WEBVTT

NOTE Appendix: Professor Rolph and the Discounted Marginal Productivity Theory

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.000
Appendix, Professor Rolfe and the Discounted Marginal Productivity Theory

2
00:00:07.000 --> 00:00:18.000
Of current schools of economic thought, the most fashionable have been the econometric, the Keynesian, the institutionalist and the neoclassic.

3
00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:25.000
The neoclassic refers to the pattern set by the major economists of the late 19th century.

4
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:31.480
The dominant neo-classical strain at present is to be found in the system of Professor Frank Knight,

5
00:00:31.480 --> 00:00:37.720
of which the most characteristic feature is an attack on the whole concept of time preference.

6
00:00:38.360 --> 00:00:45.880
Denying time preference and basing interest return solely on an alleged productivity of capital,

7
00:00:45.880 --> 00:00:56.400
The Niteans attack the doctrine of the discounted MVP and instead advocate a pure MVP theory.

8
00:00:56.400 --> 00:01:01.160
The clearest exposition of this approach is to be found in an article by a follower of

9
00:01:01.160 --> 00:01:04.640
Nites, Professor Earl Rolfe.

10
00:01:04.640 --> 00:01:11.640
Rolfe defines product as any immediate results of present valuable activities.

11
00:01:11.640 --> 00:01:16.720
These include work on goods that will be consumed only in the future.

12
00:01:16.720 --> 00:01:22.600
Thus, workmen and equipment beginning the construction of a building may have only a

13
00:01:22.600 --> 00:01:28.180
few stakes in the ground to show for their work the first day, but this, and not the

14
00:01:28.180 --> 00:01:32.460
completed structure, is their immediate product.

15
00:01:32.460 --> 00:01:38.600
Thus the doctrine that a factor receives the value of its marginal product refers to this

16
00:01:38.600 --> 00:01:40.560
immediate product.

17
00:01:40.560 --> 00:01:47.340
The simultaneity of production and product does not require any simplifying assumptions.

18
00:01:47.340 --> 00:01:50.740
It is a direct appeal to the obvious.

19
00:01:50.740 --> 00:01:55.980
Every activity has its immediate results.

20
00:01:55.980 --> 00:02:02.260
Obviously no one denies that people work on goods and move capital a little further along.

21
00:02:02.260 --> 00:02:07.980
But is the immediate result of this a product in any meaningful sense?

22
00:02:07.980 --> 00:02:14.960
It should be clear that the product is the end product, the goods sold to the consumer.

23
00:02:14.960 --> 00:02:20.220
The whole purpose of the production system is to lead to final consumption.

24
00:02:20.220 --> 00:02:26.860
All the intermediate purchases are based on the expectation of final purchase by the consumer

25
00:02:26.860 --> 00:02:30.020
and would not take place otherwise.

26
00:02:30.020 --> 00:02:35.860
Every activity may have its immediate results, but they are not results that would command

27
00:02:35.860 --> 00:02:41.900
and any monetary income from anyone if the owners of the factors themselves were joint

28
00:02:41.900 --> 00:02:47.160
owners of all they produced until the final consumption stage.

29
00:02:47.160 --> 00:02:53.300
In that case it would be obvious that they do not get paid immediately, hence their product

30
00:02:53.300 --> 00:02:55.100
is not immediate.

31
00:02:55.100 --> 00:03:02.180
The only reason that they are paid immediately, and even here there is not strict immediacy

32
00:03:02.180 --> 00:03:10.420
on the Market is that capitalists advance present goods in exchange for those future goods for

33
00:03:10.420 --> 00:03:18.020
which they expect a premium or interest return. Thus the owners of the factors are paid the

34
00:03:18.020 --> 00:03:26.180
discounted value of their marginal product. The Knight-Rolfe approach in addition is a retreat

35
00:03:26.180 --> 00:03:33.780
to a Real Cost Theory of Value, it assumes that present efforts will somehow always bring

36
00:03:33.780 --> 00:03:42.820
present results. But when? In present valuable activities. But how do these activities become

37
00:03:42.820 --> 00:03:49.620
valuable? Only if their future product is sold as expected to consumers.

38
00:03:49.620 --> 00:04:15.620
Suppose, however, that people work for years on a certain good and are paid by capitalists and then the final product is not bought by consumers. The capitalists absorb monetary losses. Where was the immediate payment according to marginal product? The payment was only an investment in future goods by capitalists.

