WEBVTT

NOTE The Fed and the Power Eilte

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.740
This is, as you can see, a potentially very big topic.

2
00:00:04.740 --> 00:00:09.040
I'm going to try to condense it in a fairly short amount of time.

3
00:00:09.040 --> 00:00:11.880
The first thing that's talked about is the power elite.

4
00:00:11.880 --> 00:00:17.080
And those of us who are interested in power elite analysis

5
00:00:17.080 --> 00:00:20.560
and its ramifications, which are fascinating,

6
00:00:20.560 --> 00:00:23.640
are always accused of being conspiracy theorists.

7
00:00:23.640 --> 00:00:25.680
And the thing about the analysis is

8
00:00:25.680 --> 00:00:30.760
Because of those theory involved in this thing, except common sense, it's not that somehow

9
00:00:30.760 --> 00:00:35.280
we've got a theory and something imposes it on the fact.

10
00:00:35.280 --> 00:00:41.040
These analyses pop up from the fact, they stare out at you, and you begin to see connections.

11
00:00:41.040 --> 00:00:46.400
For example, suppose you look in the paper, you open up the New York Times or whatever,

12
00:00:46.400 --> 00:00:50.840
you see that Congress has just passed a steel import quota, or has increased the steel import

13
00:00:50.840 --> 00:00:55.040
quota, or has passed a new automobile import quota.

14
00:00:55.040 --> 00:01:07.040
And supposing you think to yourself, I mean, do you think to yourself, A, well, gee, it looks like a few intellectuals and congressmen suddenly got into it there, has increased the import quota?

15
00:01:07.040 --> 00:01:19.040
Or do you say to yourself, I guess the oil interests or the steel interests or the automobile interests have been lobbying for increased import quotas?

16
00:01:19.040 --> 00:01:33.040
Which of the two do you say? If you say to yourself, if somebody says, I guess, if it's a case of an automobile import quota, if the automobile industry has been lobbying for it, if somebody would say, no, you're a conspiracy theorist, clearly not.

17
00:01:33.040 --> 00:01:47.040
You'd have to be sort of a nut to think that an import quota has been established or a tariff has been increased because of some abstract intellectual interest without the drive for it of the particular industry at stake.

18
00:01:47.040 --> 00:01:56.040
And the thing is that doesn't conclusively prove it. First you have the hypothesis. The hypothesis is that the steel import quota has increased yesterday, let's say.

19
00:01:56.040 --> 00:02:07.040
The hypothesis is that it looks like the steel industry lobbied for it, and then you find out. You look in the situation, you find out nine times out of ten or 99 times out of 100, yes indeed they did lobby for it, and that's it.

20
00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:14.040
So that's how you get the hypothesis, and then you look for the evidence, which usually is fairly clear.

21
00:02:14.040 --> 00:02:24.040
So this is clear on that kind of a level of a tariff, or import quota, or a lobby for some airport, and you find out who did it, who gets the contract, things of that sort.

22
00:02:24.040 --> 00:02:28.040
It's fairly obvious that economic interests are pushing for it.

23
00:02:28.040 --> 00:02:33.040
Where it gets controversial, so to speak, is when it gets a little bit more abstract, a little bit more systemic.

24
00:02:33.040 --> 00:02:42.040
Lobbying, for example, for some kind of measure, which is supposed to be just for the general interest, like a central bank, we're talking about tonight,

25
00:02:42.040 --> 00:02:47.240
or some kind of regulatory commission or a war.

26
00:02:47.240 --> 00:02:54.240
In that sort of situation, it becomes somehow controversial to look into the possible economic interests which have been lobbying for it.

27
00:02:54.240 --> 00:03:00.640
And if you start looking around for the evidence, you usually find it, but usually you don't look for evidence.

28
00:03:00.640 --> 00:03:06.740
The problem is historians mostly don't look for evidence on a more abstract level.

29
00:03:06.740 --> 00:03:11.220
and particularly with financial groups involved.

30
00:03:11.220 --> 00:03:16.820
The Chicago economists are pretty good

31
00:03:16.820 --> 00:03:18.340
when they're dealing with a specific industry,

32
00:03:18.340 --> 00:03:20.940
like a specific regulatory commission,

33
00:03:20.940 --> 00:03:22.580
say the ICC and the railroad.

34
00:03:22.580 --> 00:03:24.980
It's pretty clear that the Interstate Commerce Commission

35
00:03:24.980 --> 00:03:28.340
is lobbied for the railroad interests.

36
00:03:28.340 --> 00:03:31.820
It's not put in by intellectuals and abstract leftists or something.

37
00:03:31.820 --> 00:03:33.220
It's put in by the railroads themselves,

38
00:03:33.220 --> 00:03:35.940
but cartelized the industry.

39
00:03:35.940 --> 00:03:39.300
The problem in the Chicago School is they don't go far enough and look for the financial interests

40
00:03:39.300 --> 00:03:43.180
underneath, underlying the various industrial, the various industries.

41
00:03:43.180 --> 00:03:46.900
There are financial interests of investment bankers and commercial bankers

42
00:03:46.900 --> 00:03:51.380
which cut across narrow industrial lines.

43
00:03:51.380 --> 00:03:58.100
We get more specific, because this is an empirical question.

44
00:03:58.100 --> 00:04:02.300
We get more specific. In the late 19th century,

45
00:04:02.300 --> 00:04:08.300
Various groups of businessmen tried to cartelize their industry, monopolize and cartelize the industry.

46
00:04:08.300 --> 00:04:14.300
First in the railroads in the 1860s and 70s and then in the manufacturing in the 1890s.

47
00:04:14.300 --> 00:04:26.300
And they tried, the theory was, cut production, raise prices and thereby increase profits.

48
00:04:26.300 --> 00:04:30.300
And this was the attempt, this was the theory.

49
00:04:30.300 --> 00:04:45.300
These are first part cartels, getting together and say, look, we'll raise the prices, we'll raise the railroad rates, or whatever, but in order to do that, you have to cut production, you have to cut railroad shipments, because the railroads, it's very difficult to do, you have to arrange a quota kind of system to cut production.

50
00:04:45.300 --> 00:04:53.300
Anyway, they tried to do that, and it never worked. It was a flop-a-roo. It didn't work. The economic theory shows us it will never work.

51
00:04:53.300 --> 00:05:00.700
Two reasons, one because internal pressure, because different firms have a temptation to cheat on the cartel,

52
00:05:00.700 --> 00:05:08.060
to undercut the cartel buddies and pick up more sales, or new firms come in,

53
00:05:08.060 --> 00:05:14.660
they see this industry is getting high profits, they establish a new plant with more modern equipment and they're permanently,

54
00:05:14.660 --> 00:05:19.820
and they smash the cartel, and you're stuck forever with a newer dangerous competitor.

55
00:05:19.820 --> 00:05:26.060
So for those reasons, both first in the railroads and then in manufacturing, cartels and mergers didn't work.

56
00:05:26.060 --> 00:05:38.060
There was a great merger boom from 1898 to 1902, 200 industries or so tried to form one monopoly company in each industry in order to cut production and raise prices.

57
00:05:38.060 --> 00:05:42.060
Almost all of them were flop-a-roos, totally collapsed.

58
00:05:42.060 --> 00:05:52.620
So with that knowledge, various would-be cartelists cited the turn of the government to do the cartelization for them.

59
00:05:52.620 --> 00:06:00.780
This is the essence of the so-called progressive era, which lasted approximately from, well, officially from 1900 to 1918,

60
00:06:00.780 --> 00:06:04.300
or actually from then on, I mean, we're still living in it, basically.

61
00:06:04.300 --> 00:06:14.300
And so the theory was, we get together, we get the government, either state or urban or state or federal, to do the cartellizing for us.

62
00:06:14.300 --> 00:06:20.300
The model of that was Bismarck and Prussia in Germany in the late 19th century.

63
00:06:20.300 --> 00:06:28.300
We forced all the firms into one cartel, we forced them to go along with cutting production and raising prices.

64
00:06:28.300 --> 00:06:38.300
With the government, it's sort of the big brother, sort of running everything and arbitrating prices and wages and having high tariffs to keep competitive imports.

65
00:06:38.300 --> 00:06:40.300
That was the basic schema.

66
00:06:40.300 --> 00:06:52.300
And around 1900, several financial groups began to form around banks, around investment banks, commercial banks.

67
00:06:52.300 --> 00:07:05.300
And particularly, from the panic of 1873 on, JP Morgan and Company was a major investment banker, first in railroads and then in manufacturing later on.

68
00:07:05.300 --> 00:07:14.300
Morgan started from the very beginning with the theory of cartelizing, organizing, first of all, organizing railroad cartels. They didn't work.

69
00:07:14.300 --> 00:07:19.300
And then Morgan turns to the federal government with forces for them and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

70
00:07:19.300 --> 00:07:24.300
And then in manufacturing in the late 19th century, in the 1890s.

71
00:07:24.300 --> 00:07:31.300
So about 1900, what you've got is two competing financial groups, more or less.

72
00:07:31.300 --> 00:07:37.300
You have the Morgans on the one hand, JP Morgan Company and all their vast network of corporations which they controlled,

73
00:07:37.300 --> 00:07:44.300
on the one hand versus another combine consisting of three groups.

74
00:07:44.300 --> 00:08:09.300
The Rockefeller Empire, starting, of course, with Standard Oil and moving outward into banking and finance, et cetera, allied with the Harriman, Edward Harriman, who was a big railroad financier and speculator, who took over a lot of railroads under the nose of Morgan, so that Morgan hated Harriman,

75
00:08:09.300 --> 00:08:39.300
And Harriman's expanding out into finance also, plus Kuhn-Loeb, a German Jewish investment banking house in New York, which also, which really, which really anticipated Morgan and going into manufacturing, so they were, so the three of them formed an alliance, basically what you've got from that 1900 on, is the Rockefeller-Kuhn-Loeb-Harriman alliance versus the Morgan's. This is a big Titanic struggle, which helps explain American politics,

76
00:08:39.300 --> 00:08:45.860
from 1900 till through World War II. It's more or less the paradigm. Much more, by the way,

77
00:08:45.860 --> 00:08:50.180
explanatory than the Republicans versus Democrats, who have us to run each year and that sort of

78
00:08:50.180 --> 00:08:54.860
stuff, which is more or less the puppet show of the public. And one of the things that comes into

79
00:08:54.860 --> 00:09:01.020
this picture, I think one of the keys, the beginning of this kind of analysis, is if you see a, you see,

80
00:09:01.020 --> 00:09:05.820
you notice what somebody is doing in government. Somebody, some president or cabinet minister or

81
00:09:05.820 --> 00:09:10.900
Secretary of the Treasury, or whatever, or Federal Reserve Chairman, and you notice what

82
00:09:10.900 --> 00:09:16.380
they're doing, most historians, what they say is, so-and-so entered government, you

83
00:09:16.380 --> 00:09:20.460
know, whatever, 1900, 1940, whatever, he did such-and-such for about four years or eight

84
00:09:20.460 --> 00:09:21.460
years, then he disappears.

