WEBVTT

NOTE 8.03. Capital Values and Aggregate Profits in a Changing Economy

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.000
3. Capital Values and Aggregate Profits in a Changing Economy

2
00:00:07.860 --> 00:00:14.400
Net saving, as we have seen, increases gross investment in the economy. This increase in

3
00:00:14.400 --> 00:00:21.400
gross investment at first accrues as profits to the firms doing the increased business.

4
00:00:21.520 --> 00:00:27.400
These profits will accrue particularly in the higher stages, toward which old capital

5
00:00:27.400 --> 00:00:32.080
Capital is shifting and in which new capital is invested.

6
00:00:32.080 --> 00:00:39.560
An accrual of profits to a firm increases, by that amount, the capital value of its assets,

7
00:00:39.560 --> 00:00:43.800
just as the losses decrease the capital value.

8
00:00:43.800 --> 00:00:49.760
The first impact of the new investment, then, is to cause aggregate profits to appear in

9
00:00:49.760 --> 00:00:56.160
the economy, concentrated in the new production processes in the higher stages.

10
00:00:56.160 --> 00:01:02.760
As the transition to the new ERE begins to take place, however, these profits more and

11
00:01:02.760 --> 00:01:10.800
more become imputed to the factors for which these entrepreneurs must pay in production.

12
00:01:10.800 --> 00:01:17.020
Eventually, if no other interfering changes occur, the result will be a disappearance

13
00:01:17.020 --> 00:01:24.480
of profits in the economy, a settling into the new ERE, an increase in real wages and

14
00:01:24.480 --> 00:01:31.180
and Other Real Rents and an Increase in the Real Capital Value of Ground Land.

15
00:01:31.180 --> 00:01:36.720
This latter result, of course, is in perfect conformity with the previous conclusion that

16
00:01:36.720 --> 00:01:44.000
a progressing economy will lead to an increase in the real rents of ground land and a fall

17
00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:46.040
in the rate of interest.

18
00:01:46.040 --> 00:01:52.800
These two factors, in conjunction, both impel a rise in the real capital value of ground

19
00:01:52.800 --> 00:01:54.960
and Land.

20
00:01:54.960 --> 00:02:02.040
Future rises in the real values of rents can be either anticipated or not anticipated.

21
00:02:02.040 --> 00:02:08.560
To the extent they are anticipated, the rise in future rents is already accounted for and

22
00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:12.600
discounted in the capital value of the whole land.

23
00:02:12.600 --> 00:02:18.840
A rise in the far future may be anticipated but will have no appreciable effect on the

24
00:02:18.840 --> 00:02:25.240
in the present price of land, simply because time preference places a very distant date

25
00:02:25.240 --> 00:02:29.540
beyond the effective time horizon of the present.

26
00:02:29.540 --> 00:02:36.180
To the extent that rises in the real rate are not foreseen, then of course entrepreneurial

27
00:02:36.180 --> 00:02:42.600
errors have been made, and the market has undercapitalized in the present price.

28
00:02:42.600 --> 00:02:48.920
Throughout the whole history of landholding, therefore, income from basic land can be earned

29
00:02:48.920 --> 00:02:50.840
in only three ways.

30
00:02:50.840 --> 00:02:54.200
We are omitting, improving the land.

31
00:02:54.200 --> 00:02:55.200
1.

32
00:02:55.200 --> 00:03:00.600
Through entrepreneurial profit in correcting the forecasting errors of others.

33
00:03:00.600 --> 00:03:01.600
2.

34
00:03:01.600 --> 00:03:04.640
As interest return, or 3.

35
00:03:04.640 --> 00:03:11.480
By a rise in the capital value to the first finder and user of the land.

36
00:03:11.480 --> 00:03:15.720
The first type of income is obvious and not unique.

37
00:03:15.720 --> 00:03:19.020
It is pervasive in any field of enterprise.

38
00:03:19.020 --> 00:03:24.420
The second type of income is the general income earned by ground land.

39
00:03:24.420 --> 00:03:30.960
Because of the market phenomenon of capitalization, income from ground land is largely interest

40
00:03:30.960 --> 00:03:35.420
return on investment, just as in any other business.

