WEBVTT

NOTE The Roots of Nullification

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:17.000
Joining us now, we have a very special guest on the line, Dr. Tom Woods, who is a New York Times best-selling author of 10 books, and he's got a new book called Nullification, How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century.

2
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:26.000
And he does have his own YouTube channel, and some of them are hilarious, so we are very pleased to have on Tom Woods. Are you with us?

3
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:27.000
Yes, I am.

4
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:29.000
Oh, good morning. Thank you for joining us.

5
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:32.360
my pleasure i hope we're a little bit better than the interview with a zombie

6
00:00:33.480 --> 00:00:38.760
well i guess we'll see won't we yeah that's that's really a funny video it is really good a lot yeah

7
00:00:38.760 --> 00:00:44.920
i like it well check out so you can check out interviewwithazombie.com the the the gist of it

8
00:00:44.920 --> 00:00:50.600
for those who haven't seen it in case there is anyone out there who hasn't it's uh the idea of

9
00:00:50.600 --> 00:00:55.560
it is that with my new book i was anticipating that if i were to get interviewed by somebody in

10
00:00:55.560 --> 00:01:01.000
in the mainstream media, it would be impossible to convey the points of the book because what

11
00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:05.480
would happen is that I would have all these sort of politically correct words thrown at

12
00:01:05.480 --> 00:01:08.480
me and accusations and all the rest of it.

13
00:01:08.480 --> 00:01:13.120
So it turns out that being interviewed by Chris Matthews is pretty similar to being

14
00:01:13.120 --> 00:01:15.240
interviewed by a guy dressed as a zombie.

15
00:01:15.240 --> 00:01:22.200
Because he just throws out things like, if you're against healthcare you must be a racist

16
00:01:22.200 --> 00:01:24.160
or if you're against, yeah, of course.

17
00:01:24.160 --> 00:01:35.160
Right, so there are no arguments being made, of course. They just throw a word at you that's supposed to ruin your career and you're supposed to go crawl into some cave and die, and I just won't do it. I'm just going to laugh at these people.

18
00:01:35.160 --> 00:01:46.160
Good. I love it. And I guess you, well, I read, I read the, there's a free article that people can read a free chapter out of your recent book if they go to your website, tomwoods.com, right?

19
00:01:46.160 --> 00:01:47.160
Yes, that's right.

20
00:01:47.160 --> 00:01:50.760
and i read the articles very good about nullification and sort of just given the

21
00:01:50.760 --> 00:01:55.040
crystallized view of nullification but just tell the audience what it what is

22
00:01:55.040 --> 00:01:56.460
nullification

23
00:01:56.460 --> 00:01:58.720
well nullification is the

24
00:01:58.720 --> 00:02:02.860
is thomas jefferson's idea that's making a sort of surprise comeback

25
00:02:02.860 --> 00:02:06.120
because it basically was jefferson's answer to the question what the heck you

26
00:02:06.120 --> 00:02:07.040
do

27
00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:08.360
when the federal government

28
00:02:08.360 --> 00:02:10.240
violates the constitution

29
00:02:10.240 --> 00:02:13.520
now this is you know as you know this is not exactly a hypothetical question

30
00:02:13.520 --> 00:02:27.520
Nancy Pelosi was asked what the constitutional basis was for the health care bill, and this is her answer.

31
00:02:27.520 --> 00:02:35.520
Madam Speaker, where specifically does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?

32
00:02:35.520 --> 00:02:38.520
Are you serious?

33
00:02:38.520 --> 00:02:40.520
Are you serious?

34
00:02:40.520 --> 00:02:44.520
Are you serious? What's her response? Nancy, where...

35
00:02:44.520 --> 00:02:52.520
I was thinking to myself, you know, if for some reason there's a technical problem and they can't play this recording, I thought, well, it would still work.

36
00:02:52.520 --> 00:02:57.520
They said, here's Nancy Pelosi's constitutional argument, and it was just blank dead air.

37
00:02:57.520 --> 00:02:58.520
Yeah, you're right.

38
00:02:58.520 --> 00:03:00.520
Actually, that would have been all right.

39
00:03:00.520 --> 00:03:09.520
But that's her answer. Hey, Nancy, where do you find it in the Constitution that, you know, to carry out these unbelievable programs that you're instituting? Are you serious?

