WEBVTT

NOTE 8.08. The Entrepreneurial Component in the Market Interest Rate

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
8. The Entrepreneurial Component in the Market Interest Rate

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:13.000
In the ERE, as we have seen, the interest rate throughout the economy will be uniform.

3
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:19.000
In the real world, there is an additional entrepreneurial or risk component,

4
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:24.000
which adds to the interest rate in particularly risky ventures,

5
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:27.000
and in accordance with the degree of risk.

6
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:34.620
Risk. Since risk has an actuarially certain connotation, we may better call it degree

7
00:00:34.620 --> 00:00:41.760
of uncertainty. Thus, suppose that the basic social time preference rate, or pure rate

8
00:00:41.760 --> 00:00:50.240
of interest in the economy, is 5%. Capitalists will buy 100 ounces of future goods to sell

9
00:00:50.240 --> 00:00:57.240
A 5% return is a pure return. That is, it is the return assuming that the 105 ounces will definitely be accruing.

10
00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:15.640
The pure rate, in other words, abstracts from any entrepreneurial uncertainty. It gauges

11
00:01:15.640 --> 00:01:21.360
is the premium of present over future goods on the assumption that the future goods are

12
00:01:21.360 --> 00:01:25.540
known as certain to be forthcoming.

13
00:01:25.540 --> 00:01:32.400
In the real world, of course, nothing is absolutely certain, and therefore the pure rate of interest,

14
00:01:32.400 --> 00:01:36.840
the result of time preference, can never appear alone.

15
00:01:36.840 --> 00:01:43.880
Now suppose that in one particular venture or industry it is fairly certain that 105

16
00:01:43.880 --> 00:02:01.880
will be earned from the sale of a product one year in the future, then with a social time preference rate of 5%, the capitalist entrepreneurs will be willing to pay 100 ounces for factors and reap a 5% return.

17
00:02:01.880 --> 00:02:08.880
But suppose that there is another possible venture considered very risky by entrepreneurs.

18
00:02:08.880 --> 00:02:17.880
The product is expected to sell for 105 ounces, but there are definite possibilities that the price of the product might plummet.

19
00:02:17.880 --> 00:02:24.880
In that case, the entrepreneurs will not be willing to pay 100 ounces for factors.

20
00:02:24.880 --> 00:02:28.880
They would have to be compensated for the extra risks that they run.

21
00:02:28.880 --> 00:02:35.680
run. The price of the factors might finally be 90 ounces. Thus, the riskier a given venture

22
00:02:35.680 --> 00:02:43.360
appears ex ante, the higher will be the expected interest return that capitalists will require

23
00:02:43.360 --> 00:02:49.960
before they make the investment. On the market, then, a whole structure of interest rates

24
00:02:49.960 --> 00:02:56.800
will be superimposed on the pure rate, varying positively in accordance with the expected

25
00:02:56.800 --> 00:02:59.160
risks of each venture.

26
00:02:59.160 --> 00:03:04.320
The counterpart of this structure will be a similar variety of interest rates on the

27
00:03:04.320 --> 00:03:09.960
loan market, which as usual is derivative from the goods market.

28
00:03:09.960 --> 00:03:16.280
The loan market will diverge from the natural market to the extent that conditions for repayment

29
00:03:16.280 --> 00:03:20.640
of loans, etc. establish such differences.

30
00:03:20.640 --> 00:03:26.500
The two would be the same if the loans were clearly recognized as entrepreneurial, so

31
00:03:26.500 --> 00:03:32.060
So that in cases where there was no deliberate fraud, the borrower would not be considered

32
00:03:32.060 --> 00:03:35.260
criminal if he did not repay the loan.

33
00:03:35.260 --> 00:03:42.500
However, if, as discussed in Chapter 2, there are no bankruptcy laws, and defaulting borrowers

34
00:03:42.500 --> 00:03:49.460
are considered criminal, then obviously the safety of all loans would increase in relation

35
00:03:49.460 --> 00:03:56.000
to natural investments, and the interest rates on loans would decline accordingly.

36
00:03:56.000 --> 00:04:01.000
In the free society, however, there would be nothing to prevent borrowers and lenders

37
00:04:01.000 --> 00:04:07.960
from agreeing, at the time the contract is made, that borrowers would not be held criminally

38
00:04:07.960 --> 00:04:14.120
responsible, and that the loan would really be an entrepreneurial one, or they could make

39
00:04:14.120 --> 00:04:19.740
any sort of arrangement in dividing gains or losses that they might choose.

40
00:04:19.740 --> 00:04:25.660
In the long run, of course, the tendency, given no changes of data, will be for people

41
00:04:25.660 --> 00:04:33.660
It is possible to realize that such and such a venture is pretty consistently yielding a higher than 5% return.

42
00:04:33.660 --> 00:04:37.660
The risk component for this venture will then fall.

43
00:04:37.660 --> 00:04:45.660
Other entrepreneurs will enter this type of venture, and the interest rate will tend to fall back to 5% again.