85
00:09:21.460 --> 00:09:26.900
In other words, it's as if the government official dropped out of heaven or somewhere,

86
00:09:26.900 --> 00:09:30.820
and did things, and then left, and then disappears from the scene.

87
00:09:30.820 --> 00:09:35.700
With that kind of analysis, it seems to me what your competing view of this, I think

88
00:09:35.700 --> 00:09:40.700
This is the orthodox view. You read about John Foster Dulles or whoever you're talking about, Robert Cleveland or whatever.

89
00:09:40.700 --> 00:09:45.700
They do things in government and they leave. They come into the picture. They do things in government and they leave. And that's it.

90
00:09:45.700 --> 00:09:49.700
And nobody ever connects this up with what they did before or after. What would they do?

91
00:09:49.700 --> 00:09:53.700
Do they have a life before they entered government and after they left government?

92
00:09:53.700 --> 00:10:01.700
If you read the average orthodox story, they don't have a life. They just pop up from Mount Olympus and they do things and disappear.

93
00:10:01.700 --> 00:10:10.300
Once you, once you look at the, all you have to do is look at the situation, what did these guys do before they entered, they were president or secretary of treasury, or whatever, and what did they do afterward?

94
00:10:10.300 --> 00:10:18.700
And once you bring that into the picture, you get a whole, if it's so-called conspiracy analysis, pops out, almost leaps out at you, it becomes almost evident.

95
00:10:18.700 --> 00:10:30.000
This is one example, I can give hundreds of examples in American history, but one of the examples, Grover Cleveland, who actually happened to like, certainly a better president than anybody who succeeded him, there's no doubt about that.

96
00:10:30.000 --> 00:10:35.800
Robert Cleveland was in favor of laissez-faire, so out, he was very consistent, except on the railroad question.

97
00:10:35.800 --> 00:10:41.680
The railroad question was in favor of the Interstate Commerce Commission, passed in his administration,

98
00:10:41.680 --> 00:10:45.880
which of course set up the first regulatory commission for railroads.

99
00:10:45.880 --> 00:10:55.280
If you look at it from an abstract point of view, you might say, well, how is it that Robert Cleveland is great at everything except he somehow waffled on railroads?

100
00:10:55.280 --> 00:11:07.280
Well, it might be connected to the fact, if you look at what Cleveland did before he became a president, between his two terms, and after he left, who was he? Did he have a life before that, in addition to being a nice guy named Grover Cleveland?

101
00:11:07.280 --> 00:11:24.280
He indeed was a top railroad attorney in Buffalo, he was connected with Morgan-dominated New York Central Railroad, and his big buddy and partner, law partner, before and after he was president, was none other than Francis Lynn Stetson, who was the top personal attorney for JP Morgan.

102
00:11:24.280 --> 00:11:28.880
to Morgan. Once you look at that, and once you look at the fact also that Morgan was

103
00:11:28.880 --> 00:11:33.360
the major driver for the Interstate Commerce Commission, the major person pushing it, then

104
00:11:33.360 --> 00:11:39.080
everything begins to clarify, right? It's a light up. Or the fact that John Foster Dulles

105
00:11:39.080 --> 00:11:43.640
and his brother Allen, who ran American foreign policy for about 40 years, at least it seemed

106
00:11:43.640 --> 00:11:49.200
like it, about less than that. If I say 20 years, who were the Dulles brothers? Why did

107
00:11:49.200 --> 00:11:52.800
the Dulles brothers own American foreign policy? Is it connected with the fact that they were

108
00:11:52.800 --> 00:11:57.520
both top, before that, were top lawyers for Standard Oil in New Jersey and the Rockefeller

109
00:11:57.520 --> 00:11:58.520
royal empire.

110
00:11:58.520 --> 00:12:02.200
Do their policies have some connection with that fact?

111
00:12:02.200 --> 00:12:04.840
I think they did.

112
00:12:04.840 --> 00:12:11.760
So that opens up the whole interconnection of the power elite.

113
00:12:11.760 --> 00:12:20.160
Okay, if we look at that, that picture, and look at the fact that the various presidents

114
00:12:20.160 --> 00:12:25.760
and so forth, connected with either Morgan's or the opposition of Rockefellers during this whole period.

115
00:12:25.760 --> 00:12:31.260
And as I say, it clarifies an enormous amount about American political history, particularly because,

116
00:12:31.260 --> 00:12:36.160
and by the way, even more, I can't go into this, but what happens is, this is a tragic event.

117
00:12:36.160 --> 00:12:40.160
To me, the most tragic single event in American history was in 1896 when the Democratic Party,

118
00:12:40.160 --> 00:12:45.060
which had been the party of laissez-faire, an ideologically committed party of laissez-faire,

119
00:12:45.060 --> 00:12:49.380
is captured by the extreme status under William Jennings Bryan,

120
00:12:49.380 --> 00:12:53.620
and the whole thing then, the whole Democratic Party as a laissez-faire party disappears.

121
00:12:53.620 --> 00:12:57.860
In those days, political parties were very different from them.

122
00:12:57.860 --> 00:13:00.500
It's totally different. It must have been great for those of us who are political junkies.

123
00:13:00.500 --> 00:13:04.660
It must have been magnificent because the political parties were strongly ideological.

124
00:13:04.660 --> 00:13:09.060
They're not totally consistent, but remarkably consistent ideologically.

125
00:13:09.060 --> 00:13:13.060
They were organized around a certain key values and policies.

126
00:13:13.060 --> 00:13:20.060
So their members were very loyal, their members, when they socialized their members, the general public got interested. Everybody was either a Democrat or a Republican.

127
00:13:20.060 --> 00:13:27.060
There were no independent voters. Those were saying they were independent. You were committed to that, you grew up as a Democrat or a Republican, and you were loyal to it.

128
00:13:27.060 --> 00:13:32.060
And the reason was they had an ideology. It wasn't just, you know, scrambling for office or looking good on television.

129
00:13:32.060 --> 00:13:39.060
So therefore, and if you're a candidate waffle, if you're a Democrat or a Republican, your candidate waffle is unprincipled, you don't vote for them.

130
00:13:39.060 --> 00:13:50.060
The candidates were more militant, more ideological during the campaigns than they were the rest of the time.

131
00:13:50.060 --> 00:13:53.060
They were totally opposite from the present situation.

132
00:13:53.060 --> 00:13:57.060
So this is what happened before 1896.

133
00:13:57.060 --> 00:14:07.060
After 1896, when the laissez-faire lost its political voice, everybody forgets most of the public had a high amnesia approach politically.

134
00:14:07.060 --> 00:14:20.060
and so people forget, and then this left a vacuum of the fact that then on the party system from 1896 on was more or less like it is now, in other words, non-ideological, centrist, semi-status and all that.

135
00:14:20.060 --> 00:14:34.060
Because of that, it means the parties are no longer important and this left a vacuum, a political power vacuum for technocrats, bureaucrats and big business types that take over, a power elite to move in, which they couldn't do as well before that.

136
00:14:34.060 --> 00:14:46.060
So what you've got is all of these guys wanted cartelization by 1900. Not just the Morgans, but also the Rockefeller-Harriman group.

137
00:14:46.060 --> 00:14:52.060
None of them, they all have now committed to this concept. The problem is, how do you put this across to the average voter?

138
00:14:52.060 --> 00:15:01.060
The average voter, after all, the American voter has a tradition, tradition in the United States of anti-monopoly, pro-free market, pro-competition, anti-monopoly.

139
00:15:01.060 --> 00:15:08.580
Many state governments, for example, had in their constitution, an original state government

140
00:15:08.580 --> 00:15:10.900
had a constitution outlawing monopoly.

141
00:15:10.900 --> 00:15:16.020
By outlawing monopoly, they did not mean outlawing big business or having a flowing demand curve.

142
00:15:16.020 --> 00:15:20.900
What they meant was grants of monopoly privilege by the government, outlawing any grants of

143
00:15:20.900 --> 00:15:24.620
monopoly exclusive privilege to sell or produce by the government.

144
00:15:24.620 --> 00:15:28.620
So America was raised in an anti-monopoly tradition, as well as an anti-status tradition.

145
00:15:28.620 --> 00:15:29.620
How did they get away?

146
00:15:29.620 --> 00:15:35.620
How do the Morgan types get away with this? How do they put across cartelization of the market of the system?

147
00:15:35.620 --> 00:15:40.620
The way they put it across was to form an alliance with the opinion-molding groups of class and society,

148
00:15:40.620 --> 00:15:48.620
the opinion-molding class and society of intellectuals, intellectuals, academics, writers, journalists, media,

149
00:15:48.620 --> 00:15:53.620
what we now call the media. They form an alliance with them to put this across.

150
00:15:53.620 --> 00:16:01.620
It so happened that by 1900, the intellectuals and the media were right for this kind of alliance.

151
00:16:01.620 --> 00:16:07.620
For one thing, a lot more of them. In other words, technocrats were a tremendous technocratic explosion in the late 19th century.

152
00:16:07.620 --> 00:16:16.620
Engineering schools, PhDs came in for the first time, and engineering schools and social workers became a profession.

153
00:16:16.620 --> 00:16:26.620
and shrinks, positions, all these people want to expand their base and they all want to restrict the supply of their profession.

154
00:16:26.620 --> 00:16:30.620
Everybody want to keep the other guys out, have a licensing and all the rest of it.

155
00:16:30.620 --> 00:16:37.620
So they want a licensing and they also want to be able to staff a new interventionist society, a new order.

156
00:16:37.620 --> 00:16:41.620
They want to have jobs in a new order which, for one thing, under a free market capitalism,

157
00:16:41.620 --> 00:16:46.620
Many intellectuals don't get the jobs to which they think they should become accustomed.

158
00:16:46.620 --> 00:16:52.620
There's not much of a role there for historians and economists and all that.

