WEBVTT

NOTE The Declaration of Independence

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.000
The Declaration of Independence

2
00:00:03.000 --> 00:00:11.000
There are several important documents that bear heavily on the kind of life we live in these United States.

3
00:00:11.000 --> 00:00:14.000
One of them is the Declaration of Independence.

4
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:19.000
And although it is true that the Declaration of Independence has no legal standing

5
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:22.000
and never has had any from the time it was first written,

6
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:25.000
its influence has been profound,

7
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:31.200
and the thoughts contained in it are probably today less understood than at

8
00:00:31.200 --> 00:00:35.720
the time they were first put there, but nonetheless those thoughts continue to

9
00:00:35.720 --> 00:00:43.280
be important expressions of ideas that are meaningful primarily to those of us

10
00:00:43.280 --> 00:00:49.680
who live in the United States. Since it is quite probable that we have not all

11
00:00:49.680 --> 00:00:54.880
learned to think about the Declaration of Independence in the same way, I would

12
00:00:54.880 --> 00:01:01.200
I'd like to go over the most meaningful part of the declaration so that we could at least

13
00:01:01.200 --> 00:01:08.580
for a very short time think about it in the same way so that we could understand what

14
00:01:08.580 --> 00:01:15.180
it was that the men who wrote it were trying to say and trying to set down as a guiding

15
00:01:15.180 --> 00:01:20.820
principle for their actions and conceivably for the actions of others.

16
00:01:20.820 --> 00:01:28.380
First we have to set this into a chronological context. The war that was to separate the

17
00:01:28.380 --> 00:01:34.360
colonies from the mother country of England had begun a little better than a year before.

18
00:01:34.360 --> 00:01:42.140
Usually we say that the war began with the Battle of Lexington in April of 1775. Then

19
00:01:42.140 --> 00:02:06.620
All through the rest of 1775, the war continued, and in January of 1776, Tom Paine, a bridge builder that no one had ever heard about, wrote a little track called Common Sense, and from that came the general idea that was then to be set forth in the Declaration of Independence.

20
00:02:06.620 --> 00:02:14.780
Tom Paine, being a virtual unknown, was nonetheless very influential with his pamphlet, and the

21
00:02:14.780 --> 00:02:19.920
consequence was that other persons who were influential thought that they had best get

22
00:02:19.920 --> 00:02:26.880
together and issue a public statement, which in a very real sense was nothing more than

23
00:02:26.880 --> 00:02:33.960
a paraphrase of what Paine had already put down in his pamphlet Common Sense.

24
00:02:33.960 --> 00:02:43.340
So in July of 1776, these influential men, fifty-six in number, gathered in Philadelphia.

25
00:02:43.340 --> 00:02:50.240
The declaration itself is, we believe, written by Thomas Jefferson, who got the job of writing

26
00:02:50.240 --> 00:02:58.940
it. It was discussed relatively briefly. So far as we understand, only one serious debate

27
00:02:58.940 --> 00:03:06.060
arose relating to the wording in the document. Otherwise, there were a few minor corrections

28
00:03:06.060 --> 00:03:14.540
made and then all 56 of the people present accepted it and signed it and it became the

29
00:03:14.540 --> 00:03:22.540
Declaration of Independence. Now, the document falls into four sections very logically. There

30
00:03:22.540 --> 00:03:28.820
is a kind of preamble which is the first paragraph and it begins with those well-known words

31
00:03:28.820 --> 00:03:32.340
and so on.

32
00:03:32.340 --> 00:03:36.380
Then the second part begins with the second paragraph, and that's the point I want to

33
00:03:36.380 --> 00:03:43.500
focus our attention on because the real meat of the instrument is contained therein.

34
00:03:43.500 --> 00:03:49.600
Now after we are through with the second paragraph, we go into the third part, which is really

35
00:03:49.600 --> 00:03:53.080
a bill of indictment against the King of England.

