WEBVTT

NOTE Pictures of the Socialistic Future

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:12.000
This is Jeffrey Tucker. It's my great pleasure to be here on the phone with Brian Kaplan,

2
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:16.920
Professor of Economics at George Mason University, who was so gracious to write the foreword

3
00:00:16.920 --> 00:00:23.720
to our new edition of Pictures of the Socialistic Future by Organ Richter, written in the late

4
00:00:23.720 --> 00:00:29.120
19th century, a novel about socialism. Thank you so much for being with us today, Dr. Kaplan.

5
00:00:29.120 --> 00:00:31.620
Thanks very much for having me, Jeff.

6
00:00:31.620 --> 00:00:36.000
So I wonder if you would kind of give us a rundown, first of all, about the plot.

7
00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:37.000
This is a novel.

8
00:00:37.000 --> 00:00:38.000
Yes.

9
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:39.760
It is a dystopian novel.

10
00:00:39.760 --> 00:00:46.560
It begins with the assumption of power in Germany by the Social Democratic Party.

11
00:00:46.560 --> 00:00:52.120
It's told from the perspective of a rank-and-file member of the party who at first is overjoyed

12
00:00:52.120 --> 00:00:56.400
that his party is finally going to be delivering socialism to the German public.

13
00:00:56.400 --> 00:01:01.200
And then chapter by chapter we see what happens and his reaction and at first he's willing

14
00:01:01.200 --> 00:01:07.560
to defend some really horrible things, but over the course of the book things just go

15
00:01:07.560 --> 00:01:13.120
so badly that even he starts to doubt and by the end he's basically worried that his

16
00:01:13.120 --> 00:01:15.600
own friends are going to arrest him or worse.

17
00:01:15.600 --> 00:01:21.480
You know it's spooky on a number of levels, I mean first of all it's just a beautiful

18
00:01:21.480 --> 00:01:24.080
forecast right of what happens under socialism.

19
00:01:24.080 --> 00:01:27.880
Yes, I mean it's beautiful because I think of the time people would have said you were

20
00:01:27.880 --> 00:01:33.440
being very unfair. The most dramatic forecast in the book is that the victorious socialism

21
00:01:33.440 --> 00:01:38.160
in Germany will lead to mass migration, to escape from socialism and that the government

22
00:01:38.160 --> 00:01:43.440
will then respond by shooting anyone who tries to leave. And he predicted this 70 years before

23
00:01:43.440 --> 00:01:45.840
the wall and got it right.

24
00:01:45.840 --> 00:01:55.360
Yeah, so that aspect of it is spooky and dramatic, but as you mentioned, the fact that he kind

25
00:01:55.360 --> 00:01:59.640
of justifies all these things as you're going through chapter by chapter.

26
00:01:59.640 --> 00:02:00.640
Right, right.

27
00:02:00.640 --> 00:02:02.640
Richter's narrator, not Richter himself, of course.

28
00:02:02.640 --> 00:02:03.640
Right, right.

29
00:02:03.640 --> 00:02:05.200
Richter's narrator.

30
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:07.920
So I learned from it, I don't know, let me ask you this.

31
00:02:07.920 --> 00:02:15.080
Did you gain any insight into the minds of those people who defend the results of socialistic

32
00:02:15.080 --> 00:02:16.920
policies by reading the novel?

33
00:02:16.920 --> 00:02:17.920
Yeah.

34
00:02:17.920 --> 00:02:18.920
I think you do.

35
00:02:18.920 --> 00:02:24.160
I mean, again, you know, partly what you see is the slippery slope and how once you wind

36
00:02:24.160 --> 00:02:27.760
up defending one thing that seems kind of minor at first, you wind up defending another

37
00:02:27.760 --> 00:02:30.400
thing that's a bit worse, and by the end you're defending horrible things.

38
00:02:30.400 --> 00:02:36.240
But the other thing that you see is that many of the things that we regard as very far down

39
00:02:36.240 --> 00:02:39.960
the slippery slope of socialism were things that were widely accepted as being okay.

40
00:02:39.960 --> 00:02:59.080
So just sort of the analogy of the citizens of a country are like the soldiers in an army and soldiers in an army are not allowed to desert when there's a war. Therefore, the citizens of a country are not allowed to flee when socialism eats them. This kind of reasoning seems to have been very deeply rooted from socialism from the earliest ages. You really get that out of this book.

