WEBVTT

NOTE 14. Repeal the Drinking Age

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.000
REPEAL THE DRINKING AGE

2
00:00:03.000 --> 00:00:16.000
Somehow, and no one seems to even imagine how, this country managed to survive and thrive before 1984 without a national minimum drinking age.

3
00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:20.000
Before that, the drinking question was left to the states.

4
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:28.000
In the 19th century, and looking back even before, prepare yourself to imagine horrific, anarchistic nightmares.

5
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:33.440
There were no drinking laws anywhere, so far as anyone can tell.

6
00:00:33.440 --> 00:00:38.520
The regulation of drinking and age was left to society, which is to say, families, churches

7
00:00:38.520 --> 00:00:43.660
and communities, with varying sensibilities, who regulated such things with varying degrees

8
00:00:43.660 --> 00:00:46.160
of intensity.

9
00:00:46.160 --> 00:00:50.560
Probably some kids drank themselves silly, and we all know that this doesn't happen

10
00:00:50.560 --> 00:00:56.080
now, wink-wink, but many others learned to drink responsibly from an early age, even

11
00:00:56.080 --> 00:01:01.720
and Drinking Bourbon for Breakfast Really, it is only because we are somehow

12
00:01:01.720 --> 00:01:07.840
used to it that we accept the complete absurdity of a national law that prohibits the sale

13
00:01:07.840 --> 00:01:13.920
of beer, wine and liquor to anyone under the age of 21.

14
00:01:13.920 --> 00:01:18.080
This is a restriction unknown in the developed world.

15
00:01:18.080 --> 00:01:23.120
Most countries set 18 as the limit and countries like Germany and Austria allow 16-year-olds

16
00:01:23.120 --> 00:01:26.080
to Buy Wine and Beer.

17
00:01:26.080 --> 00:01:31.280
In the home of the brave, the police are busting up teen parties, shutting down bars, hectoring

18
00:01:31.280 --> 00:01:37.700
restaurants, finding convenience stores, and otherwise bullying people into clean living.

19
00:01:37.700 --> 00:01:43.040
We read the news and think, crazy kids, they shouldn't be doing this.

20
00:01:43.040 --> 00:01:48.440
And yet, every day, young people are finding ways around these preposterous restrictions

21
00:01:48.440 --> 00:02:07.520
On college campuses, the industry of the fake ID thrives as never before.

22
00:02:07.520 --> 00:02:12.440
It seems nearly true that almost every student believes himself or herself in need of getting

23
00:02:12.440 --> 00:02:13.920
one.

24
00:02:13.920 --> 00:02:15.640
Do the restaurants and bars know this?

25
00:02:15.640 --> 00:02:17.840
Of course they do.

26
00:02:17.840 --> 00:02:21.900
They have every interest in having these fake IDs look as real as possible to give themselves

27
00:02:21.900 --> 00:02:25.360
some degree of legal immunity if someone gets caught.

28
00:02:25.360 --> 00:02:30.600
The whole thing is a gigantic fake-a-roo, a mass exercise in open but unspoken hypocrisy,

29
00:02:30.600 --> 00:02:33.780
and everyone knows it.

30
00:02:33.780 --> 00:02:39.720
If you think about it, it is the very definition of a state gone mad that a society would have

31
00:02:39.720 --> 00:02:45.140
a law of this sort spread out over an entire nation that tells people that they cannot

32
00:02:45.140 --> 00:02:58.020
In Virginia, in the colonial period where the average lifespan was 25, this law would

33
00:02:58.020 --> 00:03:03.260
have provided only four years of drinking in the last fifth of one's life.

34
00:03:03.260 --> 00:03:05.260
But what a way to go.

35
00:03:05.260 --> 00:03:10.100
However, if you think about the history of this country in the 20th century, one might

36
00:03:10.100 --> 00:03:16.040
might say that the age of 21 is actually rather liberal, as strange as that may sound.

37
00:03:16.040 --> 00:03:21.260
After all, it was in this country, the land of the free, that the federal government actually

38
00:03:21.260 --> 00:03:26.940
added as part of its constitution a total banning of liquor, wine and beer, from sea

39
00:03:26.940 --> 00:03:32.700
to shining sea, 1920 to 1933.

40
00:03:32.700 --> 00:03:38.740
The 1920s roared, in any case, with organized crime, speakeasies, police corruption, rampant

41
00:03:38.740 --> 00:03:43.060
and alcohol abuse.

42
00:03:43.060 --> 00:03:48.980
The mystery to me is not the failure of prohibition, but the sheer insanity of the attempt to do

43
00:03:48.980 --> 00:03:51.180
this in the first place.

