WEBVTT

NOTE The Tip of the Financial Iceberg

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.500
It's been a fiery week full of pressing, some would say depressing, economic issues, with

2
00:00:05.500 --> 00:00:10.400
the Fed talk of tapering, scaring down the markets, then strategic press releases talking

3
00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:12.700
the markets back up again.

4
00:00:12.700 --> 00:00:17.600
We have the saga of Edward Snowden, and that has glued us to our seats as we try to figure

5
00:00:17.600 --> 00:00:21.320
out just how much Uncle Sam has the goods on all of us.

6
00:00:21.320 --> 00:00:25.760
And just when you thought MF Global was no longer a household word, the Goldman Sachs-led

7
00:00:25.760 --> 00:00:31.600
CFTC finally, and can I emphasize finally, goes after the very man who threw the entire

8
00:00:31.600 --> 00:00:36.480
futures industry into disarray. This would be John Corzine. To talk about all of this

9
00:00:36.480 --> 00:00:41.280
and more is Senior Fellow at the Ludwig von Mises Academy, Mark Thornton. Mark, thank you

10
00:00:41.280 --> 00:00:46.000
for joining us. Good afternoon, Bob. It's great to be with you. Thank you. Well, let's jump into

11
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:52.560
this note and affair. We have a critical trade agreement right now that Ecuador has renounced,

12
00:00:52.560 --> 00:00:58.680
and what implications does this have for the financial markets, if any?

13
00:00:58.680 --> 00:01:03.560
Well the implications for financial markets in the general economy are all negative, of

14
00:01:03.560 --> 00:01:09.800
course. The fact that NSA has invaded our rights and invaded our privacy and the fact

15
00:01:09.800 --> 00:01:15.480
that Congress, who has seen the NSA testimony, says that we've only seen the tip of the iceberg

16
00:01:15.480 --> 00:01:20.200
means that this is a triple negative for the economy. Look at the strong arm tech companies

17
00:01:50.200 --> 00:01:55.880
in the private company like Edward Snowden can access your email, can read your email,

18
00:01:55.880 --> 00:02:00.460
can look at your phone records and listen in on your phone calls.

19
00:02:00.460 --> 00:02:04.920
This opens up things like the possibility of insider trading on a massive scale.

20
00:02:04.920 --> 00:02:11.640
And then, of course, in terms of foreign relations, you have major implications here regarding

21
00:02:11.640 --> 00:02:16.040
trade regulations and interactions between countries.

22
00:02:16.040 --> 00:02:21.960
We're already involving the United States, China, Hong Kong, Russia, Cuba, Ecuador and

23
00:02:21.960 --> 00:02:26.980
other countries are involved in all this and of course we're spying on our enemies which

24
00:02:26.980 --> 00:02:32.240
can be expected but we're also spying on our friends that's been released by Snowden.

25
00:02:32.240 --> 00:02:40.520
So this is going to hurt foreign relations and trade relations and it could lead to increased

26
00:02:40.520 --> 00:03:05.520
The US, the European Union, China and other countries, especially Japan, are massively inflating their money supply in an attempt to drive down the value of their currency in order to increase trade, so these are all tied together, it's all negative, it's going to have a negative impact on the economy as well as foreign relations and trade relations.

27
00:03:05.520 --> 00:03:19.520
Well, let's talk about this currency war. Japan in particular is aiming to double their monetary base within two years, and initially it had a devastating effect on the yen it was going down, but that's actually what they wanted.

28
00:03:19.520 --> 00:03:27.520
I mean, is that what central bank policy should be doing, is to devalue the currency, and why would they aim to do that in the first place?

29
00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:42.520
Well, no, it shouldn't be done that way at all. It's called beggar-thy-neighbor policy, where you try to make your neighbor worse off by inflating your money supply and driving down the value of your dollar, so it makes your exports look better.

30
00:03:42.520 --> 00:03:55.520
And initially there's a positive response, and Japan has received this positive response to the falling yen, and their stock market initially went up tremendously, almost doubling. Now it's fallen significantly.

