WEBVTT

NOTE Preface to Revised Edition

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.000
Preface to Revised Edition

2
00:00:03.000 --> 00:00:11.000
One of the unhappy casualties of World War I, it seems, was the old-fashioned treatise on economic principles.

3
00:00:11.000 --> 00:00:23.000
Before World War I, the standard method both of presenting and advancing economic thought was to write a disquisition setting forth one's vision of the corpus of economic science.

4
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:28.000
A work of this kind had many virtues wholly missing from the modern world.

5
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:35.000
On the one hand, the intelligent layman, with little or no previous acquaintance with economics, could read it.

6
00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:45.500
On the other hand, the author did not limit himself, textbook fashion, to choppy and oversimplified compilations of currently fashionable doctrine.

7
00:00:45.500 --> 00:00:52.500
For better or worse, he carved out of economic theory an architectonic, an edifice.

8
00:00:52.500 --> 00:01:05.500
Sometimes the edifice was an original and noble one, sometimes it was faulty, but at least there was an edifice for beginners to see, for colleagues to adopt or criticize.

9
00:01:05.500 --> 00:01:15.500
Hyper refinements of detail were generally omitted as impediments to viewing economic science as a whole, and they were consigned to the journals.

10
00:01:15.500 --> 00:01:21.500
The university student, too, learned his economics from the treatise on its principles.

11
00:01:21.500 --> 00:01:27.740
It was not assumed that special works were needed with chapter lengths fitting course requirements

12
00:01:27.740 --> 00:01:34.300
and devoid of original doctrine. These works then were read by students, intelligent laymen,

13
00:01:34.300 --> 00:01:40.620
and leading economists, all of whom profited from them. Their spirit is best illustrated

14
00:01:40.620 --> 00:01:47.260
by a prefatory passage from one of the last of the species. I have tried in this book to state

15
00:01:47.260 --> 00:01:53.020
the principles of economics in such form that they shall be comprehensible to an educated and

16
00:01:53.020 --> 00:01:59.660
intelligent person who has not before made any systematic study of the subject. Though designed

17
00:01:59.660 --> 00:02:06.380
in this sense for beginners, the book does not gloss over difficulties or avoid severe reasoning.

18
00:02:06.380 --> 00:02:12.940
No one can understand economic phenomena or prepare himself to deal with economic problems

19
00:02:12.940 --> 00:02:18.300
who is unwilling to follow trains of reasoning which call for sustained attention.

20
00:02:18.300 --> 00:02:24.940
I have done my best to be clear and to state with care the grounds on which my conclusions rest,

21
00:02:24.940 --> 00:02:31.660
as well as the conclusions themselves, but have made no vain pretense of simplifying all things.

22
00:02:33.020 --> 00:02:42.140
Since the brilliant burst that gave us the works of Wickstede 1910, Towsig 1911 and Fetter 1915,

23
00:02:42.140 --> 00:02:47.660
This type of treatise has disappeared from economic thought, and economics has become

24
00:02:47.660 --> 00:02:55.260
appallingly fragmented, dissociated to such a degree that there hardly is an economics anymore.

25
00:02:55.260 --> 00:03:00.860
Instead, we find myriad bits and pieces of uncoordinated analysis.

26
00:03:00.860 --> 00:03:07.900
Economics has first been fragmented into applied fields, urban land economics,

27
00:03:07.900 --> 00:03:15.580
Agricultural economics, labor economics, public finance economics, etc., each division largely

28
00:03:15.580 --> 00:03:17.660
heedless of the others.

29
00:03:17.660 --> 00:03:22.820
More grievous still has been the disintegration of what has been confined to the category

30
00:03:22.820 --> 00:03:25.340
of economic theory.

31
00:03:25.340 --> 00:03:31.780
Utility theory, monopoly theory, international trade theory, etc., down to linear programming

32
00:03:31.780 --> 00:03:38.020
Banking and Games Theory, each moves in its sharply isolated compartment with its own

33
00:03:38.020 --> 00:03:40.580
hyper-refined literature.

34
00:03:40.580 --> 00:03:47.180
Recently growing awareness of this fragmentation has led to vague interdisciplinary admixtures

35
00:03:47.180 --> 00:03:50.660
with all the other social sciences.