36
00:03:53.080 --> 00:03:59.920
is a listing of the particular offenses which the colonists felt the king was guilty of

37
00:03:59.920 --> 00:04:05.040
and tabulates just how bad they are. We won't take the time to get into that part of the

38
00:04:05.040 --> 00:04:10.520
declaration, but I hope that you will do so at your leisure and examine it because what

39
00:04:10.520 --> 00:04:16.400
you will find is, I think, a reason for surprise.

40
00:04:16.400 --> 00:04:24.280
The things that the colonists were up in arms about were so minor compared to the heavy

41
00:04:24.280 --> 00:04:30.160
burdens that our government has placed on us that I think today, if you could, you would

42
00:04:30.160 --> 00:04:34.560
be quite willing to turn around and say, well, let's have George III back again.

43
00:04:34.560 --> 00:04:39.960
Even with all of his excesses, he never came close to what our own government is doing

44
00:04:39.960 --> 00:04:40.960
today.

45
00:04:40.960 --> 00:04:46.040
Be that as it may, that is the third part of the declaration.

46
00:04:46.040 --> 00:04:52.760
And then the final and concluding part is sort of a summation wherein the authors say

47
00:04:52.760 --> 00:04:58.880
that they have appealed to the king again and again for some kind of redress of their

48
00:04:58.880 --> 00:05:04.160
grievances and he has treated each appeal with indifference and scorn and therefore

49
00:05:04.160 --> 00:05:09.000
although they don't want to do it, they are compelled by the circumstances that they face

50
00:05:09.000 --> 00:05:14.760
to do it and they hereby declare that they intend to separate and go their separate way

51
00:05:14.760 --> 00:05:20.760
and then appear the signatures of the 56 men who were present for the occasion.

52
00:05:20.760 --> 00:05:26.560
The signature of John Hancock, of course, as you know, is a very large one, and it has

53
00:05:26.560 --> 00:05:33.200
always been said that when he signed it, Hancock said very sardonically, well, I'll sign it

54
00:05:33.200 --> 00:05:39.680
in a way where George won't have to use his spectacles, and so he wrote it large enough.

55
00:05:39.680 --> 00:05:43.120
That's the Declaration of Independence.

56
00:05:43.120 --> 00:05:49.540
It's a very short, a very brief document, and yet in a very real sense it is an extremely

57
00:05:49.540 --> 00:05:55.640
revolutionary document, and that essence is in the second paragraph, and what I propose

58
00:05:55.640 --> 00:05:56.640
to do is this.

59
00:05:56.640 --> 00:06:02.480
I'd like to take the first five sentences from the second paragraph, and I'll read each

60
00:06:02.480 --> 00:06:08.780
one so that we have the general sense of it, and then I'll go back over each of those sentences

61
00:06:08.780 --> 00:06:12.800
to analyze it to be sure that we are thinking alike about it.

62
00:06:12.800 --> 00:06:20.680
Now the first sentence in the second paragraph is this one, we hold these truths to be self-evident

63
00:06:20.680 --> 00:06:25.400
that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain

64
00:06:25.400 --> 00:06:32.600
unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

65
00:06:32.600 --> 00:06:34.160
Now that's the first sentence.

66
00:06:34.160 --> 00:06:40.200
And let me go over that to be sure that we understand what these words say and what they

67
00:06:40.200 --> 00:06:47.000
they meant at the time they were put down. We hold these truths to be self-evident. Now

68
00:06:47.000 --> 00:06:52.560
when we are speaking in terms of self-evident truth in philosophy, we are speaking in terms

69
00:06:52.560 --> 00:06:59.940
of an axiom. All philosophy, in fact all reason, is predicated upon axioms. It begins at an

70
00:06:59.940 --> 00:07:07.300
axiomatic level, at levels where you cannot prove, but you just know that it is so. An

71
00:07:07.300 --> 00:07:14.540
An example would be this axiom, man is. Is that true? Well, of course it's true. We all

72
00:07:14.540 --> 00:07:19.740
know it's true. Can you prove it? No, you can't prove it because there is a contradictory

73
00:07:19.740 --> 00:07:28.580
axiom that is also true and that is man dies. Well, how can we say man is and at the same

74
00:07:28.580 --> 00:07:34.980
time say man dies? Well, we can because they're both true. You can't prove either one. We

75
00:07:34.980 --> 00:07:39.980
We don't know what man is, we don't know what existence is, but it's self-evident, it's

76
00:07:39.980 --> 00:07:41.900
a self-evident truth.

