WEBVTT

NOTE The Politics of Recession

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.100
Thank you, Mark, and good afternoon, one and all.

2
00:00:04.100 --> 00:00:07.600
I am very pleased and indeed honored to address you,

3
00:00:07.600 --> 00:00:13.400
the friends and supporters of the Ludwig von Mises Institute today.

4
00:00:13.400 --> 00:00:23.000
Yes, it's true, as some of you are aware, I did work in a Bush administration.

5
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:29.300
For some 16 months, I was chief economist in the United States Department of Labor.

6
00:00:29.300 --> 00:00:38.300
I took a walk on the dark side, you might say, tried to sip from the cup of power.

7
00:00:38.300 --> 00:00:40.300
Well, how could I do that?

8
00:00:40.300 --> 00:00:46.800
Well, we know human motivation is complex, so to put the best spin on it,

9
00:00:46.800 --> 00:00:55.300
I'd attribute it to frustration over governmental policy and maybe a certain naiveté.

10
00:00:55.300 --> 00:01:07.700
Although true, it may have been more sinister as Samuel Johnson observed in 1773 about human weakness,

11
00:01:07.700 --> 00:01:16.500
quote, wickedness is always easier than virtue, for it takes the shortcut to everything, unquote.

12
00:01:16.500 --> 00:01:27.500
So, condemn me if you must, yet I saw economic policy and propaganda being made in close relief.

13
00:01:27.500 --> 00:01:34.500
And my conclusion, I'm a straight, get to the bottom line guy,

14
00:01:34.500 --> 00:01:45.500
the low opinion I held of government before I went to Washington D.C. was not elevated by participation in same.

15
00:01:45.500 --> 00:02:03.500
Another way to put this bottom line is that I saw a complete disconnect between reality, that is the economics of the business slump, politics and proper policy.

16
00:02:03.500 --> 00:02:10.500
I repeat, there was a complete and total disconnect between economics and politics.

17
00:02:10.500 --> 00:02:22.500
Now, the more cynical of you, and there are some gathered here today, will be nonplussed by my observation.

18
00:02:22.500 --> 00:02:32.500
After all, FDR ridiculed the sign on his Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau's desk.

19
00:02:32.500 --> 00:02:39.500
Does it contribute to recovery with the rejoinder, this is politics?

20
00:02:39.500 --> 00:02:46.100
The devious Mr. Roosevelt meant that the New Deal was, quote,

21
00:02:46.100 --> 00:02:54.600
not about economic recovery, but about displacing business as the nation's predominant elite, unquote.

22
00:02:54.600 --> 00:03:01.000
That's according to the Wall Street Journal columnist Robert L. Bartley a few days ago.

23
00:03:01.000 --> 00:03:08.100
On the other hand, there are some more earnest types present, I'm guessing.

24
00:03:08.100 --> 00:03:22.380
And you might recognize that this continuing disconnect between intervention and our scientific knowledge of recessions is a disaster.

25
00:03:22.380 --> 00:03:27.300
Why? One way to put it is, as Mises observed,

26
00:03:27.300 --> 00:03:34.980
the main issues of present-day politics are essentially economic.

27
00:03:34.980 --> 00:03:41.840
I want to put this latest recession in context, and if we need definitions of politics or recession,

28
00:03:41.840 --> 00:03:46.980
I'd be happy to supply them as I do in this paper, but I don't think we need them.

29
00:03:46.980 --> 00:03:55.700
When the Bush administration took office in January of 2001, a downturn was already underway.

30
00:03:55.700 --> 00:04:01.500
The president and his coterie said so and blamed Clinton.

31
00:04:01.500 --> 00:04:03.500
Who else?

32
00:04:03.500 --> 00:04:08.860
But hushed up when they were accused of talking the economy down.

33
00:04:08.860 --> 00:04:10.980
Some of you may recall that.

34
00:04:10.980 --> 00:04:16.100
OK, the hush-up was a mistake.

35
00:04:16.100 --> 00:04:18.340
A dose of truth about the economy,

36
00:04:18.340 --> 00:04:21.860
along the lines of the early 1980s Reagan model,

37
00:04:21.860 --> 00:04:23.500
would have worked better.

