WEBVTT

NOTE Labor and Unions

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.440
If you know anything at all, no employer is going to hire another worker to produce less

2
00:00:05.440 --> 00:00:07.480
of a product than they had before.

3
00:00:07.480 --> 00:00:10.200
You're paying out money, you're getting less return.

4
00:00:10.200 --> 00:00:11.680
Obviously idiotic.

5
00:00:11.680 --> 00:00:18.800
Also, nobody's going to be hired on the line here, because on the line, the marginal product

6
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:19.800
is zero.

7
00:00:19.800 --> 00:00:23.640
You're hiring a worker for a certain amount of money, you've got no more, zero increase

8
00:00:23.640 --> 00:00:24.640
in product.

9
00:00:24.640 --> 00:00:25.640
You're not going to do that either.

10
00:00:25.640 --> 00:00:32.640
So Zone 3 is for both, in other words the whole, because what happens in Zone 3 is there are too many workers per fixed capital.

11
00:00:32.640 --> 00:00:39.640
There are so many workers per land and per capital equipment that are producing a lower product all the time, or even no more product.

12
00:00:39.640 --> 00:00:44.640
So nobody is going to operate in Zone 3. No factor will be employed in Zone 3.

13
00:00:44.640 --> 00:00:51.640
That's pretty self-evident. The problem with Zone 1, Zone 1 is a little trickier. I went through that old thing, but the point with Zone 1 is,

14
00:00:51.640 --> 00:00:57.480
In the area of Zone 1, the fixed factors are too excessive compared to the number of workers.

15
00:00:57.480 --> 00:01:01.960
You have so few workers per land and capital that the workers have to rush around trying

16
00:01:01.960 --> 00:01:06.320
to use all of them, you wind up with a lower average product.

17
00:01:06.320 --> 00:01:07.480
The marginal product is negative.

18
00:01:07.480 --> 00:01:11.800
The marginal product for fixed factors is negative in Zone 1.

19
00:01:11.800 --> 00:01:16.000
And on the line, the marginal product is zero for fixed factors.

20
00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:24.000
To show that, if you have two workers trying to grow wheat in 10,000 acres, you get more

21
00:01:24.000 --> 00:01:25.720
wheat if you cut out half the acreage.

22
00:01:25.720 --> 00:01:29.600
If you simply cut them out, the workers are going to find themselves a smaller amount

23
00:01:29.600 --> 00:01:32.320
of land and be much better at it.

24
00:01:32.320 --> 00:01:36.640
So in other words, here you have an excessive amount of a variable factor, so the marginal

25
00:01:36.640 --> 00:01:41.200
product of the variable factor labor in this case is negative, and here the marginal product

26
00:01:41.200 --> 00:01:45.000
of the fixed factor is negative, and therefore nobody employed, no factor will be employed

27
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:50.440
So you wind up with a conclusion that all factors of production, land, labor and capital, will

28
00:01:50.440 --> 00:01:53.840
always be employed in Zone 2 for any product whatsoever.

29
00:01:53.840 --> 00:02:00.320
In other words, in the area of diminishing returns, where average physical product is

30
00:02:00.320 --> 00:02:08.120
declining, marginal physical product is declining a little less, or greater than zero.

31
00:02:08.120 --> 00:02:16.280
This doesn't need empirical testing either, those who want to do it can do it, but it's

32
00:02:16.280 --> 00:02:19.880
not necessary, it's part of the logic of reality.

33
00:02:19.880 --> 00:02:26.080
So the next step is to demonstrate what the demand curve is, this is what we're trying

34
00:02:26.080 --> 00:02:27.080
to get at here.

35
00:02:27.080 --> 00:02:30.720
The employer, of course, is interested not so much in physical production, he's interested

36
00:02:30.720 --> 00:02:34.080
in selling it and getting an income, so we have to bring in the price system.

37
00:02:34.080 --> 00:02:39.440
By the way, in general, in economics, as you go through, go on, continue in life, you'll

38
00:02:39.440 --> 00:02:43.480
read economics willy-nilly from time to time on the financial pages or whatever.

39
00:02:43.480 --> 00:02:46.880
Remember, any model of the economy doesn't mention the price system as crackpot.

40
00:02:46.880 --> 00:02:48.920
Prices have got to show up somewhere.

41
00:02:48.920 --> 00:02:53.800
If they don't show up, for example, much of macroeconomics, prices drop out.

42
00:02:53.800 --> 00:02:54.800
Don't talk about prices.

43
00:02:54.800 --> 00:02:59.080
Be very suspicious if any economic model or theory doesn't mention prices.

44
00:02:59.080 --> 00:03:01.880
Prices are the key to the whole system.

45
00:03:01.880 --> 00:03:06.840
So similarly here, what happens is the employer is interested in total revenue and total course,

46
00:03:06.840 --> 00:03:08.320
of course, maximizing profit.

47
00:03:08.320 --> 00:03:13.560
In the case of revenue, he's interested in factors of production which will bring him

48
00:03:13.560 --> 00:03:14.520
greater revenue.

49
00:03:14.520 --> 00:03:26.160
So the total revenue, of course, as we know, is the price of the product times the quantity

50
00:03:26.160 --> 00:03:27.160
produced.

51
00:03:27.160 --> 00:03:34.160
So if you sell Wonder Bay for a buck a loaf, you sell a thousand loads of Wonder Bay, you're getting a thousand bucks.

52
00:03:34.160 --> 00:03:36.160
That's how money in the price system comes into the picture.

53
00:03:36.160 --> 00:03:44.160
And so now we're looking at what is the marginal revenue productivity of each factory production, of each worker, of each piece of land, etc.

54
00:03:44.160 --> 00:03:47.160
How much money is brought in by the product?

55
00:03:47.160 --> 00:03:54.160
So what you do is you multiply, in the case of marginal, so here you have marginal physical product,

56
00:03:54.160 --> 00:04:05.160
is delta Q over delta alpha, and a marginal revenue, which is how much each loaf of bread,

57
00:04:05.160 --> 00:04:12.160
Wonder Bread brings into the firm and money, in terms, is equal to delta TR divided by

58
00:04:12.160 --> 00:04:19.160
delta Q. In other words, you sell one more loaf of Wonder Bread or one more Hi-Fi set,

59
00:04:19.160 --> 00:04:23.160
and you get certain total revenue coming in. You sell it for, you know, whatever it is,

60
00:04:23.160 --> 00:04:36.160
If you multiply these two things, MPT times MR, delta Q drops out, and you get delta TR divided by delta alpha.

61
00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:45.160
In other words, how much money is brought in, how much income or revenue is brought in by one more worker, one more piece of land, one more machine.

62
00:04:45.160 --> 00:04:48.160
So this is the marginal revenue product.

63
00:04:48.160 --> 00:04:52.160
This is the marginal physical product times the marginal revenue.

64
00:04:52.160 --> 00:05:19.160
On averages, average physical product, Q divided by alpha, there's a number of bushes a week per worker, let's say, times, then you have average revenue, which is TR divided by Q, which by the way is the same thing as the man curve, that's what price is, this is the price curve of the man curve.

65
00:05:19.160 --> 00:05:26.640
Remember, this is an old friend of the Mann Curve, this is the average revenue curve.

66
00:05:26.640 --> 00:05:31.680
Price, this is quantity, and remember, price times quantity is total revenue, so this is

67
00:05:31.680 --> 00:05:34.480
the price curve of the Mann Curve.

68
00:05:34.480 --> 00:05:40.320
Marginal revenue curve is also falling below it.

69
00:05:40.320 --> 00:05:44.880
So this, when you multiply average physical product on average revenue, at least the quantity

70
00:05:44.880 --> 00:05:52.320
drops that, and you're left with TR per alpha, in other words total revenue per worker, let's

71
00:05:52.320 --> 00:05:56.480
say, which is the same thing as average revenue, revenue product.

72
00:05:56.480 --> 00:06:03.120
In other words, revenue product, how much total income is brought in by each worker

73
00:06:03.120 --> 00:06:07.120
or each machinery, comes into the picture by multiplying the physical product times

74
00:06:07.120 --> 00:06:12.080
the price, or times the marginal revenue, that's how the money system is brought into

75
00:06:12.080 --> 00:06:14.440
the picture.

76
00:06:14.440 --> 00:06:20.060
My final contention was on Tuesday that this is, that the demand curve by the employer for

77
00:06:20.060 --> 00:06:23.960
every factor of production will be the marginal revenue product curve.

78
00:06:23.960 --> 00:06:32.960
This is the, oh wow, we're looking at a demand curve for workers or machines or land, this

79
00:06:32.960 --> 00:06:40.400
is say price or wage rate in the case of workers, this is the quantity hired, alpha or quantity

80
00:06:40.400 --> 00:06:50.400
What I'm contending is that the man curve of the firm or the industry or whatever for workers is the same thing as the marginal revenue product curve.

81
00:06:50.400 --> 00:07:01.400
Because the employer, when the employer is trying to hire a worker, let's say you're comparing the cost of the benefit, comparing the revenue brought in by the worker with the cost of paying out.

82
00:07:01.400 --> 00:07:09.400
Remember, you're trying to act at each point where you're making a profit and maximizing your profit.

83
00:07:09.400 --> 00:07:17.000
Well, if the wage rate, let's say, is $5 an hour, this is the market wage rate, which

84
00:07:17.000 --> 00:07:25.760
for a certain type of labor employer has to pay, if you're, this is, let's say, 100 workers,

85
00:07:25.760 --> 00:07:30.080
and wage rate is $5, that's how much you're paying out, and if the worker brings in a

86
00:07:30.080 --> 00:07:33.880
marginal worker, in other words, a marginal, one more worker will bring in at the margin

87
00:07:33.880 --> 00:07:46.880
7 bucks an hour. That's the productivity. Then, he's making an extra profit of $2 per hour on each additional worker.

88
00:07:46.880 --> 00:07:55.880
If you keep hiring workers, as long as you make a profit, as long as the revenue product is greater than the wage rate,

89
00:07:55.880 --> 00:07:59.880
as long as the money you're taking in is greater than the money you're shelling out,

90
00:07:59.880 --> 00:08:04.880
You keep hiring more workers so long as this is positive, it's tapping the surplus of the state.

91
00:08:04.880 --> 00:08:10.880
But each time you hire more workers, the marginal revenue product curve is falling,

92
00:08:10.880 --> 00:08:14.880
you get less and less of a profit, and you finally wind up with equality.

93
00:08:14.880 --> 00:08:18.880
Actually, you really stop over here. It's one of my arguments in micro theory.

94
00:08:18.880 --> 00:08:21.880
You really stop, say, over here. For our purposes, you don't have to go into that.

95
00:08:21.880 --> 00:08:26.880
What you do is you keep going until you maximize your profits.

96
00:08:26.880 --> 00:08:32.880
And so you get to the point where you just expect a teeny bit more from a worker than you're paying out.

97
00:08:32.880 --> 00:08:38.880
And after that, you stop before you make losses. If you're, let's say, 200.

98
00:08:38.880 --> 00:08:45.880
If you're hiring 300 workers and you're in a situation where MRP is falling all the time, you have diminishing returns,

99
00:08:45.880 --> 00:08:50.880
then you have a situation where you're paying out $5 and you're only getting $3 in revenue.

100
00:08:50.880 --> 00:08:53.880
You're losing $2 per worker, for each additional worker.

101
00:08:53.880 --> 00:08:59.040
In other words, you fire them, you get back to the situation, you avoid your losses, again

102
00:08:59.040 --> 00:09:00.040
you get back to here.

103
00:09:00.040 --> 00:09:05.560
Once again, you have a built-in feedback mechanism, so to speak, which keeps the number employed

104
00:09:05.560 --> 00:09:10.000
or the number hired or the number bought, whatever it happens to be, equal to the marginal

105
00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:13.160
revenue product of a factor.

106
00:09:13.160 --> 00:09:17.160
So in other words, if the rate rate is up here, you hire this many, you hire this many,

107
00:09:17.160 --> 00:09:18.960
you hire that many, etc., etc.

108
00:09:18.960 --> 00:09:22.680
And we've already seen the definition of a demand curve, the definition of any demand

109
00:09:22.680 --> 00:09:27.280
demand curve and given the price, this will show you how much will be purchased or hired

110
00:09:27.280 --> 00:09:28.280
in this case.

111
00:09:28.280 --> 00:09:32.520
Given the price and the lower the price the more will be purchased or hired, etc., etc.

112
00:09:32.520 --> 00:09:36.800
We've already seen when we talk about minimum wage law that demand curve for labor is falling.

113
00:09:36.800 --> 00:09:41.000
Now we're showing why it's falling, exactly how it's falling and what determines it is

114
00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:46.480
the marginal revenue product curve, which is also falling because you have a falling

115
00:09:46.480 --> 00:09:52.160
A falling marginal physical product curve, falling in the relevant zone two, and a falling

116
00:09:52.160 --> 00:09:54.800
marginal, because the marginal revenue curve is always falling, because the demand curve

117
00:09:54.800 --> 00:09:58.280
is always falling, you multiply these two, you get a falling marginal revenue product.

118
00:09:58.280 --> 00:10:03.480
Multiply two falling curves, you have to line up with a third falling curve, okay, as a

119
00:10:03.480 --> 00:10:04.480
product.

120
00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:09.480
So, this is the demand curve for the factors of production.

121
00:10:09.480 --> 00:10:14.400
It's the marginal revenue product curve for labor, different kinds of labor for capital

122
00:10:14.400 --> 00:10:25.800
In short, it's called the Marginal Productivity Theory.

123
00:10:25.800 --> 00:10:29.440
Marginal Revenue Productivity Theory is the correct word, but you could just say Marginal

124
00:10:29.440 --> 00:10:31.600
Productivity Theory for short.

125
00:10:31.600 --> 00:10:35.120
And some people have challenged this thing, somehow it's evil or whatever, this is simply

126
00:10:35.120 --> 00:10:36.120
the fact.

127
00:10:36.120 --> 00:10:42.480
In other words, any price of factors, including wage rates, will equal the marginal revenue

128
00:10:42.480 --> 00:10:48.920
Mark Curve. This determines the demand curve for labor or land or capital. Then of course

129
00:10:48.920 --> 00:10:59.920
you have the supply curve. So you have the demand curve for labor or any factor, which

130
00:10:59.920 --> 00:11:03.120
is marginal revenue or product, or you have the supply curve which is whatever, you wind

131
00:11:03.120 --> 00:11:08.440
it up with a market equilibrium wage rate or rent of land or price of capital goods

132
00:11:08.440 --> 00:11:09.440
or whatever.

