WEBVTT

NOTE 24. America’s Underground

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.200
America's Underground

2
00:00:05.200 --> 00:00:10.040
These were sharp businessmen, the four guys, who pointed out that there were three dead

3
00:00:10.040 --> 00:00:14.200
trees in my backyard that needed to be cut down lest they attract horrible bugs that

4
00:00:14.200 --> 00:00:16.360
would infest my entire property.

5
00:00:16.360 --> 00:00:24.880
They would cut them down and remove them for $475 in cash.

6
00:00:24.880 --> 00:00:31.220
We dickered back and forth and finally settled on $350, in cash.

7
00:00:31.220 --> 00:00:36.400
They attacked the trees like ants on ice cream, 45 minutes.

8
00:00:36.400 --> 00:00:39.460
The trees were gone, without a trace.

9
00:00:39.460 --> 00:00:43.220
I paid them, in cash.

10
00:00:43.220 --> 00:00:45.860
I didn't break any laws by paying them this way.

11
00:00:45.860 --> 00:00:49.520
They broke no laws in accepting cash only.

12
00:00:49.520 --> 00:00:54.840
The state is egregiously invasive in our financial affairs, but it hasn't actually banned

13
00:00:54.840 --> 00:00:57.960
and the use of cash.

14
00:00:57.960 --> 00:01:02.860
So it was last weekend when I was travelling and needed some copies made from a Pakistani-owned

15
00:01:02.860 --> 00:01:05.400
copy shop in the Midwest.

16
00:01:05.400 --> 00:01:10.980
They would provide them on high-quality coloured paper for 15 cents each, but only if I paid

17
00:01:10.980 --> 00:01:12.480
in cash.

18
00:01:12.480 --> 00:01:14.520
And so I did.

19
00:01:14.520 --> 00:01:16.200
I asked for a receipt.

20
00:01:16.200 --> 00:01:21.740
Whoops, the printer on the receipt machine was acting up, so she had to write a receipt

21
00:01:21.740 --> 00:01:23.320
by hand.

22
00:01:23.320 --> 00:01:27.780
It was indecipherable, but I took it anyway. Again, I wasn't breaking any laws in paying

23
00:01:27.780 --> 00:01:31.320
with cash. And she wasn't either.

24
00:01:31.320 --> 00:01:35.720
And yet we all intuit that there is some reason why cash payments are more valuable in the

25
00:01:35.720 --> 00:01:40.360
American service sector than checks or credit cards. Nudge, nudge, know what I mean?

26
00:01:40.360 --> 00:01:45.480
With cash, you enjoy the highest likelihood of staying out of harm's way. If you don't

27
00:01:45.480 --> 00:01:49.640
want to formalize your business model and get embroiled in the entire public sector

28
00:01:49.640 --> 00:01:54.880
apparatus of withholding tax, social security, mandated healthcare, minimum wages and the

29
00:01:54.880 --> 00:02:00.520
rest of the mind-boggling apparatus of central planning, doing a cash-only business is the

30
00:02:00.520 --> 00:02:02.880
wisest choice.

31
00:02:02.880 --> 00:02:06.280
Now this is interesting.

32
00:02:06.280 --> 00:02:12.880
The social apparatus of taxing and regulating is said to be good for us all.

33
00:02:12.880 --> 00:02:15.320
Without it, our sense of well-being would plummet.

34
00:02:15.320 --> 00:02:20.000
We need worker protection and all the glorious services of the state.

35
00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:26.020
We need protection in old age and protection from exploitative capitalists.

36
00:02:26.020 --> 00:02:30.140
We comply with the whole command-and-control burden because we are better off as a people

37
00:02:30.140 --> 00:02:33.920
than if we acted merely on our own.

38
00:02:33.920 --> 00:02:38.120
So let's say that I apply this in the two cases mentioned above.

39
00:02:38.120 --> 00:02:44.640
I have a sneaking suspicion that my tree-cutting friends are cutting their tax burden as well.

40
00:02:44.640 --> 00:02:48.200
I wonder about this Pakistani printer.

41
00:02:48.200 --> 00:02:52.800
Maybe they are not paying minimum wage to those employees, nor taking out social security,

42
00:02:52.800 --> 00:02:55.880
nor providing medical benefits.

43
00:02:55.880 --> 00:02:58.600
So as a good citizen, I make an inquiry.

44
00:02:58.600 --> 00:03:01.800
I demand to see their immigration papers and tax records.

45
00:03:01.800 --> 00:03:07.880
I look them up in the official directory of obedient businesses, if such a thing exists.

46
00:03:07.880 --> 00:03:11.480
I conclude that these are unseemly operators.

47
00:03:11.480 --> 00:03:16.360
It's true that I know I can get good service from them, but I do not want to partake in

48
00:03:16.360 --> 00:03:20.440
a transaction that will hurt others in society.

49
00:03:20.440 --> 00:03:25.640
Regulations and taxes are good for everyone, and so I will have no part in this black market

50
00:03:25.640 --> 00:03:27.260
activity.

51
00:03:27.260 --> 00:03:29.600
So I decline to hire these tree cutters.

52
00:03:29.600 --> 00:03:31.560
I decline to let this lady make copies for me.

53
00:03:31.560 --> 00:03:37.460
I wash my hands of the unsightly mess and move on.

54
00:03:37.460 --> 00:03:38.460
What happens?

55
00:03:38.460 --> 00:03:44.820
Well, my dead tree still stands, and my copies are unmade.

56
00:03:44.820 --> 00:03:49.580
The suppliers are denied a chance to serve others and profit from it, a transaction that

57
00:03:49.580 --> 00:03:54.080
both sides desired does not take place.

58
00:03:54.080 --> 00:03:59.020
Under the theory that regulations and taxes are good for us, we should both feel better

59
00:03:59.020 --> 00:04:01.580
that we didn't exchange.

