WEBVTT

NOTE Privatizing Rivers, Voluntary Slave Contracts, Environmentalism

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
Welcome back to the Wall Street Shuffle. We have Walter Block on the line with us. Walter is an economics professor at Loyola University and author of

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:11.000
Privatization of Roads and Highways and Defending the Undefendable. Walter, how are you, my friend?

3
00:00:11.000 --> 00:00:13.000
I'm delighted to be with you on your show.

4
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:19.000
Well, thank you very much. You are so polite. Most people are not anywhere near that polite. Thank you so much, my friend.

5
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:27.000
You have such provocative topics. For example, privatizing rivers. What the heck is that all about?

6
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:34.080
Well, I'm from New Orleans, and recently a government river killed a lot of people.

7
00:00:34.080 --> 00:00:40.800
I'm talking about Katrina, and the Army Corps of Engineers, which is a governmental enterprise,

8
00:00:40.800 --> 00:00:46.520
and the U.S. government, which owns the Mississippi River, between the two of them killed about

9
00:00:46.520 --> 00:00:51.680
1,500 of my fellow citizens, and I'm not much of a fan of that.

10
00:00:51.680 --> 00:00:56.560
And my thought is that if the river was owned by the Mississippi River Corporation, a private

11
00:00:56.560 --> 00:01:01.680
entity, they would take better care of their property than the government would.

12
00:01:01.680 --> 00:01:05.760
But then the argument comes right back at you that Transocean didn't do that on the

13
00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:06.840
oil rig.

14
00:01:06.840 --> 00:01:09.080
So I guess that goes both ways.

15
00:01:09.080 --> 00:01:10.080
Transocean?

16
00:01:10.080 --> 00:01:11.640
Yeah, that was a private company, right?

17
00:01:11.640 --> 00:01:16.080
Lack of regulation, 11 people died and now it's turning into the largest ecological disaster

18
00:01:16.080 --> 00:01:17.080
in history of the Gulf.

19
00:01:17.080 --> 00:01:18.880
Did we bring you in to shoot the guest wheels off?

20
00:01:18.880 --> 00:01:19.880
Did we do that?

21
00:01:19.880 --> 00:01:23.880
I wanted to bring the other side of the argument. You've been gone too long.

22
00:01:23.880 --> 00:01:27.880
Anyways, continue. Is that not a valid point as well?

23
00:01:27.880 --> 00:01:31.880
We're now talking about the BP oil spill in the Gulf.

24
00:01:31.880 --> 00:01:35.880
Yes. Guess who claims ownership of the Gulf?

25
00:01:35.880 --> 00:01:39.880
Good question. Who is it? It's the government.

26
00:01:39.880 --> 00:01:43.880
Oh, I see. And if the Gulf were privately owned,

27
00:01:43.880 --> 00:01:47.880
they would have been much more careful, presumably, than in who they

28
00:01:47.880 --> 00:01:59.360
The government, in its infinite wisdom, has seen to it that DP is not going to be responsible

29
00:01:59.360 --> 00:02:07.320
for all of the damage caused, but only up to, I think, $95 million, plus the cost of

30
00:02:07.320 --> 00:02:08.320
cleanup.

31
00:02:08.320 --> 00:02:12.640
So I think a private enterprise who own the Gulf of Mexico would have been a little bit

32
00:02:12.640 --> 00:02:16.960
more careful, because if they make a mistake, they can go broke, whereas if the government

33
00:02:16.960 --> 00:02:19.760
Make no mistake, it just raises our taxes.

34
00:02:19.760 --> 00:02:25.220
So unless we embrace socialism, and we've seen what happened with the Soviet Union,

35
00:02:25.220 --> 00:02:26.220
we should embrace pre-enterprise.

36
00:02:26.220 --> 00:02:31.360
Well, let's just assume, first of all, you are one of my favorites, because instead of

37
00:02:31.360 --> 00:02:35.880
being a Keynesian economist, you're an Austrian economist, as am I, and a libertarian theorist.

38
00:02:35.880 --> 00:02:38.120
I happen to subscribe to the libertarian theory.

39
00:02:38.120 --> 00:02:42.680
So you and I are exactly on the same page, and what you're really talking about is letting

40
00:02:42.680 --> 00:02:44.880
the free market control everything.

