WEBVTT

NOTE So Where’s the Inflation?

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.000
And we are back on The Peter Schiff Show. Tom Woods in for Peter today.

2
00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:08.000
Very happy to welcome to the program right now Mark Thornton.

3
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:14.000
Mark is a senior fellow with the Ludwig von Mises Institute, holds a PhD in economics from Auburn University,

4
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:17.000
which is one of the universities where he has taught economics over the years.

5
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:20.000
He's the author of The Economics of Prohibition.

6
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:26.000
He's co-author of a book called Tariffs, Blockades and Inflation, The Economics of the Civil War.

7
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:29.000
He's book review editor for the quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics.

8
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:35.000
and we're going to talk today about a lot of current events. Mark, very glad to welcome you to the Peter Schiff Show. How are you doing?

9
00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:38.000
I'm doing fine, Tom. It's great to hear you. It's great to be on the show.

10
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:44.000
Thanks a lot. Now let's jump right in here because I asked you before we went on what sorts of things have you been writing about but on your mind.

11
00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:56.000
I read your article on inflation, so we'll get to that in a minute. But what is the deal here? Peter's had some commentary on this, but what's going on with the German gold repatriation?

12
00:00:56.000 --> 00:01:01.640
Patriation, why do they want their gold back and is the response to this request just normal?

13
00:01:01.640 --> 00:01:05.760
I mean, is this just a matter of, well, we need to ensure the gold going from one place

14
00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:09.040
to another and it takes a lot of time and that's why we're taking all this time.

15
00:01:09.040 --> 00:01:11.080
Is there an innocent explanation?

16
00:01:11.080 --> 00:01:12.080
What's happening here?

17
00:01:12.080 --> 00:01:16.600
Well, we're not giving out a lot of information, Tom, but the German people are very uneasy

18
00:01:16.600 --> 00:01:22.020
about their position within the European Economic Community because they're viewed as the big

19
00:01:22.020 --> 00:01:28.380
Bailout Nation, and so they're worried about the Euro, they're worried about the economy,

20
00:01:28.380 --> 00:01:32.620
they asked the Federal Reserve for an audit of their gold holdings, which the Fed then

21
00:01:32.620 --> 00:01:38.420
refused, and so Germany made this request to get back some of its gold.

22
00:01:38.420 --> 00:01:46.300
It asked for 300 tons, which is a small percentage of their overall holdings at the Fed.

23
00:01:46.300 --> 00:01:51.360
The curious thing though is that, you know, mainstream economists dismiss this whole thing

24
00:01:51.360 --> 00:01:58.320
is just silly and that it's unimportant and that gold is just a relic of history but the interesting

25
00:01:58.320 --> 00:02:08.560
thing for me is that the New York Fed is not going to deliver those 300 tons until 2020, seven years

26
00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:16.160
from now. So the Fed is not exactly like Domino's Pizza. Right, now that is true. So do you think,

27
00:02:16.160 --> 00:02:27.160
Now on this issue of refusing to do this audit, it's not like Germany is like a small player that you could just treat with contempt.

28
00:02:27.160 --> 00:02:33.160
Can you conceive of an innocent explanation as to why the Fed would not consent to such an audit?

29
00:02:33.160 --> 00:02:40.160
No, I can't. It's just preposterous, the idea that it would take seven years to move a mere 300 tons of gold,

30
00:02:40.160 --> 00:02:48.440
Gold, even given security concerns and things of that nature, that's not a humongous amount

31
00:02:48.440 --> 00:02:49.440
of gold.

32
00:02:49.440 --> 00:02:55.160
That would still leave more than a thousand tons of German gold at the New York Fed.

33
00:02:55.160 --> 00:03:03.320
So there's no logical or logistical reason why they couldn't get that gold within, say,

34
00:03:03.320 --> 00:03:05.100
one year period of time.

35
00:03:05.100 --> 00:03:10.100
So that leaves us thinking that there's been some funny business going on at the Federal

36
00:03:10.100 --> 00:03:11.100
Reserve.

37
00:03:11.100 --> 00:03:16.020
You know, they run a fractional reserve banking system, and so it's not too much of a leap

38
00:03:16.020 --> 00:03:23.500
to figure that they might be using a fractional gold holding system as well.

39
00:03:23.500 --> 00:03:29.180
And people have speculated that what's going on here is that the Fed and other central

40
00:03:29.180 --> 00:03:35.920
gold banks have been selling gold or leasing gold to gold banks who in turn then sell the

41
00:03:35.920 --> 00:03:43.920
gold and buy bonds so that they can make money on the interest on the bonds and by selling

42
00:03:43.920 --> 00:03:49.600
the gold into the market, at least temporarily, that has a depressive effect on the price

43
00:03:49.600 --> 00:03:53.480
of gold which makes, you know, which is something that central banks like.

