WEBVTT

NOTE Libertarianism: Is it Conservatism’s Future?

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.280
Maybe some of these questions that we raised tonight about declining birth rate, about

2
00:00:05.280 --> 00:00:11.560
environmental activism, treating humanity as a plague, about the problems we have in

3
00:00:11.560 --> 00:00:15.240
Downton. He said, can be answered by our next guest, because I know that he's a, what do

4
00:00:15.240 --> 00:00:21.800
they call it, a polymath? Who's very, very smart in very many areas. I'm talking about

5
00:00:21.800 --> 00:00:27.120
the former chief economist for the Fraser Institute, the current Harold E. Wirth Eminent

6
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:33.480
Scholar, Chair in Economics, and Professor of Economics at Loyola University, New Orleans,

7
00:00:33.480 --> 00:00:38.600
and the Senior Fellow with the Ludwig von Mises Institute, that is a prestigious institute,

8
00:00:38.600 --> 00:00:44.060
and self-described libertarian and macro-capitalist philosopher, I love that, I got to love this

9
00:00:44.060 --> 00:00:47.040
man as well, Dr. Walter Block, hello Walter.

10
00:00:47.040 --> 00:00:50.320
Hi Terry, good to see you, hear from you again.

11
00:00:50.320 --> 00:00:55.320
Yeah, well if you turn your computer on and go to www.roadkillradio, you can see us too

12
00:01:25.320 --> 00:01:32.320
Let it from virtual nothingness to being the fifth or sixth major party in Canada.

13
00:01:32.320 --> 00:01:34.320
Or the fifth largest national party.

14
00:01:34.320 --> 00:01:35.320
Fifth largest national party.

15
00:01:35.320 --> 00:01:37.320
Sixth largest if you include the block.

16
00:01:37.320 --> 00:01:39.320
So there you go.

17
00:01:39.320 --> 00:01:53.320
So I'm not sure if the Christian, well I'm pretty sure the Christian Heritage Party and the libertarian parties across Canada and North America meet in some areas, but they don't have a lot of convergence.

18
00:01:53.320 --> 00:02:13.320
Walter, the reason I have you on tonight is because it seems that every second week or so on our show something to do with, even though Kerry Simpson and I and Ron Gray, we're broadly social conservatives, right?

19
00:02:13.320 --> 00:02:29.320
I'd say Ron's a paleoconservative and I don't know how exactly to describe Kerry, but anyway, we're definitely social conservatives, we believe in strong families and we're against abortion and all these sort of stuff like this.

20
00:02:29.320 --> 00:02:38.320
But every couple of weeks, something comes up where the libertarians come to the fore and we say, yeah, they got a good idea there, yeah, they got a good idea there.

21
00:02:38.320 --> 00:02:49.320
And the thing that's been coming up most often, in B.C. we had a provincial election that neither Kerry nor I could stand voting for any of the established parties.

22
00:02:49.320 --> 00:02:54.320
I ended up voting for a libertarian candidate, thinking, you know what, this is a good option in this particular election.

23
00:02:54.320 --> 00:02:59.320
Kerry ended up spoiling her ballot. Ron, I can't remember how you voted. You might have had a conservative candidate.

24
00:02:59.320 --> 00:03:00.320
No, I didn't.

25
00:03:00.320 --> 00:03:01.320
You didn't?

26
00:03:01.320 --> 00:03:07.320
Well, yeah. No, I didn't have a B.C. conservative candidate, so I wrote on my ballot, no conservative candidate.

27
00:03:07.320 --> 00:03:13.320
Okay, well there you go. I think Kerry said if she had had a libertarian candidate, she would have voted libertarian.

28
00:03:13.320 --> 00:03:20.320
So we talk about that and then we see in Alberta there's a new party rising up, the Wildrose Alliance,

29
00:03:20.320 --> 00:03:25.320
in opposition to the so-called conservative party in Alberta, the government there,

30
00:03:25.320 --> 00:03:30.320
and the leading candidate for that leadership is Danielle Smith, a self-described libertarian.

31
00:03:30.320 --> 00:03:35.320
Dr. Block, what is going on here? Are libertarians taking over the world?

32
00:03:35.320 --> 00:03:50.320
We're everywhere. As the homosexuals say, we're everywhere. We're accustomed to getting 1 or 2 percent of the vote in Canada and maybe 3 or 4 percent in the U.S.

33
00:03:50.320 --> 00:04:00.320
But with Ron Paul putting us on the map, we're way above that. Ron Paul True ran for the Republican Party nomination for president.

34
00:04:00.320 --> 00:04:09.320
But in a previous election, he ran as the Libertarian candidate, and he's certainly a Libertarian, even though he's in the Republican Party.

35
00:04:09.320 --> 00:04:18.020
So he has escalated our vision. People now see us much more than they did before, and he's given us a big boost.

36
00:04:18.020 --> 00:04:30.020
Well, I'd certainly encourage people to get on YouTube and enter Ron Paul and do a search, because he has some extremely interesting things to say about the current economic problems.

37
00:04:30.020 --> 00:04:45.020
Oh yeah, well he's got something to say about a lot of things. He's sometimes called Dr. No, because whenever there's a vote of 437 to 1 on something, he's usually the one, almost always the one.

38
00:04:45.020 --> 00:04:58.020
You're talking about social conservatives being pro-family. Well, libertarians are pro-family. I guess we're also in favor of single people too, if people don't want to get married.

39
00:04:58.020 --> 00:05:04.340
So there might be some overlap between Christian heritage or social conservatives and libertarians,

40
00:05:04.340 --> 00:05:10.460
but there are obviously some differences as well, for example, legalizing drugs might

41
00:05:10.460 --> 00:05:14.900
be one of them, libertarians believe in legalizing drugs and I think social conservatives would

42
00:05:14.900 --> 00:05:15.900
be against that.

43
00:05:15.900 --> 00:05:20.300
It doesn't mean that libertarians favor the use of drugs, there's a very sharp distinction

44
00:05:20.300 --> 00:05:25.540
to be made between favoring the use of and favoring the legalization of.

45
00:05:25.540 --> 00:05:29.980
If my kids, God forbid, ever got into drugs, I would hate it and I certainly wouldn't want

46
00:05:29.980 --> 00:05:30.980
them to do it.

47
00:05:30.980 --> 00:05:35.060
But I wouldn't want them to be arrested for it because they're adults and they would only

48
00:05:35.060 --> 00:05:36.060
be hurting themselves.

49
00:05:36.060 --> 00:05:43.180
Though, again, Ron Paul has said some interesting things there about Amsterdam and, you know,

50
00:05:43.180 --> 00:05:48.260
the effect of legalizing prostitution and drugs in that city, and he is not...

51
00:05:48.260 --> 00:05:50.860
Yeah, I think Portugal is now legalized drugs.

52
00:05:50.860 --> 00:05:51.860
Yes, they have.

53
00:05:51.860 --> 00:05:54.820
Amsterdam is for a long time legalized prostitution.

54
00:05:54.820 --> 00:05:58.380
I have a daughter, I wouldn't want to be a prostitute, God forbid, but

55
00:05:58.380 --> 00:06:01.900
if she were, somehow, I wouldn't want to be arrested. She's an adult and she would

56
00:06:01.900 --> 00:06:05.440
only be engaging in consensual behavior between

57
00:06:05.440 --> 00:06:06.740
adults, so

58
00:06:06.740 --> 00:06:10.300
why should she go to jail for that? The purpose of the law is to stop people

59
00:06:10.300 --> 00:06:12.500
from murdering and raping each other and

60
00:06:12.500 --> 00:06:15.260
killing each other and stealing from each other, namely

61
00:06:15.260 --> 00:06:20.140
engaging in uninvited border crossings, namely engaging in aggression.