41
00:03:35.420 --> 00:03:43.060
The only unique component of income that ground land confers, therefore, is three, accruing

42
00:03:43.060 --> 00:03:49.800
to the first user, whose land value began at zero and became positive.

43
00:03:49.800 --> 00:03:54.980
After that, the buyer of the land must pay its capitalized value.

44
00:03:54.980 --> 00:04:01.740
To earn rent on ground land, in other words, a man must either buy it or find it, and in

45
00:04:01.740 --> 00:04:06.820
In the former case he earns only interest and not pure rent.

46
00:04:06.820 --> 00:04:14.420
The capitalized value can increase from time to time and not be discounted in advance only

47
00:04:14.420 --> 00:04:21.100
if some new and unexpected development occurs, or if better knowledge of the future comes

48
00:04:21.100 --> 00:04:27.740
to light, in which case the previous owner has suffered an entrepreneurial loss in profit

49
00:04:27.740 --> 00:04:34.640
for Gone, for not having anticipated the new situation, and the current owner earns an

50
00:04:34.640 --> 00:04:37.160
entrepreneurial profit.

51
00:04:37.160 --> 00:04:43.720
The only unique aspect to ground land, then, is that it is found and first put on the market

52
00:04:43.720 --> 00:04:51.260
at some particular time, so that the first user earns pure rent as a result of his initial

53
00:04:51.260 --> 00:04:54.380
Capital Discovery and Use of the Land.

54
00:04:54.380 --> 00:05:00.780
All later increases in the capital value of the land are accounted for in the value either

55
00:05:00.780 --> 00:05:08.660
as entrepreneurial profits resulting from better forecasting or as interest return.

56
00:05:08.660 --> 00:05:15.180
The first user earns his gain only at first and not at whatever later date he actually

57
00:05:15.180 --> 00:05:17.180
The Theory of Money and Credit

58
00:05:45.180 --> 00:06:15.060
This is not the same as assuming an E.R.E., for in the E.R.E. there are no changes to

59
00:06:15.060 --> 00:06:16.700
to be foreseen.

60
00:06:16.700 --> 00:06:23.180
The first finder will reap the net gain immediately, and from then on, all that will be earned

61
00:06:23.180 --> 00:06:29.900
by him and by successive heirs or purchasers is the usual interest return.

62
00:06:29.900 --> 00:06:35.540
When future rises are too remote to enter into the capitalized price, this is simply

63
00:06:35.540 --> 00:06:41.980
a phenomenon of time preference, not a sign of some mysterious breakdown in the market's

64
00:06:41.980 --> 00:06:43.820
process of adjustment.

65
00:06:43.820 --> 00:06:50.820
The fact that complete discounting never takes place is due to the presence of uncertainty,

66
00:06:50.820 --> 00:06:57.140
and the result is a continual accretion of entrepreneurial gains through rising capital

67
00:06:57.140 --> 00:06:59.700
values of land.

68
00:06:59.700 --> 00:07:05.680
Thus we see, this time from the landowner's point of view, that aggregate gains in capital

69
00:07:05.680 --> 00:07:10.200
value are synonymous with aggregate profits.

70
00:07:10.200 --> 00:07:27.200
Profits begin with the higher order firms, then filter down until they increase real wages and the aggregate profits of landowners, particularly owners of land specific to the higher order stages of production.

71
00:07:27.200 --> 00:07:39.200
Land specific to the lower stages will, of course, bear the brunt of decreases in capital value, that is, losses in the progressing economy.

72
00:07:39.200 --> 00:07:49.200
As the only income to ground land that is not profit or interest, we are left with the original gains to the first finder of land.

73
00:07:49.200 --> 00:07:55.200
But here again there is capitalization and not a pure gain.

74
00:07:55.200 --> 00:08:02.200
Pioneering, finding new land, that is, new natural resources, is a business like any other.

75
00:08:02.200 --> 00:08:07.200
Investing in it takes capital, labor and entrepreneurial ability.

76
00:08:07.200 --> 00:08:31.200
The expected rents of finding and using are taken into account when the investments and expenses of exploration and shaping into use are made, therefore these gains are also capitalized backward in the original investment, and the tendency will be for them, too, to be the usual interest return on the investment.

