WEBVTT

NOTE Why Computer Nerds (and Most Students) Hate the Government

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.240
When Lew first asked me to speak on this topic,

2
00:00:03.240 --> 00:00:06.320
I thought to myself, computer nerds,

3
00:00:06.320 --> 00:00:09.480
now how would I know anything about nerds?

4
00:00:09.480 --> 00:00:14.480
Well, that objection quickly subsided

5
00:00:17.980 --> 00:00:20.240
and began to think about this topic.

6
00:00:20.240 --> 00:00:22.040
What I want to discuss with you today

7
00:00:22.040 --> 00:00:26.440
is the role of technology in changing public attitudes

8
00:00:26.440 --> 00:00:27.280
towards government.

9
00:00:27.280 --> 00:00:34.040
and as the title of the talk suggests, future looks pretty good. As people come

10
00:00:34.040 --> 00:00:39.000
to depend more and more on computers and information technology, people are

11
00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:44.240
becoming increasingly concerned about government intrusions into their lives.

12
00:00:44.240 --> 00:00:50.600
Now I'm not claiming that technology is a primary cause of social change. No,

13
00:00:50.600 --> 00:00:54.720
the primary cause of social change is ideas, such as the ideas that you're

14
00:00:54.720 --> 00:01:01.240
We're supporting by being here today, but technology can have a significant influence.

15
00:01:01.240 --> 00:01:06.640
Now my particular focus is on computer nerds since they are at the forefront of these new

16
00:01:06.640 --> 00:01:07.640
technologies.

17
00:01:07.640 --> 00:01:14.240
As it turns out, the dominant political philosophy of the internet community is classical liberalism

18
00:01:14.240 --> 00:01:16.840
or libertarianism.

19
00:01:16.840 --> 00:01:23.960
Now you notice that I'm using the politically correct term community as in the African American

20
00:01:23.960 --> 00:01:29.000
Community, or the Gay and Lesbian Community, or the Community of Nations, each of which

21
00:01:29.000 --> 00:01:33.720
has its self-appointed spokesperson, and I'm appointing myself as the spokesperson for

22
00:01:33.720 --> 00:01:37.480
the internet community.

23
00:01:37.480 --> 00:01:44.000
Now many of you are undoubtedly and justifiably wary of portentous pronouncements about the

24
00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:47.880
meaning of the internet and the information revolution.

25
00:01:47.880 --> 00:01:53.560
You might be expecting the sort of silly futurism you get from people like George Gilder or

26
00:01:53.560 --> 00:01:58.400
Alvin Toffler or somebody who's way out there like Newt Gingrich.

27
00:01:58.400 --> 00:02:05.240
Indeed, many pundits tell us that the Internet is going to bring about a fundamental transformation

28
00:02:05.240 --> 00:02:07.000
of human society.

29
00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:11.960
The physical world will become increasingly unimportant as we all enter a virtual reality

30
00:02:11.960 --> 00:02:14.660
of unlimited potential.

31
00:02:14.660 --> 00:02:20.760
Other writers argue that computer technology will bring an end to scarcity through nanotechnology,

32
00:02:20.760 --> 00:02:23.760
which can build things at the atomic level.

33
00:02:23.760 --> 00:02:27.000
These are the same kinds of people who arrange to have their bodies frozen until the year

34
00:02:27.000 --> 00:02:28.000
2500.

35
00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:34.060
Now, I'm not going to give you one of those speeches, and I promise I will not use the

36
00:02:34.060 --> 00:02:40.840
prefix cyber a single time, as in cyber libertarians or cyber Misesians.

37
00:02:40.840 --> 00:02:46.000
No, what I'm going to try to do instead is describe the political and social views of

38
00:02:46.000 --> 00:02:49.640
of Computer Folk, and explain why they think that way.

39
00:02:52.000 --> 00:02:54.360
What exactly do computer nerds think about the state

40
00:02:54.360 --> 00:02:55.640
and state intervention?

41
00:02:55.640 --> 00:02:58.040
Well, it's quite commonplace to observe today

42
00:02:58.040 --> 00:03:00.360
that the internet community is a source

43
00:03:00.360 --> 00:03:02.500
of decidedly libertarian sentiment.

44
00:03:04.080 --> 00:03:06.040
Let me give you a few examples.

45
00:03:06.040 --> 00:03:08.460
Forbes ran a cover story in September

46
00:03:08.460 --> 00:03:10.800
about net libertarianism, calling it, quote,

47
00:03:10.800 --> 00:03:13.740
the central axis of political discussion online.

48
00:03:13.740 --> 00:03:27.740
Wired magazine's John Katz writes about the Internet community's, quote, ingrained libertarianism, its wholehearted commitment to political and economic freedom, and its fierce opposition to constraints on individual expression.

49
00:03:27.740 --> 00:03:41.740
Even the New York Times has written on, quote, the free market libertarian bent of the architects of the high-tech economy, referring to people like the maverick entrepreneur T.J. Rogers, a cyber semiconductor.