41
00:02:44.880 --> 00:02:48.880
Now, and I agree with that, but let me ask you a question when it comes to Wall Street.

42
00:02:48.880 --> 00:02:55.880
Greenspan said the same thing. He thought that the inherent greed of people on Wall Street would be self-regulating.

43
00:02:55.880 --> 00:03:04.880
It turns out it wasn't. How do you reconcile our theory about Austrian economics and libertarianism with greed?

44
00:03:04.880 --> 00:03:10.880
Well, as Adam Smith said about greed, it's not from benevolence that the butcher and the baker and the candlestick maker

45
00:03:10.880 --> 00:03:17.880
The magic of the marketplaces, Ronald Reagan used to talk about, converts greed and selfishness into good work.

46
00:03:17.880 --> 00:03:24.880
But the problem is when you don't have private property, or when you have government regulations,

47
00:03:24.880 --> 00:03:29.880
or when you have a central bank like the Fed, of which we're all very familiar,

48
00:03:29.880 --> 00:03:35.880
or when you have a central bank like the Fed, of which we're all very familiar,

49
00:03:35.880 --> 00:03:40.080
or when you have government regulation or when you have a central bank like the

50
00:03:40.080 --> 00:03:44.280
Fed of which Greenspan and now Bernanke are head of, well then you don't have free

51
00:03:44.280 --> 00:03:48.140
enterprise and of course this isn't going to work if you have a large ad

52
00:03:48.140 --> 00:03:52.680
mixture of socialism or fascism. It only works when you have free enterprise.

53
00:03:52.680 --> 00:03:57.040
So are you saying that had there been, and I struggle with this because I think

54
00:03:57.040 --> 00:04:05.080
the avarice on Wall Street is beyond belief and how blatant it is, I guess you

55
00:04:05.080 --> 00:04:09.640
you could say that back in the early nineties before the government said we need to encourage

56
00:04:09.640 --> 00:04:10.640
more home ownership.

57
00:04:10.640 --> 00:04:15.100
If the government hadn't become involved in the whole prime, sub-prime process, getting

58
00:04:15.100 --> 00:04:18.360
more homes to the people that can't afford it, if we hadn't gotten involved in that,

59
00:04:18.360 --> 00:04:23.000
I guess you're saying we never would have gotten to 2006 through 2008 and the system

60
00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:26.640
would have been self-regulating, I'd like to believe that greed would have regulated

61
00:04:26.640 --> 00:04:27.640
the system.

62
00:04:27.640 --> 00:04:30.280
It seems to me that greed would have taken us right off the same cliff.

63
00:04:30.280 --> 00:04:35.280
Well, when you shop for a car, do you try to buy the cheapest car you can get or do

64
00:04:35.280 --> 00:04:38.160
you try to buy the most expensive car of the thing?

65
00:04:38.160 --> 00:04:39.600
Every chance I get.

66
00:04:39.600 --> 00:04:40.600
I'm sure you try to.

67
00:04:40.600 --> 00:04:44.560
If there are two cars that are identical and one is selling for $30,000 and one is selling

68
00:04:44.560 --> 00:04:49.160
for $35,000, you greedy person, don't you grab the $30,000 one?

69
00:04:49.160 --> 00:04:53.560
Actually, I prefer the $50,000 one selling for $30,000, but yes, your point's well taken.

70
00:04:53.560 --> 00:04:55.760
Well the point is that everyone is greedy.

71
00:04:55.760 --> 00:04:59.480
The average is no monopoly of Wall Street.

72
00:04:59.480 --> 00:05:03.920
Every last person wants to buy at the lowest price and sell at the highest price.

73
00:05:03.920 --> 00:05:07.000
So what is this Wall Street greed, this greed all over?

74
00:05:07.000 --> 00:05:12.720
Well, I agree with that, but we're talking about things like, let's say, the subprime

75
00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:18.160
mess, the derivatives, the one and a half quadrillion dollars worth of completely unmatched

76
00:05:18.160 --> 00:05:21.360
derivatives floating around out there.

77
00:05:21.360 --> 00:05:26.960
People have created instruments of absolutely no value to anybody in society, pocketed the

78
00:05:26.960 --> 00:05:32.060
the fees on them, left nothing behind but carnage and walked away. Now you've taken

79
00:05:32.060 --> 00:05:36.420
greed to a whole new level. Do we need regulation for that or are we just completely eliminating

80
00:05:36.420 --> 00:05:39.540
regulation of Wall Street to serve us better?

