WEBVTT

NOTE Meltdown: An Interview with Tom Woods

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.000
Welcome to the first ever Young Americans for Liberty podcast. My name is Aaron Ricks. I'm the president of the Young American High School chapter of the Young Americans for Liberty.

2
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:20.000
Along with me in here is Kyle Peabody and Michael Lee, senior members of the club. Delighted to have as our first guest Mr. Tom Woods. Mr. Woods is a senior fellow at the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

3
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:28.000
Mr. Woods' new book just released a week or two ago, Meltdown, a free market look at why the stock market collapsed, the economy tanked, and the government bailout to make things worse.

4
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:33.240
Now, personally, I really dove into the theory of Austrian economics a little more than a

5
00:00:33.240 --> 00:00:37.060
year ago, around the time I started paying attention to the Ron Paul campaign and listening

6
00:00:37.060 --> 00:00:41.160
to the Peter Schiff interviews, which, as everyone says, are very amusing.

7
00:00:41.160 --> 00:00:45.120
Now, as a high school student, I read their book, or at least most of it, I didn't have

8
00:00:45.120 --> 00:00:47.840
time, the time I would have liked to take to go through it.

9
00:00:47.840 --> 00:00:52.440
I'll be the first to admit that advanced economics theory isn't something, you know, isn't something

10
00:00:52.440 --> 00:00:53.440
easy to grasp.

11
00:00:53.440 --> 00:00:56.720
Now, the first book I read was Henry Hazlitt's Economics in One Lesson.

12
00:00:56.720 --> 00:01:03.720
The Theory of Money and Credit

13
00:01:26.720 --> 00:01:56.720
Profile Investment Services, Ltd., or Israel National News.

14
00:02:26.720 --> 00:02:31.640
the Forward by Ron Paul, in which he says exactly that, that I'm pretty sure there's

15
00:02:31.640 --> 00:02:35.120
going to be an avalanche of books and they're all going to be a disaster, so I figured I

16
00:02:35.120 --> 00:02:41.640
would sort of do one for the good guys, get it out there, make it marginally harder for

17
00:02:41.640 --> 00:02:47.200
the media to pretend that the free market interpretation of all this doesn't exist,

18
00:02:47.200 --> 00:02:51.680
and the sales of it so far, I mean it's too early to get any hard figures, but I mean

19
00:02:51.680 --> 00:03:01.680
It's selling like crazy, so I'm hopeful that it will gum up the works a little bit as they try to claim that this is a big failure of the free market.

20
00:03:01.680 --> 00:03:11.680
I wanted the book to counter them, but also to help people who support the free market to make the arguments, to learn what the arguments are so that they can defend themselves.

21
00:03:11.680 --> 00:03:41.680
Profile Investment Services, Inc., Ltd., or Israel National News.

22
00:03:41.680 --> 00:04:11.680
The question would have to be, I guess I'd put it this way, part of human nature is that people can be greedy. That's just unavoidable. So the question is, what institutional framework can cope the best with this undeniable aspect of human nature? And it seems to me the free market copes the best with it, because if the free market can cope the best with it, then the free market can cope with it.

23
00:04:11.680 --> 00:04:17.680
If you want to improve your material well-being, how do you do that in a genuine free market?

24
00:04:17.680 --> 00:04:22.080
In a genuine free market, you do that by doing something that pleases your fellow man.

25
00:04:22.080 --> 00:04:23.880
That's how you get his money, legally.

26
00:04:23.880 --> 00:04:25.920
That's how you get his money.

27
00:04:25.920 --> 00:04:32.520
So that's the institutional framework that in effect helps us best cope with greed.

28
00:04:32.520 --> 00:04:37.720
Whereas a framework that is status, that's dominated by government, is not so helpful

29
00:04:37.720 --> 00:04:42.520
because the greedy people just wind up in government and they use

30
00:04:42.520 --> 00:04:46.240
government to line their own pockets and loot the rest of the population.

31
00:04:46.240 --> 00:04:50.640
Whereas a businessman has to get the voluntary consent of his customer.

32
00:04:50.640 --> 00:04:53.480
Nobody in government needs the voluntary consent of anybody. They're the government.

33
00:04:53.480 --> 00:04:55.360
They have a monopoly on violence.

