WEBVTT

NOTE 4.05. The Marginal Utility of Money

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.480
5. The Marginal Utility of Money

2
00:00:04.480 --> 00:00:08.940
a. The Consumer

3
00:00:08.940 --> 00:00:15.360
We have not yet explained one very important problem, the ranking of money on the various

4
00:00:15.360 --> 00:00:21.800
individual value scales. We know that the ranking of units of goods on these scales

5
00:00:21.800 --> 00:00:27.920
is determined by the relative ranking of the marginal utilities of the units. In the case

6
00:00:27.920 --> 00:00:39.920
In the case of barter, it was clear that the relative rankings were the results of people's evaluations of the marginal importance of the direct uses of the various goods.

7
00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:49.920
In the case of a monetary economy, however, the direct use value of the money commodity is overshadowed by its exchange value.

8
00:00:49.920 --> 00:01:01.420
In Chapter 1, Section 5, on the Law of Marginal Utility, we saw that the marginal utility of a unit of a good is determined in the following way.

9
00:01:01.420 --> 00:01:17.920
1. If the unit is in the possession of the actor, the marginal utility of the unit is equal to the ranked value he places on the least important end or use that he would have to give up on losing the unit.

10
00:01:17.920 --> 00:01:26.320
Or, two, if the unit is not yet in his possession, the marginal utility of adding the unit is

11
00:01:26.320 --> 00:01:32.480
equal to the value of the most important end that the unit could serve.

12
00:01:32.480 --> 00:01:38.980
On this basis, a man allocates his stock of various units of a good to his most important

13
00:01:38.980 --> 00:01:46.580
uses first and his less important uses in succession, while he gives up his least important

14
00:01:46.580 --> 00:01:48.380
and Uses First.

15
00:01:48.380 --> 00:01:55.700
Now we saw in Chapter 3 how every man allocates his stock of money among the various uses.

16
00:01:55.700 --> 00:02:01.420
The money commodity has numerous different uses, and the number of uses multiplies the

17
00:02:01.420 --> 00:02:07.780
more highly developed and advanced the money economy, division of labor, and the capital

18
00:02:07.780 --> 00:02:09.420
structure.

19
00:02:09.420 --> 00:02:15.140
Decisions concerning numerous consumer goods, numerous investment projects, consumption

20
00:02:15.140 --> 00:02:21.620
Everyone at present versus expected increased returns in the future and addition to cash

21
00:02:21.620 --> 00:02:24.480
balance must all be made.

22
00:02:24.480 --> 00:02:31.180
We say that each individual allocates each unit of the money commodity to its most important

23
00:02:31.180 --> 00:02:38.380
use first, then to the next most important use, etc., thus determining the allocation

24
00:02:38.380 --> 00:02:43.260
of money in each possible use and line of spending.

25
00:02:43.260 --> 00:02:49.760
The least important use is given up first, as with any other commodity.

26
00:02:49.760 --> 00:02:55.820
We are not interested here in exploring all aspects of the analysis of the marginal utility

27
00:02:55.820 --> 00:03:02.760
of money, particularly the cash balance decision, which must be left for later treatment.

28
00:03:02.760 --> 00:03:10.100
We are interested here in the marginal utility of money as relevant to consumption decisions.

29
00:03:10.100 --> 00:03:16.460
Every man is a consumer, and therefore the analysis applies to everyone taking part in

30
00:03:16.460 --> 00:03:20.480
the nexus of monetary exchange.

31
00:03:20.480 --> 00:03:26.820
Each succeeding unit that the consumer allocates among different lines of spending, he wishes

32
00:03:26.820 --> 00:03:32.420
to allocate to the most highly valued use that it can serve.

33
00:03:32.420 --> 00:03:38.780
His psychic revenue is the marginal utility, the value of the most important use that will

34
00:03:38.780 --> 00:03:46.060
will be served. His psychic cost is the next most important use that must be foregone,

35
00:03:46.060 --> 00:03:52.700
the use that must be sacrificed in order to attain the most important end. The highest

36
00:03:52.700 --> 00:04:00.400
ranked utility foregone, therefore, is defined as the cost of any action.

37
00:04:00.400 --> 00:04:07.240
The utility a person derives or expects to derive from an act of exchange is the marginal

38
00:04:07.240 --> 00:04:13.840
Marginal utility of adding the good purchased, that is, the most important use for the units

39
00:04:13.840 --> 00:04:15.600
to be acquired.

40
00:04:15.600 --> 00:04:21.280
The utility that he forgoes is the highest utility that he could have derived from the

41
00:04:21.280 --> 00:04:26.060
units of the good that he gives up in the exchange.

42
00:04:26.060 --> 00:04:32.560
When he is a consumer purchasing a good, his marginal utility of addition is the most highly

43
00:04:32.560 --> 00:04:37.220
valued use to which he could put the units of the good.

44
00:04:37.220 --> 00:04:42.020
This is the psychic revenue that he expects from the exchange.

45
00:04:42.020 --> 00:04:48.300
On the other hand, what he forgoes is the use of the units of money that he sells or

46
00:04:48.300 --> 00:04:49.900
gives up.

47
00:04:49.900 --> 00:04:57.220
His cost, then, is the value of the most important use to which he could have put the money.

48
00:04:57.220 --> 00:05:04.220
Every man strives in action to achieve a psychic revenue greater than his psychic cost and

49
00:05:04.220 --> 00:05:06.820
thereby a psychic profit.

50
00:05:06.820 --> 00:05:10.780
This is true of the consumer's purchases as well.

51
00:05:10.780 --> 00:05:16.340
Error is revealed when his choice proves to be mistaken and he realizes that he would

52
00:05:16.340 --> 00:05:21.820
have done better to have pursued the other, foregone, course of action.

53
00:05:21.820 --> 00:05:28.540
Now, as the consumer adds to his purchases of a good, the marginal utility which the

54
00:05:28.540 --> 00:05:35.820
added good has for him must diminish in accordance with the law of marginal utility.

55
00:05:35.820 --> 00:05:41.940
On the other hand, as he gives up units of a good in sale, the marginal utility that

56
00:05:41.940 --> 00:05:48.460
this good has for him becomes greater, in accordance with the same law.

57
00:05:48.460 --> 00:05:54.820
Eventually he must cease purchasing the good, because the marginal utility of the good foregone

58
00:05:54.820 --> 00:05:59.340
becomes greater than the marginal utility of the good purchased.

59
00:05:59.340 --> 00:06:02.900
This is clearly true of direct goods.

60
00:06:02.900 --> 00:06:05.660
But what of money?

61
00:06:05.660 --> 00:06:11.700
It is obvious that money is not only a useful good but one of the most useful in a money

62
00:06:11.700 --> 00:06:12.900
economy.