41
00:02:59.120 --> 00:03:06.480
Yeah. Yeah. What do you what do you make of the the economic content of the book, the economic analytics?

42
00:03:06.480 --> 00:03:18.480
I mean, it's very good. It's basically a pretty mainstream economist story about what will happen under socialism, in particular the kind of socialism where you have very serious equality.

43
00:03:18.480 --> 00:03:26.480
I mean, what's interesting about this book is that he does show the socialists taking equality much more seriously than they actually did in the end.

44
00:03:26.480 --> 00:03:39.980
So, in this book, for example, the Prime Minister is expected to repair his own clothing because it would be an offense to socialism if there was some other lesser person who had to go and handle his tailoring.

45
00:03:39.980 --> 00:03:44.980
Right, shine his shoes, I think, was the example. Wasn't there a big scandal?

46
00:03:44.980 --> 00:03:55.540
So, you see basically the effects of actually having true equality in this book, and they're

47
00:03:55.540 --> 00:03:56.540
played out very quickly.

48
00:03:56.540 --> 00:04:01.380
You see them very quickly, how the incentives are terrible, and then questions like what

49
00:04:01.380 --> 00:04:05.340
about who wants to take out the garbage, and since the socialists in the novel aren't even

50
00:04:05.340 --> 00:04:11.180
willing to offer people extra pay for less pleasant jobs, the result is you basically

51
00:04:11.180 --> 00:04:26.700
One thing I thought was particularly realistic was you get the sense that the party really

52
00:04:26.700 --> 00:04:28.300
had no idea what it was going to do.

53
00:04:28.300 --> 00:04:32.180
It's like they're given this great gift of an opportunity to impose socialism and only

54
00:04:32.180 --> 00:04:34.580
then the improvisation begins.

55
00:04:34.580 --> 00:04:35.580
Well what does that mean?

56
00:04:35.580 --> 00:04:40.420
Right. There's a great quote from Lenin, which I believe is accurate, where he supposedly

57
00:04:40.420 --> 00:04:44.340
said, the point of the revolution is to seize power. Afterwards, we'll figure out what

58
00:04:44.340 --> 00:04:51.020
to do with it. So, look, we know we want power, we know we can do great things with it, and

59
00:04:51.020 --> 00:04:55.020
there's no time to talk about what exactly that might be. Just let us have the power

60
00:04:55.020 --> 00:04:58.300
and then you'll see what we have in mind.

61
00:04:58.300 --> 00:05:03.500
So the narrator's thinking through the meaning of what socialism in practice means day by

62
00:05:03.500 --> 00:05:11.500
and so I mean the state imposes a kind of nationalized cook shops and he says well

63
00:05:11.500 --> 00:05:15.980
of course you got to have that you can't have various meals people some be people

64
00:05:15.980 --> 00:05:19.660
eating well some people eating not so well right and it also undermines the

65
00:05:19.660 --> 00:05:24.220
communal spirit when you have people eating and families so we not only do

66
00:05:24.220 --> 00:05:27.180
they basically go and split up families and put kids into boarding schools in

67
00:05:27.180 --> 00:05:30.500
order to make sure they're brought they're properly raised as citizens of

68
00:05:30.500 --> 00:05:35.280
of the Socialist Society, but you also don't even want them eating together, because otherwise

69
00:05:35.280 --> 00:05:41.060
that will undermine socialism. Of course, this eventually becomes a key part of Maoism, with

70
00:05:41.060 --> 00:05:45.940
the Maoist communes, where they actually do have everyone eating in common in order to

71
00:05:45.940 --> 00:05:52.940
undermine the family and basically isolate the individual and then integrate them as

72
00:05:52.940 --> 00:05:54.500
a cog into the machine of this group.

73
00:05:54.500 --> 00:05:58.540
Well, that's extraordinary. I thought maybe that was a bit of an exaggeration on the part

74
00:05:58.540 --> 00:06:28.540
Right. It was an exaggeration relative to what happened in Germany, but eventually this is a very key part of Maoism, and this is one of the earliest horrors that people in China say, well, let's at least get rid of this, and it's so dehumanizing for everyone to have to go and sit in this common mess hall all the time, and you really aren't allowed to go and have your own little group where you talk to, and you don't have to worry about everybody else.