34
00:04:55.360 --> 00:04:58.280
So when I look at this crisis and people try to tell me

35
00:04:58.280 --> 00:05:02.960
it's caused by greed, well of course there are some greedy people, no question about that, but

36
00:05:02.960 --> 00:05:04.360
what kind of

37
00:05:04.360 --> 00:05:05.960
environment is it

38
00:05:05.960 --> 00:05:07.520
in which greed

39
00:05:07.520 --> 00:05:13.000
can lead to an outcome like this. And what I want to argue is that explanations that

40
00:05:13.000 --> 00:05:18.960
simply refer to greed leave out the institutional factors that allow greed to flourish. And

41
00:05:18.960 --> 00:05:24.800
those institutional factors would be, for instance, the unmentionable Federal Reserve

42
00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:32.000
system, which pumps, in this case, literally insane amounts of money into the system, thereby

43
00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:36.800
lowering interest rates below where the free market would have set them. And this, you

44
00:05:36.800 --> 00:06:06.800
Profile Investment Services, Inc., www.profile-financial.com, www.profile-financial.com,

45
00:07:06.800 --> 00:07:20.800
The Free Market is surprisingly stable, but it becomes unstable when you intervene in it, and that's what the Fed does. The Fed's very existence is a violation of the free market.

46
00:07:20.800 --> 00:07:29.800
Definitely. To me it sounded like almost a misnomer, like there's no tangible evidence behind the whole argument that greed causes a financial collapse.

47
00:07:29.800 --> 00:07:47.800
Now, one of the things I commend you for is you mentioned panics and crashes even before the Federal Reserve's coming to existence. These crashes still function in the same exact principles that we see in later booms of busts when the Federal Reserve was created. Can you elaborate a bit on these previous panics and crashes?

48
00:07:47.800 --> 00:08:17.800
Transcription is a production of the U.S. Department of State.

49
00:08:47.800 --> 00:08:54.800
The Federal Reserve is borrowing this money to go out and create projects that are aimed at future production of goods.

50
00:08:54.800 --> 00:08:58.800
So that's good. We're going to consume in the future and they're producing for the future. It's wonderful.

51
00:08:58.800 --> 00:09:04.800
But if interest rates come down just because the central bank forces them down, well now we've got a time mismatch

52
00:09:04.800 --> 00:09:09.800
because now investors once again will invest in long-term projects aimed at the future,

53
00:09:09.800 --> 00:09:16.800
but we haven't necessarily indicated a desire to consume less in the present to fund these investments.

54
00:09:16.800 --> 00:09:22.800
In fact, we may even be consuming just as much or more than before.

55
00:09:22.800 --> 00:09:25.800
So meanwhile, you've got investors investing for the future,

56
00:09:25.800 --> 00:09:28.800
but consumers are demanding more of existing goods right now.

57
00:09:28.800 --> 00:09:32.800
You've got investors engaged in product development

58
00:09:32.800 --> 00:09:37.800
at a time when Americans want more of existing products right now, so there's a time mismatch.

59
00:09:37.800 --> 00:09:43.800
And secondly, when you and I save more, the fact that we're not consuming as much

60
00:09:43.800 --> 00:09:46.800
to finish their investment projects.

61
00:09:46.800 --> 00:09:50.800
But when the interest rate comes down, just because it's been artificially forced down,

62
00:09:50.800 --> 00:09:55.800
well that doesn't magically produce all the physical goods necessary

63
00:09:55.800 --> 00:09:59.800
to finish all the investment projects that businessmen will start.

64
00:09:59.800 --> 00:10:03.800
So they're going to find that they cannot afford to finish a lot of these projects.

65
00:10:03.800 --> 00:10:06.800
So in other words, when you interfere with interest rates

66
00:10:06.800 --> 00:10:08.800
and you don't let the free market set them,

67
00:10:08.800 --> 00:10:38.800
Profile Investment Services, Inc., Ltd., or Israel National News.

68
00:10:38.800 --> 00:11:08.800
the same factor, the same events, the same interference with money and interest rates that we see in all other panics, because if you look at the 19th century, you don't have a Fed, but you do in many cases have a government established national bank with government granted monopoly privileges, which you had leading into the panic of 1819, which you had leading into the panic of 1837, and they have a national bank with government granted monopoly privileges.

69
00:11:08.800 --> 00:11:38.800
They create more money than the free market would have created and they push interest rates down lower and I quote people, contemporaries from the 19th century, looking at these panics and what they're describing, the phenomena they're describing are exactly what Hayek describes about the business cycle that we see an excess of investment in certain unsustainable lines and then we've seen this bust and everything's come crashing down. It's exactly the same thing and you look at all the other panics, it's either again some national bank that's authorized by the Federal Reserve

70
00:11:38.800 --> 00:11:55.800
or the banking system in general, simply creating money out of thin air, which in effect puts the economy on a kind of sugar high that can't last. It doesn't have a real foundation. It's phony. And so all these panics are all explainable on the same grounds.

71
00:11:55.800 --> 00:12:02.800
Well, yeah, I definitely think it's really hard for people to realize that governments, by definition, don't produce anything.

