WEBVTT

NOTE Liberalism and Peace

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:21.000
Thank you very much, Dr. Thornton. And I'd like to remind Dr. Thornton that if what is necessary to get a few more minutes for a person's talk is to deliver it with a German accent, I can do that too.

2
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:42.000
Now, it might seem that being pro-peace rather than pro-war is a pretty unexceptionable point of view.

3
00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:45.000
Historically, however, that has not been the case.

4
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:50.000
Over the centuries, multitudes of writers and thinkers have idealized war.

5
00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:58.000
From the time of the poet Homer on, Homer, who spoke of war, where men win glory.

6
00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:05.000
The voices of those who spoke on behalf of peace, on behalf of the people, rather than the warriors, were rarer.

7
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:15.000
For instance, Jesus, of course, who blessed the peacemakers, and the Christian monk Erasmus, who castigated war in vitriolic terms.

8
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:22.000
In modern times, classical liberals and libertarians, and that's what I mean by liberalism in the title of this talk,

9
00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:25.000
have always been in the forefront of the advocates of peace.

10
00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:34.000
Ludwig von Mises in his exposition of liberal doctrine placed peace third right after property and freedom as liberal ideals.

11
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:40.000
Reversing the rather obscure dictum of the Greek philosopher Heraclitus, Mises wrote,

12
00:01:40.000 --> 00:01:44.000
not war but peace is the father of all things.

13
00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:52.000
Murray Rothbard's tireless campaign for peace and against war and incitement to war is well known to the readers of his works.

14
00:01:52.000 --> 00:01:59.000
At the time, it caused writers for National Review to accuse Murray of being a communist sympathizer.

15
00:01:59.000 --> 00:02:05.000
Now, I knew Murray Rothbard. Murray Rothbard was a friend of mine.

16
00:02:05.000 --> 00:02:11.000
And one thing I can assure you of, Murray Rothbard was no comm-symp.

17
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:17.000
Extolling peace has characterized those classical liberals usually labeled as the most doctrinaire or dogmatic.

18
00:02:17.000 --> 00:02:22.520
from the early 19th century liberals whose motto was pay et liberté, peace and

19
00:02:22.520 --> 00:02:27.140
liberty, to Frederic Bastiat, who proposed the unilateral disarmament of

20
00:02:27.140 --> 00:02:32.000
France, to Herbert Spencer, the bitter critic of British imperialism and

21
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:37.280
especially of the war against the South African Boers, to Gustav de Molinari, the

22
00:02:37.280 --> 00:02:41.320
conservative anarchist who as Hans mentioned was the first to propose an

23
00:02:41.320 --> 00:02:46.840
end to monopoly government and who condemned Lincoln's war and invasion of

24
00:02:46.840 --> 00:02:52.440
of the South, to the American William Graham Sumner, who declared that McKinley's Splendid

25
00:02:52.440 --> 00:02:58.920
Little War was actually resulting in the conquest of the United States by Spain.

26
00:02:58.920 --> 00:03:03.120
And all through the writings of the founding fathers you can see the same thing.

27
00:03:03.120 --> 00:03:09.720
This is very typical from James Madison, whom my students are surprised to learn had something

28
00:03:09.720 --> 00:03:15.200
to do with the Constitution of the United States.

29
00:03:15.200 --> 00:03:16.200
Madison wrote,

30
00:03:45.200 --> 00:04:05.200
In English-speaking countries, the main grounds for identifying classical liberalism and peace are probably the work of the Manchester School and its leaders, Richard Cobden and John Bright.

31
00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:12.200
Cobden and Bright are best known for their campaign for free trade, which culminated in the repeal of the Corn Laws.

32
00:04:12.200 --> 00:04:17.080
They held that unhampered freedom of commerce among nations was the surest road to material

33
00:04:17.080 --> 00:04:22.920
well-being of the people and to an even higher goal, world peace.

34
00:04:22.920 --> 00:04:26.800
Both Cobden and Bright were businessmen in the textile trades.

35
00:04:26.800 --> 00:04:31.600
They represented, they almost personified the industrious, creative, productive middle

36
00:04:31.600 --> 00:04:33.320
classes of Britain.

37
00:04:33.320 --> 00:04:38.800
They fought against coercive labor unions, as Cobden wrote, there's a desperate spirit

38
00:04:38.800 --> 00:04:44.820
of Monopoly and Tyranny at the bottom of these trade unions. That's what the Brits call them.

39
00:04:44.820 --> 00:04:50.280
They opposed state subsidies to the established church and all the other depredations of what

40
00:04:50.280 --> 00:04:59.280
John Bright called the tax-eating classes. Their cause was that of the tax-paying classes.

