WEBVTT

NOTE 2.04. Terms of Exchange

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.340
4. Terms of Exchange

2
00:00:05.340 --> 00:00:11.340
Before analyzing the problem of the terms of exchange, it is well to recall the reason

3
00:00:11.340 --> 00:00:18.380
for exchange, the fact that each individual values more highly the good he gets than the

4
00:00:18.380 --> 00:00:25.620
good he gives up. This fact is enough to eliminate the fallacious notion that if Crusoe and Jackson

5
00:00:25.620 --> 00:00:33.100
In exchange 5,000 berries for one cow, there is some sort of equality of value between

6
00:00:33.100 --> 00:00:37.360
the cow and the 5,000 berries.

7
00:00:37.360 --> 00:00:45.200
Value exists in the valuing minds of individuals, and these individuals make the exchange precisely

8
00:00:45.200 --> 00:00:53.800
because for each of them there is an inequality of values between the cow and the berries.

9
00:00:53.800 --> 00:00:58.960
For Crusoe, the cow is valued more than the 5,000 berries.

10
00:00:58.960 --> 00:01:01.640
For Jackson, it is valued less.

11
00:01:01.640 --> 00:01:05.720
Otherwise, the exchange could not be made.

12
00:01:05.720 --> 00:01:14.580
Therefore, for each exchange, there is a double inequality of values, rather than an equality,

13
00:01:14.580 --> 00:01:20.720
and hence there are no equal values to be measured in any way.

14
00:01:20.720 --> 00:01:27.580
We have already seen what conditions are needed for exchange to occur and the extent to which

15
00:01:27.580 --> 00:01:31.420
exchange will take place on given terms.

16
00:01:31.420 --> 00:01:38.360
The question then arises, are there any principles that decide the terms on which exchanges are

17
00:01:38.360 --> 00:01:39.360
made?

18
00:01:39.360 --> 00:01:47.000
Why does Crusoe exchange with Jackson at a rate of 5,000 berries for one cow or 2,000

19
00:01:47.000 --> 00:01:49.480
berries for one cow?

20
00:01:49.480 --> 00:01:54.920
Let us take the hypothetical exchange of 5,000 berries for one cow.

21
00:01:54.920 --> 00:02:02.080
These are the terms, or the rate of exchange, 5,000 berries for one cow.

22
00:02:02.080 --> 00:02:09.520
If we express one commodity in terms of the other, we obtain the price of the commodity.

23
00:02:09.520 --> 00:02:17.080
Thus, the price of one good in terms of another is the amount of the other good divided by

24
00:02:17.080 --> 00:02:20.640
by the amount of the first good in exchange.

25
00:02:20.640 --> 00:02:28.640
If two cows exchange for one thousand berries, then the price of cows in terms of berries,

26
00:02:28.640 --> 00:02:34.320
the berry price of cows, is five hundred berries per cow.

27
00:02:34.320 --> 00:02:41.520
Conversely, the price of berries in terms of cows, the cow price of berries, is one

28
00:02:41.520 --> 00:02:44.720
five hundredth cow per berry.

29
00:02:44.720 --> 00:02:51.520
The price is the rate of exchange between two commodities expressed in terms of one

30
00:02:51.520 --> 00:02:54.120
of the commodities.

31
00:02:54.120 --> 00:03:00.360
Other useful concepts in the analysis of exchange are those of selling and buying.

32
00:03:00.360 --> 00:03:08.680
Thus, in the above exchange, we may say that Crusoe sold one thousand berries and bought

33
00:03:08.680 --> 00:03:11.360
two cows in exchange.

34
00:03:11.360 --> 00:03:18.440
On the other hand, Jackson sold two cows and bought one thousand berries.

35
00:03:18.440 --> 00:03:26.000
The sale is the good given up in exchange, while the purchase is the good received.

36
00:03:26.000 --> 00:03:30.200
Let us again focus attention on the object of exchange.

37
00:03:30.200 --> 00:03:37.480
We remember from Chapter 1 that the object of all action is to maximize psychic revenue,

38
00:03:37.480 --> 00:03:43.740
And to do this the actor tries to see to it that the psychic revenue from the action exceeds

39
00:03:43.740 --> 00:03:49.360
the psychic cost, so that he obtains a psychic profit.

40
00:03:49.360 --> 00:03:53.440
This is no less true of interpersonal exchange.

41
00:03:53.440 --> 00:04:00.740
The object in such an exchange for each party is to maximize revenue, to exchange so long

42
00:04:00.740 --> 00:04:06.000
as the expected psychic revenue exceeds the psychic cost.

43
00:04:06.000 --> 00:04:13.080
The psychic revenue from any exchange is the value of the goods received in the exchange.

44
00:04:13.080 --> 00:04:20.040
This is equal to the marginal utility to the purchaser of adding the goods to his stock.

45
00:04:20.040 --> 00:04:25.820
More complicated is the problem of the psychic costs of an exchange.

46
00:04:25.820 --> 00:04:32.100
Psychic costs include all that the actor gives up by making the exchange.

47
00:04:32.100 --> 00:04:37.740
This is equal to the next best use that he could have made of the resources that he has

48
00:04:37.740 --> 00:04:39.540
used.

49
00:04:39.540 --> 00:04:45.580
Suppose for example that Jackson possesses five cows and is considering whether or not

50
00:04:45.580 --> 00:04:48.860
to sell one cow in exchange.

51
00:04:48.860 --> 00:04:55.460
He decides on his value scale that the following is the rank in value of the possible uses

52
00:04:55.460 --> 00:04:56.820
of the cow.

53
00:04:56.820 --> 00:04:57.820
1.

