WEBVTT

NOTE Presidential Money Mismanagement from FDR to Nixon

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:11.000
All right. My topic for today is on monetary inflation. It's slightly different from what is given as a title.

2
00:00:11.000 --> 00:00:20.000
What I want to do is concentrate on how economic fascism came to the United States between the Kennedy and Nixon administrations,

3
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:25.000
and how monetary inflation was instrumental in this development.

4
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:34.000
So, I will be talking about the F word, the word that's not used in American political discourse, but that is very, very applicable.

5
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:53.000
What is economic fascism? It's a very strong term, it's emotionally laden, but we can define it so that it can be scientifically useful, so that it can identify a particular structure of policies.

6
00:00:53.000 --> 00:01:09.000
The best definition of economic fascism was given by the great John T. Flynn, the American journalist and essayist of the old right.

7
00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:20.000
In his classic work, which I highly recommend as we go marching, which was published in 1944, Flynn enumerated what he called the essential ingredients of fascism.

8
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:28.000
The first was a spending-borrowing government, which borrowed and spent huge sums on welfare programs.

9
00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:38.000
The second ingredient was militarism, not in the sense of defense, but in the sense of a huge spending program, an economic institution.

10
00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:43.000
The third ingredient was imperialism, which was the obvious handmaiden of militarism.

11
00:01:43.000 --> 00:01:52.000
and finally, rather, the fourth was a planned economy involving direct government interference with prices, wages, rents and interest rates.

12
00:01:52.000 --> 00:01:58.000
Now, Flynn referred to these first four ingredients as the prologue to fascism.

13
00:01:58.000 --> 00:02:06.000
Today we would refer to the first three of them, leaving aside the planned economy, we'd refer to the first three as the welfare warfare state.

14
00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:11.680
and with the four ingredients together including the planned economy we call

15
00:02:11.680 --> 00:02:18.120
that economic fascism. Now what Flynn did was to add two other ingredients he said

16
00:02:18.120 --> 00:02:23.280
the fifth one was a totalitarian state and the sixth one was what he called the

17
00:02:23.280 --> 00:02:27.480
leadership principle, the Fuhrer principle, the Ducci principle in Italy,

18
00:02:27.480 --> 00:02:35.080
simply dictatorship. Right, so far so good, but Flynn made a crucial mistake in

19
00:02:35.080 --> 00:02:40.520
And further claiming that economic fascism, that is the first four ingredients, could

20
00:02:40.520 --> 00:02:45.560
not last very long without being ruthlessly imposed by a totalitarian dictator.

21
00:02:45.560 --> 00:02:51.320
In other words, what Flynn was saying was that there was no middle ground between full

22
00:02:51.320 --> 00:02:56.080
totalitarian fascism and the free market.

23
00:02:56.080 --> 00:03:00.840
His argument was that as soon as the public was hit with the bill for the welfare warfare

24
00:03:00.840 --> 00:03:07.560
State, they would rise up in a glorious tax rebellion and either abolish it or be crushed

25
00:03:07.560 --> 00:03:10.060
by a dictator.

26
00:03:10.060 --> 00:03:17.940
Now let me just read you Flynn's words here.

27
00:03:17.940 --> 00:03:23.400
What he said was, of course, businessmen and individuals will resist such taxes.

28
00:03:23.400 --> 00:03:29.060
The free society knows such a device as a tax strike, only in a totalitarian state can

29
00:03:29.060 --> 00:03:32.020
Can these oppressive laws be imposed and enforced?

30
00:03:32.020 --> 00:03:34.780
And even in such a state, there is a limit.

31
00:03:34.780 --> 00:03:39.580
But the limit in the free society is swiftly reached.

32
00:03:39.580 --> 00:03:44.140
It is for this reason, and there are other reasons as well, that I make the statement

33
00:03:44.140 --> 00:03:50.420
that this managed public debt-supported autarky must turn to the totalitarian government or

34
00:03:50.420 --> 00:03:53.460
abandon its plans.

35
00:03:53.460 --> 00:03:58.900
Now would that that were so, okay, but Flynn was actually wrong about this.

36
00:03:58.900 --> 00:04:06.900
He was misled. He was misled by an inadequate definition of economic fascism, for he left out, really, its most important ingredient.

37
00:04:06.900 --> 00:04:13.900
And that was monetary inflation. There was no talk at all in his book of inflation, only of deficits and large spending.

38
00:04:13.900 --> 00:04:20.900
That is the unrestrained creation of fiat money by government.

39
00:04:20.900 --> 00:04:43.900
Because if a democratic government could finance its deficit spending on domestic welfare and military adventurism around the globe, if it could finance it by creating money, then it could effectively hide the true costs from its citizens for years, during which economic fascism could thrive under mass democracy, that is, without a totalitarian dictator.

40
00:04:43.900 --> 00:05:01.900
A second problem with Flynn's definition is that it does not provide the causal mechanism by which the huge government deficits and spending programs, that is the welfare warfare state, transform a free market economy eventually into a planned economy, that is into full fascism.

41
00:05:01.900 --> 00:05:11.900
Because deficit spending and massive budgets need not result in the abolition of the market as we see today, they need not do that.

42
00:05:11.900 --> 00:05:16.900
What provides the explanation of that transformation?

43
00:05:16.900 --> 00:05:19.900
Well, in fact, it's again monetary inflation.

44
00:05:19.900 --> 00:05:22.900
Once the consequences of monetary inflation become visible

45
00:05:22.900 --> 00:05:25.900
after four or five years or longer,

46
00:05:25.900 --> 00:05:28.900
and we begin to have rapidly rising prices,

47
00:05:28.900 --> 00:05:34.900
at that point the government may react by seeking to suppress the symptoms

48
00:05:34.900 --> 00:05:39.900
by turning to first voluntary wage and price restraints,

49
00:05:39.900 --> 00:05:43.900
and then later by imposing mandatory wage and price controls.