63
00:06:12.900 --> 00:06:17.080
It is used as a medium in practically every exchange.

64
00:06:17.080 --> 00:06:22.740
We have seen that one of a man's most important activities is the allocation of his money

65
00:06:22.740 --> 00:06:25.900
stock to various desired uses.

66
00:06:25.900 --> 00:06:32.340
It is obvious, therefore, that money obeys the law of marginal utility, just as any other

67
00:06:32.340 --> 00:06:34.140
commodity does.

68
00:06:34.140 --> 00:06:41.020
Money is a commodity, divisible into homogeneous units. Indeed, one of the reasons the commodity

69
00:06:41.020 --> 00:06:48.340
is picked as money is its ready divisibility into relatively small homogeneous units. The

70
00:06:48.340 --> 00:06:54.840
first unit of money will be allocated to its most important and valued use to an individual,

71
00:06:54.840 --> 00:07:01.980
the second unit will be allocated to its second most valued use, etc. Any unit of money that

72
00:07:01.980 --> 00:07:08.980
must be given up will be surrendered at the sacrifice of the least highly valued use previously

73
00:07:08.980 --> 00:07:15.940
being served or which would have been served. Therefore, it is true of money, as of any

74
00:07:15.940 --> 00:07:23.760
other commodity, that as its stock increases, its marginal utility declines, and that as

75
00:07:23.760 --> 00:07:30.900
its stock declines, its marginal utility to the person increases. Its marginal utility

76
00:07:30.900 --> 00:07:37.120
Money of Addition is equal to the rank of the most highly valued end the monetary unit

77
00:07:37.120 --> 00:07:44.760
can attain, and its marginal utility is equal in value to the most highly valued end that

78
00:07:44.760 --> 00:07:50.140
would have to be sacrificed if the unit were surrendered.

79
00:07:50.140 --> 00:07:53.880
What are the various ends that money can serve?

80
00:07:53.880 --> 00:07:55.380
They are a.

81
00:07:55.380 --> 00:08:01.780
the non-monetary uses of the money commodity, such as the use of gold for ornament,

82
00:08:01.780 --> 00:08:06.900
B. Expenditure on the many different kinds of consumers' goods,

83
00:08:06.900 --> 00:08:12.820
C. Investment in various alternative combinations of factors of production,

84
00:08:12.820 --> 00:08:16.660
and D. Additions to the cash balance.

85
00:08:16.660 --> 00:08:24.180
Each of these broad categories of uses encompasses a large number of types and quantities of goods,

86
00:08:24.180 --> 00:08:29.060
and each particular alternative is ranked on the individual's value scale.

87
00:08:29.700 --> 00:08:36.420
It is clear what the uses of consumption goods are. They provide immediate satisfaction for

88
00:08:36.420 --> 00:08:41.860
the individual's desires and are thus immediately ranked on his value scale.

89
00:08:42.420 --> 00:08:47.620
It is also clear that when money is used for non-monetary purposes,

90
00:08:47.620 --> 00:08:53.300
it becomes a direct consumer's good itself instead of a medium of exchange.

91
00:08:54.180 --> 00:09:00.660
Investment, which will be further discussed later, aims at a greater level of future consumption

92
00:09:00.660 --> 00:09:08.580
through investing in capital goods at present. What is the usefulness of keeping or adding to

93
00:09:08.580 --> 00:09:15.140
a cash balance? This question will be explored in later chapters, but here we may state that the

94
00:09:15.140 --> 00:09:22.660
desire to keep a cash balance stems from fundamental uncertainty as to the right time for making

95
00:09:22.660 --> 00:09:47.220
Uncertainty is a fundamental feature of all human action, and uncertainty about changing

96
00:09:47.220 --> 00:09:53.660
Purchasing prices and changing value scales are aspects of this basic uncertainty.

97
00:09:53.660 --> 00:09:59.000
If an individual, for example, anticipates a rise in the purchasing power of the monetary

98
00:09:59.000 --> 00:10:05.820
unit in the near future, he will tend to postpone his purchases toward that day and add now

99
00:10:05.820 --> 00:10:08.080
to his cash balance.

100
00:10:08.080 --> 00:10:13.880
On the other hand, if he anticipates a fall in purchasing power, he will tend to buy more

101
00:10:13.880 --> 00:10:18.000
are at present and draw down his cash balance.

102
00:10:18.000 --> 00:10:23.960
An example of general uncertainty is an individual's typical desire to keep a certain amount of

103
00:10:23.960 --> 00:10:31.040
cash on hand in case of a rainy day or an emergency that will require an unanticipated

104
00:10:31.040 --> 00:10:34.360
expenditure of funds in some direction.

105
00:10:34.360 --> 00:10:41.120
His feeling safer in such a case demonstrates that money's only value is not simply when

106
00:10:41.120 --> 00:10:47.160
When it makes exchanges, because of its very marketability, its mere possession in the

107
00:10:47.160 --> 00:10:52.780
hands of an individual performs a service for that person.

108
00:10:52.780 --> 00:10:59.160
That money in one's cash balance is performing a service demonstrates the fallacy in the

109
00:10:59.160 --> 00:11:06.780
distinction that some writers make between circulating money and money in idle hoards.

110
00:11:06.780 --> 00:11:12.380
In the first place, all money is always in someone's cash balance.

111
00:11:12.380 --> 00:11:16.780
It is never moving in some mysterious circulation.

112
00:11:16.780 --> 00:11:24.020
It is in A's cash balance, and then, when A buys eggs from B, it is shifted to B's

113
00:11:24.020 --> 00:11:25.260
cash balance.

114
00:11:25.260 --> 00:11:31.460
Secondly, regardless of the length of time any given unit of money is in one person's

115
00:11:31.460 --> 00:11:47.700
What is the marginal utility and the cost involved in any act of consumption exchange?

116
00:11:47.700 --> 00:11:54.160
When a consumer spends five grains of gold on a dozen eggs, this means that he anticipates

117
00:11:54.160 --> 00:12:01.140
that the most valuable use for the five grains of gold is to acquire the dozen eggs.

118
00:12:01.140 --> 00:12:06.400
This is his marginal utility of addition of the five grains.

119
00:12:06.400 --> 00:12:12.520
This utility is his anticipated psychic revenue from the exchange.

120
00:12:12.520 --> 00:12:20.160
What then is the opportunity cost, or simply the cost of the exchange, that is, the next

121
00:12:20.160 --> 00:12:23.340
best alternative foregone?

122
00:12:23.340 --> 00:12:29.360
This is the most valuable use that he could have made with the five grains of gold.

