WEBVTT

NOTE 38. The Socialism of Agri-Patents

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.160
The Socialism of Agri-Patents

2
00:00:05.160 --> 00:00:09.760
I'm watching the movie Unknown, which is about what happens when a man's identity

3
00:00:09.760 --> 00:00:13.720
is stripped away while in a foreign country.

4
00:00:13.720 --> 00:00:19.720
Without a passport or any other proof of identity, he is left to wonder, and then turn to a battle

5
00:00:19.720 --> 00:00:22.160
for recapturing who he is.

6
00:00:22.160 --> 00:00:27.560
It is a thrilling film in every way, one that taps into a deep anxiety we all have.

7
00:00:27.560 --> 00:00:40.280
But as we approach the core of the film, the topic turns, in ways that are unimportant

8
00:00:40.280 --> 00:00:45.820
to this article, toward the problem of agricultural patents.

9
00:00:45.820 --> 00:00:51.540
This is one in a long line of lefty films that seem to turn on this topic.

10
00:00:51.540 --> 00:00:56.100
It was the same with the blockbuster Food, Inc., which, for all its annoying and pointless

11
00:00:56.100 --> 00:01:00.980
This hectoring about the evils of living amidst capitalist plenty did have one compelling

12
00:01:00.980 --> 00:01:08.380
point to make about the injustice and exploitation of agricultural patterns.

13
00:01:08.380 --> 00:01:14.140
Such ridiculous patterns had no part in the whole history of humanity.

14
00:01:14.140 --> 00:01:20.740
As Bontrain and Levine write, Until the early 1970s, animal and plant species

15
00:01:20.740 --> 00:01:25.580
innovation flourished without much in the way of protection from intellectual monopoly.

16
00:01:25.580 --> 00:01:29.700
Farmers would develop a new plant variety, the initial seeds of which were sold to farmers

17
00:01:29.700 --> 00:01:32.380
at relatively high prices.

18
00:01:32.380 --> 00:01:36.660
Farmers were then free to reproduce and resell such seeds on the market and compete with

19
00:01:36.660 --> 00:01:40.740
the initial breeders without the latter bringing them to court.

20
00:01:40.740 --> 00:01:46.340
In fact, some bozo tried to patent a species in 1889, but the patent commissioner rejected

21
00:01:46.340 --> 00:01:51.960
it as unreasonable and impossible, exactly.

22
00:01:51.960 --> 00:01:55.140
But this changed in stages.

23
00:01:55.140 --> 00:02:01.800
The Plant Patent Act of 1930 provided very narrow coverage, which was later extended

24
00:02:01.800 --> 00:02:04.440
in the 1950s.

25
00:02:04.440 --> 00:02:11.800
Then in 1970, the Plant Variety Protection Act extended such protection to plants that

26
00:02:11.800 --> 00:02:15.140
are sexually reproduced.

27
00:02:15.140 --> 00:02:21.060
Then between 1980 and 1987, patent protection was for the first time extended to the products

28
00:02:21.060 --> 00:02:23.360
of biotechnology.

29
00:02:23.360 --> 00:02:30.520
When all hell broke loose, as seeds and species and even genetic codes came to be monopolized

30
00:02:30.520 --> 00:02:35.240
by private parties holding government privileges.

31
00:02:35.240 --> 00:02:40.920
The tragedy for defenders of the free market is that these monopolies have handed socialists

32
00:02:40.920 --> 00:02:47.400
the best case they've ever had to rail against capitalistic exploitation.

33
00:02:47.400 --> 00:02:52.840
After all, we are dealing with the staff of life, the very core of the human problem,

34
00:02:52.840 --> 00:03:00.400
How to Feed Ourselves, and this has hit the sweet spot of socialistic bias.

35
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:05.680
We have something here that has always been universally available, a free good for all,

36
00:03:05.680 --> 00:03:11.400
that has been transformed by private lobbying into a scarce commodity that has led to countless

37
00:03:11.400 --> 00:03:19.000
billions in profits for a handful of monopolists like Monsanto and DuPont, who spend their

38
00:03:19.000 --> 00:03:24.920
Their billions lobbying to keep their privileges, and fighting those who would dare trespass

39
00:03:24.920 --> 00:03:29.800
on their proprietary ownership of knowledge.

40
00:03:29.800 --> 00:03:34.880
It sounds like a nightmare that only a socialist could invent to feed his or her paranoia about

41
00:03:34.880 --> 00:03:37.640
private producers.

42
00:03:37.640 --> 00:03:41.840
Think of it this way – let's say you go to a restaurant and have a lemon cheesecake

43
00:03:41.840 --> 00:03:47.320
– you love it, so you reverse-engineer it in your mind and make it at home to serve

44
00:03:47.320 --> 00:03:49.700
at a Tupperware Party.

45
00:03:49.700 --> 00:03:54.780
As soon as the party starts, jack-booted thugs arrive wielding guns and drag you away as

46
00:03:54.780 --> 00:03:57.680
a criminal for stealing a recipe.

47
00:03:57.680 --> 00:04:04.520
The cook is dragged away, same as a real thief or murderer.

48
00:04:04.520 --> 00:04:09.140
That is the short version of what has happened to the food and agriculture industry over

49
00:04:09.140 --> 00:04:11.560
the last thirty or so years.

50
00:04:11.560 --> 00:04:17.200
Again, this is after a whole history of humanity somehow getting by, without central planners

51
00:04:17.200 --> 00:04:35.120
In the movie in question, the monopolists are pictured as thugs and killers who will

52
00:04:35.120 --> 00:04:40.960
stop at nothing to prevent a new method for growing corn from becoming part of the commons.