38
00:04:23.500 --> 00:04:25.100
Would have worked better.

39
00:04:25.100 --> 00:04:29.260
But they learned or mislearned an early lesson

40
00:04:29.260 --> 00:04:33.420
about Psychology and Confidence in Washington, D.C.

41
00:04:33.420 --> 00:04:35.740
You don't have to work there very long

42
00:04:35.740 --> 00:04:40.440
to find out that politics is all about the confidence game.

43
00:04:40.440 --> 00:04:44.360
And I mean that in the very pejorative sense as well.

44
00:04:45.380 --> 00:04:50.280
And prestige, these intangibles of prestige.

45
00:04:51.540 --> 00:04:53.300
And I was immediately struck

46
00:04:53.300 --> 00:04:56.540
and I got there a week before September 11.

47
00:04:56.540 --> 00:05:01.940
I started on the job the day after Labor Day in 2001

48
00:05:01.940 --> 00:05:04.260
about how the economic news was always

49
00:05:04.260 --> 00:05:09.460
spun by administration spokespersons with pom poms,

50
00:05:09.460 --> 00:05:12.780
a flutter, cheerlead, cheerlead, cheerlead.

51
00:05:12.780 --> 00:05:15.580
Although, I think as Bill Fleckenstein,

52
00:05:15.580 --> 00:05:17.780
the financial columnist says, all of this

53
00:05:17.780 --> 00:05:20.180
is an insult to the cheerleading field.

54
00:05:20.180 --> 00:05:32.180
But as Walter Bastiat, we heard his name, I believe it was from Sean earlier, said in the 19th century, he says,

55
00:05:32.180 --> 00:05:37.180
quote, the people are most credulous when they are most happy, unquote.

56
00:05:37.180 --> 00:05:43.180
So make the people happy, foundation or no.

57
00:05:43.180 --> 00:06:00.180
Now, politicos and mainstream economists believe that our fragile, and I've got to use quotation marks, sorry, capitalist economy depends critically on sustaining confidence.

58
00:06:00.180 --> 00:06:10.180
This month, Martin Feldstein, I always want to say Marty, but I don't know the man, Marty Feldstein, go ahead Morgan.

59
00:06:10.180 --> 00:06:22.680
Once President Reagan's Chief Economic Advisor, he wrote in the Wall Street Journal earlier this month, that's all I read, of course, is the Wall Street Journal, but hey, for the mainstream, where better to go?

60
00:06:22.680 --> 00:06:25.180
Okay, New York Times, right, left, mainstream.

61
00:06:25.180 --> 00:06:55.180
Feldstein wrote quote, because confidence is so important for spending decisions the declining number of jobs until the September report created the risk of a self-fulfilling prophecy of low demand and weaker employment and that's why the recent upturn in employment plus 57,000 jobs you know that's rounding error that's sampling error it's just just nonsense but it was the first positive report

62
00:06:55.180 --> 00:07:00.440
Report in 2003, so hooray, hooray, hooray.

63
00:07:00.440 --> 00:07:01.500
OK, end of quote.

64
00:07:01.500 --> 00:07:03.140
Now, I ended it a little earlier.

65
00:07:03.140 --> 00:07:04.900
Probably got that.

66
00:07:04.900 --> 00:07:09.340
Wall Street or Washington DC, these economists

67
00:07:09.340 --> 00:07:12.140
are all Keynesians now.

68
00:07:12.140 --> 00:07:15.140
That was indicated by, I think, Roger and Sean

69
00:07:15.140 --> 00:07:16.700
in earlier remarks.

70
00:07:16.700 --> 00:07:17.900
It's just amazing.

71
00:07:17.900 --> 00:07:19.900
It's just flabbergasting.

72
00:07:19.900 --> 00:07:23.100
Well, to me, naive child that I am.

73
00:07:23.100 --> 00:07:32.900
And they believe spending and keeping it pumped up are about all that matters as keys to prosperity.

