WEBVTT

NOTE Inflation and Austrian Economics

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.200
Welcome back and joining us live from Auburn, Alabama in the Mises Institute is Dr. Mark

2
00:00:07.200 --> 00:00:08.200
Thornton.

3
00:00:08.200 --> 00:00:09.960
Mark, how are you doing today, buddy?

4
00:00:09.960 --> 00:00:10.960
I'm doing great, Al.

5
00:00:10.960 --> 00:00:12.880
It's great to be on the show with you here Monday morning.

6
00:00:12.880 --> 00:00:14.960
Well, it's good to have you on.

7
00:00:14.960 --> 00:00:20.160
What based on our email exchange over the weekend, you know, I had a listener send me

8
00:00:20.160 --> 00:00:26.600
an article from a guy who gets into some detail on fractional reserve banking and using that

9
00:00:26.600 --> 00:00:31.480
That is the reason that we're not seeing any inflation at the moment.

10
00:00:31.480 --> 00:00:37.440
I argue based on the way inflation was tallied under Ronald Wilson Reagan and also under

11
00:00:37.440 --> 00:00:40.560
Bill Clinton that we are seeing inflation.

12
00:00:40.560 --> 00:00:46.880
In fact, we are seeing a lot of it in the equities market and we're exporting a bunch

13
00:00:46.880 --> 00:00:47.880
of it.

14
00:00:47.880 --> 00:00:51.280
Could we first speak to how the U.S. exports inflation?

15
00:00:51.280 --> 00:00:58.120
Well, that's a very complex question, Alan, but basically, if the Federal Reserve is printing

16
00:00:58.120 --> 00:01:05.480
money here in the US and it's trying to drive down the value of the dollar in order to enhance

17
00:01:05.480 --> 00:01:12.280
our exports, what happens is that other countries react to that and they start inflating their

18
00:01:12.280 --> 00:01:19.020
own currencies to try to keep their currency value in line with the US dollar or even driving

19
00:01:19.020 --> 00:01:43.140
The Central Bank of the United States, China, Japan, and the European Union, and the European

20
00:01:43.140 --> 00:01:48.020
Central Bank, they're all trying to drive down the value of their currencies.

21
00:01:48.020 --> 00:01:54.700
And so we're seeing big-time inflation, you know, here in the U.S. and a lot of different

22
00:01:54.700 --> 00:02:00.480
areas, you know, when the Fed is printing money, prices are going to rise somewhere

23
00:02:00.480 --> 00:02:01.480
in the economy.

24
00:02:01.480 --> 00:02:06.160
It doesn't necessarily show up in the CPI, especially the one that the government is

25
00:02:06.160 --> 00:02:09.900
managing and editing over time.

26
00:02:09.900 --> 00:02:16.740
But we're exporting this inflation, and so, you know, the Chinese are trying to stay level

27
00:02:16.740 --> 00:02:22.500
with us and that's causing their prices to rise and even riots over there and they're

28
00:02:22.500 --> 00:02:27.020
rushing into the market to try to buy gold and silver.

29
00:02:27.020 --> 00:02:33.580
Prices are rising in Japan, prices are rising in particularly like in Brazil.

30
00:02:33.580 --> 00:02:38.500
They're having a hard time keeping inflation in check there in Brazil.

31
00:02:38.500 --> 00:02:43.260
So there, you know, we have a federal funds rate of one quarter of one percent.

32
00:02:43.260 --> 00:02:49.540
Their actively managed interest rate in Brazil is over 10%.

33
00:02:49.540 --> 00:02:56.960
They're trying to keep inflation at bay over there because we're exporting that inflation

34
00:02:56.960 --> 00:03:00.700
to countries like Brazil and around the world.

35
00:03:00.700 --> 00:03:03.120
Well let's talk about Japan for a moment.

36
00:03:03.120 --> 00:03:09.040
They're what, over 20 years now into destroying their currency and I know from the most recent

37
00:03:09.040 --> 00:03:15.920
Economic Report that came out of Japan their trade deficit has swollen and it's

38
00:03:15.920 --> 00:03:22.360
because I mean it it was increased basically because they're paying more

39
00:03:22.360 --> 00:03:26.120
they're not importing any more than they were a year or two ago it they're just

40
00:03:26.120 --> 00:03:30.880
paying more for it so I'm always baffled by how these countries think that

41
00:03:30.880 --> 00:03:37.520
weakening their currency is somehow helpful to their population well Alan

42
00:03:37.520 --> 00:03:44.520
And that's a great example of how this beggar-thy-neighbor policy amongst central banks actually backfires

43
00:03:44.520 --> 00:03:48.780
on the consumers and the citizens of the country that we're looking at.