81
00:05:39.540 --> 00:05:44.520
Well I think we need to eliminate regulation because the cause of the problem is, as you

82
00:05:44.520 --> 00:05:49.800
say, the subprime mortgages, letting people into houses that never could have gotten into

83
00:05:49.800 --> 00:05:54.600
before under the old stricter rules of you have to have collateral and you have to have

84
00:05:54.600 --> 00:05:57.360
of Credit Rating.

85
00:05:57.360 --> 00:06:04.320
But I think that the Federal Reserve system also deserves a big dollop of blame for this

86
00:06:04.320 --> 00:06:05.320
crisis.

87
00:06:05.320 --> 00:06:06.320
Oh, absolutely.

88
00:06:06.320 --> 00:06:12.320
The Fed came in in 1913, and if you look at roughly 100 years before and after the Fed

89
00:06:12.320 --> 00:06:17.680
came in, where right now we're roughly 100 years later, the business cycle has been going

90
00:06:17.680 --> 00:06:23.600
like a cyclone ever since they got into it, where before, even though there was still

91
00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:29.280
some government regulation which caused the cycles before that, but afterward it's gigantic.

92
00:06:29.280 --> 00:06:36.280
So I think you're really on the wrong foot when you blame greed or avarice or anything

93
00:06:36.280 --> 00:06:37.280
like that.

94
00:06:37.280 --> 00:06:41.400
What you have to do is look for government intervention which screws up the market.

95
00:06:41.400 --> 00:06:48.040
These people have been artificially lowering interest rates, thus encouraging malinvestment,

96
00:06:48.040 --> 00:06:54.520
allocations of resources, and that's what causes the bubble, not the derivatives or

97
00:06:54.520 --> 00:06:58.720
any of these other Wall Street financial...

98
00:06:58.720 --> 00:07:02.000
If you're saying, could we do without a central bank, I contend the Treasury could do what

99
00:07:02.000 --> 00:07:07.080
the central bank can do, and I think the central bank's role in supposedly eliminating these

100
00:07:07.080 --> 00:07:12.700
positive and negative spikes in our economy, they haven't been able to do it since 1913.

101
00:07:12.700 --> 00:07:16.000
They're not able to do it now, and I think they're exacerbating the problem, would be

102
00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:17.000
my humble opinion.

103
00:07:17.000 --> 00:07:22.280
It's not really even that they're not able to stop it or that they're exacerbating, they're causing the whole thing.

104
00:07:22.280 --> 00:07:27.080
If we have the gold standard, which Ron Paul is favoring, and I certainly support him on that,

105
00:07:27.080 --> 00:07:31.560
I don't say we have no cycle, you know, there are variations that

106
00:07:31.560 --> 00:07:36.280
supply and demand don't always equal necessarily totally all the time, but

107
00:07:36.280 --> 00:07:39.760
there wouldn't be any of this topsy-turvy stuff.

108
00:07:39.760 --> 00:07:42.400
So the cause of it is not average or greed

109
00:07:42.400 --> 00:07:44.760
or

110
00:07:44.760 --> 00:07:48.320
Derivatives or anything like that. Rather the cause of it is

111
00:07:48.320 --> 00:07:50.760
is government intervention into the economy

112
00:07:50.760 --> 00:07:53.600
specifically in the present case by

113
00:07:53.600 --> 00:07:56.600
the toxic assets that are based on

114
00:07:56.600 --> 00:07:59.900
mortgages that never should have been granted and the Fed.

115
00:07:59.900 --> 00:08:03.540
Walter, I want to ask a very quick question, a little bit of a right turn here.

116
00:08:03.540 --> 00:08:05.800
I get a lot of callers ask me

117
00:08:05.800 --> 00:08:09.480
what's the difference between a Keynesian economist and an Austrian economist.

118
00:08:09.480 --> 00:08:13.020
They always hear the word Keynes and they assume that if they can say the word

119
00:08:13.020 --> 00:08:16.480
that they must be really really smart people because they know the name of an economist

120
00:08:16.480 --> 00:08:20.140
nobody really even knows what the Ludwig von Mises Institute is or

121
00:08:20.140 --> 00:08:24.600
about Austrian economists. Could you give us a brief

122
00:08:24.600 --> 00:08:28.100
insight into the difference between the two?

