WEBVTT

NOTE 6.05. Time Preference, Capitalists, and Individual Money Stock

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.200
5. Time Preference, Capitalists and Individual Money Stock

2
00:00:07.200 --> 00:00:13.380
When we state that the time preference schedules of all individuals in the society determine

3
00:00:13.380 --> 00:00:20.720
the interest rate and the proportion of savings to consumption, we mean all individuals, and

4
00:00:20.720 --> 00:00:27.760
not some sort of separate class called capitalists. There is a temptation since the production

5
00:00:27.760 --> 00:00:35.360
Human structure is analyzed in terms of different classes, landowners, laborers and capitalists,

6
00:00:35.360 --> 00:00:42.600
to conclude that there are three definite stratified groups of people in society corresponding

7
00:00:42.600 --> 00:00:44.480
to these classifications.

8
00:00:44.480 --> 00:00:51.200
Actually, in economic analysis of the market, we are concerned with functions rather than

9
00:00:51.200 --> 00:00:53.880
whole persons per se.

10
00:00:53.880 --> 00:01:00.800
In reality, there is no special class of capitalists set off from laborers and landowners.

11
00:01:00.800 --> 00:01:07.520
This is not simply due to the trite fact that even capitalists must also be consumers.

12
00:01:07.520 --> 00:01:14.720
It is also due to the more important fact that all consumers can be capitalists if they

13
00:01:14.720 --> 00:01:15.720
wish.

14
00:01:15.720 --> 00:01:21.360
They will be capitalists if their time preference schedules so dictate.

15
00:01:21.360 --> 00:01:26.980
At the equilibrium rate of interest on the market, some individuals will be suppliers

16
00:01:26.980 --> 00:01:34.140
of present goods, some will be demanders, others will not be in the time market at all.

17
00:01:34.140 --> 00:01:40.880
Those whose time preference schedules at this rate permit them to be suppliers will be the

18
00:01:40.880 --> 00:01:45.540
savers, that is, they will be the capitalists.

19
00:01:45.540 --> 00:01:50.820
The role of the capitalists will be clarified if we ask the question, where did they get

20
00:01:50.820 --> 00:01:57.060
the money that they save and invest. First, they may have obtained it in what we might call

21
00:01:57.060 --> 00:02:02.660
current production. That is, they could have received the money in their current capacities

22
00:02:02.660 --> 00:02:09.460
as laborers, landowners and capitalists. After they receive the money, they must then decide

23
00:02:09.460 --> 00:02:15.860
how to allocate it among various lines of goods and between consumption and investment.

24
00:02:15.860 --> 00:02:22.660
Secondly, the source of funds could have been money earned in past rounds of production,

25
00:02:22.660 --> 00:02:26.980
and previously hoarded, now being dishoarded.

26
00:02:26.980 --> 00:02:32.900
We are, however, leaving out hoarding and dishoarding at this stage in the analysis.

27
00:02:32.900 --> 00:02:39.300
The only other source, the third source, is new money, and this too will be discussed

28
00:02:39.300 --> 00:02:40.540
later.

29
00:02:40.540 --> 00:02:45.420
For the moment, therefore, we shall consider that the money from which savings derive could

30
00:02:45.420 --> 00:02:49.780
would only have come from recent earnings from production.

31
00:02:49.780 --> 00:02:56.300
Some earnings were obtained as capitalists and some as owners of original factors.

32
00:02:56.300 --> 00:03:00.500
The listener might here have detected an apparent paradox.

33
00:03:00.500 --> 00:03:06.700
How can a laborer or a landowner be a demander of present goods and then turn around and

34
00:03:06.700 --> 00:03:10.580
be a supplier of present goods for investment?

35
00:03:10.580 --> 00:03:16.140
This seems to be particularly puzzling since we have stated that one cannot be a demander

36
00:03:16.140 --> 00:03:22.940
and a supplier of present goods at the same time, that one's time preference schedule

37
00:03:22.940 --> 00:03:28.020
may put one in one camp or the other, but not in both.

38
00:03:28.020 --> 00:03:34.420
The solution to this puzzle is that the two acts are not performed at the same time, even

39
00:03:34.420 --> 00:03:40.500
Even though both are performed to the same extent in their turn in the endless round

40
00:03:40.500 --> 00:03:44.460
of the evenly rotating economy.

41
00:03:44.460 --> 00:03:50.220
Given his time preference schedule, he is bound to be in a greater supply position the

42
00:03:50.220 --> 00:03:56.340
more money he has, and in more of a demand position the less money he has.

