WEBVTT

NOTE Intro to Micro: Demand and Supply

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:10.000
The reason it's called micro is it's typically an attempt by economics to ape the physical sciences to borrow the prestige of physics,

2
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:14.000
where the term micro means something really completely different than it means here.

3
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:22.000
What micro means in economics is dealing with the individual, with the individual level, individual action, the market, prices,

4
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:33.040
is quiet please, dealing with demand, supply, production, the oil price thing which is happening

5
00:00:33.040 --> 00:00:40.960
somewhere, these things are part of micro, and macro which is the other basic course

6
00:00:40.960 --> 00:00:46.400
deals with a larger picture sort of like inflation, unemployment, business cycles, that's where

7
00:00:46.400 --> 00:00:51.120
everybody forecasts, economists forecast every year and always get it wrong, forecast always

8
00:00:51.120 --> 00:00:56.800
way off the beam, that's macro. Micro is in pretty good shape, I think it's basically

9
00:00:56.800 --> 00:01:03.800
a sort of a consensus about micro. Macro is pretty screwed up, and for good reason. At

10
00:01:03.960 --> 00:01:10.960
any rate, this is the, we're dealing now with much, sort of the basic economics of macro.

11
00:01:12.520 --> 00:01:17.800
Even good macro is essentially based on micro, so it's best to take micro first, if you're

12
00:01:17.800 --> 00:01:42.800
We deal in economics with, we don't deal only with numbers and graphs. That's only, as usually happens with economics, the graphs came in and the numbers came in in order to simplify, to present a simple basis of the theory.

13
00:01:42.800 --> 00:01:49.800
and what usually happens is that everybody got enchanted with the grass, they started the grass, it came to an end in themselves

14
00:01:49.800 --> 00:01:53.800
and economists began to lose sight of the actual people and what's going on in the world

15
00:01:53.800 --> 00:01:59.800
so that's been a danger in the higher stratospheric reaches of economic theory

16
00:01:59.800 --> 00:02:04.800
at any rate, what we're dealing with, economics really deals with as an individual

17
00:02:04.800 --> 00:02:11.800
and starts with a very simple fact, simple basic fact, namely everybody, every individual has goals which they're trying to achieve

18
00:02:11.800 --> 00:02:41.800
that he or she is trying to achieve. The goal can be a very simple one, like eating a ham sandwich in one hour, a simple short run goal, it can be a much longer goal, graduating from poly, or getting a job in electrical engineering, or whatever, there's a whole structure of goals, and in order to achieve these goals, you have to employ resources of some sort, you have to do something. In other words, by having goals of a sort, you're assuming that people can achieve them,

19
00:02:41.800 --> 00:02:48.800
to take measures, to take steps to buy a ham sandwich or to find a newspaper or to buy a Hi-Fi set or whatever

20
00:02:48.840 --> 00:02:52.400
or to graduate from poly. These things are

21
00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:55.040
at least presumably accomplishable.

22
00:02:55.040 --> 00:03:00.160
So, in other words, everybody has an objective, has different objectives in mind

23
00:03:00.160 --> 00:03:03.680
and has an idea of how to arrive at it, how to go about it.

24
00:03:03.680 --> 00:03:08.160
And that is basically the source of economic theory.

25
00:03:08.160 --> 00:03:14.160
The economic theory is a deductive system built on this basic fact, on autonomous core action.

26
00:03:14.160 --> 00:03:19.160
In other words, the fact that people act in the world to accomplish something.

27
00:03:19.160 --> 00:03:26.160
And I'd say the accomplishment can be very short-run, it can be very simple, it can be eating a sandwich, or it can be very complex, a whole series of things.

28
00:03:26.160 --> 00:03:30.160
It doesn't matter. From the point of view of economics, it doesn't matter what the goals are.

29
00:03:30.160 --> 00:03:33.160
That's up to some other discipline to worry about.

30
00:03:33.160 --> 00:03:39.040
What we deal with is the fact that people employ resources of different sorts to arrive

31
00:03:39.040 --> 00:03:40.040
at goals.

32
00:03:40.040 --> 00:03:48.800
This is an action where you have goals and you've got resources to try to achieve them.

33
00:03:48.800 --> 00:03:52.800
This is also called a means-ends relationship.

34
00:03:52.800 --> 00:04:00.320
You have an end or an objective and you employ a different means to try to achieve it.

35
00:04:00.320 --> 00:04:08.560
Okay, what are some of the resources? Well, in the first place, economists like to deal

36
00:04:08.560 --> 00:04:15.080
with what's known as Crusoeconomics. Robinson Crusoe, you're familiar with this little tale

37
00:04:15.080 --> 00:04:19.760
of also been in the movies, where a guy shipwrecked and he winds up on an island somewhere in

38
00:04:19.760 --> 00:04:23.920
the South Pacific, and he's got no resources except himself. And he's trying to, first

39
00:04:23.920 --> 00:04:27.200
of all, he has different goals he has to achieve. One, he's got to keep alive. These would be

40
00:04:27.200 --> 00:04:37.200
So the case of CRUSO, the reason why we like to use it is it's a stark situation where we can isolate one person.

41
00:04:37.200 --> 00:04:42.200
You can take one person vis-a-vis nature and bring in other people later on.

42
00:04:42.200 --> 00:04:50.200
That's how you deal with economics. You take one simple situation and you add on a more complex situation after you analyze it.

43
00:04:50.200 --> 00:04:55.200
So if you have CRUSO, it's got different goals or objectives.

44
00:04:55.200 --> 00:05:05.720
food, and he looks around fast to find out what the sources of food are, shelter and

45
00:05:05.720 --> 00:05:06.720
clothing or whatever.

46
00:05:06.720 --> 00:05:10.960
So that's, okay, so this is, he has some of his priorities and he lists them in a certain

47
00:05:10.960 --> 00:05:11.960
rank.

48
00:05:11.960 --> 00:05:12.960
We'll get to that a little later on.

49
00:05:12.960 --> 00:05:13.960
What are his means?

50
00:05:13.960 --> 00:05:15.960
What are his resources that he has?

51
00:05:15.960 --> 00:05:18.960
Well, he looks around his inventory and we go, first of all, he's got himself, he's got

52
00:05:18.960 --> 00:05:23.160
his own energy, his own personal energy.

53
00:05:23.160 --> 00:05:39.960
So, resources, energy, and he's got his own technological knowledge, presumably he doesn't

54
00:05:39.960 --> 00:05:45.360
have amnesia, he knows how to fish or chop down trees or build a bow and arrow or something

55
00:05:45.360 --> 00:05:46.360
like that.

56
00:05:46.360 --> 00:05:51.160
Technology is low tech, high tech doesn't make it on Desert Island or Crusoe Island.

57
00:05:51.160 --> 00:06:08.160
The knowledge about how to construct a computer or something, how to use it, is not going to do him much good, but low tech, even if it's low tech, it's an important tech for him, namely how to fish and how to hunt and that sort of stuff, so how to construct a long cabin.

58
00:06:08.160 --> 00:06:24.660
So, all right, so he's got technological ideas, or recipes can be called, technological knowledge, and he's also got different natural resources.

59
00:06:24.660 --> 00:06:32.160
He's got, looks around, he's got, let's say there's trees or there's fish in the stream or whatever, looks around and finds out what the natural resources are,

60
00:06:32.160 --> 00:06:37.660
and that's what he starts off with, starts off with technological ideas, his own personal energy and natural resources.

61
00:06:38.160 --> 00:06:52.160
This is basically what we have in the world in general. The world starts off, you look at the caveman, the caveman will start off with just a person, some kind of idea of what to do, and resources, a person's resources.

62
00:06:52.160 --> 00:07:01.160
Now, economics really begins as a discipline, early 19th century or late 18th century England, Britain,

63
00:07:01.160 --> 00:07:06.160
and so the language, we're sort of stuck with a little language, a lot of the language and the concepts,

64
00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:11.160
we're still stuck with, even though they're kind of, the words are a little different now,

65
00:07:11.160 --> 00:07:16.160
we have to adjust to that, you can't change the word, just have to explain why it's a little different.

66
00:07:16.160 --> 00:07:24.160
Similarly here, personal energy used to be called labor, so this is called labor, a labor energy.

67
00:07:24.160 --> 00:07:28.160
And nowadays when we think of labor, we think of a proletariat type, since Marxism came,

68
00:07:28.160 --> 00:07:32.160
and we think of a laborer as somebody who's working a steel mill or something like that.

69
00:07:32.160 --> 00:07:37.160
And this concept of labor means anybody who works in production, we haven't defined production,

70
00:07:37.160 --> 00:07:43.160
it means doing something in the world to transform it, the consumer goods, we'll get to that later.

71
00:07:43.160 --> 00:07:47.160
So everybody is a laborer in that sense, anybody who works in production is a laborer in this sense.

72
00:07:47.160 --> 00:07:52.160
The president of General Motors is a laborer, just as the guy who works on the assembly line.

73
00:07:52.160 --> 00:07:57.160
Who isn't a laborer? Well, people who are clipping coupons. It doesn't mean they're not important, just they're not laborers.

74
00:07:57.160 --> 00:08:06.160
People who are stockholders, per se, or bondholders, are not engaging in personal labor in the plant, or in production.

75
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:12.160
So this is less labor, labor which really means here personal energy.

76
00:08:12.160 --> 00:08:24.160
Natural resources, since it was 18th century agricultural Britain, is called land, the same as land and labor.

77
00:08:24.160 --> 00:08:31.160
So we use the word land, so we're stuck with the word land, we're stuck with the word labor, but again it doesn't quite mean what we think of in common sense terms now.

78
00:08:31.160 --> 00:08:37.160
Land in economics means ground land, it means natural resources, it doesn't mean in other words this building here.