72
00:12:02.800 --> 00:12:08.800
That, you know, the only way they get things done is by taking from productive members of society.

73
00:12:08.800 --> 00:12:16.800
Yeah, in fact, can I elaborate on that? Because in the same way that governments don't have any resources, don't create anything, neither do central banks.

74
00:12:16.800 --> 00:12:22.800
So the very fact, the mere fact that the Fed or some central bank lowers interest rates, that doesn't magically create resources.

75
00:12:22.800 --> 00:12:29.800
Resources

76
00:12:52.800 --> 00:13:22.800
Profile Investment Services, Inc., Ltd., or Israel National News.

77
00:13:22.800 --> 00:13:52.800
Profile Investment Services, Ltd., or Israel National News.

78
00:14:22.800 --> 00:14:34.800
are the same people who have been critical of the Fed, who have been critical of fiat money, that is money that can't be converted into anything, it's based on nothing, can just be printed up indefinitely by a printing press.

79
00:14:34.800 --> 00:14:40.800
It's all the people who basically hold our points of view are almost the only ones who weren't completely clueless.

80
00:14:40.800 --> 00:14:53.800
The only ones who actually saw this coming overwhelmingly are the ones who have this particular theory as to what caused it.

81
00:14:53.800 --> 00:15:01.800
Whereas the people who now are instructing us and who now are trying to run our economy, those people, well, almost none of them saw it coming.

82
00:15:01.800 --> 00:15:04.800
How are they supposed to fix a problem they weren't even aware of?

83
00:15:04.800 --> 00:15:18.800
Another question, Austin Vreneman, a member of the Young Americans for Liberty movement, wants to know, if you had to make a recommendation right now, would you encourage Dr. Paul to run again in 2012?

84
00:15:18.800 --> 00:15:38.800
Well, I asked him about this back in the summertime, and at that time he was saying, he seemed down on the idea, but when I look back on it and I think about what he actually said, he didn't actually rule it out, he just simply said, I can't even think that far ahead.

85
00:15:38.800 --> 00:16:08.800
Profile Investment Services, SIPC, MSRB, NFA, SIFMA.

86
00:16:08.800 --> 00:16:38.800
Profile Investment Services, Inc., www.profile-financial.com, www.profile-financial.com,

87
00:17:08.800 --> 00:17:38.800
2008 was that he has changed the landscape forever. The Federal Reserve system is now on the table. People talk about it. Peter Schiff has an in now, partly because of Ron Paul, I think. A lot of us are getting hearings that we wouldn't have gotten otherwise. I go on all kinds of radio shows, big time radio shows, where the host knows all about the Fed. That's because of Ron Paul. But beyond that, we've got all people like you guys, young people coming out of nowhere, huge

88
00:17:38.800 --> 00:18:05.800
Mark Soriano, what's your opinion on a gold-based currency versus a fiat-based currency?

89
00:18:08.800 --> 00:18:15.160
The gold-based one is infinitely preferable because, and again, in Meltdown, I quote Henry

90
00:18:15.160 --> 00:18:19.960
Hazlitt, who of course wrote Economics in One Lesson, but Hazlitt said, you know, there

91
00:18:19.960 --> 00:18:24.520
are a lot of people who have these tiny little technical criticisms of the gold standard.

92
00:18:24.520 --> 00:18:30.600
He said, but the fact is a gold money is a money that cannot be arbitrarily interfered

93
00:18:30.600 --> 00:18:38.600
with or destroyed by politicians, and he said, now, this single merit makes all technical

94
00:18:38.600 --> 00:18:42.380
Criticisms of the gold standard, utterly trivial

95
00:18:42.380 --> 00:18:43.520
by comparison.

96
00:18:43.520 --> 00:18:48.040
But my view though is not so much that we should go back to a gold-backed

97
00:18:48.040 --> 00:18:53.380
money, or a gold standard per se. I mean, if people want that, that's fine with me.

98
00:18:53.380 --> 00:18:55.080
But a gold standard

99
00:18:55.080 --> 00:18:57.120
that would require the government

100
00:18:57.120 --> 00:19:00.080
to maintain it and to maintain the

101
00:19:00.080 --> 00:19:02.880
the ratio of dollars to gold,

102
00:19:02.880 --> 00:19:05.600
I think is unrealistic because

103
00:19:05.600 --> 00:19:11.120
You know, look at the politicians who we have in Washington. Which one of them, other than Ron Paul,

104
00:19:11.120 --> 00:19:15.320
would you trust to do that? I mean, what's to stop them from just going off the gold standard again?