133
00:11:09.440 --> 00:11:17.080
This is the summation of what we had to do that because I'm throwing too much at you.

134
00:11:17.080 --> 00:11:21.080
And what we'll now do is investigate the labor market in particular, which is the most important

135
00:11:21.080 --> 00:11:22.080
of the factor markets.

136
00:11:22.080 --> 00:11:25.560
Obviously, of course, we're interested in the people, we're interested in what happens

137
00:11:25.560 --> 00:11:29.960
to wage rates, why they're what they are, and what determines them.

138
00:11:29.960 --> 00:11:40.560
In the case of labor, you do not really get a vertical supply curve.

139
00:11:40.560 --> 00:11:44.680
Land will have a vertical supply curve or any given capital equipment.

140
00:11:44.680 --> 00:11:48.360
In the case of labor, however, nobody's going to work 40 hours a week or whatever for a

141
00:11:48.360 --> 00:11:49.360
penny an hour.

142
00:11:49.360 --> 00:11:50.360
You want to stay home.

143
00:11:50.360 --> 00:11:53.640
In other words, leisure is always an alternative.

144
00:11:53.640 --> 00:11:55.240
So it's something like that.

145
00:11:55.240 --> 00:12:00.320
In other words, you'll at least get something like this, with a sharp falling off of the

146
00:12:00.320 --> 00:12:04.720
supply of labor curve as you get into a low wage rate area.

147
00:12:04.720 --> 00:12:07.240
And the greater the unemployment insurance or the welfare payment, the higher this is

148
00:12:07.240 --> 00:12:13.760
going to be, the bigger the floor you've got on how much wage rate people will accept.

149
00:12:13.760 --> 00:12:19.000
So also another thing, and it gets more complicated by the fact that some people are not on the

150
00:12:19.000 --> 00:12:20.000
labor force.

151
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:23.800
I think I've already mentioned this when I dealt with unemployment, the minimum wage

152
00:12:23.800 --> 00:12:24.800
law.

153
00:12:24.800 --> 00:12:30.800
The whole population, the labor force is defined as those who are employed or seeking employment.

154
00:12:30.800 --> 00:12:35.800
So it's sort of a variable thing because some people are retired, other people are babies,

155
00:12:35.800 --> 00:12:39.800
so there's a lot of play in the system. For example, the last 20 years or so, or 10 years,

156
00:12:39.800 --> 00:12:45.800
a lot of housewives, of course, have entered the labor force. So you have people who are,

157
00:12:45.800 --> 00:12:50.800
the population might have stayed the same or gone up a little bit, but the labor force has gone way up for that reason,

158
00:12:50.800 --> 00:12:58.700
for that particular reason. So there's a tendency, even in the short run, to have a forward sloping

159
00:12:58.700 --> 00:13:04.180
supply curve for labor because if you raise wage rates enough, people will stop being

160
00:13:04.180 --> 00:13:11.180
half-lives and join the labor force. In other words, there's an incentive. It's a little

161
00:13:11.180 --> 00:13:16.220
bit dependent on babysitter prices, or whatever you want to call it, daycare prices or something.

162
00:13:16.220 --> 00:13:21.020
To raise wage rates there for women considerably above the babysitting price or daycare price,

163
00:13:21.020 --> 00:13:23.460
you'd have more women entering a labor force.

164
00:13:23.460 --> 00:13:27.580
Wage rates go down, less of them will enter, so generally there'll be a forward sloping

165
00:13:27.580 --> 00:13:36.360
supply curve for labor even in the immediate short run, even day to day.

166
00:13:36.360 --> 00:13:46.680
So we can have a little bit more like this.

167
00:13:46.680 --> 00:13:50.760
Now this general supply curve will change for each industry, for each firm.

168
00:13:50.760 --> 00:13:54.640
In other words, this is true for labor for any other factor.

169
00:13:54.640 --> 00:13:58.800
If you remember, if you multiply the alternatives open for you, then you have a more elastic

170
00:13:58.800 --> 00:14:01.200
you get that becomes the curve.

171
00:14:01.200 --> 00:14:05.480
Consumers of demand curve for, remember for Wonder Bread, as much flatter than the Man

172
00:14:05.480 --> 00:14:13.480
Banker for Bread as a Whole. Similarly, the supply curve of labor, say, to one industry would be much flatter, more elastic than the supply curve of labor in general.

173
00:14:13.480 --> 00:14:19.480
In other words, as I said, of plumbers, there's a big increase in the amount of plumbing, let's say, and the wage rates of plumbing go up.

174
00:14:19.480 --> 00:14:26.480
You'll have people going in, you'll have a more flatter supply curve of plumbing, a supply curve of labor to an industry.

175
00:14:26.480 --> 00:14:31.480
It's flatter. If you raise the wage rates, more people will be brought into plumbing or computer engineering or whatever.

176
00:14:31.480 --> 00:14:37.480
The lower up people get out of it. This is a more longer run thing, of course, and with that, you get a longer run perspective.

177
00:14:37.480 --> 00:14:40.480
The estimated supply curve of each firm will be very quite flat.

178
00:14:40.480 --> 00:14:47.480
So if Ford increases wage rates compared to General Motors, people tend to leave General Motors and go into Ford or vice versa.

179
00:14:47.480 --> 00:14:56.480
So the supply curve of labor to a firm will be flatter than the supply curve of labor to an industry or labor in general.

180
00:14:56.480 --> 00:15:02.120
So labor is partially mobile, and it's not completely mobile, but it is mobile to a large

181
00:15:02.120 --> 00:15:03.120
extent.

182
00:15:03.120 --> 00:15:06.320
In many cases, of course, people leave, it's not that you leave an industry at the age

183
00:15:06.320 --> 00:15:07.320
of 50.

184
00:15:07.320 --> 00:15:10.880
I mean, farmers, there's been an overall shift over the last two centuries from the

185
00:15:10.880 --> 00:15:11.880
farm to the city.

186
00:15:11.880 --> 00:15:14.400
It's not that every farmer drops a pitchfork and leaves.

187
00:15:14.400 --> 00:15:19.000
It's that the sons of the farmers growing up leave the farm and go to the city.

188
00:15:19.000 --> 00:15:23.920
So the most mobile labor force, of course, are teenagers or people just entering labor

189
00:15:23.920 --> 00:15:24.920
force.

190
00:15:24.920 --> 00:15:29.400
Much more mobile people have been in the business for 20 years, so generally the mobility takes

191
00:15:29.400 --> 00:15:30.400
place among young people.

192
00:15:30.400 --> 00:15:34.920
They're the ones that are freer to move to California and all the rest of it.

193
00:15:34.920 --> 00:15:37.720
So you don't need everybody to be mobile for this thing to work.

194
00:15:37.720 --> 00:15:40.680
All you need is some people, and that's exactly what they do.

195
00:15:40.680 --> 00:15:45.240
They leave for opportunities, they leave Michigan and go to California and go to Texas and stuff

196
00:15:45.240 --> 00:15:46.240
like that.

197
00:15:46.240 --> 00:15:48.640
In England, there's much lower mobility.

198
00:15:48.640 --> 00:15:52.480
People tend to, if they're born in structure, they live in structure until they die, they

199
00:15:52.480 --> 00:15:55.300
never see beyond twenty miles of that

200
00:15:55.300 --> 00:15:58.540
so uh... there are different cultures which have different

201
00:15:58.540 --> 00:16:01.200
rates of mobility, so to speak

202
00:16:09.200 --> 00:16:13.660
historically over time what tends to happen is that

203
00:16:13.660 --> 00:16:16.580
capital equipment per worker goes up, in other words

204
00:16:16.580 --> 00:16:18.500
you have

205
00:16:18.500 --> 00:16:21.600
you start with Crusoe, if you remember way back in the first

206
00:16:21.600 --> 00:16:25.760
Our, we talk about Crusoe, Star of Crusoe, you have one stick, that's his capital equipment,

207
00:16:25.760 --> 00:16:30.240
one net, or a bow and arrow or something.

208
00:16:30.240 --> 00:16:33.880
Now we've got, over the centuries, we've accumulated lots of capital equipment.

209
00:16:33.880 --> 00:16:37.240
And as we do that, it increases the productivity of the labor force.

210
00:16:37.240 --> 00:16:43.160
In other words, if this is the marginal productivity of labor, it keeps increasing over the years

211
00:16:43.160 --> 00:16:47.640
because there's more capital equipment and better technology of capital per worker.

212
00:16:47.640 --> 00:16:48.640
That's really the key.

213
00:16:48.640 --> 00:16:53.280
In other words, you have a labor force, of course, goes up, but you have an even greater

214
00:16:53.280 --> 00:16:56.240
increase in capital equipment and productive capital equipment, et cetera, et cetera.

215
00:16:56.240 --> 00:17:01.240
So as a result of that, you have a fall in the price of machinery, fall in the price

216
00:17:01.240 --> 00:17:05.200
of capital equipment, and a fall in the price, of course, of consumer goods, and an increase

217
00:17:05.200 --> 00:17:06.200
in wage rates.

218
00:17:06.200 --> 00:17:12.280
In other words, the man for labor, as the productivity of labor increases over time,

219
00:17:12.280 --> 00:17:18.000
and this is man for labor, we're not talking about, quiet please, we're not talking about

220
00:17:18.000 --> 00:17:25.200
Wage Rates. Over time, the history of capitalist development is a history of increase of capital

221
00:17:25.200 --> 00:17:31.760
equipment and high technology, which constantly increases the demand curve for labor and thereby

222
00:17:31.760 --> 00:17:36.120
increasing the wage rate. So this is a supply of labor, you have something like that. But

223
00:17:36.120 --> 00:17:40.160
over time you have a continual increase in what's known as real wage rates, wage rates

224
00:17:40.160 --> 00:17:45.760
per purchasing power, not just in money terms, which could be inflationary, but in real terms

225
00:17:45.760 --> 00:17:53.760
The reason why the standard of living goes up over the century, especially since the Industrial Revolution, the mid-18th century,

226
00:17:53.760 --> 00:17:59.760
is the continuing increase of capital investment, capital equipment, and technology embodied in capital equipment.

227
00:17:59.760 --> 00:18:04.760
Technology by itself wasn't doing anything. The Romans probably had a lot of high-tech development.

228
00:18:04.760 --> 00:18:13.760
They didn't apply it much to real life. Just inventions isn't enough. You have to apply them in industry, in capital investment.

229
00:18:13.760 --> 00:18:15.760
and body of them, so to speak, in capital investment.

230
00:18:15.760 --> 00:18:21.760
So what you have over time, tendency is to have higher wage rates with more jobs.

231
00:18:21.760 --> 00:18:27.760
In other words, there's room for more people as you keep increasing the man curve for labor.

232
00:18:27.760 --> 00:18:31.760
So the way you have increased employment at higher wage rates.

233
00:18:31.760 --> 00:18:35.760
This is a labor market.

234
00:18:35.760 --> 00:18:45.760
So what this mostly rests on is increased capital development, capital accumulation, and higher technology embodied in capital accumulation.

235
00:18:45.760 --> 00:18:51.760
For this you need savings, you need investment, and the rest of it, you need a capitalist function to do this.

236
00:18:51.760 --> 00:19:03.760
And so over time then you have more jobs and higher wage rates. This is the history of the 19th and 20th centuries, fortunately.

237
00:19:03.760 --> 00:19:09.520
Okay, so the route, this is one route to higher wage rates.

238
00:19:09.520 --> 00:19:14.000
The other route, possible route to higher wage rates, is the route taken by restrictionism,

239
00:19:14.000 --> 00:19:19.640
by cartels, at this time cartels of labor, called labor unions, namely, what you try

240
00:19:19.640 --> 00:19:26.600
to do, given the demand for labor, instead of increasing, instead of promoting the idea

241
00:19:26.600 --> 00:19:30.760
of increased capital investment, higher wage rates through jobs, what you try to do is

242
00:19:30.760 --> 00:19:37.360
restrict the supply of labor, push it to the left in some way, thereby increasing the wage

243
00:19:37.360 --> 00:19:39.360
rate at the expense of those who are displaced.

244
00:19:39.360 --> 00:19:44.320
In other words, you take the labor force, you restrict it in one way or the other, you'll

245
00:19:44.320 --> 00:19:48.720
see various ways in which it's done, and thereby decreasing wage rates for some people and

246
00:19:48.720 --> 00:19:50.520
increasing wage rates for others at their expense.

247
00:19:50.520 --> 00:19:55.440
This is a restrictionist solution, so to speak.

248
00:19:55.440 --> 00:19:59.080
In this method, the method of capital investment, you're increasing the number of jobs and increasing

249
00:19:59.080 --> 00:20:03.640
In this method, you decrease the number of jobs and increase wage rates.

250
00:20:03.640 --> 00:20:06.600
So what you're doing is you're excluding a bunch of people, either immigrants through

251
00:20:06.600 --> 00:20:12.040
immigration restrictions, or through unions, non-union people who are pushed into other

252
00:20:12.040 --> 00:20:15.880
lower wage occupations.

253
00:20:15.880 --> 00:20:20.880
So this is the, in the labor market, this is the way it's done, you can't, unions don't

254
00:20:20.880 --> 00:20:25.320
have any, unions can't determine wage rates, they can't say, okay, we decide to have 50%

255
00:20:25.320 --> 00:20:26.320
wage increase.

256
00:20:26.320 --> 00:20:29.320
If they can do that, they can do it unlimitedly, you know, just like with minimum wage law.

257
00:20:29.320 --> 00:20:32.320
The union can come and say, we want quadruple the wage rate for everybody.

258
00:20:32.320 --> 00:20:35.320
Okay, we'll do it. Can't do that because the firms are going out of business.

259
00:20:35.320 --> 00:20:39.320
So what a way it's done is by trying to control the labor force,

260
00:20:39.320 --> 00:20:42.320
restricting it and pushing wage rates up at the expense of other workers.

261
00:20:42.320 --> 00:20:46.320
So what you have in real life, in contrast to the Marxist myth that

262
00:20:46.320 --> 00:20:49.320
you have a group of capitalists on the one hand with common class interests,

263
00:20:49.320 --> 00:20:53.320
a group of workers on the other hand with common class interests, and two are at war, just the opposite.