79
00:08:37.160 --> 00:08:46.160
We think of land, we think of the building, Brooklyn Polytechnic University, dazzling name changes.

80
00:08:46.160 --> 00:08:53.160
We think of it as the building here, but land is considered in economics only the ground underneath.

81
00:08:53.160 --> 00:08:57.160
In other words, natural nature made and not man-made.

82
00:08:57.160 --> 00:09:02.160
So land also includes fish whose natural resources are on the water, includes water.

83
00:09:02.160 --> 00:09:07.160
See, when they were making up economics in the 18th century, water was not considered a scarce resource.

84
00:09:07.160 --> 00:09:12.160
It was considered super-abundant. They had plenty of wet agriculture.

85
00:09:12.160 --> 00:09:18.160
So, nowadays we know better. Water is scarce. So, water is a scarce resource.

86
00:09:18.160 --> 00:09:26.160
Fish are a scarce resource. Also, other things like TV channels, frequencies, things like that, are also land in that sense.

87
00:09:26.160 --> 00:09:35.160
That was the natural resources. Space is land. Ocean is land. Lots of resources in the ocean which haven't been tapped yet.

88
00:09:35.160 --> 00:09:41.160
The continental shelf. There's minerals underneath the bottom of the sea and things like that.

89
00:09:41.160 --> 00:09:46.160
This is all land in a quote unquote. In other words, natural resources.

90
00:09:46.160 --> 00:09:51.160
So land means natural resources. Labor means personal energy.

91
00:09:51.160 --> 00:10:02.160
So what else is there? What else? Everything else. Everything else. In other words, people, man, take natural resources and transform them in order to get to what? The consumer goods so they can use it.

92
00:10:02.160 --> 00:10:14.160
In other words, Crusoe's got to eat, he's got to take the resources, he's got to shoot the deer or catch the fish and eat it. So he's got to do various things to get to consumer goods.

93
00:10:14.160 --> 00:10:25.560
The objective of working hard to do this is to wind up with consumer goods, food, shelter, clothing, high-five sets or whatever, or music coming out of the stereo.

94
00:10:25.560 --> 00:10:32.960
These things are consumer goods. This is what I use as an end of themselves. This is what the objective of action is all about.

95
00:10:32.960 --> 00:10:37.360
So, consumer goods are coming off the assembly line, so to speak.

96
00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:43.760
Everything else, which is not labor or natural resources, is called capital.

97
00:10:43.760 --> 00:10:45.760
Capital Goods

98
00:10:51.760 --> 00:10:57.760
Capital consists of everything used in production, which is not land or labor.

99
00:10:57.760 --> 00:11:03.760
It could be the net, fishing net used for fishing, poles used to fish, bow and arrow to hunt.

100
00:11:03.760 --> 00:11:10.760
Anything like that. Anything right now can be roads, trucks, tires on a truck.

101
00:11:10.760 --> 00:11:20.760
All these things are factories of course, goods in process, all these things are product capital, until you get to the consumer.

102
00:11:20.760 --> 00:11:28.760
For example, if you just ate a ham sandwich in Michelangelo, take that, one of my favorite examples.

103
00:11:28.760 --> 00:11:34.760
That was the end process of millions of people engaged in production.

104
00:11:34.760 --> 00:11:35.760
By the way, what is production?

105
00:11:35.760 --> 00:11:43.620
Production is a transformation, the use of labor, working on natural resources to transform

106
00:11:43.620 --> 00:11:47.860
into capital, different types of capital, finally you wind up with consumer goods.

107
00:11:47.860 --> 00:11:53.900
The production is this whole process of starting with land and labor and winding up with consumer

108
00:11:53.900 --> 00:11:54.900
goods.

109
00:11:54.900 --> 00:11:58.860
There's different degrees of capital, different stages.

110
00:11:58.860 --> 00:12:02.540
So for example, let's take a ham sandwich and Michael Weintraub, you have an enormous

111
00:12:02.540 --> 00:12:06.540
What's the most amount of cooperating factors in there?

112
00:12:06.540 --> 00:12:10.540
Factors of production.

113
00:12:10.540 --> 00:12:14.540
Got it.

114
00:12:14.540 --> 00:12:18.540
It's a whole production tree, a structure of production, starting with a farmer

115
00:12:18.540 --> 00:12:22.540
and mineral miner and so forth.

116
00:12:22.540 --> 00:12:26.540
Going for about 30 years at least until you get to the ham sandwich.

117
00:12:26.540 --> 00:12:30.540
What do you got? You got different ingredients going into it. To produce the ham sandwich

118
00:12:30.540 --> 00:12:48.540
This sandwich is solid to the consumer. You've got to have the ham, of course. You have to have the bread, the hero, whatever. You have to have cheese, all right? You have to have cheese, butter, and, yeah, tomato.

119
00:12:48.540 --> 00:12:53.540
All these things have to be brought together on a retail level.

120
00:12:53.540 --> 00:12:59.540
And you have to have workers doing it. You have to have the workers and aprons and counters.

121
00:12:59.540 --> 00:13:05.540
You've got to have counters and refrigerator units and all that sort of stuff.

122
00:13:05.540 --> 00:13:09.540
And chairs. Somebody's got to produce the chairs and sit on it.

123
00:13:09.540 --> 00:13:17.540
So all these things have to be produced. They all have to be combined to get to the one ham sandwich.

124
00:13:17.540 --> 00:13:18.540
One Ham Sandwich

125
00:13:18.540 --> 00:13:19.540
It has to be produced for many years.

126
00:13:19.540 --> 00:13:27.700
You've got to have somebody working at, the ham goes back, let's see, it goes to a, it's

127
00:13:27.700 --> 00:13:31.860
sold by a wholesaler probably, the Brooklyn Ham Division or whatever, the Brooklyn Armour

128
00:13:31.860 --> 00:13:32.860
Ham Unit or something like that.

129
00:13:32.860 --> 00:13:37.060
And they get it from a jobber, it's like Eastern Seaboard, and they get it from Chicago, they

130
00:13:37.060 --> 00:13:41.940
get the meat packer, the meat packer, gets it from the meat packer, you know, package

131
00:13:41.940 --> 00:13:47.380
the meat in slaughterhouses, slaughterhouse gets it from a farmer, raises a pig, they

132
00:13:47.380 --> 00:13:57.380
You have to have stockyards, you have to have trucks in every step of the way, and gasoline for the trucks, and tires, and stuff going, and metal going, and all sorts of stuff, I mean, on and on and on, this is only for the ham, okay?

133
00:13:57.380 --> 00:14:08.380
The pigs have to eat, they usually eat corn, the corn has to be grown, and on and on and on, with machinery every step of the way, and all this I say is just from one unit.

134
00:14:08.380 --> 00:14:13.380
It takes 30 years to involve millions of people for one lousy ham sandwich. It's incredible.

135
00:14:13.380 --> 00:14:20.380
And every country in the world probably is involved in this. People are growing ebony for pencils in Africa and so forth and so on.

136
00:14:20.380 --> 00:14:24.380
Because you have to have paper, you have to have pencils to record all this stuff and figure out what's going on.

137
00:14:24.380 --> 00:14:33.380
Every step of the way you have to have land, things to grow on, you have to have different kinds of capital, and you have to have labor.

138
00:14:33.380 --> 00:14:40.380
And all these things are involved in this. Each step of the way, each unit. Somebody's got to put it all together.

139
00:14:40.380 --> 00:14:47.380
The interesting thing is it works at every step of the way and one of the amazing things about the market, the free market economy, is it all works.

140
00:14:47.380 --> 00:14:57.380
You don't have to have, for me to get a ham sandwich right today, you don't have to have some rural planning board, eight guys on a planning board sitting around 30 years ago,

141
00:14:57.380 --> 00:15:08.380
and say, let's see, on January 20th, what is it, 26th today, 28th, January 28th, 1986, we have to get a Rothbard ham sandwich, therefore you gotta go raise the pigs,

142
00:15:08.380 --> 00:15:14.380
You over there go, raise the corn and so forth, gotta get Rothbard's hands down, nobody does that, there's no world planning board trying to figure this out.

143
00:15:14.380 --> 00:15:16.380
If there were, we'd all be in big trouble.

144
00:15:16.380 --> 00:15:23.380
And yet it all works at every step of the way, all these things happen at every step of the way with no shortages and no surpluses.

145
00:15:23.380 --> 00:15:26.380
Everything fits together like a latticework structure.

146
00:15:26.380 --> 00:15:33.380
The market economy is like a latticework, like a spiderweb when we look at something like this, derogatory metaphor.

147
00:15:33.380 --> 00:15:36.380
It's like a latticework, like a lace thing, it all fits in.

148
00:15:36.380 --> 00:15:42.380
How come it all fits in what? There's no magic, there's no planning board that fits it all, and the market itself does it.

149
00:15:42.380 --> 00:15:49.380
And really what microeconomics is, is to study how the thing works, and what happens when the government intervenes in the process and screws everything up.

150
00:15:49.380 --> 00:15:52.380
That's basically what microeconomics is all about.

151
00:15:52.380 --> 00:16:02.380
The big factor here, which is true both in cruise selling for us, the big factor is this.

152
00:16:02.380 --> 00:16:06.380
We contrast the world, whether we're talking about the caveman or kusar right now,

153
00:16:06.380 --> 00:16:10.380
with what I call the Garden of Eden model.

154
00:16:10.380 --> 00:16:14.380
Some people believe, some of us believe that mankind used to be in the Garden of Eden,

155
00:16:14.380 --> 00:16:17.380
and was then kicked out for various transgressions.

156
00:16:17.380 --> 00:16:19.380
Whether it's true or not, it's an interesting model to look at.

