WEBVTT

NOTE 4. Fin de siècle Economic Science

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.840
Part II. The Austrian School. Chapter IV. Fin de Cirque. Economic Science.

2
00:00:08.840 --> 00:00:13.880
The problems and ideas that moved Mises in his early years were addressed by the work

3
00:00:13.880 --> 00:00:21.000
of four great economic theorists, Carl Menger, Eugen von Boehm-Bawerk, Friedrich von Wieser

4
00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:28.040
and Joseph Schumpeter. Menger, Boehm-Bawerk and Wieser were the incarnation of the Austrian

5
00:00:28.040 --> 00:00:34.160
and School. Their books and papers, and their physical presence, provided the intellectual

6
00:00:34.160 --> 00:00:40.140
background of Mises's scholarly works in Van der Cerke, Austria, the period that lasted

7
00:00:40.140 --> 00:00:46.840
until 1914. Mises's major contributions were intended to solve problems raised by their

8
00:00:46.840 --> 00:00:52.040
writings. His influence on the succeeding generation of students of Austrian economics,

9
00:00:52.040 --> 00:00:57.560
or his lack of influence on them, can only be understood against the background provided

10
00:00:57.560 --> 00:01:04.280
by the pre-1914 foundational writings of the Austrian School, and by the towering presences

11
00:01:04.280 --> 00:01:11.480
of Wieser and Schumpeter on the German and Austrian scene until the late 1920s.

12
00:01:11.480 --> 00:01:18.160
Carl Menger, pioneer of empirical theory. Mises knew all four personally, but Menger

13
00:01:18.160 --> 00:01:22.760
had retired from teaching a year before Mises discovered Menger's principles. They met

14
00:01:22.760 --> 00:01:27.980
for the first time around 1910, when Mises was attending Boehm-Bawerk's seminar and

15
00:01:27.980 --> 00:01:33.440
preparing his first treatise, The Theory of Money and Credit. It was then customary that

16
00:01:33.440 --> 00:01:39.420
young men wishing to pursue an academic career in economics paid Menger a visit. He received

17
00:01:39.420 --> 00:01:46.000
them in his house amidst his impressive library, and had them talk about their work and projects.

18
00:01:46.000 --> 00:01:52.480
Menger was born in 1840 in the Galician town of Neu-Sundes, today located in Poland. His

19
00:01:52.480 --> 00:01:57.200
His father was a lawyer from a family of army officers and civil servants.

20
00:01:57.200 --> 00:02:01.840
His mother came from a rich bohemian merchant family that had moved to Galicia.

21
00:02:01.840 --> 00:02:07.200
His full name was Carl Menger Edler von Wolffesgrün, but he and his brothers, the influential

22
00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:13.320
politician Max and the socialist legal scholar Anton, did not use their title of nobility.

23
00:02:13.320 --> 00:02:18.760
After Menger successfully discharged his commission to tutor Crown Prince Rudolf in economics,

24
00:02:18.760 --> 00:02:21.680
he obtained the right to accede to knighthood.

25
00:02:21.680 --> 00:02:25.720
Menger did not apply because he preferred his bourgeois status.

26
00:02:25.720 --> 00:02:31.520
Menger was a fascinating and energetic personality. Intellectually vigorous into his old age he

27
00:02:31.520 --> 00:02:37.000
was a true polymath in his youth. He had studied law and government science first in Prague

28
00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:42.000
and then in Vienna. One of his teachers at the University of Vienna was Peter Mischler,

29
00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:47.960
a champion of marginal value theory, but apparently Menger was not then interested in economics

30
00:02:47.960 --> 00:02:55.120
or an academic career. He preferred non-academic writing and in 1863 worked as a journalist

31
00:02:55.120 --> 00:03:01.320
for the Lemberger Zeitung. Around 1864 he began preparing for a doctorate in law and

32
00:03:01.320 --> 00:03:07.080
government science and passed the first exam in March 1865. Even at this point his new

33
00:03:07.080 --> 00:03:12.700
academic commitment was overshadowed by his literary pursuits. When he passed the last

34
00:03:12.700 --> 00:03:19.720
of his four doctoral exams in March 1867. He was in the process of writing several comedies.

35
00:03:19.720 --> 00:03:24.740
His literary interest was more than academic. Menger founded the journal Wiener Tagblatt,

36
00:03:24.740 --> 00:03:31.960
which first appeared on November 26, 1865. In an early issue he began publishing an anonymous

37
00:03:31.960 --> 00:03:38.520
novel with the scandalous title Dear ewige Jude in Wien, The Eternal Jew in Vienna. This

38
00:03:38.520 --> 00:03:44.300
This was a fashionable subject of feuilleton novels, a new literary genre at the time.

39
00:03:44.300 --> 00:03:49.000
In France, the king of the feuilleton novel, Eugène Sioux, had become rich and famous

40
00:03:49.000 --> 00:03:57.240
with Le Juif Éran, 1844-1845. The protagonist of his novel symbolised the oppression of

41
00:03:57.240 --> 00:04:03.560
the Jewish people throughout the centuries. In March 1866, he joined the economic staff

42
00:04:03.560 --> 00:04:11.440
This paper was a pure government organ controlled by the Council of Ministers, and in particular

43
00:04:11.440 --> 00:04:16.700
by the President's Office of the Ministry of the Interior. The editorial staff were

44
00:04:16.700 --> 00:04:22.180
selected by the government, official articles were written in the ministries, and edited

45
00:04:22.180 --> 00:04:27.520
and submitted by the Council of Ministers. Thus Menger became a government employee in

46
00:04:27.520 --> 00:04:33.160
a fast-track position that offered prospects to reach the highest strata within the Austrian

47
00:04:33.160 --> 00:04:39.800
and Civil Service, Weezer emphasized, he entered government service. A government position

48
00:04:39.800 --> 00:04:45.800
carried great prestige and was highly coveted by the young elites. Competition was fierce

49
00:04:45.800 --> 00:04:51.860
even for lesser positions. To succeed, one needed protection, the friendly ear of someone

50
00:04:51.860 --> 00:04:57.160
sufficiently high in the government's pecking order to influence the nomination. In Menger's

51
00:04:57.160 --> 00:05:02.160
case, the initial protection might have come through his brother Max, but Carl quickly

52
00:05:02.160 --> 00:05:06.620
Frederick von Wiese soon learned to stand on his own. One of his tasks, as an officer

53
00:05:06.620 --> 00:05:12.400
of the Viennette-Saitung, was to write market surveys. As he later told his disciple Frederic

54
00:05:12.400 --> 00:05:18.940
von Wiese, this was his practical introduction to price theory. He was struck by the discrepancy

55
00:05:18.940 --> 00:05:25.280
between the actual pricing process as explained by traders and the standard textbook explanations

56
00:05:25.280 --> 00:05:30.240
he had learned at the University. Upon close inspection, he came to believe that prices

57
00:05:30.240 --> 00:05:36.200
Mises ultimately depended on the value judgements of consumers. It was with this thesis that

58
00:05:36.200 --> 00:05:42.160
he eventually earned his Habilitation, the traditional Central European University professor's

59
00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:48.000
credential in government science. Apparently Menger did not abandon his literary

60
00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:55.200
interest. In January 1869 he published another novel, Die Bettlerin von Sankt Max, The Beggaress

61
00:05:55.200 --> 00:06:06.640
In 1871 he published his work under the title Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre – Principles

62
00:06:06.640 --> 00:06:12.320
of Economics. In his book Menger presented a theoretical study of fundamental economic

63
00:06:12.320 --> 00:06:20.540
phenomena, such as economic goods, value, exchange, prices, commodities and money. He

64
00:06:20.540 --> 00:06:24.800
explained the properties of these phenomena and the laws to which they are subject at

65
00:06:24.800 --> 00:06:31.120
at all times and places. This is of course what good economics textbooks always did and

66
00:06:31.120 --> 00:06:36.760
still do. What made Menger's book special is the method he used in his explanations.

67
00:06:36.760 --> 00:06:42.200
He tried to trace the causes of the properties and laws under scrutiny back to the simplest

68
00:06:42.200 --> 00:06:48.340
facts. His purpose was to demonstrate that the properties and laws of economic phenomena

69
00:06:48.340 --> 00:06:54.440
result from these empirically ascertainable elements of the human economy, such as individual

70
00:06:54.440 --> 00:06:59.080
Individual Human Needs, Individual Human Knowledge, Ownership, and Acquisition of

71
00:06:59.080 --> 00:07:03.800
Individual Quantities of Goods, Time and Individual Error.

72
00:07:03.800 --> 00:07:08.560
In the parlance of 20th century analytical philosophy, Menger's elements would have

73
00:07:08.560 --> 00:07:13.880
been called primitives of economic theory. Menger's great achievement in principles

74
00:07:13.880 --> 00:07:19.580
consisted in identifying these elements for analysis and explaining how they cause more

75
00:07:19.580 --> 00:07:26.020
or complex market phenomena such as prices. He called this the empirical method, emphasising

76
00:07:26.020 --> 00:07:30.980
that it was the same method that worked so well in the natural sciences. Barry Smith

77
00:07:30.980 --> 00:07:37.380
has convincingly argued that Menger applied Aristotelian realism in economic analysis.

78
00:07:37.380 --> 00:07:43.800
To the present reader the label might be confusing, since it is not at all the experimental method

79
00:07:43.800 --> 00:07:50.120
of the Modern Empirical Sciences. Menger did not use abstract models to posit falsifiable

80
00:07:50.120 --> 00:07:57.120
hypotheses that are then tested by experience. Instead, Menger's was an analytical method

81
00:07:57.120 --> 00:08:03.040
that began with the smallest empirical phenomena and proceeded logically from there. This put

82
00:08:03.040 --> 00:08:09.180
Menger in a position to consider market exchanges and prices as macro-phenomena and to explain

83
00:08:09.180 --> 00:08:14.580
how they are caused by atomistic but empirically ascertainable elements of the human economy,

84
00:08:14.580 --> 00:08:20.980
situated in an economic microcosm of individual needs and the marginal quantities owned and

85
00:08:20.980 --> 00:08:26.180
acquired. In Menger's words, prices were by no means the most fundamental feature of

86
00:08:26.180 --> 00:08:32.180
the economic phenomenon of exchange, but only incidental manifestations of these activities,

87
00:08:32.180 --> 00:08:38.860
symptoms of an economic equilibrium between the economies of individuals. As later works

88
00:08:38.860 --> 00:08:43.780
Critics and Correspondence Revealed, Menger was fully aware that his most important innovation

89
00:08:43.780 --> 00:08:48.780
was the consistent application of the new empirical method, which he also called the

90
00:08:48.780 --> 00:08:55.700
exact method, the analytical synthetic or the analytical compositive method. In a February

91
00:08:55.700 --> 00:09:02.260
1884 letter to Leon Walras, criticising Walras' claim that there was a mathematical method

92
00:09:02.260 --> 00:09:04.980
of economic research, Menger wrote,

93
00:09:04.980 --> 00:09:10.620
It is rather necessary that we go back to the most simple elements of the mostly very

94
00:09:10.620 --> 00:09:16.240
complex phenomena that are here in question, that we thus determine in an analytical manner

95
00:09:16.240 --> 00:09:21.860
the ultimate factors that constitute the phenomena, the prices, and that we then accord to these

96
00:09:21.860 --> 00:09:26.400
elements the importance that corresponds to their nature, and that in keeping with this

97
00:09:26.400 --> 00:09:31.780
importance we try to establish the laws according to which the complex phenomena of human interaction

98
00:09:31.780 --> 00:09:34.740
result from simple phenomena.

99
00:09:34.740 --> 00:09:41.380
William Jaffe emphasizes that Carl Menger avoided the use of mathematics in his economics,

100
00:09:41.380 --> 00:09:46.020
not because he did not know any better, but out of principle. When he wrote to Léon Walras

101
00:09:46.020 --> 00:09:53.420
on June 28, 1883, that he had been for some time thoroughly acquainted with Walras' writings,

102
00:09:53.420 --> 00:09:58.540
he did not disclaim, as did other correspondents, sufficient knowledge of mathematics to follow

103
00:09:58.540 --> 00:10:04.140
these writings, which we may be sure he would have done if that had been the case. Instead,

104
00:10:04.140 --> 00:10:09.260
Carl Menger declared his objection in principle to the use of mathematics as a method of advancing

105
00:10:09.260 --> 00:10:10.900
economic knowledge.

106
00:10:10.900 --> 00:10:16.100
Robert Ibert reports that Menger owned the journals where the mid-19th century French

107
00:10:16.100 --> 00:10:21.260
econo-engineers published their pioneering studies in mathematical economics.

108
00:10:21.260 --> 00:10:26.060
Menger also owned the books of the major representatives of this school of thought.

109
00:10:26.060 --> 00:10:31.220
Only in this manner was it possible accurately to describe the essence of economic phenomena,

110
00:10:31.220 --> 00:10:36.900
and not just the contingent quantitative relationships in which they might stand with other phenomena

111
00:10:36.900 --> 00:10:39.260
at certain times and places.

112
00:10:39.260 --> 00:10:44.120
Referring to the disagreements between his theory of prices and the price theory of his

113
00:10:44.120 --> 00:10:50.340
French correspondent, Menger argued that real-life experience was the only legitimate way to

114
00:10:50.340 --> 00:10:52.940
decide the points under contention.

115
00:10:52.940 --> 00:10:57.620
The merit of a theory always depends on the extent to which it succeeds in determining

116
00:10:57.620 --> 00:11:02.340
Constituting the true factors, those that correspond to real life.

117
00:11:02.340 --> 00:11:06.240
Constituting the economic phenomena and the laws according to which the complex phenomena

118
00:11:06.240 --> 00:11:10.900
of political economy result from the simple elements.

119
00:11:10.900 --> 00:11:15.700
Menger continues, A researcher who arrives by the way of analysis at such elements that

120
00:11:15.700 --> 00:11:21.600
do not correspond to reality, or who without any true analysis takes his departure from

121
00:11:21.600 --> 00:11:27.600
arbitrary axioms, which is only too often the case with the so-called rational method,

122
00:11:27.600 --> 00:11:34.280
falls necessarily into error, even if you make superior use of mathematics.

123
00:11:34.280 --> 00:11:39.240
The empirical foundation of Menger's approach contrasted sharply with the Anglo-Saxon approach

124
00:11:39.240 --> 00:11:45.280
of that time, which was inspired by David Ricardo's principles, and relied on fictitious

125
00:11:45.280 --> 00:11:52.280
postulates and on such arbitrarily constructed aggregates as price-level, capitalists, landowners

126
00:11:52.280 --> 00:11:57.380
and Laborers, but Menger's approach also contrasted with the dominant fashions on the

127
00:11:57.380 --> 00:12:02.440
continent and in particular in Germany where economists in the matter of historians treated

128
00:12:02.440 --> 00:12:07.900
observed complex phenomena such as market prices as the starting point for their analysis

129
00:12:07.900 --> 00:12:13.880
rather than trying to explain them as resulting from more fundamental factors.

130
00:12:13.880 --> 00:12:19.340
In one stroke, principles of economics departed from both paradigms. Menger had found that

131
00:12:19.340 --> 00:12:31.140
The comprehensive architecture of his book also showed that the principle of marginal

132
00:12:31.140 --> 00:12:37.140
value, which had played only an obscure role in earlier theories, is of fundamental and

133
00:12:37.140 --> 00:12:42.500
all-pervasive importance in economic science. The core of Menger's book is the chapter

134
00:12:42.500 --> 00:12:48.760
on value which consumes a quarter of its pages. While financial analysts of Menger's experience

135
00:12:48.760 --> 00:12:54.520
stressed subjective factors in price formation, the personal judgement of consumers, entrepreneurs,

136
00:12:54.520 --> 00:12:59.920
traders on the stock exchange, etc. Academic economists relegated these subjective factors

137
00:12:59.920 --> 00:13:06.560
to a secondary position beneath supposedly objective factors independent of human perceptions.

138
00:13:06.560 --> 00:13:12.060
The British classical economists, Adam Smith and David Ricardo most notably, had created

139
00:13:12.060 --> 00:13:17.200
a thoroughly objectivist price theory that sought to explain the natural or long-run

140
00:13:17.200 --> 00:13:28.800
According to this labour theory of value, subjective factors can cause actual market

141
00:13:28.800 --> 00:13:34.620
prices to deviate from correct prices, but only temporarily and never by enough to outweigh

142
00:13:34.620 --> 00:13:40.240
the impact of the objective costs of labour. The value of a product was therefore ultimately

143
00:13:40.240 --> 00:13:46.900
one of its inherent qualities, just like weight or volume. It was in the good, rather than

144
00:13:46.900 --> 00:13:51.400
and an accidental feature that stemmed from outside.

145
00:13:51.400 --> 00:13:57.220
The writings of Smith and Ricardo were overwhelmingly successful in the Anglo-Saxon countries and

146
00:13:57.220 --> 00:14:03.080
had made great inroads on the European continent. The French Revolution had shifted the centre

147
00:14:03.080 --> 00:14:08.480
of economic research and learning from the continent to Britain. The Napoleonic era was

148
00:14:08.480 --> 00:14:13.720
particularly effective in suppressing the classical liberal movement on the continent.

149
00:14:13.720 --> 00:14:19.000
Big attention naturally shifted to Adam Smith, the patron saint of the still-vigorous British

150
00:14:19.000 --> 00:14:25.040
branch of the movement. Smith became the main authority on economic theory, displacing Kenay,

151
00:14:25.040 --> 00:14:31.400
reducing Turgot to a footnote, and condemning Condiac to oblivion. But his popularity as

152
00:14:31.400 --> 00:14:37.760
the intellectual leader of political liberalism did not help Smith in Germany. German economists

153
00:14:37.760 --> 00:14:43.440
were far less receptive to the Smithian message than were their peers in the West. German

154
00:14:43.440 --> 00:14:48.620
German economists tended to be government employees and abhorred unbecoming political

155
00:14:48.620 --> 00:14:53.600
affiliations. Wilhelm Rocher, a great historian of economic thought and one of the leading

156
00:14:53.600 --> 00:14:59.800
German economists of the 19th century, famously observed that it was a national peculiarity

157
00:14:59.800 --> 00:15:04.940
of the Germans to deviate from the rule of free trade, which has been imported from England

158
00:15:04.940 --> 00:15:10.520
and France through numerous exceptions made for government interventionism. The German

159
00:15:10.520 --> 00:15:16.280
One professor's red, Adam Smith, even read him attentively, but only to dismiss his views

160
00:15:16.280 --> 00:15:21.600
as lacking solid foundations, and while they did recognise Smith as an authority in the

161
00:15:21.600 --> 00:15:27.720
field, wrong-headed or not, they dismissed Ricardo almost out of hand. Smith's errors

162
00:15:27.720 --> 00:15:33.260
were debatable, but in Ricardo they found no scientific merit whatsoever. This preference

163
00:15:33.260 --> 00:15:39.160
for Smith over Ricardo grew stronger over the next century, and culminated in the works

164
00:15:39.160 --> 00:15:45.720
of the very influential Younger Historical School, which rejected economic theory altogether.

165
00:15:45.720 --> 00:15:50.840
See for example Gustav Schmoller, Volkswirtschaft, Volkswirtschaftslehre und Methode, Handwörter

166
00:15:50.840 --> 00:15:56.480
Buch der Staatswissenschaften, where Schmoller speaks of a battle of his school against Ricardo's

167
00:15:56.480 --> 00:16:03.280
one-sidedness. In his principles, Ricardo had invented what today would be called macroeconomics,

168
00:16:03.280 --> 00:16:07.920
stressing the relationships between various aggregates, such as price levels, average

169
00:16:07.920 --> 00:16:14.080
wages, average profits, but also between social aggregates, such as labourers, capitalists

170
00:16:14.080 --> 00:16:15.900
and landowners.

171
00:16:15.900 --> 00:16:21.340
On the basis of his insights about the relationships between such aggregate variables, he made

172
00:16:21.340 --> 00:16:26.500
the case for a far-reaching laissez-faire programme. This approach did not meet with

173
00:16:26.500 --> 00:16:30.200
enthusiasm among German social scientists.

174
00:16:30.200 --> 00:16:34.700
Ever since the French Revolutionary Army had invaded Germany under the bloody banner of

175
00:16:34.700 --> 00:16:36.940
of Abstract Human Rights.

176
00:16:36.940 --> 00:16:42.120
Germans tended to be suspicious of sweeping political programs derived from theory without

177
00:16:42.120 --> 00:16:44.240
basis in observed reality.

178
00:16:44.240 --> 00:16:49.660
Under the trauma of the French Revolution, 19th-century German historians, jurists and

179
00:16:49.660 --> 00:16:55.220
government scientists tended to stress the particular conditions of concrete human communities

180
00:16:55.220 --> 00:17:00.540
rather than focus on features of an unobservable humanity en masse.

