WEBVTT

NOTE Epilogue to 'Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism'

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.000
Epilogue

2
00:00:03.000 --> 00:00:09.000
If ever it could be said that one man stood against the ideological tide of an era, that

3
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:15.680
was von Mises. But whether his efforts have turned that tide is a question to be resolved

4
00:00:15.680 --> 00:00:21.220
in the future by those who understand his theories and share his love of liberty. Ludwig

5
00:00:21.220 --> 00:00:27.120
von Mises was the last knight of liberalism, but to think of him as a political thinker

6
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:33.480
only is to underestimate his place in the history of ideas. He pioneered the integration

7
00:00:33.480 --> 00:00:39.640
of monetary theory into value theory, macro and microeconomics, the theory of economic

8
00:00:39.640 --> 00:00:46.240
calculation and the inquiry into the a priori foundations of economic science. Even more

9
00:00:46.240 --> 00:00:52.760
than that, he excelled as a systematic thinker. He created a comprehensive system of economic

10
00:00:52.760 --> 00:00:57.980
Economic Theory and also highlighted the place of economics among the sciences and its role

11
00:00:57.980 --> 00:01:05.020
within human civilization. More than any other economist before or after him, he has clarified

12
00:01:05.020 --> 00:01:11.240
its political, social and cultural implications. Economics was not merely the foundation of

13
00:01:11.240 --> 00:01:17.200
a comprehensive political programme centred on private property rights, it was the scientific

14
00:01:17.200 --> 00:01:24.400
cornerstone of an entire world view in which peace, cooperation and tolerance reigned supreme.

15
00:01:24.400 --> 00:01:30.440
As he saw it, opting for a free society did not demand cold-heartedness or mistrusting

16
00:01:30.440 --> 00:01:35.840
the intellect. It was the type of society that was demonstrably best at promoting the

17
00:01:35.840 --> 00:01:42.160
material, cultural and spiritual well-being of the overwhelming majority of mankind, of

18
00:01:42.160 --> 00:01:48.920
all those who did not aspire to live off spoliation. Human reason, despite its limitations, was

19
00:01:48.920 --> 00:01:54.240
the most precious tool in a man's pursuit of happiness, and it led straight to the case

20
00:01:54.240 --> 00:02:00.600
for classical liberalism and the market economy. Other thinkers, most notably F. R. Hayek,

21
00:02:00.600 --> 00:02:06.280
had criticised socialism and statism as the fruit of excessive rationalism. For Mises,

22
00:02:06.280 --> 00:02:11.880
the planning state and the interventionist state were not reasonable enough. Their intellectual

23
00:02:11.880 --> 00:02:15.780
Several champions were quite simply wrong on the essential question, but rather than

24
00:02:15.780 --> 00:02:21.600
admitting the case for liberty and capitalism, these advocates spent their time finding ever

25
00:02:21.600 --> 00:02:26.560
new justifications for government interventionism by contesting the very existence of economic

26
00:02:26.560 --> 00:02:33.100
laws if necessary. This was not so much an intellectual hubris as it was a moral one.

27
00:02:33.100 --> 00:02:39.400
It was not, above all, an empty pretense of knowledge. It was a revolt against reason.

28
00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:44.220
This expression is taken from the title of chapter 3 in Human Action. The chief contribution

29
00:02:44.220 --> 00:02:51.100
of Human Action is to make this point. Ever since its first publication in 1949, Mises's

30
00:02:51.100 --> 00:02:56.800
magnum opus has remained for our time what the inquiry into the nature and causes of

31
00:02:56.800 --> 00:03:02.820
the wealth of nations was for the 18th and 19th centuries, a handbook of the science

32
00:03:02.820 --> 00:03:09.180
of human liberty, a treatise of the scientific foundations underpinning political liberalism.