77
00:08:31.200 --> 00:08:38.200
Deviations from this return will constitute entrepreneurial profits and losses.

78
00:08:38.200 --> 00:08:45.200
Therefore, we conclude that there is practically nothing unique about incomes from ground land,

79
00:08:45.200 --> 00:08:53.200
and that all net income in the productive system goes to wages, to interest and to profit.

80
00:08:53.200 --> 00:08:58.200
A progressive economy is marked by aggregate net profits.

81
00:08:58.200 --> 00:09:04.960
When there is a shift from one savings investment level to a higher one, therefore a progressing

82
00:09:04.960 --> 00:09:11.120
economy, aggregate profits are earned in the economy, particularly in the higher stages

83
00:09:11.120 --> 00:09:12.560
of production.

84
00:09:12.560 --> 00:09:18.880
The increased gross investment first increases the aggregate capital value of firms that

85
00:09:18.880 --> 00:09:20.880
earn net profits.

86
00:09:20.880 --> 00:09:26.360
As production and investment increase in the higher stages, and the effects of the new

87
00:09:26.360 --> 00:09:36.360
When new savings continue, the profits disappear and become imputed to increases in real wage rates and in real ground rents.

88
00:09:36.360 --> 00:09:45.360
The latter effect, added to a fall in the rate of interest, leads to a rise in the real capital values of ground land.

89
00:09:45.360 --> 00:09:55.360
What happens when there is a shift in the reverse direction, a changed proportion such that gross saving and investment decline

90
00:09:55.360 --> 00:09:57.920
consumption increases.

91
00:09:57.920 --> 00:10:03.020
For the most part, we may simply trace the earlier analysis in reverse.

92
00:10:03.020 --> 00:10:12.280
That is, consider the shift from a 338 to 80 situation to a 318 to 100 situation.

93
00:10:12.280 --> 00:10:19.600
During the transition to a new equilibrium, there would be a net dis-saving of 20 ounces,

94
00:10:19.600 --> 00:10:25.320
since gross saving decreases from 338 to 318.

95
00:10:25.320 --> 00:10:29.780
There would also be a net disinvestment of the same amount.

96
00:10:29.780 --> 00:10:36.000
The cause of such a shift would be an increase in the time preference schedules of the individuals

97
00:10:36.000 --> 00:10:37.640
on the market.

98
00:10:37.640 --> 00:10:43.420
This would increase the rate of interest and widen the interest spread between cumulative

99
00:10:43.420 --> 00:10:46.320
prices in the production stages.

100
00:10:46.320 --> 00:10:52.460
It would broaden the consumption base but leave less money available for saving and

101
00:10:52.460 --> 00:10:53.460
investment.

102
00:10:53.460 --> 00:11:02.460
will be higher prices for consumers' goods, and therefore a greater demand for factors in this and other lower stages.

103
00:11:02.460 --> 00:11:10.460
On the other hand, there would be general abandonment of the higher stages in the face of the monetary attractions of the later stages,

104
00:11:10.460 --> 00:11:17.460
the decline in investment funds, and the shift of these funds from the higher to the lower stages.

105
00:11:17.460 --> 00:11:28.460
Specific factors will bear the brunt of lowered incomes and sheer abandonment in the higher stages, and they will gain in the lower stages.

106
00:11:28.460 --> 00:11:38.460
There will be a rise in net income and consumption in monetary terms, and therefore a rise in aggregate factor income.

107
00:11:38.460 --> 00:11:44.460
The interest rate increases, while the gross investment base declines.

108
00:11:44.460 --> 00:11:58.460
In real terms, the important result is a lowering in the physical productivity of labor and of land because of the abandonment of the most productive processes of production, the lengthiest ones.

109
00:11:58.460 --> 00:12:11.460
The lower output at every stage, the lower supply of capital goods, and the consequent lower output of consumers' goods leads to a lowering in the standard of living.

110
00:12:11.460 --> 00:12:18.100
Money wage rates and money rents may rise, although this possibly might not occur because

111
00:12:18.100 --> 00:12:24.140
of the higher interest rate, but the prices of consumers' goods will rise further because

112
00:12:24.140 --> 00:12:28.080
of the reduced physical supply of goods.