123
00:12:29.360 --> 00:12:35.880
This could be any one of the following alternatives, whichever is the highest on his value scale.

124
00:12:35.880 --> 00:12:39.800
A. Expenditure on some other consumer's good.

125
00:12:39.800 --> 00:12:44.960
B. Use of the money commodity for purposes of direct consumption.

126
00:12:44.960 --> 00:12:51.520
C. Expenditure on some line of investment in factors of production to increase future

127
00:12:51.520 --> 00:12:54.800
monetary income and consumption.

128
00:12:54.800 --> 00:12:58.400
D. Addition to his cash balance.

129
00:12:58.400 --> 00:13:04.760
It should be noted that since this cost refers to a decision on a marginal unit of whatever

130
00:13:04.760 --> 00:13:10.400
size, this is also the marginal cost of the decision.

131
00:13:10.400 --> 00:13:16.920
This cost is subjective and is ranked on the individual's value scale.

132
00:13:16.920 --> 00:13:23.080
The nature of the cost or utility foregone of a decision to spend money on a particular

133
00:13:23.080 --> 00:13:39.720
When the cost is foregone investment, then what is foregone is expected future increases

134
00:13:39.720 --> 00:13:45.520
in consumption, expressed in terms of the individual's rate of time preference, which

135
00:13:45.520 --> 00:13:48.300
will be further explored later.

136
00:13:48.300 --> 00:13:54.860
At any rate, when an individual buys a particular good, such as eggs, the more he continues

137
00:13:54.860 --> 00:14:01.620
to buy, the lower will be the marginal utility of addition that each successive unit has

138
00:14:01.620 --> 00:14:03.020
for him.

139
00:14:03.020 --> 00:14:07.660
This of course is in accordance with the law of marginal utility.

140
00:14:07.660 --> 00:14:13.060
On the other hand, the more money he spends on eggs, the greater will be the marginal

141
00:14:13.060 --> 00:14:19.340
Marginal utility foregone in whatever is the next best good, for example, butter.

142
00:14:19.340 --> 00:14:25.960
Thus, the more he spends on eggs, the less will be his marginal utility derived from

143
00:14:25.960 --> 00:14:33.240
eggs, and the greater will be his marginal cost of buying eggs, that is, the value that

144
00:14:33.240 --> 00:14:34.820
he must forgo.

145
00:14:34.820 --> 00:14:39.000
Eventually, the latter becomes greater than the former.

146
00:14:39.000 --> 00:14:44.720
When this happens and the marginal cost of purchasing eggs becomes greater than the marginal

147
00:14:44.720 --> 00:14:51.620
utility of addition of the commodity, he switches his purchases to butter, and the same process

148
00:14:51.620 --> 00:14:53.360
continues.

149
00:14:53.360 --> 00:14:59.740
With any stock of money, a man's consumption expenditures come first, and expenditures

150
00:14:59.740 --> 00:15:03.240
on each good follow the same law.

151
00:15:03.240 --> 00:15:09.180
In some cases, the marginal cost of consumption on a consumer's good becomes investment in

152
00:15:09.180 --> 00:15:15.180
some line, and the man may invest some money in factors of production.

153
00:15:15.180 --> 00:15:21.220
This investment continues until the marginal cost of such investment in terms of foregone

154
00:15:21.220 --> 00:15:28.900
consumption or cash balance is greater than the present value of the expected return.

155
00:15:28.900 --> 00:15:34.620
Man's the most highly valued use is an addition to one's cash balance, and this continues

156
00:15:34.620 --> 00:15:41.420
until the marginal utility derived from this use is less than the marginal cost in some

157
00:15:41.420 --> 00:15:43.040
other line.

158
00:15:43.040 --> 00:15:51.420
In this way, a man's monetary stock is allocated among all the most highly valued uses.

159
00:15:51.420 --> 00:15:58.300
And in this way, individual demand schedules are constructed for every consumer's good,

160
00:15:58.300 --> 00:16:04.020
and market demand schedules are determined as the summation of the individual demand

161
00:16:04.020 --> 00:16:10.340
schedules on the market. Given the stocks of all the consumers' goods, this given

162
00:16:10.340 --> 00:16:17.780
will be analyzed in succeeding chapters. Their market prices are thereby determined.

163
00:16:17.780 --> 00:16:23.180
It might be thought, and many writers have assumed, that money has here performed the

164
00:16:23.180 --> 00:16:30.140
The function of measuring and rendering comparable the utilities of the different individuals.

165
00:16:30.140 --> 00:16:33.020
It has, however, done nothing of the sort.

166
00:16:33.020 --> 00:16:38.740
The marginal utility of money differs from person to person, just as does the marginal

167
00:16:38.740 --> 00:16:40.980
utility of any other good.

168
00:16:40.980 --> 00:16:46.940
The fact that an ounce of money can buy various goods on the market, and that such opportunities

169
00:16:46.940 --> 00:16:52.900
may be open to all, does not give us any information about the ways in which various

170
00:16:52.900 --> 00:17:00.780
Once people will rank these different combinations of goods, there is no measuring or comparability

171
00:17:00.780 --> 00:17:04.620
in the field of values or ranks.

172
00:17:04.620 --> 00:17:13.820
Money permits only prices to be comparable, by establishing money prices for every good.

173
00:17:13.820 --> 00:17:20.740
It might seem that the process of ranking and comparing on value scales by each individual

174
00:17:20.740 --> 00:17:28.140
has established and determined the prices of consumers' goods without any need for further analysis.

175
00:17:28.140 --> 00:17:31.260
The problem, however, is not nearly so simple.

176
00:17:31.260 --> 00:17:37.860
Neglect or evasion of the difficulties involved has plagued economics for many years.

177
00:17:37.860 --> 00:17:42.060
Under a system of barter, there would be no analytic difficulty.

178
00:17:42.060 --> 00:17:47.540
All the possible consumers' goods would be ranked and compared by each individual,

179
00:17:47.540 --> 00:17:53.140
The demand schedules of each in terms of the other would be established, etc.

180
00:17:53.140 --> 00:17:59.220
Relative utilities would establish individual demand schedules, and these would be summed

181
00:17:59.220 --> 00:18:02.580
up to yield market demand schedules.

182
00:18:02.580 --> 00:18:09.060
But in the monetary economy, a grave analytic difficulty arises.

183
00:18:09.060 --> 00:18:15.620
To determine the price of a good, we analyze the market demand schedule for the good.

184
00:18:15.620 --> 00:18:20.160
This in turn depends on the individual demand schedules.

185
00:18:20.160 --> 00:18:25.860
These in their turn are determined by the individual's value rankings of units of the

186
00:18:25.860 --> 00:18:32.340
good and units of money as given by the various alternative uses of money.