264
00:20:53.320 --> 00:21:01.320
Capitalists are competing among themselves for goods and services and all that, and workers compete among themselves for jobs and wages, etc.

265
00:21:01.320 --> 00:21:15.320
So unions are very much like a cartel of workers, with a similar aim of cutting the supply and raising the wage rate.

266
00:21:15.320 --> 00:21:18.320
We'll see how that can be done next time.

267
00:21:18.320 --> 00:21:29.840
What unions try to do is control the labor market for their particular labor as they

268
00:21:29.840 --> 00:21:35.520
can keep out entry in one way or the other and they can then raise the wage rate.

269
00:21:35.520 --> 00:21:40.400
The economic power of the union, and I will define economic power as the ability not to

270
00:21:40.400 --> 00:21:46.000
just make noise but the ability to raise wage rates above the non-union level.

271
00:21:46.000 --> 00:21:52.280
is very different from publicity, the powerful unions are usually the ones that are small,

272
00:21:52.280 --> 00:22:00.800
highly skilled craftsmen, people who have a very small craft and where you need a long

273
00:22:00.800 --> 00:22:09.400
years of apprenticeship to be good at it, which is a small part of a labor force. In

274
00:22:09.400 --> 00:22:16.200
In other words, it depends again, the power of the union depends a lot on the elasticity

275
00:22:16.200 --> 00:22:17.480
of the man curve for labor.

276
00:22:17.480 --> 00:22:24.600
In other words, if, let's take, let's take the automobile workers union, where it's probably

277
00:22:24.600 --> 00:22:29.440
pretty elastic, let's take ditch diggers, they're very elastic, almost anybody with

278
00:22:29.440 --> 00:22:33.200
a good pair of arms and shoulders can be a ditch digger, it does not take ten years of

279
00:22:33.200 --> 00:22:35.400
degrees and stuff like that, okay?

280
00:22:35.400 --> 00:22:41.400
So, you have an elasticity of demand for it, so if you, this is a demand for ditch diggers,

281
00:22:41.400 --> 00:22:45.400
and you have a ditch digger's union, which pushes the wage rate, we demand 50% wage increase,

282
00:22:45.400 --> 00:22:50.400
and you get something like, you know, the quantity of labor higher falls off drastically,

283
00:22:50.400 --> 00:22:54.400
we have huge unemployment, this breaks the union, in other words, the union's not going to last very long,

284
00:22:54.400 --> 00:22:59.400
you demand a certain wage rate increase, and even if you get it, you have 80% unemployment in the industry,

285
00:22:59.400 --> 00:23:03.400
the unemployed ditch diggers go undercut the union at the end of it.

286
00:23:03.400 --> 00:23:09.400
So, in other words, any successful union raising wage rate will cause unemployment.

287
00:23:09.400 --> 00:23:12.400
The point is that they cause a lot of that, they'll destroy the union.

288
00:23:12.400 --> 00:23:16.400
That's why there's no Ditchdigger's Union, otherwise no successful Ditchdigger's Union.

289
00:23:16.400 --> 00:23:23.400
So what you have, these successful unions will tend to be those which have an inelastic demand curve for that particular labor.

290
00:23:23.400 --> 00:23:30.400
So that if you raise the wage rate, let's say this is the supply curve labor, if you push the supply curve to the left,

291
00:23:30.400 --> 00:23:36.900
When you raise the wage rate, you'll cause some unemployment, but not too much, maybe 5% or 10% or whatever.

292
00:23:36.900 --> 00:23:39.900
And the best you're going to hope for is there'll be no visible unemployment.

293
00:23:39.900 --> 00:23:43.900
All you do is eliminate jobs for teenagers coming in, so you won't see unemployment.

294
00:23:43.900 --> 00:23:47.900
There just won't be any jobs available that would have been available without the union increase.

295
00:23:47.900 --> 00:23:52.900
So to do that, you have to have an inelastic demand curve for labor. You have to have certain conditions.

296
00:23:52.900 --> 00:23:57.900
One of them is when you have to control the labor force just to get there in the first place.

297
00:23:57.900 --> 00:24:04.900
The second one is, it should be a small percentage of the total cost of the business, a small percentage of the payroll, so to speak.

298
00:24:04.900 --> 00:24:08.900
To give you an idea, it's a beautiful example from the history of Pauley here.

299
00:24:08.900 --> 00:24:14.900
We used to have two mighty unions here, two massive unions, so to speak.

300
00:24:14.900 --> 00:24:24.900
The faculty union, called the American Association of University Professors, which represented the entire faculty of 280 whoever it was.

301
00:24:24.900 --> 00:24:54.900
and the staff union, which still exists, I think it's part of district 65 of a wholesale retail cart union, something like that, they represent the staff, secretaries, et cetera, so there's a mass union, so to speak, within Polly, 200 members, 150 members, whatever, they have never succeeded in increasing wage rates at all, as a matter of fact, we barely, we usually fall behind, of course, the living increase, we had a faculty union for many years, they used to spend a lot of time on bargaining, as is typical, they used to have hundreds and hundreds of man hours of hysteria,

302
00:24:54.900 --> 00:25:02.900
and so forth, and they wind up three years after the fact. In other words, in 1980, we'd be still bargaining for 1977 wage increases.

303
00:25:02.900 --> 00:25:08.900
And we'd finally get 7%, which would usually be the cost of living, the inflation rate.

304
00:25:08.900 --> 00:25:15.900
So after the union was dissolved, the union was kicked out by the administration, we still got the 7%, actually we got less than that.

305
00:25:15.900 --> 00:25:19.900
We still got the cost of living increase without any bargaining time lost.

306
00:25:19.900 --> 00:25:26.900
In other words, the whole thing was more or less a net loss of general conflict, energy and the rest of it.

307
00:25:26.900 --> 00:25:32.900
On the other hand, the only successful union in this place, a teeny union which nobody ever heard of, the boiler tenders local.

308
00:25:32.900 --> 00:25:35.900
I think there were three boiler tenders, one boiler.

309
00:25:35.900 --> 00:25:41.900
Two or three boiler tenders as long as the boiler tenders local, whatever it is, the boiler tenders union.

310
00:25:41.900 --> 00:25:43.900
So one time they had a little strike, kind of funny.

311
00:25:43.900 --> 00:25:47.900
They had one picket way off from the corner and around the corner so nobody could see them.

312
00:25:47.900 --> 00:25:53.020
I said, on strike, very decorous little strike, we're not on strike, local 38 or whatever,

313
00:25:53.020 --> 00:25:54.020
the boiler tenders union.

314
00:25:54.020 --> 00:25:58.420
So in those days we had a mighty and powerful faculty and staff union, we went, allegedly

315
00:25:58.420 --> 00:26:02.260
powerful, we went to them, we said, would you like solidarity, he wants to pick it with

316
00:26:02.260 --> 00:26:07.180
you and he wants to help propagandize, leaflet, go away, leave us alone, we don't have nothing

317
00:26:07.180 --> 00:26:09.120
to do with you people.

318
00:26:09.120 --> 00:26:13.740
And so after about three weeks of a very decorous strike, the boiler tenders strike was settled,

319
00:26:13.740 --> 00:26:16.140
they got a 50% wage increase.

320
00:26:16.140 --> 00:26:17.140
Why?

321
00:26:17.140 --> 00:26:21.140
Why? Because there are only two or three guys. They probably can afford to give a 50% increase to three people.

322
00:26:21.140 --> 00:26:24.140
They can't afford to give 50% to 200 people. That's the difference.

323
00:26:24.140 --> 00:26:29.140
In other words, if you have a teeny union in the interstices of the labor force, so to speak,

324
00:26:29.140 --> 00:26:34.140
and I don't know how skilled it is. There's only some skill involved in boiler tending.

325
00:26:34.140 --> 00:26:38.140
And you have a small labor force that's sort of in the pocket of the situation,

326
00:26:38.140 --> 00:26:41.140
and an employer can afford to give you a big increase.

327
00:26:41.140 --> 00:26:47.140
These are the successful unions during the days of the free labor market, even now.

328
00:26:47.140 --> 00:26:54.140
In other words, the sort of unions which made it, which were able to raise the wage rate for their employees,

329
00:26:54.140 --> 00:26:59.140
were unions that are small, skilled craft, but they can restrict the labor force.

330
00:26:59.140 --> 00:27:02.140
For example, stonemasons. There are very few stonemasons left.

331
00:27:02.140 --> 00:27:05.140
It's a magnificent, lovable craft, and unfortunately sort of dying out.

332
00:27:05.140 --> 00:27:10.140
The only stonemasons are elderly Italians who were trained in Italy, I think.

333
00:27:10.140 --> 00:27:15.140
They're getting, you know, they're getting fairly old by this time, so they're only about five stonemasons, whatever, in the United States.

334
00:27:15.140 --> 00:27:19.140
They have a strong union, because what the hell, I mean, how many stonemasons are hired?

335
00:27:19.140 --> 00:27:21.140
You can afford to have a big increase.

336
00:27:21.140 --> 00:27:29.140
So at any rate, so what you have then, in the free labor market, before 1935, in other words, from 1880s to 1935,

337
00:27:29.140 --> 00:27:34.140
they had more or less a free labor market. There was no government intervention in the union, in the labor market.

338
00:27:34.140 --> 00:27:38.820
In this period of a free labor market, the only unions which were successful

339
00:27:38.820 --> 00:27:43.780
were those with skilled, so-called craft unions, skilled, small unions

340
00:27:43.780 --> 00:27:47.300
which can restrict their labor force, which are a small percentage of the payroll,

341
00:27:47.300 --> 00:27:50.340
glassblowers, cigar-banned workers,

342
00:27:50.340 --> 00:27:56.860
stonemasons, particularly in the building trades, construction, which is still true by the way,

343
00:27:56.860 --> 00:27:58.640
joiners, plumbers,

344
00:27:58.640 --> 00:28:00.740
carpenters.

345
00:28:00.740 --> 00:28:04.620
The thing about the billing trades is that in a sense they're local, they're monopolistic

346
00:28:04.620 --> 00:28:05.620
within each locality.

347
00:28:05.620 --> 00:28:09.980
In other words, if you're, let's say, in the garment business or the printing business

348
00:28:09.980 --> 00:28:14.780
and your unionized, your costs go up or your prices go up, business can shift to North

349
00:28:14.780 --> 00:28:16.260
Carolina, which it does happen.

350
00:28:16.260 --> 00:28:21.700
Say you have a garment factory in New York, it's unionized, the costs are high, and the

351
00:28:21.700 --> 00:28:25.060
buyers simply go to, you know, somebody sets up a clothing factory in North Carolina, which

352
00:28:25.060 --> 00:28:29.300
is non-union, they undercut the current New York plan, the whole New York plan goes bankrupt,

353
00:28:29.300 --> 00:28:34.580
of the Union goes bust. But in construction, you can't do it that way. In other words,

354
00:28:34.580 --> 00:28:37.660
Chicago construction or Houston construction doesn't really compete with New York construction.

355
00:28:37.660 --> 00:28:43.020
You're not going to leave New York to become a construction person, a real estate person

356
00:28:43.020 --> 00:28:47.980
in Chicago. So it's more or less geographically monopolistic, so to speak, construction. Therefore,

357
00:28:47.980 --> 00:28:52.140
unions have been able to take root in the building trades or construction more than

358
00:28:52.140 --> 00:28:57.100
any other industry, more than any occupation. You have a whole bunch of construction, as

359
00:28:57.100 --> 00:29:07.100
The same unions, craft unions, carpenters, machinists, electricians, joiners, a whole bunch of the masons, et cetera, et cetera, all heavily, the restriction is monopolistic.

360
00:29:07.100 --> 00:29:17.100
These firms, these unions control their labor force with a mighty will. They increase their wage rate to the expense of other non-members. How do they do it? They cut the supply.

361
00:29:17.100 --> 00:29:24.100
In other words, you can't be, at least until recently, I don't know if there's a whole affirmative action sort of stuff, but before, let's say a few years ago at least,

362
00:29:24.100 --> 00:29:34.100
You cannot join the carpenter's union, electrician's union, plumber's union, say in New York or in Jersey City or whatever, unless you're the son or nephew of an existing union member, period.

363
00:29:34.100 --> 00:29:42.100
And all non-sons and non-nephews are excluded. In other words, you have very sharp restrictions. As a result, you can increase your wage rate.

364
00:29:42.100 --> 00:29:45.100
If you have an inelastic demand curve, it's even better, you can increase your wage rate.

365
00:29:45.100 --> 00:29:50.100
At the expense of those who would like to become carpenters, joiners and electricians, they can become supermarket clerks instead.

366
00:29:50.100 --> 00:29:55.580
or they're driven in, they're pushed into non-union or non-powerful union occupations.

367
00:29:55.580 --> 00:29:58.100
So if you want to be an electrician, let's say, in Hoboken, you can't do it.

368
00:29:58.100 --> 00:30:00.100
You're not a son or a nephew of a union member, you can't do it.

369
00:30:00.100 --> 00:30:01.100
You just can't be an electrician.

370
00:30:01.100 --> 00:30:05.620
You have to either move to Texas or California or become a supermarket clerk or a gas station

371
00:30:05.620 --> 00:30:06.740
attendant.

372
00:30:06.740 --> 00:30:11.700
So what happens is, in other words, is these unions have been accused of being racist.

373
00:30:11.700 --> 00:30:14.820
Well, in a sense, they're racist, but also they hate all, not only other races, but they

374
00:30:14.820 --> 00:30:17.540
discriminate not only against other races, but against non-relatives, that's what they

375
00:30:17.540 --> 00:30:21.540
Non-sons and non-nephews.

376
00:30:21.540 --> 00:30:25.540
In recent years, women have entered the construction trade, so it's a little bit of loosening up on this,

377
00:30:25.540 --> 00:30:31.540
but it's still, I think, basically true that these craft unions are highly restrictive.

378
00:30:31.540 --> 00:30:39.540
So what happens is that this is a union membership, this is a craft union occupation.

379
00:30:39.540 --> 00:30:46.540
You cut the supply drastically to the left by restricting the supply of, say, electricians only relatives.

380
00:30:46.540 --> 00:30:55.540
Then you increase your wage rate. These people, however, are excluded. These people would have been electricians, like to be electricians, are pushed into other non-union industries.

381
00:30:55.540 --> 00:31:05.540
So they become, let's say, supermarket clerks or something like that, which increases the supply of labor in the supermarket clerks or in gas station attendants.