113
00:12:28.080 --> 00:12:34.540
The rise in general money prices in monetary terms is accounted for by the decreased demand

114
00:12:34.540 --> 00:12:41.220
for money as a result of the lower number of stages for the monetary unit to turn over

115
00:12:41.220 --> 00:12:50.180
The case of decreasing gross capital investment is defined as a retrogressing economy.

116
00:12:50.180 --> 00:12:55.800
The definitions of the progressing and the retrogressing economy differ from those of

117
00:12:55.800 --> 00:12:58.060
Mises in human action.

118
00:12:58.060 --> 00:13:05.000
They are defined here as an increase or a decrease in capital in society, while Mises

119
00:13:05.000 --> 00:13:12.560
Mises defines them as an increase or a decrease in total capital per person in the society.

120
00:13:12.560 --> 00:13:18.680
The present definitions focus on the analysis of saving and investment, population growth

121
00:13:18.680 --> 00:13:23.420
or decline being a very different phase of the subject.

122
00:13:23.420 --> 00:13:29.840
When we are making an historical welfare assessment of the conditions of the economy, however,

123
00:13:29.840 --> 00:13:34.900
the question of production per capita becomes important.

124
00:13:34.900 --> 00:13:41.780
The decreased investment is first revealed as aggregate losses in the economy, particularly

125
00:13:41.780 --> 00:13:49.300
losses to firms in the highest stages of production, the firms which are now losing customers.

126
00:13:49.300 --> 00:13:56.280
As time proceeds, these losses will tend to disappear as firms leave the industry and

127
00:13:56.280 --> 00:14:00.480
abandon the now unprofitable production processes.

128
00:14:00.480 --> 00:14:16.480
The losses will thereby be imputed to factors in the form of lower real wage rates and lower real rents, which, combined with a higher interest rate, cause lower real capital values of ground land.

129
00:14:16.480 --> 00:14:22.480
Particularly hard hit will be the factors specific to these lines of production.

130
00:14:22.480 --> 00:14:34.480
The reason why there are aggregate profits in the progressing economy and aggregate losses in the retrogressing economy may be demonstrated in the following way.

131
00:14:34.480 --> 00:14:43.480
For profits to appear there must be under-capitalization or over-discounting of productive factors on the market.

132
00:14:43.480 --> 00:14:51.480
For losses to appear there must be over-capitalization or under-discounting of factors on the market.

133
00:14:51.480 --> 00:14:52.480
Market.

134
00:14:52.480 --> 00:14:59.440
But if the economy is stationary, that is, if from one period to another the total gross

135
00:14:59.440 --> 00:15:06.120
investment remains constant, the total value of capital remains constant.

136
00:15:06.120 --> 00:15:12.320
There might be an increase of investment in one line of production, but this is made possible

137
00:15:12.320 --> 00:15:15.720
only by a decrease elsewhere.

138
00:15:15.720 --> 00:15:24.240
capital values remain constant, and therefore any profits, the result of mistaken undercapitalization,

139
00:15:24.240 --> 00:15:30.960
must be offset by equal losses, the result of mistaken overcapitalization.

140
00:15:30.960 --> 00:15:36.520
In the progressing economy, on the other hand, there are additional investment funds made

141
00:15:36.520 --> 00:15:43.480
available through new savings, and this provides a source for new revenue not yet capitalized

142
00:15:43.480 --> 00:15:45.500
anywhere in the system.

143
00:15:45.500 --> 00:15:51.020
These constitute the aggregate net profits during this period of change.

144
00:15:51.020 --> 00:15:57.420
In the retrogressing economy, investment funds are lowered, and this leaves net areas of

145
00:15:57.420 --> 00:16:01.580
overcapitalization of factors in the economy.

146
00:16:01.580 --> 00:16:06.980
Their owners suffer aggregate net losses during this period of change.

147
00:16:06.980 --> 00:16:12.700
It is possible that the changes in investment were anticipated in the market, to the extent

148
00:16:12.700 --> 00:16:27.700
The fact that an increase or a decrease was anticipated, the aggregate profits or losses will accrue in the form of a gain in capital value before the actual change in investment takes place.

149
00:16:27.700 --> 00:16:35.700
Losses arise during retrogression because previously employed processes have to be abandoned.