74
00:07:32.900 --> 00:07:39.900
They know a lot that just ain't so, but I always look for the soft underbelly.

75
00:07:39.900 --> 00:07:50.300
They know enough. They suspect enough is amiss, however, in our fundamentally sound economy.

76
00:07:50.300 --> 00:07:54.620
Read my lips, it's fundamentally sound.

77
00:07:54.620 --> 00:08:00.460
They just hired a quote, strong crisis manager, unquote,

78
00:08:00.460 --> 00:08:05.220
at the New York Federal Reserve Bank, a guy named Timothy Geithner,

79
00:08:05.220 --> 00:08:08.140
who worked in the Clinton Treasury Department

80
00:08:08.140 --> 00:08:12.020
and was president of the IMF, the International Monetary Fund.

81
00:08:12.020 --> 00:08:15.460
Gee, I wonder why they're interested in somebody who's got strong crisis

82
00:08:15.460 --> 00:08:17.820
management skills.

83
00:08:17.820 --> 00:08:25.580
Could it be that ever since at least certainly the Mexican crisis, that crisis management is the key?

84
00:08:25.580 --> 00:08:27.900
I didn't ever know this about central banking.

85
00:08:27.900 --> 00:08:32.580
I thought they were just stingy guys that kept the tight rein on the money supply.

86
00:08:32.580 --> 00:08:37.660
Remember that old era or mythology?

87
00:08:37.660 --> 00:08:43.660
Now, also as a contextual remark about our latest recession,

88
00:08:43.660 --> 00:09:07.660
Note that since September 11th, a new war, or is it a portfolio of wars, has been initiated, and that replaced the late lamented end of the Cold War, fortunately, and that's pushed this whole, the economy, into a distant second place, but in the public mind, or in public opinion.

89
00:09:07.660 --> 00:09:23.660
So the public has cut the administration, and of course the public doesn't know a whole lot about the Federal Reserve, but cut them plenty of slack, though it may prove exhausted come November 2004.

90
00:09:23.660 --> 00:09:31.660
And people in the administration are definitely getting nervous. They're not entirely sure of re-election.

91
00:09:31.660 --> 00:09:41.660
Now, I want to go back, following those remarks about the recent situation, to look at predecessors and policy.

92
00:09:41.660 --> 00:09:54.660
Now, FDR, as many of you know, but some don't, perhaps, FDR didn't invent counter-cyclical policy to fix a business slump.

93
00:09:54.660 --> 00:10:03.280
No, we can always look to the Republicans for such innovation. And it was a

94
00:10:03.280 --> 00:10:11.220
Republican president of course who set the table for counter cyclical fiscal

95
00:10:11.220 --> 00:10:16.180
policy, if not monetary policy, Herbert Hoover. And I want to go back and review

96
00:10:16.180 --> 00:10:23.740
a little bit of that. Remember that the last so-called free market recession

97
00:10:23.740 --> 00:10:38.740
was sharp but brief in 1920-21, by some standards it lasted sort of a typical recession period, I think it was eight months of downturn.

98
00:10:38.740 --> 00:10:43.740
Now the Harding administration, yeah we know Warren Harding fortunately was busy doing other things,

99
00:10:43.740 --> 00:10:48.740
but there was a lot of precedent in federal tradition.

100
00:10:48.740 --> 00:10:54.740
The administration stood by and did nothing because, quote,

101
00:10:54.740 --> 00:10:57.740
everything was too high, unquote.

102
00:10:57.740 --> 00:11:01.740
In other words, people were used to having prices generally,

103
00:11:01.740 --> 00:11:07.740
money prices come down as money wages come down after a war, after the World War.

104
00:11:07.740 --> 00:11:14.740
And the depression was something that, quote, ran its course like measles, unquote.

105
00:11:14.740 --> 00:11:19.740
So, you know, public opinion was way different back when.

106
00:11:19.740 --> 00:11:26.740
There was, yes, political pressure to intervene in 1920-21.

107
00:11:26.740 --> 00:11:32.740
But the favored theory of earlier business crises carried the day last time.