33
00:03:09.180 --> 00:03:13.500
Just as Adam Smith's work was based on comprehensive acquaintance with the economic knowledge of

34
00:03:13.500 --> 00:03:19.700
his day, Human Action portrays the grammar of modern economics. The foundation of modern

35
00:03:19.700 --> 00:03:25.440
economic thought is the theory of subjective value, developed by Menger and others. Mises

36
00:03:25.440 --> 00:03:30.820
complemented this theory by a general theory of economic calculation. Its central idea

37
00:03:30.820 --> 00:03:36.860
is that economic rationality is logically and historically contingent. Contradicting

38
00:03:36.860 --> 00:03:41.620
According on this point all economic literature since Adam Smith, as well as fellow Austrians

39
00:03:41.620 --> 00:03:47.680
including Visa and Hayek, Mises stressed that calculation in terms of money prices is not

40
00:03:47.680 --> 00:03:54.040
just one form of economic calculus, it is the only type of economic calculus there is.

41
00:03:54.040 --> 00:03:58.820
It follows that human civilization is the fragile fruit of certain cultural conditions

42
00:03:58.820 --> 00:04:04.680
that are necessary for the emergence of money and monetary calculus. Here economics comes

43
00:04:04.680 --> 00:04:09.600
is again into play. Learning, developing and spreading the teachings of economic science

44
00:04:09.600 --> 00:04:14.720
has brought about an unheard of increase of living standards after the 18th century, along

45
00:04:14.720 --> 00:04:19.040
with the cultural achievements of a great number of people, who then became affluent

46
00:04:19.040 --> 00:04:24.560
enough to dedicate their lives to the arts and the sciences. To preserve these cultural

47
00:04:24.560 --> 00:04:29.760
standards it is necessary not to lose sight of their economic foundations, it is necessary

48
00:04:29.760 --> 00:04:37.080
to Learn Economics, Mises stresses, this is in our age the primary civic duty, and he

49
00:04:37.080 --> 00:04:42.280
insists that the matter is too important to be entrusted to public education and government

50
00:04:42.280 --> 00:04:44.360
expert.

51
00:04:44.360 --> 00:04:49.600
Economics must not be relegated to classrooms and statistical offices, and must not be left

52
00:04:49.600 --> 00:04:51.520
to esoteric circles.

53
00:04:51.520 --> 00:04:57.960
It is the philosophy of human life and action, and concerns everybody and everything.

54
00:04:57.960 --> 00:05:03.000
is the Pith of Civilization and of Man's Human Existence.

55
00:05:03.000 --> 00:05:08.780
In the concluding chapters of his magnum opus, he emphasized the importance of private education.

56
00:05:08.780 --> 00:05:12.440
It was an important lesson he had learned first-hand in his long life.

57
00:05:12.440 --> 00:05:18.320
Government sponsorship introduces a pro-government bias into economic education and economic

58
00:05:18.320 --> 00:05:22.680
research, thus undermining the social function of economic science.

59
00:05:22.680 --> 00:05:25.600
He concluded Human Action with this statement.

60
00:05:25.600 --> 00:05:31.180
The body of economic knowledge is an essential element in the structure of human civilization.

61
00:05:31.180 --> 00:05:37.440
It is the foundation upon which modern industrialism and all the moral, intellectual, technological

62
00:05:37.440 --> 00:05:43.160
and therapeutic achievements of the last centuries have been built. It rests with men whether

63
00:05:43.160 --> 00:05:47.400
they will make the proper use of the rich treasure with which this knowledge provides

64
00:05:47.400 --> 00:05:52.840
them or whether they will leave it unused. But if they fail to take the best advantage

65
00:05:52.840 --> 00:06:07.080
When he wrote these lines, Mises could look back on a lifetime invested in the development

66
00:06:07.080 --> 00:06:12.280
of economics. Little by little he had come to realise that his discipline was the intellectual

67
00:06:12.280 --> 00:06:17.640
foundation of modern civilisation, and that all people who care about other people and

68
00:06:17.640 --> 00:06:22.560
the progress of human civilization had to become acquainted with it. This was not a

69
00:06:22.560 --> 00:06:27.240
conviction he had adopted in youthful exuberance when he first came across the writings of

70
00:06:27.240 --> 00:06:33.400
Menger and the classical economists. It was an opinion that grew in him, even after he

71
00:06:33.400 --> 00:06:38.920
had already reached a fairly advanced age. The passage just quoted is from Human Action.

