WEBVTT

NOTE The Truth about the Great Depression

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:13.280
I'd like to continue on my my discussion of economic myths. I guess I could call these interventionist myths. And so I took on the big topic of the Great Depression for this topic.

2
00:00:15.120 --> 00:00:27.400
And I think what I'd like to start with is a discussion of what I call in my book on capitalism called the American way of dealing with recessions, because it was the way in which Americans

3
00:00:27.400 --> 00:00:33.800
in terms of economic policy with recessions or depressions really until the Great Depression

4
00:00:33.800 --> 00:00:35.480
of the 1930s.

5
00:00:35.480 --> 00:00:41.520
And that was basically to either do nothing or to deregulate, that was basically what

6
00:00:41.520 --> 00:00:50.360
was done by most administrations, most government administrations to deal with recessions.

7
00:00:50.360 --> 00:00:56.520
And a good example of that is President Martin Van Buren, who is President of the United

8
00:00:56.520 --> 00:01:26.520
is elected in 1836 and I'm going to read you just a couple of statements by Van Buren on his philosophy of what to do because 1837 there was a big deep recession if not a depression in the economy so bad luck on his part he gets elected in this recession was just about to begin and he said things like all communities are apt to look to government for too much especially at periods of sudden embarrassment

9
00:01:26.520 --> 00:01:32.120
and Distress. And he was referring to this depression. And he said, moreover, all former

10
00:01:32.120 --> 00:01:38.340
attempts on the part of government to assume the management of domestic or foreign exchange

11
00:01:38.340 --> 00:01:45.640
had proved injurious, end quote. And so all former meddling interventionism as a response

12
00:01:45.640 --> 00:01:50.920
to recession made things worse. And he said, what was needed was, quote, a system founded

13
00:01:50.920 --> 00:01:56.280
on private interest, enterprise, and competition without the aid of legislative grants or

14
00:01:56.280 --> 00:01:58.920
or Regulations by Law," end quote.

15
00:01:58.920 --> 00:02:01.960
And that was the President of the United States saying that.

16
00:02:01.960 --> 00:02:06.960
And so his actions were consistent with his words,

17
00:02:07.880 --> 00:02:09.620
as is not always the case.

18
00:02:11.560 --> 00:02:13.520
Ronald Reagan was a great speech maker,

19
00:02:13.520 --> 00:02:15.560
especially before he became President,

20
00:02:16.560 --> 00:02:18.680
but his actions were often different than his speeches.

21
00:02:18.680 --> 00:02:21.320
And the same is true of just about every President,

22
00:02:21.320 --> 00:02:23.820
but in Van Buren's case, he stuck to his rhetoric.

23
00:02:23.820 --> 00:02:53.820
and there was financial market deregulation that he supported and helped get passed for example there were there was a law in Jeffrey Hummel I read about this I didn't know about this I read about this in Jeffrey Hummel's book that I've mentioned several times there was a law actually that forced commercial banks to buy some of these worthless bonds that state governments issued to finance so-called internal improvement projects the ones that were championed by

24
00:02:53.820 --> 00:02:56.500
by Abraham Lincoln in Illinois, for example.

25
00:02:56.500 --> 00:02:59.620
They actually got a federal law forcing these banks

26
00:02:59.620 --> 00:03:02.620
to buy these bonds, which turned out to be useless.

27
00:03:02.620 --> 00:03:06.660
And so Van Buren was instrumental in getting rid of that.

28
00:03:06.660 --> 00:03:12.220
There were banking regulations that prohibited branch banking

29
00:03:12.220 --> 00:03:14.020
as there was a war in the modern era.

30
00:03:14.020 --> 00:03:16.500
And he understood that that was a bad idea, too.

31
00:03:16.500 --> 00:03:19.660
So there actually was financial market deregulation.

32
00:03:19.660 --> 00:03:22.040
Van Buren was an advocate of hard money.

33
00:03:22.040 --> 00:03:29.560
and he helped the creation, the eventual creation in the early 1840s of what was called the

34
00:03:29.560 --> 00:03:37.200
independent treasury system which made currency redeemable in gold and silver.

35
00:03:37.200 --> 00:03:43.200
There were no pork barrel spending, he didn't do what modern presidents always have done,

36
00:03:43.200 --> 00:03:48.600
especially beginning with Roosevelt and Hoover, his predecessor, is spend money like crazy

37
00:03:48.600 --> 00:03:51.260
on road building or canal building.

38
00:03:51.260 --> 00:03:58.260
He was opposed to the so-called internal improvements projects financed by taxes and he vetoed any

39
00:03:58.260 --> 00:04:03.600
bills that came across his desk to spend tax money on this sort of thing.

40
00:04:03.600 --> 00:04:08.020
There was no federal bailout of state governments even though the state governments were in

41
00:04:08.020 --> 00:04:10.620
pretty bad shape financially.

42
00:04:10.620 --> 00:04:17.460
The Van Buren administration cut federal spending in absolute dollars by 21 percent from 1836

43
00:04:17.460 --> 00:04:27.460
The Federal spending actually declined by 21%. There were no price controls and he did what he could to move closer to free trade.

44
00:04:27.460 --> 00:04:35.460
He was a free trader and did what he could to open up trade and so as a result it was a deep recession but very short.

45
00:04:35.460 --> 00:04:41.460
It didn't last that long and that was what I think of as the American way of dealing with recessions.

46
00:04:41.460 --> 00:04:47.460
They didn't do much, probably because macroeconomics hadn't been invented yet.

47
00:04:47.460 --> 00:04:54.460
That's probably the main reason that they had no philosophical rationale for doing otherwise.

48
00:04:54.460 --> 00:04:59.460
And plus, they had a lot of bad experience to point to, as Van Buren did.

49
00:04:59.460 --> 00:05:05.460
They might not have had a theoretical framework, but they had a lot of bad experience with interventionism.

50
00:05:05.460 --> 00:05:11.460
And so, well anyway, Herbert Hoover, let's, I mean, I'm supposed to be talking about the Great Depression.

51
00:05:11.460 --> 00:05:18.460
Probably the biggest economic myth there is, is that laissez-faire capitalism caused the Great Depression,

52
00:05:18.460 --> 00:05:26.460
and interventionism in the New Deal cured the Great Depression. False. Not true.

53
00:05:26.460 --> 00:05:30.460
The Hoover administration was anything but interventionist.

54
00:05:30.460 --> 00:05:43.460
There was a great bit of, a lot of monetary expansion in the 1920s, the money supply increased by almost 70% during that decade, and I'll talk about the ramifications of that in a minute.

55
00:05:43.460 --> 00:05:54.460
But, you know, Herbert Hoover is credited with being a laissez-faire, advocate of laissez-faire capitalism, and if you read some of the things he wrote after he got out of office, they were pretty good.

56
00:05:54.460 --> 00:06:24.460
they could be published by the Mises Institute even and of course he used some of his wealth to help to found the Hoover Institution in California but like a lot of other politicians even I think we were talking last night even Thomas Jefferson who was philosophically was great before he was president but once he got in office the pressures of politics changed him you know he had to if he wanted to succeed as a politician he had to compromise that's what politicians do so he wasn't that good of a president in my

57
00:06:24.460 --> 00:06:30.460
in my eyes, but his political philosophy was tremendous.

58
00:06:30.460 --> 00:06:37.460
And the same is true with Hoover, but if you look at what he actually did and what he stood for policy-wise, it was interventionism.

59
00:06:37.460 --> 00:06:43.460
He was a progressive. He was not a capitalist, an advocate of laissez-faire.

60
00:06:43.460 --> 00:06:53.460
What did he do? Well, he pressured businesses to raise wages when the economy was slowing down near the end of his term.

61
00:06:53.460 --> 00:07:00.380
When you say government pressures somebody, I think of it as, or negotiates with somebody,

62
00:07:00.380 --> 00:07:02.860
I always think of it as gun under the table negotiation.

63
00:07:02.860 --> 00:07:05.660
There's always some sort of hidden threat there.

64
00:07:05.660 --> 00:07:10.100
Either you do what I'm suggesting or something bad is going to happen to you.

65
00:07:10.100 --> 00:07:17.780
You'll be audited or I'll sign this law that will put a special excise tax on your industry,

66
00:07:17.780 --> 00:07:19.140
something like that.

67
00:07:19.140 --> 00:07:24.780
So when you negotiate with government, it's never an even negotiation.