75
00:06:28.540 --> 00:06:35.040
Reducing human well-being, right? It's never like an equality upwards. It's always an equality downwards.

76
00:06:35.040 --> 00:06:41.040
Right. Well, what's interesting is that the narrator and especially his wife at the beginning assume that the equalization will happen upwards.

77
00:06:41.040 --> 00:06:49.040
So basically, they seem to be middle class, roughly. And then they imagine that with the redistribution, they're going to go and get a much nicer apartment,

78
00:06:49.040 --> 00:06:55.540
or at least they'll get half of an apartment of a rich person. And instead, it turns out that they're evicted.

79
00:06:55.540 --> 00:06:59.540
And then they're told to go to move to some worse apartment and a couple of poor families get their apartment.

80
00:06:59.540 --> 00:07:09.540
There's this view that there's all these rich people who are going to get our share and forgetting what about all the people who are poorer than you and they're going to want their piece out of you.

81
00:07:09.540 --> 00:07:19.540
Some parts of the book struck me as funny, but then there were some parts I had to actually put it down like, I don't know, it just gave me the chills when they started taking the furniture, for example.

82
00:07:19.540 --> 00:07:42.540
Oh yeah, it's very striking, the violation and the way that the guy's wife had this view of everything is going to be better and then she sees both her family being torn apart and then the symbols of the family, the home and the furniture and all of these other things being communized.

83
00:07:42.540 --> 00:07:55.540
Um, Richter even zeroes in on the point that, um, the furniture is not just random chairs and sofas and things. It's like everything in the house sort of means something to the people who own it, didn't it?

84
00:07:55.540 --> 00:07:56.540
Yeah, yeah, exactly.

85
00:07:56.540 --> 00:07:57.540
That was gripping, wasn't it?

86
00:07:57.540 --> 00:07:58.540
Oh, yeah, yeah, very much.

87
00:07:58.540 --> 00:08:05.540
Yeah. Um, what did you make of the, uh, the socialist dance? Do you want to, do you want to mention that?

88
00:08:05.540 --> 00:08:06.540
The socialist?

89
00:08:06.540 --> 00:08:13.060
The dance, they have these community organized dances, right? So, am I right? There's a

90
00:08:13.060 --> 00:08:18.820
moment there where there's a problem that people are permitted to choose a dance partner.

91
00:08:18.820 --> 00:08:24.700
Oh, yes, yes. Tell me more. I think people are stuck with you more than me.

92
00:08:24.700 --> 00:08:30.300
Yeah. Well, this part made me laugh. So, yeah, you have to, it's a random choice of dance

93
00:08:30.300 --> 00:08:34.900
partners and that leads to inequality. So you have to have some sort of lottery for

94
00:08:34.900 --> 00:08:39.500
for the choice of dance partners and then people lose interest in the dance.

95
00:08:39.500 --> 00:08:43.540
Yeah, so it's foreshadowing Harrison Bergeron.

96
00:08:43.540 --> 00:08:45.580
Yeah, that part was funny.

97
00:08:45.580 --> 00:08:54.060
I guess there's really no history of that in real socialism, I suppose, but that impulse

98
00:08:54.060 --> 00:08:59.500
to equality still survives, doesn't it, in some ways even in the United States?

99
00:08:59.500 --> 00:09:04.860
Right, and again, I don't remember anything specifically about that dancing.

100
00:09:04.860 --> 00:09:10.540
in the Maoist communes or, you know, as a last resort check to Khmer Rouge, wouldn't

101
00:09:10.540 --> 00:09:15.660
surprise me if things of that sort, you know, or something quite similar did actually go

102
00:09:15.660 --> 00:09:16.660
on.

103
00:09:16.660 --> 00:09:17.660
Yeah.

104
00:09:17.660 --> 00:09:21.600
Well, you know, I should give you credit for this book.

105
00:09:21.600 --> 00:09:26.800
The reason the Mises Institute has it out at all is that you discovered it first at

106
00:09:26.800 --> 00:09:30.380
Liberty Fund's site, it was in HTML, right?

107
00:09:30.380 --> 00:09:32.580
And then you wrote a blog post about it.

108
00:09:32.580 --> 00:09:33.580
That's right.