41
00:04:59.280 --> 00:05:04.320
Most of all, the Manchester School opposed militarism, imperialism and war. In the very

42
00:05:04.320 --> 00:05:13.320
The very first work he ever published, Cobden placed on the title page of the work, a quotation from George Washington's farewell address.

43
00:05:13.320 --> 00:05:22.320
The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, no isolationism,

44
00:05:22.320 --> 00:05:32.320
extending our commercial relations to have as little political connection with them as possible.

45
00:05:32.320 --> 00:05:37.320
So commerce with everyone, a few, if any, political connections.

46
00:05:37.320 --> 00:05:44.320
In the course of two decades, Richard Cobden developed into the greatest libertarian analyst of international relations who ever lived.

47
00:05:44.320 --> 00:05:54.320
The two volumes of his political writings, reprinted in the Garland Library of War and Peace in 1973, are devoted entirely to foreign policy.

48
00:05:54.320 --> 00:06:02.320
Cobden held that the greatest, as he said, the greatest home question is in reality the foreign question.

49
00:06:02.320 --> 00:06:07.320
Living in the heyday of British imperialism, that was a natural conclusion for him to reach.

50
00:06:07.320 --> 00:06:10.320
For America, however, it was not always so.

51
00:06:10.320 --> 00:06:17.320
For most of our history, other issues, the national bank, tariffs, states' rights, slavery and so on, were the central issues.

52
00:06:17.320 --> 00:06:23.320
But now we, like Cobden, have the privilege of living in the heyday of our imperialism.

53
00:06:23.320 --> 00:06:31.320
And now we, like Cobden, have the privilege of witnessing the truth of what he wrote about an imperialist country.

54
00:06:31.320 --> 00:06:37.320
For us, ominously, the most important of domestic issues is foreign policy.

55
00:06:37.320 --> 00:06:42.320
If you want to see just one expose of this, read James Boevard's book,

56
00:06:42.320 --> 00:06:47.320
Terrorism and Tyranny, Trampling Freedom, Justice and Peace to Rid the World of Evil.

57
00:06:47.320 --> 00:06:52.320
Every page is white-hot of this book. I urge you to get it.

58
00:06:52.320 --> 00:06:57.320
It is remarkable how many of Cobden's insights are relevant to our own situation today.

59
00:06:57.320 --> 00:07:00.320
As I'm quoting a lot from Cobden here,

60
00:07:00.320 --> 00:07:05.320
In foreign politics, the masses are too little informed to protect themselves against fraud.

61
00:07:05.320 --> 00:07:09.320
He argued that the English knew little of foreign affairs.

62
00:07:09.320 --> 00:07:16.320
When it comes to foreign affairs, the British public, he says, is really just a big baby, his term,

63
00:07:16.320 --> 00:07:21.320
ready to accept any of the deceptions and mystifications of the government.

64
00:07:21.320 --> 00:07:26.120
As he said, even members of parliament were at a loss when it came to foreign policy.

65
00:07:26.120 --> 00:07:28.120
Which is really true enough, isn't it?

66
00:07:28.120 --> 00:07:31.640
And so parliament had abdicated any control in this area,

67
00:07:31.640 --> 00:07:35.880
which was in reality entirely in the hands of scheming ministers.

68
00:07:35.880 --> 00:07:38.920
He systematically doubted the claims of government leaders.

69
00:07:38.920 --> 00:07:44.360
As he said on foreign affairs, he refused to accept as true the word of any minister

70
00:07:44.360 --> 00:07:48.120
unless it could be authenticated by independent testimony.

71
00:07:48.120 --> 00:07:51.080
The ministers continually conjured up war scares.

72
00:07:51.080 --> 00:07:59.080
They wanted to be viewed as statesmen, as he says, but they talk exactly as if they'd taken passages from Baron Munchausen or Gulliver's Travels.

73
00:08:00.080 --> 00:08:04.080
In other words, they concoct bizarre fables. Does that ring a bell at all?

74
00:08:06.080 --> 00:08:12.080
Cobden mocked the argument that England had an obligation to spread civilization and Christianity to lesser breeds.

75
00:08:12.080 --> 00:08:15.080
His reply was, physician, heal thyself.

76
00:08:15.080 --> 00:08:39.080
This is Cobden speaking. I think as a corporate body, as a political community, if we can manage to do what is right and true and just to each other, if we can manage to carry out that at home, it will be about as much as we can do. I do not think I am responsible for seeing right and truth and justice carried out all over the world.

