WEBVTT

NOTE The Anarchists

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.640
Considering modern socialist thought, we have to begin in the latter half of the 18th century.

2
00:00:09.640 --> 00:00:18.440
The first organized branch of socialist theory began to emerge in that period of time, and

3
00:00:18.440 --> 00:00:24.400
the man who wins credit for being the father of anarchy is a British subject named William

4
00:00:24.400 --> 00:00:35.520
from Godwin. Godwin was born in 1756 and lived a long and active life. He became a

5
00:00:35.520 --> 00:00:43.440
very prominent and popular novelist and wrote a number of works that brought him wide recognition

6
00:00:43.440 --> 00:00:51.200
and acclaim. In the midst of his writing these novels, he began to detect certain things

7
00:00:51.200 --> 00:00:55.600
which caused him to become, in a sense, a social theorist.

8
00:00:55.600 --> 00:01:01.640
Godwin found that human beings were capuchins and acting upon them.

9
00:01:01.640 --> 00:01:07.700
And he also thought that he detected that human beings are, by nature, creatures who

10
00:01:07.700 --> 00:01:09.520
seek the good.

11
00:01:09.520 --> 00:01:12.360
They want things to be better.

12
00:01:12.360 --> 00:01:15.240
Human beings do not seek evil.

13
00:01:15.240 --> 00:01:19.880
And yet, as he looked about him and as he wrote his novels, Godwin became very conscious

14
00:01:19.880 --> 00:01:27.200
A great deal of evil existed in the world, and this was evil that had been caused by

15
00:01:27.200 --> 00:01:33.480
people, and these are the same people, capable of acting upon their own decisions, who want

16
00:01:33.480 --> 00:01:41.640
good, and yet evil abounds. Why? This was the dominant question that puzzled him and

17
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:47.720
that caused him to theorize as to what in the world could be wrong. Keep in mind that

18
00:01:47.720 --> 00:01:58.040
Godwin began writing in the latter half of the 18th century, so that along about 1870-1880,

19
00:01:58.040 --> 00:02:07.240
in that period he began to have his works published, and he thought he detected a constant

20
00:02:07.240 --> 00:02:12.240
problem that human beings were confronted with, and as he studied it, it seemed to him

21
00:02:12.240 --> 00:02:19.080
It seemed to him that all evil sprang from that one point, and that point was the private

22
00:02:19.080 --> 00:02:25.300
ownership of property. As he looked at it, it seemed to him that all the evil that came

23
00:02:25.300 --> 00:02:33.300
in the world was evil arising from the question of who is to control which property. You had

24
00:02:33.300 --> 00:02:39.520
wars fought over property, you had crimes committed over property, you had animosity

25
00:02:39.520 --> 00:02:45.840
that took people into courts and brought jail sentences, and virtually the whole bit was

26
00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:54.040
over property. And as Godwin considered this facet of his understanding of the way society

27
00:02:54.040 --> 00:03:00.960
is formed, it became increasingly apparent to him that the only way to resolve the problem

28
00:03:00.960 --> 00:03:09.920
was to eliminate private ownership of property. Now, that became the cornerstone of modern

29
00:03:09.920 --> 00:03:16.800
socialist theory, and it was, of course, the base upon which anarchistic theory rested.

30
00:03:16.800 --> 00:03:23.400
In other words, private property ought to be abolished. Specifically, private ownership

31
00:03:23.400 --> 00:03:32.920
of Property. Godwin went on to consider this problem still further, and as he did so, he

32
00:03:32.920 --> 00:03:39.000
became aware of the fact, which had been brought to his attention by many other social theories

33
00:03:39.000 --> 00:03:45.680
of this time, that about two percent of the people of England owned about eighty percent

34
00:03:45.680 --> 00:03:51.920
of the wealth, the wealth consisting primarily of land and other properties connected to

35
00:03:51.920 --> 00:03:52.920
to the Land.

36
00:03:52.920 --> 00:03:56.760
Well, that's where Godwin had his brainstorm.

37
00:03:56.760 --> 00:04:04.400
If it was true that evil in the world came as a result of private ownership of property,

38
00:04:04.400 --> 00:04:11.440
then it followed that private ownership of property was the evil that it was because

39
00:04:11.440 --> 00:04:15.500
the property was in the hands of a privileged class.