36
00:03:50.660 --> 00:03:56.100
Confusion has been worse confounded, with resulting invasive forays of numerous other

37
00:03:56.100 --> 00:04:25.860
I think it is fair to say that with only a single exception, Ludwig von Mises' Human Action, not one

38
00:04:25.860 --> 00:04:30.860
The General Treatise on Economic Principles has appeared since World War I.

39
00:04:30.860 --> 00:04:40.860
Perhaps the closest approach was Frank H. Knight's Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, and that was published far back in 1921.

40
00:04:40.860 --> 00:04:45.860
Since then, there has been no book of remotely as broad a scope.

41
00:04:45.860 --> 00:04:52.860
The only place where we can find economics treated with any degree of breadth is in the elementary textbooks.

42
00:04:52.860 --> 00:04:57.860
These textbooks, however, are sorry substitutes for a genuine principles.

43
00:04:57.860 --> 00:05:02.860
Since they must, by their nature, present only currently received doctrine,

44
00:05:02.860 --> 00:05:06.860
their work is uninteresting to the established economist.

45
00:05:06.860 --> 00:05:10.860
Furthermore, since they may only boil down the existing literature,

46
00:05:10.860 --> 00:05:16.860
they must, of necessity, present to the student a hodgepodge of fragmented chapters,

47
00:05:16.860 --> 00:05:19.860
each with little or no relation to the other.

48
00:05:19.860 --> 00:05:30.860
Many economists see no loss in all this. In fact, they herald these developments as signs of the enormous progress the science has made on all fronts.

49
00:05:30.860 --> 00:05:44.860
Knowledge has grown so vast that no man can encompass it all. Yet economists should at least be responsible for knowing economics, the essentials of the body of their discipline.

50
00:05:44.860 --> 00:05:49.420
Certainly, then, these essentials could have been presented by this time.

51
00:05:49.420 --> 00:05:56.200
The plain fact is that economics is fragmented precisely because it is no longer regarded

52
00:05:56.200 --> 00:06:04.060
as an edifice, since it is considered a conjuries of isolated splitters, it is treated as such.

53
00:06:04.060 --> 00:06:10.980
Perhaps the key to this change is that formerly economics was regarded as a logical structure.

54
00:06:10.980 --> 00:06:17.620
Fundamentally, whatever the differences of degree or even of proclaimed methodology,

55
00:06:17.620 --> 00:06:22.180
economics was considered a deductive science using verbal logic.

56
00:06:22.180 --> 00:06:29.100
Grounded on a few axioms, the edifice of economic thought was deduced step by step.

57
00:06:29.100 --> 00:06:34.820
Even when the analysis was primitive or the announced methodology far more inductive,

58
00:06:34.820 --> 00:06:39.100
this was the essence of economics during the 19th century.

59
00:06:39.100 --> 00:06:45.420
Since the treatise on economic principles, for if economics proceeds by deductive logic

60
00:06:45.420 --> 00:06:52.100
grounded on a few simple and evident axioms, then the corpus of economics can be presented

61
00:06:52.100 --> 00:06:58.220
as an interrelated whole to the intelligent layman with no loss of ultimate rigor.

62
00:06:58.220 --> 00:07:04.780
The layman is taken step by step from simple and evident truths to more complex and less

63
00:07:04.780 --> 00:07:06.860
evident ones.

64
00:07:06.860 --> 00:07:13.560
The Austrian economists best perceived this method and used it most fully and cogently.

65
00:07:13.560 --> 00:07:18.980
They were the classic employers in short of the praxeologic method.

66
00:07:18.980 --> 00:07:24.600
In the present day, however, the prevailing epistemology has thrown over praxeology for

67
00:07:24.600 --> 00:07:29.660
methods at once too empirical and too theoretical.

68
00:07:29.660 --> 00:07:34.380
Empiricism has disintegrated economics to such an extent that no one thinks to look

69
00:07:34.380 --> 00:07:50.380
and, paradoxically, it has falsified economics by making economists eager to introduce admittedly false and shortcut assumptions in order to make their theories more readily testable.

70
00:07:50.380 --> 00:08:02.380
Alfred Marshall's distrust of long chains of deduction, as well as the whole Cambridge impetus towards such shortcuts, has contributed a great deal to this breakdown.

71
00:08:02.380 --> 00:08:08.900
On the other hand, verbal logic in economic theory has been replaced by mathematics, seemingly

72
00:08:08.900 --> 00:08:14.740
more precise, and basking in the reflected glory of the physical sciences.