54
00:04:57.820 --> 00:05:00.820
5,000 berries offered by Crusoe.

55
00:05:00.820 --> 00:05:01.820
2.

56
00:05:01.820 --> 00:05:12.300
100 Barrels of Fish Offered by Smith, 3. 4000 Berries Offered by Jones, 4. Marginal Utility

57
00:05:12.300 --> 00:05:20.460
of the Cow in Direct Use. In this case, the top three alternatives involve the exchange

58
00:05:20.460 --> 00:05:27.540
value of the cow, the fourth its value in direct use. Jackson will make the best use

59
00:05:57.540 --> 00:06:14.540
Jackson said that for any specific exchange to occur, the marginal utility of the goods received must also be greater than the marginal utility foregone, that which could have been received, in another type of exchange.

60
00:06:14.540 --> 00:06:21.580
It is evident that Jackson will always prefer an offer of more units of one type of good

61
00:06:21.580 --> 00:06:25.180
to an offer of fewer units of the same good.

62
00:06:25.180 --> 00:06:31.580
In other words, the seller will always prefer the highest possible selling price for his

63
00:06:31.580 --> 00:06:32.580
good.

64
00:06:32.580 --> 00:06:39.580
Jackson will prefer the price of 5,000 berries per cow offered by Crusoe to the price of

65
00:06:39.580 --> 00:06:43.460
4,000 berries per cow offered by Jones.

66
00:06:43.460 --> 00:06:50.020
It might be objected that this may not always be true and may be offset by other factors.

67
00:06:50.020 --> 00:06:57.220
Thus, the prospect of 4,000 berries from Jones may be evaluated higher than the prospect

68
00:06:57.220 --> 00:07:07.000
of 5,000 berries from Crusoe, if a. the psychic disutility of labor and time, etc., for delivery

69
00:07:07.000 --> 00:07:14.180
over a longer distance to the latter, renders the prospect of sale to Crusoe less attractive

70
00:07:14.180 --> 00:07:21.000
despite the higher price in berries, or b. special feelings of friendship for Crusoe

71
00:07:21.000 --> 00:07:28.260
or hatred for Jones serve to change the utilities on Jackson's value scale.

72
00:07:28.260 --> 00:07:34.620
On further analysis, however, these turn out not to be vitiating factors at all.

73
00:07:34.620 --> 00:07:40.640
The rule that the actor will prefer the highest selling price for his good in terms of the

74
00:07:40.640 --> 00:07:44.100
other good always holds.

75
00:07:44.100 --> 00:07:51.340
It must be reiterated that a good is not defined by its physical characteristics, but by the

76
00:07:51.340 --> 00:07:55.780
equal serviceability of its units to the actor.

77
00:07:55.780 --> 00:08:01.860
Now clearly a berry from a longer distance, since it must call forth the disutility of

78
00:08:01.860 --> 00:08:08.460
of Labor to Move It, is not the same good as the berry from a shorter distance, even

79
00:08:08.460 --> 00:08:11.560
though it is physically the same berry.

80
00:08:11.560 --> 00:08:17.500
The very fact that the first is further away means that it is not as serviceable as the

81
00:08:17.500 --> 00:08:21.600
other berry, and hence not the same good.

82
00:08:21.600 --> 00:08:27.100
For one price to be comparable with another, the good must be the same.

83
00:08:27.100 --> 00:08:33.860
Thus, if Jackson prefers to sell his cow for four thousand berries from Jones as compared

84
00:08:33.860 --> 00:08:40.580
to five thousand berries from Crusoe, it does not mean that he chooses a lower price

85
00:08:40.580 --> 00:08:48.120
for his product in terms of the same good, berries, but that he chooses a price in terms

86
00:08:48.120 --> 00:08:56.300
of one good, berries from Jones, over a price in terms of an entirely different good, berries

87
00:08:56.300 --> 00:09:03.300
If these feelings cause him to sell to Jones for 4,000 berries rather than to Crusoe, he will not be able to sell them to him, and he will not be able to sell them to James for 4,000 berries.

88
00:09:26.300 --> 00:09:34.140
So for 5,000 berries, this does not mean that he chooses a lower price for the same good.

89
00:09:34.140 --> 00:09:41.580
He chooses between two different goods, berries from Crusoe and berries from Jones.

90
00:09:41.580 --> 00:09:49.380
Thus, at all times, an actor will sell his product at the highest possible price in terms

91
00:09:49.380 --> 00:09:51.580
of the good received.

92
00:09:51.580 --> 00:09:55.420
Clearly, the converse is true for the buyer.

93
00:09:55.420 --> 00:10:01.200
The buyer will always purchase his good at the lowest possible price.

94
00:10:01.200 --> 00:10:05.340
This truth can be traced in the example just discussed.

95
00:10:05.340 --> 00:10:12.420
Since at the point that Jackson was a seller of the cow, he was also a buyer of the berries.

96
00:10:12.420 --> 00:10:19.500
Where the good in question, berries, was comparable, he bought at the lowest possible price.

97
00:10:19.500 --> 00:10:25.740
Say, one five thousandth of a cow per berry in preference to one four thousandth of a

98
00:10:25.740 --> 00:10:27.740
cow per berry.

99
00:10:27.740 --> 00:10:34.100
In cases where Jackson chooses the latter price, the two berries are no longer the same,

100
00:10:34.100 --> 00:10:36.220
but different goods.

101
00:10:36.220 --> 00:10:43.260
If to buy berries, the purchaser has to range further afield or buy from someone he dislikes,

102
00:10:43.260 --> 00:10:51.260
Then this good becomes a different one in kind from the good closer by or sold by a friend.