157
00:16:19.380 --> 00:16:24.380
In the Garden of Eden, everybody gets unlimited, satisfies his or her wants in unlimited fashion,

158
00:16:24.380 --> 00:16:26.380
but no work, no nothing.

159
00:16:26.380 --> 00:16:30.380
You snap your fingers and Pepsi is trickling down your throat.

160
00:16:30.380 --> 00:16:36.380
Nobody has to work at it, nobody has to produce it. Why is that? Because there's no scarcity. There's no nut, no scarcity.

161
00:16:36.380 --> 00:16:40.380
If there's no scarcity, you don't need private property, you don't need labor, you don't have to work, that's it.

162
00:16:40.380 --> 00:16:44.380
Unfortunately, we were kicked out of the Garden of Eden if it ever existed.

163
00:16:44.380 --> 00:16:49.380
And so in the world as it exists, in human history, there's tremendous scarcity.

164
00:16:49.380 --> 00:16:52.380
You don't have unlimited abundance of all factors of production of all goods.

165
00:16:52.380 --> 00:16:56.380
The Garden of Eden models unlimited abundance of all desired for goods.

166
00:16:56.380 --> 00:17:00.380
Somebody wants to hear a symphony, they snap their fingers and get it right there.

167
00:17:00.380 --> 00:17:03.380
We haven't got that. We have to have somebody working to produce it.

168
00:17:03.380 --> 00:17:07.380
And so we have the ever-present fact of scarcity.

169
00:17:07.380 --> 00:17:14.380
Scarcity meaning scarcity of resources relative to the goals that we have got to accomplish.

170
00:17:14.380 --> 00:17:18.380
Scarcity of resources, scarcity, we'll see in a minute what the resources are.

171
00:17:18.380 --> 00:17:21.380
Obviously, it's scarcity of land, labor, and capital.

172
00:17:21.380 --> 00:17:24.380
It's all scarce. Scarce in the sense that we'd like to have more of it.

173
00:17:24.380 --> 00:17:29.380
But if we had more, we could produce more, consume more, get a higher standard of living.

174
00:17:29.380 --> 00:17:34.380
If we had no scarcity, if everything was super-abundant, we wouldn't have to work, we wouldn't have to worry about anything.

175
00:17:34.380 --> 00:17:40.380
We'd just have Pepsi trickling down our throat, just like that, or whatever equivalent.

176
00:17:40.380 --> 00:17:46.380
So, what happens is, the caveman, everything is extremely scarce.

177
00:17:46.380 --> 00:17:49.380
They're in bad shape. Crusoe is in bad shape. Everything is very scarce.

178
00:17:49.380 --> 00:17:51.380
He's going to die tomorrow if he doesn't get food immediately.

179
00:17:51.380 --> 00:17:55.380
We're in better shape, we have less scarcity than we had in the human races.

180
00:17:55.380 --> 00:18:00.380
The progress of the human race, the progress of civilization, is essentially the alleviating of scarcity.

181
00:18:00.380 --> 00:18:03.380
Scarcity is still there, there's a lot less of it.

182
00:18:03.380 --> 00:18:07.380
A lot further from the brink than Crusoe or the caveman was.

183
00:18:07.380 --> 00:18:12.380
We've got a lot more fat, so to speak, a higher living standard.

184
00:18:12.380 --> 00:18:20.380
So the process of the progress of human race is essentially the progressive diminution or alleviation of scarcity.

185
00:18:20.380 --> 00:18:33.380
In the intellectual world, there's sort of fashions, one of the few good things about being in my advanced age is I've seen them all, all the fashions come and go.

186
00:18:33.380 --> 00:18:40.380
Every five years, some new nut comes on with a new theory and everybody adopts it for about five years and forgets it five years later.

187
00:18:40.380 --> 00:18:45.380
One nutty theory that came in about 1970 was there's no more scarcity.

188
00:18:45.380 --> 00:18:46.380
Scarcity.

189
00:18:46.380 --> 00:18:50.380
Economics, micro-economics might have been correct in the old days when there was scarcity.

190
00:18:50.380 --> 00:18:51.380
Now there's no scarcity.

191
00:18:51.380 --> 00:18:52.380
It's cool.

192
00:18:52.380 --> 00:19:02.140
We live, they said, in a post-scarcity world, a post-scarcity world.

193
00:19:02.140 --> 00:19:03.140
What does that mean?

194
00:19:03.140 --> 00:19:04.140
Well, it's an interesting question.

195
00:19:04.140 --> 00:19:05.140
I know what it means.

196
00:19:05.140 --> 00:19:07.020
What it really would mean is we're back in the garden of Eden.

197
00:19:07.020 --> 00:19:08.020
Nobody has to work.

198
00:19:08.020 --> 00:19:09.020
Nobody has to produce.

199
00:19:09.020 --> 00:19:10.020
No, not.

200
00:19:10.020 --> 00:19:11.020
Obviously, we're not in that situation.

201
00:19:11.020 --> 00:19:21.020
I remember I had a debate with some turkey, I think it was at the American University in Washington, which is an odd place anyway.

202
00:19:21.020 --> 00:19:32.020
And I was on a question about, do we live in a post-scarcity world? He was maintaining we live in a post-scarcity world, therefore we don't have to work, and therefore, I don't know what this therefore was, they're all very murky.

203
00:19:32.020 --> 00:19:39.520
And my question was, if that were really true, if Professor So-and-so were not, his conclusion was, we should therefore have socialism.

204
00:19:39.520 --> 00:19:44.520
I'm not sure why that was the conclusion. Presumably, there's no scarcity, you can have anything you want.

205
00:19:44.520 --> 00:19:53.520
Deuces are wild. So I said, well, if it's true that Professor So-and-so is right and we live in a post-scarcity world, why doesn't he tear up his paycheck?

206
00:19:53.520 --> 00:19:57.520
Why doesn't he at least tear up his raises that he gets every year?

207
00:19:57.520 --> 00:20:03.520
Anyway, his answer was interesting. That's because I, too, have been sucked into the capitalist ethos.

208
00:20:03.520 --> 00:20:12.520
So it's interesting in his reply. In other words, he's also saying, he's admitting there is scarcity, and he's trying to alleviate it as much as anybody else.

209
00:20:12.520 --> 00:20:17.520
So at any rate, that has been forgotten. I haven't heard that for a long time about post-scarcity.

210
00:20:17.520 --> 00:20:23.520
As a matter of fact, the next fashion that came in shortly after that, I think by 1975,

211
00:20:23.520 --> 00:20:29.520
My God, everything is scarce. We're going to run out of resources. That was a big gimmick for about five years.

212
00:20:29.520 --> 00:20:35.520
From 1975 to 1980, the same jerks were claiming we live in a post-scarcity world, and therefore we should have socialism.

213
00:20:35.520 --> 00:20:38.520
I don't know how the therefore comes in. I can never figure that out.

214
00:20:38.520 --> 00:20:43.520
At any rate, then said from 1975 to 1980, we live, all resources are running out.

215
00:20:43.520 --> 00:20:48.520
Oil is going to run out, energy is going to run out, forests are going to run out, therefore we should have socialism.

216
00:20:48.520 --> 00:20:52.520
The conclusion is always the same, you understand?

217
00:20:52.520 --> 00:20:56.520
There's never any connection, but at any rate,

218
00:20:56.520 --> 00:21:00.520
then you have to run around refuting that, and it turned out by 1980 they shut up after that because

219
00:21:00.520 --> 00:21:04.520
there's plenty of resources, I mean there is scarcity like there always has been, but there's

220
00:21:04.520 --> 00:21:08.520
plenty of resources, nothing ran out. We'll get into the oil paper, by the way,

221
00:21:08.520 --> 00:21:12.520
fairly shortly, we'll get into the alleged energy crisis

222
00:21:12.520 --> 00:21:16.520
and all the rest of it. It's an interesting example of this stuff in action.

223
00:21:16.520 --> 00:21:30.520
At any rate, we have an ever-present scarcity of resources and people therefore have to allocate their resources to their highest values and try to make sure that they don't waste them,

224
00:21:30.520 --> 00:21:37.520
in the sense that they make sure they don't spend their time or their energy or whatever, and stuff they'll regret, figure that they really shouldn't have spent on something else.

225
00:21:37.520 --> 00:21:46.520
So these resources, by the way, also include time. Time is a resource. It's scarce. As you all know.

226
00:21:46.520 --> 00:21:52.520
What are you going to do tonight? What are you going to do for a block of hours from, say, 8 to 11 or something?

227
00:21:52.520 --> 00:21:59.520
There's lots of choices. Every person has a concrete choice. You can go to a whole bunch of movies, possible, not all at once.

228
00:21:59.520 --> 00:22:06.520
You can see people. You can do homework. Each of you could probably get a list right now of seven or eight things you could do tonight.

229
00:22:06.520 --> 00:22:08.920
What are the things you could do tonight? How do you decide what you should do?

230
00:22:08.920 --> 00:22:13.120
Well, you decide on basically your own personal values, which you think is most important, or whatever,

231
00:22:13.120 --> 00:22:15.920
or which you think is more fun. Whatever it is, you decide, one way or the other.

232
00:22:15.920 --> 00:22:19.920
It doesn't have to be an excruciating decision. You don't have to spend 10 hours on it.

233
00:22:19.920 --> 00:22:24.520
You can do it like a snap judgment. Economists, again, don't care about how long it takes to make a decision.

234
00:22:24.520 --> 00:22:27.320
That's not our bag. That's the psychologist or whatever.