40
00:03:09.520 --> 00:03:39.520
So what Jefferson decided you need to do is his answer was interesting because it's different from what we are sort of told we need to do. Like today we were told, well, you just sit back and wait for the federal courts to tell you that the federal government has done something wrong. And Jefferson's view was that, well, number one, the federal courts are probably just going to rubber stamp everything, which indeed they have. And secondly, the federal courts are actually part of the federal government, so they're not exactly impartial arbiters in all this.

41
00:03:39.520 --> 00:03:50.520
And secondly, elections. Just vote the bums out. First of all, you don't have an election every 10 seconds, so a lot of damage can be done while you're waiting for one.

42
00:03:50.520 --> 00:03:57.520
But secondly, what's the guarantee that you do vote the bum out, or that the guy you put in doesn't betray you at the first opportunity?

43
00:03:57.520 --> 00:04:07.520
How do you actually practically stop this thing? And Jefferson's answer was, well, the states have to function as restraints on the federal government.

44
00:04:07.520 --> 00:04:37.520
I love that. It's great, yeah, it's great. And it has been, in your article you point out a few areas where states have actually implemented this. For example, the Real ID Act. I know in Louisiana we've refused to fund it because we've considered it to be unconstitutional. We've considered it to be unconstitutional. We've considered it to be unconstitutional. We've considered it to be unconstitutional.

45
00:04:37.520 --> 00:04:41.820
to be an unfunded mandate and other states have taken the same position and supposedly

46
00:04:41.820 --> 00:04:44.640
refuse to comply with that law. Is that correct?

47
00:04:44.640 --> 00:04:50.600
Yeah, exactly right. So we have, early in American history, we have this idea, which

48
00:04:50.600 --> 00:04:55.840
by the way, this nullification idea that we've just talked about, you know, hardly anyone

49
00:04:55.840 --> 00:05:02.640
knows about this. I've done a lot of radio on this, basically right of center sort of

50
00:05:02.640 --> 00:05:06.980
radio. None of these hosts know anything about it. And I say that not as an insult, but because

51
00:05:06.980 --> 00:05:17.980
When they hear about it, they say, well, it makes sense to me. I mean, we tried everything else, and nothing else works on this government. Might as well try everything Jefferson suggested we try.

52
00:05:17.980 --> 00:05:30.980
But indeed, in early American history, we've got Jefferson and Madison employing nullification against infringements on free speech, the northern states using it against unconstitutional searches and seizures,

53
00:05:30.980 --> 00:05:36.940
and Military Conscription, and against the Fugitive Slave Act, and then five years ago,

54
00:05:36.940 --> 00:05:40.620
as you mentioned, with the Real ID Act, we had a couple of dozen states basically saying,

55
00:05:40.620 --> 00:05:45.700
well, we're just not doing this thing, and you know, when that many states say we're

56
00:05:45.700 --> 00:05:49.340
not doing something, I mean, what's the federal government going to do? Cut off the highway

57
00:05:49.340 --> 00:05:54.020
money to all of them, or send in the tanks to all these? I mean, what, practically speaking,

58
00:05:54.020 --> 00:05:58.400
what can they do? So there is strength in numbers, and in fact, you know, maybe the

59
00:05:58.400 --> 00:06:28.400
California is one of 14 states that allows medical marijuana. Federal law does not make an exception for medical marijuana. You are not allowed to do this. And the Supreme Court even said, you can't do this. So the Justice Department says you can't do it. The Supreme Court says you can't do it. And California basically said, well, thanks for your Supreme Court decision. And they continued doing it. And the funny thing is that today, when you raise that as an example of a state just saying, no, we're not doing it,

60
00:06:28.400 --> 00:06:33.100
to the federal government. People will say, well, that's not a good example because the

61
00:06:33.100 --> 00:06:38.440
Justice Department has decided it's not going to prosecute these cases anymore. Well, yeah,

62
00:06:38.440 --> 00:06:41.860
why do you think they decided not to do it? That's right. Because they woke up one day

63
00:06:41.860 --> 00:06:46.240
and said, gee, maybe our interpretation of the commerce clause is wrong. We really shouldn't

64
00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:50.480
be doing it. No, they woke up and said we're not doing it because no one was cooperating

65
00:06:50.480 --> 00:06:55.280
with them. That's right. The resistance was so big, so it shows that this works, actually.