109
00:09:33.580 --> 00:09:38.140
Actually, I remember hearing about this book about 20 years ago, an lecture by Ralph Reiko,

110
00:09:38.140 --> 00:09:43.300
and all that I heard was there was some German guy who wrote a dystopian novel about socialists

111
00:09:43.300 --> 00:09:46.460
taking over Germany and then shooting people trying to flee the country, and I thought

112
00:09:46.460 --> 00:09:50.740
that was kind of interesting, and I read this article that he wrote for the Review of Austrian

113
00:09:50.740 --> 00:09:54.940
Economics, I think the very first issue, actually, on Eugen Richter, but then I never did anything

114
00:09:54.940 --> 00:09:59.300
else with it, but then when the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall was coming

115
00:09:59.300 --> 00:10:03.860
I was saying, why don't you go and try to track down this book and see whether my memory

116
00:10:03.860 --> 00:10:06.540
of Rayco Summary was correct.

117
00:10:06.540 --> 00:10:12.420
And when I found the book online, wow, this book is just so good and it's amazing and

118
00:10:12.420 --> 00:10:18.620
it really gives a very different perspective on what socialism is all about because we

119
00:10:18.620 --> 00:10:23.940
tend to think of it as this wonderful idealistic movement that then got taken over by thugs.

120
00:10:23.940 --> 00:10:30.940
So, you're taking over what was corrupted. And Richter's story is, no, these guys were very bad from the beginning.

121
00:10:30.940 --> 00:10:33.940
They were idealistic, but their ideal was totalitarian.

122
00:10:33.940 --> 00:10:45.940
And it's just hard for people today to look back and imagine that there were people who heard about totalitarianism and got tears in their eyes and thought, what a lovely idea, I would die for that. That's really how it was.

123
00:10:45.940 --> 00:10:58.940
Tell me about Richter. It's not a name that we know. We know about Bastiat, we know about Adam Smith, we know about even Turgot and Menger, but Richter is not a name that comes up very much.

124
00:10:58.940 --> 00:11:05.940
Basically, he was the most prominent German politician and journalist of libertarian persuasion in the late 19th century.

125
00:11:05.940 --> 00:11:10.940
He was actually involved in a whole series of parties with various German names.

126
00:11:10.940 --> 00:11:19.940
There was a tendency for multi-party systems, so there'd often be one party and then they'd rebrand and change the name, and then there'd be some splits, so he actually was involved with a number of different parties.

127
00:11:19.940 --> 00:11:33.940
But throughout his lifetime, he was basically known as the most consistent libertarian in German politics, to the point where he was not only anti-socialism, he was anti-Bismarck, he was basically against the German Empire,

128
00:11:33.940 --> 00:11:54.940
And this seems to be, am I right, that this is pretty much the only work that's in print right now in English by Rick?

129
00:11:54.940 --> 00:11:58.940
Oh, right. I was looking at this other stuff and as far as I can tell it is the only one.

130
00:11:58.940 --> 00:12:06.940
He had one other fairly successful popular book, The Name Escapes Me, but I don't think it was ever translated.

131
00:12:06.940 --> 00:12:11.940
As far as I understand, Pictures of the Socialistic Future actually sold quite well in the English translation.

132
00:12:11.940 --> 00:12:15.940
So it wasn't just an obscure academic book in its day and it wasn't just for Germany.

133
00:12:15.940 --> 00:12:18.940
It actually made its way to the English speaking world and did well.

134
00:12:18.940 --> 00:12:26.940
It's strange to me that it seems to be a case in our generation and in the case as an instance of lost knowledge.

135
00:12:26.940 --> 00:12:31.740
Which both, Victor, this novel, the German liberalism generally?

136
00:12:31.740 --> 00:12:36.060
Yes, I mean, German liberalism, it's kind of easy to see why the knowledge is lost because

137
00:12:36.060 --> 00:12:38.060
they were so crushed.

138
00:12:38.060 --> 00:12:46.260
So, basically, by the time of World War I, the social democrats had control of the, well,

139
00:12:46.260 --> 00:12:52.340
they were at least close to control of parliament and the Kaiser had the actual reigns of power

140
00:12:52.340 --> 00:12:53.780
with the military.