77
00:07:41.900 --> 00:07:47.540
And so when we find this phrase appearing here, we know that the authors of the Declaration

78
00:07:47.540 --> 00:07:55.100
are intending to make a very deep, philosophical, fundamental statement.

79
00:07:55.100 --> 00:08:03.160
This is not to be an expedient political device for accomplishing some minor objective.

80
00:08:03.160 --> 00:08:08.680
This is to be bedrock stuff, and they are setting it forth by saying, we hold these

81
00:08:08.680 --> 00:08:16.720
truths to be self-evident. In other words, here is an axiomatic position upon which we

82
00:08:16.720 --> 00:08:21.960
are basing everything that we intend doing. Now, that is a very important thing to understand.

83
00:08:21.960 --> 00:08:29.560
There is also a secondary meaning that may appear here, and that is not merely a philosophic

84
00:08:29.560 --> 00:08:34.760
approach, but really quite a pragmatic one. Because you see, of course, with the benefit

85
00:08:34.760 --> 00:08:41.840
of hindsight, we know what they're going to say. And what they had in mind was making

86
00:08:41.840 --> 00:08:46.680
a clear declaration of the fact that the king didn't have any more rights than they did

87
00:08:46.680 --> 00:08:54.080
as individuals. And that's at this time a very revolutionary idea. This was really to

88
00:08:54.080 --> 00:09:18.920
The General Conception was that if you survived, it was only because you were under the control

89
00:09:18.920 --> 00:09:22.840
of a monarch who had been divinely ordained.

90
00:09:22.840 --> 00:09:28.680
We had had a very practical experience in the colonial area, in what we called the new

91
00:09:28.680 --> 00:09:34.280
world, because thanks to the indifference and the slothfulness of the British kings,

92
00:09:34.280 --> 00:09:39.280
we had left that part of the world, the old world, come to the new world and gotten out

93
00:09:39.280 --> 00:09:45.520
from under their control in large measure. We had been untaxed and unregulated for 150

94
00:09:45.520 --> 00:09:53.320
Years, and we had made it. It was working well. And so when these leading citizens put

95
00:09:53.320 --> 00:09:58.280
down the idea, we hold these truths to be self-evident, and of course we know what they're

96
00:09:58.280 --> 00:10:04.560
going to say, then they were perhaps also thinking not only in a philosophic term, but

97
00:10:04.560 --> 00:10:09.760
in a very practical sense. In other words, we have gotten out from under the king for

98
00:10:09.760 --> 00:10:15.360
150 years, and we're not dead, therefore you don't really need a king. And this is really

99
00:10:15.360 --> 00:10:22.180
So in that very first sentence, the gauntlet is thrown down, so to speak. We hold these

100
00:10:22.180 --> 00:10:28.680
truths to be self-evident, and then there's a comma, and then it says that all men are

101
00:10:28.680 --> 00:10:36.380
created equal. And how often I wish that they had taken that phrase and copied Tom Paine

102
00:10:36.380 --> 00:10:42.500
a little more closely, because again and again, that phrase has been lifted out of context

103
00:10:42.500 --> 00:10:47.500
to make it appear that what they are trying to say is that all men have equal ability,

104
00:10:47.500 --> 00:10:53.820
that all men have equal brain power, and that all men are equal in every conceivable sense.

105
00:10:53.820 --> 00:10:57.620
And the men putting this down were among the foremost in the world who would have known

106
00:10:57.620 --> 00:11:04.160
that that wasn't true. These men were elitists, and they certainly knew that men are not equal

107
00:11:04.160 --> 00:11:09.340
in any physical sense, nor were they trying to suggest that. What they are really setting

108
00:11:09.340 --> 00:11:26.020
What they are setting forth is a concept of morality that is absolutely new.

109
00:11:26.020 --> 00:11:32.880
You see, in the old days, the king could do no wrong because he had rights and they were

110
00:11:32.880 --> 00:11:36.380
divinely ordained and no one else had any.

