WEBVTT

NOTE 1.02. First Implications of the Concept

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.000
2. First Implications of the Concept

2
00:00:05.000 --> 00:00:11.520
The first truth to be discovered about human action is that it can be undertaken only by

3
00:00:11.520 --> 00:00:19.520
individual actors. Only individuals have ends and can act to attain them. There are no such

4
00:00:19.520 --> 00:00:28.160
things as ends of or actions by groups, collectives or states, which do not take place as actions

5
00:00:28.160 --> 00:00:31.600
by various specific individuals.

6
00:00:31.600 --> 00:00:38.720
Societies or groups have no independent existence aside from the actions of their individual

7
00:00:38.720 --> 00:00:39.720
members.

8
00:00:39.720 --> 00:00:44.320
Thus, to say that governments act is merely a metaphor.

9
00:00:44.320 --> 00:00:51.080
Actually, certain individuals are in a certain relationship with other individuals and act

10
00:00:51.080 --> 00:00:57.240
in a way that they and the other individuals recognize as governmental.

11
00:00:57.240 --> 00:01:03.320
To say that only individuals act is not to deny that they are influenced in their desires

12
00:01:03.320 --> 00:01:10.000
and actions by the acts of other individuals, who might be fellow members of various societies

13
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:11.420
or groups.

14
00:01:11.420 --> 00:01:17.560
We do not at all assume, as some critics of economics have charged, that individuals are

15
00:01:17.560 --> 00:01:21.520
atoms, isolated from one another.

16
00:01:21.520 --> 00:01:27.120
The metaphor must not be taken to mean that the collective institution itself has any

17
00:01:27.120 --> 00:01:30.960
Many Reality Apart from the Acts of Various Individuals

18
00:01:30.960 --> 00:01:39.160
Similarly, an individual may contract to act as an agent in representing another individual,

19
00:01:39.160 --> 00:01:41.480
or on behalf of his family.

20
00:01:41.480 --> 00:01:46.200
Still, only individuals can desire and act.

21
00:01:46.200 --> 00:01:52.120
The existence of an institution such as government becomes meaningful only through influencing

22
00:01:52.120 --> 00:02:06.360
In order to institute action, it is not sufficient that the individual man have unachieved ends

23
00:02:06.360 --> 00:02:08.600
that he would like to fulfill.

24
00:02:08.600 --> 00:02:15.920
He must also expect that certain modes of behavior will enable him to attain his ends.

25
00:02:15.920 --> 00:02:22.000
A man may have a desire for sunshine, but if he realizes that he can do nothing to achieve

26
00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:28.160
He does not act on this desire. He must have certain ideas about how to achieve

27
00:02:28.160 --> 00:02:34.920
his ends. Action thus consists of the behavior of individuals directed towards

28
00:02:34.920 --> 00:02:40.960
ends in ways that they believe will accomplish their purpose. Action requires

29
00:02:40.960 --> 00:02:48.080
an image of a desired end and technological ideas or plans on how to

30
00:02:48.080 --> 00:02:51.080
How to Arrive at This End

31
00:02:51.080 --> 00:02:56.040
Men find themselves in a certain environment or situation.

32
00:02:56.040 --> 00:03:01.960
It is this situation that the individual decides to change in some way in order to achieve

33
00:03:01.960 --> 00:03:03.800
his ends.

34
00:03:03.800 --> 00:03:10.360
But man can work only with the numerous elements that he finds in his environment by rearranging

35
00:03:10.360 --> 00:03:14.620
them in order to bring about the satisfaction of his ends.

36
00:03:14.620 --> 00:03:35.620
In its reference to any given act, the environment external to the individual may be divided into two parts, those elements which he believes he cannot control and must leave unchanged, and those which he can alter, or rather thinks he can alter, to arrive at his ends.

37
00:03:35.620 --> 00:03:42.900
Every actor may be termed the general conditions of the action, the latter the means used.