382
00:31:05.540 --> 00:31:15.540
So the wage rate goes down. In other words, what these unions are doing, they're increasing the wage rates of their members at the expense of lower wage rates for other people, for competing workers, so to speak.

383
00:31:15.540 --> 00:31:28.540
There's no overall increase in wage rates over the entire labor force, but unions, if they can do it at all, they can accomplish the raising of wage rates for their members at the expense of other occupations who suffer lower wage rates.

384
00:31:28.540 --> 00:31:42.540
So what you have is competition within the labor force. Not so much employers will get hurt by union restrictions as other workers, or not relatives, or not fortunate enough to be the son of an existing union member.

385
00:31:42.540 --> 00:32:12.540
So before 1935, in the free labor market, the unions took hold of crafts and construction industry in particular. Anthracite coal, in contrast to bituminous coal, which is what most coal is, bituminous coal is all over the place, all over the eastern seaboard, in West Virginia, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, whatever. It's also in the mountain state. Anthracite coal is only in a little area of eastern Pennsylvania around Scranton. So it's very easy then.

386
00:32:12.540 --> 00:32:27.540
And so it was easy to organize a powerful anthracite coal union, which was done, which could then be restricted and all the rest of it, but not in bituminous coal, which only came in after 1935 when the government intervened heavily in the labor market.

387
00:32:27.540 --> 00:32:35.500
So, the only other, let's see, construction, exercise, a few skilled crafts, glass balling

388
00:32:35.500 --> 00:32:41.940
and things like that, and the only other one I can think of at this moment is the musicians

389
00:32:41.940 --> 00:32:46.460
union, a strange paradox.

390
00:32:46.460 --> 00:32:50.540
Apparently the thing with musicians, this is so true, actors, the acting, the stage

391
00:32:50.540 --> 00:32:57.100
hands union, the theater, very powerful craft unions, they suffer very heavy unemployment,

392
00:32:57.100 --> 00:33:01.880
Unemployment. In other words, they push up the wage rate enormously. Unemployment in the

393
00:33:01.880 --> 00:33:06.100
musician industry is like 80, 90 percent. Same way with actors. Actors are mostly waiters

394
00:33:06.100 --> 00:33:10.620
in restaurants, things like that. They wait for their big break. So apparently acting

395
00:33:10.620 --> 00:33:16.620
in theater and musicians is such that people love to play music to such an extent. They're

396
00:33:16.620 --> 00:33:19.900
willing to accept a 90 percent unemployment rate, spend most of their time hanging around

397
00:33:19.900 --> 00:33:24.020
on media occupations waiting for their big break. In that sort of situation, they don't

398
00:33:24.020 --> 00:33:29.020
Break the Union, in other words. It's a very, sort of a bizarre, eccentric kind of occupation.

399
00:33:29.020 --> 00:33:36.020
I learned labor economics from a former union economist with very knowledge, very savvy

400
00:33:36.020 --> 00:33:40.380
and all this. He looked down the list and he said, well, musicians are, how come musicians

401
00:33:40.380 --> 00:33:43.780
can break the mold? How come they can have a big unemployment rate, which wouldn't be

402
00:33:43.780 --> 00:33:48.020
tolerated, say, in an FSI coal or construction? He said, well, musicians are crazy anyway.

403
00:33:48.020 --> 00:33:53.380
Everybody knows that. Anyway, that's the reason. In other words, they're willing to accept

404
00:33:53.380 --> 00:33:58.740
a union wage rate which which unemployed most of them most of the time because they're waiting for that big break

405
00:33:58.740 --> 00:34:01.180
this is uh... these are really the only

406
00:34:01.180 --> 00:34:04.540
the only uh... unions that were successful before 1935

407
00:34:04.540 --> 00:34:09.740
within that framework there was a very small percentage of labor force obviously, in other words

408
00:34:09.740 --> 00:34:12.140
uh...

409
00:34:12.140 --> 00:34:16.640
between 1886, 1885, let's say 1935

410
00:34:16.640 --> 00:34:19.980
proportion of union membership to the total labor force was

411
00:34:19.980 --> 00:34:21.740
varied between

412
00:34:21.740 --> 00:34:27.420
3.8%, something like that. A very small proportion. In other words, the union problem, whatever

413
00:34:27.420 --> 00:34:33.020
it is, was fairly limited. It was limited mostly, as I say, to construction, anticyclo,

414
00:34:33.020 --> 00:34:38.460
and the rest of the time, within this 3.8%, it would fluctuate in accordance with the business

415
00:34:38.460 --> 00:34:42.900
cycle. In other words, in the boom periods, okay, in the boom period, demand for labor

416
00:34:42.900 --> 00:34:48.740
goes up. So, it's increased wage rates. So, in other words, wage rates go up in a boom

417
00:34:48.740 --> 00:34:53.620
and the boom period and unions took the credit for it and say, hey, look, we're increasing

418
00:34:53.620 --> 00:34:56.500
our wage rates in the clothing industry.

419
00:34:56.500 --> 00:35:00.180
People join the union because of that and then comes the recession, the man for labor

420
00:35:00.180 --> 00:35:04.780
goes down again, wage rates would fall on the free market and unions try to keep wage

421
00:35:04.780 --> 00:35:07.740
rates up and it's heavy unemployment and it breaks the union.

422
00:35:07.740 --> 00:35:12.380
So what you have then, within the 3 to 8%, the 3 to 8% reflect on the business cycle.

423
00:35:12.380 --> 00:35:16.540
In other words, the recession would be down to 3% and the boom would go up to 8% and then

424
00:35:16.540 --> 00:35:22.540
would fluctuate with a business cycle within a very small range, way less than 10%.

425
00:35:22.540 --> 00:35:26.540
It would fluctuate in accordance with the business cycle factor.

426
00:35:26.540 --> 00:35:32.540
So unions would always collapse in recessions, because the reality would hit, wage rates would fall,

427
00:35:32.540 --> 00:35:36.540
and they would try to keep the wage rates up, and bingo, the whole thing would collapse.

428
00:35:36.540 --> 00:35:42.540
So even though historians like to talk about unions, one thing they're usually ideologically in favor of,

429
00:35:42.540 --> 00:35:51.540
The other thing is sort of dramatic, they have a strike, it makes the headlines, it really wasn't that important, it really only covered a small percentage of the workforce.

430
00:35:51.540 --> 00:36:04.540
And what happens then is that with World War I, I mean with the New Deal period, 1930s, everything shifts, there's a massive government intervention which still exists.

431
00:36:04.540 --> 00:36:18.660
The massive intervention, basically two major pieces of intervention, one was 1932, was

432
00:36:18.660 --> 00:36:27.180
the Norris LaGuardia Act, which still exists, which outlaws injunctions for labor disputes,

433
00:36:27.180 --> 00:36:34.460
outlaws the uses of the injunctions, outlaws the injunctions.

434
00:36:34.460 --> 00:36:41.460
Injunction is a weapon that came in the court system in the early 19th century.

435
00:36:42.940 --> 00:36:47.380
Usually if somebody's aggressing against you, somebody's stealing your watch or something,

436
00:36:47.380 --> 00:36:52.380
you call the cops, you try to punish them or prevent them from getting the watch back or whatever.

437
00:36:52.380 --> 00:36:56.420
In other cases, however, we have a continuing pattern of aggression. In other words,

438
00:36:56.420 --> 00:37:00.940
let's say somebody's always driving a truck across your lawn. Let's say there's a traffic jam

439
00:37:00.940 --> 00:37:05.180
in your corner, and the trucks would like to sort of go across your lawn so they can avoid the traffic, and they'd do it.

440
00:37:05.180 --> 00:37:09.060
Some truck keeps doing it week after week. You go to court and get an injunction.

441
00:37:09.060 --> 00:37:12.780
In other words, the judge says, thou shalt not do it. If you do it again, we'll

442
00:37:12.780 --> 00:37:16.260
clap you in jail or whatever. So, the injunction is a way of

443
00:37:16.260 --> 00:37:19.540
preventing a continuing pattern of

444
00:37:19.540 --> 00:37:25.020
aggression or violation of your rights.

445
00:37:25.020 --> 00:37:30.620
It's a very important weapon of the courts, which didn't exist before, about 1810 or so.

446
00:37:30.620 --> 00:37:42.620
Well, in the Onus LaGuardia Act, the way injunctions came in and labor-mortem excuses, on a strike situation, going on strike, what you're doing is you're saying, we won't work anymore for your company until you give us a 20% wage increase or whatever.

447
00:37:42.620 --> 00:37:50.620
The employer tendency is to say, all right, that's up to you, we'll hire somebody else. If you don't want to work for $3 an hour or whatever, we'll hire people who will work.

448
00:37:50.620 --> 00:38:05.620
And that immediately creates a problem for the strikers who then proceed to try to beat up the one way or the other, prevent non-strikers from taking their jobs, in other words, from doing the work at a rate which strikers don't want to do.

449
00:38:05.620 --> 00:38:16.620
So in other words, essential to the victory of any strike for the Union is to use violence against non-striking workers, against replacement workers known as scabs and the vernacular.

450
00:38:16.620 --> 00:38:23.240
So, in order to keep scabs out, or keep the non-strikers out, they have massive picket

451
00:38:23.240 --> 00:38:27.140
lines which intimidate people or beat them up or blow up their homes or their cars, stuff

452
00:38:27.140 --> 00:38:28.140
like that.

453
00:38:28.140 --> 00:38:31.160
So in other words, violence and labor disputes are almost always done by the Union, the reason

454
00:38:31.160 --> 00:38:37.740
is because the only way you can really win a strike is to prevent non-strikers from replacing

455
00:38:38.740 --> 00:38:41.780
Employers don't really have any incentive to commit violence, it's simply the defense's

456
00:38:41.780 --> 00:38:45.620
weapon to try to keep their plan in order and try to keep the non-strikers from being

457
00:38:45.620 --> 00:38:53.620
So generally, there's an a priori insight in most labor issues, most of the violence committed by the unions.

458
00:38:53.620 --> 00:38:58.620
I have also some personal stories of this sort, which still exist, by the way.

459
00:38:58.620 --> 00:39:04.620
A few years ago, I was a student in this class who was working for Con Ed, it was a Con Ed strike.

460
00:39:04.620 --> 00:39:09.620
And a planet Con Ed was down in Madison Avenue or something, somewhere in Midtown Manhattan.

461
00:39:09.620 --> 00:39:13.620
And the union sort of established control over who could get in and out.

462
00:39:13.620 --> 00:39:14.620
in and out.

463
00:39:14.620 --> 00:39:18.500
In other words, the Union said, well, we'll allow managers to stay in, and we'll allow

464
00:39:18.500 --> 00:39:21.980
managers to keep the con-ed going.

465
00:39:21.980 --> 00:39:26.380
We won't allow any managers to come back in, to say, at least, they had to stay there for

466
00:39:26.380 --> 00:39:29.260
the three weeks, you know, whatever the length of the strike is.

467
00:39:29.260 --> 00:39:34.660
They allow food to be shipped in, very, very nice of them, I mean, they allow them to send

468
00:39:34.660 --> 00:39:38.460
food in, but they won't allow the managers to come back, they have to stay there physically

469
00:39:38.460 --> 00:39:41.460
and sleep there and stuff.

470
00:39:41.460 --> 00:39:42.460
Fortunately it only lasted a week or two.

471
00:39:42.460 --> 00:39:53.460
My father, unfortunately, was in this situation. He was a chief chemist of what was then Tidewater Oil Company, now part of Giddy, now part of Texaco, I guess, or something.

472
00:39:53.460 --> 00:39:59.460
Anyway, it was Tidewater Oil Company trying to plant in Bayonne, New Jersey, and the union went on strike.

473
00:39:59.460 --> 00:40:04.460
The union was a so-called company union, which according to the textbooks must be a weak, dominated union, weak, you know, the tool of the employers.

474
00:40:04.460 --> 00:40:07.460
And we're not a tool of the employers at all. We're very feisty.

475
00:40:07.460 --> 00:40:17.460
And so they call a strike and oil refineries have to keep going. You can't shut them down because it'll take a couple of years to bring them up again. You have to keep a maintenance plant going.

476
00:40:17.460 --> 00:40:29.460
So the managers were allowed to stay there and keep the plant going. However, they weren't allowed to come back in. The union wouldn't allow it. The union established its control over the territory, so to speak.

477
00:40:29.460 --> 00:40:35.260
The cops, of course, look the other way, and so they allowed food to be shipped in.

478
00:40:35.260 --> 00:40:38.980
In this case, my poor father was there for about three months, literally, a three-month

479
00:40:38.980 --> 00:40:39.980
strike.

480
00:40:39.980 --> 00:40:44.460
Prison is like being in a concentration camp, being allowed to stay in this crummy dump.

481
00:40:44.460 --> 00:40:49.420
I mean, the refinery is not sort of a luxury resort, if you've ever seen a lower refinery.

482
00:40:49.420 --> 00:40:53.300
So in other words, the Union seizes control, instead of the police performing their alleged

483
00:40:53.300 --> 00:40:58.660
function of preventing violence and keeping the peace, the police abandon this responsibility

484
00:40:58.660 --> 00:41:02.660
to turn over the rule over the streets, so to speak, to the Union.

485
00:41:02.660 --> 00:41:07.660
So at any rate, this is fairly common, and really still is, except in the South, for

486
00:41:07.660 --> 00:41:10.660
example, which always has a sound attitude to a Union question.

487
00:41:10.660 --> 00:41:16.860
Namely, if the police prevent any kind of Union violence, where the police really prevent

488
00:41:16.860 --> 00:41:18.660
Union violence, strikes usually collapse.

489
00:41:18.660 --> 00:41:22.660
There's usually very little Union power for that reason.

