WEBVTT

NOTE 7.02. Determination of the Discounted Marginal Value Product

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
2. Determination of the Discounted Marginal Value Product

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:09.000
a. Discounting

3
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:21.000
If the DMVP schedules determine the prices of non-specific factor services, what determines the shape and position of the DMVP schedules?

4
00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:28.400
In the first place, by definition it is clear that the DMVP schedule is the MVP schedule

5
00:00:28.400 --> 00:00:31.640
for that factor, discounted.

6
00:00:31.640 --> 00:00:37.660
There is no mystery about the discounting, as we have stated, the MVP of the factor is

7
00:00:37.660 --> 00:00:44.000
discounted in accordance with the going pure rate of interest on the market.

8
00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:50.200
One of the determinants of the DMVP schedule is the rate of discount, and we have seen

9
00:00:50.200 --> 00:01:12.960
b.

10
00:01:12.960 --> 00:01:15.760
The Marginal Physical Product

11
00:01:15.760 --> 00:01:21.040
What then determines the position and shape of the MVP schedule?

12
00:01:21.040 --> 00:01:24.320
What is the marginal value product?

13
00:01:24.320 --> 00:01:30.200
It is the amount of revenue intake attributable to a unit of a factor.

14
00:01:30.200 --> 00:01:33.360
And this revenue depends on two elements.

15
00:01:33.360 --> 00:01:40.080
One, the physical product produced, and two, the price of that product.

16
00:01:40.080 --> 00:01:47.760
If one hour of factor X is estimated by the market to produce a value of 20 gold ounces,

17
00:01:47.760 --> 00:01:54.200
this might be because one hour produces 20 units of the physical product which are sold

18
00:01:54.200 --> 00:02:02.040
at a price of 1 gold ounce per unit, or the same MVP might result from the production

19
00:02:02.040 --> 00:02:09.040
of 10 units of the product sold at 2 gold ounces per unit, etc.

20
00:02:09.040 --> 00:02:15.980
In short, the marginal value product of a factor service unit is equal to its marginal

21
00:02:15.980 --> 00:02:21.140
physical product times the price of that product.

22
00:02:21.140 --> 00:02:26.600
This is not strictly true, but the technical error in the statement does not affect the

23
00:02:26.600 --> 00:02:29.300
causal analysis in the text.

24
00:02:29.300 --> 00:02:38.980
In fact, this argument is strengthened, for MVP actually equals MPP times marginal revenue,

25
00:02:38.980 --> 00:02:46.020
and Marginal Revenue is Always Less Than or Equal to Price.

26
00:02:46.020 --> 00:02:52.700
Let us then investigate the determinants of the Marginal Physical Product, MPP.

27
00:02:52.700 --> 00:03:00.700
In the first place, there can be no general schedule for the MPP as there is for the MVP,

28
00:03:00.700 --> 00:03:06.020
for the simple reason that physical units of various goods are not comparable.

29
00:03:06.020 --> 00:03:13.060
How can a dozen eggs, a pound of butter and a house be compared in physical terms?

30
00:03:13.060 --> 00:03:18.320
Yet the same factor might be useful in the production of any of these goods.

31
00:03:18.320 --> 00:03:25.040
There can be an MPP schedule, therefore, only in particular terms.

32
00:03:25.040 --> 00:03:32.720
That is, in terms of each particular production process in which the factor can be engaged.

33
00:03:32.720 --> 00:03:38.640
For each production process there will be for the factor a marginal physical production

34
00:03:38.640 --> 00:03:41.240
schedule of a certain shape.

35
00:03:41.240 --> 00:03:49.200
The MPP for a supply in that process is the amount of the physical product imputable to

36
00:03:49.200 --> 00:03:56.800
one unit of that factor, that is, the amount of the product that will be lost if one unit

37
00:03:56.800 --> 00:03:59.240
of the factor is removed.

38
00:03:59.240 --> 00:04:05.780
If the supply of the factor in the process is increased by one unit, other factors remaining

39
00:04:05.780 --> 00:04:13.440
the same, then the MPP of the supply becomes the additional physical product that can be

40
00:04:13.440 --> 00:04:16.580
gained from the addition of the unit.