40
00:04:15.500 --> 00:04:17.480
And who was the privileged class?

41
00:04:17.480 --> 00:04:23.480
Well, the privileged class was that group of persons who held political power and used

42
00:04:23.480 --> 00:04:29.680
the political power to acquire the property. Therefore, as Godwin looked at the world of

43
00:04:29.680 --> 00:04:36.560
his day, it seemed to him that all the evil in the world came from the private ownership

44
00:04:36.560 --> 00:04:43.120
of property and that the private ownership of property was only possible because of the

45
00:04:43.120 --> 00:04:51.640
Ergo came his conclusion. If you want to eliminate the evil in the world, to wit, private ownership

46
00:04:51.640 --> 00:04:57.480
of property, there is only one way to begin. Abolish the government.

47
00:04:57.480 --> 00:05:05.040
Now to his credit, Godwin did not advocate any violent method here. He simply argued

48
00:05:05.040 --> 00:05:11.000
and fundamentally keep in mind he was a novelist and he put these ideas and these themes into

49
00:05:11.000 --> 00:05:18.520
the novels that he wrote. He wrote a few serious tracks, but fundamentally he was engaged

50
00:05:18.520 --> 00:05:26.080
in romances. And all the way through his later stories, you'll find this theme that the evil

51
00:05:26.080 --> 00:05:34.800
that is existent in the world is the product of a privileged class of political power holders

52
00:05:34.800 --> 00:05:44.600
who use their power both to acquire property and to then use it to exploit it and to exploit

53
00:05:44.600 --> 00:05:49.960
the non-privileged class which don't have property and can't get it because the privileged

54
00:05:49.960 --> 00:05:51.720
group is in control.

55
00:05:51.720 --> 00:05:58.840
So says Godwin, we ought to begin by abolishing the government, and if we do, then all property

56
00:05:58.840 --> 00:06:00.720
will be unowned.

57
00:06:00.720 --> 00:06:08.320
It would simply be available to society at large on the basis of need. Now that is fundamentally

58
00:06:08.320 --> 00:06:16.600
the anarchist position. The anarchists were the first modern socialists as such. That is,

59
00:06:16.600 --> 00:06:23.680
they were concerned with socialist theory, the idea of what is good for everyone in society,

60
00:06:23.680 --> 00:06:30.440
and Godwin theorized here that the best way to maximize well-being in society would be

61
00:06:30.440 --> 00:06:49.360
Godwin was followed shortly after the beginning of the 19th century by a French thinker, Pierre

62
00:06:49.360 --> 00:06:57.440
Joseph Proudhon, who was born in 1809 and lived actually a very short life but an extremely

63
00:06:57.440 --> 00:07:08.240
influential one. He died in 1865. But Proudhon, who was a scholar and not a novelist, who worked

64
00:07:08.240 --> 00:07:14.720
in a university and had the opportunities of having his mind come in direct contact with

65
00:07:14.720 --> 00:07:20.880
other people who were engaged in using their minds, began to refine the ideas of Godwin.

66
00:07:20.880 --> 00:07:28.720
Design, and he of course accepted Godwin's basic premise to it that private ownership

67
00:07:28.720 --> 00:07:34.260
of property is the great evil, and that it must be abolished, and the only way to get

68
00:07:34.260 --> 00:07:40.740
at it is to first begin by destroying the state. Proudhon's most famous work carries

69
00:07:40.740 --> 00:07:46.880
the French title A Quelle Properté? What is Property? And Proudhon's answer to his

70
00:07:46.880 --> 00:07:55.040
His own rhetorical question here was, property is robbery. Anyone who owns anything privately

71
00:07:55.040 --> 00:08:02.960
has robbed society of it. And like Godwin, Proudhon was not a violent man. He did not

72
00:08:02.960 --> 00:08:09.680
advocate any kind of warfare or any kind of destruction tactics employed against those

73
00:08:09.680 --> 00:08:17.240
Having Power, he, as Godwin before him, championed the idea of general education, that if people

74
00:08:17.240 --> 00:08:22.160
once understood that this was the evil, and that this was the source of the evil, well

75
00:08:22.160 --> 00:08:26.780
then they would just naturally move to correct it, and presently we wouldn't have to have

76
00:08:26.780 --> 00:08:32.300
a government, and we wouldn't have to have the control of property in private hands.