490
00:41:22.660 --> 00:41:27.660
A famous case of that is the Kingsport strike in Kingsport, Tennessee, about 10, 15 years

491
00:41:27.660 --> 00:41:34.520
It's a very illustrative kind of situation at Kingsport. Kingsport was a modern plant

492
00:41:34.520 --> 00:41:41.180
in Tennessee, in Appalachia country. And here's this plant which was hiring at a top wage

493
00:41:41.180 --> 00:41:45.780
rate of the area. Beautiful working conditions, great place. Everybody wanted to work for

494
00:41:45.780 --> 00:41:50.900
the Kingsport printing plant. High unemployment in the area. It's Appalachia, which is, next

495
00:41:50.900 --> 00:41:54.860
time I'll tell you why it's Appalachia, because the coal miners union activities. Anyway,

496
00:41:54.860 --> 00:41:59.580
A whole bunch of unemployed people wanting to get good jobs supplied by Kingsport. Kingsport

497
00:41:59.580 --> 00:42:03.220
Union goes down on strike demanding higher wages, totally crazy, sort of like a kamikaze

498
00:42:03.220 --> 00:42:10.500
assault because there's no way you have a... See, the printers always have the propound

499
00:42:10.500 --> 00:42:14.020
of the doctrine. You have to take years to be a good printer. The views of apprenticeship

500
00:42:14.020 --> 00:42:17.780
is like being a physician. There's a lot of baloney. You can train a good printer in a

501
00:42:17.780 --> 00:42:22.860
couple of months. Of course, the printing people knew that. So when the printers went

502
00:42:22.860 --> 00:42:35.860
The unions couldn't use violence because in the south you can't get away with that, you don't own the streets, so they had to take their chances, and the Kingsport Press hired more workers and trained them in a couple of months and that was it.

503
00:42:35.860 --> 00:42:49.860
Workers were very happy, they were getting good jobs, hey, we got a great job at Kingsport, a printing plant, and the strike is still going, supposedly, but they just faded away, they were officially still on strike 20 years later, 10 years later.

504
00:42:49.860 --> 00:42:53.860
In practice, they're all gone. The unions shut up shop and left.

505
00:42:53.860 --> 00:43:00.860
So, if you look at the classic pattern of unions, there was no way they could win it.

506
00:43:00.860 --> 00:43:02.860
It was really like a suicide squad.

507
00:43:02.860 --> 00:43:08.860
They couldn't use violence, they couldn't restrict the supply because there was plenty of heavy unemployment in the area.

508
00:43:08.860 --> 00:43:10.860
And so why do they do it?

509
00:43:10.860 --> 00:43:13.860
Interesting question. Were they totally dumb? Were they crazy?

510
00:43:13.860 --> 00:43:17.860
No, they weren't. But what happened was, unions are now dominated by the national union.

511
00:43:17.860 --> 00:43:27.740
The way the structure of union power goes is that every union has a national union, whatever

512
00:43:27.740 --> 00:43:32.820
it is, the woodworkers union, machinists, automobile workers, whatever, printers, they've

513
00:43:32.820 --> 00:43:38.940
got a national union which has the locus of power, the nationals have a bunch of locals

514
00:43:38.940 --> 00:43:43.420
which are mostly dominated by the national, the national can tell them what to do, locals

515
00:43:43.420 --> 00:43:51.780
The national often join a federation, in our case right now it's the AFL-CIO, the American

516
00:43:51.780 --> 00:43:56.820
Federation of Labor Congress of Industrial Organizations, but the AFL has no power in

517
00:43:56.820 --> 00:43:57.820
itself.

518
00:43:57.820 --> 00:43:59.620
They try to arbitrate disputes within the national union.

519
00:43:59.620 --> 00:44:03.460
The locus of power is the national union which is represented in the AFL, but they really

520
00:44:03.460 --> 00:44:09.300
don't, it's like the UN in a sense, there's no government power over the national union.

521
00:44:09.300 --> 00:44:18.220
So what happened was this, the New York State and New England are essentially in many ways

522
00:44:18.220 --> 00:44:19.220
decaying areas.

523
00:44:19.220 --> 00:44:22.940
In other words, if you're ever going to see textile plants or printing plants or whatever

524
00:44:22.940 --> 00:44:28.100
in New England, they're all falling apart, they're like 19th century buildings and they're

525
00:44:28.100 --> 00:44:33.140
inefficient, they're too small, they're heavily unionized, it raises their costs, etc., etc.

526
00:44:33.140 --> 00:44:43.140
What's happened in the United States over time, the Northeast has originally been a major industrial area.

527
00:44:43.140 --> 00:44:52.140
In other words, the Northeast quadrant has industrialized New York, Pennsylvania, Michigan, et cetera, et cetera.

528
00:44:52.140 --> 00:44:56.140
And demand for labor went up as the capital investment went up, wage rates went up.

529
00:44:56.140 --> 00:44:59.140
So we had wage rates higher in the Northeast than in the South.

530
00:44:59.140 --> 00:45:02.140
The South was much less industrialized.

531
00:45:02.140 --> 00:45:16.140
So in this kind of situation, the trend over time, over the long run, remember the long run equilibrium, is for workers to leave the South and go to the North to get more jobs, higher wage rates, and for capital to leave the North to be attracted to the South to lower wage rates.

532
00:45:16.140 --> 00:45:25.140
So you have a mutual flow here, tending in the long run toward equality of wage rates. In the very long run you tend toward equalization of standard of living.

533
00:45:25.140 --> 00:45:30.820
So, of course, southern people have migrated to the north, and capital, especially in inefficient

534
00:45:30.820 --> 00:45:32.900
industries, gets migrated to the south.

535
00:45:32.900 --> 00:45:39.260
I already talked about how minimum wage laws acted as a tariff, in a sense, kind of crippled

536
00:45:39.260 --> 00:45:40.260
southern competition.

537
00:45:40.260 --> 00:45:44.260
So, what happened is, in Kingsport, Tennessee, for example, we have a brand new modern plant,

538
00:45:44.260 --> 00:45:49.740
no unions, lower wage costs, lower everything costs, higher productivity, out-competing

539
00:45:49.740 --> 00:45:54.260
these inefficient backward companies in New York and New England, and so the New York

540
00:45:54.260 --> 00:45:57.760
New York headquarters told the local down here, well first of all it happened with the

541
00:45:57.760 --> 00:46:01.460
printers, it was the printing companies in New York, New England, went to the union and

542
00:46:01.460 --> 00:46:04.700
said, look we're being outcompeted by these guys in North Carolina, Tennessee and whatever,

543
00:46:04.700 --> 00:46:08.300
do something about it, try to cripple them, in other words, try to impose higher labor

544
00:46:08.300 --> 00:46:13.420
costs on the South. You can't do it through a federal minimum wage law, you do it through

545
00:46:13.420 --> 00:46:17.900
trying to unionize them. Try your best, try to unionize them so we can get rid of their

546
00:46:17.900 --> 00:46:21.980
competition. So the national union gives an order to their local in Kingsport, Tennessee,

547
00:46:21.980 --> 00:46:26.140
like for higher wage rates, even though they had nothing to lose, the National Union had

548
00:46:26.140 --> 00:46:30.860
nothing to lose, they were sacrificing the Kingsport locals, so to speak, they're okay,

549
00:46:30.860 --> 00:46:37.460
go for it, chances are low you can do anything about it, we have nothing to lose, only the

550
00:46:37.460 --> 00:46:40.940
Kingsport people have something to lose, and sure enough of course they collapsed, but

551
00:46:40.940 --> 00:46:46.020
the whole thing was a collusion between the printers, the Northern printers, the Northern

552
00:46:46.020 --> 00:46:51.980
Employers and the Northern Union trying to cripple Southern competition, try to get unionized

553
00:46:51.980 --> 00:46:52.980
in the South.

554
00:46:52.980 --> 00:46:57.020
Now this is a story which repeats itself all throughout industry, in other words, instead

555
00:46:57.020 --> 00:47:02.420
of unions versus capitalists, what usually happens is that capitalists plus unions try

556
00:47:02.420 --> 00:47:07.540
to screw the rest of us, either through tariffs or through minimum wage law, through imposing

557
00:47:07.540 --> 00:47:10.500
unionization on other parts of the industry, et cetera, et cetera.

558
00:47:10.500 --> 00:47:14.860
Time and again this is what happens, it violates the Marxian myth that somehow you have solidarity

559
00:47:14.860 --> 00:47:17.860
and the Party of the Workers is against capitalists.

560
00:47:17.860 --> 00:47:22.860
Let's just start on the coal miners union.

561
00:47:22.860 --> 00:47:27.860
We all know about Appalachia and its very heavy unemployment in the coal fields, really,

562
00:47:27.860 --> 00:47:29.860
of Kentucky and West Virginia, etc.

563
00:47:29.860 --> 00:47:33.860
What happened was, this was all deliberately brought about more or less by John L. Lewis,

564
00:47:33.860 --> 00:47:38.860
who was the brilliant head of the United Mine Workers Union, which came in in the 1930s.

565
00:47:38.860 --> 00:47:40.860
I already mentioned the Ars Maguardia Act.

566
00:47:40.860 --> 00:47:43.860
There's another act even more important, which I'll get to next time, the Wagner Act,

567
00:47:43.860 --> 00:47:49.660
Act, as a result of which, John L. Lewis was able to unionize the bituminous co-workers

568
00:47:49.660 --> 00:47:55.900
for the first time successfully, he goes into a pact with the large mine operators, basically

569
00:47:55.900 --> 00:48:01.460
saying this, all Lewis was interested in was maximizing the wage rate of his union workers

570
00:48:01.460 --> 00:48:04.420
with seniority, that's what he cared, he didn't care about anybody, he didn't care about young

571
00:48:04.420 --> 00:48:08.940
people, about non-union people, he didn't care about any of that stuff, so, essentially

572
00:48:08.940 --> 00:48:15.900
We colluded with the large miners, mine owners, to push the wage rates way up, thereby imposing

573
00:48:15.900 --> 00:48:20.100
higher wage costs on the small mines and putting them out of business, which is what the large

574
00:48:20.100 --> 00:48:21.100
miners wanted to do.

575
00:48:21.100 --> 00:48:26.740
You screw your competition by having a national bargaining rate, national bargaining wage

576
00:48:26.740 --> 00:48:34.180
rate, the entire coal industry, push up the wage rate, bankrupt the smaller coal mines,

577
00:48:34.180 --> 00:48:39.980
can cause unemployment for younger mine workers, those with that seniority, those growing up

578
00:48:39.980 --> 00:48:44.780
who just want to get a job right now, unemployed them. Lewis didn't care. Lewis understood

579
00:48:44.780 --> 00:48:48.860
about the demand curve and it did very well. The demand curve had caused the unemployment.

580
00:48:48.860 --> 00:48:55.060
He didn't care. What he wanted to do was maximize the pension funds and the union leaders then

581
00:48:55.060 --> 00:49:01.580
stole later on, stole from, the boogle fund, maximize the benefits for the existing workers

582
00:49:01.580 --> 00:49:04.060
as a seniority and hell with everybody else.

583
00:49:04.060 --> 00:49:08.100
As a result of that, we had massive unemployment and massive bankruptcies in the coal fields

584
00:49:08.100 --> 00:49:12.380
in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Kentucky and the rest of it, which really created a

585
00:49:12.380 --> 00:49:13.380
whole Appalachia problem.

586
00:49:13.380 --> 00:49:16.580
There wasn't a real Appalachia problem before, it wasn't exactly a flourishing area, but

587
00:49:16.580 --> 00:49:21.020
it wasn't a massive area of poverty and unemployment before John L. Lewis colluded with the mine

588
00:49:21.020 --> 00:49:22.580
owners to bring this about.

589
00:49:22.580 --> 00:49:25.740
And next time we'll start, we'll talk about the Wagner Act, because it's a key thing which

590
00:49:25.740 --> 00:49:29.740
changed the whole face of unionism.

591
00:49:29.740 --> 00:49:40.940
Market and Government Intervention, in the mid-1930s, the Federal Government massively

592
00:49:40.940 --> 00:49:46.820
intervened in the labour market to substitute for a free labour market, a government dominated

593
00:49:46.820 --> 00:49:52.740
one, a controlled one. There were two basic, two major pieces of legislation which is expressed

594
00:49:52.740 --> 00:49:58.460
then. The first one, less important, was the Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932, which prohibited

595
00:49:58.460 --> 00:50:04.540
and it still does prohibit federal injunctions in labor disputes and really just court injunctions

596
00:50:04.540 --> 00:50:13.540
period because states followed after the federal government on this, which means that you can't

597
00:50:13.540 --> 00:50:19.500
take a union to court and have an injunction to prevent it from engaging in violence and

598
00:50:19.500 --> 00:50:23.500
situation, so prohibiting injunctions

599
00:50:49.500 --> 00:50:58.020
By the way, one of the reasons why so many unions are controlled by the organized crime

600
00:50:58.020 --> 00:51:04.300
is because unions engage in activity which organized crime is also very expert in, like

601
00:51:04.300 --> 00:51:11.420
violence and controlling the labor supply, in other words, excluding some groups of workers

602
00:51:11.420 --> 00:51:16.340
and half of other groups of workers or something organized crime is quite expert in doing.

603
00:51:16.340 --> 00:51:19.380
So it's sort of a natural field for organized crime to work in.

604
00:51:19.380 --> 00:51:27.100
Also, the unions have built up huge pension funds, which, since the 30s, which of course

605
00:51:27.100 --> 00:51:31.100
is a nice plum for people who got a hold of.

606
00:51:31.100 --> 00:51:40.860
Any rate, the most important mechanism came in in 1935 with the Wagner Act, which is still

607
00:51:40.860 --> 00:51:41.860
on the books.

608
00:51:41.860 --> 00:51:47.860
I'm going to modify a little bit the basic Wagner Act provisions still hold.

609
00:51:47.860 --> 00:51:57.860
Basically what the Wagner Act does is it compels collective bargaining, compels collective bargaining.

610
00:51:57.860 --> 00:52:02.860
By the way, the textbooks, every textbook that I know of mislead you about what the Wagner Act says.

611
00:52:02.860 --> 00:52:07.860
It usually says the Wagner Act is a Magna Carta for labor because it guarantees the right of collective bargaining.

612
00:52:07.860 --> 00:52:37.860
Bargaining, that's baloney, unions always have that, workers always have the right of collective bargaining in the United States, it didn't have it in Britain, it's in 1906, the United States workers always had the right to form unions and try to bargain, so what the Wagner Act does is compel bargaining by employers and by non-union workers, in other words compels collective bargaining, force collective bargaining with a union

613
00:52:37.860 --> 00:52:54.860
that has a majority of workers in a bargaining unit, that's the basic, all the provisions

614
00:52:54.860 --> 00:53:02.300
of the national, this by the way is officially called the National Labor Relations Act, Wagner

615
00:53:02.300 --> 00:53:13.300
The Winder Act for short, after Senator Wagner in New York, the National Labor Relations Act, and a bargaining unit.

616
00:53:13.300 --> 00:53:23.300
All the provisions are logically deducible from this basic axiom, in other words basic fundamental clause, fundamental essence of the Winder Act,

617
00:53:23.300 --> 00:53:30.300
to compel collective bargaining where the union has the majority of workers in a bargaining unit.