44
00:03:53.480 --> 00:03:57.840
They don't like to see rising ever higher gold prices.

45
00:03:57.840 --> 00:04:02.200
And so one way of suppressing gold prices, people have speculated, is that the central

46
00:04:02.200 --> 00:04:06.940
banks would sell some of their gold holdings, which then gets, excuse me, they lease their

47
00:04:06.940 --> 00:04:13.320
gold holdings to people who then sell the gold and that depresses the price of gold.

48
00:04:13.320 --> 00:04:18.280
Do you think we can expect more requests of the nature that we saw from Germany now in

49
00:04:18.280 --> 00:04:21.400
light of how Germany's request was handled?

50
00:04:21.400 --> 00:04:22.400
I think so.

51
00:04:22.400 --> 00:04:26.080
I mean, you know, our enemies have already requested their gold, like Venezuela and things

52
00:04:26.080 --> 00:04:38.320
The Germans have requested most of their gold held in England to be returned, and they've

53
00:04:38.320 --> 00:04:45.800
requested all of their gold in France to be returned, and we see other central banks around

54
00:04:45.800 --> 00:04:52.680
the world adding to their gold holdings, particularly countries like China has added significantly.

55
00:04:52.680 --> 00:04:58.920
Some believe that it may have even surpassed Germany as the second largest holder of gold.

56
00:04:58.920 --> 00:05:05.720
India has made some large purchases, so the whole game has changed here and central banks,

57
00:05:05.720 --> 00:05:11.880
even though they loathe to admit it, realize that real money is gold and that the paper

58
00:05:11.880 --> 00:05:15.960
money that they're dealing in is losing face value.

59
00:05:15.960 --> 00:05:18.200
All right, let's switch gears now.

60
00:05:18.200 --> 00:05:22.460
Let's talk a little bit about something you wrote a few weeks ago.

61
00:05:22.460 --> 00:05:26.220
We were more or less weighing in on a discussion that's been going on between, well if you

62
00:05:26.220 --> 00:05:30.940
can call it a discussion that would I think dignify it too much, but Paul Krugman has

63
00:05:30.940 --> 00:05:36.940
been highly critical of people who predicted that the price level would rise to a particular

64
00:05:36.940 --> 00:05:44.100
height because of what the Fed has been doing and the CPI hasn't risen to that extent and

65
00:05:44.100 --> 00:05:50.400
so Krugman is claiming this is a vindication of his whole approach and it's a devastating

66
00:05:50.400 --> 00:06:04.400
How do you sort this out? Is it a mystery as to why prices haven't risen, or have they not risen? How do you make sense of this?

67
00:06:04.400 --> 00:06:11.400
No, there's no mystery at all. I mean, the quantity theory of money tells us that if you increase the supply of money, that prices will go up.

68
00:06:11.400 --> 00:06:18.400
There's nothing particularly Austrian about that. So the idea that Krugman is somehow unseating the Austrian economist

69
00:06:18.400 --> 00:06:22.480
The Austrian economist or condemning the Austrian economist just isn't so.

70
00:06:22.480 --> 00:06:27.280
In fact, we're the only ones that can actually explain how prices have actually turned out

71
00:06:27.280 --> 00:06:33.440
as a result of this massive inflation of the money supply and the monetary base.

72
00:06:33.440 --> 00:06:36.320
It hasn't gone into consumer prices.

73
00:06:36.320 --> 00:06:42.400
Consumer prices are up, as measured by the government, about 2% using older measures.

74
00:06:42.400 --> 00:06:46.500
CPI is up 6, 7 or 8%.

75
00:06:46.500 --> 00:06:49.780
But where the money is really going, that's what you have to find out, is where is the

76
00:06:49.780 --> 00:06:50.780
money really going?

77
00:06:50.780 --> 00:06:56.060
And if we look at markets around the world, other than consumer goods, we find that the

78
00:06:56.060 --> 00:07:05.140
price of oil is over $100 a barrel, gasoline in Auburn, Alabama went up 5% last week alone,

79
00:07:05.140 --> 00:07:12.900
the price of gold is very high, near historic high levels, commodity prices in general,

80
00:07:12.900 --> 00:07:18.860
The things we build houses with, the things we consume as corporations and businesses,

81
00:07:18.860 --> 00:07:23.580
all of the prices of those things are at or near record high levels.

82
00:07:23.580 --> 00:07:28.980
And so if you look at the financial markets, what we see is government bonds and corporate

83
00:07:28.980 --> 00:07:33.220
bonds and junk bonds are at all-time record highs.