150
00:16:35.700 --> 00:16:46.700
The fact that the highest stages, already begun, have to be abandoned, is an indication that the shift was not fully anticipated by the producers.

151
00:16:46.700 --> 00:17:00.700
Thus, another conclusion of our analysis is that aggregate profits will equal aggregate losses in a stationary economy, that is, profits and losses will equal zero.

152
00:17:00.700 --> 00:17:10.700
This stationary economy is not the same construct as the evenly rotating economy that has played such a large role in our analysis.

153
00:17:10.700 --> 00:17:20.700
In the stationary economy, uncertainty does not disappear and no unending constant round pervades all elements in the system.

154
00:17:20.700 --> 00:17:26.700
There is in fact only one constancy, total capital invested.

155
00:17:26.700 --> 00:17:33.620
Clearly, the stationary economy, like all other economies, tends to evolve into the

156
00:17:33.620 --> 00:17:41.960
ERE given constant data. After a time, market forces will tend to eliminate all individual

157
00:17:41.960 --> 00:17:48.540
profits and losses, as well as aggregate profits and losses.

158
00:17:48.540 --> 00:17:55.260
We might pause here to consider briefly the old problem, our capital gains, increases

159
00:17:55.260 --> 00:17:58.440
in Capital Value, Income.

160
00:17:58.440 --> 00:18:06.540
If we fully realize that profits and capital gains and losses and capital losses are identical,

161
00:18:06.540 --> 00:18:08.680
the solution becomes clear.

162
00:18:08.680 --> 00:18:13.160
No one would exclude business profits from money income.

163
00:18:13.160 --> 00:18:16.300
The same should be true of capital gains.

164
00:18:16.300 --> 00:18:23.480
In the ERE, of course, there are neither capital gains nor capital losses.

165
00:18:23.480 --> 00:18:30.960
Let us now return to the case of the retrogressing economy and a decrease in capital investment.

166
00:18:30.960 --> 00:18:37.120
The greater the shift from saving to consumption, the more drastic will the effects tend to

167
00:18:37.120 --> 00:18:42.620
be, and the greater the lowering of productivity and living standards.

168
00:18:42.620 --> 00:18:49.640
The fact that such shifts can and do happen serves to refute easily the fashionable assumption

169
00:18:49.640 --> 00:18:56.840
that our capital structure is, by some magical provision or hidden hand, permanently and

170
00:18:56.840 --> 00:19:01.140
eternally self-reproducing once it is built.

171
00:19:01.140 --> 00:19:07.640
No positive acts of saving by capitalists are deemed necessary to maintain it.

172
00:19:07.640 --> 00:19:13.960
The ruins of Rome are mute illustrations of the error of this assumption.

173
00:19:13.960 --> 00:19:21.160
Fail to maintain the value of capital, that is, the process of net dis-saving, is known

174
00:19:21.160 --> 00:19:24.200
as consuming capital.

175
00:19:24.200 --> 00:19:30.760
Granting the impossibility of measuring the value of capital in society with any precision,

176
00:19:30.760 --> 00:19:34.400
this is still a highly important concept.

177
00:19:34.400 --> 00:19:41.040
Consuming capital means, of course, not eating machines as some critics have scoffingly referred

178
00:19:41.040 --> 00:19:48.480
to it, but failing to maintain existing gross investment and the existing capital goods

179
00:19:48.480 --> 00:19:55.020
structure, using some of these funds instead for consumption expenditure.

180
00:19:55.020 --> 00:20:01.840
It is often assumed that only depreciation funds for durable capital goods are available

181
00:20:01.840 --> 00:20:09.200
for capital consumption, but this overlooks a very large part of capital, so-called circulation

182
00:20:09.200 --> 00:20:16.320
and Capital, the less durable capital goods which pass quickly from one stage to another.

183
00:20:16.320 --> 00:20:22.840
As each stage receives funds from its sale of these or other goods, it is not necessary

184
00:20:22.840 --> 00:20:28.280
for the producer to continue to repurchase circulation capital.

185
00:20:28.280 --> 00:20:33.960
These funds, too, may be immediately spent on consumption.

186
00:20:33.960 --> 00:20:39.400
Professor Frank H. Knight has been the leader of the school of thought that assumes capital

187
00:20:39.400 --> 00:20:42.160
to be automatically permanent.