41
00:04:16.580 --> 00:04:22.760
The supply of the factor that is relevant for the MPP schedules is not the total supply

42
00:04:22.760 --> 00:04:31.200
Supply in the Society, but the supply in each process, since the MPP schedules are established

43
00:04:31.200 --> 00:04:34.200
for each process separately.

44
00:04:34.200 --> 00:04:35.680
1.

45
00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:42.200
The Law of Returns In order to investigate the MPP schedule further,

46
00:04:42.200 --> 00:04:47.560
let us recall the Law of Returns set forth in Chapter 1.

47
00:04:47.560 --> 00:04:53.300
According to the law of returns and eternal truth of human action, if the quantity of

48
00:04:53.300 --> 00:04:59.640
one factor varies and the quantities of other factors remain constant, there is a point

49
00:04:59.640 --> 00:05:04.900
at which the physical product per factor is at a maximum.

50
00:05:04.900 --> 00:05:11.880
Physical product per factor may be termed the average physical product, APP.

51
00:05:11.880 --> 00:05:17.720
The law further states that with either a lesser or a greater supply of the factor,

52
00:05:17.720 --> 00:05:21.400
the APP must be lower.

53
00:05:21.400 --> 00:05:23.160
2.

54
00:05:23.160 --> 00:05:28.120
Marginal Physical Product and Average Physical Product

55
00:05:28.120 --> 00:05:33.280
What is the relationship between the APP and MPP?

56
00:05:33.280 --> 00:05:39.280
The MPP is the amount of physical product that will be produced with the addition of

57
00:05:39.280 --> 00:05:44.080
of One Unit of a Factor, Other Factors Being Given.

58
00:05:44.080 --> 00:05:51.840
The APP is the ratio of the total product to the total quantity of the variable factor,

59
00:05:51.840 --> 00:05:53.980
other factors being given.

60
00:05:53.980 --> 00:06:01.420
To illustrate the meanings of APP and MPP, let us consider a hypothetical case in which

61
00:06:01.420 --> 00:06:08.320
all units of other factors are constant and the number of units of one factor is variable.

62
00:06:09.280 --> 00:06:20.780
With zero units of the variable factor, the total product is zero, the average physical product is zero, and the marginal physical product is zero.

63
00:06:20.780 --> 00:06:32.180
With one unit of the variable factor, the total product is three, the average physical product is three, and the marginal physical product is three.

64
00:06:32.180 --> 00:06:43.180
With 2 units of the variable factor, the total product is 8, the average physical product is 4, and the marginal physical product is 5.

65
00:06:43.180 --> 00:06:55.180
With 3 units of the variable factor, the total product is 15, the average physical product is 5, and the marginal physical product is 7.

66
00:06:55.180 --> 00:07:07.880
With four units of the variable factor, the total product is 22, the average physical product is 5.2, and the marginal physical product is 7.

67
00:07:07.880 --> 00:07:22.080
With five units of the variable factor, the total product is 27.5, the average physical product is 5.5, and the marginal physical product is 5.5.

68
00:07:22.080 --> 00:07:34.080
With 6 units of the variable factor, the total product is 30, the average physical product is 5, and the marginal physical product is 2.5.

69
00:07:34.080 --> 00:07:47.080
And with 7 units of the variable factor, the total product is 28, the average physical product is 4, and the marginal physical product is minus 2.

70
00:07:47.080 --> 00:07:57.080
In the first place, it is quite clear that no factor will ever be employed in the region where the MPP is negative.

71
00:07:57.080 --> 00:08:03.080
In our example, this occurs where 7 units of the factor are being employed.

72
00:08:03.080 --> 00:08:10.080
6 units of the factor, combined with given other factors, produced 30 units of the product.

73
00:08:10.080 --> 00:08:16.080
An addition of another unit results in a loss of 2 units of the product.

74
00:08:16.080 --> 00:08:22.080
The MPP of the factor when seven units are employed is minus two.

75
00:08:22.080 --> 00:08:27.080
Obviously, no factor will ever be employed in this region,

76
00:08:27.080 --> 00:08:32.080
and this holds true whether the factor owner is also owner of the product

77
00:08:32.080 --> 00:08:36.080
or a capitalist hires the factor to work on the product.