235
00:22:27.320 --> 00:22:32.120
What we're interested in is the fact everybody's got scarce resources, everybody's got goals they're trying to achieve,

236
00:22:32.120 --> 00:22:40.120
Scarce time, scarce money, scarce labor, scarce capital, whatever, and they're trying to allocate as best they can and have the best possible advantage.

237
00:22:41.120 --> 00:22:48.120
If you go to a, if you go to a, if you pick a movie, a certain movie, movie X, and you go to that, it turns out it was a bummer.

238
00:22:49.120 --> 00:22:55.120
Then you've wasted, you figure, damn it, I've wasted time and money, wasted the money going to it, you've wasted time, you could have gone to something else, you could have done something else.

239
00:22:56.120 --> 00:23:00.120
So, you're looking back, you figure, you took a loss, a psychic loss on it.

240
00:23:00.120 --> 00:23:04.120
The other half was a good movie, you figure it's a psychic game, you've benefited from this.

241
00:23:04.120 --> 00:23:06.120
It was good stuff.

242
00:23:06.120 --> 00:23:10.120
So everybody looks at it prospectively, tries to do the best they can.

243
00:23:10.120 --> 00:23:14.120
Looking back, you say, well, gee, I was good or I was a bad action or a good action.

244
00:23:14.120 --> 00:23:18.120
I was too cross-layered, I was a loser.

245
00:23:18.120 --> 00:23:22.120
And you figure out the next time you won't go to this director, a movie with this director in it,

246
00:23:22.120 --> 00:23:27.120
a movie with this particular actor in it, because often the same actor usually appears in the same kind of movies.

247
00:23:27.120 --> 00:23:34.120
So, you learn from experience, hopefully, and you do better next time, presumably do better next time.

248
00:23:34.120 --> 00:23:40.120
Okay, thanks enough for today. Miller, and you'll get the syllabus.

249
00:23:40.120 --> 00:23:43.120
And I hope we'll get a bigger room out of this thing.

250
00:23:43.120 --> 00:23:53.120
Talking about Crouson, also about life in general, and shifting back and forth between them,

251
00:23:53.120 --> 00:24:18.000
We have crystal energy, which is coal labor, we've got natural resources, coal land and

252
00:24:18.000 --> 00:24:23.100
everything else which are coal capital goods, everything else which transforms where labor

253
00:24:23.100 --> 00:24:27.100
Labor works on natural resources, transforms them, finally getting the consumer goods.

254
00:24:27.100 --> 00:24:35.100
So this is the capital goods of capital.

255
00:24:35.100 --> 00:24:41.100
This is the famous triad of labor, land and capital.

256
00:24:41.100 --> 00:24:46.100
As the economy develops and progresses, more and more capital is built up.

257
00:24:46.100 --> 00:24:49.100
At CUSO you have what we've got as a bow and arrow or something.

258
00:24:49.100 --> 00:25:06.100
We've got an enormous amount of capital equipment, factories, raw material, mines, roads, tires, everything else, designed to take natural resources, transform them, move them over vast spaces, and finally get to the consumers and sell them consumer goods.

259
00:25:06.100 --> 00:25:12.100
So that's how the whole economy is oriented.

260
00:25:12.100 --> 00:25:24.100
Another thing about human action in general, about Crusoe and about life in general, is that it takes time. Everything takes time. Some things take less time, others take more time.

261
00:25:26.100 --> 00:25:37.100
And everybody prefers having stuff now than waiting for it. So anybody has a choice, aside from price changes, human prices remain about the same.

262
00:25:37.100 --> 00:25:41.600
You get a million dollars. Somebody says, I'll either give you a million dollars now or ten years from now.

263
00:25:41.600 --> 00:25:44.100
What are you going to pick? Obviously, you'll pick now.

264
00:25:44.100 --> 00:25:52.100
So, this is called time preference. People prefer getting stuff, achieving their goals earlier than later.

265
00:25:52.100 --> 00:25:58.600
This conflicts, it has to be balanced against the fact that people prefer getting stuff now than later.

266
00:25:58.600 --> 00:26:03.600
But, the more they save and invest, the more stuff higher their standard of living will be in the future.

267
00:26:03.600 --> 00:26:11.600
They have to choose between eating, consuming now, or saving up now, consuming more later, those are the basics.

268
00:26:11.600 --> 00:26:13.600
We'll get to that more later on.

269
00:26:13.600 --> 00:26:17.600
Anyway, these are the things, take time, and also the time preference.

270
00:26:17.600 --> 00:26:19.600
Action takes time.

271
00:26:19.600 --> 00:26:21.600
And also, action is risky.

272
00:26:21.600 --> 00:26:23.600
There's uncertainty in the world.

273
00:26:23.600 --> 00:26:29.600
And the function of the entrepreneur is to meet that uncertainty, to bear the risk of uncertainty.

274
00:26:29.600 --> 00:26:35.440
uncertainty. So, Crusoe is an entrepreneur, except he hopes he can catch fish or he hopes

275
00:26:35.440 --> 00:26:40.440
he can build a cabin, things like that. Entrepreneurs, right now, people, everybody is an entrepreneur.

276
00:26:40.440 --> 00:26:44.680
If you become a mechanical engineer, you hope or expect that you'll be able to get a good

277
00:26:44.680 --> 00:26:49.440
job in it, stuff like that. On the other hand, more entrepreneurial are the capitalists who

278
00:26:49.440 --> 00:26:53.760
invest a lot of money in certain processes and hope they'll make money out of it. So,

279
00:26:53.760 --> 00:26:58.080
this is called entrepreneurship. There's no good English word for it. It's a French word.

280
00:26:58.080 --> 00:27:05.080
which has now been incorporated in English language. Adam Smith used the word undertaker, that didn't fly for obvious reasons.

281
00:27:05.080 --> 00:27:09.080
So, entrepreneur is it.

282
00:27:09.080 --> 00:27:18.080
Which essentially means a risk-taking capitalist, or a person who invests capital in some enterprise and hopes to make profits and not suffer losses.

283
00:27:18.080 --> 00:27:24.080
We'll get to that later on too. Right now we're sort of surveying the basic situation of the economy.

284
00:27:24.080 --> 00:27:32.080
To everybody, Crusoe and us have goals which we want to meet and which we prioritize, it's

285
00:27:32.080 --> 00:27:37.920
a terrible word anyway, we put in terms of priorities and we list them in ranked order.

286
00:27:37.920 --> 00:27:41.720
I mentioned just before the end of last hour that you have to choose what to do for three

287
00:27:41.720 --> 00:27:42.720
hours tonight.

288
00:27:42.720 --> 00:27:45.960
Let's say you can choose between four or five or eight different choices and you pick what's

289
00:27:45.960 --> 00:27:50.080
your best choice, your most valuable choice, what you think is going to be best.

290
00:27:50.080 --> 00:27:54.320
You go to movie A, you visit people, whatever.

291
00:27:54.320 --> 00:27:59.480
So everybody's got to rank preferences of choices.

292
00:27:59.480 --> 00:28:06.480
Say movie A, party, party A, movie B, whatever.

293
00:28:06.480 --> 00:28:12.000
Everybody's got different rankings and different choices, obviously, okay?

294
00:28:12.000 --> 00:28:18.320
So homework, right, usually low on the rank, most people.

295
00:28:18.320 --> 00:28:24.920
Some people, of course, are sports, it's called biology, and bike homework.

296
00:28:24.920 --> 00:28:28.880
Okay, so anyway, there's all these different visiting people or whatever.

297
00:28:28.880 --> 00:28:32.680
Okay, so this is something, you pick what's your highest value and you hope that's going

298
00:28:32.680 --> 00:28:36.160
to be correct.

299
00:28:36.160 --> 00:28:43.240
So this is called, I call it a value scale, but it now has been given the name in economics

300
00:28:43.240 --> 00:28:44.240
of utility.

301
00:28:44.240 --> 00:28:50.920
and it's a little unfortunate again because utility often means useful, objectively useful

302
00:28:50.920 --> 00:28:55.200
but in economics it means purely subjective valuation

303
00:28:55.200 --> 00:29:00.760
it could be useful or not, if people think it is, that's all we care about in economics

304
00:29:00.760 --> 00:29:06.160
in other words, a lot of left-wing intellectuals hate cosmetics

305
00:29:06.160 --> 00:29:09.040
they think it's an evil thing for a lot of women to use cosmetics

306
00:29:09.040 --> 00:29:12.800
well, most women don't agree with this, they like cosmetics

307
00:29:12.800 --> 00:29:16.120
and their value scale cosmetics rank pretty high, okay, so this is

308
00:29:16.120 --> 00:29:21.000
so this is purely subjective to the preferences and valuations of

309
00:29:21.000 --> 00:29:24.400
each individual and

310
00:29:24.400 --> 00:29:27.880
this is the utility scale which is a rank order

311
00:29:27.880 --> 00:29:31.800
and the thing about utility scales is that it's, they're ordinal

312
00:29:31.800 --> 00:29:35.400
they're ranking, unfortunately this is my first

313
00:29:35.400 --> 00:29:38.600
big disagreement with every textbook that I know of

314
00:29:38.600 --> 00:29:44.600
The textbooks will give lip service to this. They'll say, yes, it's ordinal. All of a sudden they start talking about utils.

315
00:29:44.600 --> 00:29:49.600
This margin is utils. This is three utils. That's two utils.

316
00:29:49.600 --> 00:29:57.600
Util being a unit of utility. And they add it up and they multiply it. There's no utils. There's no such thing as a util. Who's ever seen a util?

317
00:29:57.600 --> 00:30:05.600
Absurd. If you want to choose between going from movie A and movie B, you don't say to yourself, let's see, I value this at eight utils.

318
00:30:05.600 --> 00:30:10.600
So, forget it, forget Eugle, it's my first injunction.