159
00:16:52.620 --> 00:16:56.620
And one of the problems with Austrian economics in general, in the economics profession,

160
00:16:56.620 --> 00:17:00.620
if you get to the nitty-gritty, is what jobs can we offer?

161
00:17:00.620 --> 00:17:03.620
What jobs in the Austrian world offer economics?

162
00:17:03.620 --> 00:17:08.620
Well, not much in teaching, of course, but you can't offer much in any place else.

163
00:17:08.620 --> 00:17:14.620
I can't offer forecasting, you know, big forecasting jobs in government, or forecasting models and all the rest of it,

164
00:17:14.620 --> 00:17:16.620
because we just, you know, sort of most outlaw nonsense.

165
00:17:16.620 --> 00:17:22.620
So this is, it restricts the opportunities open for job opportunities for economists, there's no question about that.

166
00:17:22.620 --> 00:17:28.620
So, and these people saw that, they saw, hey, this is great, government can offer them, they can offer them jobs in the,

167
00:17:28.620 --> 00:17:33.620
economists in particular of course, they can offer them jobs apologizing for new order,

168
00:17:33.620 --> 00:17:39.620
The New Interventionist Order, and jobs in the order, planning it, or historians writing

169
00:17:39.620 --> 00:17:41.620
peons of the presidents and things like that.

170
00:17:41.620 --> 00:17:44.620
There's lots of jobs for intellectuals in the New Interventionist Order, which is not

171
00:17:44.620 --> 00:17:46.620
only just in the free market.

172
00:17:46.620 --> 00:17:48.620
Also, many of these people are well-known.

173
00:17:48.620 --> 00:17:51.620
Before we could get PhDs here, there were PhDs in Germany.

174
00:17:51.620 --> 00:17:57.620
They went to Germany to get PhDs, the first academics in the late 19th century.

175
00:17:57.620 --> 00:18:02.620
They were all in view of the spirit of the New Interventionism, the New Organic Statism,

176
00:18:02.620 --> 00:18:06.200
transcending the alleged evils of laissez-faire on the one hand and

177
00:18:06.200 --> 00:18:09.660
proletarian Marxism on the other. These people, there were statists that didn't like

178
00:18:09.660 --> 00:18:13.740
proletarians, but they go anyway. They didn't like the trouble of Marxism to make sure you have the

179
00:18:13.740 --> 00:18:18.500
rebel as a lot of sort of ruby types. This gives you a statism of a higher

180
00:18:18.500 --> 00:18:23.640
level, monarchical statism, big business statism, and the rest of it. So now we have the

181
00:18:23.640 --> 00:18:26.740
alliance that was now ripe for an alliance between these two new social

182
00:18:26.740 --> 00:18:30.260
groups, or the big business groups on the one hand and also the new intellectuals,

183
00:18:30.260 --> 00:18:41.260
and the other. You read some of the stuff I recommend. For example, the great book was written by James Gilbert in the late 1960s for designing the industrial state.

184
00:18:41.260 --> 00:18:49.260
He wanted to get a view of the intellectuals of the time. It's a wonderful, acidic, bitter book about these people. But he calls collectivist intellectuals the whole mindset.

185
00:18:49.260 --> 00:18:57.260
And one typical thing is not directly related to the Fed, but indirectly, Charles Steinmetz, who's a brilliant inventor, was a socialist.

186
00:18:57.260 --> 00:19:04.260
In 1905 he wrote a book about the importance of world socialism, I forget the title, around this period in 1905 or something like that.

187
00:19:04.260 --> 00:19:12.260
And the thing about Steinmetz, he was the big philosopher, inventor and theoretician for General Electric, which was a big Morgan company.

188
00:19:12.260 --> 00:19:21.260
And basically what he wanted was General Electric socialism. He wanted a world government run by General Electric, with him as the philosopher king, the philosopher-inventor.

189
00:19:21.260 --> 00:19:30.460
It's actually Steinmetz socialism, so that's the sort of, he symbolizes, well, two symbols for this new order, so to speak.

190
00:19:30.460 --> 00:19:42.100
One is Steinmetz and two is the New Republic magazine, which is still, unfortunately, with us, which was founded in 1914 as a big liberal, left-liberal, collectivist kind of electoral magazine.

191
00:19:42.100 --> 00:19:50.580
And the interesting thing is who founded it? It was founded by a Morgan partner, Willow Strait, and his life was a Morgan eros, a Whitney eros.

192
00:19:50.580 --> 00:19:55.780
In other words, to me, this also symbolizes Big Business, Dash, Socialist, Intellectual Alliance.

193
00:19:55.780 --> 00:20:05.380
A beautiful symbol of a Morgan-Dash Socialist intellectual order, so to speak.

194
00:20:05.380 --> 00:20:08.380
At any rate, the usual view, to get to the Federal Reserve System,

195
00:20:08.380 --> 00:20:11.180
the Federal Reserve System was part of the whole progressive movement.

196
00:20:11.180 --> 00:20:14.380
It's not just isolated, it has to be considered in context.

197
00:20:14.380 --> 00:20:19.580
Just as Big Business was reaching forward trying to get a Federal Trade Commission Act, which they did,

198
00:20:19.580 --> 00:20:23.980
to cartelize industry in general, to do for, the famous phrase at that point was,

199
00:20:23.980 --> 00:20:28.860
we need something to do, an organization to do for general industry, a general business,

200
00:20:28.860 --> 00:20:33.180
what the Interstate Commerce Commission did for, not to, but for railroads,

201
00:20:33.180 --> 00:20:37.100
and what the Labor Department does for unions, what the Agriculture Department does for farmers,

202
00:20:37.100 --> 00:20:43.180
in other words, to help them out, quote unquote. So that was, and the Federal Reserve system

203
00:20:43.180 --> 00:20:48.780
was conceived of by big bankers to cartelize the banking system.

204
00:20:48.780 --> 00:20:53.780
The American banking system had gotten a little too competitive by 1900.

205
00:20:53.780 --> 00:21:02.780
What happened is during the Civil War, the banking system had changed from a more or less free market to a more or less free banking system.

206
00:21:02.780 --> 00:21:09.780
From the 1840s on, after Jackson had destroyed the first bank, a more or less free banking system until the Civil War,

207
00:21:09.780 --> 00:21:15.780
and the Republican Party, which was a big statist party at that time, used the Civil War to push through their entire economic program,

208
00:21:15.780 --> 00:21:45.780
including high tariffs, huge subsidies on railroads and things like that, and part of which is destroying the competitive banking system, replacing it with a status banking, a centralized banking system called the National Banking Act, National Banking System, which monopolized the issue of banknotes in national banks instead of state banks. So it's semi-centralized, sort of a halfway house to a central bank.

209
00:21:45.780 --> 00:21:55.780
In the 1890s, Wall Street and especially Wall Street banks were running it, with a pyramid of credit on top of several Wall Street banks.

210
00:21:55.780 --> 00:22:03.780
By the 1890s, the control was slipping away from them. There were too many upstart banks in St. Louis and Chicago and places like that.

211
00:22:03.780 --> 00:22:10.780
And also, they were writing about the fact that there was so-called inelasticity in the money supply.

212
00:22:10.780 --> 00:22:19.780
In the last few decades, there was a clover of not enough money being poured out, and they couldn't create enough money, especially during the recession.

213
00:22:19.780 --> 00:22:28.780
During the recession, they had to contract. They'd expand during boom, creating a boom period, and then when things would get too hairy, they'd have to contract that the banks might go under.

214
00:22:28.780 --> 00:22:38.780
They needed a central bank, imported from Europe, they needed a lender of last resort to bail the banks out, and decentralized reserves that could all expand together, and would expand even during the recession.

215
00:22:38.780 --> 00:22:56.020
In this particular banking area, the two big clashing elite powers, the Morgans on the

216
00:22:56.020 --> 00:22:59.820
one hand and the Harriman, Rockefeller, Kumo, Carmbi on the other, were in agreement. There

217
00:22:59.820 --> 00:23:05.720
was no problem. They both agreed that we needed a central bank. So the question was, how to

218
00:23:05.720 --> 00:23:10.720
How to maneuver this? In other words, if they were in agreement, how to get the dumb masses to go along with it?

219
00:23:10.720 --> 00:23:13.720
This is the basic approach.

220
00:23:13.720 --> 00:23:18.720
The Orthodox view is that the drive for Federal Reserve started after the panic in 1907.

221
00:23:18.720 --> 00:23:25.720
People got scared, the bankers got scared, decided they needed a simple bank.

222
00:23:25.720 --> 00:23:30.720
It started long before that. It started about 1896.

223
00:23:30.720 --> 00:23:44.720
And what the Morgans wanted, and the Morgans essentially wanted the following, they were afraid of Brian because Brian was in favor of sort of government inflation and not bank credit inflation, so they didn't like Brian at all.

224
00:23:44.720 --> 00:23:51.720
The Morgans had to leave the Democratic Party and they made an alliance with the Rockefellers who were running the Republican Party at the time.

225
00:23:51.720 --> 00:23:55.560
And what the Morgans wanted basically was a continuing gold standard.

226
00:23:55.560 --> 00:23:58.120
They wanted a gold standard because they wanted an illusion of soundness,

227
00:23:58.120 --> 00:24:02.680
but they wanted expanding bank credit on top of the gold standard and a central bank also.

228
00:24:02.680 --> 00:24:05.640
And it was basically one of the Federal Reserve systems.

229
00:24:05.640 --> 00:24:13.960
And the idea was because the previous system was not elastic enough, quote unquote.

230
00:24:13.960 --> 00:24:19.880
So first they got the gold standard through by the 1890s from McKinley's victory and also the 1900s.

231
00:24:19.880 --> 00:24:26.920
But by 1897, they decided they needed to stimulate a phony grassroots movement.

232
00:24:26.920 --> 00:24:31.480
How do you get a Federal Reserve? You can't have Morgan mentioning a pronouncement. That's not going to work.

233
00:24:31.480 --> 00:24:35.080
Most of the public, for some obscure reason, suspicious of Wall Street and Morgan.

234
00:24:35.080 --> 00:24:37.080
They thought they were edgy.

235
00:24:37.080 --> 00:24:40.840
They had to stimulate a phony grassroots movement.

236
00:24:40.840 --> 00:24:45.960
And they searched for the Middle West. The Middle West in those days was the heartland.

237
00:24:45.960 --> 00:24:54.260
Good old boys from the Middle West. So they set up a phony Indianapolis Monetary Convention, the first session in 1896.