187
00:18:32.340 --> 00:18:39.320
Yet the latter alternatives depend in turn on given prices of the other goods.

188
00:18:39.320 --> 00:18:47.100
A hypothetical demand for eggs must assume as given some money price for butter, clothes,

189
00:18:47.100 --> 00:18:48.260
etc.

190
00:18:48.260 --> 00:18:55.100
But how then can value scales and utilities be used to explain the formation of money

191
00:18:55.100 --> 00:19:03.620
prices, when these value scales and utilities themselves depend upon the existence of money

192
00:19:03.620 --> 00:19:05.300
prices?

193
00:19:05.300 --> 00:19:28.300
B. The Money Regression It is obvious that this vitally important problem of circularity, X depends on Y, while Y depends on X, exists not only in regard to decisions by consumers, but also in regard to any exchange decision in the money economy.

194
00:19:28.300 --> 00:19:33.620
Thus, let us consider the seller of the stock of a consumer's good.

195
00:19:33.620 --> 00:19:40.140
At a given offered money price, he must decide whether to sell the units of his stock or

196
00:19:40.140 --> 00:19:42.180
whether to hold on to them.

197
00:19:42.180 --> 00:19:48.460
His eagerness to sell in exchange for acquiring money is due to the use that money would have

198
00:19:48.460 --> 00:19:49.500
for him.

199
00:19:49.500 --> 00:19:55.300
The money would be employed in its most important uses for him, and this will determine his

200
00:19:55.300 --> 00:20:18.300
The seller's evaluation of the money, or its marginal utility of addition, but the marginal utility of addition of money to the seller of the stock, is based on its already being money, and its ready command of other goods that the seller will buy, consumers' goods and factors of production alike.

201
00:20:18.300 --> 00:20:28.740
The seller's marginal utility, therefore, also depends on the previous existence of money prices for the various goods in the economy.

202
00:20:28.740 --> 00:20:41.400
Similarly, for the laborer, landowner, investor, or owner of a capital good, in selling his services or goods, money has a marginal utility of addition,

203
00:20:41.400 --> 00:20:47.320
which is a necessary prior condition to his decision to sell the goods, and therefore

204
00:20:47.320 --> 00:20:51.440
a determinant in his supply of the good for money.

205
00:20:51.440 --> 00:20:58.520
And yet, this marginal utility always depends on there being a previous array of money prices

206
00:20:58.520 --> 00:21:00.080
in existence.

207
00:21:00.080 --> 00:21:06.120
The seller of any good or service for money, therefore, ranks the marginal utility of the

208
00:21:06.120 --> 00:21:11.760
The Money that he will obtain against the marginal utility of holding on to the good

209
00:21:11.760 --> 00:21:13.240
or service.

210
00:21:13.240 --> 00:21:20.120
Whoever spends money to buy any good or service ranks the marginal utility which keeping the

211
00:21:20.120 --> 00:21:26.140
money has for him against the marginal utility of acquiring the good.

212
00:21:26.140 --> 00:21:32.760
These value scales of the various buyers and sellers determine the individual supply-demand

213
00:21:32.760 --> 00:21:39.520
and schedules, and hence all money prices, yet in order to rank money and goods on his

214
00:21:39.520 --> 00:21:47.080
value scale, money must already have a marginal utility for each person, and this marginal

215
00:21:47.080 --> 00:21:55.040
utility must be based on the fact of pre-existing money prices of the various goods.

216
00:21:55.040 --> 00:22:01.200
It is true that quoting Ludwig von Mises, he who considers acquiring or giving away

217
00:22:01.200 --> 00:22:07.540
The way money is of course first of all interested in its future purchasing power and the future

218
00:22:07.540 --> 00:22:13.680
structure of prices, but he cannot form a judgment about the future purchasing power

219
00:22:13.680 --> 00:22:20.600
of money otherwise than by looking at its configuration in the immediate past.

220
00:22:20.600 --> 00:22:26.680
The solution of this crucial problem of circularity has been provided by Professor Ludwig von

221
00:22:26.680 --> 00:22:31.680
von Mises, in his notable theory of the money regression.

222
00:22:31.680 --> 00:22:36.760
This problem obstructed the development of economic science until Mises provided the

223
00:22:36.760 --> 00:22:37.760
solution.

224
00:22:37.760 --> 00:22:43.700
Failure to solve it led many economists to despair of ever constructing a satisfactory

225
00:22:43.700 --> 00:22:47.060
economic analysis of money prices.

226
00:22:47.060 --> 00:22:53.000
They were led to abandon fundamental analysis of money prices and to separate completely

227
00:22:53.000 --> 00:23:02.600
In this fallacious course, they assumed that individual prices are determined wholly as

228
00:23:02.600 --> 00:23:10.080
in barter, without money components, while the supply of and the demand for money determined

229
00:23:10.080 --> 00:23:15.440
an imaginary figment called the general price level.

230
00:23:15.440 --> 00:23:22.200
Economists began to specialize separately in the theory of price, which completely abstracted

231
00:23:22.200 --> 00:23:28.520
from money and its real functions, and a theory of money which abstracted from individual

232
00:23:28.520 --> 00:23:33.360
prices and dealt solely with a mythical price level.

233
00:23:33.360 --> 00:23:39.200
The former were solely preoccupied with a particular price and its determinants, the

234
00:23:39.200 --> 00:23:46.200
latter solely with the economy as a whole without relation to the individual components,

235
00:23:46.200 --> 00:23:51.160
called microeconomics and macroeconomics respectively.

236
00:23:51.160 --> 00:23:57.040
Actually, such fallacious premises led inevitably to erroneous conclusions.

237
00:23:57.040 --> 00:24:03.240
It is certainly legitimate and necessary for economics in working out an analysis of reality

238
00:24:03.240 --> 00:24:08.940
to isolate different segments for concentration as the analysis proceeds.

239
00:24:08.940 --> 00:24:15.540
But it is not legitimate to falsify reality in this separation, so that the final analysis

240
00:24:15.540 --> 00:24:22.820
This does not present a correct picture of the individual parts and their interrelations.

241
00:24:22.820 --> 00:24:29.440
The theory of money regression may be explained by examining the period of time that is being

242
00:24:29.440 --> 00:24:33.120
considered in each part of our analysis.

243
00:24:33.120 --> 00:24:39.800
Let us define a day as the period of time just sufficient to determine the market prices

244
00:24:39.800 --> 00:24:42.720
of every good in the society.

245
00:24:42.720 --> 00:24:49.180
On Day X, then, the money price of each good is determined by the interactions of the supply

246
00:24:49.180 --> 00:24:57.100
and demand schedules of money and the good by the buyers and sellers on that day.