62
00:06:20.140 --> 00:06:45.640
Well, although Victor Malarek, the guy with CTV, he's got two books out now, the Natasha's and the John's, about prostitution, he argues very strongly against legalized prostitution because he says that this is almost never consensual behavior. These women are being exploited and oppressed. So that's probably a different aspect of that problem.

63
00:06:45.640 --> 00:06:51.140
Well, if they're being exploited and oppressed, that means that they're being made to be prostitutes against their will.

64
00:06:51.140 --> 00:06:51.640
And they are.

65
00:06:51.640 --> 00:06:58.640
And what we should do then is put those people in jail who are oppressing them, but not stop them from being prostitutes.

66
00:06:58.640 --> 00:07:04.340
If someone is forcing someone else into a life of prostitution, that's called slavery or kidnapping.

67
00:07:04.340 --> 00:07:06.640
Bingo. Those were you and I agree on that issue.

68
00:07:06.640 --> 00:07:07.140
Yeah.

69
00:07:07.140 --> 00:07:07.640
That's right.

70
00:07:07.640 --> 00:07:09.640
And listen, I want to bring you a piece of news.

71
00:07:09.640 --> 00:07:10.140
Okay.

72
00:07:10.140 --> 00:07:29.140
This will be an exclusive news for Roadkill Radio, the first medium in Canada to break this news, largely because the rest of the mainstream media, don't care, but the whole executive of the Social Credit Party of Canada,

73
00:07:29.140 --> 00:07:31.140
Social Credit Party of Canada? Does that still exist?

74
00:07:31.140 --> 00:07:37.620
and it still exists and they have en masse joined the Christian Heritage Party now and

75
00:07:37.620 --> 00:07:46.280
the leader of the Canada Action Party, Dr. Moulton, has quit that party to join the Christian

76
00:07:46.280 --> 00:07:50.060
Heritage Party because he feels he'd be able to be more effective for the principles.

77
00:07:50.060 --> 00:07:53.740
You remember that party was the one that Paul Hellyer started?

78
00:07:53.740 --> 00:07:56.460
Yes, yeah.

79
00:07:56.460 --> 00:08:03.100
So poor libertarians are left out in the cold again here, Walter, but okay, well there's

80
00:08:03.100 --> 00:08:04.100
news, okay?

81
00:08:04.100 --> 00:08:09.900
Walter, both sides of the border, and here's something where I think social conservatives

82
00:08:09.900 --> 00:08:16.540
and conservatives of all stripes, libertarians, maybe with the leadership of libertarians

83
00:08:16.540 --> 00:08:23.140
can unite on, is this growth in government in response to the economic problems that

84
00:08:23.140 --> 00:08:35.140
We've been swept over, especially from south of the border, by this, well, let's grow government bigger, bigger, bigger in response to this.

85
00:08:35.140 --> 00:08:44.140
In Canada, we're seeing, okay, well, let's get all this extra money here in B.C. by joining the harmonized sales tax regime.

86
00:08:44.140 --> 00:08:47.140
Because you know what? It's going to be a lot easier.

87
00:08:47.140 --> 00:08:53.460
Walter, all the opposition to the HST that's fractional, you know, it's from this restaurant

88
00:08:53.460 --> 00:08:59.360
segment, this entertainment segment, the ski hills, this group here, this group here.

89
00:08:59.360 --> 00:09:04.300
So it's easy to kind of ride out that opposition, but it's much more difficult to ride out opposition

90
00:09:04.300 --> 00:09:09.740
if we started cutting back government because the unions will get up in arms.

91
00:09:09.740 --> 00:09:14.340
Anyway, that's a little theory that I have there, Walter.

92
00:09:14.340 --> 00:09:23.340
But how can we start getting the message out there again that we can't just endlessly grow

93
00:09:23.340 --> 00:09:29.260
government in response to problems like this?

94
00:09:29.260 --> 00:09:30.260
Big question, Walter.

95
00:09:30.260 --> 00:09:31.460
Have you been thinking about this?

96
00:09:31.460 --> 00:09:32.460
What can we do here?

97
00:09:32.460 --> 00:09:33.460
Oh, yes.

98
00:09:33.460 --> 00:09:37.660
Well, I think that government is the cause of these problems and growing government in

99
00:09:37.660 --> 00:09:42.940
order to solve them is sort of like pouring gasoline on a fire in an attempt to put it

100
00:09:42.940 --> 00:09:44.260
out.

101
00:09:44.260 --> 00:09:50.140
The government created the crisis in the first place. Ron Paul has been very outspoken on

102
00:09:50.140 --> 00:09:56.380
this with regard to the Fed. The Fed has artificially lowered interest rates through its inflationary

103
00:09:56.380 --> 00:10:02.740
policies and this has led to a misallocation of capital resources and it's led to these

104
00:10:02.740 --> 00:10:11.860
booms and busts. And we're now enjoying the bust part of it. And the way that the government

105
00:10:11.860 --> 00:10:18.340
The reason it's attempting to get us out of this is by propping up industries that never

106
00:10:18.340 --> 00:10:21.500
should have been built up as much as they were in the first place.

107
00:10:21.500 --> 00:10:22.500
You use the term circus.

108
00:10:22.500 --> 00:10:31.260
The analogy I sometimes use is it's as if a store, a restaurant knew that the circus

109
00:10:31.260 --> 00:10:36.940
was coming into town and figured that the circus would bring a lot of people and a lot

110
00:10:36.940 --> 00:10:41.380
of customers and a lot of the circus workers, so what they do is they double the size of

111
00:10:41.380 --> 00:10:45.360
for their restaurant. And this is very good for the two weeks that the circus is in town,

112
00:10:45.360 --> 00:10:50.680
but after the circus leaves, you've got to double the size of a restaurant, double what

113
00:10:50.680 --> 00:10:56.940
would be justified by the ordinary weekly trade. And they're about to go broke, and

114
00:10:56.940 --> 00:11:02.580
the restaurant gets the government to subsidize and prop up this double-sized restaurant.

115
00:11:02.580 --> 00:11:06.960
Well, it never should have been built in the first place, and you know, why subsidize it?

116
00:11:06.960 --> 00:11:10.300
And if you subsidize it, what you're doing is taking money away from other things that

117
00:11:10.300 --> 00:11:33.300
So government is not the solution to these problems, government is the cause of these problems, but Obama and Harper and other leftists, and I use that word advisedly, are I don't know what, enthralled by the Keynesian vision that if the government just, we can spend our way out of the depression and I think this is just false economics.

118
00:11:33.300 --> 00:11:42.300
Well, you know, they're driven there. Certainly Harper has been driven there by the majority of the parties, all the parties in parliament.

119
00:11:42.300 --> 00:11:52.300
He's reflecting a broad consensus of opinion, and so there wasn't anything to sort of hold him back.

120
00:11:52.300 --> 00:12:02.300
I mean, his government would have fallen, A, but B, there was really no alternative in terms of everything was to the left of him there.

121
00:12:02.300 --> 00:12:10.580
I just get frustrated here when for so long we did see, from various points of view, from

122
00:12:10.580 --> 00:12:15.220
various political parties, from think tanks and things like that, a really well-stated

123
00:12:15.220 --> 00:12:20.140
argument for market principles, smaller government, lower taxes and things like that, then overnight

124
00:12:20.140 --> 00:12:26.660
in the face of the first sort of not even a full-scale hurricane, but a gale-force wind

125
00:12:26.660 --> 00:12:31.400
perhaps, we see this total reversal.

126
00:12:31.400 --> 00:12:34.520
Is this sort of inevitable?

127
00:12:34.520 --> 00:12:39.120
I can't say it's inevitable, but somehow our society is at a place where the answer is

128
00:12:39.120 --> 00:12:40.900
always more government.

