would need to go back to a gold standard is for the U.S. dollar to drop tremendously in value and for these foreign countries to begin to sell off their securities, that is, to sell off U.S. debt, get dollars in exchange, then sell the dollars for their own currencies. That would drive the value of our dollar down. It would drive interest rates sky-high in the United States.

260
00:27:36.040 --> 00:28:05.840
and it would cause a lot of popular unrest and as a result you might see the powers that be, the establishment, economists and so on, casting around for another alternative and here is where people like myself and others who are associated with the Mises Institute and other people like yourself and the media can begin to really create a campaign for going back to gold.

261
00:28:05.840 --> 00:28:15.840
So it will be a long and arduous process, but I think we're taking the first steps towards it now, and Russia's call for gold, I think, is a good thing.

262
00:28:15.840 --> 00:28:21.840
That's very interesting. So you're feeling optimistic about that.

263
00:28:21.840 --> 00:28:22.840
Yes.

264
00:28:22.840 --> 00:28:24.840
I guess long term.

265
00:28:24.840 --> 00:28:33.840
Long term, I'm optimistic. I'm not optimistic that it's going to happen tomorrow. I think we're going to go through a lot more pain, especially with this G8 stimulus program.

266
00:28:33.840 --> 00:28:39.680
What the U.S. is doing, by the way, and I don't know if you're familiar with the G20,

267
00:28:39.680 --> 00:28:47.000
the 20 largest economies in the world have gathered in London and are talking about getting

268
00:28:47.000 --> 00:28:51.880
the world economy out of this crisis, but they're talking about doing it through more

269
00:28:51.880 --> 00:28:53.240
liquidity.

270
00:28:53.240 --> 00:28:56.840
And you should be aware that whenever governments use the term liquidity, all they mean is money

271
00:28:56.840 --> 00:28:57.840
creation.

272
00:28:57.840 --> 00:29:01.640
There's nothing magical that they can do to get us out of this.

273
00:29:01.640 --> 00:29:09.760
So they have no ideas, modern economists, macro-economists are bankrupt intellectually, so they're just

274
00:29:09.760 --> 00:29:13.800
going back to what they had learned back in the 1930s, that, well, let's just print more

275
00:29:13.800 --> 00:29:14.800
money, okay?

276
00:29:14.800 --> 00:29:19.960
It's the old message of John Maynard Keynes, and so that is what liquidity is, so it's

277
00:29:19.960 --> 00:29:25.640
a liquidity program, or a stimulus program, that's another word that simply means printing

278
00:29:25.640 --> 00:29:55.640
I think an interesting thing to talk about too, Joe, is I know it's frustrating for people like me, who believe in Austrian economics, to watch all this Keynesianism going on, and again, I think what is so frustrating for me is because Austrian economists like you and the other

279
00:29:55.640 --> 00:30:17.640
You've made the statement that Keynesianism is dead from the neck up, but it's still the theory of the powerful. Can we get rid of Keynesianism or are we just going to be stuck with it?

280
00:30:17.640 --> 00:30:39.640
I think this is the final test of Keynesianism. I think everyone now, all the sophisticated mathematical models that the government advisors have been talking about, that the people associated with the Fed have been saying that they can control the money supply with these models and fine-tune the economy, that's all dead now.

281
00:30:39.640 --> 00:30:44.640
They're all scrambling, they're all saying that the way out is to spend, and if that doesn't work, spend some more.

282
00:30:44.640 --> 00:30:47.640
So all we have is government spending like drunken sailors.

283
00:30:47.640 --> 00:30:50.640
And that goes back to the original Keynesianism.

284
00:30:50.640 --> 00:30:54.640
So there is nothing left of Keynesianism except spend, spend, spend.

285
00:30:54.640 --> 00:31:01.640
So when I said that it's dead from the neck up, I mean there is no intellectual justification for it anymore, except that there's nothing else to do.

286
00:31:01.640 --> 00:31:03.640
What else can we do?

287
00:31:03.640 --> 00:31:13.320
So, I think Keynesianism will die, but what I'm fearful of is that what we're going to

288
00:31:13.320 --> 00:31:17.880
get is a move towards socialism as a replacement.

289
00:31:17.880 --> 00:31:23.960
That is getting the government directly involved in running financial organizations, even directly

290
00:31:23.960 --> 00:31:29.760
involved at least temporarily in running manufacturing organizations.

291
00:31:29.760 --> 00:31:31.620
So this is the big fear.

292
00:31:31.620 --> 00:32:01.620
At least Keynesianism kept the government out of any particular area, so if Keynesism fails we're going to have a movement towards greater government control as we did in the 1930s, but that of course will not solve the problem, so that's why I'm saying in the short run I'm not optimistic, I think we're going to have to go through a lot of setbacks as a result of these increasingly socialistic policies that are going to follow.