50
00:05:43.900 --> 00:05:49.900
But when you get mandatory wage and price controls, which you had in Nazi Germany and fascist Italy,

51
00:05:49.900 --> 00:05:54.900
it's tantamount to abolishing the market and instituting central planning.

52
00:05:54.900 --> 00:06:01.900
Thus, contrary to Flynn, economic fascism will not necessarily give rise almost immediately to dictatorship

53
00:06:01.900 --> 00:06:05.900
or be destroyed by political forces such as a tax strike.

54
00:06:05.900 --> 00:06:12.400
Economic fascism will evolve slowly as monetary inflation and its undesirable consequences

55
00:06:12.400 --> 00:06:16.400
compel more thorough going interferences into the price system.

56
00:06:16.400 --> 00:06:23.900
Now to illustrate this thesis, I will survey the march toward economic fascism in the US

57
00:06:23.900 --> 00:06:29.900
from John F. Kennedy's New Economics to Richard M. Nixon's New Economic Policy

58
00:06:29.900 --> 00:06:34.400
in which a wage price freeze was imposed.

59
00:06:34.400 --> 00:06:42.400
Let me give you a macro view of the march of economic fascism in the 1960s and early 70s.

60
00:06:42.400 --> 00:06:44.400
Let's start with the Eisenhower administration.

61
00:06:44.400 --> 00:06:51.400
And I have a much greater respect for Eisenhower after having done this paper.

62
00:06:51.400 --> 00:06:56.400
Eisenhower did reverse a great deal of the New Deal legislation.

63
00:06:56.400 --> 00:06:59.400
He actually cut real cuts, not just cuts in the rate of spending.

64
00:06:59.400 --> 00:07:04.400
He actually cut the government's budget three times during his administration.

65
00:07:04.400 --> 00:07:13.400
Nonetheless, by the end of his administration, 1960, government expenditures had risen from $68 billion to $92 billion.

66
00:07:13.400 --> 00:07:18.400
In total, that was about a 35% increase in government spending.

67
00:07:18.400 --> 00:07:22.400
The percent change was about 4.4% a year.

68
00:07:22.400 --> 00:07:30.400
Now, since there was some inflation, that meant that the government grew in real terms, it became bigger by less than 1% per year.

69
00:07:30.400 --> 00:07:36.400
Now that's dismaying, okay, but it's not catastrophic. What happened under Kennedy?

70
00:07:36.400 --> 00:07:50.400
Under Kennedy, government spending during his three years arose from 92 billion to 111 billion, okay, which now was about a 20% total increase and a 7% increase per year.

71
00:07:50.400 --> 00:08:10.400
What about Johnson? The government spending exploded under Johnson. It went from a total of $111 billion to $178 billion from $63 to $68. That was a total percent increase of about 60 percent, and a 12 percent increase of about 1.5 percent per year.

72
00:08:10.400 --> 00:08:22.400
from 1963 to 1968. That was a total percent increase of about 60% and a 12% increase per year.

73
00:08:22.400 --> 00:08:31.400
Real government grew by about 7.5%, a full 2% above what it grew under Kennedy.

74
00:08:31.400 --> 00:08:39.400
Total deficits were $42 billion over those years. So that gave us about an $8.4 billion deficit per year.

75
00:08:39.400 --> 00:08:51.400
Now, under the Nixon administration, there was a tremendous explosion in government spending, $178 billion to $269 billion, from $69 to $74.

76
00:08:51.400 --> 00:09:08.400
Government spending grew about 51%, growing about 8.5% per year. However, since there was tremendous inflation under Nixon, we had the government growing at only, in real terms, about 1%.

77
00:09:08.400 --> 00:09:17.400
Okay, so in general, from 1960 to 1964, we had an increase in government spending from $92 billion to $269 billion.

78
00:09:17.400 --> 00:09:21.400
That is, government spending tripled during those years.

79
00:09:21.400 --> 00:09:26.400
So we had that component of fascism, a tremendous increase in government spending programs.

80
00:09:26.400 --> 00:09:32.400
We also had total deficits during those years of $115 billion.

81
00:09:32.400 --> 00:09:42.400
What about militarism? The other components, militarism and imperialism, second and third components or ingredients of fascism.

82
00:09:42.400 --> 00:09:55.400
In 1957, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1 and then successfully tested ICBMs in August of 1957.

83
00:09:55.400 --> 00:09:59.400
Suddenly, there were claims that there was a missile gap, that the U.S. had to rearm.

84
00:09:59.400 --> 00:10:05.400
Those turned out to be a lie in 1961. Factors I'll talk about a little bit later if I have time.

85
00:10:05.400 --> 00:10:15.400
Kennedy's new economists were really instrumental in spreading this lie about a missile gap, especially James Tobin.

86
00:10:15.400 --> 00:10:23.400
In any case, defense expenditures under Eisenhower fell. They went from 90s to now, again, at the beginning of his regime,

87
00:10:23.400 --> 00:10:31.400
There was a Korean war going on, but they fell from almost $100 billion down to $72 billion.

88
00:10:31.400 --> 00:10:36.400
So they had fallen tremendously by about 25% in real terms.

89
00:10:36.400 --> 00:10:40.400
The military was actually cut under Eisenhower.

90
00:10:40.400 --> 00:10:45.400
I'm sorry, I cursed him all these years.

91
00:10:45.400 --> 00:10:48.400
Well, let's jump to the Vietnam War.

92
00:10:48.400 --> 00:11:00.400
Okay, we got into a war. The war didn't really heat up until 1965. There were a lot of lies about the cost of the war before, as we were getting more and more involved in 1964.