108
00:11:32.740 --> 00:11:40.740
Quote, businessmen got themselves into this mess, so let them get themselves out of it, unquote.

109
00:11:40.740 --> 00:11:51.740
One of the activists arguing in favor of intervention in 1921 was the progressive Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover.

110
00:11:51.740 --> 00:12:02.740
And the Republican Party member was a party of progress. It was filled with leftists of the respectable sort as Herbert Hoover.

111
00:12:02.740 --> 00:12:14.740
When the roaring 20s came to a roaring stop, we can mark it with the stock market crash in late October 1929,

112
00:12:14.740 --> 00:12:22.740
the great engineer Herbert Hoover was in place to administer his remedies.

113
00:12:22.740 --> 00:12:32.740
And Mr. Forward-Looking would take on the business cycle and as Paul Johnson, the British historian or English historian said,

114
00:12:32.740 --> 00:12:39.740
Stomp it flat with all the resources of government, unquote.

115
00:12:39.740 --> 00:12:45.740
And Hoover was also called the Wonder Boy and in his memoirs he recalls, quote,

116
00:12:45.740 --> 00:12:51.740
No president before had ever believed there was a governmental responsibility in such cases.

117
00:12:51.740 --> 00:12:58.780
Therefore, we had to pioneer a new field."

118
00:12:58.780 --> 00:13:05.380
And now the parallels between Hoover's policies and rhetoric

119
00:13:05.380 --> 00:13:09.540
and the current Bush-Greenspan policies are remarkable.

120
00:13:09.540 --> 00:13:11.180
And I'll tick off some of these.

121
00:13:11.180 --> 00:13:18.460
Hoover inflated credit and bullied banks into lending, keep the party going.

122
00:13:18.460 --> 00:13:23.700
He signed the Agricultural Marketing Act to subsidize farming.

123
00:13:23.700 --> 00:13:34.700
He pursued a high-wage policy by a variety of measures including extracting corporate pledges to not cut wage rates.

124
00:13:34.700 --> 00:13:41.400
He also signed the Norris LaGuardia Act, anti-injection act, to help empower labor unions.

125
00:13:41.400 --> 00:13:45.400
A fourth area was that he cut taxes heavily.

126
00:13:45.400 --> 00:13:57.400
He did that initially, and then later on they were raised when he lost control of Congress because he'd lost the battle for public opinion.

127
00:13:57.400 --> 00:14:07.400
He pushed federal expenditures up by 42% in one year, shows you things are good. That's not that bad at least.

128
00:14:07.400 --> 00:14:14.400
And he drove the burden of total government up by about five percentage points of the gross private product in one year.

129
00:14:14.400 --> 00:14:21.400
According to Murray Rothbard, he deliberately ran a huge deficit, was proud of it, thank you very much,

130
00:14:21.400 --> 00:14:25.400
and this is the conventional wisdom, of course, today.

131
00:14:25.400 --> 00:14:31.400
He started more major public works, I can name one of them out in Nevada,

132
00:14:31.400 --> 00:14:37.400
and then the federal government had embarked on in the previous 40 years,

133
00:14:37.400 --> 00:14:46.400
No, I'm sorry, correction. The previous 30 years. 30 years. That was an error. I was correcting myself. I'm good at that, yeah.

134
00:14:46.400 --> 00:14:56.400
I make errors but I correct them in a hurry. He attacked the stock exchanges and he urged the public to, quote,

135
00:14:56.400 --> 00:15:01.840
quote, invest on the basis of the future of the United States, unquote.

136
00:15:01.840 --> 00:15:09.160
Not judging value of companies based on earnings or stuff like that.

137
00:15:09.160 --> 00:15:11.920
Sound familiar?

138
00:15:11.920 --> 00:15:18.360
He signed, of course, the well-known Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act.

139
00:15:18.360 --> 00:15:23.280
He lost the confidence of foreigners, which were on the cusp of doing, it seems,

140
00:15:23.280 --> 00:15:27.400
in the dollar who began to pull out their gold.

141
00:15:27.400 --> 00:15:32.000
Then we were on an attenuated form of the gold standard.

