WEBVTT

NOTE The Fear of Monopoly - Part One

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.000
The Fear of Monopoly

2
00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:08.000
Whenever we talk to people about the idea of a free market,

3
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:16.000
most of them tend to express fears of what might happen if a free market actually appeared.

4
00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:22.000
Now, what we mean by a free market, of course, is a market that could be called laissez-faire,

5
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:27.000
that is, one in which there is no government intervention of any kind for any reason.

6
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:31.920
Any Reason. That is to say, the government would not help anybody, it wouldn't subsidize

7
00:00:31.920 --> 00:00:38.440
anybody, it wouldn't protect anybody, and of course, it would not intervene to tax anyone

8
00:00:38.440 --> 00:00:45.560
or regulate anyone. The market would behave as the individual participants in the market

9
00:00:45.560 --> 00:00:50.280
would cause it to behave by virtue of their independent actions. This is essentially what

10
00:00:50.280 --> 00:00:56.800
is meant by a free market. Incidentally, this does not exclude the area of protection. Protection

11
00:00:56.800 --> 00:01:01.280
Protection is something that falls into a separate category, and certainly it would

12
00:01:01.280 --> 00:01:05.840
be important that the market and the persons in it, including the private property and

13
00:01:05.840 --> 00:01:08.200
so on, be protected.

14
00:01:08.200 --> 00:01:12.240
But we are not talking about protection, we are talking about government, and these are

15
00:01:12.240 --> 00:01:14.480
two different things.

16
00:01:14.480 --> 00:01:17.720
Protection of course is certainly something that we want in the market.

17
00:01:17.720 --> 00:01:21.560
Whether or not government should be in there is really an overall question.

18
00:01:21.560 --> 00:01:27.280
And so we are now talking in terms of a free market and what would eventuate if we had

19
00:01:27.280 --> 00:01:33.320
a really free market. And as I've indicated, usually when this thought is suggested, people

20
00:01:33.320 --> 00:01:40.480
express various fears. Now, one of the fears that is very often brought forward is the

21
00:01:40.480 --> 00:01:47.320
fear that if we had a free market to it, one in which there was no intervention at all

22
00:01:47.320 --> 00:01:55.480
by Government, that monopolies would eventuate. In other words, there is a very popular notion

23
00:01:55.480 --> 00:02:01.560
that given a free market without government intervention, there would be a tendency for

24
00:02:01.560 --> 00:02:09.880
various industries to have fewer and fewer competitors in them, the result being that

25
00:02:09.880 --> 00:02:17.680
1 or maybe 2, a very limited number or possibly just one industry or one businessman in a

26
00:02:17.680 --> 00:02:25.520
given area would emerge as the total dominating factor in that area. He would have all of

27
00:02:25.520 --> 00:02:31.360
that particular type of business. He would dominate the field. And of course the result

28
00:02:31.360 --> 00:02:36.720
of this would be, and this is usually the fear expressed, that having obtained such

29
00:02:36.720 --> 00:02:41.920
In such a monopoly, then he could charge any price he wanted to, because there would be

30
00:02:41.920 --> 00:02:50.000
no competition. It is recognized here tacitly that if there is competition, well of course

31
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:54.960
then he wouldn't be able to raise his prices as he pleased. But assuming that you had a

32
00:02:54.960 --> 00:03:01.720
free market, what would prevent one businessman or one industrialist from becoming exceptionally

33
00:03:31.720 --> 00:03:54.720
The General Fear of a High Price Made Possible by a Monopoly Made Possible by the Skills of a particular Businessman

34
00:04:01.720 --> 00:04:08.400
They express the fear that just a monopolist would have too much power. If they really

35
00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:12.640
were worried about a monopoly as such, they would certainly not ask the government to

36
00:04:12.640 --> 00:04:17.920
come in to intervene, because government is a monopoly. And the idea that you could avoid

37
00:04:17.920 --> 00:04:22.480
whatever competitive factors that exist in the market by really turning things over to