181
00:17:00.540 --> 00:17:06.220
Smith did have an extremely able advocate in Jean-Baptiste Say, who was indefatigable

182
00:17:06.220 --> 00:17:11.940
in his efforts to promote British classical economics. Say's traité d'économique

183
00:17:11.940 --> 00:17:18.060
politique is a masterpiece in its own right, in many ways more sophisticated than the books

184
00:17:18.060 --> 00:17:25.260
of Smith and Ricardo. Say gave an axiomatic exposition of Smythian and possibly even Ricardian

185
00:17:25.260 --> 00:17:30.380
economic science, enhancing enormously the prestige of the Scotsman's unsystematic

186
00:17:30.380 --> 00:17:36.860
Wealth of Nations. Yet by the same token, Say also paved the way to displacing the continental

187
00:17:36.860 --> 00:17:41.820
tradition of economic thought that could be traced back to the Spanish late scholastics,

188
00:17:41.820 --> 00:17:47.660
a tradition that was still alive and vigorous in the Catholic countries of Europe. He redefined

189
00:17:47.660 --> 00:17:53.820
the British economist's focus on whole classes or aggregates of goods subdividing economic science

190
00:17:53.820 --> 00:18:00.060
into a macroeconomic trilogy, production, distribution and consumption of consumers' goods

191
00:18:00.060 --> 00:18:01.500
in general.

192
00:18:01.500 --> 00:18:06.500
Most important, he gave classical economics an appealing epistemological justification

193
00:18:06.500 --> 00:18:09.820
showing it to be rooted in common experience.

194
00:18:09.820 --> 00:18:15.660
This empirically-oriented methodology made much more sense to continental scholars and

195
00:18:15.660 --> 00:18:21.100
convinced them that there was a scientific case to be made for Ricardian economics and

196
00:18:21.100 --> 00:18:24.700
the political programme it seemed to entail.

197
00:18:24.700 --> 00:18:29.460
Say was the central figure in the promotion of British economics on the European continent,

198
00:18:29.460 --> 00:18:34.420
But he clearly owed a far greater intellectual debt to the scientific tradition of his own

199
00:18:34.420 --> 00:18:35.420
country.

200
00:18:35.420 --> 00:18:40.000
By the mid-19th century, thanks to the efforts of Say, British economics had become the academic

201
00:18:40.000 --> 00:18:42.660
orthodoxy of Europe and America.

202
00:18:42.660 --> 00:18:46.980
It was against the background of this orthodoxy that Menger worked on a restatement of the

203
00:18:46.980 --> 00:18:49.780
explanation of the pricing process.

204
00:18:49.780 --> 00:18:54.320
In developing his theory of value and prices, Menger relied on the remnants of an ancient

205
00:18:54.320 --> 00:18:59.600
and Price Theory from the late scholastic school of Salamanca, which in the 16th and

206
00:18:59.600 --> 00:19:05.100
early 17th centuries had stressed precisely those subjective features of the pricing process

207
00:19:05.100 --> 00:19:11.040
that were conspicuously absent from the British classical school. But the Spanish late scholastics

208
00:19:11.040 --> 00:19:15.660
never produced a treatise on economics, and their discoveries about the nature of values

209
00:19:15.660 --> 00:19:19.780
and prices were scattered across thousands of pages.

210
00:19:19.780 --> 00:19:25.580
The subjectivist theory of value survived only in this diffused form, with one important

211
00:19:25.580 --> 00:19:30.980
exception – it turned to Kondyak's great treatise, Commerce and Government. Published

212
00:19:30.980 --> 00:19:37.100
in the same year as Smith's Wealth of Nations, 1776, Kondyak's treatment gave the first

213
00:19:37.100 --> 00:19:42.980
full axiomatic presentation of political economy on the basis of the subjectivist theory of

214
00:19:42.980 --> 00:19:49.580
value. But the impact of his work was minimal, because French economists rejected it. Kondyak

215
00:19:49.580 --> 00:19:54.100
Hayek was already a famous philosopher when he published the book, and did not deem it

216
00:19:54.100 --> 00:19:58.900
necessary to follow the conventions of the disciples of Kinney. Rather, he presented

217
00:19:58.900 --> 00:20:04.740
his thoughts in an independent and original manner, an offense, it turns out, serious

218
00:20:04.740 --> 00:20:09.860
enough to prevent the translation of his work into English for more than two hundred years.

219
00:20:09.860 --> 00:20:14.580
Still, commerce and government was one of the main sources of inspiration for Menger,

220
00:20:14.580 --> 00:20:19.540
who of course read French, among other languages, when he elaborated his economic value theory.

221
00:20:19.540 --> 00:20:25.500
Menger quoted Korniak more than any foreign authority other than Adam Smith, and in contrast

222
00:20:25.500 --> 00:20:32.200
to Smith, he quoted him only favourably. Menger pointed out that value can only come into existence

223
00:20:32.200 --> 00:20:37.740
once human beings realise that economic goods exist, and that each of them has a personal

224
00:20:37.740 --> 00:20:44.240
or, as Menger would say, subjective importance. More importantly, value always concerns the

225
00:20:44.240 --> 00:20:49.560
The Concrete Units of a Good, that is, the marginal units under consideration, like one

226
00:20:49.560 --> 00:20:55.560
cup of water, four loaves of bread, three diamonds, two glasses of milk, etc.

227
00:20:55.560 --> 00:21:00.480
It never concerns the total available stock of these goods except when decisions are actually

228
00:21:00.480 --> 00:21:07.200
made about the total stock. This insight is the key to solving an apparent paradox of

229
00:21:07.200 --> 00:21:12.620
the subjectivist theory of value which had prevented a wider acceptance of the theory.

230
00:21:12.620 --> 00:21:17.380
If the price of a good really depends on the subjective importance of the good, then how

231
00:21:17.380 --> 00:21:22.420
is it that water, which is essential to human survival, commands a far lower price than

232
00:21:22.420 --> 00:21:28.660
diamonds, which are much less important than water? This apparent paradox played in favour

233
00:21:28.660 --> 00:21:34.980
of the labour theory of value, virtually the only alternative to the subjectivist approach.

234
00:21:34.980 --> 00:21:39.740
Whatever the problems of the labour theory of value, it did not contradict reality as

235
00:21:39.740 --> 00:21:46.700
strikingly as its subjectivist competitor. Menger showed that the paradox is only apparent,

236
00:21:46.700 --> 00:21:52.360
it vanishes as soon as we stop asking about the value of entire classes of goods, which

237
00:21:52.360 --> 00:21:57.300
are economically irrelevant because they are not subject to human decision-making. If we

238
00:21:57.300 --> 00:22:03.020
ask instead about the laws that rule the evaluation of individual units of a good, the answer

239
00:22:03.020 --> 00:22:09.420
becomes clear. Water is so abundant that it not only serves to satisfy the most important,

240
00:22:09.420 --> 00:22:14.900
and thus most highly valued human need for water, but also far less important needs for

241
00:22:14.900 --> 00:22:20.100
water such as decorative fountains. It is the value of the least important but still

242
00:22:20.100 --> 00:22:25.620
satisfied need that determines the economic value of every unit of water, which therefore

243
00:22:25.620 --> 00:22:31.820
commands a low market price. By contrast, diamonds are so rare that the available supply

244
00:22:31.820 --> 00:22:36.860
can only satisfy the most important needs for them, and as a consequence they are very

245
00:22:36.860 --> 00:22:43.540
Menger also showed that the value of factors of production is always derived from the value

246
00:22:43.540 --> 00:22:48.920
of consumer goods, and not the other way around. Contrary to the assertion of cost of production

247
00:22:48.920 --> 00:22:53.540
theorists, a bottle of wine is not valuable because it has been produced with valuable

248
00:22:53.540 --> 00:22:58.800
land and valuable labour. The land and the labour invested in winemaking are valuable

249
00:22:58.800 --> 00:23:03.380
in the first place because consumers value the bottle of wine.

250
00:23:03.380 --> 00:23:10.300
Finally, Menger argued that the micro-phenomenon of value exists independent of any social

251
00:23:10.300 --> 00:23:16.420
system of the division of labour. Thus, he starts analysing the macro-phenomena of exchange,

252
00:23:16.420 --> 00:23:20.900
prices and money only after his chapter on value.

253
00:23:20.900 --> 00:23:26.180
In the light of Menger's analysis, the market economy appeared as one great organism, geared

254
00:23:26.180 --> 00:23:32.160
to it the satisfaction of consumer needs. Not only the market prices, but also the institutions

255
00:23:32.160 --> 00:23:37.040
Theories of the market, such as money, are part and parcel of a rational order that can

256
00:23:37.040 --> 00:23:42.680
exist and operate without needing the assistance of political authorities. In a way Menger

257
00:23:42.680 --> 00:23:48.760
delivered a compliment to Kondiak's thesis that human needs are the great regulator of

258
00:23:48.760 --> 00:23:55.200
all human institutions. Kondiak had made his case from an economic and most famously from

259
00:23:55.200 --> 00:24:01.760
an epistemological point of view, arguing that perceptions are determined by needs.

260
00:24:01.760 --> 00:24:06.500
He lacked the important element of marginalism, however, and it was on this that Menger built

261
00:24:06.500 --> 00:24:10.240
a complete and thorough revision of economic science.

262
00:24:10.240 --> 00:24:16.280
Menger's Work in the German Context The ancient subjectivist theory of value had

263
00:24:16.280 --> 00:24:22.440
survived in fragmentary form in 19th-century German economic writings. In 1806, Scott

264
00:24:22.440 --> 00:24:28.600
Liebhufeland called the subjectivist theory the traditional view and recommended never

265
00:24:28.600 --> 00:24:33.400
never to deviate from it. In this context, the young economists from Vienna were seen

266
00:24:33.400 --> 00:24:39.160
as a reformer rather than a revolutionary, thus avoiding the fate of Kondiak. Before

267
00:24:39.160 --> 00:24:44.920
Menger, various German economists had criticised the labour theory of value specifically and

268
00:24:44.920 --> 00:24:51.280
rejected the doctrine of inherent value in general. Menger's view that value was subjective,

269
00:24:51.280 --> 00:24:57.120
personal, individual, in nature, was not exceptional among German authors of the first half of

270
00:24:57.120 --> 00:25:02.080
of the Nineteenth Century. Indeed, some of them even knew the principle of marginal subjective

271
00:25:02.080 --> 00:25:08.360
value. But their insights were merely disconnected observations. None of Menger's German predecessors

272
00:25:08.360 --> 00:25:14.800
recognised the central importance of marginal value, and none had produced a unified subjectivist

273
00:25:14.800 --> 00:25:22.400
theory. In the 1860s, two unconnected layers of analysis subsisted in the German textbooks.

274
00:25:22.400 --> 00:25:28.360
Menger price theories typically featured cost-of-production explanations as a dominant component and allowed

275
00:25:28.360 --> 00:25:34.920
for an incoherent coexistence with the traditional subjective value explanations. Erich Streisler

276
00:25:34.920 --> 00:25:40.120
points out that Alfred Marshall's Principles of Economics had the exact structure of a

277
00:25:40.120 --> 00:25:47.280
typical German textbook. Karl Marx heaped scorn and ridicule on this blatant display of eclecticism.

278
00:25:47.280 --> 00:25:52.000
He was right to do so. Menger took what was no more than hinted at in the writings of

279
00:25:52.000 --> 00:25:57.720
as Predecessors and presented it in a systematic treatise that revolutionised the profession's

280
00:25:57.720 --> 00:26:03.720
view on the relations between human needs, value and prices. Through this systematic

281
00:26:03.720 --> 00:26:10.360
attempt to look for the causes of these relations in the simplest facts open to empirical inquiry,

282
00:26:10.360 --> 00:26:15.760
the elements of the human economy, Menger put the discussion of needs, goods, economic

283
00:26:15.760 --> 00:26:21.980
systems, productions, prices, income, consumption, etc. on completely new ground.

284
00:26:21.980 --> 00:26:27.440
The contrast to his eclectic German predecessors could not have been greater. Their eclecticism

285
00:26:27.440 --> 00:26:32.680
was reinforced by tendencies Menger avoided. In particular, German economists tended to

286
00:26:32.680 --> 00:26:39.160
engage in excessive and often pointless record-keeping and classification of economic phenomena,

287
00:26:39.160 --> 00:26:43.100
an inclination that reflected the political climate of the time.

288
00:26:43.100 --> 00:26:48.820
The restoration of monarchy and a concomitant fight against liberalism between 1815 and

289
00:26:48.820 --> 00:26:54.580
1848 made it imprudent to delve too deeply into theoretical considerations which might

290
00:26:54.580 --> 00:26:59.540
lead to a critical appraisal of the limits of government. As William Johnson said, at

291
00:26:59.540 --> 00:27:04.780
a time when it was forbidden to debate matters of fundamental principle, scholars retreated

292
00:27:04.780 --> 00:27:10.440
into collecting data. The record-keeping approach to economic analysis reached its climax by

293
00:27:10.440 --> 00:27:15.540
the end of the century with the ascension of the younger historical school, as did many

294
00:27:15.540 --> 00:27:19.820
and the other academic employees of the new German Central State, they saw themselves

295
00:27:19.820 --> 00:27:25.300
as the intellectual bodyguards of the House of Hohenzollern. This point of view was not

296
00:27:25.300 --> 00:27:30.860
limited to intellectuals working in ideological fields, such as history, political economy

297
00:27:30.860 --> 00:27:36.700
or philosophy. In a public lecture given on August 3, 1870, Emile Dubois-Rémond, the

298
00:27:36.700 --> 00:27:41.720
rector of the Frederick William University of Berlin and a pioneer of electrophysiology

299
00:27:41.720 --> 00:27:54.040
A related German shortcoming that Menger scrupulously avoided was historicism, the tendency to

300
00:27:54.040 --> 00:28:00.840
regard regularities in economic phenomena as historical laws, that is, as conditioned

301
00:28:00.840 --> 00:28:06.440
by the particular circumstances of time and place. Though the German economists of those

302
00:28:06.440 --> 00:28:10.980
days would have agreed with Menger that all economic phenomena were somehow related to

303
00:28:10.980 --> 00:28:15.720
to one another, and that one of the purposes of economic science was to find out what the

304
00:28:15.720 --> 00:28:21.300
relationship was. Menger's analysis revealed that these relationships were laws that held

305
00:28:21.300 --> 00:28:27.440
true at all times and places. Moreover, he showed that they could be studied without

306
00:28:27.440 --> 00:28:33.180
reference to the concrete historical context. His book featured many concrete illustrations

307
00:28:33.180 --> 00:28:38.280
of the general laws under discussion, but in essence Menger's principles was an exercise

308
00:28:38.280 --> 00:28:42.280
Methodenstreit

309
00:28:42.280 --> 00:29:00.280
Meanwhile, in the universities of the German Reich, a vigorous movement had emerged that pursued an agenda diametrically opposed to Menger's view and advocated a radical break with the traditional approach in economic science, as Streisler points out in The Influence of German Economics on the Work of Carl Menger and Marshall.

310
00:29:00.280 --> 00:29:05.200
and Marshall. Through this work, Steisler had convincingly corrected the hereto prevailing

311
00:29:05.200 --> 00:29:09.880
notion that the younger historical school was somehow more deeply rooted in the German

312
00:29:09.880 --> 00:29:16.440
tradition of economic science than Carl Menger. As Steisler stated, the real revolutionary

313
00:29:16.440 --> 00:29:22.720
was Gustav Schmoller, not Menger. While Menger sought to turn economic theory into an analytical

314
00:29:22.720 --> 00:29:28.080
science, the young radicals in Berlin pursued a complete overthrow of theoretical research,

315
00:29:28.080 --> 00:29:33.640
replacing it instead with historical studies. The leader of this group was Gustav Schmoller,

316
00:29:33.640 --> 00:29:39.560
a young professor from the University of Halle. Schmoller was a professor in Halle from 1864

317
00:29:39.560 --> 00:29:45.480
to 1872. Being one of the first beneficiaries of the Prussian-German victory over France

318
00:29:45.480 --> 00:29:52.080
in the Franco-Prussian War, he moved to the University of Strasbourg, 1872-1882, before

319
00:29:52.080 --> 00:30:03.520
Schmoller's great goal, overriding all his theoretical and methodological concerns, was

320
00:30:03.520 --> 00:30:09.000
to combat the growing intellectual and practical influence of laissez-faire liberalism in Germany.

321
00:30:09.000 --> 00:30:13.080
His strategy was to promote the discussion of the social question, by which he meant

322
00:30:13.080 --> 00:30:17.540
the question of how government could promote the welfare of the working classes. That the

323
00:30:17.540 --> 00:30:27.580
Schmoller put his strategy into practice through an association of like-minded intellectuals

324
00:30:27.580 --> 00:30:33.620
and political leaders, most of whom were university professors and civil servants. In October

325
00:30:33.620 --> 00:30:40.060
1872 he convened a first national meeting of men of all parties of whom it can be assumed

326
00:30:40.060 --> 00:30:45.060
that they have interest in and moral pathos for the social question, and that they do

327
00:30:45.060 --> 00:30:49.980
do not believe the absolute laissez-faire and laissez-passer to be the right thing as far

328
00:30:49.980 --> 00:30:52.100
as the social question is concerned.

329
00:30:52.100 --> 00:30:57.300
Schmoller and two others who would become long-time leaders of the group, the Breslau

330
00:30:57.300 --> 00:31:02.860
professor Lure Brentano and the Berlin statistician Ernst Engel, addressed the meeting with lectures

331
00:31:02.860 --> 00:31:08.620
on strikes and labour unions, on German factory laws and on the housing question.

332
00:31:08.620 --> 00:31:13.780
The distinct anti-market and pro-government orientation of these university professors

333
00:31:13.780 --> 00:31:19.700
quickly earned them the sobriquet of Kathederssozialisten, or Socialists of the Chair.

334
00:31:19.700 --> 00:31:24.980
The smear term Kathederssozialisten was coined by Heinrich Bernhard Oppenheim in his book

335
00:31:24.980 --> 00:31:31.100
Der Kathederssozialismus. The only Austrian participant in the initial 1872 meeting was

336
00:31:31.100 --> 00:31:37.860
one Dr. Friedmann, probably Otto Bernhard Friedmann, a journalist from Vienna. Significantly,

337
00:31:37.860 --> 00:31:42.020
their first meeting took place in the city of Eisenach, which in the same year had hosted

338
00:31:42.020 --> 00:31:47.860
the founding convention of the Sozialistische Partei Deutschlands, Socialist Party of Germany.

339
00:31:47.860 --> 00:31:52.100
Because the SPD was the very first socialist party in the world, Eisenach had become the

340
00:31:52.100 --> 00:31:58.940
symbol of the organised socialist movement. The group now founded the Verein für Sozialpolitik,

341
00:31:58.940 --> 00:32:04.740
Association for Social Policy, with the explicit purpose of promoting welfare policies of the

342
00:32:04.740 --> 00:32:11.260
new German central state. The first president was Erwin Nasse, a professor from Bonn. Schmoller,

343
00:32:11.260 --> 00:32:17.180
The man who in 1872 had been a young man became Nasser's successor in 1890 and remained

344
00:32:17.180 --> 00:32:20.780
president until his death in 1917.

345
00:32:20.780 --> 00:32:25.700
The Verein organized plenary meetings, which took place every other year, and meetings

346
00:32:25.700 --> 00:32:28.700
of an elected committee, Auschuss.

347
00:32:28.700 --> 00:32:33.380
These meetings had a deep and often immediate impact on German policies because they provided

348
00:32:33.380 --> 00:32:38.740
the neutral territory for the representatives of the most powerful organized groups – university

349
00:32:38.740 --> 00:32:43.740
Professors, labour union officials, high ranking civil servants and entrepreneurs met

350
00:32:43.740 --> 00:32:48.540
in the Vérein, got to know one another and forged political compromises on the issues

351
00:32:48.540 --> 00:32:49.540
of the day.

352
00:32:49.540 --> 00:32:55.080
The strong practical orientation was also visible in the Vérein's publication series.

353
00:32:55.080 --> 00:32:59.940
Each volume addressed a different pressing social problem, analysed its symptoms and

354
00:32:59.940 --> 00:33:03.860
invariably ended with a call for government action.

355
00:33:03.860 --> 00:33:05.580
Ralph Raico states,

356
00:33:05.580 --> 00:33:13.240
Many of the 134 intensively researched volumes that were published until 1914 virtually served

357
00:33:13.240 --> 00:33:19.220
as indictments of various flaws and grievances of the existing system, and each of them called

358
00:33:19.220 --> 00:33:21.280
for government action.

359
00:33:21.280 --> 00:33:25.980
The main goal of the Socialists of the Chair, namely to change public opinion within the

360
00:33:25.980 --> 00:33:32.680
educated bourgeoisie and especially within the bureaucracy, was attained to a large extent.