105
00:19:15.320 --> 00:19:19.640
Or fiddling around with it, or whatever. I mean, why would we trust them with it?

106
00:19:19.640 --> 00:19:23.680
Instead, I think we need to think in more radical ways. We need to think

107
00:19:23.680 --> 00:19:25.400
about what Hayek said toward,

108
00:19:25.400 --> 00:19:28.920
sort of toward the end of his career. In the late seventies, he gave a speech,

109
00:19:28.920 --> 00:19:30.440
actually in New Orleans,

110
00:19:30.440 --> 00:19:34.160
and the speech is reprinted in the Journal of Libertarian Studies in the late seventies.

111
00:19:34.160 --> 00:20:04.160
Profile Investment Services, Inc., Ltd., or Israel National News.

112
00:20:04.160 --> 00:20:13.160
Don't insult me with that. The reason they want to control the money supply is so they can create money out of thin air and reward their friends with it.

113
00:20:13.160 --> 00:20:17.160
That's what it's for. That's why the government monopolizes money.

114
00:20:17.160 --> 00:20:23.160
Given this is the case, what we instead should do is look to the free market.

115
00:20:23.160 --> 00:20:32.160
The free market supplies every good we need and it supplies it the most efficiently, so why don't we look for free market alternatives?

116
00:20:32.160 --> 00:20:45.160
The way we start doing that is really to follow Ron Paul's advice, which is get rid of all sales and capital gains taxes on precious metals, which would serve to obstruct their use as money, and secondly, repeal legal tender laws.

117
00:20:45.160 --> 00:20:49.160
Those are monopolistic interferences in the free market.

118
00:20:49.160 --> 00:20:55.320
Get rid of that because legal tender laws mean basically that government courts will

119
00:20:55.320 --> 00:21:00.520
not enforce contracts that require payment in gold because the person is, because of

120
00:21:00.520 --> 00:21:04.360
legal tender, is allowed to pay you in the depreciating dollar.

121
00:21:04.360 --> 00:21:08.640
So that makes it very hard for alternatives to pop up because all alternatives are at

122
00:21:08.640 --> 00:21:09.640
artificial disadvantages.

123
00:21:09.640 --> 00:21:14.780
Let's have a level playing field and let's see how the market deals with it and we're

124
00:21:44.780 --> 00:22:02.300
Part of my answer is, look at those countries in the world where the gap between the rich

125
00:22:02.300 --> 00:22:07.660
and the poor is the widest, and those are the countries that are the farthest away from

126
00:22:07.660 --> 00:22:08.660
the free market.

127
00:22:08.660 --> 00:22:09.660
That's always the case.

128
00:22:09.660 --> 00:22:14.820
In the Soviet Union, the apparatchiks did very, very well.

129
00:22:14.820 --> 00:22:18.180
The average person suffered tremendously.

130
00:22:18.180 --> 00:22:19.180
Look at Africa.

131
00:22:19.180 --> 00:22:22.620
The only places in Africa where you've got anything approaching a free market would be

132
00:22:22.620 --> 00:22:23.620
Botswana.

133
00:22:23.620 --> 00:22:28.580
By the way, Botswana, here's a big surprise, Botswana is one of the richest countries in

134
00:22:28.580 --> 00:22:29.580
Africa.

135
00:22:29.580 --> 00:22:31.260
Big surprise there, right?

136
00:22:31.260 --> 00:22:35.260
South Africa, well, it's kind of a mess right now.

137
00:22:35.260 --> 00:22:39.620
You can find isolated pockets of the free market, but otherwise, it's a bunch of extremely

138
00:22:39.620 --> 00:23:09.620
Profile Investment Services, Inc., Ltd., or Israel National News.

139
00:23:09.620 --> 00:23:13.620
and this holds true consistently as a rule.

140
00:23:13.620 --> 00:23:16.620
So it seems to me that if we genuinely care about the poor,

141
00:23:16.620 --> 00:23:20.620
I mean look, if somebody has three yachts in a free market society,

142
00:23:20.620 --> 00:23:22.620
that doesn't hurt me any.

143
00:23:22.620 --> 00:23:23.620
He's not stealing them from me.

144
00:23:23.620 --> 00:23:25.620
I didn't have him to start with, I assure you.

145
00:23:25.620 --> 00:23:29.620
If we could just set envy aside for five seconds

146
00:23:29.620 --> 00:23:33.620
and actually demonstrate a real concern for people who are poor,

147
00:23:33.620 --> 00:23:37.620
we would not consign them to systems that have made the poor worse off.

148
00:23:37.620 --> 00:23:55.620
Even if you look at so-called third-way European welfare states like Sweden, American blacks on average are richer than the average Swede, and American blacks are not doing as well as some other groups in America, yet they are doing better than Swedes in general.