44
00:03:48.780 --> 00:03:56.680
So Japan tried to push down the value of the yen, its currency, in order to stimulate exports.

45
00:03:56.680 --> 00:04:02.280
But as most people know, Japan has to import virtually all of its raw materials, all of

46
00:04:32.280 --> 00:04:37.440
in the end and so they're just as you as you point out they're not their quantity

47
00:04:37.440 --> 00:04:43.320
hasn't of imports hasn't risen but the price of them has and so that is what

48
00:04:43.320 --> 00:04:50.760
causes the trade deficit so that they're buying more than they're selling and you

49
00:04:50.760 --> 00:04:54.720
know and so they basically shot themselves in the foot as far as that

50
00:04:54.720 --> 00:05:00.660
aggressive inflationary fighting deflation process and you know countries

51
00:05:00.660 --> 00:05:06.740
is all over the world. It's not just Japan. It's all the major economies as well as Switzerland

52
00:05:06.740 --> 00:05:14.260
is trying to keep the value of its currency competitive, so to speak, against the euro.

53
00:05:14.260 --> 00:05:21.140
And Norway and Sweden and Finland are also trying to keep their currencies level with

54
00:05:21.140 --> 00:05:26.660
the euro. And so everybody's following this song and dance initiated by the Federal Reserve

55
00:05:56.660 --> 00:06:12.900
Where is it, though, that they get taught all this stuff?

56
00:06:12.900 --> 00:06:17.540
I mean, it just seems to me that it's common sense that the stronger your currency, the

57
00:06:17.540 --> 00:06:18.900
better for your people.

58
00:06:18.900 --> 00:06:25.520
And yet, these central bankers have always taken, at least for the bulk of my lifetime,

59
00:06:25.520 --> 00:06:30.920
in the opposite position, that they'll talk a strong dollar, but they do the opposite.

60
00:06:30.920 --> 00:06:35.360
They are always striving to weaken the dollar.

61
00:06:35.360 --> 00:06:37.680
Where do they get off thinking that that is helpful?

62
00:06:37.680 --> 00:06:40.520
I just cannot connect those dots.

63
00:06:40.520 --> 00:06:43.600
Well, they shouldn't be connected, Alan.

64
00:06:43.600 --> 00:06:49.920
It's mainstream economics, the economics that's taught in college classrooms around the country

65
00:06:49.920 --> 00:06:50.920
is very wrong-headed.

66
00:06:50.920 --> 00:06:57.280
It's Keynesian based, it's an economics where the government is playing social engineer

67
00:06:57.280 --> 00:07:04.280
with the economy and you know they're raising and lowering taxes, they're raising and lowering

68
00:07:04.280 --> 00:07:08.320
the budget deficit, they're raising and lowering the trade deficit and they're raising and

69
00:07:08.320 --> 00:07:14.160
lowering the interest rates as if they were an engineer on a locomotive on a railroad trying

70
00:07:44.160 --> 00:07:50.540
and from all the participants are accounted for in market prices, market interest rates,

71
00:07:50.540 --> 00:07:56.680
market value of the currency, all of those parameters have to be adjusted by marketplaces

72
00:07:56.680 --> 00:08:00.800
that are free and open and unmanipulated by government bureaucrats.

73
00:08:00.800 --> 00:08:09.260
And so it's a basic failure of economics in the classroom and the fact that Austrian

74
00:08:09.260 --> 00:08:16.260
and Economics is basically not taught in classrooms about how markets work.

75
00:08:16.260 --> 00:08:21.700
If you go into a standard, everyday, ordinary classroom around the United States, basically

76
00:08:21.700 --> 00:08:26.580
you'll walk in and they'll be talking about some kind of market failure.

77
00:08:26.580 --> 00:08:31.860
And those market failures are generally caused by previous government interventions.

78
00:08:31.860 --> 00:08:36.420
And so it's basically an entirely wrong-headed approach that's been in place now for half

79
00:08:36.420 --> 00:08:38.100
a century.

80
00:08:38.100 --> 00:08:44.740
Keynesian Revolution occurred during the Great Depression. It never has succeeded in practice.

81
00:08:44.740 --> 00:08:49.340
And basically, as you point out, the basic common sense of it, or lack thereof, means

82
00:08:49.340 --> 00:08:55.500
that it's never going to succeed. It's always just going to pile up increasingly larger

83
00:08:55.500 --> 00:09:00.540
errors, mistakes in the economy.