44
00:04:45.660 --> 00:04:54.660
Thus, the varying risk structure of interest does not invalidate the tendency toward uniformity of the interest rate.

45
00:04:54.660 --> 00:05:01.660
And the contrary, any variety is something of an index of the various risks of uncertainty

46
00:05:01.660 --> 00:05:08.220
which still remain in the market, and which would be eliminated if data were frozen and

47
00:05:08.220 --> 00:05:11.020
an ERE were reached.

48
00:05:11.020 --> 00:05:17.700
If data did remain constant, then the uniformity of the ERE would ensue.

49
00:05:17.700 --> 00:05:24.200
It is because data are always changing, and thus setting up new uncertainties in place

50
00:05:24.200 --> 00:05:41.440
Entrepreneurship deals with the inevitable uncertainty of the future.

51
00:05:41.440 --> 00:05:47.600
Some forms of uncertainty, however, can be converted into actuarial risk.

52
00:05:47.600 --> 00:05:54.160
The distinction between risk and uncertainty has been developed by Professor Knight.

53
00:05:54.160 --> 00:06:07.160
A risk occurs when an event is a member of a class of a large number of homogeneous events and there is fairly certain knowledge of the frequency of occurrence of this class of events.

54
00:06:07.160 --> 00:06:20.160
Thus, a firm may produce bolts and know from long experience that a certain almost fixed proportion of these bolts will be defective, say 1%.

55
00:06:20.160 --> 00:06:26.280
It will not know whether any given bolt will be defective, but it will know the proportion

56
00:06:26.280 --> 00:06:29.280
of the total number defective.

57
00:06:29.280 --> 00:06:35.600
This knowledge can convert the percentage of defects into a definite cost of the firm's

58
00:06:35.600 --> 00:06:40.960
operations, especially where enough cases occur within a firm.

59
00:06:40.960 --> 00:06:47.580
In other situations, a given loss or hazard may be large and infrequent in relation to

60
00:06:47.580 --> 00:06:53.980
to a firm's operations, such as the risk of fire, but over a large number of firms it

61
00:06:53.980 --> 00:06:59.260
could be considered as a measurable or actuarial risk.

62
00:06:59.260 --> 00:07:06.220
In such situations the firms themselves could pool their risks, or a specialized firm, an

63
00:07:06.220 --> 00:07:10.980
insurance company, could organize the pooling for them.

64
00:07:10.980 --> 00:07:17.180
The principle of insurance is that firms or individuals are subject to risks which, in

65
00:07:17.180 --> 00:07:21.420
In the aggregate, form a class of homogeneous cases.

66
00:07:21.420 --> 00:07:28.540
Thus, out of a class of a thousand firms, no one firm has any idea whether it will suffer

67
00:07:28.540 --> 00:07:31.340
a fire next year or not.

68
00:07:31.340 --> 00:07:35.340
But it is fairly well known that ten of them will.

69
00:07:35.340 --> 00:07:41.860
In that case, it may be advantageous for each of the firms to take out insurance, to pool

70
00:07:41.860 --> 00:07:44.180
their risks of loss.

71
00:07:44.180 --> 00:07:50.220
Each firm will pay a certain premium which will go into a pool to compensate those firms

72
00:07:50.220 --> 00:07:53.140
which suffer the fires.

73
00:07:53.140 --> 00:07:58.980
As a result of competition, the firm organizing the insurance service will tend to obtain

74
00:07:58.980 --> 00:08:05.700
the usual interest income on its investment, no more and no less.

75
00:08:05.700 --> 00:08:11.380
The contrast between risk and uncertainty has been brilliantly analyzed by Ludwig von

76
00:08:11.380 --> 00:08:12.380
Mises.

77
00:08:12.380 --> 00:08:21.880
Mises has shown that they can be subsumed under the more general categories of class probability and case probability.

78
00:08:21.880 --> 00:08:27.880
Class probability is the only scientific use of the term probability,

79
00:08:27.880 --> 00:08:33.380
and is the only form of probability subject to numerical expression.

80
00:08:33.380 --> 00:08:42.280
In the tangled literature on probability, no one has defined class probability as cogently as Ludwig von Mises.

81
00:08:42.280 --> 00:08:49.780
Class probability means, we know or assume to know, with regard to the problem concerned,

82
00:08:49.780 --> 00:08:55.480
everything about the behavior of a whole class of events or phenomena.

83
00:08:55.480 --> 00:09:04.980
But about the actual singular events or phenomena, we know nothing but that they are elements of this class.

84
00:09:04.980 --> 00:09:09.680
Insurable risk is an example of class probability.

85
00:09:09.680 --> 00:09:16.080
The businessman knew how many bolts would be defective out of a total number of bolts,

86
00:09:16.080 --> 00:09:21.440
but had no knowledge as to which particular bolts would be defective.