53
00:04:40.960 --> 00:04:46.240
A scientist works with an Arab prince to release the recipe to the world, but the goon squads

54
00:04:46.240 --> 00:04:58.420
It may sound crazy, but there is actually a plausible scenario here, for it is impossible

55
00:04:58.420 --> 00:05:03.120
these days to otherwise release innovative recipes into the Commons.

56
00:05:03.120 --> 00:05:08.180
As soon as they are known, they can be patented, and the patent holder is thereby permitted

57
00:05:08.180 --> 00:05:14.520
to use coercion against any competitor, even the one who first came up with the idea.

58
00:05:14.520 --> 00:05:19.220
In general, it strikes me that the supporters of the free market have underestimated the

59
00:05:19.220 --> 00:05:25.200
extent to which the socialists have made hay from the case of agri-patents.

60
00:05:25.200 --> 00:05:28.220
Here is the thing.

61
00:05:28.220 --> 00:05:32.920
Socialism in real stuff is a nutty idea that leads to disaster, as the whole of modern

62
00:05:32.920 --> 00:05:34.920
experience shows.

63
00:05:34.920 --> 00:05:42.580
But there is one area in which common ownership does make sense, and that is the area of knowledge,

64
00:05:42.580 --> 00:05:49.380
which is not a scarce good, but rather an infinitely copyable good.

65
00:05:49.380 --> 00:05:53.260
Producers are free to try to keep their knowledge under wraps, but the very public nature of

66
00:05:53.260 --> 00:05:56.820
markets mitigates against that.

67
00:05:56.820 --> 00:06:01.860
As Maria Montessori wrote in Education and Peace, 1937,

68
00:06:01.860 --> 00:06:07.860
There is no discovery, not even the most minor intellectual advance in any corner of the

69
00:06:07.860 --> 00:06:12.740
The world that does not soon become known from one end of the earth to the other, like

70
00:06:12.740 --> 00:06:18.140
liquid in connecting vessels that seeks a common level.

71
00:06:18.140 --> 00:06:22.700
Such is the way that free markets provide a kind of Daoist-like balance to the world

72
00:06:22.700 --> 00:06:24.140
order.

73
00:06:24.140 --> 00:06:29.900
Scarce goods are rationed by necessity, the yin, while non-scarce goods like information

74
00:06:29.900 --> 00:06:37.300
are provided as free and held as the common possession of humanity, the yang.

75
00:06:37.300 --> 00:06:42.580
The free goods take the edge off the rationed goods, and working together through voluntary

76
00:06:42.580 --> 00:06:48.900
exchange the market serves the cause of peace and prosperity, giving us the best of all

77
00:06:48.900 --> 00:06:53.080
possible worlds at all times.

78
00:06:53.080 --> 00:06:59.240
Government intervention upsets the balance by using coercion to make free goods artificially

79
00:06:59.240 --> 00:07:05.740
scarce and thereby inflating the scarce goods sector to take on a significance that the

80
00:07:05.740 --> 00:07:09.460
The market would not otherwise support.

81
00:07:09.460 --> 00:07:15.000
The reality becomes grist for the socialistic mill, and the left can point to this as an

82
00:07:15.000 --> 00:07:20.380
incidence of how they believe the whole world works – private owners bashing others to

83
00:07:20.380 --> 00:07:24.580
extract an unfair share of the world's wealth.

84
00:07:24.580 --> 00:07:30.620
Same as they wrongly point to the armaments industry as an example of capitalism.

85
00:07:30.620 --> 00:07:38.140
Many marketeers are under a grave obligation these days to distinguish real from fake examples

86
00:07:38.140 --> 00:07:40.980
of capitalism.

87
00:07:40.980 --> 00:07:44.900
Bailouts are not the market at work.

88
00:07:44.900 --> 00:07:50.580
Bubbles inflated by the Fed are not the market at work.

89
00:07:50.580 --> 00:07:56.220
Military imperialism in foreign lands designed to protect oil stocks is not the market at

90
00:07:56.220 --> 00:07:57.960
work.

91
00:07:57.960 --> 00:08:05.160
And in the same way, agriculture patents are not the market at work.

92
00:08:05.160 --> 00:08:13.360
Each of these cases represents the failure and injustice of the interventionist state.

93
00:08:13.360 --> 00:08:21.120
The core of the Misesian critique of socialism is that scarce goods cannot be held in common,

94
00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:27.200
because the price system that provides rational economization gets destroyed under those conditions,

95
00:08:27.200 --> 00:08:30.140
thereby resulting in chaos.

96
00:08:30.140 --> 00:08:37.160
Mises's argument did not apply to those things like knowledge that need no economization,

97
00:08:37.160 --> 00:08:43.700
so yes, there can be socialism in the formulas that go into making seeds, but the products

98
00:08:43.700 --> 00:08:50.440
of those seeds, and the seeds themselves, need markets to be produced and distributed.

99
00:08:50.440 --> 00:08:57.020
It is the government regulations that conflate all these categories and lead to the ideological

100
00:08:57.020 --> 00:09:06.100
Agricultural patents are indeed an evil, but they are not an evil of the market, they

101
00:09:06.100 --> 00:09:10.040
are an evil of government intervention.

102
00:09:10.040 --> 00:09:16.160
If the movie Unknown were to live up to its title, it would have made some effort to point

103
00:09:16.160 --> 00:09:17.500
this out.

104
00:09:17.500 --> 00:09:24.360
Instead, it ends only in sowing confusion of the same type sown by all government interventions.

105
00:09:24.360 --> 00:09:31.080
We are led to believe that the capitalist order is sustained only by violence and conspiracy,

106
00:09:31.080 --> 00:09:36.800
whereas the truth is that the real energy of the free markets derives from the glorious

107
00:09:36.800 --> 00:09:40.760
and civilized principle of mutual agreement.