93
00:11:00.400 --> 00:11:08.400
Johnson and McNamara conspired to keep the costs hidden from the American people. They explicitly conspired.

94
00:11:08.400 --> 00:11:16.400
You want to look at a book called Deroliction of Duty, and I can't remember the author's name right now, but he's a major at West Point,

95
00:11:16.400 --> 00:11:20.400
An historian is very, very good on these lies.

96
00:11:20.400 --> 00:11:26.400
It costs in total, budgetary costs are $140 billion.

97
00:11:26.400 --> 00:11:36.400
In 1968 and 1969, the Vietnam War absorbed about 3.2% each year of the US GNP.

98
00:11:36.400 --> 00:11:43.400
That was about nine times the value of the North Vietnamese GNP.

99
00:11:43.400 --> 00:11:53.400
Just that 3.2% that was absorbed of the U.S., so we spent nine times the value on the war of the whole product produced in North Vietnam.

100
00:11:55.400 --> 00:11:59.400
Now, how was the Vietnam War paid for? It was very interesting.

101
00:12:02.400 --> 00:12:07.400
Before we get into that, let me just talk a little bit about the inflation situation, which I haven't referred to yet.

102
00:12:07.400 --> 00:12:14.600
This is my own ingredient that I get to Flynn's description of economic fascism.

103
00:12:14.600 --> 00:12:19.200
Under Eisenhower, we did have inflation.

104
00:12:19.200 --> 00:12:26.600
The monetary inflation I'm referring to now, the increase in the money supply, was about 3.3% per year.

105
00:12:26.600 --> 00:12:28.700
Again, that's a dismaying figure.

106
00:12:28.700 --> 00:12:35.000
Under gold standard, the money supply would be decreasing by much less than that and prices would actually be falling.

107
00:12:35.000 --> 00:12:48.700
Under Kennedy, it jumped up to 8% per year, the increase in the money supply, as measured if you're interested by M2, which is really all our currency, checking account money and savings accounts.

108
00:12:48.700 --> 00:13:01.200
Under Johnson, that figure was 7.6% and under Nixon, 8.3% per year. So over those years, the money supply increased by 8.1%, which is unprecedented in peacetime.

109
00:13:01.200 --> 00:13:13.440
This is very important because what has happened was that if you take the total deficits for all of those years,

110
00:13:13.440 --> 00:13:16.960
a great part of those deficits were paid for by printing up new money.

111
00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:19.800
So let me give you some figures on that.

112
00:13:19.800 --> 00:13:24.720
Under Eisenhower, the total deficits were $18 billion.

113
00:13:24.720 --> 00:13:29.800
Now, $1 of those deficits were paid for by an increase in the money supply.

114
00:13:29.800 --> 00:13:34.080
The increase in the money supply that did occur under Eisenhower didn't come from the Fed

115
00:13:34.080 --> 00:13:38.680
buying up, printing up new money and buying up government bonds.

116
00:13:38.680 --> 00:13:44.840
It came because the Fed was reducing the reserve requirements.

117
00:13:44.840 --> 00:13:46.640
However, things changed.

118
00:13:46.640 --> 00:13:51.920
Under Kennedy, about 2 billion of the 15 billion dollar deficits were paid for by new money.

119
00:13:51.920 --> 00:13:54.120
It's about 14%.

120
00:13:54.120 --> 00:13:56.280
By the time we got to Nixon,

121
00:13:56.280 --> 00:14:03.680
The Fed printed up over those years about 34 billion new dollars to pay for the deficits of 58 billion.

122
00:14:03.680 --> 00:14:05.440
That's about 58 percent.

123
00:14:05.440 --> 00:14:14.120
In total, there were $115 billion worth of deficits during this development of fascism in the 60s and 70s.

124
00:14:14.120 --> 00:14:18.000
52 billion were paid for by the Fed buying government securities.

125
00:14:18.000 --> 00:14:21.000
That came out to about 45.5 percent.

126
00:14:21.000 --> 00:14:24.200
Now, let's look at that with relation to the Vietnam War.

127
00:14:24.200 --> 00:14:31.520
The Vietnam War, as I said, the budget costs of the Vietnam War was $140 billion, right?

128
00:14:31.520 --> 00:14:34.560
Deficits during those years were $95 billion.

129
00:14:34.560 --> 00:14:43.000
So the Vietnam War was paid for to the tune of about 67 percent, two-thirds of the Vietnam

130
00:14:43.000 --> 00:14:48.520
War was not paid for by higher taxes, but by government deficits.

131
00:14:48.520 --> 00:14:57.520
And of those deficits, about 50% was paid for by printing up new money, not borrowing from the public.

132
00:14:57.520 --> 00:15:08.520
So in total, about 35% of the Vietnam War, a very costly war, was paid for by the printing up of new money.

133
00:15:08.520 --> 00:15:12.520
Had Americans gotten the bill much sooner in the form of much higher taxes,

134
00:15:12.520 --> 00:15:23.520
Had taxes been raised by the full $140 billion cost, rather than only a third of that, the pipeline would have had to have been paid much earlier.

135
00:15:23.520 --> 00:15:26.520
There would have been much more resistance to the war.

136
00:15:26.520 --> 00:15:34.520
So economic fascism is able to fasten itself on a society through monetary inflation.

137
00:15:34.520 --> 00:15:44.520
Now, there was a further way in which the government, Johnson and Nixon in particular, hid the costs from the American public.

138
00:15:44.520 --> 00:15:51.520
And that was the Bretton Woods system. The American dollar was considered to be as good as gold, so that when Americans printed up new dollars,

139
00:15:51.520 --> 00:15:58.520
when the Fed printed up those new dollars, prices in the United States didn't rise that much. We didn't get inflation right away.