361
00:33:32.680 --> 00:33:36.580
Through these activities, the Verein became one of the most important vehicles for the

362
00:33:36.580 --> 00:33:42.800
consolidation and expansion of the new German government civil service. The professors and

363
00:33:42.800 --> 00:33:47.660
the other civil servants saw themselves as neutral mediators among the various contesting

364
00:33:47.660 --> 00:33:53.160
social groups. Every solution to any perceived social problem invariably involved either

365
00:33:53.160 --> 00:33:59.640
their active participation or their intermediation. Many years later, Mises characterized their

366
00:33:59.640 --> 00:34:06.760
It is the mentality of officialdom, which according to Brentano was the only sounding

367
00:34:06.760 --> 00:34:11.960
board of the Association for Social Policy that considers as constructive and policy

368
00:34:11.960 --> 00:34:18.400
only that ideology which calls for the greatest number of offices and officials. And he who

369
00:34:18.400 --> 00:34:24.400
seeks to reduce the number of state agents is decried as a negative thinker or an enemy

370
00:34:24.400 --> 00:34:25.840
of the State.

371
00:34:25.840 --> 00:34:31.880
As they saw it, they promoted political compromise between the left and right, democracy and

372
00:34:31.880 --> 00:34:37.960
monarchy, utilitarianism and justice, laborers and entrepreneurs.

373
00:34:37.960 --> 00:34:42.000
They considered themselves neutral arbiters, because they considered these conflicts from

374
00:34:42.000 --> 00:34:47.840
the higher point of view of the new central government, which represented the entire nation.

375
00:34:47.840 --> 00:34:54.320
The era of the Verein für sozialpolitik coincided with the heyday of German political centralization.

376
00:34:54.320 --> 00:35:00.760
Starting in the early 1890s, however, the government began to turn its back on the Verein.

377
00:35:00.760 --> 00:35:06.480
Its constant agitation for left-wing political reform had been too successful, and it risked

378
00:35:06.480 --> 00:35:10.160
losing its reputation for political neutrality.

379
00:35:10.160 --> 00:35:15.760
For a while, Schmoller managed to steer against this trend, but the Verein's very success

380
00:35:15.760 --> 00:35:18.420
eventually spelled its doom.

381
00:35:18.420 --> 00:35:23.020
At the end of the 19th century, it had already attracted a great number of intellectuals

382
00:35:23.020 --> 00:35:28.860
and Social Leaders, such as Max Weber, Ludwig Poehler and Andreas Voigt, who were in principle

383
00:35:28.860 --> 00:35:34.300
opposed to the Verein's blind pro-government prejudices and had joined only because of

384
00:35:34.300 --> 00:35:36.820
its practical importance.

385
00:35:36.820 --> 00:35:42.020
In the early years, the most vociferous opposition to the Verein's agenda came from non-members

386
00:35:42.020 --> 00:35:47.220
such as Heinrich Oppenheim and Julius Wolf. Poehler and Voigt published their influential

387
00:35:47.220 --> 00:35:53.620
and Devastating Critiques of the Virein only after they left in 1905. Under the leadership

388
00:35:53.620 --> 00:35:58.620
of Max Weber, these men repeatedly clashed with the Virein establishment over the question

389
00:35:58.620 --> 00:36:03.980
of scientific proof in political matters. After World War I, Weber's followers would

390
00:36:03.980 --> 00:36:09.960
forever change the character of the Virein, turning it into a purely academic institution.

391
00:36:09.960 --> 00:36:16.000
But in its glory days of the late 1870s and 1880s, the Virein, and in particular the person

392
00:36:16.000 --> 00:36:22.720
of Gustav Schmoller completely transformed the language of German language economic science.

393
00:36:22.720 --> 00:36:27.320
Schmoller also had a lasting influence on German economics through his personal friendship

394
00:36:27.320 --> 00:36:32.160
with Friedrich Althof, a high-ranking civil servant in Prussia's Ministry of Education

395
00:36:32.160 --> 00:36:38.400
who from 1882 to 1907 controlled the nominations to the chairs of political economy in Prussian

396
00:36:38.400 --> 00:36:43.160
universities. It soon became obvious that to obtain a full professorship one had to

397
00:36:43.160 --> 00:36:48.600
Subscribe without qualifications to the programme defined in Schmoller's writings.

398
00:36:48.600 --> 00:36:52.740
Although Schmoller's agenda was targeted primarily against the heroes of the free trade

399
00:36:52.740 --> 00:36:58.620
movement – classical economists such as Adam Smith, Jean-Baptiste Say and David Ricardo

400
00:36:58.620 --> 00:37:04.640
– it effectively killed the teaching of any type of economic theory in German universities.

401
00:37:04.640 --> 00:37:09.920
The so-called younger historical school under Schmoller went far beyond the healthy scepticism

402
00:37:09.920 --> 00:37:14.800
A system of theoretical abstractions that had characterised the works of the previous generation

403
00:37:14.800 --> 00:37:20.920
of German economists, the Schmarrites denied outright that there were any universal social

404
00:37:20.920 --> 00:37:26.880
laws at all. There were only certain regularities that changed with the changing institutions

405
00:37:26.880 --> 00:37:33.840
of society. The job of government science was only incidentally to study these context-dependent

406
00:37:33.840 --> 00:37:38.660
regularities. Its essential task was to study the concrete meaning of the idea of justice

407
00:37:38.660 --> 00:37:44.060
at a given time and place, because this was the true basis of the principle of social

408
00:37:44.060 --> 00:37:49.980
reform, adjusting the existing social institutions to the prevailing feelings of what was right

409
00:37:49.980 --> 00:37:51.060
and just.

410
00:37:51.060 --> 00:37:57.940
Schmoller thus advocated radical relativism and radical legal positivism, the most suitable

411
00:37:57.940 --> 00:38:04.540
doctrines for justifying his belief in and adoration of omnipotent government. Carl Menger

412
00:38:04.540 --> 00:38:09.620
Menger had followed the growth of the Schmoller movement for some years. He realized that,

413
00:38:09.620 --> 00:38:14.240
under the supervening influence of the younger historical school, Germany and Austria, which

414
00:38:14.240 --> 00:38:18.480
was fully in Germany's intellectual orbit, were in the process of destroying the work

415
00:38:18.480 --> 00:38:24.440
of a century of economic scholarship. Menger's first treatise fell on deaf ears. It had found

416
00:38:24.440 --> 00:38:28.880
followers in Austria, but this was due in part to his personal influence on academic

417
00:38:28.880 --> 00:38:33.120
nominations, the German universities were impenetrable.

418
00:38:33.120 --> 00:38:38.160
Menger decided to lay the foundation for future works in positive economic analysis through

419
00:38:38.160 --> 00:38:42.160
a systematic methodological defense of his new approach.

420
00:38:42.160 --> 00:38:46.960
The result of these efforts was another great book, Untersuchungen über die Methode der

421
00:38:46.960 --> 00:38:51.760
Sozialwissenschaften und der politische Ökonomie insbesondere, Investigations into the Method

422
00:38:51.760 --> 00:38:55.760
of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics.

423
00:38:55.760 --> 00:39:01.060
Menger insisted that the economic laws he had discussed were exact laws of reality,

424
00:39:01.060 --> 00:39:05.780
and that the methods of historical research were entirely unable to discover such economic

425
00:39:05.780 --> 00:39:11.120
laws. These views could not fail to offend the historicist sensibilities of the academic

426
00:39:11.120 --> 00:39:16.580
establishment, which were especially strong among economists of Menger's own generation.

427
00:39:16.580 --> 00:39:21.300
In fact, while historicism was already noticeable in the works of the older historical school

428
00:39:21.300 --> 00:39:26.300
School, Rocha, Knies, Hildebrandt and others. In the writings of the younger historical

429
00:39:26.300 --> 00:39:32.100
school, Schmoller, Lexis and others, it had become a dogma. Schmoller published a highly

430
00:39:32.100 --> 00:39:37.340
critical review of Menger's investigations, claiming that Menger had neglected to substantiate

431
00:39:37.340 --> 00:39:42.220
his analysis with fitting historical studies. In today's jargon, Menger had indulged in

432
00:39:42.220 --> 00:39:47.560
an exercise in pure theory which lacked empirical evidence in its support. This attack could

433
00:39:47.560 --> 00:39:52.720
have led to sober scholarly debate if Schmoller had not tried to stigmatize his opponent by

434
00:39:52.720 --> 00:39:58.240
labeling his approach the Mancunian individualistic method, associating Menger with the supposedly

435
00:39:58.240 --> 00:40:00.840
discredited Manchester School.

436
00:40:00.840 --> 00:40:05.280
The debate between Menger and Schmoller soon drew their disciples into heated exchange,

437
00:40:05.280 --> 00:40:10.280
during which even the grand old man of German economics, Wilhelm Rocher, heaped scorn on

438
00:40:10.280 --> 00:40:11.420
Menger.

439
00:40:11.420 --> 00:40:15.680
This collective exchange involved several more articles and books.

440
00:40:15.680 --> 00:40:21.800
This unusually polemical and emotional character resulted from the fact that for Schmoller,

441
00:40:21.800 --> 00:40:26.200
any kind of economic theory strengthened the case for capitalism.

442
00:40:26.200 --> 00:40:31.720
The model of opposition between libertarian-minded theorists and statist historians is not a

443
00:40:31.720 --> 00:40:36.660
complete reflection of the state of affairs. There were in fact market-friendly historicists

444
00:40:36.660 --> 00:40:42.200
such as Luiu Brentano as well as theorists with strong statist inclinations such as

445
00:40:42.200 --> 00:40:49.520
Adolf Wagner or even Wieser. The debate culminated in 1895 when Menger's last great student

446
00:40:49.520 --> 00:40:54.680
Richard Schiller published his habilitation thesis in which he refuted point by point

447
00:40:54.680 --> 00:40:59.060
the criticism of the classical economists that Bruno Hildebrandt had expressed in his

448
00:40:59.060 --> 00:41:04.860
inaugural lecture at the University of Vienna. Hildebrandt had succeeded Lorenz von Stein

449
00:41:04.860 --> 00:41:09.120
but stayed only one year in Vienna. In spite of the heated atmosphere in which it took

450
00:41:09.120 --> 00:41:13.720
In place, the debate on method between Menger and Schmoller was useful for the clarification

451
00:41:13.720 --> 00:41:18.960
of the differences between theoretical and applied economic research.

452
00:41:18.960 --> 00:41:24.500
While it did not produce any lasting or definitive results, it did renew interest in the topic

453
00:41:24.500 --> 00:41:29.520
and highlighted the importance of certain fundamental distinctions that later economists,

454
00:41:29.520 --> 00:41:35.440
philosophers and historians such as Max Weber, Heinrich Rickert, Ludwig von Mises and Alfred

455
00:41:35.440 --> 00:41:36.840
Schutz would develop.

456
00:41:36.840 --> 00:41:41.400
Of particular concern would be the distinction between the fundamentally different natures

457
00:41:41.400 --> 00:41:47.480
of natural science, history and economics. What is less often seen is that the opposition

458
00:41:47.480 --> 00:41:53.280
that rallied all theorists behind Menger and all historians behind Schmoller caused some

459
00:41:53.280 --> 00:41:58.840
important differences within each group to be neglected. This was bound to promote confusion,

460
00:41:58.840 --> 00:42:03.720
especially within the ranks of the theorists who tended to be seen and to see themselves

461
00:42:03.720 --> 00:42:08.760
as adhering to THE economic theory, where they in fact held significantly different

462
00:42:08.760 --> 00:42:12.760
notions of the subject matter and contents of their science.

463
00:42:12.760 --> 00:42:18.740
Menger's unique contribution tended to be perceived as only one part of a broad consensus

464
00:42:18.740 --> 00:42:22.600
on the main outline of THE new economic theory.

465
00:42:22.600 --> 00:42:25.840
Menger did not share this perception.

466
00:42:25.840 --> 00:42:30.340
The Austrian School and the Gossen School.

467
00:42:30.340 --> 00:42:36.700
With just two books, Menger had put economic and social thought on completely new foundations.

468
00:42:36.700 --> 00:42:41.580
Principles pioneered the application of the empirical method in economic theory, and investigations

469
00:42:41.580 --> 00:42:46.120
had justified the method and clarified the relationship between the resulting theory

470
00:42:46.120 --> 00:42:49.000
and other social sciences.

471
00:42:49.000 --> 00:42:54.380
Economic science was no longer just the study of visible economic phenomena such as prices,

472
00:42:54.380 --> 00:42:59.100
money, production, it had become instead the study of how these phenomena were caused by

473
00:42:59.100 --> 00:43:04.260
by the interaction between human ideas and an environment offering limited resources

474
00:43:04.260 --> 00:43:09.880
for the satisfaction of human needs. It took some time for both his opponents and his followers

475
00:43:09.880 --> 00:43:14.540
to grasp the full impact of the Mangerian Revolution. For his contemporaries, the Mangerian

476
00:43:14.540 --> 00:43:19.940
project was attractive for reasons other than the grand new vision it implied. In particular,

477
00:43:19.940 --> 00:43:24.740
it was Menger's unique analytical method of developing economic theory as a descriptive

478
00:43:24.740 --> 00:43:28.580
Science of the Real World that Attracted Young Disciples.

479
00:43:28.580 --> 00:43:34.100
Menger's empirical method fit the ideal of its day. Schools and universities had thoroughly

480
00:43:34.100 --> 00:43:40.120
prepared the young scientific elite to appreciate the virtues of empirical research. More than

481
00:43:40.120 --> 00:43:44.580
the universities of other countries at that time, Germany's institutions of higher learning

482
00:43:44.580 --> 00:43:51.020
insisted on the necessity of empirical investigations in virtually all fields. Surprisingly, this

483
00:43:51.020 --> 00:43:55.340
Germany's orientation was the product of the idealist philosophy of Immanuel Kant, which

484
00:43:55.340 --> 00:44:00.100
stressed that knowledge about the objects of the exterior world could only be gained

485
00:44:00.100 --> 00:44:04.280
through sensory experience, and in particular through observation.

486
00:44:04.280 --> 00:44:08.740
German scientists were more willing than others to leave their armchairs and offices for field

487
00:44:08.740 --> 00:44:13.900
research to engage in systematic observation of nature. The famous Alexander von Humboldt

488
00:44:13.900 --> 00:44:18.700
was a pioneer of this movement, but others soon began to follow. German science excelled

489
00:44:18.700 --> 00:44:24.180
in Biology, Physics, Chemistry, Medicine, History and virtually all other fields of

490
00:44:24.180 --> 00:44:29.280
knowledge. In the field of political economy, however, which was usually taught under the

491
00:44:29.280 --> 00:44:35.180
name of government science, the call for an empirical foundation had led to the idealisation

492
00:44:35.180 --> 00:44:41.220
of historical research. The historicists claimed that there was no other social science but

493
00:44:41.220 --> 00:44:46.620
history, and that economic theory, insofar as it had scientific merit at all, had to

494
00:44:46.620 --> 00:45:15.740
A case in point was young Ludwig von Mises. Steeped as he was in the prejudices of interventionism

495
00:45:15.740 --> 00:45:21.740
and in the quest for a truly scientific foundation for economic policy, Mises would not have

496
00:45:21.740 --> 00:45:27.660
found Ricardo convincing, but Meyer convinced him that there was such a thing as a scientific

497
00:45:27.660 --> 00:45:33.340
economic theory, a body of propositions about empirical reality distinctly different from

498
00:45:33.340 --> 00:45:40.340
the propositions derived from historical research. Mises yielded to the evidence and became a

499
00:45:40.340 --> 00:45:46.900
and he would remain one the rest of his life. In later works, Mises would modify, generalise

500
00:45:46.900 --> 00:45:52.420
and qualify Menger's views. In particular, he became famous for his interpretation of

501
00:45:52.420 --> 00:45:58.820
the epistemological status of the propositions of economic science, that is, for his claim

502
00:45:58.820 --> 00:46:04.660
that these propositions are true on an a priori grounds and therefore cannot be verified or

503
00:46:04.660 --> 00:46:09.340
refuted by the evidence of the senses. But these claims were attempts to clarify the

504
00:46:09.340 --> 00:46:13.660
The position that Mises had inherited from Menger. The difference between Menger's

505
00:46:13.660 --> 00:46:19.280
Aristotelian rhetoric and the Kantian phrasing used by Mises is glaring, but the difference

506
00:46:19.280 --> 00:46:23.880
is mainly rhetorical. The principal thread of continuity between

507
00:46:23.880 --> 00:46:29.440
Menger and Mises is an adherence to the same scientific programme of developing economic

508
00:46:29.440 --> 00:46:34.720
theory as a descriptive discipline, distinct from other descriptive disciplines such as

509
00:46:34.720 --> 00:46:41.640
Both Menger and Mises believed that their theories described certain general features

510
00:46:41.640 --> 00:46:47.340
of human action that exist and operate at all times and places. This is what set them

511
00:46:47.340 --> 00:46:53.400
fundamentally apart from Wieser and Schumpeter, and this is what still sets Manchurian economists

512
00:46:53.400 --> 00:46:59.360
apart from all other economists. Menger's method is also what most sharply

513
00:46:59.360 --> 00:47:04.700
distinguished him from Leon Walras and William Stanley Javits, two authors with whom Menger

514
00:47:04.700 --> 00:47:10.300
Menger is often conflated as co-founders of the marginal utility approach in price theory.

515
00:47:10.300 --> 00:47:14.820
It is true that these three men published at about the same time systematic expositions

516
00:47:14.820 --> 00:47:20.180
of price theory based on the subjective and marginal nature of value. But apart from a

517
00:47:20.180 --> 00:47:25.260
broad agreement on these basic ideas, Menger's theory does not have much in common with the

518
00:47:25.260 --> 00:47:30.460
other two. According to a widespread view, Walras eclipsed Menger and Jevons because

519
00:47:30.460 --> 00:47:36.260
He had pioneered general equilibrium theory, and thereby demonstrated the interdependency

520
00:47:36.260 --> 00:47:41.820
of all economic phenomena. This view is peculiar because this general interdependency is in

521
00:47:41.820 --> 00:47:47.300
fact a presupposition of any sort of economic analysis. It is in fact merely another way

522
00:47:47.300 --> 00:47:53.140
of saying that there is scarcity. Mark Blau corrected these erroneous views, stressing

523
00:47:53.140 --> 00:47:58.860
that Menger too analysed economic phenomena in their mutual interdependence. Walras and

524
00:47:58.860 --> 00:48:03.660
When Jevons had to overcome great obstacles in expanding their principles, neither had

525
00:48:03.660 --> 00:48:08.620
the German subjectivist tradition to draw on, and both met with fierce resistance from

526
00:48:08.620 --> 00:48:14.300
the academic establishment. As far as originality and scientific merit are concerned, however,

527
00:48:14.300 --> 00:48:20.380
they cannot compare with Menger. A French predecessor was Jules Dupuis, who published

528
00:48:20.380 --> 00:48:27.300
two articles on marginal value in the late 1840s. Unlike Menger, Jevons and Balras had

529
00:48:27.300 --> 00:48:32.900
had a specific predecessor, albeit an obscure one, whom they acknowledged and praised. The

530
00:48:32.900 --> 00:48:38.540
independent German scholar Hermann Heinrich Gossen had anticipated their central tenets

531
00:48:38.540 --> 00:48:45.200
and their approach to price theory. By following Gossen, Jevons and Maras developed a marginal

532
00:48:45.200 --> 00:48:50.940
utility theory of prices that was markedly less successful at describing observed reality

533
00:48:50.940 --> 00:48:56.140
than was Menger's marginal value approach. The differences between Menger on the one

534
00:48:56.140 --> 00:49:22.900
Enwickelung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs – The Duction of the Laws of Human Interrelationships

535
00:49:22.900 --> 00:49:30.020
In this work he combined two central ideas into a general treatise on human behaviour.

536
00:49:30.020 --> 00:49:35.380
First Gosson thought that economic science concerned laws that rule human psychology

537
00:49:35.380 --> 00:49:40.960
as it relates to human action. The most fundamental psychological laws, he claimed, were two

538
00:49:40.960 --> 00:49:45.860
laws of want satisfaction that later came to be known as Gosson's first and second

539
00:49:45.860 --> 00:49:51.540
law. According to the first law, the satisfaction derived from the consumption of any good will

540
00:49:51.540 --> 00:49:56.660
will at some point reach a maximum. Neither higher nor lower consumption will produce

541
00:49:56.660 --> 00:50:01.980
greater satisfaction. According to the second law of Gossan, all goods should be consumed

542
00:50:01.980 --> 00:50:06.860
in such quantities that the contribution to overall satisfaction through the marginal

543
00:50:06.860 --> 00:50:13.100
consumption of each good is exactly equal. Second, Gossan sought to describe human action

544
00:50:13.100 --> 00:50:18.500
with algebra and graphs and relied on several implicit and false postulates in order to

545
00:50:18.500 --> 00:50:25.420
to attain his goal. For example, he postulated that value is measurable, and that the values

546
00:50:25.420 --> 00:50:31.280
of different persons can be meaningfully combined. It was this procedure that made his approach

547
00:50:31.280 --> 00:50:36.060
especially contestable in the eyes of the academic establishment of German economists,

548
00:50:36.060 --> 00:50:41.700
who abhorred speculations disconnected from the observed world. Gossen's book also suffered

549
00:50:41.700 --> 00:50:47.040
from grave formal shortcomings, being written in one continuous text without chapter headings

550
00:50:47.040 --> 00:50:52.940
or a Table of Contents. This format and his excessive use of algebra and graphs made his

551
00:50:52.940 --> 00:50:58.860
work a tedious and distasteful reading experience, but fell into oblivion where it probably would

552
00:50:58.860 --> 00:51:02.420
have remained were it not for William Stanley Jevons.