77
00:08:32.300 --> 00:08:38.320
Of course, if the government weren't there, then there would be no private property anyway,

78
00:08:38.320 --> 00:08:46.520
In the minds of these early anarchists, private property was the product of the force of political

79
00:08:46.520 --> 00:08:51.560
control. If you took that force away, then there would be no privileged class. That's

80
00:08:51.560 --> 00:08:53.640
the way they looked at it.

81
00:08:53.640 --> 00:08:58.800
Proudhon is particularly influential, and we have to remember him not only for his theories

82
00:08:58.800 --> 00:09:06.840
in this area, but also for the fact that he was the man who inspired Karl Marx. Karl Marx,

83
00:09:06.840 --> 00:09:36.840
became the best known of all of the nineteenth century economic theorists. Marx began his career by drinking at the intellectual fountains of Proudhon, and for a short while, at the beginning of his career, as Marx was toying with various philosophies, he became an anarchist, and his first writings are in praise of Proudhon. More on Marx later. But we do remember Proudhon as the man who inspired Marx.

84
00:09:36.840 --> 00:09:37.840
Marks.

85
00:09:37.840 --> 00:09:44.280
Meanwhile, Proudhon, in testing various theories as to how he could bring about this kind of

86
00:09:44.280 --> 00:09:51.440
a social change to it, the abolition of private ownership of property via the means of getting

87
00:09:51.440 --> 00:10:00.960
rid of the state, Proudhon hit upon the idea of profit sharing, that is anybody that makes

88
00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:03.960
a profit ought to share it with the workers.

89
00:10:03.960 --> 00:10:11.080
He also hit upon the idea of the labor unions. He organized or he theorized first, and then

90
00:10:11.080 --> 00:10:19.260
others really did the organizational work, that the workers ought to be the ones to manage

91
00:10:19.260 --> 00:10:25.900
the productive property. Characteristically, with all socialists, Proudhon held the view

92
00:10:25.900 --> 00:10:31.460
that you don't have to worry about production. We know how to produce anything that we need.

93
00:10:31.460 --> 00:10:37.060
What you have to worry about is distribution. And as he saw it, the distribution was not

94
00:10:37.060 --> 00:10:43.860
being effectively managed since the distribution was left in the hands of the selfish, large

95
00:10:43.860 --> 00:10:49.660
property owners who naturally would give the bulk of what they got their hands on to themselves.

96
00:10:49.660 --> 00:10:56.620
And that way the rest of society would suffer. And so he advocated what was called syndicalism,

97
00:10:56.620 --> 00:11:03.940
And the syndicalist movement spread primarily through France, although it blossomed out

98
00:11:03.940 --> 00:11:11.500
in other places as well, including Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. The idea was that

99
00:11:11.500 --> 00:11:19.460
the workers would elect the managers of each plant. And nothing is said in Proudhon's writing

100
00:11:19.460 --> 00:11:26.100
as to how you would launch a new plant. The plants already exist, everything that we need

101
00:11:26.100 --> 00:11:31.620
According to Proudhon has already been produced, that is, in the form of productive tools,

102
00:11:31.620 --> 00:11:38.440
but we simply have to manage the ones that exist by having councils of workers set them

103
00:11:38.440 --> 00:11:41.440
up and elect the managers from their own number.

104
00:11:41.440 --> 00:11:47.120
You have democratic management of the tools of production, and then the managers in a

105
00:11:47.120 --> 00:11:54.080
given district would meet and set up the hours of work and the wages and so on, and this

106
00:11:54.080 --> 00:11:59.760
would be all managed by the workers themselves. There would be no one representing capital because

107
00:11:59.760 --> 00:12:06.160
you see capital would be something that belonged to society and nothing ever would belong to anybody

108
00:12:06.160 --> 00:12:13.920
as a person. Now these are some of Proudhon's ideas and there's no question as to the very profound

109
00:12:43.920 --> 00:12:54.480
Bakunin is the man who gave it that complexion.

110
00:12:54.480 --> 00:13:00.680
He began, interestingly, as a disciple of Marx after Marx had founded the communist

111
00:13:00.680 --> 00:13:01.680
idea.