68
00:07:24.780 --> 00:07:29.300
And he held hundreds of conferences, literally hundreds, with different trade groups, industry

69
00:07:29.300 --> 00:07:31.740
groups, to try to get them to raise wages.

70
00:07:31.740 --> 00:07:37.820
And this was essentially the agenda of labor unions that Hoover was promoting.

71
00:07:37.820 --> 00:07:44.620
And all of this was codified during the Roosevelt administration by labor laws that changed.

72
00:07:44.620 --> 00:07:57.620
So, in fact, in my book, I quote Rexford Tugwell, who was FDR's chief economic advisor from 1932 to 1935, as saying that most of the ideas for the New Deal came from Herbert Hoover.

73
00:07:57.620 --> 00:08:12.620
They just went further and codified in law a lot of the things that he was trying to get done somehow through pressure or persuasion, bribery, threats. That's what politicians do.

74
00:08:12.620 --> 00:08:26.620
He also pleaded with business people to engage in work sharing, which is sort of a socialist idea of instead of having 10 people working 40 hours a week, why don't you hire 20 people and have them work 20 hours a week?

75
00:08:26.620 --> 00:08:32.620
He thought that would reduce unemployment, but of course the only way to reduce unemployment is through more production.

76
00:08:32.620 --> 00:08:40.620
That's the only way to do it. This is just rearranging the chairs in the Titanic, work sharing, sort of a socialistic idea.

77
00:08:40.620 --> 00:08:50.620
Unlike Van Buren and other predecessors, Herbert Hoover started the binging on pork barrel public work spending.

78
00:08:50.620 --> 00:08:54.620
It wasn't Roosevelt that initiated this, it was Herbert Hoover.

79
00:08:54.620 --> 00:09:02.620
He spent 13% of the federal budget on public works alone in the first couple of years of his administration.

80
00:09:02.620 --> 00:09:05.620
And of course to do that he had to raise taxes enormously.

81
00:09:05.620 --> 00:09:12.620
So we had some of the biggest tax increases in American history up to that point under Herbert Hoover.

82
00:09:12.620 --> 00:09:19.620
And Murray Rothbard's book, America's Great Depression, is a great resource on Herbert Hoover.

83
00:09:19.620 --> 00:09:23.620
It's basically about the Hoover administration for the most part.

84
00:09:23.620 --> 00:09:28.620
And if you want to read up about all the tax increases and so forth, that's where to find it.

85
00:09:28.620 --> 00:09:42.620
It was Hoover who started the business of government-supervised farm cartels, the business of paying farmers to not grow food, to not raise livestock, and so forth.

86
00:09:42.620 --> 00:09:44.620
That started with Herbert Hoover.

87
00:09:44.620 --> 00:10:07.620
Now, you don't have to be a PhD student in economics to understand that if the problem is unemployment and the government is taking one big sector of the economy, farming, and is paying people not to hire farm workers and to not grow food, that that's not going to be good for reducing unemployment.

88
00:10:07.620 --> 00:10:12.620
Paying people to not hire farm workers. That's essentially what they were doing.

89
00:10:12.620 --> 00:10:20.620
That's why these programs that continued in a much larger degree during the FDR's administration

90
00:10:20.620 --> 00:10:25.620
were a disaster for southern sharecroppers especially, low-income southern sharecroppers.

91
00:10:25.620 --> 00:10:32.620
When they cut back on agricultural production, they were hurt as hard as anyone during the Great Depression.

92
00:10:32.620 --> 00:10:37.860
There was massive unemployment among the southern sharecroppers because fewer crops are being

93
00:10:37.860 --> 00:10:42.180
grown and that was government policy for fewer crops to be grown because they wanted to raise

94
00:10:42.180 --> 00:10:48.660
the price of food. That was FDR's intention. That was Hoover's intention. They had the cockamamie

95
00:10:48.660 --> 00:10:55.100
idea that the Great Depression was caused by low prices. Therefore, if we could just have high

96
00:10:55.100 --> 00:11:02.500
prices, the depression will end. Just like that. That was basically the theory. Hoover

97
00:11:02.500 --> 00:11:10.500
The Federal Reserve signed the Smoot-Hawley tariff, which should be called the Smoot-Hawley-Hoover tariff, because he initiated the whole thing.

98
00:11:10.500 --> 00:11:14.500
He went to Congress and said, we need to raise the tariff.

99
00:11:14.500 --> 00:11:18.500
Okay, we're in a recession, a recession is approaching, therefore what do we need to do?

100
00:11:18.500 --> 00:11:23.500
Cut off trade, restrict economic activity even more.

101
00:11:23.500 --> 00:11:30.500
And so he went to Congress and then Smoot and Hawley, two members of Congress, sponsored the bill.

102
00:11:30.500 --> 00:11:38.380
And this raised the average tariff rate to just under 60 percent, 6-0, 60 percent.

103
00:11:38.380 --> 00:11:43.580
And as a result, there was an international trade war.

104
00:11:43.580 --> 00:11:51.560
The volume of international trade by the 75 top trading countries who engaged in most

105
00:11:51.560 --> 00:11:58.380
of the world trade fell by about 80 percent in three years.

106
00:11:58.380 --> 00:12:05.500
And exports fell by 53% from 1929 to 1932 in just really two years, because this was

107
00:12:05.500 --> 00:12:14.260
the end, 1930 really, when this kicked in, and so that was quite the disaster that Hoover

108
00:12:14.260 --> 00:12:15.260
was responsible for.

109
00:12:15.260 --> 00:12:17.380
It really should be called the Smoot-Hawley-Hoover tariff.

110
00:12:17.380 --> 00:12:22.380
He also socialized investment by allocating billions of dollars to something called the

111
00:12:22.380 --> 00:12:28.220
Reconstruction Finance Corporation that would give the government billions of dollars in

112
00:12:28.220 --> 00:12:33.220
and Investment through loan guarantees primarily.

113
00:12:33.460 --> 00:12:34.960
So the government got in the business

114
00:12:34.960 --> 00:12:37.220
of directing the allocation of capital.

115
00:12:37.220 --> 00:12:38.500
And of course, whenever the government

116
00:12:38.500 --> 00:12:40.500
directs the allocation of capital,

117
00:12:40.500 --> 00:12:43.400
it won't be economic criteria that are used,

118
00:12:43.400 --> 00:12:45.460
it'll be political criteria for the most part.

119
00:12:45.460 --> 00:12:48.820
How can we buy votes by making low interest loans

120
00:12:48.820 --> 00:12:50.860
to this or that industry or this or that region

121
00:12:50.860 --> 00:12:51.700
of the country?

122
00:12:51.700 --> 00:12:53.060
That's what'll happen.

123
00:12:54.420 --> 00:12:56.320
When I talk about this to my students,

124
00:12:56.320 --> 00:13:01.320
Even my example is getting dated now, I should come up with a new example.

125
00:13:01.320 --> 00:13:08.320
I asked them, just think about it, if in the late 70s when Microsoft was just being invented by Bill Gates,

126
00:13:08.320 --> 00:13:13.320
dropping out of Harvard and he and his colleagues creating Microsoft,

127
00:13:13.320 --> 00:13:21.320
what if it depended on government credit allocation, government capital allocation, not private capital?

128
00:13:21.320 --> 00:13:27.320
And we did have a government agency like the RFC, which was eventually ended in the 1950s.

129
00:13:27.320 --> 00:13:34.320
And they were dependent on government capital, government loans or preferred loans.

130
00:13:34.320 --> 00:13:41.320
And here are your choices. You're a politician. Here are your choices of who to give the capital to.

131
00:13:41.320 --> 00:13:50.320
A Harvard dropout who looks like the geek of the year with the big glasses and the long hair and skinny Bill Gates.

132
00:13:50.320 --> 00:13:59.320
and his buddies, who all look just like him, and what are they doing? They're messing around in his dad's garage in Palo Alto.

133
00:13:59.320 --> 00:14:08.320
Or IBM, give the money to IBM, or give the money to the company that's located in the district of the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

134
00:14:08.320 --> 00:14:16.320
Who is likely to get that low interest loan? It's not likely to be the entrepreneurs in Bill Gates' dad's garage.

135
00:14:16.320 --> 00:14:18.480
I guarantee you that.

136
00:14:18.480 --> 00:14:22.760
And so that's how political capital allocation takes place.

137
00:14:22.760 --> 00:14:26.240
And this was started by Hoover.