77
00:08:39.080 --> 00:08:45.240
Cobden was appalled at the fact that when it came to British imperialist

78
00:08:45.240 --> 00:08:50.760
operations overseas, when British forces blew up thousands of Indians and Chinese,

79
00:08:50.760 --> 00:08:56.000
all that the British public cared about was the death of a few British soldiers

80
00:08:56.000 --> 00:09:00.960
during those operations. The thousands of Indians and Chinese and all of the others

81
00:09:00.960 --> 00:09:06.080
meant nothing to them. And Cobden said, and this British public calls

82
00:09:06.080 --> 00:09:36.080
Revisionism was always an integral part of Cobden's analysis of foreign policy. Since the Revolution of 1688, he wrote, we have expended more than 1,500 millions of pounds in those days upon war,

83
00:09:36.080 --> 00:09:41.720
Wars, not one of which has been upon our own shores or in defense of our hearths and homes.

84
00:09:41.720 --> 00:09:48.600
He said the history of England must be rewritten, especially the history of the last century.

85
00:09:48.600 --> 00:09:59.060
A few weeks ago, our own learned president, who informed us, a dime a dozen, but who informed

86
00:09:59.060 --> 00:10:05.760
us before he went to Africa to cure AIDS there, which is, Congressman Paul will tell us which

87
00:10:05.760 --> 00:10:12.400
Article of the Constitution authorizes that, informed us that Africa is a country with

88
00:10:12.400 --> 00:10:17.400
incredible disease.

89
00:10:17.400 --> 00:10:22.640
Well our own learned president attacked the growing threat of revisionism in the land

90
00:10:22.640 --> 00:10:27.640
and even establishment historians replied to it, you have to have revisionism, history

91
00:10:27.640 --> 00:10:30.040
is constantly revised.

92
00:10:30.040 --> 00:10:33.600
But in any case what is the alternative to revisionism, supposing we didn't have any

93
00:10:33.600 --> 00:10:34.600
revisionism?

94
00:10:34.600 --> 00:10:38.600
Then the government's lies would be enshrined forever.

95
00:10:38.600 --> 00:10:41.600
The Spaniards blew up the USS Maine in Havana Harbor.

96
00:10:41.600 --> 00:10:47.600
The Lusitania was simply a peaceful passenger ship sunk for no good reason, had no munitions aboard.

97
00:10:47.600 --> 00:10:54.600
Franklin Roosevelt toiled day and night to keep America out of war and all the rest of it.

98
00:10:54.600 --> 00:10:59.600
No wonder that Bush's handlers are so afraid of revisionism.

99
00:10:59.600 --> 00:11:04.800
The most fundamental reason for opposition to war and its concomitants, imperialism and militarism,

100
00:11:04.800 --> 00:11:09.200
was stated succinctly by John Bright. None of these people are pacifists, by the way,

101
00:11:09.200 --> 00:11:14.480
they're all in favor of defending their own country, but unnecessary wars, gratuitous wars,

102
00:11:15.360 --> 00:11:20.800
horrified them. And John Bright, during one of his great speeches denouncing the war in the Crimea,

103
00:11:21.440 --> 00:11:28.560
and criticizing those who speak glibly of the need to go to war, he said, what is war? I believe

104
00:11:28.560 --> 00:11:33.560
I believe that half the people who talk about war have not the slightest idea of what it is.

105
00:11:33.560 --> 00:11:36.560
In a short sentence, it may be summed up as this.

106
00:11:36.560 --> 00:11:43.560
War is the combination and concentration of all the horrors, atrocities, crimes and sufferings

107
00:11:43.560 --> 00:11:47.560
of which human nature on this globe is capable.

108
00:11:47.560 --> 00:11:52.560
We can contrast with John Bright's compassion for those who suffer in wartime.

109
00:11:52.560 --> 00:11:57.560
Contrast with that the attitude of a prominent neoconservative,

110
00:11:57.560 --> 00:12:01.960
David Brooks, who wrote in the Murdoch Subsidized Weekly Standard

111
00:12:01.960 --> 00:12:04.660
The next few years will be defined by conflict.

112
00:12:04.660 --> 00:12:07.300
We will destroy innocent villages by accident,

113
00:12:07.300 --> 00:12:10.260
shrug our shoulders, and continue fighting.

114
00:12:10.260 --> 00:12:13.360
In an age of conflict, get this, in an age of conflict,

115
00:12:13.360 --> 00:12:15.820
bourgeois virtues,

116
00:12:15.820 --> 00:12:20.820
what, he's some kind of aristocrat from the Upper West Side,

117
00:12:20.820 --> 00:12:24.160
in an age of conflict, bourgeois virtues like compassion,

118
00:12:24.160 --> 00:12:35.360
Tolerance and industriousness are valued less than the classical virtues of courage, steadfastness, and a ruthless desire for victory.