72
00:06:38.920 --> 00:06:44.080
Nine years earlier, in nationale économie, Mises could not bring himself to assign economics

73
00:06:44.080 --> 00:06:51.480
was quite such an elevated place, but then he was only 58 years old. By economics, Mises

74
00:06:51.480 --> 00:06:57.440
meant the science that came from classical figures, such as Hume, Smith, Ricardo, Say,

75
00:06:57.440 --> 00:07:01.920
and Bastiat, that had been transformed by Menger and others in the light of the new

76
00:07:01.920 --> 00:07:07.160
subjective value theory, which had further been transformed by Mises and others in the

77
00:07:07.160 --> 00:07:14.120
of the 20th Century and which Mises expected to be transformed ever further by future generations.

78
00:07:14.120 --> 00:07:18.440
It was the science that analyzed the logical implications of human action dealing with

79
00:07:18.440 --> 00:07:24.240
scarce goods. It was the science that demonstrated again and again that government interventionism

80
00:07:24.240 --> 00:07:31.780
could not work miracles but was bound by inexorable laws of cause and effect. This science came

81
00:07:31.780 --> 00:07:36.500
to be supplanted in the course of the 20th Century, and in particular after the Second

82
00:07:36.500 --> 00:07:40.980
World War, by a new discipline that, while being taught under the same name as the old

83
00:07:40.980 --> 00:07:46.300
economics, set out to apply the methods of the natural sciences to elucidate phenomena

84
00:07:46.300 --> 00:07:52.300
such as prices, income, employment, inflation and growth. Mises digested the challenges

85
00:07:52.300 --> 00:07:57.460
that the various strands of this new discipline raised for the old economics. When he published

86
00:07:57.460 --> 00:08:03.060
Human Action then, it was not merely a summary of his own previous works, but a new synthesis

87
00:08:03.060 --> 00:08:09.580
developed in critical response not only to historicism and Marxism, but also to positivism,

88
00:08:09.580 --> 00:08:14.860
experimental psychology and game theory, disciplines that still dominate the social sciences in

89
00:08:14.860 --> 00:08:20.860
our day. Ironically, the very success of the ideas that Mises combated in a lonely struggle

90
00:08:20.860 --> 00:08:27.560
more than 30 years ago now make for the lasting importance of his own system of thought.

91
00:08:27.560 --> 00:08:33.020
Misesian economics is today a strong and fast-growing paradigm, as witnessed by the number of publications

92
00:08:33.020 --> 00:08:48.300
The most surprising aspect of this growth is that it has virtually no institutional backing.

93
00:08:48.300 --> 00:08:53.060
Mises himself turned politically incorrect at an early stage of his career and later

94
00:08:53.060 --> 00:08:59.020
on he felt even more out of fashion due to his epistemological views. The colleges and

95
00:08:59.020 --> 00:09:04.020
These universities shunned him. The political parties in power did not listen and were certainly

96
00:09:04.020 --> 00:09:10.120
glad that nobody else seemed to do so either. Mises enjoyed some personal backing by private

97
00:09:10.120 --> 00:09:16.380
foundations most notably the Volcker Fund and the Earhart Foundation. After his death,

98
00:09:16.380 --> 00:09:21.900
his legacy was promoted actively by the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Alabama. But these

99
00:09:21.900 --> 00:09:27.660
few and financially insignificant institutions had a hard time competing with organizations

100
00:09:27.660 --> 00:09:34.860
that bore the stamp of official government approval. It was and still is an uphill battle.