138
00:14:26.240 --> 00:14:30.560
And so he put a big distortion into the capital markets

139
00:14:30.560 --> 00:14:31.240
by this.

140
00:14:31.240 --> 00:14:34.280
And it lasted until the 1950s, when it became so corrupt

141
00:14:34.280 --> 00:14:37.040
that it became such a big embarrassment that they

142
00:14:37.040 --> 00:14:39.120
ended it around 1955.

143
00:14:39.120 --> 00:14:42.040
They were making loans to, I think the last straw was,

144
00:14:42.040 --> 00:14:43.880
they were making millions of dollars

145
00:14:43.880 --> 00:14:51.320
of Millions of Dollars of Loans to Strip Clubs and that was in the 50s, I guess that was

146
00:14:51.320 --> 00:14:58.580
too much even for Eisenhower and so that ended it.

147
00:14:58.580 --> 00:15:05.760
But the guy who was the head of it, a man named Jesse Jones, wrote his autobiography

148
00:15:05.760 --> 00:15:12.660
called 50 Billion Dollars and the book is how he spent 50 billion dollars and I read

149
00:15:12.660 --> 00:15:17.740
that once and it was he was bragging he would say things like we even loaned

150
00:15:17.740 --> 00:15:22.820
money on a drove a reindeer in Alaska so I guess they're trying to buy votes in

151
00:15:22.820 --> 00:15:26.400
Alaska during the Great Depression that was that was an important thing reindeer

152
00:15:26.400 --> 00:15:32.880
in Alaska they need a capital subsidy so that was that's what Hoover was

153
00:15:32.880 --> 00:15:39.120
involved in and also there was monetary expansion as I said pretty pretty severe

154
00:15:39.120 --> 00:15:46.120
The Great Depression was a major monetary expansion from 21 to 29 that fueled the Roaring 20s, helped the Roaring 20s roar.

155
00:15:46.120 --> 00:15:55.120
But of course that created a misallocation, an even bigger misallocation of capital, which I think is what the main cause of the depression was.

156
00:15:55.120 --> 00:16:06.120
But then FDR comes along, and of course I mentioned that it's the myth I said that FDR cured the Great Depression is a myth.

157
00:16:06.120 --> 00:16:10.120
And you don't have to look very far to understand why this is a myth.

158
00:16:13.120 --> 00:16:21.120
By any measure of statistics regarding economic well-being that you could dig up,

159
00:16:21.120 --> 00:16:29.120
you could see that the Great Depression never ended during Roosevelt's term prior to World War II.

160
00:16:29.120 --> 00:16:35.120
In 1929, the average unemployment rate, the normal unemployment rate, was 3.2 percent.

161
00:16:35.120 --> 00:16:54.120
by 1930, it was still 14.6%, almost five times the normal unemployment rate, it was all the way up to 19% by 1938.

162
00:16:54.120 --> 00:17:02.120
And also if you look at other measures such as per capita GNP, it was lower in 1939 than it was in 1929,

163
00:17:02.120 --> 00:17:32.120
and per capita personal consumption was lower in 1939 than it was in 1929 so by any measure of economic well-being on the eve of World War II the Great Depression was still going strong despite all the New Deal programs that you've all heard about and of course World War II didn't end the Great Depression because it really is a joke isn't it to think that okay we're going to send 16 million men out of the country and then say hey no more and

164
00:17:32.120 --> 00:18:02.120
Unemployment. Aren't I smart? I cured the unemployment problem. That doesn't cure the unemployment problem. In fact, standards of living continued to get worse because they had rationing of meat and price controls and that's another thing with price controls, the economic statistics for the war years are really meaningless because the prices of all the goods that are measured in the GDP statistics are all government mandated price control prices. They're not market prices. So you're comparing apples and oranges.

165
00:18:02.120 --> 00:18:04.120
The Theory of Money and Credit

166
00:18:32.120 --> 00:18:38.040
to do that, well, we want people to have jobs and earn income and work and have a better

167
00:18:38.040 --> 00:18:43.480
standard of living, better housing, better nutrition. That didn't happen during the war.

168
00:18:43.480 --> 00:18:49.000
Sixteen million men were sent to the Pacific and to Europe to fight in the war. Their lives

169
00:18:49.000 --> 00:18:54.060
weren't better, their lives were worse. Many of them were killed. And so the Great Depression

170
00:18:54.060 --> 00:19:03.020
never did really end until after World War II, when between 1945 and 1947, the federal

171
00:19:03.020 --> 00:19:08.300
budget with the demobilization of the Army, the federal budget in absolute dollars was

172
00:19:08.300 --> 00:19:16.420
reduced by two-thirds. It was 92 billion to 30 billion at that range. So it went from

173
00:19:16.420 --> 00:19:21.900
the 90 billion range to the 30 billion range in absolute dollars. And that, of course,

174
00:19:21.900 --> 00:19:27.580
All that money put back into the pockets of investors and consumers, that's what fueled

175
00:19:27.580 --> 00:19:35.660
the recovery, not these programs, and so he never did end the Great Depression.

176
00:19:35.660 --> 00:19:42.100
Even though a lot of politicians to this day and scholars think he did, including, let's

177
00:19:42.100 --> 00:19:48.100
see if I can find this quote from the well-known economic scholar Newt Gingrich, I had one

178
00:19:48.100 --> 00:20:18.100
here somewhere. Where was that? I should have dug it up earlier. Maybe I'll dig it up before the end. But I did have a quote here from Newt praising FDR for ending the Great Depression and praising the treetops for that. Well, what did FDR do? What did FDR do? Well, briefly, the first New Deal on

179
00:20:18.100 --> 00:20:24.580
was basically a giant price-fixing scheme. The first new deal, the hallmarks of what

180
00:20:24.580 --> 00:20:33.860
is called the first new deal, the 33 to 35, was the Agricultural Adjustment Administration,

181
00:20:33.860 --> 00:20:41.820
which was a massive scheme by the government to pay farmers for not growing food in various

182
00:20:41.820 --> 00:20:48.460
and other ways, acreage allotments to restrict the number of acres that can legally be planted,

183
00:20:48.460 --> 00:20:55.460
and all in an effort to prop up the prices that farmers got and farm incomes, supposedly.

184
00:20:55.460 --> 00:20:59.060
So it's a cartel, a government-enforced cartel.

185
00:20:59.060 --> 00:21:03.700
And then there was the National Industrial Recovery Act that tried to do the same thing

186
00:21:03.700 --> 00:21:07.020
for the rest of the economy, to fix prices.

187
00:21:07.020 --> 00:21:12.300
There were price codes for all industries, and there were swarms of bureaucrats running

188
00:21:12.300 --> 00:21:18.220
around trying to enforce the price codes, which was another cartel price-fixing scheme.

189
00:21:18.220 --> 00:21:24.140
As I said earlier, the basic theory that they had was the Depression was caused by low prices,

190
00:21:24.140 --> 00:21:29.380
therefore if we can use price controls to raise prices, we'll end the Depression.

191
00:21:29.380 --> 00:21:35.720
They had it backwards, of course, the Depression was not caused by low prices, the Depression

192
00:21:35.720 --> 00:21:49.720
Henry Hazlitt, who we consider to be an Austrian, he certainly understood all this from the very beginning.

193
00:21:49.720 --> 00:21:54.720
I have one good quote from Hazlitt of how this worked out.

194
00:21:54.720 --> 00:22:02.720
This was from the December 1933 issue of the American Mercury edited by H.L. Mencken.

195
00:22:02.720 --> 00:22:08.960
and Hazlitt wrote that the American consumer is to become the victim of a series of trades

196
00:22:08.960 --> 00:22:15.360
and industries which, in the name of, quote, fair competition, will be in effect monopolies

197
00:22:15.360 --> 00:22:20.720
consisting of units that agree not to make too serious an effort to undersell each other,

198
00:22:20.720 --> 00:22:26.040
restricting production, fixing prices, doing everything in fact that monopolies are formed

199
00:22:26.040 --> 00:22:27.040
to do.

200
00:22:27.040 --> 00:22:32.600
Instead of a relatively flexible system with some power of adjustment to fluid world economic

201
00:22:32.600 --> 00:22:38.200
and Conditions, we shall have an inadjustable structure constantly attempting, at the cost

202
00:22:38.200 --> 00:22:42.240
of stagnant business and employment, to resist these conditions.