84
00:09:00.540 --> 00:09:06.380
Didn't Keynes himself recant his economic theories towards the end of his life?

85
00:09:06.380 --> 00:09:14.180
So you know, he didn't live very much longer than after his book basically came to fame.

86
00:09:14.180 --> 00:09:20.120
But a lot of observers think that Keynes would be horrified by what his practitioners and

87
00:09:20.120 --> 00:09:28.040
followers have succeeded in implementing once they gained power and that Keynes had more

88
00:09:28.040 --> 00:09:34.820
respect for markets and had more respect for the foibles of bureaucracies because he himself

89
00:09:34.820 --> 00:09:44.820
was a bureaucrat. Certainly a lot of the blame has to go to Keynes himself, but there's also

90
00:09:44.820 --> 00:09:49.820
additional blame to be dealt out with to the followers and practitioners and the people

91
00:09:49.820 --> 00:09:56.320
who have so-called advanced Keynesian economics. There's post-Keynesian economics and new

92
00:09:56.320 --> 00:10:00.720
Keynesian economics. There's all sorts of variations of Keynesian economics, but it

93
00:10:00.720 --> 00:10:07.400
It all basically boils down to the fact that one form of Keynesian economics or another

94
00:10:07.400 --> 00:10:09.680
basically is mainstream economics.

95
00:10:09.680 --> 00:10:10.920
It's what's in the textbook.

96
00:10:10.920 --> 00:10:13.280
It's what's taught in the classroom.

97
00:10:13.280 --> 00:10:21.360
And it's a mistaken foundation of economic analysis and it's very harmful to the economy.

98
00:10:21.360 --> 00:10:28.460
And when Keynesian economics is ignored and markets are allowed to work in places like

99
00:10:28.460 --> 00:10:36.020
Hong Kong and Singapore, Japan and Germany after World War II, we've seen is a great

100
00:10:36.020 --> 00:10:43.180
flowering of economic prosperity and when Keynesian economics is put into place as it

101
00:10:43.180 --> 00:10:49.140
is now in central banks around the world, we see this increasing economic chaos.

102
00:10:49.140 --> 00:10:51.660
Mark, can you stay with me for another segment?

103
00:10:51.660 --> 00:10:53.160
I'd love to.

104
00:10:53.160 --> 00:10:57.420
We're speaking with Mark Thornton, Dr. Mark Thornton of the Mises Institute and when we

105
00:10:57.420 --> 00:11:16.460
Welcome back and joining us for another segment is Dr. Mark Thornton of the Mises Institute

106
00:11:16.460 --> 00:11:19.140
over in Auburn, Alabama.

107
00:11:19.140 --> 00:11:21.940
Mark, thanks for staying on with us.

108
00:11:21.940 --> 00:11:23.940
It's great to be on the show, Alan.

109
00:11:23.940 --> 00:11:25.580
Well, I always enjoy having you on.

110
00:11:25.580 --> 00:11:32.020
When I like to talk economics, can we switch over and talk about now the money supply and

111
00:11:32.020 --> 00:11:37.520
a lot of the central planners, and I've heard this narrative over and over again, I heard

112
00:11:37.520 --> 00:11:43.980
one guy say if you hooked the inflation rate up to a heart monitor, it'd be flat lined

113
00:11:43.980 --> 00:11:50.580
and yet we're seeing evidence of pricing inflation everywhere, but can we first of all define

114
00:11:50.580 --> 00:11:57.620
Inflation in its historical context, how that was morphed into pricing inflation, and then

115
00:11:57.620 --> 00:12:00.340
the various ways we measure the money supply?

116
00:12:00.340 --> 00:12:05.780
Yeah, certainly, and this is a very important distinction to be made between Austrians and

117
00:12:05.780 --> 00:12:07.140
mainstream economists.

118
00:12:07.140 --> 00:12:14.660
Now, the Austrians following history dating back until the existence of money has always

119
00:12:14.660 --> 00:12:19.300
viewed inflation as an increase in the money supply.

120
00:12:19.300 --> 00:12:24.740
I think the standard definition of it before central banking in the United States, say,

121
00:12:24.740 --> 00:12:30.220
100 plus years ago, was a political increase in the money supply.

122
00:12:30.220 --> 00:12:36.300
In other words, where the government engineered an increase in the money supply beyond the

123
00:12:36.300 --> 00:12:39.900
natural flows in terms of the values of gold and silver.

124
00:12:39.900 --> 00:12:43.860
And so that's what the Austrians key in on.