66
00:06:55.280 --> 00:07:14.280
Sure it does, because otherwise they lose their power. If people start seeing that, seeing odds behind the curtain, well, you know, then their power is diminished. It's only by pretending to be the big, bad federal government and, you know, not having their authority challenged that they can continue to get away with the tyranny that they get away with.

67
00:07:14.280 --> 00:07:21.280
That's an excellent point. So they realize that it's making them look bad to continue enforcing this when there's that much resistance to it.

68
00:07:21.280 --> 00:07:29.280
They say, well, you know, we've got other priorities now. Yeah, I don't doubt it. You don't want to be made to look like a fool by California and other states.

69
00:07:29.280 --> 00:07:40.280
So sure, of course you have other priorities now. So my argument is not that if we start nullifying a law, this is a guarantee that will reduce the government to back where it needs to be.

70
00:07:40.280 --> 00:07:52.280
The point is that, you know, I'm all ears if people have suggestions that we haven't already tried a thousand times, like, you know, voting for Newt Gingrich and crossing your fingers, that, I mean, best day ever done that.

71
00:07:52.280 --> 00:07:53.280
Exactly.

72
00:07:53.280 --> 00:08:02.280
Well, I wanted to ask you about Arizona, because that's kind of the opposite of nullification. They decided they're actually going to enforce something, and then they're told to back down from enforcing it.

73
00:08:02.280 --> 00:08:16.280
Indeed, right. It is a kind of reverse nullification, although if, let's say, the Federal Government struck down their law, if their governor just went ahead and enforced it anyway, that would be a kind of nullification.

74
00:08:16.280 --> 00:08:26.280
And this bill, by the way, this is an example, I think, of, I mean, if nullification is to be carried through, then, you know, it has to be done consistently.

75
00:08:26.280 --> 00:08:33.280
And it could mean that some states, you know, from time to time will have laws that some people might not like.

76
00:08:33.280 --> 00:08:38.280
But if it's going to work, we can't say, well, you can nullify this or this and this, but I don't really want you to nullify it.

77
00:08:38.280 --> 00:08:42.280
You know, look, you're going to have to put up with the fact that some of these things are going to be obnoxious.

78
00:08:42.280 --> 00:08:51.280
When the federal government does something catastrophically stupid, what do you do about it?

79
00:08:51.280 --> 00:08:55.280
Do we move to Canada? And then what do I do when Canada does something stupid?

80
00:08:55.280 --> 00:09:03.280
Do I have to move to the moon? I mean, at least if you can keep power as broken up and into pieces as you possibly can,

81
00:09:03.280 --> 00:09:09.280
then at least you can vote with your feet. I mean, there's at least some kind of restraint on these sociopaths.

82
00:09:09.280 --> 00:09:39.280
Whereas right now, they've centralized so much of their idiocy that there's nowhere to run, you know, the same idiotic laws, federal laws that the federal government has usurped, almost all state power at this point, you have nowhere to go. So you better as a state start standing up. And listen, Louisiana, we've been under the jackboot of the feds for six years at this point. And most recently, our governor who pretends to have presidential aspirations, I don't think he's read the 10th Amendment, because all he's

83
00:09:39.280 --> 00:09:45.280
During the whole confrontation with the feds over the oil, when we wanted to do things to protect ourselves,

84
00:09:45.280 --> 00:09:48.280
was, please, please, please, please, please give us permits.

85
00:09:48.280 --> 00:09:53.280
A real governor would have just done it and said, we're going to arrest you if you get in our way.

86
00:09:53.280 --> 00:10:00.280
And the fact is, who would have been against that apart from 12 ideologues in Hollywood or something?

87
00:10:00.280 --> 00:10:02.280
You know, he could have become president had he stood up.

88
00:10:02.280 --> 00:10:05.280
The whole country would have been behind this guy.

89
00:10:05.280 --> 00:10:09.600
I mean, Democrats and Republicans, they would have said, man, this guy has guts, and good

90
00:10:09.600 --> 00:10:10.600
for him, finally.

91
00:10:10.600 --> 00:10:16.920
You know, we're sick of these mealy-mouthed, nobody-jerk boobs that we have to vote for,

92
00:10:16.920 --> 00:10:17.920
whatever.