553
00:51:02.420 --> 00:51:07.620
When Jevons published the first edition of his Principles of Political Economy, 1871,

554
00:51:07.620 --> 00:51:14.240
he considered his theory unprecedented. In 1878, Professor Adamson, Jevons's successor

555
00:51:14.240 --> 00:51:18.880
Professor at Owens College in Manchester came across a reference to Gosson's book in A

556
00:51:18.880 --> 00:51:24.000
History of Economic Thought and informed his friend Jevons, who celebrated Gosson in the

557
00:51:24.000 --> 00:51:27.840
preface to the second edition of his Principles, 1879.

558
00:51:27.840 --> 00:51:34.160
Walras was even more enthusiastic than Jevons. He compared Gosson to Copernicus and Newton

559
00:51:34.160 --> 00:51:39.940
and translated Gosson's book into French. This is the same Walras who, in his correspondence

560
00:51:39.940 --> 00:51:45.740
with Menger apologised that his German wasn't good enough to digest Grundsätze.

561
00:51:45.740 --> 00:51:49.500
When Menger told him in a letter that he believed there were significant differences between

562
00:51:49.500 --> 00:51:55.300
his own approach and that of Gossen, Walras waxed indignant and replied that he found it

563
00:51:55.300 --> 00:52:00.660
odious to think that Menger would refuse to recognise such an important predecessor.

564
00:52:00.660 --> 00:52:06.620
In a January 27, 1887 letter to Leon Walras, Menger had emphasised that there was only

565
00:52:06.620 --> 00:52:12.060
will be a limited analogy between his approach and Goss'n's, but that there was no conformity

566
00:52:12.060 --> 00:52:18.980
in the decisive questions. Goss'n had indeed anticipated Jevons' and Walras' theories.

567
00:52:18.980 --> 00:52:24.700
Jaffe stresses that Walras initially did not associate diminishing marginal utility with

568
00:52:24.700 --> 00:52:31.060
quantities consumed, but with quantities possessed. It is true that Walras was more cautious

569
00:52:31.060 --> 00:52:35.660
Christ and Gossens and Jevons in speculating on the psychological underpinnings of his

570
00:52:35.660 --> 00:52:40.420
price theory, even though in his Élemore d'économie politique he eventually did bring

571
00:52:40.420 --> 00:52:46.180
in Gossens-style psychological analysis. But as we shall see, the decisive consideration

572
00:52:46.180 --> 00:52:53.060
for our purposes is that value is, for Varas, just as for Gossens and Jevons, a two-sided

573
00:52:53.060 --> 00:52:59.200
relationship involving an acting person and one other object, whereas Menger's analysis

574
00:52:59.200 --> 00:53:21.200
The Three Men had developed general theories that were analogous to Menger's general theory of value and prices, but differed from it in their psychological orientation and in the exact type of explanation they offered.

575
00:53:21.200 --> 00:53:26.880
In Menger's theory, the term value does not refer to a psychological feeling, but rather

576
00:53:26.880 --> 00:53:32.640
to the relative importance for an individual of the marginal unit of good X, that is, to

577
00:53:32.640 --> 00:53:39.500
the importance of X in comparison to the marginal units of other goods Y and Z. The market price

578
00:53:39.500 --> 00:53:44.880
of a good results from the interplay of sellers and buyers, for whom the goods bought and

579
00:53:44.880 --> 00:53:50.080
sold have different relative importance. In contrast, in the theories of the other three

580
00:53:50.080 --> 00:53:54.420
For the authors, the price of a good results from the interplay of sellers and buyers whose

581
00:53:54.420 --> 00:53:59.840
feelings or well-being are differently affected by control of the good.

582
00:53:59.840 --> 00:54:04.180
While Menger explained the pricing process as resulting from the importance of a good

583
00:54:04.180 --> 00:54:09.940
relative to the importance of other goods, Gossen, Jevons and Varas explained the pricing

584
00:54:09.940 --> 00:54:15.660
process as the impact of a marginal quantity of a good on the psychology of the actor,

585
00:54:15.660 --> 00:54:19.980
an impact they called want-satisfaction, Gossen.

586
00:54:19.980 --> 00:54:25.100
Utility, Jevons and Satisfied Needs, Arras

587
00:54:25.100 --> 00:54:31.220
Jevons' marginal utility thus played structurally the same role that marginal value played in

588
00:54:31.220 --> 00:54:36.700
Menger's theory. It delivered an explanation of market prices, but where marginal utility

589
00:54:36.700 --> 00:54:42.380
explains the price of a good by the good's direct impact on human feelings, Menger's

590
00:54:42.380 --> 00:54:47.540
marginal value explains the price of a good by how the good ranks in importance compared

591
00:54:47.540 --> 00:54:53.740
to Other Goods, according to the needs of the individuals involved in the pricing process.

592
00:54:53.740 --> 00:54:59.620
In the psychological approach of Gossen, Jevons and Walras, the human psyche was the great

593
00:54:59.620 --> 00:55:03.860
common denominator for the economic significance of all goods.

594
00:55:03.860 --> 00:55:07.420
In the theory of Menger, there was no such common denominator.

595
00:55:07.420 --> 00:55:13.320
In his approach, value cannot be independent of the specific circumstances of time and

596
00:55:13.320 --> 00:55:14.320
space.

597
00:55:14.320 --> 00:55:20.040
It is inseparable from these circumstances and means different things in different economic

598
00:55:20.040 --> 00:55:25.280
settings. According to Goss and Jevons and Walras, the amount of utility derived from

599
00:55:25.280 --> 00:55:30.440
a good could be different in different situations, but according to Menger, the entire basis

600
00:55:30.440 --> 00:55:35.140
of value is different as soon as the economic context changes, because the good would then

601
00:55:35.140 --> 00:55:39.760
be compared to different other goods. Whatever else one might think of the merits of the

602
00:55:39.760 --> 00:55:43.880
With the psychological approach, it had at least one great attraction, namely that it

603
00:55:43.880 --> 00:55:49.880
allowed the possibility of a mathematical price theory based on marginal utility.

604
00:55:49.880 --> 00:55:54.900
With the human psyche as the common denominator of all economic values, it became conceivable

605
00:55:54.900 --> 00:56:00.100
to represent the want, satisfaction or utility derived from the consumption of a good as

606
00:56:00.100 --> 00:56:03.440
a mathematical function of the qualities consumed.

607
00:56:03.440 --> 00:56:08.920
It became conceivable to scale satisfaction and utility into units with which one could

608
00:56:08.920 --> 00:56:14.800
to perform economic calculation completely disconnected from market prices.

609
00:56:14.800 --> 00:56:21.000
It also became conceivable to combine individual utility functions into something like an aggregate

610
00:56:21.000 --> 00:56:22.540
utility function.

611
00:56:22.540 --> 00:56:28.320
One person's satisfaction and another person's satisfaction can be added into a single quantity

612
00:56:28.320 --> 00:56:31.160
representing their total satisfaction.

613
00:56:31.160 --> 00:56:36.080
And one person's gain added to a different person's loss can be mathematically combined

614
00:56:36.080 --> 00:56:39.620
and to determine whether there is net gain or net loss.

615
00:56:39.620 --> 00:56:44.420
These considerations probably played a role in prompting Gossens, Jeffens and Maras to

616
00:56:44.420 --> 00:56:47.020
choose the psychological approach.

617
00:56:47.020 --> 00:56:52.780
They did not begin with observation and then adopt algebraic and geometric techniques as

618
00:56:52.780 --> 00:56:55.860
the most adequate tools for representing what they observe.

619
00:56:55.860 --> 00:57:00.620
Rather, they began with an agenda, the need to apply mathematics and economics to make

620
00:57:00.620 --> 00:57:05.980
it more scientific, and were looking for a plausible hypothesis to justify their preferred

621
00:57:05.980 --> 00:57:09.540
approach This fact is crucial to understanding the

622
00:57:09.540 --> 00:57:14.940
history of 20th century economic thought. Gosson was already an enthusiastic mathematician

623
00:57:14.940 --> 00:57:20.460
and only studied law under the severe pressure of his father. All of his followers featured

624
00:57:20.460 --> 00:57:26.480
the same mindset. As Mark Blaug points out, Jevons first studied chemistry and biology

625
00:57:26.480 --> 00:57:32.420
and then turned his attention to economics. His inspiration was Bentham's philosophic

626
00:57:32.420 --> 00:57:38.060
Calculus of Pleasure and Pain supplemented by the works of Dionysius Ladner and Fleming

627
00:57:38.060 --> 00:57:42.060
Jenkins, two British engineer economists in the 1860s.

628
00:57:42.060 --> 00:57:47.100
Walras pursued formal studies in letters, science and engineering.

629
00:57:47.100 --> 00:57:52.240
From his father, the economist August Walras, he adopted the conviction that some concept

630
00:57:52.240 --> 00:57:56.660
of utility maximization is the fundamental element of economic science.

631
00:57:56.660 --> 00:58:01.840
Walras's great follower, Wilfredo Pareto, was an engineer and turned to economics only

632
00:58:01.840 --> 00:58:10.360
Similarly, Knut Wichsels and Erwin Fischer's first university degrees were in mathematics.

633
00:58:10.360 --> 00:58:15.140
Gustav Kassel, who according to Blaug had written the most widely read textbook of the

634
00:58:15.140 --> 00:58:20.600
Interwar period, was a PhD in mathematics, then became a schoolmaster and then turned

635
00:58:20.600 --> 00:58:27.480
to economics, becoming the greatest popularizer of general equilibrium economics à la Valrasse.

636
00:58:27.480 --> 00:58:32.840
In contrast, the predominant formative influence on Austrian economists did not come in the

637
00:58:32.840 --> 00:58:37.960
form of mathematical training, but through legal studies.

638
00:58:37.960 --> 00:58:43.520
Until the interwar period, all Austrian economists had to obtain a first degree in law before

639
00:58:43.520 --> 00:58:46.400
they could turn their research to economic problems.

640
00:58:46.400 --> 00:58:52.480
As a consequence, the Vienna economists distinguished themselves by a great capacity to think conceptually

641
00:58:52.480 --> 00:58:57.680
and, more importantly, by their eagerness to relate all of their concepts to the observed

642
00:58:57.680 --> 00:58:59.040
real world.

643
00:58:59.040 --> 00:59:03.480
Their training in law effectively counterbalanced the inclinations some of them felt for the

644
00:59:03.480 --> 00:59:08.680
natural sciences, for example Boehm-Bawerk had in his youth a great interest in theoretical

645
00:59:08.680 --> 00:59:09.900
physics.

646
00:59:09.900 --> 00:59:14.780
This also explains other fictional stipulations to which they resorted, again in distinct

647
00:59:14.780 --> 00:59:16.640
contrast to Menger's method.

648
00:59:16.640 --> 00:59:21.640
In their price theories, they avoided one of the great pitfalls of economic theory a la

649
00:59:21.640 --> 00:59:26.600
by Ricardo, namely, reliance on aggregates. But because they were eager to make political

650
00:59:26.600 --> 00:59:31.440
economy a mathematical discipline, they fell prey to the other great pitfall, reliance

651
00:59:31.440 --> 00:59:38.040
on fictitious ad-hoc postulates. In order to allow for graphical and algebraic representations

652
00:59:38.040 --> 00:59:44.360
of utility, demand and prices, Gossen, Jevons and Walras assumed that all goods were infinitely

653
00:59:44.360 --> 00:59:50.300
divisible, and in order to justify their assumption that the market is in equilibrium, they neglected

654
00:59:50.300 --> 00:59:52.220
The Existence of Error

655
00:59:52.220 --> 00:59:57.420
Just as the classical economists had done before them, the Gossan School analysed prices

656
00:59:57.420 --> 01:00:02.900
as they would be if certain special conditions were fulfilled. They analysed hypothetical

657
01:00:02.900 --> 01:00:08.580
equilibrium prices rather than actual market prices. It is here, then, that we find the

658
01:00:08.580 --> 01:00:14.280
great divide between the Austrian and the Gossan schools. Menger paved the way for dealing

659
01:00:14.280 --> 01:00:20.260
with real-world prices. His work made economics more scientific in the true sense of the word

660
01:00:20.260 --> 01:00:34.700
William Jaffe was entirely right when he wrote, Carl Menger clearly stands apart from the

661
01:00:34.700 --> 01:00:39.020
other two reputed founders of the modern marginal utility theory.

662
01:00:39.020 --> 01:00:43.380
No one familiar with the primary literature can doubt for a moment that Menger's treatment

663
01:00:43.380 --> 01:00:48.820
of the structure of wants in relation to evaluation was more profound and more penetrating not

664
01:00:48.820 --> 01:00:53.920
Not only than that of Walrass, who evinced no particular interest in such questions,

665
01:00:53.920 --> 01:00:59.120
but also than that of Jevons, Jaffee went on to identify the root of the greater profundity

666
01:00:59.120 --> 01:01:04.060
in Menger's quest for realism, which prevented him from developing theory in the sense of

667
01:01:04.060 --> 01:01:09.160
a mental construct that is out of touch with concrete experience.

668
01:01:09.160 --> 01:01:13.980
Menger kept too close to the real world for either the verbal or symbolic formulation

669
01:01:13.980 --> 01:01:33.300
With his attention, unswervingly fixed on reality, Menger could not, and did not, abstract

670
01:01:33.300 --> 01:01:38.460
from the difficulties traders face in any attempt to obtain all the information required

671
01:01:38.460 --> 01:01:43.860
for anything like a pinpoint equilibrium determination of market prices to emerge, nor did his

672
01:01:43.860 --> 01:01:48.660
Menger's approach permit him to abstract from the uncertainties that veil the future, even

673
01:01:48.660 --> 01:01:53.620
the near future, in the conscious anticipation of which most present transactions take place.

674
01:01:53.620 --> 01:01:59.940
Neither did he exclude the existence of non-competing groups, or the omnipresence of monopolistic

675
01:01:59.940 --> 01:02:03.220
or monopolloid traders in the market.

676
01:02:03.220 --> 01:02:07.940
At the end of his career Menger enlarged his approach to deal with social problems.

677
01:02:07.940 --> 01:02:10.460
In this respect, too, he was a pioneer.

678
01:02:10.460 --> 01:02:16.780
The very term sociology had recently been invented by the French positivist Auguste Comte, and

679
01:02:16.780 --> 01:02:21.380
there were not yet any recognised professional sociologists around.

680
01:02:21.380 --> 01:02:25.900
Carl Menger became one of the first economists turned sociologists.

681
01:02:25.900 --> 01:02:31.060
Many other Austrian economists such as Schumpeter and Mises would follow in his footsteps.

682
01:02:31.060 --> 01:02:36.240
Mises later explained that this extension of interest is merely a natural consequence

683
01:02:36.240 --> 01:02:40.400
of the new viewpoint that Menger had developed in his principles for the gist of the new

684
01:02:40.400 --> 01:02:47.040
approach was an analysis that focused on individual human action and explained all social phenomena

685
01:02:47.040 --> 01:02:50.800
as resulting from the interaction of individuals.

686
01:02:50.800 --> 01:02:55.880
The Breakthrough of the Austrian School At the University of Vienna, Menger faced

687
01:02:55.880 --> 01:03:01.040
the determined opposition of Lorenz von Stein, the great champion of French socialism in

688
01:03:01.040 --> 01:03:03.600
in Germany and Austria.

689
01:03:03.600 --> 01:03:08.440
Stein rejected Menger's first petition for the Habilitation Degree, accepting his application

690
01:03:08.440 --> 01:03:13.160
only after Menger had his principles printed by the Vienna publisher Wilhelm Braunmüller

691
01:03:13.160 --> 01:03:18.120
at his own expense and sent a proof of the first two chapters to Stein. Having accepted

692
01:03:18.120 --> 01:03:23.940
his application, Stein still failed Menger for the degree. After several favourable reviews

693
01:03:23.940 --> 01:03:29.520
of his book appeared in German professional journals, Menger applied again, and this time

694
01:03:29.520 --> 01:03:35.120
He passed. He immediately received offers to teach outside Vienna but declined because

695
01:03:35.120 --> 01:03:40.720
of the heavy financial losses he would sustain if he abandoned his position at the Wiener

696
01:03:40.720 --> 01:03:46.120
Zeithal. Instead he stayed as a private lecturer at the University of Vienna. A year later

697
01:03:46.120 --> 01:03:51.540
the University of Basel made him a very attractive offer. To keep the gifted young professor

698
01:03:51.540 --> 01:03:56.760
the University of Vienna offered Menger a position as professor extraordinarius of political

699
01:03:56.760 --> 01:04:00.860
of the World Economy and allowed him to keep his position with the Wiener Zeitung.

700
01:04:00.860 --> 01:04:05.580
Roughly speaking, this rank corresponded to a present-day associate professor in the United

701
01:04:05.580 --> 01:04:09.940
States. He accepted and stayed in Vienna for the rest of his career, teaching courses on

702
01:04:09.940 --> 01:04:15.620
banking, credit, general economics and public finance. There must have been some protection

703
01:04:15.620 --> 01:04:20.340
involved. Here it should be remembered that Menger's journalistic activities had early

704
01:04:20.340 --> 01:04:25.100
on brought him in touch with established political forces. These connections probably played

705
01:04:25.100 --> 01:04:29.260
in his favour when he applied for the chair at the University of Vienna.

706
01:04:29.260 --> 01:04:34.820
In the fall of 1874 he abandoned his position with the Wiener Zeitung to have more time

707
01:04:34.820 --> 01:04:39.280
to devote to the research that would lead to the publication of investigations.

708
01:04:39.280 --> 01:04:43.880
In all his academic endeavours Menger met with the continued resistance of the department

709
01:04:43.880 --> 01:04:46.920
which was run by a group under Stein's leadership.

710
01:04:46.920 --> 01:04:52.040
Menger decided to form a new coalition and to wrestle down the old oligarchs, and in

711
01:04:52.040 --> 01:04:59.120
In 1876, he succeeded because a decisive change had occurred in his career. The previous fall,

712
01:04:59.120 --> 01:05:04.240
he had been approached to become the private tutor of Rudolf von Habsburg, the 22-year-old

713
01:05:04.240 --> 01:05:09.240
heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary. This commission was to be the apex of Menger's

714
01:05:09.240 --> 01:05:13.880
pedagogic activities, but it also brought to light his political views, which he had

715
01:05:13.880 --> 01:05:19.480
always been careful not to reveal in any of his published writings. After a careful analysis

716
01:05:19.480 --> 01:05:24.580
of Prince Rudolf's Notebooks, Erich concludes that these books show Menger to have been

717
01:05:24.580 --> 01:05:29.880
a classical economic liberal of the purest water, with a much smaller agenda for the

718
01:05:29.880 --> 01:05:33.080
state in mind than even Adam Smith.

719
01:05:33.080 --> 01:05:38.460
Streisler goes on, Menger's Rudolf Lectures are in fact probably one of the most extreme

720
01:05:38.460 --> 01:05:43.480
statements of the principles of laissez-faire ever put to paper in the academic literature

721
01:05:43.480 --> 01:05:45.480
of economics.

722
01:05:45.480 --> 01:05:51.840
There is just cause for economic action only in abnormal circumstances, only when disaster

723
01:05:51.840 --> 01:05:58.280
is impending, only where government support becomes indispensable should the state step

724
01:05:58.280 --> 01:06:04.400
in. Otherwise, government interference is always harmful.

725
01:06:04.400 --> 01:06:08.800
Menger was smart enough not to present these views on government as his personal opinion.

726
01:06:08.800 --> 01:06:13.480
Rather, he worked from carefully selected readings to drive his message home. He even

727
01:06:13.480 --> 01:06:18.800
Menger chose as his main textbook Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations. Still, Menger's political

728
01:06:18.800 --> 01:06:23.320
views seem to have been familiar enough within the Austrian establishment to cause conflict

729
01:06:23.320 --> 01:06:28.600
over the question of his nomination as Rudolf's tutor. In fact, it came to a confrontation

730
01:06:28.600 --> 01:06:33.880
between the conservative councillors of Rudolf's father Franz Josef and the more liberal-minded

731
01:06:33.880 --> 01:06:40.520
councillors of his mother Elisabeth. The Empress eventually had the last word.