84
00:07:33.220 --> 00:07:36.540
The stock market is at an all-time record highs.

85
00:07:36.540 --> 00:07:42.460
We see real estate markets higher significantly in some cases, all-time record highs in real

86
00:07:42.460 --> 00:07:50.100
in New York City, in Washington D.C., in San Francisco. We see art prices at the Sotheby's

87
00:07:50.100 --> 00:07:54.900
and Christie's at all-time record highs in terms of the size of the auction and record

88
00:07:54.900 --> 00:08:03.460
prices for particular artists. So if we look outside that narrow consumer index of prices,

89
00:08:03.460 --> 00:08:09.740
what we find is prices are exploding across the board and are at or near all-time record

90
00:08:09.740 --> 00:08:29.740
Well, can you describe the mechanism by which that would be the case? I mean, it would seem to the untrained mind that all prices should just rise. Like, why would there be this kind of segregation of goods in financial markets or commodities, whereas toothbrushes would just rise?

91
00:08:29.740 --> 00:08:38.740
Why would there be this kind of segregation of goods in financial markets or commodities,

92
00:08:38.740 --> 00:08:42.740
whereas toothbrushes are roughly the same as they've been? Why should that be?

93
00:08:42.740 --> 00:08:45.740
Well, because of how they're injecting the money into the economy.

94
00:08:45.740 --> 00:08:49.740
The money is going into the hands of banks and financial firms,

95
00:08:49.740 --> 00:08:54.740
and the money goes from there into capital goods and into assets.

96
00:08:54.740 --> 00:09:01.500
and so the money is flowing from the Fed to the banks and the financial firms

97
00:09:01.500 --> 00:09:06.160
where the money is then put placed into government bonds, corporate bonds, junk

98
00:09:06.160 --> 00:09:11.480
bonds, it's placed into the stock market, it's placed into real estate and things

99
00:09:11.480 --> 00:09:17.260
of that sort so the money is flowing exactly the way the system works and it

100
00:09:17.260 --> 00:09:22.700
but it's not going to the consumer. I just saw a study out yesterday that

101
00:09:22.700 --> 00:09:30.300
showed that the overall cost of the government bailing out our economy was $12 trillion dollars.

102
00:09:30.300 --> 00:09:36.300
Eleven of that $12 trillion dollars went through the banking system and less than a trillion

103
00:09:36.300 --> 00:09:39.540
of it went actually to American citizens.

104
00:09:39.540 --> 00:09:45.940
And so the money is flowing to the banks, to financial firms and then to financial markets.

105
00:09:45.940 --> 00:09:51.240
The reason our prices are high is because all those hedge fund managers, all the mutual

106
00:09:51.240 --> 00:09:57.700
Fund Managers and Dealers in Securities in New York City, they're making tons of money.

107
00:09:57.700 --> 00:10:04.600
And so they're using that money in terms of consumption in buying contemporary art and

108
00:10:04.600 --> 00:10:05.600
modern art.

109
00:10:05.600 --> 00:10:09.680
And so you see those auctions exploding because there's just so much money there.

110
00:10:09.680 --> 00:10:18.120
Now that money doesn't get to Auburn, Alabama or Kansas or Des Moines for a long period

111
00:10:18.120 --> 00:10:19.120
of time.

112
00:10:19.120 --> 00:10:32.120
Now, the time it gets to us, the prices of those consumer goods will already have been bid up, so eventually it'll get into consumer goods. It's not going to be a good thing, obviously, but eventually it'll end up there.

113
00:10:32.120 --> 00:10:39.000
Isn't it the case though that if the banks aren't... obviously we know there's a huge

114
00:10:39.000 --> 00:10:45.620
unprecedented amount of reserves that the banks are sitting on and that they're holding

115
00:10:45.620 --> 00:10:52.460
at the Fed, excess reserves, and if they are not going to lend this out, they're just going

116
00:10:52.460 --> 00:10:58.420
to sit on it, this obviously does limit the amount of the price inflation that we see.

117
00:10:58.420 --> 00:11:18.420
So, wouldn't that also be another reason that we don't see prices exploding to quite the extent, like proportionately to the money supply increase, if the banks don't lend it out, then it has no way of getting out into the general economy, so it's not exactly, you don't have to hire a private detective to figure out why prices aren't going through the roof for consumer goods.

118
00:11:18.420 --> 00:11:48.420
That's correct. The money that the Fed has given to the banks, most of that is being held as excess reserves and traditionally the banking system as a whole did not hold any excess reserves and now they hold an amount of excess reserves that equal the entire deposit base of the banking system so this is really unprecedented and they're not lending that money, they're keeping it on the books at the Fed, earning interest, the Fed is paying them interest to not lend the money.