119
00:12:35.360 --> 00:12:42.060
Brooks, like his fellow neocons, like to posture and talk as if they were modern-day Achilles and Hectors.

120
00:12:42.060 --> 00:12:48.460
But they're a little different from these ancient Greek and Trojan heroes.

121
00:12:48.460 --> 00:12:53.660
The neocons have never actually fought in combat, unlike Achilles and Hector, for instance,

122
00:12:53.660 --> 00:12:59.660
and they never will and it's not their children who will ever fight. You can count on that.

123
00:13:01.020 --> 00:13:05.660
David Brooks, incidentally, is the same great neocon intellectual. I mean they're really such

124
00:13:06.220 --> 00:13:10.540
intellectuals they must impress the hell out of President Bush.

125
00:13:13.820 --> 00:13:17.740
Brooks is the man who reviewed Ayn Rand's letters in the New York Times book review

126
00:13:17.740 --> 00:13:22.660
when they came out a few years ago and he attacked her for using the term

127
00:13:22.660 --> 00:13:29.620
parasites at the very same time when the news was beginning to come in of the

128
00:13:29.620 --> 00:13:36.540
Nazi massacre of the European Jews whom the Nazis also referred to as parasites

129
00:13:36.540 --> 00:13:42.180
right he actually wrote this it's tough well I don't want to say I published a

130
00:13:42.180 --> 00:13:47.260
little comment on that in Liberty magazine but I don't want to mention

131
00:13:47.260 --> 00:13:55.260
Or we can take Michael Ledin as another example of a neocon who blithely preaches the glories of war.

132
00:13:55.260 --> 00:14:03.260
After the Battle of Iraq, he writes, now it comes to Damascus, Tehran, Tripoli, Pyongyang, and Riyadh.

133
00:14:03.260 --> 00:14:07.260
They are on the list for invasion and overthrow.

134
00:14:07.260 --> 00:14:15.260
America must now go to war against Syria, Iran, Libya, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia.

135
00:14:15.260 --> 00:14:21.100
Arabia, Endless War and Endless Death.

136
00:14:21.100 --> 00:14:29.180
I am almost tempted to want to see it happen, to see this neocon dream come true, as C.S.

137
00:14:29.180 --> 00:14:36.400
Lewis said of his villains in his great Christian novel, That Hideous Strength, in their arrogance

138
00:14:36.400 --> 00:14:43.020
and their diabolical pride, they have pulled down deep heaven upon their heads and it utterly

139
00:14:43.020 --> 00:14:51.100
destroyed them. Today the state presents itself in two aspects, as the welfare

140
00:14:51.100 --> 00:14:57.020
state and as the warfare state. These two manifestations of the state are

141
00:14:57.020 --> 00:15:02.640
intimately intertwined. The welfare warfare state is a concept that Murray

142
00:15:02.640 --> 00:15:07.820
Rothbard used to analyze the state in its current phase. Herbert Spencer

143
00:15:07.820 --> 00:15:12.060
incidentally had already commented on the association of state coercion at home

144
00:15:12.060 --> 00:15:19.180
Home and Abroad. First, the warfare state supports and enhances the welfare state. A victorious

145
00:15:19.180 --> 00:15:24.740
warfare state, as the United States has tended to be, produces in its subject population

146
00:15:24.740 --> 00:15:29.940
a perverted pride and an infantile gratitude which translate into the readiness to welcome

147
00:15:29.940 --> 00:15:35.900
state action at home. This ideological shift has been brilliantly documented in modern

148
00:15:35.900 --> 00:15:42.700
and American History by Robert Higgs and his magisterial work Crisis and Leviathan.

149
00:15:42.700 --> 00:15:48.860
And is it an accident that our great war presidents, from Lincoln to Wilson to Roosevelt, Truman,

150
00:15:48.860 --> 00:15:54.140
Lyndon Johnson, have also been the greatest promoters of statism at home.

151
00:15:54.140 --> 00:15:59.380
In turn, an expanding welfare state prepares the people for state intervention and war

152
00:15:59.380 --> 00:16:01.820
abroad.

153
00:16:01.820 --> 00:16:06.700
The attitude of most Americans is reflected, I think, in the college students I run across.