140
00:15:58.520 --> 00:16:06.520
What happened was, as soon as our products became slightly more costly than foreign products, we began to buy those foreign products.

141
00:16:06.520 --> 00:16:14.520
So these dollars flowed out of the United States and they weren't returned, which they could have been, to be converted to gold.

142
00:16:14.520 --> 00:16:21.520
The United States legally was bound to pay out gold to foreign governments and central banks for dollars.

143
00:16:21.520 --> 00:16:26.520
But that didn't happen because foreign governments trusted us. They believed the dollar was as good as gold.

144
00:16:26.520 --> 00:16:34.520
From 1965, when the Vietnam War began to heat up until 1973, we had total deficits of $50 billion.

145
00:16:34.520 --> 00:16:43.520
That is, we sent the foreign governments $50 billion worth of depreciating paper, and they sent us $50 billion worth of goods.

146
00:16:43.520 --> 00:16:48.520
So they paid the real cost of the war, remember $140 billion.

147
00:16:48.520 --> 00:16:57.520
In real terms, foreigners paid $50 billion, about 40% or so, of the war in real terms.

148
00:16:57.520 --> 00:17:05.520
So that further lightened the perceived burden of the war on the American public.

149
00:17:05.520 --> 00:17:14.520
When we were asked later on, of course, now when they send the dollars back and you pay gold, or you have to pay in products, then you see the real burden.

150
00:17:14.520 --> 00:17:21.520
But Nixon took care of that by closing the gold window in 1971 and declaring those dollars in convertible, okay?

151
00:17:23.520 --> 00:17:32.520
Now, we did begin to get some price inflation. Price inflation was very, very mild from 61 to 65 under President Kennedy.

152
00:17:32.520 --> 00:17:43.520
Now, his advisors, the Keynesian New Economists, Paul Samuelson, James Tobin, Arthur Oaken and a few other individuals, Walter Heller in particular,

153
00:17:43.520 --> 00:17:51.260
in particular, they were chortling, they were ecstatic that prices really didn't go up.

154
00:17:51.260 --> 00:17:57.520
They had convinced Kennedy to run deficits, to lower the unemployment rate, to move us

155
00:17:57.520 --> 00:18:04.020
away from the bad old Eisenhower days, which Kennedy did, and the money supply was increasing,

156
00:18:04.020 --> 00:18:09.100
as I said, by about 8%, but yet prices were only going up by 1.3% per year, very, very

157
00:18:09.100 --> 00:18:10.100
low rate of inflation.

158
00:18:10.100 --> 00:18:15.100
There were two reasons for this, neither of which had to do with the wisdom of the new economists.

159
00:18:15.100 --> 00:18:23.100
The first was that our GNP was growing at very, very rapid rates. We were coming out of a recession in 1960.

160
00:18:23.100 --> 00:18:31.100
So there's a lot of room for the economy to grow, which meant that a lot of that new money then was spent on these goods and it didn't push up prices.

161
00:18:31.100 --> 00:18:39.100
Secondly, the American public saw that prices weren't going up by that much, but they were going up somewhat.

162
00:18:39.100 --> 00:18:46.100
And at the beginning of any inflation what the public tends to do is to hold some of this new money because they believe that prices will go down in the future.

163
00:18:46.100 --> 00:18:52.100
So they're going to hold the money until they can spend it at lower prices because it's more beneficial when you buy things at lower prices.

164
00:18:52.100 --> 00:18:59.100
So for those two reasons we didn't have much price inflation. All that changed with the relentless inflation going on during the 60s.

165
00:18:59.100 --> 00:19:08.100
That began to change in 1966. From 66 to 74 we had about five and a half percent price inflation.

166
00:19:08.100 --> 00:19:14.100
Now the administration, Johnson and Nixon, began to get worried.

167
00:19:14.100 --> 00:19:21.100
It was in this later period, as I'll show you in a moment, that the U.S. economy took a giant leap towards fascism.

168
00:19:21.100 --> 00:19:34.100
Now let me mention that the ideological foundations of fascism were laid in the late 1950s by the Keynesian New Economists.

169
00:19:34.100 --> 00:19:53.100
Liberal Economists, Tobin, Heller, Okin, Samuelson, these names should be named. These were young liberal economists from Eastern establishment universities like Harvard, Yale, MIT, who believed that the Eisenhower administration was a temporary interruption of the permanent New Deal.

170
00:19:53.100 --> 00:20:23.100
Anyway, they were there, they were here to restore the New Deal, and they had a lot of influence on Kennedy, as I said, they did influence him to spend tremendous amounts, and not to worry about raising taxes, to spend with deficits, in fact, their first success occurred in 1961 during the Berlin Crisis, when the U.S. mobilized, when the Soviet Union threatened to restrict access to West Berlin, the U.S. mobilized, and Kennedy initially was going to ask for

171
00:20:23.100 --> 00:20:53.100
The New Economist worked on him over the weekend and Brow beat him into rescinding that request for a tax increase so that he paid for it simply through deficit spending and they said, look, the economy can still use more stimulation so any spending, even and especially on military defense and so on, is stimulative. So don't worry about it.

172
00:20:53.100 --> 00:21:03.100
Don't worry about raising taxes. Don't raise taxes. And in fact, he didn't. That was their first important victory and the first step towards economic fascism.

173
00:21:03.100 --> 00:21:12.100
Now, I don't want to get into too much detail, but in 1958, James Tobin, who was on the CEA, the Council of Economic Advisers for Kennedy,

174
00:21:12.100 --> 00:21:18.940
for Kennedy wrote an article called dollars and defense and claimed that the

175
00:21:18.940 --> 00:21:24.700
Eisenhower administration was irresponsibly allowing a missile gap to

176
00:21:24.700 --> 00:21:32.740
develop and that in fact all the arguments that greater

177
00:21:32.740 --> 00:21:36.340
spending on military budgets would bring about deficits and so on were

178
00:21:36.340 --> 00:21:41.780
ridiculous because look if the government issued debt as Tobin said it was all in

179
00:21:41.780 --> 00:21:53.780
If we had inflation, he said, well, inflation is bad, but there are the worst things, juvenile delinquency, a lack of medical care, the usual list that the liberals will give you.