50
00:03:41.740 --> 00:03:46.580
The libertarian computer scientist Barry Fagan calls libertarianism, quote,

51
00:03:46.580 --> 00:03:52.100
the descriptive political philosophy of the digital age.

52
00:03:52.100 --> 00:03:56.640
It's clear then that people in the computer industry largely view the government as an

53
00:03:56.640 --> 00:04:02.380
intruder, as an interloper, interfering in areas in which it has little knowledge, let

54
00:04:02.380 --> 00:04:05.120
alone justification.

55
00:04:05.120 --> 00:04:06.200
Why do they feel that way?

56
00:04:06.200 --> 00:04:11.560
Why do computer nerds think this way about the state and state intervention?

57
00:04:11.560 --> 00:04:14.360
Let me suggest a few reasons.

58
00:04:14.360 --> 00:04:20.560
The first is fear of censorship and awareness of the potential for censorship.

59
00:04:20.560 --> 00:04:26.640
One example of this is the huge spontaneous groundswell of opposition for the Communications

60
00:04:26.640 --> 00:04:32.720
Decency Act, or the CDA, which was defeated in June of 1996.

61
00:04:32.720 --> 00:04:38.480
Those of you who surf the web may have noticed the last year and a half, an increasing number

62
00:04:38.480 --> 00:04:48.480
There's a number of websites that display this blue ribbon on their homepage, that supposedly shows your solidarity for opposition to the CDA.

63
00:04:48.480 --> 00:05:02.480
There's amazing support in the internet community for the right to encrypt information, the right to encode information to protect it from third parties, in particular what's called strong encryption.

64
00:05:02.480 --> 00:05:10.480
And I should add the right to export software that performs encryption across national borders.

65
00:05:10.480 --> 00:05:15.480
Interestingly, there's a pro-strong encryption group called Americans for Computer Privacy.

66
00:05:15.480 --> 00:05:20.480
And this group has recently hired the Malibu public relations firm Goddard-Klausen.

67
00:05:20.480 --> 00:05:25.480
This is the firm that produced the Harry and Louise ads that helped defeat the Clinton healthcare plan.

68
00:05:25.480 --> 00:05:30.480
So there's going to be much more public awareness of some of these encryption issues.

69
00:05:30.480 --> 00:05:35.480
Incidentally, there was a feature on CNN headline news this morning, I don't know if any of you saw it,

70
00:05:35.480 --> 00:05:46.980
about Hewlett-Packard being granted by the administration the right to export a certain kind of encryption technology to a few countries, about five countries including Britain.

71
00:05:46.980 --> 00:05:58.480
But the caveat is, this technology is designed so that there's what they call a back door, a secret key where government officials can unencrypt or decode the data if they need to.

72
00:06:00.480 --> 00:06:09.000
Now, I do want to say that computer nerds are not completely consistent on these kinds

73
00:06:09.000 --> 00:06:10.760
of issues.

74
00:06:10.760 --> 00:06:16.920
In general, they tend to be more tolerant of restrictions on commercial speech, advertising,

75
00:06:16.920 --> 00:06:18.700
for example, on websites.

76
00:06:18.700 --> 00:06:26.660
In general, many computer folks decry the increased commercialization of the net.

77
00:06:26.660 --> 00:06:31.440
Many of them tend to support so-called anti-spamming laws, laws that would prohibit the sending

78
00:06:31.440 --> 00:06:34.540
of unsolicited email.

79
00:06:34.540 --> 00:06:39.500
Of course, a potential danger of this is that any anti-spamming law would have to be a federal,

80
00:06:39.500 --> 00:06:42.940
nationwide anti-spamming law and not a state anti-spamming law.

81
00:06:42.940 --> 00:06:50.100
There was a group just a couple of weeks ago, there was a mock trial to see how a state

82
00:06:50.100 --> 00:06:54.060
anti-spamming law would work and it turned out it wouldn't work very well because of

83
00:06:54.060 --> 00:07:21.460
The bottom line is that many of the so-called free speech advocates on the net have more the ACLU's definition of free speech than what we would consider to be free speech.

84
00:07:21.460 --> 00:07:31.460
Free speech means the right to communicate pornography but not to communicate commercial information, not to try to sell goods and services.

85
00:07:31.460 --> 00:07:47.460
A more important reason, which Lou alluded to last night, why computer nerds tend to fear the government, is because they have a unique understanding of what it's like to operate in a largely unregulated environment.

86
00:07:47.460 --> 00:07:56.460
They're used to communicating in an unregulated environment, the so-called chat rooms and discussion groups,

87
00:07:56.460 --> 00:08:02.460
use net groups, where there's a considerable amount of sort of community self-policing through ostracism,

88
00:08:02.460 --> 00:08:07.460
refusing to deal with people who don't obey the rules of the community.

89
00:08:07.460 --> 00:08:12.460
There's relative freedom of association in those kinds of groups.

90
00:08:12.460 --> 00:08:28.460
But even more important than that, computer nerds are used to dealing with electronic commerce and they understand how to buy and sell goods and services without any regulation, without any taxation, without any government interference at all.