38
00:03:42.900 --> 00:03:47.860
Thus the individual actor is faced with an environment that he would like to change in

39
00:03:47.860 --> 00:03:50.120
order to attain his ends.

40
00:03:50.120 --> 00:03:57.300
To act, he must have technological ideas about how to use some of the elements of the environment

41
00:03:57.300 --> 00:04:02.700
as means, as pathways to arrive at his ends.

42
00:04:02.700 --> 00:04:09.180
Every act must therefore involve the employment of means by individual actors to attempt to

43
00:04:09.180 --> 00:04:12.300
arrive at certain desired ends.

44
00:04:12.300 --> 00:04:19.700
In the external environment, the general conditions cannot be the objects of any human action.

45
00:04:19.700 --> 00:04:24.060
Only the means can be employed in action.

46
00:04:24.060 --> 00:04:28.460
All human life must take place in time.

47
00:04:28.460 --> 00:04:34.860
Man reason cannot even conceive of an existence or of action that does not take place through

48
00:04:34.860 --> 00:04:35.860
time.

49
00:04:35.860 --> 00:04:43.380
At a time when a human being decides to act in order to attain an end, his goal, or end,

50
00:04:43.380 --> 00:04:49.340
can be finally and completely attained only at some point in the future.

51
00:04:49.340 --> 00:04:55.660
If the desired ends could all be attained instantaneously in the present, then man's

52
00:04:55.660 --> 00:05:00.940
Actions would all be attained, and there would be no reason for him to act, and we have seen

53
00:05:00.940 --> 00:05:05.300
that action is necessary to the nature of man.

54
00:05:05.300 --> 00:05:12.220
Therefore, an actor chooses means from his environment in accordance with his ideas to

55
00:05:12.220 --> 00:05:19.420
arrive at an expected end, completely attainable only at some point in the future.

56
00:05:19.420 --> 00:05:26.420
For any given action, we can distinguish among three periods of time involved, the period

57
00:05:26.420 --> 00:05:33.340
before the action, the time absorbed by the action, and the period after the action has

58
00:05:33.340 --> 00:05:35.340
been completed.

59
00:05:35.340 --> 00:05:41.460
All action aims at rendering conditions at some time in the future more satisfactory

60
00:05:41.460 --> 00:05:47.560
for the actor than they would have been without the intervention of the action.

61
00:05:47.560 --> 00:05:51.000
A man's time is always scarce.

62
00:05:51.000 --> 00:05:52.720
He is not immortal.

63
00:05:52.720 --> 00:05:55.620
His time on earth is limited.

64
00:05:55.620 --> 00:06:01.560
Each day of his life has only twenty-four hours in which he can attain his ends.

65
00:06:01.560 --> 00:06:06.720
Furthermore, all actions must take place through time.

66
00:06:06.720 --> 00:06:12.660
Therefore, time is a means that man must use to arrive at his ends.

67
00:06:12.660 --> 00:06:17.860
is a means that is omnipresent in all human action.

68
00:06:17.860 --> 00:06:25.060
Action takes place by choosing which ends shall be satisfied by the employment of means.

69
00:06:25.060 --> 00:06:31.740
Time is scarce for man only because, whichever ends he chooses to satisfy, there are others

70
00:06:31.740 --> 00:06:34.740
that must remain unsatisfied.

71
00:06:34.740 --> 00:06:41.860
When we must use a means so that some ends remain unsatisfied, the necessity for a choice

72
00:06:41.860 --> 00:06:50.700
For example, Jones is engaged in watching a baseball game on television.

73
00:06:50.700 --> 00:06:57.260
He is faced with the choice of spending the next hour in A, continuing to watch the baseball

74
00:06:57.260 --> 00:07:02.900
game, B, playing bridge, or C, going for a drive.

75
00:07:02.900 --> 00:07:09.500
He would like to do all three of these things, but his means, time, is insufficient.

76
00:07:09.500 --> 00:07:12.840
As a result, he must choose.

77
00:07:12.840 --> 00:07:18.520
One end can be satisfied, but the others must go unfulfilled.