123
00:08:28.100 --> 00:08:29.380
Well, let me just

124
00:08:29.380 --> 00:08:33.620
it's a very big question so let me just start with the macro part of it because

125
00:08:33.620 --> 00:08:35.580
that's what we're now discussing.

126
00:08:35.580 --> 00:08:37.500
The Keynesians believe that

127
00:08:37.500 --> 00:08:39.700
the economy is sort of like a car

128
00:08:39.700 --> 00:08:42.500
and when we are

129
00:08:42.500 --> 00:08:48.300
Down, depressed, dispirited, our animal spirits are depressed. Well, then what the government

130
00:08:48.300 --> 00:08:53.220
has got to do is press the gas. On the other hand, when our animal spirits are crawling

131
00:08:53.220 --> 00:08:57.780
up toward the roof and we're very excited, then what the government has to do is press

132
00:08:57.780 --> 00:09:03.940
the brakes because the market does not have within itself a regulatory device that keeps

133
00:09:03.940 --> 00:09:09.820
us on an even keel. Now, there are two branches of Keynesianism, the fiscalists, mainly associated

134
00:09:09.820 --> 00:09:14.660
with Harvard and MIT, and then there are the monetarist Keynesians, mainly associated with

135
00:09:14.660 --> 00:09:18.700
Milton Friedman and the University of Chicago, and the only difference between them, they're

136
00:09:18.700 --> 00:09:25.660
both Keynesians, is that the one believes that the gas pedal and the brake should be

137
00:09:25.660 --> 00:09:30.540
fiscal, tax and spending policy, and the other believes that it should be monetary policy.

138
00:09:30.540 --> 00:09:32.060
So how are the Austrians different?

139
00:09:32.060 --> 00:09:36.780
The Austrians differ because we believe that within the bowels of the economy there are

140
00:09:36.780 --> 00:09:45.140
self-regulating mechanisms that keep us on an even keel, and government is not needed

141
00:09:45.140 --> 00:09:51.660
to keep us on an even keel, but rather what government does is it screws things up, animal

142
00:09:51.660 --> 00:09:52.660
spirits.

143
00:09:52.660 --> 00:09:58.580
I mean, it's sort of a psychiatric view of the economy, the Keynesian view, that we're

144
00:09:58.580 --> 00:10:06.580
either depressed or exuberant, and there's no way out of reconciling these two.

145
00:10:06.580 --> 00:10:13.380
In the Austrian view, the market is a self-regulating institution, and it's not given to bouts of

146
00:10:13.380 --> 00:10:15.380
depression or exuberance.

147
00:10:15.380 --> 00:10:21.940
And if there is any excess exuberance or the opposite, the profit and loss system will

148
00:10:21.940 --> 00:10:22.940
take care of that.

149
00:10:22.940 --> 00:10:26.260
I've got to add, I don't want to, we're going to run out of time here pretty soon.

150
00:10:26.260 --> 00:10:27.620
We've got about two or three minutes left.

151
00:10:27.620 --> 00:10:30.020
I have to ask you about voluntary slave contracts.

152
00:10:30.020 --> 00:10:31.580
What are you talking about?

153
00:10:31.580 --> 00:10:39.300
Now, suppose my child is in horrible disease and it'll take $10 million to cure him and

154
00:10:39.300 --> 00:10:44.500
I value his life more than my own freedom and you are a very rich man and you long wanted

155
00:10:44.500 --> 00:10:49.180
to have me as a slave and then you could, you know, whip me in the shape on Keynesianism

156
00:10:49.180 --> 00:10:51.260
or whatever you wanted to do.

157
00:10:51.260 --> 00:10:53.700
So, we make the following deal.

158
00:10:53.700 --> 00:10:56.700
I will sell myself and the slavery to you for $10 million.

159
00:10:56.700 --> 00:11:01.300
You give me the $10 million, I turn it over to my son's doctors and they cure him and

160
00:11:01.300 --> 00:11:05.960
And then I become your slave. Now, this is very different than the slavery that existed

161
00:11:05.960 --> 00:11:10.960
until 1865, which was coercive slavery. We're now talking about voluntary slavery.