112
00:13:01.680 --> 00:13:08.600
So Bakunin began as a communist, and then he transferred back into the anarchist position,

113
00:13:08.600 --> 00:13:14.900
And so he is often called the father of communistic anarchy or, if you like, the father of anarchistic

114
00:13:14.900 --> 00:13:17.880
communism, depending on how you want to put it.

115
00:13:17.880 --> 00:13:24.700
Anyway, Bakunin, it was, who at one time gave a very provocative speech in which he praised

116
00:13:24.700 --> 00:13:31.320
both Godwin and Proudhon for their pioneer social theories relating to the abolition

117
00:13:31.320 --> 00:13:33.240
of private property.

118
00:13:33.240 --> 00:13:37.820
And of course, followed with the idea that naturally you have to get rid of the government

119
00:13:37.820 --> 00:13:40.420
if you're going to get rid of private property.

120
00:13:40.420 --> 00:13:46.620
But then he came up with his idea, which was to mark the anarchist movement, at least in

121
00:13:46.620 --> 00:13:49.820
the public mind, virtually from that time forward.

122
00:13:49.820 --> 00:13:57.020
He said, in effect, these men who have preceded me, Godwin and Proudhon, they are fine, amiable

123
00:13:57.020 --> 00:14:02.520
gentlemen, but they are talking peace and education, and they are just dreamers.

124
00:14:02.520 --> 00:14:04.180
They are impractical.

125
00:14:04.180 --> 00:14:10.140
If you want to accomplish the great movement that we have in mind, says Bakunin, what

126
00:14:10.140 --> 00:14:17.360
we have to do is to take our guns and take our bombs and kill the leading capitalists

127
00:14:17.360 --> 00:14:23.580
and the leading politicians, because remember now, in Bakunin's mind, that's the same fellow.

128
00:14:23.580 --> 00:14:31.120
The man who holds the capital and the man who controls the government is the same fellow.

129
00:14:31.120 --> 00:14:35.680
He may wear two different hats, or he might actually be two different men.

130
00:14:35.680 --> 00:14:41.320
It would be two men working together, creating a privileged class and managing the property

131
00:14:41.320 --> 00:14:45.840
while the bulk of humanity is shut out and unable to do anything.

132
00:14:45.840 --> 00:14:53.060
And again, keep in mind that that point of view was undoubtedly valid prior to the Industrial

133
00:14:53.060 --> 00:14:54.060
Revolution.

134
00:14:54.060 --> 00:15:00.260
Of course, the Industrial Revolution, even as Bakunin was making his statements and as

135
00:15:00.260 --> 00:15:05.180
As many of these early anarchists were writing, the Industrial Revolution was uprooting all

136
00:15:05.180 --> 00:15:11.000
their theories, but they didn't understand it. In fact, characteristic of all socialists,

137
00:15:11.000 --> 00:15:16.280
including the anarchists, they have never understood the necessary theories of production.

138
00:15:16.280 --> 00:15:22.040
They fail to grasp, in fact, they fail to grapple with it. They simply make an assumption

139
00:15:22.040 --> 00:15:27.060
that production is no problem, that we've solved all of that, and the major problem

140
00:15:27.060 --> 00:15:37.700
Bakunin gave this name to his particular theory. He said, I bring you the propaganda of the

141
00:15:37.700 --> 00:15:44.380
deed or the propaganda of action, whereas those ahead of me have brought the propaganda

142
00:15:44.380 --> 00:15:50.860
of the word or the propaganda of the idea. Bakunin therefore claimed himself to be the

143
00:15:50.860 --> 00:15:57.580
The first of the practical anarchists and the only practical way that you had to accomplish

144
00:15:57.580 --> 00:16:05.420
his objective would be to use violence, notably to go after the individuals who held political

145
00:16:05.420 --> 00:16:14.820
power or who held capital and eliminate them. Bakunin was a colorful figure and during most

146
00:16:14.820 --> 00:16:22.260
Most of his life, so far as I've been able to find, he didn't himself actively participate

147
00:16:22.260 --> 00:16:29.260
in affairs of violence. And he died in 1876, right about the time that his theories were

148
00:16:29.260 --> 00:16:37.660
beginning to take hold. It was in that same decade that the first of the anarchist excesses