78
00:08:36.080 --> 00:08:41.080
It would be senseless and contrary to the principles of human action

79
00:08:41.080 --> 00:08:47.360
To expand either effort or money on added factors, only to have the quantity of the

80
00:08:47.360 --> 00:08:49.980
total product decline.

81
00:08:49.980 --> 00:08:57.280
We follow here the law of returns, in that the APP, beginning, of course, at zero, with

82
00:08:57.280 --> 00:09:02.960
zero units of the factor, rises to a peak and then falls.

83
00:09:02.960 --> 00:09:05.120
We also observe the following.

84
00:09:05.120 --> 00:09:20.620
1. When the APP is rising, with the exception of the very first step, where TP, APP and MPP are all equal, MPP is higher than APP.

85
00:09:20.620 --> 00:09:27.620
2. When the APP is falling, MPP is lower than APP.

86
00:09:27.620 --> 00:09:39.740
3. At the point of maximum APP, MPP is equal to APP. In other words, if APP is increasing,

87
00:09:39.740 --> 00:09:45.660
then the marginal physical product is greater than the average physical product in this

88
00:09:45.660 --> 00:09:53.260
region, and where APP is decreasing, the marginal physical product is lower than the average

89
00:09:53.260 --> 00:09:55.260
physical product.

90
00:09:55.260 --> 00:10:03.580
But if MPP is greater than APP when the latter is rising, and is lower than APP when the

91
00:10:03.580 --> 00:10:12.140
latter is falling, then it follows that when APP is at its maximum, MPP must be neither

92
00:10:12.140 --> 00:10:18.220
lower nor higher than, but equal to, APP.

93
00:10:18.220 --> 00:10:23.940
Now let us explore further the area of increasing APP.

94
00:10:23.940 --> 00:10:30.460
Let us take another hypothetical, in which 2 units of the variable factor yield a total

95
00:10:30.460 --> 00:10:38.120
product of 10 and an average physical product of 5, while 3 units of the variable factor

96
00:10:38.120 --> 00:10:44.680
yield a total product of 18 and an average physical product of 6.

97
00:10:44.680 --> 00:10:50.600
Let us stipulate further that four units of the variable factor yield a total product

98
00:10:50.600 --> 00:10:57.360
of 25 and an average physical product of 6.2.

99
00:10:57.360 --> 00:11:03.580
This is a segment of the increasing section of the average physical product schedule,

100
00:11:03.580 --> 00:11:09.320
with the peak being reached at 4 units and 6.2 APP.

101
00:11:09.320 --> 00:11:15.280
The question is, what is the likelihood that this region will be settled upon by a firm

102
00:11:15.280 --> 00:11:19.400
as the right input-output combination?

103
00:11:19.400 --> 00:11:25.720
Two units of the variable factor plus a bundle of all the other factors yield 10 units of

104
00:11:25.720 --> 00:11:27.120
the product.

105
00:11:27.120 --> 00:11:34.320
On the other hand, at the maximum APP for the factor, four units of it plus other factors

106
00:11:34.320 --> 00:11:37.740
yield 25 units of the product.

107
00:11:37.740 --> 00:11:43.420
We have seen that it is a fundamental truth in nature that the same quantitative causes

108
00:11:43.420 --> 00:11:46.220
produce the same quantitative effects.

109
00:11:46.220 --> 00:11:53.260
Therefore, if we have the quantities of all the factors, we shall get half the product.

110
00:11:53.260 --> 00:12:00.740
In other words, two units of the factor combined with the other factors will yield 12.5 units

111
00:12:00.740 --> 00:12:02.940
of the product.

112
00:12:02.940 --> 00:12:04.760
Consider this situation.

113
00:12:04.760 --> 00:12:12.440
We see that 2 units of the variable factor plus given factors yield 10 units of the product.

114
00:12:12.440 --> 00:12:19.660
But we see that 2 units of the variable factor plus given factors yield 12.5 units of the

115
00:12:19.660 --> 00:12:20.660
product.