247
00:24:57.100 --> 00:25:02.740
Each buyer and seller ranks money and the given good in accordance with the relative

248
00:25:02.740 --> 00:25:06.000
marginal utility of the two to him.

249
00:25:06.000 --> 00:25:12.580
Therefore, a money price at the end of Day X is determined by the marginal utilities

250
00:25:12.580 --> 00:25:19.040
of Money and the Good as they existed at the beginning of Day X.

251
00:25:19.040 --> 00:25:25.740
But the marginal utility of money is based, as we have seen, on a previously existing

252
00:25:25.740 --> 00:25:28.740
array of money prices.

253
00:25:28.740 --> 00:25:35.820
Money is demanded and considered useful because of its already existing money prices.

254
00:25:35.820 --> 00:25:42.080
Therefore, the price of a good on Day X is determined by the marginal utility of the

255
00:25:42.080 --> 00:26:01.960
The Economic Analysis of Money Prices is therefore not circular.

256
00:26:01.960 --> 00:26:09.080
If prices today depend on the marginal utility of money today, the latter is dependent on

257
00:26:09.080 --> 00:26:16.560
and Money Prices Yesterday, Thus, in every money price in any day, there is contained

258
00:26:16.560 --> 00:26:24.160
a time component, so that this price is partially determined by the money prices of yesterday.

259
00:26:24.160 --> 00:26:30.000
This does not mean, specifically, that the price of eggs today is partially determined

260
00:26:30.000 --> 00:26:36.720
by the price of eggs yesterday, the price of butter today by that of yesterday, etc.

261
00:26:36.720 --> 00:26:44.160
On the contrary, the time component essential to each specific price today is the general

262
00:26:44.160 --> 00:26:51.360
array of yesterday's money prices for all goods, and, of course, the subsequent evaluation

263
00:26:51.360 --> 00:26:56.080
of the monetary unit by the individuals in the society.

264
00:26:56.080 --> 00:27:02.460
If we consider the general array of today's prices, however, an essential time component

265
00:27:02.460 --> 00:27:08.800
in their determination is the general array of yesterday's prices.

266
00:27:08.800 --> 00:27:14.620
This time component is purely on the money side of the determining factors.

267
00:27:14.620 --> 00:27:21.360
In a society of barter, there is no time component in the prices of any given day.

268
00:27:21.360 --> 00:27:27.440
When horses are being exchanged against fish, the individuals in the market decide on the

269
00:27:27.440 --> 00:27:34.880
and the relative marginal utilities solely on the basis of the direct uses of the commodities.

270
00:27:34.880 --> 00:27:41.280
These direct uses are immediate and do not require any previously existing prices on

271
00:27:41.280 --> 00:27:48.680
the market. Therefore, the marginal utilities of direct goods, such as horses and fish,

272
00:27:48.680 --> 00:27:55.300
have no previous time components, and therefore there is no problem of circularity in a system

273
00:27:55.300 --> 00:28:02.340
of Barter. In such a society, if all previous markets and knowledge of previous prices were

274
00:28:02.340 --> 00:28:08.460
somehow wiped out, there would, of course, be an initial period of confusion while each

275
00:28:08.460 --> 00:28:14.620
individual consulted his value scales and tried to estimate those of others, but there

276
00:28:14.620 --> 00:28:21.860
would be no great difficulty in speedily re-establishing the exchange markets. The case is different

277
00:28:21.860 --> 00:28:27.180
in a Monetary Economy Since the marginal utility of the money commodity

278
00:28:27.180 --> 00:28:34.420
depends on previously existing money prices, a wiping out of existing markets and knowledge

279
00:28:34.420 --> 00:28:41.460
of money prices would render impossible the direct re-establishment of a money economy.

280
00:28:41.460 --> 00:28:47.580
The economy would be wrecked and thrown back into a highly primitive state of barter, after

281
00:28:47.580 --> 00:28:55.020
which a money economy could only slowly be re-established as it had been before.

282
00:28:55.020 --> 00:28:57.900
Now the question may be raised.

283
00:28:57.900 --> 00:29:03.620
Granted that there is no circularity in the determination of money prices, does not the

284
00:29:03.620 --> 00:29:11.540
fact that the causes partially regress backward in time simply push the unexplained components

285
00:29:11.540 --> 00:29:14.300
back further without end?

286
00:29:14.300 --> 00:29:20.160
If today's prices are partly determined by yesterday's prices, and yesterday's by those

287
00:29:20.160 --> 00:29:27.060
of the day before yesterday, etc., is not the regression simply pushed back infinitely,

288
00:29:27.060 --> 00:29:32.620
and part of the determination of prices thus left unexplained?

289
00:29:32.620 --> 00:29:38.780
The answer is that the regression is not infinite, and the clue to its stopping point is the

290
00:29:38.780 --> 00:29:44.740
The distinction just made between conditions in a money economy and conditions in a state

291
00:29:44.740 --> 00:29:46.200
of barter.

292
00:29:46.200 --> 00:29:52.620
We remember that the utility of money consists of two major elements, the utility of the

293
00:29:52.620 --> 00:30:00.020
money as a medium of exchange, and the utility of the money commodity in its direct commodity

294
00:30:00.020 --> 00:30:04.260
use, such as the use of gold for ornaments.

295
00:30:04.260 --> 00:30:11.240
In the modern economy, after the money commodity has fully developed as a medium of exchange,

296
00:30:11.240 --> 00:30:17.720
its use as a medium tends greatly to overshadow its direct use in consumption.

297
00:30:17.720 --> 00:30:22.740
The demand for gold as money far exceeds its demand as jewelry.

298
00:30:22.740 --> 00:30:29.640
However, the latter use and demand continue to exist, and to exert some influence on the

299
00:30:29.640 --> 00:30:33.360
total demand for the money commodity.

300
00:30:33.360 --> 00:30:39.960
In any day in the money economy the marginal utility of gold and therefore the demand for

301
00:30:39.960 --> 00:30:45.280
it enter into the determination of every money price.

302
00:30:45.280 --> 00:30:51.800
The marginal utility of gold and the demand for it today depend on the array of money

303
00:30:51.800 --> 00:30:59.360
prices existing yesterday, which in turn depended on the marginal utility of gold and the demand

304
00:30:59.360 --> 00:31:02.440
for it yesterday, etc.

305
00:31:02.440 --> 00:31:09.160
Now as we regress backwards in time, we must eventually arrive at the original point when

306
00:31:09.160 --> 00:31:14.600
people first began to use gold as a medium of exchange.

307
00:31:14.600 --> 00:31:21.400
Let us consider the first day on which people passed from the system of pure barter and

308
00:31:21.400 --> 00:31:25.440
began to use gold as a medium of exchange.