73
00:08:14.740 --> 00:08:21.900
The dominant econometric wing of mathematical economists also looks for empirical verifications

74
00:08:21.900 --> 00:08:26.120
and thereby compounds the errors of both methods.

75
00:08:26.120 --> 00:08:32.640
Even on the level of pure theoretical integration, mathematics is completely inappropriate for

76
00:08:32.640 --> 00:08:36.040
any sciences of human action.

77
00:08:36.040 --> 00:08:41.880
Mathematics has, in fact, contributed to the compartmentalization of economics, to specialized

78
00:08:41.880 --> 00:08:49.480
monographs featuring a hyper-refined maze of matrices, equations and geometric diagrams.

79
00:08:49.480 --> 00:08:55.840
But the really important thing is not that non-mathematicians cannot understand them.

80
00:08:55.840 --> 00:09:02.080
The crucial point is that mathematics cannot contribute to economic knowledge.

81
00:09:02.080 --> 00:09:09.360
In fact, the recent conquest of mathematical economics by econometrics is a sign of recognition

82
00:09:09.360 --> 00:09:14.640
that pure mathematical theory in economics is sterile.

83
00:09:14.640 --> 00:09:21.400
This book, then, is an attempt to fill part of the enormous gap of 40 years' time.

84
00:09:21.400 --> 00:09:26.880
Since the last treatise on economic principles, economics has proceeded a long way in many

85
00:09:26.880 --> 00:09:33.580
areas and its methodology has been immeasurably improved and strengthened by those continuing

86
00:09:33.580 --> 00:09:36.580
to work in the praxeological tradition.

87
00:09:36.580 --> 00:09:43.340
Furthermore, there are still great gaps in the praxeological corpus since so few economists

88
00:09:43.340 --> 00:09:45.320
have worked at shaping it.

89
00:09:45.320 --> 00:09:50.520
Hence the attempt in this book to develop the edifice of economic science in the manner

90
00:09:50.520 --> 00:09:57.240
of the old-fashioned works on its principles, slowly and logically to build on the basic

91
00:09:57.240 --> 00:10:02.880
axioms an integrated and coherent edifice of economic truth.

92
00:10:02.880 --> 00:10:06.680
Hyper-refinements have been shunned as much as possible.

93
00:10:06.680 --> 00:10:12.520
In short, Professor Taussig's quoted statement of intention has been mine also, with the

94
00:10:12.520 --> 00:10:18.280
addition that I have felt it necessary to include, at pertinent points, refutation of

95
00:10:18.280 --> 00:10:21.240
of some of the main opposing doctrines.

96
00:10:21.240 --> 00:10:27.680
This was especially needed because economic fallacy prevails far more widely than in Taussig's

97
00:10:27.680 --> 00:10:28.680
time.

98
00:10:28.680 --> 00:10:34.880
I have indicated briefly that there has been one general treatise since World War I.

99
00:10:34.880 --> 00:10:40.920
Professor Paul Samuelson has written rhapsodically of the joy of being under 30 at the time of

100
00:10:40.920 --> 00:10:43.840
publication of Cain's General Theory.

101
00:10:43.840 --> 00:10:50.860
I can say the same for the publication of Ludwig von Mises' Human Action in 1949.

102
00:10:50.860 --> 00:10:57.700
For here at last was economics whole once more, once again an edifice.

103
00:10:57.700 --> 00:11:03.840
Not only that, here was a structure of economics with many of the components newly contributed

104
00:11:03.840 --> 00:11:06.300
by Professor Mises himself.

105
00:11:06.300 --> 00:11:13.280
There is no space here to present or expound Mises' great contributions to economic science.

106
00:11:13.280 --> 00:11:15.520
will have to be done elsewhere.

107
00:11:15.520 --> 00:11:21.640
Suffice it to say that from now on, little constructive work can be done in economics

108
00:11:21.640 --> 00:11:25.400
unless it starts from human action.

109
00:11:25.400 --> 00:11:30.160
Human action is a general treatise but not an old-style principles.

110
00:11:30.160 --> 00:11:36.340
Instead, it assumes considerable previous economic knowledge and includes within its

111
00:11:36.340 --> 00:11:41.120
spacious confines numerous philosophic and historical insights.

112
00:11:41.120 --> 00:11:47.680
In one sense, the present work attempts to isolate the economic, fill in the interstices,

113
00:11:47.680 --> 00:11:53.660
and spell out the detailed implications, as I see them, of the Misesian structure.