38
00:04:22.480 --> 00:04:27.840
an existing monopoly in an effort to escape monopoly is, of course, an absurdity. Clearly

39
00:04:27.840 --> 00:04:33.140
And there would be no point in doing that. But people really aren't afraid of monopoly

40
00:04:33.140 --> 00:04:39.720
as such. They really don't worry about what businessman is doing what. They really don't

41
00:04:39.720 --> 00:04:45.280
care about that. What they care about is how this is going to affect them personally. And

42
00:04:45.280 --> 00:04:51.360
they see this effect as coming to them in the form of high prices, and they are very

43
00:04:51.360 --> 00:04:54.040
much afraid of high prices.

44
00:04:54.040 --> 00:05:01.660
Now the thing then that we would have to examine would be what would happen in a market assuming

45
00:05:01.660 --> 00:05:08.200
a free market? What would be the natural conditions that would tend to develop? Are there natural

46
00:05:08.200 --> 00:05:14.720
factors in a free market that would inevitably move us toward monopoly, and consequently

47
00:05:14.720 --> 00:05:21.040
monopoly price? The argument of those who favor government intervention at this point

48
00:05:21.040 --> 00:05:27.440
is that that is the case. Given a free market, they will tell you, the market will inevitably

49
00:05:27.440 --> 00:05:38.020
move toward the emergence of a very limited number of competitors. Probably a single monopolist

50
00:05:38.020 --> 00:05:42.520
will appear and then of course we will be at his mercy. So what we have to do is to

51
00:05:42.520 --> 00:05:49.120
examine the conditions that would eventuate in a free market. Keep in mind that what we

52
00:05:49.120 --> 00:05:55.880
We have in this country today is not a free market. We have a market today into which

53
00:05:55.880 --> 00:06:03.040
the government intervenes constantly. So we do not have what we think of as a laissez-faire

54
00:06:03.040 --> 00:06:08.440
marketplace. We have to now imagine such a thing because we are not dealing with that,

55
00:06:08.440 --> 00:06:15.360
in fact. But we can, by using our brains and by employing logic, arrive at the kind of

56
00:06:15.360 --> 00:06:39.360
This is a fascinating area to me. It's particularly fascinating when I take into consideration some of the things that I have run into in my personal experience here.

57
00:06:39.360 --> 00:06:49.200
I got engaged a while ago with a young professor at one of the universities back east who wanted

58
00:06:49.200 --> 00:06:55.440
to debate with me in a letter as to what a monopoly was and whether or not a free market

59
00:06:55.440 --> 00:07:01.120
would lead into it. I think what had happened was that he had read something I had written

60
00:07:01.120 --> 00:07:08.280
in which I made the statement that given a free market we did not have to worry about

61
00:07:08.280 --> 00:07:15.820
Monopoly because in a free market a harmful monopoly could not appear. He took exception

62
00:07:15.820 --> 00:07:21.000
to that remark and challenged me in a letter, and wanted to know if perhaps there wasn't

63
00:07:21.000 --> 00:07:27.120
a typographical error, and that I couldn't possibly have intended to say what I had said.

64
00:07:27.120 --> 00:07:31.680
Well, I wrote back and assured him that I had intended to say what I had said, that

65
00:07:31.680 --> 00:07:36.480
it was not a typographical error, and that I would stand on that statement to it, that

66
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:44.320
that given a free market there is no reason to fear a harmful monopoly. Well, he responded

67
00:07:44.320 --> 00:07:52.200
in due course and an exchange occurred between us that went on for a number of months. And

68
00:07:52.200 --> 00:07:59.400
everything I said to him in our correspondence turned out to be an argument that he would

69
00:07:59.400 --> 00:08:06.400
then convert to show that what I was talking about to it, the conditions in a free market,

70
00:08:06.400 --> 00:08:14.560
would inescapably lead into a monopoly condition. And every time I gave him an instance of competition

71
00:08:14.560 --> 00:08:21.840
happening in the market, he replied, well, this was really proof of monopoly. Well, after