319
00:30:10.600 --> 00:30:16.600
It's a purely ordinal ranking order, in mathematics often called lexicographic.

320
00:30:16.600 --> 00:30:22.600
In other words, it's like, instead of saying, we could say we rank it 1, 2, 3, 4,

321
00:30:22.600 --> 00:30:27.600
but it should be ranked as lexicographic, in other words, E, B, C, D.

322
00:30:27.600 --> 00:30:33.600
See, the use of a number sucks economists into thinking you can do something, we can add, subtract,

323
00:30:33.600 --> 00:30:37.600
If you use A and B and C, nobody would say C is twice B.

324
00:30:37.600 --> 00:30:44.600
So this is, anyway, this is, unfortunately, one of these sociological phenomenon here, which we're dealing with.

325
00:30:44.600 --> 00:30:49.680
So there's no such thing as U. It's strictly ordinal, it's strictly ranking and rank order.

326
00:30:49.680 --> 00:30:52.320
Okay, so this is,

327
00:30:52.320 --> 00:30:55.220
we'll now get to

328
00:30:55.220 --> 00:30:57.120
the first important law of economics.

329
00:30:57.120 --> 00:31:03.160
All of the laws of economics, I want to say one thing, they're qualitative and not quantitative. See, one of the problems with economists is,

330
00:31:03.160 --> 00:31:10.160
They take a qualitative science, which is really what this is, and try to convert it into being quantitative so they can predict precisely what's going to happen.

331
00:31:10.160 --> 00:31:15.160
They can't do that. Their predictions are always wrong. When they make quantitative predictions, they always flop.

332
00:31:15.160 --> 00:31:21.160
What they do is they keep flopping. They keep saying, well, we have to change the model. We missed out on x, y, z.

333
00:31:21.160 --> 00:31:25.160
They change it, and they still flop. This has been going on for 20 years.

334
00:31:25.160 --> 00:31:31.160
Some economists begin to realize, and also customers of economists, people who buy forecasts, like corporations,

335
00:31:31.160 --> 00:31:34.600
beginning to realize the whole thing is a scam

336
00:31:34.600 --> 00:31:37.400
and beginning to realize, you know, I'm putting something up here

337
00:31:37.400 --> 00:31:39.560
anyway, one of the reasons why they haven't

338
00:31:39.560 --> 00:31:41.960
the customers of economic forecasters

339
00:31:41.960 --> 00:31:43.280
haven't turned on them

340
00:31:43.280 --> 00:31:44.940
before this, this is again

341
00:31:44.940 --> 00:31:46.640
an important economic lesson here

342
00:31:46.640 --> 00:31:50.760
because of the tax write-off, if you consider the legitimate expense to hire an economist

343
00:31:50.760 --> 00:31:54.800
everybody hires an economist to tell you what the unemployment rate is going to be next year

344
00:31:54.800 --> 00:31:58.320
and if it allows the unemployment rate, so what, you've hired a top economist

345
00:31:58.320 --> 00:32:00.280
everybody else missed the forecast

346
00:32:00.280 --> 00:32:05.840
and your expenses can be written off as a legitimate tax write-off of one sort or another

347
00:32:05.840 --> 00:32:08.920
anyway, but they're catching on

348
00:32:08.920 --> 00:32:09.720
in any case

349
00:32:09.720 --> 00:32:12.720
so we have a qualitative discipline

350
00:32:12.720 --> 00:32:15.120
there are laws about tendency and direction

351
00:32:15.120 --> 00:32:17.160
not about quantitative

352
00:32:17.160 --> 00:32:19.720
there are only hunches about quantitative

353
00:32:19.720 --> 00:32:23.280
okay, so we have, let's get back to Crusoe, we have

354
00:32:23.280 --> 00:32:25.680
we have a

355
00:32:25.680 --> 00:32:27.160
we're going to take

356
00:32:27.160 --> 00:32:33.160
I'll make a couple of simplifying assumptions here. He's got a bunch of logs. He's chopped down a bunch of logs and he hasn't.

357
00:32:33.160 --> 00:32:35.680
And we're going to assume that

358
00:32:35.680 --> 00:32:37.400
one log or one

359
00:32:37.400 --> 00:32:39.560
set of logs is going to be used for each of

360
00:32:39.560 --> 00:32:41.600
three or four different uses.

361
00:32:41.600 --> 00:32:45.360
Which they can, we're just going to assume it's about the same amount.

362
00:32:45.360 --> 00:32:49.960
So you can take these logs and say, okay, what's my first priority?

363
00:32:49.960 --> 00:32:53.600
He's got an ordinal value scale, ordinal utility scale.

364
00:32:53.600 --> 00:32:59.880
The top priority is food for tonight, to make the logs for a fire, to cook tonight's meat.

365
00:32:59.880 --> 00:33:04.480
Do you have a question or a point?

366
00:33:04.480 --> 00:33:07.440
Fire for tonight.

367
00:33:07.440 --> 00:33:09.920
It needs to be a top priority. I think in the case of

368
00:33:09.920 --> 00:33:14.000
Crusoe, we can come to much more agreement about which movie to go to.

369
00:33:14.000 --> 00:33:16.160
Down to basics here.

370
00:33:16.160 --> 00:33:17.600
Down to survival.

371
00:33:17.600 --> 00:33:19.180
Okay, so fire for tonight,

372
00:33:19.180 --> 00:33:23.040
the first priority, the second priority might be

373
00:33:23.040 --> 00:33:26.480
Five for tomorrow, and I can keep it for tomorrow.

374
00:33:26.480 --> 00:33:29.480
Oh, why not?

375
00:33:34.200 --> 00:33:37.560
You've got a chair with you. If you bring your own chair, I can't cancel it.

376
00:33:37.560 --> 00:33:40.360
The number of people is more than the number of chairs.

377
00:33:40.360 --> 00:33:43.760
Okay, the third priority, let's say, is

378
00:33:43.760 --> 00:33:46.440
building a...

379
00:33:46.440 --> 00:33:48.560
Well, building a shelter...

380
00:33:48.560 --> 00:33:52.440
building a cabin. Building an extension of a cabin, whatever.

381
00:33:52.440 --> 00:33:55.920
Well, okay, building an extension, who knows?

382
00:33:55.920 --> 00:34:03.800
It's fourth priority might be setting a perimeter of logs around the little camps that wolves won't come in or whatever, so you have a

383
00:34:03.800 --> 00:34:06.200
perimeter.

384
00:34:06.200 --> 00:34:08.520
And fifth priority,

385
00:34:08.520 --> 00:34:13.080
building a boardwalk down to the beach, what the hell, obviously a real luxury item,

386
00:34:13.080 --> 00:34:17.440
the toes won't be full of sand. I don't know if you saw,

387
00:34:17.440 --> 00:34:21.600
it was a CUSA type picture called, a Swiss Family Robinson, a movie called, a Swiss Family Robinson,

388
00:34:21.600 --> 00:34:51.600
40 years ago, and they had this thing to start off with nothing, and yeah, after two years there, they've got a whole, they've got boardwalks, they've got a whole bunch of capital, yeah, right, boardwalks, okay, I'm not sure they've got VCRs yet, anyway, alright, so, now he has these logs, assume each one log or one set of logs can perform each of these different functions. Now the point is, if he has a supply, a supply by the way is

389
00:34:51.600 --> 00:35:08.600
These are defined as an amount of N units of a homogeneous good, meaning that each unit is the same as any other unit.

390
00:35:08.600 --> 00:35:16.600
So if you're dealing with the same log or the same horse or whatever thing, for more or less practical purposes they're interchangeable.

391
00:35:16.600 --> 00:35:20.600
So you're not dealing with two totally different types of wood or something like that.

392
00:35:20.600 --> 00:35:33.100
Supplies N units of a homogeneous good. If he's got one log after all he's got, or one unit, he will, now we know, he will use, he will satisfy the top priority and let the others go by the board.

393
00:35:33.100 --> 00:35:44.100
He will not satisfy priority three if he gets about one. In other words, he will pick his highest priority. If he has two logs, he'll pick his first two priorities, and so forth.

394
00:35:44.100 --> 00:35:50.600
Looking at it in another way, supposing he's got three logs and he loses one, a wave comes and washes it away or something like that,

395
00:35:50.600 --> 00:35:58.100
he will give up his lowest priority that he already could have satisfied, give up priority three, he won't forget about food tonight,

396
00:35:58.100 --> 00:36:04.100
because that's his top priority. He will rearrange the logs so as to knock out three and leave one and two.

397
00:36:04.100 --> 00:36:10.100
If on the other hand he's got five logs and he loses one, he'll give up the boardwalk, he's not going to give up the really tough stuff.

398
00:36:10.100 --> 00:36:14.100
So in other words, now what do we deduce from this?

399
00:36:14.100 --> 00:36:18.100
We deduce that the greater the supply of a good,

400
00:36:18.100 --> 00:36:22.100
the greater the number of units a person has,

401
00:36:30.100 --> 00:36:34.100
the lower the value of the ranking of each unit.

402
00:36:34.100 --> 00:36:51.380
So, the more units he's got, the value now is how much he's willing to give up. There

403
00:36:51.380 --> 00:36:56.460
was a ranking of how much he loses if he loses one unit. If he's got a supply of three units

404
00:36:56.460 --> 00:37:00.900
and loses one, the value of each unit is number three, or third, or C, whatever you want to

405
00:37:00.900 --> 00:37:13.900
You've got five units, the value of each unit is five, a lesser value, because if he loses one, he gives up less, so one unit is a much higher value, so the greater the supply, the lower the value of each unit.

406
00:37:13.900 --> 00:37:23.900
This is called, technically, the lower the marginal utility, because utility means value, marginal means each unit.