111
00:11:36.380 --> 00:11:41.500
Now they were setting forth the idea that every man had the same rights and therefore

112
00:11:41.500 --> 00:11:47.880
the king didn't own anybody and therefore since all men had equal rights there would

113
00:11:47.880 --> 00:11:53.700
be certain areas in which each man could act where he could do no wrong.

114
00:11:53.700 --> 00:11:57.980
And this would be in areas in respect to his own person and property.

115
00:11:57.980 --> 00:11:59.740
That's what they're setting forth.

116
00:11:59.740 --> 00:12:05.020
It is a declaration of individualism that they are getting at and that appears in that

117
00:12:05.020 --> 00:12:14.620
that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain

118
00:12:14.620 --> 00:12:19.580
unalienable rights. In other words, what they're getting at is this, rights are not

119
00:12:19.580 --> 00:12:27.140
granted to you by the state or by other men. You have them originally because at the moment

120
00:12:27.140 --> 00:12:32.100
of birth you happen to be a man, so you come fully equipped with rights. And then they

121
00:12:32.100 --> 00:12:36.100
Certain Unalienable Rights

122
00:13:02.100 --> 00:13:07.640
say that among these, they're not going to list them all, that among these are life,

123
00:13:07.640 --> 00:13:12.500
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And believe it or not, it was right there that

124
00:13:12.500 --> 00:13:18.980
they got into their big debate in the discussion. Because in the Virginia Bill of Rights, which

125
00:13:18.980 --> 00:13:26.240
had just been drafted prior to this, and also in Tom Paine's Common Sense, the implication

126
00:13:26.240 --> 00:13:33.120
is clear, and even the direct words are used, that all men have rights to life, liberty,

127
00:13:33.120 --> 00:13:39.280
property and the pursuit of happiness. But the word property does not appear. And a debate

128
00:13:39.280 --> 00:13:47.840
ensued as to why didn't it appear? Well, it worked out this way, that in the South we

129
00:13:47.840 --> 00:13:57.200
We had slavery at the time, and the definition of a slave was a man who had lost his rights

130
00:13:57.200 --> 00:14:04.480
to own property because he himself had become a property and property doesn't own property.

131
00:14:04.480 --> 00:14:12.560
Therefore the slave is a man who has lost his rights to own property, and therefore

132
00:14:12.560 --> 00:14:18.560
If you were to say that all men had a right to property, you would be saying that slavery

133
00:14:18.560 --> 00:14:20.160
was immoral.

134
00:14:20.160 --> 00:14:26.120
Well, the owners of slaves from the South didn't want to say that, because this would

135
00:14:26.120 --> 00:14:31.700
mean that in order for them to regain their moral position, they would have to get rid

136
00:14:31.700 --> 00:14:32.700
of their slaves.

137
00:14:32.700 --> 00:14:36.020
In fact, Jefferson, it is said, made that observation.

138
00:14:36.020 --> 00:14:40.220
He said that if the word property were put into the declaration, then he would have to

139
00:14:40.220 --> 00:15:01.220
Unfortunately, the delegates from South Carolina and Georgia ganged up on this particular point

140
00:15:01.220 --> 00:15:02.820
and refused to budge.

141
00:15:02.820 --> 00:15:09.340
They said that if the declaration were approved with the word property put into it, they would

142
00:15:09.340 --> 00:15:11.340
The Declaration of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness

143
00:15:39.340 --> 00:15:45.240
Restored. Now, this, of course, does provide an ambivalence in the declaration, but that's

144
00:15:45.240 --> 00:15:50.980
where it came about and that's what it's about. One cannot help but wonder what a history

145
00:15:50.980 --> 00:15:56.340
of this country might have been had the word property been put in. Certainly, the trilogy

146
00:15:56.340 --> 00:16:02.340
of essences that inspired the entire revolutionary effort was life, liberty, and property, irrespective

147
00:16:02.340 --> 00:16:06.460
of what the Declaration of Independence said. But let me go on with it. Here's the second