93
00:10:17.920 --> 00:10:18.920
Right on.

94
00:10:18.920 --> 00:10:19.920
Finally.

95
00:10:19.920 --> 00:10:20.920
Right on.

96
00:10:20.920 --> 00:10:21.920
And he just wouldn't do it.

97
00:10:21.920 --> 00:10:22.920
I mean, what a letdown.

98
00:10:22.920 --> 00:10:24.920
Jerk boobs and sociopaths, will you stop mincing words?

99
00:10:24.920 --> 00:10:30.240
Tell us how you really feel, because I'm right there with you.

100
00:10:30.240 --> 00:10:34.280
Because every week, Jindal, you know, we're going to, that's it, we are telling the Federal

101
00:10:34.280 --> 00:10:38.280
The Federal Government, we're going to do what we want. If they would just please give us the permits.

102
00:10:38.280 --> 00:10:41.280
What a weenie.

103
00:10:41.280 --> 00:10:46.280
You said something interesting in one of your videos, and I think it was just really paraphrasing Jefferson,

104
00:10:46.280 --> 00:10:52.280
when you said that when the Federal Government is the final judge on how much power it should have,

105
00:10:52.280 --> 00:10:56.280
shouldn't we be shocked that you just keep grabbing more and more and more?

106
00:10:56.280 --> 00:11:00.280
So we're going to talk more about how to get the Federal Government off our backs with Dr. Tom Woods

107
00:11:00.280 --> 00:11:06.280
We are coming back with a most interesting and exciting guest who speaks his mind on Baldy and the Blind.

108
00:11:06.280 --> 00:11:12.280
Alright, this is Tom Coates and Michelle Godin with Tom Woods and we will be back in a few minutes. Stay tuned.

109
00:11:12.280 --> 00:11:19.280
We are coming back now with Dr. Thomas E. Woods, our probably most feisty guest. I love him.

110
00:11:19.280 --> 00:11:27.280
And he is talking to us about a solution to the ever-increasing tyranny of the federal government, which is nullification,

111
00:11:27.280 --> 00:11:39.280
which is just refuse to comply when they're out of bounds and unconstitutional, and he didn't make that up, Thomas Jefferson did. How about that? That crazy right-wing guy, Thomas Jefferson.

112
00:11:39.280 --> 00:11:43.280
Hey Tom, we've got a trio of Toms, they're all crazy, I guess, right?

113
00:11:43.280 --> 00:11:45.280
Yep. Love my Toms.

114
00:11:45.280 --> 00:11:55.280
Now, nullification is not, we're not suggesting Louisiana disobeys laws that we think are bad ideas, but are constitutional, right?

115
00:11:55.280 --> 00:12:05.280
Right. The idea is, yeah, things that are unconstitutional, but since most of the things the federal government does that you don't like are unconstitutional,

116
00:12:05.280 --> 00:12:07.280
The Theory of Money and Credit

117
00:13:35.280 --> 00:13:43.280
Is that nullification is strictly a right-wing extremist thing? Is it not true that these sanctuary cities are really just nullification?

118
00:13:43.280 --> 00:13:51.280
Yeah, it is. I mean, they would never want to use that word because, heaven forbid, they might be politically incorrect and they can't have that.

119
00:13:51.280 --> 00:14:01.280
But that is certainly a form of nullification. They're basically saying we're not going to devote any resources to enforcing this particular immigration law.

120
00:14:01.280 --> 00:14:16.280
Another way, another thing they could do, I'd love to see a city or a state, say, to the federal government. You know, you've got your crazy drug war, but we're not going to, and you can have those laws, but we're not going to devote any resources to it. So how do you like that?

121
00:14:16.280 --> 00:14:29.280
Yeah, I fully agree. Actually, that's something I'm always going on about. I agree that they're ridiculous laws and they expect the states to enforce the federal laws.