203
00:22:42.240 --> 00:22:48.880
So Hazlett, this is 1933, he immediately understood what this was going to be, what this was going

204
00:22:48.880 --> 00:22:54.480
to be is a classic cartel scheme enforced by the government.

205
00:22:54.480 --> 00:23:00.640
Even though we had any trust laws at this time supposedly designed to prohibit this,

206
00:23:00.640 --> 00:23:02.440
when the government does it, it's fine.

207
00:23:02.440 --> 00:23:20.440
It's okay. And so, and that's exactly what happened. So that was 1933. It took the main, and Hazlitt is a well-known Austrian school economist, took the mainstream of the economics profession until 2004 to understand this.

208
00:23:20.440 --> 00:23:39.440
So the Austrians were about 75 years ahead of the mainstream, and I say this because there was an article in the August 2004 Journal of Political Economy, which is one of the top, if not the very top, peer-reviewed academic journal on the field of economics.

209
00:23:39.440 --> 00:24:09.440
The American Economic Review or the JPE or one and two in the eyes of most economists and there was an article by one of the editors of the AEA co-authors are UCLA economists Harold Cole and Lee Ohanian and the article is called New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression a General Equilibrium Analysis and you read this article and there's a lot of math and economic models

210
00:24:09.440 --> 00:24:29.440
New Deal Labor and Industrial Policies did not lift the economy out of the depression, instead, the joint policies of increasing labor's bargaining power, which I'm going to talk about in a minute, and linking collusion with paying high wages prevented a normal rate of inflation.

211
00:24:29.440 --> 00:24:47.440
Instead, the joint policies of increasing labor's bargaining power, which I'm going to talk about in a minute, and linking collusion with paying high wages prevented a normal recovery by creating rents and an inefficient insider-outsider friction that raised wages significantly and restricted employment.

212
00:24:47.440 --> 00:24:54.440
The abandonment of these policies coincided with the strong economic recovery of the 1940s.

213
00:24:54.440 --> 00:25:10.440
So it took until 2004 for the mainstream of the economics profession to sift through the cloud created by all the mathematical models and the mumbo jumbo and the lingo of economics to take a look at what actually happened.

214
00:25:10.440 --> 00:25:17.440
And even then they can't just take a look at what happened. They have to create a general equilibrium model to explain what happened.

215
00:25:17.440 --> 00:25:23.400
happened. And it's just these models, in my opinion, is why they never understood

216
00:25:23.400 --> 00:25:30.480
what the heck did happen. And some of the language they use in economics is a good

217
00:25:30.480 --> 00:25:34.120
example of why it's almost impossible to understand things like the Great

218
00:25:34.120 --> 00:25:39.160
Depression if you become a general equilibrium modeler. Let's see if I can

219
00:25:39.160 --> 00:25:50.800
Oh yeah, I wrote in one of my publications that some of the theories written up by people

220
00:25:50.800 --> 00:25:58.240
like these guys in the JPE, they sort of look at the economy as kind of like a Frankenstein

221
00:25:58.240 --> 00:26:01.160
monster, and here's what they say.

222
00:26:01.160 --> 00:26:06.080
The weak recovery during the Great Depression, the weak recovery is puzzling because the

223
00:26:06.080 --> 00:26:12.600
The large negative shocks that some economists believe caused the downturn, including monetary

224
00:26:12.600 --> 00:26:18.720
shocks, productivity shocks, and banking shocks, became positive after 1933.

225
00:26:18.720 --> 00:26:26.000
And so, now read this, I hear shocks, and in my warped mind, I think of the movie Young

226
00:26:26.000 --> 00:26:31.000
Frankenstein with Frankenstein sitting there being shocked into life, you know, and that's

227
00:26:31.000 --> 00:26:32.000
how economists talk.

228
00:26:32.000 --> 00:26:34.880
We try to shock the economy into life.

229
00:26:34.880 --> 00:26:38.400
And he talked about negative shocks caused the depression.

230
00:26:38.400 --> 00:26:40.680
And so they were sapping the energy from Frankenstein,

231
00:26:40.680 --> 00:26:44.440
laying there on the table with Gene Wilder hovering over him.

232
00:26:44.440 --> 00:26:50.440
But he says, after 1933, these shocks became positive.

233
00:26:50.440 --> 00:26:51.440
What were these shocks?

234
00:26:51.440 --> 00:26:54.560
Government spending, monetary inflation.

235
00:26:54.560 --> 00:26:56.800
So they tried to shock the monster into life.

236
00:26:56.800 --> 00:26:57.320
And guess what?

237
00:26:57.320 --> 00:26:58.800
It didn't work.

238
00:26:58.800 --> 00:27:01.620
Unlike the Frankenstein monster story, where it did work,

239
00:27:01.620 --> 00:27:02.580
It did work.

240
00:27:02.580 --> 00:27:05.500
And so they failed to shock the beast

241
00:27:05.500 --> 00:27:08.060
into becoming a living being once again.

242
00:27:08.060 --> 00:27:11.300
And how are they supposed to do this

243
00:27:11.300 --> 00:27:14.380
with various injections of government spending

244
00:27:14.380 --> 00:27:16.140
or easy credits?

245
00:27:16.140 --> 00:27:18.440
They tried shocking him and that didn't work,

246
00:27:18.440 --> 00:27:21.540
so they brought out the big needles and inject him

247
00:27:21.540 --> 00:27:22.740
and it still didn't work.

248
00:27:25.540 --> 00:27:27.460
I'm not making this up, they're using these words,

249
00:27:27.460 --> 00:27:29.460
Conjection Shock

250
00:27:29.460 --> 00:27:31.460
and then

251
00:27:31.460 --> 00:27:33.460
it was

252
00:27:33.460 --> 00:27:35.460
they say that they would have expected

253
00:27:35.460 --> 00:27:37.460
a roaring recovery

254
00:27:45.460 --> 00:27:47.460
maybe

255
00:27:47.460 --> 00:27:49.460
maybe you haven't all seen the movie but you know

256
00:27:49.460 --> 00:27:51.460
when Frankenstein does come to life he roars

257
00:27:51.460 --> 00:27:53.460
doesn't he make the big loud

258
00:27:53.460 --> 00:27:55.460
noise

259
00:27:55.460 --> 00:28:06.460
It's just ridiculous, and so you guys are Ph.D. students in economics. You're just the beginning of having to learn all this stuff, and here, good luck. Good luck to you.

260
00:28:06.460 --> 00:28:17.460
But I think it's because of that kind of nonsense that, you know, how many years ago, there was a calculator, from 1933, here's old Hazlitt, immediately recognized that this is a government cartel scheme.

261
00:28:17.460 --> 00:28:25.460
What do cartels do? They restrict output. What happens when you restrict output? You restrict employment, too, don't you? That's exactly what you do.

262
00:28:25.460 --> 00:28:35.460
And so you create more unemployment, not less. And these guys just discovered that because for a brief moment they got away from their macroeconomic models

263
00:28:35.460 --> 00:28:46.460
and looked at a microeconomics book, apparently, and said, hey, look at this. There's a section on cartels here. What does it say there? And they actually got it. They got what happened.

264
00:28:46.460 --> 00:28:53.460
And so the first New Deal was all declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1935.

265
00:28:53.460 --> 00:29:05.460
But Roosevelt did get around a lot of it. A lot of his agricultural programs that were restricting production, he just started calling them soil conservation programs.

266
00:29:05.460 --> 00:29:13.460
We're conserving soil. We're not restricting output and raising prices for farmers. We're conserving soil. So they did that.

267
00:29:13.460 --> 00:29:30.760
Then the second New Deal, what's considered to be the second New Deal, is mostly a lot of labor legislation that affected labor markets, primarily labor market legislation, and a continuation of all the spending and the taxing of all the public works.

268
00:29:30.760 --> 00:29:40.960
I think there were between 10 and 11 million people who were given public works jobs, but of course all that money to pay for those jobs had to be taken out of the taxpayers' hides.

269
00:29:40.960 --> 00:30:10.960
and so there was a big diversion of employment that caused less private sector employment because of all that money taken out of the private sector and it pumped up government employment and to do all sorts of things and so but on net it didn't increase employment and in fact it always reduces overall employment because the private sector always spends the money better, more efficiently than government does and so on net it would increase unemployment.

270
00:30:10.960 --> 00:30:16.340
We have the Social Security Act, which imposed a social security payroll tax.