125
00:12:43.860 --> 00:12:50.340
I think everybody should key in on what the central bank is actually doing to increase

126
00:12:50.340 --> 00:12:55.060
or decrease the money supply and of course the natural historical tendency is for the

127
00:12:55.060 --> 00:13:04.180
central bank to increase the money supply and especially so when there's no constraints

128
00:13:04.180 --> 00:13:10.360
on it and of course the central bank doesn't have the constraint on it today that the money

129
00:13:10.360 --> 00:13:14.200
Money that increases has to be backed by gold and silver.

130
00:13:14.200 --> 00:13:21.680
And so since the establishment of the central bank in the United States in 1913, we've seen

131
00:13:21.680 --> 00:13:27.320
this ever-increasing tendency for government to increase the supply of money to its own

132
00:13:27.320 --> 00:13:28.920
benefit of course.

133
00:13:28.920 --> 00:13:35.480
Now on top of that, on top of that increase from the central bank, the banking system

134
00:13:35.480 --> 00:13:41.920
and the system itself can increase the overall amount of money in the economy by increasing

135
00:13:41.920 --> 00:13:45.920
the amount of loans that it creates in the economy.

136
00:13:45.920 --> 00:13:51.760
And so once the central bank increases the supply of money, the banking system, because

137
00:13:51.760 --> 00:13:58.960
it's a fractional reserve banking system, has what's often referred to as leverage,

138
00:13:58.960 --> 00:14:04.080
and that they can increase the supply of money simply by creating loans.

139
00:14:04.080 --> 00:14:10.080
No single bank can effectively increase the money supply on its own, but the banking system

140
00:14:10.080 --> 00:14:17.000
as a whole has this ability to increase the leverage that the Federal Reserve creates

141
00:14:17.000 --> 00:14:19.800
when it initiates increases in the money supply.

142
00:14:19.800 --> 00:14:27.720
It's all a very complicated process, but you can think of the banking system has the ability

143
00:14:27.720 --> 00:14:35.200
to Increase the Money Supply $10 for every $1 that the central bank creates to initiate

144
00:14:35.200 --> 00:14:37.000
the process.

145
00:14:37.000 --> 00:14:44.080
Okay, so the theory of the people who say we don't have any inflation right now is that

146
00:14:44.080 --> 00:14:50.660
due to the lack of lending, and I think that article totally overlooked how much lending

147
00:14:50.660 --> 00:14:58.140
Banking is being done to the federal government, but due to the lack of lending, that has the

148
00:14:58.140 --> 00:15:03.860
reverse effect of fractional reserve banking and then that actually takes money back out

149
00:15:03.860 --> 00:15:06.300
of the money supply.

150
00:15:06.300 --> 00:15:14.260
Well there, you know, obviously banks have shown a lot of reluctance to lend money into

151
00:15:14.260 --> 00:15:15.260
the economy.

152
00:15:15.260 --> 00:15:19.720
Now there's a lot of money, as you say, being lent to the government itself.

153
00:15:19.720 --> 00:15:26.000
And then there's a lot of money just sitting on the sidelines.

154
00:15:26.000 --> 00:15:34.920
Banks have, as a result of the Fed, they have a tremendous amount of excess reserves because

155
00:15:34.920 --> 00:15:39.400
the Fed is paying them interest not to lend the money.

156
00:15:39.400 --> 00:15:45.000
And so they've got a sure bet at a very low interest rate where they can lend money that

157
00:15:45.000 --> 00:15:50.960
that they've basically received from the Fed back to the Fed and get a small return, but

158
00:15:50.960 --> 00:15:52.400
it's not a very large amount.

159
00:15:52.400 --> 00:15:57.640
We're talking about more than, I think it's almost $2 trillion of excess reserves.

160
00:15:57.640 --> 00:16:03.440
Now in the past, the banking system as a whole has not held any excess reserves because they've

161
00:16:03.440 --> 00:16:06.940
always found it profitable to lend it out.

162
00:16:06.940 --> 00:16:14.320
But in this environment, banks are very reluctant to lend money long-term because they rightfully

163
00:16:14.320 --> 00:16:20.120
We feared that there could be price inflation and that all the loans they make today would

164
00:16:20.120 --> 00:16:24.240
end up being underwater for them over the long haul.

165
00:16:24.240 --> 00:16:30.360
So they're not interested in lending money long term to businesses and to households.

166
00:16:30.360 --> 00:16:35.400
And as a consequence, that's had a dampening effect on price inflation.