148
00:16:06.460 --> 00:16:13.760
sentence, an equally potent and meaningful sentence. That to secure these rights, governments

149
00:16:13.760 --> 00:16:20.700
are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Now,

150
00:16:20.700 --> 00:16:26.020
let me go back over that to be sure we're thinking alike. That to secure these rights,

151
00:16:26.020 --> 00:16:31.860
now wait a minute, that sounds like a contradiction to the first sentence because in the first

152
00:16:31.860 --> 00:17:01.860
The first sentence, it says, all men are endowed with certain unalienable rights, and now it says that to secure them, governments are instituted. Is it a contradiction? Actually, no. In our use of the language, it appears to be because we have corrupted the language from its original usage at the time this was written. When this was first penned, the word secure meant only to make safe, to nail down. Presently, the word is used to mean to obtain

153
00:17:01.860 --> 00:17:03.620
as well as to retain.

154
00:17:03.620 --> 00:17:08.080
And so we have a double meaning there that was not in the use of that word at the time

155
00:17:08.080 --> 00:17:09.180
this was written.

156
00:17:09.180 --> 00:17:16.580
So what they are really saying is that you are born with certain equal and unalienable

157
00:17:16.580 --> 00:17:18.480
rights and all men have them.

158
00:17:18.480 --> 00:17:21.900
Now these relate to your moral position.

159
00:17:21.900 --> 00:17:26.680
And to make certain that nothing immoral happens, that's the idea.

160
00:17:26.680 --> 00:17:33.360
To make certain that nothing immoral happens, governments are instituted among men to wit,

161
00:17:33.360 --> 00:17:40.280
governments are created by men and instituted among them, and get this phrase, deriving

162
00:17:40.280 --> 00:17:46.120
their just powers from the consent of the governed.

163
00:17:46.120 --> 00:17:52.540
Now that clearly indicates that it would be possible for a government to have just powers.

164
00:17:52.540 --> 00:17:57.820
It makes it quite clear that the government, to have just powers, must have them as a result

165
00:17:57.820 --> 00:18:05.140
of a contractual relation that would be established between the governed and the governor.

166
00:18:05.140 --> 00:18:10.460
In other words, if the government is to have just powers, it could only be that power granted

167
00:18:10.460 --> 00:18:13.560
to it by an individual having rights.

168
00:18:13.560 --> 00:18:19.240
But note, please, the inference is clear that it would be possible for a government to have

169
00:18:19.240 --> 00:18:27.320
And if that would be the case, then an unjust power would obviously be a power which the

170
00:18:27.320 --> 00:18:32.720
government has taken without the consent of the governed.

171
00:18:32.720 --> 00:18:35.120
And note this one additional point.

172
00:18:35.120 --> 00:18:40.280
It doesn't say without the consent of a majority of those governed.

173
00:18:40.280 --> 00:18:46.800
It clearly indicates that each individual to be governed must grant his consent.

174
00:18:46.800 --> 00:18:56.800
Otherwise the first sentence is null and void where it states clearly that each individual is endowed with certain equal and unalienable rights.

175
00:18:56.800 --> 00:19:14.800
Therefore each person has a right and could grant to a government a power if he chose to, but if he does not choose to, the government has no rightful power over him, and if the government presumes to take a power over him, it is a wrongful power by definition.

176
00:19:14.800 --> 00:19:19.800
Now that's what the Declaration says. It clearly sets it forth.

177
00:19:19.800 --> 00:19:23.800
And I venture to say there are many Americans who don't know that.

178
00:19:23.800 --> 00:19:27.800
Let me go on. This is quite an instrument here.

179
00:19:27.800 --> 00:19:29.800
This is the third sentence.

180
00:19:29.800 --> 00:19:34.800
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends,

181
00:19:34.800 --> 00:19:39.800
it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it

182
00:19:39.800 --> 00:19:52.300
And to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their safety and happiness.

183
00:19:52.300 --> 00:19:54.300
Let me go back over that.