732
01:06:40.520 --> 01:06:45.040
Menger took an extended leave of absence from the University for his work with Rudolf, which

733
01:06:45.040 --> 01:06:51.800
started in January 1876 and lasted for two years. He became one of the most trusted teachers

734
01:06:51.800 --> 01:06:58.440
of the Crown Prince, trusted by Rudolf himself and by his elders. Menger had made his career.

735
01:06:58.440 --> 01:07:04.060
His new monarchial protection quickly lifted him to the rank of full professor at the University

736
01:07:04.060 --> 01:07:10.040
of Vienna, the most prestigious position for an economist in the entire empire. He was

737
01:07:10.040 --> 01:07:14.800
is now in a position of virtually unrivalled influence on the academic social sciences

738
01:07:14.800 --> 01:07:20.680
in Austria-Hungary. Other honours followed almost as a matter of course. He became a

739
01:07:20.680 --> 01:07:25.960
lifetime member of the Herrenhaus, the upper chamber of the Austrian parliament, member

740
01:07:25.960 --> 01:07:31.360
of the academies of sciences in Vienna and Rome, of the Institut de France and of the

741
01:07:31.360 --> 01:07:36.240
Royal Society in Edinburgh. He used this power to settle conflicts within his department

742
01:07:36.240 --> 01:07:41.400
at the University of Vienna. And he also seems to have used it to fill Austria's other chairs

743
01:07:41.400 --> 01:07:47.720
of political economy with his followers, including Boehm-Bawerk and Mises. Mises' characterisation

744
01:07:47.720 --> 01:07:52.520
of Menger's and Boehm-Bawerk's attitude gives a somewhat misleading picture of the

745
01:07:52.520 --> 01:07:57.600
times. In Errenurlen, Mises stresses that these men were not interested in promoting

746
01:07:57.600 --> 01:08:02.480
their cause through their personal power, but that does not mean that they did not have

747
01:08:02.480 --> 01:08:11.660
Menger saw himself as the founder and leader of a new school of social research, and he

748
01:08:11.660 --> 01:08:16.100
strove to raise disciples and to spread them over the land.

749
01:08:16.100 --> 01:08:21.140
In a confidential March 1902 letter to the Austrian Ministry of Culture in which he petitioned

750
01:08:21.140 --> 01:08:26.360
for early retirement, he claimed that his teaching activities have generated results

751
01:08:26.360 --> 01:08:29.020
that surpassed the common results of teaching.

752
01:08:29.020 --> 01:08:33.720
His concerns in particular the foundation of the Austrian School of Economics. He also

753
01:08:33.720 --> 01:08:38.380
points out that many excellent young scholars received their university professors diploma

754
01:08:38.380 --> 01:08:44.300
– L'Habilitation – under his auspices, and that these scholars had obtained a majority

755
01:08:44.300 --> 01:08:48.140
of the chairs of political economy at the Austrian universities.

756
01:08:48.140 --> 01:08:53.900
Besides his main followers, Boehm-Bawerk and Wieser, he referred to Emile Sachs, Johann

757
01:08:53.900 --> 01:09:13.260
The list of those of his students who had not chosen an academic career is no less impressive.

758
01:09:13.260 --> 01:09:19.380
Among them were Moritz Duub, Victor Gretz, Wilhelm Rosenberg, Rudolf Siegert and Ernst

759
01:09:19.380 --> 01:09:20.740
Seidler.

760
01:09:20.740 --> 01:09:25.180
These men would play an important role in Ludwig von Mises' life and career.

761
01:09:25.180 --> 01:09:29.940
Menger was successful not only in developing the continental tradition of economic science,

762
01:09:29.940 --> 01:09:36.740
but also in establishing a network of like-minded young thinkers within the confines of Austria-Hungary.

763
01:09:36.740 --> 01:09:41.260
It appears that the main reason why Menger retired at the comparatively young age of

764
01:09:41.260 --> 01:09:46.460
62 was that he had caused a scandal through an affair with his housemaid.

765
01:09:46.460 --> 01:09:50.820
The affair became public because of the birth of Carl, whom Carl Menger acknowledged as

766
01:09:50.820 --> 01:09:55.940
his son. Carl cost Menger his career, and he thereby also changed the history of the

767
01:09:55.940 --> 01:10:00.220
Austrian School of Economics, which, under Carl's guidance, certainly would have taken

768
01:10:00.220 --> 01:10:05.700
a different course than it did under his successor, Friedrich von Mises. But Carl's birth also

769
01:10:05.700 --> 01:10:10.260
led to rapprochement between the Austrian School and the mainstream, through a more

770
01:10:10.260 --> 01:10:16.620
or direct route. Carl Menger himself would eventually become a famous mathematical economist.

771
01:10:16.620 --> 01:10:21.080
He only failed to get Boehm-Bawerk a chair at the University of Vienna, his favourite

772
01:10:21.080 --> 01:10:27.800
disciple applied twice in 1887 and 1889, but each time the Ministry of Education chose a

773
01:10:27.800 --> 01:10:33.300
different candidate. They argued that Boehm-Bawerk represented the same abstract and purely theoretical

774
01:10:33.300 --> 01:10:38.920
school as the other chairholder, Menger, and that it was necessary to also have a representative

775
01:10:38.920 --> 01:10:45.880
of the New Historical School from Germany. Even this did not prove to be a decisive obstacle.

776
01:10:45.880 --> 01:10:51.740
In the fall of 1889 Boehm-Bawerk went to Vienna to join the Ministry of Finance and became

777
01:10:51.740 --> 01:10:57.040
an adjunct professor at the University of Vienna. In 1905 he obtained a full chair.

778
01:10:57.040 --> 01:11:03.080
Hence, in distinct contrast to all modern, marginalist schools of economic thought, the

779
01:11:03.080 --> 01:11:07.800
Austrian School quickly reached a position of power, protected by intellectual tradition

780
01:11:07.800 --> 01:11:12.120
Education and Political Patronage. Under the leadership of the next generation, it would

781
01:11:12.120 --> 01:11:16.360
obtain a position of unparalleled influence.

782
01:11:16.360 --> 01:11:20.600
Eugen von Boehm-Bawerk At the time of Menger's petition for early

783
01:11:20.600 --> 01:11:26.320
retirement, Eugen von Boehm-Bawerk was his most prominent disciple, serving a fourth

784
01:11:26.320 --> 01:11:31.580
term as the head of the Austrian KK Ministry of Finance. Boehm-Bawerk had risen to the

785
01:11:31.580 --> 01:11:37.720
highest positions in the Austrian state bureaucracy. He would not have done so under normal circumstances

786
01:11:37.720 --> 01:11:44.920
He was a brilliant scholar and an excellent and efficient technocrat, but he was no politician.

787
01:11:44.920 --> 01:11:51.120
He abhorred demagogic trickery and despised socialism. He only became a government minister

788
01:11:51.120 --> 01:11:57.240
because ethnic conflicts within Austria, especially between Germans and Czechs, made political

789
01:11:57.240 --> 01:12:02.480
leadership of the whole country increasingly impossible. During such crises Austria was

790
01:12:02.480 --> 01:12:07.380
was ruled by technocratic caretaker governments and in all of them Boehm-Bawerk served as

791
01:12:07.380 --> 01:12:13.340
finance minister. His impeccable scientific credentials commanded respect from all parties

792
01:12:13.340 --> 01:12:18.200
and made him the ideal candidate for these emergency situations.

793
01:12:18.200 --> 01:12:24.300
Born in Moravia on February 12, 1851 into a family of high-state bureaucrats, Eugen Boehm-Ritter

794
01:12:24.300 --> 01:12:30.400
von Bawerk was raised in Vienna where he received a thorough education at the Schotten Gymnasium.

795
01:12:30.400 --> 01:12:34.720
His father had been entrusted with various delicate negotiations in the revolutionary

796
01:12:34.720 --> 01:12:41.400
period leading up to 1848, a term he discharged to the great satisfaction of the Emperor.

797
01:12:41.400 --> 01:12:46.240
He was knighted in 1854 but died an early death shortly after.

798
01:12:46.240 --> 01:12:51.100
His wife then moved to Vienna to assure an adequate upbringing of Eugen, the youngest

799
01:12:51.100 --> 01:12:53.360
of her three sons.

800
01:12:53.360 --> 01:12:58.320
In the Schottengymnasium Boehm-Bawerk met his alter ego in Friedrich von Wiese.

801
01:12:58.320 --> 01:13:02.720
The two of them would study law and government science at the University of Vienna, discover

802
01:13:02.720 --> 01:13:07.600
a common interest in economics and become followers of Carl Menger.

803
01:13:07.600 --> 01:13:13.140
Both of them entered the financial administration of Lower Austria in 1872, passed their doctoral

804
01:13:13.140 --> 01:13:19.960
exams with Menger as one of the examiners in 1875 and then chose a scholarly career,

805
01:13:19.960 --> 01:13:25.200
benefiting from a prestigious government scholarship programme that enabled them to study for two

806
01:13:25.200 --> 01:13:31.240
Two years were the greatest German political economists of the time. In 1875 they spent

807
01:13:31.240 --> 01:13:36.520
a year in Heidelberg to study in the seminar of Carl Knies and then spent another year

808
01:13:36.520 --> 01:13:42.960
together in the seminars of Wilhelm Rochra in Leipzig and of Bono Hildebrandt in Jena.

809
01:13:42.960 --> 01:13:47.500
Later they would both become professors of political economy and a seat to international

810
01:13:47.500 --> 01:13:53.380
fame as representatives of the new Austrian School of Economics. Both would also become

811
01:13:53.380 --> 01:13:58.500
and Cabinet Members in Emergency Situations, Boehm-Bawerk for the Ministry of Finance in

812
01:13:58.500 --> 01:14:10.340
1889 to 1890, 1895, 1896 to 1897 and from 1900 to 1904, Wieser in 1917 to 1918 as Trade

813
01:14:10.340 --> 01:14:16.460
Minister of the last Imperial Government. Boehm-Bawerk became Wieser's brother-in-law

814
01:14:16.460 --> 01:14:21.820
when he married Friedrich's sister Paula. During their year together in Heidelberg,

815
01:14:21.820 --> 01:14:27.440
They presented papers that foreshadowed their later achievements. Both used Menger's principles

816
01:14:27.440 --> 01:14:33.260
as their starting point and took his project in new directions. Visa's paper pioneering

817
01:14:33.260 --> 01:14:38.320
the analysis of opportunity costs and Boehm-Bawerk presenting the first version of his Theory

818
01:14:38.320 --> 01:14:44.380
of Interest. Thanks to Menger's unwavering support, Boehm-Bawerk obtained his Havlitation

819
01:14:44.380 --> 01:14:49.300
degree before he was 30. Menger was aware of an opening for a professor of political

820
01:14:49.300 --> 01:14:53.620
Capital Economy at the University of Innsbruck, one of the few chairs of its kind in all of

821
01:14:53.620 --> 01:14:59.540
Austria-Hungary, and seized the opportunity to place his most gifted follower.

822
01:14:59.540 --> 01:15:04.540
The 1880s were the most productive phase of Boehm-Bawerk's life. He published two massive

823
01:15:04.540 --> 01:15:09.420
volumes on the history and positive theory of capital, a work that earned him an international

824
01:15:09.420 --> 01:15:15.300
reputation and made him the best-known Austrian economist. He was, in fact, the first economist

825
01:15:15.300 --> 01:15:21.060
of the Austrian School to enjoy immediate English translations of his work. From 1889

826
01:15:21.060 --> 01:15:26.300
to 1904, however, his government activities as finance minister and in other high functions

827
01:15:26.300 --> 01:15:31.100
of the civil service absorbed virtually all of his energies, and his scholarly output

828
01:15:31.100 --> 01:15:33.060
shrank considerably.

829
01:15:33.060 --> 01:15:37.900
Boehm-Bawerk's major accomplishment as a minister of finance was the reform of the

830
01:15:37.900 --> 01:15:44.840
Austrian system of direct taxation. He started working on this project in 1889, and his proposals

831
01:15:44.840 --> 01:15:52.100
Socials made it in essentially unaltered form into a law, voted in 1896. Among other things

832
01:15:52.100 --> 01:15:57.760
Boehm-Bawerk's law introduced a personal income tax, top marginal rate 5%, as well

833
01:15:57.760 --> 01:16:03.040
as the principle of progressive tax rates into the Austrian Code. An exception was his

834
01:16:03.040 --> 01:16:09.020
activity as an honorary professor at the University of Vienna and his involvement in the Zeitschrift

835
01:16:09.020 --> 01:16:14.620
für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung, which he co-founded and managed starting

836
01:16:14.620 --> 01:16:19.460
in the early 1890s and which would become a major outlet for theoretical research in

837
01:16:19.460 --> 01:16:25.900
Germany and Austria. After Boehm-Bawerk completed his last term as a finance minister, he had

838
01:16:25.900 --> 01:16:31.140
more time for scholarly pursuits and was granted a new chair of political economy at the University

839
01:16:31.140 --> 01:16:37.860
of Vienna. Schumpeter reports that as a minister, Boehm-Bawerk followed the maxim, a finance

840
01:16:37.860 --> 01:16:43.500
minister must always be ready to give his demission and always act as if he never intended

841
01:16:43.500 --> 01:16:49.660
to quit his job. Boehm-Bawerk quit when another increase in the army budget was no longer covered

842
01:16:49.660 --> 01:16:55.100
by corresponding savings or increased taxation. Boehm-Bawerk was not opposed to additional

843
01:16:55.100 --> 01:17:00.860
government expenditure as a matter of principle. It was in fact the great strategy of the Kerber

844
01:17:00.860 --> 01:17:09.020
Cabinet from 1900 to 1904 to renew and increase the attachment of the various nations of Austria-Hungary

845
01:17:09.020 --> 01:17:18.380
The strategy succeeded. Conflicts related to national culture suddenly shifted into the

846
01:17:18.380 --> 01:17:23.260
background as the economic and financial establishment of the various nations sensed that business

847
01:17:23.260 --> 01:17:28.620
with the central government was more important than continuing the policy of obstruction.

848
01:17:28.620 --> 01:17:33.660
Visa had by then succeeded Menger and thus the University of Vienna enjoyed for a decade

849
01:17:33.660 --> 01:17:41.900
and all-star team of Austrian economists. From 1905 until his death in 1914, Boehm-Bawerk

850
01:17:41.900 --> 01:17:47.140
led the life of an elder statesman. His scholarly endeavors were constantly interrupted by his

851
01:17:47.140 --> 01:17:51.700
obligations as a lifetime member of the Herrenhaus, the upper chamber of the Austrian parliament

852
01:17:51.700 --> 01:17:59.180
which he joined in 1899, and after 1911 as president of the Austrian Academy of the Sciences,

853
01:17:59.180 --> 01:18:07.360
Schultein Schrattenhofen observes that this election was all the more remarkable because

854
01:18:07.360 --> 01:18:12.740
economics had not been considered a prestigious science. His main academic activity was of

855
01:18:12.740 --> 01:18:17.460
course on advanced economic theory, which he gave in the winter semesters, and the direction

856
01:18:17.460 --> 01:18:22.720
of a weekly graduate seminar in the summer semesters. Both Schumpeter and Mises state

857
01:18:22.720 --> 01:18:28.180
that Boehm-Bawerk declined an offer to become executive director of a major Vienna bank.

858
01:18:28.180 --> 01:18:34.180
The seminar took most of his energy, leaving him completely exhausted at the end of the sessions.

859
01:18:34.180 --> 01:18:46.180
But this was not just any seminar. The group that flocked around Boehm-Bawerk might well have been among the most brilliant crowd of young intellectuals ever gathered in a regular university function.

860
01:18:46.180 --> 01:18:51.260
Their names could be taken from any 20th century who's who of social scientists.

861
01:18:51.260 --> 01:18:57.500
Ludwig von Mises, Joseph Schumpeter, Richard von Striegel, Franz Weiss, Felix Sommary,

862
01:18:57.500 --> 01:19:04.500
Emil Lederer, Rudolf Hilferding, Nikolai Bukarin, Otto Neurath and Otto Bauer.

863
01:19:04.500 --> 01:19:10.320
The members of the seminar would come to be known as either great economists or great Marxists.

864
01:19:10.320 --> 01:19:14.280
For better or worse, they would leave their mark on the decades to come.

865
01:19:14.280 --> 01:19:18.880
The young disciples of the Austrian School considered Boehm-Bawerk to be their undisputed

866
01:19:18.880 --> 01:19:24.920
master and under his auspices set out to develop and revolutionise economic science.

867
01:19:24.920 --> 01:19:29.460
The young Austro-Marxist, as they were later called, had joined the seminar to confront

868
01:19:29.460 --> 01:19:34.940
the man in person who had authored the most devastating attack against Marx, Das Kapital,

869
01:19:34.940 --> 01:19:39.540
but they came to admire their teacher for his comprehensive knowledge, for his fairness

870
01:19:39.540 --> 01:19:45.100
and relentless quest for objectivity, and especially for his willingness and ability

871
01:19:45.100 --> 01:19:52.780
to debate them, which he did with great success. Mises attended the seminar until 1913. Boehm-Bawerk

872
01:19:52.780 --> 01:19:57.980
left a deep impression on him as a scholar and teacher, setting lifelong standards of

873
01:19:57.980 --> 01:20:05.260
scholarship. He only admonished that Boehm-Bawerk was too soft on Otto Neurath. Mises considered

874
01:20:05.260 --> 01:20:10.860
Noirata Fanatic and found him insufferable because he criticised economics without knowing

875
01:20:10.860 --> 01:20:13.160
what he was talking about.

876
01:20:13.160 --> 01:20:18.200
On occasion this seminar focused intensely on the scientific contributions of individual

877
01:20:18.200 --> 01:20:23.840
members. For example, Boehm-Bawerk spent two entire semesters discussing Mises' 1912

878
01:20:23.840 --> 01:20:28.800
book on the theory of money. Many of the seminar members already had a scholarly reputation

879
01:20:28.800 --> 01:20:34.460
when they entered the seminar or soon earned one. The main themes of the sessions, however,

880
01:20:34.460 --> 01:20:39.460
from Boehm-Bawerk's own work Price Theory, the raison d'être of economic theory vis-à-vis

881
01:20:39.460 --> 01:20:44.740
the crimes of materialistic Marxism and of the German Historical School, the Austrian

882
01:20:44.740 --> 01:20:50.580
versus the Marxist theories of value, and the meaning and importance of economic laws.

883
01:20:50.580 --> 01:20:55.500
Boehm-Bawerk had made important contributions in all these fields. In his Habilitation

884
01:20:55.500 --> 01:21:00.820
manuscript he had developed a Mengerian economic theory of rights and of legal and commercial

885
01:21:00.820 --> 01:21:06.780
Relationships. The manuscript was published as a book the following year, 1881, in a substantially

886
01:21:06.780 --> 01:21:12.740
abridged form. During the decade or so that he spent in Innsbruck, he concentrated on

887
01:21:12.740 --> 01:21:18.540
the development of Austrian price theory. Carl Menger had explained the price of consumers'

888
01:21:18.540 --> 01:21:23.780
goods, but had not gone in depth into the pricing of producers' goods. He claimed

889
01:21:23.780 --> 01:21:27.940
the latter would not differ fundamentally from the former, except that the price of

890
01:21:27.940 --> 01:21:41.500
Menger's critics had seized on this as a weakness in his system, and argued that imputation

891
01:21:41.500 --> 01:21:46.340
was impossible because any consumer's good results from the joint cooperation of several

892
01:21:46.340 --> 01:21:51.540
producers' goods. How would imputation distribute the value of the final product among the many

893
01:21:51.540 --> 01:21:57.180
factors of production? Moreover, was it not obvious that costs of production did have

894
01:21:57.180 --> 01:22:03.480
have a major impact on the prices of products. Boehm-Bawerk tackled these problems in a book-length

895
01:22:03.480 --> 01:22:10.820
article on the Theory of Value, 1886. He developed in particular what he called the Law of Costs.

896
01:22:10.820 --> 01:22:15.520
Boehm-Bawerk explained that in the case of consumer goods that could be reproduced at

897
01:22:15.520 --> 01:22:21.280
libertum in any quantity, costs of production were in fact the immediate cause of the price

898
01:22:21.280 --> 01:22:27.180
of the Final Product. But he showed that even in this special case, the costs of production

899
01:22:27.180 --> 01:22:31.780
were themselves ultimately determined by the value of the other consumer goods for the

900
01:22:31.780 --> 01:22:36.500
production of which they could also be used. His demonstration was so successful that it

901
01:22:36.500 --> 01:22:42.080
brought many economists in Austria and Germany into the Austrian School. Three years later,

902
01:22:42.080 --> 01:22:46.960
Boehm-Bawerk incorporated the essence of this article into his magnum opus, a two-volume

903
01:22:46.960 --> 01:22:50.880
volume treatise on economic theory and the history of economic thought, with special

904
01:22:50.880 --> 01:22:57.140
emphasis on the theory of capital and interest. The first volume had been published in 1884

905
01:22:57.140 --> 01:23:02.360
and gave a systematic exposition and critique of past theories of interest. The second volume

906
01:23:02.360 --> 01:23:07.880
of his treatise, entitled Positive Theorie des Kapitals, presented his own views on the

907
01:23:07.880 --> 01:23:12.960
subject and made him the best-known Austrian economist outside the German-speaking countries.