142
00:15:32.000 --> 00:15:36.880
Well, okay, after four years of frenzied interventionism,

143
00:15:36.880 --> 00:15:39.440
what was the result?

144
00:15:39.440 --> 00:15:41.640
Everybody saw what the result was, right?

145
00:15:41.640 --> 00:15:43.000
The Hoovervilles and,

146
00:15:45.720 --> 00:15:49.440
I remember one hitchhiker, it's told, he had a sign.

147
00:15:49.440 --> 00:15:52.200
It said, pick me up or I'll vote for Hoover.

148
00:15:52.200 --> 00:16:01.200
You know, his political handler says, get off the front page, you know, after three years of this.

149
00:16:01.200 --> 00:16:10.200
And as Rothbard put it, it was a ruin, quote, unprecedented in length and intensity, unquote.

150
00:16:10.200 --> 00:16:17.200
Well, at least he didn't resort to a shooting war. I've got to give him, you know, let's look at both sides of the ledger here.

151
00:16:17.200 --> 00:16:23.000
And what did our leaders in Washington D.C. learn from this episode?

152
00:16:23.000 --> 00:16:28.800
Well, Hoover bragged, quote, I mean, did he learn anything?

153
00:16:28.800 --> 00:16:30.600
No, let's consult his memoirs.

154
00:16:30.600 --> 00:16:32.200
Quote, we might have done nothing.

155
00:16:32.200 --> 00:16:34.000
That would have been utter ruin.

156
00:16:34.000 --> 00:16:36.200
I love that word, ruin.

157
00:16:36.200 --> 00:16:40.000
Instead, we met the situation with proposals to private business

158
00:16:40.000 --> 00:16:44.900
and to Congress of the most gigantic program of economic defense

159
00:16:44.900 --> 00:16:50.500
and Counter-Attack Ever Involved in the History of the Republic."

160
00:16:50.500 --> 00:16:51.980
Gigantism.

161
00:16:51.980 --> 00:16:54.580
That's my platform.

162
00:16:54.580 --> 00:16:59.220
Rexford Tugwell, one of FDR's impudent nobodies,

163
00:16:59.220 --> 00:17:02.180
as H.L. Mencken would put it.

164
00:17:02.180 --> 00:17:04.820
Well, he's part of the brain trust,

165
00:17:04.820 --> 00:17:07.220
to put it the way historians do.

166
00:17:07.220 --> 00:17:09.060
He finally conceded in an interview

167
00:17:09.060 --> 00:17:13.340
40 years after the event, quote,

168
00:17:13.340 --> 00:17:22.500
We didn't admit it at the time, but practically the whole New Deal was extrapolated from programs that Hoover had started.

169
00:17:22.500 --> 00:17:27.100
Well, we know how counterproductive these interventions are.

170
00:17:27.100 --> 00:17:30.700
To quote Murray Rothbard,

171
00:17:30.700 --> 00:17:37.340
Whenever government intervenes in the market, it aggravates rather than settles the problems it has set out to solve.

172
00:17:37.340 --> 00:17:43.360
This is a general economic law of government intervention, unquote.

173
00:17:43.360 --> 00:17:49.740
Rothbard concludes his book on America's Great Depression,

174
00:17:49.740 --> 00:17:54.460
quote, bravely Hoover used every modern tool,

175
00:17:54.460 --> 00:17:57.940
every device of progressive and enlightened economics,

176
00:17:57.940 --> 00:18:02.660
every facet of government planning to combat the depression.

177
00:18:02.660 --> 00:18:06.660
For the first time laissez-faire was boldly thrown overboard

178
00:18:06.660 --> 00:18:11.660
and Every Government Weapon Thrown into the Breach

179
00:18:11.660 --> 00:18:14.860
and what a work of art we have.

180
00:18:14.860 --> 00:18:20.560
At least Hoover had to refute a then respectable rival,

181
00:18:20.560 --> 00:18:30.260
laissez-faire theory known as promoted by the reactionary liquidationists.