149
00:23:55.620 --> 00:24:04.620
So if you really care about the well-being of the poor, you would want to adopt the system that provides for their material well-being better than any other system.

150
00:24:04.620 --> 00:24:34.620
Profile Investment Services, Inc., Ltd., or Israel National News.

151
00:24:34.620 --> 00:24:41.380
On a virtual level, the Austrian business cycle theory makes complete sense, but when

152
00:24:41.380 --> 00:24:45.660
you consider it with respect to the recent crisis, it's a bit harder to put the pieces

153
00:24:45.660 --> 00:24:46.660
together.

154
00:24:46.660 --> 00:24:50.340
Specifically, the Austrian business cycle holds the capital goods industries that are

155
00:24:50.340 --> 00:24:55.380
most affected by both the artificial boom and subsequent bust, yet it was housing that

156
00:24:55.380 --> 00:24:58.820
was the prime player in today's crisis, not exactly a capital good.

157
00:24:58.820 --> 00:25:02.340
How does the Austrian business cycle deal with this?

158
00:25:02.340 --> 00:25:12.340
Well, I guess part of the answer is that housing is at the very least an extremely durable consumer good.

159
00:25:12.340 --> 00:25:17.340
But secondly, it's not just housing that's going to ultimately bust.

160
00:25:17.340 --> 00:25:19.340
It's also going to be commercial real estate.

161
00:25:19.340 --> 00:25:22.340
That is the buildings in which businesses operate.

162
00:25:22.340 --> 00:25:31.340
Or a lot of times businesses will have built an addition or they will have built a second building for a second branch of the business.

163
00:25:31.340 --> 00:25:41.340
And that is arguably, and in fact Gerald Salerno makes this point, that's actually going to be a worse bust than residential households are going to be.

164
00:25:41.340 --> 00:25:48.340
So that in effect reinforces Austrian business cycle theory that the more capital intensive will get hit harder.

165
00:25:48.340 --> 00:26:00.340
Well, the more capital intensive type of building projects, the commercial real estate market is in fact going to wind up being hit harder than just regular residential real estate.

166
00:26:00.340 --> 00:26:01.340
Real Estate.

167
00:26:01.340 --> 00:26:02.340
So there's that.

168
00:26:02.340 --> 00:26:06.180
But also remember that how are people financing this real estate?

169
00:26:06.180 --> 00:26:08.900
How are people going out and buying a house?

170
00:26:08.900 --> 00:26:15.500
Well, they're buying it basically with this 30-year mortgage thing, which is in itself

171
00:26:15.500 --> 00:26:17.340
partly a government intervention.

172
00:26:17.340 --> 00:26:20.340
Most people in the 30s didn't own their own homes.

173
00:26:20.340 --> 00:26:23.500
Nobody would lend to you for 30 years because you could never tell what inflation is going

174
00:26:23.500 --> 00:26:25.620
to do and so on and so forth.

175
00:26:25.620 --> 00:26:33.380
So this sort of long-term type of an expenditure is very interest rate sensitive.

176
00:26:33.380 --> 00:26:42.020
Unlike consumer goods like toothbrushes or hats or potato chips, a house is a large,

177
00:26:42.020 --> 00:26:46.500
durable purchase that is paid for over a long span of time.

178
00:26:46.500 --> 00:26:52.700
So I think that does, in fact, still make it qualify as something that would be artificially

179
00:26:52.700 --> 00:27:22.700
Transcription and Transcription of interview questions.

180
00:27:22.700 --> 00:27:37.700
The Austrian Theory can be conformed to this idea that you've had a boom in residential housing.

181
00:27:37.700 --> 00:27:43.700
One of the best things I've ever heard about the Austrian Theory was that it encourages production savings,

182
00:27:43.700 --> 00:27:50.700
not this kind of artificial consumption and buy as much as you can because the businesses are dying.

183
00:27:50.700 --> 00:27:55.100
are dying. I mean, how much more can we buy? We've been buying for so long. I mean, how

184
00:27:55.100 --> 00:27:58.580
much more did they want us to do? How much more debt did they want the American people

185
00:27:58.580 --> 00:27:59.580
to have?