78
00:07:18.520 --> 00:07:24.640
Suppose that he decides on Course A. This is a clear indication that he has ranked the

79
00:07:24.640 --> 00:07:31.740
satisfaction of End A higher than the satisfaction of End B or C.

80
00:07:31.740 --> 00:07:36.760
From this example of action, many implications can be deduced.

81
00:07:36.760 --> 00:07:43.200
In the first place, all means are scarce, that is, limited with respect to the ends

82
00:07:43.200 --> 00:07:46.280
that they could possibly serve.

83
00:07:46.280 --> 00:07:51.880
If the means are in unlimited abundance, then they need not serve as the object of attention

84
00:07:51.880 --> 00:07:54.420
of any human action.

85
00:07:54.420 --> 00:08:00.260
For example, air, in most situations, is in unlimited abundance.

86
00:08:00.260 --> 00:08:07.500
It is therefore not a means, and is not employed as a means to the fulfillment of ends.

87
00:08:07.500 --> 00:08:14.700
It need not be allocated, as time is, to the satisfaction of the more important ends, since

88
00:08:14.700 --> 00:08:18.740
it is sufficiently abundant for all human requirements.

89
00:08:18.740 --> 00:08:25.940
Air, then, though indispensable, is not a means, but a general condition of human action

90
00:08:25.940 --> 00:08:28.260
and human welfare.

91
00:08:28.260 --> 00:08:35.980
Secondly, these scarce means must be allocated by the actor to serve certain ends and leave

92
00:08:35.980 --> 00:08:39.060
other ends unsatisfied.

93
00:08:39.060 --> 00:08:46.580
This act of choice may be called economizing the means to serve the most desired ends.

94
00:08:46.580 --> 00:08:53.980
Time, for example, must be economized by the actor to serve the most desired ends.

95
00:08:53.980 --> 00:08:59.660
The actor may be interpreted as ranking his alternative ends in accordance with their

96
00:08:59.660 --> 00:09:02.100
value to him.

97
00:09:02.100 --> 00:09:09.740
This scaling of ends may be described as assigning ranks of value to the ends by the actor, or

98
00:09:09.740 --> 00:09:13.060
as a process of valuation.

99
00:09:13.060 --> 00:09:20.220
Thus suppose that Jones ranked his alternative ends for the use of an hour of time as follows.

100
00:09:20.220 --> 00:09:25.220
First, one, continuing to watch the baseball game.

101
00:09:25.220 --> 00:09:29.220
Second, two, going for a drive.

102
00:09:29.220 --> 00:09:33.220
Third, three, playing bridge.

103
00:09:33.220 --> 00:09:39.220
This was his scale of values, or scale of preferences.

104
00:09:39.220 --> 00:09:47.220
The supply of means, time, available, was sufficient for the attainment of only one of these ends.

105
00:09:47.220 --> 00:09:54.260
And the fact that he chose the baseball game shows that he ranked that highest or first.

106
00:09:54.260 --> 00:10:00.380
Suppose now that he is allocating two hours of his time and can spend an hour on each

107
00:10:00.380 --> 00:10:01.880
pursuit.

108
00:10:01.880 --> 00:10:07.900
If he spends one hour on the game and then a second hour on the drive, this indicates

109
00:10:07.900 --> 00:10:11.900
that his ranking of preferences is as above.

110
00:10:11.900 --> 00:10:17.140
The lowest ranking end, playing bridge, goes unfulfilled.

111
00:10:17.140 --> 00:10:23.500
Thus the larger the supply of means available, the more ends can be satisfied, and the lower

112
00:10:23.500 --> 00:10:28.580
the rank of the ends that must remain unsatisfied.

113
00:10:28.580 --> 00:10:34.240
Another lesson to be derived is that action does not necessarily mean that the individual

114
00:10:34.240 --> 00:10:40.060
is active as opposed to passive in the colloquial sense.