293
00:32:01.620 --> 00:32:15.620
So, I guess what you're saying is, if you look at it from the politicians' point of view, there's more power moving toward socialism for them.

294
00:32:15.620 --> 00:32:24.620
A pure, capitalistic, free market society really puts them in their place as being not very important, right?

295
00:32:24.620 --> 00:32:30.620
Right, right. I mean, you really don't need... Look, capitalism is self-regulating, it's self-adjusting.

296
00:32:30.620 --> 00:32:37.620
Capitalism isn't a thing, it isn't a mechanism. It's you and me and your listeners just trading goods and services with one another.

297
00:32:37.620 --> 00:32:45.620
Ultimately, that's all capitalism is. And people, if they make mistakes when they make those exchanges, those mistakes can be easily corrected.

298
00:32:45.620 --> 00:32:55.620
If they make mistakes when they form businesses and invest in certain areas, they lose money and they readjust.

299
00:32:55.620 --> 00:33:01.420
So there is a continual profit and loss mechanism pushing people toward producing those things

300
00:33:01.420 --> 00:33:02.420
that consumers want.

301
00:33:02.420 --> 00:33:06.900
But when government begins to step in, it completely distorts those signals and it creates

302
00:33:06.900 --> 00:33:08.820
problems in the economy.

303
00:33:08.820 --> 00:33:13.060
And particularly, as you pointed out earlier and we talked about, with the interest rate.

304
00:33:13.060 --> 00:33:19.260
So the bottom line in all this is that we have to stop the Fed as the first step.

305
00:33:19.260 --> 00:33:22.620
The Fed has to be stopped from printing any more money.

306
00:33:22.620 --> 00:33:27.080
We have to allow this adjustment process to take place and then we have to seriously think

307
00:33:27.080 --> 00:33:35.740
about abolishing the Fed and reinstituting a gold standard, a market commodity as our

308
00:33:35.740 --> 00:33:36.740
basic money.

309
00:33:36.740 --> 00:33:47.380
Yes, so I guess in the last two minutes we have here, Joe, I'm assuming you have concerns

310
00:33:47.380 --> 00:34:00.380
This is like I do too about the protectionism that we're hearing about. But we're talking about the same issues here again, right? I mean, we need a free market, not just within the United States, but internationally as well.

311
00:34:00.380 --> 00:34:07.980
What happened in the 1930s, unfortunately, was that because there was a depression that

312
00:34:07.980 --> 00:34:12.740
affected many countries, the countries tried to push off their unemployment onto other

313
00:34:12.740 --> 00:34:17.580
countries by keeping out the foreign countries' products and therefore increasing the domestic

314
00:34:17.580 --> 00:34:19.460
demand for their own products.

315
00:34:19.460 --> 00:34:24.220
But of course, the foreign countries can simply retaliate against your products, and therefore

316
00:34:24.220 --> 00:34:26.580
you get what's called the trade war.

317
00:34:26.580 --> 00:34:31.500
And trade wars often, as they did in the 1930s, lead to shooting wars.

318
00:34:31.500 --> 00:34:35.820
So we don't want to move away from free markets internationally.

319
00:34:35.820 --> 00:34:41.460
We want to keep low-priced goods coming in from various areas in the world economy, for

320
00:34:41.460 --> 00:34:43.940
which we exchange our own products.

321
00:34:43.940 --> 00:34:47.060
If we don't do that, we're going to be even worse off.

322
00:34:47.060 --> 00:34:51.580
Our real incomes are going to fall even more if we suddenly see prices in Walmart going

323
00:34:51.580 --> 00:34:58.580
in China, the World Bank of China, the World Bank of China, the World Bank of China, the

324
00:35:21.580 --> 00:35:29.820
Again, Mises.org, Joe Salerno has a bunch of videos and audios there that are just absolutely

325
00:35:29.820 --> 00:35:30.820
excellent.

326
00:35:30.820 --> 00:35:31.820
So I recommend that.

327
00:35:31.820 --> 00:35:34.140
So Joe, many thanks for being with me today.

328
00:35:34.140 --> 00:35:36.260
I really appreciate this.

329
00:35:36.260 --> 00:35:37.260
Thank you, Mike.

330
00:35:37.260 --> 00:35:38.260
My pleasure.

331
00:35:38.260 --> 00:35:39.260
Oh yeah.

332
00:35:39.260 --> 00:35:40.260
I hope to get you back on again soon.

333
00:35:40.260 --> 00:35:41.260
I look forward to it.

334
00:35:41.260 --> 00:35:42.260
Thanks, Joe.

335
00:35:42.260 --> 00:35:43.260
Bye-bye.

336
00:35:43.260 --> 00:35:44.260
A pleasure.