39
00:04:15.620 --> 00:04:26.620
Roth then turns to another allegedly heinous error of the discount approach, namely the doctrine of non-coordination of factors.

40
00:04:26.620 --> 00:04:35.620
This means that some factors in their payment receive the discounted value of their product and some do not.

41
00:04:35.620 --> 00:04:39.700
Roth, however, is laboring under a misapprehension.

42
00:04:39.700 --> 00:04:46.180
There is no assumption of non-coordination in any sound discounting theory.

43
00:04:46.180 --> 00:04:53.340
As we have stated, all factors, labor, land and capital goods, receive their discounted

44
00:04:53.340 --> 00:04:55.700
marginal value product.

45
00:04:55.700 --> 00:05:01.620
The difference in regard to the owners of capital goods is that in the ultimate analysis,

46
00:05:01.620 --> 00:05:08.180
They do not receive any independent payment, since capital goods are resolved into the

47
00:05:08.180 --> 00:05:15.020
factors that produce them, ultimately land and labor factors, and to interest for the

48
00:05:15.020 --> 00:05:19.940
time involved in the advance of payment by the capitalists.

49
00:05:19.940 --> 00:05:26.140
Roth ascribes this error to Newt Wicksell, but such a confusion is not attributable to

50
00:05:26.140 --> 00:05:31.820
Wixcell, who engages in a brilliant discussion of capital and the production structure and

51
00:05:31.820 --> 00:05:34.260
the role of time in production.

52
00:05:34.260 --> 00:05:40.780
Wixcell demonstrates correctly that labor and land are the only ultimate factors, and

53
00:05:40.780 --> 00:05:46.620
that therefore the marginal productivity of capital goods is reducible to the marginal

54
00:05:46.620 --> 00:05:54.300
productivity of labor and land factors, so that money capital earns the interest or discount

55
00:05:54.300 --> 00:05:55.820
differential.

56
00:05:55.820 --> 00:06:01.180
Mixcel's discussion of these and related issues is of basic importance.

57
00:06:01.180 --> 00:06:07.500
He recognized, for example, that capital goods are fully and basically coordinate with land

58
00:06:07.500 --> 00:06:15.140
and labor factors only from the point of view of the individual firm, but not when we consider

59
00:06:15.140 --> 00:06:18.980
the total market in all of its interrelations.

60
00:06:18.980 --> 00:06:25.580
Current economic theorizing is, to its detriment, even more preoccupied than writers of his

61
00:06:25.580 --> 00:06:32.120
Today, with the study of an isolated firm instead of the interrelated market.

62
00:06:32.120 --> 00:06:38.740
Rolfe believes that non-coordination is involved because owners of land and labour factors

63
00:06:38.740 --> 00:06:45.580
receive a discounted share and capital receives an undiscounted share.

64
00:06:45.580 --> 00:06:49.160
But this is a faulty way of stating the conclusion.

65
00:06:49.160 --> 00:06:56.080
Owners of land and labor factors receive a discounted share, but owners of capital, money

66
00:06:56.080 --> 00:07:00.620
capital, receive the discount.

67
00:07:00.620 --> 00:07:06.260
The remainder of Rolfe's article is largely devoted to an attempt to prove that no time

68
00:07:06.260 --> 00:07:10.920
lag is involved in payments to owners of factors.

69
00:07:10.920 --> 00:07:17.340
Rolfe assumes the existence of production centers within every firm, which, broken down

70
00:07:17.340 --> 00:07:31.260
This tortured and unreal construction misses the entire point.

71
00:07:31.260 --> 00:07:37.940
Even if there were atomized production centers, the point is that some person or persons will

72
00:07:37.940 --> 00:07:44.940
have to make advances of present money along the route, in whatever order, until the final

73
00:07:44.940 --> 00:08:01.940
Let Rolfe picture a production system, atomized or integrated as the case may be, with no one making the advances of present goods, money capital, that he denies exist.

74
00:08:01.940 --> 00:08:11.940
And as the laborers and landowners work on the intermediate products for years without pay, until the finished product is ready for the consumer,

75
00:08:11.940 --> 00:08:25.940
Let Rolfe exhort them not to worry, since they have been implicitly paid simultaneously as they worked, for this is the logical implication of the Knight-Rolfe position.

76
00:08:25.940 --> 00:08:41.440
Rolfe ends his article consistently with a dismissal of any time preference influences on interest, which he explains in Knightian vein by the cost of producing new capital goods.