116
00:12:20.660 --> 00:12:28.300
Obviously, no one would want to spend more in effort or money on factors, the other factors,

117
00:12:28.300 --> 00:12:34.460
and obtain less total output, or for that matter, the same total output.

118
00:12:34.460 --> 00:12:41.180
It is evident that such a producer is in an area of negative marginal physical productivity

119
00:12:41.180 --> 00:12:43.380
of the other factors.

120
00:12:43.380 --> 00:12:49.200
He would obtain a greater total product by throwing away some of the other factors.

121
00:12:49.200 --> 00:12:57.720
A region of increasing APP for one factor, then, signifies a region of negative MPP for

122
00:12:57.720 --> 00:13:00.580
other factors, and vice versa.

123
00:13:00.580 --> 00:13:08.660
Thus, the variable factor will be set so that it has zero marginal productivity, only if

124
00:13:08.660 --> 00:13:10.740
it is a free good.

125
00:13:10.740 --> 00:13:14.560
There is, however, no such thing as a free good.

126
00:13:14.560 --> 00:13:20.500
There is only a condition of human welfare not subject to action, and therefore not an

127
00:13:20.500 --> 00:13:23.380
element in productivity schedules.

128
00:13:23.380 --> 00:13:37.280
Conversely, the APP is at its maximum for the variable factor only when the other factors are free goods and therefore have zero marginal productivity at this point.

129
00:13:37.280 --> 00:13:50.240
Only if all the other factors were free and could be left out of account could the producer simply concentrate on maximizing the productivity of one factor alone.

130
00:13:50.240 --> 00:13:57.540
However, there can be no production with only one factor, as we saw in Chapter 1.

131
00:13:57.540 --> 00:14:00.440
The conclusion, therefore, is inescapable.

132
00:14:00.440 --> 00:14:07.200
A factor will always be employed in a production process in such a way that it is in a region

133
00:14:07.200 --> 00:14:14.240
of declining APP and declining but positive MPP.

134
00:14:14.240 --> 00:14:21.760
In every production process, therefore, every factor will be employed in a region of diminishing

135
00:14:21.760 --> 00:14:30.320
MPP and diminishing APP, so that additional units of the factor employed in the process

136
00:14:30.320 --> 00:14:37.480
will lower the MPP and decreased units will raise it.

137
00:14:37.480 --> 00:14:41.820
C. Marginal Value Product

138
00:14:41.820 --> 00:14:49.680
As we have seen, the MVP for any factor is its MPP multiplied by the selling price of

139
00:14:49.680 --> 00:14:51.260
its product.

140
00:14:51.260 --> 00:14:57.560
We have just concluded that every factor will be employed in its region of diminishing marginal

141
00:14:57.560 --> 00:15:02.300
physical product in each process of production.

142
00:15:02.300 --> 00:15:07.700
What will be the shape of the marginal value product schedule?

143
00:15:07.700 --> 00:15:14.180
As the supply of a factor increases and other factors remain the same, it follows that the

144
00:15:14.180 --> 00:15:18.120
total physical output of the product is greater.

145
00:15:18.120 --> 00:15:25.100
A greater stock, given the consumer's demand, will lead to a lowering of the market price.

146
00:15:25.100 --> 00:15:31.980
The price of the product will then fall as the MPP diminishes and rise as the latter

147
00:15:31.980 --> 00:15:33.620
increases.

148
00:15:33.620 --> 00:15:41.220
For each specific production process, any factor will be employed in the region of diminishing

149
00:15:41.220 --> 00:15:43.100
MVP.

150
00:15:43.100 --> 00:15:48.780
This law applies to all factors, specific and non-specific.

151
00:15:48.780 --> 00:15:54.420
This correlates with the previous conclusion based on the law of utility that the factor

152
00:15:54.420 --> 00:16:02.100
in general, among various production processes, will be employed in such a way that its MVP

153
00:16:02.100 --> 00:16:24.100
is diminishing. Therefore, its general MVP between various uses and within each use is diminishing, and its various particular MVPs are diminishing within each use. Its DMVP is therefore diminishing as well.