72
00:08:21.840 --> 00:08:28.100
we exchanged enough letters in this area, I began to wonder if we were defining our

73
00:08:28.100 --> 00:08:32.660
terms properly because, of course, if you define your terms differently, you're just

74
00:09:32.660 --> 00:09:38.700
Well, he responded in due course that, of course, this is where he was standing. He

75
00:09:38.700 --> 00:09:44.780
was taking the government's position here, that the government has in its various antitrust

76
00:09:44.780 --> 00:09:51.320
measures and subsequent legislation ever since the first Antitrust Act of 1890, the Sherman

77
00:09:51.320 --> 00:09:58.220
Antitrust Act, he had been operating on the basis that the definitions of monopoly as

78
00:09:58.220 --> 00:10:03.740
They appear in this welter of law that we have would be valid and that this is where

79
00:10:03.740 --> 00:10:04.740
he was arguing.

80
00:10:04.740 --> 00:10:11.820
Well, now it just so happened that I had an attorney in my employ and I asked him to check

81
00:10:11.820 --> 00:10:19.020
out the law relating to antitrust so that we could get a good understanding in this

82
00:10:19.020 --> 00:10:20.020
area.

83
00:10:20.020 --> 00:10:24.340
Now, I am not an attorney and if you want to check it with your attorney, please do

84
00:10:24.340 --> 00:10:31.260
So, but here is what my attorney reported to me. We have, of course, beginning in 1890

85
00:10:31.260 --> 00:10:40.260
with the passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act, we have a vast library of law and rulings

86
00:10:40.260 --> 00:10:47.740
that have descended from the law that covers this field. In fact, it almost, you could

87
00:10:47.740 --> 00:10:57.740
It blankets and smothers the field. It is probably one of the most contradictory and

88
00:10:57.740 --> 00:11:03.140
prolific areas of law that we have in the country. For instance, there is one part of

89
00:11:03.140 --> 00:11:09.500
the law—I cannot tell you specifically which part of which law it is. As I say, you can

90
00:11:09.500 --> 00:11:13.180
check that with your attorney. I am not an attorney. He can tell you. But there is one

91
00:11:13.180 --> 00:11:20.420
One part of the law that specifies that if you are in business and you are selling a

92
00:11:20.420 --> 00:11:28.060
good or service at a price that is higher than that of your competition, and at the

93
00:11:28.060 --> 00:11:39.820
same time you are able to maintain as much as 8% of the market, that is defined as monopoly

94
00:11:39.820 --> 00:11:45.500
Monopoly per se. In other words, if your price is higher than your competition and you still

95
00:11:45.500 --> 00:11:52.660
are able to have 8% of the business, that is monopoly per se. The only reason, you see,

96
00:11:52.660 --> 00:11:58.780
in the government judgment, back of the law, that you could charge more than your competition

97
00:11:58.780 --> 00:12:05.020
and at the same time keep as much as 8% is because there are other factors at work that

98
00:12:05.020 --> 00:12:10.460
make you essentially a non-competitor. You're just in a class by yourself, and therefore

99
00:12:10.460 --> 00:12:19.020
under the law the government can cite you as a monopolist, take you into court, try

100
00:12:19.020 --> 00:12:25.820
you and convict you, after which you can be fined, imprisoned or both. Now that's one

101
00:12:25.820 --> 00:12:30.980
part of the law. However, there is another part of the law that specifies that if you

102
00:12:30.980 --> 00:12:36.780
If you charge less than your competition, never mind how much of the business you have,

103
00:12:36.780 --> 00:12:43.120
if you charge less than your competition, that is defined as a monopoly practice. Because

104
00:12:43.120 --> 00:12:48.400
the only reason that you are charging less is because you hope to put your competition

105
00:12:48.400 --> 00:12:53.600
out of business. Therefore you are seeking a monopoly and you are guilty under the law.