238
00:24:54.260 --> 00:25:00.460
There was a great book on this when we left historian Jim Livingston called The Origin of the Federal Reserve System.

239
00:25:00.460 --> 00:25:05.460
It goes into this at some wonderful lengths about how exactly this thing worked.

240
00:25:05.460 --> 00:25:10.960
So they pretend there's only small businessmen in Indianapolis and Indiana and across the country.

241
00:25:10.960 --> 00:25:13.960
It's a heartland. It has nothing to do with Wall Street banks. It's only a heartland.

242
00:25:13.960 --> 00:25:20.200
However, if you look into who actually was running it, it was the Morgan people. It was Morgan from beginning to end.

243
00:25:20.200 --> 00:25:25.680
So they have an Indianapolis Monetary Convention in 1896, another one in 1997.

244
00:25:25.680 --> 00:25:31.480
They pioneered what we can call a phony questionnaire technique, which was very effective from a public relations point of view.

245
00:25:31.480 --> 00:25:35.600
They sent out questionnaires to various bankers and businessmen all over the country,

246
00:25:35.600 --> 00:25:39.200
with sort of loaded questions that would get the right answers, and then they'd get the answers back,

247
00:25:39.200 --> 00:26:08.960
In 1897, two secretaries of the treasury, the first one under McKinley, was a Rockefeller

248
00:26:08.960 --> 00:26:18.960
The first, I think number one, McKinley bailed out of bankruptcy when he was governor of Ohio by the Rockefeller Combine, so he was beholden to the Rockefeller people.

249
00:26:18.960 --> 00:26:31.960
And McKinley's secretary of the treasury, Lyman J. Gage, was a Rockefeller Chicago banker, I think the first national banker in Chicago, basically was a Rockefeller bank.

250
00:26:31.960 --> 00:27:01.960
And so he tried to use, he was promoting the idea of a central bank, he was pushing for that, and after Teddy Roosevelt got in to a lone nut assassin, one of the many lone nuts in American history, popping off keenly, so Teddy Roosevelt was a Morgan person, he was shoelaces up, suddenly becomes president, he puts in a Morgan person named Leslie Shaw from Iowa, and he's trying to act as a central bank, as a treasury act as a central bank.

251
00:27:01.960 --> 00:27:06.360
and it didn't seem to work too well and finally I had to stop.

252
00:27:06.360 --> 00:27:09.680
So at that point, when it stopped working,

253
00:27:09.680 --> 00:27:11.440
when it was obvious the treasury couldn't function

254
00:27:11.440 --> 00:27:12.960
as a central bank, you have to have a central bank,

255
00:27:12.960 --> 00:27:17.680
central bank, at that point they got very serious by 1906

256
00:27:17.680 --> 00:27:22.040
and put on the big push for a Fed or a central bank.

257
00:27:22.040 --> 00:27:25.160
Interestingly enough, they started the idea of a parity,

258
00:27:25.160 --> 00:27:26.980
two-two-one parity system.

259
00:27:26.980 --> 00:27:37.980
The New York Chamber of Commerce, the final drive for the Central Bank starts with Jacob Schiff, the powerful head of the King Loewen Company.

260
00:27:37.980 --> 00:27:43.980
He makes a speech before the New York Chamber of Commerce urging the Central Bank, calling for more elastic money and all that.

261
00:27:43.980 --> 00:27:49.980
And they set up a committee to study it. The committee is headed by Frank Vanderlip, who is Mr. Rockefeller in banking.

262
00:27:49.980 --> 00:27:55.980
He's vice president of the National City Bank of New York, which is a total Rockefeller controlled bank.

263
00:27:55.980 --> 00:28:08.980
And he sets up a committee, or I think they call it a commission, of five people who should try to study the banking problems, always study, I mean the solution is always written in advance more or less.

264
00:28:08.980 --> 00:28:14.980
Five experts get together and think about something for a couple of weeks and by God they come up with a simple bank idea.

265
00:28:14.980 --> 00:28:18.980
So the parody was this, it was sort of like watching this armament conference in the 1920s.

266
00:28:18.980 --> 00:28:23.980
Two Rockefeller people, two Morgan people and one Kuhn-Lower person, two, two, one.

267
00:28:23.980 --> 00:28:32.980
So the committee was, originally the committee was supposed to be Vanderlip for the Rockefellers, George Baker, who was Morgan's closest ally for, practically, boyhood of the First National Bank of New York,

268
00:28:32.980 --> 00:28:41.980
Jacob Schiff, and Lyman Gay, who was Secretary of Treasury, and JP Morgan himself, but they couldn't make it, you know, so you wind up with Vanderlip,

269
00:28:41.980 --> 00:28:48.980
plus four other guys who were indeed two, who constituted two Morgan people, two Rockefeller people, and one Kulowa person.

270
00:28:48.980 --> 00:28:58.260
and they come out with a report, calling for a simple bank once again, and in the meantime

271
00:28:58.260 --> 00:29:02.860
the American Bankers Association, now they have to convince the American Bankers Association,

272
00:29:02.860 --> 00:29:07.560
not that easy because the small bankers were suspicious. So you start with the American

273
00:29:07.560 --> 00:29:11.540
Bankers Association, set up their own committee with staff of Morgan and Rockefeller people

274
00:29:11.540 --> 00:29:16.940
and they come up with their report and they meet together with the other New York State

275
00:29:16.940 --> 00:29:21.180
Chamber Commerce Group, all the same people, all buddy-buddies, and they come up, 10 independent

276
00:29:21.180 --> 00:29:26.140
experts at this time, and they come up with a pro-central bank report.

277
00:29:26.140 --> 00:29:33.380
So then comes the panic of 1907, which is an extra, more of a push to the whole thing.

278
00:29:33.380 --> 00:29:40.420
It really starts by the end of 1906, the whole thing is really pretty well set.

279
00:29:40.420 --> 00:29:50.620
Anyway, this particular outfit, which we celebrate here this weekend, is the site of the famous

280
00:29:50.620 --> 00:29:56.180
secret conference in the summer of 1910, where the five guys got together and write the Federal

281
00:29:56.180 --> 00:29:57.180
Reserve Act.

282
00:29:57.180 --> 00:30:01.780
Not just think about it, just so they finally get to that stage, and these are, let's see

283
00:30:01.780 --> 00:30:06.740
what these, it should be a shrine and a song and story, as they are.

284
00:30:06.740 --> 00:30:15.740
These are, first of all, it was organized by Nelson W. Aldrich, a senator from Rhode Island,

285
00:30:15.740 --> 00:30:16.740
majority leader.

286
00:30:16.740 --> 00:30:21.740
He said he charters the car, of course there was no plane, and it couldn't fly down here.

287
00:30:21.740 --> 00:30:26.740
It was a car chartered in Newark, stationed near New York.

288
00:30:26.740 --> 00:30:29.740
And everybody had a fake name, because the reporters were very interested in this whole

289
00:30:29.740 --> 00:30:30.740
thing.

290
00:30:30.740 --> 00:30:31.740
They were trying to throw the reporters off.

291
00:30:31.740 --> 00:30:34.740
They all signed themselves on by Professor Jones, something like that.

292
00:30:34.740 --> 00:30:38.300
and Aldrich said we're just going down to Jekyll Island for a duck hunting expedition

293
00:30:38.300 --> 00:30:40.540
this is a big duck hunting place

294
00:30:40.540 --> 00:30:44.700
so apparently one reporter actually found out about the purpose of this

295
00:30:44.700 --> 00:30:46.780
for some reason somehow

296
00:30:46.780 --> 00:30:51.340
Aldrich was able to silence them in one way or the other

297
00:30:51.340 --> 00:30:53.300
that hasn't been explored yet

298
00:30:53.300 --> 00:30:54.740
keep them quiet

299
00:30:54.740 --> 00:31:00.220
so the guys that went down to this thing, presumably the headquarters were provided by J.P. Morgan

300
00:31:00.220 --> 00:31:02.820
who was one of the founders of the Jekyll Island Club

301
00:31:02.820 --> 00:31:11.820
Aldrich, who is Aldrich? Again, you look at who the guy is in real life and what he is in politics. In politics, he was the majority leader of the Senate for many years.

302
00:31:11.820 --> 00:31:22.820
He was a public and wholesale grocer from Rhode Island and started as fairly, you know, fairly modestly wealthy and leads the Senate in a multi-millionaire, even though his salary is fairly low.

303
00:31:22.820 --> 00:31:30.820
He's never been really investigated how he came about this. Anyway, the thing about Aldrich, the interesting thing about Aldrich was that his daughter, Abby, married John D. Rockefeller, Jr.

304
00:31:30.820 --> 00:31:34.820
It's always good to have your daughter marry a Rockefeller.

305
00:31:34.820 --> 00:31:38.820
So he is Mr. Rockefeller from then on in the Senate.

306
00:31:38.820 --> 00:31:44.820
And so he's organizing the thing. He had a National Monetary Commission, which he put through Congress.

307
00:31:44.820 --> 00:31:48.820
They have scholarly studies showing why you have to have a Federal Reserve System.

308
00:31:48.820 --> 00:31:51.820
That's how he set the stage in April of this.

309
00:31:51.820 --> 00:31:55.820
He brings with him the following people. There's two Morgans, two Rockefellers, one Cunlola.

310
00:31:55.820 --> 00:32:15.820
This is four years after the original paradigm. Old Rich Rockefeller person, another Rockefeller person is Frank Vanderlip, I already mentioned, Vice President of the National City Bank, and two top Morgan people, Henry P. Davison, partner of AP Morgan Company, the top Morgan partner, Secretary of State of the Morgan World Empire.

311
00:32:15.820 --> 00:32:23.820
Some of the partners are interested mostly in either politics or merging. Others are regular banker-bankers.

312
00:32:23.820 --> 00:32:35.820
Davidson was the top for external bankers. And Charles Norton, president of the First National Bank of New York, which is a Morgan-Baker bank.

313
00:32:35.820 --> 00:32:41.500
Those are the two Morgan people, and Paul Warburg, Kuhl and Lohr were partners in the fifth god.

314
00:32:41.500 --> 00:32:47.980
Paul Warburg was brought over by Jacob Schiff in about 1897 as a partner from Germany.

315
00:32:47.980 --> 00:32:53.900
They were all related, and Warburg and Schiff were related in a very obscure and incestuous way.

316
00:32:53.900 --> 00:32:58.300
They were like, everybody was each other's father or something like that, or cousin, it was very complicated.