908
01:23:12.960 --> 01:23:18.440
Here, he gave a presentation of the theory of value, prices and interest that Schumpeter

909
01:23:18.440 --> 01:23:24.840
later praised in these terms. The positive theory of capital gives a theory of the entire

910
01:23:24.840 --> 01:23:30.700
socio-economic process, even though the title indicates a more narrow content. It is certain

911
01:23:30.700 --> 01:23:35.660
that here the highest goal is aimed at that can be desired within theoretical economics

912
01:23:35.660 --> 01:23:43.100
and that this goal is achieved to an extent that few can equal. Hence, wages, rents, capital,

913
01:23:43.100 --> 01:23:47.740
length of the period of production and the physical productivity of the methods of production

914
01:23:47.740 --> 01:23:53.820
are variables that mutually determine one another, and thus the entire economic process suddenly

915
01:23:53.820 --> 01:23:58.460
appears in an unheard of simplicity, clarity and completeness.

916
01:23:59.420 --> 01:24:04.940
In particular, Boehm-Bawerk presented his time preference theory of interest that revolutionised

917
01:24:04.940 --> 01:24:07.940
and economic thinking in this field.

918
01:24:07.940 --> 01:24:12.140
Where his predecessors usually considered interest to be the remuneration of a specific

919
01:24:12.140 --> 01:24:16.820
factor of production, Boehm-Bawerk defended the thesis that interest has nothing to do

920
01:24:16.820 --> 01:24:22.500
with production per se, but springs from an entirely different source, the unequal valuation

921
01:24:22.500 --> 01:24:27.380
of present goods and future goods of the same kind.

922
01:24:27.380 --> 01:24:32.240
Production and capital are only indirectly related to interest, related only in so far

923
01:24:32.240 --> 01:24:37.500
Whereas capital goods are essentially future goods, that through the time-consuming production

924
01:24:37.500 --> 01:24:42.940
process mature into consumers' goods. These seemingly subtle distinctions had a momentous

925
01:24:42.940 --> 01:24:48.640
political significance at the time Boehm-Bawerk was writing, a time that was characterised

926
01:24:48.640 --> 01:24:53.240
by the rise of various socialist movements, most notably the movement led by Karl Marx

927
01:24:53.240 --> 01:24:59.520
and Friedrich Engels. The socialists contested mainstream economic theory, the theory of

928
01:24:59.520 --> 01:25:05.200
of Jean-Baptiste Say, according to which interest was the specific income of capital.

929
01:25:05.200 --> 01:25:11.120
They asserted that labour alone creates value and income, and therefore labour alone creates

930
01:25:11.120 --> 01:25:16.040
interest. The fact that interest payments went to the capitalists could only mean that

931
01:25:16.040 --> 01:25:21.580
capitalists exploited labourers. The working classes did not receive the full value they

932
01:25:21.580 --> 01:25:27.900
had produced. But according to Boehm-Bawerk's theory, interest was not produced by anybody.

933
01:25:27.900 --> 01:25:33.660
was a value spread existing independent of production per se, that manifested itself

934
01:25:33.660 --> 01:25:40.260
only incidentally in the relationship between factors of production and products. As a consequence,

935
01:25:40.260 --> 01:25:45.900
and here we come to the far-reaching political implications, interest is not peculiar to

936
01:25:45.900 --> 01:25:52.240
capitalism. It would exist under any conceivable system of social organisation. No redistribution

937
01:25:52.240 --> 01:25:59.880
Scheme or any other social policy could abolish interest, not even a fully communist society.

938
01:25:59.880 --> 01:26:04.840
Boehm-Bawerk addressed highly politicised questions on two other famous occasions. After

939
01:26:04.840 --> 01:26:09.680
the posthumous publication of the third volume of Marx' Das Kapital, which had been edited

940
01:26:09.680 --> 01:26:16.680
by Engels, Boehm-Bawerk wrote a 120-page review titled Zum Abschluss des Marxischen Systems

941
01:26:16.680 --> 01:26:23.760
that was published in an 1895 festschrift for Carl Knies. Here, Boehm-Bawerk presented

942
01:26:23.760 --> 01:26:29.280
a devastating critique of Marx's economics, arguing that while Marx's thought was internally

943
01:26:29.280 --> 01:26:35.480
consistent, it was based on assumptions, without foundation in observed facts, and led to conclusions

944
01:26:35.480 --> 01:26:38.680
that were at odds with the real world.

945
01:26:38.680 --> 01:26:43.320
Nineteen years later, shortly before his death, Boehm-Bawerk once again addressed the theoretical

946
01:26:43.320 --> 01:26:48.120
General Foundation of Social Policies when he published a 65 page essay dealing with

947
01:26:48.120 --> 01:26:52.360
the question of whether labour union pressure can improve living conditions for all members

948
01:26:52.360 --> 01:26:58.680
of the working classes. More fundamentally, Macht oder Ökonomisches Gesetz, power or

949
01:26:58.680 --> 01:27:03.860
economic law, concern the question of whether there is such a thing as economic law independent

950
01:27:03.860 --> 01:27:11.260
of human will. If such laws exist, then they cannot be broken or circumvented by labour

951
01:27:11.260 --> 01:27:18.780
Labour Union Leadership or Determined Policymakers. In a painstaking case-by-case analysis, Boehm-Bawerk

952
01:27:18.780 --> 01:27:25.540
showed that the illusions of Labour Union leaders and politicians were just that – illusions.

953
01:27:25.540 --> 01:27:31.300
This essay was a critical response to Rudolf Stoltzmann. Possibly Boehm-Bawerk also wished

954
01:27:31.300 --> 01:27:37.060
to pre-empt a fallacious opinion accepted by some of his most gifted students. A case

955
01:27:37.060 --> 01:27:41.900
The basic point was Ludwig von Mises, who shortly before had argued that labour unions

956
01:27:41.900 --> 01:27:47.300
could raise wage rates for all workers, at least in the short run. A distinctive feature

957
01:27:47.300 --> 01:27:53.100
of Boehm-Bawerk's legacy is his readiness to focus pioneering theoretical research on

958
01:27:53.100 --> 01:27:58.700
highly contested questions. This was, in a way, the legacy of the entire second generation

959
01:27:58.700 --> 01:28:03.700
of Austrian economists. Whereas Carl Menger had concentrated virtually all of his energies

960
01:28:03.700 --> 01:28:15.180
Menger's colleagues and followers, men like Zucks, Zuckerkandel, Wieser and Boehm-Bawerk,

961
01:28:15.180 --> 01:28:20.060
sought to apply the new theory to the new social movements surrounding them. In this

962
01:28:20.060 --> 01:28:25.940
endeavour, Boehm-Bawerk stood out in originality and intellectual vigour, and this was his

963
01:28:25.940 --> 01:28:32.260
greatest impact on Mises. Boehm-Bawerk was the very model of a political economist, a

964
01:28:32.260 --> 01:28:49.420
Friedrich von Mises Mises never studied under Mises, though it

965
01:28:49.420 --> 01:28:53.900
is likely that Mises, having come to occupy Carl Menger's chair at the University of

966
01:28:53.900 --> 01:29:00.840
Vienna in 1903, was one of Mises' examiners in government science. Mises was born in 1851

967
01:29:00.840 --> 01:29:06.080
in Vienna, the son of a high civil servant. He was a tall and handsome man, aristocratic

968
01:29:06.080 --> 01:29:11.120
in manners, with clear blue eyes, and, in later years, with an impressive long beard.

969
01:29:11.120 --> 01:29:15.720
His thorough acquaintance with art and literature was legendary, and he was himself an accomplished

970
01:29:15.720 --> 01:29:21.100
piano player. A gentleman of the old world, his personal presence made him the undisputed

971
01:29:21.100 --> 01:29:27.620
leader of the Austrian School after Boehm-Bawerk's death in 1914. His admirers forgave him certain

972
01:29:27.620 --> 01:29:32.920
and Character Traits that are unusual in a great scholar and teacher. He never debated

973
01:29:32.920 --> 01:29:39.120
or discussed views other than his own, and was an extremely slow reader and slow thinker.

974
01:29:39.120 --> 01:29:44.120
He rarely quoted anyone, preferring instead to acknowledge his intellectual debt to Menger

975
01:29:44.120 --> 01:29:50.320
and Jevons only broadly in the prefaces of his early works. While the combined presence

976
01:29:50.320 --> 01:29:55.440
of these traits would exclude any lesser man from the ranks of great intellectuals, in

977
01:29:55.440 --> 01:30:00.560
In Mises' case, they further aroused the admiration of his followers.

978
01:30:00.560 --> 01:30:05.640
Schumpeter praised Mises' deficiencies in the following words, with sovereign quietness,

979
01:30:05.640 --> 01:30:11.040
which we others soon learn to understand as his right, he puts aside the professional

980
01:30:11.040 --> 01:30:17.480
literature. He is not even able to read quickly or much, and almost never has he thoroughly

981
01:30:17.480 --> 01:30:23.780
dealt with the details of the systems of thought of other people. He has never engaged in polemics,

982
01:30:23.780 --> 01:30:34.020
Hayek added in his work he never dealt with the present state of the science. He has never

983
01:30:34.020 --> 01:30:39.200
tried to reconcile existing theorems with one another, or to deduce new theorems from

984
01:30:39.200 --> 01:30:45.300
them through mere logical operations. Rarely has a theoretician been more different from

985
01:30:45.300 --> 01:30:52.220
the usual image of a theoretician than Weezer. His theoretical contemplations entirely monopolised

986
01:30:52.220 --> 01:30:57.780
him and did not leave him any time to delve into or systematically analyse the systems

987
01:30:57.780 --> 01:31:05.020
of thoughts of others. He felt the necessity to do this hampered his own work on the conceptualisation

988
01:31:05.020 --> 01:31:10.860
of reality and thus he avoided even oral discussions if they risked ending up in something other

989
01:31:10.860 --> 01:31:15.380
than the more perfect exposition of his own ideas.

990
01:31:15.380 --> 01:31:21.540
Clearly Mises differed markedly from Boehm-Bawerk both in his persona and his scholarship. While

991
01:31:21.540 --> 01:31:26.820
While his brother-in-law was widely read in economics and displayed exhaustive and detailed

992
01:31:26.820 --> 01:31:31.480
knowledge of the literature concerning the theory of capital and interest, Wieser was

993
01:31:31.480 --> 01:31:37.060
exclusively concerned with refining his own purely contemplative activities.

994
01:31:37.060 --> 01:31:43.440
In contrast to Boehm-Bawerk, whose style was often tedious, Wieser knew how to turn a phrase.

995
01:31:43.440 --> 01:31:48.540
For example, he invented the term marginal utility, which is still used in mainstream

996
01:31:48.540 --> 01:31:54.380
and where Boehm-Bawerk would always delve into the technical details of an issue, Wieser

997
01:31:54.380 --> 01:31:58.780
cherished the more general features of the theory of value and prices and preferred to

998
01:31:58.780 --> 01:32:03.660
keep his arguments on that level of abstraction. For Wieser's admirers, there were definitive

999
01:32:03.660 --> 01:32:08.900
advantages to his approach. As a coherent body of thought, Boehm-Bawerk's system might

1000
01:32:08.900 --> 01:32:13.880
seem to be the greater one in the eyes of those who appreciate a system's logical coherence

1001
01:32:13.880 --> 01:32:21.600
Visas work, however, presents far more starting points for further development, often precisely

1002
01:32:21.600 --> 01:32:26.920
in those passages that have often been criticised as inconsistent.

1003
01:32:26.920 --> 01:32:31.640
While Boehm-Bawerk enjoyed the immediate support of Menger, Visa ranked lower on Menger's

1004
01:32:31.640 --> 01:32:36.960
list of gifted followers and had to wait longer to be placed in one of the Empire's few full

1005
01:32:36.960 --> 01:32:42.000
professorships. Menger had known Visa's unpublished manuscripts on the Theory of Value for some

1006
01:32:42.000 --> 01:33:09.520
and the

1007
01:33:09.520 --> 01:33:17.960
in 1884. He became a full professor in 1889 and in 1903 he succeeded Menger at the University

1008
01:33:17.960 --> 01:33:22.280
of Vienna. Unlike Boehm-Bawerk and the bulk of contemporary

1009
01:33:22.280 --> 01:33:27.660
German language theorists, Wieser was inspired by the Gossens School of Marginalist Price

1010
01:33:27.660 --> 01:33:33.600
Theory, particularly Jevons's Theory of Political Economy. He acknowledges his intellectual

1011
01:33:33.600 --> 01:33:38.800
depth to Jevons in the preface of his Habilitation Theses where he mentions the Englishman as

1012
01:33:38.800 --> 01:33:45.040
As one of his two main sources of inspiration, the other one was Menger. He was the first

1013
01:33:45.040 --> 01:33:50.800
German academic economist to place his stamp of approval on Gossen's work. In fact, in

1014
01:33:50.800 --> 01:33:58.280
his Der Naturliche Wirt, Natural Value, 1889, Wieser presents the very core of the new marginalist

1015
01:33:58.280 --> 01:34:05.000
price theory, what he calls the elementary theory of value, as based on Gossen's law

1016
01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:10.860
of Want Satiation. Hayek noticed that Wieser had supplemented the elementary theory of

1017
01:34:10.860 --> 01:34:17.260
prices in regard to its psychological foundations through Gossens' Law of Want Satiation.

1018
01:34:17.260 --> 01:34:21.960
As we have pointed out above, there was in Menger's value theory no such emphasis on

1019
01:34:21.960 --> 01:34:28.580
diminishing satisfactions of the same type. These explicit references bear special weight

1020
01:34:28.580 --> 01:34:33.560
because Wieser's habit was never to cite anyone. Through his eloquent prose, Wieser

1021
01:34:33.560 --> 01:34:39.600
rescued Gossen's indigestible book from the oblivion into which it had fallen.

1022
01:34:39.600 --> 01:34:44.180
In his introduction to Menger's collected works, Hayek points out that Gossen's work

1023
01:34:44.180 --> 01:34:50.680
had been favourably mentioned in an 1870 book by F. A. Lange, but this had no impact.

1024
01:34:50.680 --> 01:34:56.060
Wieser was not the only Viennese theorist who developed marginal utility analyses along

1025
01:34:56.060 --> 01:35:02.040
Gevonsian lines. There were in particular two non-academic economists, Rudolf Auspitz

1026
01:35:02.040 --> 01:35:07.040
and Richard Lieben, who a few years after Wieser published two books that focused entirely

1027
01:35:07.040 --> 01:35:12.440
on the graphical and, to a lesser extent, algebraic exposition of price theory.

1028
01:35:12.440 --> 01:35:17.360
Despite the non-academic background of the authors, these works were very well researched

1029
01:35:17.360 --> 01:35:21.840
and based on a thorough knowledge of the existing literature in the field, in particular the

1030
01:35:21.840 --> 01:35:28.040
works of Bernouillis, Laplace, Thunen, Dupuis, Gossen, Mangold, Menger, Jevons, Walras,

1031
01:35:28.040 --> 01:35:31.480
Wieser, Boehm-Bawerk and Lernhardt.

1032
01:35:31.480 --> 01:35:36.440
Just as their contemporary fellow Javangians in Vienna, Auspitz and Lieben emphasised the

1033
01:35:36.440 --> 01:35:42.240
fictional nature of their style of economic analysis, thus noticing that an economic theorist

1034
01:35:42.240 --> 01:35:48.820
cannot use experiments to isolate causes and their effects. They assert that the economist

1035
01:35:48.820 --> 01:35:54.640
is forced to take refuge with his ideas into an abstract world that can be grasped more

1036
01:35:54.640 --> 01:36:00.040
easily, but then he must try to approximate the real world through gradual changes of

1037
01:36:00.040 --> 01:36:05.160
of His Assumptions. In other words, unrealistic assumptions were absolutely essential for

1038
01:36:05.160 --> 01:36:10.320
economic analysis. Realism of economic science was at best a matter of approximating the

1039
01:36:10.320 --> 01:36:15.840
real world, but not a matter of describing it. Auschwitz and Lieben were, however, quite

1040
01:36:15.840 --> 01:36:22.040
perceptive in regard to the internal logic of mathematical equilibrium economics. They

1041
01:36:22.040 --> 01:36:27.640
pointed out, for example, that equilibrium obtains only if each individual seeks to maximise

1042
01:36:27.640 --> 01:36:32.880
Mises Personal Satisfaction, and if each individual knows how to choose the combination of factors

1043
01:36:32.880 --> 01:36:36.760
of production most suitable to this end.

1044
01:36:36.760 --> 01:36:42.760
Javonjan German-language writers outside of Vienna were Knut Wichsel and Georg Sulzer,

1045
01:36:42.760 --> 01:36:49.320
yet this distinct orientation went largely unnoticed, or, to the extent that it was noticed,

1046
01:36:49.320 --> 01:36:51.560
was considered unimportant.

1047
01:36:51.560 --> 01:36:57.400
In the homogenising wake of the Metodenstreit, mainstream economists in Germany and Austria

1048
01:36:57.400 --> 01:37:02.680
are thought in much broader categories. To them, Wieser was an extreme case of Mangerian

1049
01:37:02.680 --> 01:37:08.240
theorist, where he was in fact as far removed from Mangerian theory as he was from German

1050
01:37:08.240 --> 01:37:14.840
historicism. For example, Wieser's theory featured a strong focus on quantitative relationships,

1051
01:37:14.840 --> 01:37:19.980
where Menger focused on the qualitative relationships between quantities. Wieser's work also had

1052
01:37:19.980 --> 01:37:24.880
a strong psychological orientation inspired by both the then fashionable works of the

1053
01:37:24.880 --> 01:37:30.520
by Vienna philosopher Franz Brentano and John Stuart Mill's equally popular attempt to

1054
01:37:30.520 --> 01:37:37.000
interpret epistemology and logic as psychological disciplines. Mises also distinguished himself

1055
01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:43.920
from Menger by his reliance on fictional postulates, such as the assumption that value is psychological

1056
01:37:43.920 --> 01:37:51.240
and measurable. These views were obvious from his first book über den Ursprung und die Hauptgesetze

1057
01:37:51.240 --> 01:37:55.600
Professor des Wirtschaftlichen Wirtes, which was his Habilitation Manuscript, published

1058
01:37:55.600 --> 01:38:01.960
at the beginning of the Methodenstreit in 1884. The literal translation of the title

1059
01:38:01.960 --> 01:38:07.080
is, On the Cause and the Principle Laws of Economic Value. No English translation of

1060
01:38:07.080 --> 01:38:12.800
the work exists. Although he used few mathematical expressions, he made frequent reference to

1061
01:38:12.800 --> 01:38:18.340
units of value and to calculations in terms of these units, which could be aggregated

1062
01:38:18.340 --> 01:38:23.060
and otherwise modified through arithmetic operations.

1063
01:38:23.060 --> 01:38:29.540
In a 1911 essay, he defended the fictions contained in these as he would call them idealising

1064
01:38:29.540 --> 01:38:35.420
assumptions. We will present Wieser's argument below when dealing with Schumpeter.

1065
01:38:35.420 --> 01:38:40.060
In an entry on marginal utility that he wrote for the standard German language economic

1066
01:38:40.060 --> 01:38:44.460
dictionary of the time, Wieser purported to develop the rules according to which one

1067
01:38:44.460 --> 01:38:50.380
On scales and computes rechnen economic utility, or in other words to develop the economic

1068
01:38:50.380 --> 01:38:57.780
calculation of utility. In Mises' view, value was a cardinal measure of utility. If an economic

1069
01:38:57.780 --> 01:39:05.520
good X is not reproducible, then the value of X measures the marginal utility of X itself.

1070
01:39:05.520 --> 01:39:11.760
But if X is a reproducible good, then the value of X measures the foregone utility of

1071
01:39:11.760 --> 01:39:17.400
of another good, Y, that cannot be enjoyed if the factors of production are used to make

1072
01:39:17.400 --> 01:39:23.760
X rather than Y. In other words, the value of a reproducible good is a measure of the

1073
01:39:23.760 --> 01:39:30.280
opportunity costs of producing it. These fictions about value and the speculations

1074
01:39:30.280 --> 01:39:37.000
that he based on them in Ursprung und Hauptgesetze gained Wiese a reputation as a pure theorist

1075
01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:43.040
in precisely the sense that German mainstream economists disdained someone who constructs

1076
01:39:43.040 --> 01:39:48.960
theories without foundation in human experience. The historicist Hot Spurs must have loved

1077
01:39:48.960 --> 01:39:53.800
Wieser, for he was living proof that they were not guilty of battling straw men. It

1078
01:39:53.800 --> 01:39:59.580
had been very difficult to make a case against Menger, who rigorously tied theory to experience,

1079
01:39:59.580 --> 01:40:04.360
but there could be no doubt that the work of this follower lacked empirical foundation

1080
01:40:04.360 --> 01:40:10.360
and thus scientific integrity. Young Werner Zumbart, to whom Schmoller had entrusted the

1081
01:40:10.360 --> 01:40:19.420
job of reviewing Mises' natural value, concluded that this work was entirely unsound. Ironically,

1082
01:40:19.420 --> 01:40:24.880
the heated atmosphere of the Metodenstreit considerably enhanced the significance of

1083
01:40:24.880 --> 01:40:29.980
Mises' work. His elegant prose and his highly developed sense for coining catchphrases like

1084
01:40:29.980 --> 01:40:35.260
like marginal utility and imputation gained him a widespread reputation as one of the

1085
01:40:35.260 --> 01:40:41.380
leading representatives of the Austrian School, which meant, in the mind of contemporary German

1086
01:40:41.380 --> 01:40:48.740
mainstream economists, an advocate of theoretical studies dissociated from historical research.