91
00:08:28.460 --> 00:08:46.460
Now, by the way, this is another reason to be very cautious about any kind of national sales tax plan to replace the income tax because a national sales tax would seriously cripple the booming catalog and online commerce markets.

92
00:08:46.460 --> 00:08:54.460
Now, as Lew mentioned last night and you may have read about this week, there are several internet sales tax proposals being tossed around.

93
00:08:54.460 --> 00:09:05.460
One is this proposal by the National Governors Association to which they referred to support uniform state and local sales taxes on electronic commerce.

94
00:09:05.460 --> 00:09:12.460
Now the reason the governor's group is doing this is because they're trying to head off some congressional legislation that's being debated,

95
00:09:12.460 --> 00:09:19.460
the so-called Internet Tax Freedom Act, supported by Representative Chris Cox of California and Ron Wyden of Oregon,

96
00:09:19.460 --> 00:09:25.260
Oregon, which would bar states and localities from passing any Internet taxes until at least

97
00:09:25.260 --> 00:09:26.260
the year 2004.

98
00:09:26.260 --> 00:09:32.100
Now, these state and local policymakers worry that the Tax Freedom Act or the Cox-Widen

99
00:09:32.100 --> 00:09:39.340
Bill would drain their coffers of revenues as more and more commerce moves online, okay,

100
00:09:39.340 --> 00:09:41.540
takes place between states.

101
00:09:41.540 --> 00:09:47.900
Now, to his credit, if you want to call it that, the President has so far announced that

102
00:09:47.900 --> 00:09:49.900
He Supports the Internet Tax Freedom Act.

103
00:09:49.900 --> 00:09:55.400
In fact, on Thursday, he made a pronouncement that he opposed the governor's proposal.

104
00:09:55.400 --> 00:10:02.220
But if you think about it, you can be assured that something is in mind, and it's not tax

105
00:10:02.220 --> 00:10:04.860
freedom.

106
00:10:04.860 --> 00:10:09.460
There was an article in yesterday's USA Today discussing Clinton's pronouncement, and the

107
00:10:09.460 --> 00:10:16.920
author of the article correctly observed, quote, supporters say the Internet Tax Freedom

108
00:10:16.920 --> 00:10:21.880
Act will keep state and local governments from burying the internet in taxes before

109
00:10:21.880 --> 00:10:27.560
policymakers can agree on a fair way to tax electronic commerce.

110
00:10:27.560 --> 00:10:32.360
So you don't want to kill the goose that's laying the golden egg right at the beginning.

111
00:10:32.360 --> 00:10:36.480
You want to let the process get going and then you figure out the quote fair way to

112
00:10:36.480 --> 00:10:40.200
tax and regulate it.

113
00:10:40.200 --> 00:10:45.680
Internet commerce is a really fascinating area because it's a perfect example, as Lou

114
00:10:45.680 --> 00:10:49.080
Lew mentioned last night of how an unregulated market works.

115
00:10:49.080 --> 00:10:53.540
What happens when thousands of buyers and sellers get together and through a series

116
00:10:53.540 --> 00:10:58.840
of voluntary transactions exchange goods and services.

117
00:10:58.840 --> 00:11:07.280
Couple of examples, we've recently seen the emergence of independent third party intermediaries

118
00:11:07.280 --> 00:11:11.640
who help to facilitate transactions among people on the internet.

119
00:11:11.640 --> 00:11:17.000
For example, with the buying and selling of used computer equipment, which is a big business

120
00:11:17.000 --> 00:11:22.720
on the internet, there's a company called TradeDirect.com, which some of you may have

121
00:11:22.720 --> 00:11:30.960
seen. It's a very interesting function. What TradeDirect does is it acts as a trusted third-party

122
00:11:30.960 --> 00:11:38.840
intermediary to protect these kinds of exchanges. For example, suppose that I wanted to buy

123
00:11:38.840 --> 00:11:42.560
a used computer monitor from Jeff Tucker.

124
00:11:42.560 --> 00:11:45.560
I'm a little bit wary of him,

125
00:11:45.560 --> 00:11:49.040
so I don't want to send him the money before he sends me the monitor.

126
00:11:49.040 --> 00:11:52.680
And he doesn't want to send me the monitor before I send him the money.

127
00:11:52.680 --> 00:11:55.520
It's a classic dilemma. So what to do?

128
00:11:55.520 --> 00:12:00.960
Well, Trade Direct has stepped in and offered the following services for a small fee.

129
00:12:00.960 --> 00:12:04.280
What Trade Direct does,

130
00:12:04.280 --> 00:12:07.240
once Jeff and I have agreed that we want to make this transaction,

131
00:12:07.240 --> 00:12:37.240
I send my money to Trade Direct, and they hold my money. Then Jeff sends the computer monitor to me, and I check it out, I inspect it, see if it meets my standards, if I want it. If I decide to keep it, then Trade Direct passes the money on to Jeff. If I decide that I don't like it, I send it back to Jeff, and when Jeff has received it, he notifies Trade Direct that he's gotten it, and they send my money back to me, they refund my money. So basically, there's no risk for either of us that we might be taken advantage of.