43
00:03:56.340 --> 00:04:02.700
Before the laborer or landowner sells his services, he has a certain money stock, a

44
00:04:02.700 --> 00:04:32.700
The Theory of Money and Credit

45
00:04:32.700 --> 00:04:38.700
The Theory of Money and Credit

46
00:05:02.700 --> 00:05:08.780
of Origin of his decision to allocate his money income shifts so that he might well

47
00:05:08.780 --> 00:05:12.220
become a supplier out of his income.

48
00:05:12.220 --> 00:05:18.300
Of course in many cases he is still a demander, or is not on the time market at all.

49
00:05:18.300 --> 00:05:24.020
To coin a phrase to distinguish these two positions, we may call his original condition

50
00:05:24.020 --> 00:05:31.900
a pre-income position, before he has sold his services for money, and the latter a post-income

51
00:05:31.900 --> 00:05:48.340
We have seen that a landowner's pre-income demand for money is likely to be practically

52
00:05:48.340 --> 00:05:54.060
inelastic, while a laborer's will probably be more elastic.

53
00:05:54.060 --> 00:06:00.540
Some individuals in a post-income position will be suppliers at the market rate of interest.

54
00:06:00.540 --> 00:06:04.380
Some will be demanders, some will be neutral.

55
00:06:04.380 --> 00:06:10.320
We conclude that any man can be a capitalist if only he wants to be.

56
00:06:10.320 --> 00:06:16.340
He can derive his funds solely from the fruits of previous capitalist investment, or from

57
00:06:16.340 --> 00:06:23.820
past hoarded cash balances, or solely from his income as a laborer or a landowner.

58
00:06:23.820 --> 00:06:28.820
He can, of course, derive his funds from several of these sources.

59
00:06:28.820 --> 00:06:35.300
The only thing that stops a man from being a capitalist is his own high time preference

60
00:06:35.300 --> 00:06:42.500
scale, in other words, his stronger desire to consume goods in the present.

61
00:06:42.500 --> 00:06:48.380
Marxists and others who postulate a rigid stratification, a virtual caste structure

62
00:06:48.380 --> 00:06:51.620
in society, are in grave error.

63
00:06:51.620 --> 00:06:58.800
The same person can be, at once, a labourer, a landowner and a capitalist in the same period

64
00:06:58.800 --> 00:07:00.520
of Time.

65
00:07:00.520 --> 00:07:08.080
This Marxian error stemmed from a very similar error introduced into economics by Adam Smith.

66
00:07:08.080 --> 00:07:14.020
It might be argued that only the rich can afford to be capitalists, that is, those who

67
00:07:14.020 --> 00:07:17.000
have a greater amount of money stock.

68
00:07:17.000 --> 00:07:23.640
This argument has superficial plausibility since we have seen that for any given individual

69
00:07:23.640 --> 00:07:29.760
and a given time preference schedule, a greater money stock will lead to a greater supply

70
00:07:29.760 --> 00:07:36.120
of savings and a lesser money stock to a lesser supply of savings.

71
00:07:36.120 --> 00:07:42.720
Ceteris Paribus the same applies to changes in money income which constitute additions

72
00:07:42.720 --> 00:07:44.160
to stock.

73
00:07:44.160 --> 00:07:52.960
We cannot however assume that a man with post-income assets of 10,000 ounces of gold will necessarily

74
00:07:52.960 --> 00:07:57.660
Save more than a man with 100 ounces of gold.

75
00:07:57.660 --> 00:08:05.380
We cannot compare time preferences interpersonally, any more than we can formulate interpersonal

76
00:08:05.380 --> 00:08:09.180
laws for any other type of utilities.

77
00:08:09.180 --> 00:08:15.540
What we can assert as an economic law for one person, we cannot assert in comparing

78
00:08:15.540 --> 00:08:17.740
two or more persons.

79
00:08:17.740 --> 00:08:24.380
Each person has his own time preference schedule, apart from the specific size of his monetary

80
00:08:24.380 --> 00:08:25.460
stock.

81
00:08:25.460 --> 00:08:31.100
Each person's time preference schedule, as with any other element in his value scale,

82
00:08:31.100 --> 00:08:33.900
is entirely of his own making.

83
00:08:33.900 --> 00:08:39.440
All of us have heard of the proverbially thrifty French peasant compared with the rich playboy

84
00:08:39.440 --> 00:08:42.180
who is always running into debt.

85
00:08:42.180 --> 00:08:48.360
The common sense observation that it is generally the rich who save more may be an interesting

86
00:08:48.360 --> 00:08:54.980
historical judgment, but it furnishes us with no scientific economic law whatever,

87
00:08:54.980 --> 00:08:59.940
and the purpose of economic science is to furnish us with such laws.

88
00:08:59.940 --> 00:09:06.200
As long as a person has any money at all, and he must have some money if he participates

89
00:09:06.200 --> 00:09:11.200
In the market society, to any extent, he can be a capitalist.