182
00:18:30.260 --> 00:18:34.160
Liquidate Andrew Mellon, the Secretary of the Treasury,

183
00:18:34.160 --> 00:18:49.160
So we need to liquidate labor, this term liquidation has a real harsh tone to it in an era of genocide but to allow bankruptcy, you know, it's just a terrible, terrible thing apparently.

184
00:18:49.160 --> 00:19:01.160
Now today reputable economists on Wall Street and inside the Beltway do not advocate laissez-faire as the corrective or non-intervention.

185
00:19:01.160 --> 00:19:13.160
But what really drives me nuts is that their economics is on a par with that once known as proposed by the monetary cranks.

186
00:19:13.160 --> 00:19:19.160
They're just monetary cranks, and yet they have all the prestige of the profession.

187
00:19:19.160 --> 00:19:26.160
What they do know in Washington is, quote, smart politics, unquote, right?

188
00:19:26.160 --> 00:19:32.960
Carl Rove will tell you what's the right thing to do on a steel tariff issue, right?

189
00:19:32.960 --> 00:19:39.560
That's where the Bush administration really lost it, in terms of a sequence of bad policies.

190
00:19:41.560 --> 00:19:46.360
The policies consist of happy talk, reassurance, it all is well.

191
00:19:46.360 --> 00:19:48.260
It's all under government control.

192
00:19:48.260 --> 00:19:50.760
That doesn't reassure me if it were true, but...

193
00:19:50.760 --> 00:19:58.360
and extravagant use of the Hoover FDR tools, you're just, you know, bigger and better.

194
00:20:00.360 --> 00:20:07.860
Mises wrote, quote, all governments are firmly committed to the policy of low interest rates, credit expansion and inflation.

195
00:20:08.560 --> 00:20:16.660
When the unavoidable aftermath of these short-term policies appears, especially if it's on my watch,

196
00:20:16.660 --> 00:20:24.660
They know of only one remedy, to go on in inflationary ventures, unquote.

197
00:20:24.660 --> 00:20:28.660
Now when they, Roger says, well how many arrows do they have in the quiver,

198
00:20:28.660 --> 00:20:32.660
when they're down to a one percentage point fed funds rate?

199
00:20:32.660 --> 00:20:36.660
In our office we would say he's got four arrows left.

200
00:20:36.660 --> 00:20:40.660
25 basis points apiece, right?

201
00:20:40.660 --> 00:20:45.660
And then Ben Bernanke comes out and he says, oh no, we can monetize long bonds,

202
00:20:45.660 --> 00:20:50.540
long bonds, et cetera, et cetera, we have the printing press, blah, blah, blah.

203
00:20:50.540 --> 00:20:59.100
And then what happened in the bond markets was interesting because when in June the committee

204
00:20:59.100 --> 00:21:06.180
came out and only reduced the Fed funds rates by 25 basis points, that's when we had an

205
00:21:06.180 --> 00:21:09.100
implosion in the bond market, right?

206
00:21:09.100 --> 00:21:14.620
Yields went up by a percentage point or more, at least on the bellwether 10 year.

207
00:21:14.620 --> 00:21:19.340
And that's when they went back to their editors and said, you know, we need to change our

208
00:21:19.340 --> 00:21:22.340
communication policy.

209
00:21:22.340 --> 00:21:28.140
They're going to doctor up the way they justify their stupid decisions.

210
00:21:28.140 --> 00:21:33.380
Okay, so that's smart politics, I guess.

211
00:21:33.380 --> 00:21:41.780
Okay, this tragic situation goes beyond the direct policymakers, of course.

212
00:21:41.780 --> 00:21:49.220
We should cite two additional groups beyond the direct policy makers, economists and the

213
00:21:49.220 --> 00:21:50.220
public.

214
00:21:50.220 --> 00:21:57.840
That sounds like a good book title, that was a book title by Bill Hutt, one of my heroes.

215
00:21:57.840 --> 00:22:03.140
Now first let's look at economists.

216
00:22:03.140 --> 00:22:08.640
What's wrong here is that they have treated monetary problems in a superficial way.