184
00:19:54.300 --> 00:20:07.800
That whenever any form of government, now if words have meanings at all, that clearly indicates that at any time, any particular kind of government, in other words there is no time that is sacred,

185
00:20:07.800 --> 00:20:14.600
and there is no kind of government that is sacred. At any time, any form of government, if it becomes

186
00:20:14.600 --> 00:20:23.240
destructive of these ends, what ends? The ends of maintaining your moral position, that is, your

187
00:20:23.240 --> 00:20:30.200
right to do as you please with your person and your property, your right to life, liberty and the

188
00:20:30.200 --> 00:20:36.680
pursuit of happiness, in other words. If at any time, any government becomes destructive of these

189
00:20:36.680 --> 00:20:58.680
The right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and now at the same level the right to alter or abolish your government.

190
00:20:58.680 --> 00:21:16.680
And, of course, this has to be the case, because if you have rights, then the government has only a confided power, and therefore your position is superior to your government's, your government is merely your servant, and if it serves you, well and good.

191
00:21:16.680 --> 00:21:17.680
Good.

192
00:21:17.680 --> 00:21:25.240
But when it presumes to act for you, and specifically against your wishes, your rights are greater

193
00:21:25.240 --> 00:21:31.840
than its power, and therefore you have a right to alter it, to change it so it won't be doing

194
00:21:31.840 --> 00:21:37.200
what it's doing, or if you don't want to do that, or for any reason don't feel that you

195
00:21:37.200 --> 00:21:43.140
can do so, then your right goes even to the point of abolishing the government and replacing

196
00:21:43.140 --> 00:21:54.500
Let me take sentence number four.

197
00:21:54.500 --> 00:21:56.660
It introduces a note of caution.

198
00:21:56.660 --> 00:22:01.660
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for

199
00:22:01.660 --> 00:22:07.260
light and transient causes, and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are

200
00:22:07.260 --> 00:22:12.400
more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the

201
00:22:12.400 --> 00:22:15.600
and the forms to which they are accustomed.

202
00:22:15.600 --> 00:22:17.800
Actually that says two things.

203
00:22:17.800 --> 00:22:23.920
It says, first of all, take it easy, don't be hot-headed, don't get upset over light

204
00:22:23.920 --> 00:22:26.960
and temporary problems.

205
00:22:26.960 --> 00:22:32.600
But at the same time it says mankind are prone to suffer and suffer and suffer, so it indicates

206
00:22:32.600 --> 00:22:36.400
don't die on the vine, don't give up, just don't quit.

207
00:22:36.400 --> 00:22:42.800
Stay alert, don't be hot-headed, but don't let the chains and shackles of tyranny press

208
00:22:42.800 --> 00:22:46.660
you down. So it's a note of caution both ways.

209
00:22:46.660 --> 00:22:50.180
And then we come to sentence number five, which, as I view it, is probably the most

210
00:22:50.180 --> 00:22:55.440
revolutionary of all in this instrument, and may very well be the most revolutionary statement

211
00:22:55.440 --> 00:23:03.060
in the English language, possibly in any language. This is a fantastic statement. Listen carefully.

212
00:23:03.060 --> 00:23:11.100
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces

213
00:23:11.100 --> 00:23:19.060
a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw

214
00:23:19.060 --> 00:23:25.420
off such government and to provide new guards for their future security.

215
00:23:25.420 --> 00:23:28.500
Did you get that?

216
00:23:28.500 --> 00:23:36.960
When a government evinces a pattern of behavior in which your rights are ignored or deliberately

217
00:23:36.960 --> 00:23:44.600
obscured, where indeed the government begins to presume that it is the important item and

218
00:23:44.600 --> 00:23:51.500
that you are not, that its function is not to serve you, but to make you serve it, when

219
00:23:51.500 --> 00:23:58.620
If this happens, you not only have a right to throw off such government, you have a duty

220
00:23:58.620 --> 00:24:06.460
to get rid of it. How about that? That's the Declaration of Independence. That's the

221
00:24:06.460 --> 00:24:12.940
meaningful core of the whole idea within it. Now, I don't know whether you like that

222
00:24:12.940 --> 00:24:20.240
or not. That's not the point. The point is that it is there. The founding fathers who

223
00:24:20.240 --> 00:24:26.120
who saw the situation they were in and who wanted to do something about it, recognized

224
00:24:26.120 --> 00:24:29.400
these ideas and set them down in this way.