114
00:11:53.660 --> 00:11:59.120
It must not be thought, however, that Professor Mises is in any way responsible for these

115
00:11:59.120 --> 00:12:00.120
pages.

116
00:12:00.120 --> 00:12:04.880
Indeed, he may well differ strongly with many sections of this volume.

117
00:12:04.880 --> 00:12:10.520
Yet it is my hope that this work may succeed in adding a few bricks to the noble structure

118
00:12:10.520 --> 00:12:16.260
of Economic Science that has reached its most modern and developed form in the pages of

119
00:12:16.260 --> 00:12:18.380
human action.

120
00:12:18.380 --> 00:12:24.640
The present work deduces the entire corpus of economics from a few simple and apodictically

121
00:12:24.640 --> 00:12:26.780
true axioms.

122
00:12:26.780 --> 00:12:34.300
The fundamental axiom of action, that man employ means to achieve ends, and two subsidiary

123
00:12:34.300 --> 00:12:41.420
Postulates, that there is a variety of human and natural resources, and that leisure is

124
00:12:41.420 --> 00:12:43.580
a consumer's good.

125
00:12:43.580 --> 00:12:49.680
Chapter 1 begins with the action axiom and deduces its immediate implications, and these

126
00:12:49.680 --> 00:12:56.900
conclusions are applied to crusoeconomics, that much maligned but highly useful analysis

127
00:12:56.900 --> 00:13:03.940
that sets individual man starkly against nature and analyzes his resulting actions.

128
00:13:03.940 --> 00:13:09.980
Chapter 2 introduces other men and, consequently, social relations.

129
00:13:09.980 --> 00:13:18.780
Various types of interpersonal relations are analyzed and the economics of direct exchange, barter, is set forth.

130
00:13:18.780 --> 00:13:24.980
Exchange cannot be adequately analyzed until property rights are fully defined.

131
00:13:24.980 --> 00:13:32.380
So Chapter 2 analyzes property in a free society. Chapter 2, in fact, marks the beginning of

132
00:13:32.380 --> 00:13:39.780
the body of the book, an analysis of the economics of voluntary exchange. Chapter 2 discusses

133
00:13:39.780 --> 00:13:45.980
the free market of barter, and the subsequent chapters treat the economics of indirect or

134
00:13:45.980 --> 00:13:52.340
monetary exchange. Thus, analytically, the book deals fully with the economics of the

135
00:13:52.340 --> 00:14:04.340
Chapter 3 introduces money and traces the patterns of indirect exchange on the market.

136
00:14:04.340 --> 00:14:10.340
Chapter 4 treats the economics of consumption and the pricing of consumers' goods.

137
00:14:10.340 --> 00:14:15.340
Chapters 5 through 9 analyze production on the free market.

138
00:14:15.340 --> 00:14:20.340
One of the features of this consumption and production theory is the resurrection of

139
00:14:20.340 --> 00:14:26.900
Professor Frank A. Fetter's brilliant and completely neglected theory of rent, that is,

140
00:14:26.900 --> 00:14:34.500
the concept of rent as the higher price of a unit service. Capitalization then becomes the process

141
00:14:34.500 --> 00:14:42.580
of determining the present values of the expected future rents of a good. The Fetter-Mises pure time

142
00:14:42.580 --> 00:14:48.580
preference theory of interest is synthesized with the Fetter-rent theory, with the Austrian

143
00:14:48.580 --> 00:14:54.660
One theory of the structure of production and with separation of original from produced

144
00:14:54.660 --> 00:14:57.140
factors of production.

145
00:14:57.140 --> 00:15:03.500
One radical feature of our analysis of production is a complete break with the currently fashionable

146
00:15:03.500 --> 00:15:09.740
short-run theory of the firm, substituting for this a general theory of marginal value

147
00:15:09.740 --> 00:15:12.780
productivity and capitalization.

148
00:15:12.780 --> 00:15:19.660
It is a general equilibrium analysis in the dynamic Austrian sense, and not in the static

149
00:15:19.660 --> 00:15:23.420
currently popular Walrassian sense.

150
00:15:23.420 --> 00:15:29.980
Chapter 10 expounds a completely new theory of monopoly, that monopoly can be meaningfully

151
00:15:29.980 --> 00:15:37.220
defined only as a grant of privilege by the state, and that a monopoly price can be attained

152
00:15:37.220 --> 00:15:39.500
only from such a grant.