407
00:37:23.900 --> 00:37:27.900
It's a high-falutin jargon again, but it's basically just what it means.

408
00:37:27.900 --> 00:37:33.780
So, marginal means the next unit with one log, one pound of butter, whatever the unit happens

409
00:37:33.780 --> 00:37:34.780
to be.

410
00:37:34.780 --> 00:37:39.300
So, the greater the supply, there's a lower the value of each unit and lower the marginal

411
00:37:39.300 --> 00:37:40.300
utility.

412
00:37:40.300 --> 00:37:41.300
Vice versa.

413
00:37:41.300 --> 00:37:46.140
In almost every law and economics, you can just switch it around, okay, which is simply

414
00:37:46.140 --> 00:38:11.060
The logic of the situation, the lower the supply of a good, the greater the value of

415
00:38:11.060 --> 00:38:12.060
each unit.

416
00:38:12.060 --> 00:38:16.060
It's saying the same thing. It's the other side of the coin.

417
00:38:19.060 --> 00:38:26.060
This is economics. What economics really is, is just simple of spelling out the logic of action.

418
00:38:34.060 --> 00:38:40.060
So, this is called, there's a name for this, the law of diminishing marginal utility.

419
00:38:42.060 --> 00:38:44.060
Fancy name for it.

420
00:39:02.060 --> 00:39:11.060
Okay, so that means the greater, it's really saying the same thing, the greater the supply, the lower the value of each unit.

421
00:39:11.060 --> 00:39:15.180
and we can put this in a little diagram

422
00:39:15.180 --> 00:39:18.580
the diagram is supposed to be used for economics to make it clearer

423
00:39:18.580 --> 00:39:21.420
unfortunately most cases are used to make it

424
00:39:21.420 --> 00:39:25.700
more complicated. Anyway, if you put marginal utility or value of each unit

425
00:39:25.700 --> 00:39:27.460
on the y-axis

426
00:39:27.460 --> 00:39:29.860
and only economic diagrams in microeconomics

427
00:39:29.860 --> 00:39:33.260
the y-axis has either marginal utility or price or something like that

428
00:39:33.260 --> 00:39:35.180
the x-axis has quantity

429
00:39:35.180 --> 00:39:38.020
of whatever

430
00:39:38.020 --> 00:39:44.580
In this case, we have quantity of a good. This is zero for both.

431
00:39:44.580 --> 00:39:49.820
And what they're saying is, as you increase the quantity of units one, two, three, four, whatever,

432
00:39:49.820 --> 00:39:55.380
the marginal utility keeps dropping. And we don't know what the height is, because it's ordinal.

433
00:39:55.380 --> 00:39:58.260
We probably shouldn't connect the dots.

434
00:39:58.260 --> 00:40:04.600
But anyway, we know it's falling.

435
00:40:04.600 --> 00:40:09.400
So that means that if you just see, obviously, the greater the number of units, the lower the value of each unit.

436
00:40:09.400 --> 00:40:11.960
The lesser the number of units, the greater the value of each unit.

437
00:40:11.960 --> 00:40:13.880
So this is supposed to be a way of showing this.

438
00:40:13.880 --> 00:40:20.880
Pay no attention to the actual distances and things like that, because it's a point.

439
00:40:29.160 --> 00:40:31.600
Okay, so from this we...

440
00:40:31.600 --> 00:40:39.560
This is the basis of what's known as the Law of Demand, or the analysis of consumer demand on the market.

441
00:40:39.560 --> 00:40:43.960
How much will people pay for products?

442
00:40:43.960 --> 00:40:47.260
Obviously, if you have one chess set,

443
00:40:47.260 --> 00:40:51.240
you're not going to pay as much for a second one, presumably,

444
00:40:51.240 --> 00:40:54.160
given the kind of chess set.

445
00:40:54.160 --> 00:40:57.680
So,

446
00:40:57.680 --> 00:41:04.680
I'm going to go on to the next step.

447
00:41:12.640 --> 00:41:15.880
The next question is, how much, the law of demand, which is

448
00:41:15.880 --> 00:41:18.400
based on the law of machine marginality,

449
00:41:18.400 --> 00:41:21.800
tries to figure out what consumer behavior, how much people spend on different,

450
00:41:21.800 --> 00:41:24.080
how much people buy different goods,

451
00:41:24.080 --> 00:41:26.000
given their different prices.

452
00:41:26.000 --> 00:41:27.640
In other words,

453
00:41:27.640 --> 00:41:31.720
Let's take Wonderbread, one of my favorite consumer purchases.

454
00:41:31.720 --> 00:41:35.600
I like Wonderbread. I buy lots of Wonderbread. However,

455
00:41:35.600 --> 00:41:42.560
if the price of Wonderbread is suddenly magically... let's say some guy, Mr. Wonder company, whatever the name of the company is,

456
00:41:42.560 --> 00:41:46.400
Mr. Wonder sells out or whatever, some other guy comes, the other guy's a nut.

457
00:41:46.400 --> 00:41:48.200
And the other guy says,

458
00:41:48.200 --> 00:41:55.720
I think Wonderbread is so great, a consumer should have to pay a lot of money for it. It's really worth ten bucks a loaf.

459
00:41:55.720 --> 00:42:00.720
So, he issues an order to all the Wonder Bread people, from now on, you only sell a thing for ten bucks a loaf.

460
00:42:00.720 --> 00:42:02.720
Now, of course, about a buck a loaf.

461
00:42:02.720 --> 00:42:10.720
So what happens? Well, what happens is this, you have, now you have, the basic diagram, you have price on the y-axis, price of the good.

462
00:42:10.720 --> 00:42:18.720
What does price mean? Price actually means how much you're willing to pay, or what the different terms of the exchange are.

463
00:42:18.720 --> 00:42:29.120
In other words, this is, the Crusoe and Friday, they've got, let's say the Crusoe fishes

464
00:42:29.120 --> 00:42:35.320
and Friday hunts, and so Crusoe has a lot of fish, and they decide on one barrel of

465
00:42:35.320 --> 00:42:42.000
fish per two pounds of meat, or whatever it is, okay, and they decide that that's a pure

466
00:42:42.000 --> 00:42:44.120
bargaining situation.

467
00:42:44.120 --> 00:42:48.840
When they do that, the price is how much you get, how much you, in terms of exchange, the

468
00:42:48.840 --> 00:42:53.400
quantity of one exchange, one good in exchange, is compared to the other good.

469
00:42:53.400 --> 00:42:59.360
In other words, the fish price of meat is one barrel of fish per half-pound of meat

470
00:42:59.360 --> 00:43:00.360
situation.

471
00:43:00.360 --> 00:43:10.920
And, per pound of meat, no, not per half-pound, yeah, one barrel of meat, yeah, one pound

472
00:43:10.920 --> 00:43:17.920
Half a pound of meat, two pounds of meat for one barrel of fish, it's half a pound of meat for a barrel.

473
00:43:17.920 --> 00:43:20.920
So you can, in this case, the price is one fish in terms of meat.

474
00:43:20.920 --> 00:43:24.920
When we have money and we have, in macro we deal with how money, how you get the money,

475
00:43:24.920 --> 00:43:31.920
but things get very simplified and everything in terms of money price, whatever the money is, ounces of gold or dollars or whatever.

476
00:43:31.920 --> 00:43:36.920
So the exchanges between the money and the specific good.

477
00:43:36.920 --> 00:44:06.920
So here you have a situation, let's say with Wonder Bread, it's a price, if it's on $10 a loaf, very few people will buy it, let's say this is $1 a loaf, and you have this many people, this axis you have quantity again, quantity purchased, so I don't know how many loaves of Wonder Bread are sold in the United States or New York at any given time, let's say 100,000 loaves, just as good as any other, 100,000 loaves say in New York in a week,

478
00:44:06.920 --> 00:44:17.920
So the quantity is $100,000, the price is $1 a loaf. So if Mr. Wonder suddenly insists on $10 a loaf, very few people will buy it.

479
00:44:17.920 --> 00:44:28.920
The only people who will buy it are very wealthy Wonderbread freaks. If David Rockefeller loves Wonderbread, which is probably dubious, he might shell out a lot of money.

480
00:44:28.920 --> 00:44:47.920
So the very few of the rest of us will join in, so the quantity suddenly plummets, so let's say this much will be purchased, and so he will go bankrupt pretty early and he will lose his, he keeps on with us, he will lose his fortune, whatever it is, pretty quickly.

481
00:44:47.920 --> 00:44:49.200
uh...

482
00:44:49.200 --> 00:44:53.720
on the other hand supposing he succeeded by another nut, an opposite kind of nut

483
00:44:53.720 --> 00:44:56.000
who says

484
00:44:56.000 --> 00:44:59.160
well, I think that the Wonder Bread is so great that

485
00:44:59.160 --> 00:45:03.800
people, every person in the world has been able to afford Wonder Bread

486
00:45:03.800 --> 00:45:05.720
I'm going to sell it for a nickel a loaf

487
00:45:05.720 --> 00:45:10.840
of course he loses a lot of money per loaf, but he's also crazy, so anyway

488
00:45:10.840 --> 00:45:15.800
and the Nickel Loaf, lots of people buy it, hear about a Nickel Loaf, hey, Wonder Bread's Nickel Loaf, you stop buying Pepperidge Farms or

489
00:45:15.800 --> 00:45:30.800
or tasty whatever, you rush to buy one, what the hell, you might not like it till, oh, there are nickel loads that's worth it, you get a huge, two million loads or so, it says that much so, produced, you get something like this, alright?

490
00:45:30.800 --> 00:45:41.800
Now, this is the great law of demand, and the law of demand, which is related to the fact of, related to two things.