31
00:03:55.520 --> 00:04:00.720
they're getting the small increases in industrial production in Japan and small

32
00:04:00.720 --> 00:04:06.280
increases in GDP but look you know they also have to import goods as a matter

33
00:04:06.280 --> 00:04:10.640
of fact Japan has to import virtually everything all the raw materials that

34
00:04:10.640 --> 00:04:17.120
they use to produce those exports and so in the long run it doesn't do any good

35
00:04:17.120 --> 00:04:22.320
in terms of exports and GDP and things of that nature it just creates tensions

36
00:04:22.320 --> 00:04:29.580
in Financial Markets, Uncertainty in Financial Markets, Bad Relations between Trading Partners,

37
00:04:29.580 --> 00:04:34.440
it could lead to real protectionism where tariffs, quotas are imposed, it could lead

38
00:04:34.440 --> 00:04:40.720
to actually military conflicts. I mean, protectionism, whether it's through your currency or through

39
00:04:40.720 --> 00:04:47.600
tariffs, is a prelude to war. Bastiat told us that if goods don't cross borders, armies

40
00:04:47.600 --> 00:04:53.200
Well, you know, and that's where those were important factors in the American Revolution,

41
00:04:53.200 --> 00:04:58.680
the War of 1812, the American Civil War and other wars around the world. So these look

42
00:04:58.680 --> 00:05:04.440
like small issues and small problems right now, but they have a way of getting out of

43
00:05:04.440 --> 00:05:11.040
control where the policymakers lose control of what's going on and things devolving into

44
00:05:11.040 --> 00:05:15.840
chaos. Well, Bastiat certainly did have a lot to teach us. And let's talk about what

45
00:05:15.840 --> 00:05:20.240
What might be a cataclysmic moment, not only for the United States, but also for the world,

46
00:05:20.240 --> 00:05:25.040
which is when short-term interest rates, long-term interest rates, the Fed is keeping them down,

47
00:05:25.040 --> 00:05:26.880
what happens when they rise?

48
00:05:26.880 --> 00:05:30.360
Well, the Fed is engaged in reckless policy.

49
00:05:30.360 --> 00:05:34.200
The mainstream media would have it that the Fed is trying to fix our problems, but look,

50
00:05:34.200 --> 00:05:38.840
they caused the housing bubble, they have reckless monetary policy that's hurting our

51
00:05:38.840 --> 00:05:44.700
ability to recover from that crisis, it's hurting retirees, and it's allowing Congress,

52
00:05:44.700 --> 00:05:49.100
Because the Fed is buying all these long-term government bonds from the Treasury, it's allowing

53
00:05:49.100 --> 00:05:55.180
Congress to spend recklessly and without any checks on their spending.

54
00:05:55.180 --> 00:05:59.020
And so they're allowing that to take place, and so they've hurt us in the past, they're

55
00:05:59.020 --> 00:06:02.380
hurting us in the present, and they're going to hurt us in the future.

56
00:06:02.380 --> 00:06:06.420
And look, they're also hurting themselves because they're buying up all this long-term

57
00:06:06.420 --> 00:06:10.160
debt, all these long-term bonds, which traditionally they never did.

58
00:06:10.160 --> 00:06:13.380
They usually bought short-term government securities.

59
00:06:13.380 --> 00:06:17.860
And with short-term government securities, the interest rate doesn't really get out

60
00:06:17.860 --> 00:06:23.240
of whack because the securities last only 90 days and so they're turned over very quickly.

61
00:06:23.240 --> 00:06:27.420
So changes in interest rates doesn't hurt the position of the Fed balance sheet. But

62
00:06:27.420 --> 00:06:34.180
with long-term bonds and assets that the Fed has loaded up on, what they have is a scenario

63
00:06:34.180 --> 00:06:39.820
where if long-term interest rates were to rise, which they are now currently doing,

64
00:06:39.820 --> 00:06:53.780
In a position where it would be technically bankrupt, where the assets would lose value

65
00:06:53.780 --> 00:06:55.260
and the liabilities...

66
00:06:55.260 --> 00:06:56.900
I want to get to this.

67
00:06:56.900 --> 00:07:01.740
Is it possible for the Fed to go bankrupt and we only have about 30 seconds left here?

68
00:07:01.740 --> 00:07:05.840
They've changed the rules so that they don't have to operate according to market prices.

69
00:07:05.840 --> 00:07:08.320
They can operate at the prices that they bought those things.

70
00:07:08.320 --> 00:07:13.640
So, technically they've changed the rules, the rules that you and I have to obey in their

71
00:07:13.640 --> 00:07:18.240
favor so that technically they can't go bankrupt, they would just be borrowing more money from

72
00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:24.160
the Treasury essentially, adding to the national debt, which I'm afraid that's likely to happen.

73
00:07:24.160 --> 00:07:26.120
Mark, thank you so much for joining us.

74
00:07:26.120 --> 00:07:30.280
This is Mark Thornton, Senior Fellow at the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

75
00:07:30.280 --> 00:07:31.280
Thank you for your time.

76
00:07:31.280 --> 00:07:31.960
Thank you, Bob.