119
00:11:48.420 --> 00:12:18.420
And so, under normal circumstances, if the bank started lending that money to people for mortgages and cars and business loans, then the money would actually get into the hands of the average American, and then you would see that process where the money is lent, it's spent into the economy, the money multiplier effect means that the actual amount of money circulating in the economy

120
00:12:18.420 --> 00:12:41.420
and even greater than the amount of money that the banks currently hold and so Americans would be starting to bid against one another for lumber and for car parts and the normal things that are in the consumer price index and so that's when the consumer prices would really take off is once the banks start lending that money.

121
00:12:41.420 --> 00:13:00.420
Alright, we're going to take a quick break right now and when we come back we're going to continue our conversation with Mark Thornton and I'm going to ask him about the housing bubble, how he spotted this so early, what was he seeing that other people weren't seeing, and frankly, why weren't they seeing it? That's coming up next on The Peter Schiff Show, the gold standard in talk radio.

122
00:13:00.420 --> 00:13:08.420
Well don't try to change the subject again, hide and seek with yourself, it ain't a game.

123
00:13:08.420 --> 00:13:14.420
All right, everybody, we're back on the Peter Schiff Show. Tom Woods, In for Peter, joined by Mark Thornton of the Mises Institute.

124
00:13:14.420 --> 00:13:19.420
Mark, you were one of the first people to start talking about warning about the housing bubble.

125
00:13:19.420 --> 00:13:25.420
First of all, can you tell us when did you start talking about this and what exactly were you saying?

126
00:13:25.420 --> 00:13:34.420
What were the particular aspects of the housing market that alarmed you or made you think that maybe there was something out of whack there

127
00:13:34.420 --> 00:13:47.420
Well, Tom, you'll remember that the Federal Reserve cut the interest rates to 1%, which was historically the lowest level it had ever gone to at that point.

128
00:13:47.420 --> 00:14:00.420
So we were on guard. We were looking out for where is the bubble going to form. And it wasn't too hard to really figure out that it was going to be a housing bubble because very often the Fed creates real estate-related bubbles.

129
00:14:00.420 --> 00:14:05.740
and so we were on looking out for this and then I finally in early February of

130
00:14:05.740 --> 00:14:13.580
2004 wrote an article about the housing bubble for lewrockwell.com and the

131
00:14:13.580 --> 00:14:17.140
response to that was kind of interesting because people were enraged that I would

132
00:14:17.140 --> 00:14:20.860
suggest that there was a housing bubble in the economy everybody was saying you

133
00:14:20.860 --> 00:14:24.900
know you can you always make money in real estate housing prices never go

134
00:14:24.900 --> 00:14:29.300
down and you know things of that nature you can't lose money in real estate and

135
00:14:29.300 --> 00:14:33.460
and what I was saying was just you know against all that I was saying that yeah

136
00:14:33.460 --> 00:14:38.360
people are going to lose money because housing starts, housing investment,

137
00:14:38.360 --> 00:14:43.880
housing prices, housing inventories, all of the indicators in the housing sector

138
00:14:43.880 --> 00:14:48.620
were suggesting that housing was being way way overdone and that there were too

139
00:14:48.620 --> 00:14:52.360
many houses being built, the housing prices were going up at a much higher

140
00:14:52.360 --> 00:14:56.340
rate than they had ever done in the past and so it was clear to me that there was

141
00:14:56.340 --> 00:15:01.340
was a housing bubble and I got a lot of speaking engagements actually which were more like

142
00:15:01.340 --> 00:15:06.140
ambushes where I would make my presentation about why there is a housing bubble, why this

143
00:15:06.140 --> 00:15:11.940
could be dramatically difficult for the US economy going forward and you know people

144
00:15:11.940 --> 00:15:18.300
hated that because I was you know taking away the punch bowl so to speak and so people were

145
00:15:18.300 --> 00:15:24.460
very upset but the you know the housing bubble continued on for about another year and a

146
00:15:54.460 --> 00:16:24.460
readers and listeners about that fact. And I think one of the greatest things I've ever experienced in my career as an economist was I got some telephone calls and some emails, I think four or five of them at least, where people thanked me for keeping them out of the housing market, that they would have been financially ruined in 2007 had they bought a house in 2005. And so that was very rewarding and endearing and

147
00:16:24.460 --> 00:16:26.180
makes it all worthwhile.

148
00:16:26.180 --> 00:16:28.940
Well, actually, Mark, I ignored your advice completely

149
00:16:28.940 --> 00:16:30.980
because I moved to Auburn in 2006.