271
00:30:16.340 --> 00:30:19.200
That makes it more expensive to hire people.

272
00:30:19.200 --> 00:30:24.480
We have the minimum wage law, federal minimum wage law, unemployment insurance taxes.

273
00:30:24.480 --> 00:30:27.280
That makes it more expensive to hire people.

274
00:30:27.280 --> 00:30:32.160
We have the National Labor Relations Act, which greatly empowered labor unions in many

275
00:30:32.160 --> 00:30:33.160
ways.

276
00:30:33.160 --> 00:30:39.120
And I don't want to go over the big long list of the ways it did so.

277
00:30:39.120 --> 00:30:45.300
But we also had the Norris LaGuardia Act that was signed by Herbert Hoover, but it was enforced

278
00:30:45.300 --> 00:30:48.180
vigorously by the Roosevelt administration.

279
00:30:48.180 --> 00:30:53.980
And one of the things that did, the Norris LaGuardia Act, was made it very difficult,

280
00:30:53.980 --> 00:30:57.600
almost impossible, to do anything about union violence.

281
00:30:57.600 --> 00:31:05.480
It exempted unions from the normal prosecution for various types of violent behavior.

282
00:31:05.480 --> 00:31:10.600
They couldn't get away with murder necessarily, but a lot of other stuff.

283
00:31:10.600 --> 00:31:15.540
As long as they were engaged in trying to get better wages and working conditions, the

284
00:31:15.540 --> 00:31:18.960
courts would often look the other way at the things they were doing.

285
00:31:18.960 --> 00:31:25.000
So as a result, strikes were much more prevalent and because of the boost in union power created

286
00:31:25.000 --> 00:31:33.120
by all this legislation, in 1937 alone, and once the unemployment rate is still almost

287
00:31:33.120 --> 00:31:45.580
17% in 1936, wages went up by about 14% in 1937 alone, up in the heart of the Great Depression.

288
00:31:45.580 --> 00:31:54.620
And so what that means is that when you're in a depression and consumer demand is falling,

289
00:31:54.620 --> 00:31:58.840
what is also falling is what we call the derived demand for labor.

290
00:31:58.840 --> 00:32:04.480
When there are fewer customers, businesses themselves have a lower demand for labor to

291
00:32:04.480 --> 00:32:08.320
produce goods and services to cater to the customers.

292
00:32:08.320 --> 00:32:15.200
And so the only way to minimize the disemployment effect of a recession is to allow wages to

293
00:32:15.200 --> 00:32:16.240
be flexible.

294
00:32:16.240 --> 00:32:20.760
If wages can go down, at least you'll keep your job is one way of looking at it.

295
00:32:20.760 --> 00:32:24.520
If you can take a pay cut, at least you'll keep the job at a lower pay.

296
00:32:24.520 --> 00:32:26.000
Hopefully it's temporary.

297
00:32:26.000 --> 00:32:28.680
But what was happening was the pay was being forced up.

298
00:32:28.680 --> 00:32:32.600
not only by the federal minimum wage law, but by the union power, at least in those

299
00:32:32.600 --> 00:32:38.040
segments of the economy, not necessarily universally, but the union part of the economy was a big

300
00:32:38.040 --> 00:32:43.040
part of the economy in those days, in the 1930s, and so rather than allowing wages to

301
00:32:43.040 --> 00:32:49.080
be flexible downwards, all the government policy was aimed at pushing them up, and that

302
00:32:49.080 --> 00:32:54.560
of course would cause even more unemployment than would otherwise have occurred, and Richard

303
00:32:54.560 --> 00:32:59.920
Dr. Veteran Lowell Galloway in their book, Out of Work, do the statistical analysis that

304
00:32:59.920 --> 00:33:05.080
they estimate that the unemployment rate in the U.S. as a result of this legislation was

305
00:33:05.080 --> 00:33:08.520
about eight points higher than it would have been otherwise.

306
00:33:08.520 --> 00:33:17.360
So they're saying instead of 19 percent unemployment in 1938, it would have been 11 percent in 1938.

307
00:33:17.360 --> 00:33:24.600
For about 1940, instead of almost 15 percent, it would have been about 7 percent.

308
00:33:24.600 --> 00:33:30.520
And that's getting closer to normal, you know, normal was 3.2, 3.5 percent.

309
00:33:30.520 --> 00:33:37.840
And so even if their estimate is off, which they always are, it's still, they still show

310
00:33:37.840 --> 00:33:41.920
that there was a pretty big negative effect there as a result of this.

311
00:33:41.920 --> 00:33:45.760
And so nothing that Roosevelt did was good for the economy.

312
00:33:45.760 --> 00:33:51.260
The first New Deal was a giant cartel scheme that was harmful to the economy.

313
00:33:51.260 --> 00:33:56.720
He raised taxes tremendously, public work spending, that was bad too, took more money

314
00:33:56.720 --> 00:33:57.720
out of the economy.

315
00:33:57.720 --> 00:34:01.920
The second New Deal empowered labor unions for the most part, made it more costly to

316
00:34:01.920 --> 00:34:05.400
hire people, that created more unemployment.

317
00:34:05.400 --> 00:34:10.800
That's the cynics out there, including me, would argue that maybe that's why he was so

318
00:34:40.800 --> 00:34:50.800
I want to tell you how grateful they were for these jobs they got, and how if it wasn't for Roosevelt, the family would have starved and that sort of thing.

319
00:34:50.800 --> 00:35:00.800
Well, that's why we study economics, so you can understand why your senile old grandfather is not right about this, and that you don't go and tell your children the same story.

320
00:35:00.800 --> 00:35:02.800
That's why we study economics.

321
00:35:02.800 --> 00:35:12.800
Fairly recently there's been some research by public choice scholars like Bill Shugart and one of his students

322
00:35:12.800 --> 00:35:19.800
and a few others on sort of the political economy or the public choice aspects of how the money was spent.

323
00:35:19.800 --> 00:35:25.800
The typical assumption is that while they did spend a lot of this money, out of the goodness of their hearts

324
00:35:25.800 --> 00:35:31.800
they spent billions in other people's money to try to alleviate poverty during the Great Depression.

325
00:35:31.800 --> 00:35:37.800
So, you know, you can make the case, I suppose, that, well, certainly somebody benefited from all this.

326
00:35:37.800 --> 00:35:41.800
You can't spend all these billions and nobody benefits. Somebody benefits.

327
00:35:41.800 --> 00:35:46.800
And the question is, well, who exactly benefited? Was it the people who were made worse off?

328
00:35:46.800 --> 00:35:52.800
The South was the worst part of the economy during the Great Depression, especially places like Mississippi.

329
00:35:52.800 --> 00:35:58.800
The Mississippi Delta was an awful place economically to be in the 1930s.

330
00:35:58.800 --> 00:36:06.600
and but there's a lot of evidence that the main criterion for this spending get

331
00:36:06.600 --> 00:36:12.440
this I'm not making this up politics you know it wasn't it wasn't it wasn't the

332
00:36:12.440 --> 00:36:16.080
alleviation of poverty necessarily and for years there have been a lot of

333
00:36:16.080 --> 00:36:21.720
anecdotes about this but modern scholars economists in particular have

334
00:36:21.720 --> 00:36:25.920
become begun doing more systematic research but let me give you some of

335
00:36:25.920 --> 00:36:29.920
and some of these anecdotes that illustrate how the money was spent.

336
00:36:29.920 --> 00:36:35.920
This is from a United States Senate Committee on Campaign Spending.

337
00:36:35.920 --> 00:36:42.920
Republicans in Kentucky were told they would have to change party affiliations if they wanted to keep their government jobs.

338
00:36:42.920 --> 00:36:50.920
In Pennsylvania, businessmen who leased trucks to the government were solicited for $100 campaign contributions.

339
00:36:50.920 --> 00:36:58.920
Pennsylvania government job workers, WPA workers, were told to change their party affiliation if they wanted to keep their jobs.

340
00:36:58.920 --> 00:37:01.920
Many people refused and were fired.

341
00:37:01.920 --> 00:37:10.920
Tennessee Works Progress Administration workers were also instructed to contribute 2% of their salaries to the Democratic Party as a condition of unemployment.

342
00:37:10.920 --> 00:37:22.920
In one congressional district in Cook County, Illinois, the WPA instructed 450 of its employees to canvas for democratic votes around election time in 1938.