317
00:32:58.300 --> 00:33:04.780
Anyway, they were all closely related, and Warburg comes over, apparently getting a salary of about $500,000 a year,

318
00:33:04.780 --> 00:33:13.780
which in those days was like five million or six million a year now, precisely for the purpose of bringing us the central bank, bringing us the joys of the German Reichsbank.

319
00:33:13.780 --> 00:33:23.780
I don't think he did anything else. I think it was his function. So he was there. He had been given a famous speech in 1907 in favor of the central bank.

320
00:33:23.780 --> 00:33:29.780
So these are the five guys. And also as an economist, they have the five guys plus a technocrat.

321
00:33:29.780 --> 00:33:41.780
The Harvard Economist actually liked the specific clauses, and David Tan asked me earlier who he was, and now I know his name, A. Piot Andrew, a Harvard Economist and a big fan of the Federal Reserve System.

322
00:33:41.780 --> 00:33:53.780
These six people sat there for a week and drafted the whole legislature. And there's been lots of... everybody's trying to take credit for the Federal Reserve System, so everybody writes his memoirs and claims, I really wrote it and he really wrote it.

323
00:33:53.780 --> 00:34:05.780
It's been conclusively proven by Milton Friedman and others that this is the same stuff. It's really virtually the same. What was passed three years later is virtually what they wrote here in Jekyll Island. Almost no changes.

324
00:34:05.780 --> 00:34:22.780
The reason they had to wait three years is the Democrats won the election in 1910 in Congress, and of course, Wilson won in 1912, so they had a weak tool. They couldn't have Aldrich's red name on the bill because he was a Republican.

325
00:34:22.780 --> 00:34:31.780
The Republican, the big Republican, they had to have a Democrat, they had to suck the Democrats into this too. They had to have glass, suck some of the glass. They had to re-sink it, re-tool it.

326
00:34:31.780 --> 00:34:36.780
And also they had to propagandize the masses about why this is really a grassroots movement.

327
00:34:36.780 --> 00:34:45.780
And J. Lawrence Loughlin, a Chicago economist who's a big fan of the Federal Reserve, was appointed or hired to set up a grassroots movement in Chicago.

328
00:35:15.780 --> 00:35:26.780
Willis' memoirs later on said this whole thing was fun for New York bankers. He admitted it. He turned against the Morgans anyway by that, honestly. He was fairly bitter about it. He thought it had been used.

329
00:35:26.780 --> 00:35:35.780
So at any rate, so they set up a phony grassroots thing. They converted businessmen, they converted small bankers of the American Bankers Association, and then they're ready for the big push in Congress.

330
00:35:35.780 --> 00:35:41.780
By late 1913, it's almost unanimous. They get everybody on this thing. They run through it, and that was it.

331
00:35:41.780 --> 00:35:54.280
Okay, so the Morgans, the Rockefellers, and the Kualoa forces win, then this question, what do you, okay, now, as many of the cartelists said, it's not enough to pass the legislation, you have to have sound people on the board, who's running it?

332
00:35:54.280 --> 00:36:01.280
So then you have jockeying for power, we're going to run this thing. And of course we generally accepted the Morgans were going to run it, and indeed they did.

333
00:36:01.280 --> 00:36:09.780
The Federal Reserve Board in Washington is largely Morgan, they had other influences there too, they were about seven people or whatever, there was a coalition.

334
00:36:09.780 --> 00:36:12.420
The Rockefeller guy was Frederic Delano,

335
00:36:12.420 --> 00:36:16.820
that's something I'll remember for a few minutes later.

336
00:36:16.820 --> 00:36:22.420
You have to realize that the Roosevelt family is very important for 20th century American history.

337
00:36:22.420 --> 00:36:26.420
The Theodore Roosevelt branch of the Roosevelt family, it's the Oyster Bay Manhattan branch,

338
00:36:26.420 --> 00:36:30.740
has always been Morgan connected, I mean, since almost his birth.

339
00:36:30.740 --> 00:36:34.340
Teddy Roosevelt, he went to college in Harvard and immediately married Alice Lee,

340
00:36:34.340 --> 00:36:37.940
he was an Austin Brahman type. The Boston Brahman was a little Morgan-oriented.

341
00:36:37.940 --> 00:36:43.940
So, he was a, and his mentor, his beloved political mentor was Henry Cabot Lodge, a virtually Morgan tool.

342
00:36:43.940 --> 00:36:47.940
So you have the Theodore Roosevelt wing of the family where he's been Morgan.

343
00:36:47.940 --> 00:36:53.940
On the other hand, the Franklin Roosevelt wing, the beloved Franklin Roosevelt wing, the Hyde Park Roosevelts,

344
00:36:53.940 --> 00:36:57.940
were allied to their neighbors in the Hudson Valley and the Astors and the Harrimans.

345
00:36:57.940 --> 00:36:59.940
The Harrimans were the operative people.

346
00:36:59.940 --> 00:37:03.940
The Harrimans were an underplayed group in American 20th century history.

347
00:37:03.940 --> 00:37:06.580
And they kept a low profile for some reason, because, you know,

348
00:37:06.580 --> 00:37:09.580
Eberle was the governor and ambassador to Russia and everything else.

349
00:37:09.580 --> 00:37:13.780
He was a key figure, an extremely wealthy person in the Harriman fortune,

350
00:37:13.780 --> 00:37:17.220
member of the Harriman-Wachafella Kumo of connection.

351
00:37:17.220 --> 00:37:29.180
So, at any rate, so we have Franklin Roosevelt's uncle, Frederick Delano,

352
00:37:29.180 --> 00:37:33.180
was also a member of the Federal Reserve, where he was connected with a Rockefeller railroad,

353
00:37:33.180 --> 00:38:03.180
The Federal Reserve Board, Benjamin Strong, Milton Friedman's favorite banker,

354
00:38:03.180 --> 00:38:06.180
Well, he doesn't really want it because he thinks it won't be powerful enough.

355
00:38:06.180 --> 00:38:10.540
He was persuaded to take the job by his two closest friends in the world, as Henry P.

356
00:38:10.540 --> 00:38:13.660
Davison, Morgan partner, and his neighbor got him into the whole thing.

357
00:38:13.660 --> 00:38:17.260
He was strong with Vice President Banker's Trust Company, which was set up by the Morgans

358
00:38:17.260 --> 00:38:20.700
to engage in the trust business.

359
00:38:20.700 --> 00:38:25.060
And his mentor and his closest buddy in the world was Henry P. Davison, Morgan partner.

360
00:38:25.060 --> 00:38:31.260
His other two closest friends were Dwight Morrow, Morgan partner, and I think Thomas

361
00:38:31.260 --> 00:38:33.780
from a lot more important anyway they got they worked on they said don't worry

362
00:38:33.780 --> 00:38:38.580
you'll have the power don't worry about it and indeed he did and so he gets in

363
00:38:38.580 --> 00:38:42.500
he follows a policy from then on of a totally Morgan policy until he died in

364
00:38:42.500 --> 00:38:49.180
1928 what was the policy of expanding the power tremendous power of that

365
00:38:49.180 --> 00:38:52.380
centralized in the banking system expanding inflating the money supply

366
00:38:52.380 --> 00:38:58.660
first to finance the war effort came along well first to finance exports

367
00:38:58.660 --> 00:39:05.460
of the Allies. When the World War I started, in August 1914, Thomas W. Lamont, I'm assuming

368
00:39:05.460 --> 00:39:10.140
Harold P. Davison, Morgan partner, hops the first boat to London. He couldn't take the

369
00:39:10.140 --> 00:39:14.580
Concorde, but he hopped the first boat to London. He makes an agreement with the English,

370
00:39:14.580 --> 00:39:18.380
the Bank of England and the English government, which were very closely connected. Morgan

371
00:39:18.380 --> 00:39:22.860
Grenfell and Company is one of the top English banks and so for many years. And so they make

372
00:39:22.860 --> 00:39:27.380
an agreement with the British and French governments as follows. For the duration of the war, the

373
00:39:27.380 --> 00:39:34.380
The Morgan Bank gets the monopoly underwriting of all British and French bonds in the United States

374
00:39:34.380 --> 00:39:39.380
and the monopoly purchasing of all British and French ammunition and food, everything else.

375
00:39:39.380 --> 00:39:43.380
In other words, all supplies in the United States is purchased by JP Morgan & Company.

376
00:39:43.380 --> 00:39:47.380
So they fed the contracts to their own Morgan, mostly their own Morgan industry,

377
00:39:47.380 --> 00:39:51.380
their own companies like US Steel and International Harvester and General Electric,

378
00:39:51.380 --> 00:39:54.380
got the lion's share of all this stuff.

379
00:39:54.380 --> 00:40:05.380
So, at any rate, so strong is of course, increasing the money supply, I can have to first finance the foreign loans, the foreign exports, and then to get us into the war and finance the war effort.

380
00:40:05.380 --> 00:40:23.380
After World War I, we have a situation, a very peculiar situation, which I know will go to a great length, but anyway, we have a situation where the Morgans are committed to the Tony Gold standard, which the British engineered in 1925, 1926.

381
00:40:23.380 --> 00:40:36.380
The British had a peculiar situation. The British situation was the pound had been depreciated. The pound was always $4.86. That had always been the pound. That was it. That was a God-given pound of $4.86.

382
00:40:36.380 --> 00:40:42.380
The pound depreciated during the war because of inflation. I mean, we inflated, but the Western allies inflated even more.

383
00:40:42.380 --> 00:40:49.380
The Germans also inflated even more because they were in the war longer, for one thing. They were in the war for four years and they were in the war for only a year and a half.

384
00:40:49.380 --> 00:41:00.380
So, at any rate, the pound had depreciated down to $3.20 by 1920, and the British wanted to go back to the gold standard, they didn't want to buy out money, but they insisted on going back at $4.86.

385
00:41:00.380 --> 00:41:10.380
We can't go back at $3.20, that's, yeah, that's going to make us a lesser power, we have to reestablish our great British, London is a great financial center in the world, and to do that, we have to go back at $4.86.

386
00:41:10.380 --> 00:41:18.380
Also, the bondholders were pushing for it, too, of course. So, they're committed to two things, one, they're going back to gold, but going back at $4.86.

387
00:41:18.380 --> 00:41:29.380
3. In order to make this viable, they would have had to deflate a lot. In other words, at 486, it means that British goods were unsaleable abroad and they were too highly priced.

388
00:41:29.380 --> 00:41:35.380
They would have had to deflate. They would have had a tremendous contractionary-deflationary. But I think it's great. I love deflation.