149
00:16:37.660 --> 00:16:46.300
began in Russia where Tsar Alexander II was assassinated during a parade in St. Petersburg

150
00:16:46.300 --> 00:16:51.180
by anarchists who were in the crowd. Someone tossed a bomb into the Tsar's carriage and

151
00:16:51.180 --> 00:16:56.980
it blew up. The Tsar fell to the street mortally wounded and a little anarchist girl, about

152
00:16:56.980 --> 00:17:03.380
17, rushed out of the crowd with a .44 and pumped several shots directly into the Tsar

153
00:17:03.380 --> 00:17:14.380
The assumption was, as Bakunin had taught his followers, that if you can kill the leading

154
00:17:14.380 --> 00:17:17.300
politicians, you destroy government.

155
00:17:17.300 --> 00:17:22.340
And if you can kill the leading capitalists, you destroy capitalism.

156
00:17:22.340 --> 00:17:29.660
But what happened, of course, was that as Tsar Alexander II expired, Alexander III became

157
00:17:29.660 --> 00:17:30.660
the Tsar.

158
00:17:30.660 --> 00:17:37.020
Bakunin had never explained that the death of a leading figure politically or economically

159
00:17:37.020 --> 00:17:39.980
simply leads to the promotion of a vice president.

160
00:17:39.980 --> 00:17:44.180
And that's, of course, one of the failures of his idea.

161
00:17:44.180 --> 00:17:51.460
In any case, Bakunin's ideas of violence began to take hold during the last quarter of the

162
00:17:51.460 --> 00:17:53.380
19th century.

163
00:17:53.380 --> 00:18:00.620
There were a number of anarchist excesses, including the famous Haymarket bombing in Chicago,

164
00:18:00.620 --> 00:18:07.060
and the assassination of a number of leading political heads as well as capitalist prominent

165
00:18:07.060 --> 00:18:11.860
figures, as well as a number of attempts at the lives of several of them, which attempts

166
00:18:11.860 --> 00:18:13.260
did not come off.

167
00:18:13.260 --> 00:18:20.220
You may recall that President Humbert of Italy was assassinated, President Carnot of France,

168
00:18:20.220 --> 00:18:27.180
President McKinley of the United States, all of these died at the hands of anarchist assassins.

169
00:18:27.180 --> 00:18:31.220
were made on the lives of the German princes, but they failed.

170
00:18:31.220 --> 00:18:38.400
And I think you may even recall that on one occasion, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt,

171
00:18:38.400 --> 00:18:44.380
at that time President-elect, was sitting in Bayfront Park in Miami when an anarchist

172
00:18:44.380 --> 00:18:50.900
decided to kill him and took a shot at him, but missed and killed Mayor Cermak of Chicago,

173
00:18:50.900 --> 00:18:54.420
who happened to be sitting next to Roosevelt at the time.

174
00:18:54.420 --> 00:19:03.380
We have had a number of anarchist actions of that nature in this country. Bakunin could

175
00:19:03.380 --> 00:19:09.500
be said to be fundamentally responsible for the violent element. Then in addition to Bakunin

176
00:19:09.500 --> 00:19:16.300
and coming after him, we have another Russian named Kropotkin. I'm only naming here in this

177
00:19:16.300 --> 00:19:24.200
brief period some of the most prominent. Peter Kropotkin, another Russian born actually into

178
00:19:24.200 --> 00:19:33.160
to a noble family and thoroughly disgusted with the conditions that existed in Russia

179
00:19:33.160 --> 00:19:41.320
during his childhood. Incidentally, he was born in 1842, and the industrialization of

180
00:19:41.320 --> 00:19:48.080
England and America had begun to change the world, but Russia had had no industrialization.

181
00:19:48.080 --> 00:19:53.320
It was operating still under a feudal system, and the peasantry were virtually treated like

182
00:19:53.320 --> 00:20:23.320
of Money, The Theory of Money and State, The Theory of Money and State, The Theory

183
00:20:23.320 --> 00:20:33.080
Kropotkin sort of differed from Bakunin in the employment of violence. He felt that Bakunin

184
00:20:33.080 --> 00:20:38.640
was wrong in suggesting that you had to kill the leading capitalists and the leading governmental

185
00:20:38.640 --> 00:20:45.760
figures. Kropotkin may have been influenced in fact by Marx considerably because he advocated

186
00:20:45.760 --> 00:20:52.280
manning the barricades and taking them on as a class that you couldn't just do it individually.