115
00:10:40.060 --> 00:10:46.560
Action does not necessarily mean that an individual must stop doing what he has been doing and

116
00:10:46.560 --> 00:10:59.560
He also acts, as in the above case, who chooses to continue in his previous course, even though the opportunity to change was open to him.

117
00:10:59.560 --> 00:11:05.560
Continuing to watch the game is just as much action as going for a drive.

118
00:11:05.560 --> 00:11:14.560
Furthermore, action does not at all mean that the individual must take a great deal of time in deliberating on a decision to act.

119
00:11:14.560 --> 00:11:20.960
To Act, the individual may make a decision to act hastily or after great deliberation

120
00:11:20.960 --> 00:11:24.000
according to his desired choice.

121
00:11:24.000 --> 00:11:28.000
He may decide on an action coolly or heatedly.

122
00:11:28.000 --> 00:11:34.240
None of these courses affects the fact that action is being taken.

123
00:11:34.240 --> 00:11:40.780
Some writers have unfoundedly believed that praxeology and economics assume that all action

124
00:11:40.780 --> 00:11:45.180
Action is cool, calculating, and deliberate.

125
00:11:45.180 --> 00:11:50.820
Another fundamental implication derived from the existence of human action is the uncertainty

126
00:11:50.820 --> 00:11:52.340
of the future.

127
00:11:52.340 --> 00:11:58.640
This must be true because the contrary would completely negate the possibility of action.

128
00:11:58.640 --> 00:12:04.720
If man knew future events completely, he would never act, since no act of his could change

129
00:12:04.720 --> 00:12:05.980
the situation.

130
00:12:05.980 --> 00:12:12.520
Thus, the fact of action signifies that the future is uncertain to the actors.

131
00:12:12.520 --> 00:12:19.140
This uncertainty about future events stems from two basic sources, the unpredictability

132
00:12:19.140 --> 00:12:25.620
of human acts of choice and insufficient knowledge about natural phenomena.

133
00:12:25.620 --> 00:12:31.860
Man does not know enough about natural phenomena to predict all their future developments,

134
00:12:31.860 --> 00:12:36.180
And he cannot know the content of future human choices.

135
00:12:36.180 --> 00:12:42.860
All human choices are continually changing as a result of changing valuations and changing

136
00:12:42.860 --> 00:12:47.840
ideas about the most appropriate means of arriving at ends.

137
00:12:47.840 --> 00:12:54.020
This does not mean, of course, that people do not try their best to estimate future developments.

138
00:12:54.020 --> 00:13:02.020
Indeed, any actor, when employing means, estimates that he will thus arrive at his desired goal.

139
00:13:02.020 --> 00:13:06.020
But he never has certain knowledge of the future.

140
00:13:06.020 --> 00:13:14.020
All his actions are of necessity speculations based on his judgment of the course of future events.

141
00:13:14.020 --> 00:13:22.020
The omnipresence of uncertainty introduces the ever-present possibility of error in human action.

142
00:13:22.020 --> 00:13:28.700
The actor may find, after he has completed his action, that the means have been inappropriate

143
00:13:28.700 --> 00:13:31.580
to the attainment of his end.

144
00:13:31.580 --> 00:13:37.540
To sum up what we have learned thus far about human action, the distinguishing characteristic

145
00:13:37.540 --> 00:13:42.260
of human beings is that all humans act.

146
00:13:42.260 --> 00:13:48.460
Action is purposeful behavior directed toward the attainment of ends in some future period

147
00:13:48.460 --> 00:13:54.860
which will involve the fulfillment of wants, otherwise remaining unsatisfied.

148
00:13:54.860 --> 00:14:01.340
Action involves the expectation of a less imperfectly satisfied state as a result of

149
00:14:01.340 --> 00:14:02.540
the action.

150
00:14:02.540 --> 00:14:09.280
The individual actor chooses to employ elements in his environment as means to the expected

151
00:14:09.280 --> 00:14:16.460
achievement of his ends, economizing them by directing them toward his most valued ends,

152
00:14:16.460 --> 00:14:18.460
The Theory of Money and Credit