389
00:41:35.380 --> 00:41:39.380
The point is, they didn't love it. They now have been converted to an inflationary and cheap money policy.

390
00:41:39.380 --> 00:41:45.380
They want to continue a policy of inflation and cheap money and go back to 486. It's only insane axioms.

391
00:41:45.380 --> 00:41:52.380
They started with several mutually contradictory and crazy axioms and within that they maneuvered brilliantly within it.

392
00:41:52.380 --> 00:41:57.880
They maneuvered everybody else. They forced every country to go back and overbagged currency and all the rest of it.

393
00:41:57.880 --> 00:42:01.380
They also went back to a phony gold standard. This is the ancestor of Bretton Woods.

394
00:42:01.380 --> 00:42:07.380
They didn't go back to a gold coin standard. They only had a gold bullion standard.

395
00:42:07.380 --> 00:42:13.380
You could only get bars worth $10,000. You couldn't get coins, so the average person couldn't get it.

396
00:42:13.380 --> 00:42:24.380
Plus, you're a British citizen, you couldn't even get a gold bullion, you had to be a foreign citizen getting only a bullion, so it wasn't really redeemable, it was a phony redeemability, very much like Bretton Woods, really the ancestor of Bretton Woods.

397
00:42:24.380 --> 00:42:35.380
And they forced all the other countries to go back at higher currency, but the United States had nothing to do with us, they couldn't force us, they didn't have any power over us, they had three League of Nations over Europe.

398
00:42:35.380 --> 00:42:45.380
So they induced, because of the Morgan connection, they induced strong to keep inflating, so to help quote help England, unquote, in other words to keep Britain from losing gold to us.

399
00:42:45.380 --> 00:42:54.380
So we were on a regular gold standard, Britain was on a phony gold standard, we kept inflating currency and credit and everything else to try to keep Britain, keep this thing afloat.

400
00:42:54.380 --> 00:43:03.380
At any rate, during the 1920s what we got, getting back to power idea now, is that we have a totally Morgan country, and the administration is totally Morgan, not just strong.

401
00:43:03.380 --> 00:43:08.380
After World War I, this is something which hasn't been really dealt with by most historians,

402
00:43:08.380 --> 00:43:12.380
World War I discredited not just internationals, it discredited American domestic policies

403
00:43:12.380 --> 00:43:18.380
because everybody was fed up with inflation and shortages and price controls and all the rest of it which Wilson had imposed.

404
00:43:18.380 --> 00:43:23.380
There was a tremendous reaction against the Democrats and the Republicans get in in 1920.

405
00:43:23.380 --> 00:43:29.380
Anyway, Wilson was an aberration to begin with because he only came in originally because Teddy Roosevelt

406
00:43:29.380 --> 00:43:34.380
Harding was used by the Morganists to split the Republican Party and crush Taft. He was a Rockefeller person.

407
00:43:34.380 --> 00:43:40.380
So at any rate, we have a Republican government, a dominant Republican administration in the 20s.

408
00:43:40.380 --> 00:43:45.380
Harding was a Rockefeller person largely, although he also had Ohio crooks around him.

409
00:43:45.380 --> 00:43:48.380
It's unlovable crooks playing poker all the time. I kind of like that.

410
00:43:48.380 --> 00:43:53.380
It's better to play poker than do a lot of damage.

411
00:43:53.380 --> 00:44:01.780
At any rate, so Harding was sort of a Rockefeller person. Harding then has a mysterious illness and dies quickly.

412
00:44:01.780 --> 00:44:05.780
Again, there's been no investigation of the death of Warren Harding, no exhumation.

413
00:44:05.780 --> 00:44:14.180
I'm going to say we're exhuming, by the way, every president who dies in office should be exhumed and deeply investigated with subpoena power.

414
00:44:14.180 --> 00:44:22.280
So a Secret Service guy in the Secret Service organization in the Harding administration wrote a book claiming that Mrs. Harding poisoned him.

415
00:44:22.280 --> 00:44:52.280
But that was never, he was considered dismissed as a nut. Well, he might have been a nut, but nobody ever really investigated the charge, and that's very much like the McKinley situation. McKinley was a Rockefeller person, a lone nut kills him, and he's suddenly succeeded by a Morgan person named Teddy Roosevelt. Harding was a Rockefeller person, and he's suddenly succeeded by Calvin Coolidge, who was a Morgan person. Now, Calvin Coolidge has been mislabeled by historians as being sort of a quiet, jerk type. He might have been quiet, but he was not just a jerk, he was a member of the Coolidge family, which one of his cousins was T. Jefferson Coolidge, the head of the

416
00:44:52.280 --> 00:44:55.920
and the United Fruit Company. They were in with a whole Boston financial group, the Boston

417
00:44:55.920 --> 00:45:00.520
Brahman Group, which was essentially almost completely Morgan-oriented. So Coolidge was

418
00:45:00.520 --> 00:45:04.520
a Morgan person. If you read this book by Chernow and the Morgans, you find out that

419
00:45:04.520 --> 00:45:08.760
J.P. Morgan Jr. loved Coolidge. He thought that Calvin Coolidge was the greatest statesman

420
00:45:08.760 --> 00:45:17.840
of the 20th century. So he loved Coolidge. And Coolidge's policies were Federal Reserve

421
00:45:17.840 --> 00:45:24.840
of Expansion, Whipping Up the Boom, etc. And his cabinet was a Morgan cabinet more or less completely.

422
00:45:24.840 --> 00:45:30.840
I'll give you down a list of that. And then when we get to Herbert Hoover, we have also Morgan, more or less Morgan.

423
00:45:30.840 --> 00:45:35.840
He wasn't as solidly Morgan as Coolidge was, but the Morgans wanted Coolidge to run to third term.

424
00:45:35.840 --> 00:45:39.840
That's really one that kept urging him. He didn't quite trust Hoover. He was all right, but anyway.

425
00:45:39.840 --> 00:45:45.840
They finally settled on Hoover. Hoover's control, as we say in the espionage business,

426
00:45:45.840 --> 00:45:53.840
The person we checked with was Dwight Morrow, a Morgan partner we checked with three times a week on policy and advice, things like that.

427
00:45:53.840 --> 00:46:01.840
So anyways, you have a solidly Morgan, you have Benjamin Scorn, you have Coolidge, you have Andrew Mellon, the Secretary of Treasury who was allied to the Morgans.

428
00:46:01.840 --> 00:46:08.840
So we have a solidly Morgan administration. And what happens during the 1920s is other financial groups are going to get kind of bitter.

429
00:46:08.840 --> 00:46:14.000
kind of bitter. First of all, the Rockefellers are bitter anyway. And they're getting bitter

430
00:46:14.000 --> 00:46:18.880
at Morgan domination. The Chicago bankers are bitter and largely Rockefeller because

431
00:46:18.880 --> 00:46:23.200
of the New York Fed domination. So there's a tremendous shift, beginning to be a tremendous

432
00:46:23.200 --> 00:46:31.200
shift of financial groups toward the Democrats. In late 1920s, in 1928, for example, the DuPonts,

433
00:46:31.200 --> 00:46:36.360
who had always been Republican, been protectionists, break with the Republicans and set up the

434
00:46:36.360 --> 00:46:43.360
and the Alice Smith campaign. The DuPont executive, John Raskov, was the national chairman of the Alice Smith campaign.

435
00:46:43.360 --> 00:46:54.360
And they were bitter for various reasons. They were bitter, first of all, because of chemical patents, which the United States had stolen from the Germans in World War I.

436
00:46:54.360 --> 00:46:59.360
I'd say stolen. It's part of a war booty. They had these chemical patents. The United States grabbed them.

437
00:46:59.360 --> 00:47:05.360
The question is who should get them? The Morgans and the Rockefellers wanted to return them to the Germans so they could set the Germans up.

438
00:47:05.360 --> 00:47:07.960
Germany will be able to export again or things like that.

439
00:47:07.960 --> 00:47:10.480
DuPont wanted to keep the kempf of the patent.

440
00:47:10.480 --> 00:47:11.920
So DuPont's got very bitter about this.

441
00:47:11.920 --> 00:47:13.240
They're sort of aced out.

442
00:47:13.240 --> 00:47:14.600
Also, DuPont's had a big argument.

443
00:47:14.600 --> 00:47:17.120
DuPont's was a major shareholder of the General Motors.

444
00:47:17.120 --> 00:47:18.240
In collaboration with the Morgans,

445
00:47:18.240 --> 00:47:20.960
they had a big falling out in the 20s.

446
00:47:20.960 --> 00:47:23.120
The Morgans wanted to charge them too high a price

447
00:47:23.120 --> 00:47:24.480
for finance and all sorts of stuff.

448
00:47:24.480 --> 00:47:26.520
There was a big break with the Morgans.

449
00:47:26.520 --> 00:47:28.400
The DuPont started trying to take over US Steel,

450
00:47:28.400 --> 00:47:30.520
which was a big Morgan corporation.

451
00:47:30.520 --> 00:47:34.000
And the FTC stops them, and the FTC blocks the takeover a bit.

452
00:47:34.000 --> 00:47:41.000
This is 1926, and the FTC enforces a federal government Morgan-dominated company.

453
00:47:41.000 --> 00:47:49.000
So the DuPonts are very bitter. They shifted Democrats. Also, they hated prohibition being Catholic, so there was extra incentive.

454
00:47:49.000 --> 00:47:56.000
And by the 1930s, the Rockefellers shift also. First of all, Rockefellers are bitter in Morgan domination, too.

455
00:47:56.000 --> 00:48:03.000
The Rockefellers take over the Chase National Bank, which had been a major Morgan bank, seized control over in 1930,

456
00:48:03.000 --> 00:48:07.280
and Winthrop Woolrich, the son of Nelson Woolrich becomes the chairman of the board

457
00:48:07.280 --> 00:48:14.080
and the oil industry is in fairly bad shape, they find this tremendous new oil in Texas and Oklahoma

458
00:48:14.080 --> 00:48:17.880
oil prices are down on the bottom and they decide in favor of inflation

459
00:48:17.880 --> 00:48:25.640
so what you have now is a general alliance by many business groups in favor of not just cartelism, which they all now are in favor of

460
00:48:25.640 --> 00:48:31.280
but also radical inflation, getting off the gold standard, paper money, devaluing gold and all the rest of it

461
00:48:31.280 --> 00:49:01.280
The drive for setting up, for getting off the gold standard was headed up by the Committee for the Nation, which was set up for that purpose, which had on it retail store people, retail owners who wanted, retail people like Remington Rand and Filene and people like that, they thought the consumers should get more purchasing powers, they could buy their stuff, so they were in favor of inflation to give more money to consumers, that was their gig. But farmers, of course, always want more inflation, farmers want to increase

462
00:49:01.280 --> 00:49:14.280
and some price supports, and the farmers were agitating for inflation and paper money, and also the Rockefellers who won a higher price for oil, gasoline as a retail product.