129
00:12:40.900 --> 00:12:48.600
How do we get the regular people to start thinking that the answer is a more self-motivated

130
00:12:48.600 --> 00:12:50.800
individual effort or something like that?

131
00:12:50.800 --> 00:12:51.800
How do we change that?

132
00:12:51.800 --> 00:12:52.800
That's a big question.

133
00:12:52.800 --> 00:12:59.520
Let me tell you a little story to illustrate just how deeply embedded this anti-economics

134
00:12:59.520 --> 00:13:03.520
for Economic Illiteracy is in the people.

135
00:13:03.520 --> 00:13:09.720
I now teach in New Orleans and in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, which by the way the

136
00:13:09.720 --> 00:13:13.360
damage was not caused by the hurricane, it was caused by the Army Corps of Engineers

137
00:13:13.360 --> 00:13:16.120
and FEMA, a government agency.

138
00:13:16.120 --> 00:13:22.080
What happened was that the prices of all sorts of things in the aftermath of this debacle

139
00:13:22.080 --> 00:13:23.080
arose.

140
00:13:23.080 --> 00:13:29.120
For example, a bucket of ice was a dollar a bucket before and afterward because all

141
00:13:29.120 --> 00:13:34.360
the Electricity was shut off, it was like 20-25 dollars a bucket. So some guy came down

142
00:13:34.360 --> 00:13:41.360
from Ohio with a big truck full of ice cubes and started selling buckets of ice for 20

143
00:13:42.440 --> 00:13:49.000
bucks a bucket and there were a bunch of people lining up to buy it and the first five or

144
00:13:49.000 --> 00:13:54.640
so people online had already bought it. And then what happened is that the cops came and

145
00:13:54.640 --> 00:14:00.600
arrested the guy for price gouging, and do you know what the reaction of the people who

146
00:14:00.600 --> 00:14:05.960
are still online, willing, more than willing to pay 20 bucks for a bucket of ice?

147
00:14:05.960 --> 00:14:07.520
They applauded the cops.

148
00:14:07.520 --> 00:14:09.560
Can you imagine that?

149
00:14:09.560 --> 00:14:15.060
I mean, here was this guy come all the way from Ohio somewhere to bring them ice.

150
00:14:15.060 --> 00:14:19.760
He was doing them a favor because the ice was just not available and they needed the

151
00:14:19.760 --> 00:14:20.760
ice.

152
00:14:20.760 --> 00:14:25.140
And I think even one of the people online called the cops.

153
00:14:25.140 --> 00:14:30.820
So this just sort of shows the depth of the pravity or the depth of economic illiteracy

154
00:14:30.820 --> 00:14:32.760
on the part of these people.

155
00:14:32.760 --> 00:14:38.100
And I remember the governor of Louisiana started calling for price gouges to be put

156
00:14:38.100 --> 00:14:39.100
in jail.

157
00:14:39.100 --> 00:14:43.780
Well, the economics of it is that whenever there's a shortage, and there was in the aftermath

158
00:14:43.780 --> 00:14:45.900
of Katrina, the prices rise.

159
00:14:45.900 --> 00:14:49.500
And the rise in prices has two salutary effects.

160
00:14:49.500 --> 00:14:55.500
One, a rationing effect, namely, at the old price, the first guys online are going to grab it all up.

161
00:14:55.500 --> 00:15:00.500
Whereas at the higher price, they'll share and they'll let the people at the back of the line get some too.

162
00:15:00.500 --> 00:15:07.500
And secondly, even more important, the high price is a signal that everyone from everywhere else should come and help these people.

163
00:15:07.500 --> 00:15:13.500
And as they bring stuff, the price comes back down to the normal pre-hurricane price.

164
00:15:13.500 --> 00:15:19.980
There was just no appreciation of markets, and I have a theory about this, and my theory

165
00:15:19.980 --> 00:15:23.860
is that it's biological.

166
00:15:23.860 --> 00:15:28.460
I'm sort of a sociobiologist in this regard.

167
00:15:28.460 --> 00:15:34.220
Add that to your libertarian and macro-capitalist philosopher as well, okay, so explain yourself

168
00:15:34.220 --> 00:15:35.220
now.

169
00:15:35.220 --> 00:15:42.780
I'm an anarcho-capitalist, and I guess philosopher, I'm not sure about that, but why not?

170
00:15:42.780 --> 00:15:48.260
You see, the sociobiology is the theory that we are the way we are because of what it meant

171
00:15:48.260 --> 00:15:51.460
to survive a million years ago.

172
00:15:51.460 --> 00:15:58.300
For example, nowadays, bathtubs kill many, many, many more people than snakes do.

173
00:15:58.300 --> 00:16:03.940
And yet, little kids are instinctively afraid of snakes, as are adults.

174
00:16:03.940 --> 00:16:09.020
When Indiana Jones was guarding the jewelry, they didn't surround the jewelry with bathtubs,

175
00:16:09.020 --> 00:16:11.260
they surround it with snakes.

176
00:16:11.260 --> 00:16:15.700
People have an instinctive, visceral fear, hatred of snakes, but not bathtub.

177
00:16:15.700 --> 00:16:16.700
Why?

178
00:16:16.700 --> 00:16:20.340
Well, a million years ago, if you didn't have a fear of snakes, you didn't live, and you

179
00:16:20.340 --> 00:16:22.060
didn't leave much progeny.

180
00:16:22.060 --> 00:16:31.500
So, in other words, fear of snakes was pro-biological, but fear of bathtubs was neither here nor

181
00:16:31.500 --> 00:16:32.500
there.

182
00:16:32.500 --> 00:16:36.860
Well, I've got a little grandson who has an aversion to bathtubs, so that may blow the

183
00:16:36.860 --> 00:16:37.860
theory.

184
00:16:37.860 --> 00:16:38.860
He takes after his grandfather.

185
00:16:38.860 --> 00:16:48.660
Well, you see, getting back to the economics of it and why people are instinctively economically

186
00:16:48.660 --> 00:16:53.860
illiterate and why every freshman class I've ever had in economics are just totally lefties

187
00:16:53.860 --> 00:16:58.660
and totally unappreciative of markets, the reason is that a million years ago, there

188
00:16:58.660 --> 00:17:03.700
were two ways that we can cooperate, and we were weaker than the saber-toothed tigers

189
00:17:03.700 --> 00:17:08.060
and the bears and those guys, and the only way we could survive as a species was by cooperating.

190
00:17:08.060 --> 00:17:25.060
Well, there are two ways of cooperating. One is explicit cooperation. We're pretty good at that. Explicit cooperation is the idea you help me, I help you, I'm sick this week, you get me food next week, you're sick, I get you food. The human creatures who do that will survive and the ones that don't, won't survive.

191
00:17:25.060 --> 00:17:29.060
Adam Smith has even written an entire book about the Charitable Instinct, which I read.

192
00:17:29.060 --> 00:17:31.660
The Theory of Moral Sentiments, that's right.

193
00:17:31.660 --> 00:17:36.980
But there's another, and so this is biologically ingrained in us, we are selected as the people

194
00:17:36.980 --> 00:17:41.300
who were cooperative with each other, and that's why we survive.

195
00:17:41.300 --> 00:17:45.740
And that's why if you see a starving person on the street, or a person hit by a car, you

196
00:17:45.740 --> 00:17:49.260
know, the natural instinct is to stop and get out and help them.

197
00:17:49.260 --> 00:17:53.340
Okay, but then there's another kind of, and this sort of cooperation is good for small

198
00:17:53.340 --> 00:17:58.300
groups, and we lived in small groups a million years ago, 25, 50 people.

199
00:17:58.300 --> 00:18:04.340
But if we're going to cooperate in terms of millions or billions of people, you can't

200
00:18:04.340 --> 00:18:06.780
cooperate explicitly with a billion people.

201
00:18:06.780 --> 00:18:12.260
You know, the idea that I invited 10,000 of my best friends to my birthday party is silly.