106
00:12:53.600 --> 00:13:00.240
You can be cited here, taken into court, tried, convicted, fined, imprisoned, or both. But

107
00:13:00.240 --> 00:13:05.000
But now there's still a third part of the law, which says that if you are charging the

108
00:13:05.000 --> 00:13:13.320
same price as your competition, that is collusion and conspiracy, and you are guilty of a felony,

109
00:13:13.320 --> 00:13:19.640
and you can be cited under the law, arrested, taken to court, tried, convicted, fined, imprisoned,

110
00:13:19.640 --> 00:13:20.640
or both.

111
00:13:20.640 --> 00:13:26.600
In other words, the way the laws are written, it specifies that if you are charging more

112
00:13:26.600 --> 00:13:33.240
more than your competition and still have 8% of the business, or if you are charging less

113
00:13:33.240 --> 00:13:37.520
than your competition, never mind how much business you are enjoying, or if you have

114
00:13:37.520 --> 00:13:42.480
the same price as your competition, you are guilty under the law.

115
00:13:42.480 --> 00:13:51.840
I had the interesting opportunity a few years ago to actually send a reporter to cover a

116
00:13:51.840 --> 00:13:57.120
A speech given by a man from the Justice Department, who happened to be in my part of the country

117
00:13:57.120 --> 00:14:03.460
at the time, who was talking about the activities of the antitrust provisions and the Justice

118
00:14:03.460 --> 00:14:09.360
Department in enforcing the antitrust provisions, and this man from the Justice Department stated

119
00:14:09.360 --> 00:14:15.860
flatly that if the Justice Department had the finances and the personnel, they could

120
00:14:15.860 --> 00:14:21.820
arrest and convict every successful businessman in the United States, because there is already

121
00:14:21.820 --> 00:14:51.820
So this was the thing I now played back to the professor on the East Coast. I said, if this is the way you are defining competition, then I have to give up. We can't talk anymore. Because if you are going to say that when the price is higher, that's monopoly. When it's lower, that's monopoly. And when it's the same, that's monopoly.

122
00:14:51.820 --> 00:14:57.300
Monopoly, there aren't any other places for prices to go. And therefore if putting a price

123
00:14:57.300 --> 00:15:02.760
on an item is monopoly, let's quit. There isn't any point in discussing anything. Well,

124
00:15:02.760 --> 00:15:08.180
he admitted that this is what he was doing. And of course if you're going to define every

125
00:15:08.180 --> 00:15:14.340
business action as a monopoly practice, we can of course stop talking. There is no point

126
00:15:14.340 --> 00:15:21.820
in Discussing it. But, of course, this is really an absurdity. Obviously, the word monopoly

127
00:15:21.820 --> 00:15:27.620
is an abstract term. And to understand what we mean by monopoly, we have to introduce

128
00:15:27.620 --> 00:15:33.500
a word that means the opposite of monopoly. And the opposite of monopoly is the word competition.

129
00:15:33.500 --> 00:15:38.300
Now what we have to find out is if there is such a thing as competition, if not, there

130
00:15:38.300 --> 00:15:43.540
is no point in having a word monopoly. To create an abstract that doesn't tell you

131
00:15:43.540 --> 00:15:50.540
The Theory of Money and Credit

132
00:16:13.540 --> 00:16:20.060
Meaning to the same man in the same situation to refer to monopoly or competition. The words

133
00:16:20.060 --> 00:16:25.540
are meaningless. They have no application to a situation. To have application, to create

134
00:16:25.540 --> 00:16:30.740
an abstraction, you create the abstraction because you want to show that it is opposite

135
00:16:30.740 --> 00:16:35.500
of another abstraction. So here we have two abstractions, the concept of monopoly on the

136
00:16:35.500 --> 00:16:40.060
one hand and the concept of competition on the other, and these are mutually exclusive

137
00:16:40.060 --> 00:16:48.700
So let me set that forth at the outset. Competition and monopoly are opposites. If you have one,

138
00:16:48.700 --> 00:16:54.100
it means that you do not have the other. To wit, if competition exists, that means the

139
00:16:54.100 --> 00:17:00.380
absence of monopoly. If monopoly exists, that means the absence of competition. So let's

140
00:17:00.380 --> 00:17:07.380
get our terms straight to begin with. Now, the question is, what happens in a market

141
00:17:07.380 --> 00:17:15.780
Assuming a free market, does a free market tend toward monopoly or does it tend toward competition?