154
00:16:06.700 --> 00:16:11.820
Not at the Mises Institute, I hasten to add. Our students are terrific, but at my own school

155
00:16:11.820 --> 00:16:20.660
and elsewhere. Their attitude on any domestic government welfare program is, why not? A

156
00:16:20.660 --> 00:16:25.580
problem exists. The media and their professors tell them it is a burning problem, the homeless

157
00:16:25.580 --> 00:16:31.360
prescription drugs for the elderly, whatever. So the natural, the inevitable solution that

158
00:16:31.360 --> 00:16:36.360
set up a welfare program and funnel taxpayers' dollars to it.

159
00:16:36.360 --> 00:16:39.360
Why not? No one ever told them.

160
00:16:39.360 --> 00:16:45.360
They have the slightest suspicion that there are principled and constitutional limits to what the government may do.

161
00:16:45.360 --> 00:16:50.360
Whenever something hurts, it's the government's job to fix it.

162
00:16:50.360 --> 00:16:57.360
Well then, now there's a problem overseas in some foreign country where some foreign people are hurting.

163
00:16:57.360 --> 00:17:06.060
Hurting, hurting, Bush used that term, his job is to help people who are hurting.

164
00:17:06.060 --> 00:17:13.460
People are hurting in Somalia, in Bosnia, Kosovo, or unliberated women in Afghanistan or wherever.

165
00:17:13.460 --> 00:17:18.160
The natural, the inevitable reaction now is to turn to the U.S. government.

166
00:17:18.160 --> 00:17:19.260
Well, why not?

167
00:17:19.260 --> 00:17:24.960
Isn't that the job of the U.S. government to right every wrong, to wipe away every tear anywhere,

168
00:17:24.960 --> 00:17:32.960
Central to the whole issue of war and peace is the question of language.

169
00:17:32.960 --> 00:17:39.960
The libertarian psychiatrist or rather anti-psychiatrist Thomas Saz has written,

170
00:17:39.960 --> 00:17:44.960
In the animal kingdom, the rule is eat or be eaten.

171
00:17:44.960 --> 00:17:49.960
In the human kingdom, the rule is define or be defined.

172
00:17:49.960 --> 00:18:03.960
This is nowhere more true than in the world of politics. Language, definitions of key terms are central to it, since most people, that's the way they are, judge more from words than realities.

173
00:18:03.960 --> 00:18:14.960
George Orwell was well aware of this. That is why in 1984, the state agency in charge of torturing and killing political opponents is called the Ministry of Love.

174
00:18:14.960 --> 00:18:21.960
and why the agency in charge of the incessant fabrication of new lies is called the Ministry of Truth.

175
00:18:21.960 --> 00:18:28.960
The statists have and continue to use the power of definition or redefinition with very great success.

176
00:18:28.960 --> 00:18:32.960
Probably their greatest success has been with the term isolationist.

177
00:18:32.960 --> 00:18:36.960
This goes back at least to the very end of the 19th century.

178
00:18:36.960 --> 00:18:41.960
William Graham Sumner complained that his opposition to the Spanish-American War,

179
00:18:41.960 --> 00:18:47.960
The War Against the Philippines and against the large policy of Theodore Roosevelt

180
00:18:47.960 --> 00:18:53.960
By the way, the neocons loved Theodore Roosevelt, of whom Charles Beard, the great historian, said

181
00:18:53.960 --> 00:19:01.960
he was probably the only important figure in American history, whoever thought that war was good in itself.

182
00:19:01.960 --> 00:19:09.960
So, Sumner opposed these policies and he was dismissed as an isolationist. But Sumner already had the repost.

183
00:19:09.960 --> 00:19:16.960
He said he was an isolationist only insofar as he wished to isolate his country from war.

184
00:19:16.960 --> 00:19:20.960
Imagine, calling someone like Sumner or Cobden or other great classical liberals,

185
00:19:20.960 --> 00:19:26.660
who promoted world-spanning free trade based on the gold standard, isolationists.

186
00:19:26.660 --> 00:19:28.460
But the term stuck.

187
00:19:28.460 --> 00:19:34.460
Now, anyone who was in favor of non-intervention, anyone opposed to U.S. meddling anywhere in the world,

188
00:19:34.460 --> 00:19:39.460
bombing at will peoples who have never attacked us, opposed any threat of attack,

189
00:19:39.460 --> 00:19:42.160
is dismissed as an isolationist.

190
00:19:42.160 --> 00:19:44.260
There are other examples.

191
00:19:44.260 --> 00:19:48.560
In the old days, the U.S. government had a war department,

192
00:19:48.560 --> 00:19:50.060
as well as a department of the Navy.

193
00:19:50.060 --> 00:19:51.460
That was clear enough.

194
00:19:51.460 --> 00:19:53.960
Its job was to wage war.