202
00:18:12.260 --> 00:18:17.940
We're not constituted to be able to have 10,000 best friends or to have good relations with

203
00:18:17.940 --> 00:18:19.060
10,000 different people.

204
00:18:19.060 --> 00:18:24.980
And yet, if we're going to have a sophisticated modern economy, we have to cooperate with

205
00:18:24.980 --> 00:18:26.420
millions of people.

206
00:18:26.420 --> 00:18:30.820
In the lowly pencil, no one person can make the pencil. It's a cooperative effort of

207
00:18:30.820 --> 00:18:35.700
the graphite and the wood and the paint and the metal and the rubber and the whole business.

208
00:18:35.700 --> 00:18:42.140
Well, this is implicit cooperation. It's through markets, but we're not hard-wired to appreciate

209
00:18:42.140 --> 00:18:49.620
that. That's why the people online that pick up this ice, they weren't hard-wired to appreciate

210
00:18:49.620 --> 00:18:54.660
the benefits of a higher price and gouging. That's why we have such a problem. That's

211
00:18:54.660 --> 00:19:00.500
That's why government keeps increasing. That's why it's sort of like the Rock of Sisyphus.

212
00:19:00.500 --> 00:19:06.620
We people who know economics and are into libertarianism, we try to convince people

213
00:19:06.620 --> 00:19:11.500
of this, but no sooner do we get the rock halfway up the hill, its thoughts falling down

214
00:19:11.500 --> 00:19:17.740
because we're going against biology. That's the long and short of my theory as to why

215
00:19:17.740 --> 00:19:20.900
we live in an era of economic illiteracy.

216
00:19:20.900 --> 00:19:34.620
Walter, I couldn't think of a better time to introduce that particular sound effect,

217
00:19:34.620 --> 00:19:41.500
because as our regular listeners know, that sound effect signals the naming of our Roadkill

218
00:19:41.500 --> 00:19:44.820
Radio Warrior of the Week.

219
00:19:44.820 --> 00:19:50.740
And you, Walter Block, because of your perception, perceptive insights into the nature of markets

220
00:19:50.740 --> 00:19:57.500
and the foibles of humanity have earned a place in our Hall of Fame, the Roadkill Radio Warrior

221
00:19:57.500 --> 00:19:58.500
of the Week.

222
00:19:58.500 --> 00:20:04.260
You join an illustrious group of people who have been so honored, and by the way, so named

223
00:20:04.260 --> 00:20:10.540
the Roadkill Radio Warriors of the Week because so many of the people we honor are knocked

224
00:20:10.540 --> 00:20:15.100
down on the side of the road, get back up, get knocked down again, get back up, get knocked

225
00:20:15.100 --> 00:20:19.500
down again and are still standing and still fighting, you're one of them, Ron and I are

226
00:20:19.500 --> 00:20:22.340
Part of that we hope as well, that's why we're doing this show.

227
00:20:22.340 --> 00:20:26.020
Kerry Simpson certainly is, so congratulations Walter Block!

228
00:20:26.020 --> 00:20:27.820
Oh, you're very kind, thank you.

229
00:20:27.820 --> 00:20:28.820
That's good.

230
00:20:28.820 --> 00:20:33.300
So it's a little bit of fun we have, the sound effect always signals that.

231
00:20:33.300 --> 00:20:37.220
And while we're pausing here from our discussion, it's almost the top of the hour, I want to

232
00:20:37.220 --> 00:20:42.060
tell our listeners and viewers, hello out there, that you're listening to Roadkill Radio.

233
00:20:42.060 --> 00:20:47.940
If you'd like to email us, please do so at roadkillradio.live.ca, that's again email

234
00:20:47.940 --> 00:20:54.180
at RoadkillRadio at Live.ca, Ron has got his computer fired up there, the coal generated

235
00:20:54.180 --> 00:20:59.460
computer, or you can call us, we've had a caller earlier today, a really perceptive

236
00:20:59.460 --> 00:21:07.460
caller from Victoria, area code 604-525-4167, if you have questions for our guest Walter

237
00:21:07.460 --> 00:21:12.060
Block or comments on this particular subject.

238
00:21:12.060 --> 00:21:18.380
So we'll get back to the big broad issue of libertarianism. Walter, is libertarianism

239
00:21:18.380 --> 00:21:25.260
and the libertarian parties always doomed to be a party of the fringe? Because they're

240
00:21:25.260 --> 00:21:30.100
not a consensus party. They never will be. They stand for these issues and these are

241
00:21:30.100 --> 00:21:35.140
the issues election after election after election, it seems to me. They're never really going

242
00:21:35.140 --> 00:21:41.820
to win power, but is the best hope for libertarianism to influence the other parties, to put forward

243
00:21:41.820 --> 00:21:46.060
policies that they can say, ah-ha, yeah, here's one we need now. Is that what you...

244
00:21:46.060 --> 00:21:48.060
Well, that's sort of the Fabian

245
00:21:48.060 --> 00:21:50.480
and New Democratic Party

246
00:21:50.480 --> 00:21:53.760
communist line in the Western countries, namely,

247
00:21:53.760 --> 00:21:57.280
you never really win the election. I'm sorry for insulting you, is that what I just did?

248
00:21:57.280 --> 00:21:58.620
I'm not sure. I'm sorry.

249
00:21:58.620 --> 00:22:04.000
Did I insult you by making... Oh, no, no, no. It's a perfectly reasonable

250
00:22:04.000 --> 00:22:09.140
technique. It can work for the people on the left, it can work for the people on the right.

251
00:22:09.140 --> 00:22:14.740
Look, right before the Berlin Wall fell in 89 and right before the Soviet Union went

252
00:22:14.740 --> 00:22:19.500
belly up in 91, nobody predicted that stuff.

253
00:22:19.500 --> 00:22:21.340
Nobody said, you know, the Berlin Wall is going to fall.

254
00:22:21.340 --> 00:22:26.700
I mean, Ronald Reagan said tear down this wall, but nobody thought it would happen.

255
00:22:26.700 --> 00:22:29.740
Nobody thought the Soviet Union would change.

256
00:22:29.740 --> 00:22:30.740
Sometimes these things happen.

257
00:22:30.740 --> 00:22:31.740
You never know.

258
00:22:31.740 --> 00:22:32.740
Who knows?

259
00:22:32.740 --> 00:22:37.740
Maybe Ron Paul in 2012 will become president.

260
00:22:37.740 --> 00:22:42.100
I'm one of his advisors. I think that if he wins, he'll appoint me head of the

261
00:22:42.100 --> 00:22:44.340
Fed or head of the labor

262
00:22:44.340 --> 00:22:47.260
secretary or something with the

263
00:22:47.260 --> 00:22:49.500
goal of getting rid of those things.

264
00:22:49.500 --> 00:22:53.740
If Ron Paul makes you head of the Fed, that'll be a really short-term

265
00:22:53.740 --> 00:22:57.500
job because I'm pretty sure he'll shut that institution down.

266
00:22:57.500 --> 00:23:03.060
Well, no, he'll ask me to shut it down. That's why I would be the head of it.

267
00:23:03.060 --> 00:23:05.540
Let's talk specifically about the...

268
00:23:05.540 --> 00:23:10.500
You never know for sure, and you know, in a sense, the question of are we likely to win,

269
00:23:10.500 --> 00:23:15.620
will freedom win out, will libertarianism triumph, it's an interesting speculative question,

270
00:23:15.620 --> 00:23:17.580
but I tell you, it really doesn't turn my crack.

271
00:23:17.580 --> 00:23:18.580
You know why?