132
00:12:37.240 --> 00:12:41.240
No, there's no need for a government policing agency.

133
00:12:41.240 --> 00:12:51.240
There's no need for a department of commerce, of electronic commerce, to make sure that people don't get cheated through electronic transactions.

134
00:12:51.240 --> 00:12:59.240
The market takes care of that function, that governance function perfectly well.

135
00:12:59.240 --> 00:13:11.240
Now, it should come as no surprise that media and government elites hate and fear the internet and all that it represents, and the computer industry more generally, as I'll say in a moment.

136
00:13:11.240 --> 00:13:23.240
Now, the greatest example of this, as you all know, is the Lewinsky scandal, or intern gate, whatever you want to call it, which has been a huge boost to internet news.

137
00:13:23.240 --> 00:13:33.240
The story itself, as Lew mentioned last night, was first broken on the internet by Matt Drudge, author of the great Drudge Report, an online magazine.

138
00:13:33.240 --> 00:13:43.240
Drudge was the first to report, actually what he reported was Newsweek's decision to spike the story, which Newsweek then went on to report once the whole world knew about it.

139
00:13:43.240 --> 00:14:13.240
If you've been following, if you've been on your computer in the last three or four weeks, you know that every major news site on the internet, all the websites of the agencies, CNN, Yahoo, all of these places have special sections devoted to the scandal, which in the wonderful early days were being updated almost minute by minute. A great time waster during the day.

140
00:14:13.240 --> 00:14:20.160
Now, the pundits are talking almost as much about the Internet's coverage of the scandal

141
00:14:20.160 --> 00:14:26.280
as the scandal itself. Michael Kinsley, formerly of the New Republic and the president editor

142
00:14:26.280 --> 00:14:31.360
of the online magazine Slate, told the LA Times that not only did the Internet make

143
00:14:31.360 --> 00:14:37.560
this story, but this story has made the Internet. Kinsley says, quote, it is the Lewinsky story

144
00:14:37.560 --> 00:14:42.380
has done for the Internet what the Gulf War did for CNN and what the Kennedy assassination

145
00:14:42.380 --> 00:14:48.140
for Television in General. Elsewhere he wrote that the scandal represents the Internet's

146
00:14:48.140 --> 00:14:59.140
coming of age as a media force. However, Kinsley is dead wrong about the reason for this. He

147
00:14:59.140 --> 00:15:04.180
claims, quote, the Internet beat TV and print to this story and ultimately forced it on

148
00:15:04.180 --> 00:15:11.620
them for one simple reason, lower standards. In other words, well, the respectable media

149
00:15:11.620 --> 00:15:16.400
were not going to run this story because they hadn't had time to check it out, they wanted

150
00:15:16.400 --> 00:15:22.320
to sift through and find all the inaccuracies and so on. Of course the truth is very different

151
00:15:22.320 --> 00:15:29.520
from that. The truth is that the internet allows people from all over the world to communicate

152
00:15:29.520 --> 00:15:36.400
the little bits of information that they have. This is what Hayek talked about when he mentioned

153
00:15:36.400 --> 00:15:41.160
and the knowledge of local circumstances of time and place.

154
00:15:41.160 --> 00:15:46.160
The establishment media, on the other hand, only report information that comes from Washington,

155
00:15:46.160 --> 00:15:49.960
LA or New York.

156
00:15:49.960 --> 00:15:56.200
A great example of this is the extremely hostile reaction to Ambrose Evans Pritchard's book

157
00:15:56.200 --> 00:15:59.960
that Lew mentioned last night, The Secret Life of Bill Clinton.

158
00:15:59.960 --> 00:16:04.040
One review of the book by Newsweek's Mark Hosenball.

159
00:16:04.040 --> 00:16:09.200
In that review, Hosenball complained that Evans-Pritchard must have, quote, switched

160
00:16:09.200 --> 00:16:15.200
his BS detector off before he left the mobile lounge at Dulles Airport. Now what he means

161
00:16:15.200 --> 00:16:21.720
by that is because Evans-Pritchard actually went to Oklahoma. He went to this famous Elohim

162
00:16:21.720 --> 00:16:29.480
City compound in Oklahoma and interviewed people who knew about the Oklahoma City bombing,

163
00:16:29.480 --> 00:16:46.500
to a reporter like Mark Hosenpaul, reporters see no need ever to leave the mobile lounge

164
00:16:46.500 --> 00:16:53.640
at the Dulles Airport. When your primary source is Mike McCurry, why would you ever need to

165
00:16:53.640 --> 00:17:01.920
And one thing I remember about traveling with Murray Rothbard is Murray had a passion for

166
00:17:01.920 --> 00:17:06.560
local news and events. Wherever he went, he always wanted a copy of the local paper and

167
00:17:06.560 --> 00:17:10.840
he would read it to find out what was going on, also because you get information reported