142
00:17:16.900 --> 00:17:24.260
We should be advised, I suppose historically, to keep in mind that the word monopoly came into

143
00:17:24.260 --> 00:17:32.660
practice during the Middle Ages because kings granted monopolies. This is how it was done.

144
00:17:32.660 --> 00:17:38.500
When a businessman wanted to go into business back in these early days, and of course all

145
00:17:38.500 --> 00:17:44.660
business activity is risky, the businessman would probably be afraid of going into business

146
00:17:44.660 --> 00:17:51.680
unless he had some kind of guarantee that he wouldn't have to face too much competition.

147
00:17:51.680 --> 00:17:56.660
And so he would go to the king and say to him, Your Majesty, I would like to open such

148
00:17:56.660 --> 00:18:03.460
in such and such a business, in such a location, and I will pay you a sum—sometimes the sum

149
00:18:03.460 --> 00:18:11.140
was quite large—if you will grant me an exclusive monopoly to operate in that area.

150
00:18:11.140 --> 00:18:15.420
And if the king was pleased with the sum that was offered, or could raise it to a sum that

151
00:18:15.420 --> 00:18:21.620
he would finally agree to, why the king would issue an edict guaranteeing to this man that

152
00:18:21.620 --> 00:18:26.740
But he would have the exclusive right to operate that particular business in that particular

153
00:18:26.740 --> 00:18:31.980
location. And that is a monopoly. That's where the word comes from. It is a kingly

154
00:18:31.980 --> 00:18:39.780
grant of exclusion to a party willing to pay a fee. Now why would businessmen do that?

155
00:18:39.780 --> 00:18:46.200
Why would they be willing to go and pay a fee? Since there weren't any laws prohibiting

156
00:18:46.200 --> 00:18:53.400
Competition. Why were they worried about it, if there isn't such a thing in a free market?

157
00:18:53.400 --> 00:18:58.960
Clearly these businessmen were asking for government intervention right at the outset

158
00:18:58.960 --> 00:19:04.240
in order to give them a guarantee. But if a free market moves toward monopoly anyway,

159
00:19:04.240 --> 00:19:09.200
why didn't they just go into business? They would have easily obtained a monopoly. They

160
00:19:09.200 --> 00:19:14.740
didn't think so. They thought the minute they got into business they would face competition,

161
00:19:14.740 --> 00:19:19.820
and therefore they wanted an extra market activity to come in to keep that business

162
00:19:19.820 --> 00:19:24.740
out so that they would have clear sailing. Now that's where the word monopoly came

163
00:19:24.740 --> 00:19:31.220
from and that's where the concept came from. It is certainly obvious that if a free market

164
00:19:31.220 --> 00:19:37.600
tends toward monopoly, that whole exercise would be one of futility. They would automatically

165
00:19:37.600 --> 00:19:41.500
have a monopoly. If they didn't have it at the outset, they'd soon get it. Somebody

166
00:19:41.500 --> 00:19:45.540
Nobody would get a monopoly, because it would tend toward monopoly. So the logical thing

167
00:19:45.540 --> 00:19:49.680
for the businessman to do would have been simply to go into business. And as the first

168
00:19:49.680 --> 00:19:54.820
man in business, having an advantageous position right at the outset, he would have had no

169
00:19:54.820 --> 00:19:59.160
necessity for paying a big fee to the king in order to guarantee what the market would

170
00:19:59.160 --> 00:20:05.480
do for him anyway. Clearly, in the minds of these early businessmen, the free market didn't

171
00:20:05.480 --> 00:20:11.200
lead into monopoly. It led into competition, and that's what they were afraid of. So that's

172
00:20:11.200 --> 00:20:17.980
Were these early businessmen correct in fearing competition? They were certainly correct in