272
00:23:18.580 --> 00:23:23.940
Because I will not change what I do one-eyed out or whether the case for optimism is good

273
00:23:23.940 --> 00:23:28.620
or the case for pessimism is good, I'm going to do exactly what I'm doing anyway, namely

274
00:23:28.620 --> 00:23:33.180
Trying to promote liberty through writing and speaking and teaching and publishing and

275
00:23:33.180 --> 00:23:34.180
stuff like that.

276
00:23:34.180 --> 00:23:40.420
So, while it's of interest and the listeners may be interested in this, it doesn't really

277
00:23:40.420 --> 00:23:47.100
impact my life and I don't think it impacts Ron or Terry, you guys, your lives because

278
00:23:47.100 --> 00:23:49.180
you're going to be doing what you're doing anyway.

279
00:23:49.180 --> 00:23:50.180
Yeah.

280
00:23:50.180 --> 00:23:54.260
I'm trying to look at this from a practical, political point of view right now.

281
00:23:54.260 --> 00:24:00.980
I think Danielle Smith and the Wild Rose Party, she's talking, she's libertarian and has lots

282
00:24:00.980 --> 00:24:08.780
of libertarian principles to which she adheres, but in this particular political framework,

283
00:24:08.780 --> 00:24:15.660
I think what she's putting forward are probably, are issues regarding the size of government

284
00:24:15.660 --> 00:24:22.140
and that's one of many issues that she could put forward, but this is the one that resonates.

285
00:24:22.140 --> 00:24:26.460
expenditure, the growth the size of government and the fact that this government's taxes

286
00:24:26.460 --> 00:24:30.760
are too high, they become enemies of the oil patch, things like that.

287
00:24:30.760 --> 00:24:35.260
That seems to be resonating in that particular area.

288
00:24:35.260 --> 00:24:42.460
Since you're so closely involved with Ron Paul and working in the United States now,

289
00:24:42.460 --> 00:24:48.780
and since the titular conservative party, the Republican Party, seems to be in so many

290
00:24:48.780 --> 00:24:56.820
In many ways, confused and adrift and corrupt in some ways as well.

291
00:24:56.820 --> 00:25:06.380
There is a chance, of course, for libertarian ideas to advance, to make real progress.

292
00:25:06.380 --> 00:25:12.340
Are there a set of those ideas that you see, as Daniel Smith sees, that have more resonance

293
00:25:12.340 --> 00:25:15.340
in the United States right now than the other ones?

294
00:25:15.340 --> 00:25:21.140
You might say, you know, your drug ones might really, your drug liberalization or getting

295
00:25:21.140 --> 00:25:27.780
rid of the anti-drug laws, that might work, or taxation ones, or getting rid of the Fed

296
00:25:27.780 --> 00:25:29.540
or something like that.

297
00:25:29.540 --> 00:25:37.060
Is there one or a set of beliefs or principles or policy planks that you think are the ones

298
00:25:37.060 --> 00:25:41.580
that would really work coming up in the next election, or was Ron Paul running for either

299
00:25:41.580 --> 00:25:44.580
Libertarian Party or the Republican Party?

300
00:25:44.580 --> 00:25:45.580
Long question.

301
00:25:45.580 --> 00:25:51.820
Well, I don't know that anyone is more attractive than the other, you know, getting rid of unions,

302
00:25:51.820 --> 00:25:57.340
privatizing health care, not going towards socialized medicine, engaging in free trade,

303
00:25:57.340 --> 00:26:04.060
having less inflation, going on the gold standard, getting rid of antitrust laws.

304
00:26:04.060 --> 00:26:08.020
I mean, there are just any number of ways in which you could go.

305
00:26:08.020 --> 00:26:21.020
I don't know that any have more resonance than in the others. Ron Paul is a doctor, he's an obstetrician who's delivered a lot of babies and maybe the healthcare way would be one way to go.

306
00:26:21.020 --> 00:26:32.020
You hear all these horrible stories of Canadian healthcare where there are these long lines and waiting lists and brain drain of doctors going down to the U.S. to practice.

307
00:26:32.020 --> 00:26:38.380
and now the US is thinking of adopting a closer situation to the Canadian one so

308
00:26:38.380 --> 00:26:43.300
that might be one that resonates it's hard to tell you know it's sort of like

309
00:26:43.300 --> 00:26:47.220
when you blow up a balloon it's hard to know which spot will break you just know

310
00:26:47.220 --> 00:26:52.220
that something is going to break. You raise an issue there that I hadn't

311
00:26:52.220 --> 00:26:56.260
actually associated with the party before or with libertarianism and that's

312
00:26:56.260 --> 00:26:58.100
About Getting Rid of Unions

313
00:26:58.100 --> 00:27:04.860
I know that you've argued very persuasively in the past that public sector unions should

314
00:27:04.860 --> 00:27:10.060
not be allowed to strike because if it's important enough for it to be in the public

315
00:27:10.060 --> 00:27:14.660
sector then it should be important enough for the work to be done at all times.

316
00:27:14.660 --> 00:27:18.500
But I didn't know that there was something about getting rid of unions.

317
00:27:18.500 --> 00:27:22.100
That surprised me because I thought unions were like a free association of people getting

318
00:27:22.100 --> 00:27:38.340
Well, first, I just wanted to mention Danielle Smith before I answer your question about

319
00:27:38.340 --> 00:27:39.340
unions, if I might.

320
00:27:39.340 --> 00:27:40.340
Sure, go ahead.

321
00:27:40.340 --> 00:27:43.340
I happen to, I won't say I'm a buddy of hers, but I certainly know her.

322
00:27:43.340 --> 00:27:45.860
I'm an acquaintance of hers, as she is of me.

323
00:27:45.860 --> 00:27:52.060
She's a very attractive candidate both physically, which is not unimportant, and also, I don't

324
00:27:52.060 --> 00:27:56.260
Theoretically, she's a good public speaker, she's a very intelligent woman.

325
00:27:56.260 --> 00:28:00.620
So I think that this is just a wonderful thing and I wish her every bit of luck and I hope

326
00:28:00.620 --> 00:28:03.420
that she's the next Premier of Alberta.

327
00:28:03.420 --> 00:28:08.040
Yeah, there will, by the way, be a series of town hall meetings that the Wildrose Alliance

328
00:28:08.040 --> 00:28:13.460
public meetings will be, Alliance will be having in September and their leadership vote

329
00:28:13.460 --> 00:28:16.100
will be in October and we'll be following that.

330
00:28:16.100 --> 00:28:20.340
We think it's very important and we hope it positively influences the political atmosphere

331
00:28:20.340 --> 00:28:42.660
I don't really think of Daniel Smith or any libertarian as conservative. I think that

332
00:28:42.660 --> 00:28:48.660
I think that libertarianism is equidistant from conservatism and liberalism.

333
00:28:48.660 --> 00:28:56.660
I don't really regard libertarianism as one category of the right or of conservatives.

334
00:28:56.660 --> 00:29:02.660
I think that on certain issues, libertarians are closer to conservatives, but on other issues, we're closer to liberals.

335
00:29:02.660 --> 00:29:06.660
And the way I see the political map, we're equidistant between them.

336
00:29:06.660 --> 00:29:13.660
I don't feel any more comfortable as being labeled a conservative than I would, God forbid, being labeled a liberal.

337
00:29:13.660 --> 00:29:16.660
Well, you said, God forbid, being labeled a liberal.

338
00:29:16.660 --> 00:29:20.660
So I think you would be more uncomfortable being labeled a liberal than you would a conservative.

339
00:29:20.660 --> 00:29:22.660
Well, I don't know. I like to think of myself as...

340
00:29:22.660 --> 00:29:25.660
I think there was something there that came out.

341
00:29:25.660 --> 00:29:30.660
There was a God forbid in front of a liberal and not a God forbid in front of a conservative, Walter.

342
00:29:30.660 --> 00:29:34.660
Well, maybe you got me there, Terry. I'm guilty as charged.