343
00:37:22.920 --> 00:37:25.920
The men were all laid off the day after the election.

344
00:37:25.920 --> 00:37:38.920
So even during the Roosevelt administration, there was a Senate investigation of how this money was used to buy votes, first and foremost, not so much to alleviate poverty where it was worst.

345
00:37:38.920 --> 00:37:45.380
and there's a book written by Bill Shugart and William Couch who it was I

346
00:37:45.380 --> 00:37:48.580
think it was it was Couch's doctoral dissertation at the University of

347
00:37:48.580 --> 00:37:55.160
Mississippi where Shugart teaches and it's a statistical analysis of the

348
00:37:55.160 --> 00:38:00.080
spending during the New Deal with all the pork barrel spending and I'll read

349
00:38:00.080 --> 00:38:05.260
you one of their conclusions and I think it's called the political economy of the

350
00:38:05.260 --> 00:38:08.020
New Deal is the name of the book it's an excellent book if you're interested in

351
00:38:08.020 --> 00:38:18.400
The distribution of the billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to prime the economic

352
00:38:18.400 --> 00:38:23.740
pump was guided less by considerations of economic need than by the forces of ordinary

353
00:38:23.740 --> 00:38:24.980
politics.

354
00:38:24.980 --> 00:38:29.060
Perhaps the New Deal failed as a matter of economic policy because it was so successful

355
00:38:29.060 --> 00:38:31.620
in building a winning political coalition.

356
00:38:31.620 --> 00:38:45.620
FDR was re-elected overwhelmingly in 1936 and again in 1940 in part due to the support of the big city machines, organized labor, and other constituencies which benefited disproportionately from New Deal largesse.

357
00:38:45.620 --> 00:38:52.620
So that's where most of the money went, they found, to the people who would support the Democratic Party.

358
00:38:52.620 --> 00:39:05.620
And then he says, insofar as the region was safe for Democrats, the administration's comparative neglect of the nation's number one economic problem, the South, can likewise be explained by politics.

359
00:39:05.620 --> 00:39:16.620
The South was solidly Democratic. The Republican Party, after all, was the party of Lincoln. Nobody was voting Republican, hardly at all, in the South, and so they were safe.

360
00:39:16.620 --> 00:39:21.740
They knew in those days that the South would vote Democrat. They're not going to vote Republican.

361
00:39:21.740 --> 00:39:27.660
And this was true until relatively recently, so 20, 25 years ago, that because of Lincoln,

362
00:39:28.220 --> 00:39:32.940
the South was Democratic. And so they felt they didn't need to spend that much money there.

363
00:39:32.940 --> 00:39:38.860
They're in their pocket already politically, so why waste the money? Buy votes out in California

364
00:39:38.860 --> 00:39:44.860
or someplace where the margins, the electoral margins are thin and we need to bribe people

365
00:39:44.860 --> 00:39:54.860
And so that's what Shugart and Couch found was the main determinant of all the spending during the Great Depression.

366
00:39:54.860 --> 00:40:02.860
And so that's pretty much my story about the Great Depression, that Herbert Hoover, if you study him, you read almost any book about him.

367
00:40:02.860 --> 00:40:09.860
He was a big interventionist. There's even a book about him called, I think it's called Herbert Hoover, The Forgotten Progressive,

368
00:40:09.860 --> 00:40:17.860
The Progressive, and where they argue that he fits right into the progressives, which were the socialistic interventionists of the early 20th century.

369
00:40:17.860 --> 00:40:22.860
He was just sort of the last progressive to achieve high office.

370
00:40:22.860 --> 00:40:36.860
When Hoover was, he was the head of the U.S. Department of Commerce in the 1920s, and when he got there, he created 30 new departments and hired 3,000 more bureaucrats.

371
00:40:36.860 --> 00:40:45.860
And that's not a laissez-faire kind of guy. That's somebody who thought he could centrally plan the whole economy through the Department of Commerce.

372
00:40:45.860 --> 00:40:54.860
And one of the books I read about him says this made him very famous, because he was sticking his nose into almost every industry in America,

373
00:40:54.860 --> 00:40:58.860
some way or another, and it's made him famous, got him elected president.

374
00:40:58.860 --> 00:41:04.860
He was an engineer, and he apparently believed that since he was successful as a mining engineer,

375
00:41:04.860 --> 00:41:07.860
well, social engineering ought to be a snap, you know.

376
00:41:07.860 --> 00:41:12.860
If we can figure out how to get all that coal out of underneath those mountains, you know,

377
00:41:12.860 --> 00:41:16.860
the rest of society is nothing because it's darn tough underneath those coal mines.

378
00:41:16.860 --> 00:41:18.860
And so he was a big social engineer.

379
00:41:18.860 --> 00:41:24.860
And I might as well dig out that exact quote from Rexford Tugwell.

380
00:41:24.860 --> 00:41:45.860
Rexford Tugwell, by the way, was a big admirer of Stalin. He wrote a book on America's economy, I think it was called America's Economy in 1930, where he praised Stalin and Soviet central planning to the treetops and urged America to become more like that.

381
00:41:45.860 --> 00:42:03.860
But here's what he said in 1946 after Roosevelt was dead. Tugwell, who taught at Columbia, said the ideas embodied in the New Deal legislation were a compilation of those which had come to maturity under President Herbert Hoover's ages.

382
00:42:03.860 --> 00:42:11.860
We, all of us, owed much to Hoover. So it was pretty much a continuation of the interventionism of the Hoover years.

383
00:42:11.860 --> 00:42:39.860
and let me read you one of the things he says about, is an admiration for Stalin, since I mentioned that, oh yeah, he said, American economic life is the name of Tugwell's book, 1930, and he was Roosevelt's top economic advisor from 1932 to 1945, the whole duration.

384
00:42:39.860 --> 00:42:54.860
He said, Russia's, the Soviet Union's worst enemies are being forced to admit that the system appears to be able to produce goods in greater quantities than the old one and to spread such prosperity as there is over wider areas of the population.

385
00:42:54.860 --> 00:43:06.860
That's the Soviet Union. He said, Soviet planning enabled them to, quote, carry out their industrial operations in accordance with a completely thought out program.

386
00:43:06.860 --> 00:43:07.860
Program.

387
00:43:07.860 --> 00:43:13.420
Now that's something different than what we do here, he was saying, and he says, the major

388
00:43:13.420 --> 00:43:19.760
advantages of the Soviet program outweigh the disadvantages, even though the available

389
00:43:19.760 --> 00:43:29.860
evidence suggests that there are admittedly those who suffer under it, under Soviet, this

390
00:43:29.860 --> 00:43:34.860
is 1930, the Ukrainians would come to mind.

391
00:43:34.860 --> 00:43:49.860
So even though there are those who suffer under, Tugwell said, the major advantages outweigh the disadvantages of the supposed loss of incentive under communism, the red tape, unimaginative centralized authority.

392
00:43:49.860 --> 00:44:03.860
So he put the word supposed in there. Tugwell said while there is a quote, certain ruthlessness and disregard for liberties and rights in the Soviet Union, as well as repression, spying and violence.

393
00:44:03.860 --> 00:44:18.860
So he does admit that. But still, the next line is, anyone interested in peace, prosperity, and progress must, in the coming years, devote much study and thought to Russia and the Russians.

394
00:44:18.860 --> 00:44:30.860
And that was two years before Roosevelt picked him as his top economic advisor. So you can understand why they were clueless, I think, as to what to do about the Great Depression,

395
00:44:30.860 --> 00:44:36.440
and why Roosevelt himself was surrounded by people who wanted him to go much

396
00:44:36.440 --> 00:44:42.520
further in terms of interventionism and and he eventually did I guess with the

397
00:44:42.520 --> 00:44:45.860
World War two but that's all I'm going to say about this for now we'll have time

398
00:44:45.860 --> 00:44:53.300
for questions and comments and brilliant commentary I forgot to include that

399
00:45:00.860 --> 00:45:06.860
that if anyone needs your class foot for the cause of the end of the Great Depression,

400
00:45:06.860 --> 00:45:13.860
goes and goes over World War II or the New Deal, then they would give you an automatic pass for the court.

401
00:45:19.860 --> 00:45:22.860
I don't know if you know Dr. Warnicero at all.

402
00:45:30.860 --> 00:45:45.860
At the end of World War II, when all Americans were celebrating the end of the war, the beginning of the peace,

403
00:45:45.860 --> 00:45:58.860
I'm just thinking that it came to an end at the time, after having a listen test about the idea of demobilization and cutting back the government, or going right back into the Great Depression.