150
00:16:30.980 --> 00:16:32.460
And I said to my wife, I know we're

151
00:16:32.460 --> 00:16:35.860
at the top of this bubble, but rental opportunities

152
00:16:35.860 --> 00:16:38.620
were very, I mean, practically non-existent

153
00:16:38.620 --> 00:16:40.280
for a family of our size.

154
00:16:40.280 --> 00:16:41.780
And I just said, well, I'm not planning

155
00:16:41.780 --> 00:16:43.020
on going anywhere for a while.

156
00:16:43.020 --> 00:16:45.500
So we'll just sit on this thing and do our best.

157
00:16:45.500 --> 00:16:47.020
But I know this is going to happen.

158
00:16:47.020 --> 00:16:49.060
And of course, it did.

159
00:16:49.060 --> 00:16:50.780
So I was one of these people who didn't

160
00:16:50.780 --> 00:16:53.260
want to hear what you had to say, but I sat there

161
00:16:53.260 --> 00:17:16.260
Why do you think people missed this? The things you're describing to me are not features of the housing market that one would need a crystal ball to see, or would need special access to confidential statistics to see. It can't just be wishful thinking on the part of other people.

162
00:17:16.260 --> 00:17:46.260
Well, when you're making money, like people were making money on housing, flipping housing, selling housing, building housing, everybody's making money, everybody's consuming more, they're taking money out of their mortgage and buying speed boats and RVs and worldwide trips around the globe and having so much fun and making so much money and everybody's doing it and it seems so easy and you get so euphoric that all of the reality

163
00:17:46.260 --> 00:17:51.820
Statistics just go out the window. I recently wrote an article two weeks ago

164
00:17:51.820 --> 00:17:56.820
about the housing bubble in Norway where I show that housing prices in Norway are

165
00:17:56.820 --> 00:18:02.540
completely out of control and you know it's just obvious that what's going on

166
00:18:02.540 --> 00:18:08.380
in Norway and I was criticized in Norwegian financial press that you know

167
00:18:08.380 --> 00:18:11.820
that this is that Norway has a good economy that we have lots of oil

168
00:18:11.820 --> 00:18:15.960
revenues and you know we have low unemployment and we have this that the

169
00:18:15.960 --> 00:18:26.960
Well, the reality is their housing sector is way out of control. The housing prices are up significantly and a lot of the explanations of looking at the fundamentals.

170
00:18:26.960 --> 00:18:32.960
They always say, well, just look at the fundamentals. Well, naturally, the fundamentals are going to stay in line until it's too late.

171
00:18:32.960 --> 00:18:39.960
And that's the key is you have to look beyond the fundamentals like the unemployment rate and things of that nature.

172
00:18:39.960 --> 00:18:45.720
you have to look at what is the Federal Reserve doing, what is it doing to the supply of credit,

173
00:18:45.720 --> 00:18:55.400
that fundamental fuel of the economic process, they can artificially expand that credit from

174
00:18:55.400 --> 00:19:01.440
what it should normally be and as a result they're throwing in jet fuel onto the economy

175
00:19:01.440 --> 00:19:06.920
and you're burning through resources and prices are inflated as a result of all the heat given

176
00:19:06.920 --> 00:19:12.360
off from the Federal Reserve's action. So you have to keep your eye on the Fed. It's

177
00:19:12.360 --> 00:19:19.000
the fundamentally destructive factor in the economy. And when they're active, as they

178
00:19:19.000 --> 00:19:22.680
are right now, you've got to look out for trouble because that's what they do. They

179
00:19:22.680 --> 00:19:28.960
create trouble. They like to be seen as the solver, the institution that solves all things

180
00:19:28.960 --> 00:19:35.480
and keeps everything stable, when in reality, they are the source of economic destruction

181
00:19:35.480 --> 00:19:47.600
Well, Mark Thornton, I knew the time would fly by, and indeed it has, so I much appreciate

182
00:19:47.600 --> 00:19:49.440
your taking the time to talk to us today.

183
00:19:49.440 --> 00:19:53.320
I'll look forward to seeing you at the Austrian Economics Research Conference at the Mises

184
00:19:53.320 --> 00:19:57.000
Institute next month, and thanks once again for talking to us today.

185
00:19:57.000 --> 00:19:58.000
Thank you, Tom.

186
00:19:58.000 --> 00:19:59.000
I enjoyed it.

187
00:19:59.000 --> 00:20:02.360
Mark Thornton, everybody, author of The Economics of Prohibition.

188
00:20:02.360 --> 00:20:04.600
Check out his articles at Mises.org.