168
00:17:10.840 --> 00:17:17.360
in small local newspapers that the establishment papers don't pick up. Now you can get this

169
00:17:17.360 --> 00:17:23.500
local news from anywhere delivered right to your desktop. Almost all the small local news

170
00:17:23.500 --> 00:17:34.580
Now the establishment media, as we know, purposefully suppress information, they believe, rightly

171
00:17:34.580 --> 00:17:39.940
or wrongly, to be harmful to the institutions of modern society itself, which they mean

172
00:17:39.940 --> 00:17:47.900
big government themselves, i.e. the mainstream media. Example, in February 1997, as reported

173
00:17:47.900 --> 00:17:54.820
by Evans Pritchard. ABC News had prepared a segment on Carol Howe, the BATF informant

174
00:17:54.820 --> 00:18:02.780
who had penetrated the white Aryan resistance in Oklahoma and had been reporting back to

175
00:18:02.780 --> 00:18:11.940
her superiors plans to blow up federal buildings in Oklahoma, months before the destruction

176
00:18:11.940 --> 00:18:14.420
of the Murrah Building.

177
00:18:14.420 --> 00:18:19.100
At the last segment, at the last moment, the segment was pulled and replaced, I think,

178
00:18:19.100 --> 00:18:22.940
by a story on sheep in New Zealand or something like that.

179
00:18:22.940 --> 00:18:26.460
Now the assistant producer of the segment, a retired Marine Lieutenant Colonel named

180
00:18:26.460 --> 00:18:35.280
Roger Charles, he protested this decision to ABC and he was fired immediately.

181
00:18:35.280 --> 00:18:40.940
His superiors left him two messages, he told Evans Pritchard, quote, the first, the first

182
00:18:40.940 --> 00:18:45.940
The first message was that this story would bring the country down, whatever that's supposed to mean.

183
00:18:45.940 --> 00:18:50.940
The second was that it would lead to the abolition of the ATF, machine guns on every corner.

184
00:18:50.940 --> 00:18:55.940
You know the argument.

185
00:18:55.940 --> 00:19:02.940
The government, quite understandably, is terrified by the Internet and the prospects of uncensored access to information.

186
00:19:02.940 --> 00:19:08.940
No longer can the government assume that people will get their information from the official media.

187
00:19:08.940 --> 00:19:15.500
Thousands of people have learned the truth about the Waco incident, about the Oklahoma City bombing,

188
00:19:15.500 --> 00:19:22.620
about what most likely happened with the TWA-800 crash from the internet, not from the major newspapers.

189
00:19:22.620 --> 00:19:26.300
And of course, the best writing on many of these topics has been done by Evans Pritchard.

190
00:19:26.300 --> 00:19:31.260
And before his book came out, the easiest way to get this information was on the web.

191
00:19:31.260 --> 00:19:34.300
Of course, Evans Pritchard is a reporter for the London Telegraph,

192
00:19:34.300 --> 00:19:38.860
and unless you have access to the print version of the London Telegraph,

193
00:19:38.860 --> 00:19:46.860
It would be difficult to get this information, but the electronic version of the London Telegraph is available to anybody with a web browser.

194
00:19:50.860 --> 00:19:54.860
Now, how does the White House in particular feel about this state of affairs?

195
00:19:55.860 --> 00:20:01.860
Mrs. Clinton made some surprisingly candid remarks about the internet coverage of the Lewinsky scandal

196
00:20:01.860 --> 00:20:05.860
at a press conference on an unrelated topic a couple of Wednesdays ago.

197
00:20:05.860 --> 00:20:09.860
February 11th, quoting Mrs. Clinton.

198
00:20:09.860 --> 00:20:15.860
There are a number of serious issues without any kind of editing function or gatekeeping function.

199
00:20:15.860 --> 00:20:19.860
Now I wonder who she has in mind for the editors and gatekeepers.

200
00:20:19.860 --> 00:20:22.860
I bet it's not any of us.

201
00:20:22.860 --> 00:20:23.860
She goes on,

202
00:20:23.860 --> 00:20:28.860
What does it mean to have the right to defend your reputation or to respond to what someone says?

203
00:20:28.860 --> 00:20:34.860
There used to be this old saying that the lie can be halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on.

204
00:20:34.860 --> 00:20:39.860
Well, today the lie can be twice around the world before the truth gets out of bed to find its boots.

205
00:20:39.860 --> 00:20:45.860
I mean, it is just beyond imagination what can be disseminated, she said.

206
00:20:45.860 --> 00:20:51.860
She continued, I don't have any clue about what we're going to do legally, regulatory, technologically,

207
00:20:51.860 --> 00:20:55.860
i.e. we haven't figured it out yet, but obviously we're going to do something.

208
00:20:55.860 --> 00:21:00.860
But I do think we always have to have competing interests in balance.

209
00:21:00.860 --> 00:21:07.660
Any time an individual or an institution or an invention leaps so far out of that balance and throws a system,

210
00:21:07.660 --> 00:21:13.460
whatever it might be, political, economic, technological, out of balance, you've got a problem.