225
00:24:29.400 --> 00:24:32.540
Very interesting things have happened about the declaration.

226
00:24:32.540 --> 00:24:37.680
I remember when I was a small lad, we always used to celebrate the 4th of July with great

227
00:24:37.680 --> 00:24:41.920
enthusiasm and there were exciting speeches and we had firecrackers and it was really

228
00:24:41.920 --> 00:24:42.920
quite a thing.

229
00:24:42.920 --> 00:24:47.400
But of course, the government has been protecting us from this for a long time now.

230
00:24:47.400 --> 00:24:51.800
It's very dangerous to celebrate, and it's particularly dangerous to bring out the Declaration

231
00:24:51.800 --> 00:24:57.160
of Independence and read it. And, most of all, read it and understand it. Because when

232
00:24:57.160 --> 00:25:02.280
you understand it, it clearly sets forth the proposition that the government is the least

233
00:25:02.280 --> 00:25:07.920
of your blessings, it is only a safeguard to protect your rights, and if it forgets that,

234
00:25:07.920 --> 00:25:13.080
you have the right and the government does not. The government has only a confided power,

235
00:25:13.080 --> 00:25:17.380
and thus it remains with you as to what you will do with the government, not the government

236
00:25:17.380 --> 00:25:28.560
Let me give you an instance of just what happened.

237
00:25:28.560 --> 00:25:33.500
Some of my students attending the University of Wisconsin, having studied with me prior

238
00:25:33.500 --> 00:25:37.380
to this, thought they'd conduct a little experiment.

239
00:25:37.380 --> 00:25:42.540
So they typed out those five sentences that I've just read to you on a piece of paper.

240
00:25:42.540 --> 00:25:45.040
They typed at the head of it, petition.

241
00:25:45.040 --> 00:25:49.920
And then at the bottom they put places for signatures and they went out on the street

242
00:25:49.920 --> 00:25:56.080
and approached private citizens and they handed them this petition and they said, read this

243
00:25:56.080 --> 00:25:59.600
and if you approve of it, sign it.

244
00:25:59.600 --> 00:26:00.600
That's all.

245
00:26:00.600 --> 00:26:04.640
Didn't ask to do anything, just read this and if you approve of it, sign it.

246
00:26:04.640 --> 00:26:08.760
They approached over a hundred people and only two signed it.

247
00:26:08.760 --> 00:26:11.040
And you know what the comment was by the rest of them?

248
00:26:11.040 --> 00:26:13.520
Oh boy, that's communist stuff, isn't it?

249
00:26:13.520 --> 00:26:18.640
Wow, I wouldn't dare sign that. I'd get fired. I'd lose my job. Hey, how come you guys are running

250
00:26:18.640 --> 00:26:24.320
around like this? This is a lot of red propaganda, isn't it? Ladies and gentlemen, this is the

251
00:26:24.320 --> 00:26:33.920
Declaration of Independence, a basic instrument that inspired men around the world. When this

252
00:26:33.920 --> 00:26:40.560
instrument was first struck off and people glimpsed the idea, it created a fantastic

253
00:26:40.560 --> 00:26:48.400
Image for this country. It created the idea that we could call image America, a land of the free.

254
00:26:49.280 --> 00:26:57.040
In this country, there wasn't going to be a king or any super people called politicians who had

255
00:26:57.040 --> 00:27:05.120
power over you. Goodness, no. The idea was that you had the same rights everybody else did.

256
00:27:05.120 --> 00:27:13.360
You could look anyone in the eye and say, you and I are equal morally. Sure, you may have more

257
00:27:13.360 --> 00:27:19.280
ability than I have, but that doesn't make you any better than I am from a moral point of view.

258
00:27:20.240 --> 00:27:27.200
That was the idea that rocked the world. And we in America actually have this document,

259
00:27:28.080 --> 00:27:32.800
and many Americans have forgotten what it says and what it means.