141
00:12:53.780 --> 00:12:57.700
and then after the war the socialists really got power and then they held that for a little

142
00:12:57.700 --> 00:13:02.540
while and then there was some chaos and the Nazis took over and then World War II and

143
00:13:02.540 --> 00:13:07.980
then you had the split between West and East Germany and in the course of this whole story

144
00:13:07.980 --> 00:13:12.460
German liberalism was pretty much forgotten even though they were really the only voices

145
00:13:12.460 --> 00:13:16.500
who were against everything that happened afterwards and the only people I'd say who

146
00:13:16.500 --> 00:13:21.900
were in no way tainted with any of the evils of Nazism or Communism that came later on.

147
00:13:21.900 --> 00:13:30.900
Right. What an excellent point, right? We need to revise our list of heroes and villains in history, don't we? I mean, guys like Richter should be famous to everybody.

148
00:13:30.900 --> 00:13:43.900
Yes. And it's also striking that Richter was also a very vocal opponent of Bismarck's persecution of the socialists. So he really was the kind of consistent liberal who would say,

149
00:13:43.900 --> 00:13:47.900
I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

150
00:13:47.900 --> 00:13:53.900
So during a period when the socialists were, they were never actually banned under Bismarck's anti-socialist laws,

151
00:13:53.900 --> 00:13:56.900
but they were harassed quite a bit.

152
00:13:56.900 --> 00:13:59.900
And Richter was standing up for them this whole time and saying,

153
00:13:59.900 --> 00:14:04.900
look, these guys are wrong, they have terrible ideas, but stop persecuting them

154
00:14:04.900 --> 00:14:09.900
and let's go and try to defeat them fair and square through free discussion.

155
00:14:09.900 --> 00:14:17.900
And by the time that they actually got the anti-socialist laws were off the books. They weren't actually repealed, they were just allowed to lapse.

156
00:14:17.900 --> 00:14:27.900
But by that point, the socialists basically had very little gratitude for Richter and then when it went about their merry business,

157
00:14:27.900 --> 00:14:36.900
it was like, well, now that we no longer have to worry about this, we're not going to say, we're not really planning on extending in the same favors later on.

158
00:14:36.900 --> 00:14:41.540
When you read about guys like Richter in their lives, do you feel a sense of solidarity with them?

159
00:14:41.540 --> 00:14:45.940
You know, guys like Richter and Turgeau and these other great libertarians in history, like,

160
00:14:45.940 --> 00:14:50.900
you know, a sense of identifying with their lives and the struggle that they have.

161
00:14:50.900 --> 00:14:56.100
Absolutely. I mean, you know, just the courage that they have and the insight and just the way

162
00:14:56.100 --> 00:15:01.060
that they've been so vindicated by history despite being not all that successful in their time.

163
00:15:01.060 --> 00:15:16.060
It's a very compelling story and one where in your darkest moments you can think, well maybe in a hundred years someone will read one of my things and they'll think it was good and they'll tell people that I was right although ignored and that could be my consolation prize.

164
00:15:16.060 --> 00:15:22.060
Well we just have to hope there are people like Brian Kaplan a hundred years from now to celebrate people like Brian Kaplan today, right?

165
00:15:22.060 --> 00:15:24.060
We can only hope.

166
00:15:24.060 --> 00:15:30.200
You know, I have to tell you that this book, as we prepared it, you know, of course we

167
00:15:30.200 --> 00:15:36.020
had copy editors and typesetters and everybody who was involved in it was thrilled to read

168
00:15:36.020 --> 00:15:41.140
it and came to me and said, wow, this is a fantastic piece of work, where did you find

169
00:15:41.140 --> 00:15:42.140
it?

170
00:15:42.140 --> 00:15:45.700
Yeah, I mean, pretty much all my friends who have read it have also been very interested

171
00:15:45.700 --> 00:15:46.700
in it.

172
00:15:46.700 --> 00:15:47.700
And don't forget the cover designer.

173
00:15:47.700 --> 00:15:48.700
The cover designer did a really great job.

174
00:15:48.700 --> 00:15:49.700
I love this cover.

175
00:15:49.700 --> 00:15:53.740
Yeah, the cover design, it's fantastic, yeah, it's perfect.

176
00:15:53.740 --> 00:15:59.780
It's also available in EPUB. I also have to tell you that after I read it, I felt like

177
00:15:59.780 --> 00:16:08.280
I hated socialism all over again. For the first time almost. It intensified my opposition

178
00:16:08.280 --> 00:16:10.320
to all kinds of socialism.