167
00:16:35.400 --> 00:16:42.120
And if that money gets out, what we're going to see is a tremendous amount of price inflation,

168
00:16:42.120 --> 00:16:49.080
No matter how you bother to measure it, whether it's the government CPI or your own personal

169
00:16:49.080 --> 00:16:56.960
basket of consumer goods that you have to go out and purchase every week and every month.

170
00:16:56.960 --> 00:17:01.220
But if we look around in the economy, that money is leaking out.

171
00:17:01.220 --> 00:17:03.480
It is increasing prices.

172
00:18:03.480 --> 00:18:11.080
The commodity prices in a lot of areas, even gold prices are approaching $1400 an ounce.

173
00:18:11.080 --> 00:18:20.200
So if you get beyond the spike up to $1800, gold is really at the historically extremely

174
00:18:20.200 --> 00:18:21.200
high levels.

175
00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:26.240
And so oil prices approaching $100 a barrel.

176
00:18:26.240 --> 00:18:31.200
So if you look at the broad spectrum of things, if you look at the cutting edge prices, the

177
00:18:31.200 --> 00:18:38.080
This is on world markets, which Americans eventually see, but not necessarily do you

178
00:18:38.080 --> 00:18:40.560
see them immediately.

179
00:18:40.560 --> 00:18:47.120
On all these marketplaces, you see very high prices, historically very high prices, and

180
00:18:47.120 --> 00:18:53.560
so that money is getting out, and what I fear is that if all those excess reserves of banks

181
00:18:53.560 --> 00:18:59.380
ever got cut loose and into the economy and then got leveraged up through the banking

182
00:18:59.380 --> 00:19:04.820
System, you know, I just can't imagine where prices would end up.

183
00:19:04.820 --> 00:19:11.580
Mark, let's talk about that notion, and we're down to about three minutes, of Bernanke is

184
00:19:11.580 --> 00:19:18.740
creating money out of nothing, lending it to the banks for virtually nothing, and then

185
00:19:18.740 --> 00:19:24.260
paying them interest on the money that the Fed lent them not to lend the money out to

186
00:19:24.260 --> 00:19:25.740
the rest of us.

187
00:19:25.740 --> 00:19:32.660
How in the world could that be helpful to the economy and what stretch of the imagination

188
00:19:32.660 --> 00:19:37.940
does it take to say that that activity would lower the unemployment rate?

189
00:19:37.940 --> 00:19:43.020
Well, it doesn't help the economy and the facts speak for themselves.

190
00:19:43.020 --> 00:19:47.220
What it does do is it helps the big banks because it stabilizes them.

191
00:19:47.220 --> 00:19:53.900
It's like giving them an IV, a morphine drip and oxygen and all that kind of stuff to try

192
00:19:53.900 --> 00:20:03.540
Stabilize the Patient, which is the nation's five or six largest banks that are being impacted

193
00:20:03.540 --> 00:20:05.420
by these policies.

194
00:20:05.420 --> 00:20:11.420
Those are the ones where, and Bernanke basically wrote his dissertation on what caused the

195
00:20:11.420 --> 00:20:17.940
Great Depression and his conclusion was that it was a failure of the central banks to bail

196
00:20:17.940 --> 00:20:22.100
out the large banks that caused the Great Depression.

197
00:20:22.100 --> 00:20:27.420
And so, you know, if you were looking around for a guy, you know, if you were a large bank

198
00:20:27.420 --> 00:20:32.240
and you were looking around for a guy who was interested in and willing to bail out

199
00:20:32.240 --> 00:20:37.540
the big banks, well, Ben Bernanke is your man because he's the guy that virtually wrote

200
00:20:37.540 --> 00:20:43.860
the book on, actually wrote the book on why you need to bail out the big banks if they

201
00:20:43.860 --> 00:20:46.660
get in trouble and that's exactly what he's done.

202
00:20:46.660 --> 00:20:51.140
But bailing out the big banks is not the overall economy.

203
00:20:51.140 --> 00:21:00.540
It's not Main Street. It's not the average ordinary economy out there. That's basically

204
00:21:00.540 --> 00:21:05.640
how it lines up. There's no, I don't have any expectations that bailing out the big banks

205
00:21:05.640 --> 00:21:09.140
is going to help the economy over the long run at all.

206
00:21:09.140 --> 00:21:14.020
Mark, it's been a pleasure, buddy. It flies by. This is Mark Thornton, Dr. Mark Thornton

207
00:21:14.020 --> 00:21:18.340
of the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, and we'll have Mark on again real soon. Mark,

208
00:21:18.340 --> 00:21:20.140
thanks a lot, buddy.

209
00:21:20.140 --> 00:21:22.140
MISES.ORG