153
00:15:39.500 --> 00:15:45.420
In short, there can be no monopoly or monopoly price on the free market.

154
00:15:45.420 --> 00:15:51.220
The theory of monopolistic competition is also discussed, and Chapter 11 sets forth

155
00:15:51.220 --> 00:15:57.260
the theory of money on the free market, along with an extensive discussion of the Keynesian

156
00:15:57.260 --> 00:15:58.780
theories.

157
00:15:58.780 --> 00:16:03.960
Having completed the theory of the purely free market, I then turn in the final chapter

158
00:16:03.960 --> 00:16:10.960
to applying praxeological analysis to a systematic discussion of various forms and degrees of

159
00:16:10.960 --> 00:16:14.720
coercive intervention and their consequences.

160
00:16:14.720 --> 00:16:20.940
The effects of coercive intervention can be studied only after fully analyzing the construct

161
00:16:20.940 --> 00:16:23.600
of a purely free market.

162
00:16:23.600 --> 00:16:30.600
Chapter 12 presents a typology of intervention, discusses its direct and indirect consequences

163
00:16:30.600 --> 00:16:36.600
and the Effects on Utility, and sets forth a necessarily brief analysis of the various

164
00:16:36.600 --> 00:16:44.560
major types of intervention, including price control, monopoly grants, taxation, inflation,

165
00:16:44.560 --> 00:16:47.800
and government enterprise and expenditures.

166
00:16:47.800 --> 00:16:53.520
The chapter and the book conclude with a brief summary assessment of the free market, as

167
00:16:53.520 --> 00:16:58.720
contrasted to interventionist and other coercive systems.

168
00:16:58.720 --> 00:17:04.520
For this revised edition, I have decided to keep the original text and footnotes intact

169
00:17:04.520 --> 00:17:08.720
and to confine any changes to this revised preface.

170
00:17:08.720 --> 00:17:15.200
Professor Mises died in 1973, and the following year, as luck would have it, the Austrian

171
00:17:15.200 --> 00:17:21.960
School of Economics that Mises had kept alive in an almost underground existence burst forward

172
00:17:21.960 --> 00:17:24.600
into a spectacular revival.

173
00:17:24.600 --> 00:17:30.160
It is no accident that this revival coincided with the virtual collapse of the previously

174
00:17:30.160 --> 00:17:33.040
dominant Keynesian paradigm.

175
00:17:33.040 --> 00:17:38.380
Keynesians had promised to steer the economy easily away from the recurring pitfalls of

176
00:17:38.380 --> 00:17:42.320
inflationary boom and recession and unemployment.

177
00:17:42.320 --> 00:17:48.960
Instead, they would ensure permanent and stable prosperity, bringing us full employment without

178
00:17:48.960 --> 00:17:50.200
inflation.

179
00:17:50.200 --> 00:17:56.360
And yet, after three decades of Keynesian planning, we faced a new phenomenon that cannot

180
00:17:56.360 --> 00:18:02.600
even exist, much less be explained in the Keynesian paradigm.

181
00:18:02.600 --> 00:18:07.040
Inflation combined with recession and high unemployment.

182
00:18:07.040 --> 00:18:14.520
This unwelcome specter first appeared in the inflationary recession of 1973 and 1974 and

183
00:18:14.520 --> 00:18:20.800
has been repeated since, the last time being the recession of 1990.

184
00:18:20.800 --> 00:18:27.640
The Austrian revival of 1974 was also spurred by F.A. Hayek's receiving the Nobel Prize

185
00:18:27.640 --> 00:18:34.200
for Economics that year, the first free market and non-mathematical economist to be accorded

186
00:18:34.200 --> 00:18:35.560
that honor.

187
00:18:35.560 --> 00:18:41.160
The economics profession's obsession with the Nobel reawakened interest in Hayek and

188
00:18:41.160 --> 00:18:47.440
in the Austrian School, but this award to Hayek itself can be no coincidence since it

189
00:18:47.440 --> 00:18:53.040
reflects disillusion by economists in Keynesian macro models.

190
00:18:53.040 --> 00:18:59.280
Since 1974, the number of Austrians, books and articles by Austrians and interest in

191
00:18:59.280 --> 00:19:02.240
the school has greatly multiplied.

192
00:19:02.240 --> 00:19:07.340
It is a reflection of the difference in the quality of academia in the two countries that

193
00:19:07.340 --> 00:19:12.720
But even though there are proportionately fewer Austrian school economists in Britain than

194
00:19:12.720 --> 00:19:19.420
in the United States, Austrian economics is accorded a great deal more respect in Britain.