179
00:16:10.320 --> 00:16:15.280
Right. Especially the narrative changes. When you read this book, you see it's not some

180
00:16:15.280 --> 00:16:20.280
noble ideal that got corrupted. You see it was a bad idea from the beginning. When you

181
00:16:20.280 --> 00:16:25.640
You have that story, you have a very different feeling towards it. Then it's no longer some

182
00:16:25.640 --> 00:16:29.800
very decent people whose ideas were twisted in ways they never would have imagined, said

183
00:16:29.800 --> 00:16:35.900
it was some very rotten people who got a lot of favorable press at the time and then never

184
00:16:35.900 --> 00:16:40.040
really got the condemnation of history that they should have when their ideas were put

185
00:16:40.040 --> 00:16:41.040
into practice.

186
00:16:41.040 --> 00:16:45.400
Well, you know, another thing about the book that we should mention, Richter gets right

187
00:16:45.400 --> 00:16:50.760
Right, the decline in health under socialism, right?

188
00:16:50.760 --> 00:16:55.520
So the grandfather who's taken away to go to the old folks' home, you know, declines

189
00:16:55.520 --> 00:16:56.520
very quickly.

190
00:16:56.520 --> 00:16:57.520
Right, right.

191
00:16:57.520 --> 00:17:01.560
And, of course, the daughter who's taken to one of the, you know, whatever you want

192
00:17:01.560 --> 00:17:07.120
to call it, the children's detention centers or the socialist boarding schools is, I guess,

193
00:17:07.120 --> 00:17:08.120
the favorite way.

194
00:17:08.120 --> 00:17:10.520
She did not do very well not to give away the whole story.

195
00:17:10.520 --> 00:17:14.000
Yeah, I guess we shouldn't give away the whole story.

196
00:17:14.000 --> 00:17:20.280
But she's, what, seven or eight or something like that, and the mother, it's just such

197
00:17:20.280 --> 00:17:25.400
a tragic moment, you know, the mother decides to bring her some special clothes, I think

198
00:17:25.400 --> 00:17:26.400
that she makes.

199
00:17:26.400 --> 00:17:31.640
Right, I mean, it also makes me think how, you know, under real socialism, elite socialists

200
00:17:31.640 --> 00:17:35.160
would never have let this stuff happen to their own kids, but of course all the other

201
00:17:35.160 --> 00:17:39.440
people who have to live under the system really did see stuff like this happen.

202
00:17:39.440 --> 00:17:46.120
And then this, the decline of the narrator's wife into a kind of, I guess she's labeled

203
00:17:46.120 --> 00:17:51.720
as afflicted with a kind of psychosis, laid in the book.

204
00:17:51.720 --> 00:17:54.720
Right, I think all you said is his wife, his wife.

205
00:17:54.720 --> 00:17:56.720
Yeah, what did I say?

206
00:17:56.720 --> 00:18:03.320
Right, I mean, it's psychosis or just natural, horrible depression as a result of all the

207
00:18:03.320 --> 00:18:16.160
So under real existing socialism, one of the most striking things that you find is a decline

208
00:18:16.160 --> 00:18:19.600
in the vital statistics of the population.

209
00:18:19.600 --> 00:18:23.700
So they can lie about GDP, they can lie about a lot of things, but when you see how long

210
00:18:23.700 --> 00:18:27.800
people live and you see that actually shrinking, as I guess it did in Russia, right?

211
00:18:27.800 --> 00:18:28.800
Right.

212
00:18:28.800 --> 00:18:48.800
Again, of course, you can lie about life expectancy, too, and it's very likely they did. In the case of Cuba, I've never seen a really good critique of Cuban health statistics, but I think it's very reasonable to doubt many of the health statistics they offer, why exactly should we believe them on this, given life and everything else.

213
00:18:48.800 --> 00:18:53.800
Yeah, but it's something I suppose that nobody ever anticipated.

214
00:18:53.800 --> 00:19:03.800
Well, of course, Rick did. I mean, I'd also say Mises anticipated this when he talked about what would actually happen to people under socialism.

215
00:19:03.800 --> 00:19:07.800
They'll be very poor and poor people are sick. Poor people are not healthy.