187
00:20:52.280 --> 00:21:00.960
Let me mention another one of the famous European anarchists, a man who is called the father

188
00:21:00.960 --> 00:21:08.640
of Christian anarchy, Count Leo Tolstoy, a third important Russian on the scene. Tolstoy

189
00:21:08.640 --> 00:21:15.480
of course is very well known today as the author of War and Peace and other monumental

190
00:21:15.480 --> 00:21:23.480
Marx, Tolstoy believed that Christ was the greatest anarchist of all and that the greatest

191
00:21:23.480 --> 00:21:29.240
anarchist message is the Sermon on the Mount. He preached the idea of abject poverty for

192
00:21:29.240 --> 00:21:33.560
individuals feeling that—and of course he didn't want government at all, that government

193
00:21:33.560 --> 00:21:42.600
was entirely useless—he recommended that Christ be the only king and that we simply

194
00:21:42.600 --> 00:21:49.200
Neil in reverence to Christ and have no government in the meantime and certainly no property.

195
00:21:49.200 --> 00:21:55.000
So this was Tolstoy's position. A very peaceful, a very gentle man. Tolstoy is quite different

196
00:21:55.000 --> 00:21:58.360
from Bakunin, yet they are both anarchists.

197
00:21:58.360 --> 00:22:02.520
And I'll mention one more of the European anarchists who is particularly important.

198
00:22:02.520 --> 00:22:08.760
This man came considerably earlier. Actually his career in time parallels that of Proudhon.

199
00:22:08.760 --> 00:22:31.400
Max Sterner, the Founding Intellectual Argument for that particular branch of anarchy called

200
00:22:31.400 --> 00:22:33.840
called nihilism.

201
00:22:33.840 --> 00:22:40.160
Sterner took the view that virtually all human organization is wrong and ought to be abolished.

202
00:22:40.160 --> 00:22:46.260
Also that morality is a figment of the imagination, and there is no such thing as honor or integrity.

203
00:22:46.260 --> 00:22:50.760
Marriage should be abolished, so should the church, and so should everything else.

204
00:22:50.760 --> 00:22:54.720
His general theme is this, what is it that you want in life?

205
00:22:54.720 --> 00:22:56.220
Help yourself.

206
00:22:56.220 --> 00:22:57.220
How much can you get?

207
00:22:57.220 --> 00:22:58.560
Well, how strong are you?

208
00:22:58.560 --> 00:22:59.560
How long can you keep it?

209
00:22:59.560 --> 00:23:01.560
Well, how big are you?

210
00:23:01.560 --> 00:23:05.280
If it will help you to enter into a contract with someone, do so.

211
00:23:05.280 --> 00:23:08.480
If it will help you to break the contract, do that.

212
00:23:08.480 --> 00:23:09.660
Do anything you want.

213
00:23:09.660 --> 00:23:16.400
In other words, he elevated the concept of the ego to an ultimate, all-purpose mechanism

214
00:23:16.400 --> 00:23:18.800
and that was it.

215
00:23:18.800 --> 00:23:23.760
Stirner's writings at the present time have been enjoying somewhat of a comeback and we

216
00:23:23.760 --> 00:23:31.200
We find today on our campuses quite a few more sternerites than was true, say, a quarter

217
00:23:31.200 --> 00:23:32.700
of a century ago.

218
00:23:32.700 --> 00:23:35.200
Let me turn briefly now to American anarchists.

219
00:23:35.200 --> 00:23:38.720
I've mentioned six of the most prominent Europeans.

220
00:23:38.720 --> 00:23:41.920
There are a number of other Europeans that are deserving of mention.

221
00:23:41.920 --> 00:23:47.880
But we have had about five major anarchists in this country that operated independently

222
00:23:47.880 --> 00:23:50.680
of the European scene.

223
00:23:50.680 --> 00:24:04.960
The first one in this country would be called Josiah Warren. He was born in 1799 and lived

224
00:24:04.960 --> 00:24:13.020
until 1874, his life more or less paralleling that of Proudhon and his arguments as well.