44
00:03:51.180 --> 00:03:55.620
It seems utterly bizarre in a country that habitually proclaims its devotion to liberty

45
00:03:55.620 --> 00:04:00.560
and freedom that such a thing would have ever been attempted.

46
00:04:00.560 --> 00:04:06.920
But here is Amendment 18, passed in 1917, in the same epoch in which government was

47
00:04:06.920 --> 00:04:11.820
is going to rid the world of despotism and stabilize all business cycles through scientific

48
00:04:11.820 --> 00:04:14.120
monetary policy.

49
00:04:14.120 --> 00:04:22.240
The manufacture, sale or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation

50
00:04:22.240 --> 00:04:28.000
thereof into or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territories subject

51
00:04:28.000 --> 00:04:32.920
to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.

52
00:04:32.920 --> 00:04:41.480
Yes, it really happened, right here, the good old USA, and I'm grateful to Mark Thornton

53
00:04:41.480 --> 00:04:47.100
for documenting the politics and economics of the whole sad affair in his book, The Economics

54
00:04:47.100 --> 00:04:49.420
of Prohibition.

55
00:04:49.420 --> 00:04:55.020
In a rare case of reversion and admission of error, the same constitution was later

56
00:04:55.020 --> 00:04:56.920
amended again.

57
00:04:56.920 --> 00:05:04.360
The 18th Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.

58
00:05:04.360 --> 00:05:09.080
But the habit of prohibition was already ingrained.

59
00:05:09.080 --> 00:05:13.440
For the state, it was two steps forward and one step back.

60
00:05:13.440 --> 00:05:18.580
For the rest of the population, what was previously a very normal part of life, drinking potentially

61
00:05:18.580 --> 00:05:24.800
intoxicating liquids, something integral to normal living from the Paleolithic era forward,

62
00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:29.600
took on a special ethos of hypness and daring-do.

63
00:05:29.600 --> 00:05:33.120
The father of our country might have been the largest distiller of whiskey in the late

64
00:05:33.120 --> 00:05:39.520
1700s, but after prohibition, liquor took on associations of decadence and bad behavior

65
00:05:39.520 --> 00:05:40.520
generally.

66
00:05:40.520 --> 00:05:48.120
A distiller today wouldn't be elected to the city council, much less as the US president.

67
00:05:48.120 --> 00:05:52.240
Now it wasn't too many years ago that the laws tended to be a bit more reasonable with

68
00:05:52.240 --> 00:05:55.080
for the Drinking Age Starting at 18.

69
00:05:55.080 --> 00:05:59.940
But that was changed with a universal law for the age of 21, and many people remember

70
00:05:59.940 --> 00:06:01.280
what this was like.

71
00:06:01.280 --> 00:06:07.280
For two years, a person was able to order a beer with a burger, and then, one day, doing

72
00:06:07.280 --> 00:06:11.240
the same thing was a criminal act.

73
00:06:11.240 --> 00:06:17.720
Digging around for explanations about these silly laws, there is one overarching argument.

74
00:06:17.720 --> 00:06:19.840
Driving.

75
00:06:19.840 --> 00:06:23.100
We don't want drunken teenagers on the road.

76
00:06:23.100 --> 00:06:27.220
These laws have saved thousands, millions of lives, and the desire to change them is

77
00:06:27.220 --> 00:06:31.700
the equivalent of harboring a death wish for a generation.

78
00:06:31.700 --> 00:06:37.680
Now one libertarian response might be, then get rid of the public roads and let road owners

79
00:06:37.680 --> 00:06:41.960
manage whether and to what extent its drivers drink.

80
00:06:41.960 --> 00:06:45.920
That's a principled position, but a bit impractical.

81
00:06:45.920 --> 00:06:51.300
The biggest problem with that response is that it concedes too much.

82
00:06:51.300 --> 00:06:54.960
The closer you look at these studies, the fishier they appear.

83
00:06:54.960 --> 00:07:00.160
It turns out that most of the declines in binge drinking among high school kids, according

84
00:07:00.160 --> 00:07:05.960
to trends in Drug Use Report, took place before the change in the law and, according to researchers

85
00:07:05.960 --> 00:07:12.320
Jeffrey A. Miron and Elina Tertelbaum, the changes in trends after are heavily biased

86
00:07:12.320 --> 00:07:15.120
by data sampling from a single state.

87
00:07:15.120 --> 00:07:21.060
Therefore, data on drunk driving, whatever the trends, cannot be statistically attributed

88
00:07:21.060 --> 00:07:25.120
to the national minimum drinking age law.