211
00:21:13.460 --> 00:21:17.660
Because it can lead, it can then lead to the oppression of people's rights,

212
00:21:17.660 --> 00:21:19.960
it can lead to the manipulation of information,

213
00:21:19.960 --> 00:21:23.660
it can lead to all kinds of bad outcomes which we have seen historically.

214
00:21:23.660 --> 00:21:27.560
So we're going to have to deal with that.

215
00:21:27.560 --> 00:21:32.560
Now I have to admit that she speaks with some authority on the oppression of people's rights,

216
00:21:32.560 --> 00:21:38.560
the manipulation of information, and all kinds of bad outcomes, which we've seen historically.

217
00:21:38.560 --> 00:21:47.560
According to one reporter who covered this press conference, a reporter named Declan McCullough,

218
00:21:47.560 --> 00:21:51.560
who writes for a Time Warner electronic publication called The Netley News,

219
00:21:51.560 --> 00:21:56.560
the unnamed victim of Hillary's diatribe was Drudge and the Drudge Report.

220
00:21:56.560 --> 00:21:59.760
And this reporter quite insightfully added, quote,

221
00:21:59.760 --> 00:22:01.920
the beauty of the internet, of the at-large internet,

222
00:22:01.920 --> 00:22:03.840
is that there are no gatekeepers.

223
00:22:03.840 --> 00:22:06.200
And that terrifies politicians because they

224
00:22:06.200 --> 00:22:10.400
are accustomed to a close relationship with the media.

225
00:22:10.400 --> 00:22:11.860
By the way, the White House has also

226
00:22:11.860 --> 00:22:14.840
actively encouraged Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal

227
00:22:14.840 --> 00:22:19.000
to pursue a $30 million libel suit against Drudge

228
00:22:19.000 --> 00:22:21.880
for a story that Drudge reported a few months ago

229
00:22:21.880 --> 00:22:24.360
and then immediately retracted when he discovered

230
00:22:24.360 --> 00:22:31.800
Well, what are the prospects for government regulation of the Internet?

231
00:22:31.800 --> 00:22:38.300
I'm happy to say that outright censorship of the kind favored by Hillary is not very

232
00:22:38.300 --> 00:22:44.260
likely as the failure of the Communications Decency Act indicates, although a certain

233
00:22:44.260 --> 00:22:47.840
amount of de facto censorship already exists.

234
00:22:47.840 --> 00:22:53.120
For example, in the spring of 1996, a White House official named David Lytell put pressure

235
00:22:53.120 --> 00:23:00.600
on Hotwired Magazine to remove a link from one of its pages to a page called the Skeleton

236
00:23:00.600 --> 00:23:05.920
Closet site, which details skeletons in various public figures' closets, including Clinton,

237
00:23:05.920 --> 00:23:08.520
of course.

238
00:23:08.520 --> 00:23:13.420
Now other scenarios for regulation are much more likely.

239
00:23:13.420 --> 00:23:18.200
The Esther Dyson, who's a well-known computer industry analyst, said just Monday of this

240
00:23:18.200 --> 00:23:23.120
this week that she believes a great catastrophe will happen in the near future and will be

241
00:23:23.120 --> 00:23:29.560
blamed on the Internet. For example, someone will bomb a building and it will turn out

242
00:23:29.560 --> 00:23:34.100
that that person used email to communicate with an accomplice. And see, this will be

243
00:23:34.100 --> 00:23:39.680
used as a pretext for regulating communication on the Internet or for giving the FBI and

244
00:23:39.680 --> 00:23:45.800
the BATF the right to intercept any electronic transmission without a warrant or whatever.

245
00:23:45.800 --> 00:23:50.680
This is the familiar ratchet effect described very well in Bob Higgs' book Crisis in Leviathan.

246
00:23:50.680 --> 00:23:55.060
There will be some crisis which will justify massive government intervention to protect

247
00:23:55.060 --> 00:23:58.460
us from unfettered information.

248
00:23:58.460 --> 00:24:05.720
An even more likely prospect is the regulation of Internet service providers, the companies

249
00:24:05.720 --> 00:24:09.840
like America Online CompuServe and so on who provide access to the net.

250
00:24:09.840 --> 00:24:16.000
There's discussion now of treating them like telephone companies and having Internet service

251
00:24:16.000 --> 00:24:20.560
providers be subject to the same regulations of the Federal Communications Commission that

252
00:24:20.560 --> 00:24:24.520
traditional communication services are subject to.

253
00:24:24.520 --> 00:24:30.240
For example, to regulate rates that Internet service providers charge, forcing them to

254
00:24:30.240 --> 00:24:38.920
communicate to the so-called Universal Service Fund to cross-subsidize various users.