309
00:31:25.440 --> 00:31:32.760
On that day the money price, or rather the gold price, of every other good depended partially

310
00:31:32.760 --> 00:31:36.080
on the marginal utility of gold.

311
00:31:36.080 --> 00:31:43.680
This marginal utility had a time component, namely the previous array of gold prices,

312
00:31:43.680 --> 00:31:46.400
which had been determined in barter.

313
00:31:46.400 --> 00:31:52.820
In other words, when gold first began to be used as a medium of exchange, its marginal

314
00:31:52.820 --> 00:32:03.820
The marginal utility for use in that capacity depended on the existing previous array of gold prices established through barter.

315
00:32:03.820 --> 00:32:17.820
But if we regress one day further to the last day of barter, the gold prices of various goods on that day, like all other prices, had no time components.

316
00:32:17.820 --> 00:32:25.380
are determined, as were all other barter prices, solely by the marginal utility of gold and

317
00:32:25.380 --> 00:32:32.260
of the other goods on that day, and the marginal utility of gold, since it was used only for

318
00:32:32.260 --> 00:32:37.860
direct consumption, had no temporal component.

319
00:32:37.860 --> 00:32:44.860
The determination of money prices, gold prices, is therefore completely explained with no

320
00:32:44.860 --> 00:32:48.600
No circularity and no infinite regression.

321
00:32:48.600 --> 00:32:56.100
The demand for gold enters into every gold price, and today's demand for gold, insofar

322
00:32:56.100 --> 00:33:03.740
as it is for use as a medium of exchange, has a time component, being based on yesterday's

323
00:33:03.740 --> 00:33:06.340
array of gold prices.

324
00:33:06.340 --> 00:33:13.720
This time component regresses until the last day of barter, the day before gold began to

325
00:33:13.720 --> 00:33:16.720
to be used as a medium of exchange.

326
00:33:16.720 --> 00:33:20.720
On that day, gold had no utility in that use.

327
00:33:20.720 --> 00:33:24.720
The demand for gold was solely for direct use,

328
00:33:24.720 --> 00:33:28.720
and consequently the determination of the gold prices

329
00:33:28.720 --> 00:33:31.720
for that day and for all previous days

330
00:33:31.720 --> 00:33:35.720
had no temporal component whatever.

331
00:33:35.720 --> 00:33:40.720
As we regress in time and approach the original days of barter,

332
00:33:40.720 --> 00:33:47.520
The exchange use in the demand for gold becomes relatively weaker as compared to the direct

333
00:33:47.520 --> 00:33:54.680
use of gold, until finally, on the last day of barter, it dies out altogether, the time

334
00:33:54.680 --> 00:33:57.720
component dying out with it.

335
00:33:57.720 --> 00:34:03.620
It should be noted that the crucial stopping point of the regression is not the cessation

336
00:34:03.620 --> 00:34:10.800
Session of the Use of Gold as Money, but the Cessation of its Use as a Medium of Exchange.

337
00:34:10.800 --> 00:34:17.500
It is clear that the concept of a general medium of exchange, money, is not important

338
00:34:17.500 --> 00:34:18.500
here.

339
00:34:18.500 --> 00:34:25.540
As long as gold is used as a medium of exchange, gold prices will continue to have temporal

340
00:34:25.540 --> 00:34:27.140
components.

341
00:34:27.140 --> 00:34:33.720
It is true, of course, that for a commodity used as a limited medium of exchange, only

342
00:34:33.720 --> 00:34:41.480
a limited array of prices has to be taken into account in considering its utility.

343
00:34:41.480 --> 00:34:46.860
One of the important achievements of the regression theory is its establishment of the fact that

344
00:34:46.860 --> 00:34:54.080
money must arise in the manner described in Chapter 3, that is, it must develop out of

345
00:34:54.080 --> 00:35:00.320
Demand of a commodity already in demand for direct use, the commodity then being used

346
00:35:00.320 --> 00:35:04.840
as a more and more general medium of exchange.

347
00:35:04.840 --> 00:35:11.560
Demand for a good as a medium of exchange must be predicated on a previously existing

348
00:35:11.560 --> 00:35:15.520
array of prices in terms of other goods.

349
00:35:15.520 --> 00:35:22.600
A medium of exchange can therefore originate only according to our previous description.

350
00:35:22.600 --> 00:35:31.600
It can arise only out of a commodity previously used directly in a barter situation, and therefore

351
00:35:31.600 --> 00:35:36.720
having had an array of prices in terms of other goods.

352
00:35:36.720 --> 00:35:43.220
Money must develop out of a commodity with a previously existing purchasing power, such

353
00:35:43.220 --> 00:35:45.600
as gold and silver had.

354
00:35:45.600 --> 00:35:54.800
It cannot be created out of thin air by any sudden social compact or edict of government.

355
00:35:54.800 --> 00:36:00.420
On the other hand, it does not follow from this analysis that if an extant money were

356
00:36:00.420 --> 00:36:05.600
to lose its direct uses, it could no longer be used as money.

357
00:36:05.600 --> 00:36:12.080
Thus, if gold, after being established as money, were suddenly to lose its value in

358
00:36:12.080 --> 00:36:19.160
In ornaments or industrial uses, it would not necessarily lose its character as a money.

359
00:36:19.160 --> 00:36:27.100
Once a medium of exchange has been established as a money, money prices continue to be set.

360
00:36:27.100 --> 00:36:35.360
If on day X gold loses its direct uses, there will still be previously existing money prices

361
00:37:05.360 --> 00:37:11.040
Therefore, while it is absolutely necessary that a money originate as a commodity with

362
00:37:11.040 --> 00:37:18.240
direct uses, it is not absolutely necessary that the direct uses continue after the money

363
00:37:18.240 --> 00:37:21.000
has been established.

364
00:37:21.000 --> 00:37:27.320
The money prices of consumers goods have now been completely explained in terms of individual

365
00:37:27.320 --> 00:37:33.840
value scales, and these value scales have been explained up to the point of the content

366
00:37:33.840 --> 00:37:38.080
of the Subjective Use Valuations of Each Good.

367
00:37:38.080 --> 00:37:44.780
Economics is not concerned with the specific content of these ends, but with the explanation

368
00:37:44.780 --> 00:37:52.400
of various phenomena of action based on any given ends, and therefore its task in this

369
00:37:52.400 --> 00:37:59.480
sphere is fully accomplished by tracing these phenomena back to subjective valuations of

370
00:37:59.480 --> 00:38:01.680
useful goods.