618
00:53:30.300 --> 00:53:39.300
The first question is, what's a bargaining unit? Good question. It's up to the government to decide what a bargaining unit is. It's not a natural situation.

619
00:53:39.300 --> 00:53:52.300
And so the minor act is administered by the National Labor Relations Board, the point about the federal government, NLRB for short, which decides what a bargaining unit is.

620
00:53:52.300 --> 00:54:14.300
It's not automatic. For example, take for example, say the steel industry. Here's the US Steel, it's a steel company, and there's machinists working in a steel plant, which want to have their own union, machinist union, which is a craft union, a traditional construction, a craft union construction industry. They want their own union.

621
00:54:14.300 --> 00:54:23.800
The steelworkers then form an industrial union, they want to include everybody, they want to represent everybody working in the steel industry, regardless of what occupation they're in.

622
00:54:23.800 --> 00:54:26.300
Machinists want to have their own union.

623
00:54:26.300 --> 00:54:31.300
The steelworkers union, which is an industrial union, we'll get to that in a minute,

624
00:54:31.300 --> 00:54:36.300
contrasts to a craft union, because the craft union wants to exclude people.

625
00:54:36.300 --> 00:54:46.300
Craft Union gets its power by pushing the supply curve to the left and pushing wage rates up at the expense of workers who are excluded.

626
00:54:46.300 --> 00:54:51.300
The industrial union tries to maximize, tries to include everybody, tries to maximize the number of people in the union.

627
00:54:51.300 --> 00:54:56.300
So that immediately goes against the craft union. The question is, what is the bargaining unit? What's up for the NLRB to decide?

628
00:54:56.300 --> 00:55:00.300
If they decide the machinists are their own bargaining unit, then the machinist union will win.

629
00:55:00.300 --> 00:55:06.300
If they decide the bargaining unit is the whole plant, the steelworker's union will win.

630
00:55:06.300 --> 00:55:11.300
Or if they decide the whole firm, a firm might have 20 plants in it.

631
00:55:11.300 --> 00:55:14.300
So the bargaining unit is a plant. Is it the whole firm? Is it the whole industry?

632
00:55:14.300 --> 00:55:17.300
In some cases, they decide the whole industry is a bargaining unit.

633
00:55:17.300 --> 00:55:23.300
So it's purely arbitrary and it depends on the ideology of the National Life and Relations Board members.

634
00:55:23.300 --> 00:55:24.300
Basically it.

635
00:55:24.300 --> 00:55:29.300
In the 1930s, when the NLRB was formed, it was a very left-wing period, and the NLRB was very left-wing.

636
00:55:29.300 --> 00:55:36.300
They always decided against craft unions in favor of industrial unions. They always decided in favor of maximizing union membership.

637
00:55:36.300 --> 00:55:44.300
But this, of course, does not necessarily have to be that way. It depends again on how the NLRB members see it.

638
00:55:44.300 --> 00:55:49.300
I think there are five members. They have the staff and all that sort of stuff. They have regionals, locals and all that sort of stuff.

639
00:55:49.300 --> 00:55:54.300
But basically they have their appointed members and they can decide whichever way they want.

640
00:55:54.300 --> 00:56:00.980
where they want. So it's not obvious what a bargaining unit is. Who decides who has

641
00:56:00.980 --> 00:56:05.300
the majority? Well, the NLRB has to call an election. They have the majority in an officially

642
00:56:05.300 --> 00:56:09.220
sanctioned election, which the NLRB holds at a certain date. They don't have to hold

643
00:56:09.220 --> 00:56:12.860
at a certain date. They can decide whether or not to hold an election and when to hold

644
00:56:12.860 --> 00:56:19.060
it. So in other words, you have unlimited power virtually going to the guys in the NLRB

645
00:56:19.060 --> 00:56:24.060
and the power to interpret these vague provisions.

646
00:56:24.060 --> 00:56:29.060
So another thing that happens is that the compels collective bargaining.

647
00:56:29.060 --> 00:56:30.060
So what's collective bargaining?

648
00:56:30.060 --> 00:56:31.060
They have to decide what collective bargaining is.

649
00:56:31.060 --> 00:56:32.060
It's also not very obvious.

650
00:56:32.060 --> 00:56:33.060
What does it mean?

651
00:56:33.060 --> 00:56:38.060
Well, in the old days, during the 30s and 40s, I left liberals in a heyday.

652
00:56:38.060 --> 00:56:41.060
If an employer said, you know, they have to meet with a union.

653
00:56:41.060 --> 00:56:43.060
How often does he have to meet with them?

654
00:56:43.060 --> 00:56:44.060
Who knows?

655
00:56:44.060 --> 00:56:48.060
And it was originally, in the 30s and 40s, it was decided that if the employer doesn't

656
00:56:48.060 --> 00:57:01.700
So what does good faith mean? It's a very subjective kind of decision. So usually if

657
00:57:01.700 --> 00:57:04.500
the employer didn't come in, didn't offer a wage increase, this was considered not in

658
00:57:04.500 --> 00:57:09.380
good faith. It wasn't really bargaining. It was illegal. In other words, this whole sort

659
00:57:09.380 --> 00:57:17.420
of mandates constant wage increases. Nowadays, of course, in the last 20 years or so, it's

660
00:57:17.420 --> 00:57:22.540
are very different and there are many conservatives in the NLRB, anti-union or non-union or whatever

661
00:57:22.540 --> 00:57:23.540
it is.

662
00:57:23.540 --> 00:57:29.140
Now, of course, what's been happening, especially since the recession in 1980, 1981, is that

663
00:57:29.140 --> 00:57:31.660
the employer comes in and demands a wage cut.

664
00:57:31.660 --> 00:57:34.420
This has been happening in the last four or five years.

665
00:57:34.420 --> 00:57:37.540
And in the last few years now, the unions are no longer that happy with the NLRB.

666
00:57:37.540 --> 00:57:38.540
They used to love it.

667
00:57:38.540 --> 00:57:41.340
They used to call it the Magna Carta of labor's rights.

668
00:57:41.340 --> 00:57:45.820
And now they see the NLRB rule against them and decide, well, yeah, why can't you come

669
00:57:45.820 --> 00:57:54.180
So this question of how often they have to meet, what does bargaining good faith mean?

670
00:57:54.180 --> 00:58:01.060
For example, in General Electric around the 1960s, the famous Vice President of Personnel

671
00:58:01.060 --> 00:58:08.780
Relations Lem Mule and Boo-ware came up with this theory of Boo-ware-ism.

672
00:58:08.780 --> 00:58:14.740
Boo-ware-ism is said, look, what you do is present, when you come to the bargaining table,

673
00:58:14.740 --> 00:58:22.500
In other words, this is the offer and that's it. Take it or leave it. And we offer a 10%

674
00:58:22.500 --> 00:58:26.940
wage increase or 5% wage cut or whatever it happens to be, and don't bargain any further.

675
00:58:26.940 --> 00:58:31.940
Well, this is a big, so this has been adopted by, quite successful, adopted by many employers.

676
00:58:31.940 --> 00:58:35.260
And the question is, is this really legal? Is it bargaining good faith to present one

677
00:58:35.260 --> 00:58:38.220
offer? Well, if you don't say it's bargaining good faith, well, how many offers are you

678
00:58:38.220 --> 00:58:43.580
supposed to present? So the whole thing is very murky. Indeed, it was declared illegal

679
00:58:43.580 --> 00:59:13.580
but the point is none of these things are obvious. Another thing, compelling collective bargaining also was interpreted as meaning the statutes that the employer cannot discriminate against union organizers, so it's illegal, in other words, if you're going to have an election, have a free and fair election so to speak, then it was declared illegal to discriminate against union organizers. So it's not that they couldn't fire union organizers,

680
00:59:13.580 --> 00:59:34.580
And it meant they couldn't keep a blacklist in the old non-union days. Employers could keep a blacklist so that Joe Zilch, as a militant union organizer, his name would be set to other employers. Watch out for Joe Zilch, he's a bad apple. This is not illegal. It's also illegal to discriminate.

681
00:59:34.580 --> 00:59:41.580
It's also, as part of this, was interpreted by NLRB, a mean, that employers have to present

682
00:59:41.580 --> 00:59:46.020
a supply union organization with meeting halls on the plant property.

683
00:59:46.020 --> 00:59:49.220
It's kind of a peculiar situation, here the employer, let's say, doesn't want to have

684
00:59:49.220 --> 00:59:50.220
a union.

685
00:59:50.220 --> 00:59:54.860
Yet he's compelled by the law to provide the union organizers with a hall, with leaflet

686
00:59:54.860 --> 00:59:59.660
space, you know, that sort of stuff, because that's their point of view.

687
00:59:59.660 --> 01:00:04.500
Also in the heyday of the 30s and 40s, the employers would apply the free speech, as

688
01:00:04.500 --> 01:00:14.380
to employ free speech in the capital of the 20 years ago and so forth and so on.

689
01:00:14.380 --> 01:00:19.540
As a result of this compulsory collective bargaining system, union membership, which had been,

690
01:00:19.540 --> 01:00:28.820
if you remember, between 2 and 8%, it was around 3% when the NLRB, NRA was passed, skyrocketed

691
01:00:28.820 --> 01:00:33.140
and during the late thirties and also during World War II when the

692
01:00:33.140 --> 01:00:38.940
the war labor force compelled union, had compulsory unionization for defense plants or war plants

693
01:00:38.940 --> 01:00:40.380
as a result of this

694
01:00:40.380 --> 01:00:42.420
this kind of

695
01:00:42.420 --> 01:00:46.860
privileging of unions, the percentage of membership

696
01:00:46.860 --> 01:00:49.140
percentage union membership

697
01:00:49.140 --> 01:00:51.840
of the labor force

698
01:00:51.840 --> 01:00:54.380
which had, as you remember

699
01:00:54.380 --> 01:00:56.340
fluctuated from about two to eight percent

700
01:00:56.340 --> 01:00:58.220
suddenly increased to about

701
01:00:58.220 --> 01:01:04.980
Skyrock up to about 25%, I think it was, the maximum, something like that. A lot depends

702
01:01:04.980 --> 01:01:08.660
on how you define, how you, if you include agricultural workers and government employees

703
01:01:08.660 --> 01:01:14.860
in there. But anyway, around 25% by 1945. So this is of course a quantum leap. In other

704
01:01:14.860 --> 01:01:18.580
words, all of a sudden unionism becomes an important part of the American economic system,

705
01:01:18.580 --> 01:01:23.560
which it really wasn't before, due to the fact we have a government-regulated labor

706
01:01:23.560 --> 01:01:31.920
And the unions which came in during the late 30s, 35, were mostly industrial unions, which

707
01:01:31.920 --> 01:01:37.840
were again more favored by the NLRB, which tried to include everybody in the industry.

708
01:01:37.840 --> 01:01:41.880
The steelworkers union, the rubberworkers union, the electrical workers union, bituminous

709
01:01:41.880 --> 01:01:46.280
co-workers union, you know, mine workers, etc., etc., all of these mass organizing

710
01:01:46.280 --> 01:01:47.280
drives.

711
01:01:47.280 --> 01:01:48.280
This is very dramatic also.

712
01:01:48.280 --> 01:01:52.840
So it was a very dramatic organizing drive, the automobile steel industry, automobile industry,

713
01:01:52.840 --> 01:02:06.840
So all these came in in the late 30s. Since the AFML was structured in favor of craft unions and against industrial unions, they formed their own group in the late 30s called the CIO, or the Congress of Industrial Organizations.

714
01:02:06.840 --> 01:02:13.840
Notice that industrial organization is the key term to distinguish that from the craft union.

715
01:02:13.840 --> 01:02:25.840
So, politically, the CIO unions were pretty leftist in the late 30s and 40s and they were organized along different lines.

716
01:02:25.840 --> 01:02:37.840
After World War II, the communists who controlled a lot of the CIO unions were kicked out by the union people.

717
01:02:37.840 --> 01:02:42.400
people and after, by around the fifties or sixties, somewhere around there, the two of them,

718
01:02:42.400 --> 01:02:47.360
AFL and CIO began to sort of merge, began to sort of peacefully co-exist and finally merged

719
01:02:47.360 --> 01:02:54.960
again to form the current AFL-CIO. They still have jurisdictional disputes but more or less

720
01:02:54.960 --> 01:03:01.160
they try and iron it out. So now we have the umbrella union including the old AFL and the

721
01:03:01.160 --> 01:03:07.480
newer CIO. The CIO, by the way, is the first organization to set up a political action

722
01:03:07.480 --> 01:03:12.880
Commission Committees, PACS, which are now of course all over the place, set up by corporations

723
01:03:12.880 --> 01:03:19.680
and also other organizations.

724
01:03:19.680 --> 01:03:25.880
Well since World War II, unionism has gone to a steady decline, even with the Wagner

725
01:03:25.880 --> 01:03:32.080
Act, it's been declining ever since, it's now down about 18%, something like that, it's

726
01:03:32.080 --> 01:03:33.480
a long run decline.

727
01:03:33.480 --> 01:03:39.480
There are many reasons for this. For one thing, there's a greater affluence, people are less interested in unions.

728
01:03:39.480 --> 01:03:46.480
For another thing, of course, there's been a shift of the economy toward the Southwest, which has never been particularly unionized,

729
01:03:46.480 --> 01:03:53.480
and toward new high-tech industries, computers and whatever, calculators, etc., etc.,

730
01:03:53.480 --> 01:04:00.480
and toward white-collar jobs, engineers and so forth, which have never been particularly unionized, unionizable.

731
01:04:00.480 --> 01:04:19.480
So, in other words, as the old smokestack industries decline, the old assembly line type industries decline, you have more and more service industries and engineering and professional occupations, unions are steadily in decline and probably will continue doing so, in spite of repeated hysteria on the part of unionists, how are we going to do something to reverse it?

732
01:04:19.480 --> 01:04:36.480
I maintain that most of the industrial unions have no real economic power, since they don't restrict the supply of members, even though they make a lot of noise and have a lot of publicity and so forth, they don't really increase the wage rates of their members, as the craft unions can do.

733
01:04:36.480 --> 01:04:47.480
I mentioned already about the faculty and the staff here, sort of a microcosm. They talk a lot and have a lot of members and some bureaucrats, but they really don't have much power.