216
00:19:07.800 --> 00:19:14.800
We don't have too many novels, libertarian novels, on our side, or pro-capitalist novels or anti-socialist novels.

217
00:19:14.800 --> 00:19:21.800
At least it's not as many as probably we'd like. Would you consider this one of the better examples of fiction?

218
00:19:21.800 --> 00:19:28.680
Absolutely. In terms of other ones, I think many dystopian novels, even if the author

219
00:19:28.680 --> 00:19:33.840
himself is not libertarian, they have a very libertarian feel because you see the state

220
00:19:33.840 --> 00:19:37.640
out of control doing stuff to people and you realize, look, if the state couldn't do any

221
00:19:37.640 --> 00:19:42.080
of this stuff, then none of this bad stuff would be happening. So 1984, while Orwell

222
00:19:42.080 --> 00:19:49.280
is far from libertarian, I see 1984 as a very libertarian book. And on the other hand, Atlas

223
00:19:49.280 --> 00:20:03.280
Alice Shrugged is sort of a strange combination of a dystopian with a utopia novel where you've got 700 pages of dystopia or maybe even 900 pages of dystopia followed by things suddenly getting better at the very end.

224
00:20:03.280 --> 00:20:06.280
Again, not to give the plot of Alice Shrugged away either.

225
00:20:06.280 --> 00:20:16.280
I'm a huge fan of Garrett Garrett's novels, sort of pro-capitalistic novels, because they both make an economic point and it's good literature.

226
00:20:16.280 --> 00:20:20.840
and I would consider this Richter book to be good literature too, do you?

227
00:20:20.840 --> 00:20:25.800
Oh yeah, yeah, I mean it's a very fun read, something that you could give to high school students too

228
00:20:25.800 --> 00:20:32.360
and yet professors can get a lot out of it. Yeah, I mean in terms of the, right obviously,

229
00:20:32.360 --> 00:20:36.680
the deepest lesson I learned is, you know, Richter's book made me realize there's really sort of three

230
00:20:36.680 --> 00:20:42.360
stories about why socialism turned out so badly and, you know, the first one, you know, I would

231
00:20:42.360 --> 00:20:46.520
I would attribute to Lord Acton, even though he died before socialism really took off anywhere,

232
00:20:46.520 --> 00:20:50.440
and that is the all-power tends to corrupt, absolute power corrupts absolutely.

233
00:20:50.440 --> 00:20:55.360
So, on this story, socialists are decent people, they get in power, but for all their idealism,

234
00:20:55.360 --> 00:20:59.280
even they'll do bad things when you give them absolute power. So that's one story, the Acton story.

235
00:20:59.280 --> 00:21:02.560
Then you've got what I'll call the Hayek story of the worst get on top.

236
00:21:02.560 --> 00:21:07.400
So this one is more of a selection story, where the original socialists are nice people, but

237
00:21:07.400 --> 00:21:12.320
once they actually get power, then the psychopaths and sadists manage to muscle their way to the top

238
00:21:12.320 --> 00:21:15.240
and then they push everybody else out, and then they start doing terrible things in the

239
00:21:15.240 --> 00:21:16.240
name of the ideals.

240
00:21:16.240 --> 00:21:19.080
So that's another story, the Hayek story.

241
00:21:19.080 --> 00:21:21.920
And Richter's story is really quite different from either of these two.

242
00:21:21.920 --> 00:21:24.000
I call it a born bad story.

243
00:21:24.000 --> 00:21:29.360
One where the original socialists, the founders, were actually bad people with bad ideas.

244
00:21:29.360 --> 00:21:36.120
Not that they were corrupt, but sincerely bad is a good way of thinking about it.

245
00:21:36.120 --> 00:21:40.680
And then the evolution of the ideas, for the most part, is pretty much what you should

246
00:21:40.680 --> 00:22:09.360
Well, Brian, let me express my gratitude to you for having alerted me to the existence

247
00:22:09.360 --> 00:22:15.360
Let me thank you for approaching me and getting this published. To me this was just a thrill.

248
00:22:15.360 --> 00:22:20.360
It was only a little bit of work and to go and see this book revived and actually being read makes me very happy.

249
00:22:20.360 --> 00:22:24.360
That's fantastic. Thank you so much and I look forward to working with you in the future.

250
00:22:24.360 --> 00:22:26.360
Thanks a lot, Jeff. Appreciate it.