225
00:24:13.020 --> 00:24:19.320
Warren began very much influenced by communistic ideas, but he put those aside and became an

226
00:24:19.320 --> 00:24:25.800
Anarchist, and then later on he went back to the idea of communal living. Josiah Warren

227
00:24:25.800 --> 00:24:35.520
was a peaceful man and had ideas that there should be labor certificates rather than money,

228
00:24:35.520 --> 00:24:43.560
and he worked kind of an experiment in a time store in Cincinnati where you paid the wholesale

229
00:24:43.560 --> 00:24:48.400
price of goods when you bought them from him, and in addition you paid for the salesman's

230
00:24:48.400 --> 00:24:53.920
time, who waited on you, and I believe he had about a seven percent markup generally.

231
00:24:53.920 --> 00:25:03.720
Even so, the store was not a financial success, and Warren found that he didn't get the patronage

232
00:25:03.720 --> 00:25:09.680
that he thought he deserved as a result of his generally lower prices.

233
00:25:09.680 --> 00:25:15.920
Be that as it may, Warren is a very interesting figure, an entirely a peaceful man who sort

234
00:25:15.920 --> 00:25:20.860
sort of felt that you could conduct small experiments in communities, and ultimately

235
00:25:20.860 --> 00:25:26.560
arrive at a kind of worker's paradise where money would be abolished, and there would

236
00:25:26.560 --> 00:25:32.680
be no government, and we would all live and share properties together.

237
00:25:32.680 --> 00:25:37.960
Probably the best known of all the American anarchists is Henry David Thoreau, who was

238
00:25:37.960 --> 00:25:47.400
Thoreau was born in 1817, died in 1862, and was, of course, the author of Walden Pond.

239
00:25:47.400 --> 00:25:52.880
Thoreau was obviously a very peaceful man and a brilliant writer, a man who has inspired

240
00:25:52.880 --> 00:25:58.960
millions of people with his kindness and his understanding of the importance of the individual.

241
00:25:58.960 --> 00:26:04.000
But of course, Thoreau, like most of the anarchists, completely fails to understand production,

242
00:26:04.000 --> 00:26:09.360
And economically speaking, he has that same problem with the other anarchists. They just

243
00:26:09.360 --> 00:26:15.360
don't grasp how you put the pieces together. Aside from that, a very fine, amiable and

244
00:26:15.360 --> 00:26:17.320
well-known man.

245
00:26:17.320 --> 00:26:25.200
Another rather well-known anarchist in this country is Benjamin Tucker, who lived up until

246
00:26:25.200 --> 00:26:32.840
1939 into this century, well along. He was born in 1854 and was the founder of Liberty

247
00:26:32.840 --> 00:26:38.720
magazine, which became a very popular magazine at one time and contained most of the literary

248
00:26:38.720 --> 00:26:47.120
figures of that period. Tucker, like the others, advocated freedom for the individual. He did

249
00:26:47.120 --> 00:26:54.760
not want to see governments intervening, but he was—well, actually, he, to be fair, favored

250
00:26:54.760 --> 00:27:00.680
some private property, but he was a little bit concerned about how much a person could

251
00:27:00.680 --> 00:27:07.360
have, and he is listed as an anarchist. He called himself an anarchist. Another well-known anarchist

252
00:27:07.360 --> 00:27:14.880
is Lysander Spooner of 1808 to 1887, a man who became a brilliant attorney and whose writings,

253
00:27:14.880 --> 00:27:20.720
again, are today enjoying a comeback. And the last man that I'll mention in this area would

254
00:27:20.720 --> 00:27:27.640
be Henry George. Some people don't call him an anarchist. George called himself a socialist,

255
00:27:27.640 --> 00:27:34.800
Post, but his enmity to the state as such, I think, classifies him in the anarchist column.

256
00:27:34.800 --> 00:27:41.320
He lived until 1897, at one time ran for mayor of New York City, which seems to be a popular

257
00:27:41.320 --> 00:27:48.440
pastime these days, and like most didn't make it. But George is another peaceful figure

258
00:27:48.440 --> 00:27:53.440
and rather brilliant in economics, excepting when it comes to the private ownership of

259
00:27:53.440 --> 00:27:59.680
of Land, which he objected to as about the only bit of private property that a person

260
00:27:59.680 --> 00:28:01.960
could not have.