1087
01:40:48.740 --> 01:40:53.900
These are coined to the term Grenznutzen in order to convey the meaning of Jevons' final

1088
01:40:53.900 --> 01:40:59.480
utility. Through Philip Wicksteed, one of Jevons' students, the new term then made

1089
01:40:59.480 --> 01:41:02.600
it into English.

1090
01:41:02.600 --> 01:41:07.600
Because of this publicity, Wieser was largely successful in promoting among German economists

1091
01:41:07.600 --> 01:41:14.520
the notion that the new economic theory advocated by Menger and his disciples was a form of

1092
01:41:14.520 --> 01:41:21.020
applied psychology. For example, Wieser alleged that Menger held that the law of decreasing

1093
01:41:21.020 --> 01:41:27.880
marginal value was a Gossan-style law of satiation. Boehm-Bawerk also shares some of the responsibility

1094
01:41:27.880 --> 01:41:34.000
for this confusion. His first exposition on the theory of value and prices in 1886 was

1095
01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:39.720
strongly influenced by Weezer's Ursprung und Hauptgesetze 1884, and thus indirectly

1096
01:41:39.720 --> 01:41:46.040
by Gosson and Jevons. He at least implicitly endorsed the view that value was a psychological

1097
01:41:46.040 --> 01:41:51.320
phenomenon pertaining to the sphere of human feelings, and he also believed in the measurability

1098
01:41:51.320 --> 01:41:56.960
of value and in inter-individual comparisons of value.

1099
01:41:56.960 --> 01:42:01.280
While these assumptions played a relatively insignificant role in his work compared to

1100
01:42:01.280 --> 01:42:05.720
Weiser, the fact that he held them at all promoted the gradual departure from Menger's

1101
01:42:05.720 --> 01:42:11.800
realist economics toward the emerging neo-classical paradigm. It was symptomatic that Walras complained

1102
01:42:11.800 --> 01:42:17.760
to Menger, who had shown reluctance to recognise a predecessor in Gossen, that, after all,

1103
01:42:17.760 --> 01:42:23.200
Boehm-Bawerk shared exactly the same view. Walras believed it was impossible to deny

1104
01:42:23.200 --> 01:42:28.280
I deny that he, Gossen, had been the first to conceive clearly and mathematically that

1105
01:42:28.280 --> 01:42:35.040
what I call utilité and rarité, and which is nothing but the Subjectiva Wirt or the

1106
01:42:35.040 --> 01:42:38.360
Grenzwirt of Mr. von Boehm-Bawerk.

1107
01:42:38.360 --> 01:42:43.480
Mises' views also proved to be fateful in another important respect. As mentioned earlier,

1108
01:42:43.480 --> 01:42:48.000
he was one of Menger's several followers who addressed the claims of Marxists and other

1109
01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:53.400
by the socialist scholars. But while Boehm-Bawerk tried to refine Menger's theory of prices,

1110
01:42:53.400 --> 01:42:58.840
thus clarifying and confirming Menger's insights about the operation of a capitalist economy,

1111
01:42:58.840 --> 01:43:04.680
Wieser argued that Menger's theory had no specific political implications whatsoever.

1112
01:43:04.680 --> 01:43:09.720
It was not a grand apology for the bourgeois class, as critics claimed, but neither could

1113
01:43:09.720 --> 01:43:15.400
it serve as the basis for objections to socialism. Wieser's view is rooted in his theory of

1114
01:43:15.400 --> 01:43:17.960
The Relationship Between Value and Prices

1115
01:43:17.960 --> 01:43:23.220
Recall that Rieser believed that economic value is subject to arithmetic operations,

1116
01:43:23.220 --> 01:43:28.840
just as money, prices are used in the calculations of businessmen. Thus, there is in this respect

1117
01:43:28.840 --> 01:43:35.040
no fundamental difference between value and price. Prices are merely objective exchange

1118
01:43:35.040 --> 01:43:40.920
value, they are subjective exchange value made visible. Businessmen could theoretically

1119
01:43:40.920 --> 01:44:09.340
A student of Carl Menger's in the late 19th century, Robert Zuckerkandel, argued along

1120
01:44:09.340 --> 01:44:15.220
along the same popular lines. In his eyes, too, price was but an expression of value,

1121
01:44:15.220 --> 01:44:19.340
and he rejected Boehm-Bawerk's statement that price and value shared virtually no features

1122
01:44:19.340 --> 01:44:24.380
that would permit them to be lumped together in the same analytical framework. According

1123
01:44:24.380 --> 01:44:28.520
to this doctrine, there can be situations in which entrepreneurs produce certain goods

1124
01:44:28.520 --> 01:44:34.200
in unnecessary quantities merely because they command the highest market prices. In these

1125
01:44:34.200 --> 01:44:39.300
In these cases, when market prices do not indicate the rationally established or natural

1126
01:44:39.300 --> 01:44:45.180
value, there is a conflict between objective exchange value, market price, and social utility.

1127
01:44:45.180 --> 01:44:50.900
The question then is how social utility is to be understood. Here Wieser refers to the

1128
01:44:50.900 --> 01:44:56.340
concept of natural value. He asserts that the natural value of economic goods is the

1129
01:44:56.340 --> 01:45:01.860
value that these goods have only in light of their available quantities and their utility.

1130
01:45:01.860 --> 01:45:07.300
As soon as any other factors come into play, market prices can deviate from their natural

1131
01:45:07.300 --> 01:45:13.740
values. Thus, the conflict between market prices and $ocial utility can be made intelligible

1132
01:45:13.740 --> 01:45:19.060
by comparing the real world to a fictional state of affairs of ownerless quantities and

1133
01:45:19.060 --> 01:45:25.380
of homogenous psychological utilities dissociated from the specific biological and economic

1134
01:45:25.380 --> 01:45:30.640
characteristics of the individual human being. According to Weiser, this fictional state

1135
01:45:30.640 --> 01:45:35.840
of Affairs obtained in a communist state which he understood to be a totally unified and

1136
01:45:35.840 --> 01:45:41.480
utterly rational commonwealth. It follows that real world market prices give only an

1137
01:45:41.480 --> 01:45:47.040
imperfect representation of natural value. Not only are they subject to the impact of

1138
01:45:47.040 --> 01:45:53.880
abuses, individual egotism, error and other frictions, but they are also subject to the

1139
01:45:53.880 --> 01:45:59.560
distribution of resources. Thus only in a pure Vizierian communist state does the actual

1140
01:45:59.560 --> 01:46:08.680
These are often no proof for these assertions, apparently taking their plausibility for granted.

1141
01:46:08.680 --> 01:46:13.560
Neither did he encounter any objections on these grounds. It hardly needs to be stressed

1142
01:46:13.560 --> 01:46:18.080
that his views were quite removed from Menger's views, both on the conception of value and

1143
01:46:18.080 --> 01:46:23.820
prices and on the nature of economic science. Menger believed the task of economic theory

1144
01:46:23.820 --> 01:46:50.740
Mises did not find Mises' views appealing. Mises says that despite all his great personal

1145
01:46:50.740 --> 01:47:02.980
When Mises explains the meaning of his own contributions, he makes it clear that his

1146
01:47:02.980 --> 01:47:09.640
work was based on Menger and Boehm-Bawerk, not on Mises. Mises' historicist training

1147
01:47:09.640 --> 01:47:14.620
had predisposed him to the notion that the essence of science was the discovery of relevant

1148
01:47:14.620 --> 01:47:19.600
facts, not speculations without empirical foundation. Because of Mises' central position

1149
01:47:19.600 --> 01:47:24.820
In the teaching of economic theory and the general confusion in post-Metodenstreit Germany

1150
01:47:24.820 --> 01:47:29.800
about the various competing approaches to economic theory, he was able to redefine Austrian

1151
01:47:29.800 --> 01:47:35.360
economics in a departure from the original Mangerian project as part of an emerging neoclassical

1152
01:47:35.360 --> 01:47:40.400
synthesis built on the works of Gossen, Walras and Jevons.

1153
01:47:40.400 --> 01:47:45.020
It is in this light that one has to see Wieser's personal impact on the education of the rising

1154
01:47:45.020 --> 01:47:47.600
generations of Austrian economists.

1155
01:47:47.600 --> 01:47:53.900
He helped Menger's form a position from 1903 to 1920 and continued to teach as an emeritus

1156
01:47:53.900 --> 01:47:59.980
until his death in 1926. During this entire period it was Wieser who taught the introductory

1157
01:47:59.980 --> 01:48:06.000
courses in economic science at the University of Vienna. Until 1914 Boehm-Bawerk's presence

1158
01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:11.060
provided some counterbalance, but after his death Wieser's position was that of an unquestioned

1159
01:48:11.060 --> 01:48:16.060
authority in all matters of general economic theory, a position reinforced by the publication

1160
01:48:16.060 --> 01:48:22.400
and that same year of his general treatise, Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Wirtschaft.

1161
01:48:22.400 --> 01:48:27.460
In foreign countries too, Wieser was therefore perceived as the main interwar authority on

1162
01:48:27.460 --> 01:48:32.460
Austrian economics. This goes a long way to it explaining the rise of Keynesianism in

1163
01:48:32.460 --> 01:48:38.140
the mid-1930s. The entire fourth generation of Austrian economists, brilliant young men

1164
01:48:38.140 --> 01:48:44.060
like Hayek, Machloub, Haberler, Morgenstern and Rosenstein-Rodin, were thus shaped by

1165
01:48:44.060 --> 01:48:49.900
by the Viserian mold before they set off on their own intellectual paths. Largely ignorant

1166
01:48:49.900 --> 01:48:54.860
of Menger's principles, out of print since the 1880s, they were trained in the spirit

1167
01:48:54.860 --> 01:49:00.420
of the neoclassical synthesis. As a result of these circumstances, there was, strictly

1168
01:49:00.420 --> 01:49:05.660
speaking, no fourth generation of Austrian economists in the Mengerian sense. All the

1169
01:49:05.660 --> 01:49:10.440
young men who are commonly held to be fourth generation members were in fact lost to the

1170
01:49:10.440 --> 01:49:15.800
and Neoclassical School, with the possible exception of Hayek, who decades later rediscovered

1171
01:49:15.800 --> 01:49:22.600
some Mengerian themes in his work on the Counter-Revolution of Science, 1954. Yet significantly, while

1172
01:49:22.600 --> 01:49:27.400
Hayek's book dealt with virtually all the fundamental errors in the social sciences,

1173
01:49:27.400 --> 01:49:32.640
in particular with the errors inherent in scientism, positivism, historicism and holism,

1174
01:49:32.640 --> 01:49:37.680
he did not talk about psychologism in economic theory.

1175
01:49:37.680 --> 01:49:42.240
The generation Ludwig von Mises' personal and intellectual influence on these men was

1176
01:49:42.240 --> 01:49:47.240
limited. He had virtually no impact on their basic training, admitting them to his private

1177
01:49:47.240 --> 01:49:52.560
seminar only after they had obtained their doctoral degrees, and they probably did not

1178
01:49:52.560 --> 01:49:58.760
see in him anything more than the reputed expert on monetary theory and a highly controversial

1179
01:49:58.760 --> 01:50:05.400
political economist. Mises was known for his treatises on the theory of money and on socialism,

1180
01:50:05.400 --> 01:50:10.640
But none of his students and few of his colleagues grasped the far-reaching implications of these

1181
01:50:10.640 --> 01:50:17.200
works. He became a recognised authority on general economic theory only many years later,

1182
01:50:17.200 --> 01:50:21.920
when he spelled out these implications in his general treatise on economic science,

1183
01:50:21.920 --> 01:50:28.840
Nationalökonomie, 1940, and it was only in its English language translation and expansion,

1184
01:50:28.840 --> 01:50:33.940
Human Action, 1949, that he eventually had a lasting impact on the theoretical outlook

1185
01:50:33.940 --> 01:50:41.540
Network of Subsequent Generations of Students, Joseph R. Schumpeter. With his notable 1902

1186
01:50:41.540 --> 01:50:47.620
study on the pre-1848 relationship between Galician lords and peasants, Mises had started

1187
01:50:47.620 --> 01:50:53.760
off as a star student in the camp of mainstream historicist economics. When he turned to economic

1188
01:50:53.760 --> 01:50:59.700
theory a la Carl Menger, he lost the support of his very influential network. After the

1189
01:50:59.700 --> 01:51:03.660
After the death of Boehm-Bawerk, academia had little use for the Mengerian tradition

1190
01:51:03.660 --> 01:51:08.860
that Mises maintained and developed. He would remain outside both the waning tradition of

1191
01:51:08.860 --> 01:51:14.860
historicism and the emerging influence of neoclassical economists. His work was respected

1192
01:51:14.860 --> 01:51:19.060
and he enjoyed an excellent reputation, but he was and would remain for the rest of his

1193
01:51:19.060 --> 01:51:24.140
life an intellectual outsider. His work did not fit into the general development of the

1194
01:51:24.140 --> 01:51:25.140
science.

1195
01:51:25.140 --> 01:51:30.700
The rising star among the young Viennese economists was another member of Boehm-Bawerk's seminar.

1196
01:51:30.700 --> 01:51:36.860
Two years younger than Mises, Joseph Alvar Schumpeter immediately rose to international

1197
01:51:36.860 --> 01:51:43.540
fame when, barely 25 years old, he published a 600-page treatise on economic methodology

1198
01:51:43.540 --> 01:51:49.780
with the title Wesen und Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie, The Nature and Essence

1199
01:51:49.780 --> 01:51:54.740
of Theoretical Economics. In October 1908 he submitted this work to the University of

1200
01:51:54.740 --> 01:51:59.740
of Vienna to obtain a Habilitation degree, which he received under Boehm-Bawerk and Mises

1201
01:51:59.740 --> 01:52:03.900
Enthusiastic Endorsement in March 1909.

1202
01:52:03.900 --> 01:52:09.380
Six months later, the 26-year-old Schumpeter became Austria's youngest professor of political

1203
01:52:09.380 --> 01:52:15.540
economy in the provincial capital of Czernowitz. Two years later, after publishing his second,

1204
01:52:15.540 --> 01:52:21.780
even more influential book, Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Theory of Economic Development,

1205
01:52:21.780 --> 01:52:27.100
He received a full professorship at the prestigious University of Graz. From there Schumpeter

1206
01:52:27.100 --> 01:52:33.220
began a long and productive academic career that would lead him via Bonn to Harvard. He

1207
01:52:33.220 --> 01:52:39.820
was also a visiting professor at Columbia University in 1913-14 and at Harvard University

1208
01:52:39.820 --> 01:52:49.040
in 1927-28 and in 1930. He held several prestigious positions in more practical fields, but each

1209
01:52:49.040 --> 01:52:54.160
Each time his involvement was short-lived and ended in a debacle.

1210
01:52:54.160 --> 01:52:58.160
As Austrian Minister of Finance of the 2nd Renner government he was unable to stop the

1211
01:52:58.160 --> 01:53:05.200
hyperinflation in 1919 and as President of the Biedermann Bank he went bankrupt in 1924.

1212
01:53:05.200 --> 01:53:10.440
Schumpeter's careers in politics and banking were the products of his personal connections.

1213
01:53:10.440 --> 01:53:15.280
Due to the influence of his stepfather, General Sigismond von Keller, he was admitted to the

1214
01:53:15.280 --> 01:53:21.880
The prestigious Theresianum Gymnasium, the Eaton of pre-1914 Austria. There he befriended

1215
01:53:21.880 --> 01:53:26.740
Rudolf Hilferding, who later became one of the most brilliant Austro-Marxist and a Minister

1216
01:53:26.740 --> 01:53:32.000
of Finance of the German Reich. Family Money also allowed Schumpeter to stay for a year

1217
01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:38.360
at the newly founded London School of Economics from 1906 to 1907 and to meet Canaan, Marshall

1218
01:53:38.360 --> 01:53:44.320
and other British economists. In late 1913 he was a visiting professor at Columbia University

1219
01:53:44.320 --> 01:53:49.600
and built up a network of contacts in the United States. In the chaotic first months after World

1220
01:53:49.600 --> 01:53:55.440
War I, Hilferding called Schumpeter, who by then had an excellent international reputation as an

1221
01:53:55.440 --> 01:54:01.680
economic expert, to join the commission for the socialisation of German industry. Schumpeter used

1222
01:54:01.680 --> 01:54:07.520
the opportunity to prove his political reliability, signing a recommendation to nationalise the German

1223
01:54:07.520 --> 01:54:13.800
and the coal mining industry. Shortly thereafter, he became Austrian Finance Minister. Even

1224
01:54:13.800 --> 01:54:18.320
though he remained in power for only a short time and could realise none of his projects,

1225
01:54:18.320 --> 01:54:23.640
he at least profited from this engagement on a personal level. He had used his ministerial

1226
01:54:23.640 --> 01:54:28.480
powers to grant a charter to the Biedermann Bank, which eventually appointed him its president

1227
01:54:28.480 --> 01:54:33.400
on very comfortable terms. Schumpeter never got involved in managing the bank's daily

1228
01:54:33.400 --> 01:54:40.400
Affairs, but when it went bankrupt in 1924, he felt a deep responsibility toward the stockholders

1229
01:54:40.400 --> 01:54:46.000
and worked the next 11 years to pay back his debts. He started publishing many paid articles

1230
01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:50.360
and, when this income proved to be insufficient, accepted a position at Harvard University

1231
01:54:50.360 --> 01:54:54.880
on very good financial terms. The most important factor in Schumpeter's

1232
01:54:54.880 --> 01:55:00.960
career, however, was his intellectual excellence. He had a brilliant mind and was a highly gifted

1233
01:55:00.960 --> 01:55:06.920
His ambitions as a young man were virtually boundless. He sought to become the greatest

1234
01:55:06.920 --> 01:55:11.880
economist in the world, the greatest horse rider in Austria and the greatest lover in

1235
01:55:11.880 --> 01:55:17.680
Vienna. He was sensitive to fine distinctions and the subtle problems of economic analysis

1236
01:55:17.680 --> 01:55:22.440
which he presented in appealing prose. Although Mises was sceptical of Schumpeter's work

1237
01:55:22.440 --> 01:55:28.360
on the fundamental issues of economic theory, as were Boehm-Bawerk and many other Austrian

1238
01:55:28.360 --> 01:55:33.760
He did not hesitate to acknowledge Schumpeter's more penetrating insights and to advance them

1239
01:55:33.760 --> 01:55:38.960
through his own writings. Examples of minor importance are Mises' endorsement of the

1240
01:55:38.960 --> 01:55:46.080
doctrine that later came to be called Demonstrated Preference. Similarly, Mises agreed with Schumpeter

1241
01:55:46.080 --> 01:55:52.560
and the sociologist Georg Simmel that choice or, as Simmel and Schumpeter put it, exchange

1242
01:55:52.560 --> 01:55:57.560
was the fundamental phenomenon of economic science. Most notably, Mises was among the

1243
01:55:57.560 --> 01:56:02.440
are many admirers of Schumpeter's colourful portrayal of the role of innovative entrepreneurs

1244
01:56:02.440 --> 01:56:08.060
in driving social and economic evolution. Although Mises and Schumpeter were in fundamental

1245
01:56:08.060 --> 01:56:13.600
disagreement on questions of epistemology and the nature of economic science, they were

1246
01:56:13.600 --> 01:56:19.080
in essential accord on one subtle but important question – the relationship between economics

1247
01:56:19.080 --> 01:56:24.500
and psychology. In the mid-19th century, the influential British economist, philosopher

1248
01:56:24.500 --> 01:56:29.860
Professor John Stuart Mill had popularised an empiricist epistemology according to which

1249
01:56:29.860 --> 01:56:35.720
all sciences were based on some form of experience. In the case of mathematics and economics this

1250
01:56:35.720 --> 01:56:42.440
empirical basis was psychological experience. Mill's epistemology was at first very successful

1251
01:56:42.440 --> 01:56:47.980
in Austria, where it shaped for example the epistemological views of Friedrich von Wieser,

1252
01:56:47.980 --> 01:56:53.180
but sooner reaction set in that successfully expelled the million approach from Central

1253
01:56:53.180 --> 01:56:58.280
for Europe. Around the term of the century, two philosophers Gottlob Freger and Edmund

1254
01:56:58.280 --> 01:57:04.680
Husserl published devastating attacks on Psychologism in Logic, as advocated by J.S. Mill. Their

1255
01:57:04.680 --> 01:57:09.180
writings had a considerable impact on the rising generation of Viennese intellectuals

1256
01:57:09.180 --> 01:57:14.500
in all fields, and Schumpeter spearheaded the movement to drive psychology out of economic

1257
01:57:14.500 --> 01:57:20.420
theory. He argued that it was futile to inquire after the psychological or biological causes

1258
01:57:20.420 --> 01:57:22.920
Analysis of Human Valuations

1259
01:57:22.920 --> 01:57:28.560
Economic analysis could be based entirely on a formal characteristic evaluation, namely

1260
01:57:28.560 --> 01:57:35.540
that the utility of any given unit of a homogeneous good decreased as its quantity increased.