371
00:38:01.680 --> 00:38:07.920
Professor Don Patinkin criticizes Mises for allegedly basing the regression theorem on

372
00:38:07.920 --> 00:38:14.220
the view that the marginal utility of money refers to the marginal utility of the goods

373
00:38:14.220 --> 00:38:20.860
for which money is exchanged, rather than the marginal utility of holding money, and

374
00:38:20.860 --> 00:38:27.400
charges Mises with inconsistently holding the latter view in part of his Theory of Money

375
00:38:27.400 --> 00:38:28.940
and Credit.

376
00:38:28.940 --> 00:38:36.140
In fact, Mises' concept of the marginal utility of money does refer to the utility of holding

377
00:38:36.140 --> 00:38:42.480
money, and Mises' point about the regression theorem is a different one, namely that the

378
00:38:42.480 --> 00:38:50.160
marginal utility to hold is in itself based on the prior fact that money can exchange

379
00:38:50.160 --> 00:38:55.520
for goods, that is, on the prior money prices of goods.

380
00:38:55.520 --> 00:39:02.520
Hence, it becomes necessary to break out of this circularity by means of the regression theorem.

381
00:39:02.520 --> 00:39:11.520
In short, the prices of goods have to exist in order to have a marginal utility of money to hold.

382
00:39:11.520 --> 00:39:20.520
In his own theory, Patinkin very feebly tries to justify circularity by saying that in analyzing the market,

383
00:39:20.520 --> 00:39:29.440
Market experiment, he begins with utility, and in analyzing utility, he begins with prices,

384
00:39:29.440 --> 00:39:31.660
individual experiment.

385
00:39:31.660 --> 00:39:38.440
But the fact remains that he is caught inextricably in a circular trap, which a methodology of

386
00:39:38.440 --> 00:39:45.800
cause and effect, in contrast to a mathematical type of mutual determination, would quickly

387
00:39:45.800 --> 00:39:47.520
reveal.

388
00:39:47.520 --> 00:39:55.720
C. Utility and Costs We may sum up the utility and cost considerations

389
00:39:55.720 --> 00:40:04.120
in decisions of buyers and sellers of consumers' goods, or rather of potential buyers and sellers,

390
00:40:04.120 --> 00:40:06.000
as follows.

391
00:40:06.000 --> 00:40:13.540
For the seller, revenue is the marginal utility of addition of the units of money, which equals

392
00:40:13.540 --> 00:40:18.240
Value Rank in Most Valuable Prospective Use

393
00:40:18.240 --> 00:40:20.620
Cost is either 1.

394
00:40:20.620 --> 00:40:26.520
The marginal utility of the good in direct use, the highest ranked use that would have

395
00:40:26.520 --> 00:40:29.540
to be sacrificed, or 2.

396
00:40:29.540 --> 00:40:36.080
The marginal utility of holding for anticipated futures sale at a higher price, whichever

397
00:40:36.080 --> 00:40:39.440
is the higher on his value scale.

398
00:40:39.440 --> 00:40:45.160
In cases where neither cost item is present, the sale is costless.

399
00:40:45.160 --> 00:40:51.620
For the buyer, revenue is the marginal utility of addition of the units of the good, which

400
00:40:51.620 --> 00:40:56.760
equals the highest ranked direct use of the units.

401
00:40:56.760 --> 00:41:03.800
Cost is the marginal utility of units of money, value rank in highest ranked use that will

402
00:41:03.800 --> 00:41:08.360
have to be sacrificed in making the exchange.

403
00:41:08.360 --> 00:41:14.760
The aim of the actor is always to achieve a psychic profit from an action by having

404
00:41:14.760 --> 00:41:19.480
his marginal revenue exceed his marginal cost.

405
00:41:19.480 --> 00:41:26.000
Only after the decision has been made, the action taken, and the consequences assessed,

406
00:41:26.000 --> 00:41:32.520
can the actor know if his decision was correct, that is, if his psychic revenue really did

407
00:41:32.520 --> 00:41:34.640
exceed his cost.

408
00:41:34.640 --> 00:41:39.660
It is possible that his cost may prove to have been greater than his revenue and that

409
00:41:39.660 --> 00:41:43.480
therefore he lost on the exchange.

410
00:41:43.480 --> 00:41:49.300
It is convenient to distinguish the two vantage points by which an actor judges his action

411
00:41:49.300 --> 00:41:52.780
as ex ante and ex post.

412
00:41:52.780 --> 00:41:58.020
Ex ante is his position when he must decide on a course of action.

413
00:41:58.020 --> 00:42:02.500
It is the relevant and dominant consideration for human action.

414
00:42:02.500 --> 00:42:09.000
It is the actor considering his alternative courses and the consequences of each.

415
00:42:09.000 --> 00:42:14.620
Ex post is his recorded observation of the results of his past action.

416
00:42:14.620 --> 00:42:19.160
It is the judging of his past actions and their results.

417
00:42:19.160 --> 00:42:25.800
Ex ante then, he will always take the most advantageous course of action and will always

418
00:42:25.800 --> 00:42:30.800
have a psychic profit, with revenue exceeding cost.

419
00:42:30.800 --> 00:42:45.800
In the ex-post he may have profited or lost from a course of action, revenue may or may not have exceeded cost, depending on how good an entrepreneur he has been in making his original action.

420
00:42:45.800 --> 00:42:56.800
It is clear that his ex-post judgments are mainly useful to him in the weighing of his ex-ante considerations for future action.

421
00:42:56.800 --> 00:43:03.360
Suppose that an ultimate consumer buys a product and then finds he was mistaken in this purchase

422
00:43:03.360 --> 00:43:06.720
and the good has little or no value to him.

423
00:43:06.720 --> 00:43:11.880
Thus, a man might buy a cake and find that he does not like it at all.

424
00:43:11.880 --> 00:43:17.720
Ex ante, the expected utility of the cake, was greater than the marginal utility of the

425
00:43:17.720 --> 00:43:20.640
money foregone in purchasing it.

426
00:43:20.640 --> 00:43:26.080
Ex post, he finds that he was in error and that if he had it to do over again, he would

427
00:43:26.080 --> 00:43:28.320
would not have bought the cake.

428
00:43:28.320 --> 00:43:34.200
The purchase was the consumer's responsibility, and he must bear the loss as well as the gain

429
00:43:34.200 --> 00:43:36.960
from his voluntary transaction.

430
00:43:36.960 --> 00:43:43.280
Of course, no one can relive the past, but he can use this knowledge, for example, to

431
00:43:43.280 --> 00:43:46.360
avoid purchasing such a cake again.

432
00:43:46.360 --> 00:43:52.240
It should be obvious that the cake, once purchased, may have little or no value, even though the

433
00:43:52.240 --> 00:43:56.440
The Man originally paid several grains of gold for it.