404
00:46:00.860 --> 00:46:30.860
I teach a course in American Economic History and I usually have a couple of students who have taken or at that semester will be taking intermediate macroeconomics and when I tell them that the federal budget was cut by two-thirds in two years and the economy took off, most of them think I'm lying, I have to bring the statistical abstract in and show them the page where it says that because that totally flies in the place of Keynesianism.

405
00:46:30.860 --> 00:46:35.700
You're right, they must have been in a panic, and that's one of the reasons why the Keynesians,

406
00:46:35.700 --> 00:46:42.220
they advocated a GI Bill, because they thought if all these soldiers coming back looking

407
00:46:42.220 --> 00:46:49.460
for jobs can be a disaster, unemployment's going to be 25% again, so we need to get these

408
00:46:49.460 --> 00:46:54.900
people and put them in school somewhere, use tax dollars, trade school, college, anywhere,

409
00:46:54.900 --> 00:47:00.900
And so that was part of the Keynesian hysteria, I think, over the bad news of the war ending

410
00:47:00.900 --> 00:47:05.260
and all this money going back into private hands.

411
00:47:05.260 --> 00:47:10.940
And of course, even worse yet would be if those people came back and started saving

412
00:47:10.940 --> 00:47:15.140
some of that money, right, from the Keynesians' perspective, that they came back and got bad

413
00:47:15.140 --> 00:47:18.820
enough that they started looking for a job, that they started saving that money.

414
00:47:18.820 --> 00:47:24.340
Because the Keynesians, at least when I was in school, the textbooks always had a picture

415
00:47:24.340 --> 00:47:31.340
I had a picture of a bathtub in the first chapter with injections and leakages, and the leakages were bad, that was savings.

416
00:47:31.340 --> 00:47:38.340
You save your money, it's a leak. Have you seen that in some of your books? It's a leakage, and that's not a good thing.

417
00:47:38.340 --> 00:47:45.340
It's like the blood is draining from your body, and somebody please plug the leak, stop me from saving.

418
00:47:45.340 --> 00:48:15.340
But even that had the unintended side effect of that. I wrote an article in the free market years ago called The Truth About the GI Bill and I traced a little bit of how it sort of led to the inevitably toward federal control of higher education because the government started giving all this money to people to go to trade schools and a lot of the trade schools were phony operations. They weren't a school after all. They were just collecting government checks and educating everybody.

419
00:48:15.340 --> 00:48:20.340
So the government said, well, then we have to monitor what goes on at these places if it's government money.

420
00:48:20.340 --> 00:48:25.340
And that led to the accreditation of higher education of colleges.

421
00:48:25.340 --> 00:48:34.340
And so, you know, that has led to such things as, I think in this article I mentioned a then current example of,

422
00:48:34.340 --> 00:48:39.340
I think it was Westminster Theological Seminary,

423
00:48:39.340 --> 00:49:09.340
where, which their religion does not believe in the ordination of women as priests, and so the accredited federal accreditation agency came by and said your academic programs are fine, but we refuse to give you accreditation because you don't ordain women priests, and so they didn't like their religion, therefore they wouldn't give them an accreditation, and if you're not accredited you can't get, your students can't get federal loans and that sort of thing, and that could have been

424
00:49:09.340 --> 00:49:13.180
and so they had at the time I wrote that they were going to court to sue because

425
00:49:13.180 --> 00:49:17.820
this could totally ruin the place but that's what I see the GI bill as the

426
00:49:17.820 --> 00:49:22.500
genesis of the political correctness the whole the whole mess and so you can

427
00:49:22.500 --> 00:49:28.820
blame that on John Maynard Keynes if you follow what Mark is saying.

428
00:49:39.340 --> 00:49:47.340
Security?

429
00:49:47.340 --> 00:50:01.340
Oh yeah, the Securities Exchange Commission, I didn't mention everything, all that stuff.

430
00:50:01.340 --> 00:50:06.340
Oh yeah, there's been a lot on that sort of thing.

431
00:50:06.340 --> 00:50:36.340
I can dig up some references for you and give them to you, but a good reference is right outside that door, it's a book called Crisis and Leviathan by Robert Higgs, I don't know, you may already have that, I don't know, but it's a good history of the Great Depression, it has numerous chapters on that, and I think he does mention the SEC, but it's not a book on the SEC, but I know in the Journal of Law and Economics over the years there have been quite a few articles by Chicago,

432
00:50:36.340 --> 00:50:40.340
and the Chicago School of Scholars on the effects of the SEC.

433
00:51:06.340 --> 00:51:14.340
Is this same myth present in human economics, and if so, how did it get started?

434
00:51:36.340 --> 00:51:54.660
It's, I just shake my head at this stuff. That's why it's, I mean, these guys, this is like two of the top, suppose the top economists in the country from UCLA, writing an article in the year 2004, discovering for the first time that the Great Depression or the New Deal didn't work.

435
00:51:54.980 --> 00:52:04.780
That's the tone of the article anyway. And that's why it's published in this prestigious journal. It's supposed to be new, new research, you know, path-breaking research that didn't work.

436
00:52:04.780 --> 00:52:08.500
and so you know they don't they didn't seem to understand that because they

437
00:52:08.500 --> 00:52:14.100
have this mind this Keynesian mindset that all these shocks and injections is

438
00:52:14.100 --> 00:52:18.100
what eventually did end the depression and that Hoover's problem is he wasn't

439
00:52:18.100 --> 00:52:22.260
shocking and injecting enough apparently so if you have that sort of

440
00:52:22.260 --> 00:52:27.380
Keynesian mindset that's the way you'll think but if you understand Austrian

441
00:52:27.380 --> 00:52:34.700
economics or and or common sense you're not likely to think that way and so

442
00:52:34.700 --> 00:52:40.700
So, yes, I think it still is, but economists don't write about Hoover and the Great Depression.

443
00:52:40.700 --> 00:52:48.700
There's this belief among modern economists that anything older than maybe the last two or three issues of the top journals is really not worth looking at.

444
00:52:48.700 --> 00:52:57.700
And so, apart from people like Bob Higgs and myself and sort of a small band of people who are interested in economic history,

445
00:52:57.700 --> 00:53:02.020
all the top journals the prestigious journals that they don't they have no

446
00:53:02.020 --> 00:53:08.900
concern whatsoever for these topics it's too old it's not sexy enough even though

447
00:53:08.900 --> 00:53:14.300
it's it's pretty important pretty important issue

448
00:53:14.300 --> 00:53:17.300
Well, you had your hand up. Did you have a question?

449
00:53:29.300 --> 00:53:36.300
That's right. Yeah, Steve, FDR is folly, which I don't know if it's for sale out here or not, but by Jim Powell,

450
00:53:36.300 --> 00:53:44.300
He does a pretty good chronology of all the alphabet agencies of the New Deal with references in the back.

451
00:53:44.300 --> 00:53:46.300
That would be a good one.

452
00:53:46.300 --> 00:53:55.300
One of the big myths of the Great Depression is that the Fed was doing everything absolutely correctly between 1920s,

453
00:53:55.300 --> 00:54:02.300
and then Benjamin Strong died and they made mistakes after the Great Depression started.

454
00:54:02.300 --> 00:54:06.300
The Fed actually could have prevented the whole thing from happening in the first place.

455
00:54:32.300 --> 00:54:51.300
I don't buy his interpretation, myself, but yeah, that's another big myth, I suppose, about the Fed, but it's one of those things you're never going to convince the Chicago score, because they fundamentally don't believe the whole Austrian analysis of the boom and bust cycle, so...

456
00:54:51.300 --> 00:55:08.300
One of the reasons is that they think of inflation as the right of science, and the right of science is stable during the period that we say inflation is.

457
00:55:08.300 --> 00:55:12.300
That's because we see it as a non-factual question.

458
00:55:12.300 --> 00:55:42.300
That's a good point. They do. It's even worse now because the measurement of the consumer price index leaves so much out that we don't even know what real

459
00:55:42.300 --> 00:55:46.940
prices are, you know, we've got housing and things like that, so it's kind of

460
00:55:46.940 --> 00:55:50.420
like how when the government some years ago decided it would be a good idea to

461
00:55:50.420 --> 00:55:54.700
put the Social Security off budget because when it was running deficits it

462
00:55:54.700 --> 00:56:00.180
made the budget look bad, so don't do anything about Social Security but take

463
00:56:00.180 --> 00:56:05.460
it out of the unified budget so it doesn't look as bad. Changing the CPI is

464
00:56:05.460 --> 00:56:06.060
and the

465
00:56:06.060 --> 00:56:09.060
same way. That's a good point.