162
00:11:10.960 --> 00:11:12.900
Sounds like life settlements to me.

163
00:11:12.900 --> 00:11:13.900
I'm sorry?

164
00:11:13.900 --> 00:11:17.020
I'm sorry, I'm making a joke. It sounds like life settlements to me.

165
00:11:17.020 --> 00:11:22.700
Yeah, well, I think all voluntary contracts are mutually beneficial. I gain because I

166
00:11:22.700 --> 00:11:27.420
value my son's life more than my freedom. You gain because you value me as a slave more

167
00:11:27.420 --> 00:11:32.420
and the 10 million bucks. So why should that be prohibited by law? I see no reason for it.

168
00:11:32.420 --> 00:11:39.420
So then I can only assume that prostitution is okay with you on that. And I'm not making a judgment call on that.

169
00:11:39.420 --> 00:11:46.420
I'm actually kind of sort of, you know, I'm open-minded on that, only because people should have the right to do what they want to do.

170
00:11:46.420 --> 00:11:48.420
And I'm very much a libertarian in that regard.

171
00:11:48.420 --> 00:11:55.420
Yes. Well, I wouldn't want my daughter to be a prostitute or my wife or my mother or any, I really oppose prostitution.

172
00:11:55.420 --> 00:12:10.420
I think that sex between consenting adults should be based on love and affection, not on money, but I'm not going to be putting people in jail for voluntary consensual activity between consenting adults. I think that's wrong.

173
00:12:10.420 --> 00:12:24.420
Yeah, and the people here in the control room in our studio are cringing right now that I just said that. Let me be perfectly clear what I mean. I am not promoting prostitution. What I'm trying to suggest is that if you... Danny's handing me notes right in the middle. What are you handing me?

174
00:12:24.420 --> 00:12:35.000
I think we agree that we're not favoring prostitution, and there's a big difference between favoring

175
00:12:35.000 --> 00:12:39.860
prostitution and favoring the legalization of prostitution, the same thing with the drugs

176
00:12:39.860 --> 00:12:42.660
like marijuana, cocaine, whatever.

177
00:12:42.660 --> 00:12:46.500
I oppose the use of those things, I think they're dangerous substances, but I don't

178
00:12:46.500 --> 00:12:52.500
want to be putting people in jail for putting crap into their own bodies, that is adult.

179
00:12:52.500 --> 00:12:57.220
I think the libertarian analysis on both is clear, and we have to make clear that we don't

180
00:12:57.220 --> 00:13:03.940
favor marijuana or heroin use. We don't favor prostitution. We just oppose the prohibition

181
00:13:03.940 --> 00:13:05.500
of it and putting people in jail.

182
00:13:05.500 --> 00:13:09.500
I think that's the problem that I have with this whole process. We can make our own moral

183
00:13:09.500 --> 00:13:14.260
judgments based upon our own principles, and that's fine. But the minute that our government

184
00:13:14.260 --> 00:13:19.540
starts making moral choices for us in our own personal lives, then you're ceding so

185
00:13:19.540 --> 00:13:24.200
So much control on a slippery slope to a government. That's the problem that I have. And so what

186
00:13:24.200 --> 00:13:27.960
I might choose morally not to do, I don't want the government to tell me that I can't

187
00:13:27.960 --> 00:13:28.960
do it.

188
00:13:28.960 --> 00:13:34.300
Or prohibit it, right. I mean, they can talk all they want. Obama or Bush can get up on

189
00:13:34.300 --> 00:13:38.900
their hind legs and talk all they want. I don't care. It's just when the police come

190
00:13:38.900 --> 00:13:44.900
and put you in jail for capitalist acts between consenting adults, then it's not a slippery

191
00:13:44.900 --> 00:13:47.460
slope. The slope has already arrived.

192
00:13:47.460 --> 00:13:56.460
Danny was handing me a note here. Let me get to this real quick, and then we really do need to go to a quick break. He was asking me about drug policy economics. How do you stand on drug legalization?

193
00:13:56.460 --> 00:14:10.460
Well, I certainly favor drug legalization, even though I don't approve of drugs. And look at what's happening in Arizona now and Mexico. I mean, some people say that the drug gangs are even stronger than the Mexican government, and that can happen in the U.S. too.