217
00:22:08.640 --> 00:22:16.640
failed to integrate money into their theory of markets. They naively embraced

218
00:22:16.640 --> 00:22:22.040
the neutral theory of money, you know, well let's just make bananas money, right?

219
00:22:22.040 --> 00:22:27.480
They build these general equilibrium models, I'll just name a commodity, one

220
00:22:27.480 --> 00:22:32.520
of them will have the monetary function. This is the kind of flippant, ahistorical

221
00:22:32.520 --> 00:22:37.960
and non-logical things they do, so that money is going to be neutral, won't

222
00:22:37.960 --> 00:22:42.960
don't have any distortive effects, any changes in the volume of money and credit, etc.

223
00:22:42.960 --> 00:22:46.960
And they failed to appreciate, the mainstream profession has failed to appreciate

224
00:22:46.960 --> 00:22:55.960
how monetary manipulation necessarily distorts markets and causes booms followed by corrective busts.

225
00:22:55.960 --> 00:23:03.960
Hence, Benjamin Strong, governor of the New York Federal Reserve Bank in the 1920s

226
00:23:03.960 --> 00:23:11.160
could say, ignorantly and without guilt, it's a low-fat statement,

227
00:23:11.160 --> 00:23:17.960
quote, I'll give a little shot of whiskey to the stock market, unquote.

228
00:23:22.600 --> 00:23:30.560
Okay, so you won't catch the revered Dr. Alan Greenspan in that same statement,

229
00:23:30.560 --> 00:23:36.560
Also known as, since his knighthood, was it knighthood?

230
00:23:36.560 --> 00:23:40.560
I don't know, the queen did something on a shoulder with a sword.

231
00:23:40.560 --> 00:23:47.560
But we would call him, not Sir Prince-a-Lot, he sure prints a lot.

232
00:23:47.560 --> 00:23:53.560
Or, you know, you want somebody in the private sector?

233
00:23:53.560 --> 00:23:56.560
Larry Kudlow, right? Larry Kudlow.

234
00:23:56.560 --> 00:24:05.200
Or, the Cato Institute, some of you might have seen the latest Cato policy report, Bill Niskanen,

235
00:24:05.200 --> 00:24:11.320
chairman of the Cato Institute, normally a sensible free market inclined economist,

236
00:24:11.320 --> 00:24:24.440
headline, monetary policy is still too tight. So, I was one lonely guy inside the beltway for 16

237
00:24:24.440 --> 00:24:44.440
No misunderstanding in economics as a science has done more harm than the role of money and credit in business boom and bust.

238
00:24:44.440 --> 00:24:51.440
Second, I've got to cane the public a little, not near as hard as the economists,

239
00:24:51.440 --> 00:24:58.320
But they need to bend over a little bit too because the public is myopic.

240
00:24:58.320 --> 00:25:05.120
They'll behave with great sense in the marketplace and do stupid things in the political arena.

241
00:25:05.120 --> 00:25:09.760
And so they've got a myopic disposition. They favor lower interest rates.

242
00:25:09.760 --> 00:25:13.400
That's the political balance of power and the culture.

243
00:25:13.400 --> 00:25:23.800
And if it's done by costless credit expansion and the authorities assures it's true, I'll believe in magic, right?

244
00:25:23.800 --> 00:25:30.100
It's just an irresistible temptation for politicians. It's the easy way.

245
00:25:30.100 --> 00:25:39.100
And bureaucrats and economists want to comply. You want to be popular.

246
00:25:39.100 --> 00:25:50.100
I don't want to go too much further. The public is pretty ignorant, but educable, and they do want to hear the truth, I insist, ultimately.

247
00:25:50.100 --> 00:26:00.100
But I can't resist concluding with respect to the issue of the public on money and fiscal policy and the politics, therefore,

248
00:26:00.100 --> 00:26:07.100
with H.L. Mencken's theory of democracy, because it surely applies all too well here.

249
00:26:07.100 --> 00:26:15.200
The public, this is the democracy, it's that system where the public gets what it wants, good and hard.

250
00:26:18.140 --> 00:26:20.140
Thank you so much for your kind attention.