180
00:21:53.780 --> 00:22:06.780
And he said, in any way, we have the highest and most frivolous, this is 1958, I don't remember living that high off the hog in 1958, but he said we have the highest and most frivolous standard of living ever.

181
00:22:06.780 --> 00:22:14.780
And the spending on consumer goods is really pure waste at this point. Much of it is pure waste.

182
00:22:14.780 --> 00:22:22.780
So in some sense we could almost buy more military defense without having any, without really losing any product.

183
00:22:22.780 --> 00:22:27.780
This is from a tenured, highly compensated Yale professor.

184
00:22:27.780 --> 00:22:41.020
Professor. By 1962, Kennedy, one other point I want to make very quickly about the new

185
00:22:41.020 --> 00:22:45.180
economists. They also came up with an odd theory of inflation and that was that inflation

186
00:22:45.180 --> 00:22:49.900
not only occurred when the Fed increased the money supply and when we had too much spending

187
00:22:49.900 --> 00:22:56.960
in the economy, but it also occurred when unions and big business greedily pushed up

188
00:22:56.960 --> 00:23:03.960
... up their wages and prices, because when that happened, you began to have higher costs in the economy and therefore higher prices.

189
00:23:03.960 --> 00:23:12.960
They never asked themselves if people, without any more money, if people had to spend to pay higher prices for certain products, they would have less money for other products.

190
00:23:12.960 --> 00:23:16.960
So inflation couldn't occur. Some prices would go up, other prices would go down.

191
00:23:26.960 --> 00:23:43.400
But they needed this explanation of inflation to explain what had happened in the late 1950s.

192
00:23:43.400 --> 00:23:48.400
In the late 1950s, we had a higher unemployment rate, we went into a recession in the late

193
00:23:48.400 --> 00:23:51.680
1950s, and we had higher inflation.

194
00:23:51.680 --> 00:23:53.400
But that contradicts Keynes.

195
00:23:53.400 --> 00:23:57.400
McCain said, you have higher inflation if there's too much spending.

196
00:23:57.400 --> 00:24:00.400
If there's too little spending, you have higher unemployment.

197
00:24:00.400 --> 00:24:03.400
Now we had both together. They couldn't explain that.

198
00:24:03.400 --> 00:24:09.400
So they came up with this crazy, absurd, cost-push inflation explanation.

199
00:24:09.400 --> 00:24:13.400
That is that it's greedy businesses and unions pushing up their wages and prices

200
00:24:13.400 --> 00:24:17.400
and causing unemployment as well as higher prices.

201
00:24:17.400 --> 00:24:21.400
Now why do I bring that in? Because they came up with a solution to that.

202
00:24:21.400 --> 00:24:27.400
They said that the real problem with inflation now and in the foreseeable future will be the cost push variety.

203
00:24:27.400 --> 00:24:30.400
So we don't have to worry about the Fed increasing the money supply.

204
00:24:30.400 --> 00:24:36.400
In fact, the Fed should increase the money supply and keep interest rates low so businesses could borrow more and produce.

205
00:24:36.400 --> 00:24:38.400
What we do have to worry about is cost push.

206
00:24:38.400 --> 00:24:47.400
So what we need is an incomes policy, which is a very gentle term for wage and price controls.

207
00:24:47.400 --> 00:24:55.400
But they realized that the American public wouldn't swallow wage and price controls, especially after the bad experiences with them during wartime.

208
00:24:55.400 --> 00:25:04.400
So they talked about voluntary wage price guideposts. So this, of course, is the final ingredient in economic fascism, right?

209
00:25:04.400 --> 00:25:13.400
This is the takeover of the economy, the interference with specific wage and pricing decisions by the central government.

210
00:25:13.400 --> 00:25:26.400
So, the first time that this was tested out was the steel confrontation in 1962 that Kennedy had with the steel industry.

211
00:25:26.400 --> 00:25:36.400
These guideposts had called for wage increases of only 3.2%, no more than that, because labor productivity was increasing in the economy by 3.2%,

212
00:25:36.400 --> 00:25:41.960
3.2%, which meant that if wages went up by 3.2%, costs wouldn't go up, because labor

213
00:25:41.960 --> 00:25:47.920
was more productive to that extent. And they went on to say that prices in industries where

214
00:25:47.920 --> 00:25:53.920
you have an above average increase in productivity, where even more was being produced per laborer,

215
00:25:53.920 --> 00:25:59.520
they should lower their prices. That was the guidepost. And in the slow productivity growth

216
00:25:59.520 --> 00:26:05.480
industries, they could raise their prices. Remember now, the money supply is raging at

217
00:26:05.480 --> 00:26:07.480
at 8% per year.

218
00:26:07.480 --> 00:26:09.480
Of course, prices are going to be going up.

219
00:26:09.480 --> 00:26:13.480
But of course, focusing only on cost push inflation,

220
00:26:13.480 --> 00:26:17.480
the Keynesian economists claim that no, no, no, prices should be falling in some industries

221
00:26:17.480 --> 00:26:19.480
and going up slightly in other industries.

222
00:26:19.480 --> 00:26:21.480
What happened?

223
00:26:21.480 --> 00:26:27.480
In September 1961, Kennedy, at the urging of Walter Heller and the CEA,

224
00:26:27.480 --> 00:26:34.480
sent letters to 12 major steel firms, prodding them to hold the line on prices.