194
00:14:10.460 --> 00:14:15.460
The reason for this crime is not because of drugs, it's because of the prohibition of drugs.

195
00:14:15.460 --> 00:14:17.460
Look, right now, alcohol is legal.

196
00:14:17.460 --> 00:14:24.460
And there's nobody shooting anyone over alcohol, yet a couple of decades ago, when alcohol was illegal,

197
00:14:24.460 --> 00:14:29.460
people were dying like flies that were being shot in the streets of Chicago over alcohol.

198
00:14:29.460 --> 00:14:36.460
So we've learned nothing from prohibition of alcohol because we've got prohibition of drugs and it's creating the same havoc.

199
00:14:36.460 --> 00:14:47.460
You have our own little in-studio pot-pimp over here, praising you, jumping up and down doing jumping jacks, which you just said.

200
00:14:47.460 --> 00:14:55.460
I mean, I'm in New Orleans and there are a lot of young black men that are dying of this and I go on black TV and I try to tell these people, you know,

201
00:14:55.460 --> 00:15:04.460
forget about affirmative action, forget about welfare. Young black men are dying like flies. Every day it's in the Times-Picayune.

202
00:15:04.460 --> 00:15:09.140
uh... this is a big problem and the only solution for it is to legalize it and

203
00:15:09.140 --> 00:15:12.820
you know previously over alcohol it was young italian men that were shooting each

204
00:15:12.820 --> 00:15:18.520
other and and being shot uh... so you know that this is a horrible situation

205
00:15:18.520 --> 00:15:22.500
ron paul happily favors not only legalizing gold but legalizing pot and

206
00:15:22.500 --> 00:15:27.060
legalizing anything that is not a per se violation of rights like rape or murder

207
00:15:27.060 --> 00:15:28.020
or theft

208
00:15:28.020 --> 00:15:31.620
we love ron paul ron paul is one of our regular guests on this show but i wish he

209
00:15:31.620 --> 00:15:40.620
I'm going to get rid of the Department of Defense, the CIA, the NSA, please, there are truly people out there that want to kill us. Please don't keep saying those things.

210
00:15:40.620 --> 00:15:47.620
No, no, but Ron doesn't want to get rid of the Department of Defense. He wants to make it a Department of Defense. Right now it's a Department of Offense.

211
00:15:47.620 --> 00:15:54.620
Unfortunately, he came on the show and actually said he wanted to get rid of the FBI and NSA once, and he's like, and I love the guy, don't get me wrong, I love the guy.

212
00:15:54.620 --> 00:16:24.620
I'm talking about the FBI. I'm talking about the Department of Defense. He wants a real Department of Defense, namely a very strong defensive army. He doesn't want to go over there. The reason we're over here is because we're over there. Right now, what we've got is an Department of Office. You know, they used to call it the Department of War, or the War Department. That's what it is. And what he wants to do, if I can put words in his mouth, I'm sure he would agree with me, is not get rid of the Department of Defense, but make what we've got now defensive. Yeah, I think that's right. And although I did have a good

213
00:16:24.620 --> 00:16:36.620
I have a very close friend of mine who was a very high ranking person in the military and the defense intelligence side say that not enough Americans understand why we have bases around the world and the simple answer is you take it to them before they take it to you.

214
00:16:36.620 --> 00:16:51.620
Hang on, let me just finish the point real quick. Their theory is that if you extend, if you project the land mass, the power of the United States into Europe, into Asia, into South America, that they've got to get through that first wall of defense before they get to the United States.

215
00:16:51.620 --> 00:16:56.700
I'm not suggesting whether that's true or not, but that's a much more palatable explanation

216
00:16:56.700 --> 00:17:00.820
than we're just staying there because we like being in Korea, we like being in Germany and

217
00:17:00.820 --> 00:17:04.820
we like being in Iraq. So there is some plausibility to that answer.

218
00:17:04.820 --> 00:17:09.080
I don't think it's very plausible. How would we like it if Switzerland or Portugal or any

219
00:17:09.080 --> 00:17:14.580
other country had 800 military bases in foreign countries and 150 different foreign countries

220
00:17:14.580 --> 00:17:16.580
www.fieggen.com