11.
The Time Structure of Interest Rates
It is clear that the natural interest rates are highly flexible.
They tend toward uniformity and are easily changed as entrepreneurial expectations change.
In the real world, the prices of the various factors and intermediate products, as well
as of the final products, are subject to continual fluctuation, as are the prices of stock and
and the interest return on them.
It is also clear that the interest rate on short-term loans is easily changed with changed
conditions.
As the natural interest rate changes, the new loans for short periods can easily conform
to the change.
A difficulty seems to arise, however, in the case of long-term producer's loans.
Here is an apparently clear-cut rigid element in the system, and one which can conform to
the natural rate of interest in investments only after a great lag.
After all, a 20-year loan is contracted at an original interest rate that remains fixed
for the duration.
Is this not a fixed element that cannot conform to changing conditions and valuations?
This superficial view is incorrect. Long-term IOUs can also be bought and sold in a market.
Most of these long-term debts are called bonds, and they are traded in a flourishing and flexible
bond market. The fixed rate of interest at the beginning is unimportant. Thus, a 100-ounce
Its long-term loan is contracted at 5% fixed interest, or 5 ounces per year.
If the general interest rate rises, people will tend to sell their bonds, which have
been yielding them only 5%, and invest their money elsewhere, either in whole firms, stocks
of firms, or short-term loans.
This increased willingness to sell bonds, an increased supply schedule, depresses the price
of the bond, until the interest yield to the buyer is the same as the general interest
rate elsewhere.
Thus, if the general interest rate goes up from 5% to 10%, the price of the bond will
will fall from 100 to 50, so that the fixed annual return of 5 will provide an interest
yield of 10%.
The important element in bond investment is not the original interest rate, the fixed
return on the so-called par value of the bond, but the interest yield on the market price
of the bond.
A general lowering of the interest rate will, on the other hand, raise the bond prices above
par, and push yield below 5%.
As the day of redemption of the bond draws near, the market price of the bond will, of
course, rapidly approach the par value, until it finally sells at par, since the amount
The theory of money is based on the principle of the loan.
It is clear that in the ERE the interest rates for all periods of time will be equal.
The tendency toward such equality at any one time, however, has been disputed in the case
of expected future changes in the interest rate.
Although surprisingly little attention has been devoted to this subject, the prevailing
theory is that on the loan market there will not be a tendency toward equalization if a
change in interest rates is expected in the near future.
Suppose that the interest rate is now 5% and it is expected to remain there.
Then the interest rate on loans of all maturities will be the same, 5%.
It is, however, that the interest rate is expected to increase steadily in the near future, say, to increase each year by 1% until it will be 9% four years from now.
In that case, since the short-run rate, say, the rate of interest on loans lasting one year or less, is expected to increase over the next four-year period,
And the present long-run rate for that period, for example, the present rate for 5-year loans,
will be an average of the expected future short-run rates during this period.
Thus, the present rate on 5-year loans will be 5% plus 6% plus 7% plus 8% plus 9% divided
by 5, equaling 7%.
The long-run rate will be the average of short-run rates over the relevant period.
Consequently, the long-run rates will be proportionately higher than short-run rates when the latter
are expected to increase, and lower when the latter are expected to be lower.
This however is a completely question-begging theory.
Suppose that a rise in interest rates is expected.
Why should this be simply confined to a rise in the short-term rates?
Why should not the expectation be equally applicable to long-term rates so that they rise as well?
The theory rests on the quite untenable assumption that it sets out to prove, namely that there
is no tendency for short-term and long-term rates to be equal.
The assumption that a change in the interest rate will take place only over the short term
is completely unproved, and goes against our demonstration that the short-run and long-run
rates tend to move together.
Further, the theory rests on the implicit assumption that individuals will be content
to remain lenders in shorts at 5 percent, while their fellow investors reap 7 percent
on the long market, simply because they expect that eventually, if they stay in the short
market, they will earn an average of 7%.
What is there to prevent a present lender in shorts from selling his currently earning
5% loan, purchasing a 7% long, waiting for the presumed rise in shorts above 7% after
The Theory of Money and Credit
By striving to do so, he will set up an irresistible arbitrage movement from shorts to longs, with
the rate of interest in the former thereby rising from the sales of loans on the market,
and the rate of interest in longs falling, until the rate of interest is uniform throughout
the time structure.
The same thing occurs in the case of an expectation of a future fall.
Longs cannot remain in equilibrium below shorts for any length of time, since there will be
a present movement from longs to shorts on the market, until the rates of interest for
all time structures are equal, and the arbitrage movement ceases.
The interest rate, then, always tends to be uniform throughout its time structure.
What happens if the interest rate is expected to change in the near future?
In that case, there will be a similar process, as in the case of speculation in commodities.
Speculators will bid up the interest rate in the expectation of an imminent rise, or
bid down the rate in expectation of a fall.
Clearly, the earlier a rise or fall is expected to take place, the greater proportionately
will be the effect on the speculators, and the greater impact it will have on current
movement in the rate.
In the case of a commodity, stocks would be withheld in expectation of a rise in demand
and price, and then released, thereby effecting a more rapid transition to the price eventually
The Theory of Money and Credit
of Basic Time Preferences.
Just as speculative errors in regard to commodity prices cause losses and impel further change
to the real underlying price, so speculative errors will be self-correcting here, too,
and lead the rate of interest to the height determined by underlying time preferences.
The absurdity of separating the long-run and the short-run interest rates becomes evident
when we realize that the basic interest rate is the natural rate of interest on investments,
not interest on the producer's loan market.
We have already seen the essential identity of the rate of earnings on the loan market
with that on the stock market.
If we consider the stock market, it becomes obvious that there is no distinction in rates
between short-run and long-run investments.
Different firms engage in stages of production of varying lengths.
Yet the stock market equates the rate of interest on all investments, obliterating the differences
in time structure so thoroughly that it becomes difficult for many writers to grasp the very
concept of period of production.
But since the operations of the stock market and the loan market are essentially the same,
it is obvious that there is no difference in causal explanation between short-run and
long-run interest rates.
Those writers who postulate an essential difference between the nature of long-run and short-run
and rates have been misled by a common penchant for considering the time market as confined
exclusively to the loan market, when in fact the loan market is only a dependent one.
In actual practice, it may well happen that either the short-run loan market or the long-run
market may change first, with the other market following.
Which market characteristically changes first is the outcome of the concrete conditions.