734
01:04:47.480 --> 01:04:58.480
So what the industrial unions do, the success of the industrial union basically is they have a lot of voting power, they're politically powerful, so they have a lot of voters, which craft unions don't.

735
01:04:58.480 --> 01:05:13.480
So they vote, and they have a big union bureaucracy, with big union dues and huge union bureaucracy who are very well paid at the top, and they have a whole network of professional union bureaucrats.

736
01:05:13.480 --> 01:05:18.480
So you have unions in the United States that are now very different from what they were in the 30s.

737
01:05:18.480 --> 01:05:24.480
They're much less ideologically, much less leftist, and also they're sort of bureaucrats.

738
01:05:24.480 --> 01:05:27.480
They're sort of people who often go to college and never work.

739
01:05:27.480 --> 01:05:30.480
Say if you're head of a pipe fitter's union, you're often never a pipe fitter.

740
01:05:30.480 --> 01:05:31.480
You never see a pipe.

741
01:05:31.480 --> 01:05:36.480
You become an MBA or whatever, you become a labor expert,

742
01:05:36.480 --> 01:05:40.480
and you become head or vice president of some steam fitter's union or co-union,

743
01:05:40.480 --> 01:05:42.480
even though you've never seen a stink fit.

744
01:05:42.480 --> 01:05:46.480
So this of course sets up resentment on the part of the workers

745
01:05:46.480 --> 01:05:51.480
because they begin to feel that not only quote exploited by the employer,

746
01:05:51.480 --> 01:05:56.480
but also exploited by the union, their own union who is forcing them to pay heavy dues

747
01:05:56.480 --> 01:06:00.480
to set these people up where they really don't accomplish much.

748
01:06:00.480 --> 01:06:02.480
They don't really raise the wage rates of the workers.

749
01:06:02.480 --> 01:06:07.480
So there's a lot of friction with the old egalitarian spirit of unions is long gone.

750
01:06:07.480 --> 01:06:22.480
So we have, and it's also been of course a falling back or loss of union solidarity, union spirit.

751
01:06:22.480 --> 01:06:28.480
Most people are not that pro-union anymore. It used to be that nobody would cross the picket lines.

752
01:06:28.480 --> 01:06:32.480
Everybody thought unions were great. Now even liberals are pretty sour on unions.

753
01:06:32.480 --> 01:06:35.480
They don't have the mystique they had in the 30s and 40s.

754
01:06:35.480 --> 01:06:43.920
When the Republicans first took over Congress in 1946, for the first time since 1930, they

755
01:06:43.920 --> 01:06:46.400
had been pledged to repeal the Wagner Act, get rid of this whole system.

756
01:06:46.400 --> 01:06:47.400
They didn't do it.

757
01:06:47.400 --> 01:06:52.160
What they did is they added some stuff in 1948 called the Taff-Hartley Act, which was

758
01:06:52.160 --> 01:06:55.560
really just an amendment of the Wagner Act in addition to it.

759
01:06:55.560 --> 01:06:58.120
So we have now a Wagner and Taff-Hartley structure.

760
01:06:58.120 --> 01:07:02.040
I think this is 48.

761
01:07:02.040 --> 01:07:09.840
And the Taff-Harley Act is essentially, they added stuff on top, in addition to unfair

762
01:07:09.840 --> 01:07:14.560
labor practices by employers, unions can now engage in unfair labor practices.

763
01:07:14.560 --> 01:07:17.560
Those unions are now being regulated as well as employers.

764
01:07:17.560 --> 01:07:22.080
For example, if unions are too blatant, unions have to have elections once in a while.

765
01:07:22.080 --> 01:07:23.880
They don't lose them.

766
01:07:23.880 --> 01:07:28.280
But it's now considered unfair labor practice, never to have an election.

767
01:07:28.280 --> 01:07:29.840
In the old days, most unions never had an election.

768
01:07:29.840 --> 01:07:30.840
You come in, you're a union president.

769
01:07:30.840 --> 01:07:34.840
I was a great saying in the labor movement, I mean, once a union president, always a union president.

770
01:07:34.840 --> 01:07:39.840
Once you get into power, you're there for life. It's still more or less true, even with elections.

771
01:07:39.840 --> 01:07:43.840
In some cases, like the United Mine Workers, there have been big changes.

772
01:07:43.840 --> 01:07:47.840
But in most cases, once you get in, you're there forever. It can never be dislodged.

773
01:07:47.840 --> 01:07:51.840
It's not like having a political machine.

774
01:07:51.840 --> 01:07:56.840
Also, they can't engage in too much racial discrimination. They still engage to some extent.

775
01:07:56.840 --> 01:08:00.120
So in other words, there's a certain amount of certain curves now in unions through...

776
01:08:00.120 --> 01:08:05.600
So essentially what the NLRB has added to its power, it kept the same Wagner Act provisions

777
01:08:05.600 --> 01:08:11.800
and added on union provisions regulating unions.

778
01:08:11.800 --> 01:08:18.200
The closed shop is now illegal, closed shop in a situation where you can't get a job unless

779
01:08:18.200 --> 01:08:21.600
you're going through a union first, in other words, the equivalent would be you couldn't

780
01:08:21.600 --> 01:08:28.480
You can get a job as a poly professor unless you've first joined the AOP or any other occupation.

781
01:08:28.480 --> 01:08:33.040
That's now illegal, but the union shop is still legal, so the union shop is you can get

782
01:08:33.040 --> 01:08:37.440
a job on your own, but then you have to join the union within 30 days, whatever the provision

783
01:08:37.440 --> 01:08:38.440
is.

784
01:08:38.440 --> 01:08:39.440
So it's basically the same thing.

785
01:08:39.440 --> 01:08:43.320
It's slightly less restrictive, a closed shop, but it's not too different.

786
01:08:43.320 --> 01:08:46.120
Then there's other provisions that you're probably familiar with, like you can't have

787
01:08:46.120 --> 01:08:50.800
a strike against the government employee strike, you have to wait 30 days, there's various

788
01:08:50.800 --> 01:08:55.560
Provisions of Slowing Down Strikes, but these are mostly sort of marginal provisions, like

789
01:08:55.560 --> 01:09:00.560
the key provisions are still there, the Wagner Act provisions are still there. Now there are

790
01:09:00.560 --> 01:09:07.560
various states which have outlawed the union shop too, a whole bunch of states up again

791
01:09:07.560 --> 01:09:12.680
now, mostly in the southwest and the mountain states, which just seems to me it goes against

792
01:09:12.680 --> 01:09:15.640
private property and a free market, because what you're doing when you outlaw the union

793
01:09:15.640 --> 01:09:19.160
shop, you're preventing the employer from voluntarily signing an agreement with the

794
01:09:19.160 --> 01:09:23.480
Union saying we will only have union workers. There are various reasons why many employers

795
01:09:23.480 --> 01:09:31.920
are pro-union. For example, the poor Metropolitan Opera, every few years there's a strike against

796
01:09:31.920 --> 01:09:36.600
the Metropolitan Opera. They have to confront about 30 craft unions, each one which has

797
01:09:36.600 --> 01:09:41.720
a different contract deadline. There's a stagehand union, an actor's union, a scene designer's

798
01:09:41.720 --> 01:09:46.600
union, so forth and so on, and each one of them can strike and none of them is bound

799
01:09:46.600 --> 01:09:50.680
by the other people, and each one will then also honor the picket line of the other unions.

800
01:09:50.680 --> 01:09:55.600
So the employer, the metropolitan opera, has to confront about 30 different unions, which

801
01:09:55.600 --> 01:09:58.920
is extremely difficult. They'd much rather have one union than just make an agreement

802
01:09:58.920 --> 01:10:05.680
with that and that will end it. So many employers tend to favor industrial unions even because

803
01:10:05.680 --> 01:10:10.040
they figure craft unions are just too many of them to deal with, too feisty, and too

804
01:10:10.040 --> 01:10:14.520
much economic power in a sense. There's one classic case, so in other words, some employers

805
01:10:14.520 --> 01:10:18.420
were all in favor of the Wagner Act. Most of them were against it. Various employers

806
01:10:18.420 --> 01:10:23.920
were pro-corporate state, pro-business industry partnership that were in favor of the Wagner

807
01:10:23.920 --> 01:10:29.880
Act. There was one classic case of this whole situation where Gerard Swope was head of General

808
01:10:29.880 --> 01:10:34.320
Electric for many years. He wrote a letter to William Green, who was head of the American

809
01:10:34.320 --> 01:10:38.920
Federation of Labor. This was written in the late 1920s. Please, Mr. Green, why don't you

810
01:10:38.920 --> 01:10:42.320
organize General Electric? Come in and organize it, because we have too many craft unions

811
01:10:42.320 --> 01:10:49.320
In other words, we have, you know, machinists have to deal with four or five unions. Why don't you come with one union and just organize a whole general library and then we can have an agreement?

812
01:10:49.320 --> 01:10:57.320
And Greenville banks said, God bless you, Mr. Swope, we love you, you're a great pro-union person. However, we can't do it if we're committed to the craft union.

813
01:10:57.320 --> 01:11:07.320
We can't form an industrial union. So, when the CIO came in, people like Swope helped write it and lobbied for it because then you say, okay, we'll deal with one industrial union and a general library and make an agreement.

814
01:11:07.320 --> 01:11:13.440
Agreement, and the workers don't have to shut up. In many cases, the employer prefers

815
01:11:13.440 --> 01:11:17.920
dealing, as I say, with one union, and if the union is willing to collaborate, so to

816
01:11:17.920 --> 01:11:24.920
speak, they can just form so-called sweetheart agreements, where all the workers will then

817
01:11:24.920 --> 01:11:29.680
be committed to it, because of this compulsory collective bargaining. The individual worker

818
01:11:29.680 --> 01:11:34.800
can often be screwed here, because they often suffer from the fact that the union organizer

819
01:11:34.800 --> 01:11:41.960
A union, the national union is in favor of a mild wage increase or whatever.

820
01:11:41.960 --> 01:11:46.960
So there's constant conflict from below on this sort of basis.

821
01:11:46.960 --> 01:11:49.960
As right now a big strike has been going on for the last eight months in Austin, Minnesota,

822
01:11:49.960 --> 01:11:57.040
which is a small city in a prairie out there, the Hormel plant, which is a big food manufacturer,

823
01:11:57.040 --> 01:12:01.040
and the locals all in favor of a big strike have been striking, and the national union

824
01:12:01.040 --> 01:12:02.040
is very much against it.

825
01:12:02.040 --> 01:12:11.040
The National Union is going to put the local in a trustee ship any day now, in other words, crack down on and displace the leadership, and the local swears to fight on.

826
01:12:11.040 --> 01:12:15.040
There's a whole big struggle over this of the local versus national.

827
01:12:15.040 --> 01:12:22.040
As I was already said here, the National Union is always a big power center, and the locals have very little power, so there's a big fight over this.

828
01:12:22.040 --> 01:12:30.040
One of the classic things that happened, maybe I mentioned this already, but this is like result of the...

829
01:12:30.040 --> 01:12:35.040
Did you mention John L. Lewis in the United Mine Workers Union yet? No.

830
01:12:35.040 --> 01:12:43.040
The bituminous coal industry, they try to have the United Mine Workers in the bituminous coal industry, but it was never successful because of the free market.

831
01:12:43.040 --> 01:12:48.040
In other words, they organized some few coal mines in Pennsylvania, the wage rate would go up, the costs would go up.

832
01:12:48.040 --> 01:12:53.040
They'd go bankrupt, they'd be outcompeted by non-union mines in West Virginia or whatever.

833
01:12:53.040 --> 01:13:04.040
So, the United Mine Workers Union didn't succeed until the Wagnerite came in, which then compelled collective bargaining and then set forth a condition, set up a condition for a successful union.

834
01:13:04.040 --> 01:13:17.040
The head of the United Mine Workers was John L. Lewis, a famous bushy-bob figure, Welshman, Welsh-American, who understood about the demand curve. He was brilliant.

835
01:13:17.040 --> 01:13:23.400
Brilliant. I was interested about the whole demand curve and demand for labor. They understood

836
01:13:23.400 --> 01:13:32.400
that this is wage rate, quantity of labor hired, that the only way to raise wage rates

837
01:13:32.400 --> 01:13:38.960
by union activities is to cut the supply, shift the supply to the left at the expense

838
01:13:38.960 --> 01:13:47.720
At the expense of diminished employment, in other words, he realized that the union action

839
01:13:47.720 --> 01:13:50.440
pushing up the wage rates would un-employ a whole bunch of coal miners.

840
01:13:50.440 --> 01:13:54.600
He didn't care about that, he was only in favor of it because his object was to maximize

841
01:13:54.600 --> 01:14:00.240
the wage income for those union workers with seniority, those who had been in the union

842
01:14:00.240 --> 01:14:02.680
for ten years or something.

843
01:14:02.680 --> 01:14:06.200
At the expense of younger workers, those who didn't have seniority, and new people coming

844
01:14:06.200 --> 01:14:17.200
He didn't care about that. What he wanted to do was to maximize the income of existing union members of seniority.

845
01:14:17.200 --> 01:14:21.200
So he had industry-wide bargaining with the coal miner, the whole coal mining association.

846
01:14:21.200 --> 01:14:26.200
The coal miners, the large coal mine operators, were more in favor of this.

847
01:14:26.200 --> 01:14:33.200
They were in favor of higher wage rates to impose crippling higher costs on their small competitors, small miners, and they realized they couldn't pay it.

848
01:14:33.200 --> 01:14:56.200
In other words, we had industry-wide agreements between the coal operators and the coal union tremendously pushing up wage rates and leading to the bankruptcy of the smore mines, total depression in the coal mine industry, bankruptcy of the smore mines and massive unemployment in the coal fields, which continues to this day as the so-called Appalachia problem.

849
01:14:56.200 --> 01:15:01.200
There was no Appalachia problem before the unions came in, or the coal mining industry came in.

850
01:15:01.200 --> 01:15:07.160
The coal mining industry was the major employing center in that whole area.

851
01:15:07.160 --> 01:15:12.160
So as a result you have depression in the coal industry, but the large operators continued,

852
01:15:12.160 --> 01:15:16.640
the union members continued on with seniority, they were in great shape and sort of rode

853
01:15:16.640 --> 01:15:21.920
into the sunset, destroying the entire industry in its wake, but building up a huge pension

854
01:15:21.920 --> 01:15:26.680
fund and everything else had to be looted by the union organizers.