154
00:16:24.100 --> 00:16:30.080
The price of a unit of any factor will, as we have seen, be established in the market

155
00:16:30.080 --> 00:16:34.700
as equal to its discounted marginal value product.

156
00:16:34.700 --> 00:16:41.820
This will be the DMVP as determined by the general schedule, including all the various

157
00:16:41.820 --> 00:16:44.500
uses to which it can be put.

158
00:16:44.500 --> 00:16:51.940
Now the producers will employ the factor in such a way that its DMVP will be equalized

159
00:16:51.940 --> 00:17:21.940
are used among all the uses. If the DMVP in one use is greater than in another, then employers in the former line of production will be in a position to bid more for the factor, and will use more of it until, according to the principle of diminishing MVP, the DMVP of the expanding use diminishes to the point at which it equals the increasing DMVP

160
00:17:21.940 --> 00:17:32.140
The price of the factor will be set as equal to the general DMVP, which in the ERE will

161
00:17:32.140 --> 00:17:36.300
be uniform throughout all the particular uses.

162
00:17:36.300 --> 00:17:42.780
Thus, by looking at a factor in all of its interrelations, we have been able to explain

163
00:17:42.780 --> 00:17:51.140
the pricing of its unit service without previously assuming the existence of the price itself.

164
00:17:51.140 --> 00:17:57.240
To focus the analysis on the situation as it looks from the vantage point of the firm

165
00:17:57.240 --> 00:18:04.560
is to succumb to such an error, for the individual firm obviously finds a certain factor price

166
00:18:04.560 --> 00:18:06.520
given on the market.

167
00:18:06.520 --> 00:18:13.200
The price of a factor unit will be established by the market as equal to its marginal value

168
00:18:13.200 --> 00:18:19.720
product, discounted by the rate of interest for the length of time until the product is

169
00:18:19.720 --> 00:18:27.880
Produced, provided that this valuation of the share of the factor is isolable. It is isolable

170
00:18:27.880 --> 00:18:35.480
if the factor is non-specific or is a single residual specific factor in a process.

171
00:18:36.280 --> 00:18:44.040
The MVP in question is determined by the general MVP schedule covering the various uses of the

172
00:18:44.040 --> 00:18:49.120
of the Factor and the Supply of the Factor available in the economy.

173
00:18:49.120 --> 00:18:56.280
The general MVP schedule of a factor diminishes as the supply of the factor increases.

174
00:18:56.280 --> 00:19:02.560
It is made up of particular MVP schedules for the various uses of the factor, which

175
00:19:02.560 --> 00:19:10.120
in turn are compounded of diminishing marginal physical product schedules and declining product

176
00:19:10.120 --> 00:19:11.120
prices.

177
00:19:11.120 --> 00:19:31.120
Therefore, if the supply of the factor increases, the MVP schedule in the economy remaining the same, the MVP, and hence the price of the factor, will drop, and as the supply of the factor dwindles, setteris paribus, the price of the factor will rise.

178
00:19:31.120 --> 00:19:41.620
To the individual firm, the price of a factor established on the market is the signal of its discounted marginal value product elsewhere.

179
00:19:41.620 --> 00:19:54.120
This is the opportunity cost of the firms using the product, since it equals the value product that is foregone through failure to use the factor unit elsewhere.

180
00:19:54.120 --> 00:20:07.120
In the ERE, where all factor prices equal discounted marginal value products, it follows that factor prices and opportunity costs will be equal.

181
00:20:07.120 --> 00:20:19.120
Critics of the marginal productivity analysis have contended that in the modern complex world, all factors cooperate in producing a product,

182
00:20:19.120 --> 00:20:28.720
and therefore it is impossible to establish any sort of imputation of part of the product to various cooperating factors.

183
00:20:28.720 --> 00:20:40.520
Hence, they assert, distribution of product to factors is separable from production and takes place arbitrarily according to bargaining theory.

184
00:20:40.520 --> 00:20:46.620
To be sure, no one denies that many factors do cooperate in producing goods,

185
00:20:46.620 --> 00:20:52.860
But the fact that most factors, and all labor factors, are non-specific, and that there

186
00:20:52.860 --> 00:20:59.980
is very rarely more than one purely specific factor in a production process, enables the

187
00:20:59.980 --> 00:21:07.420
market to isolate value productivity and to tend to pay each factor in accordance with

188
00:21:07.420 --> 00:21:09.780
this marginal product.