101
00:09:34.860 --> 00:09:40.080
Thus the main explanation of the present-day growth of the Misesian paradigm is the extraordinary

102
00:09:40.080 --> 00:09:47.020
vigour of the ideas that inspire it. Mises is a classic, but in our day he is more than

103
00:09:47.020 --> 00:09:52.120
that. A classic author has given mankind a timeless formulation of essential questions

104
00:09:52.120 --> 00:09:58.780
and sometimes time-tested answers. Yet these questions and answers are not necessarily the

105
00:09:58.780 --> 00:10:04.300
ones that move us today or are relevant to solve the problems that we confront. Not so

106
00:10:04.300 --> 00:10:10.000
in the case of Mises. More than thirty years after his death, his writings still strike

107
00:10:10.000 --> 00:10:15.800
the reader, academic and layman alike, as relevant and thought-provoking. His books

108
00:10:15.800 --> 00:10:21.960
and articles are still bought by the thousands each year, and, most of all, read. How many

109
00:10:21.960 --> 00:10:27.040
Many economics students today actually read something Adam Smith or David Ricardo have

110
00:10:27.040 --> 00:10:32.720
written. Any teacher of economics knows the answer. The same answer holds true for the

111
00:10:32.720 --> 00:10:38.400
writings of 20th century luminaries such as Gustav Kassel or Frank Knight. It holds

112
00:10:38.400 --> 00:10:43.960
true even for the writings of John Maynard Keynes, the greatest champion ever of interventionism

113
00:10:43.960 --> 00:10:48.560
is constantly referred to in the classroom and in the media, but few people have ever

114
00:10:48.560 --> 00:11:06.200
What is it that makes for this continued relevance?

115
00:11:06.200 --> 00:11:10.800
Looking back at the end of this volume on the life and work of Mises, many plausible

116
00:11:10.800 --> 00:11:13.520
answers could be given to this question.

117
00:11:13.520 --> 00:11:17.880
One could single out a substantial number of path-breaking contributions in various

118
00:11:17.880 --> 00:11:24.240
and its fields of economic analysis. One could refer to his personal virtues, entailing admiration

119
00:11:24.240 --> 00:11:31.040
and inspiration on the part of many close associates. But we would like to stress another consideration,

120
00:11:31.040 --> 00:11:36.440
an aspect of overriding importance that helps explain both the fascination of his work and

121
00:11:36.440 --> 00:11:43.260
his place in the history of thought, realist epistemology. Mises's work stands for the

122
00:11:43.260 --> 00:11:50.280
The idea, or hypothesis, that some aspects of social reality cannot be adequately analyzed

123
00:11:50.280 --> 00:11:56.580
with the methods used in the natural sciences and in historical investigation. Yet this

124
00:11:56.580 --> 00:12:03.440
layer of the social world can be described with praxeology and economics. There are time

125
00:12:03.440 --> 00:12:08.980
invariant causes and effects in human action. Praxeology is the descriptive knowledge of

126
00:12:08.980 --> 00:12:16.660
It was this idea that attracted Mises to Menger and that turned him into an economist once

127
00:12:16.660 --> 00:12:21.620
he convinced himself that Menger was on to something. It is the same idea that still

128
00:12:21.620 --> 00:12:26.480
attracts people to Mises' writings as a radical alternative to the great number of

129
00:12:26.480 --> 00:12:32.520
contemporary approaches that, while discarding the realist hypothesis from the outset, seem

130
00:12:32.520 --> 00:12:38.280
to fail to deliver the goods. Whoever wishes to engage in the analysis of the causes and

131
00:12:38.280 --> 00:12:44.640
and effects that prevail in the social world would do well to start with Mises, unless

132
00:12:44.640 --> 00:12:50.040
he wishes to go even further back and find his own way from the classical economists

133
00:12:50.040 --> 00:12:56.140
or from the school of Salamanca. As things stand today, Mises's writings provide the

134
00:12:56.140 --> 00:13:01.920
only continuous link between modern economic thought and the long tradition of realist

135
00:13:01.920 --> 00:13:08.480
Social Analysis that reaches back to Nicolas Oresme in the 14th century. This is not to

136
00:13:08.480 --> 00:13:15.620
say of course that the Misesian paradigm defines some sort of perfection in the social sciences,

137
00:13:15.620 --> 00:13:19.680
but it has given us the most recent system of social thought from a realist point of

138
00:13:19.680 --> 00:13:25.360
view and thus it seems to be at present the most useful starting point to engage in that

139
00:13:25.360 --> 00:13:30.960
and the great intergenerational venture that we call the social sciences.

140
00:13:30.960 --> 00:13:36.440
It has also given us a most fruitful intellectual apparatus for understanding the workings of

141
00:13:36.440 --> 00:13:39.440
society in all times and places.