60
00:04:01.580 --> 00:04:05.140
Somehow we don't.

61
00:04:05.140 --> 00:04:11.400
Or let's say that the suppliers of these services suddenly experience a conversion, and newly

62
00:04:11.400 --> 00:04:17.380
enlightened as to their civic obligations, they decide to formalize their operations.

63
00:04:17.380 --> 00:04:22.660
But of course that means that the tree-cutting service is now one-third more expensive, and

64
00:04:22.660 --> 00:04:25.220
the copies cost that much more too.

65
00:04:25.220 --> 00:04:30.420
I decide that it's just not worth it, and the exchange doesn't happen.

66
00:04:30.420 --> 00:04:36.300
Again, we should feel better, but somehow we do not.

67
00:04:36.300 --> 00:04:42.940
The question I keep asking is, how is society actually better off?

68
00:04:42.940 --> 00:04:49.520
My copies are unmade, my trees are uncut, and these businesses lose profits, which means

69
00:04:49.520 --> 00:04:55.660
they have less for providing for their children and for making a good life for themselves.

70
00:04:55.660 --> 00:05:00.500
This is especially tough in recessionary times when the prices of everything are rising and

71
00:05:00.500 --> 00:05:04.360
unemployment threatens all marginal workers.

72
00:05:04.360 --> 00:05:10.680
Try as I might, I just don't believe that anyone is really getting hurt in a cash exchange

73
00:05:10.680 --> 00:05:18.020
that enters into the grey area between the underground economy and the official economy.

74
00:05:18.020 --> 00:05:23.720
In the developing world where government bureaucrats rule everything with outrageous arbitrariness,

75
00:05:23.720 --> 00:05:30.620
The sector of society that functions in this grey area is called the informal sector.

76
00:05:30.620 --> 00:05:34.480
It is a burgeoning area of study for many academics on the right and the left, and for

77
00:05:34.480 --> 00:05:36.020
different reasons.

78
00:05:36.020 --> 00:05:42.480
It is mostly populated by the poor, and the poor have the largest stake in the outcome.

79
00:05:42.480 --> 00:05:47.320
Hans Senholtz wrote an excellent little study on the topic for the Mises Institute back

80
00:05:47.320 --> 00:05:49.740
in 1984.

81
00:05:49.740 --> 00:05:54.980
The upshot is that the larger and more intrusive the government, the more the informal sector

82
00:05:54.980 --> 00:05:56.640
flourishes.

83
00:05:56.640 --> 00:06:02.880
It is a safety valve of sorts, one that is ignored by GDP counters and nearly invisible

84
00:06:02.880 --> 00:06:05.980
to macroeconomic planners.

85
00:06:05.980 --> 00:06:12.420
One wonders just how large the US informal sector truly is.

86
00:06:12.420 --> 00:06:16.140
I'm not just talking about the drug trade or prostitution or off-the-books gambling,

87
00:06:16.140 --> 00:06:21.420
I'm referring to wholly legitimate and wholly legal trades of goods and services that take

88
00:06:21.420 --> 00:06:26.500
place outside the purview of the public sector.

89
00:06:26.500 --> 00:06:31.260
I'm going to venture a guess that every single reader of this article is capable of telling

90
00:06:31.260 --> 00:06:34.740
stories similar to mine above.

91
00:06:34.740 --> 00:06:39.540
The cash-only economy is pervasive in the United States.

92
00:06:39.540 --> 00:06:40.780
How big?

93
00:06:40.780 --> 00:06:43.100
No one knows for sure, obviously.

94
00:06:43.100 --> 00:06:48.540
The lesson here represents a wholesale overturning of the official rationale for the interventionist

95
00:06:48.540 --> 00:06:52.620
state that it is good for us.

96
00:06:52.620 --> 00:06:59.260
You can turn these informal scenarios around in your head again and again, and still fail

97
00:06:59.260 --> 00:07:04.940
to see how we as a society are better off when mutually beneficial exchanges that would

98
00:07:04.940 --> 00:07:12.980
take place absent intervention fail to take place because of the intervention.

99
00:07:12.980 --> 00:07:18.180
What's more, the existence of the informal sector provides a useful blueprint for reform.

100
00:07:18.180 --> 00:07:23.540
They can be completely abolished by lowering the costs associated with compliance.

101
00:07:23.540 --> 00:07:29.220
If the costs of compliance fall low enough, what is informal becomes formal, and no one

102
00:07:29.220 --> 00:07:32.780
has any reason to continue to hide anything.

103
00:07:32.780 --> 00:07:39.220
The agenda for a free market might be summed up as nothing more than the complete legalization

104
00:07:39.220 --> 00:07:45.580
of the Prevailing Informal Sector, which itself is created and sustained by a tax and regulatory

105
00:07:45.580 --> 00:07:50.380
burden that is too heavy to be sustained.

106
00:07:50.380 --> 00:07:56.660
And yet, the impetus for reform is precisely the opposite.

107
00:07:56.660 --> 00:08:02.700
The politicians believe that if they could stamp out the informal sector, crack down

108
00:08:02.700 --> 00:08:08.540
on cash-only businesses, shut down the fly-by-night tree cutters and photocopiers, we would all

109
00:08:08.540 --> 00:08:11.140
be better off.

110
00:08:11.140 --> 00:08:16.860
What will it take for the public sector to begin seeing the informal sector as a model

111
00:08:16.860 --> 00:08:22.820
to replicate rather than a symbol of antisocial economic activity?

112
00:08:22.820 --> 00:08:28.940
In a phrase, it will take an enlightened political class that is more interested in the well-being

113
00:08:28.940 --> 00:08:34.180
of Society and the Power and Glory of the State.