122
00:14:29.280 --> 00:14:33.640
Right, so if the states just say, I mean by and large the federal government needs the

123
00:14:33.640 --> 00:14:39.200
states to cooperate in its, you know, absurdities, and if the states say, well we're not doing

124
00:14:39.200 --> 00:14:42.840
it, well this, you know, this could be the beginning of something, this could be the

125
00:14:42.840 --> 00:14:47.520
beginning of the states saying, you know, what, we want to go back to the constitution

126
00:14:47.520 --> 00:14:50.920
we were supposed to have, so we better have a meeting of the minds here, because we're

127
00:14:50.920 --> 00:14:54.440
just not doing what you want us to do, we're just not going to do it, and especially with

128
00:14:54.440 --> 00:14:59.240
the economy the way it is, and unlikely to really recover in the near future, and states

129
00:14:59.240 --> 00:15:29.240
I think you could get to a point where it gets so bad that some governor starts saying look starting tomorrow I'm going line by line through the state budget and everything I see here that's an unconstitutional federal mandate we're not doing anymore, period. And go ahead, throw me in jail. See what that does for your popularity, throw a governor in jail. I'd like to see you try. And I've actually seen Andrew Napolitano advocate arresting federal officials that come in and try to enforce unconstitutional federal laws.

130
00:15:29.240 --> 00:15:33.600
Jefferson envisioned trying them for treason against the state.

131
00:15:33.600 --> 00:15:34.600
Absolutely.

132
00:15:34.600 --> 00:15:38.560
So, I mean, yeah, I know Keith Olbermann would be horrified by that, but I don't think

133
00:15:38.560 --> 00:15:40.160
Jefferson over Keith Olbermann.

134
00:15:40.160 --> 00:15:41.160
Myself.

135
00:15:41.160 --> 00:15:45.600
You know, Harry Lee was a sheriff in Jefferson Parish that I think really understood his

136
00:15:45.600 --> 00:15:47.920
constitutional authority as a sheriff.

137
00:15:47.920 --> 00:15:54.660
And after Katrina, the feds actually cut the communication lines between he and his deputies,

138
00:15:54.660 --> 00:15:59.820
And he reestablished them and put armed guards on the lines and ordered them to shoot any

139
00:15:59.820 --> 00:16:01.980
federal officials that tried to cut the lines again.

140
00:16:01.980 --> 00:16:03.980
Oh wow, I hadn't heard that.

141
00:16:03.980 --> 00:16:08.240
You know what, it's really buried, but it's one of the greatest things I've ever heard

142
00:16:08.240 --> 00:16:12.140
in the last ten years of a local authority standing up to the feds, and you'd have to

143
00:16:12.140 --> 00:16:16.940
know him, he's kind of a legend here, so he was something, but we have a bunch of wusses

144
00:16:16.940 --> 00:16:18.660
in office now, so.

145
00:16:18.660 --> 00:16:26.620
Yeah, we do, but maybe if they see that their ambitions can be, in other words, if they

146
00:16:26.620 --> 00:16:31.340
realize there's a group of people out there that feel strongly about this, well, maybe

147
00:16:31.340 --> 00:16:34.460
some of them will do something.

148
00:16:34.460 --> 00:16:40.020
I'm inclined to think that state legislators might be reachable, because they're not all

149
00:16:40.020 --> 00:16:42.220
crazy loons who want to be president some day.

150
00:16:42.220 --> 00:16:45.260
Some of them are just regular people who feel like they're doing a civic duty.

151
00:16:45.260 --> 00:17:15.260
Well, you might be able to persuade them to take a historic stand, or you might even be able to win as a state legislator, and again, it's not that state legislators are wonderful, saintly people necessarily, but at least in Jefferson's view, there was a chance you might actually know your state legislator. You might live down the street from him. You might have some prayer of influencing them, whereas you have zero prayer of influencing the U.S. Senate. I have no authority over the U.S. Senate whatsoever. And they do obviously whatever they want. I mean, they don't care at all what the American people

152
00:17:15.260 --> 00:17:20.940
Well that's been made clear to us again and again, nobody wanted the bank bailouts, we

153
00:17:20.940 --> 00:17:26.080
got the bank bailouts, huge opposition to the healthcare, we got the healthcare, skepticism

154
00:17:26.080 --> 00:17:30.400
about the stimulus, we got the stimulus, I mean they clearly do not care what we're saying

155
00:17:30.400 --> 00:17:31.400
or thinking.