195
00:19:53.960 --> 00:19:55.560
On our road to World War II, for instance,

196
00:19:55.560 --> 00:20:00.160
a man named Henry Stimson was actually called the Secretary of War.

197
00:20:00.160 --> 00:20:03.460
As a great revisionist historian, Charles Tanzler, commented,

198
00:20:03.460 --> 00:20:07.660
no one ever deserved the name war.

199
00:20:07.660 --> 00:20:19.060
But in 1946, the War Department was amalgamated with the Navy and the Air Force was added to produce the Department of Defense, some defense department.

200
00:20:19.060 --> 00:20:31.460
After expending trillions of taxpayers' money, it turned out that this Department of Defense could not even defend its own headquarters from attack.

201
00:20:31.460 --> 00:20:35.660
No one seems to think there's anything strange about that.

202
00:20:35.660 --> 00:20:38.780
But the redefinition was a masterful stroke.

203
00:20:38.780 --> 00:20:42.220
Now all the trillions the government ends up eating and waging war,

204
00:20:42.220 --> 00:20:47.180
preparing to wage war all over the globe, are called defense expenditures.

205
00:20:47.180 --> 00:20:49.660
Even our people call them defense expenditures.

206
00:20:51.900 --> 00:20:54.860
Nowadays the government's wars are given propaganda names,

207
00:20:55.420 --> 00:20:57.660
which are supposed to ratify them by definition.

208
00:20:58.220 --> 00:21:03.660
In bygone days there were neutral names for military operations, overlord, torch and so on.

209
00:21:03.660 --> 00:21:18.660
Now we have Operation Enduring Freedom. Enduring Freedom is supposed to be what the U.S. military was supposed to bring to Afghanistan, of all places where freedom is likely to endure.

210
00:21:18.660 --> 00:21:29.660
Before there was an Operation Rescue Democracy to Haiti, that beacon of Jeffersonian democracy that is an inspiration to the world.

211
00:21:29.660 --> 00:21:38.900
Incidentally, the first propaganda use I can find for a military operation is Adolf Hitler's

212
00:21:38.900 --> 00:21:41.500
name for the invasion of Russia.

213
00:21:41.500 --> 00:21:46.740
He called it Operation Barbarossa, after the German emperor who led a Christian crusade

214
00:21:46.740 --> 00:21:48.700
to the east.

215
00:21:48.700 --> 00:21:53.160
Now we have Operation Iraqi Freedom, at least the hacks in the Pentagon.

216
00:21:53.160 --> 00:22:05.160
This time, smart enough not to name it Operation Iraqi Liberty, the initials would have sounded funny.

217
00:22:05.160 --> 00:22:17.160
There's nowadays the use of the term terrorists and Islamic terrorists, but this has not meant the KLA,

218
00:22:17.160 --> 00:22:21.580
KLA, the so-called Kosovo Liberation Army, on behalf of which the United States went

219
00:22:21.580 --> 00:22:27.880
to war with Serbia in 1999, bombed the hell out of those courageous people.

220
00:22:27.880 --> 00:22:34.080
This KLA, composed of militant Muslims, was by every common definition a terrorist organization.

221
00:22:34.080 --> 00:22:38.880
In fact, the U.S. State Department had labeled it a terrorist organization a few years before.

222
00:22:38.880 --> 00:22:43.460
The aim of the group was to eject the Serbian government and the Serbian population from

223
00:22:43.460 --> 00:22:51.460
from the province of Kosovo by assassination and other terrorist acts, typical policy of terrorist groups.

224
00:22:51.460 --> 00:23:01.460
By the way, this is an excellent book, a classic book called The First Casualty by Philip Knightley

225
00:23:01.460 --> 00:23:08.460
and his added chapters bringing it through the First Gulf War.

226
00:23:08.460 --> 00:23:14.900
The First Casualty, the famous saying, the first casualty of war is truth, and what he

227
00:23:14.900 --> 00:23:23.100
deals with are the government's lies from the time of the Civil War through the first

228
00:23:23.100 --> 00:23:24.380
Gulf War.

229
00:23:24.380 --> 00:23:30.860
And let me just mention, I'm getting tired of people talking about something being disingenuous,

230
00:23:30.860 --> 00:23:35.020
when what they mean is that it's a lie.

231
00:23:35.020 --> 00:23:41.460
It's as if these journalists have discovered the word disingenuous and are kind of showing off a little bit.

232
00:23:41.460 --> 00:23:48.660
We're talking about lies. We're talking about deliberate fabrications.

233
00:23:48.660 --> 00:23:52.980
The Serbians were supposed to have committed genocide against Albanians in Kosovo.