225
00:26:34.480 --> 00:26:51.480
The CEA, Council of Economic Advisers, by reading, believe it or not, Popular Mechanics, believe that they knew enough about the steel industry to lecture the steel executives.

226
00:26:51.480 --> 00:26:57.480
They told them that with the new technology they were instituting, a description of which they got from Popular Mechanics,

227
00:26:57.480 --> 00:27:05.480
that they should be earning seven to nine percent profit during that year without raising their prices and that certainly was sufficient.

228
00:27:05.480 --> 00:27:11.480
Well, the steel industry gave in for the moment, but they did something real neat.

229
00:27:11.480 --> 00:27:20.480
The Kennedy administration got involved in negotiations in 1962 between the steel industry and the unions

230
00:27:20.480 --> 00:27:28.480
And they put pressure on the unions to take a wage increase that was within their so-called guidelines.

231
00:27:28.480 --> 00:27:36.480
What happened? Two weeks after the conclusion of negotiations, U.S. Steel heroically announced a price increase of $6 per ton.

232
00:27:36.480 --> 00:27:42.480
Of course, it's greatly embarrassed the Kennedy administration, and their reaction was swift and vicious.

233
00:27:42.480 --> 00:27:47.480
Kennedy reportedly declared to his advisors, quote,

234
00:27:47.480 --> 00:27:52.120
My father told me that all businessmen were SOBs, well, actually he said sons of bitches,

235
00:27:52.120 --> 00:27:54.840
but I never believed it until now.

236
00:27:54.840 --> 00:27:58.600
Kennedy later claimed in an interview he said steelmen.

237
00:27:58.600 --> 00:28:01.800
After all, he said, my father was a businessman too.

238
00:28:01.800 --> 00:28:10.080
Well, I guess that's so if you can count liquor bootleggers as businessmen.

239
00:28:10.080 --> 00:28:16.600
The next day, he gave a demagogic talk to the nation bashing the steel industries.

240
00:28:16.600 --> 00:28:25.600
and basically he went on to say there's a serious hour in our nation's history when we are confronted with grave crises in Berlin and Southeast Asia,

241
00:28:25.600 --> 00:28:32.600
when we are devoting our energies to economic recovery and stability, when we are asking reservists to leave their homes and families for months on end

242
00:28:32.600 --> 00:28:41.600
and servicemen to risk their lives and asking union members to hold down their wage requests at a time when restraint and sacrifice are being asked of every citizen.

243
00:28:41.600 --> 00:28:57.600
The American people will find it hard, as I do, to accept the situation in which a tiny handful of steal executives whose pursuit of private power and profit exceeds their sense of public responsibility can show such utter contempt for the interests of 185 million Americans.

244
00:28:57.600 --> 00:29:03.600
A few gigantic corporations have decided to increase prices in utter disregard of their public responsibilities.

245
00:29:03.600 --> 00:29:12.600
Responsibilities. Responsibilities to whom? Not to embarrass an inflationist, proto-fascist regime, maybe.

246
00:29:12.600 --> 00:29:21.600
Now, it wasn't just words. The Kennedy administration in the next 72 hours followed up with the following actions.

247
00:29:21.600 --> 00:29:30.600
They jawboned or pressured a number of the smaller steel companies not to increase prices so as to undercut the steel price increase.

248
00:29:30.600 --> 00:29:34.760
Attorney General Robert Kennedy subpoenaed U.S. Steel and other companies

249
00:29:34.760 --> 00:29:37.200
to produce records for grand jury.

250
00:29:37.200 --> 00:29:41.120
The FBI began to look into rumors that the Bethlehem Steel president

251
00:29:41.120 --> 00:29:43.640
had previously issued a statement against

252
00:29:43.640 --> 00:29:45.060
a price increase

253
00:29:45.060 --> 00:29:47.800
and then suspiciously changed his mind.

254
00:29:47.800 --> 00:29:49.400
Senator Estes

255
00:29:49.400 --> 00:29:53.660
Kiefalver agreed to conduct an antitrust investigation of the steel industry

256
00:29:53.660 --> 00:29:57.360
and the FTC suddenly decided to open an investigation of the industry's

257
00:29:57.360 --> 00:29:59.000
compliance

258
00:29:59.000 --> 00:30:02.880
with an agreement not to collude in 1951.

259
00:30:02.880 --> 00:30:05.520
Also, McNamara announced that the Defense Department

260
00:30:05.520 --> 00:30:08.980
had ordered defense contractors to transfer steel purchases

261
00:30:08.980 --> 00:30:11.280
to companies that had not raised prices.

262
00:30:11.280 --> 00:30:13.520
Within three days, U.S. Steel and Bethlehem Steel

263
00:30:13.520 --> 00:30:15.620
rescinded the announced price increases.

264
00:30:18.660 --> 00:30:23.660
So this was the first small step towards a planned economy.

265
00:30:26.360 --> 00:30:28.820
What happened was, and I'll skip skipping ahead here,

266
00:30:28.820 --> 00:30:31.860
was that the Vietnam War heated up, okay?

267
00:30:31.860 --> 00:30:35.620
In 1964, President Johnson and McNamara

268
00:30:35.620 --> 00:30:38.000
deliberately understated the budgetary costs

269
00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:40.340
and refused to ask for a tax increase.

270
00:30:40.340 --> 00:30:45.340
Johnson wanted to avoid the stigma of imposing a war tax,

271
00:30:45.580 --> 00:30:48.700
he used those terms, on the American people

272
00:30:48.700 --> 00:30:51.420
before the election of 1964, okay?

273
00:30:51.420 --> 00:30:53.780
So the war was to be paid for in great part,

274
00:30:53.780 --> 00:30:57.580
as I pointed out before, by deficits and money creation.