195
00:19:19.420 --> 00:19:25.180
In British textbooks and surveys of thought, Austrian economics, while not often winning

196
00:19:25.180 --> 00:19:31.660
agreement, is treated objectively and fairly as a respectable wing of economic thought.

197
00:19:31.660 --> 00:19:37.060
In the United States, on the contrary, while there are a large number of sympathizers,

198
00:19:37.060 --> 00:19:46.060
as well as adherence in the profession, Austrians are still marginalized, unheeded and unread by the bulk of economists.

199
00:19:46.060 --> 00:19:54.060
Intellectual curiosity has a habit of breaking through, however, especially among college and graduate students.

200
00:19:54.060 --> 00:20:02.060
As a result, the Austrian School has flourished over the last two decades despite severe institutional obstacles.

201
00:20:02.060 --> 00:20:17.060
In fact, the number of Austrians has grown so large and the discussion so broad that differences of opinion and branches of thought have arisen, in some cases developing into genuine clashes of thought.

202
00:20:17.060 --> 00:20:31.060
Yet they have all been conflated and jammed together by non-Austrians and even by some within the school, giving rise to a great deal of intellectual confusion, lack of clarity and outright error.

203
00:20:31.060 --> 00:20:40.060
The good side of these developing disputes is that each side has clarified and sharpened its underlying premises and worldview.

204
00:20:40.060 --> 00:20:49.060
It has indeed become evident in recent years that there are three very different and clashing paradigms within Austrian economics,

205
00:20:49.060 --> 00:20:55.060
the original Misesian or praxeological paradigm to which the present author adheres,

206
00:20:55.060 --> 00:21:01.780
The Hayekian Paradigm, stressing knowledge and discovery rather than praxeological action

207
00:21:01.780 --> 00:21:08.660
and choice, and whose leading exponent now is Professor Israel Kirzner, and the nihilistic

208
00:21:08.660 --> 00:21:15.740
view of the late Ludwig Lachmann, an institutionalist anti-theory approach taken from the English

209
00:21:15.740 --> 00:21:19.940
subjectivist Keynesian G. L. S. Shackel.

210
00:21:19.940 --> 00:21:25.160
Fortunately, there is now a scholarly journal, The Review of Austrian Economics, where the

211
00:21:25.160 --> 00:21:32.100
reader can keep apprised of ongoing developments in Austrian economics, as well as other publications,

212
00:21:32.100 --> 00:21:37.220
conferences and instructional courses of the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

213
00:21:37.220 --> 00:21:43.420
The Mises Institute, founded on the centenary of his birth, keeps alive the spirit of Mises,

214
00:21:43.420 --> 00:21:48.460
as well as the paradigm that he has bequeathed to scholarship and to the world.

215
00:21:48.460 --> 00:21:53.760
For the latest on the three Austrian paradigms, the reader is referred to the Mises Institute

216
00:21:53.760 --> 00:22:02.020
working paper by the present author, the present state of Austrian economics, November 1992.

217
00:22:02.020 --> 00:22:06.760
My overriding intellectual debt, of course, is to Ludwig von Mises.

218
00:22:06.760 --> 00:22:11.280
But apart from that, I can never fully express my personal debt.

219
00:22:11.280 --> 00:22:17.600
His wisdom, kindness, enthusiasm, good humor, and unflagging encouragement of even the slightest

220
00:22:17.600 --> 00:22:45.640
I can also never fully express my gratitude to Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr., who, at a low

221
00:23:15.640 --> 00:23:32.640
Finally, I must at least try to convey how grateful I am to another long-time colleague, Burton S. Blummert, of the Mises Institute and head of the Center for Libertarian Studies, Burlingame, California.

222
00:23:32.640 --> 00:23:40.640
Self-effacing and indispensable, Bert is always there, with wit, wisdom, kindness and friendship.

223
00:23:40.640 --> 00:23:56.640
It is impossible to list all the friends and acquaintances who, over the many years, have taught and inspired me in the area of Austrian economics, or in the wider arena of political economy, and in the nature of coercion of freedom.

224
00:23:56.640 --> 00:24:03.640
I am grateful to them all. None of them, of course, are responsible for any errors herein.

225
00:24:03.640 --> 00:24:09.640
Murray N. Rothbard, Las Vegas, Nevada, May 1993