173
00:20:17.980 --> 00:20:22.800
realizing that given a free market, that's what they'd have to face. Competition is

174
00:20:22.800 --> 00:20:28.520
going to be the logical condition, the natural condition, in a free market in which the government

175
00:20:28.520 --> 00:20:34.380
does not intervene. In fact, let me point out to you that one of the basic items of

176
00:20:34.380 --> 00:20:43.100
of Competition is price. Assuming a free market, whether your price is higher than, lower than,

177
00:20:43.100 --> 00:20:49.480
or the same as your competition, that is a factor in competition and not an indication

178
00:20:49.480 --> 00:20:55.940
of monopoly, providing you are free to try to move the price. As long as you have a free

179
00:20:55.940 --> 00:21:02.500
market and the price can be moved, that is a factor in competition. So you can put down

180
00:21:02.500 --> 00:21:19.500
It is often on your list that the pricing factor, instead of being a monopoly factor, as the government would have you believe, it is actually a factor in competition, a primary factor in competition, and would remain so if there is no intervention.

181
00:21:19.500 --> 00:21:26.760
Another constant factor in competition would be quality. It happens that when businessmen

182
00:21:26.760 --> 00:21:32.120
get into the same business, supplying more or less the same type of good or service,

183
00:21:32.120 --> 00:21:39.700
they tend to find that their prices will equal out. It costs about so much to manufacture

184
00:21:39.700 --> 00:21:46.020
a ton of steel or to manufacture a kilowatt of electricity or to provide a lady's dress

185
00:21:46.020 --> 00:21:56.020
The amount of cost involved is only going to fluctuate fractions of pennies between one entrepreneur and another.

186
00:21:56.020 --> 00:22:03.020
They will very quickly find that they're on a head-on collision insofar as prices are concerned.

187
00:22:03.020 --> 00:22:09.020
Do what they will. Their prices are going to trend downward to the lowest possible level,

188
00:22:09.020 --> 00:22:11.020
and then you just can't go below that.

189
00:22:11.020 --> 00:22:15.020
And you don't dare go above it because if you do, your competitor gets the advantage.

190
00:22:15.020 --> 00:22:21.300
Advantage. So prices will trend downward and then they'll level off there. So the businessman

191
00:22:21.300 --> 00:22:27.500
seeking competition now turns around and introduces the element of quality. If he can't beat

192
00:22:27.500 --> 00:22:34.740
his competition on the basis of price, perhaps he can beat him on quality. He can add something.

193
00:22:34.740 --> 00:22:42.920
He can give green stamps. Or he can deliver. Or he can give you convenient credit terms.

194
00:22:42.920 --> 00:22:48.040
Or he can paint his widgets blue, and the others are just pink, and maybe some people

195
00:22:48.040 --> 00:22:51.300
prefer blue to pink, or something.

196
00:22:51.300 --> 00:22:53.560
He introduces some variation.

197
00:22:53.560 --> 00:23:00.520
He tries to come up with better quality, lighter weight, more durable merchandise, etc., etc.,

198
00:23:00.520 --> 00:23:04.040
in an effort to become more competitive.

199
00:23:04.040 --> 00:23:09.840
Assuming the government doesn't regulate the quality, well, quality then becomes a factor

200
00:23:09.840 --> 00:23:11.120
in competition.

201
00:23:11.120 --> 00:23:17.120
Incidentally, most places where governments begin to intervene in the economy is at the

202
00:23:17.120 --> 00:23:22.960
level of price or quality. And actually, I could point out that a regulation that regulates

203
00:23:22.960 --> 00:23:30.640
quality has exactly the same effect in the market as a price regulation. If you are required

204
00:23:30.640 --> 00:23:37.160
to put out so much of something in order to sell it, it is the same as being compelled

205
00:23:37.160 --> 00:23:44.120
to sell it at such a price for so much. In every exchange you've got a good and money,

206
00:23:44.120 --> 00:23:50.440
or a service and money. And whether you regulate the money side of it, which is the price side,