275
00:30:57.580 --> 00:31:01.540
After he was re-elected, Johnson and McNamara widened the war and deepened the American

276
00:31:01.540 --> 00:31:05.340
involvement in it while continuing to lie about its costs.

277
00:31:05.340 --> 00:31:09.820
Johnson now wanted to avoid a tax increase because he was fearful it would interfere

278
00:31:09.820 --> 00:31:12.020
with his domestic rate society programs.

279
00:31:12.020 --> 00:31:16.420
Now, Johnson described his dilemma a number of years later in the following interesting

280
00:31:16.420 --> 00:31:26.380
terms.

281
00:31:26.380 --> 00:31:31.640
He said, I knew from the start that I was bound to be crucified either way I moved.

282
00:31:31.640 --> 00:31:36.420
If I left the woman I loved, the great society, in order to get involved with that bitch of

283
00:31:36.420 --> 00:31:41.180
a war on the other side of the world, then I would lose everything at home.

284
00:31:41.180 --> 00:31:47.240
All my programs, all my hopes to feed the hungry and shelter the homeless, all my dreams

285
00:31:47.240 --> 00:31:51.300
to provide education and medical care to the browns and the blacks and the lame and the

286
00:31:51.300 --> 00:31:52.820
poor.

287
00:31:52.820 --> 00:31:56.820
But if I left that war and let the communists take over South Vietnam, then I would be seen

288
00:31:56.820 --> 00:32:01.820
as a coward and my nation would be seen as an appeaser, and we would both find it impossible

289
00:32:01.820 --> 00:32:06.740
to accomplish anything for anybody anywhere on the globe.

290
00:32:06.740 --> 00:32:12.540
Here we have it, the foul-mouthed, corn-pwned, corrupt, machine politician as frustrated

291
00:32:12.540 --> 00:32:22.420
global messiah who would feed the poor and heal the lame with counterfeited money.

292
00:32:22.420 --> 00:32:52.420
Johnson, having been caught on this dilemma, prices began to rapidly rise as money creation continued and he, Johnson, also resorted to the same tactic that Kennedy did, okay, that is draw boning, threatening the aluminum and copper industries if they raised prices, but eventually price increases became stratospheric, or at least by that standards then

293
00:32:52.420 --> 00:32:58.420
and so the wage price controls went by the wayside, the voluntary guideposts.

294
00:32:58.420 --> 00:33:00.420
Let me get to Nixon.

295
00:33:00.420 --> 00:33:04.420
Now, after Nixon took office, a recession occurred in 1969-70.

296
00:33:04.420 --> 00:33:09.420
The Fed began to aggressively increase the money supply in 1970.

297
00:33:09.420 --> 00:33:13.420
But prices continued to rise in 1970.

298
00:33:13.420 --> 00:33:16.420
Unemployment began to rise.

299
00:33:16.420 --> 00:33:21.420
In other words, we began to have stagflation raising its ugly head.

300
00:33:21.420 --> 00:33:25.500
Even though we were recovering from the recession by 1971,

301
00:33:25.500 --> 00:33:31.100
unemployment increased by 1% from about 5% to 6%.

302
00:33:31.100 --> 00:33:33.420
Very, very high level of unemployment.

303
00:33:33.420 --> 00:33:39.140
At the same time, the rate of inflation was very, very high during this time.

304
00:33:39.140 --> 00:33:44.460
Now, the conservative, quote-unquote, Arthur Burns, took over the Fed in 1970

305
00:33:44.460 --> 00:33:47.660
and began clamoring for mandatory wage and price controls.

306
00:33:47.660 --> 00:33:56.660
This was the same Arthur Burns, who in the mid-60s attacked the Keynesian New Economists for their voluntary wage-of-price guideposts.

307
00:33:56.660 --> 00:34:01.360
I guess you get a clearer view of things when you sit on high in the seat of power.

308
00:34:01.360 --> 00:34:08.660
Now, Burns promised Nixon he would gun the money supply and rapidly reduce unemployment if Nixon would institute controls.

309
00:34:08.660 --> 00:34:16.660
With presidential election a little more than a year away, Nixon needed lower inflation and lower unemployment in order to get re-elected.

310
00:34:16.660 --> 00:34:27.660
Burns was as good as his word. The money supply exploded by 13.5% per year in 1971.

311
00:34:27.660 --> 00:34:35.660
That hadn't happened since World War II, that rate. And also by 13% in 1972, the year of the election.

312
00:34:35.660 --> 00:34:40.660
Now, in return, of course, Nixon then, on August...

313
00:34:40.660 --> 00:34:47.660
Do I have two more minutes on this?

314
00:34:47.660 --> 00:34:52.660
Because I have a...

315
00:34:52.660 --> 00:34:55.660
Oh, good, seven more minutes.

316
00:34:55.660 --> 00:34:57.660
How many more minutes?

317
00:34:57.660 --> 00:35:00.660
Six, okay.

318
00:35:00.660 --> 00:35:03.660
I'll only take five.

319
00:35:03.660 --> 00:35:09.660
On August 15th, 1971, we had the real day of infamy in the U.S.

320
00:35:09.660 --> 00:35:15.660
This was when full economic fascism came to the U.S. during peacetime, not during a war.

321
00:35:15.660 --> 00:35:23.660
FDR had the excuse of the war, of a total war in bringing economic fascism.

322
00:35:23.660 --> 00:35:29.660
The interesting thing is that no one uttered a peep, except for one courageous exception.

323
00:35:29.660 --> 00:35:38.660
The business, and especially big business, were all for the price controls, the wage price freeze, because it promised to effectively hold down wage increases.

324
00:35:38.660 --> 00:35:45.660
They bought into the Keynesian nonsense about inflation being caused by cost push inflation.