343
00:29:34.660 --> 00:29:43.660
I guess the reason for it is that I came in through the conservative movement, so maybe I have a softer spot in my heart for it.

344
00:29:43.660 --> 00:29:56.660
But in my brain, I know that they're equidistant. Conservatives are a little bit better on economics and a little bit worse on civil liberties, civil rights, like legalizing drugs and prostitution and pornography and stuff like that.

345
00:29:56.660 --> 00:30:01.820
that and on war that is imperialistic aggressive wars against countries that

346
00:30:01.820 --> 00:30:05.460
have never done anything to us conservatives are slightly worse than

347
00:30:05.460 --> 00:30:11.660
liberals although liberals do that too maybe it's a tie but we libertarians

348
00:30:11.660 --> 00:30:15.460
are a unique sui generis group we're neither liberal nor conservative and

349
00:30:15.460 --> 00:30:20.500
while I might have more of a disgust for liberals it's just my own background but

350
00:30:20.500 --> 00:30:26.300
my brain tells me that we libertarians are equidistant from both okay then we

351
00:30:26.300 --> 00:30:33.300
You know where your heart is then. You were going to talk a little about the policy towards unions, because I had a question about that.

352
00:30:33.300 --> 00:30:39.300
Yes, let me talk about unions. First of all, public sector unions, not so much I'm against public sector unions as it is I'm against the public sector.

353
00:30:39.300 --> 00:30:47.300
I don't think we ought to have public schools. I don't think we ought to have public post offices. I don't think we ought to have public transportation.

354
00:30:47.300 --> 00:30:52.300
My most recent book is Why We Shouldn't Have Public Highways, Why We Should Privatize Wall Highways.

355
00:30:52.300 --> 00:30:56.860
My next major book, after a few more Defending of the Undefendables, will be

356
00:30:56.860 --> 00:31:01.380
Why We Should Privatize Oceans, Lakes and Rivers. So, I'm not so much against public

357
00:31:01.380 --> 00:31:06.140
sector unions as I am against public sector, period. I mean, the garbage

358
00:31:06.140 --> 00:31:11.420
collection, the policing, the fire protection, all that should be done

359
00:31:11.420 --> 00:31:15.900
privately. Well, you know, let me talk about that. Quickly on that point then,

360
00:31:15.900 --> 00:31:22.100
noting the kind of thing, how silly it is for Americans to be going to

361
00:31:52.100 --> 00:32:12.100
I'm very irked by public libraries. Don't ask. I just went to the library to borrow some discs and they've got more discs there than Blockbuster does. Poor Blockbuster has to compete against a library that's giving it away for free. I don't see why we should have public libraries.

362
00:32:12.100 --> 00:32:20.640
Okay, but on to unions, now you're right, unions are a complex issue. If the union

363
00:32:20.640 --> 00:32:25.860
limited itself to a threat of a mass quiz, and that's all they did, in other

364
00:32:25.860 --> 00:32:29.500
words, here's the theory, one guy goes to the boss and says, hey boss,

365
00:32:29.500 --> 00:32:34.260
I need a raise or I'm quitting, and the guy's got 5,000 other workers, so he says,

366
00:32:34.260 --> 00:32:38.940
okay, my way or the highway, take a hike, fine. But if he goes in there and says,

367
00:32:38.940 --> 00:32:43.940
Look, I represent all 5,000 of the workers, and unless you give us a 10% raise or whatever

368
00:32:43.940 --> 00:32:46.460
is what we want, we're all going to leave.

369
00:32:46.460 --> 00:32:51.860
Well, now the boss has to sort of think twice, because to get rid of 5,000 workers who are

370
00:32:51.860 --> 00:32:57.780
well coordinated and have been there for a number of years, it's not easy to find 5,000

371
00:32:57.780 --> 00:33:02.620
new workers and get them to mesh well with each other, so he'd be more likely to listen

372
00:33:02.620 --> 00:33:07.220
to reason or to listen to the union, and if that's all the unions did, if all the unions

373
00:33:07.220 --> 00:33:14.220
The only problem with slavery, by the way, is you couldn't quit. I mean, slavery was okay in other ways. You know, they give you gruel, and you could sing songs, you could pick cotton. The only problem with slavery is you couldn't quit.

374
00:33:14.220 --> 00:33:44.220
The only problem with slavery, by the way, is you couldn't quit. I mean, slavery was okay in other ways, you know, they give you gruel, and you could sing songs, you could pick cotton. The only problem with slavery is you couldn't quit. So if you can't quit, and if one person can quit by himself, he doesn't lose the right to quit just because everyone else wants to quit, but if you can't quit, you can't quit because you're a slave.

375
00:33:44.220 --> 00:33:50.660
So a mass quit is a legitimate function of unions, and if all unions did was that, then

376
00:33:50.660 --> 00:33:55.300
I would say unions are just like any other voluntary organization in society.

377
00:33:55.300 --> 00:33:59.140
However, unions do not limit themselves to that.

378
00:33:59.140 --> 00:34:03.740
What they do in addition to that is that they say, not only are we going to down tools and

379
00:34:03.740 --> 00:34:07.860
walk out and you're going to have to hire another 5,000 people, but we're going to set

380
00:34:07.860 --> 00:34:13.500
up a picket line around your factory and any scab or that is any competing worker who's

381
00:34:13.500 --> 00:34:20.500
The Theory of Money and Credit

382
00:34:43.500 --> 00:34:48.560
and I went through a lot of unions and they all favored yes the scabs are evil

383
00:34:48.560 --> 00:34:52.620
they have no right to take our jobs which is silly because jobs are an

384
00:34:52.620 --> 00:34:57.420
embodiment of an agreement no one person can own a job it's not like your code

385
00:34:57.420 --> 00:35:02.260
it's very different so I went around and I finally came up with this thing called

386
00:35:02.260 --> 00:35:09.500
CLAC, C-L-A-C, Christian Labor Association of Canada, and I figured hey

387
00:35:09.500 --> 00:35:14.820
Hey, I've got a live one here. So I said, when you guys go on strike, will you beat

388
00:35:14.820 --> 00:35:18.660
up scabs? Oh, no, no, no. We're Christians. We turn the other cheek. We never use violence.

389
00:35:18.660 --> 00:35:22.980
Yuck, yuck, yuck. Fine. I said, wow, whoop-dee-doo. We've got a candidate. And then I said, well,

390
00:35:22.980 --> 00:35:28.620
what do you think of labor laws, the laws that compel the employer not to engage in

391
00:35:28.620 --> 00:35:32.820
quote unfair labor practices, namely hiring scabs instead of you guys? I said, oh, we

392
00:35:32.820 --> 00:35:39.060
save for those laws. Well, so even CLAC doesn't make it. Namely, I'm now willing to say that

393
00:35:39.060 --> 00:35:42.860
But there are no unions that are compatible with libertarianism, even though there could

394
00:35:42.860 --> 00:35:48.300
be theoretically, if they would just uphold the right to quit en masse instead of the

395
00:35:48.300 --> 00:35:53.740
right to prevent the employer from hiring scabs.

396
00:35:53.740 --> 00:35:59.060
Look, if you want to divorce your wife, well, it's a personal tragedy.

397
00:35:59.060 --> 00:36:04.060
But suppose, in addition to divorcing her, what you do is you get all your friends to

398
00:36:04.060 --> 00:36:10.740
Surrounder House, and then beat up any other guy she might date, well that's a horse of

399
00:36:10.740 --> 00:36:12.140
a different color.

400
00:36:12.140 --> 00:36:16.780
You have the right to quit because otherwise you're an enslaved to her, but you certainly

401
00:36:16.780 --> 00:36:20.780
have no right to prevent her from dating other men if she wants to.