434
00:43:56.440 --> 00:44:03.400
The cost of the cake was the foregone marginal utility of the three grains of gold paid for

435
00:44:03.400 --> 00:44:04.400
it.

436
00:44:04.400 --> 00:44:11.000
But this cost incurred in the past cannot confer any value on the cake now.

437
00:44:11.000 --> 00:44:17.160
This would seem obvious, and yet economics has always suffered from neglect of this truth,

438
00:44:17.160 --> 00:44:23.960
Particularly during the 19th century, in the form of various cost theories of value.

439
00:44:23.960 --> 00:44:30.760
These cost theories asserted that the value of goods is conferred by the costs or sacrifices

440
00:44:30.760 --> 00:44:34.200
incurred in their acquisition in the past.

441
00:44:34.200 --> 00:44:41.720
On the contrary, it is clear that value can be conferred on a good only by individuals'

442
00:44:41.720 --> 00:44:59.060
As Philip Wicksteed states, efforts are regulated by anticipated values, but values are not

443
00:44:59.060 --> 00:45:05.800
controlled by antecedent efforts, and the value of what you have got is not affected

444
00:45:05.800 --> 00:45:11.500
by the value of what you have relinquished or foregone in order to get it.

445
00:45:11.500 --> 00:45:17.720
But the measure of the advantages you are willing to forgo in order to get a thing is determined

446
00:45:17.720 --> 00:45:23.340
by the value that you expect it to have when you have got it.

447
00:45:23.340 --> 00:45:29.660
We may modify the buyer summary by considering the case in which the buyer is not an ultimate

448
00:45:29.660 --> 00:45:36.260
consumer but rather a speculative buyer anticipating a future price rise.

449
00:45:36.260 --> 00:45:43.100
In that case, the higher revenue for him will be the marginal utility of holding for anticipated

450
00:45:43.100 --> 00:45:51.500
future sale at a higher price, which he considers net of the cost of storage.

451
00:45:51.500 --> 00:45:56.500
D Planning and the Range of Choice

452
00:45:56.500 --> 00:46:01.620
It should be evident that the establishment of money tremendously broadens the range of

453
00:46:01.620 --> 00:46:13.620
The range of alternative uses that can be satisfied by units of money is far wider than the number of uses to which individual goods can be put.

454
00:46:13.620 --> 00:46:29.620
Horses or houses can be allocated to several uses, raw materials to many areas of production, but money can be allocated in expenditure on every single type of exchangeable good in the society,

455
00:46:29.620 --> 00:46:47.840
Money serves greatly to expand the range of choice, and it itself becomes a key means

456
00:46:47.840 --> 00:46:53.500
to be allocated to the most highly valued of alternative ends.

457
00:46:53.500 --> 00:47:00.060
We shall see in Chapter 11 that money is unique in not conferring any general benefit through

458
00:47:00.060 --> 00:47:06.860
an increase in the supply once money has been established on the market.

459
00:47:06.860 --> 00:47:13.140
It might be worthwhile to consider at this point what each person does in action.

460
00:47:13.140 --> 00:47:19.500
He is always engaged in allocating means to the most highly valued of his alternative

461
00:47:19.500 --> 00:47:23.300
Ends, as ranked on his value scale.

462
00:47:23.300 --> 00:47:29.980
His actions in general, and his actions in exchange in particular, are always the result

463
00:47:29.980 --> 00:47:36.900
of certain expectations on his part, expectations of the most satisfactory course that he could

464
00:47:36.900 --> 00:47:37.900
follow.

465
00:47:37.900 --> 00:47:44.100
He always follows the route that he expects will yield him the most highly ranked available

466
00:47:44.100 --> 00:47:51.580
and at a certain future time, which might in some cases be so near as to be almost immediate,

467
00:47:51.580 --> 00:47:55.380
and therefore a psychic profit from the action.

468
00:47:55.380 --> 00:48:00.580
If he proves to have acted erroneously so that another course of action would have yielded

469
00:48:00.580 --> 00:48:05.700
him a greater psychic revenue, then he has incurred a loss.

470
00:48:05.700 --> 00:48:12.380
Ex-ante, he appraises his situation, present and prospective future, chooses among his

471
00:48:12.380 --> 00:48:18.820
Evaluations, tries to achieve the highest ones according to his know-how, and then chooses

472
00:48:18.820 --> 00:48:23.460
courses of action on the basis of these plans.

473
00:48:23.460 --> 00:48:30.100
Plans are his decisions concerning future action, based on his ranking of ends and on

474
00:48:30.100 --> 00:48:34.500
his assumed knowledge of how to attain the ends.

475
00:48:34.500 --> 00:48:39.740
Every individual, therefore, is constantly engaged in planning.

476
00:48:39.740 --> 00:48:45.220
This planning may range from an impressive investment in a new steel plant to a small

477
00:48:45.220 --> 00:48:52.260
boy's decision to spend two cents on candy, but it is planning, nevertheless.

478
00:48:52.260 --> 00:48:58.100
Planning does not necessarily mean that the man has pondered long and hard over a decision

479
00:48:58.100 --> 00:48:59.940
and subsequent action.

480
00:48:59.940 --> 00:49:07.340
He might have made his decision almost instantaneously, yet this is still planned action, since all

481
00:49:07.340 --> 00:49:11.140
All action is purposive rather than reflexive.

482
00:49:11.140 --> 00:49:18.300
There must always before an action have been a decision to act as well as valuations.

483
00:49:18.300 --> 00:49:22.020
Therefore there is always planning.

484
00:49:22.020 --> 00:49:28.380
It is erroneous, therefore, to assert that a free market society is unplanned.

485
00:49:28.380 --> 00:49:34.220
On the contrary, each individual plans for himself.

486
00:49:34.220 --> 00:49:41.180
Does not chaos result from the fact that individual plans do not seem to be coordinated?

487
00:49:41.180 --> 00:49:47.940
On the contrary, the exchange system in the first place coordinates individual plans by

488
00:49:47.940 --> 00:49:52.180
benefiting both parties to every exchange.

489
00:49:52.180 --> 00:49:58.220
In the second place, the bulk of the present volume is devoted to an explanation and analysis

490
00:49:58.220 --> 00:50:09.220
are the basis of the principles and order that determine the various exchange phenomena in a monetary economy, prices, output, expenditures, etc.

491
00:50:09.220 --> 00:50:23.220
Far from being chaotic, the structure of the monetary economy presents an intricate systematic picture and is deducible from the basic existence of human action and indirect exchange.

492
00:50:23.220 --> 00:50:42.220
As Wickstede puts it, economics must at any rate include and imply a study of the way in which members of society will spontaneously administer their own resources and the relations into which they will spontaneously enter with each other.