234
00:23:52.980 --> 00:23:58.780
It was just like the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. No sign of genocide was ever found.

235
00:23:58.780 --> 00:24:07.380
Just some 2,100 or so corpses never identified as to whether they were Albanian fighters or Serbian forces or civilian bystanders.

236
00:24:07.380 --> 00:24:09.980
It was all a lie.

237
00:24:09.980 --> 00:24:13.080
But who remembers his ancient history?

238
00:24:13.080 --> 00:24:23.380
Meanwhile, the Albanian Muslim militants have killed and chased out the remaining Serbs in Kosovo and blown up over 100 ancient Christian churches and shrines.

239
00:24:23.380 --> 00:24:38.380
I think it was bad for the Taliban to have blown up those Buddhist statues, but why doesn't anybody mention these hundred ancient Christian shrines in Kosovo that have been desecrated, blown up, destroyed by the Albanian Muslims?

240
00:24:38.380 --> 00:24:43.380
We don't hear about those because we were on the side of those Albanian Muslims.

241
00:24:43.380 --> 00:24:52.380
Then they talk about peacekeepers. Why peacekeepers instead of occupiers? Well, peacekeepers sounds a lot better.

242
00:24:52.380 --> 00:24:56.620
seems that the U.S. government is going to bring some thousands of Turkish peacekeepers

243
00:24:56.620 --> 00:25:02.260
into Iraq. There are already a few thousand Polish peacekeepers in place. All of them

244
00:25:02.260 --> 00:25:09.140
and all the rest of the coalition of the willing, coalition of the billing is what it was called,

245
00:25:09.140 --> 00:25:14.020
our modern day Hessians. Like the Hessians in the American Revolution, today the client

246
00:25:14.020 --> 00:25:18.360
states of the U.S. government sell their own conscript soldiers. In the case of Turkey,

247
00:25:18.360 --> 00:25:27.360
The Office of Soldiers was preceded by an offer of 8 billion dollars in an American loan.

248
00:25:27.360 --> 00:25:34.360
The Turkish people, the democracy, opposed sending the troops, but the Turkish elite overrode the people.

249
00:25:34.360 --> 00:25:40.360
Bankrupt states like Turkey and Poland sent peacekeepers to act as surrogates for our own mercenaries.

250
00:25:40.360 --> 00:25:43.360
It's all bought and paid for by American tax dollars.

251
00:25:43.360 --> 00:25:59.360
Today world politics floats on an ocean of American taxpayers' money. Foreign aid is not to feed starving Africans, but to cover the budget deficits of the ruling elites, bribing them to fall in line with the policies of the U.S. government elite.

252
00:25:59.360 --> 00:26:08.360
Dr. Paul last week delivered a characteristically courageous and a characteristically blistering attack on foreign aid on the floor of the House.

253
00:26:08.360 --> 00:26:18.360
I just want to say that there have been, since I started following politics many years ago, a few good men in Congress.

254
00:26:18.360 --> 00:26:26.360
Senator Robert Taft, for instance, I was the head of the Students for Taft in New York City in 1952.

255
00:26:26.360 --> 00:26:33.360
It was a very important position and I did a lot of good.

256
00:26:33.360 --> 00:26:37.360
Well, it was me against Wall Street. What do you expect?

257
00:26:37.360 --> 00:26:47.360
I shook the hand of Robert Taft. But to my mind, Ron Paul is the greatest member of Congress to have served in my lifetime.

258
00:26:47.360 --> 00:26:53.360
Now everyone keeps bringing up George Orwell in his novel, 1984.

259
00:26:53.360 --> 00:27:02.360
Let's remember that the protagonist of 1984, Winston Smith, had a job at the Ministry of Truth.

260
00:27:02.360 --> 00:27:13.360
His specialty was scanning old newspapers for articles and pictures that did not jibe with the current party line, because the party, big brother, was always right.

261
00:27:13.360 --> 00:27:26.360
Winston Smith accomplished this by excising, offending materials from the old files, tossing them down the memory hole, you know the term memory hole or Wellian memory hole,

262
00:27:26.360 --> 00:27:31.360
shooting them down to the furnaces in the depths of the Ministry of Truth.

263
00:27:31.360 --> 00:27:37.360
Today, no such cleansing of the historical record is necessary.

264
00:27:37.360 --> 00:27:41.360
Amazingly, what a comment on human nature.

265
00:27:41.360 --> 00:27:45.360
The true historical record is right there, everywhere.

266
00:27:45.360 --> 00:27:50.360
It continues to exist in hard copy in thousands of libraries.