89
00:07:25.120 --> 00:07:30.400
In any case, quote, underage drinking is still sky high, even with the law, making course

90
00:07:30.400 --> 00:07:33.520
in effect even more difficult to trace.

91
00:07:33.520 --> 00:07:38.940
As to why drinking is still high among college students, the National Institute on Drug Abuse

92
00:07:38.940 --> 00:07:42.960
offers the following polite reason.

93
00:07:42.960 --> 00:07:47.560
has provided some insulation from the effects of changes in the drinking age laws that took

94
00:07:47.560 --> 00:07:50.560
place during that interval.

95
00:07:50.560 --> 00:07:53.160
You can say that again.

96
00:07:53.160 --> 00:07:54.600
Human beings are remarkable things.

97
00:07:54.600 --> 00:08:00.560
When they want to do something, no amount of tyranny, even that of jail, can stop them.

98
00:08:00.560 --> 00:08:07.480
Still, it is impossible to silence the screams of the prohibition advocates who trace every

99
00:08:07.480 --> 00:08:11.120
car accident among teen drivers to alcohol.

100
00:08:11.120 --> 00:08:15.560
I find this all fascinating to read because it bears so much in common with the prohibition

101
00:08:15.560 --> 00:08:19.920
literature from the 1910s and the 1920s.

102
00:08:19.920 --> 00:08:24.840
Their propaganda blamed alcohol for the destruction of the family, the persistence of poverty,

103
00:08:24.840 --> 00:08:31.960
the high rate of crime, the problem of illiteracy and the ubiquity of sin generally.

104
00:08:31.960 --> 00:08:36.240
Clearly their arguments were widely accepted, even though it is all a big and fallacious

105
00:08:36.240 --> 00:08:38.960
mix-up of cause and effect.

106
00:08:38.960 --> 00:08:43.040
It's not that liquor caused all these terrible things, it's that the people who engage in

107
00:08:43.040 --> 00:08:46.680
terrible behaviours tend also to be drinkers.

108
00:08:46.680 --> 00:08:52.600
Abolishing the drink won't fix the problems of the human heart.

109
00:08:52.600 --> 00:08:58.520
So it is with teenage drinking, with two-thirds or more of people under the age of 21 reporting

110
00:08:58.520 --> 00:09:02.340
that they have consumed alcohol in the past year, it should be obvious that the law is

111
00:09:02.340 --> 00:09:07.860
doing nothing but providing a gigantic excuse for arbitrary police-state impositions on

112
00:09:07.860 --> 00:09:14.460
and Human Liberty, and also socializing young people in a habit of hypocrisy and law-breaking.

113
00:09:14.460 --> 00:09:21.580
It's like the old Soviet-style joke – they pretend to regulate us, and we pretend to

114
00:09:21.580 --> 00:09:22.580
be regulated.

115
00:09:22.580 --> 00:09:28.420
Still, shouldn't it be illegal for young people to drink and drive?

116
00:09:28.420 --> 00:09:35.660
Murray Rothbard sums up the libertarian point in For a New Liberty – only the overt commission

117
00:09:35.660 --> 00:09:38.700
of a crime should be illegal.

118
00:09:38.700 --> 00:09:44.220
And the way to combat crimes committed under the influence of alcohol is to be more diligent

119
00:09:44.220 --> 00:09:48.220
about the crimes themselves, not to outlaw the alcohol.

120
00:09:48.220 --> 00:09:53.060
And this would have the further beneficial effect of reducing crimes not committed under

121
00:09:53.060 --> 00:09:55.820
the influence of alcohol.

122
00:09:55.820 --> 00:10:00.780
We've just been through our annual celebration of Independence Day, the day on which every

123
00:10:00.780 --> 00:10:05.580
Radio and Television Commentator gives pious speeches about the glories of American liberty

124
00:10:05.580 --> 00:10:09.060
and all the sacrifices that have been made to preserve it.

125
00:10:09.060 --> 00:10:12.240
Do we really believe it?

126
00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:17.120
The founders would have never imagined such a thing as a national law regulating the age

127
00:10:17.120 --> 00:10:22.620
at which beer, wine, port and other alcoholic beverages are consumed.

128
00:10:22.620 --> 00:10:27.940
If we are serious about embracing their vision of a free society, as opposed to just blathering

129
00:10:27.940 --> 00:10:33.700
Let's start with something that is supremely practical and would have immediate effects

130
00:10:33.700 --> 00:10:40.700
on an entire generation – repeal the national minimum drinking age law.

131
00:10:40.700 --> 00:10:43.620
You say that this is unthinkable?

132
00:10:43.620 --> 00:10:47.620
I say that you don't really believe in human liberty.