87
00:09:21.440 --> 00:09:28.880
In life insurance, the mortality tables reveal the proportion of mortality of each age group in the

88
00:09:28.880 --> 00:09:35.520
population, but they tell nothing about the particular life expectancy of any given individual.

89
00:09:35.520 --> 00:10:01.520
Insurance firms have their problems. As soon as something specific is known about individual cases, firms break down the cases into sub-aggregates in an effort to maintain homogeneity of classes, that is, the similarity, as far as is known, of all individual members in the class with respect to the attribute in question.

90
00:10:01.520 --> 00:10:08.600
Thus, certain subgroups within one age group may have a higher mortality rate because of

91
00:10:08.600 --> 00:10:10.480
their occupation.

92
00:10:10.480 --> 00:10:15.820
These will be segregated, and different premiums applied to the two cases.

93
00:10:15.820 --> 00:10:21.320
If there were knowledge about differences between subgroups and insurance firms charged

94
00:10:21.320 --> 00:10:28.120
the same premium rate to all, then this would mean that the healthy or less risky groups

95
00:10:28.120 --> 00:10:31.160
would be subsidizing the riskier.

96
00:10:31.160 --> 00:10:37.340
Unless they specifically desire to grant such subsidies, this result will never be maintained

97
00:10:37.340 --> 00:10:39.840
in the competitive free market.

98
00:10:39.840 --> 00:10:46.000
In the free market, each homogeneous group will tend to pay premium rates in proportion

99
00:10:46.000 --> 00:10:54.040
to its actuarial risk, plus a sum for interest income and for necessary costs for the insurance

100
00:10:54.040 --> 00:10:55.960
firms.

101
00:10:55.960 --> 00:11:02.680
Most uncertainties are uninsurable, because they are unique, single cases, and not members

102
00:11:02.680 --> 00:11:04.020
of a class.

103
00:11:04.020 --> 00:11:08.760
They are unique cases facing each individual or business.

104
00:11:08.760 --> 00:11:15.320
They may bear resemblances to other cases, but are not homogeneous with them.

105
00:11:15.320 --> 00:11:20.920
Individuals or entrepreneurs know something about the outcome of the particular case,

106
00:11:20.920 --> 00:11:22.540
but not everything.

107
00:11:22.540 --> 00:11:29.700
As Mises defines it, case probability means we know with regard to a particular event

108
00:11:29.700 --> 00:11:35.980
some of the factors which determine its outcome, but there are other determining factors about

109
00:11:35.980 --> 00:11:38.540
which we know nothing.

110
00:11:38.540 --> 00:11:45.720
Estimates of future costs, demands, etc. on the part of entrepreneurs are all unique cases

111
00:11:45.720 --> 00:11:51.880
Methods of Uncertainty, where methods of specific understanding and individual judgment

112
00:11:51.880 --> 00:12:00.620
of the situation must apply, rather than objectively measurable or insurable risk.

113
00:12:00.620 --> 00:12:08.220
It is not accurate to apply terms like gambling or betting to situations either of risk or

114
00:12:08.220 --> 00:12:10.060
of uncertainty.

115
00:12:10.060 --> 00:12:17.000
These terms have unfavorable emotional implications, and for this reason, they refer to situations

116
00:12:17.000 --> 00:12:26.480
where new risks or uncertainties are created for the enjoyment of the uncertainties themselves.

117
00:12:26.480 --> 00:12:32.200
Gambling on the throw of the dice and betting on horse races are examples of the deliberate

118
00:12:32.200 --> 00:12:40.040
creation by the better or gambler of new uncertainties which otherwise would not have existed.

119
00:12:40.040 --> 00:12:44.160
There is a distinction between gambling and betting.

120
00:12:44.160 --> 00:12:50.720
Gambling refers to wagering on events of class probability, such as throws of dice, where

121
00:12:50.720 --> 00:12:54.480
there is no knowledge of the unique event.

122
00:12:54.480 --> 00:13:02.480
Betting refers to wagering on a unique event about which both parties to the bet know something,

123
00:13:02.480 --> 00:13:06.000
such as a horse race or a presidential election.

124
00:13:06.000 --> 00:13:13.020
In either case, however, the wagerer is creating a new risk or uncertainty.

125
00:13:13.020 --> 00:13:18.780
The entrepreneur, on the other hand, is not creating uncertainties for the fun of it.

126
00:13:18.780 --> 00:13:23.200
On the contrary, he tries to reduce them as much as possible.

127
00:13:23.200 --> 00:13:28.560
The uncertainties he confronts are already inherent in the market situation.

128
00:13:28.560 --> 00:13:35.360
Indeed, in the nature of human action, someone must deal with them, and he is the most skilled

129
00:13:35.360 --> 00:14:02.880
Profit and Loss are the results of entrepreneurial uncertainty, actuarial risk is converted into

130
00:14:02.880 --> 00:14:10.600
to a cost of business operation, and is not responsible for profits or losses except insofar

131
00:14:10.600 --> 00:14:14.160
as the actuarial estimates are erroneous.