491
00:45:41.800 --> 00:45:52.800
One is diminishing marginal utility to keep increasing the supply, and two is the fact that some people are poorer than others and can't afford to spend a lot of money on one specific item.

492
00:45:52.800 --> 00:45:59.800
So, at any rate, you wind up with a law of demand which is very simple, but very important, probably the most important single law in microeconomics.

493
00:45:59.800 --> 00:46:07.800
Namely, the lower the price, the more will be purchased, the more the consumers will purchase.

494
00:46:07.800 --> 00:46:14.800
Lower the price for any item.

495
00:46:14.800 --> 00:46:16.800
We don't know how much more, that's what we don't know.

496
00:46:16.800 --> 00:46:18.800
We know it will be more, that's an absolute law.

497
00:46:18.800 --> 00:46:24.800
How much? That depends on the specific item, depends on the people.

498
00:46:24.800 --> 00:46:31.800
It's sort of like applied punches. But we do know, absolutely, the lower the price, the more will be purchased.

499
00:46:37.800 --> 00:46:40.800
And this is called a falling demand curve.

500
00:46:42.800 --> 00:46:49.800
We also know, again, conversely, again, there's always the other side of the coin, the higher the price, the less will be purchased.

501
00:46:49.800 --> 00:46:51.800
Again, saying the same thing.

502
00:46:54.800 --> 00:47:14.960
That's the law of demand. Again, as I say, it's saying the same thing. We're following

503
00:47:14.960 --> 00:47:22.880
the man curve, and we don't know the shape. As a matter of fact, there are fashions in

504
00:47:22.880 --> 00:47:25.880
and Economics, like everything else.

505
00:47:25.880 --> 00:47:30.880
And originally, before, say, I guess the Mankers came in about 1920 or something like that.

506
00:47:30.880 --> 00:47:32.880
Why is that called falling to the right?

507
00:47:32.880 --> 00:47:35.880
It's falling to the right. That's wrong.

508
00:47:35.880 --> 00:47:40.880
As you look at it from left to right, most of us do, we read from left to right,

509
00:47:40.880 --> 00:47:41.880
it's falling.

510
00:47:41.880 --> 00:47:45.880
Isn't it the length of the right side?

511
00:47:45.880 --> 00:47:47.880
No, it's not rising.

512
00:47:47.880 --> 00:47:59.880
Now, that, they have hit it. You've now hit the key problem in microeconomics, which I tell students all the time, the key problem, every year, and half of you usually get it wrong on exams.

513
00:47:59.880 --> 00:48:07.880
Namely, the key difference between quantity demanded and the demand curve. The demand curve is the whole curve.

514
00:48:07.880 --> 00:48:13.880
The demand curve is a locus of, given the price, how much will be purchased?

515
00:48:43.880 --> 00:49:13.880
Wonder Bread, basically, how much income they've got, and what they think of Wonder Bread, and competing products, what's going on competing products, with Pepperidge Farm Bread, or Tasty Bread, or Rolls, or whatever, all these things are competing with Wonder Bread, so this determines the demand curve in accordance with the subject of value scales, utility scales of the people, once given this, this gives you the whole demand curve, and I'll get into this a little bit later, because the point is, you must never confuse the quantity

516
00:49:13.880 --> 00:49:25.880
The quantity demanded at each point, which is, let's say this is, in other words, at 50 cents a loaf, 200,000 loaves will be demanded of that, okay?

517
00:49:25.880 --> 00:49:29.880
That's the quantity demanded at each point.

518
00:49:29.880 --> 00:49:44.880
I'm going to confuse that with the entire demand curve, which is the locus of all quantity demand at every point, at every price, I should say at each price at all.

519
00:49:44.880 --> 00:49:48.880
Quantity demand at any given price, alright?

520
00:49:48.880 --> 00:49:54.880
You never confuse the quantity demand at any given price with the demand curve of the whole.

521
00:49:54.880 --> 00:49:59.880
Now, the point is that a man-curve as a whole cannot change if price changes. That's the key.

522
00:49:59.880 --> 00:50:04.880
The reason it can't change, in other words, a falling price will not increase at a man-curve, ever.

523
00:50:04.880 --> 00:50:11.880
It can't, because the man-curve is defined as a response to prices, price changes, alright?

524
00:50:11.880 --> 00:50:15.880
The one thing which cannot increase the demand curve is a falling price.

525
00:50:15.880 --> 00:50:23.880
The one thing which can't lower the demand curve is a rising price, because the whole shape of the man-curve has already been incorporated in the definition of the man-curve, the whole shape of this thing.

526
00:50:23.880 --> 00:50:30.880
All the responses to price. So the one thing which can't change the price of the curve as a whole is changes in price.

527
00:50:30.880 --> 00:50:35.880
I'll explain this more in greater detail as we go along. We'll still get it wrong in the test.

528
00:50:35.880 --> 00:50:40.880
Anyway, this is like a law of students over the years.

529
00:50:40.880 --> 00:50:44.880
Every economics professor has the same reaction to it, but I'll tell you anyway.

530
00:50:44.880 --> 00:50:47.880
It's once in a while that they get it right.

531
00:50:47.880 --> 00:50:57.880
Alright, so this is, uh, in 18, from 1920 or so when the man curve starts, until about 1940-45,

532
00:50:57.880 --> 00:51:02.380
there was always the same shape in the textbooks. The shape was the man curve.

533
00:51:02.380 --> 00:51:07.380
Remember, we don't know the shape. All we know is that it's falling. Right from the y-axis, one of the x-axis.

534
00:51:07.380 --> 00:51:12.880
The shape was this. The shape was known in mathematics as the rectangular hyperbola.

535
00:51:12.880 --> 00:51:16.880
In other words, the area under the curve is the same at every point.

536
00:51:18.880 --> 00:51:20.880
This means that...

537
00:51:29.880 --> 00:51:35.880
Let's say the curve is based on a schedule, on tables, price, quantity, purchase.

538
00:51:35.880 --> 00:51:41.880
If the price is $10 a loaf, let's say they sell a thousand loaves,

539
00:51:41.880 --> 00:51:51.880
The total revenue taken in by the retail stores is price times quantity.

540
00:51:51.880 --> 00:51:58.880
Obviously, if you're selling, you charge 10 bucks a load, you can sell 1,000 loads, you're taking in 10,000 dollars.

541
00:51:58.880 --> 00:52:04.880
That's total revenue equal price times quantity. Key point.

542
00:52:04.880 --> 00:52:16.880
If the price goes down to $5, let's say they sell 20,000 copies, and the total revenue goes up to $100,000, and so forth.

543
00:52:16.880 --> 00:52:22.880
But the way the textbooks used to draw the curves is that the area always remained the same.

544
00:52:22.880 --> 00:52:26.880
In other words, the total was always $10,000 or whatever, $100,000 or whatever.

545
00:52:26.880 --> 00:52:33.880
It was adjusted in such a way that the area was always the same. That's the definition of rectangular hyperbola.

546
00:52:33.880 --> 00:52:39.560
Finally, by 1943, George Stiegler, later one of Nobel Prize, his young professor wrote

547
00:52:39.560 --> 00:52:43.680
a textbook called The Theory of Price, he said, there's no evidence for this, why do

548
00:52:43.680 --> 00:52:44.680
they draw the curve that way?

549
00:52:44.680 --> 00:52:45.680
What is this nonsense?

550
00:52:45.680 --> 00:52:49.440
And so he started drawing it as a straight line, which at least doesn't commit you to

551
00:52:49.440 --> 00:52:51.400
thinking that the areas are the same, okay?

552
00:52:51.400 --> 00:52:56.800
There's no evidence for a straight line either, and so sometimes, I think McCloskey's latest

553
00:52:56.800 --> 00:53:03.800
book on applied price theory, sort of a maverick type, he draws the lines as wavy, yeah, kind

554
00:53:03.800 --> 00:53:08.600
It could be wavy, it's easier to make it, I still prefer the straight lines, provided

555
00:53:08.600 --> 00:53:12.560
that you're holding your head at all times, it's purely convenience, doesn't mean a damn

556
00:53:12.560 --> 00:53:16.960
thing. Unfortunately, most economists don't hold that in their head. By the time they

557
00:53:16.960 --> 00:53:20.240
get to Chapter 8 or something, they're thinking it's deeply significant, they start talking

558
00:53:20.240 --> 00:53:26.320
about tangencies, as we'll see as we go along, and go to all sorts of crazy conclusions based

559
00:53:26.320 --> 00:53:29.920
on tangencies that don't exist because there ain't no straight lines. At any rate, straight

560
00:53:29.920 --> 00:53:33.280
lines are at least easier to cope with, at least doesn't assume you have a theory of

561
00:53:33.280 --> 00:53:39.280
No reason for the area to remain the same. No reason why consumers always spend the same amount of money, regardless of price.

562
00:53:39.280 --> 00:53:46.280
So, we'll get back to that too, what happens is the total spending becomes a key thing, a property of the man curve.

563
00:53:46.280 --> 00:53:49.280
The only really important property of the man curve.

564
00:53:49.280 --> 00:53:52.280
Anyway, we now have the man curve with straight lines.

565
00:53:52.280 --> 00:53:55.280
And the next thing is dealing with supply.

566
00:53:55.280 --> 00:54:00.280
Alright, we now have the man curve, which we know is falling, although we don't know exactly how much.

567
00:54:00.280 --> 00:54:04.280
And we have supply. What's supply? Supply, despite the textbooks.

568
00:54:04.280 --> 00:54:08.280
You see in this thing, when I disagree with the textbook, I'm always right.

569
00:54:08.280 --> 00:54:12.280
Axiom of the courts. Supply is vertical.

570
00:54:12.280 --> 00:54:15.280
In other words, supply of everything is how much there's around right now.

