Recently, I've seen two sets of neighborhoods with ripped up lawns.
The neighborhood in West Texas had destroyed grass caused by the remarkable proliferation
of these monstrous black pigs.
No one knows for sure where they came from.
Some say they walked from Mexico.
Some say they are indigenous, but just recently out of control.
No one doubts that they are a serious problem.
One pig is the size of a large desk.
They travel in huge packs, they not only destroy lawns in minutes, they are also carnivores,
so they trap goats, cats, dogs and chickens in a corner, and proceed to devour them alive.
They are absolutely terrifying, worse even than the horned javelina pig that is native
to this area of the state.
You can't kill them with small guns like .22 pistols or rifles.
Free enterprise is assisting in this process,
Pig trap makers and distributors started two years ago as a cottage industry, but they've
grown to become a serious player in Texas commerce.
Free enterprise is saving the day!
One marvels at the process of how the market works here, as everywhere.
There is a need, and it is filled long before the government is even aware of the problem.
Where these makers and dealers come from is a mystery to me.
But one thing all of human history teaches is that profit signals work.
Entrepreneurs won't be far behind.
On the other hand, my own neighbourhood is also festooned with torn-up grass, and not
because of pigs.
A new internet service provider is in town, a company that is stringing the entire city
with fibre-optic cables in anticipation of a massive win against the existing competition.
The company drives up its trucks, digs holes in people's yards, lays down cable in ways
that are seemingly up to the company itself, even when it means traipsing on and destroying
private property.
The company never asks permission of homeowners.
Just as with the Black Pigs in Texas, the entire event has people out in the streets
shaking their fists and denouncing the company for its uncompensated, destructive actions.
It's given free enterprise a bad name as people blame the company directly and wonder how
this kind of violation of property can even be legal.
It is darn legal, as it turns out.
The company negotiated a deal with the city and absorbed unto itself a much coveted utility
easement, which grants the legal right to the company to dig into private property up
to a certain amount and under certain conditions.
The city itself absorbs this right from its eminent domain privileges, which is a fancy
way of saying that the state has first ownership rights over all private property.
What you own, you own by grant of the state.
And the state can take it any time.
Legal or not, it is animal-like behavior.
It's one thing when it is done by wild pigs – we can trap them and kill them in an effort
to defend our rights against the brutality of nature.
But when identical forms of destruction are sponsored by the state, we are talking about
a form of brutality that is purely man-made.
Now, you might say that this power is necessary because, if the company tried to buy out the
rights, there would be holdouts who would charge exorbitant fees.
This scenario strikes me as the kind of scenario economists invent to show market failure.
The real world has many solutions, including keeping privacy in contract, making and offering
Giving special goodies to homeowners such as free service for a time or perhaps different
technologies to do not invade people's land.
Where there is a will, there is a market way.
As it stands, the city has granted this internet company a massive corporate subsidy that intuitively
strikes most people as unfair and corrupt.
It is an example of the mixture of private and public sectors, very much along the same
same lines as the bailouts of 2008 and following.
These kinds of issues go a long way toward explaining how it is that people turn against
free enterprise, despite the reality that the market itself is the source of every material
blessing that is ours.
It accounts for how people come to see private enterprise as the source of corruption and
a despoiler of society.
For this reason, the greatest cost of public-private collusion is ideological.
The forces that save us from the destruction wrought by pigs can themselves, under the
wrong legal conditions, behave very much like pigs.
And when they do, they can't be surprised when the public wants to trap them, kill them,
and eat them for dinner.