402
00:36:20.780 --> 00:36:23.980
Well that's what the union does, not only does it want to quit, but it wants to prevent

403
00:36:23.980 --> 00:36:26.300
the employer from hiring other people.

404
00:36:26.300 --> 00:36:31.140
So I think that unions, extant unions, not theoretical unions that don't exist, they're

405
00:36:31.140 --> 00:36:35.940
are all a bunch of criminals and they all ought to be in jail, every last one of them.

406
00:36:35.940 --> 00:36:41.700
And I realized that in Canada this is sort of an unpopular thing because in Canada the

407
00:36:41.700 --> 00:36:45.820
labor force is unionized at a much higher rate than in the US.

408
00:36:45.820 --> 00:36:51.740
In the US it's in single digits for non-public sector unions, whereas I think the unionization

409
00:36:51.740 --> 00:36:56.900
rate is in Canada something like 40-45% of the whole labor force, which is one of the

410
00:36:56.900 --> 00:37:02.300
The reason that Canada is much poorer relatively per capita than the US, one of the main reasons

411
00:37:02.300 --> 00:37:07.940
is unions and another big one is unemployment insurance, which is like four times more generous

412
00:37:07.940 --> 00:37:15.220
than in the US, which is due to some great degree to unionization.

413
00:37:15.220 --> 00:37:19.340
Your comment about slaves not being able to quit reminds me of a line from the movie earlier

414
00:37:19.340 --> 00:37:23.100
this summer, The Year Zero, when one of the...

415
00:37:23.100 --> 00:37:25.100
Terry, could you speak up a little?

416
00:37:25.100 --> 00:37:29.900
Her comment about the slaves not being able to quit reminds me of a line from the movie

417
00:37:29.900 --> 00:37:36.340
The Year Zero, a comedy from earlier this year in which one of the sort of proto-cavemen

418
00:37:36.340 --> 00:37:43.500
or something who stumbles into a city asks a slave, hey, kind of attracted, a male caveman

419
00:37:43.500 --> 00:37:50.740
sort of asks a female slave, hey, you know, you're pretty good looking, when are you off,

420
00:37:50.740 --> 00:37:52.140
when are you off tonight?

421
00:37:52.140 --> 00:37:54.580
And she looks at him and says, I'm a slave, I'm never off.

422
00:37:54.580 --> 00:38:14.140
I'd like to leap back to when we were talking about the conservative party and ask Dr. Block

423
00:38:14.140 --> 00:38:15.140
your opinion.

424
00:38:15.140 --> 00:38:18.900
Look, there was a political scientist from Australia who came up here recently and did

425
00:38:18.900 --> 00:38:25.700
a piece for Reform Perspective magazine in which he said if Stephen Harper were in Australia

426
00:38:25.700 --> 00:38:31.620
he would be to the left of their labor party, and he said if he were in the United States

427
00:38:31.620 --> 00:38:34.940
he'd be considered a Clintonian Democrat.

428
00:38:34.940 --> 00:38:42.220
And what I wanted to ask you is, do you think, after having gotten in with admittedly a minority

429
00:38:42.220 --> 00:38:48.060
government, if he had hewed to truly conservative principles and worked for smaller government

430
00:38:48.060 --> 00:39:10.060
Do you really think that he would have been defeated, or do you think that might have been his, would have been defeated in the House, but might that have been his path to a majority government, if he'd really held on to conservative principles?

431
00:39:10.060 --> 00:39:40.060
Well, that's a very interesting question. And I'm appreciative of the Canadian political system. I mean, he had a minority government. He really couldn't go berserk and go against all the other parties and against the median voter. So I'm sort of willing to be more forgiving of him than if he had a majority government and did what he did. But, you know, I sort of resist your notion that a conservative government means less spending. I don't believe that for a minute. Ronald Reagan talked a good

432
00:39:40.060 --> 00:39:44.740
Good Conservative, Ronald Reagan is a hero of conservatives, yet when he was governor

433
00:39:44.740 --> 00:39:51.740
of California, the California budget increased. When he was president for two terms, the U.S.

434
00:39:51.740 --> 00:39:55.860
government budget increased. I don't think that it's fair to say that the conservatives

435
00:39:55.860 --> 00:40:01.100
stand for smaller government. I think conservatives stand for smaller government in some things,

436
00:40:01.100 --> 00:40:04.340
but bigger government in other things, and that balances more government.

437
00:40:04.340 --> 00:40:05.340
Of course.

438
00:40:05.340 --> 00:40:11.140
So with regard to Harper, what the hell is Canada doing in Afghanistan? When is the last

439
00:40:11.140 --> 00:40:17.540
time any Afghani ever attacked Canada? This is an imperialist foreign war and if he were

440
00:40:17.540 --> 00:40:22.200
true to not conservative principles, which he is, which is very bad here, but if he were

441
00:40:22.200 --> 00:40:26.580
true to libertarian principles that as I thought he was when he was the, what was the National

442
00:40:26.580 --> 00:40:35.300
Citizens Coalition? That was a libertarian-ish organization. If he had pulled out every troop

443
00:40:35.300 --> 00:40:52.300
The NDP would have at least applauded him. He could have gotten away with that with a minority government. But no, we're in there, I guess, sucking up to the U.S. and engaging in an imperialist war against the people that never attacked us.

444
00:40:52.300 --> 00:41:01.760
So I quarrel with your assessment that a true conservative government would be a smaller government. It wouldn't be. It would be a bigger government.

445
00:41:01.760 --> 00:41:10.840
Conservatives are bad guys too, despite what Terry found out about me with my Oh God about a liberal. Oh God, thank God I'm not a conservative either.

446
00:41:10.840 --> 00:41:11.840
Oh yeah.

447
00:41:11.840 --> 00:41:12.840
Conservatives are a bunch of rascals.

448
00:41:12.840 --> 00:41:14.840
That's all theatrics there, Walter. I can tell.

449
00:41:14.840 --> 00:41:16.840
No, no. Conservatives are a bunch of rascals.

450
00:41:16.840 --> 00:41:18.840
Equally rascallion.

451
00:41:18.840 --> 00:41:20.840
Rascallion? Sure, well.

452
00:41:20.840 --> 00:41:26.600
Let me pop one more question at you because way earlier on in the conversation you made

453
00:41:26.600 --> 00:41:31.560
an oblique reference to the fact that we have booms and busts and we are now enjoying a

454
00:41:31.560 --> 00:41:37.660
bust and it occurred to me there are some people who are enjoying it more than others

455
00:41:37.660 --> 00:41:45.200
and I wondered if you had seen Matt Taibbi's book or his articles in the Rolling Stone

456
00:41:45.200 --> 00:41:53.760
about the great deception, I think is the title of his book, but he points out that

457
00:41:53.760 --> 00:42:00.600
the Obama White House has now become virtually a branch plant of Goldman Sachs, and I wondered

458
00:42:00.600 --> 00:42:11.320
if you were familiar with that whole theory that says that there's a bunch of robber barons

459
00:42:11.320 --> 00:42:15.640
who have now infiltrated into the government they are taking money from the

460
00:42:15.640 --> 00:42:21.240
taxpayer and giving it to their buddies as for example they gave money to AIG

461
00:42:21.240 --> 00:42:25.360
which gave it to Goldman Sachs and Goldman Sachs is now planning to give

462
00:42:25.360 --> 00:42:33.200
its employees $11.6 billion dollars in bonuses in a time of what is being

463
00:42:33.200 --> 00:42:38.960
called a crisis so some of us are enjoying the bust more than others

464
00:42:38.960 --> 00:42:45.960
Yes, now I'm very sympathetic to this view. I believe that this is, what is it, monopoly state corporate capitalism or fascism?

465
00:42:45.960 --> 00:42:46.960
Yeah, we're in fascism.

466
00:42:46.960 --> 00:42:54.960
The government gives money to its favored crew. I certainly am against socialism for big business.