156
00:17:31.400 --> 00:17:34.580
And then you're going to see amnesty, and you know, what should have woken people up

157
00:17:34.580 --> 00:17:40.220
to the fact that both sides, Republicans and Democrats, are equally crazy and unconstitutional

158
00:17:40.220 --> 00:17:46.220
When George Bush was pushing for amnesty for illegal aliens, you know, and Republicans were kind of like, huh?

159
00:17:46.220 --> 00:17:55.220
Yeah, well, and the fact is that to hear them talk today about, well, you know, we're going to take back America by putting the Republicans back in.

160
00:17:55.220 --> 00:17:56.220
Joke.

161
00:17:56.220 --> 00:18:00.220
I mean, we want to take it back from them after what they did to us for eight years.

162
00:18:00.220 --> 00:18:01.220
Right.

163
00:18:01.220 --> 00:18:07.220
I mean, seriously, look at their track record. I mean, Bill Clinton was clearly, this isn't, I'm not just saying this just to be facetious,

164
00:18:07.220 --> 00:18:16.220
Bill Clinton was clearly a fiscal conservative compared to George W. Bush. What's the challenge to seeing that? That was clear and obvious.

165
00:18:16.220 --> 00:18:23.220
Absolutely. Again, he had disdain for the Constitution as much as George Bush.

166
00:18:23.220 --> 00:18:53.220
I mean, they're all cut from the same cloth, but I mean, if what I'm supposed to look forward to is, you know, is George W. Bush and his, basically the sort of policies he implemented on education and health and deficits and wars and civil liberties. I mean, come on. I mean, every drone running for president favors the same thing. Nobody's going to change anything. I mean, if I elect, you know, Mitt Romney, if I elect another GOP plastic man,

167
00:18:53.220 --> 00:19:01.860
is going to change, except, I'm afraid, some of the Tea Party people, one thing that will

168
00:19:01.860 --> 00:19:05.900
change is they'll say, ah, finally, finally we got one of our own people in office, all

169
00:19:05.900 --> 00:19:10.900
right, let's go back to our jobs, no, no, no, what's the matter with you people, no.

170
00:19:10.900 --> 00:19:16.020
Yeah, unfortunately the Tea Party in many ways has been compromised by Republican takeover,

171
00:19:16.020 --> 00:19:21.540
or at least the Republicans are trying to get branded with them, whereas I think the

172
00:19:21.540 --> 00:19:25.540
The True Tea Party people were a lot of Ron Paul supporters that had started this years

173
00:19:25.540 --> 00:19:26.540
ago.

174
00:19:26.540 --> 00:19:29.780
And there's still some hope for them.

175
00:19:29.780 --> 00:19:34.420
When nullification is spelled out to them, when they hear it, a lot of them are ready

176
00:19:34.420 --> 00:19:35.420
to jump on board.

177
00:19:35.420 --> 00:19:36.420
Hey, let's get started.

178
00:19:36.420 --> 00:19:37.420
Go ahead.

179
00:19:37.420 --> 00:19:38.420
Let's start nullifying.

180
00:19:38.420 --> 00:19:39.420
Some of them had some good instincts.

181
00:19:39.420 --> 00:19:40.420
We're down to our last minute.

182
00:19:40.420 --> 00:19:41.420
Do this.

183
00:19:41.420 --> 00:19:44.540
Give out your website and how people can find your book, Nullification.

184
00:19:44.540 --> 00:19:45.540
Okay, sure.

185
00:19:45.540 --> 00:19:50.980
Nullification is in all your major bookstores, but most cheaply you can get it on Amazon.com

186
00:19:50.980 --> 00:19:55.780
and check out tomwoods.com, there's a lot of free stuff, you can learn all about this stuff

187
00:19:55.780 --> 00:19:59.080
free audio and video, it's all there, tomwoods.com

188
00:19:59.080 --> 00:20:01.520
and i think you know our next guest, Walter Block, huh?

189
00:20:01.520 --> 00:20:03.920
oh yeah, say hello to Walter Block, sure will

190
00:20:03.920 --> 00:20:07.940
thanks tom, you've been great and i hope that you can join us again sometime, it's been a

191
00:20:07.940 --> 00:20:09.880
terrific visit with you

192
00:20:09.880 --> 00:20:13.480
great, i had fun, thank you

193
00:20:13.480 --> 00:20:14.580
yeah, that's what we need

194
00:20:14.580 --> 00:20:15.300
more Tom Woods