255
00:24:38.920 --> 00:24:43.880
There are also prospects for government intervention in the computer industry more generally, even

256
00:24:43.880 --> 00:24:50.160
outside the internet. The Microsoft case is a perfect example of that. What the Microsoft

257
00:24:50.160 --> 00:24:56.200
case primarily illustrates is that government officials, and I should say government economists,

258
00:24:56.200 --> 00:25:00.680
really don't understand much about computers. This whole recent controversy over whether

259
00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:08.080
Microsoft was violating the 1994 consent decree by requiring resellers to include the Internet

260
00:25:08.080 --> 00:25:14.040
Explorer Web Browser, along with Windows 95, this big debate raged among techies as

261
00:25:14.040 --> 00:25:18.880
to whether a browser is part of the operating system, as Microsoft claimed, or whether it's

262
00:25:18.880 --> 00:25:24.120
a separate application, as the government claimed. The lesson from that dispute is,

263
00:25:24.120 --> 00:25:30.520
who knows? There's no unambiguous definition of what constitutes an operating system, what

264
00:25:30.520 --> 00:25:34.560
constitutes an applications program. This is not something that the government should

265
00:25:34.560 --> 00:25:44.600
The Head of the Justice Department's Antitrust Division, Joel Klein, insists that the government

266
00:25:44.600 --> 00:25:47.680
is not trying to decide what goes into computers.

267
00:25:47.680 --> 00:25:53.880
However, the Justice Department's latest complaint against Microsoft included a request

268
00:25:53.880 --> 00:25:59.960
that Microsoft had to submit design details and descriptions to the government 30 days

269
00:25:59.960 --> 00:26:06.400
before the introduction of any new browser or operating system.

270
00:26:06.400 --> 00:26:11.800
And I want to mention that some of the chief villains in the Microsoft case, as you know,

271
00:26:11.800 --> 00:26:16.960
are Microsoft's competitors, who have been pushing very hard for the government to attack

272
00:26:16.960 --> 00:26:22.400
the menace of Microsoft. People like Scott McNeely, the CEO of Sun Microsystems, and

273
00:26:22.400 --> 00:26:27.500
Larry Ellison, the CEO of Oracle, are villains here.

274
00:26:27.500 --> 00:26:34.340
And by the way, you might never guess who is the latest friend of Microsoft's competitors.

275
00:26:34.340 --> 00:26:40.620
This very prominent citizen wrote a fundraising letter containing the following, quote,

276
00:26:40.620 --> 00:26:44.700
In the coming months, we will need to educate the public, the administration and Congress

277
00:26:44.700 --> 00:26:50.620
about the dangers of a laissez-faire attitude toward Microsoft. I am personally convinced

278
00:26:50.620 --> 00:26:54.980
that if nothing is done now, it will become increasingly difficult to have fair competition

279
00:26:54.980 --> 00:27:00.940
in the years ahead. That is why we will need companies like yours to help finance and support

280
00:27:00.940 --> 00:27:09.940
our efforts. Do you know who said that? That was Bob Dole. Bob Dole's law firm is now representing

281
00:27:09.940 --> 00:27:15.580
Netscape, Sun and other companies who are agitating for action against Microsoft.

282
00:27:15.580 --> 00:27:23.920
Finally, I want to speak just a moment or two about students.

283
00:27:23.920 --> 00:27:30.320
Students are the most computer literate, on average, the most technologically hip of the

284
00:27:30.320 --> 00:27:34.040
future victims of government action.

285
00:27:34.040 --> 00:27:38.080
Do they share the attitudes and outlooks of these computer nerds?

286
00:27:38.080 --> 00:27:41.100
The answer is yes, by and large they do.

287
00:27:41.100 --> 00:27:42.600
Why is that?

288
00:27:42.600 --> 00:27:57.600
One reason is simply because they are more, they have more experience with technology, more experience with computers, so they learn these free market attitudes of the internet community at an earlier age than the rest of us.

289
00:27:57.600 --> 00:28:03.600
But there's even more than that. Just as computer nerds have little respect for the governing elites,

290
00:28:03.600 --> 00:28:11.600
Students also have increasingly little respect for the academic elites and the regime they serve.

291
00:28:11.600 --> 00:28:19.600
Why is this? Well, students increasingly recognize, as has been mentioned by both Lew and Sean,

292
00:28:19.600 --> 00:28:29.600
that they recognize the modern, multicultural, politically correct university for what it truly is, namely an embarrassment.

293
00:28:29.600 --> 00:28:34.800
I recently read, according to the Young America's Foundation, every Ivy League university except

294
00:28:34.800 --> 00:28:40.880
Princeton now offers more courses in women's studies than in economics.

295
00:28:40.880 --> 00:28:45.600
That's not true at the Mises University, I can guarantee.

296
00:28:45.600 --> 00:28:50.360
Students are also realizing that the traditional university as an institution is losing much

297
00:28:50.360 --> 00:28:52.680
of its social relevance.

298
00:28:52.680 --> 00:28:56.880
You've heard many pronouncements about the university being in a state of crisis, increasing

299
00:28:56.880 --> 00:29:03.400
and Costs. There's much more public scrutiny now of what goes on in public universities.