855
01:15:26.680 --> 01:15:33.000
So here's a beautiful example, a crystal clear example of how, in the Moxian myth, workers

856
01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:36.880
are always in solidarity against the employer. The employer is competing with each other

857
01:15:36.880 --> 01:15:41.560
for products, to sell stuff and to buy stuff, and workers compete against each other. We

858
01:15:41.560 --> 01:15:45.600
saw with immigration restrictions and everything else, and with the craft unions, and with

859
01:15:45.600 --> 01:15:50.120
the coal mining situation, when one group of workers benefit the expense of unemployment

860
01:15:50.120 --> 01:15:56.320
for the other group, for the younger people coming up. So we have collaboration between

861
01:15:56.320 --> 01:16:01.920
There was some monopolistic collaboration between the large employers and the union.

862
01:16:01.920 --> 01:16:06.160
Similar to the collaboration between the printing union, remember, and the printing

863
01:16:06.160 --> 01:16:10.960
employers in New York and New England to try to hobble, to try to impose higher costs on

864
01:16:10.960 --> 01:16:15.200
the southern, efficient southern printers, Kingsport strike.

865
01:16:15.200 --> 01:16:24.640
So similar things happened in the coal situation.

866
01:16:24.640 --> 01:16:27.880
So the whole Appalachian problem is really a product of the mine workers, of the mine

867
01:16:27.880 --> 01:16:38.880
worker employer, large employer collaboration in the 40s and 50s and 60s.

868
01:16:38.880 --> 01:16:42.160
Most of the increase, whatever increase in unions that have been in the last 20 years

869
01:16:42.160 --> 01:16:46.360
has been in government employee unions, which is really not exactly the same thing as, I

870
01:16:46.360 --> 01:16:50.120
mean that depends on what the government is willing to pay and it's not entirely an employer

871
01:16:50.120 --> 01:16:55.920
Employer vs. Employee Situations. It's how much the government officials, the taxpayers

872
01:16:55.920 --> 01:17:01.440
or whatever are willing to shell out. So the only union growth has really been in that

873
01:17:01.440 --> 01:17:08.440
in the government employee area. This of course has also made government very costly, like

874
01:17:08.440 --> 01:17:14.600
the post office, garbage collection. So there's now a big drive toward privatization. People

875
01:17:14.600 --> 01:17:19.880
get fed up with paying very high garbage costs or whatever and they contract out to private

876
01:17:19.880 --> 01:17:49.880
firms, which are either non-union, well, unionized, they don't have the same sort of cloud as the government union, they're simply, because since the taxpayer pays, the government doesn't really care. He'd be a nice guy. He's a government official. They're dealing with big unions, unions with big membership. They say, yeah, sure, we'll give you a 20% wage increase. Why not? The taxpayer shelves it out. Not the guy, not the president or the mayor or the governor. But this has now come to a ruse, to get to a situation where government is so costly, that even the government is now looking around for privatizing alternatives. And so you have

877
01:17:49.880 --> 01:17:58.880
We have garbage collection in many cities in the United States, there are private fire companies where the government simply contracts it out to the fire company instead of the fire department.

878
01:17:58.880 --> 01:18:09.880
Also, as I've said, the government officials don't have any real incentive to be efficient and to benefit the consumer because the taxpayer is forced to kick in.

879
01:18:09.880 --> 01:18:16.880
The fire, if anybody has any experience with fire departments, for example in New York,

880
01:18:16.880 --> 01:18:21.880
the usual, they usually don't care about the private property they're allegedly trying to save.

881
01:18:21.880 --> 01:18:25.880
In other words, the objective is to put the fire out relative to having to destroy a whole bunch of apartments

882
01:18:25.880 --> 01:18:29.880
in the name of putting out the fire.

883
01:18:29.880 --> 01:18:37.880
And because there's no consumer payment, you have to rely on a consumer to shell out.

884
01:18:37.880 --> 01:18:46.320
So it's a very different sort of situation with a private farm service.

885
01:18:46.320 --> 01:19:02.280
Same way of course with the mail and also the government services.

886
01:19:02.280 --> 01:19:06.360
I think this is actually sums up the union situation.

887
01:19:06.360 --> 01:19:13.400
The pro-union spirit is more or less dwindled a lot in the United States, so you don't have

888
01:19:13.400 --> 01:19:14.400
the backing for the stuff.

889
01:19:14.400 --> 01:19:24.680
One more thing I should say about unionization, about 20 years ago there was a famous great

890
01:19:24.680 --> 01:19:25.680
boycott.

891
01:19:25.680 --> 01:19:32.680
Cesar Chavez, one of the unionized grape workers in California and other areas, and the idea

892
01:19:32.680 --> 01:19:37.800
The idea was that the consumer should kick in, should help out the grape workers' union

893
01:19:37.800 --> 01:19:38.800
by boycotting grapes.

894
01:19:38.800 --> 01:19:44.800
Now the effect of this, of course, is if you're boycotting grapes, and here's a man for grapes,

895
01:19:44.800 --> 01:19:51.160
the effect, of course, is to cut the supply, the demand curve for grapes, here's the price

896
01:19:51.160 --> 01:19:55.960
of grapes, and reduce it because you're boycotting grapes.

897
01:19:55.960 --> 01:19:59.440
Of course, another peculiar thing about the whole grape thing is you can't see, when you

898
01:19:59.440 --> 01:20:02.120
look at a grape, you can't tell if it's a union grape or a non-union grape.

899
01:20:02.120 --> 01:20:10.120
The result of this course was to diminish the demand curve for all grapes, including the poor guys who unionized grapes.

900
01:20:10.120 --> 01:20:14.120
At any rate, the result of this course was that you cut the demand curve for grapes, shifted to the left,

901
01:20:14.120 --> 01:20:22.120
reduced the profits of the incurred losses in the grape industry, and the result, the demand curve for grape workers goes down.

902
01:20:22.120 --> 01:20:29.120
So the result of the boycott was to lower the wage rate for grape workers, instead of increasing them.

903
01:20:29.120 --> 01:20:41.120
Eventually, when they finally knuckled under, they did have unionization, they did increase the grape unions, although that's sort of diminished now for the last 10 years.

904
01:20:41.120 --> 01:20:49.120
But the interesting thing is that, in other words, if you look at the direct action here, boycotting, what boycotting does is it reduces the demand curve or something and thereby lowers the wage rate.

905
01:20:49.120 --> 01:20:58.120
So the goal, the objective was to benefit the grape workers, instead of that really injure the grape workers, at least for the whole period when the boycott was going on.

906
01:20:58.120 --> 01:21:08.120
As one economist wrote at the time, he said, if you want to really help the grape workers, you should eat as many grapes as possible, you should increase the man curve for grapes,

907
01:21:08.120 --> 01:21:17.120
which then of course increases the man curve for grape workers and increases their wage rate and increases the employment, instead of the other way around, which cuts the wage rate and cuts the employment.

908
01:21:17.120 --> 01:21:23.920
So boycotts are generally a self-defeating way of trying to benefit the workers involved,

909
01:21:23.920 --> 01:21:28.760
and at least while the boycott is going on, you can say, wow, the boycott is victorious,

910
01:21:28.760 --> 01:21:32.760
it helps them, it's kind of a, you know, I'm not sure the great workers really consulted

911
01:21:32.760 --> 01:21:39.840
about this in depth, at least the full consequences were stalled after them before the boycott

912
01:21:39.840 --> 01:21:40.840
got underway.

913
01:21:40.840 --> 01:21:46.000
This is a trouble by way of all boycotts in general.

914
01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:51.480
An ideological boycott, say a boycott of Russia or South Africa or whatever, the problem is

915
01:21:51.480 --> 01:21:55.160
it doesn't help the workers who are involved in this thing.

916
01:21:55.160 --> 01:22:00.000
It cuts the demand curve and thereby reduces their wages and their employment.

917
01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:03.400
So it's a very tricky kind of weapon to use.

918
01:22:03.400 --> 01:22:08.760
It's a weapon which is much more self-indulgent, it's a weapon which is usually employed by

919
01:22:08.760 --> 01:22:15.560
people far removed from the action, who don't see the consequences on the people involved.

920
01:22:15.560 --> 01:22:34.560
Okay, we now cover the union question, the next step on a, we can only deal with it to some extent, the next step is to talk about the supply of labor, talk about the union and the effect on the supply of labor,

921
01:22:34.560 --> 01:22:40.560
the supply of labor and population, in other words, one of the big determinants of labor supply is the number of people around.

922
01:22:40.560 --> 01:22:48.560
And so the question then is, the question of population growth, which about 10 years ago was a big thing.

923
01:22:48.560 --> 01:22:55.560
There were a lot of, the opinion of population growth fluctuated a lot in the 20th century.

924
01:22:55.560 --> 01:23:00.560
Usually in the old days the idea was the bigger the population the better.

925
01:23:00.560 --> 01:23:08.560
And then with the Malthusian theory, this was the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus,

926
01:23:08.560 --> 01:23:23.880
An English minister, an economist, around late 18th, early 19th century and in writing

927
01:23:23.880 --> 01:23:27.200
in a period, interesting enough, writing in a period of a tremendous industrial revolution

928
01:23:27.200 --> 01:23:30.880
where population was going up and standards of living were going up at the same time.

929
01:23:30.880 --> 01:23:35.760
Writing in this period around 1790s, Malthus concluded that the world is going to hell

930
01:23:35.760 --> 01:23:38.300
because of increased population growth.

931
01:23:38.300 --> 01:23:40.140
the way he put it was

932
01:23:40.140 --> 01:23:44.220
the famous phrase was that the population tends to grow geometrically

933
01:23:44.220 --> 01:23:45.580
in other words

934
01:23:45.580 --> 01:23:49.340
it tends to double and quadruple whenever everybody has two kids or four kids

935
01:23:49.340 --> 01:23:51.140
and each one of them has four kids

936
01:23:51.140 --> 01:23:55.860
you have sort of a skyrocketing or exponential increase in population

937
01:23:55.860 --> 01:23:58.340
whereas the food supply

938
01:23:58.340 --> 01:24:01.380
grows only arithmetically, it only grows

939
01:24:01.380 --> 01:24:04.700
I guess more moderately, it's a very peculiar construction, but anyway

940
01:24:04.700 --> 01:24:07.740
the population grows geometrically

941
01:24:07.740 --> 01:24:37.740
And food supply grows arithmetically, and so therefore, he said, population always tends to press on the food supply, people are tending to die out, in other words, people are always down a subsistence level, if that, and as population presses on the food supply, this causes famine, wars, because everybody's, you know, warring for the only water hole left and that sort of thing, killing each other all the time.

942
01:24:37.740 --> 01:24:43.500
and the wealth of the scarce food and disease and famine, all these things are coming awake

943
01:24:43.500 --> 01:24:45.500
which tends to keep the population down.

944
01:24:45.500 --> 01:24:50.900
In other words, as population becomes excessive, people kind of die out, they starve, there's

945
01:24:50.900 --> 01:24:52.620
diseases and they kill each other.

946
01:24:52.620 --> 01:24:57.260
So this is the, it's a very gloomy picture, of course, of world history.

947
01:24:57.260 --> 01:25:02.260
It's a curious thing, he wrote this just at a time, in a period when the population was

948
01:25:02.260 --> 01:25:04.780
going up indeed, but when the food, when the standard living was going up.

949
01:25:04.780 --> 01:25:11.780
we wrote it, it's very odd for a guy to write this just as standard living was taking it off into the stratosphere for the first time in 500 years

950
01:25:11.780 --> 01:25:18.780
in other words, what you really had is the population remained about the same in Europe

951
01:25:18.780 --> 01:25:24.780
about constant, from about 1000 A.D. until about 1750

952
01:25:24.780 --> 01:25:28.780
this is simplification, but basically this is what it is, it didn't really fluctuate much, it didn't keep increasing

953
01:25:28.780 --> 01:25:32.780
we're used to a situation where population is always going up, it didn't happen

954
01:25:32.780 --> 01:25:37.860
1750, he started taking it off, doubling every 30 years or so, and the reason is because

955
01:25:37.860 --> 01:25:43.020
if standard living went up, that's basically the reason we'll go into.

956
01:25:43.020 --> 01:25:46.580
So he's writing this thing just at a time when everybody, when the population was really

957
01:25:46.580 --> 01:25:51.060
improving, not only going up, but also improving standard living, and it's influenced economics.

958
01:25:51.060 --> 01:25:55.640
The classical economists became Malthusians, always worried about the population pressing

959
01:25:55.640 --> 01:25:58.660
on the food supply, just at a time when obviously it wasn't pressing on the food supply.

960
01:25:58.660 --> 01:26:17.580
In the early 20th century, as the population started declining in Western Europe, in France

961
01:26:17.580 --> 01:26:22.340
and other places in Western Europe, the population was declining, and so the theoreticians started

962
01:26:22.340 --> 01:26:26.220
belly-aching about race suicide, as they call it, because the world is going to die out.

963
01:26:26.220 --> 01:26:31.220
What they do is they project trends. They say, well, if the French population is going down by 2% a year or something,

964
01:26:31.220 --> 01:26:36.220
it means in 80 years the French franc will be wiped out. In other words, given the existing rate,

965
01:26:36.220 --> 01:26:42.220
they simply extrapolate the trend. They say, gee, the franc will disappear in 80 years or 100 years, whatever it is.

966
01:26:42.220 --> 01:26:47.220
This, by the way, is the way demographers operate. It's a very simplistic...

967
01:26:47.220 --> 01:26:53.220
We just take existing trends and extrapolate them, and of course you can have any sort of horror result.

968
01:26:53.220 --> 01:27:00.220
So then they started having bounties for kids in France and other parts of Western Europe, subsidized number of kids because they were also worried about cannon fodder.

969
01:27:00.220 --> 01:27:06.220
In other words, they were worried if the French population declines, how are they going to fight? How are you going to conscript people in the army if there's no people to be conscripted?

970
01:27:06.220 --> 01:27:11.220
So they started giving bounties for kids, you know, give you a thousand dollars per kid born.

971
01:27:11.220 --> 01:27:16.220
And this indeed tended to turn around in the population growth.

972
01:27:16.220 --> 01:27:38.030
and about 10, 15, 20 years ago, they started a ZPG history and the population is growing too fast and it won't have any room to stand on, we'll disappear, we'll be starving, therefore we should limit population growth now, a big so-called ZPG movement, calling for zero population growth, okay we'll resume this next time, next Tuesday