WEBVTT

NOTE 9.05. A Note on the Fallacy of “Distribution”

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.240
5. A Note on the Fallacy of Distribution

2
00:00:06.240 --> 00:00:13.480
Ever since the days of early classical economics, many writers have discussed distribution theory,

3
00:00:13.480 --> 00:00:19.840
as if it were completely separate and isolated from production theory. Yet we have seen that

4
00:00:19.840 --> 00:00:27.680
distribution theory is simply production theory. The receivers of income earn wages, rent,

5
00:00:27.680 --> 00:00:46.680
The theory of the market determines the prices and incomes accruing to productive factors, thereby also determining the functional distribution of the factors.

6
00:00:46.680 --> 00:01:00.680
Personal distribution, how much money each person receives from the productive system, is determined in turn by the functions that he or his property performs in that system.

7
00:01:00.680 --> 00:01:14.680
There is no separation between production and distribution, and it is completely erroneous for writers to treat the productive system as if producers dump their product onto some stockpile

8
00:01:14.680 --> 00:01:31.120
Many people criticize the free market as follows.

9
00:01:31.120 --> 00:01:37.560
Yes, we agree that production and prices will be allocated on the free market in a way best

10
00:01:37.560 --> 00:01:43.980
fitted to serve the needs of the consumers, but this law is necessarily based on a given

11
00:01:43.980 --> 00:01:48.980
One initial distribution of income among the consumers.

12
00:01:48.980 --> 00:01:54.220
Some consumers begin with only a little money, others with a great deal.

13
00:01:54.220 --> 00:02:00.920
The market system of production can be commended only if the original distribution of income

14
00:02:00.920 --> 00:02:03.680
meets with our approval.

15
00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:10.540
This initial distribution of income, or rather of money assets, did not originate in thin

16
00:02:10.540 --> 00:02:12.460
air however.

17
00:02:12.460 --> 00:02:19.420
It too was the necessary consequence of a market allocation of prices and production.

18
00:02:19.420 --> 00:02:24.380
It was the consequence of serving the needs of previous consumers.

19
00:02:24.380 --> 00:02:31.320
It was not an arbitrarily given distribution, but one that itself emerged from satisfying

20
00:02:31.320 --> 00:02:33.320
consumer needs.

21
00:02:33.320 --> 00:02:38.980
It too was inextricably bound up with production.

22
00:02:38.980 --> 00:02:45.220
As we saw in Chapter 2, a person's presently owned property could have been ultimately

23
00:02:45.220 --> 00:02:49.420
obtained in only one of the following ways.

24
00:02:49.420 --> 00:02:56.620
Through personal production, voluntary exchange for a personal product, the finding and first

25
00:02:56.620 --> 00:03:02.700
using of unappropriated land, or theft from a producer.

26
00:03:02.700 --> 00:03:09.300
On a free market, only the first three can obtain, so that any distribution served by

27
00:03:09.300 --> 00:03:16.100
producers was in itself the result of free production and exchange.

28
00:03:16.100 --> 00:03:21.960
Suppose however that at some preceding time the bulk of the wealthy consumers had acquired

29
00:03:21.960 --> 00:03:28.620
their property through theft and not through serving other consumers on the free market.

30
00:03:28.620 --> 00:03:34.960
Does this not instill a built-in bias into the market economy, since future producers

31
00:03:34.960 --> 00:03:40.600
must satisfy demands ensuing from unjust incomes?

32
00:03:40.600 --> 00:03:46.760
The answer is that after the initial period, the effect of unjust incomes becomes less

33
00:03:46.760 --> 00:03:48.940
and less important.

34
00:03:48.940 --> 00:03:54.940
For in order to keep and increase their ill-gotten gains, the former robbers, now that a free

35
00:03:54.940 --> 00:04:01.920
Every economy is established have to invest and recoup their funds so as to serve consumers

36
00:04:01.920 --> 00:04:03.220
correctly.

37
00:04:03.220 --> 00:04:09.100
If they are not fit for this task and their exploits in predation have certainly not trained

38
00:04:09.100 --> 00:04:15.340
them for it, then entrepreneurial losses will diminish their assets and shift them to more

39
00:04:15.340 --> 00:04:17.340
for Able Producers