188
00:20:42.160 --> 00:20:49.480
Knight has contributed a great deal to economics in his analysis of profit theory and entrepreneurship,

189
00:20:49.480 --> 00:20:55.880
but his theories of capital and interest have misled a generation of American economists.

190
00:20:55.880 --> 00:21:01.160
Knight succinctly summed up his doctrine in an attack on the Austrian investment theory

191
00:21:01.160 --> 00:21:07.760
History of Boehm-Bawerk and Hayek, Knight said that the latter involved two fallacies.

192
00:21:07.760 --> 00:21:14.120
One is that Boehm-Bawerk viewed production as the production of concrete goods, whereas

193
00:21:14.120 --> 00:21:19.200
in reality what is produced and consumed is services.

194
00:21:19.200 --> 00:21:21.840
There is no real problem here, however.

195
00:21:21.840 --> 00:21:28.760
It is not to be denied, in fact it has been stressed herein, that goods are valued for

196
00:21:28.760 --> 00:21:35.180
for their services, yet it is also undeniable that the concrete capital goods structure

197
00:21:35.180 --> 00:21:40.300
must be produced before its services can be obtained.

198
00:21:40.300 --> 00:21:47.300
The second alleged correction, and here we come directly to the problem of capital consumption,

199
00:21:47.300 --> 00:21:54.760
is that the production of any service includes the maintenance of things used in the process,

200
00:21:54.760 --> 00:22:01.860
And this includes reproduction of any which are used up, really a detail of maintenance.

201
00:22:01.860 --> 00:22:04.960
This is obviously incorrect.

202
00:22:04.960 --> 00:22:10.800
Services are yielded by things, at least in the cases relevant to our discussion, and

203
00:22:10.800 --> 00:22:16.480
they are produced through the using up of things, of capital goods.

204
00:22:16.480 --> 00:22:22.960
And this production does not necessarily include maintenance and reproduction.

205
00:22:22.960 --> 00:22:29.580
This alleged detail is a completely separate area of choice and involves the building up

206
00:22:29.580 --> 00:22:35.480
of more capital at a later date to replace the used up capital.

207
00:22:35.480 --> 00:22:41.680
The case of the retrogressing economy is our first example of what we may call a crisis

208
00:22:41.680 --> 00:22:42.680
situation.

209
00:22:42.680 --> 00:22:49.680
A crisis situation is one in which firms in the aggregate are suffering losses.

210
00:22:49.680 --> 00:22:56.200
The crisis aspect of the case is aggravated by a decline in production through the abandonment

211
00:22:56.200 --> 00:22:58.960
of the highest production stages.

212
00:22:58.960 --> 00:23:07.400
The troubles arose from under-saving and under-investment, that is, a shift in people's values so that

213
00:23:07.400 --> 00:23:14.640
they do not now choose to save and invest enough to enable continuation of production

214
00:23:14.640 --> 00:23:17.640
processes begun in the past.

215
00:23:17.640 --> 00:23:23.920
We cannot simply be critical of this shift, however, since the people, given existing

216
00:23:23.920 --> 00:23:29.680
conditions, have decided voluntarily that their time preferences are higher, and that

217
00:23:29.680 --> 00:23:36.800
they wish to consume more proportionately at present, even at the cost of lowering future

218
00:23:36.800 --> 00:23:38.800
productivity.

219
00:23:38.800 --> 00:23:45.200
Once an increase to a greater level of gross investment occurs, therefore, it is not maintained

220
00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:47.240
automatically.

221
00:23:47.240 --> 00:23:53.240
Those have to maintain the gross investment and this will be done only if their time preferences

222
00:23:53.240 --> 00:24:00.000
remain at the lower rates and they continue to be willing to save a greater proportion

223
00:24:00.000 --> 00:24:02.720
of gross monetary income.

224
00:24:02.720 --> 00:24:08.640
We have demonstrated further that this maintenance and further progress can take place without

225
00:24:08.640 --> 00:24:15.080
any increase in the money supply or other change in the money relation.

226
00:24:15.080 --> 00:24:21.320
This can occur, in fact, with falling prices of all products and factors.