186
00:27:59.580 --> 00:28:04.260
Right. And I've got an article coming out in the Campaign for Liberty site sometime

187
00:28:04.260 --> 00:28:09.120
this week, sort of explaining this, because I know that there is a superficial plausibility

188
00:28:09.120 --> 00:28:13.180
to the idea that people should spend because, you know, how can businesses stay in business

189
00:28:13.180 --> 00:28:17.460
if people don't spend? And there are a lot of different replies to that. But one that's

190
00:28:17.460 --> 00:28:47.460
The most relevant to today is, as you say, it's not spending per se that we need, because if that were the case, everybody should get into debt up to his eyeballs, as a lot of people already are, and then go out and spend, but then, you know, well then what will we do three weeks from now, when we're so in debt that we can't spend anymore, I mean, obviously that can't be the solution in and of itself, but beyond that, the fact is that because of the housing boom, people spent more than they should have, they thought they were richer than they really were, because everybody thinks he's sitting on a half million dollar house.

191
00:28:47.460 --> 00:28:50.940
Now they realize they're not, and now they realize they've engaged in more consumption

192
00:28:50.940 --> 00:28:54.380
spending than they should have, or they borrowed against the equity in their homes to finance

193
00:28:54.380 --> 00:28:55.380
consumption spending.

194
00:28:55.380 --> 00:28:58.460
And they wouldn't have done that if they had known the real value of their homes.

195
00:28:58.460 --> 00:29:02.780
So what we're starting to see now is that in the boom, it was not just housing that

196
00:29:02.780 --> 00:29:04.120
was affected by the boom.

197
00:29:04.120 --> 00:29:09.100
The boom distorts all lines of production, or a lot of lines of production, that wouldn't

198
00:29:09.100 --> 00:29:10.700
have occurred without the boom.

199
00:29:10.700 --> 00:29:16.300
And so for instance, we're now learning that Starbucks, or at least it's one store every

200
00:29:16.300 --> 00:29:20.300
Every 10-feet business model was a bubble activity.

201
00:29:20.300 --> 00:29:24.300
They are closing stores like you wouldn't believe, because when people feel like,

202
00:29:24.300 --> 00:29:28.300
hey, I've got an infinitely appreciating asset in the form of my house,

203
00:29:28.300 --> 00:29:31.300
well, sure, a five-buck cup of coffee has sky's the limit.

204
00:29:31.300 --> 00:29:36.300
Or a six-dollar ice cream cone with cold stone creamery, great, fine, let's do it.

205
00:29:36.300 --> 00:29:42.300
But we're now seeing that those are bubble activities. They're going south, fast.

206
00:29:42.300 --> 00:29:49.300
So it's not so much that we need spending per se. We don't need people to go out and spend five dollar cups of coffee.

207
00:29:49.300 --> 00:29:54.300
What we need is for the economy to realize, wait a minute, five dollar cups of coffee are not what we need to be producing.

208
00:29:54.300 --> 00:29:58.300
We need capital to go out of that and to produce one dollar cups of coffee.

209
00:29:58.300 --> 00:30:05.300
So what we need is a restructuring of the economy so that it produces things people can sustainably spend their money on.

210
00:30:05.300 --> 00:30:09.300
We don't want to freeze this economy just the way it is and tell people to keep spending.

211
00:30:09.300 --> 00:30:14.900
We're producing things that people can't afford. We're producing more plasma TVs maybe than we should be.

212
00:30:14.900 --> 00:30:18.900
I don't exactly know what we're producing too much of. That's why we have a price system.

213
00:30:18.900 --> 00:30:24.700
But we need the economy to sort out what is sustainable in a post-bubble economy

214
00:30:24.700 --> 00:30:26.900
and what should be allowed to go out of business.

215
00:30:26.900 --> 00:30:33.100
And then we will restore an equilibrium where people will spend and will be producing things that people want.

216
00:30:33.100 --> 00:30:38.900
But just throwing money at the existing economy is just going to prop up zombies. That's the last thing we want.

217
00:30:38.900 --> 00:30:53.900
On that note, the Obama administration so far has spent over a trillion dollars and God knows how much the Geithner bank program could cost. But if they continue on this path, what do you see happening in the next four years?

218
00:30:53.900 --> 00:31:11.900
Well, if they continue on this path, I just can't see how the economy could recover. Markets are incredibly resilient. The market was trying to recover in the early years of the New Deal. There are some signs of that.

219
00:31:11.900 --> 00:31:20.900
So it can fight against government intervention, but given that we've got no savings, we're very much hollowed out as an economy,

220
00:31:20.900 --> 00:31:31.900
it's hard to see where the resources for the recovery could come from given that our pool of savings has been stretched thin or is almost nonexistent,

221
00:31:31.900 --> 00:31:38.900
and then what little we have left the government wants to raid so it can spend on arbitrary projects to reward political favorites.

222
00:31:38.900 --> 00:31:52.900
So I don't see where the recovery could come from. So we could, you know, best case scenario, we degenerate to a West European welfare state model where they have extremely sluggish growth, if any growth at all.