1261
01:57:35.540 --> 01:57:40.720
This purely formal law of want-association had nothing to do with psychology, it was

1262
01:57:40.720 --> 01:57:46.160
not even a part of economic science proper, but only a convenient hypothesis that explained

1263
01:57:46.160 --> 01:57:49.780
market prices better than any other.

1264
01:57:49.780 --> 01:57:55.640
Economics had to take this formal characteristic evaluation as an ultimate given of their deductions,

1265
01:57:55.640 --> 01:58:00.460
and then compare the result of their deductions to the observed real world.

1266
01:58:00.460 --> 01:58:04.780
Mises later argued among very similar lines that the laws of economics had nothing to

1267
01:58:04.780 --> 01:58:10.140
do with the acting person's psychological disposition, but he disagreed with Schumpeter

1268
01:58:10.140 --> 01:58:15.740
about the nature of economic laws. For Schumpeter, the only basis for scientific propositions

1269
01:58:15.740 --> 01:58:40.700
Mises, on the other hand, followed the program of Menger's very different empirical theory,

1270
01:58:40.700 --> 01:58:45.860
gathered relevant facts wherever he could find them. Unfortunately, however, Mises

1271
01:58:45.860 --> 01:58:51.340
had written nothing on epistemology until the late 1920s, and Schumpeter's views had

1272
01:58:51.340 --> 01:58:55.180
a strong impact on the rising generation.

1273
01:58:55.180 --> 01:58:59.520
Around 1900, Schumpeter's epistemological views were much more fashionable than those

1274
01:58:59.520 --> 01:59:04.500
of Menger and Wieser, and they reinforced the general intellectual and aesthetic appeal

1275
01:59:04.500 --> 01:59:10.680
of his work. His positivism allowed Schumpeter to adopt a lofty attitude of standing above

1276
01:59:10.680 --> 01:59:19.080
Shumpeter took a completely agnostic stance on the issue of price theory, arguing that

1277
01:59:19.080 --> 01:59:24.080
from a scientific point of view it was irrelevant whether prices really arose from subjective

1278
01:59:24.080 --> 01:59:29.560
value or from the costs of production. The subjective value theory was, as he saw it

1279
01:59:29.560 --> 01:59:34.600
only a hypothesis, and it was to be preferred over costs of production theories, not because

1280
01:59:34.600 --> 01:59:39.800
the latter were false and the former true, but because the subjective value hypothesis

1281
01:59:39.800 --> 01:59:45.760
serve to explain a larger realm of price phenomena than did the cost-of-production hypothesis.

1282
01:59:45.760 --> 01:59:50.740
Schumpeter was the first real positivist among economic theoreticians, probably inspired

1283
01:59:50.740 --> 01:59:56.120
by the works of the Vienna physicist-philosopher Ernst Mach, who was an extremely influential

1284
01:59:56.120 --> 02:00:02.160
thinker at the time, and in the decades to come. Mach paved the way for the Vienna circle

1285
02:00:02.160 --> 02:00:08.400
of the logical positivists in the 1930s. In the nature and essence of theoretical economics,

1286
02:00:08.400 --> 02:00:13.840
Schumpeter fundamentally argued that modern economic science à la visa and Valrass was

1287
02:00:13.840 --> 02:00:20.480
a science in the precise sense of Marx philosophy. He had anticipated this thesis in a 1906 article

1288
02:00:20.480 --> 02:00:26.160
on what he called the mathematical method of theoretical economics. He advocated the

1289
02:00:26.160 --> 02:00:31.300
same views that Milton Friedman presented more than 40 years later in his famous essay

1290
02:00:31.300 --> 02:00:36.640
on economic methodology. But while Friedman's presentation was sketchy and detached from

1291
02:00:36.640 --> 02:00:41.760
In the presentation of the actual doctrine, Schumpeter's Nature and Essence made a 600-page

1292
02:00:41.760 --> 02:00:44.880
case for positivism in economics.

1293
02:00:44.880 --> 02:00:50.040
Wieser honoured Schumpeter's book with the only review he ever wrote praising Schumpeter

1294
02:00:50.040 --> 02:00:54.000
for his achievement in presenting the main contents of economic science.

1295
02:00:54.000 --> 02:00:59.200
Wieser's only admonition was a point that he himself actually considered to be of comparatively

1296
02:00:59.200 --> 02:01:02.040
minor importance – methodology.

1297
02:01:02.040 --> 02:01:07.000
He severely criticized Schumpeter's positivist methodology and his rejection of psychological

1298
02:01:07.000 --> 02:01:10.280
introspection as the foundation of economic knowledge.

1299
02:01:10.280 --> 02:01:14.800
Wieser claimed that as a consequence of this methodological stance, Schumpeter failed to

1300
02:01:14.800 --> 02:01:19.280
adequately present the vision, the nature of economic science.

1301
02:01:19.280 --> 02:01:23.700
Contradicting Schumpeter's claim that he had adopted his method because it best fitted

1302
02:01:23.700 --> 02:01:27.320
the subject matter of economic research, Wieser stated,

1303
02:01:27.320 --> 02:01:32.820
The truth is that, without knowing it, he brings in his ready-made methodology from outside.

1304
02:01:32.820 --> 02:01:40.320
Blinded by the success of the exact natural science, he adopts its way of thinking even where it does not at all fit our subject matter,

1305
02:01:40.320 --> 02:01:48.820
and thus construes an artificial method with which he would never have been able to arrive at the results that he wants to take over from his predecessors.

1306
02:01:48.820 --> 02:01:55.820
Mises then brilliantly addresses Schumpeter's claim that the fundamental economic theorems have the character of hypotheses.

1307
02:01:55.820 --> 02:02:01.540
He states that the hypotheses of the natural sciences are assumptions about unknowns, whereas

1308
02:02:01.540 --> 02:02:06.980
the assumptions of economic science always have known real-world correlates, even though

1309
02:02:06.980 --> 02:02:10.140
they may not always reflect them faithfully.

1310
02:02:10.140 --> 02:02:15.740
He distinguishes two types of assumptions made by economists, isolating assumptions and

1311
02:02:15.740 --> 02:02:21.900
idealising assumptions. The former are needed to engage in Gedanken-Experimenten or thought

1312
02:02:21.900 --> 02:02:28.100
Not Experiments. Wieser did not use this expression in his essay, but it had already been introduced

1313
02:02:28.100 --> 02:02:33.460
by the physicist-philosopher Ernst Mach. They serve to describe the state of affairs that

1314
02:02:33.460 --> 02:02:39.660
is the subject of theoretical analysis. Just like the natural scientist in an experiment,

1315
02:02:39.660 --> 02:02:45.420
we must make isolations in our mental observations. Complex experiences cannot be interpreted

1316
02:02:45.420 --> 02:02:50.860
as a whole, we must decompose them into their elements to understand their meaning. Only

1317
02:02:50.860 --> 02:02:56.380
Only then are we in a position to deduce the total effect through a composition of separate

1318
02:02:56.380 --> 02:03:01.560
particularities. These isolations must, however, be strictly realistic because their usefulness

1319
02:03:01.560 --> 02:03:07.260
depends entirely on their truthfulness. In contrast, the idealising assumptions do not

1320
02:03:07.260 --> 02:03:13.940
truthfully reflect a real correlate but deliberately transform it into an ideal form, such as homo

1321
02:03:13.940 --> 02:03:20.220
economicus. Thus, even in this contestable and, as Wiese admits, highly contested form,

1322
02:03:20.220 --> 02:03:25.580
The fundamental assumptions of economics always have a known real-world correlate in human

1323
02:03:25.580 --> 02:03:31.300
consciousness. Refusing to make use of them, as Schumpeter suggests, would result in incomplete

1324
02:03:31.300 --> 02:03:38.000
and ultimately unconvincing economic arguments. Weiser warned that Schumpeter-style presentations

1325
02:03:38.000 --> 02:03:43.420
could hamper the understanding of the meaning of economic relations. Schumpeter himself

1326
02:03:43.420 --> 02:03:48.660
still knows the meaning, because he has been introduced to it by his predecessors, but

1327
02:03:48.660 --> 02:03:54.000
The pupils that he introduces will not know it any longer, because he deprives them of

1328
02:03:54.000 --> 02:03:58.920
the presentation of those most subtle connections which only reveal themselves to the inner

1329
02:03:58.920 --> 02:04:05.680
observation. Despite these objections to Schumpeter's misdirected methodology, these are praise

1330
02:04:05.680 --> 02:04:10.960
nature and essence. While Schumpeter quickly passes over all those subjects that he thinks

1331
02:04:10.960 --> 02:04:16.700
others have sufficiently presented, he lingers on the more difficult problems. Having begun

1332
02:04:16.700 --> 02:04:33.620
Schumpeter's appearance, and his promotion through both Wieser and Boehm-Bawerk, was

1333
02:04:33.620 --> 02:04:38.040
an important development in the emergence and consolidation of an international network

1334
02:04:38.040 --> 02:04:43.360
of economic theorists following in Gossen's footsteps. Schumpeter built on the foundations

1335
02:04:43.360 --> 02:04:48.640
was laid by Wiese, making the German-speaking economics seen safe for what today is known

1336
02:04:48.640 --> 02:04:55.280
as neoclassical economics. Whereas Wiese had further developed the theory of Jevons, Schumpeter

1337
02:04:55.280 --> 02:05:00.360
brought Walras to Vienna. Having thought through the implications of the doctrine of natural

1338
02:05:00.360 --> 02:05:05.220
value, he discovered important and far-reaching affinities between Wiese's system and the

1339
02:05:05.220 --> 02:05:11.200
general equilibrium framework developed by Leon Walras in Lausanne. Both Jevons and Walras

1340
02:05:11.200 --> 02:05:16.460
had developed a theory of price determination under fictional ideal conditions, disregarding

1341
02:05:16.460 --> 02:05:22.200
various essential features of the human economy that Menger, and to a lesser degree Boehm-Bawerk,

1342
02:05:22.200 --> 02:05:27.640
had carefully sought to integrate in the new price theory. For instance, both Walras and

1343
02:05:27.640 --> 02:05:32.440
Wieser considered human error to be a mere friction, preventing the real world from following

1344
02:05:32.440 --> 02:05:37.920
the course it should take, and they both implicitly denied that all quantities of economic goods

1345
02:05:37.920 --> 02:05:44.360
were essentially related as private property to human beings, and that the utility or value

1346
02:05:44.360 --> 02:05:50.080
of a good was essentially related to the specific situation of the person evaluating the good.

1347
02:05:50.080 --> 02:05:56.240
Both Walrass and Wieser conceived of price determination as the mechanistic interplay

1348
02:05:56.240 --> 02:06:01.800
of freely floating quantities of an equally freely floating and measurable utility. This

1349
02:06:01.800 --> 02:06:07.600
explanation of economic phenomena is general equilibrium theory, implicit in Wieser and

1350
02:06:07.600 --> 02:06:13.400
Explicit in Walras In Nature and Essence, Schumpeter gave a refined

1351
02:06:13.400 --> 02:06:19.360
and largely verbal restatement of general equilibrium theory. He remedied certain shortcomings

1352
02:06:19.360 --> 02:06:24.680
of Walras and Wiese, for example, by accounting for the fact that all quantities of goods

1353
02:06:24.680 --> 02:06:30.280
are owned quantities, and he came very close to presenting economic science as the science

1354
02:06:30.280 --> 02:06:36.240
of human choices when he argued that the nature of economic action is exchange.

1355
02:06:36.240 --> 02:06:41.680
Ludwig von Mises, Richard von Strieger and Lionel Robbins would develop this insight and

1356
02:06:41.680 --> 02:06:47.240
argue that the fundamental economic phenomenon was the act of preferring one thing over another

1357
02:06:47.240 --> 02:06:53.720
thing and that virtually all economic laws in one way or another relate to this phenomenon.

1358
02:06:53.720 --> 02:06:59.880
Schumpeter spent most of his book discussing methodological and epistemological questions,

1359
02:06:59.880 --> 02:07:05.280
in the course of which he gave the first succinct descriptions of methodological individualism

1360
02:07:05.280 --> 02:07:12.200
and the Method of Variations, Comparative Statics, terms that he coined. He dealt with economic

1361
02:07:12.200 --> 02:07:18.320
laws only incidentally, using them as illustrations for his methodological and epistemological

1362
02:07:18.320 --> 02:07:24.560
claims. His most fateful contribution was to recast the entire general equilibrium theory

1363
02:07:24.560 --> 02:07:31.560
in terms of a distinction he borrowed from classical mechanics between statics and dynamics.

1364
02:07:31.560 --> 02:07:37.680
According to Schumpeter, the static economy and the dynamic economy are entirely different

1365
02:07:37.680 --> 02:07:43.120
states of affairs. They present different problems and require different methods of

1366
02:07:43.120 --> 02:07:49.320
analysis. Schumpeter was not the first economist to stress the usefulness of analysing static

1367
02:07:49.320 --> 02:07:54.960
and dynamic economic conditions separately. The American economist John Bates Clark had

1368
02:07:54.960 --> 02:07:59.800
pioneered this approach a few years earlier in his book The Distribution of Wealth, which

1369
02:07:59.800 --> 02:08:04.600
which proved to be very influential among Vienna economists. But Schumpeter produced

1370
02:08:04.600 --> 02:08:11.040
a mechanistic interpretation of the static, dynamic scheme, holding that in a truly static

1371
02:08:11.040 --> 02:08:16.360
economy, all events of a given day are only repetitions of whatever happened the previous

1372
02:08:16.360 --> 02:08:23.040
day. He claimed, moreover, that past economists had dealt exclusively with static conditions,

1373
02:08:23.040 --> 02:08:28.240
which are the proper subject matter of general equilibrium theory. Dynamic conditions remained

1374
02:08:28.240 --> 02:08:38.680
Schumpeter attempted to fill the gap with his Theory of Economic Development, which

1375
02:08:38.680 --> 02:08:44.520
he published in 1911, a year before Mises published his first major work. The book was

1376
02:08:44.520 --> 02:08:49.500
the dynamic complement, so to speak, to Nature and Essence, which had focused exclusively

1377
02:08:49.500 --> 02:08:56.480
on static conditions. The second book contained three major theses. First, Schumpeter argued

1378
02:08:56.480 --> 02:09:01.760
that economic development was exclusively the result of pioneering entrepreneurs, a special

1379
02:09:01.760 --> 02:09:07.500
breed as different from the rest of mankind as greyhounds are from poodles.

1380
02:09:07.500 --> 02:09:13.320
Innovative entrepreneurs are the true driving force of social evolution. They impose unheard

1381
02:09:13.320 --> 02:09:19.500
of products and methods of production on a reluctant society of mere adjusters. It was

1382
02:09:19.500 --> 02:09:24.980
this thesis in particular that roused the admiration of Schumpeter's friends and colleagues.

1383
02:09:24.980 --> 02:09:30.060
Three years later, Mises listed the book as one of the top four German language contributions

1384
02:09:30.060 --> 02:09:35.580
to economics. He emphasised that he took no account of his own writings. It has continued

1385
02:09:35.580 --> 02:09:40.180
to fascinate some of the best Austrian economists to the present day.

1386
02:09:40.180 --> 02:09:46.380
Second, Schumpeter portrayed entrepreneurs as essentially resourceless market participants.

1387
02:09:46.380 --> 02:09:52.660
They needed new fiduciary bank credit, credit out of thin air, to finance their projects

1388
02:09:52.660 --> 02:10:03.060
Capital was essentially purchasing power, rather than a quantity of real goods that

1389
02:10:03.060 --> 02:10:08.160
could sustain workers in the production process. Bankers could therefore create capital out

1390
02:10:08.160 --> 02:10:15.000
of nothing by simply printing additional banknotes. Third, and most importantly, he asserted that

1391
02:10:15.000 --> 02:10:20.340
under static conditions the phenomenon of interest would not exist. Interest paid on

1392
02:10:20.340 --> 02:10:25.260
One capital invested could only come into being under dynamic conditions, that is, as

1393
02:10:25.260 --> 02:10:32.580
a result of change. Its primary form was entrepreneurial profit. By contrast, the interest paid on

1394
02:10:32.580 --> 02:10:37.760
bonds or on bank credits was just a share of profits that entrepreneurs were forced

1395
02:10:37.760 --> 02:10:43.820
to pay to bankers to secure their cooperation. Schumpeter contested in particular Boehm-Bawerk's

1396
02:10:43.820 --> 02:10:50.420
theory, according to which time preference creates interest even under static conditions.

1397
02:10:50.420 --> 02:10:55.580
Arguing along the lines of John Bates Clark, Schumpeter insisted that the passage of time

1398
02:10:55.580 --> 02:11:01.280
is irrelevant to production under static conditions because consumption and investment are always

1399
02:11:01.280 --> 02:11:07.860
synchronised. Schumpeter's first thesis, that entrepreneurship drives progress, has

1400
02:11:07.860 --> 02:11:12.340
proven to be the least controversial, but with the other two contentions he opened the

1401
02:11:12.340 --> 02:11:35.620
He wrote a long review of Theory of Economic Development in an attempt to offset the damage

1402
02:11:35.620 --> 02:11:40.580
being done by one of his most gifted students. Boehm-Bawerk made it clear that Schumpeter's

1403
02:11:40.580 --> 02:11:46.300
dynamic theory of interest was completely wrong. Moreover, Schumpeter's economic analysis

1404
02:11:46.300 --> 02:11:51.780
suffered from a sloppiness that belied the author's great intellectual gifts.

1405
02:11:51.780 --> 02:11:56.340
One of the review's opening paragraphs came close to charging Schumpeter with a lack of

1406
02:11:56.340 --> 02:12:03.020
professional integrity. Schumpeter has taken pleasure in contemplating an ingenious idea,

1407
02:12:03.020 --> 02:12:08.880
but unfortunately he has not had the self-discipline, selbstüberwindung, to subject himself and

1408
02:12:08.880 --> 02:12:14.880
and his idea to a sober and encompassing cross-examination, an examination that very soon would have shown

1409
02:12:14.880 --> 02:12:18.120
problems on all sides.

1410
02:12:18.120 --> 02:12:22.340
After dissecting some of the most important shortcomings of the theory of economic development

1411
02:12:22.340 --> 02:12:27.680
in detail, Boehm-Bawerk went on to identify the spirit of Schumpeter's work.

1412
02:12:27.680 --> 02:12:32.600
I do not intend to give a running critique of all of Schumpeter's ideas. I am content

1413
02:12:32.600 --> 02:12:37.420
with briefly expressing my conviction that Schumpeter commits a fateful mistake, which

1414
02:12:37.420 --> 02:12:42.420
Which despite all the qualifications that he makes is a truly mercantilistic mistake

1415
02:12:42.420 --> 02:12:47.260
of superficial reasoning. When it comes to determining the possible scope of productive

1416
02:12:47.260 --> 02:12:53.100
credit he accords the essential role to money and means of payment rather than to the economy

1417
02:12:53.100 --> 02:12:59.180
supplies of real goods. Schumpeter is much closer than he thinks and maybe then he wishes

1418
02:12:59.180 --> 02:13:04.500
to the laws and Macleods and regrettably he is quite removed from Hume despite all the

1419
02:13:04.500 --> 02:13:09.780
and the praise that he has for the latter. Boehm-Bawerk went to great lengths in refuting

1420
02:13:09.780 --> 02:13:15.220
the doctrines of his former disciple. He knew that ideas have consequences and that fallacious

1421
02:13:15.220 --> 02:13:20.820
ideas can ruin a country or an entire civilization if they are presented with the grace and vigor

1422
02:13:20.820 --> 02:13:26.860
of Schumpeter's works. Unfortunately, Boehm-Bawerk died a year later, and the mantle passed to

1423
02:13:26.860 --> 02:13:32.580
Wieser and Schumpeter. Both would make sure that the next generation of Viennese economists

1424
02:13:32.580 --> 02:13:35.620
would be part of the emerging neoclassical synthesis.