571
00:54:15.280 --> 00:54:19.280
How many loads of wonder better around at the stores today? Say 100,000.

572
00:54:19.280 --> 00:54:23.280
So you have, in other words, at any given time, supply as a fixed amount.

573
00:54:23.280 --> 00:54:27.280
It changes over time. Sure, they'll produce more next week or something, or less.

574
00:54:27.280 --> 00:54:31.280
The point is, at any given time, and the demand curve, after all, is a freeze-frame situation.

575
00:54:31.280 --> 00:54:36.280
How much, at any given time, how much will be purchased at any given price by consumers?

576
00:54:36.280 --> 00:54:42.280
Similarly, the supply curve should be a fixed freeze-frame. At any given day, how much is out there?

577
00:54:42.280 --> 00:54:47.280
So the supply curve is vertical.

578
00:54:47.280 --> 00:54:54.280
Right now, by the way, by knowing about the falling demand curve, you right now know more economics than most of the people in the country.

579
00:54:54.280 --> 00:55:02.280
They already, after one week, less than a week, they're already very savvy, you know, more than the jerks who run the subway system, for example.

580
00:55:02.280 --> 00:55:13.280
I'll tell you that right now. The way most people run utilities, particularly, subways, railroads, whatever, they assume that the man curve is vertical.

581
00:55:13.280 --> 00:55:19.280
The implicit is that they don't think about the man curve, but they implicitly assume the man curve is vertical.

582
00:55:19.280 --> 00:55:29.280
And it means that people will essentially kick in to buy the same amount of stuff regardless of what the price is.

583
00:55:29.280 --> 00:55:33.280
There's no fooling the maker. There's no problem with the maker going that way.

584
00:55:33.280 --> 00:55:39.280
So, for example, every year or so they keep raising a subway fare.

585
00:55:39.280 --> 00:55:42.280
And because they've got a deficit. Of course they have a deficit. The government always has a deficit.

586
00:55:42.280 --> 00:55:45.280
It's almost by definition. The government's always screwed up.

587
00:55:45.280 --> 00:56:05.280
Anyway, we've got a deficit. How do we cure a deficit? We raise the fare. Why not? If you're suffering from a certain deficit, you figure out, you can balance the budget, if you take in whatever, if you raise the price by 20% and you keep the same number of fares, then you'll balance the budget.

588
00:56:05.280 --> 00:56:20.280
by God, next year they find out there's a falling off of rides, of fares, so deficit never gets cured, and there's always startle of this, how come we didn't, why did the number of fares go down?

589
00:56:20.280 --> 00:56:29.280
Why aren't people riding the subway as much as they used to? Gee, I don't know, maybe it's because it's crummy, but it's always crummy, that's not the answer, it's just the fare went up, okay?

590
00:56:29.280 --> 00:56:34.280
and it takes, it's a long time before it sinks into these jerks, it still really hasn't.

591
00:56:34.280 --> 00:56:38.280
My prediction is that some fine day in the future is not going to be too long from now.

592
00:56:38.280 --> 00:56:47.280
See, what happened was, on the fair caper, is that they built, they first built the subways around 1900, 1904.

593
00:56:47.280 --> 00:56:54.280
The fair was done in nickel. Well, nickel was a lot then, alright, so prices were low and for nickel you could buy a good lunch or something.

594
00:56:54.280 --> 00:57:05.280
The Fair of Maine and Nickel was regulated by the government, naturally the New York City government, they kept the fair, they froze the Fair of Nickel from then on until about 1950.

595
00:57:05.280 --> 00:57:14.280
For 50 years the fair was frozen to nickels, actually the firms began to lose a lot of money, it was inflation, costs are going up, you can only charge a nickel, and so the subways began to go bankrupt.

596
00:57:14.280 --> 00:57:23.280
At that point, the city government made a deal with the owners of the subway, the stockholders of the IRP and BNP, which were privately owned.

597
00:57:23.280 --> 00:57:28.280
The 8th Avenue subway came in later, in the 1930s, as a government subway.

598
00:57:28.280 --> 00:57:32.280
So they made a deal, they bought the subway from the stockholders at a very high subsidy.

599
00:57:32.280 --> 00:57:36.280
In other words, subways were crazy bank crops, they really weren't worth much.

600
00:57:36.280 --> 00:57:40.280
So they made a deal with the stockholders, they were, I don't know, 50% bonus.

601
00:57:40.280 --> 00:57:46.280
The stockholders loved it. They have to realize about businessmen. They don't mind being nationalized or stateized if they make money out of it.

602
00:57:46.280 --> 00:57:53.280
So these guys were coining it. Not only that, they got paid off in government and New York City transit bonds.

603
00:57:53.280 --> 00:58:05.280
And then they created this transit authority situation, a real racket if there ever was one, and the transit authority, they get the bondholders keep getting money off the top.

604
00:58:05.280 --> 00:58:10.280
In other words, before they pay off anybody else on the subway system, they pay the bondholders.

605
00:58:10.280 --> 00:58:13.280
The bondholders are usually the former stockholders.

606
00:58:13.280 --> 00:58:16.280
Their bonds get refinanced every few years at a higher interest rate.

607
00:58:16.280 --> 00:58:18.280
Because in the old days, the interest rate was much lower.

608
00:58:18.280 --> 00:58:24.280
So they originally got bonds at 3%, which was a handsome subsidy then, and now getting 10% or something.

609
00:58:24.280 --> 00:58:26.280
And they're living off us, basically.

610
00:58:26.280 --> 00:58:29.280
I mean, the bondholders.

611
00:58:29.280 --> 00:58:41.280
At any rate, so some flying day in the future, it's not going to be too long from now, they're going to raise the fare again, sometimes, to five bucks, whatever it is, right?

612
00:58:41.280 --> 00:58:47.280
And they're going to find out, not only the number of rides are going, but the total revenue is going down. That's what they're going to find out.

613
00:58:47.280 --> 00:58:54.280
They're going to get up here somewhere, and find out they're taking in less money than they did before. What are they going to do then? Who knows? Cut their throat, perhaps.

614
00:58:54.280 --> 00:59:00.720
because they haven't even got the mindset of lowering the fare to try to get a lot of people

615
00:59:00.720 --> 00:59:03.280
they might even privatize it, that would help

616
00:59:03.280 --> 00:59:04.840
but that's uh...

617
00:59:04.840 --> 00:59:08.940
that's the objective and you heard it here first five years from now you're

618
00:59:08.940 --> 00:59:13.240
looking at the newspaper and the fare goes up to five bucks and they find out they lose money on it

619
00:59:13.240 --> 00:59:16.320
you know you heard it here first

620
00:59:16.320 --> 00:59:18.020
okay so this is the uh...

621
00:59:18.020 --> 00:59:20.120
this is the general mindset

622
00:59:20.120 --> 00:59:21.500
of uh...

623
00:59:21.500 --> 00:59:28.500
of most people, authorities and government, in a fair-setting business.

624
00:59:31.780 --> 00:59:34.340
We have a law of demand,

625
00:59:34.340 --> 00:59:39.740
and

626
00:59:39.740 --> 00:59:42.780
there's a property of,

627
00:59:42.780 --> 00:59:46.820
as you can see, it makes a big difference to businessmen, what happens to total revenue.

628
00:59:46.820 --> 00:59:49.780
Because we know now, it's not necessarily,

629
00:59:49.780 --> 00:59:51.780
It's not going to be the same, it can change.

630
00:59:51.780 --> 00:59:56.780
What happens to total revenue becomes a key thing, because this is what I'm trying to make profits and avoid losses.

631
00:59:56.780 --> 01:00:02.780
Total revenue, price times quantity is total revenue.

632
01:00:02.780 --> 01:00:08.780
And total revenue minus total cost, which we'll get to later on in the course, will give you the profit or loss.

633
01:00:08.780 --> 01:00:18.780
In other words, if this is positive, if total revenue is $100,000, that means you take in $100,000 and you pay out $80,000, then your profit is $20,000.

634
01:00:18.780 --> 01:00:29.780
Plus, if on the other hand your total revenue is $100,000 and you've paid out $120,000 then you're in bad shape and you have a loss of $20,000.

635
01:00:29.780 --> 01:00:32.780
So you have to do something fairly rapidly to get out of this.

636
01:00:32.780 --> 01:00:36.780
So businessmen are extremely interested in total revenue.

637
01:00:36.780 --> 01:00:40.780
Let's say we're now concentrating on, we'll get later in the term, the cost question.

638
01:00:40.780 --> 01:00:56.780
And so, it becomes very important to them, what happens if the price changes, if it's raised, whatever the price, whatever the thing is, whatever the good is, you raise the price from here to here, what happens to total revenue?

639
01:00:56.780 --> 01:01:09.940
We now come to the most important property of the demand curve, which is the reaction

640
01:01:09.940 --> 01:01:13.580
on the demand curve as you change the price, what happens to total revenue?

641
01:01:13.580 --> 01:01:19.460
In other words, how does quantity react compared to their price?

642
01:01:19.460 --> 01:01:20.460
This is the end of this hour.

643
01:01:20.460 --> 01:01:24.020
I think what I'm going to do is I'm going to do, we didn't have more chairs than number

644
01:01:24.020 --> 01:01:35.020
more people, more people in chairs, it's just about even, as a sort of a modified protest, I'm going to cancel a second hour and hope that next Thursday we'll have a decent room.

645
01:01:35.020 --> 01:01:41.020
The Tuesday room isn't so bad, the Thursday room, although I'm trying to change that too. The Thursday room is abominable.

646
01:01:41.020 --> 01:01:49.020
Okay, so I'm going to cancel an hour or two, and you've got the syllabus, and you've got the readings, etc. That's it.