223
00:31:52.900 --> 00:32:07.900
They have high unemployment and they pretend not to know why this is happening to them. Or there is the possibility of, you know, the worst case scenario is a complete collapse of the whole system, a complete collapse of the dollar with all this pressure being put on it.

224
00:32:07.900 --> 00:32:15.900
I think it's very hard to know which of those outcomes will happen, but neither one of them is completely implausible.

225
00:32:15.900 --> 00:32:20.900
Okay, now we have a caller, Matt, from Syracuse University. He's going to ask you a question. Matt, you're live.

226
00:32:20.900 --> 00:32:25.900
Hey, Tom, how's it going? Big fan. This is more of a prod than a question.

227
00:32:25.900 --> 00:32:30.900
So, conservative pundits and politicians who are poignant on pretty much everything when a Republican's in office,

228
00:32:30.900 --> 00:32:34.900
but sometimes all right on economics when a Democrat's in office,

229
00:32:34.900 --> 00:32:54.900
The New Deal didn't cure the Great Depression, some will even say that it didn't make it worse, but they'll usually follow a lot of step behind your Paul Krugman of the world in saying that the Public Works Project that was World War II actually cured us of the Depression.

230
00:32:54.900 --> 00:33:07.900
Can you just speak to curing people of this kind of fallacy, this notion that World War II was a depression? I know you're going to reference Higgs and everything.

231
00:33:07.900 --> 00:33:37.900
Profile Investment Services, Inc.

232
00:33:37.900 --> 00:33:42.900
There should be some alarm bells going off when you hear that the war was good for us.

233
00:33:42.900 --> 00:33:48.900
I mean, when you have a war and you've got 12 million people drafted into the armed forces,

234
00:33:48.900 --> 00:33:53.900
12 million of your prime workers, and they're drafted into the armed forces,

235
00:33:53.900 --> 00:33:55.900
they're no longer available to produce goods and services.

236
00:33:55.900 --> 00:34:05.900
And 40% of the economy, 40% is either devoted to the armed forces or it's devoted to civilian employees of the armed forces

237
00:34:05.900 --> 00:34:35.900
Profile Investment Services, Inc.

238
00:34:35.900 --> 00:35:05.900
Profile Investment Services, Inc., Ltd., or Israel National News.

239
00:35:05.900 --> 00:35:35.900
Profile Investment Services, Inc., Ltd., or Israel National News.

240
00:35:36.060 --> 00:35:40.540
for the 1940s that tells you that we had a great boom in America during the war.

241
00:35:40.540 --> 00:35:44.220
You have to ask yourself, wait a minute, do these statistics make any sense? How could

242
00:35:44.220 --> 00:35:51.220
we have the biggest boom in the history of the United States at a time when the economy

243
00:35:51.980 --> 00:35:58.300
is suddenly finding itself under unprecedented resource constraints? The best workers have

244
00:35:58.300 --> 00:36:04.460
been shipped away and replaced by inexperienced people and that gives us the single greatest

245
00:36:04.460 --> 00:36:08.940
Boom in American history? How can that be? There's got to be something wrong with this.

246
00:36:08.940 --> 00:36:12.020
And so the rest of the answer, and I'll make this as quick as I can,

247
00:36:12.020 --> 00:36:15.380
the rest of the answer is that these GDP figures are totally misleading.

248
00:36:15.380 --> 00:36:17.380
They're just phony numbers.

249
00:36:17.380 --> 00:36:21.900
GDP is a screwy number to begin with under ideal circumstances.

250
00:36:21.900 --> 00:36:26.660
But basically what happened is that the economy was so controlled by the government

251
00:36:26.660 --> 00:36:28.020
during the war

252
00:36:28.020 --> 00:36:31.620
that so many of the prices were just dictated by the government.

253
00:36:31.620 --> 00:36:35.620
This is what we're going to pay for this good. Now, you go and produce it for us for the war.

254
00:36:35.620 --> 00:36:39.620
And this has spillover effects and affects other prices in the economy.

255
00:36:39.620 --> 00:36:46.620
Prices are only meaningful if they arise voluntarily between the bids of buyers and sellers for products.

256
00:36:46.620 --> 00:36:57.620
But if the government were to arbitrarily say, from now on, the price of eggs is, we declare to be $10 per egg, and the government is going to order a million eggs,

257
00:37:27.620 --> 00:37:57.620
Profile Investment Services, Inc., Ltd., or Israel National News.

258
00:37:57.620 --> 00:38:03.020
One of the hosts mentioned earlier that they had a liberal fund at their school that kind

259
00:38:03.020 --> 00:38:05.620
of couldn't see through the free market view on this.