463
00:49:14.280 --> 00:49:27.280
So the committee for the nation was heavily financed by Standard Oil of New Jersey, plus the Royal Dutch Shell Group was agitating for free silver, all these groups got together to get us off the gold standard.

464
00:49:27.280 --> 00:49:37.280
When Roosevelt, Roosevelt's famous breakup of the London Economic Conference, I've written on this, I didn't know, from the time I wrote on this, I didn't know about these details, the key forces behind the scenes.

465
00:49:37.280 --> 00:49:47.280
When Roosevelt sent a delegation, the Warburgs at the London Economic Conference, they were in favor, they were essentially the Morgan Group, they wanted to reestablish, not exactly a gold standard, but some kind of a fixed exchange rate with England.

466
00:49:47.280 --> 00:49:50.280
England's always their main buddy, maybe anyway.

467
00:49:50.280 --> 00:49:57.280
So they wanted to fix the exchange rate with England and the superinflationists wanted to cut that out and have all that inflation.

468
00:49:57.280 --> 00:50:10.280
And so the Rockefellers and the pre-silver people induced Roosevelt to send the famous telegram, the molly, whatever it's called, cancel negotiations, ending the London Economic Conference.

469
00:50:10.280 --> 00:50:23.280
And that's what happens in the first New Deal. The early New Deal is essentially the brilliant writings on this by Thomas Ferguson, the new left political scientist, who's writing a great book which hasn't been published yet, hasn't been finished yet.

470
00:50:23.280 --> 00:50:37.280
I'm waiting for great anticipation for the tentative title of the full of the House of Morgan on the coming of the New Deal. But he interprets, I think, that was the big Morgan thing, to have both together.

471
00:50:37.280 --> 00:50:44.280
together and was put in by the Rockefellers and others who wanted to smash them and cut the tie between commercial investment and banking.

472
00:50:44.280 --> 00:50:52.280
So that was the big Glass-Steagall Act and also the Public Utilities Holding Act 1935 to break up the Morgan-run public utilities company.

473
00:50:52.280 --> 00:50:56.280
The Morgan is the holding company's public utility, also successfully accomplished.

474
00:50:56.280 --> 00:51:02.280
It was a big smash of the Morgan. It was essentially the crushing of the Morgan royal empire.

475
00:51:02.280 --> 00:51:13.280
The guy who succeeded, and also centralizing power in the Washington Fed, the New York Fed was still Morgan-oriented, so they moved a ton of this in the Banking Act of 1935,

476
00:51:13.280 --> 00:51:23.280
and coming in as the dynamic New Deal head of the Fed was Mariner Echols. Mariner Echols was a Utah banker.

477
00:51:23.280 --> 00:51:28.280
The interesting thing about Echols, which hasn't been pointed out enough, everybody's praising Echols for being a pretensionist.

478
00:51:28.280 --> 00:51:40.280
The American Economic Review had an article about seven years ago saying that Eccles was a great guy, he was a pre-Keynesian, but not even leading Keynes, he was a 14, he existed or whatever, he was writing stuff about the need for deficit spending and more consumption and the rest of it.

479
00:51:40.280 --> 00:51:51.280
He wasn't just that, he was also in favor of everything else, social security and unemployment insurance schemes and going back to World War I collectivism and the rest of it. He was an all out status.

480
00:51:51.280 --> 00:52:02.280
At any rate, who was he? Again, if you look at Eccles, he wasn't just a guy who suddenly pops out from Utah, and he's there for bath from 1934 as head of the Fed until 1948.

481
00:52:02.280 --> 00:52:16.280
So what he was was the richest person in Utah, he was the head of a fleet of bank holding companies, and very opposed to the Morgans because they were antagonistic to him by being able to use the New York Fed as a power center.

482
00:52:16.280 --> 00:52:20.320
Center. He wanted to smash the New York Fed on the Morgans. He was an ally of the Rockefellers

483
00:52:20.320 --> 00:52:24.520
in doing it. Winfrey Bolgerich was also pushing for taking over, you know, smashing the New

484
00:52:24.520 --> 00:52:30.920
York Fed. So he was, and also in addition to that, Eccles was connected strongly to the

485
00:52:30.920 --> 00:52:35.320
Rockefeller interest. He had a construction, a Utah construction company, which built the

486
00:52:35.320 --> 00:52:41.040
Boulder Dam and lots of other stuff, in collaboration with the Standard Oil of California, the Bechdel

487
00:52:41.040 --> 00:52:45.480
Corporation, which in turn is heavily connected, has always been heavily connected with Standard

488
00:52:45.480 --> 00:53:15.480
by the way, when you look at Bechtel, when you look at the fact that two Reagan administration cabinet members, George Shultz and Castle Weinberg were both Bechtel's executives, things are coming out, this is a coincidence, who is Bechtel? Bechtel is the world's biggest construction company, also very strongly connected and attached to the Rockefeller world empire. When Rockefeller got the big concession in Saudi Arabia, the oil concession, Bechtel built the bases, they had to build stuff, they had to build pipelines and oil bases and stuff like that.

489
00:53:15.480 --> 00:53:20.480
So all these businesses are interconnected.

490
00:53:20.480 --> 00:53:31.480
So what you've got then in the first New Deal, in particular, you have the more or less smashing of the Morgan's rise to power of the Rockefeller plus retail interest plus the lower than the Harriman.

491
00:53:31.480 --> 00:53:36.480
Harriman was a big democratic contributor, of course, too, big in the New Deal.

492
00:53:36.480 --> 00:53:40.480
And collaboration was, of course, intellectual collectiveness.

493
00:53:40.480 --> 00:53:58.480
One interesting thing is that the Banking Act of 1935, which centered power on the Federal Reserve Board in Washington, was written both by Eccles and by Lachlan Curry, an extinguished quantitativeist in economics and also, of course, later translated, a Soviet agent.

494
00:53:58.480 --> 00:54:06.480
I'm not saying that the Soviet must and the Kremlin, they told Curry, push Federal Reserve to Varash or something like that.

495
00:54:06.480 --> 00:54:16.480
It's going along the same path, centralizing power in government and Washington, dominating, crippling any kind of free market system.

496
00:54:16.480 --> 00:54:19.480
So it all fits into this whole pattern.

497
00:54:19.480 --> 00:54:35.480
So, now, after the war, what happens after the war is over is that the, in general, in this titanic struggle between the Morgans on one hand and the Harriman, the Rockefeller, the Kummler, and the other, we have a detente, a permanent detente through World War II.

498
00:54:35.480 --> 00:54:41.480
World War II was a happy hunting ground, will we speak. Basically, what happened was that Morgan, once again, wanted an intervention in Europe.

499
00:54:41.480 --> 00:54:49.480
and connected with Britain and France and British and French finance, Morgan was always out to crush Germany, both of World War I and World War II.

500
00:54:49.480 --> 00:55:01.480
Ideology didn't seem to make a heck of a lot of difference here. On the other hand, the Rockefellers had no interest in Europe, as a matter of fact they had cartel arrangements with IG Farben, so they were isolationist in the German area and in Europe.

501
00:55:01.480 --> 00:55:02.480
in Europe.

502
00:55:02.480 --> 00:55:03.480
On the other hand, they wanted to crush Japan.

503
00:55:03.480 --> 00:55:04.480
Japan was evil.

504
00:55:04.480 --> 00:55:09.760
They were trying to take over rubber and oil in Southeast Asia, which the Rockefellers wanted.

505
00:55:09.760 --> 00:55:14.000
The Rockefellers were very interested in crushing Japan, stopping, quote, Japanese aggression,

506
00:55:14.000 --> 00:55:19.600
unquote, and from 1933 on, and 31 on, I should say.

507
00:55:19.600 --> 00:55:22.000
And meanwhile, the Morgans were sort of isolationists on Japan.

508
00:55:22.000 --> 00:55:26.560
As a matter of fact, the one person in the State Department in the 30s, against the war

509
00:55:26.560 --> 00:55:30.560
with Japan, was Joseph C. Groove, who was an ambassador to Japan.

510
00:55:30.560 --> 00:55:35.060
If you look at this and say, well, Jesus, he grew, you know, bastard, champion, must have been pro-Japanese, that's not really the point.

511
00:55:35.060 --> 00:55:43.560
The point is, he was not only a Morgan person, he was his cousin, JP Morgan Jr., Morgan married into the Groove family, a very close relative.

512
00:55:43.560 --> 00:55:55.560
So, is it conspiracy theory to say, well, look, you know, this guy's a cousin of Morgan, maybe his policies were also consonant, is it an accident, his policies going along with the Morgan financial interests?

513
00:55:55.560 --> 00:56:03.060
So at any rate, and by the way, John Foster Dulles, whom I already mentioned, is a Rockefeller lawyer for many decades.

514
00:56:03.060 --> 00:56:08.560
He was an isolationist in World War II, and after the war is over and the communist problem comes up,

515
00:56:08.560 --> 00:56:14.560
he all of a sudden becomes a world global crusader. We have to establish freedom everywhere, crush aggression everywhere, crush tyranny.

516
00:56:14.560 --> 00:56:20.060
How come he shifts so radically from 1940 to 1950? That could have been, of course, an intellectual shift.

517
00:56:20.060 --> 00:56:28.060
On the other hand, it seems to be going along with the fact that the Rockefeller interest also shifted from an isolationist or global to a stating position.

518
00:56:28.060 --> 00:56:31.060
At any rate, after World War II, we have a totally different line-up.

519
00:56:31.060 --> 00:56:36.060
The line-up is essentially the Rockefellers become the senior partners in the whole.

520
00:56:36.060 --> 00:56:46.060
The Rockefellers and Morgans become permanently allied, and the Morgans become junior partners in the Rockefeller Eastern establishment in 1945 or so on.

521
00:56:46.060 --> 00:57:03.060
And this is symbolized in many ways. One thing, the Council of Foreign Relations, which was set up by the Morgans, after World War I, to push internationalism and foreign loans and the rest of it, was taken over by the Rockefellers after World War II, and sort of a friendly takeover. It was not a hostile takeover.