142
00:13:39.440 --> 00:13:48.440
The Ludwig von Mises Institute hopes that you have enjoyed this audiobook.

143
00:13:48.440 --> 00:13:54.200
For a world of free market literature, media and discussion, visit Mises.org.

144
00:13:55.360 --> 00:14:02.720
The Mises Institute dedicates this volume to all of its generous donors and wishes to thank these patrons in particular.

145
00:14:25.360 --> 00:14:55.360
Chris Rufer, Art Schumer, Lloyd Alerbach, Wesley and Terry Alexander, Ross K. Anderson, Anonymous, Robert G. Beard Jr., J.D. CPA, L.C.K.H. Beakley, Mr. and Mrs. William M. Benton, Professor Walter Block, John Hamilton Ballstadt, Herbert Bob, Mr. and Mrs. J. Robert Bost, Philip G. Brumder, Aubrey

146
00:14:55.360 --> 00:15:03.240
Professor T. Kuruth, Dan H. Courtney, Professor Jim Cox, Mr. and Mrs. Jeremy S. Davies, Mr.

147
00:15:03.240 --> 00:15:09.920
and Mrs. Charles F. Ligonard, Michael H. and William E. Denier, Dr. and Mrs. George

148
00:15:09.920 --> 00:15:17.800
G. Eddy, Dr. Larry J. Eshelman, Clyde Evans, Robert S. Ferguson, Mr. and Mrs. Willard

149
00:15:17.800 --> 00:15:26.760
Richard Fisher, James W. Freeford, Henry Goetz, Stuart B. Gillespie, Brian J. Gladish, Charles

150
00:15:26.760 --> 00:15:37.520
C. Grove, Charles F. Haynes, Keith M. Harnish, Mr. and Mrs. John A. Hayes, Jule R. Herbert,

151
00:15:37.520 --> 00:15:47.560
Jr., Dr. Frederick Herman, Dr. James M. Herring, Adam L. Knott, David M. Kramer, Silvio O.

152
00:15:47.560 --> 00:15:59.480
Arthur L. Loeb, James Mahanna, Ronald Mandel, Mr. and Mrs. William W. Massey Jr., Wesley

153
00:15:59.480 --> 00:16:10.720
G. McCain, Joseph Edward Paul Melville, A-Jr., Dr. Dorothy Donnelly Moller, Kyle Heinz Moore,

154
00:16:10.720 --> 00:16:18.960
The Orcas Bay Foundation, George A. Peterson, Professor and Mrs. Stanley E. Porter, Mr.

155
00:16:18.960 --> 00:16:27.280
and Mrs. Wilfried A. Pusher, T. James Reynolds, David L. Richards, Willard A. Richardson,

156
00:16:27.280 --> 00:16:36.320
Thomas Ross, Mr. and Mrs. Joseph P. Shurek, Conrad Schneiker, Norman K. Singleton, Andrew

157
00:16:36.320 --> 00:16:45.680
Alexander S. Serkis, Henry Etel Skinner, Carleton M. Smith, David M. Smith, Mr and Mrs. Warren

158
00:16:45.680 --> 00:16:54.580
C. and Georgia M. Spatz, Mr and Mrs. Dennis A. Spardudo, William V. Stevens, Richard and

159
00:16:54.580 --> 00:17:03.800
Alicia Stevenson, Byron L. Strosser, Charles A. Strong, James E. Tempesta M.D., Kenneth

160
00:17:03.800 --> 00:17:12.760
S. Templeton, Mr. and Mrs. Reginald Thatcher, Topdart TM, Chris and Carolyn Tormey, Polly

161
00:17:12.760 --> 00:17:20.960
J. Townsend, Lawrence van Sommeren Sr., Guy M. Binks Walker, Dr. Thomas L. Wenk, Brian

162
00:17:20.960 --> 00:17:30.560
J. Wilton, Malcolm F. Wittig, Mr. and Mrs. Walter Woodall III, Dr. Stephen Lee Yamshen,

163
00:17:30.560 --> 00:17:31.560
Robert S. Young