300
00:29:03.400 --> 00:29:08.440
A lot of cutbacks and downsizing are on the horizon. And at the same time, the quality

301
00:29:08.440 --> 00:29:13.720
of higher education is perceived as being in a state of constant decline. Students are

302
00:29:13.720 --> 00:29:18.460
increasingly dissatisfied with large classes and different instructors, poor campus facilities

303
00:29:18.460 --> 00:29:26.000
and safety and so on. Yesterday before coming here, I was giving a talk at USC. If you've

304
00:29:26.000 --> 00:29:31.000
If you've ever been to USC, you know it's not in the greatest neighborhood. It's a completely gated campus.

305
00:29:31.000 --> 00:29:37.000
Campuses are not safe places in most cities.

306
00:29:37.000 --> 00:29:45.000
What can we expect the University of the future to be like?

307
00:29:45.000 --> 00:29:49.000
Well, in all likelihood, it will be radically decentralized.

308
00:29:49.000 --> 00:29:54.000
It's already true that much of the intellectual activity, the real intellectual activity in the US,

309
00:29:54.000 --> 00:29:59.760
goes on not at the universities, but in the private sector, at think tanks and other private

310
00:29:59.760 --> 00:30:05.800
research organizations like the Mises Institute. That's where many scholars would much rather

311
00:30:05.800 --> 00:30:13.760
be where they don't have to deal with the politicized curricula and committees of the

312
00:30:13.760 --> 00:30:18.520
university, they don't have to attend mandatory sensitivity training seminars and so on. There's

313
00:30:18.520 --> 00:30:24.920
There's no political correctness at Mises U, as Lew mentioned last night. Furthermore,

314
00:30:24.920 --> 00:30:29.720
increasing numbers of students are uninterested in pursuing an education at these traditional

315
00:30:29.720 --> 00:30:35.120
institutions of higher learning. For example, the popularity of homeschooling is at an all-time

316
00:30:35.120 --> 00:30:36.120
high.

317
00:30:36.120 --> 00:30:42.640
Now, I should add that for all the blather from people like Al Gore about hooking up

318
00:30:42.640 --> 00:30:47.680
every public school classroom to the Internet, which I think would be a complete waste of

319
00:30:47.680 --> 00:30:52.400
program, you hear very little from those people about the potentially revolutionary impact

320
00:30:52.400 --> 00:30:59.040
of the Internet on homeschooling and other decentralized educational opportunities.

321
00:30:59.040 --> 00:31:03.840
It's now easier than ever for homeschooling parents to get information, to get course

322
00:31:03.840 --> 00:31:08.520
and curriculum information, to share ideas with other homeschooling parents than ever

323
00:31:08.520 --> 00:31:10.960
before through the Internet.

324
00:31:10.960 --> 00:31:16.100
And I did a little web search and found that there are dozens and dozens of websites and

325
00:31:16.100 --> 00:31:22.260
and mailing lists devoted to homeschooling, resources for homeschoolers.

326
00:31:22.260 --> 00:31:29.980
I didn't find any sites devoted to resources for public school teachers.

327
00:31:29.980 --> 00:31:36.900
Now these kinds of students, the students who are homeschooled or who do get a proper

328
00:31:36.900 --> 00:31:42.140
education and of course they're much brighter and more motivated than the average student,

329
00:31:42.140 --> 00:31:45.460
they're going to be interested in alternative forms of higher education, maybe some using

330
00:31:45.460 --> 00:31:51.540
and the New Technologies, video classes, classes over the internet, whatever.

331
00:31:51.540 --> 00:31:57.180
As evidence that such students are around and that they exist, you only have to consider

332
00:31:57.180 --> 00:32:00.100
the huge popularity of the Mises University.

333
00:32:00.100 --> 00:32:04.580
And I'm sure Lew would tell us that there is enough demand to hold three or four Mises

334
00:32:04.580 --> 00:32:06.980
Universities every summer.

335
00:32:06.980 --> 00:32:13.220
These are the students who we're reaching and the students we need to continue to reach

336
00:32:13.220 --> 00:32:20.100
To conclude, like the computer nerds we've discussed, these students are a great hope

337
00:32:20.100 --> 00:32:25.540
for us. They share the computer nerds' skepticism and frustration with the governing elites.

338
00:32:25.540 --> 00:32:30.460
But they do want to learn. They are interested in genuine ideas. They do want to know about

339
00:32:30.460 --> 00:32:35.980
liberty. It's nature and origins. And that's what we must continue to teach them. Thanks

340
00:32:35.980 --> 00:32:40.500
to these new technologies, we have better and better opportunities to do so.

341
00:32:40.500 --> 00:32:46.500
Now remember, technology is not the determinant of culture. Technology is the product of culture.

342
00:32:46.500 --> 00:32:50.500
It is ideas that created Western civilization.

343
00:32:50.500 --> 00:32:55.500
The civilization that you are helping to sustain through your continued support of the Mises Institute.

344
00:32:55.500 --> 00:32:58.500
And for that, you deserve our heartfelt thanks.