467
00:42:54.960 --> 00:42:58.960
I'm against welfare for big business, and this is just welfare for big business.

468
00:42:58.960 --> 00:43:07.960
But there's a long history of this in the United States, giving money to railroads, making it impossible for people to enter into the medical field

469
00:43:07.960 --> 00:43:19.960
The Farm Subsidies, the big agribusiness, the list goes on and on about this and I'm very sympathetic to this.

470
00:43:19.960 --> 00:43:26.960
This is some of the leftists like Gabriel Coco, who's a Marxist historian and is very good on this,

471
00:43:26.960 --> 00:43:33.960
showing that what's going on with government is giving money to big business, hand over fist,

472
00:43:33.960 --> 00:43:39.960
and AIG and Goldman Sachs are just the latest in a long list that includes Rockefellers,

473
00:43:39.960 --> 00:43:48.960
Morgans, all throughout the U.S. history this has been done and it's just some sort of crony capitalism or fascism and it's evil.

474
00:43:48.960 --> 00:43:53.960
Well, I've got one more for you then. There's a Toronto analyst named Sunil Ram.

475
00:43:53.960 --> 00:44:00.960
He was doing a radio interview out here a couple of weeks back and he made the observation that,

476
00:44:00.960 --> 00:44:16.960
The estimated total value of all the real property in the world, not just real estate, houses, apartments, commercial real estate, factories, trains, planes, buses, everything,

477
00:44:16.960 --> 00:44:36.960
He says it's been estimated somewhere between 100 and 150 trillion and then he pointed out that the amount of fiat money in circulation by banks primarily but also by central banks which are not really government in most countries anyway,

478
00:44:36.960 --> 00:44:46.960
The amount of money that they put in circulation is 8 to 10 times the net value of all the real assets in the world.

479
00:44:46.960 --> 00:44:52.960
And he was saying, this balloon has got to break too, and it is going down.

480
00:44:52.960 --> 00:44:58.960
What's your read on that, the inflated state of the global economy?

481
00:44:58.960 --> 00:45:11.960
Well, I think it was our man Lenin, or was it Stalin? I think it was Lenin who said that the surest way to conquer a country or screw up a country is to debauch its currency.

482
00:45:11.960 --> 00:45:22.960
And, you know, what happened in 1923 in Germany with the hyperinflation and what's happening in Zimbabwe and what's happened in certain South American countries,

483
00:45:22.960 --> 00:45:29.760
It's just a horrendous thing because the money supply, the money stock, is to the economy

484
00:45:29.760 --> 00:45:37.160
as the blood is to the body. Every trade except the border, half of it is money. It's just

485
00:45:37.160 --> 00:45:43.320
insidious. Just as the blood flows to every capillary in the body, money flows to every

486
00:45:43.320 --> 00:45:50.400
interstitial of the economy. So money is very, very important. And Ron Paul has done yeoman

487
00:45:50.400 --> 00:46:20.400
We've been working here saying that we can't trust government to run money, just as we should have separation of church and state, we should have separation of money and state, we should get back to the gold standard, the reason that the bureaucrats and the totalitarians hate gold is it's very hard to inflate gold, it's impossible to inflate gold, they can't inflate gold, or they can inflate fiat currency. So I'm not sure that the amount of currency has to equal the amount of all goods and services

488
00:46:20.400 --> 00:46:36.400
That's a different issue, but I think the point where I agree with this theorist is that not just the U.S., but every country is off the gold standard, every country is...

489
00:46:36.400 --> 00:46:40.400
You've heard of this thing, what is it, girls gone wild?

490
00:46:40.400 --> 00:46:41.400
Yes.

491
00:46:41.400 --> 00:46:44.400
Well, we've got central bankers gone wild.

492
00:46:44.400 --> 00:46:47.400
They don't take off their clothes.

493
00:46:47.400 --> 00:46:50.400
Much better if they took off their clothes, they wouldn't do as much harm. But what they

494
00:46:50.400 --> 00:46:55.280
do is they inflate the currency. You know, when I was younger and our kids were very

495
00:46:55.280 --> 00:47:01.120
small, we had this babysitting co-op. And various couples, I think there were ten couples

496
00:47:01.120 --> 00:47:05.720
and we all had kids between, oh, I guess, age one and five. And, you know, this one

497
00:47:05.720 --> 00:47:10.560
would babysit for that one and couple A would, the rule was only the woman would babysit

498
00:47:10.560 --> 00:47:15.400
for someone else. But we would keep records and at the end of the thing, it evened out.

499
00:47:15.400 --> 00:47:22.400
Suppose some central planning bureaucrat of a Fed got in there and started inflating the babysitting credits.

500
00:47:22.400 --> 00:47:25.400
This would have just ruined the whole cooperative venture.

501
00:47:25.400 --> 00:47:28.400
And that's what governments are doing there.

502
00:47:28.400 --> 00:47:31.400
You see, there are only three ways that governments can get money.

503
00:47:31.400 --> 00:47:34.400
One is through taxes, but everyone knows who's doing the taxing.

504
00:47:34.400 --> 00:47:39.400
You can't blame taxes on capitalist greed. I mean, everyone knows that.

505
00:47:39.400 --> 00:47:42.400
The second way is borrowing, but there are limits there.

506
00:47:42.400 --> 00:47:45.660
I mean, if the government reneges, people aren't going to lend it money.

507
00:47:45.660 --> 00:47:48.160
The third way is just print it up.

508
00:47:48.160 --> 00:47:52.040
And now you can say, well, the inflation isn't really, because people are so economically

509
00:47:52.040 --> 00:47:58.640
ignorant, they start saying, well, the inflation is due to greed or people trying to make profits.

510
00:47:58.640 --> 00:48:03.000
When it's due to the fact that they're running the printing presses or under fractional reserve

511
00:48:03.000 --> 00:48:09.400
banking bank credits, it's much easier to raise money that way because it's much more

512
00:48:09.400 --> 00:48:10.400
insidious.

513
00:48:10.400 --> 00:48:14.400
and it's a tax on the poorest people, the people who are on fixed incomes.

514
00:48:14.400 --> 00:48:20.400
So I think that you're quite right that one of the enemies of civilization,

515
00:48:20.400 --> 00:48:25.400
one of the leaders toward barbarism is an uncontrolled central bank.

516
00:48:25.400 --> 00:48:29.400
And there are those that are worse and those that are better, Canada is slightly better,

517
00:48:29.400 --> 00:48:33.400
but look at, I mean, I'm more familiar with the US statistics on this.

518
00:48:33.400 --> 00:48:37.400
When the Fed came in in 1913, a dollar was worth a dollar.

519
00:48:37.400 --> 00:48:56.520
Dr. Walter Block, I'm sorry that we're going to have to say good night.

520
00:48:56.520 --> 00:49:03.080
We've got some business that we have to wrap up here before we go off the internet air in

521
00:49:03.080 --> 00:49:04.080
six minutes.

522
00:49:04.080 --> 00:49:07.000
Thanks for giving me that award, Terry.

523
00:49:07.000 --> 00:49:13.400
and that's not the only thing I gave you tonight but anyway I hope I didn't give

524
00:49:13.400 --> 00:49:18.040
you too hard of a time no it's a lovely time great I really enjoyed having you on

525
00:49:18.040 --> 00:49:21.760
the show and I know Ron did too he was really looking forward to this because

526
00:49:21.760 --> 00:49:26.600
he does a lot of thinking about the world financial and the monetary system

527
00:49:26.600 --> 00:49:30.520
and banking system as well so it's a it was a good mix here tonight I hope we

528
00:49:30.520 --> 00:49:34.600
can do it again yeah and great good night guys and thanks for having me thank you

529
00:49:34.600 --> 00:49:37.600
Thank you very much. Good night. Take care. Bye. Bye-bye.