260
00:38:05.620 --> 00:38:11.260
I'm wondering if you can speak to how the current financial system, how the Federal

261
00:38:11.260 --> 00:38:17.380
Reserve, how the government is currently set up, how that kind of feeds into the warfare

262
00:38:17.380 --> 00:38:18.380
state.

263
00:38:18.380 --> 00:38:21.380
I feel like a good answer on that would be something that could appeal to more liberal

264
00:38:21.380 --> 00:38:22.380
people.

265
00:38:22.380 --> 00:38:36.380
Yeah, yeah. Well, I mean, think of it this way. Is government going to be more able to wage destructive wars and by and large without the full enthusiastic consent of the population?

266
00:38:36.380 --> 00:38:42.380
Is it going to be more likely to be able to do that if it can just print up the money it needs to finance it out of thin air?

267
00:38:42.380 --> 00:38:49.380
Or if it has to actually go to the population and get the money either through borrowing from the population or through taxes?

268
00:38:49.380 --> 00:39:19.380
The question answers itself. If you really, really honestly care about war, and it's not just posturing, and it's not just a way to skip school for the day, but if you really believe it, if you really believe that war is evil, and that a lot of these wars that we've seen in recent years have been just unbelievable atrocities, well then it's very hard to take you seriously if you're going to say, but the government needs to be able to create out of thin air, out of absolutely nothing, with nobody's consent, even if the population is dead-set,

269
00:39:19.380 --> 00:39:29.380
I mean, that was what made Vietnam possible, because how did Lyndon Johnson finance that?

270
00:39:29.380 --> 00:39:36.380
I mean, a very, very large proportion of it was through just creating the money out of nowhere.

271
00:39:36.380 --> 00:39:42.380
Likewise for the Iraq War, taxes weren't raised, so where did the money come from?

272
00:39:42.380 --> 00:39:50.380
It was basically borrowing from foreigners and then creating the money, just printing the money up, and that's what made the war possible.

273
00:39:50.380 --> 00:39:56.380
So you can tell me all day long about you're all tears and pity for the Iraqi people and how terrible this is.

274
00:39:56.380 --> 00:40:11.380
But if you're going to sit here and either ignore or actually defend the government's power to fund these atrocities with money it has a monopoly on creating, you've just got to be kidding me.

275
00:40:11.380 --> 00:40:26.380
So, I mean, now you probably want to say this a little more nicely in a nicer tone than I just did, but I mean, as I say, if the war machine also runs a money machine, do you think there's going to be more war or less war? I mean, this is not brain surgery.

276
00:40:26.380 --> 00:40:32.380
Well, thanks a lot. Just one more question, Mr. Woods. Do you have an idea for another book?

277
00:40:32.380 --> 00:40:41.940
I've been writing an awful lot of books lately, so in the immediate run, I don't, just because

278
00:40:41.940 --> 00:40:48.300
I worked just day and night on Meltdown and it really took a lot out of me to be honest

279
00:40:48.300 --> 00:40:51.300
with you.

280
00:40:51.300 --> 00:40:54.740
People have actually been writing to me and say, ìHey, you're writing books faster than

281
00:40:54.740 --> 00:40:58.700
I can read them.î Well, then maybe right now I'm going to let people catch up a little

282
00:40:58.700 --> 00:41:00.900
bit while I get some recuperation.

283
00:41:00.900 --> 00:41:08.320
I'm not going to lie, I was impressed with all those citations and you sourced everything

284
00:41:08.320 --> 00:41:09.320
that you said.

285
00:41:09.320 --> 00:41:13.460
There were five pages of sources in the back and I love it and I'm going to go through

286
00:41:13.460 --> 00:41:15.900
all of them as soon as I have the chance.

287
00:41:15.900 --> 00:41:18.300
Thank you very much Mr. Woods, I guess we're going to conclude.

288
00:41:18.300 --> 00:41:22.100
Thanks for talking to us, it's been a very enjoyable experience and we're grateful that

289
00:41:22.100 --> 00:41:25.580
you took time out of your busy schedule to talk with other Liberty-minded people to get

290
00:41:25.580 --> 00:41:26.580
the message out there.

291
00:41:26.580 --> 00:41:34.580
So to everyone listening, Buy Meltdown. It's available on Amazon.com. It's a great book and I highly recommend it. Thank you very much, Mr. Woods.

292
00:41:34.580 --> 00:41:40.580
Thank you, guys. And check me out at TomWoods.com where I've got a free chapter of the book available.

293
00:41:40.580 --> 00:41:42.580
Alright. Thanks a lot.

294
00:41:42.580 --> 00:41:44.580
Okay. Thank you, guys.