207
00:23:50.440 --> 00:23:57.000
or the good side of it in relation to the money, the same effect occurs. Given a free

208
00:23:57.000 --> 00:24:04.000
market, price and quality are both active factors in competition. As long as the businessman

209
00:24:04.000 --> 00:24:11.080
is free without any law or government intervention, to try to beat his competition, then he can

210
00:24:11.080 --> 00:24:17.380
manipulate his prices, and the normal process of manipulation would be this, he will constantly

211
00:24:17.380 --> 00:24:23.560
endeavor to manipulate his prices downward, because that's where he gets his advantage,

212
00:24:23.560 --> 00:24:27.720
and he will constantly try to manipulate his quality upwards, because that's where he

213
00:24:27.720 --> 00:24:32.140
gets his advantage, assuming the market is free.

214
00:24:32.140 --> 00:24:42.100
In a free market, quality trends upward and prices trend downward. But now those are only

215
00:24:42.100 --> 00:24:50.780
two factors in competition. There are many more. I will get into some other factors here,

216
00:24:50.780 --> 00:24:57.500
and we have to examine a number of them before we see what we really have to deal with. But

217
00:24:57.500 --> 00:25:04.660
In the area of price and quality, governments are most active. They enter the field arguing

218
00:25:04.660 --> 00:25:11.840
that by so doing, they are protecting the consumer. In actual fact, they are not protecting

219
00:25:11.840 --> 00:25:22.740
the consumer. The consumer will pay an ever higher price and he will pay it for less and

220
00:25:22.740 --> 00:25:29.260
and less quality. The effort will be made not to improve the quality, but to figure

221
00:25:29.260 --> 00:25:36.260
out how to do the same thing cheaper. And therefore you continue to have a downgrading

222
00:25:36.680 --> 00:25:42.300
of merchandise and an upgrading of pricing once the government gets into the field of

223
00:25:42.300 --> 00:25:48.860
regulation. Certainly that should be a matter that we are all aware of at the present time.

224
00:25:48.860 --> 00:25:54.420
The quality of certain types of merchandise where government has primarily intervened

225
00:25:54.420 --> 00:26:01.340
steadily tends to deteriorate. And the price of these same items where government regulates

226
00:26:01.340 --> 00:26:07.060
steadily tends to increase. We figure out how to get substitutes, how to make things

227
00:26:07.060 --> 00:26:13.820
cheaper, not how to make them better. Because we are limited on the basis of government

228
00:26:13.820 --> 00:26:19.700
regulation, respecting the numbers of persons who can enter the field, the licensing fees,

229
00:26:19.700 --> 00:26:24.940
the requirements for how you operate, the standards and so on that are imposed upon

230
00:26:24.940 --> 00:26:31.020
all, only the very best can survive under these conditions, and thus the number of entrepreneurs

231
00:26:31.020 --> 00:26:36.340
engaged in a given area tend to be reduced with the passing of time.

232
00:26:36.340 --> 00:26:42.320
However, let's go into some of the other areas where competition is also a fact if

233
00:26:42.320 --> 00:26:48.200
If we are talking about a free market, let me just quickly name these, and then I'll

234
00:26:48.200 --> 00:26:56.720
get into them in detail in another lecture. The various areas of competition that I want

235
00:26:56.720 --> 00:27:05.600
to examine will include direct competition, parallel competition, dollar competition,

236
00:27:05.600 --> 00:27:14.480
and what we call market competition. These four areas, in addition to price and quality,

237
00:27:14.480 --> 00:27:24.520
make up the six fundamental areas where competition will exist given a free market. The major

238
00:27:24.520 --> 00:27:31.760
enemy of competition has always been the government, and yet the illusion exists, and it is an

239
00:27:31.760 --> 00:27:37.360
An illusion in the minds of many people that the government helps to preserve competition,

240
00:27:37.360 --> 00:27:43.120
when in point of fact it does precisely the opposite. So we'll want to take a good look

241
00:27:43.120 --> 00:27:48.120
at this and be sure you get to hear the next lecture. Thank you very much.