466
00:56:27.060 --> 00:56:31.060
Well, as Bill Clinton would say, it all depends on how you define Keynesian,

467
00:56:31.060 --> 00:56:42.060
Because, I don't know who your professor is, but people like Paul Samuelson and James Tobin,

468
00:56:42.060 --> 00:56:50.060
I've read them celebrating Roosevelt for putting Keynesian style policies into practice.

469
00:56:50.060 --> 00:56:55.060
So there are different Keynesians that are probably more prominent than your professor,

470
00:56:55.060 --> 00:57:03.780
Samuelson and Tobin who were big fans of FDR and wouldn't expect him to follow every exact

471
00:57:04.500 --> 00:57:11.220
prescription of the Keynesians. There's a book by James Buchanan and Richard Wagner called

472
00:57:11.220 --> 00:57:21.460
Democracy and Deficit that they published in 1976, I think, and it's sort of an evaluation of what

473
00:57:21.460 --> 00:57:28.680
have the Keynesians rot, and it talks about, as all public choice analysis does, they lay

474
00:57:28.680 --> 00:57:35.700
out the textbook Keynesian prescriptions in a recession, cut taxes and or raise spending,

475
00:57:35.700 --> 00:57:39.540
and then just ask the simple question, well, what are the political incentives that politicians

476
00:57:39.540 --> 00:57:40.900
have?

477
00:57:40.900 --> 00:57:41.900
Will they cut taxes?

478
00:57:41.900 --> 00:57:46.060
No, they prefer to increase spending instead and run deficits instead, and that's what

479
00:57:46.060 --> 00:58:16.060
and what Keynesians will do, even though, and they're not so inclined to cut taxes, even if that's the textbook prescription, and so I'm sure people like Tobin, James Tobin, who's a Nobel Prize-winning economist, along with Samuelson, understand that, even though they hated the book by Buchanan and Wagner, but because they made them look kind of like fools, I think, and it's a really good book though, but I recommend this book if you can find it. It's out of print now, as far as I know.

480
00:58:16.060 --> 00:58:30.060
It's part of the collection fund, the Liberty Fund to spend all the rest of the money they had, I guess, on his collected work, so I heard.

481
00:58:30.060 --> 00:58:36.060
This is one of my favorite Buchanan books, along with Cost and Choice.

482
00:58:36.060 --> 00:58:42.220
it's probably because Wagner at the time was an Austrian and he influenced how

483
00:58:42.220 --> 00:58:47.220
that book was written a lot in all costs and choices an Austrian book any other

484
00:58:47.220 --> 00:59:00.460
brilliant commentaries or declarations the wrong people well one reason it has

485
00:59:00.460 --> 00:59:04.740
to do with money one reason it has to do a lot to do with money Mark and I were

486
00:59:04.740 --> 00:59:09.660
I was talking about this the other day with some of the people in the room, and that the

487
00:59:09.660 --> 00:59:14.900
academic world is so overwhelmingly dominated by government and government money, the government

488
00:59:14.900 --> 00:59:21.380
universities, the research grants are overwhelmingly from the government despite a few foundations

489
00:59:21.380 --> 00:59:27.860
here and there that support university research, they're just swamped by government.

490
00:59:27.860 --> 00:59:31.700
And so if you have a government job and you work for the government, you're not going

491
00:59:31.700 --> 00:59:39.700
You're not going to be necessarily too blatant about writing distorted history or pro-interventionist state of history,

492
00:59:39.700 --> 00:59:46.700
but you're probably not going to ask the same questions in your research that somebody like Mark or me would ask in our research,

493
00:59:46.700 --> 00:59:48.700
just leave them lie, leave them go.

494
00:59:48.700 --> 00:59:51.700
And I've seen this in my career over and over and over again.

495
00:59:51.700 --> 00:59:57.700
One of my very first jobs was at the State University of New York at Buffalo,

496
00:59:57.700 --> 01:00:03.140
publishing all these articles about how devious local politicians were in their

497
01:00:03.140 --> 01:00:08.660
setting their tax policies and I had my dean tell me that I'd better watch it

498
01:00:08.660 --> 01:00:12.940
it's kind of dangerous to be criticizing and I was criticizing them in academic

499
01:00:12.940 --> 01:00:16.940
journals it's not as though the political hacks in New York State were

500
01:00:16.940 --> 01:00:20.780
reading the National Tax Journal or something like that which they weren't

501
01:00:20.780 --> 01:00:26.040
and you know extreme example I gave some of the students the other day was a man

502
01:00:26.040 --> 01:00:36.040
The man I know named Ed Krug, who was a soil chemist, was on a big government research team to study acid rain in the 90s.

503
01:00:36.040 --> 01:00:43.040
And the research team with scientists from all over the world concluded it wasn't a big problem, acid rain.

504
01:00:43.040 --> 01:00:45.040
That's not what Congress wanted to hear.

505
01:00:45.040 --> 01:00:54.040
Ed Krug, being a naive scientist, went on 60 Minutes, a CBS television show, 60 Minutes, and explained to Ed Bradley what the scientists found.

506
01:00:54.040 --> 01:01:04.040
And as a result, his career was ruined. He showed me once a letter that the EPA had sent around to universities warning them not to hire him, or else their grants would be pulled.

507
01:01:04.040 --> 01:01:13.040
Because they wanted this research to say the opposite, to justify the Clean Air Act amendments of the early 90s, and it didn't.

508
01:01:13.040 --> 01:01:20.040
They were honest scientists and said, good news, we don't need another Clean Air Act amendment. Congress didn't want to hear that.

509
01:01:20.040 --> 01:01:26.040
So his career was totally ruined by that. And a lot of that goes on in history and other fields.

510
01:01:26.040 --> 01:01:32.040
So that's my take on it, why so much history is written by statists.

511
01:01:32.040 --> 01:01:39.040
Although I read the stuff, because good historians will have a lot of information in their books and articles,

512
01:01:39.040 --> 01:01:45.040
but we just look at it all from a different lens. If you know economics, for example,

513
01:01:45.040 --> 01:01:49.040
you can look at some of the same historical facts and have different ideas about what they mean.

514
01:01:49.040 --> 01:01:53.640
So I wouldn't say don't read what they write. Most of the history books are

515
01:01:53.640 --> 01:01:59.120
written by leftists, but educate yourself as well as you can and still read these

516
01:01:59.120 --> 01:02:03.440
books and then you can write books criticizing them, you know, equip yourself

517
01:02:03.440 --> 01:02:06.440
to answer them.

518
01:02:19.040 --> 01:02:25.040
Yeah, at least that's his final act that got us out of there.

519
01:02:42.040 --> 01:02:45.040
The tugwells of the crew, yeah.

520
01:02:45.040 --> 01:03:15.040
Yeah, well, Bob Higgs, some of Bob Higgs' work, you probably read this, he had a paper on the effect of the Roosevelt administration's haranguing of businessmen and threats to businessmen on investment, that they created this whole atmosphere, even the creation of the SEC and the investigations and everything, it created a great deal of uncertainty over capital investment, why should I invest my capital here if the administration

521
01:03:15.040 --> 01:03:19.160
is so threatening to me this industry and so he makes the case that a lot of

522
01:03:19.160 --> 01:03:23.920
investors held back for years during the Great Depression years and but then as

523
01:03:23.920 --> 01:03:28.440
soon as these people cut this out like you said Bob makes a pretty pretty good

524
01:03:28.440 --> 01:03:34.000
case and he gathers as much data as he can on different aspects of the stock

525
01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:41.040
market and and so forth to make the case that it was good the investment took off

526
01:03:41.040 --> 01:03:48.040
The biggest myth, though, is that I think that World War II ended the Great Depression, because it literally did alter the unemployment status of the United States and the United States, and that's when the economy took off.

527
01:04:11.040 --> 01:04:18.040
Society, but people were sent to Europe and the South Pacific to fight in a war. They

528
01:04:18.040 --> 01:04:26.040
weren't given jobs. Anything else? Well, maybe we'll call it quits for now then.