189
00:21:09.780 --> 00:21:15.620
On the free market, therefore, the price of each factor is not determined by arbitrary

190
00:21:15.620 --> 00:21:22.620
is not just bargaining, but tends to be set strictly in accordance with its discounted marginal value product.

191
00:21:22.620 --> 00:21:31.620
The importance of this market process becomes greater as the economy becomes more specialized and complex,

192
00:21:31.620 --> 00:21:34.620
and the adjustments more delicate.

193
00:21:34.620 --> 00:21:40.620
The more uses develop for a factor, and the more types of factors arise,

194
00:21:40.620 --> 00:21:47.940
More important is this market imputation process as compared to simple bargaining.

195
00:21:47.940 --> 00:21:55.020
For it is this process that causes the effective allocation of factors and the flow of production

196
00:21:55.020 --> 00:22:01.220
in accordance with the most urgent demands of the consumers, including the non-monetary

197
00:22:01.220 --> 00:22:04.380
desires of the producers themselves.

198
00:22:04.380 --> 00:22:11.840
In the free market process, therefore, there is no separation between production and distribution.

199
00:22:11.840 --> 00:22:19.040
There is no heap somewhere on which products are arbitrarily thrown, and from which someone

200
00:22:19.040 --> 00:22:24.980
does or can arbitrarily distribute them among various people.

201
00:22:24.980 --> 00:22:31.940
On the contrary, individuals produce goods and sell them to consumers for money, which

202
00:22:31.940 --> 00:22:39.620
which they in turn spend on consumption or on investment in order to increase future consumption.

203
00:22:39.620 --> 00:22:48.180
There is no separate distribution, there is only production and its corollary, exchange.

204
00:22:48.180 --> 00:22:53.820
It should always be understood, even where it is not explicitly stated in the text for

205
00:22:53.820 --> 00:23:04.660
for Reasons of Exposition, that the MVP schedules used to set prices are discounted MVP schedules,

206
00:23:04.660 --> 00:23:11.660
discounting the final MVP by the length of time remaining until the final consumer's

207
00:23:11.660 --> 00:23:13.500
product is produced.

208
00:23:13.500 --> 00:23:20.340
It is the DMVPs that are equalized throughout the various uses of the factor.

209
00:23:20.340 --> 00:23:27.380
The importance of this fact is that it explains the market allocation of non-specific factors

210
00:23:27.380 --> 00:23:33.140
among various productive stages of the same or of different goods.

211
00:23:33.140 --> 00:23:41.260
Thus, if the DMVP of a factor is 6 gold ounces, and if the factor is employed on a process

212
00:23:41.260 --> 00:23:47.860
practically instantaneous with consumption, its MVP will be 6.

213
00:23:47.860 --> 00:23:54.500
Suppose that the pure rate of interest is 5%. If the factor is at work on a process that

214
00:23:54.500 --> 00:24:06.340
will mature in final consumption 5 years from now, a DMVP of 6 signifies an MVP of 7.5.

215
00:24:06.340 --> 00:24:15.800
If it is at work on a 10-year process, a DMVP of 6 signifies an MVP of 10, etc.

216
00:24:15.800 --> 00:24:23.160
The more remote the time of operation is from the time when the final product is completed,

217
00:24:23.160 --> 00:24:29.120
the greater must be the difference allowed for the annual interest income earned by the

218
00:24:29.120 --> 00:24:35.920
capitalists who advance present goods and thereby make possible the entire length of

219
00:24:35.920 --> 00:24:37.980
the production process.

220
00:24:37.980 --> 00:24:45.200
The amount of the discount from the MVP is greater here because the higher stage is more

221
00:24:45.200 --> 00:24:49.200
are more remote than the others from final consumption.

222
00:24:49.200 --> 00:24:54.200
Therefore, in order for investment to take place in the higher stages,

223
00:24:54.200 --> 00:25:01.200
their MVP has to be far higher than the MVP in the shorter processes.