325
00:35:45.660 --> 00:35:54.660
Of course, the Keynesian new economists loved these mandatory controls because it vindicated their own position.

326
00:35:54.660 --> 00:35:57.660
It vindicated their failed wage price guideposts.

327
00:35:57.660 --> 00:36:21.660
They said the only problem with our program was that it was voluntary, but just as a Republican president can get away with going to China, whereas a Democrat never could get away with it, so a Republican president could also get away with imposing mandatory controls, something we would have liked to have done but weren't able to.

328
00:36:21.660 --> 00:36:31.660
Big labor did balk at first because Nixon hadn't put any controls on profits and dividends.

329
00:36:31.660 --> 00:36:36.660
But they said they were willing to cooperate with this as long as profits and dividends were brought in.

330
00:36:36.660 --> 00:36:40.660
And by the way, free market economists were strangely silent.

331
00:36:40.660 --> 00:36:45.660
Milton Friedman mildly criticized the controls as inefficient.

332
00:36:45.660 --> 00:36:49.660
And 16 Chicago school economists wrote an open letter against it.

333
00:36:49.660 --> 00:37:05.660
Only Murray Rothbard spoke out passionately against the controls, as inefficient and unjust, and fearlessly used the f-word, fascism, which isn't used in polite political discourse.

334
00:37:05.660 --> 00:37:09.660
In fact, Murray had predicted the move to Nixonite fascism seven months in advance.

335
00:37:09.660 --> 00:37:17.420
And what I want to end with is just some of the stirring writing on this that Murray did.

336
00:37:17.420 --> 00:37:21.740
A full seven months before we had the controls imposed,

337
00:37:21.740 --> 00:37:26.020
Murray already saw the tendency towards fascism in the Nixon regime.

338
00:37:26.020 --> 00:37:33.300
He said, well, we've had two years of Nixonism, and what we are undergoing is a super great society.

339
00:37:33.300 --> 00:37:39.620
In fact, what we are seeing is the greatest single thrust towards socialism since the days of Franklin Roosevelt.

340
00:37:39.620 --> 00:37:43.820
It is not Marxian Socialism, to be sure, but neither was FDR's.

341
00:37:43.820 --> 00:37:47.420
It is a big business socialism or state corporatism.

342
00:37:47.420 --> 00:37:52.620
That was the name for Mussolini's program.

343
00:37:52.620 --> 00:37:55.220
But that is cold comfort indeed, right?

344
00:37:55.220 --> 00:37:57.420
And then he goes on to say,

345
00:37:57.420 --> 00:38:00.620
not only is it impossible for direct controls to work,

346
00:38:00.620 --> 00:38:03.620
now he's forecasting that we're going to have these,

347
00:38:03.620 --> 00:38:07.820
their position adds the final link in the forging of a totalitarian economy,

348
00:38:07.820 --> 00:38:14.360
of an American Fascism. What is it for totalitarian to outlaw any sort of voluntary exchange,

349
00:38:14.360 --> 00:38:21.020
any voluntary sale of a product or hiring of a labor? Then when the controls were actually

350
00:38:21.020 --> 00:38:26.420
implemented, Murray reacted with the following. He said, there is only one word for this new

351
00:38:26.420 --> 00:38:31.220
economic policy. That was the name that Nixon gave it. A word that is at first glance harsh

352
00:38:31.220 --> 00:38:37.820
is harsh and exaggerated, but is in fact precisely appropriate. That word is fascism, a system

353
00:38:37.820 --> 00:38:43.340
of permanent price and wage controls administered by a central government bureaucracy, probably

354
00:38:43.340 --> 00:38:49.240
headed by some form of tripartite board, including big business, big labor and big government.

355
00:38:49.240 --> 00:38:54.040
This is precisely what fascism is, precisely the economic system of Mussolini's Italy

356
00:38:54.040 --> 00:38:59.640
and Hitler's Germany. This is the economy of the corporate state, administered by dictation

357
00:38:59.640 --> 00:39:04.360
from the Top, controlled and monopolized by big business and big union interests, with

358
00:39:04.360 --> 00:39:09.600
the individual and the consumer the person who suffers. In short, the mass of American

359
00:39:09.600 --> 00:39:14.160
public will suffer from this system of corporate statism, from the death of the free-price

360
00:39:14.160 --> 00:39:18.040
system, from the invasion of individual rights, from the hampering of growth, efficiency

361
00:39:18.040 --> 00:39:23.800
and productivity that the system will entail. Now, Murray did see, like Flynn saw, that

362
00:39:23.800 --> 00:39:30.800
After a while, the operation of the system would include a leader, a dictator.

363
00:39:30.800 --> 00:39:37.800
And so, I'll close with this. He said, there's also the Caesarism involved in the freeze by presidential edict.

364
00:39:37.800 --> 00:39:43.800
If the president can simply go on TV and unilaterally declare an immediate freeze,

365
00:39:43.800 --> 00:39:49.800
then all of our liberties, moral, political and constitutional, are truly gone.

366
00:39:49.800 --> 00:39:53.800
If the President can do this, then he is truly another Caesar, another Mussolini, another Hitler.

367
00:39:53.800 --> 00:39:57.800
His power is then absolute. Is our Constitution completely forgotten?

368
00:39:57.800 --> 00:40:02.800
Are we going to put up passively with a slide into absolute presidential dictatorship?

369
00:40:02.800 --> 00:40:07.800
And by what stretch of constitutional finagling can the President freeze local rents?

370
00:40:07.800 --> 00:40:12.800
What gives him the power to freeze rents in Peoria? Where is interstate commerce here?

371
00:40:12.800 --> 00:40:16.800
Are there to be no restraints on the President's absolute power?

372
00:40:16.800 --> 00:40:23.800
I'll close there. Thank you.