522
00:57:03.060 --> 00:57:13.060
And the oil becomes the dominant situation in general, and the Rockefellers take it as a senior post in the so-called Eastern establishment.

523
00:57:13.060 --> 00:57:17.560
So from then on, the heads of the Fed become, doesn't make much difference than Morgan and Rockefeller,

524
00:57:17.560 --> 00:57:25.560
although it's interesting to cite it. The first guy is Thomas McKay, after Eccles leaves as Truman, kind of rush with Truman,

525
00:57:25.560 --> 00:57:33.560
Thomas McKay becomes head of the Fed for a few years. He was the head of Scott Paper Company, which is allies of the Morgan interests.

526
00:57:33.560 --> 00:57:39.560
After that, William McChesney Martin, a much beloved figure, becomes head of the Fed.

527
00:57:39.560 --> 00:57:45.560
William M. Martin Jr. came from St. Louis. I think the key thing is his father-in-law,

528
00:57:45.560 --> 00:57:51.560
Dwight Davis, was the secretary of war under Coolidge, was tied in with a Morgan interest.

529
00:57:51.560 --> 00:57:59.560
And after Martin, we have of course the beloved Paul Volcker, who was lionized by everybody,

530
00:57:59.560 --> 00:58:03.560
the press, the media, the academics, everybody else. He was 6'6", and he had a focus at the

531
00:58:03.560 --> 00:58:07.560
bar, the charismatic figure. I don't think that was the reason he was lionized.

532
00:58:07.560 --> 00:58:13.560
The fact that he was who he was, in other words, chairman of the Fed, and he was also, of course, long time connected with the Rockefeller royal empire.

533
00:58:13.560 --> 00:58:18.560
He was an economist for the Chase National Bank, he had been in the Manhattan Bank.

534
00:58:18.560 --> 00:58:24.560
He was an economist before that for Exxon Corporation, his whole life was in the Rockefeller ambit.

535
00:58:24.560 --> 00:58:36.560
Alan Greenspan, by the way, in addition to being an alleged ex-Randian, Alan Greenspan was also, before he became head of the Fed, the board of directors of the Morgan Guaranteed Trust Company, a big Morgan bank.

536
00:58:36.560 --> 00:58:43.560
There's also, of course, the neck of the Tri-Lateral Commission, which should be mentioned here as a post-Council of Foreign Relations is getting kind of unwieldy.

537
00:58:43.560 --> 00:58:57.560
So David Rockefeller set up the Tri-Lateral Commission in the early 70s as a very small group, I think 75 people in the United States, something like that, to sort of plan the world, to plan the world economic scene and make suggestions.

538
00:58:57.560 --> 00:59:05.560
By the way, I should say this also, what happens in Bretton Woods, for example, was set up.

539
00:59:05.560 --> 00:59:13.560
The whole Bretton Woods system was planned ahead of time during World War II, like five secret groups headed by the Council of Foreign Relations.

540
00:59:13.560 --> 00:59:17.560
The Morgan people began to work their way back by late 30s, early 40s.

541
00:59:17.560 --> 00:59:25.560
For one reason, Norman Davis, who was head of the CFR, was a Morgan person, was also a close buddy of Franklin Roosevelt, so they had a personal relation.

542
00:59:55.560 --> 00:59:59.560
and the so-called right and the so-called left is a very respectable center.

543
00:59:59.560 --> 01:00:05.560
And so what you've got is an agreement on post-war setup

544
01:00:05.560 --> 01:00:10.560
and just minor differences in negotiating with things themselves.

545
01:00:10.560 --> 01:00:13.560
I think one more stuff with Britain and also a very minor negotiation.

546
01:00:13.560 --> 01:00:16.560
Everybody was very happy with the post-war monetary picture,

547
01:00:16.560 --> 01:00:21.560
where essentially the English system comes back with a dollar being a phony gold standard

548
01:00:21.560 --> 01:00:23.560
instead of the British pound.

549
01:00:23.560 --> 01:00:31.560
So, and as I said, with the power elite, we essentially have Rockefeller domination, largely, with the Morgans as junior partner.

550
01:00:31.560 --> 01:00:39.560
What's happened in post-World War II America is basically the other, there's always competition, both in economics and politics,

551
01:00:39.560 --> 01:00:49.560
and the Eastern establishment has been challenged by sort of maverick types from the 1950s on, maverick types mostly from either Texas or Southern California or Florida,

552
01:00:49.560 --> 01:01:19.560
The Sun Belt, New Self-Made Millionaires, Pop-Up, The Monkey Ranch of the System, The Cowboys, The Libertarian Reporter-Historian, Carl Oglesby, The Yankee Cowboy War, The Watergate on the Kennedy Assassination, The Watergate on the Kennedy Assassination, The Watergate on the Kennedy Assassination, The Watergate on the Kennedy Assassination,

553
01:01:19.560 --> 01:01:29.560
He looks at, I think it's a very interesting way to look at it, he looks at, for example, the Kennedy assassination, basically a coup by the cowboys to take over, take power against the Yankees.

554
01:01:29.560 --> 01:01:33.560
Kennedy, of course, being a quintessential Yankee and Lyndon Johnson being a quintessential cowboy.

555
01:01:33.560 --> 01:01:41.560
And once again a lone nut pops up and suddenly there's a change, a fundamental change in power elite rule.

556
01:01:41.560 --> 01:01:47.560
And then he interprets Watergate as a counter-attack by the Eastern establishment, using not violence but the media.

557
01:01:47.560 --> 01:01:59.560
The Media, it's respectable media, PBS, Washington Post, New York Times, that sort of stuff, using control and public opinion to oust Nixon, who of course is basically a cowboy top coming from Southern California.

558
01:01:59.560 --> 01:02:08.560
It's a very interesting kind of way of looking at it, because then you don't look at Republican versus Democrats so much, you look at who's the financial group here, what's going on, who are the power elite forces at work.

559
01:02:08.560 --> 01:02:38.560
work. And of course we need more analysis of this, we need more scholars. One of the problems in this whole field is, since the field is not considered respectable, the field of power and analysis, orthodox historians mostly work at it, academic types don't work at it, it's easier to talk about, you know, every battle of the civil war in great detail and talk about Morgan Rockefeller combined. And so what you get is the people, it leaves the field of analyzing this stuff to sort of more marginal types, independent scholars or

560
01:02:38.560 --> 01:02:45.560
Reporters and things like that tend to get, might make more mistakes and that's what they get jumped on, discrediting the whole approach.

561
01:02:45.560 --> 01:02:50.560
That's one of the problems in this whole area. It tends to be self-fulfilling profiteers. Wow, these guys made mistakes.

562
01:02:50.560 --> 01:02:56.560
But all fields make mistakes. That's the pioneering, having any kind of new discipline. This basically is.

563
01:02:56.560 --> 01:03:04.560
So anyway, that's the, this all comes from looking at what these guys were doing before they got into office and after they got out of office.

564
01:03:04.560 --> 01:03:34.560
And I think that's the kind of insights you get when you're looking at the, you know, what's inside this throughout his life, and as John Forster does, or any of these people, Mara Echols, or any of these people, gives you a totally new perspective, and needs to be brought out, brought out and, you know, discussed in a scholarship, and almost has never done that way, and so that's, I think, I'm going to throw open to you, this is a new way, you know, another way of looking at the Fed.

565
01:03:34.560 --> 01:04:04.560
It's not just people doing things that... I mean, everybody in Mises and Fettes sort of screwed up and made errors and things like that, but maybe the errors are also systemically related to who's doing it, and why they're doing it. Maybe it's not so much an error from their point of view. It might be perfectly rational from the point of view of the forces that are operating it. It's like the farm policy, you know, the agricultural policy. You look at agricultural policy, and I'll leave you with that. You look at the farm policy since the New Deal. It's actually since 1928 when Hoover started it. You look at the farm policy, not 1929, Hoover started it. You look at the farm policy

566
01:04:04.560 --> 01:04:14.560
It looks irrational. Many economists say it's irrational. Why is it irrational? Look, first you pay the farmers not to grow stuff. You pay them to grow less. You pay them not to grow food.

567
01:04:14.560 --> 01:04:22.560
And then, that's one thing, and then you also pay them, another division of the Department of Agriculture, pays them to grow more food.

568
01:04:22.560 --> 01:04:30.560
Presently irrigate, have to have more fertilizer and rural electrification and the rest of it. So it increases their production. On the one hand the Federal Government increases their production.

569
01:04:30.560 --> 01:04:34.040
production, the other hand, the federal government pays them to cut production. It seems irrational.

570
01:04:34.040 --> 01:04:36.960
It's irrational from our point of view. It's not irrational from the point of view of two

571
01:04:36.960 --> 01:04:41.200
groups. One, the Department of Agriculture, more and more bureaucrats, and two, the farmers.

572
01:04:41.200 --> 01:04:44.680
They get paid both ways. They get paid from producing more. They get paid from producing

573
01:04:44.680 --> 01:04:48.280
less. That's great. Those who are still left in there, the large farmers, will benefit

574
01:04:48.280 --> 01:04:52.120
from it. So irrationality is only from the point of view of which you're talking about.

575
01:04:52.120 --> 01:04:56.240
The point of view of the economy or the standard of living, of course, is irrational. The point

576
01:04:56.240 --> 01:05:00.040
of view of the forces at work, it isn't. I think, by the way, it's important in general

577
01:05:00.040 --> 01:05:10.040
Just to leave you with this thought, when we argue for the free market, we tend to look at it as intellectual error, which of course socialism, status, are intellectual errors.

578
01:05:10.040 --> 01:05:16.040
They're wrong and they lead to terrible consequences and all the rest of it. There's something else involved, namely economic interest.

579
01:05:16.040 --> 01:05:20.040
Many of these guys benefit from these policies. They're for it because they benefit from it.

580
01:05:20.040 --> 01:05:50.040
When I was growing up and entering the free market field, you look at Nelson Rockefeller and the Rockefeller family, statists to the hilt, and the usual explanation is why are they statists, the usual explanation is why they were brainwashed by left-wing professors or left-wing prep school teachers, that's one way to look at it. The other way to look at it is maybe they're benefiting from it, maybe that's why they're for it, maybe it's a tie-in, maybe they're not so crazy, maybe it isn't brainwashing, maybe it's perfectly, but if you're immoral, setting aside morality, they've sort of disappeared anyway,

581
01:05:50.040 --> 01:05:54.040
from their point of view. I think this needs deep investigation. Thank you very much.