267
00:27:50.360 --> 00:27:57.360
It's on the internet, it's on tens of thousands of personal hard drives all around the world.

268
00:27:57.360 --> 00:28:05.120
To take an example, check out Jim Boevard's excellent article last Thursday on lewrockwell.com,

269
00:28:05.120 --> 00:28:12.880
the 20th anniversary of the killing of 240 or so U.S. Marines in Beirut, and Boevard tells a story

270
00:28:12.880 --> 00:28:20.800
as everybody knows it is now, but that are lied about by the government at the time, and now no

271
00:28:20.800 --> 00:28:50.040
The Founding Fathers warned us especially against entangling alliances, George Washington from the Farewell Address,

272
00:28:50.040 --> 00:28:55.480
The nation which indulges towards another, and habitual hatred or habitual fondness,

273
00:28:55.480 --> 00:28:58.000
is to some degree a slave.

274
00:28:58.000 --> 00:29:04.200
Against the wilds of foreign influence, I conjure you to believe me, fellow citizens,

275
00:29:04.200 --> 00:29:09.600
the jealousy of the free people ought to be constantly awake.

276
00:29:09.600 --> 00:29:15.700
In Jefferson's first inaugural address, peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations

277
00:29:15.700 --> 00:29:18.760
entangling alliances with none.

278
00:29:18.760 --> 00:29:35.760
The founding fathers understood that war is the chief enemy of liberty and that the delicate constitutional balance they established could not prevail against endless wars.

279
00:29:35.760 --> 00:29:40.760
They also understood that entangling alliances would entangle us in such wars.

280
00:29:40.760 --> 00:29:45.760
Do we have such alliances today? Obviously there is NATO, which is never going to end.

281
00:29:45.760 --> 00:29:53.760
It's probably outlive the European countries, maybe the United States itself.

282
00:29:53.760 --> 00:29:57.760
It's a perpetual military bureaucracy.

283
00:29:57.760 --> 00:30:07.760
And then there is, most of all, the unconditional support and the continual immense subsidies that the U.S. government gives to Israel.

284
00:30:07.760 --> 00:30:15.920
Now, whenever anybody criticizes Israel, the Zionist Amen Corner starts yelling anti-Semite.

285
00:30:15.920 --> 00:30:21.840
What can you do? It's like institutional racism. You know, how can you defend yourself against

286
00:30:21.840 --> 00:30:27.840
something like that? But is it anti-Semitism that leads Jews like Norman Solomon, Noam Chomsky,

287
00:30:27.840 --> 00:30:35.680
Norman Finkelstein, the libertarian, a friend of mine, Sheldon Richmond, to condemn Israeli

288
00:30:35.680 --> 00:30:38.480
and the Oppression of the Palestinians.

289
00:30:38.480 --> 00:30:46.260
Is it because they are anti-Semites that heroic Israelis like Rory Avnery and Ron Hacoen,

290
00:30:46.260 --> 00:30:52.760
you can read their articles on antiwar.com, attack their own government's murderous policies

291
00:30:52.760 --> 00:30:55.360
towards the Arabs?

292
00:30:55.360 --> 00:31:01.300
As Americans we cannot and must not have a foreign policy one of whose epicenters is the

293
00:31:01.300 --> 00:31:06.860
The Ruthless Expansionism of Ariel Sharon and the Liquid Party.

294
00:31:06.860 --> 00:31:14.140
Well, finally, I have to confess that my bitterness towards this administration and its neocon

295
00:31:14.140 --> 00:31:21.020
handlers is in part based on a personal element here.

296
00:31:21.020 --> 00:31:27.340
In my sunset years, I have looked forward to a well-deserved retirement.

297
00:31:27.340 --> 00:31:33.420
Enjoying my remaining time, reading, doing some research, and most of all, enjoying the

298
00:31:33.420 --> 00:31:42.780
winter wonderland that is Buffalo, New York.

299
00:31:42.780 --> 00:31:47.020
But the Bush government and the neocons have filled me with feelings I never thought I

300
00:31:47.020 --> 00:31:50.180
would have and I do not know how to cope with.

301
00:31:50.180 --> 00:31:55.980
Honestly, I never thought that I would regret Bill Clinton and wish that Bill Clinton were

302
00:31:55.980 --> 00:32:12.540
I never ever thought I would regret Janet Reno, who was a predecessor of our great John Ashcroft.

303
00:32:12.540 --> 00:32:18.020
For that and much else to this administration and its supporters, I say damn them, damn them all.

304
00:32:19.020 --> 00:32:21.020
Thank you very much.
